Next Article in Journal
Modeling the Effects of Human Awareness and Use of Insecticides on the Spread of Human African Trypanosomiasis: A Fractional-Order Model Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Mathematical Formulation of Intensity–Duration–Frequency Curves and Their Hydrological Risk Implications in Civil Engineering Design
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New Insight on Damped Oscillating Regular Structures from “Effective” Proton Electromagnetic Form Factor Data

by
Stanislav Dubnička
1,*,
Anna-Zuzana Dubničková
2,
Lukáš Holka
1 and
Andrej Liptaj
1
1
Institute of Physics, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská Cesta 9, SK-845 11 Bratislava, Slovakia
2
Department of Theoretical Physics, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, Comenius University, Mlynská dolina F1, SK-842 48 Bratislava, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
AppliedMath 2025, 5(3), 126; https://doi.org/10.3390/appliedmath5030126
Submission received: 1 April 2025 / Revised: 5 August 2025 / Accepted: 12 September 2025 / Published: 20 September 2025

Abstract

An objective existence of damped oscillation regular structures from the proton “effective” electromagnetic form factor data, appearing when these data are described by a two parametric Tomasi-Gustafsson-Rekalo function, is investigated. If the same data are described with an improved precision by the function dependent on twelve physical parameters, obtained from the total cross section σ t o t ( e + e p p ¯ ) expression through the proton electromagnetic form factors represented by the Unitary and Analytic model, no damped oscillation regular structures are observed. As a result it seems, the damped oscillation regular structures are created from the proton “effective” electromagnetic form factor data description by the two-parametric formula of Tomasi-Gustafsson-Rekalo, which is unable to describe the proton “effective” electromagnetic form factor data with a sufficient high accuracy.

1. Introduction

Every strongly interacting particle possess the electromagnetic structure, which theoretically is described by the corresponding electromagnetic (EM) form factors (FFs). They are defined as coefficients in the matrix elements of current operators decomposition into maximal number of independent relativistic covariants constructed from momenta and spin parameters. They describe the electromagnetic structure of the hadron in one-photon exchange approximation, which is broken down at the next orders of perturbation theory. The EM FFs possess definite analytic properties derived from the causality in the quantum field theory.
The number of EM FFs is given by the spin of the considered hadron. The EM structure of the proton with the spin S = 1/2 is completely described by two EM FFs, the electric G E p ( s ) and magnetic G M p ( s ) . Their experimental behavior in the space-like region is obtained by the scattering of the unpolarized, or polarized electrons on protons. In the time-like region the electric G E p ( s ) and magnetic G M p ( s ) FFs are complex functions and an information on the behavior of their absolute values nowadays is obtained from the measurement of the total cross section
σ t o t ( e + e p p ¯ ) = 4 π α 2 C p β p ( s ) 3 s | G M p ( s ) | 2 + 2 m p 2 s | G E p ( s ) | 2 ,
with the velocities β p ( s ) = 1 4 m p 2 s of the outgoing protons and antiprotons in (c.m.) system, α = 1/137 and the so-called Sommerfeld-Gamov-Sakharov Coulomb enhancement factor [1] C p = π α / β p ( s ) 1 exp ( π α / β p ( s ) ) , which accounts for the EM interaction between the outgoing p p ¯ pairs.
The functions G E p ( s ) and G M p ( s ) in Equation (1) are the Sachs electric and magnetic form factors (FFs), respectively. These two functions have the same values at the proton-antiproton threshold, as it follows from their definition in terms of the Dirac F 1 p ( s ) and the Pauli F 2 p ( s ) FFs
G E p ( s ) = F 1 p ( s ) + s 4 m p 2 F 2 p ( s )
G M p ( s ) = F 1 p ( s ) + F 2 p ( s ) .
Because it is not possible to determine both EM FFs G E ( s ) and G M ( s ) from single experimental value on σ t o t b a r e ( e + e p p ¯ ) , without additional assumptions, experimental groups in [2,3,4,5,6,7], and also in [8] extended a validity of the threshold identity | G E p ( 4 m p 2 ) |     | G M p ( 4 m p 2 ) | in Equation (1) to all s-values above the threshold and the data with errors obtained by means of the consequent expression
| G e f f p ( s ) | = σ t o t ( e + e p p ¯ ) 4 π α 2 C p β p ( s ) 3 s 1 + 2 m p 2 s ,
has been defined as the proton “effective” EM FF. It is a starting quantity in investigation of the “proton damped oscillation regular structures”.
It is clear from the previous considerations that the concept of “the proton ‘effective’ EM FF” in the elementary particle physics is temporary and it will survive only until the moment when sufficiently high luminosity of the e + e colliders is achieved, allowing the precise determination of the separate absolute values of the electric and magnetic timelike proton FFs from angular distribution of the reactions e + e p p ¯ , p p ¯ e + e , or possibly from measurements of the vector and tensor polarization components of the final protons and antiprotons in the e + e p p ¯ , process [9].
We would like to note that in such case the investigation of the objective existence of damped oscillation regular structures from the separate absolute values of the nucleon electric and the nucleon magnetic FFs data will be still interesting and the results may be different from conclusions of this paper pertinent of the proton “effective” EM FF.
Despite of the promising future experiments, investigating the first proton “effective” EM FF data [2,3], the following new phenomenon has been observed in the paper [10]. The authors of this paper, first describing the data on the “effective” proton EM FF by a two free parametric formula
G e f f p = A ( 1 + s / m a 2 ) ( 1 s / 0.71 GeV 2 ) 2 ,
from [11] with the values of parameters A = 7.7 and m a 2 = 14.8 GeV 2 , then subtracting the obtained curve from the proton “effective” EM FF data, revealed the “proton damped oscillation regular structures” as it is demonstrated in Figure 1.
In the next Section all other new proton “effective” EM FF data are collected, then repeating the procedure of the paper [10], results of the authors of the paper [10] are confirmed even more expressively. However, further we bring some doubt in their objective existence.

2. Proton Damped Oscillation Regular Structures Seem to Have No Objective Existence

Collecting also other existing data on the proton “effective” FF measured till now [4,5,6,7] together with [2,3], then again describing them by a two free parametric formula [11], utilizing the least squares method given by the CERN programm MINUIT, however, now with slightly different values of parameters A = 8.9 ± 0.3 and m a 2 = 9.2 ± 0.8 GeV 2 , finally subtracting the obtained fitted curve from all completed proton “effective” EM FF data, the result of the paper [10] is confirmed in Figure 2.
Here we would like to note, that despite of the latter discussion on the proton “effective” EM FF data, also the separate data on | G E p ( s ) | and | G M p ( s ) | exist, which, however, are considered to be not fully credible, because they have been extracted from σ t o t ( e + e p p ¯ ) under some simplified assumptions [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Like that the | G E p ( s ) | and | G M p ( s ) | are roughly equal if measurements of the σ t o t ( e + e p p ¯ ) are carried out not very far above the p p ¯ threshold, or that | G E p ( s ) | 0 at the energies enough far away from it, as it follows directly from the explicit form of the σ t o t ( e + e p p ¯ ) in (1).
These data in combination with the most reliable proton electric FF spacelike data [20,21,22,23,24,25] given by the ratio G E p ( s ) / G M p ( s ) and measured by the Akhiezer-Rekalo polarization method [26,27], and with the proton magnetic FF spacelike data [28,29,30,31,32,33,34], evaluated by the Rosenbluth technique from the differential cross section of the elastic scattering of electrons on unpolarized protons, are presented in Figure 3.
Despite the inaccuracy of the data in Figure 3, we have described them by the Unitary and Analytic (U&A) model [35] of the proton EM structure, derived in the paper [36] in detail, being very productive in investigation of various problems of the electromagnetic structure of hadrons.
The model is formulated in the language of flavour independent the isoscalar F 1 s N ( s ) , F 2 s N ( s ) and isovector F 1 v N ( s ) , F 2 v N ( s ) parts of the Dirac and Pauli FFs, which appear, if the mixed transformation properties of the EM current J μ E M ( 0 ) under the rotation in the isospin space are utilized. The latter consist in the fact, that one part of J μ E M ( 0 ) transforms like the isoscalar and another part like the third component of the isovector. As a result of these transformation properties there are splittings of the proton Dirac and Pauli EM FFs to flavour independent isoscalars F 1 s N ( s ) , F 2 s N ( s ) and isovectors F 1 v N ( s ) , F 2 v N ( s ) FFs as follows
F 1 p ( s ) = [ F 1 s N ( s ) + F 1 v N ( s ) ] F 2 p ( s ) = [ F 2 s N ( s ) + F 2 v N ( s ) ]
whereby the sign between them is specified by the sign of the third component of the proton isospin to be + 1 / 2 .
Then the relation between the proton EM FFs and the flavour-independent isoscalar and isovector parts of the proton Dirac and Pauli FFs is
G E p ( s ) = [ F 1 s N ( s ) + F 1 v N ( s ) ] + s / 4 m p 2 [ F 2 s N ( s ) + F 2 v N ( s ) ] G M p ( s ) = [ F 1 s N ( s ) + F 1 v N ( s ) ] + [ F 2 s N ( s ) + F 2 v N ( s ) ]
with normalizations
G E p ( 0 ) = 1 G M p ( 0 ) = μ p
and
F 1 s N ( 0 ) = F 1 v N ( 0 ) = 1 / 2 F 2 s N ( 0 ) = 1 2 ( μ p + μ n 1 ) F 2 v N ( 0 ) = 1 2 ( μ p μ n 1 ) ,
where μ p = 2.79284 μ N and μ n = 1.91304 μ N are the magnetic moments of the proton and neutron, respectively, which are measured in the nucleon magneton μ N units.
So, an explicit form of F 1 s N ( s ) , F 1 v N ( s ) , F 2 s N ( s ) , F 2 v N ( s ) leads to a description of the proton EM FFs G E p ( s ) and G M p ( s ) in the whole region of their definition.
However, there is no theory predicting behaviors of the functions F 1 s N ( s ) , F 1 v N ( s ) , F 2 s N ( s ) , F 2 v N ( s ) and we know only some of their properties, like their analyticity, fulfilling the reality condition F * ( s ) = F ( s * ) , normalization conditions (9) and the asymptotic behaviors,
F 1 s N ( s ) | s | = F 1 v N ( s ) | s | 1 s 2 F 2 s N ( s ) | s | = F 2 v N ( s ) | s | 1 s 3
following from QCD up to the logarithmic corrections [37] for G E p ( s ) and G M p ( s ) EM FFs.
All above mentioned properties are contained just in the constructed proton EM structure U&A model, which is defined on the four-sheeted Riemann surface, generated by two square root branch points. One s 0 representing two-pion, or three-pion threshold, dependent if it is concerned of the isovector parts, or the isoscalar parts of the Dirac and Pauli FFs, and another, the inelastic effective threshold s i n , approximating contributions of all other inelastic thresholds generated by the particles in the intermediate states of the unitarity condition, therefore in a description of the data it is left as a free parameter of the model and its numerical value is found by an optimal description of existing data.
The four-sheeted Riemann surfaces, on which the U&A models of F 1 s N ( s ) , F 1 v N ( s ) , F 2 s N ( s ) and F 2 v N ( s ) are defined, are mapped by the transformation
V ( s ) = i ( s i n 1 s s 0 s s 0 s ) 1 / 2 + ( s s 0 s s 0 s ) 1 / 2 ( s i n 1 s s 0 s s 0 s ) 1 / 2 ( s s 0 s s 0 s ) 1 / 2 ( s i n 1 s s 0 s s 0 s ) 1 / 2 + ( s s 0 s s 0 s ) 1 / 2 + ( s i n 1 s s 0 s s 0 s ) 1 / 2 ( s s 0 s s 0 s ) 1 / 2 ,
into one V-plane with unit disc, whereby the first physical sheet of the Riemann surface is completely mapped into left half disc, the second sheet is mapped into right half disc, the third sheet into left half plane besides the left half disc and finally the fourth sheet is mapped into right half plane besides the right half disc.
The behavior of FFs under consideration is practically formed by the experimentally confirmed isoscalar and isovector vector meson resonances with quantum numbers of the photon J P C = 1 and the isospin values 1 and 0, which one finds in the Review of Particle properties, published by the Particle Data Group always with all new achievements every even year.
Every of these vector meson resonances with the mass m r 2 (their width is in the first step ignored) is mapped into four poles, either on the imaginary axis (two complex conjugate inside of the unit disc and two complex conjugate out of the unit disc) by means of the relation
V ( m r 2 ) = i ( s i n 1 s s 0 s s 0 s ) 1 / 2 + ( m r 2 s 0 s s 0 s ) 1 / 2 ( s i n 1 s s 0 s s 0 s ) 1 / 2 ( m r 2 s 0 s s 0 s ) 1 / 2 ( s i n 1 s s 0 s s 0 s ) 1 / 2 + ( m r 2 s 0 s s 0 s ) 1 / 2 + ( s i n 1 s s 0 s s 0 s ) 1 / 2 ( m r 2 s 0 s s 0 s ) 1 / 2 ,
if the mass of the resonance fulfils the condition s 0 s < m r 2 < s i n , or into four symmetric poles on the unit circle by means of the following relation
V ( m r 2 ) = i ( s i n 1 s s 0 s s 0 s ) 1 / 2 + ( m r 2 s 0 s s 0 s ) 1 / 2 + ( s i n 1 s s 0 s s 0 s ) 1 / 2 ( m r 2 s 0 s s 0 s ) 1 / 2 ( s i n 1 s s 0 s s 0 s ) 1 / 2 + ( m r 2 s 0 s s 0 s ) 1 / 2 ( s i n 1 s s 0 s s 0 s ) 1 / 2 ( m r 2 s 0 s s 0 s ) 1 / 2 ,
if the mass of the resonance fulfils the condition m r 2 > s i n .
Only with such forms of transformations then in explicit expressions of F 1 s N ( s ) , F 1 v N ( s ) , F 2 s N ( s ) , F 2 v N ( s ) , after substituting the instability of the resonance by means of the Breit-Wigner relation m r 2 ( m r i Γ 2 ) 2 , all considered resonances from the imaginary axis, and from the unit circle, are shifted exclusively into the unphysical sheets of the Riemann surface and in this manner the correct analyticity and unitarity of the model on the first sheet of the considered FFs is not violated.
Further a construction of explicit forms of the flavour-independent F 1 s N ( s ) , F 1 v N ( s ) , F 2 s N ( s ) , F 2 v N ( s ) functions is demonstrated in detail, with all above discussed properties, however, depending on some free parameters to be numerically evaluated in comparison of the model with experimental data on the proton EM FFs in Figure 3.
We start from the naive vector-meson-dominance (VMD) model representation
F ( s ) = j = 1 n m j 2 m j 2 s ( f j h h / f j ) ,
which does not reflect any of the properties formulated above, besides the vector meson resonances in the e + e annihilation processes into hadron-antihadron pairs, considering them first as the stable particles. The f j h h and f j are the vector-meson coupling constants of a vector meson interaction with hadron h and the universal vector meson coupling constant describing the charged lepton decay of the considered resonance, respectively.
Each term in (14) behaves like
F ( s ) | s | s 1 ,
however, from a destructive interference of ground and excited state vector mesons, one can enforce the sum to behave like
F ( s ) | s | s m ,
where 1 < m n and “n” is a number of considered vector mesons in (14).
In detail, the procedure one finds in [38], where first (14) is transformed into a rational function of “s”, creating a common denominator and obtaining the polynomial of (n − 1) degree in the numerator. Afterwards requiring the first (m − 1) coefficients from the highest powers of “s” to be zero, a complicated system of (m − 1) linear homogeneous algebraic equations for coupling constant ratios a j = ( f j h h / f j ) is found, from the solution of which, together with the normalization conditions (9), one could find explicit forms of F 1 s N ( s ) , F 1 v N ( s ) , F 2 s N ( s ) , F 2 v N ( s ) functions.
Nevertheless, there is a way to simplify the latter complicated system of linear homogeneous algebraic equations.
Really, the utilization of the superconvergent sum rules for the imaginary parts of FFs and their approximation by the δ -function one finds a more simple system of (m − 1) linear homogeneous algebraic equations, which is proved in [38] to be equivalent with the previous one.
Finally, their solution together with the normalization of FFs (9) at length given in [39], gives a general form of F 1 s N ( s ) , F 1 v N ( s ) , F 2 s N ( s ) , F 2 v N ( s ) FFs. They are expressed through the masses of considered vector meson resonances, possess the asymptotic behaviors (16) and normalization (9), and are ready for the unitarization.
Such well physically founded U&A model is formulated in the language of the isoscalar F 1 s N ( t ) , F 2 s N ( t ) and isovector F 1 v N ( t ) , F 2 v N ( t ) parts of the proton Dirac and Pauli EM FFs, in which all 9 experimentally confirmed [40], 3 isovector and 6 isoscalar, vector mesons, ρ ( 770 ) , ω ( 782 ) , ϕ ( 1020 ) , ω ( 1420 ) , ρ ( 1450 ) , ω ( 1650 ) , ϕ ( 1680 ) , ρ ( 1700 ) , ϕ ( 2170 ) with quantum numbers of the photon ( 1 ) are taken into account. Then, if their masses and widths are fixed at the values from the PDG Table [40], the U&A model, derived in [36], depends on 12 free parameters numerically evaluated (see Table 1) in a fitting algorithm (least squares utilizing the CERN program MINUIT) of data in Figure 3.
The explicit form of the U&A model is given in Appendix A.
A graphical presentation of the quality of description of data with χ 2 / n d f = 1.74 is demonstrated in Figure 4. It appeared however that using the parameters in Table 1, the U & A model disagrees with the published data on σ t o t ( e + e p p ¯ ) , strongly underestimating it at s > 5 GeV2 (Figure 5). Since the cross section at large s is dominated by the proton magnetic form factor squared, the underestimation is obviously caused by a similar underestimation of this form factor seen in Figure 4.
Therefore the parameter values in Table 1 have been corrected to the values fairly describing the σ t o t ( e + e p p ¯ ) experimental data by a direct fit of them by the cross section to be expressed through G E p ( s ) and G M p ( s ) with starting numerical values of parameters from the Table 1.
As a result one expects that then also the proton “effective” EM FF data through the relation (4) will be more precisely reproduced.
Such task from a mathematical point of view is rigorously unsolvable, however, practically one could realize it, because the form of functions G E p ( s ) and G M p ( s ) is by the U&A model strongly restricted. They represent a well-matched unification of pole contribution of unstable vector mesons with a cut structure in the complex s plane, where the cuts represent the so-called continua contributions generated by the exchange of more than one particle in the corresponding Feynman diagrams. Moreover they ensure that the FFs imaginary parts are nonzero only above the lowest possible branch point on the positive real axis, as it is required by the FFs unitarity conditions.
Besides the analyticity, FFs fulfill the reality condition F * ( s ) = F ( s * ) , which guarantees FFs to be real on the real axis below their the lowest branch point and generate always two complex conjugate poles exclusively on unphysical sheets for each vector meson. All FFs are normalized, possess the asymptotic behavior predicted by the QCD up to the logarithmic corrections and depend on reasonable number of free parameters as given in Table 1.
The corrected values by the procedure discussed above are presented in Table 2 and by means of them a perfect agreement of the calculated σ t o t ( e + e p p ¯ ) with σ t o t ( e + e p p ¯ ) data is achieved, as one can see in Figure 6.
Having the curve of σ t o t ( e + e p p ¯ ) in Figure 6, one calculates a behavior of the proton “effective” EM FF in Figure 7, employing the relation (4), which is in agreement with proton “effective” EM FF data.
Finally, subtraction of the curve in Figure 7, obtained by means of the relation (4), from existing experimental data on the proton “effective” EM FF, indicates in Figure 8 (compare it with Figure 1 and Figure 2) no objective existence of the “proton damped oscillation regular structures”.
To a similar conclusion came also the authors of the paper [41] on the base of results obtained by an application of the timelike nucleon EM FFs constructed within the simple extended vector meson dominance model.

3. Conclusions and Discussion

In this paper an experimental data on the proton EM FFs, as obtained from experiments on the e + e annihilation into proton-antiproton pair, are investigated in more detail. First they have been described by well physically founded Unitary and Analytic model of the electromagnetic structure of hadrons. Then the results are confronted with the data on the corresponding total cross section and a transparent disagreement has been found (see Figure 5). Therefore the same model for the total cross section has been corrected by parameters in Table 2, obtained in a direct fit of experimental total cross section data with errors. The obtained improved agreement of the behavior of σ t o t ( e + e p p ¯ ) with the data (see Figure 6) finally has been used to calculate an improved behavior of the proton “effective” EM FF in Figure 7, which then was subtracted from existing data with errors. The obtained result is presented in Figure 8, which indicates (compare it with Figure 1 and Figure 2) no objective existence of the “proton damped oscillation regular structures”, first revealed in the paper [10]. In our opinion, an explanation of the latter result is probably in a description of the proton “effective” EM FF data by two free parametric formula of [11], which is unable to reproduce the data with the adequate accuracy.

Author Contributions

S.D. and A.-Z.D.: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, writing, supervision, A.L. and L.H.: investigation, validation, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The support of the Slovak Grant Agency for Sciences VEGA, grant No. 2/0084/25 is acknowledged.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Erik Bartoš for valuable discussions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

F 1 s N [ V ( s ) ] = 1 V 2 1 V N 2 4 { 1 2 H ω ( V ) H ϕ ( V ) + [ H ϕ ( V ) H ω ( V ) ( C ϕ 1 s C ω 1 s ) ( C ϕ 1 s C ω 1 s ) + H ω ( V ) H ω ( V ) ( C ω 1 s C ω 1 s ) ( C ω 1 s C ϕ 1 s ) H ω ( V ) H ϕ ( V ) ] ( f ω p p ( 1 s ) / f ω ) + [ H ϕ ( V ) H ϕ ( V ) ( C ϕ 1 s C ϕ 1 s ) ( C ϕ 1 s C ω 1 s ) + H ω ( V ) H ϕ ( V ) ( C ω 1 s C ϕ 1 s ) ( C ω 1 s C ϕ 1 s ) H ω ( V ) H ϕ ( V ) ] ( f ϕ p p ( 1 s ) / f ϕ ) + [ H ϕ ( V ) L ω ( V ) ( C ϕ 1 s C ω 1 s ) ( C ϕ 1 s C ω 1 s ) + H ω ( V ) L ω ( V ) ( C ω 1 s C ω 1 s ) ( C ω 1 s C ϕ 1 s ) H ω ( V ) H ϕ ( V ) ] ( f ω p p ( 1 s ) / f ω ) + [ H ϕ ( V ) L ϕ ( V ) ( C ϕ 1 s C ϕ 1 s ) ( C ϕ 1 s C ω 1 s ) + H ω ( V ) L ϕ ( V ) ( C ω 1 s C ϕ 1 s ) ( C ω 1 s C ϕ 1 s ) H ω ( V ) H ϕ ( V ) ] ( f ϕ p p ( 1 s ) / f ϕ ) }
with 5 free parameters ( f ω p p ( 1 s ) / f ω ) , ( f ϕ p p ( 1 s ) / f ϕ ) , ( f ω p p ( 1 s ) / f ω ) , ( f ϕ p p ( 1 s ) / f ϕ ) , s i n 1 s
F 1 v N [ V ( s ) ] = 1 V 2 1 V N 2 4 { 1 2 L ρ ( V ) L ρ ( V ) + [ L ρ ( V ) L ρ ( V ) ( C ρ 1 v C ρ 1 v ) ( C ρ 1 v C ρ 1 v ) + L ρ ( V ) L ρ ( V ) ( C ρ 1 v C ρ 1 v ) ( C ρ 1 v C ρ 1 v ) L ρ ( V ) L ρ ( V ) ] ( f ρ p p ( 1 v ) / f ρ ) }
with 2 free parameters ( f ρ p p ( 1 v ) / f ρ ) and s i n 1 v ,
F 2 s N [ V ( s ) ] = 1 V 2 1 V N 2 6 { 1 2 ( μ p + μ n 1 ) H ω ( V ) H ϕ ( V ) H ω ( V ) + [ H ϕ ( V ) H ω ( V ) H ϕ ( V ) ( C ϕ 2 s C ϕ 2 s ) ( C ω 2 s C ϕ 2 s ) ( C ϕ 2 s C ω 2 s ) ( C ω 2 s C ω 2 s ) + H ω ( V ) H ω ( V ) H ϕ ( V ) ( C ω 2 s C ϕ 2 s ) ( C ω 2 s C ϕ 2 s ) ( C ω 2 s C ϕ 2 s ) ( C ω 2 s C ϕ 2 s ) + H ω ( V ) H ϕ ( V ) H ϕ ( V ) ( C ω 2 s C ϕ 2 s ) ( C ϕ 2 s C ϕ 2 s ) ( C ω 2 s C ω 2 s ) ( C ϕ 2 s C ω 2 s ) H ω ( V ) H ϕ ( V ) H ω ( V ) ] ( f ϕ p p ( 2 s ) / f ϕ ) + [ H ϕ ( V ) H ω ( V ) L ω ( V ) ( C ϕ 2 s C ω 2 s ) ( C ω 2 s C ω 2 s ) ( C ϕ 2 s C ω 2 s ) ( C ω 2 s C ω 2 s ) + H ω ( V ) H ω ( V ) L ω ( V ) ( C ω 2 s C ω 2 s ) ( C ω 2 s C ω 2 s ) ( C ω 2 s C ϕ 2 s ) ( C ω 2 s C ϕ 2 s ) + + H ω ( V ) H ϕ ( V ) L ω ( V ) ( C ω 2 s C ω 2 s ) ( C ϕ 2 s C ω 2 s ) ( C ω 2 s C ω 2 s ) ( C ϕ 2 s C ω 2 s ) H ω ( V ) H ϕ ( V ) H ω ( V ) ] ( f ω p p ( 2 s ) / f ω ) + [ H ϕ ( V ) H ω ( V ) L ϕ ( V ) ( C ϕ 2 s C ϕ 2 s ) ( C ω 2 s C ϕ 2 s ) ( C ϕ 2 s C ω 2 s ) ( C ω 2 s C ω 2 s ) + H ω ( V ) H ω ( V ) L ϕ ( V ) ( C ω 2 s C ϕ 2 s ) ( C ω 2 s C ϕ 2 s ) ( C ω 2 s C ϕ 2 s ) ( C ω 2 s C ϕ 2 s ) + H ω ( V ) H ϕ ( V ) L ϕ ( V ) ( C ω 2 s C ϕ 2 s ) ( C ϕ 2 s C ϕ 2 s ) ( C ω 2 s C ω 2 s ) ( C ϕ 2 s C ω 2 s ) H ω ( V ) H ϕ ( V ) H ω ( V ) ] ( f ϕ p p ( 2 s ) / f ϕ ) }
with 4 free parameters ( f ϕ p p ( 2 s ) / f ϕ ) , ( f ω p p ( 2 s ) / f ω ) , ( f ϕ p p ( 2 s ) / f ϕ ) , s i n 2 s , and
F 2 v N [ V ( s ) ] = 1 V 2 1 V N 2 6 1 2 ( μ p μ n 1 ) L ρ ( V ) L ρ ( V ) H ρ ( V )
dependent on only 1 free parameter s i n 2 v with
L r ( V ) = ( V N V r ) ( V N V r * ) ( V N 1 / V r ) ( V N 1 / V r * ) ( V V r ) ( V V r * ) ( V 1 / V r ) ( V 1 / V r * ) , C r 1 s = ( V N V r ) ( V N V r * ) ( V N 1 / V r ) ( V N 1 / V r * ) ( V r 1 / V r ) ( V r 1 / V r * ) , r = ω , ϕ
H l ( V ) = ( V N V l ) ( V N V l * ) ( V N + V l ) ( V N + V l * ) ( V V l ) ( V V l * ) ( V + V l ) ( V + V l * ) , C l 1 s = ( V N V l ) ( V N V l * ) ( V N + V l ) ( V N + V l * ) ( V l 1 / V l ) ( V l 1 / V l * ) , l = ω , ϕ , ω , ϕ
L k ( V ) = ( V N V k ) ( V N V k * ) ( V N 1 / V k ) ( V N 1 / V k * ) ( V V k ) ( V V k * ) ( V 1 / V k ) ( V 1 / V k * ) , C k 1 v = ( V N V k ) ( V N V k * ) ( V N 1 / V k ) ( V N 1 / V k * ) ( V k 1 / V k ) ( V k 1 / V k * ) , k = ρ , ρ , ρ
L r ( V ) = ( V N V r ) ( V N V r * ) ( V N 1 / V r ) ( V N 1 / V r * ) ( V V r ) ( V V r * ) ( V 1 / V r ) ( V 1 / V r * ) , C r 2 s = ( V N V r ) ( V N V r * ) ( V N 1 / V r ) ( V N 1 / V r * ) ( V r 1 / V r ) ( V r 1 / V r * ) , r = ω , ϕ
H l ( V ) = ( V N V l ) ( V N V l * ) ( V N + V l ) ( V N + V l * ) ( V V l ) ( V V l * ) ( V + V l ) ( V + V l * ) , C l 2 s = ( V N V l ) ( V N V l * ) ( V N + V l ) ( V N + V l * ) ( V l 1 / V l ) ( V l 1 / V l * ) , l = ω , ϕ , ω , ϕ
L k ( V ) = ( V N V k ) ( V N V k * ) ( V N 1 / V k ) ( V N 1 / V k * ) ( V V k ) ( V V k * ) ( V 1 / V k ) ( V 1 / V k * ) , C k 2 v = ( V N V k ) ( V N V k * ) ( V N 1 / V k ) ( V N 1 / V k * ) ( V k 1 / V k ) ( V k 1 / V k * ) , k = ρ , ρ
H ρ ( V ) = ( V N V ρ ) ( V N V ρ * ) ( V N + V ρ ) ( V N + V ρ * ) ( V V ρ ) ( V V ρ * ) ( V + V ρ ) ( V + V ρ * ) , C ρ 2 v = ( V N V ρ ) ( V N V ρ * ) ( V N + V ρ ) ( V N + V ρ * ) ( V ρ 1 / V ρ ) ( V ρ 1 / V ρ * ) .

References

  1. Ferroli, R.B.; Pacetti, S.; Zallo, A. No Sommerfeld resummation factor in e+e p p ¯ ? Eur. Phys. J. 2012, A48, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lees, J.P.; Poireau, V.; Tisserand, V.; Grauges, E.; Palano, A.; Eigen, G.; Stugu, B.; Brown, D.N.; Kerth, L.T.; Kolomensky, Y.G.; et al. Study of e+e p p ¯ via initial-state radiation at BABAR. Phys. Rev. 2013, D87, 092005. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lees, J.P.; Poireau, V.; Tisserand, V.; Grauges, E.; Palano, A.; Eigen, G.; Stugu, B.; Brown, D.N.; Kerth, L.T.; Kolomensky, Y.G.; et al. Measurement of the e+e p p ¯ cross section in the energy range from 3.0 to 6.5 GeV. Phys. Rev. 2013, D88, 072009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ablikim, M.; Achasov, M.N.; Ai, X.C.; Albayrak, O.; Albrecht, M.; Ambrose, D.J.; Amoroso, A.; An, F.F.; An, Q.; Bai, J.Z.; et al. Measurement of the proton form factor by studying e+e p p ¯ . Phys. Rev. 2015, D91, 112004. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ablikim, M.; Achasov, M.N.; Adlarson, P.; Ahmed, S.; Albrecht, M.; Alekseev, M.; Amoroso, A.; An, F.F.; An, Q.; Bai, Y.; et al. Study of the process e+e p p ¯ via initial state radiation at BESIII. Phys. Rev. 2019, D99, 092002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ablikim, M.; Achasov, M.N.; Adlarson, P.; Ahmed, S.; Albrecht, M.; Alekseev, M.; Amoroso, A.; An, F.F.; An, Q.; Bai, Y.; et al. Measurement of proton electromagnetic form factors in e+e p p ¯ in the energy region 2.00–3.08 GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 124, 042001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ablikim, M.; Achasov, M.N.; Adlarson, P.; Ahmed, S.; Albrecht, M.; Aliberti, R.; Amoroso, A.; An, M.R.; An, Q.; Bai, X.H.; et al. Measurement of proton electromagnetic form factors in the time-like region using initial state radiation at BESIII. Phys. Lett. 2021, B817, 136328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ablikim, M.; Achasov, M.N.; Adlarson, P.; Ahmed, S.; Albrecht, M.; Aliberti, R.; Amoroso, A.; An, M.R.; An, Q.; Bai, X.H.; et al. Oscillating features in the electromagnetic structure of the neutron. Nat. Phys. 2021, 17, 1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dubnickova, A.Z.; Dubnicka, S.; Rekalo, M.P. Investigation of the nucleon electromagnetic structure by polarization effects in e+e → N anti-N processes. Nuovo Cim. 1996, A109, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bianconi, A.; Tomasi-Gustafsson, E. Periodic interference structures in the timelike proton form factor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 114, 232301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tomasi-Gustafsson, E.; Rekalo, M.P. Search for evidence of asymptotic regime of nucleon electromagnetic form-factors from a compared analysis in space- and time-like regions. Phys. Lett. 2001, B504, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bardin, G.; Burgun, G.; Calabrese, R.; Capon, G.; Carlin, R.; Dalpiaz, P.; Dalpiaz, P.F.; Derré, J.; Dosselli, U.; Duclos, J.; et al. Determination of the electric and magnetic form-factors of the proton in the timelike region. Nucl. Phys. 1994, B411, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Antonelli, A.; Baldini, R.; Bertani, M.; Biagini, M.E.; Bidoli, V.; Bini, C.; Bressani, T.; Calabrese, R.; Cardarelli, R.; Carlin, R.; et al. Measurement of the electromagnetic form-factor of the proton in the timelike region. Phys. Lett. B 1994, 334, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Delcourt, B.; Derado, I.; Bertrand, J.L.; Bisello, D.; Bizot, J.C.; Buon, J.; Cordier, A.; Eschstruth, P.; Fayard, L.; Jeanjean, J.; et al. Study of the Reaction e+e p p ¯ in the Total Energy Range 1925-MeV–2180-MeV. Phys. Lett. B 1979, 86, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bassompierre, G.; Schneegans, M.A.; Binder, G.; Gissinger, G.; Jacquey, S.; Dalpiaz, P.; Dalpiaz, P.F.; Peroni, C.; Tecchio, L. Electron positron pair production in anti-p p annihilation at rest and related determination of the electromagnetic form-factor of the proton in the timelike region. Nuovo Cim. A 1983, 73, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bisello, D.; Limentani, S.; Nigro, M.; Pescara, L.; Posocco, M.; Sartori, P.; Augustin, J.E.; Busetto, G.; Cosme, G.; Couchot, F.; et al. A Measurement of e+e p p ¯ for 1975-MeV ≤ s ≤ 2250-MeV. Nucl. Phys. B 1983, 224, 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Armstrong, T.A.; Bettoni, D.; Bharadwaj, V.; Biino, C.; Borreani, G.; Broemmelsiek, D.; Buzzo, A.; Calabrese, R.; Ceccucci, A.; Cester, R.; et al. Measurement of the proton electromagnetic form-factors in the timelike region at 8.9 − GeV2 − − 13 − GeV2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993, 70, 1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ambrogiani, M.; Bagnasco, S.; Baldini, W.; Bettoni, D.; Borreani, G.; Buzzo, A.; Calabrese, R.; Cester, R.; Dalpiaz, P.; Fan, X.; et al. Measurements of the magnetic form-factor of the proton in the timelike region at large momentum transfer. Phys. Rev. D 1999, 60, 032002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ablikim, M.; Bai, J.Z.; Ban, Y.; Bian, J.G.; Cai, X.; Chen, H.F.; Chen, H.S.; Chen, H.X.; Chen, J.C.; Chen, J.; et al. Measurement of the cross section for e+e → p anti-p at center-of-mass energies from 2.0-GeV to 3.07-GeV. Phys. Lett. B 2005, 630, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  20. Jones, M.K.; Aniol, K.A.; Baker, F.T.; Berthot, J.; Bertin, P.Y.; Bertozzi, W.; Besson, A.; Bimbot, L.; Boeglin, W.U.; Brash, E.J.; et al. GEp/GMp ratio by polarization transfer in e pe p . Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 84, 1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gayou, O.; Aniol, K.A.; Averett, T.; Benmokhtar, F.; Bertozzi, W.; Bimbot, L.; Brash, E.J.; Calarco, J.R.; Cavata, C.; Chai, Z.; et al. Measurement of G(Ep) / G(Mp) in polarized-e p → e polarized-p to Q**2 = 5.6-GeV**2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 88, 092301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Punjabi, V.; Perdrisat, C.F.; Aniol, K.A.; Baker, F.T.; Berthot, J.; Bertin, P.Y.; Bertozzi, W.; Besson, A.; Bimbot, L.; Boeglin, W.U.; et al. Proton elastic form-factor ratios to Q**2 = 3.5-GeV**2 by polarization transfer. Phys. Rev. C 2005, 71, 055202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhan, X.; Allada, K.; Armstrong, D.S.; Arrington, J.; Bertozzi, W.; Boeglin, W.; Chen, J.-P.; Chirapatpimol, K.; Choi, S.; Chudakov, E.; et al. High-Precision Measurement of the Proton Elastic Form Factor Ratio μpGE/GM at low Q2. Phys. Lett. B 2011, 705, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Puckett, A.J.R.; Brash, E.J.; Gayou, O.; Jones, M.K.; Pentchev, L.; Perdrisat, C.F.; Punjabi, V.; Aniol, K.A.; Averett, T.; Benmokhtar, F.; et al. Final Analysis of Proton Form Factor Ratio Data at Q2 = 4.0, 4.8 and 5.6 GeV2. Phys. Rev. C 2012, 85, 045203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Puckett, A.J.R.; Brash, E.J.; Jones, M.K.; Luo, W.; Meziane, M.; Pentchev, L.; Perdrisat, C.F.; Punjabi, V.; Wesselmann, F.R.; Afanasev, A.; et al. Polarization Transfer Observables in Elastic Electron Proton Scattering at Q2 = 2.5, 5.2, 6.8, and 8.5 GeV2. Phys. Rev. C 2017, 96, 055203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Akhiezer, A.; Rekalo, M.P. Polarization phenomena in electron scattering by protons in the high energy region. Sov. Phys. Dokl. 1968, 13, 572. [Google Scholar]
  27. Akhiezer, A.; Rekalo, M.P. Polarization effects in the scattering of leptons by hadrons. Sov. J. Part. Nucl. 1974, 4, 277. [Google Scholar]
  28. Janssens, T.; Hofstadter, R.; Hughes, E.B.; Yearian, M.R. Proton form factors from elastic electron-proton scattering. Phys. Rev. 1966, 142, 922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Berger, C.; Burkert, V.; Knop, G.; Langenbeck, B.; Rith, K. Electromagnetic form-factors of the proton at squared four momentum transfers between 10-fm**-2 and 50 fm**-2. Phys. Lett. B 1971, 35, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bartel, W.; Büsser, F.-W.; Dix, W.-R.; Felst, R.; Harms, D.; Krehbiel, H.; Kuhlmann, P.E.; McElroy, J.; Meyer, J.; Weber, G. Measurement of proton and neutron electromagnetic form-factors at squared four momentum transfers up to 3-GeV/c2. Nucl. Phys. B 1973, 58, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Höhler, G.; Pietarinen, E.; Sabba-Stefanescu, I.; Borkowski, F.; Simon, G.G.; Walther, V.H.; Wendling, R.D. Analysis of Electromagnetic Nucleon Form-Factors. Nucl. Phys. B 1976, 114, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sill, A.F.; Arnold, R.G.; Bosted, P.E.; Chang, C.C.; Gomez, J.; Katramatou, A.T.; Martoff, C.J.; Petratos, G.G.; Rahbar, A.A.; Rock, S.E.; et al. Measurements of elastic electron-proton scattering at large momentum transfer. Phys. Rev. D 1993, 48, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Walker, R.C.; Filippone, B.; Jourdan, J.; Milner, R.; McKeown, R.; Potterveld, D.H.; Andivahis, L.; Arnold, R.; Benton, D.; Bosted, P.E.; et al. Measurements of the proton elastic form-factors for 1-GeV/c**2 <= Q**2 <= 3-GeV/C**2 at SLAC. Phys. Rev. D 1994, 49, 5671. [Google Scholar]
  34. Andivahis, L.; Bosted, P.E.; Lung, A.; Stuart, L.M.; Alster, J.; Arnold, R.G.; Chang, C.C.; Dietrich, F.S.; Dodge, W.; Gearhart, R.; et al. Measurements of the electric and magnetic form-factors of the proton from Q**2 = 1.75-GeV/c**2 to 8.83-GeV/c**2. Phys. Rev. D 1994, 50, 5491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Dubnicka, S.; Dubnickova, A.Z. Analyticity in a phenomenology of electro-weak structure of hadrons. Acta Phys. Slovaca 2010, 60, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  36. Dubnickova, A.Z.; Dubnicka, S. Prediction of neutron electromagnetic form factors behaviors just by the proton electromagnetic form factors data. Eur. Phys. J. 2021, A57, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Brodsky, S.J.; Lepage, P.G. Exclusive Processes in Perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics. Phys. Rev. D 1980, 22, 2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Adamuscin, C.; Dubnickova, A.Z.; Dubnicka, S.; Pekarik, R.; Weisenpacher, P. Asymptotic conditions for electromagnetic form-factors of hadrons represented by VMD model. Eur. Phys. J. C 2003, 28, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dubnicka, S.; Dubnickova, A.Z.; Weisenpacher, P. General expressions for VM dominated form factors of hadrons fulfilling asymptotic conditions. Eur. Phys. J. C 2004, 32, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Navas, S.; Amsler, C.; Gutsche, T.; Hanhart, C.; Hernández-Rey, J.J.; Lourenço, C.; Masoni, A.; Mikhasenko, M.; Mitchell, R.E.; Patrignani, C. Review of particle physics. Phys. Rev. 2024, D110, 030001. [Google Scholar]
  41. Yan, B.; Chen, C.; Li, X.; Xie, J.-J. Understanding oscillating features of the timelike nucleon electromagnetic form factors within the extending vector meson dominance model. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2312.04866v2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Result of a subtraction of the best fit of the proton “effective” form factor data by (5) from experimental data [2,3] with errors.
Figure 1. Result of a subtraction of the best fit of the proton “effective” form factor data by (5) from experimental data [2,3] with errors.
Appliedmath 05 00126 g001
Figure 2. Result of a subtraction of the best fit of all the proton “effective” form factor data from data [2,3,4,5,6,7] with errors.
Figure 2. Result of a subtraction of the best fit of all the proton “effective” form factor data from data [2,3,4,5,6,7] with errors.
Appliedmath 05 00126 g002
Figure 3. Existing experimental data on the proton electric and proton magnetic FFs in space-like and time-like regions.
Figure 3. Existing experimental data on the proton electric and proton magnetic FFs in space-like and time-like regions.
Appliedmath 05 00126 g003
Figure 4. Unitary and Analytic model ( U & A ) [36], taking into account contributions of 9 vector mesons and 12 parameters from Table 1, more or less describes the available proton EM FF data.
Figure 4. Unitary and Analytic model ( U & A ) [36], taking into account contributions of 9 vector mesons and 12 parameters from Table 1, more or less describes the available proton EM FF data.
Appliedmath 05 00126 g004
Figure 5. Disagreement of the reproduced σ t o t ( e + e p p ¯ ) behavior by curves of the proton EM FFs in Figure 4 with existing experimental data on it.
Figure 5. Disagreement of the reproduced σ t o t ( e + e p p ¯ ) behavior by curves of the proton EM FFs in Figure 4 with existing experimental data on it.
Appliedmath 05 00126 g005
Figure 6. A perfect agreement with σ t o t ( e + e p p ¯ ) data is achieved by the corrected parameters in Table 2.
Figure 6. A perfect agreement with σ t o t ( e + e p p ¯ ) data is achieved by the corrected parameters in Table 2.
Appliedmath 05 00126 g006
Figure 7. An agreement of the calculated curve of the “effective” proton EM FF with experimental data. It has been obtained by means of the relation (4) utilizing the curve of the total e + e p p ¯ cross section in Figure 6.
Figure 7. An agreement of the calculated curve of the “effective” proton EM FF with experimental data. It has been obtained by means of the relation (4) utilizing the curve of the total e + e p p ¯ cross section in Figure 6.
Appliedmath 05 00126 g007
Figure 8. Result of a subtraction of the calculated curve of the proton “effective” EM FF in Figure 7 from proton “effective” EM FF data with errors indicates no damped oscillation regular structures.
Figure 8. Result of a subtraction of the calculated curve of the proton “effective” EM FF in Figure 7 from proton “effective” EM FF data with errors indicates no damped oscillation regular structures.
Appliedmath 05 00126 g008
Table 1. Values of free parameters of the proton EM structure U & A model evaluated in the analysis of the proton EM FFs data with graphic results in Figure 4.
Table 1. Values of free parameters of the proton EM structure U & A model evaluated in the analysis of the proton EM FFs data with graphic results in Figure 4.
List of parameters
χ 2 / n d f = 1.74 ;   s i n 1 s = ( 1.675 ± 0.036 ) GeV 2 ; s i n 1 v = ( 2.968 ± 0.009 ) GeV 2 ;
s i n 2 s = ( 1.859 ± 0.002 ) GeV 2 ; s i n 2 v = ( 2.443 ± 0.021 ) GeV 2 ;
( f ω p p ( 1 s ) / f ω ) = 0.294 ± 0.002 ; ( f ϕ p p ( 1 s ) / f ϕ ) = 0.530 ± 0.003 ;
( f ω p p ( 1 s ) / f ω ) = 0.638 ± 0.003 ; ( f ϕ p p ( 1 s ) / f ϕ ) = 0.027 ± 0.001 ;
( f ϕ p p ( 2 s ) / f ϕ ) = 0.308 ± 0.016 ; ( f ω p p ( 2 s ) / f ω ) = 0.168 ± 0.038 ;
( f ϕ p p ( 2 s ) / f ϕ ) = 0.123 ± 0.004 ; ( f ρ p p ( 1 v ) / f ρ ) = 0.080 ± 0.001 .
Table 2. Corrected values of free parameters in Table 1 by a direct description of the data on σ t o t ( e + e p p ¯ ) in Figure 5.
Table 2. Corrected values of free parameters in Table 1 by a direct description of the data on σ t o t ( e + e p p ¯ ) in Figure 5.
List of parameters
χ 2 / n d f = 1.85 ;   s i n 1 s = ( 1.428 ± 0.020 ) GeV 2 ; s i n 1 v = ( 2.924 ± 0.078 ) GeV 2 ;
s i n 2 s = ( 1.830 ± 0.176 ) GeV 2 ; s i n 2 v = ( 2.687 ± 0.078 ) GeV 2 ;
( f ω p p ( 1 s ) / f ω ) = 0.031 ± 0.008 ; ( f ϕ p p ( 1 s ) / f ϕ ) = 0.642 ± 0.006 ;
( f ω p p ( 1 s ) / f ω ) = 0.997 ± 0.003 ; ( f ϕ p p ( 1 s ) / f ϕ ) = 0.032 ± 0.001 ;
( f ϕ p p ( 2 s ) / f ϕ ) = 0.785 ± 0.018 ; ( f ω p p ( 2 s ) / f ω ) = 0.497 ± 0.184 ;
( f ϕ p p ( 2 s ) / f ϕ ) = 0.149 ± 0.002 ; ( f ρ p p ( 1 v ) / f ρ ) = 0.185 ± 0.004 .
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dubnička, S.; Dubničková, A.-Z.; Holka, L.; Liptaj, A. New Insight on Damped Oscillating Regular Structures from “Effective” Proton Electromagnetic Form Factor Data. AppliedMath 2025, 5, 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/appliedmath5030126

AMA Style

Dubnička S, Dubničková A-Z, Holka L, Liptaj A. New Insight on Damped Oscillating Regular Structures from “Effective” Proton Electromagnetic Form Factor Data. AppliedMath. 2025; 5(3):126. https://doi.org/10.3390/appliedmath5030126

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dubnička, Stanislav, Anna-Zuzana Dubničková, Lukáš Holka, and Andrej Liptaj. 2025. "New Insight on Damped Oscillating Regular Structures from “Effective” Proton Electromagnetic Form Factor Data" AppliedMath 5, no. 3: 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/appliedmath5030126

APA Style

Dubnička, S., Dubničková, A.-Z., Holka, L., & Liptaj, A. (2025). New Insight on Damped Oscillating Regular Structures from “Effective” Proton Electromagnetic Form Factor Data. AppliedMath, 5(3), 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/appliedmath5030126

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop