Previous Article in Journal
Nonlinear Responses and Population-Level Coupling of Growth and MC-LR Production in Microcystis aeruginosa Under Multifactorial Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Photon Fluence Rate and Temperature Effects on Temperate Atlantic Kelp Species

by
Tomás F. Pinheiro
,
Silvia Chemello
,
Isabel Sousa-Pinto
and
Tânia R. Pereira
*
Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research (CIIMAR), University of Porto, Novo Edifício do Terminal de Cruzeiros do Porto de Leixões, Avenida General Norton de Matos, S/N, 4450-208 Matosinhos, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Phycology 2025, 5(2), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/phycology5020027
Submission received: 14 April 2025 / Revised: 13 June 2025 / Accepted: 16 June 2025 / Published: 19 June 2025

Abstract

:
The Portuguese coast forms a key biogeographic transition zone where co-occurring kelp species show limited vertical overlap. This study aimed to understand whether temperature and light responses help explain the vertical niche differentiation of Laminaria ochroleuca, Saccorhiza polyschides, and Phyllariopsis brevipes. Results revealed that P. brevipes, despite occupying the southernmost range, showed a low thermal tolerance: 27 °C significantly increased respiration rates, indicating metabolic stress, and exposition at 30 °C caused physiological stress. In contrast, L. ochroleuca and S. polyschides exhibited a greater thermal resilience but displayed high light requirements, with evident stress at 30 °C. These results suggest that light availability may play a key role in shaping vertical zonation in a climate warming scenario, with species adapted to low light occupying deeper subtidal zones. S. polyschides, a high light-requiring species, dominates the shallow subtidal region, while L. ochroleuca, also high light-requiring and temperature-tolerant, is abundant in both intertidal pools and shallow subtidal habitats. These findings raise new hypotheses regarding future distribution patterns under climate change: while L. ochroleuca may continue expanding polewards and potentially replace other Laminaria spp. at shallow depths, low-light-adapted, cold-water species may retain a competitive advantage in deeper zones.

1. Introduction

Kelp species (i.e., brown macroalgae belonging to the order Laminariales) are widespread and present along over one-third of the world’s coastlines [1,2]. Several environmental factors can affect the ability of kelp species to populate a given area: substrate availability is essential; nutrient availability, nitrate shortages in particular, may cause the individuals to deteriorate; a strong water motion may cause individuals to break; sedimentation may cause the burial of the microscopic stages, impairing recruitment; and salinity is a limiting factor [3]. Furthermore, the temperature and photon fluence rate are the primary drivers, with a particularly important influence on the kelp vertical distribution [4]. Species living in the intertidal and the high subtidal are exposed to wider oscillations of environmental conditions, and their ability to cope with them is essential not only for survival but also for reproduction, ensuring population persistence [5]. At local scales, photon fluence rate may also limit the maximum depth macroalgae species may inhabit, and in shallower areas, the combined effects of high temperature and photon fluence rate can further restrict the available habitat [6,7,8]. Biotic factors, such as grazing and interspecific competition, can also limit species establishment and impact their vertical distribution [9].
Several kelp species inhabit the Atlantic Iberian shore, a contact zone for colder adapted species (e.g., Saccharina latissima) and temperate species, such as Saccorhiza polyschides and Laminaria ochroleuca, and warm-temperate species, such as Phyllariopsis brevipes. L. ochroleuca, S. polyschides, and P. brevipes can be found as south as the Moroccan coast. However, L. ochroleuca extends northward to the southern coast of the United Kingdom and the west coast of Ireland, where it reaches its leading edge [10]. S. polyschides can be found as far north as the Northern Norwegian Coast, while P. brevipes’ northern limit is the Southern Bay of Biscay [11,12].
In Atlantic Iberian shores, the three different temperate kelp species occupy different depths, with a similar optimum temperature, close to 15 °C, and can grow at up to 25 °C [13,14,15,16]. While L. ochroleuca dominates the higher subtidal and intertidal pools, being able to thrive and reproduce in these conditions, S. polyschides dominate the high subtidal and, although the species can recruit up to intertidal pools, individuals remain small and are unable to reach maturity. On the other hand, P. brevipes is restricted to subtidal areas [17]. To investigate whether these vertical distribution patterns are driven by physiological differences, we measured physiological performances under varying temperature conditions and increasing photon fluence rates, simulating the high photon fluence rate and thermal stress characteristic of shallower depths.
Understanding how the population structure varies across environmental gradients provides essential baseline data to anticipate climate-driven shifts in the species distribution. This is particularly relevant as changes in metabolic costs across temperature gradients may constrain the vertical distribution, limiting the capacity of populations to persist or expand, even when substrate is available and reproduction is successful. As such, this study aimed to determine how light and temperature interactions may affect the ability of different co-occurring kelp species (L. ochroleuca, S. polyschides, and P. brevipes) to inhabit different depths and how these factors may drive shifts in their vertical and horizontal distributions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Biological Material

Juveniles of L. ochroleuca, S. polyschides, and P. brevipes with between 15 and 20 cm of blade length were collected in the northern Portuguese coast, in Amorosa (41°38′28.15″ N, 8°49′21.90″ W, Figure 1), during summer. After collection, individuals were acclimated for one week at 15 °C, the optimum temperature for these species, in a 16 h:8 h light/dark photoperiod with 100 µmol m−2 s−1 photon fluence rate.

2.2. Photosynthesis and Respiration

In summer, nearshore waters in this region typically range from 14 to 15 °C but can sporadically reach 25 °C in shallow stratified waters and can go as high as 30 °C at the blade surface when close to the waterline [18]. The control temperature (15 °C) was selected to match environmental conditions commonly experienced by the species in their natural habitats. In this experiment, incubations were performed at the control (15 °C) and two higher temperatures (27 °C and 30 °C). Along the Northern Portuguese coast, typical intertidal pools occupied by kelp are isolated from the sea for 2–3 h during spring tide’s low tide (author’s personal observation).
Incubations lasted 2.5 h, mimicking the duration of a rapid heat shock during the stratification of seawater in shallow depths or tide pools. For each constant temperature, individuals were exposed to 30 min under dark conditions and 20 min at each increasing photon fluence rate: 15, 45, 70, 90, 110, and 300 µmol photons m−2 s−1. The incubation unit was illuminated with 400 W Biolux Halogen Osram® bulbs (BioluxHalgen-Osram®, MidView City, Singapore). Oxygen variation was measured every 30 secs with multiple HQ40D (Hach Lange®, Ames, IA, USA) oxygen probes (one per beaker). Beakers were filled with filtered seawater (1 µm filter), and water circulation was provided by an aquarium pump. As P. brevipes was more negatively impacted by higher temperatures than expected, an extra incubation was added at 24 °C, to narrow down its temperature higher limit.
To assess photosynthesis and respiration, whole juvenile algae were placed in independent 1.5 L chambers to allow independent measurements. Four replicates per temperature per species were used. After the incubation, individuals were dried at 60 °C for 48 h. Oxygen concentration variation was corrected for algae dry mass (DM) and water volume so that all functional responses are expressed in mg (O2) g−1 (DM) h−1.
Maximum respiration (Rmax) was measured as oxygen variation in dark conditions. Net Primary Production (NPP) was assessed by determining the slope of a linear regression of photon fluence rate versus oxygen concentration. Photon fluence rate at which maximum production was reached (Lmax) was also used to compare the response to different temperatures.
The maximum quantum yield of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) was measured for all individuals before and after the incubation to assess how light and temperature affected the efficiency of photosystem II as a rapid indicator of physiological stress. Fv/Fm response to different temperatures was normalized by dividing each measurement by the initial value to facilitate comparisons.
Untransformed data were analyzed with one-way ANOVAs, considering temperature as a factor for each response and each species separately, using SPSS (version 28.0.0.0). Whenever a significant difference between temperatures within a species was found, a Tukey test was performed to verify if differences between each pair of temperatures were significant.

