Green Health, Volume 1, Issue 2 (September 2025) – 2 articles

The relationship between natural environments and psychological well-being has gained increasing attention in environmental and health sciences. However, there is still a lack of robust quantitative instruments to assess the restorative potential of different environments. This study aimed to adapt and validate the Portuguese version of the Perceived Restorativeness Scale (PRS), an instrument based on Attention Restoration Theory that evaluates the perceived restorative qualities of environments. In Study 1, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted on data from 410 participants. The results supported a refined 20-item version of the scale, comprising four factors—being away, fascination, compatibility, and legibility—with good internal consistency and acceptable model fit. Measurement invariance analysis confirmed configural, metric, and scalar invariance across gender. In Study 2, a separate sample of 212 participants completed the PRS along with additional validated measures: the Sublime Emotion toward Nature Scale (SEN), an aesthetic evaluation of landscapes, and the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). The PRS showed strong convergent and discriminant validity and significantly predicted restorative outcomes. These findings support the psychometric adequacy of the Portuguese PRS and its relevance as a valid tool for assessing perceived restorativeness in both natural and built environments. The scale may inform future research and public policies aimed at designing spaces that promote psychological restoration and mental well-being. Full article

Background: The associations between physical activity (PA) and all-cause mortality remain under-investigated among individuals with impaired lung function. Methods: With 201,596 participants from the UK Biobank cohort, baseline pre-bronchodilation lung function tests and a modified International Physical Activity Questionnaire were used to assess lung function status (normal, restricted, obstructed) and PA attributes (volume, intensity, duration). All-cause mortality was determined through linkage to the National Health Services Register. Cox proportional hazard regression was applied to characterize the associations between PA metrics and all-cause mortality among people with different lung function statuses. Dose–response relationships between PA metrics and all-cause mortality risks were examined using restricted cubic splines (number of knots = 4). Results: Over a 11.81-year median follow-up, 5.24% of participants died. All-cause mortality risk declined with increasing total PA volume, plateauing at 1800 MET-min/week without further reduction in individuals with and without impaired lung function. Similar trends were observed for PA intensity and duration, with both factors demonstrating reduced mortality risk that plateaued after reaching a specific threshold. Notably, 24.1% (95% CI: 16.7%, 30.8%) and 43.1% (95% CI: 36.1%, 49.7%) lower mortality risk was observed among individuals with and without impaired lung function for PA with 1201–1800 MET-min/wk. Conclusions: PA was associated with a decreased risk of all-cause mortality among individuals with and without impaired lung function, suggesting that those with impaired lung function might also benefit from PA. Full article