Next Issue
Volume 2, September
Previous Issue
Volume 2, March
 
 

AI Sens., Volume 2, Issue 2 (June 2026) – 4 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
24 pages, 4800 KB  
Article
Making Sense of Sensors: Improving LLM Interpretation of Time-Series Data
by Andres Rico and Kent Larson
AI Sens. 2026, 2(2), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/aisens2020007 - 3 Jun 2026
Viewed by 986
Abstract
The increasing expansion of ubiquitous sensing systems has created large streams of time-series data that are difficult for non-technical users to interpret. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a promising interface for transforming sensor data into natural language insights, particularly in distributed environments where [...] Read more.
The increasing expansion of ubiquitous sensing systems has created large streams of time-series data that are difficult for non-technical users to interpret. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a promising interface for transforming sensor data into natural language insights, particularly in distributed environments where users may lack familiarity with data analysis. However, models optimized for text generation often struggle to interpret raw time-series signals, producing responses that are generic, inaccurate, or poorly grounded in the data. This study evaluates a prompt structure based on the Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework for interpreting sensor-derived time-series data from water-consumption monitoring systems installed in household storage tanks. The prompt integrates statistical summaries, sensor metadata, and contextual information about household water-use practices. Performance is evaluated using synthetic datasets representing a year of tank water-consumption measurements and a rubric-based evaluation framework applied by three independent language-model evaluators. Results show that augmenting prompts with structured contextual information improves the clarity and grounding of language model responses to sensor time-series data, increasing evaluation scores and reducing failure modes such as hallucination, contradiction with the data, and misuse of contextual information, as assessed by independent evaluator models. These findings highlight the potential of structured contextual prompting to support locally deployed language models that produce reliable and actionable interpretations of sensor time-series data. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Generative AI and Interdisciplinary Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 5022 KB  
Article
AI Framework Integrated with InN Gas Sensing to Distinguish Sedentary Metabolic Fingerprints from Chronic Liver Disease
by Tsung Ming Chao, Rakesh Kumar Patnaik, Yu Chen Lin, Ming-Chih Ho and J. Andrew Yeh
AI Sens. 2026, 2(2), 6; https://doi.org/10.3390/aisens2020006 - 21 May 2026
Viewed by 1332
Abstract
Clinical monitoring of chronic liver disease (CLD) is currently hindered by the invasiveness of conventional biopsies. While breath-borne volatile organic compound (VOC) analysis offers a promising non-invasive alternative, the metabolic profiles of sedentary populations often overlap significantly with those of healthy individuals, making [...] Read more.
Clinical monitoring of chronic liver disease (CLD) is currently hindered by the invasiveness of conventional biopsies. While breath-borne volatile organic compound (VOC) analysis offers a promising non-invasive alternative, the metabolic profiles of sedentary populations often overlap significantly with those of healthy individuals, making latent pathologies difficult to identify. To overcome this high-resolution diagnostic challenge, this study developed an integrated framework that couples high-performance semiconductor sensing technology with a machine learning-based analytical baseline. During the biomarker screening phase, GC-MS was utilized to analyze over 2000 VOCs, identifying 20 markers associated with CLD. These were further optimized into a robust feature panel including ammonia, isoprene, dimethyl sulfide (DMS), and limonene. For several critical metabolic features exhibiting high diagnostic potential, preliminary identifications were conducted by referencing NIST database matches and relevant literature. To maintain analytical rigor and account for the inherent complexity of trace volatile metabolites in biological samples, these signals are treated as putative metabolic features and characterized by their retention times. Regarding hardware, an InN-based sensor with Pt-AlN surface modification was fabricated, achieving a limit of detection (LOD) for ammonia below 0.2 ppm. Crucially, while the InN sensor was validated for specific core markers such as ammonia, the current AI classification model is trained on a refined 7-VOC panel derived from the comprehensive GC-MS data. To resolve diagnostic overlaps, a three-state dynamic sampling protocol (resting, exercise, and recovery) was implemented to isolate biomarkers that remain physiologically stable. By integrating multi-dimensional VOC features (e.g., isoprene and DMS) with sensor-validated data through DBSCAN and Random Forest algorithms, the framework successfully captured non-linear metabolic fingerprints. Machine learning results confirm that the framework effectively distinguished sedentary controls from CLD patients, achieving a macro-average AUC of 0.96. This integration provides a high-precision technical pathway for early-stage liver disease screening. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

2 pages, 166 KB  
Correction
Correction: Fonseca et al. Supporting ASD Diagnosis with EEG, ML and Swarm Intelligence: Early Detection of Autism Spectrum Disorder Based on Electroencephalography Analysis by Machine Learning and Swarm Intelligence. AI Sens. 2025, 1, 3
by Flávio Secco Fonseca, Adrielly Sayonara de Oliveira Silva, Maria Vitória Soares Muniz, Catarina Victória Nascimento de Oliveira, Arthur Moreira Nogueira de Melo, Maria Luísa Mendes de Siqueira Passos, Ana Beatriz de Souza Sampaio, Thailson Caetano Valdeci da Silva, Alana Elza Fontes da Gama, Ana Cristina de Albuquerque Montenegro, Bianca Arruda Manchester de Queiroga, Marilú Gomes Netto Monte da Silva, Rafaella Asfora Siqueira Campos Lima, Sadi da Silva Seabra Filho, Shirley da Silva Jacinto de Oliveira Cruz, Cecília Cordeiro da Silva, Clarisse Lins de Lima, Giselle Machado Magalhães Moreno, Maíra Araújo de Santana, Juliana Carneiro Gomes and Wellington Pinheiro dos Santosadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
AI Sens. 2026, 2(2), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/aisens2020005 - 20 May 2026
Viewed by 313
Abstract
In the original publication [...] Full article
50 pages, 80206 KB  
Review
AI-Enabled RF Sensing: A Pipeline-Centric Review from Design to Recognition
by Zirui Zhang, Xianyue Liao and Zhirun Hu
AI Sens. 2026, 2(2), 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/aisens2020004 - 16 Apr 2026
Viewed by 1498
Abstract
For electromagnetic (EM)-driven design, we summarize surrogate modeling and inverse design based on full-wave simulations and, when available, measurements, use adjacent-domain EM exemplars only as methodological templates where direct closed-loop RF design-to-recognition evidence remains limited, and explain why reported speedups depend on the [...] Read more.
For electromagnetic (EM)-driven design, we summarize surrogate modeling and inverse design based on full-wave simulations and, when available, measurements, use adjacent-domain EM exemplars only as methodological templates where direct closed-loop RF design-to-recognition evidence remains limited, and explain why reported speedups depend on the sampled design domain, sample density near feasibility boundaries, and how constraint-boundary checks and final verification are implemented. For RF sensing and recognition, we discuss how the learned “signature” is shaped by the measurement chain (hardware, placement, synchronization, calibration, and preprocessing). We then outline an author-synthesized set of checkable evaluation and reporting items, including explicit domains/constraints, complete sensing metadata, cross-condition tests, and edge deployment evidence, where deployability is defined at the full-pipeline level and requires measured latency, throughput, peak memory, energy per inference, preprocessing overhead, runtime, numerical precision, and an explicit statement of whether communication or offloading is included. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Next Issue
Back to TopTop