A Review of Vertebrate Footprints from the Mesozoic of Thailand and Their Palaeobiogeographical Significance

Abstract

Thailand preserves one of the most extensive records of Mesozoic vertebrate tracks in Tropical Asia, yet these ichnological data have never been comprehensively synthesized. This review compiles and reassesses all known Triassic to Cretaceous vertebrate tracksites in Thailand to clarify their stratigraphic distribution, taxonomic diversity, and palaeobiogeographical significance. Published records, new field observations, and updated stratigraphic correlations are integrated to evaluate trackmaker attributions and temporal patterns. The Thai record documents diverse assemblages including chirotheriids, early theropods, sauropodomorphs, ornithopods, sauropods, and crocodilians. Late Triassic–Early Jurassic assemblages capture a major faunal transition, revealing the co-occurrence of non-dinosaurian archosaurs and some of the earliest dinosaurs in the region, whereas Lower Cretaceous sites are dominated by theropods, sauropods and diverse ornithopods. Comparison with other Asian ichnofaunas indicates faunal continuity across eastern Asia and supports early dinosaur dispersal into equatorial low latitudes. This synthesis also evaluates site conservation, highlighting the vulnerability of several Triassic localities and a positive trend of community-led discoveries since 2009, underscoring the need for proactive management and standardized digital documentation. Overall, the Thai ichnological succession represents the most complete Mesozoic track record presently known from Tropical Asia and provides key insights into vertebrate evolution, palaeoecology, and regional biogeography.

1. Introduction

Over the past few decades, ichnology has experienced a major resurgence as a core discipline within palaebiology, driven by growing recognition that trace fossils record behavioural, ecological, and environmental information unavailable from body fossils alone. Advances in ichnotaxonomy, ichnofacies analysis, and digital documentation, particularly three-dimensional photogrammetry [1], have transformed vertebrate tracks into more robust datasets for reconstructing locomotion, community structure, palaeoecology, and large-scale biogeographic patterns. Within this global context, vertebrate ichnology can now also play an important role in discussions of Mesozoic faunal turnover, biochronology, and continental dispersal.

Despite these developments, Southeast Asia remains underrepresented in synthetic ichnological reviews, with nearly two decades having elapsed since the last national-scale assessment in 2009 [2]. This gap is striking given Thailand’s strategic palaeogeographic position along the equatorial margin of the Indochina Terrane and the presence of extensive continental Mesozoic deposits within the Khorat Group. Vertebrate tracks preserved from the Late Triassic to the Early Cretaceous provide a rare low-latitude record of archosaur and dinosaur diversity that complements the better-known ichnofaunas of China, Korea and Japan.

Vertebrate ichnology in Thailand emerged relatively late, with the first dinosaur tracks reported in the 1980s in Phu Luang Wildlife Sanctuary (Phu Phan Formation, Lower Cretaceous) [3,4]. Subsequent discoveries during the 1990s and early 2000s, notably at Huai Dan Chum and Phu Faek [5,6], revealed diverse theropod, ornithopod, and sauropod track assemblages and demonstrated that vertebrate tracks are widespread throughout the Khorat Group. More recent fieldwork has extended the record into the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic, documenting chirotheriid assemblages and early dinosaur tracks [7]. Together, these discoveries establish Thailand as a key reference area for understanding Mesozoic continental ecosystems within equatorial Asia.

This review has three primary objectives. First, we synthesize all currently documented vertebrate tracksites in Thailand, providing a standardized overview of their stratigraphic distribution, ichnotaxonomic composition, geographic setting, and preservation status. Second, we assess the palaeoecological and palaeobiogeographic significance of this record, with particular emphasis on faunal transitions and ecosystem structure across Southeast and East Asia. Third, we identify methodological and conceptual challenges, especially those related to legacy documentation, stratigraphic gaps, and site vulnerability, while highlighting opportunities for future research and conservation frameworks.

By integrating historical data within modern ichnological perspectives, this review aims to provide a coherent and up-to-date framework for vertebrate track research in Thailand and to reinforce its importance within the broader context of Mesozoic palaeontology in tropical Asia.

2. Materials and Methods

In recent years, documentation of vertebrate tracksites in Thailand has increasingly followed best-practice protocols that recognize vertebrate tracks as three-dimensional topographic structures and advocate the routine use of photogrammetry or other high-resolution 3D techniques to maximize reproducibility, comparability, and long-term scientific value [1].

However, most sites reviewed here were discovered and documented prior to the widespread availability of high-definition portable cameras, affordable photogrammetric software, and dedicated digital storage infrastructure. During the previous two decades of vertebrate ichnological research in Thailand, palaeoichnology was largely treated as a subsidiary component of vertebrate palaeontology, resulting in inconsistent access to technical support, limited funding, and heterogeneous documentation standards. Consequently, early records often rely on traditional mapping, photography, hand measurements, and casting, with variable levels of precision and completeness [2].

Recent discoveries have catalyzed a marked shift in this paradigm, driven by the growing recognition of ichnology as a distinct, data-intensive discipline. This review therefore represents a synthesis of legacy data collected under heterogeneous conditions and a foundational step toward a more consistent, systematic, and reproducible framework for recording vertebrate tracksites in Thailand. We anticipate that future work will progressively converge toward full implementation of modern ichnological protocols, strengthening the national ichnological record and facilitating global-scale comparisons.

The dataset examined in this review comprises 19 vertebrate tracksites spanning six stratigraphic formations, ranging in age from the Late Triassic to the Early Cretaceous. Discovery contexts for these sites were documented through systematic compilation of published records, field reports, and first-hand observations. This approach allowed classification of site discoverers into three levels of expertise: non-specialists (local villagers), paraprofessionals (forest rangers), and professionals (geologists or palaeontologists) (

Table 1. Comprehensive inventory of documented vertebrate tracksites from northeastern Thailand (Indochina Terrane). The table summarizes site name, stratigraphic assignment (series and stage), estimated numerical age (Ma), formation, geographic location, year and type of discovery, conservation status, identified ichnogenera, inferred trackmakers, and corresponding taxa known from the Thai fossil record.

	Site Name	Serie	Stage	Ma	Fm	Location	Discoverer	Year	Conservation	Type (Ichnogenus)	Inferred Trackmakers	Corresponding Taxa from the Thai Fossil Record
19	Lam Pao	Lower Cretaceous	Aptian to Albian	100	Khok Kruat	Kalasin, Mueang	Professional	2022	Level 2 (at risk/unprotected)	Caririchnium-like	Ornithopod	Siamodon nimngami/Ratchasimasaurus suranareae/Sirindhorna khoratensis
18	Ban Nong Sa Rai					Nakhon Phanom, Tha Uthen	Professional	2010	Level 1 (lost/destroyed)	Eubrontes-grade Asianopodus-like Caririchnium-like	Theropods - Ornithopod	Spinosauridae indet./Siamraptor suwati Ornithomimosauria indet. Siamodon nimngami/Ratchasimasaurus suranareae/Sirindhorna khoratensis
17	Huai Dan Chum					Nakhon Phanom, Tha Uthen	Professional	2001	Level 4 (well preserved)	Asianopodus-like Didactyl tracks Caririchnium-like Batrachopus	Theropod Deinonychosaurian Ornithopod Crocodile	Ornithomimosauria indet., Siamodon nimngami/Ratchasimasaurus suranareae/Sirindhorna khoratensis Atoposauridae indet./Goniopholidid sp.
16	Phu Hin Rong Kla		Barremian	121	Phu Phan	Phu Hin Rong Kla, Phitsanulok	Non-specialist	2024	Level 3 (moderately protected)	Eubrontes-grade Grallator-grade Caririchnium-like	Theropods - Ornithopod	Spinosauridae indet./Siamraptor suwati Ornithomimosauria indet. Siamodon nimngami/Ratchasimasaurus suranareae/Sirindhorna khoratensis ***
15	Phu Luang					Loei, Phu Ruea	Paraprofessional	1985	Level 2 (at risk/unprotected)	Megalosauripus-grade	Robust theropod	Spinosauridae indet./Siamraptor suwati ***
14	Nong Sung		Berriasian to early Barremian	125	Sao Khua	Mukdahan, Nong Sung	Professional	2007	Level 1 (lost/destroyed)	Grallator-grade	Small theropod	Phuwiangvenator yaemniyomi/Vayuraptor nongbualamphuensis/Kinnareemimus khonkaenensis
13	Phu Kao					Nong Bua Lamphu, Non Sang	Professional	2000	Level 4 (well preserved)	Grallator-grade	Small theropod	Tyrannosauroidea indet. *
12	Ba Chad			133	Phra Wihan	Kalasin, Na Khu	Non-specialist	2023	Level 3 (moderately protected)	Tridactyl trackway	Medium theropods	Phuwiangvenator yaemniyomi/Vayuraptor nongbualamphuensis/Kinnareemimus khonkaenensis **
11	Mun Daeng					Loei, Dan Sai	Paraprofessional	2006	Level 3 (moderately protected)	Grallator-grade	Small theropod	Tyrannosauroidea indet. *
10	Phu Faek					Kalasin, Na Khu	Non-specialist	1996	Level 4 (well preserved)	Eubrontes-like Brontopodus-like	Medium to large theropods Sauropod	Tyrannosauroidea indet., Metriacanthosauridae indet. Mamenchisauridae indet. *
9	Sai Yai Waterfall					Prachin Buri, Khao Yai	Professional	1993	Level 2 (at risk/unprotected)	cf. Siamopodus khaoyaiensis	Theropod	Tyrannosauroidea indet. *
8	Hin Lat Pa Chad			143		Khon Kaen, Phu Wiang	Professional	1989	Level 4 (well preserved)	Neoanomoepus Tridactyl trackways Crocodile track	Ornithopod Small theropod Crocodilian	Minimocursor phunoiensis/Basal neornithischia indet. Tyrannosauroidea indet. Indosinosuchus potamosiamensis/kalasinensis/Mesoeucrocodylia indet./Chalawan thailandicus *
7	Non Tum 2	Upper Triassic to Lower Jurassic	?		Upper Nam Phong ?	Chaiyaphum, Nong Bua Daeng	Professional	2023	Level 2 (at risk/unprotected)	Brontopodus	Sauropod	Isanosaurus attavipachi/Sauropoda cf. Vulcanodontidae/Sauropoda cf. Tazoudasaurus
6	Huai Duk					Phetchabun, Lom Sak	Paraprofessional	2009	Level 2 (at risk/unprotected)	Didactyl trackway	Archosaur/theropod	Archosauria cf. Pseudosuchia/Theropoda indet.
5	Non Tum					Chaiyaphum, Nong Bua Daeng	Non-specialist	2008	Level 2 (at risk/unprotected)	Eubrontes-grade Brontopodus didactyl trackway	Theropod Sauropod Temnospondyl	Theropoda indet. Isanosaurus attavipachi/Sauropoda cf. Vulcanodontidae/Sauropoda cf. Tazoudasaurus -
4	Tha Song Khon					Loei, Phu Kradung	Non-specialist	2007	Level 2 (at risk/unprotected)	Gigandipus-like	Large basal saurischian /theropod	Theropoda indet.
3	Tad Yai	Upper Triassic	Norian	~205	Huai Hin Lat	Phetchabun, Nam Nao	Professional	2023	Level 3 (moderately protected)	Grallator-grade Brontopodus Chirotheriidae	Theropod Sauropod Archosauriform /pseudosuchian
2	Tad Fa						Non-specialist	2022	Level 3 (moderately protected)	Chirotheriidae/ Brachychirotherium	Aetosaur	Aetosauria indet.
1	Tad Huai Nam Yai			~227			Non-specialist	2000	Level 4 (well preserved)	Apatopus lineatus	Phytosaur	Phytosauria indet.

* No confirmed fossil material has yet been documented from this unit, faunal interpretation relies on correlation with the fossil-bearing Phu Kradung Formation; ** No confirmed fossil material has yet been documented from this unit, faunal interpretation relies on correlation with the fossil-bearing Sao Khua Formation; *** No confirmed fossil material has yet been documented from this unit, faunal interpretation relies on correlation with the fossil-bearing Khok Kruat Formation.

). Temporal trends in site discovery were analysed by comparing datasets compiled before and after 2009 (the date of the previous review) to evaluate shifts in discovery pathways and stakeholder involvement.

Conservation status was assessed using a standardized four-tiered management index (destroyed/lost; unprotected and at risk; partially protected; under active management), applied consistently across nineteen vertebrate track localities. Levels of protection were evaluated based on field observations, land-use context, legal status, and curatorial practices, allowing assessment of site vulnerability and exposure to natural or anthropogenic degradation. This integrative approach enabled evaluation of both discovery processes and preservation risks, providing a framework for prioritizing documentation, monitoring, and conservation actions. In this review, the terms “well-preserved” and “better-preserved” refer strictly to the degree of preservation (i.e., how closely a track retains its original morphology at the time of formation) and do not imply a higher degree of anatomical fidelity or a more foot-like appearance.

3. Geological and Paleogeographical Framework

3.1. Geographical Distribution of Track Discoveries in Thailand

Vertebrate tracksites in Thailand are geographically distributed across the Khorat Plateau, a large tableland in northeastern Thailand (Isan) and adjacent parts of Laos. Situated at elevations of roughly 90–200 m above sea level, the plateau is bounded by the Mekong River to the north and east, the Phetchabun Mountain Range to the west, and the Phnom Dangrek Range to the south (Figure 1). As a geomorphological unit, the Khorat Plateau broadly coincides with the Khorat Basin and forms the core of Thailand’s Mesozoic continental record [8].

Within the Khorat Basin, the Khorat Group constitutes a major Mesozoic continental lithostratigraphic unit composed predominantly of fluvial and lacustrine siliciclastic deposits of Jurassic–Early Cretaceous age (Figure 2). It overlies older continental successions, notably the Triassic Kuchinarai Group, which comprises fluvio-lacustrine sediments deposited within extensional half-graben systems during the early stages of basin development.

While many vertebrate track localities occur within formations of the Khorat Group, others are preserved in these underlying Triassic units. Nevertheless, all known sites are geographically situated on or along the margins of the Khorat Plateau.

The central sector of the Khorat Plateau forms the historical and scientific core of vertebrate ichnological research in Thailand (Figure 1A). Corresponding to Khon Kaen, Kalasin, and Maha Sarakham provinces, it represents the historical and academic centre of Thai palaeontology, where research began in the late 1970s and where several iconic sites, such as Phu Wiang and the Sirindhorn Museum, are located [9].

Along the western margin of the Khorat Plateau (Phetchabun, Loei, and Phitsanulok provinces) and its southwestern edge (Chaiyaphum), an increasing number of track localities have been documented (Figure 1B). In this sector, the westernmost outcrops of the Khorat Basin succession include both older units and marginal exposures of the Khorat Group, which have yielded several important recent discoveries.

In contrast, the northeastern margin of the plateau, along the Mekong River in Nakhon Phanom Province (Figure 1C), is dominated by Lower Cretaceous strata of the Khorat Group and has yielded two significant tracksites: Huai Dan Chum and Ban Nong Sa Rai.

A single southern outlier at Khao Yai National Park (Prachin Buri Province) represents localized erosional windows exposing the Khorat Group along the forested southern cuesta of the Khorat Plateau (Figure 1D).

3.2. Chronostratigraphic Distribution of Vertebrate Tracksites in Thailand

Among the nineteen vertebrate track localities currently documented in Thailand, approximately 37% (seven sites) are attributed to the Late Triassic–Early Jurassic interval, 37% (seven sites) to the Early Cretaceous (Berriasian–Barremian), and the remaining 26% (five sites) to the Late Early Cretaceous (Aptian–Albian). No track localities are yet known from the Middle or Late Jurassic, marking a distinct stratigraphic gap in the regional ichnological record (Figure 2).

The Late Triassic–Early Jurassic interval exhibits the most recent growth in documented sites: about 29% (two sites) were identified in 2009 [2,5], while 71% (five sites) have been discovered since, reflecting intensified field activity and improved recognition of track-bearing horizons within the Upper Triassic Formations.

In contrast, most Early Cretaceous (Berriasian–Barremian) sites, namely 86% (six out of seven), were already known by 2009, indicating an earlier research emphasis on Phra Wihan and Sao Khua Formation exposures [2,3,4,5,10,11,12,13]. The Late Early Cretaceous (Aptian–Albian) record shows a more balanced pattern, with 60% of sites discovered before 2009 and 40% afterward, consistent with the continued exploration of Khok Kruat Formation deposits [2,5,10,14].

Overall, this distribution reflects both the exposure and accessibility of key lithostratigraphic units within the Khorat Group and the historical evolution of palaeontological research in northeastern Thailand, which has progressively expanded from the well-studied Lower Cretaceous successions to encompass older Triassic–Jurassic intervals and more peripheral outcrop regions (Table 1).

4. Results

4.1. Discovery and Conservations Patterns

Prior to the 2009 review, ten track localities were known, of which 36.4% were discovered by non-specialists, 18.1% by paraprofessionals, and 45.5% by professionals (

Table 2. Discovery profiles of Thailand’s vertebrate tracksites before and after 2009. Percentages indicate the proportion of sites within each category.

Discoverer Profile	Sites	%	Pre-2009	%	Post-2009	%
Made by non-specialist	7	36.8	4	36.4	3	37.5
Made by paraprofessional	3	15.8	2	18.1	1	12.5
Made by professional	9	47.4	5	45.5	4	50
Total	19		11		8

). This pattern reflects the predominance of systematic scientific fieldwork during the early phase of ichnological exploration, complemented by valuable local contributions, particularly in remote areas.

Since 2009, eight additional sites have been documented, with 37.5% discovered by non-specialists, 12.5% by paraprofessionals, and 50% by professionals (Table 2). The constant participation of local and regional actors underscores the effectiveness of long-term public outreach, training, and communication initiatives.

The overall distribution of preservation status is balanced but concerning: 10.5% of sites are classified as Level 1 (destroyed or lost), 36.9% as Level 2 (unprotected and at risk), 26.3% as Level 3 (partially protected), and 26.3% as Level 4 (under active management) (

Table 3. Conservation status of vertebrate tracksites in Thailand, categorized into four protection levels.

Protection Level	Status	Sites	%	Triassic/Jurassic	%	Early Cretaceous	%
Level 1	destroyed/lost	2	10.5	-	-	2	16.7
Level 2	unprotected/at risk	7	36.9	4	57.1	3	25
Level 3	partially protected	5	26.3	2	28.6	3	25
Level 4	active management	5	26.3	1	14.3	4	33.3
	Total	19		7		12

). This reflects progress driven by protected areas and museum initiatives (e.g., Phu Faek, Phu Kao), as well as increased familiarity with vertebrate tracks and the lithologies that preserve them. At the same time, it underscores the vulnerability of localities situated in quarries or along riverine exposures.

Among the seven Late Triassic–Early Jurassic sites, 57.1% receive minimal protection (Level 2), 28.6% are moderately protected (Level 3), and only 14.3% receive dedicated conservation (Level 4) (Figure 3B). In contrast, the Early Cretaceous localities show a more heterogeneous protection pattern, with a greater proportion of actively managed sites (33.3% Level 4) but also a measurable fraction of destroyed or lost sites (16.7% Level 1) (Table 3).

A comparative analysis reveals a shift in conservation status correlated with discovery date (

Table 4. Conservation status of Thailand’s vertebrate tracksites before and after 2009.

Protection Level	Status	Pre-2009	%	Post-2009	%
Level 1	destroyed/lost	1	9.1	1	12.5
Level 2	unprotected/at risk	3	27.3	4	50
Level 3	partially protected	2	18.2	3	37.5
Level 4	active management	5	45.5	-	-
	Total	11		8

). Pre-2009 sites were predominantly (45.5%) highly protected (Level 4) (Figure 4A), whereas post-2009 discoveries exhibit lower protection levels, with 50% minimally protected (Level 2), 37.5% moderately managed (Level 3), and none attaining Level 4.

4.2. The Huai Hin Lat Formation

The Huai Hin Lat Formation is part of the Kuchinarai Group and consists predominantly of non-marine fluvial–lacustrine deposits. The age of the formation is well constrained by both palynological and vertebrate fossil evidence. Based on these data, Racey et al. [15] and Racey & Goodall [16] proposed a Carnian to Norian age for the unit. Furthermore, Buffetaut & Suteethorn [17] noted that the vertebrate assemblages from this formation show close affinities to those of the Norian Stubensandstein (Löwenstein Formation) of southern Germany. To date, three distinct tracksites have been identified within the Huai Hin Lat Formation.

4.2.1. Tad Huai Nam Yai

The Tad Huai Nam Yai tracksite, located near Ban Na Po Song, Nam Nao District, Phetchabun Province, was discovered by local villagers in 2000. The site lies within the Huai Hin Lat Formation, which consists predominantly of fluvial–lacustrine sandstone and mudstone. Three vertebrate trackways occur as natural concave epirelief on a steep sandstone surface extending over 80–100 m. Mapping of the lower portions of the trackways was conducted during surveys in 2003, 2011, and 2021. Partial casts made in 2011 are housed at the Sirindhorn Museum, Kalasin Province, Thailand.

The tracks consist of elongated pes impressions measuring approximately 30–35 cm in length and 15 cm in width, characterized by prominent metapodial traces and three dominant digits (II–IV), with digits III and IV being the longest. Associated manus impressions are smaller, ranging from 15 to 20 cm in length and 10 to 15 cm in width. Lateral expansions in some tracks suggest reduced outer digits, and the digits display gentle curvature with internal convexity. The trackway is wide-gauge, with an inner pes trackway width of 25–30 cm and an outer width of 45–50 cm. No tail-drag marks are present, implying an elevated tail posture. These features indicate a large, plantigrade tetrapod with a broad gait and well-developed metatarsal impressions.

Based on track morphology and gauge, previous studies have interpreted the trackmakers as phytosaurs, supported by coeval skeletal remains from the same formation [18]. Klein & Lucas [19] attributed these tracks to Apatopus lineatus (Bock, 1952) [20]. Considering both the ichnological evidence and associated phytosaur cranial and dentary material from northeastern Thailand [21], we concur with a phytosaurian affinity for the trackmakers.

The Tad Huai Nam Yai tracksite constitutes one of the earliest ichnological records of vertebrate locomotion in Southeast Asia and represents the longest known Triassic vertebrate trackway in the region. It provides key evidence for basal archosaur locomotor diversity within the Indochina Terrane during the Late Triassic. The site remains partially exposed on a steep slope and, despite partial casting and museum replication, is vulnerable to erosion; continued monitoring and documentation are recommended to preserve this important ichnological heritage.

4.2.2. Tad Fa

The Tad Fa tracksite, located in Nam Nao District, Phetchabun Province, was discovered in 2022 by a local villager, who reported tridactyl tracks that were initially interpreted and publicized as theropod dinosaur tracks. The site lies within the Dat Fa Member of the Huai Hin Lat Formation and consists of sandstone interbedded with blackish-grey mudstone deposited in a half-graben fluvial–lacustrine basin [22,23].

During the 2022 field visit, three tracks were documented—two preserving four distinct digits (II–V) and one incomplete impression. The tracks measure approximately 18–19 cm in length and 17–18 cm in width. Follow-up work in 2023 revealed at least four trackways composed of narrow-gauge, bipedal, tetradactyl pes impressions without associated manus prints (Figure 3). Digit V is slender and bears a distinct claw trace, whereas digit I is absent. The trackways show a pace length of approximately 62 cm and a stride length of about 120 cm.

The track morphology excludes a theropod origin and is consistent with archosauriform or pseudosuchian trackmakers of the ichnofamily Chirotheriidae [24]. The configuration resembles Chirotherium, Brachychirotherium, or related ichnogenera typical of crurotarsan archosaurs. The plantigrade posture, tetradactyl pattern, and narrow gauge suggest a large archosaur moving across firm, subaerially exposed sediment. On current evidence, a phytosaur- or aetosaur-like archosauriform is the most plausible trackmaker, an interpretation consistent with the presence of phytosaur and aetosaurian vertebrate material currently under study at the Palaeontological Research Centre (PRC), Mahasarakham University [25].

The tracks formed on semi-indurated floodplain deposits within the Huai Hin Lat half-graben system. The combination of fluvial sandstones and overlying mudstones favored partial preservation of the impressions, though surface weathering continues to threaten exposure quality. Detailed morphometric and photogrammetric analysis is required to refine ichnotaxonomic identification and to document the site before further erosion.

4.2.3. Tad Yai

The Tad Yai tracksite, situated in Nam Nao District, Phetchabun Province, was discovered in 2023 by a geologist who recognized sauropod-like tracks. Subsequent investigations in 2024 revealed a total of 94 tracks preserved in concave epirelief, organized into six trackways representing three morphologically distinct vertebrate ichnotaxa. The tracks occur on greyish-brown mudstone of the Dat Fa Member from the Huai Hin Lat Formation.

The first ichnological group comprises 18 tracks, including 2 isolated prints and a trackway of 16 consecutive impressions. The tridactyl, mesaxonic tracks have digit III as the longest, with lengths ranging from 10 to 17 cm and divarication angles of about 35°. Several preserve distinct claw marks, consistent with referral to the ichnogenus Grallator. Mean track dimensions are 12.8 × 11.45 cm; estimated hip height ≈ 57.6 cm, body length ≈ 2.3 m, and running speed ≈ 22.9 km/h [26,27,28,29,30], although such speed estimates should be treated with caution given methodological limitations [31]. The second group includes four trackways attributed to large quadrupedal trackmakers. Individual tracks are rounded to subcircular, deeply impressed, and bordered by displacement rims (Figure 4). Manus prints are sometimes indistinct, and pes impressions may overstep them. When preserved, the manus exhibits a distinct oval to crescentic shape. The trackways occur on a ripple-marked sandstone surface bearing both true tracks and underprints and have been subsequently affected by modern weathering.

The third group consists of a single trackway comprising 29 tracks with pentadactyl manus and pes impressions. The pes impressions have a mean length of 16.9 cm and a mean width of 13.9 cm, whereas the manus impressions average 5.8 cm in length and 8.6 cm in width. The trackway exhibits a narrow-gauge with manus and pes placed close to the midline, and a mean pace angulation of approximately 150° (Figure 5). The pes oversteps the manus, and the tracks are outwardly rotated, with the pes showing a negative orientation relative to the trackway midline.

The Grallator-like tracks represent small bipedal theropods, while the large quadrupedal impressions correspond to Brontopodus-type sauropod trackmakers.

Although preservational masking and undertrack formation can obscure diagnostic characters and occasionally lead to confusion between early sauropodomorph and dicynodont-type tracks [32], several features support the tentative attribution of these trackways to a Brontopodus-like sauropod ichnotaxon. The presence of crescent-shaped manus impressions and a quadrupedal wide-gauge configuration is consistent with sauropodiform trackmakers [33,34]. The absence of clearly ectaxonic, pentadactyl manus–pes sets, together with the differentiated manus and pes morphology, further favors referral to a sauropod-type trackmaker. Although Brontopodus is generally regarded as no earlier than the Early Jurassic [35,36], its occurrence here would suggest that sauropodiform dinosaurs had already appeared in Thailand by the Late Triassic–Early Jurassic transition, consistent with reports of Isanosaurus from the overlying Nam Phong Formation [37,38,39].

The pentadactyl trackway is interpreted as the product of a chirotherian, indicating the persistence of non-dinosaurian archosaurs within the same assemblage.

The Tad Yai site records vertebrate activity on floodplain mudstones of the Dat Fa Member under alternating subaerial exposure and fluvial deposition. It captures a critical ecological shift from non-dinosaurian archosaur-dominated fauna toward increasingly dinosaur-dominated ecosystems typical of the Norian-Rhaetian interval [40,41,42]. As one of the most extensive Triassic track surfaces in Thailand, the site is highly significant but vulnerable to surface erosion; Comprehensive photogrammetric documentation and formal protection are strongly recommended to ensure the long-term preservation of this key ichnological resource.

4.3. The Nam Phong Formation

The Nam Phong Formation is a key lithostratigraphic unit of northeastern Thailand, recording continental sedimentation during the Late Triassic–Early Jurassic transition. Formerly included within the Khorat Group, its lower part was later distinguished based on its distinct stratigraphic architecture. The formation shows strong lateral thickness variations, thinning towards the western margin of the Khorat Basin where it is mainly exposed.

Lithologically, the Nam Phong Formation consists predominantly of resistant red-brown, micaceous sandstones ranging from fine-grained to conglomeratic, interbedded with siltstones and mudstones. Common sedimentary structures, including current ripples, cross-lamination, and plane-bed stratification, indicate deposition in fluvial systems dominated by channels, bars, and floodplains under semi-arid climatic conditions.

The formation is now subdivided into a Lower and an Upper Nam Phong Formation, separated by a regional unconformity related to the Indosinian III event. This subdivision is well supported by seismic data from the basin centre. The Lower Nam Phong Formation is generally assigned a Late Triassic (Rhaetian) age while the Upper Nam Phong Formation has a more debated age [16,23,43].

Available evidence suggests that the deposition of the Upper Nam Phong Formation may extend from the Early Jurassic into the Middle Jurassic [38]. Palynological data from subsurface wells support a Triassic–Jurassic transition hypothesis [16], although precise age constraints remain limited, and the Nam Phong is increasingly regarded as diachronous.

The stratigraphic type section of the Nam Phong Formation near the western margin of the Khorat Basin (Phu Kradung area) requires major revision. Recent geological mapping by the Department of Mineral Resources suggests that part of this section should be reassigned to the underlying Huai Hin Lat Formation [8], implying that exposed successions at the basin margin likely represent only the Upper Nam Phong Formation, while the Lower Nam Phong Formation is mainly recognised in seismic data. This reassessment has important implications for regional correlations and age assignments and highlights that interpretations of vertebrate fossil and ichnological records cannot be considered complete without a comprehensive stratigraphic revision of both parts of the formation.

4.3.1. Tha Song Khon

The Tha Song Khon tracksite is situated along the Nam Phong River, Ban Thung Yai, Phu Kradung District, Loei Province. It was discovered in 2007 by local villagers and occurs as concave epireliefs on a sandstone surface showing desiccation cracks and ripple marks. Stratigraphically, the trackway lies within the upper part of the Nam Phong Formation, near its debated contact with the Phu Kradung Formation, along the type section of both formations [8,44].

The preserved trackway comprises six tetradactyl, bipedal tracks bearing digits I–IV. Digit III is the longest, digits II and IV are subequal, and digit I (hallux) is distinctly impressed and oriented medially to posteromedially at around 90–100° to the axis of digit III. Individual tracks measure approximately 50 cm in length; stride length is 270 cm, giving an estimated hip height of around 245 cm. The tracks are bordered by marginal rims, indicating registration in soft, cohesive sediment that enhanced the preservation of both metatarsal and hallux impressions (Figure 6).

The combination of a semiplantigrade stance, strong medial hallux impression, and tetradactyl morphology indicates a large basal saurischian—likely a theropod—trackmaker. The tracks closely resemble those of the ichnogenus Gigandipus [45], traditionally linked to Eubrontes-grade theropods. However, the Thai specimen shows greater development and medial projection of digit I, suggesting either a distinct ichnotaxon or a variant gait within large basal theropods. Estimated total body length (around 6 m) supports interpretation as a robust, early theropod dinosaur rather than a non-sauropod sauropodomorph.

The Tha Song Khon tracks were formed on a moist but cohesive fluvial substrate within a channel-margin environment, later exposed and preserved as concave epireliefs. The occurrence provides the earliest known ichnological evidence of a large theropod-like dinosaur in mainland Southeast Asia, marking a key discovery near the Triassic–Jurassic transition. A detailed site map and cast replica are curated at the Sirindhorn Museum, Kalasin Province. The trackway surface remains partially exposed along the riverbank and requires continued monitoring and protective management to mitigate erosion.

4.3.2. Non Tum 1

The Non Tum 1 tracksite is located near Ban Non Tum village, Wang Chomphu Subdistrict, Nong Bua Daeng District, Chaiyaphum Province, northeastern Thailand. Tracks are preserved on a fine- to medium-grained sandstone slab of the Nam Phong Formation exposed along the bank of the Chi River. Discovered by local villagers in July 2008, the site contains more than 80 tracks preserved as concave epireliefs [46]. The track-bearing surface lies deep within the Upper Nam Phong Formation, about 650 m below the inferred contact with the overlying Phu Kradung Formation. Biostratigraphic data based on non-marine ostracods (Suchonellina sarytirmenensis) and palynological evidence indicate an Early Jurassic age (Pliensbachian or younger) [47].

The ichnoassemblage includes three morphologically distinct groups. The first group consists of five separate bipedal trackways comprising a total of 15 tridactyl footprints. Individual prints measure 33.9–38.3 cm in length and 20.8–26.3 cm in width. Digit III is consistently longer than digits II and IV, with a divarication angle of approximately 35°. Estimated hip height ranges between 166 and 188 cm.

The second group is represented by a single quadrupedal trackway composed of 10 tracks, of which 5 are well exposed. It displays subcircular pes impressions (3–4 digits) associated with crescent-shaped manus prints (4–5 digits), oriented toward the northwest (Figure 7). The pes measures on average 46.4 × 45.2 cm. Mean pace length are 209.5 cm and stride length 419.2 cm, yielding an inferred hip height of approximately 266.7 cm, an estimated body length of about 4.5 m, and a calculated walking speed of roughly 9.8 km/h.

The third group comprises an unusual quadrupedal trackway consisting of 64 didactyl impressions arranged in parallel manus–pes pairs (23 on the left and 41 on the right). The manus impressions average 11.2 × 22.9 cm, whereas the pes impressions average 18.5 × 23.6 cm. Stride length is approximately 146 cm. Each print shows two blunt anterior digits, with consistent angulation and no evidence of tail drag.

The tridactyl trackways of Group 1 correspond to Eubrontes, attributed to large theropod dinosaurs. Group 2 displays a wide-gauge quadrupedal gait with marked heteropody, typical of Brontopodus, and therefore represents sauropod trackmakers. Group 3 is distinctive in its didactyl, quadrupedal morphology and wide-gauge pattern, which may reflect buoyancy-modified locomotion. The reduced digit impression (didactyl condition) may result from only two anterior digits penetrating deeply enough into the substrate to register, while the remaining digits failed to leave preserved impressions due to reduced effective substrate contact under partially buoyant conditions. The discontinuous substrate contact suggests the possibility of a subaqueous or swimming-related trackway rather than purely terrestrial locomotion. Comparison with the locomotor model of Episcopopus ventrosus is consistent with, but does not uniquely require, interpretation as a large temnospondyl amphibian moving under shallow-water conditions [48,49]. Temnospondyl amphibians are already documented from the Upper Triassic Huai Hin Lat Formation of northeastern Thailand, including capitosaurids such as Cyclotosaurus [50]. Brachyopid temnospondyls are also recorded from the Upper Jurassic Phu Kradung Formation [51]. However, these body fossil occurrences are represented by relatively small specimens, and temnospondyl remains have not yet been recorded from the Nam Phong Formation. On this basis, the attribution of the tracks to temnospondyl trackmakers should be regarded as preliminary and open to alternative interpretations. The coexistence of Eubrontes-, Brontopodus-, and temnospondyl-type traces nonetheless indicates a diverse community of vertebrate trackmakers active spanning the Triassic–Jurassic boundary.

The site records activity on a floodplain or low-energy fluvial surface stabilized by microbial mats, producing firm but penetrable substrates. Located within the active channel of the Chi River, the track-bearing slabs are experiencing accelerated erosion due to changing hydrological conditions. High-resolution photogrammetric documentation and detailed sedimentological analyses should be prioritized to preserve the ichnological and palaeoecological value of this exceptional locality.

4.3.3. Huai Duk

The Huai Duk tracksite is located within the Phu Pha Daeng Wildlife Sanctuary, No Hunting Area, Lom Sak District, Phetchabun Province, northeastern Thailand. It was discovered in 2009 by a forest officer and examined during fieldwork in 2010. The tracks occur on an isolated sandstone block measuring approximately 1.5 × 2 m, tentatively assigned to the Upper Nam Phong Formation.

Four small didactyl tracks are preserved as concave epireliefs and can be arranged into two distinct trackways oriented in nearly opposite directions. Mean track dimensions are 11 cm in length and 8 cm in width, with an average pace length of 54 cm and overall trackway length of 40 cm. The slender, pointed digits show well-defined distal terminations and narrow interdigital angles, indicating a light, precise gait.

The Huai Duk tracks represent small didactyl impressions produced by a medium-sized, gracile bipedal archosaur. Morphological proportions and narrow gauge suggest a theropod-like affinity, possibly corresponding to a basal member of the Coelurosauria or similar agile archosauriform. These traces, briefly reported by Liard et al. [52], add to the growing number of didactyl morphotypes identified in Thai ichnofaunas from the Late Triassic–Early Jurassic interval.

Preserved on a detached sandstone slab within forested terrain, the Huai Duk tracks likely originated on a fine-grained fluvial substrate that later indurated and detached from its parent layer. Their didactyl morphology contributes to a broader pattern of ichnodiversity characterizing Thai Triassic–Jurassic transition assemblages. As the block remains isolated and exposed, detailed photogrammetric documentation is recommended to prevent definitive loss.

4.3.4. Non Tum 2

The Non Tum 2 site is located along the Chi River, upstream from the Non Tum 1 locality, within Wang Chomphu Subdistrict, Nong Bua Daeng District, Chaiyaphum Province. It was discovered during a joint geological and local survey conducted by boat in January 2022. The tracks occur as concave epireliefs on a sandstone bed of the Nam Phong Formation exposed mid-channel. Stratigraphically, this horizon lies roughly 500 m above the Ban Non Tum 1 level, representing an additional track-bearing interval within the Upper Nam Phong Formation, likely of Early Jurassic age.

Eight tracks are preserved on the sandstone surface, although only three are currently visible, with the remainder submerged by the river during the rainy season. The trackway records a wide-gauge, quadrupedal animal showing subcircular pes impressions measuring approximately 35 cm in length and 40 cm in width (preserving 3–4 digits), and crescent-shaped manus impressions measuring about 20 cm in length and 35 cm in width (preserving four digits). The overall track morphology indicates a large trackmaker with consistent pace and orientation. The combination of subcircular pes prints, crescentic manus impressions, and wide-gauge trackway pattern is characteristic of the ichnogenus Brontopodus, attributed to sauropod dinosaurs.

The Non Tum 2 tracks were impressed on firm, fine-grained sandstone deposited within a low-energy river channel or floodplain setting. The site adds a new stratigraphic level to the Nam Phong Formation’s ichnological record, documenting the rise of large sauropod trackmakers during the Early Jurassic. The track-bearing surface remains partially submerged and seasonally eroded; therefore, monitoring and photogrammetric documentation are recommended to prevent further loss of material.

4.4. The Phra Wihan Formation

The Phra Wihan Formation conformably overlies the Upper Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous Phu Kradung Formation and is itself overlain by the Lower Cretaceous Sao Khua Formation. The Phra Wihan deposits consist predominantly of sandstones and siltstones with intercalated claystone beds. Palynological data reported by Racey et al. [53] and subsequently confirmed by Racey and Goodall [16] indicate a Berriasian to early Barremian age for this unit.

The Phra Wihan Formation represents the principal dinosaur track-bearing unit in Thailand, with at least five known ichnite localities. These sites have yielded the highest number of dinosaur tracks currently known from the country, including tracks attributed to small theropods, primitive ornithopods, and possible sauropods. Particularly noteworthy are small quadrupedal ornithopod trackways described from the Hin Lat Pa Chad sites [6,54]. As noted by Le Loeuff et al. [6], the presence of ornithopod tracks in the Phra Wihan Formation suggests faunal affinities closer to those of the underlying Phu Kradung Formation. The latter has yielded remains of small ornithopods [55,56,57], in contrast to the overlying Sao Khua Formation, which-despite being the most bone-rich vertebrate-bearing unit in Southeast Asia-has not yet produced any ornithopod remains.

4.4.1. Hin Lat Pa Chad

The Hin Lat Pa Chad tracksite is situated within the hilly terrain of Phu Wiang National Park, a few kilometres from the well-known dinosaur bone localities of the Khon Kaen province. It was discovered in 1989 by a forest officer and geologists. The tracks occur as concave epireliefs on the upper surface of a fine- to medium-grained sandstone bed assigned to the Phra Wihan Formation (Lower Cretaceous).

Eight distinct trackways are preserved on the exposed sandstone surface, representing a diverse assemblage of small to medium-sized vertebrates. A small bipedal theropod trackway is characterized by tridactyl tracks measuring approximately 12 cm in length and 10 cm in width. Several quadrupedal trackways are attributable to small ornithopods, with pes impressions ranging from 10 to 13 cm in length and 8 to 12 cm in width, associated with smaller manus prints measuring 5–6 cm in length and 4–6 cm in width. A larger quadrupedal trackway, likely produced by a crocodilian trackmaker, displays tracks approximately 16 cm in length and 19.5 cm in width. In addition, a very small indeterminate trackway is present, with diminutive prints measuring 3–3.7 cm in length and 2.5–3 cm in width. The assemblage reflects a varied ichnofauna preserved on a single bedding plane.

The ornithopod tracks were initially described by Le Loeuff et al. and later assigned by Lockley et al. to the ichnogenus Neoanomoepus, a morphotype also known in the Lower Cretaceous of North America [6,54]. This correlation suggests a widespread radiation of small ornithopods during the Early Cretaceous and provides key biogeographical evidence linking Southeast Asian track assemblages to other Laurasian sites. The associated theropod trackway represents a small, agile biped consistent with early coelurosaur-grade trackmakers.

The track-bearing sandstone slab displays abundant meniscate burrows typical of the Scoyenia ichnofacies, indicating a floodplain mudflat environment periodically exposed and desiccated. The ichnological and sedimentological features together point to a low-energy, freshwater setting subject to intermittent drying. Cast replicas of the Hin Lat Pa Chad tracks are exhibited at both the Phu Wiang Dinosaur Museum and the Sirindhorn Museum. The original surface remains within the national park and benefits from protected status, though ongoing monitoring is advised to prevent surface degradation from weathering and vegetation cover.

4.4.2. Sai Yai

The Sai Yai Waterfall tracksite is located along the Sai Yai River near the boundary between Kabin Buri and Prachantakham districts, which are located in the northeastern part of Khao Yai National Park, Prachin Buri Province. The site was first reported by Polahan and Daorerk [58] and later redescribed by Lockley et al. [59]. The tracks occur as convex hyporeliefs on an isolated block of reddish-brown sandstone, interpreted as belonging to the Phra Wihan Formation (Lower Cretaceous) rather than to the Sao Khua or Phu Phan formations, as earlier proposed [2].

A total of eleven complete or partial tracks are preserved on the sandstone block, of which only four are complete. The complete tracks range from 14 to 30 cm in length and 11.5 to 25 cm in width. The tracks display tridactyl morphology, medium-sized, and mesaxonic symmetry, consistent with bipedal trackmakers. Preserved features include slender digits and distinct claw traces, although preservation quality varies among specimens. The tracks are visible as positive epireliefs, indicating they were infilled impressions subsequently exposed on the upper bedding surface.

Lockley et al. assigned the tracks to the ichnospecies Siamopodus khaoyaiensis based on a cast housed at Chulalongkorn University, which serves as the holotype and measures 30 cm in length and 25 cm in width. However, the holotype specimen is poorly preserved, and several diagnostic features remain indistinct, leaving the ichnotaxonomic definition of Siamopodus uncertain. A better-preserved cast of the original specimen is currently curated at the Khorat Fossil Museum, Nakhon Ratchasima, offering potential for re-examination and taxonomic revision.

The reddish-brown sandstone matrix and mode of preservation suggest a fluvial or overbank depositional setting under semi-arid conditions typical of the Phra Wihan Formation. The Sai Yai Waterfall site holds considerable ichnotaxonomic and stratigraphic importance as the type locality of Siamopodus khaoyaiensis. Renewed field surveys along the Sai Yai River are strongly recommended to relocate the original outcrop, recover additional material, and confirm its stratigraphic position within the Phra Wihan Formation. The known specimens are preserved in museum collections, but the original site remains unchecked and potentially lost.

4.4.3. Phu Faek

The Phu Faek tracksite is located within Phu Faek Forest Park, Na Khu District, Kalasin Province. It was discovered in 1996 by two schoolgirls in a seasonal riverbed and first described by Buffetaut et al. [11], with further documentation by Le Loeuff et al. [2,6]. The tracks are preserved as natural impressions (concave epireliefs) on a sandstone bed belonging to the Phra Wihan Formation (Lower Cretaceous).

The site preserves several theropod trackways and two isolated sauropod tracks. The first theropod morphotype (A) is characterized by tridactyl tracks measuring 38–43 cm in length and 34–40 cm in width. Digit III is consistently the longest (23–26 cm) and well-defined claw marks are present, indicating a large theropod.

The second theropod morphotype (B) consists of smaller tridactyl footprints attributed to one or more small theropod individuals. These tracks measure approximately 30 cm in footprint length and 30 cm in footprint width.

The sauropod material comprises two large, elongate pes impressions measuring approximately 52 × 40 cm, located upstream from the principal theropod trackways. Shallow depressions anterior to these prints may represent associated manus impressions. Although incomplete, these remains represent the first sauropod tracks recorded in Thailand (2002) [6].

A small sandstone block recovered from the same stream in 2023 bears minute archosaur footprints (around 1 cm long), highlighting additional ichnodiversity at the locality.

The tridactyl tracks are consistent with medium to large-sized theropod dinosaurs, potentially representing a mixed assemblage of morphologically distinct trackmakers. The large pes impressions with associated manus tracks are comparable to indeterminate Brontopodus-type sauropod tracks, confirming the presence of large sauropods in Lower Cretaceous Thailand.

Sedimentary structures on the track-bearing bed and overlying flagstone layers show abundant meniscate burrows typical of the Scoyenia ichnofacies, indicating low-energy fluvial to floodplain environments subject to episodic subaerial exposure and bioturbation. The Phu Faek site is of exceptional ichnological and heritage importance, representing the first locality in Thailand to yield both large theropod and sauropod tracks. It is officially protected under a conservation program and remains one of the most visited and best-known dinosaur tracksites in the country.

4.4.4. Mun Daeng

The Mun Daeng Waterfall tracksite is located near Ban Mun Khao within Phu Hin Rong Kla National Park, Dan Sai District, Loei Province. It was discovered in 2006 by a forest officer from the park. The tracks occur as concave epireliefs on fine-grained sandstone attributed to the Phra Wihan Formation (Lower Cretaceous). The track-bearing surface is exposed along a small stream within a forested valley setting.

Nineteen tridactyl, digitigrade tracks (digits II–IV) are preserved on the sandstone surface, forming at least four discernible trackways. Individual tracks measure 32–38 cm in length and 30–36 cm in width, with pace lengths ranging from 120 to 160 cm, corresponding to an estimated hip height of approximately 170 cm. Two morphotypes appear to be present: one showing relatively narrow digit divarication, the other broader, possibly reflecting different theropod trackmakers or variations in gait dynamics.

The tridactyl, mesaxonic morphology and digitigrade stance are characteristic of medium-sized theropod dinosaurs. Differences in track proportions and divarication angles suggest multiple individuals or taxa, potentially representing coexisting theropods of varying size or behavioral variation within a single species. These features are consistent with other Early Cretaceous theropod tracks attributed to Eubrontes- or Grallator-grade ichnotaxa within the Phra Wihan Formation.

The track-bearing sandstone represents deposition within a moderately high-energy fluvial system dominated by braided to meandering channels of the Phra Wihan Formation. The presence of well-defined tracks indicates brief episodes of subaerial exposure and substrate firming, possibly related to seasonal fluctuations in water level. Although partly affected by weathering and stream erosion, the Mun Daeng Waterfall site remains a significant ichnological locality and should be subject to periodic monitoring and 3D documentation to ensure preservation of the tracks in situ.

4.4.5. Ba Chad

The Ba Chad tracksite is located within Phu Faek Forest Park, Na Khu District, Kalasin Province, and lies stratigraphically within the Phra Wihan Formation (Lower Cretaceous). The site was discovered in January 2023 by a local villager and investigated during a subsequent field survey. The tracks occur as concave epireliefs on a weathered sandstone surface displaying ripple marks and fine bedding typical of fluvial floodplain deposits.

Nine tridactyl (mesaxonic) tracks are preserved, ranging from 21 to 30 cm in length and 17 to 30 cm in width. The prints exhibit elongate, slender digits II–IV with distinct claw impressions and moderate divarication angles (Figure 8). The tracks are arranged in four directional clusters, although no continuous trackway can be established. Estimated hip heights range from approximately 95 to 135 cm, indicating at least two trackmakers of differing size classes.

The tridactyl morphology, narrow digit proportions, and size range are consistent with medium-sized theropod dinosaurs, possibly coelurosaurs. These tracks are smaller than those at the nearby Phu Faek site and represent a distinct ichnofaunal component within the same stratigraphic interval. The inferred trackmakers may be related to small- to medium-bodied coelurosaurian taxa such as Phuwiangvenator yaemniyommi, Vayuraptor nongbualamphuensis, and Kinnareemimus khonkaenensis, known from the overlying Sao Khua Formation of northeastern Thailand [60,61].

The track-bearing sandstone surface was deposited under shallow fluvial to floodplain conditions, with periodic subaerial exposure evidenced by ripple marks and desiccation features. Although preservation is limited, the Ba Chad tracks reinforce the ichnological significance of the Phu Faek Forest Park area and contribute to a more complete picture of Early Cretaceous dinosaur diversity in northeastern Thailand. Continued conservation and documentation efforts within the park are essential to protect these valuable ichnological resources from natural weathering and visitor impact.

4.5. The Sao Khua Formation

The Sao Khua Formation consists predominantly of floodplain deposits composed of sandstone, siltstone, and mudstone, with frequent occurrences of calcrete horizons. Sedimentological evidence indicates deposition within a low-energy fluvial system, characterized by meandering channels and extensive floodplain environments. Although palynological data suggest a Berriasian to early Barremian age for the Sao Khua Formation and U–Pb dating of detrital zircons constrains deposition to no later than the mid–late Valanginian (≤133.6 Ma) [62], freshwater bivalves—particularly Pseudohyria (Matsumotoina) somanai—indicate a Late Barremian age for at least part of the formation [63,64]. The Sao Khua Formation represents the most fossiliferous stratigraphic unit in Thailand, yielding a highly diverse dinosaur assemblage, including sauropods, theropods [65].

4.5.1. Phu Kao

The Phu Kao tracksite is located within a seasonally dry riverbed in Phu Kao–Phu Phan Kham National Park, Ban Dong Bak, Non Sang District, Nong Bua Lamphu Province. It was discovered in February 2000 by the Thai–French Geological Mission. The track-bearing sandstone slab was originally assigned to the Phra Wihan Formation [2,5] but has since been reinterpreted as part of the Sao Khua Formation [66].

Eleven tridactyl tracks forming six discontinuous trackways are preserved as concave epireliefs on the sandstone surface. The tracks are mesaxonic (digits II–IV) and digitigrade, measuring 19–27 cm in width and 19–25 cm in length. Variations in pace and stride lengths suggest locomotion at moderate to relatively high speeds. The tridactyl morphology, narrow gauge, and consistent mesaxonic symmetry indicate small, agile theropods as the trackmakers.

The size range and proportions of the tracks are consistent with small theropod dinosaurs, potentially corresponding to taxa such as Vayuraptor nongbualamphuensis, known from skeletal remains within the same area [60]. The variable orientation and discontinuous arrangement of trackways suggest repeated passage of several individuals across a moist substrate, with subtle differences in stride length reflecting behavioral or speed variations rather than distinct ichnotaxa.

The track-bearing surface represents a moist but intermittently exposed floodplain or channel-margin environment within the Sao Khua Formation, where fluctuating hydrological conditions favored partial drying and track preservation. Despite minor surface disturbance related to nearby road construction, several footprints remain clearly visible. The site is maintained under the protection of the Department of Mineral Resources, which has established a small interpretive pavilion to facilitate educational access.

4.5.2. Nong Sung

The Nong Sung site is located along the road between the Nong Sung and Nikhom Kham Soi districts in Mukdahan Province, northeastern Thailand. The outcrop consists of displaced blocks of reddish sandstone moved during road construction activities. These sandstones belong to the Sao Khua Formation (Lower Cretaceous, Barremian) and are well known for preserving both vertebrate body fossils and ichnological material [67].

Tracks at Nong Sung were first recognized in July 2007 during fieldwork performed by the Sirindhorn Museum team, with confirmation and documentation following in December 2007. Numerous isolated tracks are preserved as convex epireliefs (natural casts) on bioturbated sandstone surfaces. The tracks are tridactyl, measuring 15–22 cm in length and 12–13 cm in width, and represent morphotypes consistent with medium-sized theropod dinosaurs. The tridactyl morphology, mesaxonic symmetry, and size variation indicate multiple theropod trackmakers, possibly coexisting within a dynamic fluvial–floodplain system. Smaller tracks resemble Grallator-grade ichnites, while larger examples are comparable to Eubrontes-type forms.

The track-bearing sandstones exhibit intense bioturbation and are interpreted as overbank or floodplain deposits periodically exposed and colonized by vertebrates. The friable nature of the rock has led to severe weathering; most exposed blocks have been lost or are heavily overgrown. Two slabs containing well-preserved tracks are curated at the Sirindhorn Museum, while the remaining in situ material is effectively destroyed or at imminent risk. The site underscores the vulnerability of surface tracksites in unconsolidated sandstones and highlights the need for early conservation action upon discovery.

4.6. The Phu Phan Formation

The Phu Phan Formation consists predominantly of conglomeratic and coarse-grained sandstones, reflecting deposition within a high-energy fluvial system. It conformably overlies the Sao Khua Formation and is itself overlain by the Aptian–Albian Khok Kruat Formation. Based on stratigraphic relationships and palynological evidence, the Phu Phan Formation is considered to be younger than the early Barremian [16].

4.6.1. Phu Luang

The Phu Luang tracksite is located within the Phu Luang Wildlife Sanctuary, Phu Ruea District, Loei Province, and holds historical importance as the earliest discovery of dinosaur tracks in Southeast Asia. The site was first documented by Buffetaut et al. [3,4]. The tracks are preserved as concave epireliefs on a sandstone slab attributed to the Phu Phan Formation.

Fifteen tridactyl tracks are preserved on the exposed sandstone surface. The tracks range from 32 to 37 cm in length and 23 to 29 cm in width and they display mesaxonic symmetry, with elongate central digits and distinct claw impressions (Figure 9). Their overall proportions indicate large, bipedal, digitigrade theropods. Although detailed morphometric data were not recorded at the time of discovery, the uniformity of the track dimensions and consistent tridactyl configuration support interpretation as a single morphotype produced under similar substrate conditions.

The Phu Luang tracks were originally attributed to large theropods of the “carnosaur” type, following the terminology used at the time of their description. This classification predates modern ichnotaxonomic revisions and should be reassessed within the framework of large theropod ichnogenera such as Megalosauripus and related morphotypes recognized from the Early Cretaceous of Asia [68]. The size, digit proportions, and lack of metatarsal impressions are indeed consistent with Megalosauripus-grade tracks produced by robust theropods occupying high trophic niches.

The track-bearing sandstone represents fluvial to overbank deposition within the Phu Phan Formation, consistent with the floodplain settings typical of northeastern Thailand’s Lower Cretaceous basins. The original site, located along an elephant migration route, has suffered surface erosion and physical disturbance, and its present preservation state is uncertain. High-quality cast replicas of the track slab are curated at the Sirindhorn Museum, Kalasin Province, providing a valuable record for renewed ichnotaxonomic and paleoecological analysis of large theropod tracks from the Early Cretaceous of Southeast Asia.

4.6.2. Phu Hin Rong Kla

The Phu Hin Rong Kla tracksite is located within Phu Hin Rong Kla National Park, Phitsanulok Province. The site was initially discovered during the 2010s as a single small theropod track by visitors to the park. The track-bearing surface is a flat sandstone bed forming a rock prairie near a tourist camp, in an area formerly used as a helipad and subject to seasonal flooding. According to the 2023 geological map, the site occurs within typical lithologies of the Phu Phan Formation (Lower Cretaceous).

Field investigations conducted in 2024 documented a total of 20 tracks, preserved as concave epireliefs and organized into four trackways and two isolated tracks. The tracks occur on a broad, laterally extensive surface associated with abundant burrows characteristic of the Scoyenia ichnofacies. Two trackways consist of medium-sized tridactyl tracks measuring 19.5–24 cm in length and approximately 14 cm in width, with well-defined digit impressions (Figure 10). Two isolated tridactyl tracks are slightly larger and more gracile, ranging from 22 to 32 cm in length and 16 to 23 cm in width. The remaining two tridactyl trackways display relatively blunt digit terminations and broader digit proportions, with tracks measuring 22–36 cm in length and 20–24 cm in width.

Two of the tridactyl trackways are attributable to medium-sized theropod dinosaurs and are comparable to Eubrontes-grade ichnites. The two isolated tridactyl prints likely represent smaller theropods referable to Grallator-grade morphotypes. The remaining trackways, characterized by blunt digits and broader track outlines, are tentatively assigned to small ornithopods and compared with the ichnogenus Caririchnium. Given the extent of the surface and variability in preservation, these ichnotaxonomic assignments remain preliminary and require detailed morphometric analysis.

The track-bearing sandstone represents a floodplain surface subject to repeated subaerial exposure and seasonal inundation, as indicated by the association with Scoyenia ichnofacies burrows. The extensive nature of the exposed surface suggests repeated vertebrate activity under fluctuating substrate conditions. Although the site lies within a protected national park, its proximity to tourist infrastructure and former use as a helipad pose potential conservation concerns. Comprehensive mapping, photogrammetric documentation, and controlled access are recommended before further interpretive or taxonomic conclusions are drawn.

4.7. The Khok Kruat Formation

The Khok Kruat Formation consists predominantly of sandstones, conglomerates, siltstones, and shales with intermittent palaeosol horizons, reflecting deposition in a fluvial system with channel and overbank facies. Palynological and vertebrate evidence indicates an Aptian–Albian age for the formation [16,69]. Dinosaur tracks from this unit have been documented in both northeastern Thailand and adjacent areas of Laos, yielding a diverse ichnofauna-including tracks of advanced iguanodontids and various theropods-and providing a unique perspective on Late Early Cretaceous dinosaur communities in continental Southeast Asia.

4.7.1. Huai Dan Chum

The Huai Dan Chum tracksite is in Tha Uthen District, Nakhon Phanom Province, northeastern Thailand, along Highway 212 approximately 15 km north of Tha Uthen. The site was discovered in 2001 by Nares Sattayarak (Department of Mineral Resources) during quarrying activities, where sandstone blocks were extracted for riverbank stabilization. The track-bearing strata belong to the Khok Kruat Formation (Lower Cretaceous, Aptian–Albian) and consist of fine- to medium-grained fluvial sandstones exposed both as displaced slabs and in situ bedding surfaces.

Initial finds comprised displaced sandstone slabs bearing small tridactyl tracks attributed to theropod dinosaurs [70]. Subsequent excavation in 2003 and 2004 revealed an extensive in situ track surface preserving more than 200 vertebrate tracks, later expanded to over 800 documented tracks following further excavation in 2007. The assemblage includes multiple parallel trackways dominated by small tridactyl theropod tracks preserved as concave epireliefs, suggesting repeated passage of individuals or small groups moving in similar directions. Two tracks preserved as convex hyporeliefs exhibit didactyl morphology. A distinct ornithopod trackway of four well-preserved tridactyl tracks with broad, rounded digits is also present, along with small crocodyliform tracks.

Most dinosaur tracks are attributable to small theropod dinosaurs, including Grallator- and Eubrontes-grade morphotypes, several of which have been referred to the ichnogenus Asianopodus [71]. Early Cretaceous Thai theropod tracks display considerable morphological variability, expressed in size, interdigital divarication, and degrees of mesaxony and robustness. This variability may suggest a continuum of tridactyl morphologies rather than clearly discrete ichnotaxa; however, this interpretation remains tentative and requires validation through quantitative morphometric analyses. In this context, future ichnotaxonomic revision of Thai Early Cretaceous theropod tracks should explicitly test this hypothesis using robust statistical approaches, as comparable ranges of morphological variation have been noted in Asian assemblages by Xing and Lockley [72], encompassing forms traditionally referred to Grallator, Anchisauripus, Eubrontes, and regionally common morphotypes such as Asianopodus. The didactyl tracks may reflect deinonychosaurian trackmakers, although poor preservation precludes definitive assignment [73,74]. The ornithopod trackway closely resembles Caririchnium-type tracks known from the Early Cretaceous of East Asia [71] and is provisionally referred to that ichnogenus. Small crocodyliform tracks assigned to Batrachopus [75] further expand the ichnodiversity of the assemblage and indicate the presence of semi-aquatic archosaurs.

The ichnoassemblage reflects vertebrate activity on low-energy fluvial to floodplain substrates within the Khok Kruat Formation, with conditions favorable for track preservation during episodes of subaerial exposure. Huai Dan Chum represents one of the most diverse and best-preserved Lower Cretaceous vertebrate tracksites in Southeast Asia. It was the first track locality officially registered and protected under Thailand’s Fossil Protection Act [76]. A protective structure and on-site museum have been constructed, and detailed maps and cast replicas of the principal track-bearing slabs are curated at the Sirindhorn Museum, Kalasin Province. Despite these protective measures, the site has undergone noticeable surface deterioration over time. Fine anatomical details clearly visible during the initial documentation phase are now significantly degraded, highlighting the intrinsic fragility of the exposed surfaces and the challenges of preserving such sites over the long term.

4.7.2. Ban Nong Sa Rai

The Ban Nong Sa Rai tracksite was located within an active sandstone quarry in Tha Uthen District, Nakhon Phanom Province, approximately 2 km east of the Huai Dan Chum site. The track-bearing strata belong to the Khok Kruat Formation (Lower Cretaceous, Aptian–Albian) and occur within the same stratigraphic interval as the Huai Dan Chum ichnoassemblage. The tracks were preserved on fine- to medium-grained fluvial sandstones exposed during quarrying operations.

The site was first noted in 2010 by R. Liard, who documented a single track tentatively attributable to Caririchnium, preserved in association with ripple marks. This track measures 23 cm in length and 21 cm in width. In 2018, following the cessation of quarrying activities, geologists from the Department of Mineral Resources (DMR) identified several additional tridactyl dinosaur footprints preserved as both convex hyporeliefs and concave epireliefs. Among these, tracks referable to Eubrontes measure approximately 20 cm in length and 14 cm in width. The best-preserved tracks display mesaxonic morphology and proportions consistent with medium-sized bipedal dinosaurs. Fragmentary vertebrate bone material was also observed on a sandstone block during the 2018 visit.

The tridactyl tracks are morphologically comparable to Eubrontes-grade theropod ichnotaxa, although limited exposure and rapid loss of the track-bearing surfaces prevented detailed morphometric analysis and definitive ichnotaxonomic assignment. The single track initially interpreted as Caririchnium suggests the possible presence of ornithopod trackmakers, consistent with the mixed theropod–ornithopod assemblages documented at the nearby Huai Dan Chum site. The associated bone fragments further indicate vertebrate activity within the same depositional system.

The tracks were impressed on fluvial sandstone surfaces bearing ripple marks, indicative of shallow-water channel or floodplain settings subject to periodic subaerial exposure. Despite its ichnological significance, the Ban Nong Sa Rai site was destroyed shortly after documentation, as the track-bearing layers were removed and reused as embankment material during quarry operations. This loss highlights the extreme vulnerability of ichnological sites in active industrial contexts and underscores the urgent need for rapid-response documentation protocols, legal protection mechanisms, and emergency funding to safeguard palaeontological resources within the Khok Kruat Formation and comparable settings.

4.7.3. Lam Pao

The Lam Pao tracksite is located on the active spillway of the Lam Pao Dam in Mueang District, Kalasin Province, northeastern Thailand. The exposed strata belong to the Khok Kruat Formation (Lower Cretaceous, Aptian–Albian), which is well known for yielding a rich microvertebrate assemblage, including dinosaur and crocodyliform teeth, turtle shell fragments, shark teeth, and ganoid fish remains [69,77,78]. Notable material from the site includes an incomplete lanceolate atoposaurid tooth with faint parallel ridges and crenulated carinae, spinosaurid teeth, large ganoid scales, and a distinctive button-like ginglymodian tooth.

During a field excursion associated with the 6th International Palaeontological Congress (2022), a new vertebrate ichnological occurrence was identified at the site. The tracks are preserved as concave epireliefs on a fine-grained sandstone block and consist of two tridactyl impressions (Figure 11). The best-preserved track (interpreted as a pes) measures 33 cm in length and 25 cm in width, with individual digit lengths of approximately 15–17–15 cm. A second, less distinct impression preserves only the distal portions of two digits. The distance between the two impressions is approximately 67 cm.

The well-preserved track displays broad, rounded digits and a low divarication angle, features consistent with an ornithopod affinity. On this basis, the track is tentatively attributed to an iguanodontian-grade trackmaker and shows close similarity to the ichnogenus Caririchnium [79], which is widely reported from Lower Cretaceous deposits across Asia [80,81,82]. Although ornithopod skeletal remains are relatively common in the Khok Kruat Formation, ichnological evidence for this group remains scarce, making this occurrence particularly significant.

The track-bearing sandstone was deposited in a low-energy fluvial or floodplain setting within the Khok Kruat Formation, consistent with the sedimentological context inferred from the associated microvertebrate assemblage. The Lam Pao ichnite provides rare ichnological confirmation of ornithopod activity in these ecosystems and complements the body-fossil record. However, its location on an active dam spillway exposes the site to ongoing erosion and anthropogenic disturbance. Prompt documentation and potential relocation or casting of the track are therefore recommended to ensure long-term preservation of this important ichnological record.

5. Discussion

5.1. Ichnodiversity and Evolutionary Patterns

The ichnological record from Upper Triassic to Lower Jurassic deposits of northeastern Thailand reveal a diverse assemblage of vertebrate trace fossils that documents a major faunal transition across the Triassic–Jurassic boundary in Southeast Asia. The stratigraphically lowest tracksite, at Tad Yai, preserves a mixed assemblage including Chirotheriidae, Grallator-type, and Brontopodus-like tracks, illustrating the early co-occurrence of non-dinosaurian archosaurs and basal dinosaurs during the Norian (Figure 12). This association provides one of the earliest indications of dinosaur dispersal into Tropical Asia.

Other Norian sites, such as Tad Huai Nam Yai and Tad Fa, are dominated by Chirotheriidae tracks characterized by broad, short impressions and a strong outward rotation of the pes. These morphologies differ from the typically narrower and more elongate European Chirotheriidae, suggesting regional variation possibly linked to substrate conditions or to distinct archosaur trackmakers, most plausibly phytosaurs or other pseudosuchian archosauriforms [24,41]. Such taxa were abundant in fluvial and floodplain settings of the Upper Triassic, and their occurrence in Thailand represents the southeasternmost record of chirotheriid ichnites in Asia, extending the known palaeogeographic range of this group along the south-eastern margin of Laurasia.

Younger sites, including Tha Song Khon and the two Ban Non Tum localities, attributed to the Rhaetian to possibly Pliensbachian, document the emergence and diversification of tridactyl and large quadrupedal dinosaur tracks (Figure 12). At these sites, the Grallator–Eubrontes continuum records small to large theropod or basal saurischian trackmakers, while associated Brontopodus-type tracks indicate the presence of early sauropod or sauropodomorph dinosaurs. The Gigandipus-like morphotype from Tha Song Khon, characterized by a pronounced medially directed hallux impression, reflects a more primitive pedal configuration that foreshadows the Eubrontes morphotype observed at the younger Ban Non Tum 1 locality. Together, these assemblages mark a significant faunal and ichnological turnover from non-dinosaurian archosaur-dominated communities of the Late Triassic to dinosaur-dominated ichnofaunas of the Early Jurassic in Southeast Asia.

In contrast, the Early Cretaceous ichnological record of the Khorat Group documents a consistent dominance of theropod tracks across a range of fluvial and overbank depositional environments (Table 2). Small to medium tridactyl tracks, attributable to gracile coelurosaur-grade theropods, occur at multiple sites including Ba Chad, Phu Kao, Nong Sung, and Mun Daeng. Larger theropod ichnites, such as those from Phu Faek, Phu Luang, and Phu Hin Rong Kla, further attest to the persistence of apex predators within these ecosystems.

Toward the Aptian–Albian interval, the progressive expansion and diversification of ornithopod trackmakers becomes evident (Figure 12). Smaller quadrupedal traces referred to Neoanomoepus at the Hin Lat Pa Chad site, together with well-preserved Caririchnium-type tracks from Huai Dan Chum, Ban Nong Sa Rai, and Lam Pao, document the increasing abundance and ecological breadth of ornithopods during this time. Collectively, these ichnological patterns align with the broader Mesozoic faunal turnover in Southeast Asia, marking a transition from predominantly theropod- and sauropod-dominated assemblages of the Early Cretaceous to more taxonomically and ecologically diverse dinosaur communities later in the period.

5.2. Palaeoecological and Environmental Patterns

The oldest Thai tracksites, preserved within the Huai Hin Lat and Nam Phong formations, record palaeoecosystems structured around a diverse assemblage of non-dinosaurian archosauriforms and early dinosaurs. Chirotheriidae tracks, attributed to large pseudosuchians or phytosaurs, dominate many surfaces and reflect the ecological prominence of semi-terrestrial archosaurs occupying fluvial and floodplain environments. These tracks co-occur with Grallator-, Eubrontes-, and Brontopodus-like tracks produced by early saurischians and sauropodomorphs, indicating the presence of dinosaurs within ecosystems still largely structured by non-dinosaurian archosaurs. Together, these assemblages capture a critical ecological transition across the Triassic–Jurassic boundary, marking a shift from archosaur-dominated to increasingly dinosaur-dominated terrestrial communities [83].

Within this transitional context, the Gigandipus-like morphotype from Tha Song Khon, characterized by a strongly medially directed hallux, reflects a functional and biomechanical intermediary between classical chirotheriid trackmakers and the Eubrontes morphotype that becomes prevalent in younger assemblages. This pedal configuration suggests experimentation in locomotor strategies during a period of ecological restructuring, as dinosaurs began to occupy niches previously dominated by other archosaurs. The occurrence of a large, enigmatic didactyl trackway at Ban Non Tum 1, plausibly produced by a partially buoyant temnospondyl amphibian, further underscores the persistence of basal tetrapods within Late Triassic ecosystems of Southeast Asia, highlighting the ecological complexity and taxonomic heterogeneity of these transitional environments.

Early Cretaceous tracksites of the Phra Wihan to Khok Kruat formations record a markedly different palaeoecological structure, characterized by sustained theropod dominance across a range of fluvial, floodplain, and overbank depositional settings. Small to medium-sized tridactyl tracks attributable to gracile theropods indicate widespread occupation of terrestrial predator niches, while the continued presence of large theropod tracks attests to the persistence of apex predators within these ecosystems. Alongside this theropod dominance, the progressive expansion of ornithopod trackmakers reflects increasing ecological partitioning and herbivore diversification during the Early Cretaceous.

Small quadrupedal traces assigned to Neoanomoepus in the Phra Wihan Formation represent early stages of ornithopod ecological expansion, preceding the appearance of more advanced iguanodontian-grade Caririchnium tracks in the Khok Kruat Formation. These ichnites document a shift toward larger, alternately quadrupedal herbivores capable of exploiting a broader range of substrates and habitats. Their close similarity to contemporaneous ichnofaunas from Japan, Korea and China indicates strong palaeoecological continuity across East and Southeast Asia during the Aptian–Albian [79,80,84,85,86]. The presence of didactyl and crocodyliform tracks within the same formations further supports the persistence of diverse semi-aquatic and terrestrial guilds, reinforcing the interpretation of structurally complex and environmentally stable ecosystems during this interval.

5.3. Palaeobiogeography

The Mesozoic vertebrate track record of Thailand, spanning the Late Triassic to the Late Early Cretaceous within the Khorat Group, occupies a pivotal palaeogeographical position for interpreting continental vertebrate evolution in Southeast Asia. Located along the equatorial margin of the Indochina Terrane, Thailand provides the most continuous and best-documented low-latitude ichnological record in the region, offering a critical tropical counterpart to the more extensively studied, higher-latitude ichnofaunas of China, Korea, and Japan.

Comparative data from neighboring regions highlight both the uniqueness and the regional significance of the Thai record. In the Mesozoic of Cambodia, vertebrate evidence remains sparse, with only unverified reports of dinosaur tracks and a single confirmed Early Cretaceous sauropod body fossil [87,88,89]. These fragmentary signals contrast sharply with Thailand, where systematic documentation has revealed multiple track-rich formations. In Laos, however, confirmed dinosaur tracks from the top of the so-called “Grès Supérieurs Formation” at Muong Phalane-equivalent in age to Thailand’s Khok Kruat Formation-include sauropod, theropod, and large ornithopod tracks that closely mirror Thai Early Cretaceous ichnofaunas, supporting faunal continuity across the eastern extension of the Khorat Plateau [90].

Further south, ichnological data from Peninsular Malaysia and Singapore remain extremely limited but nonetheless informative. A large trackway from Kelantan, tentatively interpreted as sauropod in origin, indicates that track preservation may occur within suitable sedimentary contexts in Sundaland [91,92]. In Singapore, a rare didactyl dinosaur-like track from the Upper Triassic Jurong Formation provides a critical low-latitude datapoint broadly contemporaneous with the Late Triassic Thai record, reinforcing the regional extent of early dinosauriform activity across mainland and adjacent Southeast Asia [93].

In contrast, East Asia (China, Korea, and Japan) preserves some of the most diverse and intensively studied Mesozoic ichnofaunas globally, including abundant theropod, sauropod, ornithopod, avian, crocodyliform, turtle, and choristoderan tracks present across a wide range of depositional environments [85,94,95]. The apparent absence of avian and specialized aquatic vertebrate traces in Thailand likely reflects a combination of depositional bias and preservation potential, rather than true faunal absence. Thai tracksites are overwhelmingly associated with fluvial and overbank deposits characteristic of the Scoyenia ichnofacies [96,97], which preferentially preserve large terrestrial dinosaur tracks, whereas lacustrine and marginal-marine systems common in East Asia favor the preservation of smaller and more delicate traces.

Viewed in this regional framework, Thailand emerges as a key palaeobiogeographic bridge. Its ichnological record documents the southeasternmost occurrence of chirotheriid tracks in Asia, significantly extending the known distribution of non-dinosaurian archosauriforms during the Late Triassic, and provides some of the earliest evidence for dinosaur dispersal into equatorial regions. By recording successive phases of archosaur- and dinosaur-dominated ichnofaunas, the Thai sequence constrains dispersal pathways and faunal continuity between South, Southeast, and East Asia, emphasizing the role of lowland fluvial systems as major corridors for terrestrial vertebrate movement throughout the Mesozoic.

Taken together, regional comparisons demonstrate that Thailand’s ichnological significance lies not in taxonomic novelty alone but in its capacity to document evolutionary transitions, dispersal dynamics, and ecosystem structure in tropical continental settings that remain underrepresented in the global footprint record.

5.4. Limitations and Preservation Biases

The Thai vertebrate track record spans the Norian to the Aptian–Albian and captures key evolutionary phases, including the transition from archosaur-dominated assemblages to dinosaur-dominated ecosystems and the subsequent diversification of ornithopods. However, this record is discontinuous. Unlike several regions of East Asia where Middle–Upper Jurassic track-bearing strata are preserved within basin or accretionary successions [98,99,100,101], Thailand has not yet yielded confirmed ichnological localities of this age, resulting in an apparent stratigraphic gap between the Triassic–Jurassic transition and the Early Cretaceous in the current ichnological record. This hiatus may partly reflect a genuine stratigraphic discontinuity, as previously proposed for part of the Jurassic succession [16,23], or, more likely, a preservational and depositional bias within the Phu Kradung Formation. In particular, the lower part of this unit is dominated by alluvial floodplain deposits with well-developed palaeosols (e.g., caliche nodules) and pedogenic overprinting, conditions that are generally unfavorable to the preservation of vertebrate footprints. In addition, the overall coarsening-upward trend of the formation suggests that substrate conditions may have been less conducive to track registration and preservation during this interval of deposition. This apparent hiatus limits direct assessment of faunal continuity and evolutionary trajectories through a critical interval of global dinosaur diversification. Nevertheless, despite this gap, the Thai succession remains the most complete Mesozoic ichnological record presently known from Tropical Asia. This ichnological record is further complemented by body fossil occurrences from southern Thailand and from the upper part of the Upper Phu Kradung Formation.

Documentation quality represents a further constraint. Many Early Cretaceous tracksites were recorded prior to the widespread adoption of high-resolution digital methods and are known primarily from field sketches, measurements, casts, or limited photographic documentation. As a result, subtle morphological features, extramorphological variation, and intra-trackway variability are difficult to reassess using modern standards. Comprehensive re-evaluation of these sites using standardized photogrammetric acquisition, quantitative morphometrics, and digital archiving is therefore essential to refine ichnotaxonomic assignments and to evaluate accurately the morphospace occupied by theropod and ornithopod trackmakers within the Khorat Group.

In comparison with East Asian ichnological records, which document a broader ecological spectrum including avian, pterosaur, and specialized semi-aquatic or aquatic reptile tracks (e.g., Koreanaornis, Novapes ulsanensis), the Thai record is notably restricted to terrestrial dinosaurs and crocodyliforms [102,103]. This disparity likely reflects a combination of depositional bias, taphonomic filtering, sampling intensity, and the historical predominance of dinosaur-focused research, rather than a simple absence of these clades from Thai ecosystems. Many Thai tracksites formed in fluvial channel margins and overbank settings favorable to large terrestrial trackmakers but less conducive to preserving delicate avian or pterosaur traces. Despite these limitations, the Thai ichnological record provides uniquely valuable insight into the early establishment, ecological dominance, and subsequent diversification of continental dinosaur faunas in tropical Southeast Asia, offering critical constraints on faunal provinciality and dispersal pathways along the south-eastern margin of Laurasia.

5.5. Conservation Implications

The observed discovery and preservation patterns underscore the interdependence of structured scientific research and sustained community engagement in building a robust ichnological record. While professional fieldwork has historically driven the identification and documentation of vertebrate tracksites in Thailand, the increasing role of local villagers and forest rangers highlights the effectiveness of long-term outreach, education, and institutional visibility. The establishment of local field museums (e.g., Phu Faek, Phu Kao) and regional research hubs (e.g., Sirindhorn Museum, Phu Wiang Dinosaur Museum, Mahasarakham and Khon Kaen Universities) has facilitated rapid reporting of new discoveries. These networks now constitute a critical component of Thailand’s ichnological research infrastructure.

Institutional visibility and public engagement have further amplified this effect. Cohen documents how dinosaurs [104], and by extension fossil sites, have become embedded in regional identity, educational programs, and tourism strategies, particularly in northeastern Thailand. Notably, this process of cultural integration unfolded over a remarkably short timespan, with dinosaurs transitioning from imported scientific imagery to widely recognized regional symbols within just a few decades [105]. This cultural integration, reinforced by national media coverage and state-supported heritage initiatives, has increased public awareness and legitimacy of palaeontological research, encouraging rapid reporting of new discoveries and reducing the likelihood that sites remain unnoticed or undocumented. The increasing proportion of ichnological sites reported by non-specialists since 2009 reflects the maturation of these informal reporting networks, which now operate as an essential complement to formal scientific surveys.

From a conservation perspective, the results reveal a pronounced stratigraphic and sedimentological bias in site conservation and curation. Late Triassic tracksites, typically preserved in friable, poorly indurated sandstones and siltstones, yield exceptionally diverse and morphologically informative track assemblages (including tridactyl, tetradactyl, and didactyl forms), yet are acutely vulnerable to fluvial erosion, weathering, and substrate collapse. This combination of high scientific value and low geological resilience renders the Late Triassic ichnological record the most threatened component of Thailand’s vertebrate track heritage. In contrast, Early Cretaceous tracksites within the more indurated Phra Wihan and Khok Kruat formations exhibit greater physical durability but remain susceptible to surface exfoliation and degradation under tropical climatic conditions, particularly where sites intersect with quarrying, infrastructure development, or river management.

These findings emphasize the necessity of integrating ichnological research with proactive conservation strategies. Enhanced monitoring of known sites, rapid-response documentation of newly exposed surfaces, and timely legal protection are especially critical for Triassic localities and sites discovered in dynamic or anthropogenic settings. More broadly, the data advocates for continuous, anticipatory conservation policies, in which survey and digital documentation are prioritized.

6. Conclusions

This review synthesizes more than three decades of vertebrate ichnological research in Thailand, documenting a spatially expanding and temporally significant track record essentially hosted in the Khorat Plateau. From early discoveries concentrated in Khon Kaen and Kalasin provinces, documented tracksites have progressively expanded toward the western and eastern margins of the plateau, including Phetchabun and Nakhon Phanom. The compiled dataset comprises 19 vertebrate tracksites distributed across six formations spanning the Late Triassic (Norian) to the Late Early Cretaceous (Aptian–Albian), representing the most complete ichnological record currently available from Tropical Southeast Asia.

Despite a pronounced stratigraphic gap in the Middle–Late Jurassic, the Thai track record captures a coherent narrative of faunal and ecological change. Late Triassic assemblages record communities dominated by non-dinosaurian archosaurs (Chirotheriidae) co-occurring with early dinosaurs, documenting one of the earliest phases of dinosaur dispersal into equatorial regions. These are followed by Early Jurassic dinosaur-dominated ichnofaunas and the progressive expansion and ecological diversification of ornithopods during the Aptian–Albian, reflected by the increasing prevalence of Caririchnium-type trackways. Palaeobiogeographically, Thailand occupies a key low-latitude position, representing the southeasternmost occurrence of chirotheriid ichnites in Asia and forming a spatial bridge between the Early Mesozoic faunas of China and younger Cretaceous ichnofaunas of Laos, Korea, and Japan.

The review also underscores significant methodological and preservation challenges. Many Early Cretaceous sites were documented using legacy methods, while friable Upper Triassic substrates remain particularly vulnerable to erosion and irreversible loss. The systematic re-documentation of both legacy and newly discovered sites using standardized three-dimensional workflows is therefore essential to refine ichnotaxonomic interpretations, quantify morphospace occupation, and ensure long-term reproducibility.

Looking forward, key priorities include the targeted exploration to resolve the Jurassic gap, the expansion of ichnological surveys to encompass more delicate track types (e.g., avian and pterosaurian), and continued support for community-based reporting networks that now play a critical role in site discovery. Overall, the Thai vertebrate track record constitutes a unique and irreplaceable archive of Mesozoic life at low latitudes. Safeguarding this heritage will require sustained collaboration between academic institutions, governmental agencies, protected-area authorities, and local communities, integrating standardized documentation, institutional support, and public engagement to advance ichnology as a mature and integrative discipline within Southeast Asian vertebrate palaeontology.