The Utilization of Antibiotic, Incidence and Risk Aspects for Surgical Site Infections Amongst Surgical Patients ^†

Abstract

Surgical site infections (SSI) are one of the main healthcare-related infections in developing nations. Regardless of upgrades in surgical strategy and the utilization of best disease avoidance techniques, SSI stayed the significant reason for medical clinic obtained infections. Subsequently, the target of this paper was to describe risk factors for SSI and the utilization of antibiotics to decrease the risk involved for the SSI. SSI is a possibly morbid and expensive complications of medical procedures. In this way, an underlying pursuit recognized various titles distributed in 2012–2022. Extracted data, including design of study and procedure, revealed combined occurrence and time taken as post-surgery until the beginning of SSI, and probabilities proportions and associated inconstancy for all variables considered in univariate and additionally multivariable investigations. In a wide survey of available works, risk factors for SSI were portrayed as depicting decreased wellness, patient fragility, medical procedure length, and intricacy. The occurrence of SSI was high in the review set. There were critical quantities of contributing variables to the event of surgical site infections. Recognition of risk factors habitually connected with SSI considers the identification of such patients with the best requirement for ideal protective actions to be recognized and pre-treatment before medical procedure.

1. Introduction

Medical care related diseases are considered the most well-known and deadliest occasions undermining the well-being of patients. They drag out the length of clinic stays and increase medical care costs worldwide [1]. A surgical site infection (SSI) is an infection that occurs following an obtrusive method [2]. SSI is one of the most well-known and genuine causes of hospitalization from obtained contaminations around the world [3]. According to the “Centre for Disease Control and Prevention” (CDC), SSI is characterized as “post-operative contaminations that create in 30 days after any careful surgical procedure or the span of one year of any implants” [4]. If we look at the worldwide data, around 300 million medical procedures are carried out annually. This rising number of medical procedures consequently means an increase in the frequency of postoperative injury diseases on surgical sites [5]. A new report distributed by the World Health Organization (WHO) that SSI is one of the common hospital-acquired infections (HAI) in low- and middle-income countries. These effects were dependent upon 33% of patients who have gone through surgery.

Despite the fact that SSI recurrence is lower in developed nations, it remains the second-most common sort of HAI in the USA [6]. Notwithstanding enhancements in operating room preparation, instrument cleansing strategies, better surgical procedures, and the best endeavors of contamination anticipation systems, SSI remains a significant reason for HAI and rates are expanding universally, even in clinics with up-to-date offices and standard conventions of preoperative preparation and anti-microbial prophylaxis. In addition, in emerging nations where assets are restricted, even fundamental life-saving tasks—such as appendectomies and cesarean sections—are related to high contamination rates and mortality [7]. Surgical wound infection results disrupted host–microorganism balance that prompts colonization of the microbes on the surgical site. Therefore, healing of surgical wounds is incredibly impacted, and fundamental reactions likewise will show [8]. Utilizing anti-antibiotics before incision of surgery is viewed as a compelling method in forestalling SSIs, which are among the most well-known preventable post-medical procedure difficulties including HAIs [9]. A parenteral prophylaxis specialist range with comparing expected microscopic organisms on specific destinations of medical procedures has been recommended as of late to diminish SSI rates proficiently [10]. This study was led to identifying the SSI rate and to distinguish risk factors for SSI among surgical patients. An improved comprehension of indicators could further develop disease control by antibiotics in post-surgical patient infections.

2. Methodology

The current systematic review was made according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) revealing rules and statements. We looked at PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, and ScienceDirect. The search included the keywords “incidence of surgical site infection”, “prevalence of surgical site infection”, “surgical site infection”, and “utilization of antibiotics in post-operative infection”. The selection involved articles distributed in the English language, other language articles were removed. Articles distributed in the last decade were only considered. All of the authors have gathered the articles according to these consideration standards. After the assortment and aggregation of articles, the authors explored and included articles for information extraction. The journals collected for the study were published in a peer-reviewed journal and all the papers have an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN).

3. Results and Discussion

SSI is one of the fastest-growing concerns in the medical sector. Prevention and control of the SSI is an important aspect of the reduction in medical care costs and, as of now, it is increasingly important as pressure from the COVID-19 pandemic is paralyzing the medical sector. There has been an increased use of antibiotics among patients with SSI in the last decade. Antibiotics help in the control of the spreading tendency in the case of SSI in surgical patients. The current systemic review is intended to distinguish the epidemiological features and risk factors for the growth of SSI and the uses of antibiotics to overcome them.

In order to understand the utilization of antibiotics, a systemic PRISMA review was performed of the incidence and risk aspects for SSI among surgical patients. The following figure (flow chart of PRISMA as shown in Figure 1) sums up the information extraction process for this systematic review. The number of articles included and barred in the various stages because of the information extraction measures is depicted. These articles were distributed in peer-reviewed journals over the past 10 years. At first, there were around 312 articles selected in this survey. Consequently, after rejection from each stage on the basis of inclusion/exclusion criteria, an sample of 26 full-text articles was evaluated for evidence synthesis as shown in

Table 1. Summary of major outcomes in the SSI.

Author, Year	Study Description	Key Findings
Wakeman et al., 2022 [11]	Administered tazobactam/piperacillin for at least 72 h post-operatively	Decreased significantly from 35% to 15% after the administration of the drug
Alghamdi et al., 2021 [12]	Patients with spinal surgery, retrospective case-control study, N = 221	Low SSI rate found in spinal surgery
Li Z et al., 2021 [13]	Emergency abdominal surgery, prospective multicentric study, N = 953	E. coli was the most common pathogen—29.6% positivity rate. Incidence rate is 7.5%.
Brennfleck FW et al., 2020 [14]	Retrospective	Organ space—2.4%; deep incisional—9%; superficial SSI—13.5%
Alshammari et al., 2020 [15]	In a tertiary care hospital, a 10-year retrospective study	The rate of prevalence ranges from 20 per 1000 in 2009 to 3.5 per 1000 in 2018
Rouse T et al., 2019[16]	Prospective study, N = 120, OBG-GYN patients	5.9% incidence rate
Mekhala et al, 2019 [17]	Patients with intra-abdominal surgery prospective cohort study N = 100	Incidence rate (29.4–49.2%)
Azeze et al., 2019 [18]	Post cesarian section cross-sectional study N = 383	7.8% was the prevalence of SSI following caesarian section
Patel S et al., 2019 [19]	Retrospective study N = 16513	Use of dexamethasone; p < 0.01, OR (95% CI) = 3.03 (1.71–5.36) Wound: p < 0.01, OR (95% CI) = 27.77 (16.36–47.15)
Mirzashahi et al., 2019 [20]	Cross-sectional study N = 78 Aged 18 years and above	A remarkable link founds between SSI and caries, gingivitis/periodontitis
Torres S et al., 2018[21]	Craniotomy patients, retrospective study, N = 178	Incidence of SSI is 11.56%, compared with a 1-month incidence of 8.67% and a 3-month incidence of 10.98%
Negi V, 2018 [22]	Cross-sectional study N = 768	Prevalence—17.8%. The order of common organisms: S. aureus—50.4%, E. coli—23.02%, P. aeruginosa—7.9%.
Lubega A et al., 2017 [23]	Prospective study, emergency post-operative patients, N = 114	Klebsiella pneumonia was the most predominant organism (50%) followed by S. aureus (27.8%). E. coli and P. aeruginosa both accounted for 11.1%
Carvalho et al., 2017 [24]	Non-concurrent cohort study N = 16,882	3.4% was the incidence of surgical site infection
Pathak A et al., 2017 [25]	Gynecology and obstetrics, cross-section study, N = 1173	7.84% was the occurrence rate of SSI
Kumar A et al., 2017[26]	All general surgical unit patients, retrospective study, N = 3321 elective and 451 emergencies	Prevalence—12.5% in elective surgeries and 17.7% emergency surgeries
Morikane K et al., 2016 [27]	Gastric surgery patients, retrospective study from the nationwide database	Rate of SSI 8.8%
Dessie W et al., 2016[28]	To find the causative organisms, a cross-sectional study was conducted with 107 SSI patients	E.coli (23.1%) was the most common infective microorganism. Multi-drug resistance was highly prevalent.

.

In spite of the best exertion from our examination group for this systematic review, certain constraints should be considered while deciphering this systematic review. Initially, the current review only included English-language articles. Subsequently, discoveries of non-English articles are not considered for audit, this systematic review may not be pertinent for worldwide targets.

The sample sizes of most of the articles in this survey are small. Furthermore, around 33% of included investigations are case-control studies. Thus, the chance of perplexing predisposition should be considered while deciphering this systematic review.

4. Conclusions

The event rate of SSI among post-operative patients is extremely high, particularly in developing nations. This prompts a double burden on the medical services conveyance settings. The layout of operating rooms, deficient ventilation norms, inadequate staffing, unrestrained traffic in the operating rooms, absence of information about contamination control actions, or more all, obliviousness about disease control exercise account for the high SSI rates. The usage of antibiotics in the case of SSI helps in the faster recovery of the patients but improper usage and maltreatment of antibiotics results in SSIs with multi-resistant microbes. Henceforth, it is fundamental to incorporate a severe contamination control strategy, and fair utilization of antibiotic practices to be executed.