Altered Transcriptome Signature in Primary Human Myotubes Exposed to Inclusion Body Myositis Serum: A Pilot Case Comparison of Anti-cN1A Positive and Negative Sera
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Patients’ Informed Consent
2.2. Serum Donor Characteristic
2.3. Blood Collection and Serum Isolation
2.4. Myoblasts Isolation and Expansion
2.5. Myoblast Differentiation
2.6. Myotube Treatment
2.7. Cell Collection and Lysis
2.8. RNA Sequencing
2.9. Reads Pre-Processing
- the raw count matrix was transformed to counts per million (CPM);
- lowly expressed genes were filtered using the filterByExpr function;
- the filtered data were normalised using the Trimmed Mean of M-values (TMM) method, which accounts for compositional biases arising from differences in library sizes, sequencing depth, or gene expression distributions across samples.
- genes were annotated using Bioconductor org.Hs.eg.db package v. 3.20.0 as protein-coding, long non-coding RNA or pseudogenes. The count matrix was subsequently filtered to retain only protein-coding genes.
2.10. Differentially Expressed Gene Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Myotubes Differentiation In Vitro
3.2. Differential Gene Expression
3.3. Upregulation of the Adaptive Immune Genes
3.4. Expression of Enzymes Within the Adenosine Salvage Pathway
3.5. NT5C1A Expression Is Downregulated in Cultured Myotubes
4. Discussion
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lilleker, J.B.; Naddaf, E.; Saris, C.G.J.; Schmidt, J.; de Visser, M.; Weihl, C.C.; Alexanderson, H.; Alfano, L.; Allenbach, Y.; Badrising, U.; et al. 272nd ENMC international workshop: 10 Years of progress-revision of the ENMC 2013 diagnostic criteria for inclusion body myositis and clinical trial readiness. 16–18 June 2023, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2024, 37, 36–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McLeish, E.; Slater, N.; Sooda, A.; Wilson, A.; Coudert, J.D.; Lloyd, T.E.; Needham, M. Inclusion body myositis: The interplay between ageing, muscle degeneration and autoimmunity. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2022, 36, 101761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larman, H.B.; Salajegheh, M.; Nazareno, R.; Lam, T.; Sauld, J.; Steen, H.; Kong, S.W.; Pinkus, J.L.; Amato, A.A.; Elledge, S.J.; et al. Cytosolic 5′-nucleotidase 1A autoimmunity in sporadic inclusion body myositis. Ann. Neurol. 2013, 73, 408–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pluk, H.; van Hoeve, B.J.; van Dooren, S.H.; Stammen-Vogelzangs, J.; van der Heijden, A.; Schelhaas, H.J.; Verbeek, M.M.; Badrising, U.A.; Arnardottir, S.; Gheorghe, K.; et al. Autoantibodies to cytosolic 5′-nucleotidase 1A in inclusion body myositis. Ann. Neurol. 2013, 73, 397–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amlani, A.; Choi, M.Y.; Tarnopolsky, M.; Brady, L.; Clarke, A.E.; Garcia-De La Torre, I.; Mahler, M.; Schmeling, H.; Barber, C.E.; Jung, M.; et al. Anti-NT5c1A autoantibodies as biomarkers in inclusion body myositis. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Herbert, M.K.; Stammen-Vogelzangs, J.; Verbeek, M.M.; Rietveld, A.; Lundberg, I.E.; Chinoy, H.; Lamb, J.A.; Cooper, R.G.; Roberts, M.; Badrising, U.A.; et al. Disease specificity of autoantibodies to cytosolic 5′-nucleotidase 1A in sporadic inclusion body myositis versus known autoimmune diseases. Front. Immunol. 2019, 75, 696–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lilleker, J.B.; Rietveld, A.; Pye, S.R.; Mariampillai, K.; Benveniste, O.; Peeters, M.T.; Miller, J.A.; Hanna, M.G.; Machado, P.M.; Parton, M.J.; et al. Cytosolic 5′-nucleotidase 1A autoantibody profile and clinical characteristics in inclusion body myositis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 76, 862–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenberg, S.A. Cytoplasmic 5′-nucleotidase autoantibodies in inclusion body myositis: Isotypes and diagnostic utility. Muscle Nerve 2014, 50, 488–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mavroudis, I.; Knights, M.; Petridis, F.; Chatzikonstantinou, S.; Karantali, E.; Kazis, D. Diagnostic accuracy of anti-CN1A on the diagnosis of inclusion body myositis. A hierarchical bivariate and Bayesian meta-analysis. J. Clin. Neuromuscul. Dis. 2021, 23, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rampazzo, C.; Miazzi, C.; Franzolin, E.; Pontarin, G.; Ferraro, P.; Frangini, M.; Reichard, P.; Bianchi, V. Regulation by degradation, a cellular defense against deoxyribonucleotide pool imbalances. Mutat. Res. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 2010, 703, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hunsucker, S.A.; Spychala, J.; Mitchell, B.S. Human cytosolic 5′-nucleotidase I: Characterization and role in nucleoside analog resistance. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 10498–10504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skladanowski, A.C.; Smolenski, R.T.; Tavenier, M.; De Jong, J.W.; Yacoub, M.H.; Seymour, A.M. Soluble forms of 5′-nucleotidase in rat and human heart. Am. J. Physiol.-Heart Circ. Physiol. 1996, 270, 1493–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tavenier, M.; Skladanowski, A.C.; De Abreu, R.A.; de Jong, J.W. Kinetics of adenylate metabolism in human and rat myocardium. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta-(Bba)-Gen. Subj. 1995, 1244, 351–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tawara, N.; Yamashita, S.; Zhang, X.; Korogi, M.; Zhang, Z.; Doki, T.; Matsuo, Y.; Nakane, S.; Maeda, Y.; Sugie, K.; et al. Pathomechanisms of anti–cytosolic 5′-nucleotidase 1A autoantibodies in sporadic inclusion body myositis. Ann. Neurol. 2017, 81, 512–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- D’Agostino, C.; Nogalska, A.; Engel, W.K.; Askanas, V. In sporadic inclusion body myositis muscle fibres TDP-43-positive inclusions are less frequent and robust than p62 inclusions, and are not associated with paired helical filaments. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2011, 37, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rose, M.R. 188th ENMC international workshop: Inclusion body myositis, 2–4 December 2011, Naarden, The Netherlands. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2013, 23, 1044–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Slater, N.; Sooda, A.; McLeish, E.; Beer, K.; Brusch, A.; Shakya, R.; Bundell, C.; James, I.; Chopra, A.; Mastaglia, F.L.; et al. High-resolution HLA genotyping in inclusion body myositis refines 8.1 ancestral haplotype association to DRB1*03:01:01 and highlights pathogenic role of arginine-74 of DRβ1 chain. J. Autoimmun. 2024, 142, 103150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rando, T.A.; Blau, H.M. Primary mouse myoblast purification, characterization, and transplantation for cell-mediated gene therapy. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2011, 125, 1275–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaster, M.; Kristensen, S.R.; Beck-Nielsen, H.; Schrøder, H.D. A cellular model system of differentiated human myotubes. Apmis 2001, 109, 735–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Picelli, S.; Faridani, O.R.; Björklund, r.K.; Winberg, G.; Sagasser, S.; Sandberg, R. Full-length RNA-seq from single cells using Smart-seq2. Nat. Protoc. 2014, 9, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, P.D.; Ebert, D.; Muruganujan, A.; Mushayahama, T.; Albou, L.P.; Mi, H. PANTHER: Making genome-scale phylogenetics accessible to all. Protein Sci. 2022, 31, 8–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Johari, M.; Vihola, A.; Palmio, J.; Jokela, M.; Jonson, P.H.; Sarparanta, J.; Huovinen, S.; Savarese, M.; Hackman, P.; Udd, B. Comprehensive transcriptomic analysis shows disturbed calcium homeostasis and deregulation of T lymphocyte apoptosis in inclusion body myositis. J. Neurol. 2022, 269, 4161–4173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Raymond, F.; Métairon, S.; Kussmann, M.; Colomer, J.; Nascimento, A.; Mormeneo, E.; García-Martínez, C.; Gómez-Foix, A.M. Comparative gene expression profiling between human cultured myotubes and skeletal muscle tissue. BMC Genom. 2010, 11, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinal-Fernandez, I.; Muñoz-Braceras, S.; Casal-Dominguez, M.; Pak, K.; Torres-Ruiz, J.; Musai, J.; Dell’Orso, S.; Naz, F.; Islam, S.; Gutierrez-Cruz, G.; et al. Pathological autoantibody internalisation in myositis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2024, 83, 1549–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanisch, F.; Hellsten, Y.; Zierz, S. Ecto-and cytosolic 5′-nucleotidases in normal and AMP deaminase-deficient human skeletal muscle. Biol. Chem. 2006, 387, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abdelmoez, A.M.; Sardón Puig, L.; Smith, J.A.B.; Gabriel, B.M.; Savikj, M.; Dollet, L.; Chibalin, A.V.; Krook, A.; Zierath, J.R.; Pillon, N.J. Comparative profiling of skeletal muscle models reveals heterogeneity of transcriptome and metabolism. Am. J. Physiol.-Cell Physiol. 2020, 318, C615–C626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cantó-Santos, J.; Valls-Roca, L.; Tobías, E.; Oliva, C.; García-García, F.J.; Guitart-Mampel, M.; Andújar-Sánchez, F.; Esteve-Codina, A.; Martín-Mur, B.; Padrosa, J.; et al. Integrated multi-omics analysis for inferring molecular players in inclusion body myositis. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riese, R.J.; Chapman, H.A. Cathepsins and compartmentalization in antigen presentation. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2000, 12, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Villadangos, J.A.; Ploegh, H.L. Proteolysis in MHC class II antigen presentation: Who’s in charge? Immunity 2000, 12, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perišić Nanut, M.; Sabotič, J.; Jewett, A.; Kos, J. Cysteine cathepsins as regulators of the cytotoxicity of NK and T cells. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ewald, S.E.; Engel, A.; Lee, J.; Wang, M.; Bogyo, M.; Barton, G.M. Nucleic acid recognition by Toll-like receptors is coupled to stepwise processing by cathepsins and asparagine endopeptidase. J. Exp. Med. 2011, 208, 643–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berdowska, I. Cysteine proteases as disease markers. Clin. Chim. Acta 2004, 342, 41–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.; Li, Q.; Lou, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Huang, J. Cysteine cathepsins and autoimmune diseases: A bidirectional Mendelian randomization. Medicine 2024, 103, e40268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Needham, M.; Mastaglia, F.L. Immunotherapies for Immune-Mediated Myopathies: A Current Perspective. Neurotherapeutics 2016, 13, 132–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Russell, W.M.S.; Burch, R.L. The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique; Methuen: London, UK, 1959. [Google Scholar]
- Dessauge, F.; Schleder, C.; Perruchot, M.-H.; Rouger, K. 3D in vitro Models of Skeletal Muscle: Myosphere, Myobundle and Bioprinted Muscle Construct. Vet. Res. 2021, 52, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, Y.; Chen, W.; Ogawa, K.; Koide, M.; Takahashi, T.; Hagiwara, Y.; Itoi, E.; Aizawa, T.; Tsuchiya, M.; Izumi, R.; et al. Feeder-Supported In Vitro Exercise Model Using Human Satellite Cells from Patients with Sporadic Inclusion Body Myositis. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]








| Diagnosis | -cN1A Status | IgG Titer a | IgA Titer a | IgM Titer a | Gender | Age (y) b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| clinically-defined IBM | Positive | 11–25 | 1–3 | 0.5–1 | Male | 79 |
| clinico-pathologically defined IBM | Negative | 1.2–3.7 | 0.1–2.6 | 0.1–0.7 | Male | 95 |
| Healthy | NA | NA | NA | NA | Male | 67 |
| Gene Symbol | Gene Name | HC | IBM− | IBM+ | UT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACTA1 | actin alpha 1, skeletal muscle | 5.22 | 3.62 | 4.92 | 7.14 |
| ACTN2 | actinin alpha 2 | −0.30 | 4.55 | 1.22 | 3.72 |
| MYH1 | myosin heavy chain 1 | −1.28 | −2.03 | −3.46 | −3.96 |
| MYH2 | myosin heavy chain 2 | 3.06 | 1.87 | −1.37 | 4.50 |
| MYH7 | myosin heavy chain 7 | −2.26 | 2.77 | −0.61 | −3.96 |
| MYL1 | myosin light chain 1 | −2.73 | 5.40 | 4.15 | 6.92 |
| MYL2 | myosin light chain 2 | 0.48 | 4.47 | 5.05 | −3.96 |
| TTN | titin | 8.34 | 7.67 | 8.34 | 9.25 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Slater, N.; Chopra, A.; Ram, R.; Adams, A.; Mastaglia, F.L.; Needham, M.; Coudert, J.D. Altered Transcriptome Signature in Primary Human Myotubes Exposed to Inclusion Body Myositis Serum: A Pilot Case Comparison of Anti-cN1A Positive and Negative Sera. Muscles 2025, 4, 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/muscles4040053
Slater N, Chopra A, Ram R, Adams A, Mastaglia FL, Needham M, Coudert JD. Altered Transcriptome Signature in Primary Human Myotubes Exposed to Inclusion Body Myositis Serum: A Pilot Case Comparison of Anti-cN1A Positive and Negative Sera. Muscles. 2025; 4(4):53. https://doi.org/10.3390/muscles4040053
Chicago/Turabian StyleSlater, Nataliya, Abha Chopra, Ramesh Ram, Abbie Adams, Frank L. Mastaglia, Merrilee Needham, and Jerome D. Coudert. 2025. "Altered Transcriptome Signature in Primary Human Myotubes Exposed to Inclusion Body Myositis Serum: A Pilot Case Comparison of Anti-cN1A Positive and Negative Sera" Muscles 4, no. 4: 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/muscles4040053
APA StyleSlater, N., Chopra, A., Ram, R., Adams, A., Mastaglia, F. L., Needham, M., & Coudert, J. D. (2025). Altered Transcriptome Signature in Primary Human Myotubes Exposed to Inclusion Body Myositis Serum: A Pilot Case Comparison of Anti-cN1A Positive and Negative Sera. Muscles, 4(4), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/muscles4040053

