Bio-Flocculation: A Green Tool in Biorefineries for Recovering High Added-Value Compounds from Microalgae

Abstract

The growing demand for the sustainable production of high-value compounds, such as biofuels, lipids, and pigments like carotenoids and phycobilin, has become the subject of numerous investigations. Furthermore, this has led to the exploration of renewable methods utilizing microalgae as feedstock to mitigate the challenges associated with producing these valuable compounds. Nevertheless, despite the numerous advantages of microalgae, the development of a microalgal biorefinery that employs sustainable, environmentally friendly, and economically efficient technologies remains a necessity. To address this challenge, the bio-flocculation process, and more specifically self-flocculation, is presented as a cost-effective and energy-efficient solution. This method is as easy and effective as chemical flocculation, which is applied at an industrial scale; however, in contrast, it is sustainable and cost-effective as no costs are involved in the pre-treatment of the biomass for oil extraction or in the pre-treatment of the medium before it can be re-used. In addition, microalgae possess molecular tools that would allow the efficiency of these processes to be increased. In the present review, we summarize the microalgal harvesting technologies used, with a particular focus on bio- and self-flocculation processes, and identify the improvements that could be made to enhance the production of high-added-value compounds while simultaneously reducing costs in microalgae biorefineries.

1. Introduction

The combustion of fossil fuels releases considerable quantities of CO₂, a major greenhouse gas, into the atmosphere, with only 40% of this being naturally absorbed [1]. Researchers indicate that it is essential to maintain CO₂ levels below 450 ppm to prevent severe environmental disruptions. This requires a reduction in emissions by 44.2 million metric tons on an annual basis. Despite the discovery of limited reserves, increasing demand may exhaust fossil fuel resources by 2066 [2,3,4]. In order to address the energy crisis and climate change, renewable energy sources, particularly biofuels, are gaining global support. Many countries are increasing their production of biofuels and integrating them into the transportation industry to reduce fossil fuel dependency [5]. At the same time, the rapid growth of the global population is intensifying the demand for food, placing pressure on existing agricultural systems. This situation is further aggravated by the limited availability of arable land and freshwater. Therefore, identifying sustainable and efficient alternative sources of food is becoming increasingly urgent.

In this context, biorefineries—facilities that use biomass conversion processes and equipment to produce fuels, power, heat, and value-added chemicals from biomass—represent a sustainable alternative to traditional fossil fuel-based industries. Unlike conventional refineries, which rely on finite and polluting resources, biorefineries utilize renewable biological resources, thereby significantly lowering greenhouse gas emissions [6].

Among the various types of biorefineries, microalgae-based biorefineries are particularly promising due to the exceptional characteristics of microalgae. These include a higher photosynthetic efficiency compared to terrestrial plants, as microalgae can convert solar energy into biomass at rates ten times higher than terrestrial plants in some cases [7]. This efficiency is primarily attributed to their simple cellular structure, direct access to nutrients in aquatic environments, and ability to grow in photobioreactors under optimized conditions. Moreover, microalgae are capable of capturing CO₂ directly from industrial emissions, can be cultivated using wastewater as the culture medium, and unlike terrestrial crops, which are the sources of first-generation and second-generation biofuels, microalgae do not compete with food production and can be cultivated on non-arable land. Microalgae biofuel productions are recognized as third-generation biofuels, positioning these organisms as one of the most promising feedstocks [8,9], contributing to both carbon mitigation and the sustainable production of biofuels and high-value compounds [10,11].

Beyond their applications in energy production, microalgae are also recognized for their capacity to synthesize a wide range of high-value compounds with potential uses in food, pharmaceuticals, and nutraceuticals. These include proteins with balanced amino acid profiles, essential fatty acids such as omega-3 and omega-6, pigments like chlorophylls, carotenoids (e.g., astaxanthin, lutein), and phycobiliproteins, as well as vitamins, antioxidants, and bioactive polysaccharides. Their biochemical versatility, combined with their fast growth and minimal resource requirements, makes microalgae a highly attractive platform for the sustainable production of bioactive compounds that can contribute to human health and food security [12].

However, the recovery of algal cells from base water typically necessitates external energy and chemicals due to their low concentrations in the culture medium, small size, and negative surface charge [13,14,15]. In addition, various morphological and physiological traits of algal cells, including their shape, cell wall structure, and extracellular organic matter, can vary significantly based on nutritional and environmental factors, such as medium composition, light exposure, temperature, pH levels, culture duration, and the type of bioreactor used [2]. Indeed, one of the primary challenges is the efficient harvesting of microalgae from the medium during downstream processes. High biomass concentrations cause microalgae cells to clump together, leading to reduced productivity. To maintain a high concentration of biomass, it is essential to harvest the microalgae [16,17]. Consequently, substantial volumes of water must be extracted from production systems during the harvesting process, which necessitates energy consumption and financial investment. It is estimated that harvesting costs represent over 30% of the total production costs [18].

To date, a diversity of technologies has been developed for harvesting microalgae which includes physical, chemical, biological, and electrical techniques. In some instances, combinations of two or more methods have been employed to achieve optimal biomass recovery [12,19,20]. Centrifugation is one such method used for microalgae harvesting. Based on a mechanical gravitational force that allows for the efficient harvesting of suspended cells in a short time, it is rapid and highly efficient in recovery. However, it is also energy intensive, and the shear force generated can damage the cells [19]. On the other hand, gravity sedimentation and filtration, while cost-effective and easy to operate, demonstrate insufficient productivity for effectively separating biomass from the bulk culture [20,21]. In contrast to the aforementioned methods, air flotation is based on the generation of up-rising gas bubbles that bind to the algal cells, offering several advantages, including a smaller footprint, flexibility, and potential for industrial scalability. Nonetheless, it requires a higher initial investment and is also energy intensive [22,23].

Flocculation is a commonly used technique for separating coarse dispersions and colloidal substances in water, and it has been utilized for the separation and collection of microalgae since the 1980s [24]. Flocculation involves the aggregation of small and unstable particles, facilitated by the neutralization of surface charges, electrostatic patching, and bridging after the introduction of flocculants (Figure 1). The formation of flocs allows for separation or recovery through methods like gravity settling or other conventional separation techniques [25]. This process has been studied as an effective method for harvesting various algal species [14,20].

