Previous Article in Journal
Biotechnological Innovations to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance and Advance Global Health Equity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Humoral Immune Activation Against Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis Through Oral Immunization with Engineered Salmonella

by
Azar Motamedi Boroojeni
1,
Nikoo Veiskarami
1,
Elena Rita Simula
2,
Leonardo Antonio Sechi
2,3,* and
Abdollah Derakhshandeh
1,*
1
Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz 71441-11731, Iran
2
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Microbiology, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy
3
Struttura Complessa Microbiologia e Virologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Bacteria 2025, 4(3), 47; https://doi.org/10.3390/bacteria4030047
Submission received: 9 July 2025 / Revised: 1 September 2025 / Accepted: 4 September 2025 / Published: 8 September 2025

Abstract

Attenuated Salmonella strains offer an opportunity for delivering DNA vaccines to antigen-presenting cells. DNA vaccines trigger cellular immune responses, making them suitable for targeting intracellular pathogens, such as Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP). Since whole organism MAP vaccines interfere with tuberculosis diagnosis, innovative vaccine technologies have been introduced to elicit an immune response targeting species-specific antigens. Fibronectin attachment protein (FAP), a MAP surface antigen that is species-specific, can induce cellular immune responses. The present study aims to explore the immunogenic potential of a mammalian expression plasmid encoding the fap-P gene of MAP within a mouse model, utilizing a Salmonella vector for oral immunization using a fluorescent assay and Western blot analysis. The results proved the ability of the constructed plasmid to stimulate the humoral immune response in mice. Moreover, fluorescence microscopy of splenocytes confirmed the successful delivery of the plasmid to the immune system at 24, 48, and 72 h following oral administration. It can be concluded that FAP-P could be considered a candidate for further investigation in the context of MAP vaccine development. Additionally, the use of Salmonella as a delivery system not only improves the efficacy of DNA vaccines but also helps in the preliminary evaluation of the antigens’ immunogenic properties.

1. Introduction

Paratuberculosis is a chronic and progressive enteritis affecting ruminants worldwide, also known as Johne’s disease (JD). It is caused by Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP), and the affected animals show diarrhea, weight loss, and a decreased production performance, leading to substantial economic losses [1]. Considering the direct effects of MAP on animal health, economic losses, and potential public health consequences, its control among domestic ruminants is critical. Particularly, control of MAP infection in dairy cattle is essential, as they represent the most common host of the organism. Although vaccination against MAP seems promising, currently available vaccines are not permitted for use in countries employing test-and-cull protocols for the eradication of bovine tuberculosis. These vaccines contain inactivated (heat-killed) MAP, which may compromise the accuracy of the tuberculin test by inducing cross-reactivity [2]. Consequently, researchers have concentrated their efforts on subunit and DNA vaccines as potential solutions to this issue. These vaccine strategies can overcome cross-reactivity in diagnostic assays by targeting MAP-specific antigens. Furthermore, DNA vaccines confer better protection against MAP as an intracellular pathogen by inducing cell-mediated immune responses as well as humoral responses [3,4,5]. However, the efficacy of DNA vaccines can be affected by the low delivery rate of DNA plasmids into the host cells. To solve this problem, researchers have proposed using facultative intracellular bacteria such as Salmonella sp., Listeria monocytogenes, and Shigella sp. as plasmid carriers that can specifically target host antigen-presenting cells [6]. Bacterial carriers are easy to grow, modify, and scale up, making them a practical choice for vaccine development. This contributes to the cost-effectiveness and wide availability of bacterial carrier-based vaccines.
One of the key challenges in utilizing pathogenic bacteria as vaccine vectors lies in achieving an optimal balance between attenuation and immunogenicity; excessive attenuation can compromise the immune response. Compared to other bacterial vectors, Salmonella stands out as a superior candidate for vaccine delivery, offering a favorable combination of safety and the ability to elicit strong and lasting immunity. Auxotrophic mutants of Salmonella, particularly those with deletions in genes associated with the biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids, such as aroA, aroC, and hisG, are unable to replicate within the host’s cells. Nevertheless, these bacteria are capable of invading the intestinal tract of the host and can persist long enough to elicit an immune response. A double mutant of Salmonella typhimurium SL7207 has been engineered through the deletion of the aroA and hisG genes, which ensures the safety of this carrier [7,8]. Furthermore, Salmonellae can act as a natural adjuvant while also facilitating the transfer of plasmids to host macrophages. They can also be administered orally, which makes them an attractive choice in veterinary medicine [6,9].
In addition to using appropriate vaccine technologies, selecting species-specific antigens with immunogenic potential is of great importance in the success of vaccine design against MAP, such as superoxide dismutase, antigen complex 85A (Ag85A), Ag85B, and Ag85C [4]. When it comes to vaccine development, surface proteins that show both antigenic properties and virulence are usually regarded as appropriate targets. M. paratuberculosis expresses a fibronectin attachment protein on its surface to target the host’s M cells [10]. This protein, which is called FAP-P, has been shown to activate dendritic cells through toll-like receptor 4, leading to the induction of cell-mediated immune responses and a high level of IFNγ production [11]. In addition, this antigen has species-specific B-cell epitopes, which have made it a candidate for MAP infection diagnosis [12]. The combination of these traits, along with the possession of strong T-cell and B-cell epitopes makes FAP-P a promising candidate for the development of a vaccine targeting MAP infection.
This study builds upon our previous work, in which a DNA vaccine candidate encoding the FAP-P gene from MAP was constructed by cloning the gene (NCBI accession number: DQ241505.1) into the mammalian expression vector pcDNA3.1(+) [13]. The recombinant plasmid was then electroporated into Salmonella typhimurium strain SL7207 (ΔhisG, ΔaroA) to serve as a bacterial delivery vehicle. Antigen expression was confirmed in vitro using macrophages derived from the human monocytic THP-1 cell line [14]. In the present study, the same vaccine construct and bacterial carrier are employed to evaluate the efficacy of oral immunization in a murine model. A Western blot analysis was performed to assess FAP-P-specific antibody responses, thereby investigating the immunogenic potential of the candidate vaccine in vivo.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. The Bacteria Used in the Present Study

All the bacteria used in this study were constructed in previously published work [14]. The following are the names of the bacteria mentioned in this study, along with a brief description of each.
Sal-FAP: An attenuated strain of Salmonella typhimurium strain SL7207 that harbored the pre-constructed pcDNA 3.1(+) containing the FAP-P coding gene.
Sal-PC: An attenuated strain of Salmonella typhimurium strain SL7207 that harbored pcDNA 3.1(+), a mammalian expression vector.
Sal-GFP: The attenuated strain of Salmonella typhimurium that harbored the mammalian expression vector containing a green fluorescent protein coding gene

2.2. In Vitro Experiments

2.2.1. Construction of Salmonella SL7207 as a Vector-Harboring FAP Gene

The Salmonella containing pcDNA 3.1(+) harboring the FAP-P coding gene that was used in the present study, had been constructed during a previous investigation. Briefly, the FAP-P coding sequence (NCBI accession number: DQ241505.1), followed by a six-His tag-encoding sequence at its downstream end, was cloned into the pcDNA3.1(+) mammalian expression vector. The 5′ and 3′ ends of the sequence were flanked by KpnI and XhoI restriction sites, respectively. The electroporation procedure was used to transfer the constructed plasmid into the S. Typhimurium strain SL7207 (ΔhisG, ΔaroA), kindly provided by Dr. Siegfried Weiss (German Research Centre for Biotechnology, Braunschweig). The isolate is referred to as Sal-FAP. The empty vector was also electroporated into S. Typhimurium to serve as a control in subsequent assays (Sal-pc). The effective transfection of the constructed plasmid into macrophages, along with the expression of FAP-P, was also verified in macrophages derived from THP-1 cells [14].
The isolate referred to as Sal-FAP was used in the present study for the immunization of mice. To evaluate innate, nonspecific responses elicited by the DNA plasmid and bacterial carrier, Salmonella containing an empty pcDNA 3.1(+) vector (Sal-pc) was used as a control. Transformed Salmonella, which harbored a mammalian expression vector encoding a green fluorescent protein (Sal-GFP), was also utilized to show the effective introduction of the plasmid into the immune system of mice [14].

2.2.2. Verifying the Presence of the Pre-Constructed Plasmid in Salmonella

To confirm the presence of the pcDNA 3.1(+) plasmid containing the FAP-P coding gene in Salmonella, bacteria preserved in glycerol stock were cultured on Luria–Bertani (LB) agar supplemented with ampicillin (100 μg/mL). A single colony was then selected and inoculated into LB broth containing ampicillin (100 μg/mL) for overnight incubation. Following plasmid extraction, a double digestion was performed using the restriction enzymes KpnI and XhoI (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). The resulting fragments were visualized via agarose gel electrophoresis to confirm successful digestion and the presence of the target insert.

2.2.3. Bacteria Preparation

An overnight culture was prepared from all the bacteria in Luria–Bertani (LB) broth containing ampicillin (100 μg/mL). For immunization, 1000 μL of each overnight culture was inoculated in 20 mL of LB medium containing ampicillin and incubated in a shaker (150 rpm) at 37 °C until they reached the logarithmic phase of growth. Then, the bacteria were harvested by centrifugation at 13,000× g for 5 min at room temperature and washed twice in cold PBS. The pelleted cells were ultimately resuspended in 100 μL of 5% sodium bicarbonate, achieving a concentration of 1 × 109 CFU.

2.2.4. FAP-P Expression in E. coli

A pre-constructed pET-26b (+), containing the high antigenic region of the FAP-P coding gene, was used in this study. This plasmid had been transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) and successfully expressed. The protein expression procedure was performed using the previously described conditions [15]. Briefly, 1 ml of the overnight culture was inoculated into 100 mL of fresh LB medium containing the antibiotic and incubated at 37 °C, with shaking at 150 rpm until the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) reached 0.6. Then, IPTG was added to a final concentration of 1 mM, and the incubation period was extended for an additional 4 h. The bacterial pellet was obtained by centrifugation, resuspended in 50 μL 2× sample buffer (4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 10% 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.004% bromphenol blue, and 0.125 M Tris HCl, pH approx. 6.8), and heated at 90 °C for 10 min.

2.2.5. Evaluation of FAP-P Expression Using SDS-PAGE and Western Blot Analysis

The E. coli lysate from the previous step was separated using 12% SDS-PAGE and then transferred to a PVDF membrane with a semi-dry transfer apparatus (Bio-Rad, Mainland, Beijing, China). The PVDF membrane was blocked overnight in TBS (Tris-Buffered Saline) containing 5% low-fat dried milk. After blocking, the His-tagged expressed protein was detected using a 1:1000 dilution of anti-His tag HRP-conjugated antibody. The expected bands were visualized by treating the membrane with DAB (3,3′-diaminobenzidine).

2.3. In Vivo Experiments

2.3.1. Animals and Housing

A total of 15 female BALB/c mice aged 4 weeks were used. The animals were housed under standard conditions (temperature 22 ± 2 °C and humidity 50 ± 15%), and the light–dark cycle was 12:12. All the animals had free access to food and water. The animals were given a week to rest before the experiment began. This break was meant to help them adjust to their new surroundings and the procedures that would be used.

2.3.2. Experimental Groups

All the animals were divided into three groups, with each group containing five mice. One group received Sal-FAP (test group), another received Sal-pc (control-negative group), and the other received Sal-GFP.

2.3.3. Immunization Schedule

For the purpose of immunization, a total volume of 100 μL of a 10% sodium bicarbonate solution, which contained 1 × 109 CFU of bacteria, was delivered through intragastric gavage at ten-day intervals and repeated three times. The procedure was performed using a steel ball-tipped curved needle. Two groups of mice were used in the immunization procedure: (1) The test group, which received Sal-FAP to evaluate the immunogenic potential of the candidate vaccine, and (2) the negative control group, which received Sal-pc to assess any nonspecific reactions.

2.3.4. Blood Collection Procedure

Blood collection from the orbital sinus was performed ten days following the final immunization. The animals were anesthetized with ether prior to sample collection procedures. Capillary tubes were used to collect the blood into microcentrifuge tubes, and the animals were euthanized immediately after blood collection.

2.3.5. Serum Preparation

The collected blood was placed into a sterile microcentrifuge tube. The microcentrifuge tubes were left undisturbed at room temperature to allow the blood to clot. After clotting, the tubes were centrifuged at 2000× g for 10 min to separate the serum. The serum was carefully transferred to new tubes. Then, the serum samples from all mice were pooled in equal proportions and stored at −20 °C for further analysis.

2.4. Evaluation of Anti-FAP-P Antibody Production Using Western Blot Analysis

Bacterial lysates were separated using 12% SDS-PAGE, and protein bands were transferred onto a PVDF membrane using a semi-dry transfer system (Bio-Rad, Mainland, China). The membrane was then blocked overnight in TBS containing 5% low-fat dried milk. Following blocking, the membrane was washed three times with TBST (0.5 M NaCl, 0.02 M Tris [pH 7.5], and 0.05% Tween 20). It was subsequently incubated with mouse serum (1:20 dilution) as the primary antibody for four hours at room temperature. One lane contained E. coli lysate expressing FAP-P, another contained Salmonella lysate incubated with serum from the test group, and a third lane contained E. coli lysate probed with serum from the negative control group. After incubation with the primary antibody, the membrane was washed three times and then incubated with a 1:1000 dilution of monoclonal HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Sigma Lifesciences, Whitby, ON, Canada) for two hours. Finally, DAB (3,3′-diaminobenzidine) treatment (Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) was performed to visualize the immunoreactive bands.

2.5. Assessment of Antibody Specificity Using Dot Blot Analysis

The dot blot assay was conducted by blotting purified protein derivatives of Johnin onto a nitrocellulose membrane. After blotting the PPD, the membrane was blocked in TBS containing 5% low-fat dried milk for one hour at room temperature. Following three washes with TBST, the membrane was incubated with the primary antibody for two hours. Serum samples from the test and negative control groups were used as the primary antibody at a 1:20 dilution. After washing, the membrane was incubated with a 1:1000 dilution of HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Sigma Lifesciences, Whitby, ON, Canada) as the secondary antibody for two hours at room temperature. Finally, DAB (Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) was applied to visualize the results.

2.6. The Plasmid Delivery to the Immune System

To verify the delivery of plasmids to the immune system, a group received Salmonella-GFP, and subsequent to this treatment, mice were euthanized at 24, 48, and 72 h post-administration. Spleens were removed and mashed through 70 μM cell strainers with the plunger end of a syringe. The strainer was washed with 5 mL cold PBS, and the red blood cells were lysed using RBC lysis buffer. Followed by washing the cells with cold PBS, the cell pellets were resuspended in PBS and studied with fluorescence microscopy.

3. Results

3.1. Verifying the Presence of the Pre-Constructed Plasmid in Salmonella

The FAP-P coding sequence had been cloned into pcDNA 3.1(+), flanked by KpnI and XhoI restriction sites at the 5′ and 3′ ends, respectively. To confirm the presence of the recombinant plasmid in Salmonella, the plasmid was extracted and double digested using the restriction enzymes KpnI and XhoI. Separating DNA fragments using agarose gel electrophoresis confirmed the excision of a band of approximately 1 Kb from the plasmid that was equal to our expected size (Figure 1).

3.2. The Plasmid Delivery to Lymphoid Organs

To confirm the successful delivery of plasmid to lymphoid organs under experimented conditions, Sal-GFP was orally administered to a group of mice. Fluorescence microscopy conducted on splenocytes from mice at 24, 48, and 72 h following the oral administration of Sal-GFP revealed the presence of green fluorescent cells. These cells demonstrated the successful uptake and expression of the gene encoding the green fluorescent protein. As illustrated in Figure 2, after 48 and 72 h, the number of fluorescent cells was greater than that after 24 h. In Figure 3, the comparison between the fluorescence and white light microscope images of the same field better shows the significant increase in the number of fluorescent cells after 72 h.

3.3. FAP-P Expression

Recombinant FAP-P was used to detect the specific antibody produced in response to the immunization of mice with Sal-FAP. To express this protein, a pre-constructed E. coli BL21 strain containing the plasmid pET-26b(+), encoding the highly antigenic region of FAP-P, was used. This protein was His-tagged, and a Western blot analysis using an anti-His-tag antibody revealed a protein band of approximately 35 kDa expressed by the engineered E. coli, consistent with the previously reported size by Eraghi et al. [15] (Figure 4, lane B).

3.4. Antibody Production Against FAP-P

To investigate the immunogenic potential of the candidate vaccine, a group of five mice was orally immunized with Sal-FAP (test group). Another group was immunized with Sal-PC (control-negative group). The immunization was performed at ten-day intervals and repeated three times. Ten days following the final immunization, serum was obtained from each group. Then, a Western blot analysis was used to detect the production of antibodies against FAP-P. Figure 4 shows the results of the Western blot analysis.
One lane containing the cell lysate of FAP-P-expressing E. coli was treated with serum obtained from the test group (lane C) as the primary antibody and compared with lane B, which contained the same cell lysate but was treated with an anti-His-tag antibody. Lane B indicates the position of FAP-P (at around 35 kDa), and a sharp band observed in lane C at the same position suggests that the test group serum contains antibodies specific to FAP-P. Lane D, containing the same cell lysate but treated with serum obtained from the negative control group, displayed the same band, although it was less sharp. This suggests that antibodies against FAP-P were produced as a result of the immunization process.

3.5. Validation of Anti-FAP-P Antibody Specificity

To evaluate the specificity of generated antibodies against natural FAP-P and to further validate the results observed in the Western blot analysis, a dot blot assay was performed using the purified protein derivative (PPD) of MAP (Johnin). Serum from both the immunized (test) and negative control groups was applied as the primary antibody, followed by HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgG as the secondary antibody. The serum from the test group produced a positive signal, whereas the control group serum did not yield any detectable reaction. These results confirm that immunization with Sal-FAP successfully induced the production of antibodies capable of recognizing natural FAP-P. (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis, as the etiological agent of Johne’s disease, which causes chronic enteritis in ruminants, can cause serious economic losses in the dairy cattle industry. Additionally, it may also play a role in some human autoimmune diseases, such as Crohn’s disease, which has intensified the need to control paratuberculosis infection among domestic ruminants. Two vaccines that are presently available, Gudair® and Silirum®, are effective in preventing the advancement of clinical disease in the majority of vaccinated sheep and cattle, respectively. However, in addition to not providing complete protection against infection, they cannot be used in countries that use test-and-cull strategies to control bovine tuberculosis [16]. As a result, researchers have focused on designing subunit- and DNA-based vaccines using MAP-specific antigens.
In addition to effectively inducing cellular immune responses by producing endogenous antigens, some features of DNA vaccines, such as stability and ease of production, have made them a tempting choice for the rapid screening of candidate vaccine antigens. Consequently, many researchers have used this approach for the preliminary assessment of MAP antigens, recording those antigens that can trigger substantial amounts of INFγ production following immunization in mouse models [17,18]. However, the most significant obstacle to DNA vaccines is their low immunogenicity when used in large animals. To address this problem, researchers have tried many solutions to improve the delivery of DNA vaccines [19]. Live attenuated strains of Salmonella typhimurium have a prominent position among these solutions because they are very easy to produce and maintain on a large scale, making Salmonella carrier vaccines more economically viable and accessible. Qi-long Wang et al. showed that using attenuated Salmonella typhimurium aroA SL7207 harboring the Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv ESAT6-Ag85B fusion gene could improve protective responses and triggered antigen-specific mucosal responses [20]. In the present study, observing green fluorescent splenocytes 24, 48, and 72 h after oral administration of 1 × 109 CFU Salmonella containing a GFP expression plasmid confirmed the efficient delivery of plasmid using a salmonella vector in mice.
Therefore, it seems that using eukaryotic expression plasmids harboring the gene coding for MAP-specific, immunodominant antigens in combination with a Salmonella carrier has great potential to develop protective vaccines against paratuberculosis.
FAP-P is one of the mycobacterial fibronectin attachment proteins expressed by MAP. This protein is able to stimulate cell-mediated immune responses, including high levels of IFNγ through DC activation [11]. Donghee Cho et al. have reported that the B-cell epitopes around the C-terminal end of FAP-P have the most significant specificity for M. paratuberculosis, which have turned this antigen to a candidate for MAP infection diagnosis [12]. Based on the immunoinformatics analysis of FAP-P by Moezzi et al., this protein is immunogenic, non-allergenic, and non-toxic and possesses potent T-cell and B-cell epitopes [21]. Eraghi et al. reported that goats immunized with a chimeric fusion protein, consisting of heparin-binding hemagglutinin adhesin and a high antigenic region of FAP-P, can induce a strong IFN-γ response [15,22]. In a previous study, we showed that Salmonella typhimurium strain SL7207 (ΔhisG, ΔaroA) can successfully be used as a carrier for delivering pcDNA3.1+ containing fap-P gene (pcDNA-fap) to THP-1-derived macrophages, and FAP-P expression by these cells was approved using the Western blot analysis [14].
In this study, the Western blot analysis indicated that the oral immunization of mice with Salmonella carrying the pcDNA-fap elicited a detectable humoral immune response against FAP-P. Nonetheless, the appearance of a faint band in the Western blot results of the negative control group raised concerns regarding the conclusiveness of this finding.
Since the lysate of E. coli expressing FAP-P had been used to detect anti- FAP anti-bodies, it was hypothesized that cross-reactivity with E. coli proteins might be the reason for this unexpected band. To test this, a dot blot assay was performed using the PPD of MAP, which contains the native form of FAP-P. The assay revealed a positive signal with serum from the immunized group, while no reaction was observed with serum from the negative control group. These results support the hypothesis that the weak band observed in the Western blot of the control group was likely due to cross-reactivity with E. coli proteins and also confirmed the specificity of antibodies produced following mice immunization using Salmonella carrying the pcDNA-fap.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, Salmonella typhimurium strain SL7207 (ΔhisG, ΔaroA) can be used as an efficient carrier for designing DNA vaccine candidates against MAP. The ease of Salmonella carrier propagation can effectively reduce the time and labor required for the large-scale isolation of highly purified plasmids. This advantage simultaneously simplifies the initial screening of antigens and the mass production of vaccines. However, for optimal application of this carrier system, anatomical differences in the gastrointestinal tracts of various hosts must be carefully considered.
Moreover, the results suggest that FAP-P may be immunogenic in mice, although further studies are necessary to evaluate its protective efficacy and cellular immune responses in the target animal species.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.D., L.A.S. and A.M.B.; Methodology, N.V. and A.M.B.; Validation, A.D., A.M.B. and L.A.S.; Formal Analysis, A.M.B., N.V. and E.R.S.; Investigation, N.V. and E.R.S.; Data Curation, A.M.B., E.R.S. and N.V.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, A.D., L.A.S., A.M.B., N.V. and E.R.S.; Writing—Review and Editing, A.D., L.A.S., A.M.B., N.V. and E.R.S.; Visualization, A.D., L.A.S., A.M.B., N.V. and E.R.S.; Supervision, A.D. and L.A.S.; Project Administration, A.D.; Funding Acquisition, A.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded partially by Shiraz University grant number [40032617] and also Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) (No. 98023138). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This project has been approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of School of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University (dated 6 March 2024). The animal-related procedures were conducted in compliance with the committee’s established guidelines (permit: 2GCB3M163973).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [A.D.], upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank M.R. Sorbi and A. Alavi for their valuable help on some practical assays.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

  1. Idris, S.M.; Eltom, K.H.; Okuni, J.B.; Ojok, L.; Elmagzoub, W.A.; El Wahed, A.A.; Eltayeb, E.; Gameel, A.A. Paratuberculosis: The Hidden Killer of Small Ruminants. Animals 2021, 12, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Whittington, R.; Donat, K.; Weber, M.F.; Kelton, D.; Nielsen, S.S.; Eisenberg, S.; Arrigoni, N.; Juste, R.; Sáez, J.L.; Dhand, N.; et al. Control of paratuberculosis: Who, why and how. A review of 48 countries. BMC Vet. Res. 2019, 15, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bannantine, J.P.; Hines, M.E., 2nd; Bermudez, L.E.; Talaat, A.M.; Sreevatsan, S.; Stabel, J.R.; Chang, Y.-F.; Coussens, P.M.; Barletta, R.G.; Davis, W.C.; et al. A rational framework for evaluating the next generation of vaccines against Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2014, 4, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gupta, S.K.; Wilson, T.; Maclean, P.H.; Rehm, B.H.A.; Heiser, A.; Buddle, B.M.; Wedlock, D.N. Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis antigens induce cellular immune responses in cattle without causing reactivity to tuberculin in the tuberculosis skin test. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 1087015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Osterloh, A. Vaccination against Bacterial Infections: Challenges, Progress, and New Approaches with a Focus on Intracellular Bacteria. Vaccines 2022, 10, 751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Eng, S.W.; Muniandy, V.; Punniamoorthy, L.; Tew, H.X.; Norazmi, M.N.; Ravichandran, M.; Lee, S.Y. Live Attenuated Bacterial Vectors as Vehicles for DNA Vaccine Delivery: A Mini Review. Malays. J. Med. Sci. 2024, 31, 6–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hajra, D.; Datey, A.; Chakravortty, D. Attenuation Methods for Live Vaccines. Methods Mol. Biol. 2021, 2183, 331–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Plocica, J.; Guo, F.; Das, J.K.; Kobayashi, K.S.; Ficht, T.A.; Alaniz, R.C.; Song, J.; de Figueiredo, P. Engineering live attenuated vaccines: Old dogs learning new tricks. J. Transl. Autoimmun. 2023, 6, 100198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bansal, G.; Ghanem, M.; Sears, K.T.; Galen, J.E.; Tennant, S.M. Genetic engineering of Salmonella spp. for novel vaccine strategies and therapeutics. EcoSal Plus 2024, 12, eesp00042023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Secott, T.E.; Lin, T.L.; Wu, C.C. Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis fibronectin attachment protein facilitates M-cell targeting and invasion through a fibronectin bridge with host integrins. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 3724–3732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Noh, K.T.; Shin, S.J.; Son, K.H.; Jung, I.D.; Kang, H.K.; Lee, S.J.; Lee, E.K.; Shin, Y.K.; You, J.C.; Park, Y.-M. The Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis fibronectin attachment protein, a toll-like receptor 4 agonist, enhances dendritic cell-based cancer vaccine potency. Exp. Mol. Med. 2012, 44, 340–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Cho, D.; Shin, S.J.; Collins, M.T. B-cell epitope specificity of carboxy terminus of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis ModD. J. Immunoass. Immunochem. 2010, 31, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cho, D.; Shin, S.J.; Talaat, A.M.; Collins, M.T. Cloning, expression, purification and serodiagnostic evaluation of fourteen Mycobacterium paratuberculosis proteins. Protein Expr. Purif. 2007, 53, 411–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Motamedi Boroojeni, A.; Derakhshandeh, A.; Haghkhah, M.; Jalali, S.A.H.; Eraghi, V. A Novel Approach to Deliver a Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis Antigen in Eukaryotic Cells. Mol. Biotechnol. 2019, 61, 506–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Eraghi, V.; Derakhshandeh, A.; Hosseini, A.; Haghkhah, M.; Sechi, L.A.; Motamedi Boroojeni, A. Recombinant fusion protein of Heparin-Binding Hemagglutinin Adhesin and Fibronectin Attachment Protein (rHBHA-FAP) of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis elicits a strong gamma interferon response in peripheral blood mononuclear cell culture. Gut Pathog. 2019, 11, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Criado, M.; Reyes, L.E.; Marín, J.F.G.; Gutiérrez-Expósito, D.; Zapico, D.; Espinosa, J.; Pérez, V. Adjuvants influence the immune cell populations present at the injection site granuloma induced by whole-cell inactivated paratuberculosis vaccines in sheep. Front. Vet. Sci. 2024, 11, 1284902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Roupie, V.; Leroy, B.; Rosseels, V.; Piersoel, V.; Noël-Georis, I.; Romano, M.; Govaerts, M.; Letesson, J.-J.; Wattiez, R.; Huygen, K. Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of DNA vaccines encoding MAP0586c and MAP4308c of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis secretome. Vaccine 2008, 26, 4783–4794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Roupie, V.; Viart, S.; Leroy, B.; Romano, M.; Trinchero, N.; Govaerts, M.; Letesson, J.-J.; Wattiez, R.; Huygen, K. Immunogenicity of eight Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis specific antigens in DNA vaccinated and Map infected mice. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2012, 145, 74–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mahmoud, A.H.; Abdellrazeq, G.S.; Franceschi, V.; Schneider, D.A.; Bannantine, J.P.; Fry, L.M.; Hulubei, V.; De Matteis, G.; Park, K.T.; Minesso, S.; et al. Vaccination of cattle with a virus vector vaccine against a major membrane protein of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis elicits CD8 cytotoxic T cells that kill intracellular bacteria. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2024, 275, 110814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, Q.; Pan, Q.; Ma, Y.; Wang, K.; Sun, P.; Liu, S.; Zhang, X.-L. An attenuated Salmonella-vectored vaccine elicits protective immunity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Vaccine 2009, 27, 6712–6722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Moezzi, M.S.; Derakhshandeh, A.; Hemmatzadeh, F. Immunoinformatics analysis of candidate proteins for controlling bovine paratuberculosis. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0277751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Eraghi, V.; Derakhshandeh, A.; Hosseini, A.; Motamedi-Boroojeni, A. In silico design and expression of a novel fusion protein of HBHA and high antigenic region of FAP-P of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in Pichia pastoris. Mol. Biol. Res. Commun. 2017, 6, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Agarose gel electrophoresis of the digestion product: the arrow shows the excised band approximately 1 Kb in size, which corresponds to our expected size of 975 bp.
Figure 1. Agarose gel electrophoresis of the digestion product: the arrow shows the excised band approximately 1 Kb in size, which corresponds to our expected size of 975 bp.
Bacteria 04 00047 g001
Figure 2. Fluorescence microscope images of splenocytes (images taken at 400× magnification): (a): 24 h post-administration, (b): 48h post-administration, and (c): 72 h post-administration.
Figure 2. Fluorescence microscope images of splenocytes (images taken at 400× magnification): (a): 24 h post-administration, (b): 48h post-administration, and (c): 72 h post-administration.
Bacteria 04 00047 g002
Figure 3. Fluorescence and white light microscope images of splenocytes (images taken at 400× magnification). (A): White light microscope image of splenocytes 24 h post-administration, (B): fluorescence microscope image of the same field, (C): white light microscope image of splenocytes 72 h post-administration, and (D): fluorescence microscope image of the same field, (a marked increase in the number of fluorescent cells is evident after 72 h).
Figure 3. Fluorescence and white light microscope images of splenocytes (images taken at 400× magnification). (A): White light microscope image of splenocytes 24 h post-administration, (B): fluorescence microscope image of the same field, (C): white light microscope image of splenocytes 72 h post-administration, and (D): fluorescence microscope image of the same field, (a marked increase in the number of fluorescent cells is evident after 72 h).
Bacteria 04 00047 g003
Figure 4. Western blot: Lane A: Protein marker, Lane B: The cell lysate of FAP-P-expressing E.coli, treated with anti-His-tag, (the ~35 KDa band confirms the expression of FAP-P), Lane C: The cell lysate of FAP-P-expressing E.coli, treated with the test group’s serum (the red arrow shows a sharper band around the expected size of FAP-P. Red bracket indicates two bands of equal size present in separate lanes), Lane D: The cell lysate of FAP-P-expressing E.coli, treated with the control group’s serum, and Lane E: the cell lysate of Salmonella, treated with the test group’s serum (a control used to assess potential cross-reactivity with Salmonella antigens).
Figure 4. Western blot: Lane A: Protein marker, Lane B: The cell lysate of FAP-P-expressing E.coli, treated with anti-His-tag, (the ~35 KDa band confirms the expression of FAP-P), Lane C: The cell lysate of FAP-P-expressing E.coli, treated with the test group’s serum (the red arrow shows a sharper band around the expected size of FAP-P. Red bracket indicates two bands of equal size present in separate lanes), Lane D: The cell lysate of FAP-P-expressing E.coli, treated with the control group’s serum, and Lane E: the cell lysate of Salmonella, treated with the test group’s serum (a control used to assess potential cross-reactivity with Salmonella antigens).
Bacteria 04 00047 g004
Figure 5. The result of dot blot assay: Johnin PPD was blotted onto nitrocellulose membrane; mice serum samples were used as primary antibody that was detected using HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgG. (A) Shows the positive reaction between the test group serum and PPD; (B) shows the negative reaction between the control-negative group serum and PPD.
Figure 5. The result of dot blot assay: Johnin PPD was blotted onto nitrocellulose membrane; mice serum samples were used as primary antibody that was detected using HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgG. (A) Shows the positive reaction between the test group serum and PPD; (B) shows the negative reaction between the control-negative group serum and PPD.
Bacteria 04 00047 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Boroojeni, A.M.; Veiskarami, N.; Simula, E.R.; Sechi, L.A.; Derakhshandeh, A. Humoral Immune Activation Against Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis Through Oral Immunization with Engineered Salmonella. Bacteria 2025, 4, 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/bacteria4030047

AMA Style

Boroojeni AM, Veiskarami N, Simula ER, Sechi LA, Derakhshandeh A. Humoral Immune Activation Against Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis Through Oral Immunization with Engineered Salmonella. Bacteria. 2025; 4(3):47. https://doi.org/10.3390/bacteria4030047

Chicago/Turabian Style

Boroojeni, Azar Motamedi, Nikoo Veiskarami, Elena Rita Simula, Leonardo Antonio Sechi, and Abdollah Derakhshandeh. 2025. "Humoral Immune Activation Against Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis Through Oral Immunization with Engineered Salmonella" Bacteria 4, no. 3: 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/bacteria4030047

APA Style

Boroojeni, A. M., Veiskarami, N., Simula, E. R., Sechi, L. A., & Derakhshandeh, A. (2025). Humoral Immune Activation Against Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis Through Oral Immunization with Engineered Salmonella. Bacteria, 4(3), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/bacteria4030047

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop