Cultivation of Limnospira platensis (Spirulina) in Full Seawater with Medium Recycling: A Promising Source of Protein and Phycocyanin for Arid Coastal Regions
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Environmental Parameters and Culture Conditions
2.2. Productivity Trends
2.3. Biomass Composition Comparison
2.3.1. Proximal Composition and C-Phycocyanin Content
2.3.2. Mineral Composition and Microbiological Quality
2.3.3. Composition Profile of Spray-Dried L. platensis Biomass Cultivated in Optimized Full-Seawater Conditions
2.4. Energy, Freshwater, Effluents, and Nutrients Savings
3. Discussion
3.1. Full Seawater Culture Acclimation and Optimization
3.2. Key Drivers Affecting Culture Productivity
3.3. Biomass Composition Under Optimized Full-Seawater Conditions
3.4. Environmental and Economic Perspectives of Cultivation in Seawater with Long-Term Medium Recirculation
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Strain Collection and Cultivation Maintenance
4.2. Outdoor Cultivation and Seawater Acclimation
4.2.1. Cultivation Site Characteristics
4.2.2. L. platensis BEA 1257B Scale-Up Process
4.2.3. Experimental Steps Toward Full-Seawater Culture Acclimation and Optimization
4.3. Biomass Harvesting and Processing Optimization
4.4. Biochemical and Microbiological Analysis of the Biomass
4.5. Statistical Analysis
4.6. Calculations of Energy, Freshwater, and Nutrient Savings
- -
- An operating culture depth of 0.100 and 0.125 m was adopted in this study for the FWR and SWR scenarios, respectively. A depth of 0.10 m was previously selected to maximize volumetric productivity while reducing freshwater demand for culture medium preparation of L. platensis BEA 1257B cultivated in freshwater in the Canary Islands [3]. However, the same authors stated that greater culture depths may enhance areal productivity and total biomass production per unit land area. Since freshwater use for medium preparation was eliminated under full-seawater cultivation, a slightly higher culture depth (0.125 m) was selected in this study to favor areal productivity, and this value was applied in the SWR scenario calculations.
- -
- In both FWR and SWR cultivation processes, culture RWs require an initial fill with the make-up medium. The required water supply is ensured by (i) a reverse-osmosis seawater desalination plant with an electric power consumption (EPC) of 3.91 kWh m−3 [106] for FWR; (ii) a submersible pump installed inside a borehole with an EPC of 0.25 kWh m−3 for SWR. Fertilizers are supplied according to the specific optimized recipe for each cultivation process (Appendix A.5, Table A2).
- -
- Harvesting of 3000 m3 of culture volume is performed weekly for both FWR and SWR: (i) no pumps are used to bring the culture to the vibrating filter, assuming that the harvesting systems are located at a lower level than the cultivation RWs; (ii) the harvest process is performed with vibrating filter units with EPC: 0.50 kWh m−3.
- -
- The culture medium after solid–liquid separation by filtration during harvesting (3000 m3 week−1 for each cultivation process) is pumped back to the culture RWs for volume replenishment (pump EPC: 0.07 kWh m−3), except when it is discharged for renewal (see below). Nutrient replenishment after biomass harvesting was assumed to occur with the same amounts of salt reintegrated per kg of harvested dry biomass [3] in both cultivation processes, except for Mg, which is not reintegrated at all in SWR.
- -
- The culture medium renewal rate (RR) has been established as (i) renewal of the entire culture volume every 8 months for FWR (RR: 1.5 year−1), taking into account an average value between those reported by [35] (7–12 months) and [27] (6 months). Exhausted medium (effluent) is discharged either to a filtering well or to a sewage treatment plant; (ii) renewal of half of the culture volume every 3 months for SWR (RR: 2 year−1), in order to cautiously prevent episodes of milky green coloring of the culture (see Results Section 2.4). Exhausted medium (effluent) is discharged either to a filtering well or to a marine outfall.
- -
- Pump EPC for effluent discharge is 0.07 kWh m−3 for both cultivation processes.
- -
- Assumed residual concentrations of N–NO3 and P–PO4 in the discharged medium are based on literature values for FWR (minimum reported values have been taken into account: N–NO3 181 mg L−1; P–PO4 20 mg L−1; [27]) and on measurements performed in this study for SWR (maximum measured values have been considered: N–NO3 11 mg L−1; P–PO4: 5 mg L−1). Chloride (Cl−) was assumed to be negligibly assimilated by L. platensis [52,120].
- -
- The same amount of discharged medium is replaced by make-up medium prepared as outlined above in point 1.
- -
- Daily evaporation has also been considered in freshwater consumption calculations, assuming an evaporation rate of 3.0% day−1 for both FWR [3] and SWR (this study). Freshwater used for rinsing the harvested biomass on the vibrating filter (approximately 50 m3 per ton of dry biomass produced, see Section 4.3) was not counted as a separate freshwater demand, as this water was entirely returned to the raceway and used to compensate evaporative losses in both cultivation systems (ref. [3] and this study). Consequently, rinsing water is already accounted for within the total freshwater volume required for evaporation compensation.
- -
- Culture mixing with paddlewheels is the same for FWR and SWR. EPC was set at 2.12 kWh m−2 year−1. This value was estimated by multiplying an average power requirement of 0.245 W m−2, calculated as the mean of the values reported by [121] (0.25 W m−2) and [122] (0.24 W m−2]), by 24 h and 360 days, assuming continuous paddlewheel operation.
- -
- For the normalization of resource savings and nutrient discharge per unit of product, biomass productivity and biochemical composition were assumed based on the cultivation scenarios considered in this study. For FWR, a biomass productivity of 21.9 t ha−1 year−1 with protein and phycocyanin contents of 62.2 and 7.2 g 100 g−1, respectively, was assumed according to [3]. For SWR, a biomass productivity of 14.8 t ha−1 year−1 with protein and phycocyanin contents of 46.4 and 9.6 g 100 g−1, respectively, was assumed based on the results obtained in this study. It should be noted that the FWR benchmark values adopted from [3] represent favorable cultivation conditions obtained during a 1-month medium-recycling period under high nitrate and phosphate concentrations in the culture medium (2 and 0.06 g L−1, respectively), whereas the SWR values used here derive from 615 days of operation under reduced nitrate and phosphate supply (0.5 and 0.03 g L−1, respectively). Therefore, normalized comparisons should be interpreted in the context of the different cultivation durations and nutrient regimes considered.
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Appendix A.1

Appendix A.2

Appendix A.3
| Nutrient Concentration (mg L−1) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before Harvesting | After Replenishment | |||||||
| Phase | NO3 Target | NO3 Measured | PO4 Target | PO4 Measured | NO3 Target | NO3 Measured | PO4 Target | PO4 Measured |
| P1 | ≤50 | 900 ± 329 | ≤10 | 11 ± 7 | 1200 | 1200 ± 0 | 50 | 50 ± 0 |
| P2 | ≤50 | 27 ± 60 | ≤10 | 4 ± 3 | 300 | 326 ± 109 | 50 | 50 ± 0 |
| P3 | ≤50 | 240 ± 82 | ≤10 | 19 ± 8 | 600 | 600 ± 0 | 50 | 50 ± 0 |
| P4 | ≤50 | 244 ± 79 | ≤10 | 22 ± 6 | 600 | 600 ± 0 | 50 | 50 ± 0 |
| P5 | ≤50 | 99 ± 46 | ≤10 | 11 ± 6 | 600 | 600 ± 0 | 50 | 50 ± 0 |
| P6Total | ≤50 | 28 ± 18 | ≤10 | 3 ± 4 | 300 | 300 ± 0 | 25 | 25 ± 0 |
| P7.CO2+ | ≤50 | 46 ± 9 | ≤10 | 9 ± 3 | 300 | 300 ± 0 | 25 | 25 ± 0 |
| P7.CO2− | ≤50 | 42 ± 28 | ≤10 | 6 ± 4 | 300 | 300 ± 0 | 25 | 25 ± 0 |
| P6NS | ≤50 | 26 ± 17 | ≤10 | 7 ± 4 | 300 | 300 ± 0 | 25 | 25 ± 0 |
Appendix A.4

Appendix A.5
| Chemical | FWR OUT Medium (g L−1) [3] | SWR OUTs 100% Medium (g L−1) [this study] | Estimated Nutrient Replenishment (g kg−1 of Algal DW) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NaCl | 5 | - | - |
| NaHCO3 | 8 | 0.6 | - |
| Na2CO3 | - | 0.6 | - |
| KNO3 | 2 | 0.5 | 1000 [3] |
| NH4H2PO4 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 50 [3] |
| CO(NH2)2 | 0.015 | 0.015 | * |
| FeSO4·7H2O | 0.005 | 0.005 | * |
| C6H8O7 | 0.015 | 0.015 | * |
| MgSO4·7H2O | 0.16 | - | 30 ** |
| MnCl2·4H2O | 0.0015 | 0.0015 | * |
| ZnSO4·7H2O | 0.00022 | 0.00022 | * |
| CuSO4·5H2O | 0.000025 | 0.000025 | * |
References
- Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). The State of Food and Agriculture 2020: Overcoming Water Challenges in Agriculture; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- IPCC. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability; Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2022; Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/ (accessed on 1 September 2025).
- Guidi, F.; Gojkovic, Z.; Venuleo, M.; Assunçao, P.A.C.J.; Portillo, E. Long-term cultivation of a native Arthrospira platensis (Spirulina) strain in Pozo Izquierdo (Gran Canaria, Spain): Technical evidence for a viable production of food-grade biomass. Processes 2021, 9, 1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ahsan, M.; Habib, B.; Parvin, M.; Huntington, T.C.; Hasan, M.R. A Review on Culture, Production and Use of Spirulina as Food for Humans and Feeds for Domestic Animals; FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2008; Volume 1034. [Google Scholar]
- Richmond, A. Biological principles of mass cultivation of photoautotrophic microalgae. In Handbook of Microalgal Culture; Richmond, A., Hu, Q., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 169–204. [Google Scholar]
- Vieira, V.V.; Benemann, J.; Vonshak, A.; Belay, A.; Ras, M.; Unamunzaga, C.; Cadoret, J.P.; Rizzo, A. Spirulina in the 21st century: Five reasons for success in Europe. J. Appl. Phycol. 2025, 37, 2203–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Alves, J.L.D.B.; Costa, P.C.T.D.; Sales, L.C.S.D.; Silva Luis, C.C.; Bezerra, T.P.T.; Souza, M.L.A.; Costa, B.A.; de Souza, E.L. Shedding light on the impacts of Spirulina platensis on gut microbiota and related health benefits. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2025, 65, 2062–2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Díaz, S.; Romero, F.; Suárez, L.; Ríos, R.; Alemán, M.; Venuleo, M.; Ortega, Z. Characterization of microalgae biomass-based composites obtained through rotational molding. Polymers 2024, 16, 1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Vonshak, A. (Ed.) Spirulina: Growth, physiology and biochemistry. In Spirulina platensis Arthrospira; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1997; pp. 43–66. [Google Scholar]
- Athiyappan, K.D.; Routray, W.; Paramasivan, B. Phycocyanin from Spirulina: A comprehensive review on cultivation, extraction, purification, and its application in food and allied industries. Food Humanit. 2024, 2, 100235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Russo, N.P.; Ballotta, M.; Usai, L.; Torre, S.; Giordano, M.; Fais, G.; Casula, D.D.; Dessì, D.; Nieri, P.; Concas, A. Mixotrophic cultivation of Arthrospira platensis (Spirulina) under salt stress: Effect on biomass composition, FAME profile and phycocyanin content. Mar. Drugs 2024, 22, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Villaró, S.; García-Vaquero, M.; Morán, L.; Álvarez, C.; Cabral, E.M.; Lafarga, T. Effect of seawater on the biomass composition of Spirulina produced at a pilot-scale. New Biotechnol. 2023, 78, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Materassi, R.; Tredici, M.; Balloni, W. Spirulina culture in sea-water. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1984, 19, 384–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tomaselli, L.; Torzillo, G.; Giovannetti, L.; Pushparaj, B.; Bocci, F.; Tredici, M.; Papuzzo, T.; Materassi, R. Recent research on Spirulina in Italy. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Seaweed Symposium, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 27 July–1 August 1986; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1987; pp. 79–82. [Google Scholar]
- Tambiev, A.K.; Vasilieva, S.G.; Lukyanov, A.A. Manifestation of salt tolerance of Spirulina platensis and Spirulina maxima cyanobacteria of the genus Arthrospira (Spirulina). Mosc. Univ. Biol. Sci. Bull. 2011, 66, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jiménez, C.; Cossío, B.R.; Labella, D.; Niell, F.X. The feasibility of industrial production of Spirulina (Arthrospira) in Southern Spain. Aquaculture 2003, 217, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Celekli, A.; Yavuzatmaca, M. Predictive modeling of biomass production by Spirulina platensis as function of nitrate and NaCl concentrations. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 1847–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Leema, J.M.; Kirubagaran, R.; Vinithkumar, N.V.; Dheenan, P.S.; Karthikayulu, S. High value pigment production from Arthrospira (Spirulina) platensis cultured in seawater. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 9221–9227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Villalobos, V.V.; Vergaray, D.; Suarez, S.; Valladares, J.; Zamora, A.; Gaspar, K.; Escurra, X. Proportional influence of sea water and bicarbonate on the production of Spirulina sp. biomass with light-emitting diode lighting. Sci. Agropecu. 2014, 5, 199–209. [Google Scholar]
- Dineshkumar, R.; Narendran, R.; Sampathkumar, P. Cultivation of Spirulina platensis in different selective media. Indian J. Geo Mar. Sci. 2016, 45, 1749–1754. [Google Scholar]
- Markou, G.; Kougia, E.; Arapoglou, D.; Chentir, I.; Andreou, V.; Tzovenis, I. Production of Arthrospira platensis: Effects on growth and biochemical composition of long-term acclimatization at different salinities. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sandeep, K.P.; Shukla, S.P.; Vennila, A.; Purushothaman, C.S.; Manjulekshmi, N. Cultivation of Spirulina (Arthrospira) platensis in low cost seawater based medium for extraction of value added pigments. Indian J. Geo-Mar. Sci. 2015, 44, 384–393. [Google Scholar]
- Tredici, M.R.; Papuzzo, T.; Tomaselli, L. Outdoor mass culture of Spirulina maxima in sea-water. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1986, 24, 47–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- González-Portela, R.E.; Romero-Villegas, G.I.; Kapoore, R.V.; Alammari, Z.M.; Malibari, R.A.; Al Shaikhi, A.; Al Hafedh, Y.; Aljahdali, A.H.; Banjar, R.E.; Mhedhbi, E.; et al. Cultivation of Limnospira maxima under extreme environmental conditions in Saudi Arabia: Salinity adaptation and scaling-up from laboratory culture to large-scale production. Bioresour. Technol. 2024, 406, 131089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Lim, H.R.; Khoo, K.S.; Show, P.L. Impact of nutrient deficiency and harvesting strategy on biomass and phycocyanin production in Spirulina cultures. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2025, 13, 1546801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bustamante, B.; Alemán, M.; Reis, D.B.; Pérez, J.A.; Venuleo, M.; Gómez-Pinchetti, J.L.; Portillo, E.; Guidi, F. Revalorization of microalgae cultivation effluent: A circular strategy for long-term sustainable production of Tetraselmis striata. Aquaculture 2025, 613, 743297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pistocchi, R.; Guerrini, F.; Vanucci, S.; Montalbetti, L.; Simonazzi, M.; Mazzotti, M.; Abbondanzi, F.; Emiliani, G.; Pezzolesi, L. Good practices for the industrial cultivation of the cyanobacterium Arthrospira platensis under a greenhouse in a temperate zone (northern Italy). Ital. Bot. 2024, 18, 193–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Thevarajah, B.; Nishshanka, G.K.S.H.; Premaratne, M.; Nimarshana, P.H.V.; Nagarajan, D.; Chang, J.S.; Ariyadasa, T.U. Large-scale production of Spirulina-based proteins and c-phycocyanin: A biorefinery approach. Biochem. Eng. J. 2022, 185, 108541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Guidi, F.; Guerrini, F.; Algeri, M.; Marchiselli, S.; Pinna, A.; Mazzotti, M.; Emiliani, G.; Pistocchi, R. Year-Long Growth of High-Quality Spirulina in a Pilot Plant. In Proceedings of the Riunione Annuale del Gruppo di Algologia, Società Botanica Italiana, Venezia, Italy, 5 November 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Mazorra Aguiar, L.; Lauret, P.; Díaz Reyes, F.; Ortegón, A.; Pérez-Suárez, R. Daily global solar radiation estimation for Gran Canaria Island using artificial neural networks. Renew. Energy Power Qual. J. 2016, 1, 992–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gojkovic, Z.; Guidi, F.; Bustamante, B.; Venuleo, M.; Assunçao, P.A.C.J.D.; Portillo, E. Scaling-up and semi-continuous cultivation of locally isolated marine microalgae Tetraselmis striata in the subtropical island of Gran Canaria (Canary Islands, Spain). Processes 2021, 9, 1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gobierno de Canarias. Decreto 102/2018, de 9 de julio, por el que se aprueba definitivamente el Plan Regional de Ordenación de la Acuicultura de Canarias (PROAC). In Boletín Oficial de Canarias 2018; Gobierno de Canarias: Santa Cruz de Tenerife y Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, 2018; p. 146. Available online: https://www.gobiernodecanarias.org/boc/2018/146/001.html (accessed on 12 January 2026).
- Nowicka-Krawczyk, P.; Mühlsteinová, R.; Hauer, T. Detailed characterization of the Arthrospira type species separating commercially grown taxa into the new genus Limnospira (Cyanobacteria). Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhu, T.; Dittrich, M. Carbonate precipitation through microbial activities in natural environment, and their potential in biotechnology: A review. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2016, 4, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Belay, A. Spirulina (Arthrospira): Production and quality assurance. In Spirulina in Human Nutrition and Health; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2007; pp. 15–40. [Google Scholar]
- Paul, K.; Gaikwad, M.; Choudhary, P.; Mohan, N.; Pai, P.; Patil, S.D.; Pawar, Y.; Chawande, A.; Banerjee, A.; Nagle, V.; et al. Year-round sustainable biomass production potential of Nannochloris sp. in outdoor raceway pond enabled through strategic photobiological screening. Photosynth. Res. 2022, 154, 303–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Alemán, M.; Guidi, F.; Venuleo, M.; Portillo, E. Long-term pilot-scale cultivation of Arthrospira platensis in seawater: Strategies for the production of alternative protein sources and high-value compounds while maximizing hydric efficiency. In Abstract Book of AlgaeEurope 2022; Oral presentation; European Algae Biomass Association (EABA): Rome, Italy, 2022; p. 82. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Z.; Qu, C.; Zhang, K.; He, Y.; Zhao, X.; Yang, L.; Zheng, Z.; Ma, X.; Wang, X.; Wang, W.; et al. Adaptation to extreme Antarctic environments revealed by the genome of a sea ice green alga. Curr. Biol. 2020, 30, 3330–3341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kato, Y.; Ho, S.H.; Vavricka, C.J.; Chang, J.S.; Hasunuma, T.; Kondo, A. Evolutionary engineering of salt-resistant Chlamydomonas sp. strains reveals salinity stress-activated starch-to-lipid biosynthesis switching. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 245, 1484–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Singh, R.P.; Yadav, P.; Sharma, H.; Kumar, A.; Hashem, A.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Gupta, R.K. Unlocking the adaptation mechanisms of the oleaginous microalga Scenedesmus sp. BHU1 under elevated salt stress: A physiochemical, lipidomics and transcriptomics approach. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1475410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gobierno de Canarias, 1994. Reglamento de Control de Vertidos para la Protección del Dominio Público Hidráulico. Available online: https://www.gobiernodecanarias.org/boc/1994/104/003.html (accessed on 12 January 2026).
- Zarrouk, C. Contribution to the Study of a Cyanophyte: Influence of Various Physical and Chemical Factors on the Growth and Photosynthesis of Spirulina maxima (Setchell et Gardner) Geitler. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Paris, Paris, France, 1966. [Google Scholar]
- Aiba, S.; Ogawa, T. Assessment of growth yield of a blue—Green alga, Spirulina platensis, in axenic and continuous culture. Microbiology 1977, 102, 179–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jourdan, J.P. Manuel de Culture Artisanale de Spiruline; Edition 2 Feb 2018; Antenna Technologies: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Shiraishi, F.; Omori, T.; Tomioka, N.; Motai, S.; Suga, H.; Takahashi, Y. Characteristics of CaCO3 nucleated around cyanobacteria: Implications for calcification process. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2020, 285, 55–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Roussel, T.; Halary, S.; Duval, C.; Piquet, B.; Cadoret, J.P.; Vernès, L.; Cécile, B.; Marie, B. Monospecific renaming within the cyanobacterial genus Limnospira (Spirulina) and consequences for food authorization. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2023, 134, lxad159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Belay, A. Mass Culture of Spirulina Outdoors—The Earthrise Farms Experience. In Spirulina platensis (Arthrospira): Physiology, Cell-Biology and Biotechnology; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1997; p. 252. [Google Scholar]
- Slade, R.; Bauen, A. Micro-algae cultivation for biofuels: Cost, energy balance, environmental impacts and future prospects. Biomass Bioenergy 2013, 53, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lua, M.; Eustance, E.; Deshpande, A.; McGowen, J.; Laurens, L.M. Elucidating operational drivers of CO2 transfer and utilization efficiency in photosynthetic algae cultivation systems. J. CO2 Util. 2025, 95, 103069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yuan, D.; Zhan, X.; Wang, M.; Wang, X.; Feng, W.; Gong, Y.; Hu, Q. Biodiversity and distribution of microzooplankton in Spirulina (Arthrospira) platensis mass cultures throughout China. Algal Res. 2018, 30, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Méndez, C.; Uribe, E. Control de Branchionus sp. y Amoeba sp. en cultivos de Arthrospira sp. Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res. 2012, 40, 553–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sili, C.; Torzillo, G.; Vonshak, A. Arthrospira (Spirulina). In Ecology of cyanobacteria II: Their Diversity in Space and Time; Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2012; pp. 677–705. [Google Scholar]
- Richa Sinha, R.P.; Häder, D.P. Effects of global change, including UV and UV screening compounds. In The Physiology of Microalgae; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 373–409. [Google Scholar]
- Zaparoli, M.; Ziemniczak, F.G.; Mantovani, L.; Costa, J.A.V.; Colla, L.M. Cellular stress conditions as a strategy to increase carbohydrate productivity in Spirulina platensis. BioEnergy Res. 2020, 13, 1221–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chrismadha, T.; Satya, A.; Satya, I.A.; Rosidah, R.; Satya, A.D.M.; Pangestuti, R.; Harimawan, A.; Setiadi, T.; Chew, K.W.; Show, P.L. Outdoor inclined plastic column photobioreactor: Growth, and biochemicals response of Arthrospira platensis culture on daily solar irradiance in a tropical place. Metabolites 2022, 12, 1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Dhiab, R.B.; Ouada, H.B.; Boussetta, H.; Franck, F.; Elabed, A.; Brouers, M. Growth, fluorescence, photosynthetic O2 production and pigment content of salt adapted cultures of Arthrospira (Spirulina) platensis. J. Appl. Phycol. 2007, 19, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Markou, G.; Georgakakis, D. Cultivation of filamentous cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) in agro-industrial wastes and wastewaters: A review. Appl. Energy 2011, 88, 3389–3401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bezerra, P.Q.M.; Moraes, L.; Cardoso, L.G.; Druzian, J.I.; Morais, M.G.; Nunes, I.L.; Costa, J.A.V. Spirulina sp. LEB 18 cultivation in seawater and reduced nutrients: Bioprocess strategy for increasing carbohydrates in biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 316, 123883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chisti, Y. Raceways-based production of algal crude oil. Green 2013, 3, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barceló-Villalobos, M.; Sánchez, J.G.; Cara, I.M.; Molina, J.S.; Fernández, F.A. Analysis of mass transfer capacity in raceway reactors. Algal Res. 2018, 35, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tredici, M.R. Photobiology of microalgae mass cultures: Understanding the tools for the next green revolution. Biofuels 2010, 1, 143–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hirayama, A.; Sueyoshi, M.N.; Nakano, T.; Ota, Y.; Kurita, H.; Tasaki, M.; Kuroiwa, Y.; Kato, T.; Serizawa, S.; Kojima, K.; et al. Development of large-scale microalgae production in the Middle East. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 343, 126036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kurpan, D.; Idà, A.; Körner, F.G.; Bombelli, P.; da Silva Aguiar, J.P.; Marinho, L.M.; do Valle, A.F.; Acién, F.G.; Trasatti, S.P.; Schievano, A. Long-term evaluation of productivity and harvesting efficiency of an industrial Spirulina (Arthrospira platensis) production facility. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2024, 25, 101741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Guerra, I.; Torres, C.; Cardoso, H.; Pereira, H.; Trovao, M.; Rodrigues, A.M.; Varela, J. Impact of seasons on industrial cultivation of Limnospira platensis (Spirulina): A year-round case study on biomass, phycocyanin, and protein productivity in Portugal. Algal Res. 2025, 91, 104335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ruiz, J.; Olivieri, G.; De Vree, J.; Bosma, R.; Willems, P.; Reith, J.H.; Eppink, M.H.M.; Kleinegris, D.M.M.; Wijffels, R.H.; Barbosa, M.J. Towards industrial products from microalgae. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 3036–3043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Suchan, J.; Azam, S. Effect of salinity on evaporation from water surface in bench-scale testing. Water 2021, 13, 2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Delrue, F.; Alaux, E.; Moudjaoui, L.; Gaignard, C.; Fleury, G.; Perilhou, A.; Richaud, P.; Petitjean, M.; Sassi, J.F. Optimization of Arthrospira platensis (Spirulina) growth: From laboratory scale to pilot scale. Fermentation 2017, 3, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Béchet, Q.; Plouviez, M.; Chambonnière, P.; Guieysse, B. Environmental impacts of full-scale algae cultivation. In Microalgae-Based Biofuels and Bioproducts; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2017; pp. 505–525. [Google Scholar]
- Guieysse, B.; Béchet, Q.; Shilton, A. Variability and uncertainty in water demand and water footprint assessments of fresh algae cultivation based on case studies from five climatic regions. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 128, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lu, Y.M.; Xiang, W.Z.; Wen, Y.H. Spirulina (Arthrospira) industry in Inner Mongolia of China: Current status and prospects. J. Appl. Phycol. 2011, 23, 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Depraetere, O.; Pierre, G.; Noppe, W.; Vandamme, D.; Foubert, I.; Michaud, P.; Muylaert, K. Influence of culture medium recycling on the performance of Arthrospira platensis cultures. Algal Res. 2015, 10, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Andrade, L.M.; Andrade, C.J.; Dias, M.; Nascimento, C.; Mendes, M.A. Chlorella and Spirulina microalgae as sources of functional foods. Nutraceuticals Food Suppl. 2018, 6, 45–58. [Google Scholar]
- da Silva Braga, V.; Moreira, J.B.; Costa, J.A.V.; de Morais, M.G. Enhancement of the carbohydrate content in Spirulina by applying CO2, thermoelectric fly ashes and reduced nitrogen supply. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 123, 1241–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zeitler, C.; Braune, S.; Waldeck, P.; Jung, C.G.; Küpper, J.H.; Petrick, I.; Jung, F. Response of Arthrospira platensis to nitrogen depletion and the effect of aqueous extracts on tumor and non-tumor cells. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 2024, 88, S95–S111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Giordano, M. Homeostasis: An underestimated focal point of ecology and evolution. Plant Sci. 2013, 211, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Yang, Z.; Xu, B.; Liu, J.; Zhan, J.; Song, L. Dynamic changes of growth and physiological parameters of Spirulina cultivated outdoors—A case study in Spirulina Industrial Park in Inner Mongolia, China. J. Appl. Phycol. 2022, 34, 1163–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mehar, J.; Shekh, A.; Sarada, R.; Chauhan, V.S.; Mudliar, S. Automation of pilot-scale open raceway pond: A case study of CO2-fed pH control on Spirulina biomass, protein and phycocyanin production. J. CO2 Util. 2019, 33, 384–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- de Jesus, C.S.; da Silva Uebel, L.; Costa, S.S.; Miranda, A.L.; de Morais, E.G.; de Morais, M.G.; Costa, J.A.V.; Nunes, I.L.; de Souza Ferreira, E.; Druzian, J.I. Outdoor pilot-scale cultivation of Spirulina sp. LEB-18 in different geographic locations for evaluating its growth and chemical composition. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 256, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Koru, E. Earth food Spirulina (Arthrospira): Production and quality standards. Food Addit. 2012, 10, 31848. [Google Scholar]
- Rastogi, R.P.; Sonani, R.R.; Madamwar, D. Effects of PAR and UV radiation on the structural and functional integrity of phycocyanin, phycoerythrin and allophycocyanin isolated from the marine cyanobacterium Lyngbya sp. A09DM. Photochem. Photobiol. 2015, 91, 837–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Hidasi, N.; Belay, A. Diurnal variation of various culture and biochemical parameters of Arthrospira platensis in large-scale outdoor raceway ponds. Algal Res. 2018, 29, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Seghiri, R.; Kharbach, M.; Essamri, A. Functional composition, nutritional properties, and biological activities of Moroccan Spirulina microalga. J. Food Qual. 2019, 2019, 3707219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Darwish, R.; Gedi, M.A.; Akepach, P.; Assaye, H.; Zaky, A.S.; Gray, D.A. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is a potential food supplement with the capacity to outperform Chlorella and Spirulina. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Michael, A.; Kyewalyanga, M.S.; Lugomela, C.V. Biomass and nutritive value of Spirulina (Arthrospira fusiformis) cultivated in a cost-effective medium. Ann. Microbiol. 2019, 69, 1387–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- World Health Organization. Guideline: Potassium Intake for Adults and Children; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2012; ISBN 978-92-4-150482-9. [Google Scholar]
- World Health Organization. Guideline: Sodium Intake for Adults and Children; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Soni, R.A.; Sudhakar, K.; Rana, R.S. Spirulina–From growth to nutritional product: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 69, 157–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Giordano, M.; Raven, J.A. Nitrogen and sulfur assimilation in plants and algae. Aquat. Bot. 2014, 118, 45–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Selmi, C.; Leung, P.S.; Fischer, L.; German, B.; Yang, C.Y.; Kenny, T.P.; Cysewski, G.R.; Gershwin, M.E. The effects of Spirulina on anemia and immune function in senior citizens. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2011, 8, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- World Health Organization. Iron Deficiency Anemia. Assessment, Prevention, and Control. A Guide for Programme Managers; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2001; pp. 47–62. [Google Scholar]
- Masten Rutar, J.; Jagodic Hudobivnik, M.; Nečemer, M.; Vogel Mikuš, K.; Arčon, I.; Ogrinc, N. Nutritional quality and safety of the spirulina dietary supplements sold on the Slovenian market. Foods 2022, 11, 849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gogna, S.; Kaur, J.; Sharma, K.; Prasad, R.; Singh, J.; Bhadariya, V.; Kumar, P.; Jarial, S. Spirulina-an edible cyanobacterium with potential therapeutic health benefits and toxicological consequences. J. Am. Nutr. Assoc. 2023, 42, 559–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- European Parliament & Council of the European Union. Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 on the provision of food information to consumers. Off. J. Eur. Union L 2011, 304, 18–63. [Google Scholar]
- European Parliament & Council of the European Union. Directive 2002/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 May 2002 on undesirable substances in animal feed. Off. J. Eur. Communities L 2002, 140, 10–21. [Google Scholar]
- EU Regulation. Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/1869 of 7 November 2019 Amending and Correcting Annex I to Directive 2002/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as Regards Maximum Levels for CertainUndesirable Substances in Animal Feed. Off. J. Eur. Union L 2019, 289, 51–55. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. Commission Regulation (EC) No 629/2008 of 2 July 2008 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in food supplements. Off. J. Eur. Union L 2008, 173, 6–9. [Google Scholar]
- Almela, C.; Clemente, M.J.; Vélez, D.; Montoro, R. Total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, lead and cadmium contents in edible seaweed sold in Spain. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2006, 44, 1901–1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Popov, M.; Kubeš, J.; Vachová, P.; Hnilička, F.; Zemanová, V.; Česká, J.; Praus, L.; Lhotská, M.; Kudrna, J.; Tunklová, B.; et al. Effect of arsenic soil contamination on stress response metabolites, 5-Methylcytosine level and CDC25 expression in spinach. Toxics 2023, 11, 568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Yu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, H.; Chen, Z. Survey of arsenic content in edible seaweeds and their arsenic species distributions. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2024, 186, 114603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mühling, M.; Belay, A.; Whitton, B.A. Variation in fatty acid composition of Arthrospira (Spirulina) strains. J. Appl. Phycol. 2005, 17, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Consultation, F.E. Dietary protein quality evaluation in human nutrition. FAO Food Nutr. Pap. 2011, 92, 26369006. [Google Scholar]
- Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 of 15 November 2005 on Microbiological Criteria for Foodstuffs (Text with EEA Relevance). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2005/2073 (accessed on 10 December 2025).
- Zhang, S.; Lin, W.; Liang, S.; Sun, G.; Yao, J.; Duan, D. Co-Culturing Seaweed with Scallops Can Inhibit the Occurrence of Vibrio by Increasing Dissolved Oxygen and pH. Plants 2025, 14, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- European Commission. Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/915 of 25 April 2023 on maximum levels for certain contaminants in food and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006. Off. J. Eur. Union L 2023, 119, 103–157. [Google Scholar]
- Sirota, R.; Winters, G.; Levy, O.; Marques, J.; Paytan, A.; Silverman, J.; Sisma-Ventura, G.; Rahav, E.; Antler, G.; Bar-Zeev, E. Impacts of desalination brine discharge on benthic ecosystems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024, 58, 5631–5645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gobierno de Canarias. Consejería de Politica Territorial Cohesión Territorial y Aguas, 2022. Dirección General de aguas, 2022. In Jornadas de Presentación del Proyecto DESALRO 2.0; Gobierno de Canarias: Pozo Izquierdo Gran Canaria, Spain, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Ragaza, J.A.; Hossain, M.S.; Meiler, K.A.; Velasquez, S.F.; Kumar, V. A review on Spirulina: Alternative media for cultivation and nutritive value as an aquafeed. Rev. Aquac. 2020, 12, 2371–2395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- European Union. Regulation (EU) 2024/795 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 February 2024 establishing the Strategic Technologies for Europe Platform (STEP), and amending Directive 2003/87/EC and Regulations (EU) 2021/1058, 2021/1056, 2021/1057, No 1303/2013, No 223/2014, 2021/1060, 2021/523, 2021/695, 2021/697 and 2021/241. Off. J. Eur. Union 2024. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/795/oj/eng (accessed on 12 January 2026).
- Dadheech, P.K.; Ballot, A.; Casper, P.; Kotut, K.; Novelo, E.; Lemma, B.; Pröschold, T.; Krienitz, L. Phylogenetic relationship and divergence among planktonic strains of Arthrospira (Oscillatoriales, Cyanobacteria) of African, Asian and American origin deduced by 16S–23S ITS and phycocyanin operon sequences. Phycologia 2010, 49, 361–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Stunda-Zujeva, A. Review of Spirulina/Arthrospira growth medium modifications. Key Eng. Mater. 2020, 850, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Grafcan. Single Weather Station: Historical and Real-Time Meteorological Data. Gobierno de Canarias. 2024. Available online: https://metrics.grafcan.es/d/Ss-8yBhGz/single-weather-station?orgId=1&var-thing_location=27&from=now-5y&to=now&viewPanel=32&refresh=%205m (accessed on 20 February 2025).
- Richmond, A.; Hu, Q. (Eds.) Handbook of Microalgal Culture; John Wiley & Sons, Limited: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Belay, A. Biology and industrial production of Arthrospira (Spirulina). In Handbook of Microalgal Culture: Applied Phycology and Biotechnology; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 339–358. [Google Scholar]
- Morocho-Jacome, A.L.; Mejia-da-Silva, L.D.C.; Bresaola, M.D.; Matsudo, M.C.; Bezerra, R.P.; Carvalho, J.C.M.D. Nutrient Recycling in Microalgae Cultivation as a Sustainable Process for Biomass Production. Fermentation 2025, 12, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Latimer, G.W. (Ed.) Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 22nd ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Templeton, D.W.; Laurens, L.M. Nitrogen-to-protein conversion factors revisited for applications of microalgal biomass conversion to food, feed and fuel. Algal Res. 2015, 11, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- James, C.S. (Ed.) Analytical Chemistry of Foods; Springer Science & Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- United States Pharmacopeial Convention. The United States Pharmacopeia: USP 40; The National Formulary: NF 35; United States Pharmacopeial Convention: Rockville, MD, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Hammer, Ø.; Harper, D.A. Past: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 2001, 4, 1. [Google Scholar]
- Borowitzka, M.A. Chemically-mediated interactions in microalgae. In The Physiology of Microalgae; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 321–357. [Google Scholar]
- Weissman, J.C.; Goebel, R.P. Design and Analysis of Microalgal Open Pond Systems for the Purpose of Producing Fuels: A Subcontract Report (No. SERI/STR-231-2840, 6546458); Solar Energy Research Institute (SERI): Golden, CO, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Lundquist, T.J.; Woertz, I.C.; Quinn, N.W.T.; Benemann, J.R. A Realistic Technology and Engineering Assessment of Algae Biofuel Production. Energy Biosci. Inst. 2010, 1, 1–178. Available online: https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cenv_fac/188 (accessed on 12 January 2026).





| Phase | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | P6Total | P6NS | P7.CO2+ | P7.CO2− |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cycles # | 13 | 31 | 9 | 38 | 25 | 65 | 38 | 8 | 12 |
| Time (days) | 50 | 116 | 40 | 217 | 115 | 615 | 314 | 55 | 81 |
| G0 (1) (W m−2 day−1) | 248 ± 46 a 84 ± 16 a | 310 ± 53 b 105 ± 18 b | 279 ± 42 c 95 ± 14 a,b,c | 190 ± 49 d 64 ± 17 d | 297 ± 58 b,c 101 ± 20 b,e | 233 ± 70 a,e 79 ± 24 a,c | 224 ± 73 a,e 161 ± 52 f | 261 ± 80 a,c,f 88 ± 27 a,c,e | 278 ± 51 a,c,e,f 94 ± 11 a,c |
| T (°C) | 22.5 ± 2.0 a,b | 24.2 ± 2.3 c | 25.0 ± 2.0 c | 22.0 ± 2.5 a | 23.8 ± 1.8 b,c | 22.2 ± 2.7 a,d | 22.0 ± 3.1 a | 23.8± 2.4 b,c,d | 24.7 ± 1.9 c |
| pH | 10.14 ± 0.3 a | 10.24 ± 0.3 a | 9.73 ± 0.3 a,b | 9.48 ± 0.3 c | 9.33 ± 0.3 c,d | 9.35 ± 0.4 d | 9.50 ± 0.4 b,e | 9.34 ± 0.3 c,d,e | 9.33 ± 0.2 c,d |
| S (g L−1) | 10.0 ± 0.6 a | 10.3 ± 0.7 a | 21.7 ± 1.3 a | 38.5 ± 3.9 b,(2) | 38.5 ± 1.4 b,c | 37.9 ± 1.6 c | 36.3 ± 3.0 d | 38.1 ± 0.9 b,c | 38.1 ± 1.5 b,c |
| CO2 (L min−1) | 0.19 ± 0.11 a | 0.40 ± 0.25 b | 0.07 ± 0.04 c | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.10 ± 0 c | 0 |
| ER (% day−1) | 3.7 ± 1.5 a | 3.7 ± 1.6 a | 3.2 ± 1.5 a,b | 2.7 ± 1.5 b,c | 3.1 ± 1.1 a,c | 2.4 ± 1.2 b,c | 3.4 ± 1.7 a | 2.2 ± 1.1 b,c | 2.8 ± 1.4 a,b,c |
| Cx Start (gDW L−1) | 0.54 ± 0.1 a | 0.94 ± 0.3 b,c,d | 0.87 ± 0.2 b,c,d | 0.79 ± 0.2 b,c | 0.89 ± 0.2 b,d | 0.79 ± 0.2 b,c | 0.93 ± 0.2 d | 0.65 ± 0.1 a,b,c | 0.73 ± 0.1 a,b,c,d |
| Cx End (gDW L−1) | 0.74 ± 0.1 a | 1.2 ± 0.3 b | 1.06 ± 0.2 b,c,d | 0.95 ± 0.2 c,e | 1.06 ± 0.1 b,d | 1.05 ± 0.2 d | 1.13 ± 0.2 b | 0.87 ± 0.1 a,e | 0.91 ± 0.1 c,e |
| Phase | Cycles # | G0 (1) (W m−2 day−1) | T (°C) | pH | S (g L−1) | CO2 (L min−1) | ER (%) | Cx Start (gDW L−1) | Cx End (gDW L−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P6 | 28 | 214 ± 68 72 ± 23 | 21.1 ± 2.5 | 9.23 ± 0.4 | 38.5 ± 1.2 | 0 | 2.1 ± 1.1 | 0.86 ± 0.21 | 1.10 ± 0.17 |
| P6NS | 33 | 214 ± 68 141 ± 41 * | 21.6 ± 3.0 | 9.53 ± 0.4 * | 36.0 ± 3.2 * | 0 | 3.2 ± 1.4 * | 0.91 ± 0.19 | 1.09 ± 0.18 |
| Phase | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | P6Total | P6NS | P7.CO2+ | P7.CO2− |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min. Pvol (gDW L−1 day−1) | 0.040 | 0.036 | 0.004 | 0.012 | 0.013 | 0.011 | 0.010 | 0.017 | 0.007 |
| Max. Pvol (gDW L−1 day−1) | 0.074 | 0.134 | 0.079 | 0.063 | 0.121 | 0.086 | 0.101 | 0.047 | 0.085 |
| Av. Pvol (gDW L−1 day−1) | 0.054 ± 0.010 a,b | 0.075 ± 0.025 a | 0.042 ± 0.023 a,b,c | 0.029 ± 0.011 c | 0.048 ± 0.026 b,d | 0.033 ± 0.014 c,d | 0.032 ± 0.021 c | 0.031 ± 0.009 b,c | 0.032 ± 0.020 c,d |
| Pale-Green (7 September 2022–30 November 2023) | Dark Green-Blue (1 December 2022–19 May 2023) | Overall (7 September 2022–19 May 2023) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P6 | P6NS | P6 | P6NS | P6 | P6NS | |
| Cycles # | 10 | 12 | 17 | 21 | 27 | 33 |
| PC (% AFDW) | 10.7 ± 2.2 | 6.5 ± 0.5 * | 9.0 ± 4.2 | 6.8 ± 3.9 | 9.8 ± 3.9 | 6.7 ± 1.5 * |
| Pvol (gDW L−1 day−1) | 0.037 ± 0.010 | 0.024 ± 0.015 * | 0.026 ± 0.008 | 0.036 ± 0.020 | 0.030 ± 0.010 | 0.031 ± 0.019 |
| Fv/Fm (λex = 630 nm) | 0.524 ± 0.073 | 0.428 ± 0.042 * | 0.401 ± 0.062 | 0.438 ± 0.063 | 0.443 ± 0.088 | 0.435 ± 0.057 |
| G0 (W m−2 day−1) | 72 ± 16 | 152 ± 35 * | 73 ± 26 | 155 ± 55 * | 72 ± 23 | 154 ± 49 * |
| Salinity (g L−1) | 38.9 ± 1.2 | 38.4 ± 2.4 | 38.2 ± 1.1 | 34.8 ± 2.8 * | 38.5 ± 1.2 | 36.0 ± 3.1 * |
| Phase | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | P6 | P6NS | P7.CO2+ | P7.CO2− |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ash content (% DW) | 13.9 ± 2.6 | 11.7 ± 2.2 | 13.5 ± 0.6 | 13.9 ± 1.4 | 7.9 ± 5.1 | 13.5 ± 6.8 | 12.9 ± 1.9 | 17.6 ± 9.2 | 12.8 ± 3.8 |
| Elements | P1 | P3 | P4 | P6Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minerals (mg 100 g−1 DW) | K | 1359.5 ± 395.4 a | 910.1 ± 124.1 b | 1280.2 ± 311.1 a | 1645.4 ± 568.7 a |
| Na | 632.8 ± 153.7 a,b | 375.0 ± 97.7 a | 1281.3 ± 790.4 b,c | 2822.2 ± 2460.4 c | |
| Mg | 243.9 ± 17.9 a | 1238.4 ± 92.7 b | 742.6 ± 678.5 b | 781.6 ± 278.5 b | |
| Ca | 73.6 ± 9.1 a | 530.3 ± 223.9 b | 248.0 ± 36.5 b | 292.8 ± 99.7 b | |
| Trace elements (mg 100 g−1 DW) | Fe | 58.1 ± 21.2 a | 47.3 ± 14.4 a | 27.2 ± 7.2 b | 32.4 ± 18.1 a,b |
| Mn | 0.8 ± 0.3 a | 4.3 ± 1.2 b | 1.3 ± 0.7 a,c | 4.7 ± 2.9 b,c | |
| Cu | 0.8 ± 0.1 a | 0.4 ± 0.3 a,b | - | 0.2 ± 0.2 b | |
| Zn | 0.6 ± 0.2 a | 3.3 ± 1.1 b | 0.9 ± 0.2 a,c | 3.0 ± 1.9 b,c | |
| B | 1.0 ± 0.3 a | 4.5 ± 1.2 a | - | 4.2 ± 6.4 a | |
| Heavy metals (mg kg−1 DW) | Se | nd | 3 ± 2 × 10−3 | - | 4 ± 3 × 10−3 |
| Cr | 10 ± 2 × 10−3 a | 28 ± 15 × 10−3 a | 2 ± 12 × 10−3 b | 76 ± 67 × 10−3 a | |
| Pb | 3 ± 1 × 10−3 a | 36 ± 8 × 10−3 b | 19 ± 9 × 10−3 c | 46 ± 39 × 10−3 b,c | |
| Cd | 4 ± 1 × 10−3 | nd | nd | 25 ± 17 × 10−3 * | |
| Mo | 5 ± 1 × 10−3 | nd | - | nd | |
| As | nd | nd | 15 ± 82 × 10−3 | 230 ± 172 × 10−3 * | |
| Hg | nd | nd | nd | nd | |
| Co | nd | nd | nd | nd | |
| Microbiological Parameters | P1 | P3 | P4 | P6Total | P6NS | P7.CO2+ | P7.CO2− |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total aerobic mesophilic flora (cfu g−1) | 1.2 ± 1.4 × 103 a,b | 1.6 ± 0.5 × 103 a,b | 6.6 ± 8.1 × 103 a,b | 1.1 ± 1.0 × 104 a | 2.6 ± 1.5 × 102 b | 2.1 × 104 | 1.4 × 104 |
| Yeasts and molds (cfu g−1) | <50 | <50 | <50 | <10 * | <10 * | <10 | <100 |
| Enterobacteriaceae (cfu g−1) | <50 | <50 | <50 | <10 | <10 | <100 | <100 |
| Total coliforms (cfu g−1) | <10 | <10 | <10 | <10 | <10 | <10 | <10 |
| Escherichia coli (cfu g−1) | <10 | <10 | <10 | <10 | <10 | <10 | <10 |
| Staphylococcus spp. (cfu g−1) | <50 | <50 | <50 | <10 | <10 | <100 | <10 |
| Clostridium perfrigens (cfu g−1) | <50 | <50 | <50 | <10 | <10 | <10 | <10 |
| Salmonella spp. (Abs 25 g−1) | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd |
| General Composition (g 100 g−1) | |
|---|---|
| Protein | 46.42 ± 4.23 |
| Carbohydrates | 17.22 ± 7.33 |
| of which sugars | 2.3 ± 0.1 |
| of which dietary fiber | 7.1 ± 4.0 |
| Lipids | 3.41 ± 1.36 |
| of which saturates FA | 1.7 ± 0.3 |
| of which monounsaturates FA | 0.5 ± 0.1 |
| of which polyunsaturates FA | 1.7 ± 0.3 |
| C-phycocyanin | 9.64 ± 2.69 |
| Ash | 15.63 ± 7.64 |
| Moisture | 7.51 ± 1.84 |
| kcal | 285 |
| kJ | 1193 |
| Amino acid profile (g 100 g−1 protein) | |
| Glutamate | 16.62 ± 1.16 |
| Aspartate | 9.33 ± 1.53 |
| Leucine | 9.09 ± 1.45 |
| Alanine | 7.88 ± 1.19 |
| Valine | 6.59 ± 0.74 |
| Arginine | 6.69 ± 0.92 |
| Isoleucine | 5.73 ± 0.79 |
| Glycine | 5.11 ± 0.72 |
| Threonine | 4.86 ± 1.01 |
| Serine | 4.34 ± 1.43 |
| Phenylalanine | 4.33 ± 0.76 |
| Lysine | 4.31 ± 1.52 |
| Tyrosine | 4.27 ± 0.78 |
| Proline | 3.52 ± 0.80 |
| Asparagine | 2.59 |
| Methionine | 1.52 ± 0.44 |
| Histidine | 1.44 ± 0.37 |
| Tryptophan | 1.25 ± 0.47 |
| Cysteine | 0.63 |
| Glutamine | 0.04 |
| Fatty acids profile (% of total fatty acids) | |
| Palmitic acid (16:0) | 42.9 ± 0.3 |
| Palmitoleic acid (16:1) | 5.4 ± 1.0 |
| Stearic acid (18:0) | 1.0 ± 0.1 |
| Oleic acid (18:1) | 5.5 ± 2.1 |
| Linoleic acid (LA; 18:2 ω-6) | 21.0 ± 1.5 |
| γ-linolenic acid (GLA; 18:3 ω-6) | 20.7 ± 1.3 |
| Arachidonic acid (ARA; C20:4 ω-6) | 0.12 |
| Σ SFA | 44.2 ± 1.2 |
| Σ MUFA | 12.5 ± 2.4 |
| Σ PUFA | 42.7 ± 2.2 |
| Σ Omega-6 (n-6) fatty acids | 42.7 ± 2.2 |
| Σ Omega-9 (n-9) fatty acids | 5.5 ± 2.1 |
| Vitamins (mg kg1) | |
| Thiamine (B1) | 1.04 ± 0.03 |
| Riboflavin (B2) | 3.8 ± 2.4 |
| Niacin (B3) | 11.5 |
| Biotin (B8) | 2.6 × 10−3 |
| Cyanocobalamin (B12) | 23.4 ± 23.1 × 10−3 |
| Production Basis | Energy Savings | Freshwater Savings | Fertilizer Savings | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KNO3 | NH4H2PO4 | CO3 | NaCl | |||||||||
| (MWh) | (%) | (m3) | (%) | (t) | (%) | (t) | (%) | (t) | (%) | (t) | (%) | |
| Surface-based | ||||||||||||
| 10-ha year−1 | 41.9 | 10.5 | 12,000 | 12.0 | 14.0 * | 58.3 * | 0.12 * | 16.7 * | 23.2 * | 67.7 * | 60 * | 100 * |
| Product-based | ||||||||||||
| t biomass | −1.4 | −38.1 | −171 | −30.1 | 0.1 | 4.6 | −0.001 | −1.8 | 0.1 | 52.2 | 0.6 | 100 |
| t protein | −4.9 | −85.1 | −680 | −74.4 | −0.5 | −27.8 | −0.032 | −36.4 | 0.1 | 35.9 | 0.6 | 100 |
| t phycocyanin | 0.9 | 6.6 | 266 | 12.0 | 1.6 | 35.5 | 0.1 | 31.2 | 0.5 | 67.7 | 1.3 | 100 |
| Production Basis | Inorganic Nutrients and Ions of Environmental Concern Prevented from Being Discharged | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-NO3 | P-PO4 | Cl− | ||||
| (t year−1) | (%) | (t year−1) | (%) | (t year−1) | (%) | |
| Surface-based | ||||||
| 10-ha year−1 | 1.94 | 89.6 | 0.2 | 86.1 | 36.4 | 100 |
| Product-based | ||||||
| t biomass | 0.053 | 96.5 | 0.001 | 79.4 | 2.08 | 100 |
| t protein | 0.016 | 79.3 | 0.002 | 72.5 | 0.33 | 100 |
| t phycocyanin | 0.043 | 89.6 | 0.005 | 86.1 | 0.81 | 100 |
| Chemical | OUT Medium (g L−1) [3] | OUTs 10% Medium (g L−1) * |
|---|---|---|
| NaCl | 5 | - |
| NaHCO3 | 8 | 8 |
| KNO3 | 2 | 2 |
| NH4H2PO4 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| CO(NH2)2 | 0.015 | 0.015 |
| FeSO4·7H2O | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| C6H8O7 | 0.015 | 0.015 |
| MgSO4·7H2O | 0.16 | - |
| MnCl2·4H2O | - | 0.0015 |
| ZnSO4·7H2O | - | 0.00022 |
| CuSO4·5H2O | - | 0.000025 |
| Experimental Conditions | P1 25 February 2021 –16 April 2021 | P2 16 April 2021 –10 August 2021 | P3 10 August 2021 –20 September 2021 | P4 20 September 2021 –25 April 2022 | P5 25 April 2022 –18 August 2022 | P6Total P6.1 18 August 2022–19 May 2023 P6.2 2 October 2023 –5 December 2023 P6.3 22 January 2024 –15 October 2024 | P6NS 7 September 2022 –28 September 2023 | P7.CO2+ 19 May 2023 –13 July 2023 | P7.CO2− 13 July 2023 –2 October 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen shading | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ |
| Medium Recirculation | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | X |
| CO2 supply | √ | √ | √ | X | X | X | X | √ | X |
| Seawater (% v/v) | 10 | 10 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| NaHCO3 (g L−1) | 8 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Na2CO3 (g L−1) | - | - | 1 | 1 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| KNO3 (g L−1) | 2 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| NH4H2PO4 (g L−1) | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Alemán, M.; Venuleo, M.; Gómez-Pinchetti, J.L.; Portillo, E.; Guidi, F. Cultivation of Limnospira platensis (Spirulina) in Full Seawater with Medium Recycling: A Promising Source of Protein and Phycocyanin for Arid Coastal Regions. Mar. Drugs 2026, 24, 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/md24040141
Alemán M, Venuleo M, Gómez-Pinchetti JL, Portillo E, Guidi F. Cultivation of Limnospira platensis (Spirulina) in Full Seawater with Medium Recycling: A Promising Source of Protein and Phycocyanin for Arid Coastal Regions. Marine Drugs. 2026; 24(4):141. https://doi.org/10.3390/md24040141
Chicago/Turabian StyleAlemán, Monserrat, Marianna Venuleo, Juan Luis Gómez-Pinchetti, Eduardo Portillo, and Flavio Guidi. 2026. "Cultivation of Limnospira platensis (Spirulina) in Full Seawater with Medium Recycling: A Promising Source of Protein and Phycocyanin for Arid Coastal Regions" Marine Drugs 24, no. 4: 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/md24040141
APA StyleAlemán, M., Venuleo, M., Gómez-Pinchetti, J. L., Portillo, E., & Guidi, F. (2026). Cultivation of Limnospira platensis (Spirulina) in Full Seawater with Medium Recycling: A Promising Source of Protein and Phycocyanin for Arid Coastal Regions. Marine Drugs, 24(4), 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/md24040141

