Introduction: Propofol is a widely used sedative drug in electrophysiological studies (EPS). However, literature has shown that this drug may interfere with the cardiac conduction system (CCS). Our objective is to evaluate whether propofol interferes with CCS and the inducibility of arrhythmias
[...] Read more.
Introduction: Propofol is a widely used sedative drug in electrophysiological studies (EPS). However, literature has shown that this drug may interfere with the cardiac conduction system (CCS). Our objective is to evaluate whether propofol interferes with CCS and the inducibility of arrhythmias during EPS.
Method: A systematic review and a meta-analysis were performed. The databases were PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus. Rayyan software was used to select the studies. Three Mesh terms were used: Propofol, Cardiac arrhythmias, Electrophysiologic Study, and Cardiac. Cohort studies and randomized clinical trials were included.
Results: Only one of the six studies showed four cases where it was impossible to induce arrhythmia. We found no significant difference between propofol and the control group in the analyzed variables: cycle length, atrial-His, His-ventricular, corrected sinus node recovery time, atrial effective refractory factor, and ventricular effective refractory period, with low heterogeneity (I
2 = 0% to a maximum of I
2 = 8%). A significant difference in favor of the control group was found in the analysis of the atrioventricular node effective refractory period (MD:18.67 {95% CI 4.86 to 32.47}
p = 0.008, I
2 = 44%).
Discussion: The meta-analyzed data in this study showed that propofol possibly does not interfere with CCS, making it a safe drug for this type of procedure.
Conclusions: However, extra care should be exercised with pediatric patients when the arrhythmia’s mechanism is automatic. More robust studies are still needed in this class.
Full article