Bio-flocculation is an emerging low-cost and eco-friendly technique that leverages microbial interactions to aggregate suspended particles, particularly microalgal cells, without the need for synthetic chemicals. This natural flocculation process, often mediated by bacteria, filamentous fungi, or microalgae, offers several environmental and economic advantages. It reduces reliance on energy-intensive harvesting methods such as centrifugation or chemical flocculants, which are often expensive, resource-intensive, and may introduce contaminants [26]. From an environmental perspective, bio-flocculation minimizes secondary pollution and aligns with circular bioeconomy principles by promoting sustainable biomass recovery. In the context of microalgae harvesting, bio-flocculation is especially important due to the small size and dilute concentration of microalgal cultures, which make harvesting a major bottleneck in large-scale production. Efficient harvesting through bio-flocculation enhances the overall feasibility of microalgae-based biorefineries, lowering operational costs and preserving the biochemical integrity of valuable compounds for downstream processing, highlighting the applicability of bio-flocculation in integrated biorefinery frameworks [5].

Considering the prevailing advancements and the rapid technological development currently underway, it is essential to undertake continuous bibliographic reviews of this research topic to facilitate the acceleration and enhancement of ongoing research efforts. The objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of recent flocculation technologies, emphasizing the intricacies of microalgal bio-flocculation and its potential for developing a sustainable, feasible, and environmentally friendly biorefinery. The work also examines promising research pathways for utilizing microalgae as bio-factories and details how bio-flocculation techniques have been applied to enhance the industrial production of high-value compounds such as carotenoids, lipids, and enriched biomass. The review concludes with an outline of future directions and key insights for further investigation.

2. Flocculation Methods

2.1. Physical Flocculation

Utilizing physical flocculation for the extraction of microalgae is an effective method which minimizes contamination. This process can be carried out using various techniques, including ultrasound, electro-flocculation, and magnetic separation. For example, ultrasonic irradiation–coagulation demonstrated effective algae recovery under optimal conditions. On the other hand, electro-flocculation presents a more cost-efficient and scalable approach for harvesting microalgae. In this method, negatively charged microalgal cells migrate toward the anode and lose their charge, leading to the formation of aggregates or flocs. The bubbles generated at the anode rise to the surface, capturing microalgal aggregates or flocs, which can be easily removed.

There are many studies demonstrating that different metal ion treatments enhance electro-coagulation process in various microalgae [27,28,29]. Another treatment technique is the use of magnetic nanoparticles, which has been investigated as a potential alternative process in microalgae harvesting, where magnetic nanoparticles adhere directly to the surfaces of microalgal cells, promoting flocculation in the presence of a magnetic field. Different researchers have proved the efficacy of marine microalga harvesting using nanoparticles and they have shown a rapid flocculation rate and high efficiency [30]. Moreover, the effectiveness of nanoparticles binding to different microalgal species appears to be species-specific, with improved adsorption to Chlorella vulgaris, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Phaeodactylum tricornutum observed when the nanoparticles were coated with canonic polymers or silica [31,32,33,34]. A notable advantage of utilizing magnetic nanoparticles for microalgae harvesting is their ability to be efficiently reused without the need for pH adjustments [35]. However, it is important to highlight that effective elution strategies are critical for nanoparticle regeneration, and obtaining biomass free of nanoparticles is generally preferred [36]. A significant limitation of this technology is the high cost associated with magnetic nanoparticles and the specialized equipment required for their recycling.

Compared to other physical harvesting methods, flocculation offers significant advantages in terms of energy efficiency and operational costs. For instance, while centrifugation enables rapid separation and high recovery rates, it involves high energy consumption and maintenance costs. Dissolved air flotation is effective for low-density microalgae but requires the addition of reagents and more complex equipment. Gravity sedimentation, although low-cost, is a slow and inefficient process for small-sized microalgae. In contrast, flocculation enables rapid cell aggregation and subsequent separation with a lower energy input, making it a more viable option for large-scale applications, especially when natural or low-cost flocculants are employed [12,19,20,37].

2.2. Chemical Flocculation

Chemical flocculation in microalgae is typically facilitated by three primary categories of flocculants: inorganic flocculants (including metal salts and ammonia), inorganic polymers, and organic polymers. Several studies have demonstrated the effective use of chemical flocculation for harvesting various microalgae species [38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46].

The high flocculation efficiency and convenience it offers for microalgae harvesting has positioned chemical flocculants as a viable option for large-scale microalgae biomass production. However, the introduction of inorganic or organic pollution from these flocculants can lead to secondary pollution, and residual chemicals (such as aluminum) in the microalgal biomass may hinder its application in food and animal feed [47].

The presence of chemical residues, including aluminum, in microalgae can affect the composition of fatty acid methyl esters. This is due to the fact that these residues are also present in lipids extracted from harvested microalgae by chemical flocculation processes [42,48]. The accumulation of these chemical residues can cause cellular damage. Additionally, the quality of pigments in microalgae, particularly chlorophyll, may be affected by the presence of ferric salts [47,49]. In contrast, using aqueous ammonia for harvesting microalgae typically has a minimal impact on the distribution of metabolites such as chlorophyll, protein, and lipids [50]. Conversely, chitosan has the potential to facilitate downstream dewatering processes, such as centrifugation and filtration, by reducing time and costs [49,51,52].

Although organic flocculants are typically regarded as safe and biodegradable, their utilization is frequently constrained by pH sensitivity [53,54]. It is also important to note that the cost of organic polymers is typically higher than that of inorganic flocculants. Consequently, the utilization of pH-based flocculation techniques, employing either acids or alkalis, has considerably expanded the range of methodologies available for microalgae harvesting. The ability of microalgal cells to maintain a stable suspension due to their negatively charged surfaces has made flocculation via pH adjustment an effective method [55]. The alteration of the proton and hydroxyl ratio and the presence of magnesium in the medium can disrupt the electrostatic interactions between anionic algae. Moreover, the utilization of chemical flocculation could be entirely avoided throughout the aforementioned process, thereby markedly reducing the risk of chemical contamination and secondary pollution.

Recently, several microalgae species have been successfully harvested through pH-induced flocculation without the addition of any chemical agents. For instance, a flocculation of 95% was achieved for Nannochloropsis oculata during the late exponential phase when the culture medium was adjusted to pH 10 with Ca(OH)₂ [56,57]. Similar results were noted when the pH of the culture media used for Scenedesmus quadricauda, Dunaliella viridis and Phaeodactylum tricornutum was adjusted to 11.5, 10 and 10.5, respectively, using NaOH or through CO₂ regulation [58,59]. Moreover, the addition of a relatively small quantity of magnesium ions to a medium with a high pH value has been demonstrated to facilitate the flocculation of Chlorella vulgaris and Chlorococcum infusionum, as well as some cyanobacteria strains [60,61,62].

It is notable that the flocculation of microalgae at high biomass concentrations due to a decreased pH demonstrated a performance that was comparable to that observed with chemical flocculants. In this instance, the process was driven by proton ions rather than magnesium, and the estimated harvesting cost was less than one dollar per kilogram of microalgal biomass, despite the limited acidic pH range [51,63].

Several techno-economic assessments have indicated that pH-induced flocculation can be competitive on a large scale. For example, Lu et al., in 2022 reported that the energy input for pH-based flocculation was around 0.389 kWh/m³, significantly lower than many chemical or mechanical harvesting methods [37]. Additionally, the cost of reagents (e.g., NaOH or lime) used for pH adjustment is generally lower than that of high-purity chemical flocculants such as aluminum or polyaluminum chloride, especially when applied in closed-loop systems that allow for reuse and pH recovery. However, the economic performance of this method can vary depending on the water hardness, initial pH, and buffering capacity of the culture medium.

2.3. Bio-Flocculation

Bio-flocculation is a biological process whereby microorganisms, including bacteria, yeast and microalgae, aggregate to form structures known as flocs. This process is most prevalent in aquatic environments, such as wastewater treatment systems and aquaculture. During bio-flocculation, suspended particles in the water cluster together form larger flocs, which are then more readily separable from the water. This method is fundamental to the improvement of water quality, as it reduces the concentration of suspended particles and contaminants and it is recognized as a sustainable flocculation method for microalgae [64,65]. Furthermore, it facilitates the recycling of essential nutrients within cultivation systems, such as those employed in aquaculture. The role of microalgae bio-flocculation in sustainable water treatment and bio-compounds recovery is an increasingly studied area, as it has the potential to minimize the use of chemical additives and support the principles of circular resource management [66,67,68].

Research efforts have primarily focused on enhancing its efficiency and applicability for use in microalgae biorefineries. Despite its promise, the scalability of bio-flocculation for large-scale microalgae harvesting remains a significant challenge. Key limitations include variability in flocculation efficiency depending on species, culture conditions, and microbial community dynamics. Maintaining stable bio-flocculant-producing consortia in large open systems can be difficult, and the time required for effective aggregation is often longer compared to chemical flocculants. In contrast, conventional chemical flocculation offers rapid and consistent cell aggregation but relies on costly and potentially toxic reagents, such as aluminum or ferric salts, which can contaminate the biomass and complicate downstream processing [16,69]. Electroflocculation, while more sustainable in terms of chemical inputs, involves high energy consumption and infrastructure costs, making it less viable for low-margin applications like bulk biomass production [70].

From an energy and cost perspective, bio-flocculation is significantly more favorable, particularly when integrated into low-input systems. It requires no external energy input or chemical additives and can potentially leverage native microbial communities. However, scaling bio-flocculation requires the optimization of culture parameters, co-cultivation strategies, and real-time monitoring to ensure consistent performance. Environmentally, bio-flocculation is the most sustainable option, as it avoids secondary pollution and aligns with green processing goals. Therefore, while not yet fully optimized for industrial use, bio-flocculation holds considerable promise as a low-cost, low-impact alternative, especially when coupled with other harvesting techniques in hybrid systems designed for biorefinery applications [71,72].

Recent investigations into microalgae bio-flocculation have focused on four principal approaches: flocculation by microbial bio-flocculants; fungi-mediated flocculation; bacteria-mediated flocculation; algal-mediated flocculation; and self-flocculation mechanisms.

2.3.1. Flocculation by Bio-Flocculant Molecules

Effective bio-flocculation is typically initiated by other microorganisms or the extracellular substances they produce, which act as flocculants to aggregate the target microalgae [73]. These polymers can include polysaccharides, proteins, or various other bio-flocculant agents secreted by bacteria, fungi, and algae, thereby promoting the sedimentation of microalgae. The efficiency of flocculation is influenced by the species of microalgae involved. Each species synthesizes distinct extracellular polymers, resulting in varying settling rates and efficiencies.

Table 1. Main microalgae species harvested by bio-flocculants.

Microalgae	Bio-Flocculant Used	Recovery Efficiency (%)	Reference
Chlorella vulgaris	Paenibacillus sp. AM49	90	[74]
Chlorella sp.	Aspergillus terreus	80–90	[75]
Scenedesmus sp.	Aspergillus sp.	80–90	[71]
Dunaliella salina	Heterocapsa circularisquama	80–90	[76]
Nannochloropsis oculata	Tannin-based polymer	99	[77]
Nannochloropsis sp.	Nano-chitosan	85	[78]
Botryococcus braunii	Aspergillus sp.	97	[79]

provides a summary of the principal species of microalgae for which bio-flocculant harvesting has been employed.

2.3.2. Fungi-Mediated Flocculation

Fungi have the ability to form filaments or, in some cases, undergo self-pelletization, which can be leveraged for the harvesting of microalgae cells [80]. Certain fungi from the Basidiomycetes, Aspergillus, and Phanerochaete species can facilitate coagulation by forming pellets or aggregates through the presence of spores [81]. In contrast, non-coagulative fungi from the Mucor, Rhizopus, and Penicillium species can aid in trapping algal cells by developing extensive hyphae [82]. To promote bio-flocculation, fungi and microalgae can sometimes be co-cultivated. However, the effectiveness of this process is often uncertain, as fungi may outgrow microalgae due to their faster growth rates and the concurrent competition for available carbon sources [82,83].

Fungal exopolysaccharides are common and serve various biological functions, such as acting as viscosity stabilizers in the food industry, enhancing oil recovery, and exhibiting antioxidant, antiviral, and antitumor activities [84,85]. The production of exopolysaccharides by fungi can also promote cell aggregation and is influenced by culture conditions and medium composition [86]. Typically, exopolysaccharide-producing fungal strains are either aerobic or facultative anaerobic, suggesting that low oxygen levels are not conductive to exopolysaccharide synthesis. Certain fungal strains have demonstrated effective flocculation in the microalga Chlorella vulgaris, resulting in minimal settling times. The fungal-mediated bio-flocculation of microalgae can be initiated either by adding fungal cultures or through algal–fungal co-culture. Generally, fungi can flocculate microalgae through charge neutralization and ionic bridging [87,88,89]. Another study identified that algal and fungal aggregation occurred through ionic bridge formation, enhancing the flocculation efficiency using metal ions [8]. The results showed that co-cultivating the microalga Chlorella vulgaris together with Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus versicolor, and Leucogyraphana arizona increased the aggregation efficiency to 100% [44].

2.3.3. Bacteria-Mediated Flocculation

The presence of bacterial cells is unavoidable in outdoor conditions and they are often considered a contaminant. However, the interaction between algae and bacteria can provide nutritional and environmental advantages for the bacteria. Conversely, this association can be detrimental to microalgal growth, as bacteria typically present a fast growth rate compared to microalgae and thus proliferate quickly. The interaction between bacteria and microalgae is specific to both species and strains.

Bacteria can produce glutamic acid as bio-flocculant promoters in microalgae. This production is primarily essential for synthesizing amino acids and factors involved in the Krebs cycle pathway. Glutamic acid can be transformed into polyglutamic acid, which serves as an effective bio-flocculant. Some bacterial strains have been observed to induce agglomeration in microalgal cultures during their growth. The underlying mechanisms of adhesion are normally due to charge neutralization, bridging, and electrostatic patching [90]. The green algae Asterococcus limneticus WL2 and the phytohormone-producing Streptomyces rosealbus MTTC12951 have been cultivated together in a co-cultivation process to measure the production of indole-3-acetic acid and its precursor. The results showed that within 24h of resting time, the cells co-cultivated in the early deceleration phase demonstrated significant bio-flocculation and lipid production efficiency. Thus, the production and harvesting expenses of in vitro grown microbial biomass as well as energy yield suggest co-cultivation, and a two-stage co-cultivation strategy has the potential to improve cost efficiency and energy conservation [89].

Bacterial extracellular secretions can lead to charge neutralization on microalgal cell surfaces, resulting in microalgal flocculation [90,91]. Paenibacillus sp. AM49 has been identified as an effective flocculant for Chlorella vulgaris. This efficiency significantly surpasses that of chemical flocculants, such as polyacrylamide and aluminum. Additionally, Paenibacillus sp. AM49 has been shown to be notable flocculant for other species, including Botriococcus braunii, Scenedesmus quadricauda, and Selenastrum capricornutum [76].

There are studies that have utilized bacteria such as Cobetia marina L03 as a bio-flocculant for Chlorella vulgaris, evading the two necessary steps to successfully harvest microalgae: flocculation and filtration [92]. Another study investigated the flocculation activity of Shinella albus xn-1 with Chlorella vulgaris. This bacterium, commonly found in waste compost, sludge, or soil, participates in nitrate reduction [93,94,95] and the assimilation of methylsulfolano [96]. The flocculation efficiency increased when using the supernatant obtained after solid component separation from the bacterial culture as the flocculant. Several microalgae such as Nanochloropsis oculata and three species of Microcystis aeruginosa were treated with a bio-flocculant provided from the extracellular products derived from the fermentation broth. The results showed that the level of biomass recovered was lower than that for Chlorella vulgaris, indicating species specificity of the bio-flocculant [88,92].

2.3.4. Alga-Mediated Flocculation

While some species of microalgae exhibit natural self-flocculation, others can be induced to flocculate by altering the pH or introducing cationic additives. Nonetheless, the use of cationic flocculants or acid/base treatments for self-flocculation can lead to contamination of the biomass with residual flocculants [97], complicating downstream processing and biomass utilization [12]. This section focuses on algal–algal bio-flocculation, which involves harvesting through self-aggregating algae or their extracellular polymeric substances. Self-flocculation has been documented in various strains of Chlorella vulgaris, Dunaliella salina, and Scenedesmus quadrucauda.

Throughout their cell cycle, microalgae secrete extracellular polymeric substances into their environment, creating a biofilm layer. The extracellular substances are primarily made up of proteins, polysaccharides, lipids, and nucleic acids. The dominant monosaccharide components in algae include hexose, uronic acid, pentose, methyl pentose, and sulfates [98]. The proteins involved in cell adhesion are typically lectins, which bind with carbohydrates, amyloids, or other cell surface proteins [99]. These extracellular substances can be found either attached to the cells or dissolved in the surrounding environment. The synthesis and production of these substances are complex processes influenced by factors such as the specific microalgal strain and various cultivation conditions, including nutrient availability, salinity, temperature, and light intensity. Research on the production of extracellular polymeric substances has been conducted in various microalgal species (Porphyridium cruentum, Chlorella vulgaris, Spirulina sp., and Nostoc commune). But compared to polymeric substances derived from seaweeds, terrestrial plants, fungi, or non-photosynthetic microorganisms, these processes have been less studied in cyanobacteria and microalgae [100].

In green algae, glycoproteins represent a significant portion of the extracellular substances [101] and these extracellular proteins play a key role in regulating CO₂ metabolism in these organisms. The conditions under which algae are cultivated can influence the extracellular substances by helping with the aggregation of microalgae that are typically non-aggregated with the bio-flocculation process. Some studies have demonstrated improved recovery from the algal–algal bio-flocculation of Picochlorum sp. QUCCM130 with a low-settling capacity [102]. The results show that self-settlement capacity increased with cell size and can be indirectly related to the decreased zeta potential of larger cells which enhances the Van der Waals attractive forces in Picochlorum sp. QUCCM130, Nannochloris sp. QUCCM31, and Tetraselmis sp. QUCCM50 [103]. Zeta potential is a key indicator of cell surface charge, and lower (less negative) values reduce electrostatic repulsion between cells, favoring aggregation. Differences in zeta potential among species can partly explain variability in natural flocculation behavior. Moreover, zeta potential can be artificially modified to improve the flocculation efficiency—for example, by adjusting pH, ionic strength, or adding multivalent cations, which neutralize surface charges and promote aggregation [104].

In another study conducted by Salim and co-workers [26], the researchers demonstrated that cell-to-cell adhesion mechanisms vary when a consortium of flocculating algae is employed to harvest the non-flocculating Chlorella vulgaris. Specifically, in Ankistrodesmus falcatus, floc formation occurred through bridging, attributed to the positively charged extracellular polymeric substances, while in Tetraselmmis suecica and Scenedesmus obliquus, flocculation resulted from the principle of patch formation. When the self-flocculating microalgae Ettlia texensis, Scenedesmus obliquus, and Ankistrodesmus falcatus were introduced to Chlorella vulgaris, the flocculation efficiencies increased. In contrast, the addition of Tetraselmis suecica as a flocculant to Neochloris oleoabundans at the same ratio resulted in an increase in biomass recovery [105]. The flocculant derived from the self-flocculating Chlorella vulgaris JSC-7 was primarily composed of carbohydrates, with glucose, mannose, and galactose identified as the sugar residues [103]. Using this alga as a flocculant for harvesting the non-flocculating Chlorella vulgaris CNW11 and Scenedesmus obliquus led to improved flocculation efficiencies. When the self-flocculated Ettlia texensis acted as a flocculant for non-flocculating Chlorella vulgaris, it was found that glycoproteins on the cell surfaces played a crucial role in flocculation.

Co-culturing flocculating and non-flocculating algae also proved beneficial for harvesting. For instance, when Desmodesmus sp. ZFY was co-cultured with Monoraphidium sp. QLY-1, the flocculation efficiency reached 85.33% with a settling time of 4 h, compared to the mono-culture efficiencies of 57.98% and 32.45%, respectively. The extracellular polymeric substances from this co-culture were notably rich in proteins and carbohydrates. Furthermore, co-culturing enhanced the metabolite content of the biomass [106].

2.3.5. Self-Flocculation

Cellular self-flocculation is the process by which cells aggregate and adhere to one another in a liquid culture, facilitated by the specific properties of their surfaces. This phenomenon is common among microorganisms, with several self-flocculating microalgae having been identified, such as Chlorella vulgaris, Scenedesmus obliquus, Ankistrodesmus falcatus, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, and Ettlia texensis [69,103,105,107], or flocculating-related genes being present in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Tetradesmus dimorphus, and Microcystis aeruginosa [108].

The recovery of biomass through the sedimentation of flocculating yeast has been utilized in several industries, particularly in brewing and bioethanol production [109]. Flocculation presents a cost-effective and simple method for cell collection, making it an appealing area of research, especially in the context of harvesting microalgal cells. A key benefit of self-flocculation is the elimination of chemical additives, resulting in a sustainable process that avoids chemical contamination.

Investigating the biochemical and genetic foundations of flocculation is essential for engineering this trait. Although the genetic principles related to flocculation are well-established in brewing yeast, where a set of FLO genes promotes cell adhesion [110,111], the molecular mechanisms in other microbial strains, particularly microalgae, are not well understood. Research on Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus obliquus has indicated that polysaccharides produced by these trains play a crucial role in self-flocculation. Additionally, recent studies suggest that glycoproteins may also contribute to the flocculation of Ettlia texensis [112].

Self-flocculation is believed to occur when the flocculating agents produced by microalgae link to nearby cells or form bridges through charge neutralization, thereby enhancing the flocculation process. Moreover, self-flocculation encompasses not only the spontaneous sedimentation of certain microalgal strains but also the aggregation induced by external factors, such as the addition of alkalis or the consumption of CO₂, which raise the medium’s pH [19,70]. This process leads to the precipitation of carbonates and the co-precipitation of magnesium and calcium ions as pH increases [62]. Other species such as Scenedesmus quadrucaula can produce extracellular polymeric substances that facilitate effective self-flocculation [113,114]. The potential applications of self-flocculating microalgae extend to wastewater treatment [109], where certain strains can remove nutrients while producing lipids [115]. For instance, specific microalgae isolated from undiluted piggery wastewater demonstrate impressive nutrient removal efficiencies. Additionally, microalgae like Tribonema viride and Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 have proven to be effective in eliminating ammonia nitrogen, total phosphorus, and chemical oxygen demand, underscoring the potential for microalgae [116]. Certain microalgal species have shown superior nutrient removal efficiency in wastewater treatment systems due to their tolerance of high nutrient loads and fluctuating environmental conditions. For example, Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus obliquus are widely studied for their robust growth in nutrient-rich wastewater and their ability to efficiently take up nitrogen and phosphorus. Similarly, Tetraselmis sp. and Picochlorum sp. are known for their high adaptability to saline and variable wastewater environments, making them promising candidates for the treatment of more challenging effluents [117].

To further advance the capabilities of microbial strains, recent developments in genetic manipulation systems have opened new opportunities for exploring flocculation agent biosynthesis. Concerns regarding the stability of transgenic microalgae can be alleviated through the integration of target genes into the nuclear genome [107,118,119]. Furthermore, controlling the timing of flocculation can help reduce potential growth declines that may arise from the energy and nutrient demands associated with synthesizing flocculating agents. Techniques such as utilizing ethanol-induced promoters in yeast may be similarly adapted to enhance elements, hence providing a sustainable approach to microalgal cultivation and harvesting.

Genetic Improvement of Self-Flocculation

In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the use of genetic and metabolic engineering in the field of microalgae. The main goal is to achieve more efficient and sustainable microalgal technology, as well as increased productivity and yield in the production processes of high value-added compounds derived from these photosynthetic microorganisms. However, these genetic tools have only been successfully demonstrated in a limited number of species, mainly due to their metabolic versatility, lack of unique and strong promoters that unify the protocols, low performance in the expression of heterologous genes, and the instability of nuclear expression [120]. Nevertheless, in certain biological processes, the restricted understanding of their molecular bases makes this task especially challenging. This is exemplified by the mechanisms that regulate self-flocculation in microorganisms, with a particular focus on microalgae. Furthermore, there is a limited number of research groups globally that are dedicated to this topic, and a similarly limited number of published studies [89,121].

The fact that self-flocculation has been demonstrated to be a profitable and environmentally sustainable mechanism for microalgal biorefineries highlights the need to investigate its molecular mechanisms in greater depth in order to enhance yields through the utilization of genetic engineering and to establish this mechanism as an effective solution to the reduction in the use of chemicals in microalgae biomass harvesting processes. With regard to the induction of self-flocculation in microalgae through genetic engineering, the existing bibliography is notably scarce. The majority of studies have focused on the examination of the dominant agents involved in this process, both microalgae and highly flocculent microorganisms that are widely utilized in industrial applications, such as bacteria and fermentation yeasts.

As mentioned above, some authors have investigated the molecules involved in the flocculation mechanism of two self-flocculant microalgae from the Chlorella and Scenedesmus genera. In 2014, M. A. Alam and colleagues investigated the flocculation mechanism of Chlorella vulgaris JSC-7 [103], identifying cell wall polysaccharides as flocculating agents. Their crude extracts were observed to induce flocculation in both C. vulgaris CNW11 and Scenedesmus obliquus FS. Alternatively, a study by the authors Guo S et al., 2013 [122], on Scenedesmus obliquus AS-6-1 demonstrated that the self-flocculation of this microalgae was mediated by polysaccharides associated with the cell wall. These polysaccharides were found to comprise glucose, mannose, galactose, rhamnose, and fructose in a molar ratio of 8:5:3:2:1. The cell wall polysaccharides may be the subject of genetic studies with the objective of inducing their expression in the cell walls of other microalgae and reorganizing them to achieve a more adequate composition for flocculation. In a further investigation conducted by Lam and co-workers, the glycoproteins present in the cell wall and their interactions in the self-flocculent microalga E. texenis were elucidated, thereby opening the door for possible genetic modifications or integration of these glycoproteins and their interactions in other species of non-flocculating microalgae [60].

An alternative approach was the induction of self-flocculation in the model green microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii by expressing a flocculin gene from the highly flocculant yeast Saccharomyces bayanus (FLO5), which is responsible for the flocculation process in these microorganisms. The genetically engineered Chlamydomonas species exhibited self-flocculation capacities that were 2–3.5 times higher than those observed in the wild-type strain [123].

On the other hand, the ongoing advancement of technology and the emergence of novel tools such as genetic editing, synthetic biology, computational biology and artificial intelligence could facilitate the development of sustainable and viable genetic engineering techniques for the induction of self-flocculation. In this context, the utilization of CRISPR-Cas gene editing technology represents a promising approach for the development of genetically enhanced microalgae strains with an enhanced self-flocculation capacity [124,125]. The application of CRISPR-Cas technology would facilitate the modification of specific genes that influence cell surface properties and the production of exopolysaccharides, which are pivotal in the flocculation process. Some of these genes could be those involved in cell wall biosynthesis (e.g., cellulose synthase), extracellular polysaccharide production (e.g., beta-glucan synthase), and surface charge regulation, as they could influence cell aggregation behavior [28,126].

Such modifications could optimize the natural tendency of microalgae to group together in flocs, thereby significantly enhancing their self-flocculation ability. This would facilitate the harvesting and collection of algal biomasses, while reducing the costs associated with separating algae from the culture medium. Moreover, the generation of highly flocculent strains using CRISPR-Cas technology would allow the engineering of microalgae to enhance other beneficial properties, such as increased efficiency in CO₂ fixation [127] or the production of high-added-value compounds [128].

Despite the lack of research exploring the use of CRISPR-Cas technology to induce self-flocculation in microalgae, the advances made in other areas demonstrate the potential of CRISPR technology in modifying microalgae to improve certain metabolic and biomolecule accumulation characteristics relevant to industry [129,130]. For instance, CRISPR has been utilized to increase the accumulation of lipids and other metabolites with potential utility in biofuels as in the case of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii [131], Nannochloropsis gaditana [132] or Chlorella spp. [133]. Furthermore, the use of CRISPR has enabled the manipulation of microalgal genes resulting in an increased yield of interesting industrial carotenoids, such as, for example, astaxanthin in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii [134], β-carotene in Dunaliella salina [135], or even the marine carotenoid diatoxanthin in the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum [136]. Furthermore, the potential of CRISPR technology is being investigated in other areas of interest for microalgae, including its use for a sustainable aquaculture and the efficient biological treatment of wastewater [137].

In summary, the utilization of genetic editing systems in microalgae has the potential to expedite the development of more efficient microalgal strains as a biological platform to produce high-added-value molecules. This, in turn, could facilitate a feasible and suitable biomass concentration and harvesting for microalgal biorefineries.

3. Valuable Microalgae Compounds and Bio-Flocculation Implications

Microalgae are commonly referred to as ‘sustainable bio-factories’ because of their ability to both reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide and produce a wide range of valuable compounds. However, the key to the successful large-scale use of microalgae as bio-factories lies in the selection of the right microalgae and ideal growth conditions. A screening process should be established to select the best microalgae strains based on their growth, strength and metabolite production, thanks to the diverse range of microalgae species [138]. Current opportunities in microalgae technology are shifting towards the production of valuable bio-compounds such as lipids, carotenoids and other compounds for pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, and cosmetic uses.

The harvesting of microalgae biomass is challenging due to the highly diluted nature of the culture, which typically has a cell density of less than 1.0 g/L. Consequently, a substantial volume of water must be removed during the microalgae harvesting process. The inherent properties of microalgal cells, namely their diminutive size and colloidal stability within the culture medium, contribute to the complexity of the harvesting process [139]. For this reason, the economic costs associated with microalgal biomass harvesting have emerged as a significant barrier to the market’s expansion towards microalgae-derived products. In this context, bio-flocculation has garnered attention as a promising solution to mitigate these costs, offering a more environmentally friendly alternative.

Despite the growing interest in this area, research efforts have been limited, with a scarcity of publications addressing bio-flocculation processes.

Figure 2 and the subsequent sections offer an overview of the most relevant examples found in the literature on the implications of bio-flocculation for the production of high value-added compounds of major industrial relevance in a microalgae biorefinery.

3.1. Lipids

Microalgal lipids are a chemically diverse group of hydrophobic compounds, typically stored in the plasma membrane, chloroplasts, and lipid bodies as triacylglycerides (TAGs) and free fatty acids. They are broadly categorized into neutral lipids—such as TAGs and sterols, which serve as energy reserves—and polar lipids, including phospholipids and glycolipids, which have structural roles. Additionally, microalgae can produce waxes, hydrocarbons, and long-chain fatty acids (up to 24 carbons), including omega-3 compounds with known health benefits. TAGs are particularly important for biofuel production due to their high productivity and their role in protecting photosynthesis under stress conditions [140,141,142]. Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), such as eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), found in microalgae, are highly regarded due to their health benefits as food supplements, and they lack plant-based alternatives. These characteristics position microalgae as a valuable resource for both the biofuel industry and the nutraceutical sector [141].

Oleaginous microalgae are photosynthetic microorganisms that can accumulate substantial amounts of lipids, rendering them a promising source for the production of biofuels and other high-added-value compounds [143]. Their capacity to synthesize fatty acids under diverse environmental conditions renders them particularly attractive for applications in the energy and nutraceutical industries. Notable species include Botryococcus braunii, Nannochloropsis sp., Chlorella vulgaris, Neochloris oleoabundans, and Crypthecodinium cohnii, which exhibit lipid accumulation rates ranging from 20% to 80% of their dry weight [144]. These microalgae have been extensively studied due to their high oil production efficiency and their potential to be used as substitutes for fossil fuels in the production of sustainable energy.

Despite the prevalence of mechanical or chemical processes in the current biomass collection level, there is an emerging body of research exploring bio-flocculation as a promising and sustainable alternative [145,146]. Some authors have explored the use of fungal culture-assisted bio-flocculation, which has been demonstrated to improve the flocculation performance of microalgae species of interest. In 2015, Nazim Muradov and his team evaluated 33 fungal strains against microalgae species commonly utilized for biodiesel production, including the heterotrophic freshwater microalgae Chlorella protothecoides and the marine microalgae Tetraselmis suecica [147]. In addition, other authors have investigated the bio-flocculation of oleaginous microalgae using the natively adapted filamentous fungi Aspergillus niger, isolated from wastewater and its subsequent hydrothermal liquefaction for biofuel production [148]. Additionally, the lipid-rich cellulolytic fungus Aspergillus terreus, which was recently isolated, was evaluated as a bio-flocculant to enhance the collection yield of the oleaginous microalga Chlorella sp. In this instance, the lipids extracted from the Chlorella–Aspergillus co-culture were utilized for the production of biodiesel through methylation, yielding a substantial percentage of C18:1,2 unsaturated fatty acids, which is regarded as a suitable fraction for biodiesel production [75].

Conversely, other researchers have explored microalgae–bacteria co-cultures as a bio-flocculation methodology. In this regard, Manogaran Lakshmikandan and colleagues examined the efficacy of the co-cultivation of Asterococcus limneticus WL2 and Streptomyces rosealbus MTTC 12951 in both the harvesting processes and the production of lipids of interest for biodiesel [91]. In another sense, some authors have explored the use of naturally occurring flocculant molecules (bio-based flocculants) for the flocculation of microalgae and the production of biofuels. In 2018, Liandong Zhu et al. delved into the use of chitosan as a bio-flocculant compound on Chlorella vulgaris [149].

A substantial number of studies have been conducted on natural coagulant compounds and natural polymers, predominantly protein, polysaccharide, carbohydrate, or polyphenol compounds derived from various plant sources, including Moringa species, Strychnos potatorum, Plantago ovata or Jatropha curcu; from bacteria such as Bacillus megaterium SP1, lactic-acid bacteria or Arthrobacter humicola; fungi such as Aspergillus or Rhizopus; and the microalgae themselves [74]. In relation to this final point, in 2021 the self-flocculation capability of the oleaginous microalgae of interest for biodiesel, Auxenochlorella protothecoides UTEX 2341, was analyzed [150].

The implementation of bio-flocculation processes has been demonstrated to enhance the efficiency of biomass collection and to contribute to the economic and environmental viability of lipid production from microalgae biorefinery. This, in turn, supports the sustainable development of biofuels.

3.2. Carotenoids

Carotenoids are terpenoid pigments derived from tetraterpenes (C40). These hydrocarbons are classified into two principal groups: firstly, carotenes, which contain solely carbon and hydrogen atoms (e.g., α-carotene, β-carotene, γ-carotene, phytoene and lycopene), and secondly, xanthophylls, which possess a carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen molecular structure [151]. A schematic of the carotenogenesis pathway and the enzymes involved is shown in Figure 3.

Photosynthetic organisms, as well as some non-photosynthetic bacteria and fungi, are capable of synthesizing carotenoids and, significantly, microalgae are among the most prolific producers of naturally occurring carotenoids [152] (Figure 4).

Carotenoids obtained from microalgae constitute a sustainable and valuable source of bioactive compounds, exhibiting applications in diverse industries, including food, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics. These pigments, notably astaxanthin from Haematococcus pluvialis, β-carotene from Dunaliella salina, or lutein from Chlorella vulgaris, possess potent antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and photoprotective properties, rendering them essential in nutritional supplements and sunscreens [129]. Moreover, the extraction of these pigments from microalgae within a biorefinery enables the optimization of biomass utilization, integrating the production of bioenergy, proteins, and other high-added-value compounds in a circular economy model.

The increasing demand for natural pigments, in conjunction with limitations on synthetic dyes, has prompted the development of more efficient and sustainable extraction and purification technologies for carotenoids, thereby solidifying microalgae as a promising alternative in the context of biorefineries [153]. From this perspective, bio-flocculation is presented as an efficient and sustainable strategy for harvesting microalgae biomass in biorefineries aimed at producing carotenoids without the need to add external chemical agents.

Despite the limited availability of research on the application of bio-flocculation processes for collecting microalgal biomass exclusively for the extraction of carotenoids, some studies have reported the potential use of these methods for this purpose. For example, in 2022, Hui Liu et al. stated the application of co-cultures of filamentous fungi with microalgae for the treatment of wastewater and its association with the production of biomass enriched with high-added-value compounds, such as carotenoids [154]. The use of co-cultures of Aspergillus sp., Ganoderma lucidum, or Trichoderma reesei was studied primarily with microalgae such as Chlorella sp., Scenedesmus sp., or Haematococcus pluvialis, which are rich in lutein and astaxanthin. Moreover, a more recent study by Goswami R et al. reported the utilization of fungi-assisted bio-flocculation for the harvesting of the microalgae Picochlorum sp. using Aspergillus niger and, the potential subsequent production of astaxanthin and β-carotene [117]. On the other hand, certain studies have reported the use of co-cultures of flocculent microalgae and non-flocculent microalgae to increase the harvest efficiency of the latter and the yields of carotenoids such as β-carotene. For instance, co-cultures of Coelastrum cf. pseudomicroporum and Scenedesmus sp. have been examined [155] as well as Skeletonema sp. with Euglena sp. [156] and the co-culture of the marine microalgae Nannochloropsis oculata and Phaeodactylum tricornutum [157].

In terms of efficiency and yields for carotenoids recovery, co-cultures of filamentous fungi and microalgae generally achieve higher harvesting efficiencies and carotenoid yields compared to flocculent and non-flocculent microalgae co-cultures. Flocculent microalgae co-cultures show intermediate performance, while non-flocculent species typically require additional flocculation aids, resulting in a lower overall efficiency and carotenoid recovery [158,159].

Alternatively, some authors have explored the self-flocculant capacity of certain microalgae species, studying the most beneficial abiotic conditions for an optimal increase in said process with applicability in the efficient and sustainable harvesting of microalgal biomass and the production of carotenoids, such as β-carotene, lutein, violaxanthin, canthaxanthin, and astaxanthin. In 2022, Malik and his team characterized a newly self-flocculant algal strain identified as Bracteacoccus pseudominor BERC09, which revealed its promising potential to produce carotenoids and lipids [160]. And, in 2024 Galan et al. focused on the study of culture parameters that could influence the self-flocculation of Haematococcus pluvialis with the aim of improving its harvesting yields for further production of astaxanthin among other valuable industrial carotenoids [161].

3.3. Proteins

Microalgae have attracted great interest among food technologists due to their distinct advantages over traditional protein sources. They have been found to be rich in essential amino acids (EAAs), such as leucine, arginine, lysine, isoleucine, phenylalanine, threonine, and valine [162], and many authors have studied amino acid profiles of conventional meat sources with microalgal proteins [163]. They have garnered heightened interest among food technologists due to their distinctive advantages over traditional protein sources. These organisms exhibit rapid growth, are not contingent on arable land, require minimal water, and can produce a diverse array of bioactive compounds. Notably, species such as Chlorella vulgaris, Arthrospira platensis, Dunaliella salina, and Haematococcus pluvialis are particularly noteworthy for their exceptional protein composition, which can account for up to 70% of their dry weight [164]. These microorganisms offer a sustainable source of protein and possess an intriguing amino acid profile, rich in essential amino acids, similar to some animal protein sources, such as eggs [165]. Consequently, microalgae are regarded as promising protein sources due to their distinctive amino acid profile and the presence of numerous bioactive peptides derived from species such as Porphyridium, Nostoc commune, Chlorella pyrenoidosa, and Arthrospira platensis [166]. This renders them ideal for application in the food, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical industries. Existing studies have reported a substantial increase in the protein content of various food products following the incorporation of microalgae biomass. However, the utilization and development of microalgae for protein-rich foods for humans is in the early stages, and thus, they are considered an alternative protein source for the future [167]. Microalgae proteins have important applications, such as emulsifying, foaming, and gelling, which are crucial in determining the quality and texture of foods. Furthermore, microalgae peptides have been shown to possess bioactivity with various health-promoting effects, including antioxidant, antidiabetic, and antihypertensive properties, as well as antibacterial, osteogenic, anticancer, and anti-aging activities [164,168].

Microalgae have been identified as promising organisms for the production of recombinant proteins due to their unique characteristics and ability to grow under controlled conditions. Species such as Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, and Nannochloropsis gaditana have been the focus of extensive research for their potential in the production of therapeutic proteins and vaccines. Notably, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii has been utilized to produce recombinant proteins, including EGF (epidermal growth factor) and monoclonal antibodies, which have demonstrated applications in cancer treatment and immunological diseases [169,170]. Additionally, Phaeodactylum tricornutum has demonstrated its efficacy in producing proteins with antiviral activity, which could be pivotal in the development of novel treatments for viral infections [171]. Nannochloropsis gaditana has been utilized to produce bioactive proteins with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, rendering it suitable for applications in the food and cosmetics industries [172]. These investigations underscore the potential of microalgae as biotechnological platforms for the sustainable production of recombinant proteins with diverse industrial and medical applications.

Bio-flocculation has the potential to become a viable process for the harvesting of microalgal proteins. This is due to its efficiency in cell aggregation, its low environmental impact, and its potential cost reduction compared to traditional methods such as centrifugation or filtration. Despite the absence of specific studies on the recovery of microalgal proteins by bio-flocculation, the existing evidence on its efficacy in biomass separation suggests that this method could facilitate the concentration and recovery of proteins without the use of aggressive chemical agents, thus preserving their functionality and nutritional quality. In addition, the possibility of using natural bio-flocculants or those produced by endogenous microorganisms minimizes the risk of contamination of the final product, aligning with the principles of sustainable bioprocesses.

3.4. Other Valuable Compounds

Microalgae have been identified as a promising source of secondary metabolites, with potential applications in various industrial sectors, including agriculture, food, and pharmacology. These molecules of interest include phytohormones, polysaccharides, carbohydrates such as starch, substances with biocidal activity or micro and macro nutrients. The implications of bio-flocculation and different harvesting methods, for the obtaining of these kind of bioactive compounds and their use in biorefineries, are summarized in

Table 2. Other microalgae-derived bioactive compounds and main harvesting methods.

Biocompounds	Microalgae Species	Applications	Harvesting Method	Reference
Phytohormones and Biostimulant molecules	Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Chlorella vulgaris, Scenedesmus obliquus, Thalassiosira sp., Nannochloropsis oceanica, Haematococcus pluvialis, Arthrospira platensis, Synechococcus sp., Anabaena sp.	Production of auxins, gibberellins, and cytokinins, plant growth stimulants, root development, and stress resistance. Applications in agricultural biostimulants.	Bio-flocculation Aqueous extraction	[173,174,175,176].
Biocidal molecules	Chlorella vulgaris, Nannochloropsis oculata, Oscillatoria agardhii, Nostoc (genus)	Antibacterial, antifungal, and insecticidal activity. Ecological alternatives to synthetic agrochemicals in agriculture.	Bio-flocculation	[177,178]
Enriched biomass and Biofertilization	Scenedesmus obliquus, Chlorella vulgaris, Anabaena cylindrica	Improves soil fertility, plant nutrition, soil structure, and beneficial microbial activity. Used as a biofertilizer.	Bio-flocculation	[179,180]
Polysaccharides	Chlorella vulgaris, Porphyridium cruentum, Arthrospira platensis	Production of polysaccharides with immunostimulant, antioxidant, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory activities. Applications in food and pharmaceuticals.	Bio-flocculation Chemical extraction	[181,182,183]
Starch and other carbohydrates	Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Nannochloropsis gaditana, Chlorella vulgaris, Botryococcus braunii	Accumulation of starch and carbohydrates for the production of biofuels and bioplastics. Sustainable alternatives to conventional materials.	Bio-flocculation Chemical extraction Enzymatic hydrolysis Acid hydrolysis	[184,185]

.

4. Conclusions

The metabolic diversity of microalgae and their capacity to produce a wide range of bioactive compounds underscores their potential as biotechnological resources for biorefineries. Pursuing ongoing research in this domain is imperative to enhance their cultivation and extraction, thereby facilitating their incorporation into sustainable industrial applications. The recovery of bioactive molecules produced by microalgae necessitates the implementation of efficient harvesting and extraction methods. Conventional techniques employed include centrifugation, membrane filtration, dissolved air flotation, and chemical or biological flocculation. Centrifugation and filtration are highly effective methods, but they require a significant amount of energy and financial resources. Chemical flocculation, while efficient, can leave unwanted residues in the biomass. In this context, bio-flocculation emerges as a promising and sustainable alternative for the harvesting of microalgal biomass. This method uses metabolites excreted by the microalgae themselves or natural microbial consortia to induce cell aggregation and their subsequent separation. It does not require the use of synthetic chemical agents, which can be a significant environmental benefit. The optimization and scaling of this approach could represent a significant advancement in microalgae biotechnology, aligning with more sustainable and efficient production strategies for obtaining biofertilizers, biostimulants, and biocides of microalgal origin.

5. Future Perspectives

The future of bio-flocculation as a green tool for recovering valuable compounds from microalgae in biorefineries lies in the integration of advanced technologies to enhance efficiency and scalability. Genetic engineering and synthetic biology could be employed to develop highly efficient flocculating microorganisms with tailored properties, improving recovery rates and selectivity. Additionally, the induction of self-flocculation in microalgae through metabolic engineering or controlled environmental triggers could reduce the need for external flocculants, simplifying downstream processing and lowering costs. Artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms can optimize process parameters, predict flocculation behavior, and enhance operational efficiency. Furthermore, emerging bioinformatics tools will enable the identification of key genes and metabolic pathways involved in bio-flocculation, facilitating strain improvement and process optimization. By combining these innovative approaches, bio-flocculation can become a more precise, cost-effective, and sustainable strategy, reinforcing its role in circular economy-driven biorefineries.