3. Results

3.1. Photosynthesis and Respiration

Respiration of the different species in dark conditions increased significantly with increasing temperature, except for S. polyschides (Table 1, Figure 2). The NPP of the different species varied significantly with temperature (Table 2). For L. ochroleuca, the NPP was higher at temperatures above the control. For S. polyschides, on the other hand, the NPP increased from the control temperature to 27 °C, while at 30 °C it did not differ significantly from the control (Figure 3). For P. brevipes, while smaller increases in temperature (at 24 and 27 °C) did not cause significant variations in NPP, exposure to 30 °C resulted in a significant reduction (Figure 3).
Photon fluence rates used in this experimental setup were not high enough to cause a significant inhibition in oxygen production in any of the kelp species (Figure 4). However, the photon fluence rate needed for photosynthesis to compensate for respiration varied. Both L. ochroleuca and S. polyschides required a higher photon fluence rate with increasing high-temperature exposure. When exposed to 30 °C, however, photosynthesis did not compensate for the oxygen consumption for either species (Figure 4). Likewise, P. brevipes showed low light demand when exposed to lower temperatures (at 15 and 24 °C). Its photosynthetic performance when exposed to 27 and 30 °C, however, was lower than for the other species, with oxygen consumption largely exceeding its production (Figure 4). The photon fluence rate at which the maximum production was attained (Lmax) varied for L. ochroleuca and P. brevipes but not for S. polyschides (Table 3).
For both L. ochroleuca and P. brevipes, the Lmax did not vary significantly for temperatures up to 27 °C but significantly decreased when exposed to 30 °C (Figure 5).

3.2. Chlorophyll Fluorescence

For all species, the Fv/Fm varied significantly with temperature (Table 4). Pairwise comparisons for temperatures within each species revealed that for all species, the exposure to 27 °C did not vary significantly from the exposure to the control, while the exposure to 30 °C caused a significant decrease in the Fv/Fm (Figure 6). Still, the exposure to 30 °C caused significant damage to P. brevipes.

4. Discussion

Laminaria ochroleuca has been previously reported to be able to survive only at temperatures below 22 °C while under a photon fluence rate of 60–80 µmol photons m−2 s−1 [19]. However, in accordance with previous studies, our results showed that this species was able to cope with a short exposure to 27 °C without being significantly affected [20,21]. At this temperature, the photon fluence rates used (between 15 and 300 µmol m−2 s−1) were not stressful enough to cause either photoinhibition or damage to photosystem II, as indicated by the Fv/Fm results. Furthermore, the increase in respiration accompanied by the temperature increase was compensated by photosynthesis for light exposures above 70 µmol photons m−2 s−1. Discrepancies with earlier studies reporting a suboptimal growth between 20 and 24 °C may be attributed to several factors [8]. First, as the study goals differed, the short heat shock duration used in our study was a major difference in the experimental design. Although this species appears capable of withstanding short-term temperature increases, recent findings indicate that prior exposure to marine heatwaves can reduce its critical thermal maxima (CTmax), highlighting the cumulative physiological cost of repeated thermal stress [22,23]. Second, different source populations of L. ochroleuca were used in different studies, potentially leading to variations in local adaptations. For instance, populations from Portugal have been previously reported to withstand repeated heat shocks at 30 °C, while individuals from northern France did not survive [21]. Consistently, studies suggest that the effects of temperature on development will change with factors including the population of origin [20,24]. Third, light requirements might increase with increasing temperature, potentially leading to reduced survival under low-light conditions. This could occur if the temperature increased abruptly, up to 27 °C, and L. ochroleuca would not be able to occupy deeper areas where light might be limiting. Such increases in temperature are, however, not expected in the subtidal. These results are in accordance with previous findings indicating that below 20 µmol photons m−2 s−1, L. ochroleuca gametophytes are infertile, and sporophytes have low growth rates [25]. However, while previous studies indicate an ability to cope with recurring short exposures to 27 °C [21], as the photon fluence rate was not as high as in intertidal pools during summer low tides, it remains unknown how they are affected. The highest temperature exposure (30 °C) was stressful enough to cause either photoprotection (i.e., prevention against damaging effects of intense solar radiation) or damage to photosystem II, as indicated by Fv/Fm results, hinting that a higher light exposure would not help the individuals cope with the stress caused by the temperature increase. Previous studies have also reported photoprotection in L. ochroleuca recruits exposed to a 30 °C heat shock under a low photon fluence rate [21]. While such physiological constraints may limit its vertical distribution in warmer regions, L. ochroleuca has nonetheless been expanding its range poleward. Earlier studies already hypothesized its northward expansion, potentially replacing other Laminaria species [26,27]. Indeed, an isolated population in northwest Ireland was documented, further supporting evidence of its continued poleward range extension [10]. However, given the species’ light requirements, we hypothesize that this expansion is more likely to occur in the upper subtidal and intertidal zones, while low-light-adapted, cold-water Laminaria species may retain a competitive advantage in deeper subtidal areas.
Saccorhiza polyschides did not seem to be negatively affected by an exposure to 27 °C, not showing a significant increase in respiration, which would be otherwise expected, while significantly increasing the NPP. Fv/Fm measurements also showed no significant difference from the control temperature, hinting that this species might perform well when exposed to short exposures to increased temperature. These results are consistent with previous studies that showed no significant impact of recurrent exposure to 27 °C [20,21]. Although our study does not allow for the prediction of how the species would cope with a longer-term increase in temperatures, past research suggests that its decrease in certain geographical zones might be linked to the inability to reproduce at temperatures above 25 °C, ultimately preventing population persistence [28,29]. Chefaoui et al. demonstrated that prolonged heat stress in summer–autumn, driven by high air and seawater temperatures, can hinder or collapse sporophyte growth and reproduction in this species [30]. Therefore, despite similar thermal affinities, S. polyschides does not have the same ability to populate the intertidal region as L. ochroleuca, being able to recruit but not to reach maturity [31]. It was thus expected that they would respond negatively to an increase in light and temperature. While respiration did not vary significantly with increasing temperature, the NPP increased at 27 °C, but no significant difference was observed between 30 °C and the control temperature (15 °C). However, the exposure to 30 °C caused stress. While no significant increase in respiration or decrease in the NPP could be observed, the photosynthetic activity was unable to compensate for respiration, and the Fv/Fm indicated that some damage to photosystem II or photoprotection might occur. While the results were not completely unexpected in an opportunistic species, a stronger effect of the temperature and light increase was expected. Still, these observations are in accordance with previous reports that S. polyschides does not seem to undergo photosystem protection, with its metabolism apparently staying unaffected by the high-temperature exposure while showing observable damage to the tissue [21].
Phyllariopsis brevipes, being a Mediterranean species, was expected to have considerable heat resilience. However, the negative response to the exposure to 30 °C was stronger than expected. This motivated the addition of an extra exposure at 24 °C to better understand its responses to high temperatures. No significant difference between the response to 24 °C and the control temperature was observed for any of the variables studied. At 27 °C, however, while the Fv/Fm and NPP were not significantly different from either the control or 24 °C, the respiration rate was significantly higher, indicating that the exposure to 27 °C, but not 24 °C, significantly increased metabolism. While P. brevipes can live from the Bay of Biscay to the Moroccan coast and in the western Mediterranean [12], its temperature resistance is reduced when compared to the temperate species L. ochroleuca and S. polyschides. This is an annual species whose sporophytes are present in the field only between spring and the beginning of autumn, with its populations reduced to microscopic stages for the remainder of the year [13,32]. Geographical areas occupied by P. brevipes are characterized by strong upwelling currents during summer, which may be essential to lower the temperature enough for maintaining the population [33,34].
The results support previous reports that the temperature and light exposure play an important role in zonation [4,11]. P. brevipes has considerably low light requirements at the lower temperatures (15 and 24 °C); this might provide some competitive advantage to occupy deeper areas, while the higher light requirements of S. polyschides may limit its depth distribution, while their opportunistic characteristics may give them a competitive advantage in the high subtidal. In intertidal pools, however, these large individuals may be limited by both heat and desiccation, while L. ochroleuca, being more resilient to heat exposure, has a competitive advantage in these conditions that allows it to form dense intertidal pool patches [21].

5. Conclusions

This study highlights the complex interactions between temperature, light exposure, and species-specific physiological responses in Laminaria ochroleuca, Saccorhiza polyschides, and Phyllariopsis brevipes, offering new insights into the mechanisms driving their vertical zonation and distribution along the Portuguese coast. L. ochroleuca demonstrated a notable resilience to short-term exposures to elevated temperatures, coping well with 27 °C when light was not limiting. This thermal tolerance, together with high light requirements, supports its dominance in shallow subtidal and intertidal zones. However, long-term exposure or repeated heat stress events may reduce its thermal tolerance, potentially limiting its resilience under future climate change scenarios. While L. ochroleuca has demonstrated an ability to expand poleward, its dependence on higher light availability may restrict its distribution in deeper subtidal zones.
S. polyschides displayed a similar tolerance to short-term temperature increases without a significant physiological impairment, showing an increased productivity at 27 °C. Nonetheless, the exposure to 30 °C led to a decline in its photophysiological performance, despite limited changes in respiration and the NPP. While this opportunistic species can recruit under warm conditions, its ability to complete the life cycle may be compromised by prolonged thermal stress, particularly in intertidal zones, potentially influencing its future distribution under warming conditions.
Unexpectedly, P. brevipes, a species with a southern distribution, exhibited a lower heat tolerance than expected. No significant differences were observed between the control temperature and 24 °C across the studied variables. However, at 27 °C, significant metabolic increases were detected, indicating a physiological response to elevated temperatures. The exposure to 30 °C caused a marked stress response, further exacerbating the metabolic activity and suggesting potential thermal limitations. Given its annual life cycle and dependence on seasonal upwelling, P. brevipes may be particularly vulnerable to rising ocean temperatures, with potential implications for its persistence in the lower subtidal zones.
Looking ahead, future climate scenarios predict an increase in both the frequency and intensity of marine heatwaves, which could have profound effects on the distribution and survival of these species [35]. L. ochroleuca’s ability to expand poleward may allow it to replace other Laminaria species in some regions, but its dependence on sufficient light may restrict its success in deeper waters. S. polyschides may persist in the short term but could face long-term challenges due to reproductive limitations under prolonged warming. P. brevipes, already showing signs of vulnerability, may experience significant population declines if upwelling patterns shift or weaken due to climate change.
These findings underscore the importance of continued monitoring and modelling efforts to predict shifts in kelp forest ecosystems under future climate scenarios. Understanding species-specific responses to warming will be essential for conservation strategies, habitat management, and ensuring the resilience of temperate marine ecosystems in a rapidly changing ocean. Future research should focus on long-term experiments that simulate chronic temperature increases and recurring heat stress events to better understand the cumulative effects on these species. Additionally, studies incorporating genetic and physiological plasticity could provide insights into potential adaptation mechanisms. Investigating the combined effects of temperature, light availability, and other environmental stressors such as ocean acidification will be crucial to developing a comprehensive understanding of how kelp forests will respond to future climate change.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.R.P.; methodology, T.R.P.; validation, T.R.P., S.C. and T.F.P.; formal analysis, T.R.P.; investigation, T.R.P., S.C. and T.F.P.; resources, I.S.-P.; data curation, T.R.P.; writing—original draft preparation, T.R.P.; writing—review and editing, T.F.P. and S.C.; visualization, T.F.P., T.R.P. and S.C.; supervision, T.R.P.; project administration, T.R.P.; funding acquisition, I.S.-P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
DMDry Mass
Fv/FmMaximum quantum yield of photosystem II
LMaxPhoton fluence rate at which maximum production was attained
NPPNet Primary Production
RMaxMaximum respiration rate

References

  1. Wernberg, T.; Krumhansl, K.A.; Filbee-Dexter, K.; Pedersen, M. Status and Trends for the World’s Kelp Forests. In World Seas: An Environmental Evaluation, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jayathilake, D.R.M.; Costello, M.J. A modelled global distribution of the kelp biome. Biol. Conserv. 2020, 252, 108815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dayton, P. Ecology of Kelp Communities. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 1985, 16, 215–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lenoir, J.; Gégout, J.C.; Marquet, P.A.; de Ruffray, P.; Brisse, H. A significant upward shift in plant species optimum elevation during the 20th century. Science 2008, 320, 1768–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bartsch, I.; Vogt, J.; Pehlke, C.; Hanelt, D. Prevailing sea surface temperatures inhibit summer reproduction of the kelp aminaria digitata at Helgoland (North Sea). J. Phycol. 2013, 49, 1061–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Markager, S.; Sand-Jensen, K. Light requirements and depth zonation of marine macroalgae. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1992, 88, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dieter, H.; Melchersmann, B.; Wiencke, C.; Nultsch, W. Effects of high light stress on photosynthesis of polar macroalgae in relation to depth distribution. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1997, 149, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Franco, J.N.; Tuya, F.; Bertocci, I.; Rodríguez, L.; Martínez, B.; Sousa-Pinto, I.; Arenas, F. The ‘golden kelp’ Laminaria ochroleuca under global change: Integrating multiple eco-physiological responses with species distribution models. J. Ecol. 2018, 106, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Franco, J.N.; Wernberg, T.; Bertocci, I.; Duarte, P.; Jacinto, D.; Vasco-Rodrigues, N.; Tuya, F. Herbivory drives kelp recruits into ‘hiding’ in a warm ocean climate. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2015, 536, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schoenrock, K.; O’Callaghan, T.; O’Callaghan, R.; Krueger-Hadfield, S. First record of Laminaria ochroleuca Bachelot de la Pylaie in Ireland in Béal an Mhuirthead, county Mayo. Mar. Biodivers. Rec. 2019, 12, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lüning, K.; Yarish, C.; Kirkman, H. Seaweeds: Their Environment, Biogeography, and Ecophysiology; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  12. Birkett, D.; Maggs, C.; Dring, M.; Boaden, P. An Overview of Dynamic and Sensitivity Characteristics for Conservation Management of Marine SACs. 1998. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242700157_An_Overview_of_Dynamic_and_Sensitivity_Characteristics_for_Conservation_Management_of_Marine_SACs (accessed on 1 June 2025).
  13. Henry, E. The life history of Phyllariopsis brevipes (=Phyllaria reniformis) (Phyllariaceae, Laminariales, Phaeophyceae), a kelp with dioecious but sexually monomorphic gametophytes. Phycologia 1987, 26, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dieck, I. Temperature tolerance and survival in darkness of kelp gametophytes (Laminariales, Phaeophyta)—Ecological and biogeographical implications. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1993, 100, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pereira, T.R.; Engelen, A.H.; Pearson, G.A.; Serrão, E.A.; Destombe, C.; Valero, M. Temperature effects on the microscopic haploid stage development of Laminaria ochroleuca and Sacchoriza polyschides, kelps with contrasting life histories. Cah. Biol. Mar. 2011, 52, 395–403. [Google Scholar]
  16. García-Sánchez, M.; Delgado Huertas, A.; Fernández, J.; Flores-Moya, A. Photosynthetic use of inorganic carbon in deep-water kelps from the Strait of Gibraltar. Photosynth. Res. 2016, 2016, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tempera, F.; Milla-Figueras, D.; Sinde-Mano, A.L.; Atchoi, E.; Afonso, P. Range Extension of Mesophotic Kelps (Ochrophyta: Laminariales and Tilopteridales) in the Central North Atlantic: Opportunities for Marine Forest Research and Conservation. J. Phycol. 2021, 57, 1140–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Pearson, G.; Lago-Leston, A.; Mota, C. Frayed at the edges: Selective pressure and adaptive response to abiotic stressors are mismatched in low diversity edge populations. J. Ecol. 2009, 97, 450–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dieck, I.T. North Pacific and North Atlantic digitate Laminaria species (Phaeophyta): Hybridization experiments and temperature responses. Phycologia 1992, 31, 147–163. [Google Scholar]
  20. Biškup, S.; Bertocci, I.; Arenas, F.; Tuya, F. Functional responses of juvenile kelps, Laminaria ochroleuca and Saccorhiza polyschides, to increasing temperatures. Aquat. Bot. 2014, 113, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pereira, T.; Engelen, A.; Pearson, G.; Valero, M.; Serrao, E. Response of kelps from different latitudes to consecutive heat shock. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2015, 463, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. King, N.; Leathers, T.; Smith, K.; Smale, D. The influence of pre-exposure to marine heatwaves on the critical thermal maxima (CTmax) of marine foundation species. Funct. Ecol. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Leathers, T.; King, N.G.; Foggo, A.; Smale, D.A. Marine heatwave duration and intensity interact to reduce physiological tipping points of kelp species with contrasting thermal affinities. Ann. Bot. 2024, 133, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Strasser, F.-E.; Barreto, L.M.; Kaidi, S.; Sabour, B.; Serrão, E.A.; Pearson, G.A.; Martins, N. Population level variation in reproductive development and output in the golden kelp Laminaria ochroleuca under marine heat wave scenarios. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 9, 943511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Izquierdo, J.; Pérez-ruzafa, I.; Gallardo, T. Effect of temperature and photon fluence rate on gametophytes and young sporophytes of Laminaria ochroleuca Pylaie. Helgol. Mar. Res. 2001, 55, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Smale, D.; Wernberg, T.; Yunnie, A.L.E.; Vance, T. The rise of Laminaria ochroleuca in the Western English Channel (UK) and comparisons with its competitor and assemblage dominant Laminaria hyperborea. Mar. Ecol. 2015, 36, 1033–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Smale, D.A.; Moore, P.J. Variability in kelp forest structure along a latitudinal gradient in ocean temperature. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2017, 486, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Norton, T.A. Experiments on the Factors Influencing the Geographical Distributions of Saccorhiza polyschides and Saccorhiza dermatodea. New Phytol. 1977, 78, 625–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fernández, C. The retreat of large brown seaweeds on the north coast of Spain: The case of Saccorhiza polyschides. Eur. J. Phycol. 2011, 46, 352–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chefaoui, R.M.; Duarte, C.M.; Serrão, E.A. Dramatic loss of seagrass habitat under projected climate change in the Mediterranean Sea. Glob. Change Biol. 2018, 24, 4919–4928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pereira, T.R.; Engelen, A.H.; Pearson, G.A.; Valero, M.; Serrão, E.A. Population dynamics of temperate kelp forests near their low-latitude limit. Aquat. Bot. 2017, 139, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Flores-Moya, A.; Fernández, J.A.; Niell, F.X. Reproductive phenology, growth and primary production of Phyllariopsis purpurascens (Phyllariaceae, Phaeophyta) from the Straits of Gibraltar. Eur. J. Phycol. 1993, 28, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lemos, R.; Pires, H. The upwelling regime off the West Portuguese Coast, 1941–2000. Int. J. Climatol. 2004, 24, 511–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gómez-Gesteira, M.; de Castro, M.; Alvarez, I.; Lorenzo, M.N.; Gesteira, J.L.; Crespo, A.J. Spatio-temporal upwelling trends along the Canary Upwelling System (1967–2006). Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1146, 320–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Oliver, E.C.J.; Donat, M.G.; Burrows, M.T.; Moore, P.J.; Smale, D.A.; Alexander, L.V.; Benthuysen, J.A.; Feng, M.; Sen Gupta, A.; Hobday, A.J.; et al. Longer and more frequent marine heatwaves over the past century. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Sampling location, in Amorosa, Northern Portugal. Map data: Maphub.net, ©2025.
Figure 1. Sampling location, in Amorosa, Northern Portugal. Map data: Maphub.net, ©2025.
Phycology 05 00027 g001
Figure 2. Respiration, as dissolved oxygen variation (higher respiration rate corresponds to lower oxygen recorded), of (A) Laminaria ochroleuca, (B) Saccorhiza polyschides, and (C) Phyllariopsis brevipes under dark conditions, in response to different temperatures. Error bars are SD. Different letters were attributed to significantly different values, per species, based on Tukey test results.
Figure 2. Respiration, as dissolved oxygen variation (higher respiration rate corresponds to lower oxygen recorded), of (A) Laminaria ochroleuca, (B) Saccorhiza polyschides, and (C) Phyllariopsis brevipes under dark conditions, in response to different temperatures. Error bars are SD. Different letters were attributed to significantly different values, per species, based on Tukey test results.
Phycology 05 00027 g002
Figure 3. Net Primary Production (NPP), assessed by determining the slope of the linear regression of the photon fluence rate versus the oxygen concentration, of (A) Laminaria ochroleuca, (B) Saccorhiza polyschides, and (C) Phyllariopsis brevipes under increasing photon fluence rates when exposed to 15 °C (control), 27 °C, and 30 °C. Error bars are SD. Different letters indicate significant differences in response between temperatures for each species, based on Tukey test results. Pairwise comparisons were performed within each species.
Figure 3. Net Primary Production (NPP), assessed by determining the slope of the linear regression of the photon fluence rate versus the oxygen concentration, of (A) Laminaria ochroleuca, (B) Saccorhiza polyschides, and (C) Phyllariopsis brevipes under increasing photon fluence rates when exposed to 15 °C (control), 27 °C, and 30 °C. Error bars are SD. Different letters indicate significant differences in response between temperatures for each species, based on Tukey test results. Pairwise comparisons were performed within each species.
Phycology 05 00027 g003
Figure 4. Oxygen variation, as result of respiration and photosynthesis, with increasing photon fluence rate for individuals of (A) Laminaria ochroleuca, (B) Saccorhiza polyschides, and (C) Phyllariopsis brevipes when exposed to 15 °C (control), 27 °C, and 30 °C. Error bars are SD.
Figure 4. Oxygen variation, as result of respiration and photosynthesis, with increasing photon fluence rate for individuals of (A) Laminaria ochroleuca, (B) Saccorhiza polyschides, and (C) Phyllariopsis brevipes when exposed to 15 °C (control), 27 °C, and 30 °C. Error bars are SD.
Phycology 05 00027 g004
Figure 5. Photon fluence rate at which (A) Laminaria ochroleuca, (B) Saccorhiza polyschides, and (C) Phyllariopsis brevipes achieved maximum oxygen production (Lmax) for the three temperature exposures: 15 °C (control), 27 °C, and 30 °C. Error bars are SD. Different letters indicate significant differences between points for each species, based on Tukey test results.
Figure 5. Photon fluence rate at which (A) Laminaria ochroleuca, (B) Saccorhiza polyschides, and (C) Phyllariopsis brevipes achieved maximum oxygen production (Lmax) for the three temperature exposures: 15 °C (control), 27 °C, and 30 °C. Error bars are SD. Different letters indicate significant differences between points for each species, based on Tukey test results.
Phycology 05 00027 g005
Figure 6. The Fv/Fm response, normalized with the initial value, of (A) Laminaria ochroleuca, (B) Saccorhiza polyschides, and (C) Phyllariopsis brevipes during 2.5 h of exposure with increasing photon fluence rates every 20 min at three temperature levels: 15 °C (control), 27 °C, and 30 °C. Different letters indicate significant differences in the response to different temperatures within each species, based on Tukey test results. Error bars are SD.
Figure 6. The Fv/Fm response, normalized with the initial value, of (A) Laminaria ochroleuca, (B) Saccorhiza polyschides, and (C) Phyllariopsis brevipes during 2.5 h of exposure with increasing photon fluence rates every 20 min at three temperature levels: 15 °C (control), 27 °C, and 30 °C. Different letters indicate significant differences in the response to different temperatures within each species, based on Tukey test results. Error bars are SD.
Phycology 05 00027 g006
Table 1. ANOVA results on the respiration in dark conditions for the different species. Significant values at p < 0.05 are shown in bold.
Table 1. ANOVA results on the respiration in dark conditions for the different species. Significant values at p < 0.05 are shown in bold.
Speciesp-ValueFdf
Laminaria ochroleuca0.000123.4192
Saccorhiza polyschides0.1971.9562
Phyllariopsis brevipes0.0029.0513
Table 2. ANOVA results for Net Primary Production (NPP) of the different species. Significant values at p < 0.05 are shown in bold.
Table 2. ANOVA results for Net Primary Production (NPP) of the different species. Significant values at p < 0.05 are shown in bold.
Speciesp-ValueFdf
Laminaria ochroleuca0.0069.6222
Saccorhiza polyschides0.0127.4272
Phyllariopsis brevipes0.0115.8613
Table 3. ANOVA results for the photon fluence rate at which the different species attained maximum production (LMax). Significant values at p < 0.05 are shown in bold.
Table 3. ANOVA results for the photon fluence rate at which the different species attained maximum production (LMax). Significant values at p < 0.05 are shown in bold.
Speciesp-ValueFdf
Laminaria ochroleuca0.00214.4252
Saccorhiza polyschides0.13.0002
Phyllariopsis brevipes0.00110.7433
Table 4. ANOVA results for Fv/Fm measured at different temperatures for each species. Significant values at p < 0.05 are shown in bold.
Table 4. ANOVA results for Fv/Fm measured at different temperatures for each species. Significant values at p < 0.05 are shown in bold.
Speciesp-ValueFdf
Laminaria ochroleuca<0.00125.6212
Saccorhiza polyschides0.0235.9222
Phyllariopsis brevipes0.00111.0103
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pinheiro, T.F.; Chemello, S.; Sousa-Pinto, I.; Pereira, T.R. Photon Fluence Rate and Temperature Effects on Temperate Atlantic Kelp Species. Phycology 2025, 5, 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/phycology5020027

AMA Style

Pinheiro TF, Chemello S, Sousa-Pinto I, Pereira TR. Photon Fluence Rate and Temperature Effects on Temperate Atlantic Kelp Species. Phycology. 2025; 5(2):27. https://doi.org/10.3390/phycology5020027

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pinheiro, Tomás F., Silvia Chemello, Isabel Sousa-Pinto, and Tânia R. Pereira. 2025. "Photon Fluence Rate and Temperature Effects on Temperate Atlantic Kelp Species" Phycology 5, no. 2: 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/phycology5020027

APA Style

Pinheiro, T. F., Chemello, S., Sousa-Pinto, I., & Pereira, T. R. (2025). Photon Fluence Rate and Temperature Effects on Temperate Atlantic Kelp Species. Phycology, 5(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/phycology5020027

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop