Next Article in Journal
Evaluating the Booster Grant’s Impact on YouthMappers’ Climate Activism and Climate Education in Sri Lanka
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Intersection of Youth Development, Physical Education, Teacher Education, and Social Justice
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Critical Theoretical Approach to Sport-Based Youth Development Research: Yosso’s Community Cultural Wealth Framework
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Empowering Youth Through the Power of Reflective Journaling: Understanding Life Skills from the Reflections of Youth

by
Dawn Anderson-Butcher
1,*,
Tarkington J. Newman
2 and
Ellen Williams
3
1
College of Social Work, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
2
College of Social Work, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA
3
National Youth Advocate Program in Ohio, Columbus, OH 43215, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Youth 2025, 5(2), 60; https://doi.org/10.3390/youth5020060
Submission received: 25 February 2025 / Revised: 12 May 2025 / Accepted: 3 June 2025 / Published: 18 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Critical Approaches to Youth Development through Sport)

Abstract

:
Youth sport research has routinely suggested that sport has the potential to serve as a meaningful context for learning. particularly when programs are designed to promote positive youth development (PYD) outcomes. Indeed, participation in sport-based PYD programs has been shown to lead to the development and transfer of life skills. Yet, even given the growth of sport-based PYD research over the last two decades, much remains unknown about specific programmatic design features. Promising practices point to the role of reflection in facilitating life skill development and the application of newly learned skills to real-life. This study investigates the reflective journaling of 234 youth experiencing social vulnerabilities who participated in a sport-based PYD program called LiFEsports. Thematic analyses explored text and illustrations included in youth journals. Results suggest that youth both understand and consider how life skills (i.e., self-control, effort, teamwork, social responsibility, personal responsibility, leadership) can be transferred to settings such as at home, during school and in the community. Further findings highlight the relationship between significant others (e.g., teammates, coaches, parents) and life skills transfer, particularly related to reinforcement. Ultimately, journaling may serve as a viable method to prompt reflections among youth.

1. Introduction

Finally, the last day of the LiFEsports summer program; a celebratory event that culminates with team-based competitions in sports such as lacrosse, soccer, and basketball. Over the course of four weeks, youth participated in sport- and play-based programming to learn new sport skills and tactics. Simultaneously, youth were actively engaged in activities designed to teach key life skills that can contribute to success on the court and throughout life. As youth got on the busses to go home, the reflective journals they left behind were scattered all around the ground. Left behind. As program staff began to sweep up the journals, one could question if reflecting on learning experiences via journaling made any difference at all! To answer this question, this study investigated the reflective journaling of youth who participated in a youth sport program to better understand if/how youth reflect on their knowledge and skills. We ask the question, do journals matter—can journals prompt reflection related to life skills development and transfer?

1.1. Positive Youth Development Through Sport

Positive youth development (PYD) is an area of research and practice with two general and complementary goals: the promotion of healthy, holistic development and the reduction of behavioral health problems and other social problems (Catalano et al., 2002). Over the last three decades, sport has been conceptualized and positioned as a unique social setting where PYD and learning can occur (Anderson-Butcher, 2019; Camiré et al., 2023), especially when sport-based PYD programs have been well-designed and intentionally structured. For instance, Vella et al. (2025) recently proposed a set of seven international indicators of quality youth sport programming including (1) appropriate organizational structure; (2) deliberate and appropriate instructional design; (3) a safe and positive program climate; (4) equity and accessibility; (5) focus on youth enjoyment and experience; (6) development of holistic youth outcomes; and, (7) inclusion and support of adult leaders and personnel. Recent research syntheses, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses continue to demonstrate the value of youth sport programming for emotional, intellectual, physical, psychological, and social development (Anderson-Butcher, 2019; Bruner et al., 2016; Eime et al., 2013; Hermens et al., 2017; Holt et al., 2017; Jones et al., 2011; Pozo et al., 2018; Whitley et al., 2019).
Further, research has shown that for youth recognized as being socially vulnerable (Vettenburg, 1998)—such as youth of color, LGBTQ+ youth, and youth living in economically-disadvantaged communities—participating in sport, may be particularly beneficial (Anderson-Butcher et al., 2014, 2018b; Haudenhuyse et al., 2014; Newman, 2020; Robinson et al., 2024; Spruit et al., 2016). Due to histo-contemporary systemic inequities and institutional injustices, youth experiencing social vulnerabilities—particularly youth of color—are confronted with societal pressures, stressors, and risk factors throughout their daily lived experiences. However, when sport is intentionally optimized as a learning context, youth have opportunities to learn, develop, and grow. For instance, Newman et al. (2021b, 2023b) found that among Black and multiracial youth from economically-disadvantaged communities within urban areas, participation in such programming can lead to healthy masculinity construction and the development of an intersectional identity inclusive of their racial, cultural, faith, gender, and athletic selves. Moreover, Anderson-Butcher et al. (2018a) found that, among youth of color from economically-disadvantaged communities, youth with relatively low levels of life skills (compared to their peers in the program) maintained and demonstrated more consistent growth over the course of two years. In other words, as a unique context of learning, sport has the potential to provide positive experiences for all youth.
Sport-based PYD programs, in particular, integrate evidence-informed PYD programming, pedagogy, and practices into sport settings to promote the development of transferable life skills among youth participants, while simultaneously improve sport skills and athletic proficiencies (Anderson-Butcher et al., 2014; Gould & Carson, 2008; Holt et al., 2017). The development of transferable life skills, which can be learned in one setting (e.g., sport) and transferred and applied to other settings (e.g., home, school, community), is commonly recognized as a key PYD outcome (Camiré et al., 2021, 2023; Pierce et al., 2022). Although there is growing evidence that sport-based PYD programs are associated with the promotion such outcomes (e.g., Núñez et al., 2023; Pozo et al., 2018); a gap remains in explaining how these programs work (Anderson-Butcher et al., 2014; Coalter, 2013, 2015). Some program mechanisms have been identified, such as a sense of belonging and safety (Anderson-Butcher et al., 2014; Kimiecik et al., 2020; McDonough et al., 2013), healthy relationships with peers and teammates (Barcza-Renner et al., 2022; Kimiecik et al., 2020; L. E. Lower-Hoppe et al., 2021), supportive relationships with coaches and caring adults (Anderson-Butcher et al., 2020; Newman et al., 2020), positive climate and quality instruction (L. M. Lower-Hoppe et al., 2020), and parental engagement and support (Newman & Anderson-Butcher, 2021). However, contemporary youth sport scholars have often elected to focus on the role of adult program leaders (e.g., program staff, coaches) and their facilitative coaching practices (Newman et al., 2023a), rather than youth-centric approaches that support learning and development.

1.2. Reflection and Journaling

Over the last decade youth sport scholars have begun to posit about the importance of reflection in relation to transferring what is learned at a program to real life “outside of the gym”. In fact, Pierce et al. (2017) developed a model of life sports transfer to guide research and practice in this area. Others have pointed to specific programmatic design features related to adult-led discussions to prompt reflection among youth (Newman & Anderson-Butcher, 2021). For example, Bean and Forneris (2016) contended that the following activities facilitate skill development and transfer in sport-based PYD programs: practicing skills, drawing upon teachable moments, and debriefing activities to promote learning. Additionally, Pierce et al. (2022) identified personal reflection as a key factor related to transfer of self-control skills to school contexts. Research following youth who participated in sport-based PYD program also has demonstrated how opportunities for reflection can contribute to the development and transfer of life skills (Newman et al., 2021a, 2025; Scheadler et al., 2024).
One potential way in which learning and application can be amplified is through reflective journaling. Reflective journals have been used by educators in disciplines—including adventure pedagogy (Newman et al., 2018), experiential learning (Newman et al., 2017), physical education (Martinek & Santos, 2022; Stuhr et al., 2018), and nursing (Raterink, 2016)—to promote critical thinking, learning, and development. Through this type of reflection youth are motivated to integrate in their writing several key elements for growth—experiencing, reflecting, thinking, and acting (Jenkins & Clarke, 2017). Youth in turn gain insight into their experiences as they critically think about their learning and actions.
Although reflective journaling may be a promising mechanism to facilitate learning and personal growth, there is limited research about its use in comparison with other teaching techniques (Epp, 2008; O’Connell & Dyment, 2011). Further, most research exploring learning through self-reflection and reflective writing has been conducted on college students, with little-to-no studies targeting youth participants, especially youth experiencing vulnerabilities. Many have argued that educators and other professionals need to facilitate critical reflection to enable youth to move beyond a superficial understanding of their world (Colley et al., 2012). As such, for youth experiencing social vulnerabilities, self-reflection of their unique lived experiences—which builds self- and social-awareness—may be especially important for facing challenges, developing the capacity for leadership, and navigating social injustices (Ginwright & Cammarota, 2002).

1.3. Present Study

Given the potential of sport-based PYD programs, researchers have begun to explore mechanisms that promote PYD outcomes (Jacobs & Wright, 2018; Pierce et al., 2017; Newman et al., 2023a), especially for youth experiencing social vulnerabilities (Hermens et al., 2017; Newman & Anderson-Butcher, 2021). In alignment with experiential learning theory (Kolb, 1984; Newman et al., 2024), reflection may be a critical process that encourages the active processing of learning experiences and, in turn, the transfer of learning. That is, individuals do not simply “learn by doing”, rather (guided) reflection may be the key to supporting the transfer and application of new knowledge and skills (Newman et al., 2017). One strategy to prompt reflection is through journaling, an understudied method in sport-based PYD research. As an autonomy-supportive research method, youth journaling seeks to center and amplify youth voice to better understand the where, when, and how of life skills transfer (Newman et al., 2025). Youth-centric, autonomy-support and empowerment-based research methods welcome novel reimagining’s of not only the knowledge and skills developed through participation but also provide insight into the lived experiences and realities of youth during their sport experiences (Camiré et al., 2021, 2023). As such, this study investigates the text and illustrations of reflective journals ‘left behind’ by youth who participated in a sport-based PYD program to better understand how they conceptualize and, in turn, understand transfer life skills.

2. Methods

2.1. Context

This research explores the youth experiences in the LiFEsports summer program at The Ohio State University. LiFEsports is a sport-based PYD program with a unique curriculum focused on teaching life skills and promoting sport sampling. This program has been serving youth in Central Ohio area for over 15 years. Annually, LiFEsports serves approximately 800 youth between the ages of 6 and 15, with approximately 85% living in poverty LiFEsports is provided free-of-charge, with most programs including transportation to-and-from the program as well as two meals each day. Within the context of this study, youth at the program were stratified by age and sex/gender and then randomly assigned to one of 24 groups, which is then led by an adult program staff member.
All program activities, including booster sessions, follow a sequenced curriculum that focuses on fostering social and athletic competence. Specifically, the LiFEsports program aims to teach youth transferable life skills, including Self-Control, Effort, Teamwork, and Social Responsibility (i.e., SETS). Over the course of the four-week, 19-day LiFEsports summer program, youth receive five hours of instruction each day through seven different sports (e.g., basketball, football, lacrosse, soccer, dance, volleyball) and a healthy lifestyles curriculum. The LiFEsports curricula and activities incorporate the learning and application of SETS through sport and play-based activities. For instance, while youth are instructed in lacrosse skills (e.g., cradling, digging), program staff simultaneously reinforce the application of Effort by youth as they practice and develop mastery of those new lacrosse skills. In addition to daily sport instruction, youth engage in one hour of a play-based life skill curriculum each day called Chalk Talk, where they learn and practice SETS in non-sport activities. Notably, when youth use SETS at the program (e.g., using Teamwork to pass the ball), program staff distribute SETS “pins” (sometimes called buttons), which serve as a positive behavioral intervention designed to reinforce and reward exemplary applications of the SETS. Table 1 outlines curricular components related to SETS.
The end of camp features the LiFEsports Games, a culminating event where youth have opportunities to showcase their newly learned sport and life skills. Once the 4-week program ends, youth participate in follow-up sport clinics (i.e., booster sessions), where youth continue to refine and apply their sport and life skills year-round. The program also includes parental engagement and learning opportunities designed to arm parents/caregivers with the skills to reinforce their child’s learning at home and in the community.
Relevant to this study, youth also complete reflective journals as part of the Chalk Talk life skill curriculum. As a programmatic feature, at the end of each week, youth are provided with concentrated time to reflect on their understanding and use of SETS at the program. During this time, youth receive a paper-journal to write and/or illustrate not only the ways in which they have used these skills during sport and play-based activities, but also to consider how SETS may be useful in life. Each youth journal is comprised of 4 pages, one specific to each of the SETS. Within the journal, youth respond to several brief prompts, including questions such as, “What does it mean to have self-control?” or “Think of a time when playing sports, at home, or at school when you worked on a team. Describe how you used teamwork to achieve a goal” (Anderson-Butcher et al., 2018b). Reflective writing and illustrations contained within the journals serve as data for the present study.

2.2. Positionality

The research process was grounded in a constructivist epistemology, which values that each youth has specific and unique experiences at LiFEsports and play an important role in co-learning and co-constructing knowledge (Guba & Lincoln, 2005). The reflections of youth provide unique insights into the lived realities and learning that occurs at LiFEsports and similar sport contexts. Given this epistemological perspective, there is a recognition that the researchers directly and indirectly influence the study through their positionality within the research.
The members of our research team have and continue to work within LiFEsports in multiple ways (e.g., working as staff, leading staff trainings, overseeing programming), as well as in other sport and youth development contexts. The research team also has shared backgrounds in the social work profession, holding values related to strength-based and empowerment-oriented approaches to promote social justice. All members also have backgrounds in sport, having been participants as youth and young adults, as well as serving as school and community sport coaches. The knowledge and past experiences of the research team directly informed the scope and purpose of the study, as well as the iterative analytical process.
Specifically, the researcher who led data coding efforts, a social work student at the time of the study, had first-hand experience as a Chalk Talk leader for multiple years. This experience allowed the researcher to interpret and reflect on the data (i.e., journal text and illustrations) meaningfully within the context of the LiFEsports program and the community in which it serves. The other members of the research team, who were involved throughout the iterative research process, also helped to facilitate a contextual understanding of the data (and, ultimately, the findings) within the broader body of research knowledge.

2.3. Procedures and Participants

Prior to the start of the study, all research procedures were approved by The Ohio State University Institutional Review Board. A total of 699 youth participated in the LiFEsports summer program, of which 567 youth had parental/caregiver consent to participate in the study. Using a random number generator, Chalk Talk journals were randomly collected from 10 youth from each of the 24 groups (n = 234). These journals were collected at the end of the summer program and transcribed by the research team member who led the data coding efforts.
The final sample of youth participants were between the ages of 6 to 15 years old (M = 11.41 years-old, SD = 1.68), with the majority of participants identifying as a male/boy (n = 138; 58.97%). Most youth identified their race/ethnicity as Black and/or African American (n = 196; 83.76%), followed by Biracial/Multiple Races (n = 17; 7.26%), white (n = 8; 3.42%), American Indian/Alaskan Native (n = 3; 1.28%), and Asian (n = 1; 0.43%). Several youth elected to not respond or declined to answer (n = 9; 3.83%). A large portion of participants received free/reduced lunches from school (n = 148; 63.25%) and lived at or below 200% of the federal poverty line (n = 195; 83.33%). These sociodemographic characteristics are also representative of the broader youth population at the LiFEsports summer program.

2.4. Data Analysis

Journals were first reviewed for completeness to better understand the overall usage of journaling among youth in the study. The overall degree of completeness among the sample was relatively high for Self-Control and Effort (with approximately 89% of youth completing these sections), whereas 69% reflected on Teamwork and only 50% on Social Responsibility.
Reflexive thematic analysis guidelines were used to guide the data analysis process (Braun & Clarke, 2019, 2021). Initially, the lead coder became familiar with the raw data by (re)reading, reviewing, and reflecting on the journals. Data were then coded both deductively and inductively using NVivo 12 Windows software to help manage and organize the data. Specifically, individual codes were identified and grouped into a priori categories that align with the LiFEsports program curriculum (i.e., SETS). Simultaneously, inductive coding was conducted in which the coder kept an open mind when interpreting participant text and/or illustrations (e.g., life skills not programmatically taught by the program). After coding was completed and codes were collated into distinct themes, the initial findings were reviewed to ensure that the researcher’s interpretations of the data were representative of youth voice. Upon review of themes, each were assigned names and defined. Finally, exemplary quotes were selected to reflect the essence of each distinct theme.
To enhance the trustworthiness of the analytical process and the credibility of its representative findings, several techniques such as bracketing and peer debriefing were used (Guba & Lincoln, 2005). Prior to the beginning of the analytical process, and again after becoming familiar with the data, the lead coder engaged in bracketing interviews with the other research team members (Tufford & Newman, 2012). Bracketing was particularly relevant given the depth of experience that the lead coder had within the program. The reflexive thematic analysis was conducted independently by the lead coder, who used a codebook and memos to organize codes and construct themes from the data. Additionally, the full research team was engaged throughout the analytical process via peer debriefing during systematically (e.g., after initial coding, upon construction of initial themes) scheduled consultations with the full research team (Padgett, 2016). Together, the researchers questioned and challenged the primary coder’s schema and interpretation of the data. For instance, to check for misinterpretations of the data, alternative descriptions and/or explanations were proposed and explored.

3. Results

Study results are organized into themes representing each of the SETS and additional life skills not specifically taught in the program that emerged (i.e., personal responsibility, leadership), as well as the transfer and application of SETS, value of SETS pins, and a sense of achievement and positive affirmation. Please note example text and illustrations are presented exactly as found in the journals to accurately represent the lived experiences of the youth. Findings highlight how youth conceptualize and, in turn, transfer life skills and underscore important mechanisms of learning.

3.1. Self-Control

Youth reflected on Self-control by defining clearly what it was, often through text and visually through illustration. For instance, one youth stated, “Self control is being able to control your actions in public and other places in your community”. A younger youth wrote, “To be a good kid. behaving”, “Stay calm” and “say if you mess up Do not get mad. Calm Down!” Figure 1 and Figure 2 showcase illustrations demonstrating what Self-control looks like (or doesn’t) according to two youth.
However, most reflections about Self-control were specific to controlling one’s emotional responses. For instance, one young boy reflected, “Self control means that you control your body and emotions. Self-control looks like you get mad and you don’t punch the person”. Another boy wrote, “I knew I was showing self control in basketball when I got fouled and a ref didn’t call it. So I just kept playing”. A girl wrote in her journal, “self control means to be in control of your emotions an example of self control is not expressing your anger to much because you migh make someone around you feel bad or make them be mean to other people which can hurt a lot of peoples feelings”. More broad application was reflected by an older boy who explained:
“That you control yourself. It [self-control] looks like this when you walk away from a situation or take a breath and calming down. I showed self control during school when someone said something racist to me I took a breath and calmed down. What happened when I had self control, I didn’t react and didn’t retaliate.”
As an example of using Self-control, another girl drew to illustrate how she applies this life skill when feeling mad (see Figure 3).
Additionally, youth wrote and/or drew about Self-control within the context of the LiFEsports summer program. One girl reflected, “In a football game somebody kicked me instead of kicking him I told the referee and he throw a flag”. Another wrote, “One time when I showed self control was when I was in football when the other team won and I said “good job” instead of getting mad”. Some youth, however, reflected the use of Self-control outside of sport. One boy wrote about home life, “I showed self control when my little brother was making me angry and instead of punching the wall I asked someone to watch him so that I can take a breath and calm down”. School also was a common context. For instance, a girl provided both written text and drawings when reflecting on a taking a test at school: “I gave it my all on my tests especially when there was a hard question”. She then drew herself sitting in class taking a test and wrote, “What happened was that I passed my test” and drew her memory of passing the test (see Figure 4).

3.2. Effort

Most youth wrote something in their journals reflecting on Effort as trying and/or doing their best. In the words of one participant, “Try your best even when you fail try try again”. Another girl also described what effort means to her, “To try hard on something + work to your full potential”. Another way in which youth described Effort was through examples of physical exertion at LiFEsports, such as “I was out of breath and I was sweating. And I was working hard to”, “My hart was beating fast”, and “was playing socear and I kenw i was giveing it my all because my heart was so fast”. In fact, one boy provided an illustration of using Effort in soccer (see Figure 5). Several youth also reflected on how peers reinforced their Effort, such as a boy who explained, “I knew that I was giving my all because I was sweating bullets and also my teammates were clapping and cheering me on”.
When providing examples of Effort application, youth frequently wrote about doing something that they did not want to do. For instance, one girl wrote, “Trying your best. When you don’t want to do something you still do it. When you put everything into what you doing”. Some youth used examples from when playing sports at LiFEsports, such as one youth who wrote, “During life sports I hate football so I gave it my all even though I don’t’ like it”. Another girl indicated Effort is “Mostly related to sports at LiFEsports. to give tennis your best even if you don’t like”. Others reflected on how they applied Effort when they were not very skilled, such as “When I will a camp I was swimming I did not now I could swim but I put my best effort in to it”. Conversely, sometimes Effort was described when the youth loved an activity, too, as described by this girl: “Dance is my favorite sport and I love to dance really hard and good and also I knew because my dance teacher said that I have a lot of effort”.
Although the majority of youth described using Effort at LiFEsports, some extrapolated on the usage of this skill outside of the program. For example, one boy reported, “When I was at finals for the track city league championships I knew I gave it my all because it was cold outside and I still threw the disc far”. Other examples were set at school. Written text included sentences such as, “When I’m at school I give effort by listening and not talking back and all that” and “I was doing a paper for my school I didn’t want to but did and done with it even no I didn’t want too”. A few journals reflected Effort at home, such as while doing chores (see Figure 6).
Of particular note, learning and improvement were noted in reflections about Effort. As exemplified by an entry from one, “Well in volleyball I give my all even if I wasn’t good at first I put effort and got better”, upon which they added, “it means to put forth your all what you have to give to got better”. Another youth stated putting forth Effort made things “easier, because then you’ll be able to do it better and better every time”. That is, Effort may be particularly beneficial when learning new skills.

3.3. Teamwork

Teamwork was described in writing and through illustrations as when youth “work together”. Some went further and wrote that Teamwork “means you work with people to achieve something” or how “teamwork is to work together as a team, even if you don’t get along”. Illustrations also included subtexts such as cheering for others and saying “You can do it” and “You got this”. Another way the youth reflected about Teamwork was by helping others. For instance, one girl reflected, “I remember when my teammate was crying and even though I sad myself I decided to go and cheer on her and make sure she was ok”. A boy wrote in his journal, “It means to help out and cheer people on when they feel they can’t or to give extra encouragement”. Another wrote described using Teamwork to “help out your teammate” and drew an image of helping someone (See Figure 7).
Journals also reflected Teamwork when playing sports, particularly in relation to passing the ball. As one young boy explained, “I was playing speed ball and I threw it to a girl then she threw it to a girl. Then she threw it back to me than I think I threw it to someone and we scored”. Other descriptions reflected their overall contributions to team performance, such as one boy who wrote, “Playing with teamwork give you a sense of flow and community with one another. Without teamwork every team will fall apart, like the saying goes there no I in team”. Another youth provided an illustration of Teamwork as shown in Figure 8, drawing what happens as a result (both in relation to joy on the faces and scoring a point).
A few youth described other contexts where Teamwork was important. One boy journaled about their school experiences, writing “When I was playing soccer at school, I made myself equal with the team & we each played our parts an we WON!! GOAL!!!” Another youth stated, “When you play football at school you have to work together to win”. Indeed, many reflections were related to competitive sport experiences, particularly contributions to winning. For instance, one youth wrote, “I was a soccer tourmant and we worked together to win the championship”. Another added, “When I was playing in my aau game my team wher pasing the ball to each other and we won”. In general, journal content related to the use of Teamwork in settings outside of sport was very limited. However, one boy shared, “When I was at home I showed teamwork by helping my brother clean his room even though I was tired”. A different boy also described Teamwork as meaning “to work together in class or sports”.

3.4. Social Responsibility

Journal reflections, based on level of completeness, suggest that defining Social responsibility may be challenging for youth. However, two girls similarly described Social responsibility as, “To do the right thing when no one is watching” and “means to be good when no one is watching”. Other youth reflected on specific behaviors, such as “I help out my teammate cheer from on when they tried”, “helped pick the rackets and balls”, and “the people that played with the balls didn’t clean it up so I did it so they wouldn’t get in trouble”. Further, youth recognized that Social responsibility can be demonstrated proactively (e.g., picking up trash; see Figure 9) and in response to another person (see Figure 10). As another youth explained, “When your being socially responsible you do things even without being asked you also take charge and be a leader”.

3.5. Personal Responsibility

In addition to the SETS, which serve as the foci of the LiFEsports program, some youth also began to recognize the life skill of personal responsibility. As one boy reflected, “I showed responsibility for my actions when I almost hit a kid on acident with the lacross ball. I told that person I was sorry and made sure they were ok”. Several youth further expanded on the concept of personal responsibility, such as one boy who shared:
“At lifesport when playing soccer I hand balled, I didn’t try to defend myself or lie I just told the coach I did. At home I broke a mug and instead of hiding it I told my mom and she didn’t get mad.”
Another youth wrote, “to take responsibility for your mistakes also when you do something like destroy a property you take responsibility for it”. One girl journaled, “tells people that what ever happens Imma fight for it and show my best effort even when its not the best of the best but I know that’s the best that I can show”. Although some youth demonstrated confusion between “social” and “personal” responsibility, there also were youth who depicted personal responsibility as taking responsibility for their actions.

3.6. Leadership

Leadership was also recognized by some youth. For example, one girl reflected on a time when she helped her teammate and, in turn, the impact that this had on others. She explained, “At practice my teammate was doing bear crawls and I did it with him and he told the coach and it inspired my team to do it”. Outside of the LiFEsports program, one boy wrote, “When I was at school and we were playing soccer I had to be a leader and help my teammates win”. Another girl shared, “During basketball season, my teammate wanted to fight a girl for hitting her, I pulled my friend/teammate away, the girl on the other team hit me I turned around and could’ve hit her but I didn’t I walked away”. In general, among youth who depicted leadership in their journals, there was an understanding that leadership meant serving as a role model for their teammates and friends.

3.7. The Transfer and Application of SETS

Indeed, much of the journaling done by the youth represented text and illustrations specific to sporting contexts, whether this clearly was articulated as using SETS at LiFEsports or through text and illustrations about specific sports. Within these descriptions, participants often mentioned interactions with their teammates, friends, and peers. For instance, one youth reflected on teamwork by stating, “I remember when my teammate [name] was crying and even though I sad myself I decided to go and cheer on her and make sure she was ok”. Encouragement and support from teammates also were reflected, such as when one youth explained, “Playing in a basketball game really good I knew I was giving it my all because I was doing everything right and getting good feed back from my teammates and other people”. Youth even wrote about acknowledgement from program staff, such as “At football practice because my coach was giving me good compliments”. Another boy added, “When my coach told me to be a leader so that my team does not run, so I told my team to do the right thing”.
Youth also depicted using SETS, particularly Effort and Self-control, within school settings. Effort, in particular, was used when taking tests and completing schoolwork, whereas self-control was displayed as a form of emotional regulation. For example, one youth wrote, “My teacher came up to me and said thank you for having self-control and staying calm”. Another girl explained, “I showed self-control at school. This girl was talking non-true things about me. I wanted to hit her but I didn’t cause I had self-control. So I just told the teacher”. Additionally, several youth wrote about using Social responsibility at school. For instance, one youth reflected by shared, “At school when the teacher needed someone to get all the papers and no one did it but me;” whereas another wrote, “When I was at school my teacher left the room I showed Social-Responsibility”.
Although sparingly, youth also reflected on SETS usage at home, particularly Self-control. These examples often included situations with siblings, such as “…by forgiving my brother for pushing me” and “…by walking away. I knew I was showing sc because I didn’t get angry”. Another youth wrote, “I showed self control by when my brother and I were playing volley ball (I was teaching him) and he made me fustrated because he didn’t know the forms but I kept it in and showed him multiple times”. There were also several occasions in which youth used Social responsibility. As one participant reported, “A home I helped my mom with cleaning the house but she did not no I was doing it”.

3.8. Value of SETS Pins

Throughout the journal reflections, youth commonly provided text and illustrations to represent the value of earning a SETS “pin” for actively demonstrating one of the targeted life skills. Youth reflected upon the receipt of these SETS pins by leaving comments such as “We I was at camp I want to quit but I tried my best so I got a Effort pin” and “When I showed self control at camp I got a pin”. For most youth participants, the SETS pins served as an external source of motivation; however, for some youth, this external motivation transformed into an internal drive. For instance, one participant reflected on their interactions with their staff leader in which they explained, “He felt happy. It was easier because I found a way to be nice without him giving me something in return”. Ultimately, regardless of age—as evidenced by drawings provided by two younger youth (see Figure 11)—the SETS pins held value and helped to reinforce the development and transfer of these particular life skills taught at LiFEsports.

3.9. A Sense of Achievement and Positive Affirmation

Journals were filled with text and illustrations that demonstrate how youth felt a sense of achievement. Examples include, “I felt good” or “I felt accomplished” to explain how using SETS made them feel. Two other boys also shared, “When I gave it my all it made me feel like I was doing good for the team and made me feel like I acomplished something”. and “When I showed self-control I felt good about what I did and what I said”. Moreover, positive feelings were reflected when youth wrote about using SETS. One youth reflected on effort by wrote, “A time I gave it my all was when I was playing kickball at school. I knew I was giving it my all because I felt really good afterward”. Another shared, “I fill joyful and still when I have self-control”, and reflecting social responsibility, someone else stated, “You feel happy that you’re doing the right thing”. One younger youth even described social benefits, which resulted from his use of SETS. They explained, “I started to Learn more and diddent hear talking Behind my back. I was acctley paying attention then talking”. Others similarly reflected on the praise they received from others, such as “Playing basketball I give it my all. I know because I was exaused and complimented”, “I did very good and everyone was proud of me”, and “Like I said, I got complement and people recognized me as a leader and big hitter”. In fact, one boy even wrote about an experience in his community and stated, “I was using self-control at the library, and People said thank you for having your hands and feet to your selfs”. For participants, an internal sense of achievement and positive affirmation from others seemingly support the application of SETS in a variety of situations and settings.

4. Discussion

This study set out to explore whether reflective journaling among youth at a sport-based PYD program mattered. By investigating the text and illustrations included in youth journals, rich understandings of how youth conceptualize and, in turn, understand transfer life skills. Specifically, findings highlight how youth define the SETS, which are intentionally taught within the LiFEsports summer program, as well as personal responsibility and leadership that were not prescriptively discussed during programming. Findings also suggest that youth may transfer these life skills to a variety of settings and situations outside of sport, including at home, during school, and in the community. Finally, internal and external sources of reinforcement and motivation that support the development and transfer of life skills were identified by youth participants.
More specifically, journal content shows that youth thought and reflected on what was learned at LiFEsports. Reflections related to Self-control demonstrated that youth knew how to “calm down”, “walk away”, and seek help from others (e.g., teachers, coaches), particularly when their emotions were elevated. Youth also understood that they need to put forth Effort, particularly when confronted with challenging situations. To this end, the use of Effort led youth to perceive previously challenging tasks as being “easier” because of self- and/or team-improvements. Teamwork was readily exemplified through sport examples, such as passing a basketball to teammates or working together to win a game. As a life skill, Social responsibility was commonly understood as “doing the right thing when no one is watching”; whereas some youth also recognized personal responsibility as taking accountability. Findings here aligned with the SETS taught in Chalk Talk and reinforced while learning multiple sports and playing games at LiFEsports. Youth journals also depicted leadership as a life skill reflected upon through journaling, as suggested by Martinek and Santos (2022), which in turn was used to be a role model for others. These findings echo research by Newman (2020), which found that youth (regardless of the social vulnerabilities in which they are confronted with) are capable of learning a range of intrapersonal and interpersonal life skills, including those not intentionally taught by a program. Indeed, youth have untapped capacity for learning (Camiré et al., 2021, 2023), and other programs should consider expanding upon the knowledge and skills they introduce to youth.
For the youth in the current study, the journals served as a space where they could reflect on their experiences, describe what they were learning at LiFEsports, and write about how they used the skills in and outside of the program. Whether through text or illustrations, youth involved in this study clearly demonstrated the ability to reflect up where, when, and how they transferred and applied SETS and other life skills. For instance, SETS application was demonstrated when dealing with challenging situations, which is supported by other research contending that the use of reflective journaling encourages youth to engage in psychological process, such as unconscious personal reconstructions, confidence, and meaningfulness of learning (Newman et al., 2021a), and can enhance one’s critical thinking and problem-solving skills (Colley et al., 2012). From an experiential learning lens (Newman et al., 2024), this intentional engagement in the reflective process is critical aspect of not only learning and development, but also in considering where, when, and how knowledge/skills can be transferred and applied (Newman et al., 2025). That is, journaling may serve as a viable method for sport-based PYD programs to use to prompt reflection related to targeted outcomes (e.g., SETS) among youth. Organizing and personalizing journals, allocating journal time during a program, balancing free versus guided reflections, and providing feedback may further journaling’s utility and impact (Martinek & Santos, 2022).
Moreover, youth indicated that their learning was associated with positive interactions with significant adults (e.g., staff, coaches, parents) and peers (e.g., teammates, friends) who helped to reinforce their learning and application of SETS outside of the LiFEsports summer program. These findings related to significant others were not surprising given how youth sport scholars also have demonstrated the role of significant others in promoting the development and transfer of life skills among youth who may be socially vulnerable (e.g., L. E. Lower-Hoppe et al., 2021; Newman et al., 2020; Riley & Anderson-Butcher, 2012). For instance, Riley and Anderson-Butcher (2012) found that life skill development was strengthened by opportunities for peer interactions, as well as via sport instructors who were caring, personable, and outgoing. In fact, Newman et al. (2020) demonstrated that staff support is particularly impactful, even above and beyond that of parent support. These findings underscore the value of programmatic designs that intentionally engage significant others throughout the social systems of youth. For instance, sport-based PYD programs should consider ways in which to engage parents/caregivers in talking to their children about the lessons, skills, and general experiences gleaned from the program (Newman et al., 2021a, 2025). Further emphasizing peer norms and relationships continues to be a growing priority, as well (Barcza-Renner et al., 2022; L. E. Lower-Hoppe et al., 2021).
The value of receiving SETS pins from program staff also was highlighted through journal reflections. Although prior research has demonstrated the value of behavioral reinforcements in sport-based PYD programs (Anderson-Butcher et al., 2021), the findings from the current study suggest that youth may become intrinsically motivated via strengths-based behavioral reinforcement. Additionally, findings provide rich detail of the lived experiences of youth, at times, pointing to a sense of achievement and positive feelings as a result of applying the SETS at LiFEsports and throughout other social settings. Journal reflections represented feelings of joy, accomplishment, and achievement, which may be especially important for the youth served at the LiFEsports summer program. Such findings are supported by prior research that has demonstrated the value of positive experiences in supporting the healthy development of youth (Kimiecik et al., 2020).
Ultimately, illustrations provided in the journals proved to be quite powerful, demonstrating lived experiences of the youth as they applied SETS. In fact, when illustrations were used in addition to text, the reflection was deeper and richer in content. Therefore, drawing may be a meaningful strategy to prompt reflections among youth, especially younger youth or those who struggle with reading and writing (such as many at LiFEsports). Illustrations also could serve as a bridge to many of the barriers socially vulnerable youth face, affording nonverbal methods to express feelings and share experiences that support learning and development.

Limitations

Although rich with details, there are several noteworthy study limitations. Foremost, this study only included youth in one sport-based PYD program, LiFEsports. This learning context was intentionally designed and may not reflect sport-based PYD programs in other social settings. To this end, the program was designed to meet the needs of a particular youth community, which, in turn, allowed the researchers to focus on the SETS taught at the LiFEsports summer program. Another limitation involves how reflection was implemented during the journaling experiences. In the future, open-ended prompts may allow for a diversity of creativity reflections. Additionally, the “age” of the data is—in part, due to societal consciousness of systemic inequities and institutional injustices (Turgeon et al., 2024)—relatively dated. Indeed, although the reflections captured in youth journals still represent the unique lived realities, more timely research is certainly needed. Despite limitations, the study provides a unique glimpse into the lived realities of youth and, in turn, their valuable perspectives can provide implications for future research and practice.

5. Conclusions

Overall, this study helps to showcase the experiences of youth participating in a sport-based PYD program, providing evidence that reflective journaling does matter! Findings support the value of journaling as evidenced by the reflective writings and illustrations, which helped to depict if and how youth thought about life skills and their applications. Specifically, findings demonstrate that youth are capable of understanding a variety of life skills, including life skills not intentionally taught by the program, and actively consider how to transfer those life skills to other settings. What were once carelessly left behind journals are now picturesque representations of how youth describe, reflect on, and transfer their knowledge and skills.

Author Contributions

Methodology, D.A.-B., T.J.N. and E.W.; Validation, D.A.-B. and T.J.N.; Formal analysis, D.A.-B. and E.W.; Investigation, D.A.-B. and T.J.N.; Resources, D.A.-B.; Data curation, D.A.-B. and E.W.; Writing—original draft, D.A.-B.; Writing—review & editing, T.J.N.; Supervision, D.A.-B.; Project administration, D.A.-B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external fundings.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by Behavioral Institutional Review Board of The Ohio State University (19 December 2016).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed Consent were obtained from parent/guardians of the youth participants.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Anderson-Butcher, D. (2019). Youth sport as a vehicle for social development. Kinesiology Review, 8(30), 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Anderson-Butcher, D., Amorose, A., Bates, S., Newman, T., Okamoto, K., & Volek, A. (2020). Exploring the influence of program staff and parental support on changes in physical health outcomes of vulnerable youth participating in a sport-based positive youth development summer camp. Journal of Sport Behavior, 41(4), 394–414. [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson-Butcher, D., Bates, S., Amorose, A., Wade-Mdivanian, R., & Lower-Hoppe, L. (2021). Social-emotional learning interventions in youth sport: What matters in design? Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 38, 367–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Anderson-Butcher, D., Martin, E., Paluta, L., & Gould, D. (2018a). Patterns of social skill development over-time among clusters of LiFEsports participants. Children and Youth Services Review, 87, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Anderson-Butcher, D., Riley, A., Amorose, A. J., Iachini, A., & Wade-Mdivanian, R. (2014). Maximizing youth experiences in community sport settings: The design and impact of the LiFE Sports Camp. Journal of Sport Management, 26(2), 236–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Anderson-Butcher, D., Wade-Mdivanian, R., & Davis, J. (2018b). LiFEsports overview and curriculum. College of Social Work, Ohio State University. [Google Scholar]
  7. Barcza-Renner, K., Anderson-Butcher, D., Amorose, A., & Wade-Mdivanian, R. (2022). Examining the impact of counselor and peer support on social skill development in a sport-based positive youth development program. Journal of Sport Behavior, 45(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bean, C., & Forneris, T. (2016). Examining the importance of intentionally structuring the youth sport context to facilitate positive youth development. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 28, 410–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bruner, M. W., Hillier, S., Baillie, C. P. T., Lavallee, L. F., Bruner, B. G., Hare, K., Lovelace, R., & Lévesque, L. (2016). Positive youth development in aboriginal physical activity and sport: A systematic review. Adolescent Research Review, 1, 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Camiré, M., Newman, T. J., Bean, C., & Strachan, L. (2021). Reimagining positive youth development and life skills through a social justice lens. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 34(6), 1058–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Camiré, M., Santos, F., Newman, T. J., Vella, S., MacDonald, D., Milistetd, M., Pierce, S., & Strachan, L. (2023). Positive youth development as a guiding framework in sport research: Is it time to plan for a transition? Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 69, 102505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Catalano, R. F., Berglund, M. L., Ryan, J. A. M., Lonczak, H. S., & Hawkins, J. D. (2002). Positive youth development in the United States: Research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 98–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Coalter, F. (2013). There is loads of relationships here’: Developing a programme theory for sport-for-change programmes. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 48(5), 594–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Coalter, F. (2015). Sport-for-change: Some thoughts from a sceptic. Social Inclusion, 3(3), 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Colley, B. M., Bilics, A. R., & Lerch, C. M. (2012). Reflection: A key component to thinking critically. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(1). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Eime, R. M., Young, J. A., Harvey, J. T., Charity, M. J., & Payne, W. R. (2013). A systematic review of the psychological and social benefits of participation in sport for children and adolescents: Informing development of a conceptual model of health through sport. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 10, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Epp, S. (2008). The value of reflective journaling in undergraduate nursing education: A literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(9), 1379–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ginwright, S., & Cammarota, J. (2002). New terrain in youth development: The promise of a social justice approach. Social Justice, 29(4), 82–95. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/29768150 (accessed on 24 February 2025).
  21. Gould, D., & Carson, S. (2008). Life skills development through sport: Current status and future directions. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1(1), 58–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Guba, E. E., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191–216). Sage. [Google Scholar]
  23. Haudenhuyse, R. P., Theeboom, M., & Skille, E. A. (2014). Towards understanding the potential of sports-based practices for socially vulnerable youth. Sport in Society, 17(2), 139–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hermens, N., Super, S., Verkooijen, K. T., & Koelen, M. A. (2017). A systematic review of life skill development through sports programs serving socially vulnerable youth. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 88(4), 408–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Holt, N. L., Neely, K. C., Slater, L. G., Camiré, M., Côté, J., Fraser-Thomas, J., MacDonald, D., Strachan, L., & Tamminen, K. A. (2017). A grounded theory of positive youth development through sport based on results from a qualitative meta-study. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10(1), 1–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Jacobs, J. M., & Wright, P. M. (2018). Transfer of life skills in sport-based youth development programs: A conceptual framework bridging learning to application. Quest, 70(1), 81–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jenkins, J., & Clarke, T. (2017). Engaged journalism: Using experiential learning theory (ELT) for in-class journaling activities. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(1), 154–161. [Google Scholar]
  28. Jones, M. I., Dunn, J. G., Holt, N. L., Sullivan, P. J., & Bloom, G. A. (2011). Exploring the ‘5Cs’ of positive youth development in sport. Journal of Sport Behavior, 34, 250–267. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kimiecik, C., Bates, S., & Anderson-Butcher, D. (2020). Examining the impact of a sport-based positive youth development program on adolescent black girls: A mixed method study. Journal of Sport for Development, 9(1), 48–64. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lower-Hoppe, L. E., Anderson-Butcher, D., Newman, T., & Logan, J. (2021). The influence of peers on life skill development in a sport-based positive youth development program. Journal of Sport for Development, 9(2), 69–85. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lower-Hoppe, L. M., Anderson-Butcher, D., Lo, M., & Turner, B. A. (2020). The influence of organizational climate and process on youth outcomes: A case study of a community youth sport organization. Leisure/Loisir, 44(4), 489–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Martinek, T., & Santos, F. (2022). Principles and strategies of reflective journaling in a youth leadership program. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 93(5), 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. McDonough, M., Ullrich-French, S., Anderson-Butcher, D., Amorose, A. J., & Riley, A. (2013). Social relationships predict social competence among low-income youth in sport-based positive youth development programs. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 25, 431–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Newman, T. J. (2020). Life skill development and transfer: “They’re not just meant for playing sports”. Research on Social Work Practice, 30(6), 643–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Newman, T. J., Alvarez, A., & Kim, M. (2017). An experiential approach to sport for youth development. Journal of Experiential Education, 40(3), 308–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Newman, T. J., & Anderson-Butcher, D. (2021). Mechanisms of life skill development and life skill transfer: Interconnections and distinctions. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 12(3), 489–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Newman, T. J., Anderson-Butcher, D., & Amorose, A. J. (2020). Examining the influence of sport program staff and parent/caregiver support on youth outcomes. Applied Developmental Science, 24(3), 263–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Newman, T. J., Anderson-Butcher, D., Bostick, K., & Black, S. (2021a). Psychological processes involved in life skill transfer: Understanding the lived experiences of youth recognized as being socially vulnerable. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 38(4), 423–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Newman, T. J., Black, S., Santos, F., Jefka, B., & Brennan, N. (2023a). Coaching life skill development and transfer: A scoping review of facilitative coaching practices in youth sports. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 16(1), 619–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Newman, T. J., Jefka, B., Lower-Hoppe, L., Kimiecik, C., Brgoch, S., Dillard, R., Dwyer, K., Rockhill, C., & Ingram, D. (2021b). Youth identity formation: (Mis)alignment between male youth and sport coaches. Children and Youth Services Review, 120, 105733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Newman, T. J., Kim, M., Tucker, A., & Alvarez, A. (2018). Learning through the adventure of youth sport. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(3), 280–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Newman, T. J., Lee, L., Santos, F., Ferreira, M., & Anderson-Butcher, D. (2025). Photo-based methods to illustrate the what-where-how of life skill transfer. Research on Social Work Practice. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Newman, T. J., Lee, L., & Stauffer, A. (2024). An experiential approach to understanding PYD from sport-based programs. In N. Holt, & M. McDonough (Eds.), Positive youth development through sport (3rd ed., pp. 1–15). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Newman, T. J., McCray, K., Lower-Hoppe, L., Ingram, D., Rockhill, C., Ohanasian, J., & Simmons-Horton, S. (2023b). Healthy masculinity construction: The influence of race, faith, and athletics. Children & Society, 37(3), 854–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Núñez, P. D. P., Portela-Pino, I., & Martínez-Patiño, M. (2023). Understanding the characteristics of community youth sports programs interventions: A systematic review and recommendations. SAGE Open, 13(2). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. O’Connell, T., & Dyment, J. (2011). The case of reflective journals: Is the jury still out? Reflective Practice, 12(1), 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Padgett, D. K. (2016). Qualitative methods in social work research (3rd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar]
  49. Pierce, S., Gould, D., & Camiré, M. (2017). Definition and model of life skills transfer. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10(1), 186–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pierce, S., Scheadler, T., Anderson-Butcher, D., Amorose, A., & Wade-Mdivanian, R. (2022). Social skill transfer from a sport-based positive youth development program to the school setting. Sport Social Work Journal, 1(1), 78–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pozo, P., Grao-Cruces, A., & Pérez-Ordás, R. (2018). Teaching personal and social responsibility model-based programmes in physical education: A systematic review. European Physical Education Review, 24(1), 56–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Raterink, G. (2016). Reflective journaling for critical thinking development in advanced practice registered nurse students. The Journal of Nursing Education, 55(2), 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Riley, A., & Anderson-Butcher, D. (2012). Participation in a summer sport-based youth development program for disadvantaged youth: Getting the parent perspective. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(7), 1367–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Robinson, E., Newman, T., Scheadler, T., Lower-Hoppe, L., & Baeth, A. (2024). The unique lived experiences of LGBQ athletes: A collegiate women’s rugby club team as an inclusive and empowering community. Journal of Homosexuality, 71(4), 1003–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Scheadler, T. R., Anderson-Butcher, D., & Bates, S. (2024). Long-term life skill transfer from sport-based positive youth development programs. Journal of Youth Development, 19(3), 21–38. Available online: https://open.clemson.edu/jyd/vol19/iss3/2 (accessed on 24 February 2025).
  56. Spruit, A., Assink, M., Van Vugt, E. S., Van der Put, C. E., & Stams, G. J. J. M. (2016). The effects of physical activity interventions on psychosocial outcomes in adolescents: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 45, 56–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Stuhr, P. T., De La Rosa, T., Samalot-Rivera, A., & Sutherland, S. (2018). The road less traveled in elementary physical education: Exploring human relationship skills in adventure-based learning. Education Research International, 2018(1), 3947046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tufford, L., & Newman, P. (2012). Bracketing in qualitative research. Qualitative Social Work, 11(1), 80–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Turgeon, S., Newman, T., Lee, L., Nicholas, O., & Bean, C. (2024). Social justice attitudes and behavioral intentions of NCAA student-athletes: The role of life skills. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 22(6), 1549–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Vella, S., Pierce, S., Camiré, M., Newman, T., MacDonald, D., Milistetd, M., Strachan, L., & Santos, F. (2025). What is considered quality youth sport? A Delphi study of international scholar perspectives. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Vettenburg, N. (1998). Juvenile delinquency and the cultural characteristics of the family. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 10, 193–209. [Google Scholar]
  62. Whitley, M. A., Massey, W. V., Camire, M., Boutet, M., & Borbee, A. (2019). Sport-based youth development interventions in the United States: A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 19, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Self-Control or Not.
Figure 1. Self-Control or Not.
Youth 05 00060 g001
Figure 2. What Self-Control Looks Like.
Figure 2. What Self-Control Looks Like.
Youth 05 00060 g002
Figure 3. Self-Control When Mad.
Figure 3. Self-Control When Mad.
Youth 05 00060 g003
Figure 4. Passing My Test.
Figure 4. Passing My Test.
Youth 05 00060 g004
Figure 5. Example of Effort in Sport.
Figure 5. Example of Effort in Sport.
Youth 05 00060 g005
Figure 6. Effort at Home.
Figure 6. Effort at Home.
Youth 05 00060 g006
Figure 7. Helping your Teammate.
Figure 7. Helping your Teammate.
Youth 05 00060 g007
Figure 8. The Benefits of Teamwork.
Figure 8. The Benefits of Teamwork.
Youth 05 00060 g008
Figure 9. Social Responsibility By Picking Up Trash.
Figure 9. Social Responsibility By Picking Up Trash.
Youth 05 00060 g009
Figure 10. Social Responsibility as Helping Others.
Figure 10. Social Responsibility as Helping Others.
Youth 05 00060 g010
Figure 11. Illustrations of SETS Pins.
Figure 11. Illustrations of SETS Pins.
Youth 05 00060 g011
Table 1. LiFEsports Curriculum and SETS.
Table 1. LiFEsports Curriculum and SETS.
Life SkillDefinitionLesson Plan TopicsExample Curricular Activity
Self-Control
  • The ability to regulate emotions and control one’s own actions and behaviors
  • Recognizing emotions
  • Understanding the body’s reaction to emotions
  • Regulating & controlling emotions
  • Youth match pictures of faces and body language with hypothetical situations
  • Ex. “Not ready for a big test”. Youth pick anxious or overwhelmed feeling cards
Effort
  • Self-directed behavior and initiative
  • Try your best even when its hard
  • Motiving oneself
  • Setting goals
  • Persisting when the going gets tough
  • Youth must get across an “Alligator Pit” using bases (two fewer than the number of youth participating) as “rafts” to help
  • Everyone must get from the starting point to the ending point without falling in
Teamwork
  • The ability to work with others to achieve a common goal
  • Be an effective communicator and problem solver
  • Building a team and respecting others
  • Listening & communicating
  • Group problem solving
  • Youth split into three teams and work together to design a team flags, mottos, etc.
  • Teams determine team colors, mottos, mascots and flags
Social Responsibility
  • Do what’s right when no one is looking
  • The ability to think about how our actions and behaviors ultimately affect others
  • Take responsibility for self
  • Be a leader
  • Being a good sport
  • Showing appreciation
  • Giving back & helping others
  • Being a leader and role model
  • Youth break into small groups to plan and film videos on sportsmanship and leadership
  • Videos include examples of a time at LiFEsports when group members used good sportsmanship and highlight at least one of the SETS modeled for others
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Anderson-Butcher, D.; Newman, T.J.; Williams, E. Empowering Youth Through the Power of Reflective Journaling: Understanding Life Skills from the Reflections of Youth. Youth 2025, 5, 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/youth5020060

AMA Style

Anderson-Butcher D, Newman TJ, Williams E. Empowering Youth Through the Power of Reflective Journaling: Understanding Life Skills from the Reflections of Youth. Youth. 2025; 5(2):60. https://doi.org/10.3390/youth5020060

Chicago/Turabian Style

Anderson-Butcher, Dawn, Tarkington J. Newman, and Ellen Williams. 2025. "Empowering Youth Through the Power of Reflective Journaling: Understanding Life Skills from the Reflections of Youth" Youth 5, no. 2: 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/youth5020060

APA Style

Anderson-Butcher, D., Newman, T. J., & Williams, E. (2025). Empowering Youth Through the Power of Reflective Journaling: Understanding Life Skills from the Reflections of Youth. Youth, 5(2), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/youth5020060

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop