Rethinking ESG and CSR: Advancing Transparency and Integrity in Corporate Governance

A special issue of Accounting and Auditing (ISSN 3042-6618).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 December 2026 | Viewed by 5493

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Business Administration and Tourism, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71410 Heraklion, Greece
Interests: ESG management commentary; disclosure narrative information; multiple criteria decision-making in management accounting; IPSAS; auditing; quality of financial statements; accounting and operational research
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

As the global economy continues to grapple with complex social, environmental, and governance challenges, businesses' role in addressing these issues has never been more crucial. ESG (environmental, social, and governance) and CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) have emerged as pivotal frameworks for companies striving to make meaningful contributions toward sustainable development. However, the growing emphasis on ESG and CSR reporting has also exposed significant challenges, particularly around transparency, accountability, and integrity in corporate governance.

This Special Issue aims to explore cutting-edge approaches and solutions that can help enhance the role of ESG and CSR in corporate reporting. By fostering interdisciplinary research, we seek to understand how organizations can navigate these evolving expectations while maintaining ethical and transparent governance practices. We invite researchers, academics, and industry professionals to contribute their insights, case studies, and critical analyses on the following key areas.

Topics of Interest:

We welcome original research articles, reviews, case studies, and conceptual papers on the following themes:

  • Innovative ESG and CSR Reporting Practices:
    How can companies improve the accuracy and reliability of ESG disclosures? Explore new tools, frameworks, and technologies that facilitate transparent ESG reporting.
  • CSR in the Digital Age:
    With the advent of advanced technologies, what role does digital transformation play in shaping CSR strategies? Examine how organizations use digital tools to enhance social and environmental impact reporting.
  • Fraud, Governance, and ESG:
    What role does strong governance play in preventing internal fraud and ensuring the ethical implementation of ESG and CSR policies? Assess the challenges and strategies in aligning governance with ESG initiatives.
  • Financial Implications of ESG and CSR:
    What are the impacts of ESG and CSR initiatives on financial performance? Investigate the correlation between sustainability-driven strategies and long-term business value creation.
  • Global and Regional ESG Practices:
    Compare how ESG and CSR are adopted in different regions, with a particular focus on Europe and the United States. Discuss the regulatory landscape and its influence on corporate behavior.
  • The Role of Auditors in ESG Assurance:
    How are auditors contributing to the credibility of ESG disclosures? Analyze the evolving role of external auditors in providing independent assurance for ESG reports.
  • Ethical and Legal Challenges in ESG:
    Explore the ethical and legal implications of ESG controversies, including greenwashing and corporate misrepresentation. What steps can companies take to avoid reputational damage and legal penalties?

Dr. Ioannis Passas
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Accounting and Auditing is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1000 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • ESG reporting standards
  • corporate social responsibility (CSR)
  • transparency in corporate governance
  • sustainability
  • auditing and assurance
  • ethical leadership
  • risk management
  • ESG Controversies
  • financial performance
  • corporate integrity

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

19 pages, 624 KB  
Article
Explanatory Factors of Materiality Disclosure in the Non-Financial Reporting of European Listed Companies
by Miguel Gomes, Fábio Albuquerque and Maria Albertina Barreiro Rodrigues
Account. Audit. 2025, 1(3), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/accountaudit1030012 - 1 Dec 2025
Viewed by 743
Abstract
This study analyses disclosures on materiality in non-financial information (NFI) reporting by examining their likely explanatory factors, including entities’ financial or structural characteristics, governance features, and contextual factors, grounded in a set of relevant theories. Based on archival research and content analysis, this [...] Read more.
This study analyses disclosures on materiality in non-financial information (NFI) reporting by examining their likely explanatory factors, including entities’ financial or structural characteristics, governance features, and contextual factors, grounded in a set of relevant theories. Based on archival research and content analysis, this study uses consolidated NFI reports from 2021 of entities listed in the main Euronext indices. The descriptive analysis reveals that while 71% of companies present a materiality matrix, only about half (50%) meet all eight criteria of materiality disclosure, with double materiality being addressed by just 16%. The regression results show that the level of materiality disclosure is significantly and positively associated only with the size of the board of directors, whereas other expected relationships, such as those with firm size, profitability, or debt, were not statistically significant, challenging traditional assumptions from stakeholders, agency, and positive accounting theories. These findings suggest that governance structures may play a more decisive role in transparency regarding materiality than the entities’ financial or structural characteristics. This research contributes to both the academic literature and practice by identifying explanatory factors and empirical patterns in materiality disclosure in NFI reporting, which may be relevant for standard-setting bodies, regulators, auditors, and stakeholders. Full article
41 pages, 3504 KB  
Article
Redefining Development Through Logistics Performance and ESG Metrics
by Panagiotis Karountzos, Damianos P. Sakas, Dimitrios K. Nasiopoulos and Kanellos Toudas
Account. Audit. 2025, 1(3), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/accountaudit1030011 - 13 Nov 2025
Viewed by 1287
Abstract
This study investigates the systemic interrelations between logistics performance, environmental performance, sustainable development progress, and institutional governance. While the existing literature often examines these dimensions separately, this research conceptualizes them as co-determined drivers of national development. Using data from 123 countries, the analysis [...] Read more.
This study investigates the systemic interrelations between logistics performance, environmental performance, sustainable development progress, and institutional governance. While the existing literature often examines these dimensions separately, this research conceptualizes them as co-determined drivers of national development. Using data from 123 countries, the analysis integrates four composite indices—Logistics Performance Index (LPI), Environmental Performance Index (EPI), Sustainable Development Goals Index (SDG), and Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI)—alongside GDP per capita. Methodologically, this study applies multiple linear regressions and correlation analyses to assess the associations among these variables and employs Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping (FCM) to simulate scenario-based systemic interactions. Results show that all ESG indicators are positively and significantly associated with LPI, with WGI exerting the strongest effect. In turn, LPI, EPI, SDG, and WGI jointly explain 81.7% of the variance in GDP per capita, confirming their integrated role in shaping economic performance. FCM simulations further reveal that both environmental and institutional improvements generate reinforcing effects on logistics capacity and GDP outcomes. This study’s originality lies in its multiple-method approach and its synthesis of ESG and logistics performance metrics into a unified explanatory framework. It contributes to development studies by highlighting the structural embeddedness of logistics within broader institutional and sustainability ecosystems. Its policy implication lies in suggesting that integrated reforms—combining infrastructure, regulatory quality, and environmental stewardship—are essential for enhancing long-term national competitiveness and resilience. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 667 KB  
Article
The Impact of Fraud Perception and ESG-Washing on Investment Trust: Integrating Corporate Governance Theory and Empirical Evidence
by Ioannis Passas and Alexandros Garefalakis
Account. Audit. 2025, 1(3), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/accountaudit1030009 - 25 Sep 2025
Viewed by 2184
Abstract
This study investigates the credibility of disclosures and examines the reporting protocols in place, utilizing logistic regression models. While various background factors were analyzed, certain associations emerged. This suggests that the logistic regression analysis, bolstered by diagnostic checks such as (ROC AUC, Brier [...] Read more.
This study investigates the credibility of disclosures and examines the reporting protocols in place, utilizing logistic regression models. While various background factors were analyzed, certain associations emerged. This suggests that the logistic regression analysis, bolstered by diagnostic checks such as (ROC AUC, Brier score, and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test), provides robust evidence and strengthens the empirical foundation of the research. These methodological enhancements contribute to the theoretical integration of signaling and legitimacy perspectives, while also offering practical implications for regulatory frameworks. Overall, this work aims to enhance investor confidence and support credibility in the field. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop