Next Article in Journal
Statement of Peer Review
Previous Article in Journal
Abstracts of the 8th International Electronic Conference on Water Sciences (ECWS-8)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Environmental and Earth Sciences Proceedings
Volume 32
Issue 1
10.3390/eesp2025032023
eesp-logo
Submit to this Journal
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Statement of Peer Review †

by
Helena M. Ramos
Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment Department, CERIS, Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
†
Presented at the 8th International Electronic Conference on Water Sciences, 14–16 October 2024; Available online: https://sciforum.net/event/ECWS-8.
Environ. Earth Sci. Proc. 2025, 32(1), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/eesp2025032023
Published: 23 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 8th International Electronic Conference on Water Sciences)
Versions Notes
In submitting conference proceedings to Environmental and Earth Sciences Proceedings, the volume editors of the proceedings certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review administered by the volume editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal.
  • Type of peer review: single-blind
  • Conference submission management system: Susy
  • Number of submissions sent for review: 25
  • Number of submissions accepted: 21
  • Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 84%
  • Average number of reviews per paper: 1
  • Total number of reviewers involved: 30
  • Any additional information on the review process: Peer-review process and regulations: The review was conducted in a single-blind manner, with the entire procedure carried out through the MDPI Susy platform. At least one review report was collected for each paper, and the evaluations were carried out by qualified independent experts. The authors made sufficient revisions based on the review reports. The final decision was made by the chairs of the conference.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ramos, H.M. Statement of Peer Review. Environ. Earth Sci. Proc. 2025, 32, 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/eesp2025032023

AMA Style

Ramos HM. Statement of Peer Review. Environmental and Earth Sciences Proceedings. 2025; 32(1):23. https://doi.org/10.3390/eesp2025032023

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ramos, Helena M. 2025. "Statement of Peer Review" Environmental and Earth Sciences Proceedings 32, no. 1: 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/eesp2025032023

APA Style

Ramos, H. M. (2025). Statement of Peer Review. Environmental and Earth Sciences Proceedings, 32(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/eesp2025032023

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop