Next Article in Journal
Formation of Layered Structure in Ceramics Based on Alumina Nanopowder Under Effect of Induction Heating
Previous Article in Journal
Real-Time Detection of Critical Moisture Levels in Fluidized Bed Drying Using Spectral Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Drying Structures of Droplets of Aluminosilicate-Based Hollow Particle Aqueous Dispersions

Faculty of Engineering, Gifu University, Gifu 501-1193, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Powders 2025, 4(2), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/powders4020017
Submission received: 29 April 2025 / Revised: 7 June 2025 / Accepted: 17 June 2025 / Published: 18 June 2025

Abstract

The drying structures of droplets of colloidal aqueous dispersions exhibit a wide variety of patterns depending on experimental conditions. It has been established by previous researchers that capillary flows and Marangoni convection significantly influence the macroscopic pattern formation. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to focus on sessile droplets of aqueous dispersions containing hollow particles. These hollow particles have a lower density than water and thus float in the medium. The drying pattern of these droplets was markedly different from the well-known ring pattern. Instead, a bump-shaped structure—often referred to as a “coffee-eye”—was formed due to the accumulation of particles at the center of the dried film. While a ring pattern was still present, it was extremely narrow and barely noticeable. This behavior is attributed to the dominance of the buoyant motion of the hollow particles, which prevented their transport by capillary flow. The findings of this study provide fundamental and important insights into the drying structures of various types of colloidal droplets.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

When a sessile droplet of a typical colloidal dispersion dries, it commonly forms a characteristic ring-shaped deposition pattern, widely known as the “coffee ring.” This structure arises due to the preferential evaporation of liquid near the contact line of the droplet, which induces a capillary flow from the interior toward the edge [1,2,3,4]. In a water droplet placed horizontally on a cover glass at room temperature, a downward flow is typically generated from the droplet center toward the bottom substrate, followed by a radial outward flow along the substrate surface. This capillary flow transports colloidal particles, particularly micrometer-sized particles and above, toward the edge, ultimately leading to the formation of a ring-like pattern. This flow predominantly occurs near the bottom region of the droplet, and therefore, conventional sedimenting particles are readily entrained in it. It is well known that the formation of such ring patterns can be suppressed by Marangoni flow, which is driven by surface tension gradients at the droplet surface [5]. In general, the drying pattern is primarily governed by the balance between capillary flow and Marangoni flow. It is further influenced by various factors such as the composition of the dispersion medium [6,7,8,9,10,11,12], the droplet size [13], substrate wettability [14,15,16], temperature [5,17,18], humidity [19], airflow [20], electric and acoustic fields [21,22,23], and laser irradiation [24,25]. Additionally, particle properties such as particle size and size distribution [26], particle shape [27,28,29], and particle concentration [16,30] are critical factors influencing the drying patterns. Under low substrate temperature conditions [5], Marangoni flow can become dominant. Marangoni flow occurs along the droplet surface, and when its influence is strong, it can induce a large-scale circulation flow throughout the droplet interior. The competition between capillary flow and Marangoni flow in sessile droplets has been discussed in detail by Erbil (2012) [4]. Although ring patterns are generally governed by the interplay of these two flows, almost all previous studies have focused on systems where the particle density is greater than that of the solvent. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no systematic investigations on drying patterns of sessile droplets containing particles with a density lower than that of the dispersion medium. The ring-like pattern, which most frequently appears in the drying of sessile droplets, is formed as a result of capillary flow transporting particles toward the droplet edge. Since this flow occurs primarily near the bottom of the droplet, conventional sedimenting particles are readily entrained in it. In contrast, hollow particles tend to float in water and may therefore escape the influence of capillary flow.
In our previous studies, we discovered the phenomenon of the rapid ascent of hollow particles when a horizontal DC electric field was applied to aqueous dispersions of hollow particles—the so-called Electrically Induced Rapid Separation (ERS) effect [31]. The hollow particles used in this study were spherical in shape. Furthermore, we revealed that when hollow particles were mixed with poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) particles, the behavior under a horizontal DC electric field varied depending on the mixing ratio: the entire particle population either sedimented or floated [32]. Due to their lower density compared to water, hollow particles are particularly attractive as subjects for fundamental research. In the present study, we investigated the drying structures of droplets of hollow particle aqueous dispersions. Since hollow particles float in water, the resulting drying patterns were expected to be markedly different from the conventional patterns observed for particles denser than the solvent. Specifically, we aimed to clarify the effects of particle volume fraction and electrolyte concentration on the drying patterns of sessile droplets of aluminosilicate-based hollow particle dispersions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Sample Preparation

Aluminosilicate hollow particles were provided by Taiheiyo Cement Co. (Tokyo, Japan). The shells of the hollow particles are composed of aluminosilicate glass. The particle size distribution was relatively broad, with diameters ranging from approximately 1.0 to 8.0 μm, as observed using a digital microscope (BA81–6T–1080M, Shimadzu RIKA Co., Tokyo, Japan) [32]. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements were performed using a Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, UK) to evaluate the hydrodynamic diameter and polydispersity index (PDI) of the particles. The DLS results yielded a z-average diameter (dz) of 1.4 μm and a PDI of 0.23. The zeta potential was measured to be –31 mV [32]. Based on our previous study [32], the temporal change in transmittance intensity of the hollow particle dispersions was measured, allowing the buoyancy velocity to be estimated. As a result, the particle density was determined to be 0.77 g/cm3. The particle Reynolds number for hollow particles in water (diameter 1.4 μm) was calculated to be 4.4 × 10−7, indicating that their buoyancy-driven ascent can be accurately described by the Stokes approximation. The hollow particles were dispersed in ultrapure water (Milli-Q Advantage A10, Millipore Co., Burlington, MA, USA) and then subjected to desalination treatment using an ion-exchange resin (AG501-X8 (D), Bio-Rad Lab., Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). The deionization treatment was continued for more than two months. Sample dispersions were prepared with particle volume fractions (ϕ) ranging from 0.001 to 0.1 and sodium chloride [NaCl] concentrations ranging from 0 to 0.1 mol/L. NaCl (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan) is the most basic and simple monovalent salt, and it allows for the adjustment of ionic strength without introducing specific ion effects. For this reason, it is one of the most commonly used electrolytes in studies on drying patterns [33].

2.2. Observation of Droplet Drying Patterns

The volume of all sessile droplets was standardized to 0.1 mL using a pipette (4910, Eppendorf Co., Ltd., Synapse, Singapore). The cover glasses (30 mm × 30 mm, Matsunami Glass Ind., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) were used as purchased without any additional cleaning and were placed horizontally. Droplets were gently deposited onto the cover glass. Several representative droplets were recorded using a time-lapse camera (TLC200 Pro., Brinno Inc., Taipei, Taiwan), and enlarged images of the dried films were captured using a digital microscope (BA81–6T–1090M, Shimadzu RIKA Co., Tokyo, Japan). During the recording of the drying process, direct illumination from the LED light was avoided; instead, the light was positioned at a distance to provide indirect illumination. For some droplets, mass changes were recorded every five minutes under a relative humidity (RH) of 25%. The cross-sectional profiles of the dried films were measured using a laser 3D profile microscope (VK-8500, Keyence Co., Osaka, Japan). All measurements were conducted at 25 °C. Except for the mass change measurements, the humidity was maintained within the range of 25%RH to 50%RH, centered around 35%RH.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Formation Process of Drying Patterns

The gravitational Péclet number PeG, a dimensionless number indicating the relative importance of sedimentation or flotation compared to diffusion for particles in water, is expressed as follows:
Pe G = π d 4 Δ ρ g 12 k B T
where d is the particle diameter, Δρ is the density difference between the particle and water, g is the gravitational acceleration, kB is the Boltzmann constant, and T is the absolute temperature. For example, in the case of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) particles with a diameter of 5 μm and a specific gravity of 1.2, the gravitational Péclet number in water is approximately 100. Sedimented PMMA particles are captured by the capillary flow and transported toward the contact line, resulting in the formation of a clear ring pattern upon the drying of the sessile droplet. The drying process of a droplet of the hollow particle aqueous dispersion (ϕ = 0.01) was observed from above (Figure 1). Immediately after deposition, the entire droplet appeared to be turbid, except for a slightly transparent region near the droplet edge where the thickness was small (Figure 1a). After 5 min, a turbid region appeared slightly inside the droplet periphery, forming a blurred boundary (Figure 1b). A part of this boundary is indicated by a red dotted line in the upper part of the image. After 23 min (Figure 1c), the boundary became more distinct, and it slightly moved outward, indicating an expansion of the turbid central region. Between 70 min (Figure 1f) and 160 min (Figure 1g), the turbid central region evolved into a single floating cluster (FC) that gradually moved. This behavior was reminiscent of an iceberg drifting on the sea. Drying was completed in approximately 200 min (Figure 1h), and just before complete drying, several fine grooves appeared within the turbid central region, likely caused by rapid volumetric shrinkage at the final stage of drying. Of particular interest was the very narrow width of the ring formed near the droplet edge; the formation of this ring-like pattern was almost completed in the very early stage of drying. There was almost no significant increase in ring width over time, which is markedly different from the typical drying patterns observed in sessile droplets of general colloidal dispersions.
Next, the drying process of a droplet with a lower particle volume fraction (ϕ = 0.003) was observed (Figure 2). Immediately after deposition (Figure 2a), the appearance was similar to that of the droplet with ϕ = 0.01 shown in Figure 1. After 23 min (Figure 2b), a more distinct turbid floating cluster (FC) appeared at the center. By 67 min (Figure 2c), the outline of the FC became clearer, and the surrounding area became even more transparent. Compared to the appearance at 23 min, the diameter of the FC had slightly increased. After 220 min (Figure 2d), the overall pattern reached a steady state. In the later stages of drying (Figure 2e), irregular fluctuations in the position of the FC were observed. This behavior is considered to be due to slight inhomogeneities in the evaporation rate, generating forces that pushed the FC in one direction. At 262 min (Figure 2f), turbidity began to appear around the FC, indicating that the film was entering the final stage of drying. At this point, a ring-shaped pattern rapidly appeared. Shortly thereafter, circular white rings were observed propagating from the film edge toward the center (arrows in Figure 2g,h). By 273 min (Figure 2i), the final drying pattern was completed.
It is evident that the upward movement of hollow particles due to buoyancy plays a primary role in the formation of the drying pattern. Capillary flow is a well-known mechanism that transports particles toward the contact line, leading to the so-called “coffee-ring effect.” However, in the present system, particles move upward due to buoyancy, effectively avoiding the radial capillary flow near the droplet bottom, which normally transports sedimenting particles to the contact line. As a result, although a ring-like deposition was observed, it remained extremely narrow and barely noticeable. Marangoni flow, which is driven by surface tension gradients at the liquid–air interface of the droplet, typically consists of flow along the droplet surface and an accompanying bulk circulation. Under deionized conditions, such a flow is relatively weak, but it may become stronger with increasing [NaCl]. Nevertheless, as discussed later, no significant changes in the drying pattern attributable to Marangoni flow were observed within the [NaCl] range of 10−4 to 10−2 mol/L. Therefore, under the present experimental conditions, the effect of Marangoni flow is considered to be limited.

3.2. Particle Size Distribution of Hollow Particles

The hollow particles used in this study exhibited a relatively broad size distribution. According to observations using a digital microscope [32], the particle diameters ranged from 1.0 to 8.0 μm. However, it was difficult to observe hollow particles smaller than 1.0 μm using the digital microscope. Therefore, dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements were conducted to clarify the detailed particle size distribution (Figure 3a).
As a result, particles with diameters smaller than 1.0 μm, which were difficult to capture using the digital microscope, were confirmed, with the minimum observed diameter being 0.5 μm. It was also found that particles smaller than 1.0 μm accounted for approximately 30% of the total particle population by number. While the digital microscope observations had revealed a large number of particles with diameters greater than 5.0 μm, the maximum diameter detected by DLS was 3.4 μm. This limitation is considered to be due to the detection range of the DLS instrument. Combining the results of the digital microscope observations and the DLS measurements, the z-average diameter was determined to be 1.4 μm, and the particle size range was found to be 0.5–8.0 μm.

3.3. Buoyancy of Hollow Particles in Water

The effect of particle diameter on the buoyancy-driven ascent velocity, assuming that the gravitational Péclet number and the Stokes approximation are valid, is shown in Figure 3b. For hollow particles with a number-averaged diameter of dz = 1.4 μm, the gravitational Péclet number was approximately 0.55. This indicates a regime where the effects of gravity and diffusion are comparable, although the influence of diffusion is relatively small. The gravitational Péclet number ranged from 0.009 (for d = 0.5 μm) to 590 (for d = 8.0 μm). Because the Péclet number is large for particles with a diameter of 8.0 μm, the effect of diffusion can be neglected for such particles. According to the DLS measurements, particles with diameters of 1.3 µm or less account for approximately 20% of the total volume, while those smaller than 1.0 µm account for less than 10%. Therefore, for the group of particles larger than the average diameter—which constitutes about 80% of the total volume—buoyancy is the dominant factor. These results suggest that for most particles, buoyancy is dominant over diffusion during the drying process of the droplet.
The particle Reynolds number (Rep), which indicates the relative importance of inertial and viscous forces acting on a particle in a fluid, is given by the following equation:
R e p = ρ w v d η
where ρw is the density of water, v is the sedimentation or buoyancy velocity of the particle, and η is the viscosity of water (0.00089 Pa·s at 25 °C). According to our previous study [31], the average buoyancy velocity of hollow particles in water was found to be 0.28 μm/s. Under these conditions, for a particle with dz = 1.4 μm, Rep was extremely small, calculated as 4.4 × 10−7. This confirms that the buoyancy-driven ascent velocity of hollow particles of this size can be accurately described by the Stokes approximation. When the Stokes approximation is valid, the buoyancy-driven ascent velocity (vASC) of a hollow particle is expressed as:
v A S C = d 2 Δ ρ g 18 η
Assuming that the density of all hollow particles is 0.77 g/cm3 regardless of particle size, the buoyancy velocities in water ranged from 0.28 μm/s (for dz =1.4 μm) to 9.0 μm/s (for d = 8.0 μm), as shown in Figure 3b.
An example of a droplet observed from the horizontal direction 15 min after deposition is shown in Figure 4a. The maximum height of the droplet (at the center) was 3.2 mm. The concentration distribution of hollow particles within the droplet was divided into four distinct regions: the upper region (I), middle region (II), lower region (III), and transparent region (IV). These four regions were separated along horizontal planes. The upper region (I) exhibited the highest degree of turbidity and was located at heights H > ∼2.6 mm from the bottom. The middle region (II) had a lower degree of turbidity and spanned approximately 0.5 mm < H < 2.6 mm. These regions correspond to the previously described floating cluster (FC). The lower region (III) exhibited even less turbidity and occupied heights H < ∼0.5 mm. Below this, there was a relatively transparent region (IV).
The buoyancy-driven ascent velocity of the largest hollow particles with a diameter of 8.0 μm present in the droplet, assuming the Stokes approximation, was calculated to be 9.0 μm/s. This corresponds to a buoyant ascent distance of 8.1 mm over 15 min. This suggests that in region (I), larger hollow particles with diameters around 8.0 μm are densely packed. The fact that regions (I) and (II) are separated by a relatively distinct horizontal plane implies that the surface of the droplet, at least in region (I), is covered by a densely packed layer of hollow particles due to buoyant ascent. Furthermore, the hollow particles that have floated up to the droplet surface appear to continue migrating along the surface to higher positions. The changes in drying patterns observed from above (Figure 1 and Figure 2) can be explained by the buoyant motion of these particles. Regions (II) and (III) are separated by a less distinct boundary. The buoyancy-driven ascent velocity of hollow particles with a z-average diameter dz = 1.4 μm is 0.28 μm/s, resulting in a buoyant ascent distance of 0.25 mm over 15 min. This distance roughly corresponds to the boundary between the lower region (III) and the transparent region (IV). Therefore, the ambiguous boundary between regions (III) and (IV) is likely the transition between region (III), which contains a relatively higher proportion of smaller particles including those around the average size, and region (IV), where diffusion becomes dominant and very small particles prevail. Since the gravitational Péclet number for hollow particles with dz = 1.4 μm is approximately 0.55, the presence of smaller particles influenced by diffusion likely contributes to the formation of the indistinct boundary between regions (III) and (IV). As will be discussed later, after drying, region (III) observed from above forms a fractal-like pattern, consisting of low-density, dendritic or mesh-like clusters. This observation suggests two possibilities for region (III): (A) a thin layer of fractal clusters with low particle number density formed at the droplet surface, or (B) flocculated structures dispersed in water that organize into fractal patterns upon the completion of drying. Overall, these results indicate that for most hollow particles used in this study, buoyancy predominates over diffusion during the drying process, as discussed earlier.
The central floating cluster (FC) was directly stimulated at the droplet surface using a needle (Figure 4b–i). First, the needle was gently brought close to the droplet surface from the upper left direction in Figure 4b and made contact with the surface. Immediately after contact (Figure 4c), the originally circular FC deformed. The deformation occurred very rapidly, reaching the state shown in Figure 4e within less than one second after contact. Subsequently, the needle was gently brought close again, this time from the right side of the image. In this case, the needle touched the droplet surface at a location slightly away from the FC (Figure 4g). As a result, the area of the FC abruptly contracted. This change also occurred rapidly, with the FC reaching the state shown in Figure 4i within approximately 0.5 s after stimulation. The sudden reduction in area suggests that some hollow particles were forced beneath the FC and partially submerged into the water due to the physical vibration of the droplet surface caused by the needle. As the particle number density increases, the particles themselves can act as electrolytes, effectively raising the local ionic strength in the densely packed region. This may have led to the formation of a three-dimensional network. In other words, buoyancy not only transports particles vertically but also contributes to particle–particle interactions and network formation near the liquid–air interface during evaporation. The deformation behavior of the floating cluster (FC) upon external stimulation suggests that the FC is not merely a loosely aggregated cluster, but rather a flexible and elastic network structure. Furthermore, it indicates that the FC is likely formed through direct physical contact between hollow particles, rather than by interfacial adsorption.

3.4. Effects of ϕ and [NaCl] on Drying Patterns

The effects of particle volume fraction ϕ and added salt concentration [NaCl] on the drying patterns of droplets after complete evaporation were investigated (Figure 5). The drying patterns observed from above were generally established during the relatively early stage after droplet deposition and remained largely unchanged until complete drying. The overall appearance of the dried films was markedly different from that typically observed for colloidal dispersions containing particles denser than the dispersion medium. Focusing first on the effect of ϕ, at the lowest volume fraction (ϕ = 0.001), a coffee-eye pattern was formed due to the accumulation of hollow particles in the central region, while only a very faint and narrow ring appeared at the periphery. As ϕ increased, the area occupied by hollow particles in the central region expanded, and at the highest ϕ (0.1), the entire droplet was filled with hollow particles, and the peripheral ring disappeared. Interestingly, the width of the observed ring pattern was almost independent of both particle volume fraction and added salt concentration, remaining nearly constant at approximately 0.2 mm. No cracks were observed in the dried films under any of the tested conditions, suggesting the flexibility of the films formed by the hollow particles.
When correlating the concentration regions (I)–(IV) observed during droplet drying (Figure 4a) with the drying patterns observed from above after complete evaporation, the relationships can be organized as follows:
  • Upper region (I) corresponds to the central part or the entire film, spreading circularly with a high particle number density, forming the coffee-eye structure (Id).
  • Middle region (II) surrounds region (Id) in a circular manner, exhibiting a lower particle number density, but upon completely drying, it integrates with (Id) to form an expanded coffee-eye structure (IId).
  • Lower region (III) surrounds region (IId) and corresponds to a fractal-like structure (IIId) characterized by an even lower particle number density.
  • Transparent region (IV) corresponds to a region comprising part of (IIId) along with the droplet edge area, which shows a high particle number density (IVd).
In typical drying patterns of sessile droplets, a central turbid bump-shaped structure (often referred to as a coffee-eye) is observed only under rather limited conditions, such as when the ϕ is very high [16,30], when the droplet is in a gel state and convection is suppressed [34], or in the case of pendant (hanging) droplets [35,36,37]. In particular, for sessile droplets of hollow particle aqueous dispersions, the formation of a coffee-eye structure even at low ϕ and in the sol state is a remarkable feature. Notably, in pendant droplets, particles are strongly influenced by gravity and form a concentrated deposition structure at the center [38], which is often referred to as a “coffee-eye.” The drying patterns of hollow particle aqueous dispersions closely resemble these coffee-eye structures, suggesting that the underlying pattern formation mechanisms may be similar. Regarding the mechanisms of coffee-eye formation, both particle-interface adsorption-based mechanisms [36] and non-adsorption-based mechanisms [37] have been reported. In the case of hollow particles, considering that the formed coffee-eye structure readily moves during the drying process (Figure 1 and Figure 2) and that it exhibits rapid deformation (contraction) when stimulated with a needle, it appears that the particles are not adsorbed at the interface. Instead, they seem to accumulate at the center purely due to the large buoyancy forces acting on them.
All sessile droplets were dried under the constant contact radius (CCR) mode [1]. In this mode, the droplets remained pinned on the substrate while the contact angle gradually decreased and the volume reduced over time. Investigation of the mass change during drying (Figure 6) revealed that the rate of mass loss was constant for each droplet, strongly supporting that drying proceeded according to the CCR mode [14]. When the added salt concentration was [NaCl] = 0.01 mol/L, the drying rate was faster compared to that under deionized conditions. Previous studies have reported that the addition of trace amounts of surfactants can induce Marangoni flow [39], and that the enhancement of Marangoni flow can increase the drying rate [5]. Therefore, at [NaCl] = 0.01 mol/L, the acceleration of the drying rate is considered to result from the induction of solutal Marangoni flow caused by concentration gradients along the droplet–air interface. In contrast, at [NaCl] = 0.1 mol/L, the drying rate decreased. At this salt concentration, except for the case with the smallest particle volume fraction (ϕ = 0.001), the floating cluster (FC) expanded throughout the entire droplet and formed the final drying pattern (Figure 5e,j,o,t). This observation suggests that the reduction in electrostatic repulsion led to the aggregation of hollow particles, forming a three-dimensional network and resulting in the gelation of the droplet. As will be discussed later, the results of the DLVO potential curve analysis strongly support this interpretation. In gelled droplets, convection during drying is suppressed, making the decrease in drying rate a reasonable consequence.
The corresponding cross-sectional profiles (Figure 7a–d) were consistent with the patterns observed from above and were very convincing. In the deionized condition (Figure 7a–d), the characteristic feature of the cross-sectional profiles was the monotonic expansion of the “coffee-eye” region with increasing ϕ. While a “coffee-ring” was formed, its width remained very narrow, as previously described. The maximum height of the coffee-ring was approximately 100 μm, regardless of the ϕ or [NaCl] conditions. In addition, for ϕ = 0.01 (Figure 7e–h), the characteristic feature of the cross-sectional profiles was the existence of a minimum in the extent of the “coffee-eye” region as the salt concentration increased. Since the coffee-eye appeared to be circular when observed from above, its spread was evaluated as the radius Robs based on Figure 5 (Figure 8). Comparing Robs with the cross-sectional profiles revealed that the coffee-eye boundary could be visually recognized when the film thickness was greater than approximately 40 μm. When the thickness was less than 40 μm, it became considerably difficult to visually detect the presence of particles.
The radius R of the entire dried film area remained relatively unchanged with variations in ϕ and NaCl concentration, staying within the range of approximately 10–13 mm. The measured radius Robs of regions Id and IId increased monotonically with increasing ϕ, regardless of the salt concentration (Figure 8a). This can be interpreted as an expansion of the central cluster due to the increase in particle number. When no salt was added, the cluster extended broadly across the droplet; however, at [NaCl] = 0.0001 mol/L, Robs markedly decreased. With further increases in salt concentration, Robs began to increase again, showing a clear minimum (Figure 8b). At the highest salt concentration, [NaCl] = 0.1 mol/L, a pattern was observed where the turbid area expanded throughout the entire droplet, regardless of ϕ, except for the smallest volume fraction (ϕ = 0.001). In the case of ϕ = 0.001, the number density of hollow particles was too low to induce gelation throughout the droplet. Thus, during the early stages of drying, the droplet remained in a sol state with individually dispersed aggregates, similar to the behavior seen at lower salt concentrations, where aggregates floated and tended to gather toward the center. Indeed, the drying pattern at ϕ = 0.001 showed a centrally gathered structure similar to those at lower salt concentrations, but the clusters were notably irregular in shape rather than forming neat circles. Additionally, scattered NaCl crystals were observed near the droplet edge. As hollow particles floated during droplet drying, the edge region became increasingly enriched with NaCl solution. Efstratiou et al. (2020) [40] reported that in sessile droplets of NaCl aqueous solutions, crystal rings aligned with spacing were formed around the droplet perimeter during drying. NaCl crystals were also clearly present within region Id. For ϕ = 0.001, the crystals were larger, and as ϕ increased to 0.003 and 0.005, the crystal size decreased. This observation suggests that NaCl crystallization occurred with the hollow particle surfaces serving as nucleation sites.
When hollow particles float up to the droplet surface during the drying process, they subsequently migrate toward the apex of the droplet due to buoyancy. As a result, the hollow particles eventually accumulate at the center of the dried film. Assuming that the hollow particles assemble horizontally in a circular pattern under close-packed conditions, the following arrangement can be considered: for example, in the case of seven particles, one particle is located at the center and six particles surround it. In this case, the radius Rcal of the circular area occupied by the hollow particles, observed from above, can be expressed as Rcal = 3r, where r is the particle radius. Similarly, for a total of 19 particles, Rcal = 5r, and for 37 particles, Rcal = 7r. If the central particle is defined as the zeroth generation (G = 0), then the above examples correspond to the first generation (G = 1), the second generation (G = 2), and the third generation (G = 3), respectively. The total number of particles N and the calculated radius Rcal of the circular region can be expressed as follows, assuming a monolayer horizontal arrangement of hollow particles:
N = 1 + 3 G (G + 1)
Rcal = (2 G + 1) r
Using the average radius of the hollow particles, r = 0.7 × 10−6 m, the total number of particles N, the generation G, and the calculated radius Rcal for each ϕ are summarized in Table 1.
The difference between Rcal and Robs (Figure 8a) is clearly attributable to the fact that the actual clusters are not monolayer structures near the droplet surface but rather multilayered structures. During the early stages of drying, it is reasonable to assume that particles floating up to the droplet surface remain near the surface while gradually migrating toward the apex, leading to the formation of stacked structures as more particles ascend from below. An interesting observation is the existence of a minimum in Robs with increasing salt concentration. Although the exact reason remains unclear at present, it is possible that the flocculation of smaller particles induced by the addition of electrolytes, or an increase in the influence of Marangoni convection, may be involved. In the case of droplets composed of ultrapure water, the influence of Marangoni flow is reported to be relatively weak [41].
To observe the distribution of hollow particles forming the drying pattern, we enlarged three regions from Figure 5g: the central region A, the outer region B, and the edge region C. In a part of region A (Figure 9a), the particles were visually identified, and a red closed circle with a diameter of 3.0 μm was placed at the center of each identified particle. It should be noted that closed circles were placed only on the particles that could be visually confirmed. The spacing between these red circles corresponds to the case where large particles with diameters of approximately 8.0 μm are densely packed, indicating that many large particles were present in this area. Next, in a part of region B (Figure 9b), all particles with diameters greater than 5.0 μm were marked with a red open circle with a diameter of 10 μm. Compared to region A, the proportion of large particles was clearly reduced. Similarly, in a part of region C (Figure 9c), large particles were marked with red open circles, revealing that very few large particles were present. The observation that most of the large particles are concentrated in the center and that their number decreases with distance from the center is highly reasonable, considering that larger particles have higher buoyancy-driven ascent velocities. Additionally, although a small portion of the smaller hollow particles was transported to the periphery to form a ring, the majority of the smaller particles avoided capillary flow and floated upward.

3.5. Hamaker Constant AH of Hollow Particles in Water

The fact that the drying patterns exhibit abrupt changes in the range of 0.01–0.1 mol/L clearly indicates the aggregation of hollow particles. More specifically, at [NaCl] = 0.03 mol/L and higher, almost the entire dried film became turbid (see Figure 10a–c).
In water, hollow particles are covered by an electric double layer, and at lower salt concentrations, strong electrostatic repulsion acts between particles. Generally, the aggregation behavior of particles in water is discussed based on the DLVO (Derjaguin–Landau–Verwey–Overbeek) theory [42,43].
V = V R + V A = π d ε Ψ 0 2 exp ( H L D ) A H d 24 H
Here, the symbols represent the following parameters: V is the total potential energy, VR is the electrostatic potential energy, VA is the van der Waals attractive potential energy, ε is the dielectric constant of water, ψ0 is the surface potential of the particle, LD is the thickness of the electric double layer, H is the inter-particle distance, and AH is the Hamaker constant. The formula for VR is applicable when dLD [44]. Assuming only 1:1-type electrolytes are present in the aqueous medium, LD can be determined by the following equation [45]:
L D = 1 κ = ε k B T 2000 e 2 c N A
where κ is the Debye–Hückel parameter, e is the elementary charge, c is the electrolyte concentration, and NA is Avogadro’s number. At 25 °C, the Debye length LD as a function of electrolyte concentration c (mol/L) can be approximated as follows:
L D = 3.04 c × 10 10
Assuming that c = 1.0 × 10−5 mol/L, LD is calculated as 96 nm. The value of c was estimated from the electrical conductivity of the ultrapure water used [46]. Regarding hollow particles, the Hamaker constant AH is unknown. To determine AH, a DLVO potential curve was constructed for [NaCl] = 0.03 mol/L (Figure 10d). Generally, when the barrier height V/kB of the potential curve exceeds 25, particle aggregation upon close approach does not occur [47]. Here, by setting the condition where V/kB reaches zero, the Hamaker constant for the hollow particles was determined to be AH = 3.2 × 10−20 J.

3.6. Discussion of the Minimum Value of Robs

One possible explanation is the aggregation of smaller particles induced by salt addition. Assuming a Hamaker constant AH = 3.2 × 10−20 J, the effect of particle size on the DLVO potential curves was investigated (Figure 11).
Under the same conditions, smaller particles generally tend to aggregate more easily. Here, several representative particle sizes ranging from 0.5 μm to 8.0 μm were selected. In the case of no added salt ([NaCl] = 0, Figure 11a), even assuming the smallest particle size of d = 0.5 μm, aggregation was not expected to occur. For [NaCl] = 0.001mol/L (Figure 11b), it was predicted that particles with d = 0.5 μm would tend to form flocs. In the case of [NaCl] = 0.01 mol/L (Figure 11c), a secondary minimum appeared in the potential curves for larger particles, suggesting that many large particles could form flocs. Based on the results for [NaCl] = 0.1 mol/L (Figure 11d), it is expected that aggregates would form at the primary minimum for all particle sizes. Regarding the existence of a minimum in Rcal with increasing salt concentration, it is considered that flocs formed by smaller particles correspond to aggregation at the secondary minimum of the potential curves, and these flocs are relatively small in size. During droplet drying, they could be easily transported by capillary flow and Marangoni flow (both flows directed toward the apex near the droplet surface), and under the influence of a solutal Marangoni flow [5,48], they were likely gathered near the droplet center during their ascent and accumulated underneath the floating cluster (FC) at the surface. This may explain the reduction in Robs observed at [NaCl] = 0.0001 to 0.001 mol/L. At [NaCl] = 0.01 mol/L and above, larger particles also form flocs; however, their size is larger, and buoyancy rather than convection became dominant, resulting in an increase in Robs again. At [NaCl] = 0.1 mol/L and higher, network-like aggregates formed at the primary minimum of the potential curves, leading to gelation as previously discussed. Consequently, the buoyancy and convection of hollow particles were suppressed, ultimately resulting in the formation of a “coffee-eye” structure.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we systematically investigated for the first time the drying patterns of sessile droplets of aqueous dispersions of aluminosilicate-based hollow particles, which are less dense than liquid. Unlike the widely known “coffee-ring” patterns, in this system, a “coffee-eye” pattern was formed, characterized by the concentration of particles at the center of the dried droplet and the formation of an extremely narrow peripheral ring. This behavior is attributed to the buoyant ascent of hollow particles in water, which allowed them to avoid the influence of capillary flow. Furthermore, when the added salt concentration [NaCl] exceeded 0.03 mol/L, aggregation between hollow particles was promoted, leading to the suppression of internal convection during drying. As a result, the ring structure disappeared and transitioned into a gel-like, expanded drying structure. This salt concentration dependence was supported by DLVO theory analysis. The findings of this study demonstrate that by actively utilizing the density characteristics of colloidal particles, it is possible to control droplet drying patterns. This provides important new insights into the fundamental understanding of sessile droplet drying processes. Future studies are expected to explore more diverse pattern formations by investigating mixed systems of hollow particles with other types of particles and by further controlling the salt concentration.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.K.; methodology, H.K. and K.S.; validation, H.K. and K.S.; formal analysis, H.K.; investigation, K.S.; resources, H.K.; data curation, H.K.; writing—original draft preparation, H.K.; writing—review and editing, H.K.; visualization, H.K.; supervision, H.K.; project administration, H.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

This research was partly supported by Instrumental Analysis, Life Science Research Center, Gifu University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Deegan, R.D.; Bakajin, O.; Dupont, T.F.; Huber, G.; Nagel, S.R.; Witten, T.A. Capillary flow as the cause of ring stains from dried liquid drops. Nature 1997, 389, 827–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hu, H.; Larson, R.G. Analysis of the microfluid flow in an evaporating sessile droplet. Langmuir 2005, 21, 3963–3971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Eggers, J.; Villermaux, E. Physics of liquid jets. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2008, 71, 036601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Erbil, H.Y. Evaporation of pure liquid sessile and spherical suspended drops: A review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2012, 170, 67–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hu, H.; Larson, R.G. Marangoni effect reverses coffee-ring depositions. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 7090–7094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Okubo, T.; Okuda, S.; Kimura, H. Dissipative Structures Formed in the Course of Drying the Colloidal Crystals of Silica Spheres on a Cover Glass. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2002, 280, 454–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Okubo, T.; Kimura, K.; Kimura, H. Dissipative Structures Formed in the Course of Drying the Colloidal Crystals of Monodispersed Polystyrene Spheres on a Cover Glass. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2002, 280, 1001–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bhardwaj, R.; Fang, X.; Somasundaran, P.; Attinger, D. Self-Assembly of Colloidal Particles from Evaporating Droplets: Role of DLVO Interactions and Proposition of a Phase Diagram. Langmuir 2010, 26, 7833–7842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dugyala, V.R.; Basavaraj, M.G. Control over Coffee-Ring Formation in Evaporating Liquid Drops Containing Ellipsoids. Langmuir 2014, 30, 8680–8686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Marin, A.; Karpitschka, S.; Noguera-Marín, D.; Cabrerizo-Vílchez, M.A.; Rossi, M.; Kähler, C.J.; Rodríguez Valverde, M.A. Solutal Marangoni Flow as the Cause of Ring Stains from Drying Salty Colloidal Drops. Phys. Rev. Fluids 2019, 4, 041601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Doppelhammer, N.; Puttinger, S.; Pellens, N.; Voglhuber-Brunnmaier, T.; Asselman, K.; Jakoby, B.; Kirschhock, C.E.A.; Reichel, E.K. Generation and Observation of Long-Lasting and Self-Sustaining Marangoni Flow. Langmuir 2023, 39, 7804–7810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Al-Milaji, K.N.; Radhakrishnan, V.; Kamerkar, P.; Zhao, H. pH-Modulated Self-Assembly of Colloidal Nanoparticles in a Dual-Droplet Inkjet Printing Process. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 529, 234–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Shen, X.; Ho, C.-M.; Wong, T.-S. Minimal Size of Coffee Ring Structure. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 5269–5274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. McHale, G.; Aqil, S.; Shirtcliffe, N.J.; Newton, M.I.; Erbil, H.Y. Analysis of Droplet Evaporation on a Superhydrophobic Surface. Langmuir 2005, 21, 11053–11060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, Y.-F.; Sheng, Y.-J.; Tsao, H.-K. Evaporation Stains: Suppressing the Coffee-Ring Effect by Contact Angle Hysteresis. Langmuir 2013, 29, 7802–7811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lee, H.H.; Fu, S.C.; Tso, C.Y.; Chao, C.Y.H. Study of Residue Patterns of Aqueous Nanofluid Droplets with Different Particle Sizes and Concentrations on Different Substrates. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2017, 105, 230–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kim, J.-H.; Park, S.-B.; Kim, J.H.; Zin, W.-C. Polymer Transports Inside Evaporating Water Droplets at Various Substrate Temperatures. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 15375–15383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Patil, N.D.; Bange, P.G.; Bhardwaj, R.; Sharma, A. Effects of Substrate Heating and Wettability on Evaporation Dynamics and Deposition Patterns for a Sessile Water Droplet Containing Colloidal Particles. Langmuir 2016, 32, 11958–11972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Du, F.; Zhang, L.; Shen, W. Controllable Dried Patterns of Colloidal Drops. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 606, 758–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, Q.; Gao, Y.; He, F.; Hao, P. Patterning in Colloidal Droplets by Forced Airflow. J. Appl. Phys. 2021, 129, 024701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mugele, F.; Baret, J.C. Electrowetting: From basics to applications. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2005, 17, R705–R774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Eral, H.B.; Augustine, D.M.; Duits, M.H.G.; Mugel, F. Suppressing the Coffee Stain Effect: How to Control Colloidal Self-Assembly in Evaporating Drops Using Electrowetting. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 4954–4958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mampallil, D.; Reboud, J.; Wilson, R.; Wylie, D.; Klug, D.R.; Cooper, J.M. Acoustic Suppression of the Coffee-Ring Effect. Soft Matter 2015, 11, 7207–7213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yen, T.M.; Fu, X.; Wei, T.; Nayak, R.U.; Shi, Y.; Lo, Y.-H. Reversing Coffee-Ring Effect by Laser-Induced Differential Evaporation. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Goy, N.-A.; Bruni, N.; Girot, A.; Delville, J.-P.; Delabre, U. Thermal Marangoni Trapping Driven by Laser Absorption in Evaporating Droplets for Particle Deposition. Soft Matter 2022, 18, 7949–7958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhong, X.; Xie, H.; Duan, F. Deposition Patterns from Evaporating Sessile Droplets with Suspended Mixtures of Multi-Sized and Multi-Species Hydrophilic and Non-Adsorbing Nanoparticles. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017, 111, 1565–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yunker, P.J.; Still, T.; Lohr, M.A.; Yodh, A.G. Suppression of the Coffee-Ring Effect by Shape-Dependent Capillary Interactions. Nature 2011, 476, 308–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hodges, C.S.; Ding, Y.; Biggs, S. The Influence of Nanoparticle Shape on the Drying of Colloidal Suspensions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 352, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dugyala, V.R.; Lama, H.; Satapathy, D.K.; Basavaraj, M.G. Role of Particle Shape Anisotropy on Crack Formation in Drying of Colloidal Suspension. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 30708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sefiane, K. On the Formation of Regular Patterns from Drying Droplets and Their Potential Use for Bio-Medical Applications. J. Bionic Eng. 2010, 7, S82–S93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kimura, H. Rapid Ascent of Hollow Particles in Water Induced by an Electric Field. Powders 2023, 2, 737–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kimura, H.; Sakakibara, M. Electric Field-Induced Settling and Flotation of Flocs in Mixed Aqueous Suspensions of Poly(methyl methacrylate) and Aluminosilicate Hollow Particles. Materials 2025, 18, 1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Carreón, Y.J.P.; Díaz-Hernández, O.; Escalera Santos, G.J.; Cipriano-Urbano, I.; Solorio-Ordaz, F.J.; González-Gutiérrez, J.; Zenit, R. Texture Analysis of Dried Droplets for the Quality Control of Medicines. Sensors 2021, 21, 4048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kimura, H. Influence of Sol–Gel State in Smectite Aqueous Dispersions on Drying Patterns of Droplets. Materials 2024, 17, 2891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hampton, M.A.; Nguyen, T.A.H.; Nguyen, A.V.; Xu, Z.P.; Huang, L.; Rudolph, V. Influence of surface orientation on the organization of nanoparticles in drying nanofluid droplets. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2012, 377, 456–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mondal, R.; Semwal, S.; Kumar, P.L.; Thampi, S.P.; Basavaraj, M.G. Patterns in Drying Drops Dictated by Curvature-Driven Particle Transport. Langmuir 2018, 34, 11473–11483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hodges, C.S.; Tangparitkul, S.M. Comment on “Patterns in Drying Drops Dictated by Curvature-Driven Particle Transport”. Langmuir 2019, 35, 9988–9990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lee, S.; Tiara, A.M.; Cho, G.; Lee, J. Control of the drying patterns for complex colloidal solutions and their applications. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Still, T.; Yunker, P.J.; Yodh, A.G. Surfactant-Induced Marangoni Eddies Alter the Coffee-Rings of Evaporating Colloidal Drops. Langmuir 2012, 28, 4984–4988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Efstratiou, M.; Christy, J.; Sefiane, K. Crystallisation-Driven Flows within Evaporating Aqueous Saline Droplets. Langmuir 2020, 36, 4995–5003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rossi, M.; Marin, A.; Kähler, C.J. Interfacial Flows in Sessile Evaporating Droplets of Mineral Water. Phys. Rev. E 2019, 100, 033103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Derjaguin, B.; Landau, L.D. Theory of the stability of strongly charged lyophobic sols and of the adhesion of strongly charged particles in solutions of electrolytes. Acta Physicochim. URSS 1941, 14, 633–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Verwey, E.J.W.; Overbeek, J.T.G. Theory of the Stability of Lyophobic Colloids; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1948. [Google Scholar]
  44. Hunter, R.J. Foundations of Colloid Science, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press Inc.: Oxford, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  45. Israelachvili, J.N. Intermolecular and Surface Forces, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  46. Kimura, H. Influence of alternating electric field on electrorheological effect of aqueous dispersions of stevensite. Appl. Clay Sci. 2024, 254, 107393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tadros, T. General principles of colloid stability and the role of surface forces. In Colloid Stability: The Role of Surface Forces; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2011; pp. 1–45. [Google Scholar]
  48. Lalanne, C.; Givaudan, A.; Boumendil, P.; Lequien, F.; Fullana, J.-M. Salt Concentration Effects on Evaporation-Driven Pattern Formation in Sessile Droplets. Eur. J. Mech. B Fluids 2023, 102, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Snapshots from a time-lapse video of a sessile droplet of a hollow particle aqueous dispersion, taken from above at 25 °C. Droplet volume: 0.1 mL; ϕ = 0.01; [NaCl] = 0. Images of the droplet (a) immediately after deposition, t = 0; (b) 5 min; (c) 23 min; (d) a magnified view of the square region in (b); (e) a magnified view of the square region in (c); (f) at 70 min; (g) at 160 min; (h) at 200 min; (i) a magnified view of the square region in (f); (j) a magnified view of the square region in (g). The white scale bar represents 5 mm, and the black scale bar represents 1 mm. The red dashed line indicates the boundary of the central region with a higher particle concentration observed at t = 5 min. The red solid line shows the outer edge of the floating cluster (FC) at t = 70 min. The blue arrow indicates the direction of FC movement.
Figure 1. Snapshots from a time-lapse video of a sessile droplet of a hollow particle aqueous dispersion, taken from above at 25 °C. Droplet volume: 0.1 mL; ϕ = 0.01; [NaCl] = 0. Images of the droplet (a) immediately after deposition, t = 0; (b) 5 min; (c) 23 min; (d) a magnified view of the square region in (b); (e) a magnified view of the square region in (c); (f) at 70 min; (g) at 160 min; (h) at 200 min; (i) a magnified view of the square region in (f); (j) a magnified view of the square region in (g). The white scale bar represents 5 mm, and the black scale bar represents 1 mm. The red dashed line indicates the boundary of the central region with a higher particle concentration observed at t = 5 min. The red solid line shows the outer edge of the floating cluster (FC) at t = 70 min. The blue arrow indicates the direction of FC movement.
Powders 04 00017 g001
Figure 2. Snapshots from a time-lapse video of a sessile droplet of a hollow particle aqueous dispersion, taken from above at 25 °C. Droplet volume: 0.1 mL; ϕ = 0.003; [NaCl] = 0. Images taken (a) immediately after deposition, at t = 0; (b) at 23 min; (c) at 67 min; (d) at 220 min; (e) at 257 min; (f) at 262 min; (g) at 264 min; (h) at 265 min; (i) at 273 min. The scale bar represents 5 mm. The red solid line indicates the outer edge of the floating cluster (FC) at t = 220 min. The arrows point to the bright ring observed just before drying was completed, which appeared at the boundary between the dried and undried regions.
Figure 2. Snapshots from a time-lapse video of a sessile droplet of a hollow particle aqueous dispersion, taken from above at 25 °C. Droplet volume: 0.1 mL; ϕ = 0.003; [NaCl] = 0. Images taken (a) immediately after deposition, at t = 0; (b) at 23 min; (c) at 67 min; (d) at 220 min; (e) at 257 min; (f) at 262 min; (g) at 264 min; (h) at 265 min; (i) at 273 min. The scale bar represents 5 mm. The red solid line indicates the outer edge of the floating cluster (FC) at t = 220 min. The arrows point to the bright ring observed just before drying was completed, which appeared at the boundary between the dried and undried regions.
Powders 04 00017 g002
Figure 3. (a) Particle size distribution of hollow particles dispersed in water, measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS). The z-average diameter dz is 1.4 μm, and the polydispersity index (PDI) is 0.23. (b) Effect of particle diameter on the gravitational Péclet number (PeG) and buoyancy-driven ascent velocity (vASC) calculated based on the Stokes approximation, at 25 °C.
Figure 3. (a) Particle size distribution of hollow particles dispersed in water, measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS). The z-average diameter dz is 1.4 μm, and the polydispersity index (PDI) is 0.23. (b) Effect of particle diameter on the gravitational Péclet number (PeG) and buoyancy-driven ascent velocity (vASC) calculated based on the Stokes approximation, at 25 °C.
Powders 04 00017 g003
Figure 4. (a) Horizontal observation of a droplet of a hollow particle aqueous dispersion at 25 °C. Droplet volume: 0.1 mL; ϕ = 0.01; [NaCl] = 0. Observation at 15 min after deposition. The droplet is divided into four regions based on particle concentration differences: upper region (I), middle region (II), lower region (III), and transparent region (IV). (bi) Snapshots from a time-lapse video of a sessile droplet of a hollow particle aqueous dispersion taken from above at 25 °C. Droplet volume: 0.1 mL; ϕ = 0.003; [NaCl] = 0. (be) Changes in the coffee-eye structure after stimulation from the upper left direction with a needle; (fi) changes after subsequent stimulation from the right direction with a needle. (b) Image of the droplet 45 min after deposition, immediately before needle stimulation, at t1 = 0; (c) t1 = 0.08 s; (d) t1 = 0.14 s; (e) t1 = 0.71 s; (f) t2 = 0; (g) t2 = 0.08 s; (h) t2 = 0.14 s; (i) t2 = 0.41 s. Red circles indicate the position of the needle. t1 represents the elapsed time after the first stimulation, and t2 represents the elapsed time after the second stimulation. The scale bar represents 5 mm.
Figure 4. (a) Horizontal observation of a droplet of a hollow particle aqueous dispersion at 25 °C. Droplet volume: 0.1 mL; ϕ = 0.01; [NaCl] = 0. Observation at 15 min after deposition. The droplet is divided into four regions based on particle concentration differences: upper region (I), middle region (II), lower region (III), and transparent region (IV). (bi) Snapshots from a time-lapse video of a sessile droplet of a hollow particle aqueous dispersion taken from above at 25 °C. Droplet volume: 0.1 mL; ϕ = 0.003; [NaCl] = 0. (be) Changes in the coffee-eye structure after stimulation from the upper left direction with a needle; (fi) changes after subsequent stimulation from the right direction with a needle. (b) Image of the droplet 45 min after deposition, immediately before needle stimulation, at t1 = 0; (c) t1 = 0.08 s; (d) t1 = 0.14 s; (e) t1 = 0.71 s; (f) t2 = 0; (g) t2 = 0.08 s; (h) t2 = 0.14 s; (i) t2 = 0.41 s. Red circles indicate the position of the needle. t1 represents the elapsed time after the first stimulation, and t2 represents the elapsed time after the second stimulation. The scale bar represents 5 mm.
Powders 04 00017 g004
Figure 5. Appearance of dried films formed from droplets of hollow particle aqueous dispersions at 25 °C, observed from above. (ae) ϕ = 0.1, (fj) ϕ = 0.01, (ko) ϕ = 0.005, (pt) ϕ = 0.003, (uy) ϕ = 0.001. (a,f,k,p,u) [NaCl] = 0, (b,g,l,q,v) [NaCl] = 0.0001 mol/L, (c,h,m,r,w) [NaCl] = 0.001 mol/L, (d,i,n,s,x) [NaCl] = 0.01 mol/L, (e,j,o,t,y) [NaCl] = 0.1 mol/L. The scale bar represents 10 mm. The drying films indicated by the arrows were analyzed in detail for their cross-sectional profiles.
Figure 5. Appearance of dried films formed from droplets of hollow particle aqueous dispersions at 25 °C, observed from above. (ae) ϕ = 0.1, (fj) ϕ = 0.01, (ko) ϕ = 0.005, (pt) ϕ = 0.003, (uy) ϕ = 0.001. (a,f,k,p,u) [NaCl] = 0, (b,g,l,q,v) [NaCl] = 0.0001 mol/L, (c,h,m,r,w) [NaCl] = 0.001 mol/L, (d,i,n,s,x) [NaCl] = 0.01 mol/L, (e,j,o,t,y) [NaCl] = 0.1 mol/L. The scale bar represents 10 mm. The drying films indicated by the arrows were analyzed in detail for their cross-sectional profiles.
Powders 04 00017 g005
Figure 6. Mass change during the drying of droplets of hollow particle aqueous dispersions at 25 °C. Droplet volume: 0.1 mL; ϕ = 0.01. (a) Entire drying process; (b) enlarged view of the late stage of drying.
Figure 6. Mass change during the drying of droplets of hollow particle aqueous dispersions at 25 °C. Droplet volume: 0.1 mL; ϕ = 0.01. (a) Entire drying process; (b) enlarged view of the late stage of drying.
Powders 04 00017 g006
Figure 7. Cross-sectional profiles of dried films formed from droplets of hollow particle aqueous dispersions at 25 °C. (ad) [NaCl] = 0: (a) ϕ = 0.001, (b) ϕ = 0.005, (c) ϕ = 0.01, (d) ϕ = 0.1. (eh) ϕ = 0.01: (e) [NaCl] = 0, (f) [NaCl] = 0.0001 mol/L, (g) [NaCl] = 0.01 mol/L, (h) [NaCl] = 0.1 mol/L.
Figure 7. Cross-sectional profiles of dried films formed from droplets of hollow particle aqueous dispersions at 25 °C. (ad) [NaCl] = 0: (a) ϕ = 0.001, (b) ϕ = 0.005, (c) ϕ = 0.01, (d) ϕ = 0.1. (eh) ϕ = 0.01: (e) [NaCl] = 0, (f) [NaCl] = 0.0001 mol/L, (g) [NaCl] = 0.01 mol/L, (h) [NaCl] = 0.1 mol/L.
Powders 04 00017 g007
Figure 8. Effects of (a) particle volume fraction ϕ and (b) added salt concentration [NaCl] on the measured radius Robs of the coffee-eye at the center of dried films formed from droplets of hollow particle aqueous dispersions at 25 °C. (Symbols) Robs: experimentally measured values observed from above; (solid line) Rcal: calculated values based on Equations (4) and (5).
Figure 8. Effects of (a) particle volume fraction ϕ and (b) added salt concentration [NaCl] on the measured radius Robs of the coffee-eye at the center of dried films formed from droplets of hollow particle aqueous dispersions at 25 °C. (Symbols) Robs: experimentally measured values observed from above; (solid line) Rcal: calculated values based on Equations (4) and (5).
Powders 04 00017 g008
Figure 9. Enlarged images of dried films formed from droplets of hollow particle aqueous dispersions at 25 °C. Droplet volume: 0.1 mL; ϕ = 0.01; [NaCl] = 1.0 × 10−4 mol/L (refer to Figure 5g). (a) Enlarged view of region A from Figure 5g, (b) region B, (c) region C, (d) a further enlarged view of the square-marked area in (a), (e) a further enlarged view of the square-marked area in (b), and (f) a further enlarged view of the square-marked area in (c). In (d), a red closed circle with a diameter of 3.0 μm was placed at the center of each clearly identified particle; in (e,f), particles with diameters greater than 5.0 μm were marked with a red open circle of 10 μm in diameter. The scale bar in all images represents 100 μm.
Figure 9. Enlarged images of dried films formed from droplets of hollow particle aqueous dispersions at 25 °C. Droplet volume: 0.1 mL; ϕ = 0.01; [NaCl] = 1.0 × 10−4 mol/L (refer to Figure 5g). (a) Enlarged view of region A from Figure 5g, (b) region B, (c) region C, (d) a further enlarged view of the square-marked area in (a), (e) a further enlarged view of the square-marked area in (b), and (f) a further enlarged view of the square-marked area in (c). In (d), a red closed circle with a diameter of 3.0 μm was placed at the center of each clearly identified particle; in (e,f), particles with diameters greater than 5.0 μm were marked with a red open circle of 10 μm in diameter. The scale bar in all images represents 100 μm.
Powders 04 00017 g009
Figure 10. (ac) Appearance of dried films formed from droplets of hollow particle aqueous dispersions at 25 °C, observed from above. Droplet volume: 0.1 mL; ϕ = 0.01. (a) [NaCl] = 0.02 mol/L, (b) 0.03 mol/L, (c) 0.05 mol/L. The scale bar represents 5 mm. (d) DLVO potential curves for hollow particles in deionized water. Several curves are drawn for AH values ranging from 2.5 × 10−20 J to 3.3 × 10−20 J. The red line corresponds to AH = 3.2 × 10−20 J. Parameters: dz = 1.4 μm, zeta potential = –31 mV, LD = 1.76 nm ([NaCl] = 0.03 mol/L), T = 298 K.
Figure 10. (ac) Appearance of dried films formed from droplets of hollow particle aqueous dispersions at 25 °C, observed from above. Droplet volume: 0.1 mL; ϕ = 0.01. (a) [NaCl] = 0.02 mol/L, (b) 0.03 mol/L, (c) 0.05 mol/L. The scale bar represents 5 mm. (d) DLVO potential curves for hollow particles in deionized water. Several curves are drawn for AH values ranging from 2.5 × 10−20 J to 3.3 × 10−20 J. The red line corresponds to AH = 3.2 × 10−20 J. Parameters: dz = 1.4 μm, zeta potential = –31 mV, LD = 1.76 nm ([NaCl] = 0.03 mol/L), T = 298 K.
Powders 04 00017 g010
Figure 11. DLVO potential curves for hollow particles in deionized water. The Hamaker constant AH is 3.2 × 10−20 J. Several particle diameters ranging from 0.5 to 8.0 μm were selected. Zeta potential = –31 mV, T = 298 K. (a) [NaCl] = 0, LD = 96 nm; (b) [NaCl] = 0.001 mol/L, LD = 9.6 nm; (c) [NaCl] = 0.01 mol/L, LD = 3.0 nm; (d) [NaCl] = 0.1 mol/L, LD = 0.96 nm.
Figure 11. DLVO potential curves for hollow particles in deionized water. The Hamaker constant AH is 3.2 × 10−20 J. Several particle diameters ranging from 0.5 to 8.0 μm were selected. Zeta potential = –31 mV, T = 298 K. (a) [NaCl] = 0, LD = 96 nm; (b) [NaCl] = 0.001 mol/L, LD = 9.6 nm; (c) [NaCl] = 0.01 mol/L, LD = 3.0 nm; (d) [NaCl] = 0.1 mol/L, LD = 0.96 nm.
Powders 04 00017 g011
Table 1. Number of particles N, generation number G assuming horizontal and circular close packing, and calculated radius Rcal for droplets with various particle volume fractions at 25 °C. It is assumed that only particles with a z-average diameter dz = 1.4 μm are present.
Table 1. Number of particles N, generation number G assuming horizontal and circular close packing, and calculated radius Rcal for droplets with various particle volume fractions at 25 °C. It is assumed that only particles with a z-average diameter dz = 1.4 μm are present.
ϕN (Particles)G (Generations)Rcal (mm)
0.16.96 × 1094.82 × 10467.5
0.016.97 × 1081.52 × 10421.3
0.0053.48 × 1081.08 × 10415.1
0.0032.09 × 1088.35 × 10311.7
0.0016.96 × 1074.82 × 1036.75
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kimura, H.; Saito, K. Drying Structures of Droplets of Aluminosilicate-Based Hollow Particle Aqueous Dispersions. Powders 2025, 4, 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/powders4020017

AMA Style

Kimura H, Saito K. Drying Structures of Droplets of Aluminosilicate-Based Hollow Particle Aqueous Dispersions. Powders. 2025; 4(2):17. https://doi.org/10.3390/powders4020017

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kimura, Hiroshi, and Kaoru Saito. 2025. "Drying Structures of Droplets of Aluminosilicate-Based Hollow Particle Aqueous Dispersions" Powders 4, no. 2: 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/powders4020017

APA Style

Kimura, H., & Saito, K. (2025). Drying Structures of Droplets of Aluminosilicate-Based Hollow Particle Aqueous Dispersions. Powders, 4(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/powders4020017

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop