Therapeutics, Volume 2, Issue 4 (December 2025) – 3 articles

Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) therapy remains essential in treating blood disorders, autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative conditions, and cancers. Despite its potential, challenges arise from the inherent heterogeneity of HSCs and the complexity of their regulatory niche. Recent advancements in single-cell RNA sequencing and chromatin accessibility sequencing have provided deeper insights into HSC markers and chromatin dynamics, highlighting the intricate balance between intrinsic and extrinsic regulatory mechanisms. Zebrafish models have emerged as valuable tools in HSC research, particularly through live imaging and cellular barcoding techniques. These models have allowed us to describe critical interactions between HSCs and embryonic macrophages, involving reactive oxygen species and calreticulin signaling. These are essential for ensuring HSC quality and proper differentiation, with implications for improving HSC transplant outcomes. Furthermore, the review examines clonal hematopoiesis, with a focus on mutations in epigenetic regulators such as DNMT3A, TET2, and ASXL1, which elevate the risk of myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia. Emerging technologies, including in vivo cellular barcoding and CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing, are being investigated to enhance clonal diversity and target specific mutations, offering potential strategies to mitigate these risks. Additionally, macrophages play a pivotal role in maintaining HSC clonality and ensuring niche localization. Interactions mediated by factors such as VCAM-1 and CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling are crucial for HSC homing and the stress response, opening new therapeutic avenues for enhancing HSC transplantation success and addressing clonal hematopoiesis. This review synthesizes findings from zebrafish models, cutting-edge sequencing technologies, and novel therapeutic strategies, offering a comprehensive framework for advancing HSC biology and improving clinical outcomes in stem cell therapy and the treatment of hematologic diseases. Full article

Background/Objectives: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a frequent complication after lung transplantation, especially in high-risk donor-positive/recipient-negative (D+/R−) patients. CMV-specific hyperimmunoglobulin (CMV-HIG), administered either with antivirals or as monotherapy, may be beneficial for preventing or treating CMV infection in selected clinical scenarios. This study evaluated CMV-HIG indications and their impact on clinical outcomes in our lung transplant unit. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed adult lung transplant recipients (2010–2023) who received ≥2 doses of CMV-HIG for universal prophylaxis, monotherapy prophylaxis, preemptive therapy, or treatment of invasive disease. Results: CMV-HIG was administered to 204 out of 336 recipients (61%). CMV-HIG was well tolerated, with no treatment-related adverse events. Indications were preemptive therapy (63%), universal prophylaxis (24%), monotherapy prophylaxis (7%), and treatment of invasive disease (6%). CMV-HIG was well tolerated, with no treatment-related adverse events. No patients developed invasive disease during combination prophylaxis or preemptive treatment. The combination treatment of patients with invasive disease was also effective, and no cases of VGC resistance were detected. CMV-HIG monoprophylaxis has allowed us to delay or prevent viral replication in recipients who developed VGC side effects. Rates of acute rejection, Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction (CLAD), and overall survival were similar across CMV risk groups. Conclusions: Our results showed that the combined use of CMV-HIG and antiviral agents is effective in preventing CMV infection and disease in high-risk lung transplant recipients. This combination is also useful in treating invasive disease and preventing VGC resistance. Additionally, CMV-HIG monoprohylaxis can delay or prevent viral replication in recipients experiencing VGC-related side effects. These findings support the use of CMV-HIG in selected clinical settings, although prospective studies are needed to define its potential benefits within the current therapeutic armamentarium. Full article

Background/Objectives: Biochemical recurrence (BCR) occurs in 15–40% of men within five years of radical prostatectomy (RP), presenting a major challenge for long-term disease control. While salvage radiotherapy (SRT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) are established post-RP interventions, the optimal integration of ADT with SRT—regarding timing, duration, and patient selection—remains unclear. We aimed to synthesize current clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of combining ADT with SRT in patients experiencing BCR after RP. Methods: A narrative review was conducted, encompassing retrospective cohort studies, prospective randomized controlled trials (notably RTOG 9601, GETUG-AFU 16, RADICALS-HD, and SPPORT), and meta-analyses. Studies were selected based on relevance to combined ADT + SRT versus SRT alone, with outcomes of interest including biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS). Trial characteristics, ADT duration (short-term [4–6 months] versus long-term [≥24 months]), radiation scheme, and prostate specific antigen (PSA) thresholds at SRT initiation were extracted and compared. Results: The combination of ADT and SRT represents a promising strategy for the treatment of prostate cancer with BCR after RP. Current evidence supports its benefit in terms of disease control and survival, particularly in high-risk patients. Conclusions: Differences in inclusion criteria, ADT duration, and the heterogeneous quality of the available studies limit the formulation of universal recommendations. Well-designed prospective trials are needed to optimize therapeutic approaches and personalize treatment based on each patient’s risk profile. Full article