Growth and Productivity of Micractinium inermum with Increased Inorganic Carbon Delivery Under Ammonium Nutrition Conditions
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Alga Isolation and Identification
2.2. Cultivation in a Photobioreactor
2.3. Experimental Conditions
2.4. Assessment of Algal Growth
2.5. Analysis of Biochemical Composition of Algal Cells
2.6. Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Phylogenetic Analysis of M. inermum EE-M2
3.2. Cultivation of M. inermum Under Batch Conditions

| Treatment | Maximum Chlorophylls, mg L−1 | Maximum Carotenoids, mg L−1 | Final Pigments, % DW |
|---|---|---|---|
| TR 1_1 | 71.1 ± 2.62 a | 12.2 ± 0.45 a | 2.32 ± 0.16 a,b |
| TR 1_2 | 66.2 ± 3.46 a | 7.6 ± 0.40 c | 1.81 ± 0.10 c,d |
| TR 1_3 | 66.4 ± 3.97 a | 8.9 ± 0.53 b,c | 1.80 ± 0.13 c,d |
| TR 1_4 | 64.8 ± 3.09 a | 9.0 ± 0.43 b | 1.78 ± 0.07 d |
| TR 2_1 | 70.1 ± 3.12 a | 11.3 ± 0.50 a | 2.03 ± 0.13 a,b,c,d |
| TR 2_2 | 67.4 ± 3.83 a | 12.1 ± 0.69 a | 1.97 ±0.14 b,c,d |
| TR 2_3 | 63.6 ± 2.75 a | 9.2 ± 0.40 b | 1.78 ± 0.10 d |
| TR 2_4 | 65.2 ± 3.34 a | 8.2 ± 0.42 b,c | 1.83 ± 0.15 c,d |
| TR 3_1 | 69.8 ± 2.14 a | 8.6 ± 0.26 b,c | 2.38 ± 0.12 a |
| TR 3_2 | 71.7 ± 4.02 a | 9.0 ± 0.50 b | 2.14 ± 0.18 a,b,c,d |
| TR 3_3 | 68.4 ± 4.23 a | 7.9 ± 0.49 b,c | 2.19 ± 0.14 a,b,c |
3.3. Cultivation of M. inermum Under Continuous Conditions
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| AFDW | ash-free dry weight |
| BBM | Bold’s basal medium |
| DW | final dry weight |
| DIC | dissolved inorganic carbon |
| HRT | hydraulic retention time |
| OD750nm | optical density measured at 750 nm |
| PBR | photobioreactor |
References
- Pekkoh, J.; Ruangrit, K.; Aurepatipan, N.; Duangjana, K.; Sensupa, S.; Pumas, C.; Chaichana, C.; Pathomaree, W.; Kato, Y.; Srinuanpan, S. CO2 to green fuel converter: Photoautotrophic-cultivation of microalgae and its lipids conversion to biodiesel. Renew. Energy 2024, 222, 119919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nashath, F.Z.; Ng, Y.J.; Khoo, K.S.; Show, P.L. Current contributions of microalgae in global biofuel production; cultivation techniques, biofuel varieties and promising industrial ventures. Biomass Bioenergy 2025, 201, 108092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaudry, S.; Hurtado-McCormick, V.; Cheng, K.Y.; Willis, A.; Speight, R.; Kaksonen, A.H. Microalgae to bioplastics—Routes and challenges. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2025, 25, 100922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.; Cazzaniga, S.; Jang, J.; Pivato, M.; Kim, G.; Ballottari, M.; Jin, E. Photoautotrophic cultivation of a Chlamydomonas reinhardtii mutant with zeaxanthin as the sole xanthophyll. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2024, 17, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daneshvar, E.; Wicker, R.J.; Show, P.; Bhatnagar, A. Biologically-mediated carbon capture and utilization by microalgae towards sustainable CO2 biofixation and biomass valorization—A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 427, 130884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quiroz, D.; McGowen, J.; Quinn, J. Techno-economic analysis of microalgae cultivation strategies: Batch and semi-continuous approaches. Algal Res. 2025, 90, 104109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esteves, A.F.; Gonçalves, A.L.; Vilar, V.J.P.; Pires, J.C.M. Is it possible to shape the microalgal biomass composition with operational parameters for target compound accumulation? Biotechnol. Adv. 2025, 79, 108493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narayanan, I.; Pandey, S.; Vinayagam, R.; Selvaraj, R.; Varadavenkatesan, T. A recent update on enhancing lipid and carbohydrate accumulation for sustainable biofuel production in microalgal biomass. Discov. Appl. Sci. 2025, 7, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scherholz, M.L.; Curtis, W.R. Achieving pH control in microalgal cultures through fed-batch addition of stoichiometrically balanced growth media. BMC Biotechnol. 2013, 13, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Rosov, T.; Wensel, P.; McGowen, J.; Curtis, W.R. A preliminary implementation of metabolic-based pH control to reduce CO2 usage in outdoor flat-panel photobioreactor cultivation of Nannochloropsis oceanica microalgae. Algal Res. 2016, 18, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Razzak, A.S.; Bahar, K.; Islam, K.M.O.; Haniffa, A.K.; Faruque, M.O.; Hossain, S.M.Z.; Hossain, M.M. Microalgae cultivation in photobioreactors: Sustainable solutions for a greener future. Green Chem. Eng. 2024, 5, 418–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanachi, P.; Aghababaie, A.; Noroozi, M. Effects of temperature and pH on biochemicals content of microalgae Monoraphidium sp. Iran. J. Med. Aromat. Plants Res. 2021, 37, 290–299. [Google Scholar]
- Ziganshina, E.E.; Bulynina, S.S.; Ziganshin, A.M. Comparison of the photoautotrophic growth regimes of Chlorella sorokiniana AM-02 in a photobioreactor for enhanced biomass productivity. Biology 2020, 9, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Singh, S.P.; Singh, P. Effect of temperature and light on the growth of algae species: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 50, 431–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziganshina, E.E.; Bulynina, S.S.; Yureva, K.A.; Ziganshin, A.M. Optimization of photoautotrophic growth regimens of Scenedesmaceae alga: The influence of light conditions and carbon dioxide concentrations. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 12753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alavianghavanini, A.; Shayesteh, H.; Bahri, P.A.; Vadiveloo, A.; Moheimani, N.R. Microalgae cultivation for treating agricultural effluent and producing value-added products. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 912, 169369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gopalakrishnappa, C.; Li, Z.; Kuehn, S. Environmental modulators of algae-bacteria interactions at scale. Cell Syst. 2023, 15, 838–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aditya, L.; Vu, H.P.; Abu Hasan Johir, M.; Mahlia, T.M.I.; Silitonga, A.S.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Q.; Tra, V.-T.; Ngo, H.H.; Nghiem, L.D. Role of culture solution pH in balancing CO2 input and light intensity for maximising microalgae growth rate. Chemosphere 2023, 343, 140255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kassim, M.A.; Adnan, M.F.I.M.; Tan, K.M.; Bakar, M.H.A.; Lalung, J.; Mohamed, M.S. Carbonic anhydrase (CA) activity by Chlorella sp. in immobilised matrix under carbon dioxide rich cultivation condition. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 716, 012015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, H.; Kim, J.; Rhee, C.; Shin, J.; Shin, S.G.; Lee, C. Effects of different pH control strategies on microalgae cultivation and nutrient removal from anaerobic digestion effluent. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Latagan, M.J.D.; Nagarajan, D.; Huang, W.-M.; de Luna, M.D.G.; Chen, J.-H.; Rollon, A.P.; Ng, I.-S.; Lee, D.-J.; Chang, J.-S. Bicarbonate-based microalgal cultivation technologies: Mechanisms, critical strategies, and future perspectives. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 502, 157998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, Y.Y.; Joun, J.M.; Lee, J.; Hong, M.E.; Pham, H.M.; Chang, W.S.; Sim, S.J. Development of large-scale and economic pH control system for outdoor cultivation of microalgae Haematococcus pluvialis using industrial flue gas. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 244, 1235–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alami, A.H.; Alasad, S.; Ali, M.; Alshamsi, M. Investigating algae for CO2 capture and accumulation and simultaneous production of biomass for biodiesel production. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 759, 143529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lohman, E.J.; Gardner, R.D.; Pedersen, T.; Peyton, B.M.; Cooksey, K.E.; Gerlach, R. Optimized inorganic carbon regime for enhanced growth and lipid accumulation in Chlorella vulgaris. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2015, 8, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pancha, I.; Chokshi, K.; Ghosh, T.; Paliwal, C.; Maurya, R.; Mishra, S. Bicarbonate supplementation enhanced biofuel production potential as well as nutritional stress mitigation in the microalgae Scenedesmus sp. CCNM 1077. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 193, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitra, R.; Das Gupta, A.; Kumar, R.R.; Sen, R. A cleaner and smarter way to achieve high microalgal biomass density coupled with facilitated self-flocculation by utilizing bicarbonate as a source of dissolved carbon dioxide. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 391, 136217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, K. Approaches and involved principles to control pH/pCO2 stability in algal cultures. J. Appl. Phycol. 2021, 33, 3497–3505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sathinathan, P.; Parab, H.M.; Yusoff, R.; Ibrahim, S.; Vello, V.; Ngoh, G.C. Photobioreactor design and parameters essential for algal cultivation using industrial wastewater: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2023, 173, 113096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandes, T.; Cordeiro, N. Microalgae as sustainable biofactories to produce high-value lipids: Biodiversity, exploitation, and biotechnological applications. Mar. Drugs. 2021, 19, 573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kandasamy, S.; Zhang, B.; He, Z.; Bhuvanendran, N.; EL-Seesy, A.I.; Wang, Q.; Narayanan, M.; Thangavel, P.; Dar, M.A. Microalgae as a multipotential role in commercial applications: Current scenario and future perspectives. Fuel 2022, 308, 122053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoshina, R.; Fujiwara, Y. Molecular characterization of Chlorella cultures of the National Institute for Environmental Studies culture collection with description of Micractinium inermum sp. nov., Didymogenes sphaerica sp. nov., and Didymogenes soliella sp. nov. (Chlorellaceae, Trebouxiophyceae). Phycol. Res. 2013, 61, 124–132. [Google Scholar]
- Chae, H.; Lim, S.; Kim, H.S.; Choi, H.G.; Kim, J.H. Morphology and phylogenetic relationships of Micractinium (Chlorellaceae, Trebouxiophyceae) taxa, including three new species from Antarctica. Algae 2019, 34, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krivina, E.; Sinetova, M.; Savchenko, T.; Degtyaryov, E.; Tebina, E.; Temraleeva, A. Micractinium lacustre and M. thermotolerans spp. nov. (Trebouxiophyceae, Chlorophyta): Taxonomy, temperature-dependent growth, photosynthetic characteristics and fatty acid composition. Algal Res. 2023, 71, 103042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sushchenko, R.Z.; Nikulin, V.Y.; Bagmet, V.B.; Nikulin, A.Y. Molecular genetic and morphological characteristics of Micractinium thermotolerans and M. inermum (Trebouxiophyceae, Chlorophyta) from pyroclastic deposits of the Kamchatka Peninsula (Russia). Vavilovskii Zhurnal Genet Sel. 2024, 28, 706–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Severo, I.A.; Ordóñez, J.C.; Mariano, A.B.; Vargas, J.V.C. Microalgae Horizons. Fundamentals, Innovations, and Industrial Applications; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, R.T.; Bangert, K.; Wilkinson, S.J.; Gilmour, D.J. Synergistic carbon metabolism in a fast growing mixotrophic freshwater microalgal species Micractinium inermum. Biomass Bioenergy 2015, 82, 73–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, G.-Y.; Yun, Y.-M.; Shin, H.-S.; Han, J.-I. Cultivation of four microalgae species in the effluent of anaerobic digester for biodiesel production. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 224, 738–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banskota, A.H.; Hui, J.P.M.; Jones, A.; McGinn, P.J. Characterization of neutral lipids of the oleaginous alga Micractinum inermum. Molecules 2024, 29, 359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, M.; Wei, H.; Chen, Q.; Wang, X.; Zhou, W.; Liu, J. Exploring an isolate of the oleaginous alga Micractinium inermum for lipid production: Molecular characterization and physiochemical analysis under multiple growth conditions. J. Appl. Phycol. 2019, 31, 1035–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, S.; Kim, J.; Park, Y.; Son, S.; Cho, S.; Kim, C.; Lee, T. Comparison of batch cultivation strategies for cost-effective biomass production of Micractinium inermum NLP-F014 using a blended wastewater medium. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 234, 432–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Germond, A.; Inouhe, M.; Nakajima, T. Effects of acidic conditions on the physiology of a green alga (Micractinium sp.) before and after a 5-year interaction with Tetrahymena thermophila in an experimental microcosm. Eur. J. Phycol. 2014, 49, 526–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, C.; Chen, S.; Ji, Y.; Schwaneberg, U.; Chi, Z. Progress toward a bicarbonate-based microalgae production system. Trends Biotechnol. 2022, 40, 180–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ballesteros, I.; Terán, P.; Guamán-Burneo, C.; González, N.; Cruz, A.; Castillejo, P. DNA barcoding approach to characterize microalgae isolated from freshwater systems in Ecuador. Neotrop. Biodivers. 2021, 7, 170–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Straka, L.; Rittmann, B.E. Light-dependent kinetic model for microalgae experiencing photoacclimation, photodamage, and photodamage repair. Algal Res. 2018, 31, 232–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziganshina, E.E.; Bulynina, S.S.; Yureva, K.A.; Ziganshin, A.M. Growth parameters of various green microalgae species in effluent from biogas reactors: The importance of effluent concentration. Plants 2022, 11, 3583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bulynina, S.S.; Ziganshina, E.E.; Ziganshin, A.M. Growth efficiency of Chlorella sorokiniana in synthetic media and unsterilized domestic wastewater. BioTech 2023, 12, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ziganshina, E.E.; Ziganshin, A.M. Influence of nutrient medium composition on the redistribution of valuable metabolites in the freshwater green alga Tetradesmus obliquus (Chlorophyta) under photoautotrophic growth conditions. BioTech 2025, 14, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le Gouic, B.; Marec, H.; Pruvost, J.; Cornet, J.F. Investigation of growth limitation by CO2 mass transfer and inorganic carbon source for the microalga Chlorella vulgaris in a dedicated photobioreactor. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2021, 233, 116388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Griffiths, M.J.; Garcin, C.; van Hille, R.P.; Harrison, S.T. Interference by pigment in the estimation of microalgal biomass concentration by optical density. J. Microbiol. Methods 2011, 85, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziganshina, E.E.; Yureva, K.A.; Ziganshin, A.M. Poultry slaughterhouse wastewater treatment by green algae: An eco-friendly restorative process. Environments 2025, 12, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ughetti, A.; Roncaglia, F.; Anderlini, B.; D’Eusanio, V.; Russo, A.L.; Forti, L. Integrated carbonate-based CO2 capture—biofixation through cyanobacteria. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 10779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, C.; Zhang, R.; Cheng, L.; Chi, Z. A recycling culture of Neochloris oleoabundans in a bicarbonate-based integrated carbon capture and algae production system with harvesting by auto-flocculation. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2018, 11, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elisabeth, B.; Rayen, F.; Behnam, T. Microalgae culture quality indicators: A review. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2021, 41, 457–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gaysina, L.A. Influence of pH on the morphology and cell volume of microscopic algae, widely distributed in terrestrial ecosystems. Plants 2024, 13, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, Y.; He, Y.; Zhao, T.; Zhao, Y.; Yu, Z.; Pei, H. Enhanced production of microalgal metabolites through aeration coupled with stirring. Sustainability 2024, 16, 9001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bautista-Monroy, S.S.; Chávez-Urbiola, E.A.; Ortega-Palacios, R.; González-Sánchez, A.; Gómez-Aldapa, C.A.; Rodríguez-Nava, O.; Salgado-Ramírez, J.C.; Cadena-Ramírez, A. Insights of raceway bioreactor scale-up: Effect of agitation on microalgae culture and reduction of the liquid medium speed. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, S.; Shao, C.; Zhu, F.; Schagerl, M.; Hu, X.; Sobhi, M.; Xu, L.; Qian, J.; Huo, S. Optimization and synergistic enhancement of microalgae productivity in laboratory raceway ponds via co-regulation of automated light-supplemented mixers and electric field system. Biotechnol. Biofuels Bioprod. 2025, 18, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ran, W.; Wang, H.; Liu, Y.; Qi, M.; Xiang, Q.; Yao, C.; Zhang, Y.; Lan, X. Storage of starch and lipids in microalgae: Biosynthesis and manipulation by nutrients. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 291, 121894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Li, C.; Lan, C.Q.; Liao, D. Effects of sodium bicarbonate on cell growth, lipid accumulation, and morphology of Chlorella vulgaris. Microb. Cell Fact. 2018, 17, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- White, D.A.; Pagarette, A.; Rooks, P.; Ali, S.T. The effect of sodium bicarbonate supplementation on growth and biochemical composition of marine microalgae cultures. J. Appl. Phycol. 2013, 25, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Umetani, I.; Janka, E.; Sposób, M.; Hulatt, C.J.; Kleiven, S.; Bakke, R. Bicarbonate for microalgae cultivation: A case study in a chlorophyte, Tetradesmus wisconsinensis isolated from a Norwegian lake. J. Appl. Phycol. 2021, 33, 1341–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ratomski, P.; Hawrot-Paw, M.; Koniuszy, A. Utilisation of CO2 from sodium bicarbonate to produce Chlorella vulgaris biomass in tubular photobioreactors for biofuel purposes. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukherjee, S.; Sen, R.; Ralph, P.G.; Poddar, N. The catalytic role of carbonic anhydrase in optimizing carbon fixation in microalgal cultures. J. Clean. Prod. 2025, 505, 145461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.; Lee, J.-Y.; Lu, T. Effects of dissolved inorganic carbon and mixing on autotrophic growth of Chlorella vulgaris. Biochem. Eng. J. 2014, 82, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López-Hernández, J.F.; García-Alamilla, P.; Palma-Ramírez, D.; Álvarez-González, C.A.; Paredes-Rojas, J.C.; Márquez-Rocha, F.J. Continuous microalgal cultivation for antioxidants production. Molecules 2020, 25, 4171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Paepe, J.; Gragera, G.D.; Jimenez, A.C.; Rabaey, K.; Vlaeminck, S.E.; Gòdia, F. Continuous cultivation of microalgae yields high nutrient recovery from nitrified urine with limited supplementation. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 345, 118500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vezzosi Zoto, G.F.; Sacks, N.A.; Urbani, M.A.; Zapata, L.M. Semi-continuous microalgae cultivation on dairy wastewater considering low dilution rates: Insights about cultivation stability and contaminant removal. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2026, 28, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tuantet, K.; Temmink, H.; Zeeman, G.; Janssen, M.; Wijffels, R.H.; Buisman, C.J.N. Nutrient removal and microalgal biomass production on urine in a short light-path photobioreactor. Water Res. 2014, 55, 162–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nur, M.M.A.; Buma, A.G.J. Opportunities and challenges of microalgal cultivation on wastewater. Waste Biomass Valorization 2019, 10, 2079–2097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, S.; Liu, F.; Zhu, S.; Xu, Z.; Qin, L.; Feng, P.; Wang, Z.; Chen, H.; Guo, W.; Hao Ngo, H. Role of hydraulic retention time in integration of microalgae and activated sludge process for nutrient recycle from diluted dairy liquid digestate. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 484, 149538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziganshina, E.; Bulynina, S.; Ziganshin, A. Semi-continuous cultivation of indigenous Chlorella sorokiniana for biomass and pigment production. E3S Web Conf. 2023, 431, 01021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agbebi, T.V.; Ojo, E.O.; Watson, I.A. Towards optimal inorganic carbon delivery to microalgae culture. Algal Res. 2022, 67, 102841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chauhan, D.S.; Sahoo, L.; Mohanty, K. Acclimation-driven microalgal cultivation improved temperature and light stress tolerance, CO2 sequestration and metabolite regulation for bioenergy production. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 385, 129386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, G.-Y.; Heo, J.; Kim, K.; Chung, J.; Han, J.-I. Electrochemical pH control and carbon supply for microalgae cultivation. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 426, 131796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]





| Treatment | pH of Medium | pH Control Agent | Continuous Supply of CO2, % | Stirring, rpm | Cultivation Regimen |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st group of experiments | |||||
| TR 1_1 | 6.0 | 2 M NaOH | 2.0 | 120 | Batch |
| TR 1_2 | 7.0 | 120 | |||
| TR 1_3 | 8.0 | 120 | |||
| TR 1_4 | 7.0 | 240 | |||
| 2nd group of experiments | |||||
| TR 2_1 | 6.0 | 1 M NaHCO3 | 2.0 | 120 | Batch |
| TR 2_2 | 7.0 | ||||
| TR 2_3 | 7.7 | ||||
| TR 2_4 | from 6.0 to 7.7 | ||||
| 3rd group of experiments | |||||
| TR 3_1 | 7.0 | 2 M NaOH | 0.5 | 120 | Batch |
| TR 3_2 | 7.0 | 1 M NaHCO3 | |||
| TR 3_3 | from 7.0 to 8.15 | 1 M NaHCO3 | |||
| 4th group of experiments | |||||
| HRT_10 | 7.0 | 2 M NaOH | 2.0 | 120 | Continuous |
| HRT_9 | |||||
| HRT_8 | |||||
| HRT_7 | |||||
| HRT_6 a | |||||
| HRT_6 b | 1 M NaHCO3 | ||||
| Treatment | Final Cell Concentration, ×106 Cells mL−1 | DW, g L−1 | Biomass Productivity, g L−1 day−1 | AFDW, g L−1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TR 1_1 | 451 ± 17.7 a | 3.79 ± 0.13 b,c | 0.54 ± 0.02 b,c | 3.56 ± 0.12 b,c |
| TR 1_2 | 446 ± 23.3 a | 3.82 ± 0.08 b | 0.55 ± 0.01 b,c | 3.57 ± 0.07 b |
| TR 1_3 | 457 ± 28.3 a | 3.81 ± 0.10 b,c | 0.54 ± 0.01 b,c | 3.53 ± 0.09 b,c |
| TR 1_4 | 496 ± 16.3 a | 4.14 ± 0.08 a | 0.59 ± 0.01 a | 3.88 ± 0.07 a |
| TR 2_1 | 471 ± 18.4 a | 4.01 ± 0.09 a,b | 0.57 ± 0.01 a,b | 3.76 ± 0.08 a,b |
| TR 2_2 | 479 ± 20.5 a | 4.03 ± 0.11 a,b | 0.57 ± 0.02 a,b | 3.79 ± 0.12 a,b |
| TR 2_3 | 489 ± 12.7 a | 3.98 ± 0.07 a,b | 0.57 ± 0.01 a,b | 3.72 ± 0.08 a,b |
| TR 2_4 | 482 ± 11.3 a | 4.00 ± 0.15 a,b | 0.57 ± 0.02 a,b | 3.75 ± 0.14 a,b |
| TR 3_1 | 431 ± 17.0 a | 3.42 ± 0.08 d | 0.49 ± 0.01 d | 3.20 ± 0.11 d |
| TR 3_2 | 436 ± 19.8 a | 3.50 ± 0.11 c,d | 0.50 ± 0.02 c,d | 3.28 ± 0.09 c,d |
| TR 3_3 | 427 ± 26.9 a | 3.44 ± 0.10 d | 0.49 ± 0.02 d | 3.21 ± 0.09 d |
| pH Control Agent | Maintained pH During Cultivation | Exit CO2, % | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Start-Up Stage * (No Algal Cells) | pH Adjustment Stage (No Algal Cells) | Inoculation Stage | |||
| After 10 min | After 30 min | ||||
| NaOH | 6.0 | 2.01 ± 0.03 | 2.00 ± 0.03 | 1.99 ± 0.03 | 2.00 ± 0.02 |
| 7.0 | 2.01 ± 0.02 | 1.69 ± 0.02 | 1.80 ± 0.03 | 1.97 ± 0.02 | |
| 8.0 | 1.99 ± 0.03 | 1.56 ± 0.03 | 1.61 ± 0.02 | 1.95 ± 0.02 | |
| NaHCO3 | 6.0 | 2.00 ± 0.01 | 2.01 ± 0.03 | 2.02 ± 0.02 | 2.02 ± 0.03 |
| 7.0 | 2.02 ± 0.02 | 2.17 ± 0.03 | 2.09 ± 0.02 | 2.03 ± 0.01 | |
| 7.7 | 2.01 ± 0.02 | 2.25 ± 0.02 | 2.22 ± 0.03 | 2.06 ± 0.02 | |
| Treatment | Dry Weight, g L −1 | Chlorophyll a (mg L−1) | Chlorophyll b (mg L−1) | Total Carotenoids (mg L−1) | HRT, Day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HRT_10 | 3.36 ± 0.14 a | 41.66 ± 1.98 a | 27.47 ± 1.35 a | 12.80 ± 1.80 a | 10 |
| HRT_9 | 3.43 ± 0.12 a | 42.19 ± 3.09 a | 26.58 ± 2.33 a | 12.96 ± 1.50 a | 9 |
| HRT_8 | 3.30 ± 0.15 a | 43.92 ± 3.71 a | 27.16 ± 2.01 a | 13.04 ± 1.55 a | 8 |
| HRT_7 | 2.99 ± 0.14 b | 38.78 ± 4.85 a | 25.02 ± 2.74 a | 10.82 ± 2.16 a,b | 7 |
| HRT_6 a | 2.86 ± 0.11 b | 37.09 ± 1.95 a | 24.73 ± 1.72 a | 7.98 ± 0.92 b | 6 |
| HRT_6 b | 2.74 ± 0.13 b | 38.34 ± 2.17 a | 26.08 ± 2.49 a | 8.95 ± 1.53 a,b | 6 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Ziganshina, E.E.; Ziganshin, A.M. Growth and Productivity of Micractinium inermum with Increased Inorganic Carbon Delivery Under Ammonium Nutrition Conditions. Phycology 2026, 6, 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/phycology6010026
Ziganshina EE, Ziganshin AM. Growth and Productivity of Micractinium inermum with Increased Inorganic Carbon Delivery Under Ammonium Nutrition Conditions. Phycology. 2026; 6(1):26. https://doi.org/10.3390/phycology6010026
Chicago/Turabian StyleZiganshina, Elvira E., and Ayrat M. Ziganshin. 2026. "Growth and Productivity of Micractinium inermum with Increased Inorganic Carbon Delivery Under Ammonium Nutrition Conditions" Phycology 6, no. 1: 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/phycology6010026
APA StyleZiganshina, E. E., & Ziganshin, A. M. (2026). Growth and Productivity of Micractinium inermum with Increased Inorganic Carbon Delivery Under Ammonium Nutrition Conditions. Phycology, 6(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/phycology6010026
