Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Heartland Virus: An Evolving Story of an Emerging Zoonotic and Vector-Borne Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Bridging the Gap: Exploring the Connection between Animal and Human Health
Previous Article in Special Issue
Incidental Finding of Dirofilaria immitis (Spirurida: Onchocercidae) Microfilariae in the Bone Marrow of a Dog with Mixed Leishmania infantum-Dirofilaria immitis Infection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Real-Time Surveillance of Dog Bite Incidence in Islamabad: A Cross-Sectional Study from December 2019 to July 2020

1
National Institute of Health, Islamabad 45500, Pakistan
2
Department of Public Health, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Campbell University, Lillington, NC 27546, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Zoonotic Dis. 2023, 3(3), 179-187; https://doi.org/10.3390/zoonoticdis3030015
Submission received: 9 May 2023 / Revised: 11 July 2023 / Accepted: 12 July 2023 / Published: 17 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers of Zoonotic Diseases 2023)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Rabies is a neglected viral zoonotic disease with an almost 100% fatality rate. Here, we describe an assessment of dog bite incidence in Islamabad, Pakistan, from December 2019 to July 2020 using a cross-sectional study design and a mobile phone-based application to detect and record dog bites in the community. Our results suggest that future work on dog bite prevention should include a One Health approach incorporating mass canine vaccination, access to rabies vaccines and immunoglobulins, and community engagement.

Abstract

Rabies is a neglected viral zoonotic disease with an almost 100% fatality rate. A pilot project was initiated by the National Institute of Health (NIH), Islamabad, in collaboration with Health Security Partners (HSP) to establish a real-time dog bite surveillance in humans in public sector secondary care hospitals of Islamabad. The main objective of this study was to analyze different characteristics of dog bite cases, identify gaps in surveillance, and recommend suggestions to improve and strengthen real-time dog bite surveillance systems. An observational cross-sectional study was conducted in two major public sector hospitals in Islamabad from December 2019 to July 2020. Data on demographic information, site of the dog bite, category of the dog bite, and treatment was collected via a WVS mobile-based application. Descriptive analysis was carried out for different variables at a p-value of <0.05. A total of 338 dog bite cases were captured in the World Veterinary Service (WVS) application, and most cases (n = 226, 85.6%) were reported in December 2019 with a male-to-female ratio of 2:1. Most cases were reported from the age group of 22 to 31 years (n = 178, 53%). Out of the total number of cases, 263 (78%) presented with a single anatomical location, and 174 (51%) had Category II wounds. All dog bite patients were given only the first dose of the anti-rabies vaccine at the hospital level. Real-time dog bite surveillance via a mobile-based application proved to be effective for the timely recording and management of dog bite cases. Young people were reported to be mostly affected by dog bites, and nearly half of the cases were managed in hospitals. Refresher training was conducted for medics and paramedics for mobile-based applications, dog bite management, and proper referral of cases to tertiary care hospitals.

1. Introduction

Rabies is a lethal viral zoonotic disease that results in death for approximately 59,000 people per year in many countries in Africa and Asia [1]. Because of the lack of specific and effective medical care for individuals with clinical rabies [2,3], many countries have taken various measures to prevent and control rabies in animals. In Africa and Asia, human rabies is contracted primarily from rabid dogs. However, several wild animal species, including bats and foxes, are carriers and vectors for rabies and related viruses in the genus Lyssavirus [1,3]. Rabies is almost always fatal and is one of the most painful forms of death from any infectious disease. It is also almost always preventable if properly managed according to the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. However, if untreated or managed incorrectly, the disease assumes horrific features that invariably kill the victim, as there is no treatment currently available for this disease.
In Pakistan, the problem of dog bites and, consequently, rabies has been an extremely contentious and neglected issue. The lack of epidemiological data on rabies has been previously noted by Iqbal et al., 2019 [4] and Ahmad et al., 2021 [5]. However, in Karachi alone, over 20,000 new cases of dog bite victims are treated annually [6,7]. In other provinces, new cases of dog bites each year range from approximately 10,000 to over 200,000 per year. In particular, this issue affects children (below the age of 15 years), as they play in the streets and are unable to run away from or defend themselves against an attacking animal. Some of the bites are severe and disfiguring if the victim is bitten on the head, face, or neck. It is also possible for multiple dogs to attack small children. Many families have been devastated by the loss of a child or a working family member. Within both the medical community and the general community, information, attitudes, and prevention practices against rabies are extremely poor.
It is well known that rabies awareness in most developing countries, including Pakistan, is inadequate [1,8]. Most victims do not wash bite wounds with soap and water, and most do not report bites to a health center. In healthcare centers, medical professionals do not assess wound severity correctly and, as a result, do not make the correct decisions about the use of vaccines and rabies immune globulin (RIG). Consequently, there is much mismanagement of animal bites both within the community as well as at the professional level, resulting in deaths from rabies. An important component of rabies awareness is the vaccination of dogs in public areas [9]; however, in Pakistan, canine vaccination rates are not recorded despite the fact that the vaccination is recommended for pet dogs. In some provinces, such as Punjab, vaccines are available free of charge at public vaccination clinics. Despite this, these clinics are not available in all areas, including the study area. Additionally, there have been no studies evaluating the connection between dogs and humans in ecological settings in Pakistan [10,11]. Other efforts to reduce human exposure include governmental and private sector education programs, including the celebration of World Rabies Day. The goal of these programs is to educate the public on wound care and post-exposure human vaccination.
Rabies is a neglected and potentially underreported disease [12]. In places where there is no organized control or surveillance, data are weak [9]. Poor surveillance, underreporting, frequent misdiagnosis, and a lack of coordination between concerned departments are likely to lead to an underestimated calculation of incidence [13,14]. In the absence of specific data, a clustering of countries based on epidemiological, socioeconomic, and geographical criteria has been used to extrapolate estimates. Despite this, better surveillance and strengthened regional and global reporting systems would increase the accuracy of estimates and the impact of control programs. Country-specific studies of the burden and better surveillance are encouraged to obtain more reliable global estimates. In Pakistan, specifically, there have been few if any national rabies investigations on serology molecular epidemiology to support rabies prevention efforts [5]. A robust One Health approach has been proposed to address the issue of dog bite cases and rabies around the world [8]. Priorities for the One Health approach would include increased mass dog vaccination, access to human rabies vaccination, and community engagement.
In Pakistan, prior to 2021, there was no comprehensive surveillance system for dog-bite cases, and those cases were reported to the District Health Information System (DHIS) of the Ministry of National Health Services, Regulation and Coordination (MoNHSR&C). This system had several drawbacks, including delayed reporting and incomplete data collection. With this in mind, the reporting of dog bite cases was included in Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response System (IDSR) in 2021. To fill the gap in dog bite surveillance before 2021, the NIH started a pilot project of the World Veterinary Service (WVS) application for the real-time reporting of dog bite cases.
The National Institutes of Health of Pakistan produces equine rabies immunoglobulins (eRIG) and vero-cell culture rabies vaccine and provide these products to all public sector hospitals across the country [15]. Moreover, different cell culture rabies vaccines and human rabies immunoglobulins (hRIG) are available in the open market. As there was no real-time data available before 2021 on the incidence of rabies in Islamabad, to address this need, a pilot project was initiated by the National Institute of Health (NIH) in collaboration with Health Security Partners (HSP) to establish dog bite case surveillance in all public sector secondary care hospitals of Islamabad by collecting information on every patient who visits a secondary care hospital with a history of dog bite and is categorized as per World Health Organization protocols [16]. Moreover, open access to an application named WVS (world veterinary service for rabies) was given to strengthen surveillance of dog bite cases. This study aims to analyze different characteristics of dog bite case data, identify the gaps in dog bite data surveillance information, and recommend suggestions to improve and strengthen the dog bite surveillance system.

2. Materials and Methods

From December 2019 to July 2020, the study team relied on a convenience sample to enroll as many people as possible using a descriptive cross-sectional study approach. All people who visited the Federal Government Polyclinic Hospital or the Federal General Hospital and presented with a history of dog bites were considered as a case and enrolled in this study. Individuals who were afflicted with dog bites were categorized into Category I, II, and III depending on the type of exposure. Those with Category I exposure were defined as any patient presenting with an animal lick on intact skin, whereas Category II exposure were those patients with minor scratches or abrasions without bleeding, while Category III exposure patients were those who present with transdermal bite or scratches, contamination of mucus membrane or broken skin with saliva from animal licks, and exposure due to direct contact with bats. The following stakeholders were involved and engaged in the data collection for this research study:
(a)
National Institute of Health, Islamabad (focal point for dog bite surveillance);
(b)
Federal Government Polyclinic Hospital, Islamabad (focal point for data collection);
(c)
Federal General Hospital, Chak Shahzad, Islamabad (focal point for data collection).
Orientation meetings were held with the hospital and research authorities to brief them on the project objectives and to develop cross-site protocols. Based on the meetings, a focal person was nominated from each emergency department staff. The designated focal person was engaged in all data collection activities and was trained in data entry using the WVS mobile-based application. Data collected included demographic information, level, and site of dog bite with category and treatment status.

Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was conducted at NIH, Islamabad. Data collected at each hospital were viewed using the WVS mobile application and analyzed using epi-info 2007 (Center for Disease Control & Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA). Variables such as male-to-female ratio, age range, common site of bite and exposure level, and type of treatment were examined and compared, while the chai square test and independent t-test were calculated with p-value ≤ 0.005 for statistical analysis

3. Results

In this study, we observed 338 dog bite cases between December 2019 and July 2020. The distribution of dog bite cases by month is depicted in Figure 1; 233 bites occurred in males (69%), while 105 occurred in females (31%), with a male-to-female ratio of (2:1). The age range among dog bite cases was between 2 and 71 years, and the frequency of age is depicted in Figure 2. The majority of the cases occurred in individuals aged 22 to 31 (n = 178), followed by 32 to 41 years of age (n = 53) and 12 to 21 years (n = 46). The age group least affected was aged 62–71 (n = 10), followed by 52 to 61 years of age (n = 12). An independent t-test was applied, and it showed a significant relationship between age and gender among dog bite cases (t = 2.027, df = 336, 95% CI = 0.084, 5.535, p-value = 0.04). Similarly, a Chi-Square test showed a significant association between age groups and category of wound (χ2 = 32.614, df = 8, p-value ≤ 0.001). Also, there was a strong association of dog bite cases with gender (χ2 = 6.251, df = 2, p-value = 0.044).
More than 51% of the dog bite cases had Category II exposure (n = 174) and 32% presented with Category III exposure (n = 106). Only 18% of people had a presentation of Category I exposure with a total of 58 cases. It was also observed that a Category II wound was common in individuals younger than 40 years of age. Category I of the wound was only noted prominently in the 22–31-year age groups (Figure 3).
At the hospital, the anatomical location of each person’s wound was also recorded. Depending on the area affected, the wound of each person was categorized with presentation as a single anatomical location and multiple anatomical locations (Figure 4). About 78% of people (n = 263) presented with a single anatomical location involved, while the most commonly affected location was the foot (28%), followed by the leg (22%), and the hand (20%). The area least affected area was the arm (8%). Out of the 22% of individuals indicating multiple anatomical locations, a head–neck wound was most often the case for those individuals (7%), followed by trunk–torso–buttock in (6%) of the bite cases (Figure 4). No individuals with single or multiple anatomical locations were referred to other hospitals for further case management.

4. Discussion

Rabies is known as the oldest infectious disease to affect all mammals. The causative agent belongs to the genus Lyssavirus and the family Rhabdoviridae is transmitted from the saliva of an already infected (rabid) animal to other animals or humans through a bite as it does not transmit through intact skin [17,18,19]. Although some data are available at the province level in Pakistan, there are no data on dog bite incidence in Islamabad prior to this study. To address this need, our pilot project was initiated by the NIH to collect dog bite case data. It was observed in the data that the most common age group (>68%) among dog bite cases was 22–41 years. Similarly, data from the Central Park Medical College, Lahore, were utilized by the University of Lahore to determine public services available for dog bite victims in district Lahore, in which the most common age group was found ranging from 16 to 60 years [20]. The most likely reason for exposure in this group might be that in Pakistan, this age group is often outside the home for various activities such as business, prayer early in the morning, travel, and many other activities. Similar to other studies, we found that a higher number of dog bites occurred in males compared to females. A hospital-based survey was conducted in Bhutan among dog-bite-affected people, and it was found that males are more vulnerable to dog bites than females; another study conducted between June 2018 and May 2019 in Karachi also reflected such findings [6,21].
In many studies, it has been found that children less than 15 years of age are at high risk for dog bite attacks due to their outdoor activities [22]. Our findings are somewhat contrary as we found the greatest incidence of bites in an older age group. Despite this, other studies have also found median age values of approximately 20 years, indicating that other interactions with dog populations may be important, such as pedestrian behavior or occupational hazards [9].
Although in this study, a large increase in the number of dog bites was observed during the month of December, it is not clear whether this trend is a result of increased outdoor activity or increased human activity. In January 2020, the coronavirus pandemic began spreading across the world and human behavior changed significantly. In future studies, dog bite rates should be recorded throughout the year to evaluate seasonal patterns.
The wounds of 34 individuals with Category I wound were cleaned at home or at the hospital, while 24 did not treat their wounds. Only 84 persons with Category II exposure were evaluated by healthcare providers. Though all people with Category I, II, and III exposure were given the first dose of the anti-rabies vaccine, the rest of the doses had to be arranged by patients at their own cost. As per national and international guidelines, it is recommended that Category I patients should not be given the anti-rabies vaccine [15]. However, the common practice in Pakistan is that healthcare providers at tertiary care hospitals will administer one dose of the anti-rabies vaccine to all dog bite patients, including Category I wound patients, as noted in previous studies [9,23]. None of the patients with Category II or III wounds were treated with rabies immunoglobulins at hospitals. To do this, they had to buy the immunoglobulins from a private pharmacy. The medications were very expensive, and patients were not provided with further hospital treatment.
In Pakistan and other developing countries, rabies is a neglected viral disease [7]. The incidence of the disease is much lower compared to other viral diseases, and the subsequent load of patients with rabies infection is very low. Therefore, rabies patients are not managed properly as recommended by World Health Organization (WHO) or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at hospitals.
The World Health Organization recommends rabies immunoglobulins for Category III exposures if an individual has not been immunized previously [16]. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has provided guidelines for the management of Category III dog bites, including recommendations for patient exposures and antibiotics for patients apart from rabies immunoglobulins and vaccination [24]. In 2014, a study conducted on the management of dog bites by frontline service providers in primary healthcare facilities in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana concluded that knowledge and practices among frontline service providers are poor. This study recommended capacity-building training in the management of dog bites and relevant susceptible potential rabies infection [25]. Poor dog bite management skills and practices were also evident in our study. Here, we describe poor wound management at the hospital level in most cases of Categories II and III dog bites [9]. Often, these wounds were not cleaned or managed well. Even with Category III exposure, immunoglobulins were not administered to the patient due to the unavailability of immunoglobulins.
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, all essential medical services to patients have been compromised [1,6,16,26,27]. All outpatient services were limited to COVID-19 suspected patients. This challenge was faced not only by developing countries but also by each developed country as they reserved medical and emergency services to treat COVID-19 [28]. The lockdown was imposed in the last week of March or the first week of April 2020 throughout the whole country [29]. The public was directed to avoid unnecessary outside activity. However, these restrictions were not applicable to the health sector, pharmacies, and patients visiting emergency departments [30]. Although dedicated rabies clinics were not available in Islamabad, dog bite cases were managed by the emergency departments of public and private sector hospitals. The anti-rabies vaccine was available in the hospitals and public sector hospitals as per policy, and they provided the first dose of the anti-rabies vaccine free of cost. The anti-rabies vaccine was also available in private hospitals and pharmacies for purchase. Despite the lockdown and work-from-home policies, the NIH-Pakistan produced and supplied anti-rabies vaccines to government hospitals and dispensaries throughout the pandemic. From March to June 2020, only 26 dog bite cases were reported in this pilot project. This project was limited as a result of resource reallocation due to the COVID-19 pandemic as, ideally, rabies surveillance would include additional months of surveillance and evaluation of patient outcomes.
This study represents the first report of incidence data from Islamabad, and from the data, it is clear that real-time dog bite data can be collected easily, and that surveillance can be conducted at a facility level and potentially at district or state levels. At the hospital level, immunoglobulins are not provided, which requires patients to purchase these medications out of pocket or skip treatment if their bite is categorized as Category III. This increases the chances for patients of developing a rabies infection and its complications and may result in the death of the patient if the cost of immunoglobulins is out of reach. A limitation of this study is that it focused only on the surveillance of human bites. There is a veterinary component to the spread of rabies in Pakistan that should also be examined in order to further prevention and control efforts. Future research should include a One Health strategy to incorporate an examination of the spread of this deadly pathogen in humans, animals, and the environment.
It is recommended that immunoglobulins be provided free of cost at the facility level to minimize the burden on patients and, consequently, lower the chances of carrying rabies infection. There should be multi-stakeholder engagement in rabies surveillance using a One Health approach involving political commitment, as it will empower surveillance mechanisms from local administrations to the ministerial level. Additionally, the management of dog populations should be managed by municipal administration to control, neutralize, and vaccinate stray dogs rather than kill them.

5. Conclusions

We identified several limitations to care for dog bite patients in Pakistan, from facility-level issues surrounding access to immunoglobulins to the lack of mass vaccination across the country. In Islamabad, there has not been a systematic record of rabies cases, as there has been in other provinces and cities in Pakistan. Although data collection was limited by the COVID-19 pandemic, we report that further work is required to develop strategies for preventing the spread of rabies, including robust human, animal, and environmental surveillance. Additionally, there is a need to evaluate and consider case management for dog bite cases, as some dog bite cases may be from non-rabid dogs. As our data suggest, not all bites are Category II or III wounds and may be treated with wound cleaning or other medical procedures.

Author Contributions

This research study was conceptualized by S.u.R., M.I., and J.A.A. The methodology was planned by M.W.M., S.u.R., and M.I. Data was collected by S.u.R., M.I., and Z.A. The data were analyzed by M.W.M., S.u.R., M.A.R., and W.W.A. The draft of the manuscript was written by S.u.R., M.I., and W.W.A. The drafts were reviewed by M.W.M., M.A.K., M.A.R., and E.S.B. The manuscript was finalized by E.S.B., J.A.A., and A.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to the collection of retrospective, de-identified data.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Rabies; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recovery of a patient from clinical rabies—Wisconsin, 2004. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2004, 53, 1171–1173. [Google Scholar]
  3. Schmiedel, S.; Panning, M.; Lohse, A.; Kreymann, K.G.; Gerloff, C.; Burchard, G.; Drosten, C. Case report on fatal human rabies infection in Hamburg, Germany, March 2007. Eur. Surveill. 2007, 12, E070531-5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Iqbal, M.; Shahid, B.; Shaukat, N. Rabies in Pakistan: Roadmap for future. Pak. J. Public Health 2019, 9, 130–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ahmad, W.; Naeem, M.A.; Akram, Q.; Ahmad, S.; Younus, M. Exploring rabies endemicity in Pakistan: Major constraints & possible solutions. Acta Trop. 2021, 221, 106011. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. What is Rabies? CDC: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  7. Tenzin; Dhand, N.K.; Gyeltshen, T.; Firestone, S.; Zangmo, C.; Dema, C.; Gyeltshen, R.; Ward, M.P. Dog bites in humans and estimating human rabies mortality in rabies endemic areas of Bhutan. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2011, 5, e1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Nadal, D.; Beeching, S.; Cleaveland, S.; Cronin, K.; Hampson, K.; Steenson, R.; Abela-Ridder, B. Rabies and the pandemic: Lessons for One Health. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2022, 116, 197–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zaidi, S.M.; Labrique, A.B.; Khowaja, S.; Lotia-Farrukh, I.; Irani, J.; Salahuddin, N.; Khan, A.J. Geographic variation in access to dog-bite care in Pakistan and risk of dog-bite exposure in Karachi: Prospective surveillance using a low-cost mobile phone system. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Knobel, D.L.; Cleaveland, S.; Coleman, P.G.; Fèvre, E.M.; Meltzer, M.I.; Miranda, M.E.G.; Shaw, A.; Zinsstag, J.; Meslin, F.-X. Re-evaluating the burden of rabies in Africa and Asia. Bull. World Health Organ. 2005, 83, 360–368. [Google Scholar]
  11. Davlin, S.L.; VonVille, H.M. Canine rabies vaccination and domestic dog population characteristics in the developing world: A systematic review. Vaccine 2012, 30, 3492–3502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ahmed, T.; Hussain, S.; Zia, U.U.; Rinchen, S.; Yasir, A.; Ahmed, S.; Khan, W.A.; Tahir, M.F.; Ricketson, R. Knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) survey of canine rabies in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Punjab Province of Pakistan. BMC Public Health 2020, 20, 1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ali, M.I.; Jamali, S.; Ashraf, T.; Ahmed, N. Patterns and Outcomes of dog bite injuries presenting to emergency department in a tertiary care hospital at Karachi. Pak. J. Med. Sci. 2021, 37, 794–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Trembath, F. An Analysis of the Challenges and Possible Solutions for Dog Bite Injury Surveillance. Online J. Public Health Inform. 2015, 7, E94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. World Health Organization. Rabies Vaccinations and Immunization; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  16. Morgan, M.; Palmer, J. Dog bites. BMJ 2007, 334, 413–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rupprecht, C.E.; Abela-Ridder, B.; Abila, R.; Amparo, A.C.; Banyard, A.; Blanton, J.; Chanachai, K.; Dallmeier, K.; de Balogh, K.; Del Rio Vilas, V.; et al. Towards rabies elimination in the Asia-Pacific region: From theory to practice. Biologicals 2020, 64, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jackson, A.C. Human Rabies: A 2016 Update. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2016, 18, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevent Bites and Scratches; CDC: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  20. Llyas, N.R.R.; Latif, Z. Incidence of dog bite in rural area (Chountra), District Rawalpindi, Province Punjab, Pakistan. J. Med. Allied Sci. 2017, 7, 99–102. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kenu, E.; Ganu, V.; Noora, C.L.; Adanu, R.; Lartey, M. Management of dog bites by frontline service providers in primary healthcare facilities in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana, 2014–2015. Infect. Dis. Poverty 2018, 7, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Salahuddin, N. Guidelines for Human Rabies Prevention in Pakistan; Rabies in Asia Foundation: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  23. Salahuddin, N.; Jamali, S.; Ibraheem, K.; Sardar, S. Awareness about rabies post exposure prophylaxis in Pakistan among patients and health care workers: Results from an Asian Rabies Expert Bureau study. J. Coll. Physicians Surg. Pak. 2011, 21, 491–494. [Google Scholar]
  24. Overall, K.L.; Love, M. Dog bites to humans--demography, epidemiology, injury, and risk. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2001, 218, 1923–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Jan, H.; Naqvi, S.; Jafry, S.I.A.; Firdous, S.N. Knowledge and practice regarding dog bite management among general practitioners of District Malir, Karachi. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 2020, 70, 486–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. VOA News. Pakistan Lifts Lockdowns, Top UN Diplomat Lauds Anti-Virus Gains. Voice of America, 10 July 2020. [Google Scholar]
  27. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Rabies Vaccine; CDC: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  28. Nadal, D.; Abela-Ridder, B.; Beeching, S.; Cleaveland, S.; Cronin, K.; Steenson, R.; Hampson, K. The Impact of the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Canine Rabies Control Efforts: A Mixed-Methods Study of Observations About the Present and Lessons for the Future. Front. Trop. Dis. 2022, 3, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Saif, F. COVID-19 Pandemic in Pakistan: Stages and Recommendations. medRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shahid, E.; Taqi, U.; Fasih, U. Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on quality of life in a literate population in Pakistan. East Mediterr. Health J. 2022, 28, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Dog bites from December 2019 to July 2020.
Figure 1. Dog bites from December 2019 to July 2020.
Zoonoticdis 03 00015 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of ages among male and female dog bite victims.
Figure 2. Distribution of ages among male and female dog bite victims.
Zoonoticdis 03 00015 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of category of wound with age range.
Figure 3. Comparison of category of wound with age range.
Zoonoticdis 03 00015 g003
Figure 4. Single vs. multiple anatomical locations of dog bite.
Figure 4. Single vs. multiple anatomical locations of dog bite.
Zoonoticdis 03 00015 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rehman, S.u.; Iqbal, M.; Ali, W.W.; Malik, M.W.; Ali, Z.; Khan, M.A.; Ansari, J.A.; Ranjha, M.A.; Bailey, E.S.; Ikram, A. Real-Time Surveillance of Dog Bite Incidence in Islamabad: A Cross-Sectional Study from December 2019 to July 2020. Zoonotic Dis. 2023, 3, 179-187. https://doi.org/10.3390/zoonoticdis3030015

AMA Style

Rehman Su, Iqbal M, Ali WW, Malik MW, Ali Z, Khan MA, Ansari JA, Ranjha MA, Bailey ES, Ikram A. Real-Time Surveillance of Dog Bite Incidence in Islamabad: A Cross-Sectional Study from December 2019 to July 2020. Zoonotic Diseases. 2023; 3(3):179-187. https://doi.org/10.3390/zoonoticdis3030015

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rehman, Shafiq ur, Moin Iqbal, Wajiha Waqar Ali, Muhammad Wasif Malik, Zulfiqar Ali, Mumtaz Ali Khan, Jamil Ahmed Ansari, Muazam Abbas Ranjha, Emily S. Bailey, and Aamer Ikram. 2023. "Real-Time Surveillance of Dog Bite Incidence in Islamabad: A Cross-Sectional Study from December 2019 to July 2020" Zoonotic Diseases 3, no. 3: 179-187. https://doi.org/10.3390/zoonoticdis3030015

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop