Next Article in Journal
The Complex and Changing Genus Bacillus: A Diverse Bacterial Powerhouse for Many Applications
Previous Article in Journal
The Effects of Recreational and Pharmaceutical Substance Use on Oral Microbiomes and Health
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Emergence of the Slc11 Clade MCbgut: A Parsimonious Hypothesis for the Dawn of Lactobacillales in the Gut of Early Vertebrates

by
Mathieu F. M. Cellier
Centre Armand-Frappier Santé Biotechnologie, Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (INRS), Laval, QC H7V 1B7, Canada
Bacteria 2024, 3(3), 223-255; https://doi.org/10.3390/bacteria3030016
Submission received: 21 June 2024 / Revised: 4 August 2024 / Accepted: 9 August 2024 / Published: 14 August 2024

Abstract

:
The Lactobacillales (LB) stand apart among bacterial orders, using manganese (Mn) instead of iron to support their growth and swiftly ferment complex foods while acidifying their environment. The present work investigates whether a shift in the use of Mn could mark the origin of LB. Transmembrane carriers of the ubiquitous Slc11 family play key roles in LB physiology by catalyzing proton-dependent Mn import. In prior studies, the Slc11 clade found in LB (MntH Cb, MCb) showed both remarkable structural plasticity and highly efficient Mn uptake, and another Slc11 clade, MCg1, demonstrated divergent evolution coinciding with emergence of bacterial genera (e.g., Bordetella, Achromobacter). Herein, the Slc11 clade MCb is subdivided in sister groups: MCbie and MCbgut. MCbie derives directly from the Slc11 clade MCa, pointing an intermediate stage in the evolution of MCbgut. MCbie predominates in marine Bacillaceae, is more conserved than MCbgut, lacks the structural plasticity that typify MCbgut carriers, and responds differently to identical mutagenesis. Exchanging MCbie/MCbgut amino acid residues at sites that distinguish these clades showed conformation-dependent effects with both MCbie and MCbgut templates, and the 3D location of the targeted sites in the carrier structure together suggests that the mechanism to open the inner gate, and release Mn into the cytoplasm, differs between MCbie and MCbgut. Building on the established phylogeny for Enterococcus revealed that a pair of genes encoding MCbgut was present in the common ancestor of LB, as MCbgu1 and MCbgu2 templates exhibited distinct structural dynamics properties. These data are discussed when examining whether MCbgut+ LB could emerge in the upper gut of early vertebrates (ca. 540 mya), through genome contraction and evolution toward Mn-centrism, as they specialized as gastric aids favoring stomach establishment in jawed vertebrates through bi-directional communication with host nervous, endocrine and immune systems.

1. Introduction

The Solute carrier 11 (Slc11) family of proton (H+)-dependent importers of Mn2+ and/or Fe2+ belongs to the APC superfamily and adopts the tridimensional (3D) LeuT fold [1,2,3]. This fold consists of tandem repeats of five transmembrane helices that display inverted transmembrane topology. The repeats fold intertwined and coexist in alternate 3D configurations that are exchanged as the carrier molecule switches between two main states, either outward open (OO) or inward open (IO). The absence of sequence similarity between the two halves of the Slc11 carrier hydrophobic core implies asymmetric evolution, which could favor directional substrate transport, i.e., H+-dependent import [4,5].
Molecular evolutionary genetic and structural analyses revealed that Slc11 synapomorphy functionally distinguishes this protein family from the rest of the APC superfamily [6]. Slc11 synapomorphy comprises 11 (quasi) invariant amino acid (aa) residues forming a 3D network that articulates Slc11 substrate-selective carrier conformational exchange between the OO state and the IO state. The functional maintenance of this 3D network amid diverging Slc11 clades (e.g., bacterial MCb and MCg1) testifies to the resilience and evolvability of the molecular mechanism embedded through this synapomorphy in Slc11 architecture.
Moreover, the Slc11 mechanism of carrier coupling to the transmembrane protonmotive force (pmf), to catalyze cytoplasmic import of divalent metals such Mn and Fe (Me2+), demonstrated stepwise evolution in the form of serial synapomorphies that distinguished groups of Slc11 homologs found either in prokaryotes (the proton-dependent Mn transporters, MntH) or in eukaryotes (the Natural resistance-associated macrophage proteins, Nramp, Table S1).
MntH synapomorphies demonstrate successive sets of coevolutionary rate-shifts that progressively edified an extended ‘H+-network’ interacting with the pmf, from anaerobic bacteria (MntH B, before aerobiosis) to aerobic bacteria (MntH A) and to hyperthermophile TACK and Asgard Archaea (MntH H). This latter evolutionary intermediate likely shared a common ancestor with the first eukaryotic representative of the Slc11 family (Nramp precursor, [7]).
The Slc11 H+-network further evolved in eukaryotes, during the transition from the first to last eukaryotic common ancestor (FECA to LECA), yielding two types of Nramp: prototype Nramp, mainly found in primitive eukaryotes, and archetype Nramp, predominant in multicellular organisms of both animal and vegetal realms (Figure 1A). Coupled with phagocytosis, archetype Nramp can restrict bacterial survival by depleting the acidified phagosomal milieu of Me2+, such as Mn and Fe [8]. Arguably, the evolution of the Slc11 mechanism of carrier coupling to the pmf resulted in functional antagonism, yielding eukaryotic Nramp carriers that import Me2+ more efficiently than their bacterial counterparts (MntH).
However, both types of prototype Nramp genes (pN-I and pN-II, Table S1) were independently transferred horizontally towards bacteria. Therefore, bacterial MntH are polyphyletic [9], either of prokaryotic origin (MntH B, MntH A, MntH H) or of eukaryotic ancestry (MntH C). Alphafold (AF) [10]/Colabfold (CF) [11] 3D modeling of native MntH carriers of eukaryotic origin, from the sister clades MntH Cb (MCb) and MntH Cg1 (MCg1) Figure 1), coupled with the modeling of phylogeny-informed site-directed mutants, demonstrated paths of divergent evolution which affected both the carrier shape and functional plasticity [6].
A hallmark of MCb carriers is their conformational flexibility, and protein sequences from distinct clades (>80% sequence identity) yield 3D models representing discrete conformers. Regarding MCg, a mutation altering both the H+-network in transmembrane helix 4 (h4) and carrier shape contributed to found MCg1 clade, and further divergent epistasis within this clade yielded an apparently functional neovariant, whose emergence coincided with novel bacterial genera (Bordetella and Achromobacter). This unexpected result suggested that, by analogy, the emergence of the MCb carrier might correspond as well with the rise of other bacterial genera.
Indeed, MCb is the only Slc11 type found in the order Lactobacillales (LB), and the majority of known MCbs are encoded by LB genomes. In contrast, the close relatives Bacillales may harbor either mntH A, mntH Ca or mntH Cb genes [7]. The extraordinary flexibility and functional plasticity of MntH Cb 3D models may relate to high carrier efficiency, able to support LB’s mntH-dependent competitive exclusion of other organisms [12,13].
It is perhaps no coincidence that LB stand out as a bacterial order that relinquished heme-based metabolism to become Mn-centric microorganisms. As Mn excess can jeopardize iron-based metabolic functions, high efficiency Mn import seems particularly suited to cells notably lacking iron-cofactored enzymes for respiration, antioxidant defenses and the tricarboxylic acid cycle [14,15] and which rely on Mn instead of Fe for growth [12,16,17]. Based on the available data, it can therefore be hypothesized that the emergence of the MCb clade is concomitant to the dawn of LB.
The consensus on LB origin indicates they derived from a Bacillale ancestor through ~1/3 genome reduction and by adapting to some microaerated/anaerobic nutrient-rich environmental niche [14,15]. Given that LB are both notoriously proficient at predigesting (fermenting) complex food and common residents of animal gut [18,19], it seems plausible that LB could originate there. LB are demonstrated residents of the gut of various vertebrates (fish, reptiles, birds, and mammals) and a landmark study proposing the genus Enteroccoccus arose more than 425 million years ago (mya), as animals colonized land [20], suggests the LB common ancestor could have evolved earlier, during the Ediacaran–Cambrian transition for instance.
To test the hypothesis that the emergence of the (Slc11) MCb clade may coincide with LB origin, a sequence of possible evolutionary events linking MCa and MCb clades was established and their functional implications tested in silico using AF/CF 3D modeling. Several questions were addressed: Is there a group of MntH Cb seqs that display common properties identifying them as possible intermediates (hereby named MCbie for MCb environmental intermediate) between MntH Ca and the rest of the MCb clade (hereafter named MCbgut)? Do MCbie+ microorganisms form a defined Bacillale taxon and/or share a common habitat? How do MCbie and MCbgut in silico structural dynamics compare? Do they support a distinct mechanism of Mn import in LB? Does MCbgut emergence predate the origin of Enterococci and what was the mntH Cbgut gene complement of the common ancestor of LB?
The results presented define the Slc11 clades MCbie and MCbgut which together form the phylogroup MCb. MCbie predominates in marine Bacillaceae and is closely related to both its ancestor clade, MCa, and the common precursor of MCbgut. Regarding MCbgut, it is in fact a pair of genes, encoding MCbgu1 and MCbgu2, that typifies LB. The three MCb clades MCbie, MCbgu1 and MCbgu2 vary in their evolutionary conservation and conformational properties as the opening of the carrier inner gate apparently evolved in the transition from MCbie to MCbgut. These data are discussed, relating the emergence of MCbgut+ LB and the development of the gastro-intestinal tract of early vertebrates.

2. In Silico Results

2.1. P. halotolerans A0A1I3CNB9 Identifies the Clade MCbie, Intermediate between MCa and MCbgut

Prior work suggested that reevaluating the phylogenetic structure of the MCb clade may delineate a putative precursor lineage (MCbie) from LB’s MCbs (MCbgut). NCBI sequence wp_092092601.1 from the Carnobacteriaceae Pisciglobus halotolerans (Uniprot ID: A0A1I3CNB9), representing a cluster of sequences (seqs > 70% aa id), identified the most basal branching node of MCb and demonstrated relatively little specific divergence compared to the rest of the MCb clade [7]. Detailing the phylogenetic relationships of the A0A1I3CNB9 clade, i.e., MCbie, amid eukaryotic prototype Nramps and other bacterial MntH C clades (Figure 1B) confirmed both its basal position relative to the rest of MCb homologs, i.e., the MCbgut clade, and the relative sequence conservation of its members.
MCbie conservation contrasts with the diversity of the MCa clade, which comprises both the closest known relatives of prototype Nramp-I (pN-I) and candidate precursors of both MCb and MCg clades [7]. The phylogenetic position of MCbie identifies an evolutionary intermediate between MCa and MCbgut (Figure 1 and Figure S1). MCbie clade topology shows two subsets (Figure S1A): a ‘crown’ formed by conserved sequences from core marine Bacillales (Bacillaceae, Paenibacillaceae) plus more divergent subsets from other (Lacto)bacillales spp. that exhibit relatively reduced genomes.
MCbie is most prevalent in Bacillaceae (45 seqs, 95% id cutoff, Figure S1A) and MCbie+ genera represent about 10% of the Bacillaceae family (Figure S1B). MCbie phylogeny segregates several established genera of Bacillaceae, a pattern seemingly compatible with the vertical inheritance of mntH Cbie. Yet, both Bacillaceae and Planococcaceae encode predominantly the more ancestral MntH A (MA) protein, which contrasts with Paenibacillaceae wherein MntH Ca (MCa) predominates (205 seqs, 95% id cutoff). Neither Listeriaceae [21,22,23] nor Carnobacteriaceae (LB) harbor any MA coding gene, and contrarily to Paenibacillaceae, MCb (MCbie or MCbgut) is enriched in both of these families. In comparison, Lactobacillaceae possess exclusively MCbgut (MCbgu1 and/or MCbgu2, detailed in Section 2.6).
The topology of the MCbie ‘crown’ group shows clusters of seqs from Paenibacillaceae that diverge from clusters of seqs from Bacillaceae (Figure S1A). Moreover, only spp. of Paenibacillaceae (e.g., Paenibacillus: NZ_CP019717, NZ_CP020327 and Brevibacillus: CP048799, CP139435) were found harboring both genes encoding MCa and MCbie, including some Paenibacillus isolates wherein MCbie appears inactivated (NZ_CP019794, NZ_CP020557). Together with the large genome size of MCbie+ Paenibacillaceae spp., the data support that MCbie could originate in Bacillaceae and subsequently spread among Paenibacillaceae spp. Similarly, mntH Cbie gene transfers toward spp. showing genome erosion (e.g., Listeraceae and Carnobacteriaceae) may account for the relative divergence of their encoded MCbie proteins.
Phylogenomic analyses [24,25] support this interpretation, showing marine MCbie+ Bacillaceae, e.g., Heyndrickxia and Lederbergia genera, as more likely candidate precursors of LB than the MA+ Bacillus spp. (B. subtilis and B. anthracis, Figure 2 and Figure S2). Staphylococcaceae and Listeriaceae are known as highly derived Bacillales families of Fe-dependent bacteria [26,27] and both lack MA encoding genes.
Altogether, the data presented clarify the emergence of the Slc11 clade MCb from its precursor MCa (itself derived from eukaryotic pN-I, Figure 1A). An intermediate step in this process produced the sister clades MCbie and MCbgut, respectively, predominant in marine Bacillaceae, such as Heyndrickxia and Lederbergia, which are aerobic, and in anaerobic LB. These results provide molecular insight into the hypothetical evolutionary transition relating MA+ Bacillales to MCbgut+ LB through a marine MCbie+ Bacillaceae intermediate.

2.2. AF/CF 3D Modeling of Native MCbie and MCbgut Carriers Differs Significantly

The multiple alignment of diverse sequences from the three groups MCa, MCbie and MCbgut demonstrate 29 membranous sites that coevolved in the transition between MCa and MCb, i.e., coevolved mutations fixed in the common ancestor of MCbie and MCbgut (Figure 3A,B). Also, sequence variations in extra membranous loops of the carrier molecule show several instances of selective conservation between MCa and MCbie vs. MCbgut (e.g., l 4/5, l6/7, l7/8, l8/9 and l9/10, Figure S3), indicating that the common precursor of the MCb clade evolved directly from MCa.
A 3D display of these 29 coevolved sites between MCa and MCb, on superposed MCbgut models representing both the OO and IO states (cracked-open representation segregating half segments of helix 5 (h5), Figure 3C), shows accumulation along h5. The tilt of h5 modeled during MCbgut carrier conformation switch was shown to mobilize separate communities of networked residues, involving one or the other half of h5, each contributing to open the inner gate of the carrier toward the cell interior [6]. The 29 (MCa/MCb) rate-shifted sites segregate in distinct areas involving either h5C, h7C, h1b, h2N, h6a and h11C (right panel) or h5N, h4C and h8N plus additional sites scattered across the ‘hash module’, which hosts a large part of the Slc11 H+-network (left panel).
These data indicate that evolution of the precursor of the MCb clade directly from MCa involved a set of coevolved sites. These evolutionary coupled mutations, common to both MCbie and MCbgut, may form a clade-specific (MCb) synapomorphy. Their accumulation in local areas of the 3D structure that involve one half or the other of h5, whose tilting during MCbgut carrier cycle connects outer gate locking and inner gate opening [6], suggests these processes evolved in the transition from the MCa to MCb common ancestor.
The 3D modeling properties of MCbgut templates differ from other MntH C clades, apparently due to their intrinsic carrier plasticity and the presence of flexible loops [6,7]. Based on the candidate MCb synapomorphy (Figure 3B,C), one could expect that AF2/CF models of native MCbie carriers would resemble known MCbgut structures either modeled or solved. However, the 3D modeling of MCbie templates differed significantly (Figure 4).
The 3D correspondence of available Uniprot/AF2 MCbie models showed very similar predicted structures that did not clearly segregate with either the OO state or the IO state of solved structures of MCbgut homologs (Figure 4A). This result contrasts with the array of functional conformers that AF2 predicted using MCbgut sequences (Figure 4A, inset).
Examining the models obtained for four representative MCbie templates (~70% pairwise aa id) shows they do not represent clearly distinct OO or IO candidate conformers (Figure 4B), and their sequence relationships (cf Figure 1B, i.e., between WP_256212980.1 (NCBI proxy for Uniprot A0A143Y4E1), WP_092092601.1 (A0A1I3CNB9), WP_092652552.1 (A0A1H9T065) and WP_277619782.1 (proxy for A0A3D8TQ78)) suggests MCbie phylogeny does not influence AF2 or CFnt predictions. The two sequences that produced similar CFnt models, apparently closer to the MCbgut IO state, were selected for further analysis (A0A143Y4E1 and A0A1H9T065, both from Carnobacteriaceae spp., Trichococcus palustris and Isobaculum melis, respectively).
The topology of the MCb clade (MCbie and MCbgut) resembles the previously characterized MCg1 clade ([6] and Figure 1B): both subdivide in sister groups that differ in their relative extent of divergence. For the MCg1 clade, this situation was correlated with (i) founding mutations that introduced intrinsic structural constraints and (ii) reversion to a less constrained model structure as a result of extensive epistatic divergence.
Regarding MCbgut, divergence from the MCb common ancestor produced remarkably flexible and intrinsically dynamic structures, whose predicted conformations reflected phylogenetic diversity (Figure 4A, inset). In contrast, the 3D models obtained using relatively diverse MCbie seem structurally constrained (Figure 4B), suggesting that MCbgut could evolve out of epistatic divergence from (its common ancestor with) MCbie.

2.3. Evolution of MCb Carrier Cycling between MCbie and MCbgut

To examine this, the possible functional evolution between MCbie and MCbgut was investigated by comparing the AF/CF 3D modeling of native and mutant templates targeted at sites that underwent coevolutionary rate-shifts in the transition from MCbie to MCbgut (putative MCbgut synapomorphy). Meaning, 15 or 16 mutations that distinguish MCbgut from MCbie were cointroduced into the sequences A0A143Y4E1 and A0A1H9T065, respectively (71.5% aa id, Figure 4C and Figure 5A and Table S2). This approach aimed at testing the impact on the MCbie predicted structure of 17 comutations that typify instead the MCbgut clade.
As a result, the CFnt modeling of the compound mutant A0A143Y4E1_15mt (Table S2) predicted a structure closer to the IO state of MCbgut (Figure 4C). This suggested MCbgut synapomorphy may signify functional determinants, as the corresponding residues map to 3D areas either partially overlapping with MCb synapomorphy (Figure 5A and Figure 3B,C, respectively) or specific to MCbgut (e.g., l 7/8). In addition, while the native MCbie A0A143Y4E1 CFnt model cannot fully superimpose onto the MCbgut IO CFpdb model (Q5HQ64_WFLF, [6]), the predicted structure for the compound mutant A0A143Y4E1_15mt does so almost perfectly (Figure 5B).
These data suggest that a select portion of MCbgut carrier, which contributes to inner gate opening [6], was rearranged compared to MCbie. Per residue root mean square deviation (pRMSD) from the MCbgut IO CFpdb model (Q5HQ64_WFLF) shows the segments rearranged in the MCbie compound mutant include l1/2 & h2, h4-h6, l 7/8 & h8, and l 9/10 & h10 (Figure 5C). These structural rearrangements extend beyond the areas targeted for mutagenesis (Figure 5A), implying the targeted sites may directly mediate MCb carrier conformation change.
Investigating this further, the reciprocal mutational approach was applied to MCbgut homologs from distinct clades (>80% aa id) that produce discrete native conformers, either OO or IO or in between ([6] and Figure 6A), to determine how MCbie-specifying residues affect the MCbgut predicted structure.
This yielded two types of results: (i) for templates whose predicted native conformers adopt the IO state, the 17 mutations introduced resulted in the prediction of OO conformers, a result similar to that obtained by targeting instead five sites of Slc11 synapomorphy ([6] and Figure 6A,B); (ii) considering templates whose predicted native conformers adopt the OO state or in-between state, identical compound mutagenesis had comparatively little or no effect.
The conformational effects of the reciprocal mutageneses performed were both asymmetric and specific, favoring an MCbgut-like IO state for the MCbie A0A143Y4E1_15mt mutant while triggering MCbgut conformation switch from the IO state to the OO state but showing marginal effects on alternate MCbgut carrier conformational states (OO and in between). Together these results demonstrate the functional impact of exchanging a set of coevolved residues that distinguish MCbgut from MCbie, showing a conformation-dependent effect on MCbgut carrier 3D modeling.

2.4. Mutagenesis of Slc11 Synapomorphy Supports Functional Divergence of MCbgut and MCbie

A comparative analysis of CF modeling sensitivity to mutagenesis targeting Slc11 synapomorphy has proven useful to decipher the functional evolution between MCb and MCg1 clades and within the MCg1 clade [6]. The introduction of the canonical VNT mutation (h6 VY, h3 YN, and h6 T) into templates from both clades resulted in the conversion of native IO conformers into OO mutant conformers. However, the respective sensitivity to either h3 YN and/or h6 VY +/ h6 T mutations varied between clades.
Applying the VNT mutation to MCbie A0A143Y4E1 produced the expected CFnt modeling result, which predicted an OO conformer like the reference MCbgut Q5HQ64-VNT [6], indicated by a comparable broad scale rearrangement (Figure 7A) and quasi-superimposable structures (Figure 7B). In contrast, none of native A0A143Y4E1 predicted structures (using CFnt or AF2) nor the CFnt model for A0A143Y4E1_15mt fitted alike the MCbgut OO model conformer. Hence, mutating five sites of Slc11 synapomorphy induced a conformational response of MCbie A0A143Y4E1 like those observed before with the MCbgut and MCg1 clades.
However, detailing the effect of h3 YN and/or h6 VY +/ h6 T mutations showed that, unlike MCbgut, MCbie A0A143Y4E1 predicted conformation was fully switched in response to the h3 YN mutation only (Figure 8A,B), as previously observed using MCg1 A0A149PND7 [6]. Yet, contrary to MCg1 A0A149PND7, additional mutations targeting potential suppressor sites of a YN-induced conformation switch had no impact on the modeling of A0A143Y4E1 YN (Figure 8C).
In addition, A0A143Y4E1_15mt modeling was insensitive to h3 YN mutagenesis and neither the A0A143Y4E1 YN, A0A143Y4E1_15mt YN nor A0A143Y4E1_15mt model were affected by adding two other h3 mutations (Figure 8D). Furthermore, reversing three coevolutionary rate-shifts that distinguish MCbgut in l 7/8 (DPA sites #582, #589, #596, Figure 5A) restored a degree of conformational response to h3 YN mutagenesis, observed with the A0A143Y4E1_15mt DPAYN model, akin to the A0A143Y4E1 YN modeling response (Figure 8E).
These results indicate MCbie modeling operated the conformation switch toward the OO state in response to the Slc11 synapomorphy VNT mutation, as expected from prior modeling studies of MCbgut and MCg1. But MCbie A0A143Y4E1 modeling displays unique sensitivity to h3 YN mutation, which is lost after introducing 15 evolutionary coupled mutations that specify the clade MCbgut. These data support divergent structure/function relationships between MCbgut and MCbie and suggest a conformational role for intervening loops that are distal from the Mn2+ binding site.

2.5. Conformation-Dependent Impact of Mutations Targeting MCb l 7/8 and l 8/9

Reversing MCbie/MCbgut rate-shifts in l 7/8 (DPA) was guided by observing that they map to a specific area of the MCbgut structure (Figure 5A), i.e., not part of the evolutionary transition from MCa to MCb (Figure 3B,C) and polymorphic (Figure S3). And preserving this area as is in MCbie retained some conformational flexibility in the MCbie mutant A0A143Y4E1_15mt DPAYN (Figure 8E). Moreover, the functional importance of these DPA residues for MCbie conformational response to h3 YN mutagenesis is underscored by their conservation in the MCa clade (Figure S3, sites #582, #589, #596).
Along similar lines, mutation at site #632 (Figure 5A) in l 8/9 (Figure S3) was reevaluated. To mimic more precisely the MCbie/MCbgut residue exchange vs. the MCbie/MCa exchange, the two sites #632 and #633 (cf Figure S3) were initially mutated in A0A143Y4E1_15mt (counted as one mutation). To verify whether this dual mutation also introduced a 3D constraint, it was reverted as well, either alone or combined to l 7/8 DPA reversion mutation (Figure 9A). In both instances, restoring MCbie native sequence in l 8/9 recovered some conformational flexibility. The modeling of the amended mutant A0A143Y4E1_15mt DPA-KP responded to YN-induced conformation exchange like native A0A143Y4E1 (Figure 9C). However, in the absence of the YN mutation, the amended mutant A0A143Y4E1_15mt DPA-KP deviated locally from the reference MCbgut Q5HQ64 IO conformer (Figure 9B) and did not appear superimposable anymore (Figure 9C,D).
In sum, introducing 15 coevolutionary rate-shifts that distinguish MCbgut from MCbie into MCbie recipient A0A143Y4E1 allows for the modeling of an IO conformer that is superimposable onto the MCbgut reference IO conformer (A0A143Y4E1_15mt). Conversely, the reciprocal mutagenesis of MCbgut members demonstrated native conformation-dependent effects, underscoring the functional significance of the targeted sites (cf Section 2.3).
However, A0A143Y4E1_15mt lost 3D flexibility and responsiveness to the YN-induced conformation exchange from the IO state to the OO state. This impact was alleviated by reverting five of the mutations that targeted extramembranous loops distal from the substrate binding site (l 7/8 & l 8/9). Yet, these same reverted sites abrogated the 3D resemblance observed between the MCbie compound mutant and reference MCbgut structure in the IO state. These five sites therefore demonstrate a conformation-dependent effect in the MCbie template A0A143Y4E1, and similar results were obtained using another MCbie template, A0A285P4W2 (from the Bacillaceae Terribacillus aidingensis, Figure S4).
To conclude, reciprocal mutations of coevolutionary rate-shifts that took place as MCbie and MCbgut diverged exert distinct conformation-dependent effects on the 3D modeling of members of each clade. This implies the targeted sites contribute to the mechanism of MCb carrier cycling, but their respective role may differ within the MCbie or MCbgut model structure. Together, these data relate MCbgut-specific functional divergence to the IO state of the carrier, which seems consistent with a possible shift in Mn import capacity in LB.

2.6. MCbgut Phylogeny Reveals a Pair of Distinct Carriers in the Common Ancestor of LB

To approximate a possible period for this functional transition, from marine MCbie+ Bacillaceae toward MCbgut+ LB, MCbgut phylogeny was further explored, first, among spp. of the Enterococcaceae family because its origin was dated (>425 million years ago [20]) and its structure comprises four clades, one of which diverged basally [30]. MCbgut phylogeny is complex due to pervasive horizontal gene transfers [31] and multiple copies per genome (e.g., six in the Levilactobacillus suantsaii strain CBA3634 chromosome, NZ_CP059603.1). This may explain why the phylogenies of enterococcacal MCbgut and Enterococci spp. vary (Figure S5). But the general topology of the tree and the profound dichotomy of the Enterococcus clade A vs. clades B-D were recovered, implying a significant phylogenetic signal encoded by MCbgut. The separate grouping of MCbgut seqs resulting from gene transfer to bacteria of different phyla, either enterobacterial or actinobacterial spp., indicates distinct events. The position of the Enterococcaceae P. termitis seq suggested it may demarcate two types of MCbgut, meaning that perhaps the common ancestor of Enterococcaceae possessed a pair of distinct mntH Cbgut genes.
To address this possibility, MCbgut phylogeny was determined across the LB order using a set of representative seqs from each LB family (Figure 10). The results show the presence of two clusters of MCbgut, labeled MCbgu1 and MCbgu2, found both in Enterococcaceae and Lactobacillaceae. In addition, the data suggest two other clades could diverge independently from MCbgu2.
The present tree thus supports the possible existence of two MCbgut copies in the common ancestor of LB. Several spp. of Lactobacillaceae harbor both genes encoding MCbgu1 and MCbgu2 on their chromosome (e.g., NZ_LT854705.1, NZ_CP059603.1), implying perhaps some LB retained both genes since their origin.
The presence of both MCbgu1 and MCbgu2 in the common ancestor of LB suggests they are not functionally equivalent. To evaluate this proposal, three individual sequences from each type were subjected to AF/CF modeling using either native sequences or compound mutants. Native AF2 models showed that, both in Lactobacillaceae and Enterococcaceae, MCbgu1 and MCbgu2 yielded distinct conformers in the OO state (Figure 11A and Figure 11B, respectively). The MCbgu2 type appeared closer to the fully OO conformation and less structurally conserved among Enterococcaceae. The introduction of a set of (reciprocal) mutations corresponding to the MCbie/MCbgut evolutionary transition (cf Section 2.3) confirmed it had little impact on the OO conformers of the MCbgu1 and MCbgu2 types. These data are in accordance with previous observations showing a strong phylogenetic component in the AF/CF modeling of MCbgut [6].
To compare MCbgu1 and MCbgu2 structural dynamics a combination of mutations able to mimic the carrier forward transition, i.e., exchanging the OO state modeled by CF pdb using the native sequence for the IO state of a mutated carrier, was necessary. Along sites previously identified as conformationally active, either as part of Slc11 synapomorphy or contributing to inner gate opening, additional sites were targeted in helices 3, 4, 8 and 9, which together constitute the Slc11 carrier ‘hash module’ known to interact with the pmf [2,3]. All targeted sites are evolutionary conserved so that identical mutations were introduced among both the MCbgu1 and MCbgu2 templates (Table S2).
Introducing a series of 15 phylogenetically aware mutations into the Paucilactobacillus wasatchensis template PLBgu1 enabled us to model an IO conformer like the MCbgut Q5HQ64 reference CF model (Figure 12A,C). Applying this combination of mutations to other MCbgu1 had a similar yet less pronounced effect, producing models more advanced toward, albeit not switched to, the IO state (Figure 12E and Figure S6A,C). In comparison, the MCbgu2 mutant response appeared more sequence-specific with two templates (Ecegu2, Lbrgu2) progressing toward the IO state (Figure 12F and Figure S6B,D).
To further distinguish the modeling properties of MCbgu1 and MCbgu2 templates, a set of discriminatory type ii evolutionary rate-shifts was targeted to perform reciprocal residue exchanges between MCbgu1 and MCbgu2 seqs (Figure 12D). Again, all three MCbgu1 behaved similarly and were modeled into more OO conformers, implying some antagonism between the two series of mutations tested altogether (Figure 12G and Figure S6E). Reciprocal mutagenesis had distinct effects on MCbgu2 templates, which appeared either unchanged or further progressing toward the IO state (Figure 12H and Figure S6F).
Lastly, evolutionary conservation among representative sets of MCbgu1 and MCbgu2 seqs suggests these clades experienced distinct selective pressures (Figure 12I,J and Figure S7).
From these results, it is concluded that MCbgut phylogeny replicates the evolutionary dichotomy previously established among Enteroccoccus spp. It appeared the common ancestor of LB likely possessed a pair of genes encoding seemingly distinct types of MCbgut. The transition from marine Bacillaceae MCbie toward LB’s MCbgut could proceed sequentially with the functional evolution of a substrate-dependent step, such as inner gate opening, followed by gene copying and a separate evolution of distinct carriers.

3. Discussion

This in silico study correlates the emergence of LB with the functional divergence of a pair of (Slc11) MCbgut carriers. MCbgut carriers share a common ancestor with their sister clade MCbie, and together, they form the group MCb, which evolved from the group MCa. MCbie predominates in marine Bacillaceae and demonstrates evolutionary conservation; it relates directly MCa to MCbgut because MCbie seqs display non-overlapping patterns of identical residues with relatives from each group. Comparative studies between the sister clades MCbie and MCbgut indicate functional innovation to open the inner gate of MCbgut carriers as well as MCbgut-specific structural dynamics plasticity. Apparently, MCbgut could evolve from MCbie in response to selective pressure that fosters functional divergence. Assuming this was the case, such evolutionary pressure indicated novel environmental conditions. It is hypothesized that the gastro-intestinal tract of early marine vertebrates provided a novel niche conducive for the progressive evolution of an MCbie+ Bacillaceae into the ancestor of LB, which carried a pair of genes coding for distinct MCbgut.
To what extent did the data gathered support the possibility that Mn-dependent, MCbgut+ LB evolved from some Bacillaceae precursor adapted to marine environment? First, several bacterial orders enriched in MCa+ spp. (e.g., Cyanobacteria, Pseudomonadales (gamma proteobacteria, GPB), Burkholderiales (BPB), Rhodobacterales, Sphingomonadales, Hyphomicrobiales (Rhizobiales, APB)) [7] might have formed Precambrian subaerial microbial mats that could include Bacillus spp. [32,33]. Such a terrestrial setting would facilitate the acquisition of the mntH Cbie gene precursor (mntH Ca) by some Bacillus spp. Bacillaceae represent the primary source of the mntH Cbie gene, consistent with evidence of recent gene transfers toward different spp. of Paenibacillaceae (Paenibacillus and Brevibacillus spp.) in which mntH Ca dominates. And many MCbie+ genera are marine Bacillales found in deep-sea sediments (e.g., Bacillus, Paenibacillus, Lysinibacillus and Terribacillus spp.), while others populate various environments, including the gut of animals [34,35].
Second, while the MntH A (MA) type, which is ancestral to all mntH C genes that were derived from eukaryotic cells (Figure 1A, Table S1), predominates in Bacillaceae, a fraction of Bacillaceae spp. acquainted with marine environment adopted instead MCbie. MCbie phylogeny indicates genera such as Lederbergia, Siminovitchia, Heyndrickxia, and Neobacillus (Figure S1B, [36]) may have inherited mntH Cbie vertically. Their phylogeny suggests these species as more likely candidate precursors of LB than MA+ Bacillaceae, such as B. subtilis and B. cereus. Also, these marine Bacillaceae grow aerobically, which implies Fe-based metabolism, and some were recovered as well from a dairy environment or found in the gut of various animals. The emergence of MCbie from MCa in marine Bacillaceae could thus mark a first step in the adaptation to the gut of animals such as invertebrates.
A consolidated hypothesis may thus be viewed in successive steps (Figure 13) with (i) the emergence of MCa+ Bacillaceae within subaerial/terrestrial microbial mats, which also colonized marine habitat, (ii) the adaptation of marine MCbie+ Bacillaceae to the gut of invertebrates, and (iii) the selection of Mn-dependent LB carrying a pair of mntH Cbgut genes in the gut of early vertebrates. Previous studies suggest an exchange of MA for MCa affected the coupling of the pmf to Mn2+ import [7], which could improve resistance to environmental stresses (e.g., dessication, temperature, osmotic stress) and provide a path toward adaption to an acidic environment through the evolution of MCa to MCbie and then to MCbgut—a step shown to the impact opening of the inner gate to carry Mn2+ ions inside cells. Prior works on MCbgut homologs revealed both the plasticity of their functional dynamics [6] and their efficient use by LB to pump Mn2+ in competitive environments [12].
Whether this LB evolution toward Mn-based metabolism matched the final design of the gastro-intestinal (GI) tract of early vertebrates is a matter of conjecture. But this possibility may provide an interesting angle to approach our intimate relationships with LB because vertebrate development owed to successive innovations following the differentiation of the pharynx at the entry of the digestive tract in chordates, including, for instance, the development of sensory organs and vertebrate novelties such as the spleen, individualized pancreas, heart innervation and the eye’s own muscles [37,38], which might have fostered mutualistic interactions between emerging LB and their host.
Vertebrate inventions took place around the 1R whole genome duplication (WGD) that occurred in the early Cambrian and which produced, in particular, the archetype Nramp ‘Ohnologs’ Nramp1 and Dmt1 ([39,40,41] and Figure S8). NRAMP1 (SLC11A1) expression depends on C/EBP [42,43] and dominates in the spleen, blood and tissue phagocytes, contributing to host resistance to infection [8,44]. Dmt1/Nramp2 (Slc11a2) catalyzes H+-dependent Fe2+ import both as part of the transferrin endocytic cycle that delivers iron through the body and at the apical membrane of duodenal enterocytes [45,46]. This context may suggest the Ediacaran transition to early Cambrian as a possible evolutionary interval for LB emergence while the GI tractus of early vertebrates was developing into its final form.
High efficiency Mn intracellular accumulation under acidic conditions makes physiological sense for LB because Mn as a micronutrient accelerates their growth under lactate stress [47]. The lactic acidification of an LB environment has important effects on the GI tract: inhibiting the growth of potential microbial pathogens while providing a nutrient for potentially beneficial bacteria, such as the spore-forming component of the colonic microbiota [48], which, by consuming lactate that is transformed into short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), may stimulate LB growth in return [49,50]. These effects, added to LB’s ability to predigest complex foods could possibly help develop the GI tract of early vertebrates by favoring the differentiation of the gastric organ (stomach).
The GI tracts of urochordates and cephalochordates comprise organs homologous to the liver and pancreas of vertebrates, and chordates share the molecular basis of extracellular digestion with vertebrates. Yet, their genomes lack the pepsinogen gene encoding a gastric digestive enzyme and cephalochordates demonstrate evidence of intracellular digestion in the hepatic cecum. This suggests that extracellular digestion systems based on both stomach and pancreatic digestive enzymes emerged specifically in the common ancestor of vertebrates ([51,52] and based on the homologs of GTEx stomach-specific encoded polypeptides, [53], detected in Cephalochordates: Lipase F, gastric type >50% aa id; in Chondrichthyes: Pepsinogen >60% aa id; in Tetrapods: Trefoil factor 1 & 2, >67% aa id).
LB strains isolated from mammalian source (mainly rodents) colonize the gastric epithelium by forming biofilms [18,54,55,56]. To resist the harsh environment of the stomach lumen, LB use glutamate and aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylases which help in sustaining the transmembrane pmf to energize metabolism and transport [57,58]. The fact that these bacterial enzymes produce amino acid-derived compounds used as neurotransmitters (NTs) in bilaterian animals [59], such as serotonine, dopamine and GABA [55], both in the central nervous system (CNS) and the enteric nervous system (ENS) [60], suggests a possible feed forward loop [61] where proto-LB residing in the upper gut of some vertebrate ancestor would respond to food intake by generating an acidic environment, facilitating digestion and contributing to gut–brain signaling.
An acidic environment in the duodenum of vertebrates is key for absorbing the growth supporting micronutrient iron in the form of Fe2+ [46]. As it seems, selection of duodenal Slc11a2- and H+-dependent Fe2+ uptake may thus correspond to the period of the establishment of the vertebrate stomach. And the prospect that these processes were supported by Mn2+-dependent acid-resistant LB expressing MCbgut parologs may bear significance in terms of distinct substrate selectivity among Slc11 homologs and the partition of micronutrient resources for mutual benefits [62] to the vertebrate host (Fe) and to the LB residing in its gut (Mn). Arguably, an example of ecological–evolutionary interaction [61,63,64] that provided a rich foundation to diversify vertebrate holobionts.
Previous in silico data obtained with MCbgut demonstrated highly plastic structural dynamics that may increase Mn import efficiency, hereby sustaining LB resistance to acidic and osmotic stress. Herein, a further study of MCbgut revealed a parology that predated LB radiation, while the sister carrier MCbie showed structural differences likely altering Mn intracellular release. These data may suggest that the evolution of LB MCbgut could foster a novel, Mn-dependent way of life in an acidic environment stocked up with food while relinquishing the use of Fe to their host. This process was likely progressive, contracting LB’s ancestral MCbie+ Bacillaceae genome and going along with the differentiation of the stomachal pouch as a specialized organ in the neo gastro-intestinal tract of the ancestor of jawed vertebrates.
Gastric LB could impact host behavior and food habits through the synthesis of NTs that act directly on leukocytes within the GI tract lamina propria and affect nerve ganglia of the ENS, producing signals relayed through afferent vagal connections to the CNS [65,66]. These instructions could be modulated by intestinal SCFA-producing bacteria, which may act directly on vagal intestinal terminals and stimulate NT signals [67]. In return, efferent vagal influx from the CNS toward the spleen produces NTs that directly regulate the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines by leukocytes [68]. Similarly, enteric bacteria could also modulate local steroid secretion, contributing to reduce stress hormone levels and inform the CNS to adjust behavioral output [60]. It would seem possible that the emergence of LB is owed at least partly to their ability to communicate with their host via the gut–brain axis.
Vertebrate transition to extracellular intestinal digestion presented inherent risks that required immunological surveillance because luminal microbes opting for a pathogenic lifestyle may weaken the intestinal barrier’s integrity and create a portal for host infection [69,70]. Viewing regulatory lymphocytes as metabolic sensors, the fact that Tregs mediate suppressive functions when food is scarce, whereas the inflammatory functions of Th17 are fueled by glycolysis [71,72], suggests food digestion potentially incurs intestinal inflammation that depends on subsequent resolution to maintain homeostasis and develop immune tolerance to food-derived determinants [73]. Also, lactic acid sensing has an anti-inflammatory effect by modulating macrophage phenotype polarization [74,75]. According to these views, gut LB and SCFA producers and their metabolites could directly instruct the emerging adaptive immune system while sustaining systemic innate immunity due to Firmicutes intrinsic lysozyme sensitivity [76].
Also, both lymphocyte and erythrocyte cell types emerged as vertebrate specificities [77]. Duodenal Fe absorption boosted with gastric acidification likely helped develop the erythron (e.g., hetero-tetrameric hemoglobin in jawed vertebrates, [78]) to distribute oxygen within tissues and sustain their metabolic activity. Apparently, LB Mn-based metabolism and gastric acidification could thus enhance host Fe- and oxygen-based metabolism. And combined with their behavioral and immunological influence, LB’s role in stimulating host metabolism could elevate energetic efficiency and help diversify early vertebrates. The divergence of LB families may have been contemporaneous, perhaps reflecting various mutualist interactions implemented by diverse hosts.
According to recent views, the Ediacaran–Cambrian transition, which produced animal radiation, could be due to a combination of causes, including transient catastrophic events (snowball earths and hypoxic environments) and progressive ‘biotic replacement’ through successive pulses of evolutionary innovations and ecosystem engineering [79,80,81,82,83,84]. The 1R genome duplication that occurred prior to the divergence of jawed vertebrates may indeed testify to disruptive environmental changes during this period. On the other hand, the ability of extant LB probiotics to regulate mammalian brain, digestive and immune activity [55,60,66] suggests that emerging Mn-dependent MCbgut+ LB colonizers, adapted to the upper gut of ancestral vertebrates, could impact the feeding habits and behavior of their host, thereby influencing its evolution [85,86].
Hence, a LB-driven feed forward loop may have contributed to diversify early vertebrate body plans, and turning to jawless vertebrates may be instructive in this regard. The sea lamprey has a life cycle comprising three distinct stages: blind larvae burrowing into the sand feeding on microbes and detritus by filtering surrounding water; the first metamorphosis rearranges sensory organs, forms a new esophagus and modifies the digestive system of free living juvenile lampreys that display high diet conversion efficiency and temperature-dependent growth; the second metamorphosis atrophies the intestine of fasting adults that die after spawning [87,88]. Apparently, the microbiota associated with growing wild juveniles is selectively enriched in LB, Streptococcus spp., in particular. Regarding hagfish gut microbiota, a close relative of LB Weissella cibaria (MCbgut+) was detected in wild Eptatretus, while in captive specimens, MntH A+ enterobacteria dominate (Figure S9). These data support the notion that gut LB could directly contribute to the growth and development of early vertebrates. However, continuous host development, perhaps tributary of further innovations such as jaws, heterodimeric hemoglobin and myelinization as well as the 2R genome allotetraploidization [39,40,78,89], was likely required to further vertebrate radiation and inflate marine biodiversity by fueling an evolutionary arms race toward ever more efficient predators [81,90].
In sum, it is proposed that MCbgut+ LB emerged in the upper gut of early vertebrates (ca. 540 mya, i.e., prior to vertebrate 1R WGD). LB colonization formed a novel holobiont that prefigured the final design of the gastro-intestinal tract of jawed vertebrates, whose development could benefit from boosted nutritional efficiency procured through LB–host interactions. Establishing a feed forward loop for food access and tolerance could incentivize LB genome reduction and adaptation as Mn-dependent gastric aids, while their pro-gastric functions stimulated vertebrate Fe-dependent growth and development. Accordingly, LB evolution involved successive phases: (i) reductive, during marine MCbie+ Bacillaceae adaptation to early vertebrate upper gut, leading to Mn-centric, acid-resistant fermentative cells (MCbgut+ LB); and (ii) expansive, through the subsequent dissemination of MCbgut+ LB adapting to novel niches, including terrestrial environments. Molecular communication between extant LB and the mammalian gut–brain axis and immune system may include remnants of early vertebrate pro-gastric functions and subsequent interactions between more evolved organisms.

4. Materials and Methods

Protein sequences were collected using NCBI and Uniprot repositories and BLAST programs (PHI-BLAST, TBLASTN and BLASTP, [91]). Sequences were curated using the MPI toolkit and the MMseqs2 program to retrieve sets of diverse seqs with reduced complexity [92]. ClustalX [93] seqs clustering and graphic display was used to unambiguously classify seqs into established phylogroups, using reference seqs [7].
Each phylogenetic analysis was performed using a balanced set of groups of seqs to be analyzed plus a defined outgroup. Multiple seqs were aligned using Muscle [94] and the resulting alignments were manually edited using Seaview [95]. As needed, a Phylo-mLogo [96] display of the multiple sequence alignment was generated by writing a simple tree, aggregating clade-specific sets of seqs. Multiple sequence alignments were trimmed to eliminate sites with gaps or judged poorly informative in the Phylo-mLogo display, using Treecon [97]. Parsimony-informative sites were selected using Mega [98]. Tree calculations with IQ-Tree [99] used a number of categories of the free-rate heterogeneity model that was commensurate with the length of the parsimony-informative site alignment to estimate variations in substitution rate among sites using proportions of site categories and mixture substitution matrices [100]. Trees were displayed using FigTree (Version—v1.4.4; http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ (accessed on 1 August 2024)) to appreciate the statistical robustness of tree nodes.
Site selection for mutagenesis used defined phylogroups of aligned seqs to identify candidate type ii evolutionary rate-shifts, distinguishing the groups under study [4] based on the Sequence Harmony and Multi-Relief approaches [101]. Sites producing highly significant scores with both approaches were selected as sets of coevolved sites discriminating sister phylogroups. Reciprocal mutagenesis was performed by exchanging sets of phylogroup-specific residues between templates from each group. Additional mutations targeted sites defining the family of Slc11 carriers (Slc11 synapomorphy) as well as sites that characterize clades part of the Slc11 family. Every point mutation introduced was verified a posteriori with the returned seq of the predicted model. Differences in evolutionary rates between sister clades were also visualized using Consurf [102].
3D modeling was performed using CF [11] with or without template (CFpdb and CFnt, respectively) and native seqs to identify the training model producing the best model, which was used to analyze corresponding mutant seqs [6]. AF2 models were retrieved from the Uniprot repository [103]. Molecular analyses using 2StrucCompare [104] allowed us to determine per residue the root mean square deviation of the Ca trace between pairs of aligned structures, which was visualized using spreadsheet software. The All Against All program (Dali EBI, [105]) was used to establish the 3D correspondence of groups of structures based on pairwise comparisons. POSA [106] was used to obtain multiple flexibly superimposed structures. Structures were visualized using Pymol (DeLano, W.L. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System; Delano Scientific: San Carlos, CA, USA, 2002).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/bacteria3030016/s1, Figure S1: MCb (MCbie and MCbgut) phylogeny among bacterial families comprising MCbie+ spp.; Figure S2: Phylogenomic analyses of select LB, Bacillaceae, Listeriaceae and Staphylococcaceae spp.; Figure S3: Phylo-mLogo display of site-specific sequence variations in extra-membranous loops between aligned seqs from the MntH C groups MCa, MCbie and MCbgut; Figure S4: CFnt modeling of Terribacillus aidingensis MCbie A0A285P4W2 responds to mutagenesis like A0A143Y4E1 from Trichochoccus palustris; Figure S5: MCbgut phylogeny in the Enterococcaceae family; Figure S6: CFpdb modeling shows MCbgu1 and MCbgu2 structural dynamics differ; Figure S7: MCbgu1 and MCbgu2 unrooted phylogeny; Figure S8: Divergence of archetype Nramp parologs Nramp1 and Dmt1 followed the 1R whole genome that took place in early vertebrates; Figure S9: The gut microbiota of wild hagfishes may be enriched in MCbgut+ bacteria; Table S1: Slc11 carrier nomenclature, taxonomic distribution (representative taxa) and origin; Table S2: Mutants produced in this study.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The models and sequences used in this study are included in Non-published Material.

Acknowledgments

The providers and caretakers of the online services, servers and repositories that were used for this work are gratefully acknowledged. I thank Stella Cellier-Goetghebeur for her comments and suggestions to improve this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Del Alamo, D.; Meiler, J.; McHaourab, H.S. Principles of Alternating Access in LeuT-fold Transporters: Commonalities and Divergences. J. Mol. Biol. 2022, 434, 167746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Manatschal, C.; Dutzler, R. The Structural Basis for Metal Ion Transport in the SLC11/NRAMP Family. Chimia 2022, 76, 1005–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ray, S.; Gaudet, R. Structures and coordination chemistry of transporters involved in manganese and iron homeostasis. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2023, 51, 897–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cellier, M.F. Nramp: From sequence to structure and mechanism of divalent metal import. Curr. Top. Membr. 2012, 69, 249–293. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Marinelli, F.; Faraldo-Gomez, J.D. Conformational free-energy landscapes of a Na+/Ca2+ exchanger explain its alternating-access mechanism and functional specificity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2024, 121, e2318009121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Cellier, M.F.M. Slc11 Synapomorphy: A Conserved 3D Framework Articulating Carrier Conformation Switch. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cellier, M.F.M. Nramp: Deprive and conquer? Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 988866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Casanova, J.L.; MacMicking, J.D.; Nathan, C.F. Interferon-gamma and infectious diseases: Lessons and prospects. Science 2024, 384, eadl2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cellier, M.F.; Bergevin, I.; Boyer, E.; Richer, E. Polyphyletic origins of bacterial Nramp transporters. Trends. Genet. 2001, 17, 365–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jumper, J.; Evans, R.; Pritzel, A.; Green, T.; Figurnov, M.; Ronneberger, O.; Tunyasuvunakool, K.; Bates, R.; Zidek, A.; Potapenko, A.; et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 2021, 596, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mirdita, M.; Schütze, K.; Moriwaki, Y.; Heo, L.; Ovchinnikov, S.; Steinegger, M. ColabFold: Making protein folding accessible to all. Nat. Methods 2022, 19, 679–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bosma, E.F.; Rau, M.H.; van Gijtenbeek, L.A.; Siedler, S. Regulation and distinct physiological roles of manganese in bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2021, 45, fuab028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Karlsen, S.T.; Rau, M.H.; Sanchez, B.J.; Jensen, K.; Zeidan, A.A. From genotype to phenotype: Computational approaches for inferring microbial traits relevant to the food industry. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2023, 47, fuab028, fuad030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Makarova, K.; Slesarev, A.; Wolf, Y.; Sorokin, A.; Mirkin, B.; Koonin, E.; Pavlov, A.; Pavlova, N.; Karamychev, V.; Polouchine, N.; et al. Comparative genomics of the lactic acid bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 15611–15616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Makarova, K.S.; Koonin, E.V. Evolutionary genomics of lactic acid bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 1199–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Huynh, U.; Qiao, M.; King, J.; Trinh, B.; Valdez, J.; Haq, M.; Zastrow, M.L. Differential Effects of Transition Metals on Growth and Metal Uptake for Two Distinct Lactobacillus Species. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0100621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Elli, M.; Zink, R.; Rytz, A.; Reniero, R.; Morelli, L. Iron requirement of Lactobacillus spp. in completely chemically defined growth media. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 88, 695–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Li, F.; Li, X.; Cheng, C.C.; Bujdos, D.; Tollenaar, S.; Simpson, D.J.; Tasseva, G.; Perez-Munoz, M.E.; Frese, S.; Ganzle, M.G.; et al. phylogenomic analysis of Limosilactobacillus reuteri reveals ancient and stable evolutionary relationships with rodents and birds and zoonotic transmission to humans. BMC Biol. 2023, 21, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Koga, Y. Microbiota in the stomach and application of probiotics to gastroduodenal diseases. World J. Gastroenterol. 2022, 28, 6702–6715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lebreton, F.; Manson, A.L.; Saavedra, J.T.; Straub, T.J.; Earl, A.M.; Gilmore, M.S. Tracing the Enterococci from Paleozoic Origins to the Hospital. Cell 2017, 169, 849–861.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Weller, D.; Andrus, A.; Wiedmann, M.; den Bakker, H.C. Listeria booriae sp. nov. and Listeria newyorkensis sp. nov., from food processing environments in the USA. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2015, 65 Pt 1, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Maayer, P.; Aliyu, H.; Cowan, D.A. Reorganising the order Bacillales through phylogenomics. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 42, 178–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Collins, M.D.; Wallbanks, S.; Lane, D.J.; Shah, J.; Nietupski, R.; Smida, J.; Dorsch, M.; Stackebrandt, E. Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Listeria based on reverse transcriptase sequencing of 16S rRNA. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1991, 41, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tian, R.; Imanian, B. VBCG: 20 validated bacterial core genes for phylogenomic analysis with high fidelity and resolution. Microbiome 2023, 11, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sun, J.; Lu, F.; Luo, Y.; Bie, L.; Xu, L.; Wang, Y. OrthoVenn3: An integrated platform for exploring and visualizing orthologous data across genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, W397–W403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. van Dijk, M.C.; de Kruijff, R.M.; Hagedoorn, P.L. The Role of Iron in Staphylococcus aureus Infection and Human Disease: A Metal Tug of War at the Host-Microbe Interface. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 857237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. McLaughlin, H.P.; Hill, C.; Gahan, C.G. The impact of iron on Listeria monocytogenes; inside and outside the host. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2011, 22, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ehrnstorfer, I.A.; Manatschal, C.; Arnold, F.M.; Laederach, J.; Dutzler, R. Structural and mechanistic basis of proton-coupled metal ion transport in the SLC11/NRAMP family. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ehrnstorfer, I.A.; Geertsma, E.R.; Pardon, E.; Steyaert, J.; Dutzler, R. Crystal structure of a SLC11 (NRAMP) transporter reveals the basis for transition-metal ion transport. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2014, 21, 990–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Schwartzman, J.A.; Lebreton, F.; Salamzade, R.; Shea, T.; Martin, M.J.; Schaufler, K.; Urhan, A.; Abeel, T.; Camargo, I.; Sgardioli, B.F.; et al. Global diversity of enterococci and description of 18 previously unknown species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2024, 121, e2310852121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Richer, E.; Courville, P.; Bergevin, I.; Cellier, M.F. Horizontal gene transfer of “prototype” Nramp in bacteria. J. Mol. Evol. 2003, 57, 363–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Finke, N.; Simister, R.L.; O’Neil, A.H.; Nomosatryo, S.; Henny, C.; MacLean, L.C.; Canfield, D.E.; Konhauser, K.; Lalonde, S.V.; Fowle, D.A.; et al. Mesophilic microorganisms build terrestrial mats analogous to Precambrian microbial jungles. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lenton, T.M.; Daines, S.J. Matworld—The biogeochemical effects of early life on land. New Phytol. 2017, 215, 531–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ettoumi, B.; Guesmi, A.; Brusetti, L.; Borin, S.; Najjari, A.; Boudabous, A.; Cherif, A. Microdiversity of deep-sea Bacillales isolated from Tyrrhenian sea sediments as revealed by ARISA, 16S rRNA gene sequencing and BOX-PCR fingerprinting. Microbes Environ. 2013, 28, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mandic-Mulec, I.; Stefanic, P.; van Elsas, J.D. Ecology of Bacillaceae. Microbiol. Spectr. 2015, 3, TBS-0017-2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gupta, R.S.; Patel, S.; Saini, N.; Chen, S. Robust demarcation of 17 distinct Bacillus species clades, proposed as novel Bacillaceae genera, by phylogenomics and comparative genomic analyses: Description of Robertmurraya kyonggiensis sp. nov. and proposal for an emended genus Bacillus limiting it only to the members of the Subtilis and Cereus clades of species. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 5753–5798, Erratum in Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 6531–6533. [Google Scholar]
  37. Shimeld, S.M.; Holland, P.W. Vertebrate innovations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 4449–4452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Grillner, S. Evolution of the vertebrate motor system—From forebrain to spinal cord. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2021, 71, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Yu, D.; Ren, Y.; Uesaka, M.; Beavan, A.J.S.; Muffato, M.; Shen, J.; Li, Y.; Sato, I.; Wan, W.; Clark, J.W.; et al. Hagfish genome elucidates vertebrate whole-genome duplication events and their evolutionary consequences. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2024, 8, 519–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Marletaz, F.; Timoshevskaya, N.; Timoshevskiy, V.A.; Parey, E.; Simakov, O.; Gavriouchkina, D.; Suzuki, M.; Kubokawa, K.; Brenner, S.; Smith, J.J.; et al. The hagfish genome and the evolution of vertebrates. Nature 2024, 627, 811–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sassa, M.; Takagi, T.; Kinjo, A.; Yoshioka, Y.; Zayasu, Y.; Shinzato, C.; Kanda, S.; Murakami-Sugihara, N.; Shirai, K.; Inoue, K. Divalent metal transporter-related protein restricts animals to marine habitats. Commun. Biol. 2021, 4, 463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Richer, E.; Campion, C.G.; Dabbas, B.; White, J.H.; Cellier, M.F. Transcription factors Sp1 and C/EBP regulate NRAMP1 gene expression. FEBS J. 2008, 275, 5074–5089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Cellier, M.F.M. Developmental Control of NRAMP1 (SLC11A1) Expression in Professional Phagocytes. Biology 2017, 6, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Raberg, L. Human and pathogen genotype-by-genotype interactions in the light of coevolution theory. PLoS Genet. 2023, 19, e1010685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Galy, B.; Conrad, M.; Muckenthaler, M. Mechanisms controlling cellular and systemic iron homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2024, 25, 133–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Shawki, A.; Anthony, S.R.; Nose, Y.; Engevik, M.A.; Niespodzany, E.J.; Barrientos, T.; Ohrvik, H.; Worrell, R.T.; Thiele, D.J.; Mackenzie, B. Intestinal DMT1 is critical for iron absorption in the mouse but is not required for the absorption of copper or manganese. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver. Physiol. 2015, 309, G635–G647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, K.; Zhang, Z.; Guo, X.; Guo, R.; Zhu, L.; Qiu, X.; Yu, X.; Chai, J.; Gu, C.; Feng, Z. Changes in nutrient consumption patterns of Lactobacillus fermentum mediated by sodium lactate. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2023, 103, 1775–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. de Hoon, M.J.; Eichenberger, P.; Vitkup, D. Hierarchical evolution of the bacterial sporulation network. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20, R735–R745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Morrison, D.J.; Preston, T. Formation of short chain fatty acids by the gut microbiota and their impact on human metabolism. Gut Microbes 2016, 7, 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Sereti, I.; Verburgh, M.L.; Gifford, J.; Lo, A.; Boyd, A.; Verheij, E.; Verhoeven, A.; Wit, F.; Schim van der Loeff, M.F.; Giera, M.; et al. Impaired gut microbiota-mediated short-chain fatty acid production precedes morbidity and mortality in people with HIV. Cell Rep. 2023, 42, 113336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nakayama, S.; Sekiguchi, T.; Ogasawara, M. Molecular and evolutionary aspects of the protochordate digestive system. Cell Tissue Res. 2019, 377, 309–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Castro, L.F.; Goncalves, O.; Mazan, S.; Tay, B.H.; Venkatesh, B.; Wilson, J.M. Recurrent gene loss correlates with the evolution of stomach phenotypes in gnathostome history. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2014, 281, 20132669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Consortium, G.T. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 580–585. [Google Scholar]
  54. Suzuki-Hashido, N.; Tsuchida, S.; Hayakawa, T.; Sakamoto, M.; Azumano, A.; Seino, S.; Matsuda, I.; Ohkuma, M.; Ushida, K. Lactobacillus nasalidis sp. nov., isolated from the forestomach of a captive proboscis monkey (Nasalis larvatus). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2021, 71, 004787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Yuan, C.; He, Y.; Xie, K.; Feng, L.; Gao, S.; Cai, L. Review of microbiota gut brain axis and innate immunity in inflammatory and infective diseases. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1282431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Duar, R.M.; Lin, X.B.; Zheng, J.; Martino, M.E.; Grenier, T.; Perez-Munoz, M.E.; Leulier, F.; Ganzle, M.; Walter, J. Lifestyles in transition: Evolution and natural history of the genus Lactobacillus. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 41 (Suppl. S1), S27–S48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Perez, M.; Calles-Enriquez, M.; Nes, I.; Martin, M.C.; Fernandez, M.; Ladero, V.; Alvarez, M.A. Tyramine biosynthesis is transcriptionally induced at low pH and improves the fitness of Enterococcus faecalis in acidic environments. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 3547–3558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Pereira, C.I.; Matos, D.; San Romao, M.V.; Crespo, M.T. Dual role for the tyrosine decarboxylation pathway in Enterococcus faecium E17: Response to an acid challenge and generation of a proton motive force. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Goulty, M.; Botton-Amiot, G.; Rosato, E.; Sprecher, S.G.; Feuda, R. The monoaminergic system is a bilaterian innovation. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 3284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cryan, J.F.; O’Riordan, K.J.; Cowan, C.S.M.; Sandhu, K.V.; Bastiaanssen, T.F.S.; Boehme, M.; Codagnone, M.G.; Cussotto, S.; Fulling, C.; Golubeva, A.V.; et al. The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis. Physiol. Rev. 2019, 99, 1877–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Decaestecker, E.; Van de Moortel, B.; Mukherjee, S.; Gurung, A.; Stoks, R.; De Meester, L. Hierarchical eco-evo dynamics mediated by the gut microbiome. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2024, 39, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tannock, G.W.; Wilson, C.M.; Loach, D.; Cook, G.M.; Eason, J.; O’Toole, P.W.; Holtrop, G.; Lawley, B. Resource partitioning in relation to cohabitation of Lactobacillus species in the mouse forestomach. ISME J. 2012, 6, 927–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Shankregowda, A.M.; Siriyappagouder, P.; Kuizenga, M.; Bal, T.M.P.; Abdelhafiz, Y.; Eizaguirre, C.; Fernandes, J.M.O.; Kiron, V.; Raeymaekers, J.A.M. Host habitat rather than evolutionary history explains gut microbiome diversity in sympatric stickleback species. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1232358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Baldo, L.; Pretus, J.L.; Riera, J.L.; Musilova, Z.; Bitja Nyom, A.R.; Salzburger, W. Convergence of gut microbiotas in the adaptive radiations of African cichlid fishes. ISME J. 2017, 11, 1975–1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Gaskill, P.J.; Khoshbouei, H. Dopamine and norepinephrine are embracing their immune side and so should we. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2022, 77, 102626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Decarie-Spain, L.; Hayes, A.M.R.; Lauer, L.T.; Kanoski, S.E. The gut-brain axis and cognitive control: A role for the vagus nerve. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2024, 156, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kasarello, K.; Cudnoch-Jedrzejewska, A.; Czarzasta, K. Communication of gut microbiota and brain via immune and neuroendocrine signaling. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1118529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Liu, Y.; Sanderson, D.; Mian, M.F.; McVey Neufeld, K.A.; Forsythe, P. Loss of vagal integrity disrupts immune components of the microbiota-gut-brain axis and inhibits the effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus on behavior and the corticosterone stress response. Neuropharmacology 2021, 195, 108682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Rogers, A.P.; Mileto, S.J.; Lyras, D. Impact of enteric bacterial infections at and beyond the epithelial barrier. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2023, 21, 260–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Gierynska, M.; Szulc-Dabrowska, L.; Struzik, J.; Mielcarska, M.B.; Gregorczyk-Zboroch, K.P. Integrity of the Intestinal Barrier: The Involvement of Epithelial Cells and Microbiota-A Mutual Relationship. Animals 2022, 12, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Brescia, C.; Audia, S.; Pugliano, A.; Scaglione, F.; Iuliano, R.; Trapasso, F.; Perrotti, N.; Chiarella, E.; Amato, R. Metabolic drives affecting Th17/Treg gene expression changes and differentiation: Impact on immune-microenvironment regulation. APMIS 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. de Candia, P.; Procaccini, C.; Russo, C.; Lepore, M.T.; Matarese, G. Regulatory T cells as metabolic sensors. Immunity 2022, 55, 1981–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sasidharan Nair, V.; Heredia, M.; Samsom, J.; Huehn, J. Impact of gut microenvironment on epigenetic signatures of intestinal T helper cell subsets. Immunol. Lett. 2022, 246, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Shi, W.; Cassmann, T.J.; Bhagwate, A.V.; Hitosugi, T.; Ip, W.K.E. Lactic acid induces transcriptional repression of macrophage inflammatory response via histone acetylation. Cell Rep. 2024, 43, 113746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Jeffrey, M.P.; Saleem, L.; MacPherson, C.W.; Tompkins, T.A.; Clarke, S.T.; Green-Johnson, J.M. A Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus secretome induces immunoregulatory transcriptional, functional and immunometabolic signatures in human THP-1 monocytes. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 8379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Jordan, C.K.I.; Brown, R.L.; Larkinson, M.L.Y.; Sequeira, R.P.; Edwards, A.M.; Clarke, T.B. Symbiotic Firmicutes establish mutualism with the host via innate tolerance and resistance to control systemic immunity. Cell Host Microbe 2023, 31, 1433–1449.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Nagahata, Y.; Masuda, K.; Nishimura, Y.; Ikawa, T.; Kawaoka, S.; Kitawaki, T.; Nannya, Y.; Ogawa, S.; Suga, H.; Satou, Y.; et al. Tracing the evolutionary history of blood cells to the unicellular ancestor of animals. Blood 2022, 140, 2611–2625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Storz, J.F.; Opazo, J.C.; Hoffmann, F.G. Gene duplication, genome duplication, and the functional diversification of vertebrate globins. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013, 66, 469–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Mussini, G.; Dunn, F.S. Decline and fall of the Ediacarans: Late-Neoproterozoic extinctions and the rise of the modern biosphere. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 2024, 99, 110–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Evans, S.D.; Tu, C.; Rizzo, A.; Surprenant, R.L.; Boan, P.C.; McCandless, H.; Marshall, N.; Xiao, S.; Droser, M.L. Environmental drivers of the first major animal extinction across the Ediacaran White Sea-Nama transition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2207475119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Antell, G.T.; Saupe, E.E. Bottom-up controls, ecological revolutions and diversification in the oceans through time. Curr. Biol. 2021, 31, R1237–R1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Mangano, M.G.; Buatois, L.A. The rise and early evolution of animals: Where do we stand from a trace-fossil perspective? Interface Focus 2020, 10, 20190103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Wood, R.; Liu, A.G.; Bowyer, F.; Wilby, P.R.; Dunn, F.S.; Kenchington, C.G.; Cuthill, J.F.H.; Mitchell, E.G.; Penny, A. Integrated records of environmental change and evolution challenge the Cambrian Explosion. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 3, 528–538, Erratum in Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 3, 858. [Google Scholar]
  84. Darroch, S.A.F.; Smith, E.F.; Laflamme, M.; Erwin, D.H. Ediacaran Extinction and Cambrian Explosion. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2018, 33, 653–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Boem, F.; Greslehner, G.P.; Konsman, J.P.; Chiu, L. Minding the gut: Extending embodied cognition and perception to the gut complex. Front. Neurosci. 2023, 17, 1172783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Bateson, P. Adaptability and evolution. Interface Focus 2017, 7, 20160126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Tetlock, A.; Yost, C.K.; Stavrinides, J.; Manzon, R.G. Changes in the gut microbiome of the sea lamprey during metamorphosis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 7638–7644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Mathai, P.P.; Byappanahalli, M.N.; Johnson, N.S.; Sadowsky, M.J. Gut Microbiota Associated with Different Sea Lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) Life Stages. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 706683, Erratum in Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 807068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Salzer, J.L.; Zalc, B. Myelination. Curr. Biol. 2016, 26, R971–R975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Wyles, J.S.; Kunkel, J.G.; Wilson, A.C. Birds, behavior, and anatomical evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1983, 80, 4394–4397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Zhang, Z.; Schäffer, A.A.; Miller, W.; Madden, T.L.; Lipman, D.J.; Koonin, E.V.; Altschul, S.F. Protein sequence similarity searches using patterns as seeds. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26, 3986–3990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Gabler, F.; Nam, S.Z.; Till, S.; Mirdita, M.; Steinegger, M.; Soding, J.; Lupas, A.N.; Alva, V. Protein Sequence Analysis Using the MPI Bioinformatics Toolkit. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2020, 72, e108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Larkin, M.A.; Blackshields, G.; Brown, N.P.; Chenna, R.; McGettigan, P.A.; McWilliam, H.; Valentin, F.; Wallace, I.M.; Wilm, A.; Lopez, R.; et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 2947–2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1792–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Gouy, M.; Guindon, S.; Gascuel, O. SeaView version 4: A multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27, 221–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Shih, A.C.; Lee, D.T.; Peng, C.L.; Wu, Y.W. Phylo-mLogo: An interactive and hierarchical multiple-logo visualization tool for alignment of many sequences. BMC Bioinform. 2007, 8, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Van de Peer, Y.; De Wachter, R. TREECON for Windows: A software package for the construction and drawing of evolutionary trees for the Microsoft Windows environment. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1994, 10, 569–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Trifinopoulos, J.; Nguyen, L.T.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. W-IQ-TREE: A fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W232–W235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Le, S.Q.; Lartillot, N.; Gascuel, O. Phylogenetic mixture models for proteins. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2008, 363, 3965–3976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Brandt, B.W.; Feenstra, K.A.; Heringa, J. Multi-Harmony: Detecting functional specificity from sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, W35–W40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Yariv, B.; Yariv, E.; Kessel, A.; Masrati, G.; Chorin, A.B.; Martz, E.; Mayrose, I.; Pupko, T.; Ben-Tal, N. Using evolutionary data to make sense of macromolecules with a “face-lifted” ConSurf. Protein Sci. 2023, 32, e4582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. UniProt, C. UniProt: The Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D523–D531. [Google Scholar]
  104. Drew, E.D.; Janes, R.W. 2StrucCompare: A webserver for visualizing small but noteworthy differences between protein tertiary structures through interrogation of the secondary structure content. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W477–W481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Holm, L.; Laiho, A.; Törönen, P.; Salgado, M. DALI shines a light on remote homologs: One hundred discoveries. Protein Sci. 2023, 32, e4519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Li, Z.; Natarajan, P.; Ye, Y.; Hrabe, T.; Godzik, A. POSA: A user-driven, interactive multiple protein structure alignment server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, W240–W245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Phylogeny of bacterial Slc11 carriers of eukaryotic origin (MntH Ca (MCa), MCb, MCg and MCaU). (A) Recapitulation of the current knowledge on evolution of the Slc11 family (detailed in text) and proposition that MCb clade derived from MCa and comprises sister clusters, MCbie and MCbgut. Asterisks identify MC clades previously characterized as functionally divergent (highlighted in (B)). (B) Identification of MCbie as possible evolutionary intermediate between MCa and MCbgut clades. The tree presented was rooted using MntH H seqs from TACK and Asgard archaea. Phylogenetic reconstruction used 395 PI sites, the substitution model EHO, ML estimate of a.a. state frequency, free rate model of variation among sites with 15 categories. The statistical significance of each node is indicated together with the scale (nb substitution per site). Phylogroups are highlighted with different colors and sequence ids. This phylogeny demonstrates partition of eukaryotic pN-I and pN-II parologs, and the common ancestries of pN-II and MCaU on one hand and pN-I and MCa, MCb, MCg on the other hand. MCb and MCg clades apparently derived from distinct MCas. The topology of MCb group suggests divergent evolutionary trajectories for MCbie and MCbgut, as previously observed in MCg1 subgroup [6].
Figure 1. Phylogeny of bacterial Slc11 carriers of eukaryotic origin (MntH Ca (MCa), MCb, MCg and MCaU). (A) Recapitulation of the current knowledge on evolution of the Slc11 family (detailed in text) and proposition that MCb clade derived from MCa and comprises sister clusters, MCbie and MCbgut. Asterisks identify MC clades previously characterized as functionally divergent (highlighted in (B)). (B) Identification of MCbie as possible evolutionary intermediate between MCa and MCbgut clades. The tree presented was rooted using MntH H seqs from TACK and Asgard archaea. Phylogenetic reconstruction used 395 PI sites, the substitution model EHO, ML estimate of a.a. state frequency, free rate model of variation among sites with 15 categories. The statistical significance of each node is indicated together with the scale (nb substitution per site). Phylogroups are highlighted with different colors and sequence ids. This phylogeny demonstrates partition of eukaryotic pN-I and pN-II parologs, and the common ancestries of pN-II and MCaU on one hand and pN-I and MCa, MCb, MCg on the other hand. MCb and MCg clades apparently derived from distinct MCas. The topology of MCb group suggests divergent evolutionary trajectories for MCbie and MCbgut, as previously observed in MCg1 subgroup [6].
Bacteria 03 00016 g001
Figure 2. Bacillales and Lactobacillales phylogeny. Based on the VBCG pipeline [24] using select mntH encoding genomes plus IQ-Tree reanalysis (EX-EHO + R6) of the VBCG concatenated alignment. Species names are color-coded at family-level (indicated, right). mntH-encoded isotype is indicated per genome (bold). Appreciation of mntH gene flows according to the present hypothesis is schematized using colored arrowheads.
Figure 2. Bacillales and Lactobacillales phylogeny. Based on the VBCG pipeline [24] using select mntH encoding genomes plus IQ-Tree reanalysis (EX-EHO + R6) of the VBCG concatenated alignment. Species names are color-coded at family-level (indicated, right). mntH-encoded isotype is indicated per genome (bold). Appreciation of mntH gene flows according to the present hypothesis is schematized using colored arrowheads.
Bacteria 03 00016 g002
Figure 3. Structural evolution of MntH C in transition from MCa to MCb. (A) Similarity clusters highlight relationships between the groups of sequences analyzed in (B). (B) Phylo-mLogo display of the site-specific evolutionary rate-shifts that discriminate aligned MCb seqs (MCbie plus MCbgut) from MCa seqs. (C) 3D location of the coevolutionary rate-shifts presented in (B). Superposed models (Cα ribbon) of previously characterized MCb conformers (AF-Q5HQ64, magenta, CF-Q5HQ64, light pink, CF-Q5HQ64_VY-YN-228T, dark blue; CF-A0A380H8T1, light green, CF-A0A380H8T1_VN223T, light blue; CF-WP_002459413, light orange, CF- WP_002459413_VN224T, marine blue) [6] allow visualizing site motion during carrier cycle. MCb architecture is presented after split of transmembrane helix 5 (h5) and opposite rotation of each half to display views from the center of the molecule. Transmembrane helices are numbered, and the extra membranous loops were omitted for clarity.
Figure 3. Structural evolution of MntH C in transition from MCa to MCb. (A) Similarity clusters highlight relationships between the groups of sequences analyzed in (B). (B) Phylo-mLogo display of the site-specific evolutionary rate-shifts that discriminate aligned MCb seqs (MCbie plus MCbgut) from MCa seqs. (C) 3D location of the coevolutionary rate-shifts presented in (B). Superposed models (Cα ribbon) of previously characterized MCb conformers (AF-Q5HQ64, magenta, CF-Q5HQ64, light pink, CF-Q5HQ64_VY-YN-228T, dark blue; CF-A0A380H8T1, light green, CF-A0A380H8T1_VN223T, light blue; CF-WP_002459413, light orange, CF- WP_002459413_VN224T, marine blue) [6] allow visualizing site motion during carrier cycle. MCb architecture is presented after split of transmembrane helix 5 (h5) and opposite rotation of each half to display views from the center of the molecule. Transmembrane helices are numbered, and the extra membranous loops were omitted for clarity.
Bacteria 03 00016 g003
Figure 4. Three-dimensional modeling (AF2 or CF) demonstrates structural difference between MCbie and MCbgut. (A) Structural correspondence established by pairwise alignments of sampled AF2 models of MCbie carriers and the solved reference structure of MCbgut carriers, either outward open (5M87, [28]) or inward open (5M94, [29]). Inset, array of native MCbgut models [6,7]. (B) Structural correspondence between AF2 and CFnt models of 4 MCbie templates, details enlarged. (C) Impact of compound mutagenesis targeting a set of coevolved sites that discriminate MCbie from MCbgut (presented in Figure 5A) on CFnt 3D modeling of select MCbie templates. Additional reference models include MCbgut Q5HQ64 AF2 and CFpdb models (IO) and the Q5HQ64 VNT mutant (OO, CFpdb, [6]).
Figure 4. Three-dimensional modeling (AF2 or CF) demonstrates structural difference between MCbie and MCbgut. (A) Structural correspondence established by pairwise alignments of sampled AF2 models of MCbie carriers and the solved reference structure of MCbgut carriers, either outward open (5M87, [28]) or inward open (5M94, [29]). Inset, array of native MCbgut models [6,7]. (B) Structural correspondence between AF2 and CFnt models of 4 MCbie templates, details enlarged. (C) Impact of compound mutagenesis targeting a set of coevolved sites that discriminate MCbie from MCbgut (presented in Figure 5A) on CFnt 3D modeling of select MCbie templates. Additional reference models include MCbgut Q5HQ64 AF2 and CFpdb models (IO) and the Q5HQ64 VNT mutant (OO, CFpdb, [6]).
Bacteria 03 00016 g004
Figure 5. Structural reorganization of MCbie A0A143Y4E1 after exchanging 15 residues that distinguish MCbie and MCbgut clades. (A) 17 type ii evolutionary rate-shifts identified by comparing aligned representative seqs of MCbie (core marine Bacillales) and MCbgut clades. Left panel, Phylo-mLogo display, right panel, 3D location on MCbgut models. (B) 3D superposition onto native MCbgut CFpdb model (Q5HQ64_WFLF, inward open) of MCbie A0A143Y4E1 CFnt models predicted for the native (right) and compound mutant (A0A143Y4E1_15mt, left) templates. The dotted line shows local deviation between the structures compared. (C) Per residue root mean square deviation (pRMSD) from MCbgut inward open predicted structure (Q5HQ64_WFLF, CFpdb) of models obtained for MCbie A0A143Y4E1 templates either native (AF2, CFnt) or after compound mutagenesis (A0A143Y4E1_15mt, CFnt, mutations detailed in Table S2).
Figure 5. Structural reorganization of MCbie A0A143Y4E1 after exchanging 15 residues that distinguish MCbie and MCbgut clades. (A) 17 type ii evolutionary rate-shifts identified by comparing aligned representative seqs of MCbie (core marine Bacillales) and MCbgut clades. Left panel, Phylo-mLogo display, right panel, 3D location on MCbgut models. (B) 3D superposition onto native MCbgut CFpdb model (Q5HQ64_WFLF, inward open) of MCbie A0A143Y4E1 CFnt models predicted for the native (right) and compound mutant (A0A143Y4E1_15mt, left) templates. The dotted line shows local deviation between the structures compared. (C) Per residue root mean square deviation (pRMSD) from MCbgut inward open predicted structure (Q5HQ64_WFLF, CFpdb) of models obtained for MCbie A0A143Y4E1 templates either native (AF2, CFnt) or after compound mutagenesis (A0A143Y4E1_15mt, CFnt, mutations detailed in Table S2).
Bacteria 03 00016 g005
Figure 6. Conformation-dependent impact on MCbgut CFpdb modeling of substituting 17 residues that discriminate MCbie and MCbgut (reciprocal mutagenesis cf Figure 5 and Table S2). (A) MCbgut phylogeny was previously shown to influence the conformers modeled by CFpdb [6]. (B) Co-introduction of 17 mutations in select MCbgut templates shows conformation-dependent effects. Native CFpdb models were used as reference to determine the pRMSD of each respective mutant model. From top to bottom: Q74JG3, A0A1P8Q6E3, Q49WM9, WP_002459413, Q5HQ64. The pRMSD of WP_002459413 VNT and Q5HQ64 VNT mutant models [6] is also shown to visualize the expected deviation when comparing inward open and outward open conformers.
Figure 6. Conformation-dependent impact on MCbgut CFpdb modeling of substituting 17 residues that discriminate MCbie and MCbgut (reciprocal mutagenesis cf Figure 5 and Table S2). (A) MCbgut phylogeny was previously shown to influence the conformers modeled by CFpdb [6]. (B) Co-introduction of 17 mutations in select MCbgut templates shows conformation-dependent effects. Native CFpdb models were used as reference to determine the pRMSD of each respective mutant model. From top to bottom: Q74JG3, A0A1P8Q6E3, Q49WM9, WP_002459413, Q5HQ64. The pRMSD of WP_002459413 VNT and Q5HQ64 VNT mutant models [6] is also shown to visualize the expected deviation when comparing inward open and outward open conformers.
Bacteria 03 00016 g006aBacteria 03 00016 g006b
Figure 7. VNT compound mutagenesis of MCbie A0A143Y4E1 induces a conformational response like MCbgut templates. (A) Identical VNT mutations (cf Table S2) result in similar rearrangements of the models predicted by CFnt (MCbie A0A143Y4E1) or CFpdb (MCbgut Q5HQ64), indicated by pRMSD from MCbgut Q5HQ64 native CFpdb model (inward open). (B) MCbie A0A143Y4E1 and MCbgut Q5HQ64 VNT mutant 3D models are quasi-superimposable (top left).
Figure 7. VNT compound mutagenesis of MCbie A0A143Y4E1 induces a conformational response like MCbgut templates. (A) Identical VNT mutations (cf Table S2) result in similar rearrangements of the models predicted by CFnt (MCbie A0A143Y4E1) or CFpdb (MCbgut Q5HQ64), indicated by pRMSD from MCbgut Q5HQ64 native CFpdb model (inward open). (B) MCbie A0A143Y4E1 and MCbgut Q5HQ64 VNT mutant 3D models are quasi-superimposable (top left).
Bacteria 03 00016 g007aBacteria 03 00016 g007b
Figure 8. Distinct conformational response of MCbie A0A143Y4E1 to select mutations targeting sites of Slc11 synapomorphy. (A) Recap of the effect of VNT mutagenesis on MCbgut Q5HQ64 (h3 A131YG135N, h6 A228T M231V H233Y, [6]) shown as pRMSD from Q5HQ64 native CFpdb model (inward open). (B) MCbie A0A143Y4E1 displays increased sensitivity to h3 mutation YN. (C) Modeling of MCbie A0A143Y4E1 YN-induced conformation change is unaltered by secondary mutations previously shown to suppress MCg1 A0A149PND7 YN-induced rearranged modeling [6]. (D) The impact of h3 YN mutation on MCbie A0A143Y4E1 CFnt modeling is lost in the compound mutant (A0A143Y4E1_15mt, cf Figure 5), and additional h3 mutations have no further effect. (E) Reverting 3 of the 15 targeted mutations co-assayed in MCbie A0A143Y4E1_15mt restores some modeling responsiveness to h3 mutation YN. The corresponding mutants are listed in Table S2.
Figure 8. Distinct conformational response of MCbie A0A143Y4E1 to select mutations targeting sites of Slc11 synapomorphy. (A) Recap of the effect of VNT mutagenesis on MCbgut Q5HQ64 (h3 A131YG135N, h6 A228T M231V H233Y, [6]) shown as pRMSD from Q5HQ64 native CFpdb model (inward open). (B) MCbie A0A143Y4E1 displays increased sensitivity to h3 mutation YN. (C) Modeling of MCbie A0A143Y4E1 YN-induced conformation change is unaltered by secondary mutations previously shown to suppress MCg1 A0A149PND7 YN-induced rearranged modeling [6]. (D) The impact of h3 YN mutation on MCbie A0A143Y4E1 CFnt modeling is lost in the compound mutant (A0A143Y4E1_15mt, cf Figure 5), and additional h3 mutations have no further effect. (E) Reverting 3 of the 15 targeted mutations co-assayed in MCbie A0A143Y4E1_15mt restores some modeling responsiveness to h3 mutation YN. The corresponding mutants are listed in Table S2.
Bacteria 03 00016 g008aBacteria 03 00016 g008b
Figure 9. MCbie A0A143Y4E1 shows conformation-dependent responses to reversion of 5 of the 15 sites mutated in A0A143Y4E1_15mt. (A,B) pRMSD relative to native A0A143Y4E1 CFnt model. (C,D) Multiple 3D structure alignment using POSA. Reversion of 5 mutations from A0A143Y4E1_15mt (cf Table S2) has dual effects: it allows YN-induced conformation switch toward outward open state (A,C) but decreases 3D resemblance to MCbgut Q5HQ64 inward open 3D model (D) by restoring instead similarity to the native MCbie A0A143Y4E1 model (B).
Figure 9. MCbie A0A143Y4E1 shows conformation-dependent responses to reversion of 5 of the 15 sites mutated in A0A143Y4E1_15mt. (A,B) pRMSD relative to native A0A143Y4E1 CFnt model. (C,D) Multiple 3D structure alignment using POSA. Reversion of 5 mutations from A0A143Y4E1_15mt (cf Table S2) has dual effects: it allows YN-induced conformation switch toward outward open state (A,C) but decreases 3D resemblance to MCbgut Q5HQ64 inward open 3D model (D) by restoring instead similarity to the native MCbie A0A143Y4E1 model (B).
Bacteria 03 00016 g009
Figure 10. IQ-Tree phylogeny of MCbgut among Lactobacillales (LB). Representative seqs from each LB family (Aerococcaceae, AerC, Lactobacillaceae, LctB, Streptococcaceae, StpC, Enterococcaceae, EntC, Carnobacteriaceae, CrnB) were analyzed using 5 MCa and 2 MCbie seqs as outgroup. The tree presented used 347 PI sites, the substitution model EX-EHO, ML estimate of a.a. state frequency, free rate model of variation among sites with 7 categories. The statistical significance of each node is indicated together with the scale (nb substitution per site). Two clusters of MCbgut seqs, separated by P. termitis seq and that replicate the profound dichotomy observed by analyzing MCbgut seqs from Enterococcaceae (Figure S5), are highlighted: MCbgu1 and MCbgu2.
Figure 10. IQ-Tree phylogeny of MCbgut among Lactobacillales (LB). Representative seqs from each LB family (Aerococcaceae, AerC, Lactobacillaceae, LctB, Streptococcaceae, StpC, Enterococcaceae, EntC, Carnobacteriaceae, CrnB) were analyzed using 5 MCa and 2 MCbie seqs as outgroup. The tree presented used 347 PI sites, the substitution model EX-EHO, ML estimate of a.a. state frequency, free rate model of variation among sites with 7 categories. The statistical significance of each node is indicated together with the scale (nb substitution per site). Two clusters of MCbgut seqs, separated by P. termitis seq and that replicate the profound dichotomy observed by analyzing MCbgut seqs from Enterococcaceae (Figure S5), are highlighted: MCbgu1 and MCbgu2.
Bacteria 03 00016 g010
Figure 11. AF2 models distinct conformers for LB MCbgu1 and MCbgu2 templates. (A) Lactobacillaceae. (B) Enterococcaceae. Pairwise structural similarity was established with Dali all against all, using as 3D references the solved structures of MCbgut in outward open state (5M87) and inward open state (5M94) as well as AF2 and CFpdb models of MCbgut Q5HQ64 and CFpdb model of Q5HQ64 VNT. Similarity depicted using dendrogram (left) and 3D correspondence (right) representations.
Figure 11. AF2 models distinct conformers for LB MCbgu1 and MCbgu2 templates. (A) Lactobacillaceae. (B) Enterococcaceae. Pairwise structural similarity was established with Dali all against all, using as 3D references the solved structures of MCbgut in outward open state (5M87) and inward open state (5M94) as well as AF2 and CFpdb models of MCbgut Q5HQ64 and CFpdb model of Q5HQ64 VNT. Similarity depicted using dendrogram (left) and 3D correspondence (right) representations.
Bacteria 03 00016 g011
Figure 12. CFpdb modeling reveals functional differences between MCbgu1 and MCbgu2. (A–C) Mutagenesis-driven conformational change, from the outward open state toward inwardly open state, obtained by CFpdb modeling of compound PLBgu1 mutants is shown as pRMSD from native PLBgu1 model. The a.a. replacements targeted selectively conserved sites either across the Slc11 family (B) or among prototype Nramps (pN-I, pN-II) and MntH C clades (MCa, MCb, MCg and MCaU, [7]) (C). (E,F) Identical compound mutants LLBgu1 (Lagu1) and ECgu1 (Efagu1) display conformational responses like PLBgu1, while the mutants PLBgu2, LLBgu2 (Lbrgu2) and ECgu2 (Ecegu2) exhibit more diverse overall shapes, shown as pRMSD from ECgu1 (E) and PLBgu2 (F) native 3D models. (D,G,H) Adding reciprocal mutations to exchange residues that distinguish MCbgu1 from MCbgu2 (D) impaired MCbgu1 conformation similarly for all 3 templates (G), while some MCbgu2 showed opposite effect (H), indicated by pRMSD from ECgu1 (G) and PLBgu2 (H) respective native 3D models (cf mutant Table S2). (I,J) Evolutionary divergence of MCbgu1 and MCbgu2 clades. Simplified IQ-Tree representation of MCbgu1 and MCbgu2 clade relationships ((I), 46 seqs each, detailed in Figure S7). Clade-specific Consurf evolutionary conservation patterns among MCbgu1 (top, native ECgu1 CF model, Efagu1) and MCbgu2 (bottom, native ECgu2 CF model, Ecegu2) clades (J). Model MCb carrier views of the outward face (left) and the transmembrane helix bundle (right).
Figure 12. CFpdb modeling reveals functional differences between MCbgu1 and MCbgu2. (A–C) Mutagenesis-driven conformational change, from the outward open state toward inwardly open state, obtained by CFpdb modeling of compound PLBgu1 mutants is shown as pRMSD from native PLBgu1 model. The a.a. replacements targeted selectively conserved sites either across the Slc11 family (B) or among prototype Nramps (pN-I, pN-II) and MntH C clades (MCa, MCb, MCg and MCaU, [7]) (C). (E,F) Identical compound mutants LLBgu1 (Lagu1) and ECgu1 (Efagu1) display conformational responses like PLBgu1, while the mutants PLBgu2, LLBgu2 (Lbrgu2) and ECgu2 (Ecegu2) exhibit more diverse overall shapes, shown as pRMSD from ECgu1 (E) and PLBgu2 (F) native 3D models. (D,G,H) Adding reciprocal mutations to exchange residues that distinguish MCbgu1 from MCbgu2 (D) impaired MCbgu1 conformation similarly for all 3 templates (G), while some MCbgu2 showed opposite effect (H), indicated by pRMSD from ECgu1 (G) and PLBgu2 (H) respective native 3D models (cf mutant Table S2). (I,J) Evolutionary divergence of MCbgu1 and MCbgu2 clades. Simplified IQ-Tree representation of MCbgu1 and MCbgu2 clade relationships ((I), 46 seqs each, detailed in Figure S7). Clade-specific Consurf evolutionary conservation patterns among MCbgu1 (top, native ECgu1 CF model, Efagu1) and MCbgu2 (bottom, native ECgu2 CF model, Ecegu2) clades (J). Model MCb carrier views of the outward face (left) and the transmembrane helix bundle (right).
Bacteria 03 00016 g012aBacteria 03 00016 g012bBacteria 03 00016 g012c
Figure 13. Hypothetical emergence of LB in the gut of early vertebrates based on molecular genetic and structural evolutionary analyses of Slc11 clade MCb (MCbie and MCbgut, i.e., MCbgu1 and MCbgu2). (A) The evolutionary time window considered is indicated to be from eukaryogenesis, ca. 2 billion years ago, to emergence of the genus Enterococcus, ca. 425 million years ago. It is proposed LB evolved during the Ediacaran–Cambrian transition (635–485 mya), possibly in the early Cambrian (ca. 540 mya). Substitution of the ancestral mntH A gene for a horizontally acquired mntH Ca gene is posited as initial step (MntH Ca+ Bacillaceae), followed by a combination of selective processes, including genome reduction and gene duplication. Successive environmental changes that could favor evolution of MCb (left) and previously reported stepwise changes in MntH functional properties (right) are indicated (from top to bottom). (B) LB colonization of the gut of protochordates led to acidification of the upper part of the gut during food fermentation, producing outcomes that could foster the establishment of the vertebrate gastro-intestinal tract in its canonical form (right panel), by emulating developmental host functions such as differentiation of the stomachal pouch, food habits and behavioral responses, and immunological tolerance (left panel).
Figure 13. Hypothetical emergence of LB in the gut of early vertebrates based on molecular genetic and structural evolutionary analyses of Slc11 clade MCb (MCbie and MCbgut, i.e., MCbgu1 and MCbgu2). (A) The evolutionary time window considered is indicated to be from eukaryogenesis, ca. 2 billion years ago, to emergence of the genus Enterococcus, ca. 425 million years ago. It is proposed LB evolved during the Ediacaran–Cambrian transition (635–485 mya), possibly in the early Cambrian (ca. 540 mya). Substitution of the ancestral mntH A gene for a horizontally acquired mntH Ca gene is posited as initial step (MntH Ca+ Bacillaceae), followed by a combination of selective processes, including genome reduction and gene duplication. Successive environmental changes that could favor evolution of MCb (left) and previously reported stepwise changes in MntH functional properties (right) are indicated (from top to bottom). (B) LB colonization of the gut of protochordates led to acidification of the upper part of the gut during food fermentation, producing outcomes that could foster the establishment of the vertebrate gastro-intestinal tract in its canonical form (right panel), by emulating developmental host functions such as differentiation of the stomachal pouch, food habits and behavioral responses, and immunological tolerance (left panel).
Bacteria 03 00016 g013
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cellier, M.F.M. The Emergence of the Slc11 Clade MCbgut: A Parsimonious Hypothesis for the Dawn of Lactobacillales in the Gut of Early Vertebrates. Bacteria 2024, 3, 223-255. https://doi.org/10.3390/bacteria3030016

AMA Style

Cellier MFM. The Emergence of the Slc11 Clade MCbgut: A Parsimonious Hypothesis for the Dawn of Lactobacillales in the Gut of Early Vertebrates. Bacteria. 2024; 3(3):223-255. https://doi.org/10.3390/bacteria3030016

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cellier, Mathieu F. M. 2024. "The Emergence of the Slc11 Clade MCbgut: A Parsimonious Hypothesis for the Dawn of Lactobacillales in the Gut of Early Vertebrates" Bacteria 3, no. 3: 223-255. https://doi.org/10.3390/bacteria3030016

APA Style

Cellier, M. F. M. (2024). The Emergence of the Slc11 Clade MCbgut: A Parsimonious Hypothesis for the Dawn of Lactobacillales in the Gut of Early Vertebrates. Bacteria, 3(3), 223-255. https://doi.org/10.3390/bacteria3030016

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop