Seed Germination of Native Mediterranean Species for Establishing Self-Sustaining Urban Meadows Supporting Urban Biodiversity
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Species Selection and Seed Collection
2.2. Seed Viability Testing
2.3. Seed Dormancy and Pretreatments Applied
2.4. Data Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| TTZ | Tetrazolium chloride |
References
- Grimm, N.B.; Faeth, S.H.; Golubiewski, N.E.; Redman, C.L.; Wu, J.; Bai, X.; Briggs, J.M. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 2008, 319, 756–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seto, K.C.; Güneralp, B.; Hutyra, L.R. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 16083–16088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United Nations System Chief Executives Board for Coordination. CEB/2019/1/Add.5. United Nations. 2019. Available online: https://unsceb.org/sites/default/files/2021-01/CEB_2019_1_Add-5-EN.pdf (accessed on 24 January 2026).
- European Urban Initiative. 2024. Introduction and Background: Context. Available online: https://www.urban-initiative.eu/online-guidance-innovative-actions/introduction-background/context (accessed on 24 January 2026).
- McKinney, M.L. Effects of urbanization on species richness: A review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst. 2008, 11, 161–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aronson, M.F.; Lepczyk, C.A.; Evans, K.L.; Goddard, M.A.; Lerman, S.B.; MacIvor, J.S.; Nilon, C.H.; Vargo, T. Biodiversity in the city: Key challenges for urban green space management. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2017, 15, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McDonnell, M.J.; MacGregor-Fors, I. The ecological future of cities. Science 2016, 352, 936–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paudel, S.; States, S.L. Urban green spaces and sustainability: Exploring the ecosystem services and disservices of grassy lawns versus floral meadows. Urban For. Urban Green. 2023, 84, 127932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burkman, C.E.; Gardiner, M.M. Urban greenspace composition and landscape context influence natural enemy community composition and function. Biol. Control 2014, 75, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casanelles-Abella, J.; Pellissier, L.; Aleixo, C.; Orti, M.A.; Chiron, F.; Deguines, N.; Laanisto, L.; Myczko, Ł.; Müller, S.; Niinemets, Ü.; et al. Urban intensity gradients shape community structure, life-history traits and performance in a multitrophic system. Insect Conserv. Divers. 2024, 17, 243–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wenzel, A.; Grass, I.; Belavadi, V.V.; Tscharntke, T. How urbanization is driving pollinator diversity and pollination—A systematic review. Biol. Conserv. 2020, 241, 108321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narango, D.L.; Tallamy, D.W.; Marra, P.P. Native plants improve breeding and foraging habitat for an insectivorous bird. Biol. Conserv. 2017, 213, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hallmann, C.A.; Sorg, M.; Jongejans, E.; Siepel, H.; Hofland, N.; Schwan, H.; Stenmans, W.; Müller, A.; Sumser, H.; Hörren, T.; et al. More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0185809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baldock, K.C.; Goddard, M.A.; Hicks, D.M.; Kunin, W.E.; Mitschunas, N.; Osgathorpe, L.M.; Potts, S.G.; Robertson, K.M.; Scott, A.V.; Stone, G.N.; et al. Where is the UK’s pollinator biodiversity? The importance of urban areas for flower-visiting insects. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2015, 282, 20142849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baldock, K.C.R.; Goddard, M.A.; Hicks, D.M.; Kunin, W.E.; Mitschunas, N.; Morse, H.; Osgathorpe, L.M.; Potts, S.G.; Robertson, K.M.; Scott, A.V.; et al. A systems approach reveals urban pollinator hotspots and conservation opportunities. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 3, 363–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Petanidou, T.; Kallimanis, A.S.; Tzanopoulos, J.; Sgardelis, S.P.; Pantis, J.D. Long-term observation of a pollination network: Fluctuation in species and interactions, relative invariance of network structure and implications for estimates of specialization. Ecol. Let. 2008, 11, 564–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Potts, S.G.; Vulliamy, B.; Dafni, A.; Neeman, G.; Willmer, P. Linking bees and flowers: How do floral communities structure pollinator communities? Ecology 2003, 84, 2628–2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Snow, D.W.; Perrins, C.M. The Birds of the Western Palearctic; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Kildisheva, O.A.; Dixon, K.W.; Silveira, F.A.O.; Chapman, T.; Di Sacco, A.; Mondoni, A.; Turner, S.R.; Cross, A.T. Dormancy and germination: Making every seed count in restoration. Restor. Ecol. 2020, 28, 256–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baskin, C.C.; Baskin, J.M. Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Finch-Savage, W.E.; Leubner-Metzger, G. Seed dormancy and the control of germination. New Phytol. 2006, 171, 501–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strid, A. Mountain Flora of Greece; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1986; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
- Strid, A. Mountain Flora of Greece; Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh, UK, 1991; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
- Tutin, T.G.; Heywood, V.H.; Burges, N.A.; Moore, D.M.; Valentine, D.H.; Walters, S.M.; Webb, D.A. Flora Europaea; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1980; Volume 5. [Google Scholar]
- Copeland, L.O.; McDonald, M.B. Principles of Seed Science and Technology, 4th ed.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- AOSA/SCST. Tetrazolium Testing Handbook; Contribution No. 29; AOSA: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Nikolić, B.; Braunović, S.; Jovanović, F.; Eremija, S.; Marković, M.; Rakonjac, L. Seed germination tests in Achillea genus from the Pirot County (Southeastern Serbia). Ethnobotany 2022, 2, 145–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blandino, C.; Carruggio, F.; Impelluso, C.; Castrogiovanni, M.; Cristaudo, A. Germination protocols for seven Mediterranean taxa of the genus Anthemis (Asteraceae) from Sicily. Flora Medit. 2022, 32, 207–219. [Google Scholar]
- Erbaş, F. Effects of some treatments on seed dormancy in branched asphodel (Asphodelus ramosus L.). Plant Prot. Bull. 2024, 64, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vuerich, M.; Pasquini, S.; Casolo, V.; Boscutti, F.; Petrussa, E. Seed germination of the endemic Armeria helodes (Plumbaginaceae) in Italy. Flora Medit. 2022, 32, 227–232. [Google Scholar]
- Dixon, J.M. Briza media L. J. Ecol. 2002, 90, 737–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paradisiotis, M.; Pipinis, E.; Kostas, S.; Tsoktouridis, G.; Hatzilazarou, S.; Mastrogianni, A.; Tsiripidis, I.; Krigas, N. Seed Germination Requirements of the Threatened Local Greek Endemic Campanula pangea Hartvig Facilitating Species-Specific Conservation Efforts. Conservation 2025, 5, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bazanis, A.E.; Papafotiou, M. In vitro germination, micropropagation and addressing the hyperhydricity of the Balkan native Dianthus cruentus. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Baalen, J. Germination ecology and seed population dynamics of Digitalis purpurea. Oecologia 1982, 53, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Myerscough, P.J. Epilobium angustifolium L. J. Ecol. 1980, 68, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matarrese, E.; Renna, M. Prospects of hogweed (Heracleum sphondylium L.) as a new horticultural crop for food and non-food uses: A review. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García, F.; Huertas, M.; Mora, E.; Peña, B.; Varela, F.; González-Benito, M.E. Hypericum perforatum L. seed germination: Interpopulation variation and effect of light, temperature, presowing treatments and seed desiccation. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2006, 53, 1187–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, J.; Li, K.; Deng, C.; Gong, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, L. Seed germination ecology of semiparasitic weed Pediculariskansuensis in alpine grasslands. Plants 2022, 11, 1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baskin, J.M.; Baskin, C.C. Role of temperature and light in the germination ecology of buried seeds of Potentilla recta. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1990, 117, 611–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campbell-Martínez, G.; Olsson, R.; Hersey, A.; Meikle, S.; Freitag, K. Native seed germination trials at the Rae Selling Berry Seed Bank. In Proceedings of the International Plant Propagators Society, Western Region, Wilsonville, OR, USA, 24–27 January 2023; Available online: https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/43841 (accessed on 20 July 2025).
- Park, K.; Lee, S.Y.; Ji, B.; Jang, B.K.; Lee, H.; Lee, H.; Song, S.-K.; Cho, J.S. Seed longevity and germinability of Pulsatilla dahurica after storage and accelerated aging test. Hortic. Sci. Technol. 2022, 40, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vojík, M.; Kadlecová, M.; Kutlvašr, J.; Berchova, K. Two shades of grey: Effect of temperature on seed germination of the escaping ornamental species Lychnis coronaria and Stachys byzantina. Plant Ecol. 2022, 223, 1121–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baskin, J.M.; Baskin, C.C. The great diversity in kinds of seed dormancy: A revision of the Nikolaeva–Baskin classification system for primary seed dormancy. Seed Sci. Res. 2021, 31, 249–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosbakh, S.; Carta, A.; Fernández-Pascual, E.; Phartyal, S.S.; Dayrell, R.L.C.; Mattana, E.; Saatkamp, A.; Vandelook, F.; Baskin, J.; Baskin, C.C. Global seed dormancy patterns are driven by macroclimate but not fire regime. New Phytol. 2023, 240, 555–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xoplaki, E.; Gonzalez-Rouco, J.; Luterbacher, J.; Wanner, H. Wet season Mediterranean precipitation variability: Influence of large-scale dynamics and trends. Clim. Dyn. 2004, 23, 63–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carruggio, F.; Onofri, A.; Catara, S.; Impelluso, C.; Castrogiovanni, M.; Lo Cascio, P.; Cristaudo, A. Conditional Seed Dormancy Helps Silene hicesiae Brullo & Signor. Overcome Stressful Mediterranean Summer Conditions. Plants 2021, 10, 2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

| A/N | Species | Habitat Type | Average Height of Mature Individuals (cm) | Flower Color | Leaf Color | Flowering Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Achillea crithmifolia Waldst. & Kit. | Dry/open habitats | 10–30 (40) | Pale greenish, yellow/white | Gray-green | June–August |
| 2 | Achillea millefolium L. | Dry/open habitats | 10–50 | White or pinkish | Green | July–September |
| 3 | Anthemis tinctoria L. (=syn. Cota tinctoria (L.) J.Gay) | Dry/open habitats | 20–60 | Bright yellow | Green (glaucous above) | June–August |
| 4 | Asphodeline lutea (L.) Rchb. | Dry/open habitats | 60–90 | Yellow | Glaucous-green | April–June |
| 5 | Armeria canescens (Host) Boiss. | Mesic habitats | 15–35 | Pinkish or withe | Green | May–June (July) |
| 6 | Briza media L. | Mesic habitats | 15–60 | Purple-tinged | Green | June–August |
| 7 | Campanula lingulate Waldst. & Kit. | Dry/open habitats | 15–35 | Violet-blue | Green | July–September |
| 8 | Campanula persicifolia L. | Mesic habitats | 30–80 | Blue | Bright green | June–August |
| 9 | Campanula trachelium L. | Moist/shaded habitats | 40–100 | Violet-blue | Green, hispid | July–September |
| 10 | Dianthus cruentus Griseb. | Dry/open habitats | 30–60 | Reddish-purple | Glaucous | End of May and mid-July |
| 11 | Dianthus gracilis Sm. | Dry/open habitats | 15–40 | Pink-reddish | Green to glaucous | June–August |
| 12 | Dianthus pinifolius Sm. | Dry/open habitats | 15–45 | Red-purple | Green | June–August |
| 13 | Digitalis lanata Ehrh. | Mesic habitats | 30–60 (90) | White or cream | Green glaucous | June–August |
| 14 | Digitalis viridiflora Lindl. | Mesic habitats | 40–80 | Greenish yellow | Green, glaucous or sparsely pubescent | June–August |
| 15 | Epilobium angustifolium L. | Moist/shaded habitats | (30) 60–150 | Pink to purple | Green (lighter below) | June–August |
| 16 | Heracleum sphondylium L. | Moist/shaded habitats | 50–150 | White or pinkish | Dark green | June–August |
| 17 | Hypericum maculatum Crantz | Mesic habitats | 20–60 | Yellow | Green | June–July (August) |
| 18 | Hypericum olympicum L. | Mesic habitats | 10–35 | Yellow | Glaucus | June–July |
| 19 | Hypericum perforatum L. | Mesic habitats | 30–90 | Yellow | Green | June–August |
| 20 | Pedicularis friderici-augusti Tomm. | Moist/shaded habitats | 10–20 | Pale yellow | Green | May–July |
| 21 | Potentilla recta L. | Dry/open habitats | 30–70 | Yellow-cream | Green to gray-green | Mid-May–early August |
| 22 | Prunella vulgaris L. | Mesic habitats | 5–30 | Violet-blue | Green | June–September |
| 23 | Pulsatilla helleri (All.) Willd. | Dry/open habitats | 10–30 | Violet-purple | Green | April–May |
| 24 | Silene coronaria (L.) Clairv. | Dry/open habitats | 40–80 | Deep pink-magenta | White tomentose | June–July |
| 25 | Thymus thracicus Velen. | Dry/open habitats | 5–15 | Pink or purplish | Dark green, sometimes reddish-purple | June–August |
| 26 | Thymus praecox Opiz | Dry/open habitats | 2–10 (15) | Purple or pink | Green | June–August |
| Species/Genus | Reference on the Dormancy Type | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Achillea sp. | [27] |
| 2 | Anthemis sp. | [28] |
| 3 | Asphodeline sp. | [29] |
| 4 | Armeria sp. | [30] |
| 5 | Briza media | [31] |
| 6 | Campanula sp. | [32] |
| 7 | Dianthus sp. | [33] |
| 8 | Digitalis sp. | [34] |
| 9 | Epilobium angustifolium | [35] |
| 10 | Heracleum sphondylium | [36] |
| 11 | Hypericum sp. | [37] |
| 12 | Pedicularis friderici-augusti | [38] |
| 13 | Potentilla recta | [39] |
| 14 | Prunella vulgaris | [40] |
| 15 | Pulsatilla halleri | [41] |
| 16 | Silene coronaria | [42] |
| 17 | Thymus sp. | [20] |
| Species | Treatment | First Week Germination (% ± SE) | Fourth Week Germination (% ± SE) | Final Germination (% ± SE) | T50 (Days) | Embryo Viability (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Achillea crithmifolia | CS | 20.04 ± 7.26 | 74.00 ± 2.79 a | 74.00 ± 2.79 a | 11.05 ± 1.55 a | 85 |
| Control | 0 | 24.00 ± 2.83 b | 45.00 ± 1.91 b | 27.91 ± 1.84 b | ||
| Achillea millefolium | CS | 23.60 ± 4.35 a | 70.36 ± 2.29 a | 72.00 ± 1.68 a | 9.70 ± 1.11 a | 100 |
| Control | 1.00 ± 1.04 b | 7.00 ± 3.00 b | 39.00 ± 3.41 b | 36.84 ± 2.21 b | ||
| Achillea clypeolata | CS | 55.78± 6.88 a | 73.25 ± 1.37 a | 73.25 ± 1.37 a | 7.00 ± 0.03 a | 95 |
| Control | 3.77 ± 2.18 b | 18.47 ± 5.36 b | 41.75 ± 1.18 b | 27.34 ± 5.17 b | ||
| Asphodeline lutea | CS | 0 | 2.92 ± 1.90 b | 58.00 ± 1.47 b | 34.15 ± 1.67 a | 90 |
| Control | 0 | 65.00 ± 4.12 a | 74.00 ± 4.16 a | 25.01 ± 0.26 b | ||
| Armeria canescens | CS | 0 | 69.00 ± 5.00 a | 83.00 ± 4.72 a | 15.80 ± 1.57 a | 100 |
| Control | 0 | 82.00 ± 3.82 a | 88.00 ± 5.16 a | 11.07 ± 0.23 a | ||
| Briza media | CS | 7.55 ± 5.44 | 49.16 ± 4.86 a | 68.50 ± 1.55 a | 21.18 ± 1.91 b | 91 |
| Control | 0 | 23.02 ± 4.07 b | 64.25 ± 0.85 a | 30.39 ± 1.11 a | ||
| Campanula lingulata | CS | 0 | 47.00 ± 4.72 | 22.00 ± 2.58 b | 11.26 ± 0.34 | 100 |
| Control | 0 | 61.00 ± 5.74 | 61.00 ± 5.74 a | 15.26 ± 0.68 | ||
| Campanula persicifolia | CS | 0 | 0 | 78.00 ± 2.58 b | 43.20 ± 1.97 a | 100 |
| Control | 0 | 95.00 ± 1.91 | 95.00 ± 1.91 a | 13.04 ± 0.97 b | ||
| Campanula trachelium | CS | 0 | 0 | 71.00 ± 4.43 a | 36.71 ± 0.78 a | 100 |
| Control | 0 | 5.00 ± 2.51 | 10.00 ± 2.58 b | 22.75 ± 3.03 b | ||
| Dianthus cruentus | CS | 0 | 23.00 ± 2.51 b | 56.00 ± 5.65 b | 32.50 ± 3.85 a | 95 |
| Control | 2.00 ± 2.04 | 49.00 ± 8.38 a | 74.00 ± 1.15 a | 19.10 ± 3.43 b | ||
| Dianthus gracilis | CS | 34.00 ± 6.21 | 66.00 ± 8.71 b | 87.00 ± 3.00 b | 21.37 ± 2.77 a | 100 |
| Control | 0 | 95.00 ± 1.00 a | 98.00 ± 1.14 a | 10.94 ± 0.27 b | ||
| Dianthus pinifolius | CS | 68.00 ± 4.89 a | 89.00 ± 0.91 a | 89.00 ± 0.91 a | 7.00 ± 0.02 b | 92 |
| Control | 20.10 ± 4.19 b | 33.79 ± 7.79 b | 50.50 ± 0.64 b | 18.46 ± 6.62 a | ||
| Digitalis lanata | CS | 0 | 0 | 89.00 ± 4.43 a | 39.98 ± 0.74 a | 96 |
| Control | 0 | 79.00 ± 9.14 | 81.00 ± 6.19 a | 14.46 ± 1.24 b | ||
| Digitalis viridiflora | CS | 0 | 0 | 94.00 ± 2.58 a | 40.73 ± 0.33 a | 100 |
| Control | 0 | 64.00 ± 4.00 | 74.00 ± 3.82 b | 13.64 ± 1.02 b | ||
| Epilobium angustifolium | CS | 0 | 3.00 ± 1.91 b | 82.00 ± 2.58 a | 51.70 ± 0.21 a | 100 |
| Control | 0 | 84.00 ± 2.82 a | 84.00 ± 2.82 a | 10.58 ± 0.05 b | ||
| Heracleum sphondylium | CS | 0 | 0 | 63.00 ± 5.74 a | 40.02 ± 0.47 a | 91 |
| Control | 0.83 ± 0.8 3 | 0.83 ± 0.83 | 4.50 ± 0.28 b | 32.38 ± 9.08 a | ||
| Hypericum maculatum | CS | 1.92 ± 1.92 b | 28.87 ± 3.38 b | 65.00 ± 1.87 b | 29.51 ± 1.17 a | 100 |
| Control | 22.36 ± 2.07 a | 59.93 ± 3.00 a | 88.25 ± 1.93 a | 15.81 ± 2.11 b | ||
| Hypericum olympicum | CS | 0 | 0 | 66.00 ± 2.58 b | 47.20 ± 0.75 a | 100 |
| Control | 0 | 41.00 ± 11.12 | 77.00 ± 2.51 a | 27.58 ± 5.81 b | ||
| Hypericum perforatum | CS | 0 | 0 | 60.00 ± 1.63 b | 43.64 ± 1.06 a | 99 |
| Control | 0 | 82.00 ± 8.86 | 95.00 ± 3.00 a | 19.69 ± 1.12 b | ||
| Pedicularis friderici-augusti | CS | 0 | 0 | 53.00 ± 7.18 a | 45.84 ± 0.34 a | 90 |
| Control | 0 | 0.5 ± 0.62 | 1.75 ± 0.47 b | 31.50 ± 2.86 b | ||
| Potentilla recta | CS | 0 | 1.00 ± 1.02 b | 35.00 ± 6.19 b | 38.33 ± 0.18 a | 100 |
| Control | 0 | 77.00 ± 9.29 a | 93.00 ± 4.72 a | 10.67 ± 0.13 b | ||
| Prunella vulgaris | CS | 1.00 ± 1.00 b | 4.25 ± 1.65 b | 5.75 ± 0.85 b | 17.50 ± 6.23 a | 90 |
| Control | 41.97 ± 6.56 a | 66.78 ± 2.73 a | 69.50 ± 1.04 a | 7.00 ± 0.00 b | ||
| Pulsatilla halleri | CS | 0 | 4.51 ± 0.51 | 5.50 ± 0.95 b | 21.00 ± 3.20 a | 80 |
| Control | 12.61 ± 4.89 | 38.74 ± 0.74 | 52.00 ± 1.08 a | 16.15 ± 2.19 a | ||
| Silene coronaria | CS | 0 | 0 | 79.00 ± 3.41 a | 39.34 ± 0.42 a | 86 |
| Control | 0 | 67.00 ± 8.38 | 73.00 ± 8.06 a | 11.19 ± 0.16 b | ||
| Thymus thracicus | CS | 0 | 11.76 ± 1.75 b | 12.75 ± 1.25 b | 17.94 ± 3.38 a | 100 |
| Control | 29.82 ± 3.40 | 62.99 ± 2.85 a | 63.75 ± 2.13 a | 10.79 ± 1.87 a | ||
| Thymus praecox | CS | 1.00 ± 1.00 b | 8.00 ± 3.26 b | 15.00 ± 1.91 b | 28.22 ± 3.43 a | 100 |
| Control | 39.80 ± 1.97 a | 74.68 ± 3.54 a | 86.00 ± 2.48 a | 9.80 ± 1.83 b |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Varsamis, G.; Karapatzak, E.; Vasiou, A.; Merou, T. Seed Germination of Native Mediterranean Species for Establishing Self-Sustaining Urban Meadows Supporting Urban Biodiversity. Seeds 2026, 5, 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/seeds5030027
Varsamis G, Karapatzak E, Vasiou A, Merou T. Seed Germination of Native Mediterranean Species for Establishing Self-Sustaining Urban Meadows Supporting Urban Biodiversity. Seeds. 2026; 5(3):27. https://doi.org/10.3390/seeds5030027
Chicago/Turabian StyleVarsamis, Georgios, Eleftherios Karapatzak, Anna Vasiou, and Theodora Merou. 2026. "Seed Germination of Native Mediterranean Species for Establishing Self-Sustaining Urban Meadows Supporting Urban Biodiversity" Seeds 5, no. 3: 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/seeds5030027
APA StyleVarsamis, G., Karapatzak, E., Vasiou, A., & Merou, T. (2026). Seed Germination of Native Mediterranean Species for Establishing Self-Sustaining Urban Meadows Supporting Urban Biodiversity. Seeds, 5(3), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/seeds5030027

