Next Issue
Volume 2, March
Previous Issue
Volume 1, September
 
 

Account. Audit., Volume 1, Issue 3 (December 2025) – 5 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 624 KB  
Article
Explanatory Factors of Materiality Disclosure in the Non-Financial Reporting of European Listed Companies
by Miguel Gomes, Fábio Albuquerque and Maria Albertina Barreiro Rodrigues
Account. Audit. 2025, 1(3), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/accountaudit1030012 - 1 Dec 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2189
Abstract
This study analyses disclosures on materiality in non-financial information (NFI) reporting by examining their likely explanatory factors, including entities’ financial or structural characteristics, governance features, and contextual factors, grounded in a set of relevant theories. Based on archival research and content analysis, this [...] Read more.
This study analyses disclosures on materiality in non-financial information (NFI) reporting by examining their likely explanatory factors, including entities’ financial or structural characteristics, governance features, and contextual factors, grounded in a set of relevant theories. Based on archival research and content analysis, this study uses consolidated NFI reports from 2021 of entities listed in the main Euronext indices. The descriptive analysis reveals that while 71% of companies present a materiality matrix, only about half (50%) meet all eight criteria of materiality disclosure, with double materiality being addressed by just 16%. The regression results show that the level of materiality disclosure is significantly and positively associated only with the size of the board of directors, whereas other expected relationships, such as those with firm size, profitability, or debt, were not statistically significant, challenging traditional assumptions from stakeholders, agency, and positive accounting theories. These findings suggest that governance structures may play a more decisive role in transparency regarding materiality than the entities’ financial or structural characteristics. This research contributes to both the academic literature and practice by identifying explanatory factors and empirical patterns in materiality disclosure in NFI reporting, which may be relevant for standard-setting bodies, regulators, auditors, and stakeholders. Full article
41 pages, 3504 KB  
Article
Redefining Development Through Logistics Performance and ESG Metrics
by Panagiotis Karountzos, Damianos P. Sakas, Dimitrios K. Nasiopoulos and Kanellos Toudas
Account. Audit. 2025, 1(3), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/accountaudit1030011 - 13 Nov 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2988
Abstract
This study investigates the systemic interrelations between logistics performance, environmental performance, sustainable development progress, and institutional governance. While the existing literature often examines these dimensions separately, this research conceptualizes them as co-determined drivers of national development. Using data from 123 countries, the analysis [...] Read more.
This study investigates the systemic interrelations between logistics performance, environmental performance, sustainable development progress, and institutional governance. While the existing literature often examines these dimensions separately, this research conceptualizes them as co-determined drivers of national development. Using data from 123 countries, the analysis integrates four composite indices—Logistics Performance Index (LPI), Environmental Performance Index (EPI), Sustainable Development Goals Index (SDG), and Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI)—alongside GDP per capita. Methodologically, this study applies multiple linear regressions and correlation analyses to assess the associations among these variables and employs Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping (FCM) to simulate scenario-based systemic interactions. Results show that all ESG indicators are positively and significantly associated with LPI, with WGI exerting the strongest effect. In turn, LPI, EPI, SDG, and WGI jointly explain 81.7% of the variance in GDP per capita, confirming their integrated role in shaping economic performance. FCM simulations further reveal that both environmental and institutional improvements generate reinforcing effects on logistics capacity and GDP outcomes. This study’s originality lies in its multiple-method approach and its synthesis of ESG and logistics performance metrics into a unified explanatory framework. It contributes to development studies by highlighting the structural embeddedness of logistics within broader institutional and sustainability ecosystems. Its policy implication lies in suggesting that integrated reforms—combining infrastructure, regulatory quality, and environmental stewardship—are essential for enhancing long-term national competitiveness and resilience. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 217 KB  
Article
Do Investors’ Tolerance for Ambiguity and Auditors’ Associations with Clients Who Have Had Restatements and Regulatory Enforcement Actions Impact Investing Decisions?
by Arnold Schneider
Account. Audit. 2025, 1(3), 10; https://doi.org/10.3390/accountaudit1030010 - 2 Oct 2025
Viewed by 2503
Abstract
This research examines investing decisions when the company under consideration has an auditor with other clients who have had financial statement restatements and regulatory enforcement actions. Another issue addressed is whether investors’ tolerance for ambiguity affects these investing decisions. Participants were given a [...] Read more.
This research examines investing decisions when the company under consideration has an auditor with other clients who have had financial statement restatements and regulatory enforcement actions. Another issue addressed is whether investors’ tolerance for ambiguity affects these investing decisions. Participants were given a questionnaire involving an investment decision and were asked to provide risk assessments and investment amounts. They were assigned to one of two treatment groups, each of which described the same hypothetical company scenario except for its audit firm’s associations with other clients. One group was informed that the company’s auditor has had other clients who have recently had financial statement restatements and regulatory enforcement actions. The other group was informed that the company’s auditor has not recently had any clients who have had financial statement restatements or regulatory enforcement actions. Participants’ tolerance for ambiguity was measured with a commonly used metric. Results indicate that knowledge about an audit firm’s associations with other clients did not significantly impact either investors’ risk assessments (5.76 vs. 6.17 on a scale from 1 to 10) or investment amounts ($4917 vs. $4227). This research also did not find evidence that participants’ tolerance for ambiguity influences risk assessments (6.20 vs. 5.72 on a scale from 1 to 10) or investment amounts ($4857 vs. $4309). Full article
39 pages, 2338 KB  
Article
The Impact of AI-Integrated Drone Technology and Big Data on External Auditing Performance, Sustainability, and Financial Reporting Quality on the Emerging Market
by Abdulkarim Hamdan J. Alhazmi, Sardar Islam and Maria Prokofieva
Account. Audit. 2025, 1(3), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/accountaudit1030008 - 26 Sep 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4588
Abstract
This study investigates the influence of drone technology on the quality of Saudi financial reports through the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and big data. The study’s mixed-method approach is based on a bibliometric analysis of previous studies, along with documentary and content [...] Read more.
This study investigates the influence of drone technology on the quality of Saudi financial reports through the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and big data. The study’s mixed-method approach is based on a bibliometric analysis of previous studies, along with documentary and content analysis. The results show that external auditors benefit from using drones when inspections are integrated with AI and big data technology. Moreover, this integration can reduce costs for audit firms and shorten the duration of audit engagements, resulting in more efficient and effective auditing. Seven clusters were identified, with ‘big data’ being the highest-frequency term. This study does not consider potential cybersecurity threats that could impact data integrity and decrease financial transparency. Furthermore, environmental issues in Saudi Arabia, such as sandstorms, could compromise the effectiveness of drone-based auditing. However, this study contributes to the ESG literature by demonstrating how integrated audit technology transforms traditional sustainability reporting into continuous, AI-enhanced verification processes. These processes improve financial report quality while supporting Saudi Arabia’s Green Initiative and its goal of achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2060. The adoption of AI and big data technologies in auditing represents a shift toward more automated and intelligent audit practices. These changes provide practical insights for government authorities, such as the Saudi Capital Market Authority (CMA), and may result in higher-quality financial reports and increased investor confidence. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 667 KB  
Article
The Impact of Fraud Perception and ESG-Washing on Investment Trust: Integrating Corporate Governance Theory and Empirical Evidence
by Ioannis Passas and Alexandros Garefalakis
Account. Audit. 2025, 1(3), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/accountaudit1030009 - 25 Sep 2025
Viewed by 4253
Abstract
This study investigates the credibility of disclosures and examines the reporting protocols in place, utilizing logistic regression models. While various background factors were analyzed, certain associations emerged. This suggests that the logistic regression analysis, bolstered by diagnostic checks such as (ROC AUC, Brier [...] Read more.
This study investigates the credibility of disclosures and examines the reporting protocols in place, utilizing logistic regression models. While various background factors were analyzed, certain associations emerged. This suggests that the logistic regression analysis, bolstered by diagnostic checks such as (ROC AUC, Brier score, and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test), provides robust evidence and strengthens the empirical foundation of the research. These methodological enhancements contribute to the theoretical integration of signaling and legitimacy perspectives, while also offering practical implications for regulatory frameworks. Overall, this work aims to enhance investor confidence and support credibility in the field. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Next Issue
Back to TopTop