Next Article in Journal
Can Caenorhabditis elegans Serve as a Reliable Model for Drug and Nutraceutical Discovery?
Previous Article in Journal
Bioactive Factors Isolated and Purified from Bovine Colostrum Can Restore Extracellular Matrix Under Degradation by Metalloproteinases
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Maximizing Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Productivity Through Application of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers in Alkaline Soil

by
Safiullah Habibi
1,*,
Shafiqullah Aryan
2,
Ali Yawar Seerat
1,
Kalimullah Saighani
3 and
Mohammad Daud Haidari
4
1
Faculty of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology (TUAT), Saiwai-cho 3-5-8, Fuchu City, Tokyo 183-8509, Japan
2
Faculty of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Sakuragaoka 1-1-1, Setagaya City, Tokyo 156-8502, Japan
3
School of Biology, Biomedical Sciences Research Complex, University of St. Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9TS, UK
4
Department of Soil Science and Irrigation, Faculty of Agriculture, Kabul University, Kabul 1001, Afghanistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Biosci. 2025, 4(2), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/applbiosci4020022
Submission received: 10 December 2024 / Revised: 15 March 2025 / Accepted: 17 April 2025 / Published: 1 May 2025

Abstract

:
Common beans are a vital source of protein, vitamins, and minerals. Increasing common beans productivity is crucial for improving food security and farmers’ incomes globally. This study evaluated the growth and yield responses of common beans to integrated organic and inorganic fertilizers under field conditions at the Faculty of Agriculture, Kabul University. The trial was repeated over two consecutive growing seasons in 2020 and 2021, using a randomized complete block design with 18 treatments and three replications. The fertilizers used included urea (N) (0, 60, and 90 kg/ha), diammonium phosphate (D) (0, 50, and 100 kg/ha), and farmyard manure (O) (0 and 5000 kg/ha). The results show that integrated fertilizers, particularly O5000N60D50, O5000N60D100, O5000N90D50, and O5000N90D100, significantly increased growth and yield parameters. In 2020, the grain yield increased significantly (p < 0.05) by 75.6, 76.7, and 68.4% with the O5000N60D50, O5000N60D100, and O5000N90D100 treatments, respectively. In 2021, O5000N60D50, O5000N60D100, and O5000N90D50 showed significant yield increases of 94.7, 89.6, and 97.9%, respectively. The grain yield strongly correlated with the SPAD value (r = 0.84), number of pods per plant (r = 0.71), and number of seeds per pod (r = 0.66) in 2020, and it more strongly correlated with the SPAD value (r = 0.91), number of pods per plant (r = 0.77), and number of seeds per pod (r = 0.76) in 2021. A principal component analysis highlighted the effectiveness of organic–inorganic fertilizer combinations, particularly O5000N60D50, in enhancing productivity while potentially reducing inorganic fertilizer application. This study demonstrates that integrating organic and inorganic fertilizers enhances sustainable crop productivity and reduces negative environmental impacts, particularly in regions facing nutrient depletion and drought conditions.

1. Introduction

Common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) are one of the world’s main staple crops [1], which are widely cultivated and consumed [2,3,4] because of their high quality and nutritional value. Common beans provide valuable nutritional food containing high-quality protein, fiber, and other essential components [4,5,6,7]. In addition to their nutritional value, common beans are vital for income generation, boosting soil fertility, and animal feeding [8]. Moreover, farmers prefer common bean cultivation because of its early maturity, nutritional qualities, and better adaptation to various climates and soil conditions than other legumes [9]. Common beans, as members of leguminous crops, can contribute to soil fertility improvement through biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) by rhizobial micro-symbiont in the plant root nodules [10,11,12]. BNF is a significant process in mitigating synthetic nitrogen fertilizer pollution, in which nitrogen can easily leach and cause soil degradation, soil acidification, depletion of organic matter, and global warming while conserving a sustainable agroecosystem [13,14,15]. This process supplies 200 million tons of N annually to aquatic and terrestrial ecosystem [16]. Incorporating legumes into cereal rotation effectively promotes plant growth [17] through soil fertility improvement, alleviating the effects of climate change, restoring soil organic matter, and mitigating pest and disease problems [18,19].
The crop rotation of various beans has been revealed to be an effective way to improve soil conditions and strengthen wheat crop rotation [14,20]. Cultivated beans increase soil nutrient availability, improve soil productivity, and interrupt pest and disease cycles in crop rotation systems. Thus, they provide a productive system for the next crop planting [21].
Organic fertilizer applications can increase water-holding capacity, enhance physical and chemical properties, and improve soil structure, thereby improving soil health, fertility, and sustainable crop productivity [15,22,23,24,25]. Furthermore, adding organic fertilizer to soil provides a rich source of food for various microbial communities and influences their composition compared to without application [26]. In addition, farmers have greater access to organic materials than chemical fertilizers because of their low cost and local availability in different regions. Incorporating chemical fertilizers with various organic fertilizers is considered a practical approach to boosting soil fertility and increasing cereal crop yields in crop rotation systems [10,27]. Previous studies have indicated that the combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizers may have the potential to significantly enhance the growth and yield of various crops, such as soybean [28], maize [29], tomato [30], and maize–wheat, in a cropping system [31]. They highlight that the integration of chemical fertilizers and manures is beneficial for sustainable yield productivity through improving soil fertility.
Twenty years and frequent drought occurrences have adversely influenced food security and agriculture in Afghanistan [32,33]. Livestock and legume products are primary protein sources that enhance food security in Afghanistan [34]. Common bean is widely cultivated in various regions of Afghanistan and accounts for about 16% of cultivated legumes and 69,000 hectares of land in 2020 [35]. Common beans are extensively used in the country as the cheapest and most available protein source and as a poor man’s meat [36].
Therefore, increasing common bean productivity is necessary to provide adequate protein for poor Afghan households, alleviate poverty in Afghanistan, and increase farmers’ incomes in rural areas. As primary inputs, inorganic fertilizers are applied to enhance the growth and yield of common beans. However, the excessive application of chemical compounds, including fertilizers, is a primary concern related to environmental pollution in Afghanistan [37,38], especially river and groundwater contamination [39]. Furthermore, the availability of chemical fertilizers is limited for some farmers due to their high costs [10] and unstable markets [40]. Therefore, the combined use of organic and inorganic fertilizers might be suitable for reducing chemical fertilizer applications and moving toward a sustainable and sound agroecosystem [30,31,41] in the country. This study is significant as it explores the integration of organic and inorganic fertilizers to enhance common bean productivity in Afghanistan, where reliance on costly inorganic fertilizers poses a significant environmental challenge [42,43]. The findings could provide sustainable, cost-effective solutions for smallholder farmers, improving soil health, boosting yields, and reducing environmental degradation. The research also has broader implications for regions facing similar agricultural challenges, contributing to the development of sustainable farming practices worldwide.
The objectives of this study were (1) to evaluate the impact of integrating organic (farmyard manure) and inorganic (urea and diammonium phosphate (DAP)) fertilizers on the growth and yield of common bean and (2) to find the most optimal integrated rates of applied fertilizers for improving sustainable common bean productivity in Afghanistan.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design and Site Description

A field trial was conducted over two consecutive years, with the first experiment in 2020 and the second in 2021. Both experiments were carried out in the research field of the faculty of Agriculture at Kabul University, Kabul, Afghanistan (Figure 1). It was located at coordinates N 34.517175 and E 69.139377, at an altitude of 1789 m above sea level, as mentioned in our recently published study [28].
The climate in Kabul is arid and semi-arid, and cultivated crops frequently acquire irrigation. The soil’s characteristics indicated a pH of 8.2, calcareous soil, low organic matter, and a silty loam soil texture at a depth of 0–30 cm (Table 1).
The experiments were conducted from May 3 to August 30 in 2020, and from May 5 to September 10, in 2021. The research was carried out using a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) consisting of eighteen treatments with various levels of fertilizers and three replications. Each plot was 2 m × 2 m in size. The land was plowed and leveled using a 240 Massey Ferguson tractor. The first irrigation was applied to specify the water border and suitable placement of the seed in the plot.
Prior to cultivation, a seed germination test was conducted to assess seed germination viability. A local common bean variety (Capsuli) was cultivated using an inter-row spacing of 70 cm and 10 cm between the plants (intra-row spacing), with 180,000 plants per ha. Well-decomposed organic fertilizer was added to the plot two weeks before the planting and mixed with the soil surface.
Eighteen treatment combinations were designed and implemented to optimize fertilization practices for common bean production. These treatments involved varying the amounts and combinations of chemical fertilizers to assess their impact on crop yield and overall productivity. The urea fertilizer (N), containing 46% nitrogen, was applied at rates of 0, 60, and 90 kg/ha, while DAP (used as ’D’ in the treatment combinations), containing 18% nitrogen and 46% phosphorus, was applied at rates of 0, 50, and 100 kg/ha. Farmyard manure (O) was also used at 0 and 5000 kg/ha. Nitrogen fertilizer was applied twice during the crop’s growth, as follows: 70% at the cultivation stage and 30% during the flowering stage. All phosphorus fertilizer was applied during cultivation. Although common beans are nitrogen-fixing legumes, additional nitrogen supplementation was required because of the low organic matter content and alkaline nature of the soil in Kabul [28]. During the growing season, weeds were regularly removed after two weeks using hand hoeing. The cultivated plants were irrigated according to their water requirements. The integration of various fertilizers in eighteen treatments is shown in Table 2.
Additionally, the climate conditions, including precipitation, reference evapotranspiration (ETo), temperature and growing degree days (GDD), are shown in Figure 2. The GDD for common bean was determined, as described by Aryan et al. [44], using the following formula:
G D D = ( ( T max + Tmin ) / 2 T b )
The T b (T base) value was used at 10 °C, as reported in previous studies [45,46] for bean crops.
Figure 2. Details of precipitation, temperature, reference evapotranspiration (ETo), and growing degree days (GDD) for common bean in the research field at Kabul University [47].
Figure 2. Details of precipitation, temperature, reference evapotranspiration (ETo), and growing degree days (GDD) for common bean in the research field at Kabul University [47].
Applbiosci 04 00022 g002

2.2. Data Collection

Fifteen plants per treatment were selected to measure various growth and yield parameters. The growth attributes, including plant height (cm), the number of leaves, and branches per plant, were recorded 60 days after cultivation. The soil plant analysis development (SPAD) value was measured with a SPAD value meter (SPAD—502 Plus; Spectrum Technologies, Aurora, IL, USA) on the third trifoliate leaf before the flowering stage to evaluate the chlorophyll content of the crops’ leaves. The yield components, such as the number of pods per plant, the number of seeds per pod, the 100-seed weight, and grain yield, were measured after the maturation of pods and were gradually recorded until the end of the harvest.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The data for various growth and yield parameters were statistically analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), a correlation matrix, and principal component analysis (PCA) in the R language (version 3.6.1). A Tukey post hoc test was performed at a 5% significance level to compare treatment means and identify the most effective treatments for future field applications.

3. Results

3.1. Impact of Combined Fertilizers on Growth Attributes

Generally, the fertilizers’ application significantly (p < 0.05) improved the growth response parameters like plant height, the number of leaves and branches, and SPAD value. In 2020, the plant height ranged from 39.2 to 44.7 cm, and maximum significant differences of 18.8% and 14.0% were observed through the applications of three integrated types of fertilizer treatments (O5000N60D50 and O5000N60D100) compared with the non-fertilized treatment (O0N0D0) (Table 2). In 2021, the treatment of O5000N90D50 exhibited a considerable plant height increase of 10.3% among the treatments, with a variation of 42.7 to 47.1 cm (Table 2).
The applications of the O5000N90D50 treatment resulted in a significant increase in leaf number, by 30.0% compared with the negative control for two years (2020–2021). In both years, the variation in leaf numbers between the integrated organic and inorganic fertilizer treatments was higher than for a single inorganic fertilizer combination (Table 2).
The number of branches significantly increased through the application of different fertilizer treatments. The highest branch number values were obtained in 2020, with applications of O5000N60D50 and O5000N90D50 treatments at 64.1% and 56.4%, respectively. Moreover, in 2021, the same trend of significant results related to the O5000N60D50 and O5000N90D50 treatments was observed at 35.8% and 41.0%, respectively.
The SPAD values in 2020 varied among the treatments from 30.5 to 41.9, while in 2021, they ranged from 29.7 to 42.6. A gradual increase in SPAD values was observed with the increasing amounts of various combinations of organic and inorganic fertilizers during the two consecutive years (2020–2021) (Table 2). Among the treatments, the highest SPAD value in 2020 was recorded in the treatment O5000N90D100 at 37.4%, followed by O5000N90D50 at 35.4% and O5000N60D100 at 35.0%. In 2021, the treatment O5000N90D50 showed the highest value (39.7%). Notably, adding organic fertilizer significantly improved common bean growth parameters over the two growth seasons.

3.2. Effect of Integrated Fertilizers on Yield and Yield Components

The number of pods per plant over two years significantly varied through applying different fertilizers, ranging from 55.6 to 87.0 in 2020. The maximum values (56.4%, 41.9%) were observed in the O5000N60D50 and O5000N90D50 treatments compared to the negative control (Table 3). In 2021, numerous treatments of organic and inorganic fertilizers exhibited considerable enhancement in the number of pods per plant. The O5000N90D100 treatment displayed the maximum number of pods per plant (54.9%) among the four treatments with the highest number.
In 2020, the number of seeds per pod significantly increased with the application of O5000N60D100, reaching a value of 46.6% compared to the unfertilized treatment. Likewise, in 2021, the treatments O5000N60D50 and O5000N60D100 showed a considerable increase of 42.4% and 39.3% in the number of seeds per pod, respectively. In addition, substantial increases of 33.3% and 36.3 were observed with O5000N90D50 and O5000N90D100 treatments compared to the control (Table 3).
In both years, the weight of 100 seeds varied from 45.8–51.5 g in 2020 and 44.1–51.3 g in 2021. Significant increases in the weight of 100 seeds were observed in many treatments (Table 3), with maximum values of 13.7% and 16.3% noted with the O5000N90D50 treatment in 2020 and 2021, respectively.
The yields over two years (2020 and 2021) significantly (p < 0.05) varied among the treatments (Figure 3). In 2020, the application of inorganic fertilizers, such as O0N60D50, O0N60D100, and O0N90D100, resulted in significant increases of 47.5%, 58.3%, and 58.5%, respectively.
Of the organic combination, the O5000N60D50, O5000N60D100, and O5000N90D100 treatments recorded the highest significant increases of 75.6%, 76.7%, and 65.9%, respectively.
Of the inorganic fertilizer combinations (except O0N60D100), the other treatments showed considerable increases in yield parameters. The highest results (79.9% and 80.4%) were observed with the O0N90D50 and O0N90D100 treatments, respectively (Figure 3). For the integrated organic and inorganic fertilizer treatments, O5000N60D50, O5000N60D100, and O5000N90D50 showed significant results at 96.1%, 89.6% and 97.9%, respectively. The statistical analysis revealed significant differences among treatments, with O5000N60D50 consistently showing superior results in growth and yield parameters.

3.3. Correlations of Growth and Yield Parameters

The growth and yield parameters showed a great correlation among the increased parameters (Figure 4). In 2020, the number of leaves revealed a positive correlation (r = 0.65) with the number of branches. Similarly, the number of branches showed close correlations with the number of pods (r = 0.77) and 100 seed weight (r = 0.78). Moreover, the SPAD value correlated highly with plant height (r = 0.80) and grain yield (r = 0.84). In 2021, the number of leaves indicated a strong relationship with the number of branches (r = 0.78), SPAD value (r = 0.80), and number of pods per plant (r = 0.78). Likewise, the grain yield had a positive correlation with the number of leaves (r = 0.75), SPAD value (r = 0.91), number of pods per plant (r = 0.77), and number of seeds per pod (r = 0.76).
The principal component analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship among the treatments, growth and grain yield parameters (Figure 5). In 2020, it was found that adding organic fertilizer with inorganic fertilizer highly influenced the growth and yield parameters and grouping of the treatments. The effects were more visible in the leaf numbers, SPAD, 100-seed weight, number of pods per plant, and number of seeds per pod (Figure 5) under organic fertilization. The increasing growth and yield parameters were effectively influenced by applying the O5000N60D50, O5000N60D100, O5000N90D50, and O5000N90D100 treatments. In 2021, similar results for the organic fertilizer effects were observed in the correlation of treatments and parameters, as well as effective treatments (Figure 5). The O5000N60D50 treatment contains low nitrogen and phosphorus rates compared to other effective treatments, showing the same effect on the growth and yield parameters. However, the effects on growth and yield parameters varied over two consecutive growth seasons. A strong positive correlation was observed between SPAD values and grain yield (e.g., r = 0.84–0.91), highlighting the importance of nitrogen availability in improving productivity.

4. Discussion

Plants require essential nutrients for optimal growth and yield, with nitrogen and phosphorus being major elements that play crucial roles in plant growth development. Furthermore, organic materials provide various crop nutrients and help maintain soil health [48]. Therefore, we evaluated the influence of integrated organic and inorganic fertilizers on common bean growth and yield. Our results show that the combined use of organic and inorganic fertilizers significantly affected growth and yield parameters, which might be due to the availability of both macro- and micronutrients for the plants. In 2020 and 2021, the maximum plant heights, leaf numbers per plant, and branch numbers per plant were observed in the mixed treatments of organic and inorganic fertilizers (O5000N60D50, O5000N60D100, and O5000N90D50). A similar positive influence of organic and inorganic fertilizers on plant height and branch numbers per plant in common beans was reported by Mohamed et al. [49], who found that the tallest plant, highest branch numbers per plant, and the heaviest fresh and dry weights in T4 (100% M-RDN) and salicylic acid at 150 ppm treatment over two growth seasons. Likewise, the highest plant height (38.9 cm) was reported in the combined treatment of organic and inorganic fertilizers (CM2 + NP1) [50]. The increase in common bean growth parameters could be attributed to the synergistic effects of combined organic and inorganic fertilizers.
The SPAD value increased across the treatments, ranging from 29.7 to 42.6 when organic and inorganic fertilizers were used over two consecutive years (2020–2021). Previous studies have reported similar trends in SPAD value increments for beans [51] and other crops [52,53] when mixed organic and inorganic fertilizers were applied. However, the chlorophyll contents of different common bean genotypes varied depending on the specific treatment of organic and inorganic fertilizers [51]. The increase in SPAD value could be due to the increased availability of nutrients, particularly nitrogen [54], in the soil, which is crucial for plant health and can enhance leaf chlorophyll content.
The application of organic and inorganic fertilizers improved the yield and yield parameters. In 2020 and 2021, the O5000N60D50, O5000N60D100, and O5000N90D50 treatments showed a significantly higher number of pods per plant, seed per pod, and 100-seeds weight. These results are consistent with previous studies [49,50], and Mohamed et al. [49] reported that in both years (2020 and 2021), treatments T4 (100% M-RDN) and T3 (75% of M-RDN +25% O-RDN) with 150 ppm salicylic acid (SA) showed the highest 100-seed weight. Similarly, Ref. [50] found that the number of pods per plant was considerably increased in mixed treatments of organic manure and chemical fertilizers (CM1 + NP3). Moreover, Ref. [55] indicated a significant increase in pods per plant (40.83) when organic and inorganic fertilizers treatment (100% NPK + PM @ 5 t ha−1) were combined. Integrating organic fertilizers with inorganic fertilizers for common bean yield components appears to be very effective and may influence plant growth in various ways [56,57,58]. Furthermore, organic fertilizers are not only crucial for sustainable crop productivity, but they also serve as a viable alternative for restoring degraded soil [59], improving soil physical and chemical properties [60,61], preserving diverse soil organisms [62], and mitigating the need for inorganic fertilizer application [63,64,65].
The grain yield significantly increased with the application of combined organic and inorganic fertilizer treatments. In 2020, the highest results were observed with the O5000N60D50, O5000N60D100, and O5000N90D100 treatments, while in 2021, the O5000N90D100 was replaced by the O5000N90D50 treatment. Interestingly, the O5000N60D50 treatment in both experiments (2020 and 2021), which contained lower nitrogen and phosphorus levels compared to the other effective treatments, resulted in the same grain yield. This may be attributed to the nutrient balance in this treatment, as excessive nitrogen disrupts microbial activity and suppresses nodulation in common bean [66,67], while increasing phosphorus does not mitigate the inhibitory effect of nitrogen on nodule formation [68]. Additionally, previous studies stated that organic fertilizers improve the efficiency of inorganic fertilizers by providing nutrients and improving soil quality, leading to better plant growth and yield [69,70].
Plants cannot utilize all applied nitrogen in the field, eventually leading to runoff and groundwater contamination [71,72] and environmental pollution [73,74].
Combining organic and inorganic fertilizers effectively boosts grain yield and reduces inorganic fertilizer usage. Mohamed et al. [49] reported similar findings, stating that organic treatment T3 (75% M-RDN+ 25% M-RDN) + 150 ppm SA improved common bean productivity by enhancing soil physical conditions, root aeration, water drainage, and nutrient exchange. Likewise, Tunc et al. [50] reported that a maximum grain yield (2742.1 kg ha−1) was found in combined organic and inorganic fertilizers (CM1 + NP3). Furthermore, Ref. [75] indicated the highest economic value of 69,460 and 63,250 ETB from applying organic (compost) and inorganic (Triple Superphosphate) fertilizers.
The correlation matrix resulted in a positive correlation between grain yield and other growth and yield parameters, including plant height, SPAD value, and number of pods per plant in 2020, while in 2021, the correlation efficiency was found to be stronger with the number of leaves, SPAD value, number of pods per plant, and number of seeds per pods. Previous studies have confirmed the positive correlation between grain yield and several growth and yield parameters [76,77]. Moreover, SPAD values exhibited a strong, significant relationship with grain yield in both experiments (2020 and 2021), ranging from 0.84 to 0.91. This suggests that enhancing the SPAD value increases crop yield, as it reflects the nitrogen status of the crop through chlorophyll content in the leaves [78,79,80,81]. A similar trend of increasing SPAD value with various nitrogen levels has been observed in numerous crops and previous studies [52,69,82]. Furthermore, it has been reported that organic fertilizers increase leaf chlorophyll content [83], leaf area, and the number of branches, all of which commonly result in positive yield outcomes [51]. The positive outcomes observed in the growth and yield of common beans through the combined use of organic and inorganic fertilizers demonstrate the effectiveness of these treatments and underscore their transformative potential for sustainable agriculture. These findings align with global fertilizer policies by increasing organic matter application, efficiently using inorganic fertilizers, and reducing reliance on mineral fertilizers [42,84]. They also provide a valuable framework for developing agricultural policies for improving soil health, enhancing productivity, and addressing environmental challenges such as nutrient runoff and groundwater contamination.

5. Conclusions

In this study, various organic and inorganic fertilizers were integrated and applied to determine the most effective treatments for enhancing common bean productivity. Over two years of evaluation, treatments such as O5000N60D50, O5000N60D100, O5000N90D50, and O5000N90D100 significantly improved growth attributes and yield components. Notably, the O5000N60D50 treatment, with lower nitrogen and phosphorus levels, led to a remarkable 75.6% increase in grain yield in 2020 and 96.1% in 2021, demonstrating its potential for enhancing productivity while reducing dependency on inorganic fertilizer. The findings suggest that integrating organic and inorganic fertilizers can be a practical approach for improving crop yield, particularly in drought-prone and nutrient-depleted regions, and could cooperate to reduce costs, improve soil health, and mitigate environmental impacts. These practices offer a pathway to more sustainable and climate-resilient agriculture, especially for smallholder farmers facing high fertilizer costs and ecological challenges. Further research is required to explore the mechanisms of the synergistic effects of organic and inorganic fertilizers on common beans growth and yield using different soil types under various climatic conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.H., S.A. and M.D.H.; methodology, S.H., S.A., A.Y.S. and M.D.H.; software, S.H. and S.A.; validation, S.H., S.A., A.Y.S., K.S. and M.D.H.; formal analysis, S.H. and S.A.; investigation, S.H., S.A. and M.D.H.; resources, S.H., S.A. and M.D.H., data curation, S.H. and S.A.; writing—original draft preparation, S.H., S.A., K.S. and M.D.H.; writing—review and editing, S.H., S.A., A.Y.S., K.S. and M.D.H.; visualization, S.H. and S.A.; supervision, S.H., S.A. and M.D.H.; project administration, S.H., S.A. and M.D.H.; funding acquisition, S.H., S.A. and M.D.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author(s).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Al-Amri, S.M. Application of Bio-Fertilizers for Enhancing Growth and Yield of Common Bean Plants Grown under Water Stress Conditions. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 3901–3908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bamber, N.; Arulnathan, V.; Puddu, L.; Smart, A.; Ferdous, J.; Pelletier, N. Life Cycle Inventory and Assessment of Canadian Faba Bean and Dry Bean Production. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2024, 46, 442–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Horácio, E.H.; Zambrano Gavilanes, F.E.; Feliciano, M.V.; de Moraes, J.G.; Zucareli, C.; Andrade, D.S.; Maddela, N.R.; Prasad, R. Exploring the Interaction Effects between Common Bean Cultivars and Rhizobia Inoculation on Plant Growth and Yield. J. Agric. Food Res. 2024, 15, 100926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Degu, T.; Alemu, T.; Desalegn, A.; Amsalu, B.; Assefa, A. Association of Cropping Practices, Cropping Areas, and Foliar Diseases of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Ethiopia. J. Agric. Food Res. 2023, 14, 100765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shi, Z.; Blecker, C.; Richel, A.; Wei, Z.; Chen, J.; Ren, G.; Guo, D.; Yao, Y.; Haubruge, E. Three-Dimensional (3D) Printability Assessment of Food-Ink Systems with Superfine Ground White Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Protein Based on Different 3D Food Printers. LWT 2022, 155, 112906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Paula, L.C.; Lemes, A.C.; Valencia-Mejía, E.; Moreira, B.R.; Oliveira, T.S.; Campos, I.T.N.; Neri, H.F.S.; Brondani, C.; Ghedini, P.C.; Batista, K.A.; et al. Effect of Extrusion and Autoclaving on the Biological Potential of Proteins and Naturally-Occurring Peptides from Common Beans: Antioxidant and Vasorelaxant Properties. Food Chem. X 2022, 13, 100259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hussain, S.; Malakar, S.; Arora, V.K. Extrusion-Based 3D Food Printing: Technological Approaches, Material Characteristics, Printing Stability, and Post-Processing. Food Eng. Rev. 2022, 14, 100–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shumi, D. Response of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties to Rates of Blended NPS Fertilizer in Adola District, Southern Ethiopia. Afr. J. Plant Sci. 2018, 12, 164–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Etana, D.; Nebiyu, A. Response of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to Lime and TSP Fertilizer under Acid Soil. Heliyon 2023, 9, e15176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rurangwa, E.; Vanlauwe, B.; Giller, K.E. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment Bene Fi Ts of Inoculation, P Fertilizer and Manure on Yields of Common Bean and Soybean Also Increase Yield of Subsequent Maize. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2018, 261, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Polania, J.; Poschenrieder, C.; Rao, I.; Beebe, S. Estimation of Phenotypic Variability in Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation Ability of Common Bean under Drought Stress Using 15N Natural Abundance in Grain. Eur. J. Agron. 2016, 79, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hirsch, A.M.; Lum, M.R.; Downie, J.A. What Makes the Rhizobia-Legume Symbiosis so Special? Plant Physiol. 2001, 127, 1484–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bustos-Segura, C.; Godschalx, A.L.; Malacari, L.; Deiss, F.; Rasmann, S.; Ballhorn, D.J.; Benrey, B. Rhizobia-Legume Symbiosis Mediates Direct and Indirect Interactions between Plants, Herbivores and Their Parasitoids. Heliyon 2024, 10, e27815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, L.; Knight, J.D.; Lemke, R.L.; Farrell, R.E. Quantifying the Contribution of Above- and below-Ground Residues of Chickpea, Faba Bean, Lentil, Field Pea and Wheat to the Nitrogen Nutrition of a Subsequent Wheat Crop. Field Crops Res. 2024, 313, 109412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nadeem Shah, M.; Wright, D.L.; Hussain, S.; Koutroubas, S.D.; Seepaul, R.; George, S.; Ali, S.; Naveed, M.; Khan, M.; Tanveer Altaf, M.; et al. Organic Fertilizer Sources Improve the Yield and Quality Attributes of Maize (Zea mays L.) Hybrids by Improving Soil Properties and Nutrient Uptake under Drought Stress. J. King Saud. Univ. Sci. 2023, 35, 102570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, L.; Jia, R.; Qu, Z.; Li, T.; Shen, W.; Qu, D. Coupling between Nitrogen-Fixing and Iron (III)-Reducing Bacteria as Revealed by the Metabolically Active Bacterial Community in Flooded Paddy Soils Amended with Glucose. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 716, 137056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yang, X.; Xiong, J.; Du, T.; Ju, X.; Gan, Y.; Li, S.; Xia, L.; Shen, Y.; Pacenka, S.; Steenhuis, T.S.; et al. Diversifying Crop Rotation Increases Food Production, Reduces Net Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Improves Soil Health. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ayilara, M.S.; Abberton, M.; Oyatomi, O.A.; Odeyemi, O.; Babalola, O.O. Potentials of Underutilized Legumes in Food Security. Front. Soil. Sci. 2022, 2, 1020193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Das, A.; Ghosh, P.K. Role of Legumes in Sustainable Agriculture and Food Security: An Indian Perspective. Outlook Agric. 2012, 41, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Singh, H.; Northup, B.K.; Gowda, P.H.; Omara, P.; Baath, G.S.; Prasad, P.V.V. Moth Bean and Tepary Bean as Green Nitrogen Sources in Intensive Winter Wheat Cropping Systems. J. Agric. Food Res. 2024, 15, 100938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Stagnari, F.; Maggio, A.; Galieni, A.; Pisante, M. Multiple Benefits of Legumes for Agriculture Sustainability: An Overview. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2017, 4, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mahmood, F.; Khan, I.; Ashraf, U.; Shahzad, T.; Hussain, S.; Shahid, M.; Abid, M.; Ullah, S. Effects of Organic and Inorganic Manures on Maize and Their Residual Impact on Soil Physico-Chemical Properties. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2017, 17, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cai, A.; Xu, M.; Wang, B.; Zhang, W.; Liang, G.; Hou, E.; Luo, Y. Manure Acts as a Better Fertilizer for Increasing Crop Yields than Synthetic Fertilizer Does by Improving Soil Fertility. Soil Tillage Res. 2019, 189, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, H.; Xu, J.; Liu, X.; Zhang, D.; Li, L.; Li, W.; Sheng, L. Effects of Long-Term Application of Organic Fertilizer on Improving Organic Matter Content and Retarding Acidity in Red Soil from China. Soil Tillage Res. 2019, 195, 104382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Duan, Y.; Chen, L.; Zhang, J.; Li, D.; Han, X.; Zhu, B.; Li, Y.; Zhao, B.; Huang, P. Long-Term Fertilisation Reveals Close Associations between Soil Organic Carbon Composition and Microbial Traits at Aggregate Scales. Agric. Ecosyst. Env. 2021, 306, 107169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhou, Z.; Zhang, S.; Jiang, N.; Xiu, W.; Zhao, J.; Yang, D. Effects of Organic Fertilizer Incorporation Practices on Crops Yield, Soil Quality, and Soil Fauna Feeding Activity in the Wheat-Maize Rotation System. Front. Env. Sci. 2022, 10, 1058071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vanlauwe, B.; Bationo, A.; Chianu, J.; Giller, K.E.; Merckx, R.; Mokwunye, U.; Ohiokpehai, O.; Pypers, P.; Tabo, R.; Shepherd, K.D.; et al. Integrated Soil Fertility Management: Operational Definition and Consequences for Implementation and Dissemination. Outlook Agric. 2010, 39, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Turabi, A.B.; Habibi, S.; Kakar, K.; Aryan, S. Optimizing Soybean Crop Performance through the Integrated Application of Organic and Chemical Fertilizers: A Study on Alkaline Soil in Afghanistan. Crops 2024, 4, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, Y.; Li, C.; Wang, Y.; Hu, Y.; Christie, P.; Zhang, J.; Li, X. Maize Yield and Soil Fertility with Combined Use of Compost and Inorganic Fertilizers on a Calcareous Soil on the North China Plain. Soil Tillage Res. 2016, 155, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, Y.; Si, W.; Yan, S.; Wu, L.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, F.; Fan, J. Water Consumption, Soil Nitrate-Nitrogen Residue and Fruit Yield of Drip-Irrigated Greenhouse Tomato under Various Irrigation Levels and Fertilization Practices. Agric. Water Manag. 2023, 277, 108092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, J.; Yang, X.; Huang, S.; Wu, L.; Cai, Z.; Xu, M. Long-Term Combined Application of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers Increases Crop Yield Sustainability by Improving Soil Fertility in Maize-Wheat Cropping Systems. J. Integr. Agric. 2024, 24, 290–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lu, J.; Gao, B.; Li, G.; Huang, J.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J.; Zhu, D.; Yao, X. Impacts of the 20-Year War on Crop Planting and Food Security in Afghanistan. Int. J. Digit. Earth 2024, 17, 2344585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. FAO. Afghanistan Drought Risk Management Strategy; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  34. Tavva, S.; Singh, M.; Rizvi, J.; Saharawat, Y.S.; Swain, N.; Shams, K. Potential for Introducing Improved Production Practices in Food Legumes with Increased Food Security in Afghanistan. Sci. Agric. 2019, 76, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock (MAIL). Agriculture Annual Report. 2020. Available online: https://mail.gov.af/en (accessed on 10 December 2024).
  36. Lisciani, S.; Marconi, S.; Le Donne, C.; Camilli, E.; Aguzzi, A.; Gabrielli, P.; Gambelli, L.; Kunert, K.; Marais, D.; Vorster, B.J.; et al. Legumes and Common Beans in Sustainable Diets: Nutritional Quality, Environmental Benefits, Spread and Use in Food Preparations. Front. Nutr. 2024, 11, 1385232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Elrys, A.S.; Abo El-Maati, M.F.; Abdel-Hamed, E.M.W.; Arnaout, S.M.A.I.; El-Tarabily, K.A.; Desoky, E.S.M. Mitigate Nitrate Contamination in Potato Tubers and Increase Nitrogen Recovery by Combining Dicyandiamide, Moringa Oil and Zeolite with Nitrogen Fertilizer. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 209, 111839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Noli, F.; Sidirelli, M.; Tsamos, P. The Impact of Phosphate Fertilizer Factory on the Chemical and Radiological Pollution of the Surrounding Marine Area (Seawater and Sediments) in Northwestern Greece. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2024, 73, 103458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ministry of Agriculture of Afghanistan. Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock, Livestock Project NHLP); Ministry of Agriculture of Afghanistan: Kabul, Afghanistan, 2012.
  40. The World Bank. Food Security Update; The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2023; pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang, F.; Gao, X.; Wang, J.; Liu, F.; Ma, X.; Cao, H.; Chen, X.; Wang, X. Sustainable Nitrogen Management for Vegetable Production in China. Front. Agric. Sci. Eng. 2022, 9, 373–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. FAO-WTO. Global Fertilizer Markets and Policies: A Joint FAO/WTO Mapping Exercise; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2022; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  43. Bank, W. Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Agricultural Sector Review Revitalizing Agriculture for Economic Growth, Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Agricultural Sector Review; Ministry of Agriculture of Afghanistan: Kabul, Afghanistan, 2014; pp. 1–107.
  44. Aryan, S.; Gulab, G.; Hashemi, T.; Habibi, S. Pre-Spike Emergence Nitrogen Fertilizer Application as a Strategy to Improve Floret Fertility and Production Efficiency in Wheat. Field Crops Res. 2024, 319, 109623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jenni, S.; Bourgeois, G.; Laurence, H.; Roy, G.; Tremblay, N. Improving the Prediction of Processing Bean Maturity Based on the Growing-Degree Day Approach. HortScience 2000, 35, 1234–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Stagnari, F.; Pisante, M. The Critical Period for Weed Competition in French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Mediterranean Areas. Crop Prot. 2011, 30, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Weather Meta—Meteoblue. Available online: https://www.meteoblue.com/en/weather/week/meta_italy_3173524 (accessed on 10 December 2024).
  48. Mutai, J.C.; Medvecky, B.; Vanek, S.J.; Gikonyo, E.W.; Ojiem, J.O.; Fonte, S.J. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment Long-Term Organic Matter Inputs Enhance Soil Health and Reduce Soil-Borne Pathogen Pressure in Maize-Bean Rotations in Kenya. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2025, 380, 109402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mohamed, A.S.; Mohamed, M.H.M.; Halawa, S.S.; Saleh, S.A. Partial Exchange of Mineral N Fertilizer for Common Bean Plants by Organic N Fertilizer in the Presence of Salicylic Acid as Foliar Application. Gesunde Pflanz. 2023, 75, 2009–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tunc, M.; Ipekesen, S.; Basdemir, F.; Akinci, C.; Bicer, B.T. Effect of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizer Doses on Yield and Yield Components of Common Beans. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2023, 33, 1333–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Carreño Siqueira, J.A.; Marques, D.J.; Silva, M.C.G.; Silva, C.A. The Use of Photosynthetic Pigments and SPAD Can Help in the Selection of Bean Genotypes under Fertilization Organic and Mineral. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 22610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kim, T.H.; Kim, S.M. Effects of SPAD Value Variations According to Nitrogen Application Levels on Rice Yield and Its Components. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1437371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Jiang, C.; Johkan, M.; Hohjo, M.; Tsukagoshi, S.; Maruo, T. A correlation analysis on chlorophyll content and SPAD value in tomato leaves. HortResearch 2017, 71, 37–42. [Google Scholar]
  54. Leonardo, F.d.A.P.; Pereira, W.E.; Silva, S.d.M.; Costa, J.P.d. Teor de Clorofila e Índice SPAD No Abacaxizeiro Cv. Vitória Em Função Da Adubação Nitrogenada. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 2013, 35, 377–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kamble, M.Y.; Kalalbandi, B.M.; Kadam, A.R.; Rohidas, S.B. Effect of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Growth, Green Pod Yield and Economics of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Cv. HPR-35. Legume Res.—Int. J. 2015, 39, 110–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Celestina, C.; Hunt, J.R.; Sale, P.W.G.; Franks, A.E. Attribution of Crop Yield Responses to Application of Organic Amendments: A Critical Review. Soil. Tillage Res. 2019, 186, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. King, A.E.; Ali, G.A.; Gillespie, A.W.; Wagner-Riddle, C. Soil Organic Matter as Catalyst of Crop Resource Capture. Front. Env. Sci. 2020, 8, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Oldfield, E.E.; Bradford, M.A.; Augarten, A.J.; Cooley, E.T.; Radatz, A.M.; Radatz, T.; Ruark, M.D. Positive Associations of Soil Organic Matter and Crop Yields across a Regional Network of Working Farms. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2022, 86, 384–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Li, M.; Bai, L.; Yang, L.; Wang, Q.; Zhu, J. Amount, Distribution and Controls of the Soil Organic Carbon Storage Loss in the Degraded China’s Grasslands. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 944, 173848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, J.; Chen, L.; Zhang, C.; Ma, D.; Zhou, G.; Ning, Q.; Zhang, J. Combining Rotary and Deep Tillage Increases Crop Yields by Improving the Soil Physical Structure and Accumulating Organic Carbon of Subsoil. Soil Tillage Res. 2024, 244, 106252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Iroshaka Gregory Marcelus Cooray, P.L.; Chalmers, G.; Chittleborough, D. A Review of Properties of Organic Matter Fractions in Soils of Mangrove Wetlands: Implications for Carbon Storage. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2025, 201, 109660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Liu, Q.; Pang, Z.; Sun, H.; Zeng, X.; Kong, X.; Li, S.; Shen, Y. Unveiling the Maize-Benefit: Synergistic Impacts of Organic-Inorganic Fertilizer Cooperation on Rhizosphere Microorganisms and Metabolites. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2024, 193, 105171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Shang, B.; Tian, T.; Mo, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, K.; Agathokleous, E.; Ji, Y.; Feng, Z. Combined Application of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers Sustained Rice Yields and N Accumulation and Decreased Soil-Canopy System NH3 Emission. Agric. Ecosyst. Env. 2025, 377, 109260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, L.; Bi, J.; Chen, J.; Ren, B.; Zhao, B.; Liu, P.; Gu, S.; Dong, S.; Zhang, J. Energy, Environmental Footprints and Economic Benefit of Substituting Inorganic Fertilizer with Organic Manure for Winter Wheat in Huanghuaihai Plain. Eur. J. Agron. 2025, 162, 127394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Supriatna, J.; Setiawati, M.R.; Sudirja, R.; Suherman, C. Enhancing Soil Fertility, Inorganic Fertilizer Efficiency, and Oil Palm Productivity through Bio-Compost Application in Oxium Biodegradable Sacks on Former Mining Land-Podzols: Insights from a Field Study in Indonesia. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 2024, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Reinprecht, Y.; Schram, L.; Hill, B.; Pauls, K.P. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Nitrogen Fixation in Common Bean Production. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Dogra, R.C.; Dudeja, S.S. Fertilizer N and Nitrogen Fixation in Legume-Rhizobium Symbiosis. Ann. Biol. 1993, 9, 149–164. [Google Scholar]
  68. Ro, S.; Williams, J.; Chea, L. Effects of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Application on Growth and Root Nodules of Mungbean under Sandy Soil Conditions. Curr. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2023, 23, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bekele, G.; Dechassa, N.; Tana, T. Effect of Inorganic and Organic Fertilizers on Productivity of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Varieties in East Hararghe, Eastern Ethiopia. Oil Crop Sci. 2022, 7, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Yang, J.; Ren, Y.; Jia, M.; Huang, S.; Guo, T.; Liu, B.; Liu, H.; Zhao, P.; Wang, L.; Jie, X. Improving Soil Quality and Crop Yield of Fluvo-Aquic Soils through Long-Term Organic-Inorganic Fertilizer Combination: Promoting Microbial Community Optimization and Nutrient Utilization. Env. Technol. Innov. 2025, 37, 104050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Assa, B.G.; Bhowmick, A.; Cholo, B.E. Assessing Nitrate Leaching and Runoff Coefficients in the Dynamic Interplay of Seasonal Crop Biomass: A Study of Surface and Groundwater Nitrate Contamination in the Bilate Cropland Watershed. Environ. Adv. 2024, 16, 100528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hou, X.; Fan, J.; Hu, W.; Zhang, F.; Yan, F.; Xiao, C.; Li, Y.; Cheng, H. Optimal Irrigation Amount and Nitrogen Rate Improved Seed Cotton Yield While Maintaining Fiber Quality of Drip-Fertigated Cotton in Northwest China. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 170, 113710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Lu, Y.; Ma, R.; Gao, W.; You, Y.; Jiang, C.; Zhang, Z.; Kamran, M.; Yang, X. Optimizing the Nitrogen Application Rate and Planting Density to Improve Dry Matter Yield, Water Productivity and N-Use Efficiency of Forage Maize in a Rainfed Region. Agric. Water Manag. 2024, 305, 109125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kamran, M.; Yan, Z.; Ahmad, I.; Jia, Q.; Ghani, M.U.; Chen, X.; Chang, S.; Li, T.; Siddique, K.H.M.; Fahad, S.; et al. Assessment of Greenhouse Gases Emissions, Global Warming Potential and Net Ecosystem Economic Benefits from Wheat Field with Reduced Irrigation and Nitrogen Management in an Arid Region of China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2023, 341, 108197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wabela, R.; Abera, G.; Lemma, B.; Gobena, A. Effects of Integrated Fertilizer Application on Selected Soil Properties and Yield Attributes of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) on Different Soil Types. Heliyon 2024, 10, e38163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sodagar, A.; Farooq, Q.; Shakir, M. Correlation Coefficient and Path Coefficient Analysis for Yield and Its Component Traits in Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Germplasm. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. Vol. 2020, 11, 1081–1086. [Google Scholar]
  77. Dauda, S.N.; Isa, A.S.; Ndor, E.; Azagaku, E.D.; Haruna, I.M. Correlation and Path Analysis of Yield, Growth and Yield Components of Green Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Prod. Agric. Technol. 2015, 11, 83–93. [Google Scholar]
  78. Kulig, B.; Lepiarczyk, A.; Oleksy, A.; Kołodziejczyk, M. The Effect of Tillage System and Forecrop on the Yield and Values of LAI and SPAD Indices of Spring Wheat. Eur. J. Agron. 2010, 33, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Xiong, D.; Chen, J.; Yu, T.; Gao, W.; Ling, X.; Li, Y.; Peng, S.; Huang, J. SPAD-Based Leaf Nitrogen Estimation Is Impacted by Environmental Factors and Crop Leaf Characteristics. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Hammami, H.; Parsa, M.; Bayat, H.; Aminifard, M.H. The Behavior of Heavy Metals in Relation to Their Influence on the Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) Symbiosis. Env. Exp. Bot. 2022, 193, 104670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Behera, S.D.; Garnayak, L.M.; Behera, B.; Panda, R.K. Chlorophyll Content and SPAD Value Relationships Between Varying Nitrogen Application and Cultivar in Rice. J. Indian Soc. Coast. Agric. Res. 2022, 40, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Walsh, O.S.; Torrion, J.A.; Liang, X.; Shafian, S.; Yang, R.; Belmont, K.M.; McClintick-Chess, J.R. Grain Yield, Quality, and Spectral Characteristics of Wheat Grown under Varied Nitrogen and Irrigation. Agrosystems Geosci. Environ. 2020, 3, e20104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Belmeskine, H.; Ouameur, W.A.; Dilmi, N.; Aouabed, A. The Vermicomposting for Agricultural Valorization of Sludge from Algerian Wastewater Treatment Plant: Impact on Growth of Snap Bean Phaseolus vulgaris L. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. European Commission. Ensuring Availability and Affordability of Fertilisers; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2022; pp. 1–3.
Figure 1. Afghanistan map and research site location in Kabul province.
Figure 1. Afghanistan map and research site location in Kabul province.
Applbiosci 04 00022 g001
Figure 3. The effects of different fertilizer treatments on increasing common bean grain yield parameters over two years (2020 and 2021). The letters on the top of bars show differences among treatments according to Tukey’s HSD at a 5% level. The DAP indicates diammonium phosphate.
Figure 3. The effects of different fertilizer treatments on increasing common bean grain yield parameters over two years (2020 and 2021). The letters on the top of bars show differences among treatments according to Tukey’s HSD at a 5% level. The DAP indicates diammonium phosphate.
Applbiosci 04 00022 g003
Figure 4. Correlation matrix of growth attributes and yield parameters for the cultivated common bean crop. The symbols *, **, and *** in the correlation matrix indicate p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001 values, respectively.
Figure 4. Correlation matrix of growth attributes and yield parameters for the cultivated common bean crop. The symbols *, **, and *** in the correlation matrix indicate p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001 values, respectively.
Applbiosci 04 00022 g004
Figure 5. Principal component analysis of two years of experiments concerning the applied fertilizers’ treatments, growth, and yield parameters. The letters of treatments in organic conditions present T1:O5000N0D0, T2:O5000N0D50, T3:O5000N0D100, T4:O5000N60D0, T5:O5000N60D50, T6:O5000N60D100, T7:O5000N90D0, T8:O5000N90D50, and T9:O5000N90D100. The growth attributes parameters are abbreviated as PH: plant height (cm), LN: leaf number, BN: branch number, SPADv: soil and plant analyzer development value, NPP: number of pods/plant, NSP: number of seeds/pod, 100SW: 100 seeds weight (g), GY: grain yield (Kg/ha).
Figure 5. Principal component analysis of two years of experiments concerning the applied fertilizers’ treatments, growth, and yield parameters. The letters of treatments in organic conditions present T1:O5000N0D0, T2:O5000N0D50, T3:O5000N0D100, T4:O5000N60D0, T5:O5000N60D50, T6:O5000N60D100, T7:O5000N90D0, T8:O5000N90D50, and T9:O5000N90D100. The growth attributes parameters are abbreviated as PH: plant height (cm), LN: leaf number, BN: branch number, SPADv: soil and plant analyzer development value, NPP: number of pods/plant, NSP: number of seeds/pod, 100SW: 100 seeds weight (g), GY: grain yield (Kg/ha).
Applbiosci 04 00022 g005aApplbiosci 04 00022 g005b
Table 1. Physical and chemical characteristics of the field soil used for common bean cultivation.
Table 1. Physical and chemical characteristics of the field soil used for common bean cultivation.
Soil CharacteristicsAmount
pH8.2
EC (dS/cm)17.8
Organic matter (%)0.7
Nitrogen (ppm)8.9
Phosphorus (ppm)8.7
Potassium (ppm)73.2
Calcium carbonate (CaCO3, %)15.1
Sulfur (ppm)7.1
Magnesium (ppm)11.2
Soil textureSilty loam
Table 2. Description of treatments and the results of various organic and inorganic fertilizers’ effects on cultivated common bean growth attributes. Highlighted bold numbers indicate effective treatment combinations of different fertilizers on growth attribute parameters.
Table 2. Description of treatments and the results of various organic and inorganic fertilizers’ effects on cultivated common bean growth attributes. Highlighted bold numbers indicate effective treatment combinations of different fertilizers on growth attribute parameters.
Organic Manure (kg/ha)Urea (kg/ha)DAP (kg/ha)Plant Height (cm)Number of LeavesNumber of BranchesSPAD Value
20202021202020212020202120202021
00039.2 ± 2.5 b42.7 ± 2.5 b18.3 ± 2.6 b19.3 ± 1.5 b3.9 ± 1.3 b3.5 ± 0.6 b30.5 ± 1.7 d29.7 ± 1.5 c
5042.2 ± 3.1 ab43.1 ± 3.9 b20.3 ± 1.5 b20.2 ± 1.3 b4.7 ± 0.6 ab3.8 ± 0.7 b35.0 ± 2.6 bcd37.3 ± 2.1 b
10040.1 ± 2.6 ab43.7 ± 5.1 ab19.2 ± 2.1 b20.7 ± 0.8 ab4.8 ± 1.5 ab3.7 ± 0.5 b36.3 ± 1.9 abcd37.6 ± 1.5 ab
60040.0 ± 2.2 ab43.6 ± 5.3 ab19.8 ± 3.7 b20.1 ± 1.8 b4.7 ± 1.7 ab4.4 ± 0.5 ab36.2 ± 2.5 abcd37.0 ± 0.6 b
5043.5 ± 4.5 ab44.6 ± 4.1 ab20.2 ± 0.8 b23.1 ± 2.3 ab5.1 ± 1.8 ab4.6 ± 1.1 ab36.9 ± 2.6 abc39.0 ± 1.1 ab
10044.7 ± 4.6 ab45.0 ± 1.5 ab20.1 ± 0.9 b22.3 ± 1.5 ab5.4 ± 0.7 ab4.9 ± 0.9 ab38.0 ± 2.0 abc39.3 ± 1.5 ab
90042.7 ± 0.6 ab43.7 ± 4.5 ab20.0 ± 1.0 b22.1 ± 1.7 ab5.6 ± 1.8 ab3.8 ± 1.1 b38.3 ± 2.1 abc39.2 ± 2.1 ab
5042.1 ± 2.1 ab43.2 ± 1.9 b21.2 ± 1.5 b21.7 ± 2.7 ab5.3 ± 0.6 ab4.3 ± 1.2 ab39.1 ± 2.3 abc40.3 ± 1.5 ab
10043.3 ± 5.2 ab45.2 ± 6.6 ab21.2 ± 1.5 b23.4 ± 1.2 ab5.3 ± 0.6 ab4.8 ± 0.5 ab39.6 ± 2.5 abc41.6 ± 1.0 ab
50000041.5 ± 4.1 ab43.6 ± 2.1 ab21.1 ± 2.1 b20.3 ± 1.1 ab4.7 ± 0.8 ab4.3 ± 0.9 ab37.0 ± 1.2 abcd37.7 ± 1.0 ab
5041.3 ± 2.0 ab45.7 ± 3.8 ab21.3 ± 2.1 b21.3 ± 1.2 ab4.8 ± 1.1 ab4.2 ± 0.6 ab33.7 ± 1.0 cd37.3 ± 2.3 b
10043.6 ± 2.1 ab44.1 ± 5.4 ab21.2 ± 2.6 b22.3 ± 1.2 ab5.1 ± 0.2 ab4.9 ± 0.7 ab37.0 ± 1.6 abcd38.6 ± 1.0 ab
60042.4 ± 3.2 ab44.3 ± 4.6 ab21.3 ± 3.5 b21.7 ± 1.5 ab5.4 ± 1.4 ab4.5 ± 1.1 ab40.1 ± 2.5 abc39.0 ± 2.6 ab
5046.6 ± 2.5 a45.5 ± 3.2 ab22.3 ± 1.5 ab23.3 ± 1.1 ab6.4 ± 1.3 a5.3 ± 0.5 a40.9 ± 2.6 abc42.1 ± 2.5 ab
10044.7 ± 1.4 a45.1 ± 5.1 ab21.9 ± 1.1 ab21.3 ± 1.2 ab5.4 ± 0.8 ab4.6 ± 0.6 ab41.2 ± 1.5 ab41.3 ± 2.1 ab
90045.2 ± 9.1 ab44.4 ± 3.5 ab21.2 ± 2.6 b22.7 ± 2.5 ab5.1 ± 1.9 ab4.8 ± 0.8 ab40.9 ± 1.5 abc41.3 ± 1.5 ab
5044.7 ± 4.9 ab47.1 ± 2.2 a23.8 ± 1.4 a25.1 ± 2.0 a6.1 ± 1.2 a5.5 ± 0.6 a41.3 ± 2.1 ab42.6 ± 0.6 a
10044.7 ± 4.6 ab45.3 ± 4.7 ab22.3 ± 1.1 ab23.3 ± 2.6 ab5.3 ± 1.7 ab4.7 ± 0.6 ab41.9 ± 1.5 a42.0 ± 1.7 ab
The letters show differences among treatments according to Tukey’s HSD at a 5% level. Highlighted bold numbers indicate effective treatment combinations of different fertilizers on growth attribute parameters of the common bean crop.
Table 3. Description of the treatments and the results of various organic and inorganic fertilizers’ effects on the yield parameters. Highlighted bold numbers demonstrate the effective treatment of different fertilizers in relation to enhancing yield parameters.
Table 3. Description of the treatments and the results of various organic and inorganic fertilizers’ effects on the yield parameters. Highlighted bold numbers demonstrate the effective treatment of different fertilizers in relation to enhancing yield parameters.
Organic Manure (kg/ha)Urea (kg/ha)DAP (kg/ha)Number of Pods/PlantsNumber of Seeds/Pods100-Seeds Weight (g)
202020212020202120202021
00055.6 ± 5.1 c44.6 ± 5.2 c3.0 ± 0.1 b3.3 ± 0.4 b45.8 ± 1.9 b44.1 ± 2.6 b
5059.7 ± 3.5 abc46.8 ± 6.8 bc3.5 ± 0.3 ab3.4 ± 0.4 b47.1 ± 1.5 ab46.1 ± 1.5 ab
10063.3 ± 9.8 abc57.7 ± 2.7 abc3.6 ± 0.4 ab3.7 ± 0.2 ab47.7 ± 2.3 ab46.0 ± 1.2 ab
60059.1 ± 1.5 bc52.8 ± 10.5 abc3.3 ± 0.9 ab4.3 ± 0.9 ab48.1 ± 3.2 ab46.4 ± 2.5 ab
5066.1 ± 11.9 abc61.2 ± 5.7 abc3.5 ± 0.2 ab4.3 ± 0.5 ab49.0 ± 3.2 ab47.2 ± 3.2 ab
10064.7 ± 11.1 abc64.3 ± 4.5 abc3.5 ± 0.2 ab3.9 ± 0.3 ab48.9 ± 3.1 ab46.4 ± 2.1 ab
90065.1 ± 10.5 abc65.1 ± 11.3 abc3.5 ± 0.3 ab4.2 ± 0.2 ab49.2 ± 4.3 ab46.3 ± 3.1 ab
5065.0 ± 7.6 abc68.3 ± 7.2 a3.6 ± 0.3 ab3.8 ± 0.2 ab49.3 ± 6.1 ab45.6 ± 1.5 ab
10064.4 ± 3.7 abc68.1 ± 3.3 a4.0 ± 0.8 ab4.3 ± 0.1 ab48.6 ± 3.3 ab45.3 ± 2.1 ab
50000068.3 ± 15.3 abc62.6 ± 4.6 abc3.1 ± 0.3 b3.5 ± 0.9 b48.2 ± 2.1 ab48.2 ± 2.1 ab
5063.7 ± 8.1 abc55.4 ± 4.9 abc3.5 ± 0.1 ab3.9 ± 0.6 b49.2 ± 1.2 ab46.7 ± 2.5 ab
10072.5 ± 5.5 abc60.6 ± 8.3 abc3.8 ± 0.1 ab4.0 ± 0.2 ab49.3 ± 0.7 ab48.3 ± 2.5 ab
60066.4 ± 7.2 abc55.4 ± 4.9 abc4.1 ± 0.3 ab4.4 ± 0.8 ab48.2 ± 3.1 ab46.7 ± 3.5 ab
5087.0 ± 2.6 a66.3 ± 5.5 ab4.1 ± 0.2 ab4.7 ± 0.4 a51.1 ± 1.4 a51.2 ± 1.4 ab
10076.7 ± 5.7 abc62.7 ± 5.5 abc4.4 ± 0.1 a4.6 ± 0.3 a50.8 ± 1.1 a51.3 ± 1.0 a
90069.1 ± 5.8 abc61.6 ± 6.6 abc4.0 ± 1.0 ab4.3 ± 0.2 ab50.1 ± 5.3 ab46.6 ± 1.5 ab
5078.9 ± 6.6 ab68.8 ± 10.1 a3.9 ± 0.2 ab4.4 ± 0.3 ab52.1 ± 1.7 a51.3 ± 1.9 a
10077.2 ± 9.3 abc69.1 ± 5.0 a4.2 ± 0.3 ab4.5 ± 0.7 ab51.5 ± 2.1 a51.3 ± 1.5 a
The letters show differences among treatments according to Tukey’s HSD at a 5% level. Highlighted bold numbers indicate effective treatment combinations of different fertilizers on growth attribute parameters of the common bean crop.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Habibi, S.; Aryan, S.; Seerat, A.Y.; Saighani, K.; Haidari, M.D. Maximizing Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Productivity Through Application of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers in Alkaline Soil. Appl. Biosci. 2025, 4, 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/applbiosci4020022

AMA Style

Habibi S, Aryan S, Seerat AY, Saighani K, Haidari MD. Maximizing Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Productivity Through Application of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers in Alkaline Soil. Applied Biosciences. 2025; 4(2):22. https://doi.org/10.3390/applbiosci4020022

Chicago/Turabian Style

Habibi, Safiullah, Shafiqullah Aryan, Ali Yawar Seerat, Kalimullah Saighani, and Mohammad Daud Haidari. 2025. "Maximizing Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Productivity Through Application of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers in Alkaline Soil" Applied Biosciences 4, no. 2: 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/applbiosci4020022

APA Style

Habibi, S., Aryan, S., Seerat, A. Y., Saighani, K., & Haidari, M. D. (2025). Maximizing Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Productivity Through Application of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers in Alkaline Soil. Applied Biosciences, 4(2), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/applbiosci4020022

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop