Previous Article in Journal
A Comparative Kinetic Study on Alkaline Phosphatase Thermal Inactivation in Different Milk Types
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Multifaceted Role of STK35/STK35L1 in Human Diseases: A Time for Critical Appraisal

by
Arpana Yadav
1,
Kritika Gaur
1,
Phulwanti Kumari Sharma
1,
Pragya Gehlot
1,
Saloni Bage
1,
Mahesh Saini
1,
Daniela Brünnert
2,* and
Pankaj Goyal
1,*
1
Department of Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Central University of Rajasthan, Bandarsindri, Kishangarh 305 817, Rajasthan, India
2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Würzburg, D-97080 Würzburg, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Kinases Phosphatases 2025, 3(2), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/kinasesphosphatases3020012
Submission received: 3 March 2025 / Revised: 20 April 2025 / Accepted: 20 May 2025 / Published: 23 May 2025

Abstract

:
Dysregulation of protein kinases is associated with developmental defects and various human diseases. The human kinome comprises 518 kinases, including several orphan kinases whose functions remain to be fully characterized. The NKF4 family, which includes STK35L1 and PDIK1L, is one such uncharacterized kinase family. STK35L1, also known as Clik1, was initially identified as a nuclear kinase associated with actin fibers. Subsequent studies have demonstrated that STK35L1 plays critical roles in cellular processes such as cell cycle regulation, migration, angiogenesis, the DNA damage response, and related processes such as spermatogenesis. STK35L1 has also been implicated in various developmental processes and its knockout mice exhibited defects in the testis, ovary, and eye. STK35L1 acts as a central regulator of the fundamental cellular functions, and its dysregulation leads to various diseases. Research has established that STK35L1 regulates tumor growth and proliferation in cancers such as osteosarcoma, colorectal cancer, and acute myeloid leukemia. Notably, it also affects chemosensitivity in colorectal cancer and metabolism in acute myeloid leukemia. Additionally, STK35L1 is crucial for the infection of hepatocytes by Plasmodium sporozoites during the liver stage of Malaria. This review discusses the current understanding of STK35L1, highlighting its role in various diseases.

1. Introduction

Protein kinases phosphorylate proteins on serine (Ser), threonine (Thr), or tyrosine (Tyr) residues and are the largest superfamily of enzymes, comprising ~1.7% of all human genes [1]. Dysregulation of protein kinases is linked to developmental defects and several human diseases, including cancers, neurodegenerative diseases, and autoimmune disorders [2]. Protein kinases represent highly promising therapeutic targets with numerous kinase inhibitors currently in clinical trials. To date, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved multiple kinase inhibitors for clinical use, particularly the treatment of different types of cancer [3,4].
Since the release of the first draft of the human genome in 2001, various strategies have been employed to catalog human kinases. Depending on the methods and criteria used, different studies have reported a total of 448 [5], 510 [6], or up to 518 [1,7,8] kinase-encoding genes. Protein kinases are classified into eukaryotic (typical protein kinases) and atypical protein kinases. Typical kinases were further classified into 10 groups (AGC, CAMK, CK1, CMGC, STE, NEK, RGC, TYR, TKL, and Other) [8]. Atypical kinases were classified into eight groups (PDHK, Alpha, RIO, A6, Other, ABC1, BRD, and PIKK) [1]. The group “Other” of typical kinases comprises 37 families with 83 kinases in humans [7]. The NKF3, NKF4, and NKF5 families of group “Other” are found only in humans, and the functions of their members are largely unknown [1].
STK35L1 and PDIK1L are members of the NKF4 family of Ser/Thr Kinases [1]. The first member of this family, STK35, also known as Clik1, was initially identified as a nuclear kinase associated with actin fibers via interacting with an α-actinin-1 binding protein, CLP36, in the osteosarcoma cell line, U2OS [9]. The following year, PDIK1L (PDLIM1 Interacting Kinase 1 Like) was identified by high-throughput sequencing of a human fetal brain cDNA library [10]. In 2009, Goyal et al. performed a comprehensive genomic analysis of the STK35 family of kinases and discovered an ambiguity in the STK35 gene coding sequence. This led to the identification of a novel longer form of STK35 named STK35L1 (STK35 Long isoform 1) that contains an additional exon at the 5′ of the STK35 gene (Figure 1A) [11]. Thereafter, Goyal et al. also demonstrated that STK35L1 interacts with nuclear actin, regulates the expression of various cell cycle genes, and is essential for endothelial cell migration and angiogenesis [12]. Subsequently, STK35L1 has been established as a critical regulator in diverse cellular processes such as apoptosis regulation and DNA damage response. STK35L1 is also implicated in diseases such as osteosarcoma, colorectal cancer (CRC), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and malaria. Notably, STK35L1 has modulated drug resistance in CRC and metabolic pathways in AML [13,14,15,16,17]. This review summarizes current knowledge on STK35L1 and its functional roles in human disease pathogenesis, with particular emphasis on oncogenic processes and malaria infection.

2. Characterization of the STK35 Locus

The human STK35 gene is located on chromosome 20 subregion p13. The STK35 gene, first characterized by Vallenius et al., comprises three exons and two introns encoding a 401aa protein with a predicted molecular weight of 44.58 kDa (Figure 1A). We detected a 58 kDa band in endothelial and HEK cells using STK35-specific antibodies [11]. We analyzed the STK35 genomic locus to investigate this discrepancy and identified a new 5′-extended transcript containing four exons and three introns. This transcript encodes a 534 aa protein with a predicted molecular weight of 58 kDa, which we designated STK35L1 (Figure 1A) [11]. Interestingly, multiple bands of different sizes of STK35L1 were observed in HeLa cells, suggesting the STK35 gene locus is contributing more than one transcript that might be involved in a cell-specific or condition-specific manner [11].
In the mouse genome, the stk35 gene is located on chromosome 2 and consists of four exons. The mouse stk35 gene locus contributes two splice variants (NM_183262 and NM_001038365) named STK35L1, STK35L1b, and a long noncoding RNA (stk35os1). In the STK35L1b transcript, the third exon was spliced out and coded for a STK35L1 protein with the truncated kinase domain. The stk35os1 is transcribed from the second exon antisense strand of the mouse stk35 gene locus [18]. The stk35 gene locus in the mouse contributes more than one transcript that might be involved in distinct functions that need further study.

3. Evolution of STK35 Family Members

Gene synteny analysis is a powerful method often used in comparative genomics to identify the orthologs of a gene in different species [19]. Using syntenic searches, gene pattern data analysis, and homology searches, three members of the STK35 family, namely, STK35L1, PDIK1L (also known as STK35L2), and STK35L3, were identified and were conserved throughout vertebrate genomes [11]. The homologs of STK35L1 were identified as orthologous, as STK35L1 and PDIK1L were found to have independent origins (Figure 2) [11].
The first homolog of the STK35L1, namely PDIK1L, was identified by Guo et al. in 2003 and showed 69% homology with STK35L1 in the kinase domain [10]. This gene is located on chromosome 1p36.11 and has five exons (Figure 1B). In contrast to STK35L1, PDIK1L mainly consists of the kinase domain. STK35L1 and PDIK1L are highly conserved across different vertebrate species during evolution (Figure 2).
Another homolog of STK35L1, STK35L3, was found to be conserved from fishes to marsupial mammals. Fishes exhibit four exons/three introns gene structural organization; however, during evolution, an intron was lost in higher vertebrates such as frogs and opossums [11]. Interestingly, STK35L3 was lost in placental mammals during the time of divergence of marsupials and placental mammals, some 173–190 million years ago, implicating its role in egg laying or egg development [11].

4. Structural Features of STK35L1

STK35L1 showed significant similarity to other Ser/Thr kinases, presenting all the major characteristics attributed to the S-TKc family kinase domains. However, it did not belong to any major kinase group of the human kinome cataloged by Manning et al. [1,8]. The STK35L1 kinase domain is 333 aa long, located at the C-terminal of the protein (from position 201 to 534) [9]. The kinase domain of eukaryotic kinases comprises 12 catalytically conserved subdomains (I to V, VIA, VIB, and VII to XI). STK35L1 possesses two unique inserts between catalytic subdomains IV and V (Insert 1) and VII and VIII (Insert 2) (Figure 3). The significance of these sequences is not yet known. Members of other Kinase families are found to have such unique inserts within them, like Interferon-induced protein kinase (PKR), which possesses an insert between subdomain IV and V that is essential for its kinase activity [20]. Calcium-calmodulin-dependent kinase is yet another example that possesses an insert between its subdomains II and III that is responsible for the recruitment and orientation of the substrate within the catalytic cleft and recognition of downstream kinases for phosphorylation [21,22]. PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) also contains three inserts in its sequence with unique functional significances; mutations within insert 1 have been identified in patients with Parkinson’s disease [23], whereas insert 3 is a key motif that is crucial for the protein’s substrate recognition and interaction function, particularly ubiquitin interaction and phosphorylation [24]. Several other protein kinases like Tie2 kinase, platelet-derived growth factor receptor kinase, and mitogen-activated protein kinase-interacting kinase also exhibit unique insert regions at distinct locations in the kinase domain [25,26,27]. These inserts regulate the binding of protein substrates, ATP, or other regulatory proteins. These examples indicate that the unique inserts in STK35L1 may be functionally significant.
The crystal structure of STK35L1 has not yet been resolved. However, the 3D structure of STK35L1 was generated in our laboratory using AlphaFold 3 (Figure 3B). It shows that the N-terminal region of STK35L1 is intrinsically disordered and predominantly displays loop conformation. It is observed that the intrinsic disordered region is a hub for the various post translational modifications such as phosphorylation, which induces a disorder-to-order transition in various protein such as myosin [28], the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) [29], and the kinase-inducible domain (KID) [30]. We speculate that the N-terminal region of STK35L1 might be a target site for various PTMs that could induce its disorder-to-order transition and regulate its functions.
STK35L1 is a nuclear and nucleolar protein kinase [9,12]. Localization of a protein in the nucleus requires a nuclear localization signal (NLS), a basic amino acid-rich stretch responsible for the nuclear import of protein [31,32]. STK35L1 possesses a highly conserved and functional bipartite NLS in the N-terminal region (142–153 aa) (Figure 3) [12]. STK35, which lacks the 133 aa of the N-terminus, was mainly localized in the nucleus [9], suggesting that the extended N-terminal sheltered the Nucleolar localization signal (NoLS); however, no specific nucleolar localization sequences have yet been identified [12]. This could be due to the presence of novel uncharacterized nucleolar recognition motifs within the extended N-terminus of the STK35L1 protein. Earlier studies using the gene trap method identified the DEAD-box motif as the canonical motif found in most nucleolar proteins [33]. However, proteomic analysis of human nucleoli showed several proteins that lacked the canonical nucleolar localization signals (NoLS), implicating the existence of alternative nucleolar targeting mechanisms [34,35]. The MDM2 protein found in the nucleoplasm is sequestered into the nucleolus by binding with ARF protein, an example of protein-protein interaction-mediated nucleolar localization [36].
STK35 is primarily a nuclear protein. In the U2OS osteosarcoma cells, STK35 interacts with CLP36, an α-actinin binding protein, and localizes to actin stress fibers in the cytoplasm [9,37,38], suggesting its potential role in regulating actin dynamics and other cellular activities like cell movement, cell adhesion, protein/ RNA transport etc. [39]. However, in endothelial cells, co-transfection of CLP36 along with STK35 did not show localization of STK35 in the cytoplasm. It remained predominantly localized in the nucleolus [11]. STK35 was found to interact with nuclear actin through its class III PDZ domain at the N-terminal region (173–176 aa) (Figure 3) [12]. The role of nuclear actin is well-established in gene expression, DNA damage repair, and DNA replication [40]. Differential subcellular distribution of the STK35L1 suggests that they might have distinct functions in different cellular contexts or regulate condition-specific functions.

5. Cellular Functions of STK35L1

5.1. Cell Cycle

Nuclear localization of STK35L1 suggests its involvement in various nuclear processes such as transcription, DNA replication, and cell cycle regulation. Silencing of STK35L1 in endothelial cells by siRNA accelerated the progression of the cell cycle from G1 to S phase, establishing STK35L1 as a key cell cycle regulator kinase [12]. Various cell cycle-related genes, including CDKN2A and GADD45A, were also downregulated in STK35L1-silenced endothelial cells [12]. Similar results were also observed in SKT35L1-knockdown HepG2 cells [13]. CDKN2A is a tumor-suppressor gene that plays a crucial role during the G1 to S phase transition. The CDKN2A gene locus is frequently found to be mutated or deleted in various tumors [41,42], indicating its central role in cell cycle regulation. Two partially overlapping transcripts are expressed from the CDKN2A locus, and the alternatively spliced mRNA transcripts named α-transcript and β-transcript encode two distinct proteins, p16INK4a and p14ARF, respectively [43]. The p16INK4a is a tumor suppressor that induces G1 cell cycle arrest by inhibiting the cyclin-dependent kinase CDK4, and the p14ARF induces an arrest in both G1 and G2/M phases via activation of the p53 pathway [44]. The regulation of α-transcript of CDKN2A (p16INK4a) expression by STK35L1 may represent a novel signaling mechanism that regulates the progression of the cell cycle from G1 to S phase.
Interestingly, a report showed that STK35 was a potential target of GSK3β in Xenopus [45]. GSK3β regulates the expression of β-catenin by phosphorylating it, followed by its proteasomal degradation [46]. Nuclear β-catenin regulates the expression of p16INK4a in various cancer cell lines [47,48]. These data suggest a novel GSK3β-dependent signaling pathway that might regulate STK35-dependent expression of CDKN2A.
Besides CDKN2A, the downregulation of GADD45A, a protein involved in DNA repair and G1 cell cycle arrest, led to increased G1 to S phase transition [49,50,51,52]. Knockdown of STK35L1 in RPE1 cells showed a significant increase in the proportion of cells in the S phase of the cell cycle [17]. Various cell cycle genes, e.g., CCNB2, CDC2, CDC20, CDK6, CDKN3, GTSE1, MKI67, and CDK5R1, which are involved in the M-phase and G2-M-phase transition of the cell cycle, were downregulated after silencing of STK35L1 in HepG2 and endothelial cells [12,13]. These findings support the hypothesis that STK35L1 is a key regulator of the cell cycle and is not only crucial for G1 to S phase transition but might also be involved in various other cell cycle-related processes. The precise role and mechanism of regulation of STK35L1 remain largely to be deciphered.

5.2. Angiogenesis

Angiogenesis is a complex process involved in the development of several diseases, including cancer. Expression of STK35L1 is upregulated during the late regulation of angiogenesis in human microvascular endothelial cells [53]. An upregulation of STK35L1 was also reported in endothelial cells during early angiogenesis, and its silencing inhibited in vitro sprouting, which is a crucial step for angiogenesis [12]. STK35L1 is localized in the nucleolus of endothelial cells [12]. The nucleolus is a functional nuclear sub-compartment critical for regulating various processes, such as synthesizing precursor rRNA and assembly of ribosomal subunits, cell-cycle regulation, senescence, and stress responses [54,55,56,57]. These data suggest that STK35L1 could play a crucial role in regulating angiogenesis. STK35L1 also regulates the expression of GADD45A, which is known to be a suppressor of angiogenesis [12,58]. STK35L1 is associated with angiogenesis in endothelial cells, and GADD45A might mediate its regulation. This opens new questions and research avenues to understand the complex pathways and explore new therapeutic targets related to angiogenesis.

5.3. Cell Migration

Cell migration is involved in various physiological processes such as development, tissue repair, wound healing, cancer metastasis, and angiogenesis [59,60]. The process of cell migration involves coordinated biophysical processes, i.e., adhesion, cytoskeleton, and nuclear dynamics, as well as matrix remodeling [61]. Studies by Goyal et al. showed that the knockdown of STK35L1 in endothelial cells resulted in reduced cell migration and a lack of stable lamellipodia formation in the direction of migration [12]. The role of actin dynamics in cell migration is well established [62]. Besides this, nuclear actin plays a role in chromatin remodeling and gene transcription of various genes involved in different cellular functions, such as cell migration [40]. Interaction of STK35L1 with both nuclear and cytoplasmic actin suggests its key role in cell migration by regulating actin dynamics and altering other gene expressions.

5.4. Cell Death

Cell turnover and tissue homeostasis depend on robustly functioning programmed cell death (PCD) mechanisms, including apoptosis and controlled necrosis. PCD dysregulation is a major concern and is strongly linked to aging and aging-related diseases [63]. Nuclear accumulation of importin α2 in HeLa cells resulted in a slight but significant increase in the expression of STK35L1 while studying the non-transport functions of importin α2 in response to oxidative stress [64]. Importin α2 interacts with the promoter of STK35 and drives its mRNA expression. The elevated levels of STK35L1 in HeLa cells triggered an increased non-apoptotic cell death, i.e., caspase-independent cell death [64]. Interestingly, in osteosarcoma cell line U2OS, the knockdown of STK35L1 led to enhanced apoptosis via the caspase-dependent pathway [16]. In colorectal cancer, elevated STK35L1 expression promotes cell survival and tumor growth, and knockdown of STK35L1 in SW620 and HCT116 led to reduced tumor growth via apoptotic cell death (Caspase-dependent pathway) [14], implicating it as a potential therapeutic target in CRC. STK35L1 shows a paradoxical role, promoting cell death under stress and contributing to cell proliferation in cancerous states. This calls forth further studies to unravel the precise regulation of cell death and proliferation under different physiological and pathophysiological conditions.

5.5. DNA Damage and Repair

Silencing STK35L1 has been shown to alter several DNA repair genes (GADD45A, DDX11, and RAD51) [12,13]. GADD45A is known to interact with several DNA repair-related proteins and is considered a prime regulator of nucleotide/base excision repair [51,52]. DDX11, a 5′ to 3′ DNA helicase, is implicated in double-stranded break (DSB) repair. Knockout of DDX11 in various cells leads to the accumulation of DNA damage, jeopardizing the genomic stability [65,66]. RAD51 is a critical player in homologous recombination-based DNA repair and is required for homologous DNA pairing and strand exchange [67]. Depletion of STK35L1 leads to decreased levels of ɤH2AX and Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) phosphorylation, which is the hallmark of DNA damage [17]. The knockdown of STK35L1 in RPE1 cells led to G2/M phase cell cycle arrest upon cisplatin-induced DNA damage [17]. Furthermore, these knockdown RPE1 cells were sensitive to cisplatin, suggesting a major role of STK35L1 in DNA damage response (DDR) [17]. This collaborative data suggests that STK35L1 plays a pivotal role in DNA repair mechanisms and has a complex role in its regulation, accentuating the need for extensive investigation to find the underlying molecular mechanisms.

6. Pathophysiological Role of STK35L1 in Diseases

Research has shown the involvement of STK35L1 in diseases like cancer, Parkinson’s, and malaria, but the precise role of STK35L1 in disease development is yet to be deciphered [13,14,15,16,68,69].

6.1. STK35L1 in Malaria

In the recent past, a significant focus in the field of infection biology has been to study the relationship between parasite and host kinases to understand how the parasite manipulates the host kinases to infect and survive in the host [70]. Various host kinases, which might be crucial in the liver stage of malarial infection, were identified via kinome-wide high-throughput screening [69,71]. STK35L1 was identified to be a crucial protein during hepatocyte infection by P. berghei sporozoites [69]. However, further studies are required to elucidate its precise function in malaria. Recently, Goyal et al. reported that STK35L1 expression was upregulated in HepG2 cells and mouse liver during P. berghei sporozoites. Furthermore, the knockdown of STK35L1 in the HepG2 cells remarkably suppressed the sporozoite infection [13]. The transcription factor STAT3 is upregulated and phosphorylated during P. berghei sporozoites infected HepG2 cells. STAT3 is required to upregulate STK35L1 and STAT3 [13].
Along with the upregulation of STK35L1, specific cell cycle genes were also upregulated during the sporozoite infection, and the knockdown of STK35L1 inhibited the basal expression of STK35L1-linked cell cycle genes except CDKN3 and GTSE1 [13]. Studies also showed that various cell cycle-associated genes were differentially and temporally regulated during infection of the mouse hepatoma cell line, Hepa1-6, and the HepG2-A16 cell line, implicating their role in parasite growth, development, and survival within the host [72,73]. Of note, higher expression of CDKN2A is observed during an acute malarial stage, and STK35L1 is involved in regulating CDKN2A expression in endothelial and HepG2 cells [12,13,74]. Other STK35L1-associated genes RAD51 and DDX11 were upregulated during P. berghei sporozoites infection, which are known to be involved in DNA replication and repair [66,67]. The role of STK35L1 in hepatocyte infection and intra-hepatocytic parasite development at the molecular level has not yet been deciphered. Identifying STK35L1-mediated signaling pathways that are active during the liver stage of malaria will provide a newer understanding to develop STK35L1 as a potential novel therapeutic drug target that could be used to treat drug-resistant malaria.

6.2. Colorectal Cancer

Misregulation of STK35 is observed in colorectal cancer (CRC) [75]. STK35L1 was one of the significantly upregulated kinases in CRC when a panel of 125 kinases was screened [75]. Later, Yang et al. explored the role of STK35L1 in CRC prognosis and progression at the molecular level and observed similar upregulation [14]. Both in vivo and in vitro studies showed that STK35L1 promotes tumor growth and regulates CRC-related cellular activities [14]. Additionally, NEDD4L, an E3 ubiquitin ligase, has been reported to inhibit CRC and promote degradation of STK35L1 through ubiquitination [14,76]. Of note, the expression of NEDD4L was significantly lower in CRC [76], whereas STK35L1 expression was significantly higher, leading to tumor progression [14]. STK35L1 also promotes drug resistance in colorectal cancer cell lines SW620 and SW480 to 5-Fluorouracil. Regulation of glycolysis and apoptosis in CRC has been linked with STK35L1 through AKT signaling that promotes glycolysis while negatively regulating apoptosis and promoting CRC tumor growth [14]. STK35 is a potential downstream target of GSK3β [45]. The role of GSK3β has been implicated in various cancers, including colorectal cancer [77]. In CRC, the nuclear accumulation of GSK3β is associated with overall poor clinical outcome, increased tumor proliferation, and acts as a tumor promoter aiding CRC development [77,78]. Also, AKT kinase regulates the function of GSK through phosphorylation-mediated degradation [78]. Therefore, GSK3β, STK35L1, and AKT may be part of a new signaling network in colorectal cancer that promotes tumor progression and glycolysis.

6.3. Osteosarcoma Cancer

STK35L1 expression was significantly higher in osteosarcoma patients. In vitro and in vivo studies showed that STK35L1 influenced cell proliferation and apoptosis in the osteosarcoma cell line U2OS. The transcription factor STAT3 was identified as a positive regulator of STK35L1 expression. STAT3 binds to the STK35L1 promoter between the nucleotide positions −230 and −132 and regulates its expression. Knockdown of STK35L1 in osteosarcoma cell lines MG63 and HOC hampered cell proliferation by inducing cell apoptosis, indicating that STK35L1 is negatively associated with apoptotic pathways in a cancerous state [16].

6.4. Acute Myeloid Leukemia

The expression of STK35L1 has been recently linked to AML; it supports cell proliferation, amino acid biosynthesis, and transport in AML [15]. The double knockdown of STK35L1 and PDIK1L in the AML cell line MOLM-13 reduced the proliferation of malignant cells [15]. Interestingly, it was found that SCP4, a nuclear phosphatase, regulates the expression of STK35L1 and PDIK1L in the MOLM-13 cell line. Further investigation revealed that SCP4 binds with STK35L1 and PDIK1L, dephosphorylates phospho-S385 and phospho-S194 in the catalytic domain of STK35L1 and PDIK1L, respectively, and enhances the activity of these kinases [15]. This nuclear SCP4-STK35L1/PDIK1L signaling complex might play a critical role in the pathogenesis of AML.

7. Reproduction

Comparative expression profile analysis of 27 different human tissues revealed that expression of STK35L1 is significantly higher in the human testis compared to other tissues. Similar expression patterns were observed in mice (unpublished data). Additionally, a higher expression of STK35L1 was also observed in the mouse ovary and eyes [18]. STK35L1, STK35L1 b, and stk35os1 were sequentially and overlappingly expressed at different stages of spermatogenesis. STK35L1 is expressed in the initial stages of spermatogenesis, i.e., spermatogonia and early spermatid; stk35os1 is expressed during the middle stages, i.e., pachytene stage-round spermatid, and STK35L1b is expressed in the latter stages, i.e., round spermatid-early elongated spermatid [18]. STK35L1 and STK35L1 b are present in somatic cells of the WT follicles in the mouse ovary, whereas higher expression of STK35L1 b mRNA is found in larger follicles [18]. The evidence strongly suggests that STK35 gene products play an important role during gametogenesis. Further investigations are needed to comprehend the role of the STK35 allele in oogenesis.
STK35(−/−) knockout mouse showed testicular defects and abnormal ovarian development (reduced size and fewer follicles), suggesting its role in gonad development [18]. Additionally, several phenotypic defects like extensive germinal epithelium vacuolization, Sertoli cell sloughing into the tubule lumen, and areas lacking germ cells were observed. All these observations suggest that the absence of stk35l1 gene products results in male germ cell loss, Sertoli cell dysfunction, and ultimately reduced male fertility [18]. Characterizing the precise regulation of different gene products of the stk35 locus will enhance our understanding of the role of STK35L1 and its variants in reproduction.

8. Eye Development

Compared to adult mice, higher stk35l1 mRNA levels were detected in the ganglion cell layer (GCL) and inner nuclear layer (INL) of the mouse eye during the initial postpartum period, suggesting its role in eye development [18]. Consistent with this, STK35L1 knockout mice also showed abnormal eye phenotypes in adult mice, reiterating STK35L1’s role in eye development. Phenotypic eye defects of KO mice ranged from gross deformity to mild goniodysgenesis. The gross deformities were aniridia, corneal opacity, retinal dysplasia, lens malformation, iridocorneal adhesions, failure of anterior chamber formation, and proliferative vitreoretinopathy [18]. PAX6 is the transcription factor that plays a vital role in eye development, and mutation of PAX6 gene leads to an array of eye abnormalities, including aniridia and corneal opacity [79,80]. During the early stages of eye development, TGFβ and Wnt/β-catenin signal transduction pathways are the two crucial signaling networks involved in eye development and are associated with PAX6 regulatory network [80,81]. TGFβ2 is the most important isoform in eye development, as loss of TGFβ2 leads to multiple defects in ocular structures [82]. A report showed STK35L1 is associated with SMAD, which is disrupted upon receiving the TGFβ signal [83]. Literature suggests links between STK35L1 and Wnt/TGFβ pathways, which indicates that STK35L1 might be one of the downstream kinases regulating the activation and activity of the Wnt/TGFβ/PAX6 signaling pathway in eye development during embryogenesis.

9. Conclusions

STK35L1 is emerging as a critical kinase regulating several human diseases, including malaria and various types of cancer (Figure 4). STK35L1 plays a diverse role in numerous cellular processes, such as cell cycle, DNA damage repair, angiogenesis, cell migration, and cell death. STK35L1 has a paradoxical role in apoptosis, which should be further studied. The substrate of STK35L1 and the molecular mechanism regulating its functions have not been discovered yet. This is a major obstacle to establishing its precise function in various human diseases. The oncogenic role of STK35L1 is identified in a few tumors, and it is essential to investigate this kinase in other types of cancers to establish it as a prooncogenic protein kinase. A few studies demonstrated that STK35L1 causes drug resistance, which should be further investigated at the molecular level. STK35L1 is crucial for the sporozoite infection during the liver stage of malaria. Identifying its signaling during the liver stage will provide an opportunity to develop STK35L1 as a novel therapeutic drug target to treat drug-resistant malaria. The future research must focus on identifying the molecular mechanism governing its actions, which will expand our understanding of this kinase and its importance in various diseases.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the study’s conception, design, and writing. A.Y., P.G. (Pankaj Goyal) and D.B. wrote the final draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by DBT, Govt. of India (DBT Builder Project (BT/INF/22/SP44383/2021), ICMR, Govt. of India, (6/9-7(234)2020/ECD-II)), and DST-SERB, Govt. of India (DST-SERB CRG/2022/007356).

Acknowledgments

A.Y. and P.G. (Pragya Gehlot) are the recipients of fellowships from DBT, Govt. of India (DBT/2020/CUR/1470) and CSIR, Govt. of India (CSIR-NET SRF; 09/1131(0039)/2019-EMR-I), respectively. We thank the Kinases and Phosphatases editorial staff and MDPI for the free APC support. We thank Sindhu K Veetil for technical support and English language corrections.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Manning, G.; Whyte, D.B.; Martinez, R.; Hunter, T.; Sudarsanam, S. The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science 2002, 298, 1912–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gajulapalli, V.P.R. Development of kinase-centric drugs: A computational perspective. ChemMedChem 2023, 18, e202200693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xiao, Y.; Dong, J. Coming of Age: Targeting Cyclin K in cancers. Cells 2023, 12, 2044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cohen, P.; Cross, D.; Jänne, P.A. Kinase drug discovery 20 years after imatinib: Progress and future directions. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2021, 20, 551–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Krupa, A.; Srinivasan, N. The repertoire of protein kinases encoded in the draft version of the human genome: Atypical variations and uncommon domain combinations. Genome Biol. 2002, 3, research0066.1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kostich, M.; English, J.; Madison, V.; Gheyas, F.; Wang, L.; Qiu, P.; Greene, J.; Laz, T.M. Human members of the eukaryotic protein kinase family. Genome Biol. 2002, 3, research0043.1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hanks, S.K. Genomic analysis of the eukaryotic protein kinase superfamily: A perspective. Genome Biol. 2003, 4, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Modi, V.; Dunbrack, R.L. A structurally-validated multiple sequence alignment of 497 human protein kinase domains. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 19790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vallenius, T.; Mäkelä, T.P. Clik1: A novel kinase targeted to actin stress fibers by the CLP-36 PDZ-LIM protein. J. Cell Sci. 2002, 115, 2067–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Guo, L.; Ji, C.; Gu, S.; Ying, K.; Cheng, H.; Ni, X.; Liu, J.; Xie, Y.; Mao, Y. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel human kinase gene, PDIK1L. J. Genet. 2003, 82, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Goyal, P.; Behring, A.; Kumar, A.; Siess, W. Identifying and characterizing a novel protein kinase STK35L1 and deciphering its orthologs and close-homologs in vertebrates. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e6981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Goyal, P.; Behring, A.; Kumar, A.; Siess, W. STK35L1 associates with nuclear actin and regulates cell cycle and migration of endothelial cells. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e16249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sharma, P.K.; Kalia, I.; Kaushik, V.; Brünnert, D.; Quadiri, A.; Kashif, M.; Chahar, K.R.; Agrawal, A.; Singh, A.P.; Goyal, P. STK35L1 regulates host cell cycle-related genes and is essential for Plasmodium infection during the liver stage of malaria. Exp. Cell Res. 2021, 406, 112764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yang, H.; Zhu, J.; Wang, G.; Liu, H.; Zhou, Y.; Qian, J. STK35 Is ubiquitinated by NEDD4L and promotes glycolysis and inhibits apoptosis through regulating the AKT signaling pathway, influencing chemoresistance of colorectal cancer. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 582695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Polyanskaya, S.A.; Moreno, R.Y.; Lu, B.; Feng, R.; Yao, Y.; Irani, S.; Klingbeil, O.; Yang, Z.; Wei, Y.; Demerdash, O.E.; et al. SCP4-STK35/PDIK1L complex is a dual phospho-catalytic signaling dependency in acute myeloid leukemia. Cell Rep. 2022, 38, 110233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wu, Z.; Liu, J.; Hu, S.; Zhu, Y.; Li, S. Serine/Threonine Kinase 35, a target gene of STAT3, regulates the proliferation and apoptosis of osteosarcoma cells. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 45, 808–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pan, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Xiong, Y.; Bao, Y.; Chen, T.; Xu, P.; Liu, Z.; Ma, H.; Yu, Y.; Zhou, Z.; et al. Mapping functional elements of the DNA damage response through base editor screens. Cell Rep. 2024, 43, 115047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Miyamoto, Y.; Whiley, P.A.F.; Goh, H.Y.; Wong, C.; Higgins, G.; Tachibana, T.; McMenamin, P.G.; Mayne, L.; Loveland, K.L. The STK35 locus contributes to normal gametogenesis and encodes a lncRNA responsive to oxidative stress. Biol. Open 2018, 7, bio032631. [Google Scholar]
  19. Veltri, D.; Wight, M.M.; Crouch, J.A. SimpleSynteny: A web-based tool for visualization of microsynteny across multiple species. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W41–W45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Craig, A.W.B.; Cosentino, G.P.; Donzé, O.; Sonenberg, N. The kinase insert domain of interferon-induced protein kinase PKR is required for activity but not for interaction with the pseudosubstrate K3L. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 24526–24533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tokumitsu, H.; Takahashi, N.; Eto, K.; Yano, S.; Soderling, T.R.; Muramatsu, M.-a. Substrate recognition by Ca2+/Calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase: Role of the Arg-Pro-rich insert domain. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 15803–15810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kaneshige, R.; Ohtsuka, S.; Harada, Y.; Kawamata, I.; Magari, M.; Kanayama, N.; Hatano, N.; Sakagami, H.; Tokumitsu, H. Substrate recognition by Arg/Pro-rich insert domain in calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase for target protein kinases. FEBS J. 2022, 289, 5971–5984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mills, R.D.; Sim, C.H.; Mok, S.S.; Mulhern, T.D.; Culvenor, J.G.; Cheng, H.-C. Biochemical aspects of the neuroprotective mechanism of PTEN-induced kinase-1 (PINK1). J. Neurochem. 2008, 105, 18–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Schubert, A.F.; Gladkova, C.; Pardon, E.; Wagstaff, J.L.; Freund, S.M.V.; Steyaert, J.; Maslen, S.L.; Komander, D. Structure of PINK1 in complex with its substrate ubiquitin. Nature 2017, 552, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kazlauskas, A.; Cooper, J.A. Autophosphorylation of the PDGF receptor in the kinase insert region regulates interactions with cell proteins. Cell 1989, 58, 1121–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shewchuk, L.M.; Hassell, A.M.; Ellis, B.; Holmes, W.D.; Davis, R.; Horne, E.L.; Kadwell, S.H.; McKee, D.D.; Moore, J.T. Structure of the Tie2 RTK domain: Sslf-inhibition by the nucleotide binding loop, activation loop, and C-terminal tail. Structure 2000, 8, 1105–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jauch, R.; Cho, M.-K.; Jäkel, S.; Netter, C.; Schreiter, K.; Aicher, B.; Zweckstetter, M.; Jäckle, H.; Wahl, M.C. Mitogen-activated protein kinases interacting kinases are autoinhibited by a reprogrammed activation segment. EMBO J. 2006, 25, 4020–4032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Espinoza-Fonseca, L.M.; Kast, D.; Thomas, D.D. Molecular dynamics Simulations Reveal a Disorder-to-Order Transition on Phosphorylation of Smooth Muscle Myosin. Biophys. J. 2007, 93, 2083–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Baker, J.M.R.; Hudson, R.P.; Kanelis, V.; Choy, W.-Y.; Thibodeau, P.H.; Thomas, P.J.; Forman-Kay, J.D. CFTR regulatory region interacts with NBD1 predominantly via multiple transient helices. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007, 14, 738–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, N.; Guo, Y.; Ning, S.; Duan, M. Phosphorylation regulates the binding of intrinsically disordered proteins via a flexible conformation selection mechanism. Commun Chem. 2020, 3, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lu, J.; Wu, T.; Zhang, B.; Liu, S.; Song, W.; Qiao, J.; Ruan, H. Types of nuclear localization signals and mechanisms of protein import into the nucleus. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2021, 19, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Görlich, D.; Kutay, U. Transport between the cell nucleus and the cytoplasm. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 1999, 15, 607–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Sutherland, H.G.; Mumford, G.K.; Newton, K.; Ford, L.V.; Farrall, R.; Dellaire, G.; Cáceres, J.F.; Bickmore, W.A. Large-scale identification of mammalian proteins localized to nuclear sub-compartments. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2001, 10, 1995–2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Andersen, J.S.; Lyon, C.E.; Fox, A.H.; Leung, A.K.; Lam, Y.W.; Steen, H.; Mann, M.; Lamond, A.I. Directed proteomic analysis of the human nucleolus. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Andersen, J.S.; Lam, Y.W.; Leung, A.K.L.; Ong, S.-E.; Lyon, C.E.; Lamond, A.I.; Mann, M. Nucleolar proteome dynamics. Nature 2005, 433, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Olson, M.O.J. Sensing Cellular Stress: Another new function for the nucleolus? Sci. STKE 2004, 2004, pe10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bauer, K.; Kratzer, M.; Otte, M.; de Quintana, K.L.; Hagmann, J.; Arnold, G.J.; Eckerskorn, C.; Lottspeich, F.; Siesset, W. Human CLP36, a PDZ-domain and LIM-domain protein, binds to α-actinin-1 and associates with actin filaments and stress fibers in activated platelets and endothelial cells. Blood 2000, 96, 4236–4245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vallenius, T.; Luukko, K.; Mäkelä, T.P. CLP-36 PDZ-LIM protein associates with nonmuscle α-Actinin-1 and α-Actinin-4. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 11100–11105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Caridi, C.P.; Plessner, M.; Grosse, R.; Chiolo, I. Nuclear actin filaments in DNA repair dynamics. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019, 21, 1068–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kyheröinen, S.; Vartiainen, M.K. Nuclear actin dynamics in gene expression and genome organization. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 102, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lesueur, F.; French Familial Melanoma Study Group; de Lichy, M.; Barrois, M.; Durand, G.; Bombled, J.; Avril, M.-F.; Chompret, A.; Boitier, F.; Lenoir, G.M.; et al. The contribution of large genomic deletions at the CDKN2A locus to the burden of familial melanoma. Br. J. Cancer 2008, 99, 364–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Raschke, S.; Balz, V.; Efferth, T.; Schulz, W.A.; Florl, A.R. Homozygous deletions of CDKN2A caused by alternative mechanisms in various human cancer cell lines. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2005, 42, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Stott, F.J.; Bates, S.; James, M.C.; McConnell, B.B.; Starborg, M.; Brookes, S.; Palmero, I.; Ryan, K.; Hara, E.; Vousden, K.H.; et al. The alternative product from the human CDKN2A locus, p14ARF, participates in a regulatory feedback loop with p53 and MDM2. EMBO J. 1998, 17, 5001–5014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cánepa, E.T.; Scassa, M.E.; Ceruti, J.M.; Marazita, M.C.; Carcagno, A.L.; Sirkin, P.F.; Ogara, M.F. INK4 proteins, a family of mammalian CDK inhibitors with novel biological functions. IUBMB Life 2007, 59, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kim, N.-G.; Xu, C.; Gumbiner, B.M. Identification of targets of the Wnt pathway destruction complex in addition to β-catenin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 5165–5170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Clevers, H. Wnt/β-Catenin signaling in development and disease. Cell 2006, 127, 469–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Saegusa, M.; Hashimura, M.; Kuwata, T.; Hamano, M.; Okayasu, I. Induction of p16INK4A mediated by β catenin in a TCF4-independent manner: Implications for alterations in p16INK4A and pRb expression during trans-differentiation of endometrial carcinoma cells. Int. J. Cancer 2006, 119, 2294–2303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wassermann, S.; Scheel, S.K.; Hiendlmeyer, E.; Palmqvist, R.; Horst, D.; Hlubek, F.; Haynl, A.; Kriegl, L.; Reu, S.; Merkel, S.; et al. p16INK4a is a β-Catenin target gene and indicates low survival in human colorectal tumors. Gastroenterology 2009, 136, 196–205.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hollander, M.C.; Philburn, R.T.; Patterson, A.D.; Wyatt, M.A.; Fornace, J.A.J. Genomic instability in Gadd45a-/- cells is coupled with S-phase checkpoint defects. Cell Cycle 2005, 4, 704–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, X.; Ma, L.; Enkemann, S.A.; Pledger, W.J. Role of Gadd45α in the density-dependent G1 arrest induced by p27Kip1. Oncogene 2003, 22, 4166–4174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Niehrs, C.; Schäfer, A. Active DNA demethylation by Gadd45 and DNA repair. Trends Cell Biol. 2012, 22, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Jung, H.J.; Kim, E.H.; Mun, J.-Y.; Park, S.; Smith, M.L.; Han, S.S.; Seo, Y.R. Base excision DNA repair defect in Gadd45a-deficient cells. Oncogene 2007, 26, 7517–7525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Glesne, D.A.; Zhang, W.; Mandava, S.; Ursos, L.; Buell, M.E.; Makowski, L.; Rodi, D.J. Subtractive transcriptomics: Establishing polarity drives in vitro human endothelial morphogenesis. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 4030–4040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Huang, Y.; Shi, H.; Zhou, H.; Song, X.; Yuan, S.; Luo, Y. The angiogenic function of nucleolin is mediated by vascular endothelial growth factor and nonmuscle myosin. Blood 2006, 107, 3564–3571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pederson, T. The plurifunctional nucleolus. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26, 3871–3876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Visintin, R.; Amon, A. The nucleolus: The magician’s hat for cell cycle tricks. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2000, 12, 372–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Boisvert, F.M.; van Koningsbruggen, S.; Navascués, J.; Lamond, A.I. The multifunctional nucleolus. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8, 574–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yang, F.; Zhang, W.; Li, D.; Zhan, Q. Gadd45a suppresses tumor angiogenesis via inhibition of the mTOR/STAT3 protein pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 6552–6560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Clark, A.G.; Vignjevic, D.M. Modes of cancer cell invasion and the role of the microenvironment. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2015, 36, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Friedl, P.; Gilmour, D. Collective cell migration in morphogenesis, regeneration and cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10, 445–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Merino-Casallo, F.; Gomez-Benito, M.J.; Hervas-Raluy, S.; Garcia-Aznar, J.M. Unravelling cell migration: Defining movement from the cell surface. Cell Adhes. Migr. 2022, 16, 25–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Seetharaman, S.; Etienne-Manneville, S. Cytoskeletal crosstalk in cell migration. Trends Cell Biol. 2020, 30, 720–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Tower, J. Programmed cell death in aging. Ageing Res. Rev. 2015, 23, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Yasuda, Y.; Miyamoto, Y.; Yamashiro, T.; Asally, M.; Masui, A.; Wong, C.; Loveland, K.L.; Yoneda, Y. Nuclear retention of importin α coordinates cell fate through changes in gene expression. EMBO J. 2012, 31, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Jegadesan, N.K.; Branzei, D. DDX11 loss causes replication stress and pharmacologically exploitable DNA repair defects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2024258118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Shah, N.; Inoue, A.; Woo Lee, S.; Beishline, K.; Lahti, J.M.; Noguchi, E. Roles of ChlR1 DNA helicase in replication recovery from DNA damage. Exp. Cell Res. 2013, 319, 2244–2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sung, P.; Krejci, L.; Van Komen, S.; Sehorn, M.G. Rad51 Recombinase and recombination mediators. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 42729–42732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hourani, M.A.; Berretta, R.; Mendes, A.; Moscato, P. Genetic signatures for a rodent model of parkinson’s disease using combinatorial optimization methods. In Bioinformatics: Structure, Function and Applications. Methods in Molecular Biology™; Keith, J.M., Ed.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2008; pp. 379–392. [Google Scholar]
  69. Prudêncio, M.; Rodrigues, C.D.; Hannus, M.; Martin, C.; Real, E.; Gonçalves, L.A.; Carret, C.; Dorkin, R.; Röhl, I.; Jahn-Hoffmann, K.; et al. Kinome-wide RNAi screen implicates at least 5 host hepatocyte kinases in plasmodium sporozoite infection. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4, e1000201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Doerig, C.; Abdi, A.; Bland, N.; Eschenlauer, S.; Dorin-Semblat, D.; Fennell, C.; Halbert, J.; Holland, Z.; Nivez, M.-P.; Semblat, J.-P.; et al. Malaria: Targeting parasite and host cell kinomes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Proteins Proteom. 2010, 1804, 604–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Arang, N.; Kain, H.S.; Glennon, E.K.; Bello, T.; Dudgeon, D.R.; Walter, E.N.F.; Gujral, T.S.; Kaushansky, A. Identifying host regulators and inhibitors of liver stage malaria infection using kinase activity profiles. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Albuquerque, S.S.; Carret, C.; Grosso, A.R.; Tarun, A.S.; Peng, X.; Kappe, S.H.; Prudêncio, M.; Mota, M.M. Host cell transcriptional profiling during malaria liver stage infection reveals a coordinated and sequential set of biological events. BMC Genom. 2009, 10, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Chattopadhyay, R.; de la Vega, P.; Paik, S.H.; Murata, Y.; Ferguson, E.W.; Richie, T.L.; Ooi, G.T. Early transcriptional responses of HepG2-A16 liver cells to infection by Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 26396–26405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Asghar, M.; Yman, V.; Homann, M.V.; Sondén, K.; Hammar, U.; Hasselquist, D.; Färnert, A. Cellular aging dynamics after acute malaria infection: A 12-month longitudinal study. Aging Cell 2018, 17, e12702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Capra, M.; Nuciforo, P.G.; Confalonieri, S.; Quarto, M.; Bianchi, M.; Nebuloni, M.; Boldorini, R.; Pallotti, F.; Viale, G.; Gishizky, M.L.; et al. Frequent alterations in the expression of Serine/Threonine kinases in human cancers. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 8147–8154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Tanksley, J.P.; Chen, X.; Coffey, R.J. NEDD4L Is downregulated in colorectal cancer and inhibits canonical WNT signaling. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e81514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Duda, P.; Akula, S.M.; Abrams, S.L.; Steelman, L.S.; Martelli, A.M.; Cocco, L.; Ratti, S.; Candido, S.; Libra, M.; Montalto, G.; et al. Targeting GSK3 and associated signaling pathways involved in cancer. Cells 2020, 9, 1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Aghabozorgi, A.S.; Ebrahimi, R.; Bahiraee, A.; Tehrani, S.S.; Nabizadeh, F.; Setayesh, L.; Jafarzadeh-Esfehani, R.; Ferns, G.A.; Avan, A.; Rashidi, Z. The genetic factors associated with Wnt signaling pathway in colorectal cancer. Life Sci. 2020, 256, 118006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Vasilyeva, T.A.; Sukhanova, N.V.; Khalanskaya, O.V.; Marakhonov, A.V.; Prokhorov, N.S.; Kadyshev, V.V.; Skryabin, N.A.; Kutsev, S.I.; Zinchenko, R.A. An unusual presentation of novel missense variant in PAX6 gene: NM_000280.4:c.341A>G, p.(Asn114Ser). Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Shaham, O.; Menuchin, Y.; Farhy, C.; Ashery-Padan, R. Pax6: A multi-level regulator of ocular development. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2012, 31, 351–376. [Google Scholar]
  81. Tidu, A.; Schanne-Klein, M.-C.; Borderie, V.M. Development, structure, and bioengineering of the human corneal stroma: A review of collagen-based implants. Exp. Eye Res. 2020, 200, 108256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Saika, S. TGFβ pathobiology in the eye. Lab. Investig. 2006, 86, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Barrios-Rodiles, M.; Brown, K.R.; Ozdamar, B.; Bose, R.; Liu, Z.; Donovan, R.S.; Shinjo, F.; Liu, Y.; Dembowy, J.; Tayloret, I.W.; et al. High-throughput mapping of a dynamic signaling network in mammalian cells. Science 2005, 307, 1621–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Pictorial depiction showing the chromosomal gene locus of STK35 and PDIK1L. (A) STK35 (Clik1) and STK35L1 are located on chromosome 20p13. STK35 (Clik1) gene comprises three exons and two introns and codes for a protein of 401 amino acids. STK35L1 comprises four exons and three introns: exons 1–3 code for a protein of 534 amino acids. (B) PDIK1L is located on chromosome 1p36.11, comprises three exons and two introns, and codes for a protein of 341 amino acids.
Figure 1. Pictorial depiction showing the chromosomal gene locus of STK35 and PDIK1L. (A) STK35 (Clik1) and STK35L1 are located on chromosome 20p13. STK35 (Clik1) gene comprises three exons and two introns and codes for a protein of 401 amino acids. STK35L1 comprises four exons and three introns: exons 1–3 code for a protein of 534 amino acids. (B) PDIK1L is located on chromosome 1p36.11, comprises three exons and two introns, and codes for a protein of 341 amino acids.
Kinasesphosphatases 03 00012 g001
Figure 2. Microsynteny analysis of STK35L1 family members. Genomic localizations with flanking genes of STK35L1, PDIK1L (STK35L2), and STK35L3 across vertebrates are shown. STK35L3 was lost during the evolution of placental mammals and is shown here by a gray box with broken lines.
Figure 2. Microsynteny analysis of STK35L1 family members. Genomic localizations with flanking genes of STK35L1, PDIK1L (STK35L2), and STK35L3 across vertebrates are shown. STK35L3 was lost during the evolution of placental mammals and is shown here by a gray box with broken lines.
Kinasesphosphatases 03 00012 g002
Figure 3. Structural features of STK35L1. (A) The cartoon shows the STK35L1 structural features. The kinase domain is shown in green. Two unique inserts, Insert-1 (red) and Insert-2 (yellow), are present in the kinase domain of STK35L1. NLS and NoLS are shown in brown and purple, respectively. PDZ-BM and the activation loop are shown in blue and orange, respectively. (B) The 3D structure of STK35L1 was generated from the AlphaFold 3 server (https://deepmind.google/science/alphafold/alphafold-server/, accessed on 3 April 2025).
Figure 3. Structural features of STK35L1. (A) The cartoon shows the STK35L1 structural features. The kinase domain is shown in green. Two unique inserts, Insert-1 (red) and Insert-2 (yellow), are present in the kinase domain of STK35L1. NLS and NoLS are shown in brown and purple, respectively. PDZ-BM and the activation loop are shown in blue and orange, respectively. (B) The 3D structure of STK35L1 was generated from the AlphaFold 3 server (https://deepmind.google/science/alphafold/alphafold-server/, accessed on 3 April 2025).
Kinasesphosphatases 03 00012 g003
Figure 4. Overview of STK35L1 cellular functions, disease progression, reproduction, and development. Created in BioRender. Goyal, P. (2025) https://BioRender.com/p79a189, accessed on 3 April 2025.
Figure 4. Overview of STK35L1 cellular functions, disease progression, reproduction, and development. Created in BioRender. Goyal, P. (2025) https://BioRender.com/p79a189, accessed on 3 April 2025.
Kinasesphosphatases 03 00012 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yadav, A.; Gaur, K.; Sharma, P.K.; Gehlot, P.; Bage, S.; Saini, M.; Brünnert, D.; Goyal, P. The Multifaceted Role of STK35/STK35L1 in Human Diseases: A Time for Critical Appraisal. Kinases Phosphatases 2025, 3, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/kinasesphosphatases3020012

AMA Style

Yadav A, Gaur K, Sharma PK, Gehlot P, Bage S, Saini M, Brünnert D, Goyal P. The Multifaceted Role of STK35/STK35L1 in Human Diseases: A Time for Critical Appraisal. Kinases and Phosphatases. 2025; 3(2):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/kinasesphosphatases3020012

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yadav, Arpana, Kritika Gaur, Phulwanti Kumari Sharma, Pragya Gehlot, Saloni Bage, Mahesh Saini, Daniela Brünnert, and Pankaj Goyal. 2025. "The Multifaceted Role of STK35/STK35L1 in Human Diseases: A Time for Critical Appraisal" Kinases and Phosphatases 3, no. 2: 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/kinasesphosphatases3020012

APA Style

Yadav, A., Gaur, K., Sharma, P. K., Gehlot, P., Bage, S., Saini, M., Brünnert, D., & Goyal, P. (2025). The Multifaceted Role of STK35/STK35L1 in Human Diseases: A Time for Critical Appraisal. Kinases and Phosphatases, 3(2), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/kinasesphosphatases3020012

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop