Next Article in Journal
Why Search for Alternative GPCR Agonists?
Next Article in Special Issue
Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AhR) Signaling in Colonic Cells and Tumors
Previous Article in Journal
The NK-1 Receptor Signaling: Distribution and Functional Relevance in the Eye
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Role of Hepatic Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Receptors 2023, 2(1), 1-15; https://doi.org/10.3390/receptors2010001
by Nikhil Y. Patil 1, Jacob E. Friedman 2 and Aditya D. Joshi 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Receptors 2023, 2(1), 1-15; https://doi.org/10.3390/receptors2010001
Submission received: 25 October 2022 / Revised: 18 November 2022 / Accepted: 28 December 2022 / Published: 4 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected Papers from the AHR Symposium 2022)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This review is an excellent overview of the state of the field with regards to AhR and NAFLD.

Table 1 gives a nice overview of the “double-edged sword” effects of AhR in NAFLD.  I wonder if a model diagram could be developed to help show the conundrum pictorially.

The last sentence of the abstract and the last paragraph of the paper begin to talk about AhR as a drug target.  Given the contradictory effects, it would be interesting to speculate, in this review, how that might occur.  How might AhR, or its signaling pathway, be targeted for drug development in the case of NAFLD?

Author Response

We will like to thank the reviewer for evaluating our submitted article for publication in 'Receptors' journal. We greatly value the constructive feedback and suggestions provided by the reviewer which have helped us improve the quality of the article.  

  1. Table 1 gives a nice overview of the “double-edged sword” effects of AhR in NAFLD. I wonder if a model diagram could be developed to help show the conundrum pictorially.

Thank you for the suggestion. We have now included a model diagram to help show the conundrum pictorially.

  1. The last sentence of the abstract and the last paragraph of the paper begin to talk about AhR as a drug target. Given the contradictory effects, it would be interesting to speculate, in this review, how that might occur.  How might AhR, or its signaling pathway, be targeted for drug development in the case of NAFLD?

We have included a paragraph addressing this in the Summary and Conclusion section. Knowing that AhR’s involvement in fatty liver disease is complex and multifactorial, targeting AhR or its signaling pathway for drug development against NAFLD must take into consideration the characteristics of the ligand, coactivators and corepressors interacting with AhR in response to ligand binding, tissue/cell-specific activity of the ligand, epigenetic modifications, modulation of chromatin structure and cross-talk of AhR with other signaling pathways.

Reviewer 2 Report

Manuscript ID receptors-2022483 Role of hepatic Aryl hydrocarbon Receptor in Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease Nikhil Y. Patil , Jacob E. Friedman , Aditya D Joshi  The review on the role of the AHR in NAFLD was well-written, fairly comprehensive, and very readable. Itt will be a reference used frequently. No major problems. My only complaints were that the authors seeseemed to have an aversion in using the identifier "the". When describing work from a given laboratory, the authors did not use "the", made up e.g., work was carried out in Smith lab that led to . . .; rather than: work was carried out in the Smith lab that . . . I found it disconcerting. Also, there were some subject verb agreement discrepancies. The review needs a careful and diligent editing of again minr issues.

Author Response

We will like to thank the reviewer for evaluating our submitted article for publication in the 'Receptors' journal. We greatly value the constructive feedback and suggestions provided by the reviewer which have helped us improve the quality of the article.  

  1. My only complaints were that the authors seemed to have an aversion in using the identifier "the". When describing work from a given laboratory, the authors did not use "the", made up e.g., work was carried out in Smith lab that led to . . .; rather than: work was carried out in the Smith lab that . . . I found it disconcerting. Also, there were some subject verb agreement discrepancies. The review needs a careful and diligent editing of again minor issues.

We have now added the identifier “the” wherever appropriate and corrected the subject-verb agreement discrepancies throughout the article.  We have also carefully edited the article to make it grammatically correct.

Back to TopTop