Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of Novel 2-Phenylindole Analogues as Antifungal and Antibacterial Agents
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Docking Studies of Antimalarial Compounds from the Acetonic Extract of Cecropia obtusifolia 
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Mental Health Care and Online Consultation during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Literature Review †

by
Maria Moudatsou
1,2,3,*,
Areti Stavropoulou
2,4,
Michael Rovithis
2,3,5 and
Sofia Koukouli
1,2,3
1
Department of Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Hellenic Mediterranean University, GR-71410 Heraklion, Greece
2
Laboratory of Interdisciplinary Approaches for the Enhancement of Quality of life, (Quality of Life Lab) Hellenic Mediterranean University, GR-71410 Heraklion, Greece
3
Institute of Agri-Food and Life Sciences, University Research Centre, Hellenic Mediterranean University, GR-71410 Heraklion, Greece
4
Department of Nursing, School of Health and Care Sciences, University of West Attica, GR-12243 Athens, Greece
5
Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Hellenic Mediterranean University, GR-71410 Heraklion, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2nd International Electronic Conference on Healthcare, 17 February–3 March 2022; Available online: https://iech2022.sciforum.net/.
Med. Sci. Forum 2022, 10(1), 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECH2022-12336
Published: 2 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 2nd International Electronic Conference on Healthcare)

Abstract

:
The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic had a negative effect on people’s mental health. Additionally, it resulted in many transformations in mental healthcare services delivery. Mental health professionals preferred to provide mental health services via telehealth in order to meet their clients’ mental health needs. The purpose of this literature review is to analyze and evaluate the concept of online consultation throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.

1. Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has had numerous political, economic, and societal ramifications [1,2]. It resulted in a lot of stress and had a negative impact on people’s mental health [3]. Isolation, social distance, job loss, dread of sickness, and death are all linked to the epidemic [4,5]. Before the COVID-19 epidemic, the consultation process was done in person [6,7].
The pandemic’s onset requires immediate and drastic adjustments in the administration of mental health care [8]. In such trying circumstances, mental health professionals make every attempt to communicate with their patients, but there are still challenges. Despite the fact that there was scientific knowledge on online consultation [9,10], therapists and clients faced numerous problems, including ethical concerns, technological access, and scientific understanding [3].

2. Methods

Our research group aims to investigate the experiences of Greek therapists (social workers, psychotherapists, psychologists, and others) with online consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic in a future field study. The present paper is a literature review with a typical narrative synthesis of previous studies on the topic of therapists’experiences with online consultation as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The literature review method seeks to identify what has been accomplished previously, allowing for consolidation, building on previous work, summation, avoiding duplication, and identifying omissions or gaps. Therefore, the goal of our review is to provide a brief overview of the challenges, perceived benefits, and prospects associated with online counseling. The following research questions have been considered: (a) the experiences with online consultation, (b) the advantages of online consultation, and(c) the difficulties of online consultation. A literature search was undertaken using the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases to find research published in English in the last three years. Online consultation in mental health and COVID-19 and psychotherapists’ attitudes towardonline consultation and COVID-19 were employed as keywords. There was a total of 35 studies found. Twenty-nine of them were considered to better address the goals and objectives of the current study. Especially, we selected only those with qualitative or quantitative research data on online counseling throughout COVID-19. Narrative approaches for online consultation research, as well as research related to online counseling during the pre-COVID era, were omitted. The research team discussed and reviewed these studies in order to establish a consensus on their suitability for the specified research questions. Following the agreement, the outcomes of the investigations were re-examined and analyzed, resulting in the formation of theme groups. Finally, three themes were identified: (a) the experiences of online consultation, (b) the advantages of online consultation, and (c) the difficulties of online consultation.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Experiences of Online Consultation

Online consultation is distinguished from traditional consultation [11]. The formation of working alliances and cohesion differs between online and face-to-face consultations [12]. A successful online consultation requires prior scientific knowledge and experience. Psychotherapists’ opinions regarding online consultation are influenced by their past online consultation experiences, such as therapeutic modality, clinical experience, and special online consultation experience [13,14,15,16]. According to a poll conducted by the European Federation of Psychologists Associations, therapists’ prior experience with the online approach in Norway and Denmark was very good [17]. Positive experiences with the online method were supported by the Portuguese Psychologists Association [18]. France’s therapists, on the other hand, were less effective in online sessions due to a lack of prior experience [17].
Theoretical perspective influenced online consulting as well [14]. In an Italian study, for example, 71.1 percent of Gestalt psychotherapists agreed that they could not use some of their regular approaches for their therapeutic orientation because of the online process [14]. The transition experience of clients and therapists during the pandemic, as well as their geographic location, are also crucial factors for a successful consultation [13].

3.2. Advantages of Online Consultation

Online consultations let therapists and clients communicate more effectively [19]. Telepresence aided in the formation of a therapeutic relationship [20]. Clients pointed out that online therapy is a way to reduce stigma while simultaneously increasing access to mental health treatments [21,22]. People are in a safe portion of their house, which reduces stress in the waiting area and saves money and time [23,24]. Accessibility/geographic flexibility, convenience flexibility, and low-priced cost were all advantages of a successful online consultation [18].

3.3. Difficulties of Online Consultation

Both clients and therapists faced numerous technological and communicative problems [2,13,17]. Moreover, several experts reported feeling weary, disconnected, and insecure during the online session [13,14]. Many problems were caused by a lack of training and knowledge [17,18,25,26]. Additionally, clients cannot experience the sense of close contact and recognize and manage their difficulties, which puts serious obstacles into their treatment [27]. Others, particularly the most vulnerable groups, find it difficult to trust their therapists and develop a therapeutic relationship with them [23,27]. Many studies have reported ethical constraints and challenges in establishing a therapeutic relationship [25,28,29].

4. Conclusions

To summarize, distance counseling has numerous advantages: (a) on the one hand, it addressed serious issues in supporting patients with various mental health issues that they already had, as well as those caused by the pandemic: (b) on the other hand, it met the needs of reducing COVID-19 transmission. Future research is required. Ethical concerns and building therapeutic relationships are two specific research topics. The accessibility of vulnerable people to internet processes is also a critical issue that needs to be addressed in future studies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/IECH2022-12336/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M. and S.K.; methodology M.M. and S.K.; formal analysis, M.M. and S.K.; data curation, M.M., S.K., A.S. and M.R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M. and S.K.; review and editing; A.S. and M.R.; supervision, M.M. and S.K.; project administration M.M. and S.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This literature research received no external funding.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Masic, I.; Gerc, V. On Occasion of the COVID-19 Pandemic—One of the Most Important Dilemma: Vaccinate or Not? Med. Arch. 2020, 74, 164–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Novo, A.; Pandza, H.; Kulasin, I.; Knezevic, B. COVID-19 pandemic and psycho -social Tele- counseling. Int. J. Biomed. Health 2021, 9, 15–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Holly, A.; Swartz, H.A. The role of psychotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am. J. Psychother. 2020, 73, 41–42. [Google Scholar]
  4. Galea, S.; Merchant, R.M.; Lurie, N. The mental health consequences of COVID-19 and physical distancing: The need for prevention and early intervention. JAMA Intern. Med. 2020, 180, 817–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fiorillo, A.; Gorwood, P. The consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and implications for clinical practice. Eur. Psychiatry 2020, 63, e32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Irvine, A.; Drew, P.; Bower, P.; Brooks, H.; Gellatly, J.; Armitage, C.J.; Barkham, M.; McMillan, D.; Bee, P. Are there interactional differences between telephone and face-to-face psychological therapy? A systematic review of comparative studies. J. Affect. Disord. 2020, 265, 120–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wind, T.R.; Rijkeboer, M.; Andersson, G.; Riper, H. The COVID-19 pandemic: The ‘black swan’ for mental health care and a turning point for e-health. Internet. Interv. 2020, 20, 100317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Humer, E.; Stippl, P.; Pieh, C.; Pryss, R.; Probst, T. Experiences of Psychotherapists with remote psychotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional web-based survey study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020, 22, e20246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bashshur, R.L.; Shannon, G.W.; Bashshur, N. The empirical evidence for telemedicine interventions in mental disorders. Telemed. J. E-Health 2016, 22, 87–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gardner, J.S.; Plaven, B.E.; Yellowlees, P. Remote telepsychiatry workforce: A solution to psychiatry’s workforce issues. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 2020, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Messina, I.; Löffler-Stastka, H. Psychotherapists’ perception of their clinical skills and in-session feelings in live therapy versus online therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: A pilot study. Res. Psychother. Psychopathol. Process. Outcome 2021, 24, 514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Weinberg, H. Online Group Psychotherapy: Challenges and Possibilities During COVID-19—A Practice Review. Group Dyn. Theory Res. Pract. 2020, 24, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Békés, V.; Aafjes-van Doorn, K. Psychotherapists’ attitudes toward online therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Psychother. Integr. 2020, 30, 238–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cantone, D.; Guerriera, C.; Architravo, M.; Alfano, Y.M.; Cioffi, V.; Moretto, E.; Mosca, L.L.; Longobardi, T.; Muzii, B.; Maldonato, N.M.; et al. A sample of Italian psychotherapists expresses their perception and opinions of online psychotherapy during the covid-19 pandemic. Riv. Psichiatr. 2021, 56, 198–204. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lindsay, J.A.; Hudson, S.; Martin, L.; Hogan, J.B.; Nessim, M.; Graves, L.; White, D. Implementing video to home to increase access to evidence-based psychotherapy for rural veterans. J. Technol. Behav. Sci. 2017, 2, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Donovan, C.L.; Poole, C.; Boyes, N.; Redgate, J.; March, S. Australian mental health worker attitudes towards CBT: What is the role of knowledge? Are there differences? Can we change them? Internet. Interv. Appl. Inf. Technol. Ment. Behav. Health 2015, 2, 372–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Haddouk, L.; Milcent, C. Telepsychology in France since COVID-19. Training as Key Factor for Telepsychology Practice and Psychologists’ Satisfaction in Online Consultations. Available online: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03265054 (accessed on 24 January 2022).
  18. Dores, A.R.; Geraldo, A.; Carvalho, I.P.; Barbosa, F. The Use of New Digital Information and Communication Technologies in Psychological Counseling during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Connolly, S.L.; Miller, C.J.; Lindsay, J.A.; Bauer, M.S. A systematic review of providers’ attitudes toward telemental health via videoconferencing. Clin. Psychol. 2020, 27, e12311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Haddouk, L.; Bouchard, S.; Brivio, E.; Galimberti, C.; Trognon, A. Assessing presence in videoconference telepsychotherapies: A complementary qualitative study on breaks in telepresence and intersubjectivity co-construction processes. Annu. Rev. Cyber Therapy Telemed. 2018, 16, 118–123. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kruse, C.S.; Krowski, N.; Rodriguez, B.; Tran, L.; Vela, J.; Brooks, M. Telehealth and patient satisfaction: A systematic review and narrative analysis. Br. Med. J. 2017, 7, e016242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wrape, E.R.; McGinn, M.M. Clinical and ethical considerations for delivering couple and family therapy via telehealth. J. Marital. Fam. Ther. 2018, 45, 296–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. De Witte, N.A.; Carlbring, P.; Etzelmueller, A.; Nordgreen, T.; Karekla, M.; Haddouk, L.; Belmont, A.; Øverland, S.; Abi-Habib, R.; Bernaerts, S.; et al. Online consultation in mental health care during the COVID-19 outbreak: An international survey study on professionals motivations and perceived barriers. Internet. Interv. 2021, 25, 100405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kysely, A.; Bishop, B.; Kane, R.; Cheng, M.; Palma, M.D.; Rooney, R. Expectations and experience of couples receiving therapy through videoconferencing: A qualitative study. Front. Psychol. 2020, 10, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mendes-Santos, C.; Weiderpass, E.; Santana, R.; Andersson, G. Portuguese Psychologists’ attitudes towards internet interventions: An exploratory cross-sectional study. JMIR Ment. Health 2020, 7, e16817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mayer, G.; Gronewold, N.; Alvarez, S.; Bruns, B.; Hilbel, T.; Schultz, J.H. Acceptance and expectations of medical experts, students, and patients toward electronic mental health apps: Cross-sectional quantitative and qualitative survey study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2019, 21, e14018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Stanley, S.M.; Markman, H.J. Helping couples in the shadow of COVID-19. Fam. Process. 2020, 59, 937–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Andersson, G.; Titov, N. Advantages and limitations of Internet-based interventions for common mental disorders. World J. Psychiatry 2014, 13, 4–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. MacMullin, K.; Jerry, P.; Cook, K. Psychotherapist Experiences WithTelepsychotherapy: Pre COVID-19 Lessons for a Post COVID-19 World. J. Psychother. Integr. 2020, 30, 248–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moudatsou, M.; Stavropoulou, A.; Rovithis, M.; Koukouli, S. Mental Health Care and Online Consultation during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Literature Review. Med. Sci. Forum 2022, 10, 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECH2022-12336

AMA Style

Moudatsou M, Stavropoulou A, Rovithis M, Koukouli S. Mental Health Care and Online Consultation during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Literature Review. Medical Sciences Forum. 2022; 10(1):4. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECH2022-12336

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moudatsou, Maria, Areti Stavropoulou, Michael Rovithis, and Sofia Koukouli. 2022. "Mental Health Care and Online Consultation during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Literature Review" Medical Sciences Forum 10, no. 1: 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECH2022-12336

APA Style

Moudatsou, M., Stavropoulou, A., Rovithis, M., & Koukouli, S. (2022). Mental Health Care and Online Consultation during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Literature Review. Medical Sciences Forum, 10(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECH2022-12336

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop