Next Article in Journal
Chemical Characterisation of Sargassum Inundation from the Turks and Caicos: Seasonal and Post Stranding Changes
Next Article in Special Issue
Red Seaweed Pigments from a Biotechnological Perspective
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Monthly Variation and Ultraviolet Stability of Mycosporine-like Amino Acids from Red Alga Dulse Palmaria palmata in Japan
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Extending the Cultivation Period of Undaria pinnatifida by Using Regional Strains with Phenotypic Differentiation along the Sanriku Coast in Northern Japan

1
Riken Food Co., Ltd., 2-5-60 Miyauchi, Tagajyo 985-0844, Japan
2
RIKEN Nishina Center for Accelerator-Based Science, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan
3
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Miyazaki, 1-1 Gakuen-Kibanadai Nishi, Miyazaki 889-2192, Japan
4
Future Center Initiative, The University of Tokyo, 178-4-4 Wakashiba, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-0871, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Phycology 2021, 1(2), 129-142; https://doi.org/10.3390/phycology1020010
Submission received: 20 October 2021 / Revised: 29 November 2021 / Accepted: 29 November 2021 / Published: 6 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Phycology)

Abstract

:
The Sanriku district is one of the largest Undaria pinnatifida (Wakame) cultivation areas in Japan. However, the production has steadily declined in recent years due to the high retirement rate among fishers. Extending the cultivation period is a potential way to improve productivity by decentralizing the workforce through the production process. We aimed to investigate the phenotypic differentiation between regional strains of U. pinnatifida collected from Matsushima Bay (MAT) and Hirota Bay (HRT) in the Sanriku district through a cultivation trial to verify the application for the purpose of extending the cultivation period. The growth of MAT was better than that of HRT when the cultivation started earlier (i.e., 9 and 19 October 2014); in contrast, HRT outperformed MAT when the cultivation started later (6 November and 12 December 2014). The yield of MAT reached over the standard amount in the Sanriku district in February. On the other hand, the yield of HRT reached over this value in April. Furthermore, the photosynthetic performance and nutrient uptake rates differed between MAT and HRT, indicating that the differences may result in maturation characteristics. According to these results, the combined use of MAT and HRT would be a valuable strategy by which to extend the cultivation period.

1. Introduction

Kelps are utilized globally as edible foods and energy sources because of their high primary productivity and great nutrition [1,2]. Undaria pinnatifida (Japanese vernacular name: “Wakame”) is a major industrially produced species of kelp that has been cultivated in northern Asia for over half a century [3]. It is regarded as a healthy food due its many bioactive effects [4,5,6,7], and harvest and cultivation trials have been undertaken in various regions outside northern Asia since the 1980s [8,9].
Although the market demand has increased to meet the requirement of customers, the yield of U. pinnatifida in Japan has decreased over recent years. For example, in the Sanriku district (Iwate and Miyagi Prefectures), the principal U. pinnatifida production area in Japan, the total harvest declined from 49,872 to 21,771 t between 1999 and 2019 [10]. The decrease is correlated with a declining number of fishers; for example, the number working for Undaria cultivation at Iwate Prefecture in 2018 was 898, almost one-fifth of that in 1998. Furthermore, 35% of all fishers are over 65 years old, and 76.7% do not have successors [11]. Therefore, the decrease in number and aging of fishers seriously threaten the viability of the Undaria industry. In addition, Undaria farming in the Sanriku district requires a high workforce concentration over a short period. Sporelings are generally set into the culture rope in the sea from October to the end of November. Intensive harvesting is generally carried out in March and April. These highly time-restrictive cultivation schemes impede the scaling-up of the cultivation with a limited workforce. Therefore, there is a need to extend the cultivation period and harvesting time to equalize the daily cultivation tasks by developing aquaculture technology and appropriate cultivars.
In order to achieve higher productivity in the aquaculture of U. pinnatifida, previous studies have investigated the characteristics of heritability [12] and heterosis [13], and selective breeding has been applied [14,15,16,17,18]. Gao et al. [19] showed that Undaria sporophytes from a warmer site (Naruto, southern Japan) had significantly greater photosynthetic activities at high temperatures and higher nitrogen accumulation capacities than those from colder sites (Matsushima and Okirai bays, Sanriku coast in northeastern Japan). They concluded that sporophytes from Naruto had a greater tolerance to high temperatures and low-nutrient conditions, and that they could be introduced as parental stock in northern Japan. We previously investigated the phenotypic differences among U. pinnatifida plants cultivated at six different sites in Japan, and identified the ecotype-dependent characteristics in their growth and nutrient uptake kinetics [20]. Based on this result, our past studies compared the growth rates among regional strains through a common garden experiment using a novel tank culture system [21,22]. This showed that sporophytes from Matsushima Bay (MAT) in Miyagi Prefecture grow faster than other sporophytes, including those used at Hirota Bay (HRT) in Iwate Prefecture, suggesting that these differences are attributed to genotypes [22]. Fishers of the Sanriku district empirically used the techniques to shift the harvest time by using different phenotypic variants with different growth rates. However, these variants’ growth patterns and physiological characteristics have not been quantitatively verified, and the scientific evidence has been insufficient.
In the present study, we focused on comparing the phenotypic differences between regional strains via a cultivation trial under experimental aquaculture conditions and evaluating the physiological responses to temperature. In order to achieve this, two regional strains—MAT and HRT—identified in previous studies [20,22], were used. The cultures were begun on five different dates, from September to December. Their morphological characteristics were observed in order to confirm the differences in their growth patterns, and to compare their photosynthesis rates and nutrient uptake kinetics. We also discuss the potential application of these different regional strains in the Undaria cultivation industry.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparing the MAT and HRT Strains

Two regional strains in the Sanriku district were used for the present study. First, the regional strain used for industrial cultivation in Matsushima Bay, Miyagi Prefecture (38°32′ N, 141°31′ E, MAT) was originally introgressed from Kinkasan (38°30′ N, 141°55′ E), which is located 30 km northeast of MAT, and lies in the mixture area of the Oyashio and Kuroshio current [22]. Second, the regional strain used for industrial cultivation in Hirota Bay, Iwate Prefecture (38°98′ N, 141°71′ E, HRT) originated from wild sporophytes in Hirota Bay. Ten single-isolated sporophytes were selected from each strain, and were transferred to a tank system termed the “circulation and floating culture system” (CFCS) [21], where they were cultivated for two months at 10 °C under a 12 h:12 h L:D cycle, with light of 80–100 µmol photons m−2 s−1, until the sporophylls formed. The largest plants were then selected, and spores were induced from their sporophylls. The resulting gametophytes from each strain were incubated in PESI medium [23] at 20 °C, with a light intensity of 20 µmol photons m−2 s−1 and a 12 h photoperiod.

2.2. Sporeling Production

The MAT and HRT gametophytes were separately maintained in 9 cm diameter plastic Petri dishes. The dishes contained 30 mL of PESI medium, were kept at 20 °C and a 20 µmol photons m−2 s−1 light intensity, and were subjected to a 12 h photoperiod to promote growth (Figure 1a). Sporelings were produced from the gametophytes by a partially modified version of the technical manual in Tokushima Prefecture in Japan [24]. In brief, each gametophyte (male and female) from MAT and HRT was transferred to a 300 mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 200 mL PESI medium, and was then shredded to approximately 10 cells by a microblender (T 18 digital Ultra-Turrax®; IKA, Osaka, Japan). In order to prepare a substrate for the sporelings, nylon fiber string was wound around a 13 cm square stainless steel frame, which was sterilized by boiling and then thoroughly dried. Next, the shredded gametophytes were poured into a plastic vat containing the PESI medium [23], and the substrate was soaked in the medium. The gametophytes were subsequently attached to the substrate by absorption, and the inoculated substrates were placed in an aquarium containing 7.5 L of quarter-strength PESI medium.
During the first week, the substrates were incubated at a temperature of 20 °C and a light intensity of 40 µmol m−2 s−1 with a 12 h photoperiod. In each subsequent week, the light intensity was increased by 20 µmol m−2 s−1. In addition, the photoperiod was reduced to 11 h on week 3 and 10 h on week 4. At week 5, when visible sporophytes were observed on the fiber (Figure 1b), the substrates were transferred to an aquarium with running seawater. The sporelings were transferred to a cultivation farm in the sea approximately 10 days before the marine cultivation started. The strings were tied onto ropes, which were hung at a depth of 50 cm in Hirota Bay, Iwate Prefecture (Figure 1c). The sporeling production was carried out five times.
The marine cultivation was carried out at Hirota Bay. A rope measuring 150 m in length and 50 mm in diameter was used as the mother rope, which is the standard in Iwate Prefecture. The sporophyte strings were cut into 3 cm sections and inserted at 30 cm intervals along a 3-mm-diameter nylon rope for the sporelings. The MAT and HRT sporelings were then set from different ends along the mother rope on five different dates in 2014 (set I: 14 September; set II: 9 October; set III: 19 October; set IV: 6 November; set V: 12 December), with 10m intervals between each set (Figure 1d–f). Before the total length of the sporophytes reached about 1 m, the number of individuals was pruned to 80–120 per 1m of aquaculture rope according to the fisherman’ s experiences.

2.3. Environmental Measurements

The seawater temperature at the cultivation farm was measured every 15–20 days. A 300 mL seawater sample was also collected when the temperature was measured. The nitrate (NO3–N), ammonium (NH4–N), and phosphate (PO4–P) concentrations were measured using an automated analyzer (QuAAtro 2-HR; BLTEC, Osaka, Japan). The average seawater temperature between 1995 and 2013 was obtained from the Hirota Bay Fisheries Cooperative database.

2.4. Morphological Measurements

All of the MAT and HRT sporophytes that grew on the 1m long mother rope were collected from each set once every 2–3 weeks (Figure 1e,f). Then, the total wet weight of the individuals per 1m of the mother rope was measured in the laboratory. The total length, sporophyte weight, and sporophyll weight of the longest 20 sporophytes were measured after removing the holdfasts.

2.5. Photosynthesis and Nutrient Uptake Rates

In order to quantify the photosynthesis rates and nutrient uptake rates of the MAT and HRT sporophytes, 50 individuals from MAT and HRT were removed from the set III sporelings with a razor blade on 15 January 2015, and were cultivated in the CFCS tank. After one month, 30 plants, with a total length of < 30 cm, were collected and pre-incubated at 10 °C under a light intensity of 100 µmol photons m−2 s−1 for 1 h in 30 L of seawater in the CFCS tank, which was installed with a thermostatic circulator pump to regulate the seawater temperature. Following the pre-incubation, the central part of the maximum blade width area was subjected to dark conditions by attaching a leaf clip (PAM-2000; WALZ, Effeltrich, Germany) for 20 min to fully oxidize the electron transport chain before conducting the measurements [25]. While the sporophytes were still in seawater, a pulse amplitude modulation (PAM) fluorimeter (MINI-PAM II; WALZ) was used to determine the effective quantum yield (Fv/Fm) using the following equation [26]:
Fv/Fm = (FmFo)/Fm
where Fo is the minimum fluorescence and Fm is the maximum fluorescence. This test was conducted at seawater temperatures of 5 °C, 10 °C, 15 °C, 20 °C, and 25 °C using the same 30 sporophytes.
In order to quantify the nutrient uptake rates of the two strains, 3.3-cm-diameter blade discs were removed from the maximum blade-width area of five individuals from the MAT and HRT samples. These discs were pre-incubated in 1 L flasks containing aerated sterilized seawater at 10 °C and under a light intensity of 100 μmol photons m−2 s−1 with a 12 h photoperiod for 48 h in order to allow recovery from the wounding that had occurred during the blade disk preparation [27,28]. The seawater used for the pre-incubation was collected from the Sea of Japan by the Akita Prefectural Institute of Fisheries, and contained natural nutrient concentrations close to the detection limits. Each disc was transferred to a 200 mL flask containing 100 mL of sterilized and filtered seawater (GF/F filters; Whatman, Maidstone, UK). Flasks that contained seawater without sporophyte discs were used as the control. Then, NO3–N, NH4–N, and PO4–P were added to the flasks in the form of sodium nitrate, ammonium chloride, and sodium phosphate dibasic dodecahydrate, respectively, to provide initial concentrations of 15 µM NO3–N, NH4–N, and 2 µM PO4–P, respectively. The flasks were then incubated at 5 °C, 10 °C, 15 °C, 20 °C, or 25 °C, and shaken at 80 rpm on a multi-shaker (MMS-4010; Tokyo Rikakikai, Tokyo, Japan) under a light intensity of 180 μmol photons m−2 s−1, which was provided by white fluorescent lamps. The samples were incubated for 60 min using a previously reported method [20,22].
After 60 min incubation, 10 mL seawater samples were collected in plastic tubes and frozen until they were needed for analysis. The blade discs were dried in a convection oven (NDO–600ND; Tokyo Rikakikai) at 80 °C for 48 h, and their dry weights were measured. The nutrient concentrations in the seawater were determined using an automated analyzer. The NO3–N, NH4–N, and PO4–P uptake rates (µmol g dry weight (dw)−1 h−1) were calculated for each disc by comparing the concentrations in the control and experimental flasks at each temperature [20,22,29]. The seawater used in these experiments was also collected from the Sea of Japan by the Akita Prefectural Institute of Fisheries. Q10 values were calculated for the different temperatures using the following equation [30,31]:
lnQ10 = 10 ∗ (lnNUR2–lnNUR1)/(T2–T1)
where T2 and T1 are the test temperatures set in the experiments, and NUR2 and NUR1 are the nutrient uptake rates (µmol g dw−1 h−1) at test temperatures T2 and T1, respectively.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Student’ s t-test was used to compare the morphological and physiological characteristics between the MAT and HRT strains. In contrast, the differences in the values of the nutrient uptake rates for MAT and HRT at the different seawater temperatures were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by a post hoc Scheffe’s test for multiple comparisons. The statistical tests were carried out using IBM SPSS Statistics (v. 23; IBM, Armonk, USA). A nonparametric procedure was used because not all of the data were normally distributed or homoscedastic. Differences were considered to be significant at a probability of 5% (p < 0.05).

3. Results

3.1. Environmental Conditions

The seawater temperatures on the cultivation start dates for each set were 21.4 °C on 17 September (set I), 20.0 °C on 9 October (set II), 18.2 °C on 19 October (set III), 15.2 °C on 6 November (set IV), and 13.1 °C on 12 December (set V, Figure 2a). The nutrient concentrations in the seawater are shown in Figure 2b,c. The NO3–N concentration was 0.29 µM on 21 October, and increased to a maximum value of 7.66 µM on 6 December. Then, it decreased until it reached 3.55 µM in February, but began to increase again in February and reached 5.15 µM in April. The NH4–N maximum concentration was 13.32 µM on 17 September, but then decreased to undetectable levels, except for readings of 0.69 µM on 9 October and 2.15 µM on 6th December. The PO4–P concentration reached a maximum value of 0.59 µM on 6 December, and showed a similar overall trend to that of NO3–N.

3.2. Growth at the Different Dates of Cultivation Start and Yield of MAT and HRT

The total lengths, thallus weights, and sporophyll weights of MAT and HRT on each cultivation start date (i.e., sets I–V) are shown in Figure 3. In set I, MAT and HRT grew until 30 December 2014 and 15 January 2015, respectively (Figure 3I-a,b,c); however, both strains became covered in other algae and diatoms, and could not be subsequently observed. In set II, the total length, thallus weight, and sporophyll weight of MAT were significantly higher than those of HRT after February (Figure 3II-a,b,c). Because almost the entire thalli of MAT were covered epiphytes and eroded, only HRT could be collected for measurement on 28 April. In set III, although the total length increased in almost the same pattern in the two strains, the thallus weight and sporophyll weight of MAT were significantly higher than those of HRT (Figure 3III-a,b,c). The values of the thallus weight and sporophyll weights were indicated as 2391 g and 447 g on 28 April, respectively, and these were the maximum values during the present cultivation trial (Figure 3III-b,c). On the contrary, in set IV, the growth of HRT was superior to that of MAT, and the total length after February and the thallus and sporophyll weights on 4 April of HRT were significantly higher than those of MAT (Figure 3 IV-a,b,c). Because the thalli of MAT were eroded and covered by epiphytes in a similar manner to set I, all of the values could not be measured on 28 April. In set V, only HRT thalli were grown; the total length, thallus weight, and sporophyll weight were 232 cm, 975 g, and 84 g, respectively (Figure 3V-a,b,c). These values were almost similar to those of HRT on April in set IV (Figure 3IV-a,b,c).
Pictures of the typical MAT and HRT sporophytes, collected on 4 March in 2015 from set III, are shown in Figure 4. MAT had large thalli and sporophylls, whereas HRT had deeply cut thalli and smaller sporophylls than those of MAT. According to the results of the cultivation trial, the yields on 1m of mother rope of MAT were higher than those of HRT (Table 1). No differences in the quality for food were observed between the MAT and HRT strains until the end of February. However, the thalli of MAT became more wrinkled on the surface and developed a coarser texture after the middle of March, whereas those of HRT remained smooth, with a good texture, until the final harvest on 28 April. On the other hand, there was no deterioration in the quality of either MAT or HRT during the harvest period for the sporophylls, despite the fact that on 28 April, and spores were obtained from the sporophylls of both MAT and HRT.

3.3. Effects of Temperature on Fv/Fm and the Nutrient Uptake Rates

The Fv/Fm values reached their maximum at 10 °C and 5 °C in MAT and HRT, respectively (Figure 5a). The values for both strains decreased when the seawater temperature increased, but the values for MAT were significantly higher than those for HRT at all temperatures above 10 °C (p < 0.05, Figure 5a).
The NO3–N uptake rate of MAT was significantly affected by the seawater temperature (Supplementary Materials Table S1). The lowest uptake rate was 9.15 µmol g−1 h−1 at 5 °C, and the highest was 26.88 µmol g−1 h−1 at 20 °C (Figure 5b). In contrast, there were no significant differences between the NO3–N uptake rates of HRT irrespective of the tested temperatures (Supplementary Materials Table S1), with values ranging from 15.9 to 21.3 µmol g−1 h−1 (Figure 5b). Thus, the NO3–N uptake rates of MAT were significantly higher than those of HRT at 20 °C, but the value of HRT was significantly higher than that of MAT at 5 °C (Figure 5b).
The NH4–N uptake rates ranged between 21.8 and 31.9 µmol g−1 h−1 for MAT, and between 23.5 and 25.0 µmol g−1 h−1 for HRT. There were no significant differences among the seawater temperatures for both strains (Supplemental Materials Table S1). However, the NH4-N uptake rates of MAT were significantly higher than those of HRT at all seawater temperatures above 15 °C (Figure 5c).
The PO4–P uptake rates for MAT and HRT significantly increased as the seawater temperature rose (Supplemental Materials Table S1). They reached their maximum values of 0.52 µmol g−1 h−1 for MAT and 0.75 µmol g−1 h−1 for HRT at 25 °C (Figure 5d). The PO4–P uptake rates for HRT were significantly higher than those for MAT above 10 °C (Figure 5d).
The Q10 values for nutrient uptake differed among the nutrients, temperatures, and strains (Table 2). The NO3–N uptake rate values were 1.7 or below in all cases except for MAT, when the temperature increased from 5 °C to 10 °C, whereas the Q10 values for the NH4–N uptake rate were ≤1.4 for both strains at all of the seawater temperatures. The Q10 values for the PO4–P uptake rate were 2.2 and above for both strains at all of the temperatures except 20–25 °C. The maximum values were 6.3 at 10–15 °C for MAT and 4.7 at 5–10 °C for HRT.

4. Discussion

4.1. Environmental Conditions

The seawater temperatures measured in this study were approximated to those of an average year in Hirota Bay. It was experientially shown that starting the cultivation of U. pinnatifida > 20 °C in Hirota Bay causes the sporelings to wither (Susumu Ohwada, personal communication). Therefore, the fishery workers’ cooperative association provides seawater temperature information to the U. pinnatifida producers to ensure that cultivation is started <20 °C. In this study, the seawater temperature fell below 20 °C in the first half of October between sets II and III. The nutrient concentration was low in September and October, except for the pulse of NH4-N in September, but increased toward spring as the seawater temperature decreased. Although there is typically a decrease in nutrients in early spring at Undaria farms in the Sanriku district due to the spring bloom of phytoplankton [32], this was not observed during the present study.

4.2. Differences in the Growth Characteristics of MAT and HRT

The differences in the growth pattern between MAT and HRT were revealed; the thallus and sporophyll growths of MAT were superior to those of HRT in sets II and III; on the other hand, these growths of HRT were superior to those of MAT in sets IV and V. Additionally, the tolerance for the seawater temperature at the beginning of cultivation was also different between MAT and HRT: the seawater temperature at the start of cultivation, which allows subsequent growth, was limited to 20 °C to 18 °C for MAT, whereas it was 20 °C or below for HRT. Regarding the cultivation yield of U. pinnatifida in the Sanriku district, the standard amount is 10–20 kg per 1m of the mother rope [33]. The yield of MAT in set III exceeded 10 kg m−1 in February, and the quality of thalli was satisfactory to market until the middle of March. On the other hand, the yield of HRT exceeded 10 kg m−1 after the beginning of April. Therefore, the proper time to begin cultivation and harvesting could be extended by using both MAT and HRT even in the same aquaculture site. Firstly, the cultivation period of MAT begins when the seawater temperature is 20–18 °C, and harvesting is carried out until the middle of March. Secondly, the cultivation period of HRT begins when the seawater temperature is 20–13 °C, and harvesting occurs in April. These differences in characteristics among the strains could help to distribute the concentration of the workforce in the aquaculture process of this alga. These results suggested that MAT and HRT are applicable for cultivation as an earlier maturation strain and a later maturation strain, respectively.
In the present study, both the MAT and HRT strains did not grow in set I when the seawater temperature was 21.4 °C. Therefore, if cultivation is to begin >20 °C, selecting the mother plant from a warmer location would be necessary. For example, the strain from Naruto region, Tokushima Prefecture (southern Japan, in the Seto Inland Sea), would be appropriate as the mother plant for high-temperature tolerance, because this strain does not have a reduced survival rate at 24 °C and has a high nitrogen accumulation ability under low-nutrient conditions [19].

4.3. Physiological Characteristics of MAT and HRT

The Fv/Fm and nutrient uptake rates showed differences between MAT and HRT. The Fv/Fm values of MAT were higher than those of HRT at 10–25 °C. The uptake rates of MAT in NO3–N at 20 °C and NH4–N at 15–25 °C were also observed to be higher than those of HRT. These results suggest that MAT has a potential for higher growth than that of HRT in the temperature region, and the characteristics may result in earlier maturation. In previous studies, we observed the NO3–N and NH4–N uptake kinetics to differ between several regional strains [20]. According to subsequent common garden experiments using the land-based tank cultivation method, NO3–N uptake kinetics with affinity to lower concentration levels may have a genetic origin [22]. Therefore, the different uptake responses in NO3–N and NH4–N between the strains in the present study might also have a genetic origin. On the other hand, the uptake rates in PO4–P of HRT were observed to be higher than those of MAT. Because the influence of the PO4–P uptake kinetics on growth and the differences in the kinetics among regional strains of U. pinnatifida have not been fully studied, further studies are needed.
Raven and Geider [34] previously reported that temperature influences the nutrient uptake rates via Q10 effects on algal metabolism. It has been shown that Q10 values of 2.0–2.5 characterize the active nutrient uptake across cell membranes, whereas Q10 values between 1.0 and 1.2 reflect passive processes, such as diffusion, which are not significantly affected by temperature [35]. The present study shows, for the first time, the Q10 values for the nutrient uptake rate in relation to the seawater temperature in U. pinnatifida. Based on the Q10 values, the uptake kinetics in NH4–N may be involved in passive processes, and those in PO4–P may be involved in active processes. The differences in the Q10 values in NO3–N between MAT and HRT may be due to the differences in the uptake kinetics depending on the regional strains. Similar differences in the Q10 values among different varieties of the same species have previously been reported for Porphyra leucostica [36]. For brown macroalgae, Xu et al. (2011) [31] previously detected differences in the Q10 values between nitrogen and phosphorus, and among temperature ranges in Saccharina japonica; the Q10 values of phosphorus were higher than those of nitrogen > 10 °C, and these results are similar to those observed in this study. In further studies, the relationship between the growth characteristics and nutrient uptake kinetics in relation to the seawater temperature should be assimilated and clarified in further detail.

4.4. Applications in the Undaria Farming Industry

Although the MAT thalli were markedly larger than the HRT thalli in sets II and III, there was a notable deterioration in MAT after the middle of March. The thallus surface developing wrinkles is regarded as an indicator of low quality in U. pinnatifida [3,32,37]. Therefore, the optimum harvest time for MAT is before the middle of March. However, the quality of the sporophylls did not decline even in April, and it has been reported that sporophyll growth is not negatively affected by Undaria thallus excision [38]. Therefore, multiple harvesting using the thallus excision method could be carried out on MAT before the middle of March, when only the thallus should be harvested by excision at 30 cm above the meristem [38], and at the end of April, when sufficiently large sporophylls can be harvested.
Using a combination of both MAT and HRT, it may be possible to harvest twice a year on the same cultivation rope, because MAT cultivation could start in October, with the thalli being harvested in December as “sprout leaf”. After the harvest of MAT, the HRT sporelings could subsequently be set on the mother rope, and the sporophytes could then be harvested until the end of April without quality deterioration. A higher price is paid for faster harvest times by the Undaria market [37]. In the Sanriku district, the price of young sporophytes harvested during the growth phase (December–January) as a sprouting leaf is five times higher than that of the ordinary crop [19]. Therefore, although the yield of MAT in December is about 15 times smaller than the value of the thalli in March (Table 1), harvesting in December may improve profitability through additional sales brought about by the double-cropping method.
In recent years, high waves and storms have frequently been generated along the coast of northern Japan due to rapidly developing low-pressure systems in winter [39]. These unseasonable storms have caused severe damage to Undaria sporelings during pre-cultivation or just after starting cultivation in the sea. This storm damage has reduced growth and caused a drop in viable seedlings. Against such sudden climate risks, HRT sporelings can start cultivation later; these are available to fishers whose seedlings have disappeared.
Undaria farming is a manual process, from sporeling setting through to shipping [33]. In particular, the separation of the thallus and stipes after boiling and salt storage must be carried out by hand for each individual in all the major cultivation areas of northeastern Asia. For example, in Japan, U. pinnatifida is intensively harvested from March to April, and thus the separation process must be completed before shipping. This creates an extremely large workload for fishermen, particularly with the recent decrease in the labor force. Therefore, extending the harvest period through the use of strains with different growth patterns may be an effective means of maintaining and increasing the production of Undaria with a limited workforce.

5. Conclusions and Perspectives

By comparing the MAT and HRT strains for U. pinnatifida in a cultivation study at an aquaculture site, it became clear that the growth pattern of both strains was different according to the seawater temperature at the beginning of cultivation. Moreover, the physiological characteristics between the two strains support these differences. These findings verified the efficiency of extending the cultivation period by the combined use of these regional strains.
Because Wakame farming at the Sanriku coast in Japan is becoming increasingly difficult year by year, a paradigm shift to higher productivity and more intensive production is required. Therefore, we must concentrate our research efforts on the development of elite cultivars and the assimilation of scientific evidence through the cultivation process, from sporeling production to the optimum period for harvest.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/phycology1020010/s1, Table S1. Differences in NO3-N, NH4-N, and PO4-P uptake rates between five temperatures of MAT and HRT strains of Undaria pinnatifida were cultivated in Hirota Bay, Iwate Prefecture. Data were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis test followed by post-hoc Scheffe’s test for multiple comparisons.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.S., N.F. and T.A.; methodology, Y.S. and T.H.; validation, Y.S.; formal analysis, Y.S.; investigation, Y.S. and T.H.; data curation, Y.S. and S.K.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.S.; writing—review and editing, T.H., H.I., N.F., T.A. and S.K.; visualization, Y.S. and T.H.; supervision and project administration, T.A. and N.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was partly supported by the Formation of Tohoku Marine Science Centre Project (Technical Development That Leads to the Creation of New Industries) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan to Y.S., T.H., H.I., N.F. and T.A.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article and Supplementary Material.

Acknowledgments

We thank Haruo Hosoya (Riken Vitamine Co., Ltd.), Hironobu Watanabe and Katsunori Ono (Riken Food Co., Ltd.) for their guidance throughout this research. We are very grateful to Osamu Sakuma, Tatsuya Musashi and Takahiro Saido (Iwate Prefectural Fisheries Technology Centre), and Susumu Ohwada and Osamu Hatakeyama (Hirota Bay Fisheries Cooperative) for their generous support during the field surveys. We also thank Nobuyoshi Nanba and Misaki Shinotsuka (Kitasato University) for their valuable advice and cooperation during the measurement of the nutrient concentrations. We thank Yutaka Ito, Miho Mogamiya, and Naoko Sasaki (Riken Food Co., Ltd.) for their technical support in measuring the morphological characteristics of U. pinnatifida. We also thank Eri Inomata (Riken Food Co., Ltd.) for the suggestions and comments which improved our manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Holdt, S.L.; Kraan, S. Bioactive compounds in seaweed: Functional food applications and legislation. J. Appl. Phycol. 2011, 23, 543–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wells, M.L.; Potin, P.; Craigie, J.S.; Raven, J.A.; Merchant, S.S.; Helliwell, K.E.; Smith, A.G.; Camire, M.E.; Brawley, S.H. Algae as nutritional and functional food sources: Revisiting our understanding. J. Appl. Phycol. 2017, 29, 949–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yamanaka, R.; Akiyama, K. Cultivation and utilization of Undaria pinnatifida (wakame) as food. J. Appl. Phycol. 1993, 5, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kikunaga, S.; Miyata, Y.; Ishibashi, G.; Koyama, F.; Tano, K. The bioavailability of magnesium from Wakame (Undaria pinnatifida) and Hijiki (Hijikia fusiforme) and the effect of alginic acid on magnesium utilization of rats. Plant Foods Hum. Nut. 1999, 53, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Synytsya, A.; Bleha, R.; Synytsya, A.; Pohl, R.; Hayashi, K.; Yoshinaga, K.; Nakano, T.; Hayashi, T. Mekabu fucoidan: Structural complexity and defensive effects against avian influenza A viruses. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 111, 633–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Maruyama, H.; Tamauchi, H.; Kawakami, F.; Yoshinaga, K.; Nakano, T. Suppressive effect of dietary fucoidan on proinflammatory immune response and MMP-1 expression in UVB-irradiated mouse skin. Planta Med. 2015, 81, 1370–1374. [Google Scholar]
  7. Yoshinaga, K.; Mitamura, R. Effects of Undaria pinnatifida (Wakame) on postprandial glycemia and insulin levels in humans: A randomized crossover trial. Plants Foods Human Nut. 2019, 74, 461–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Dellatorre, F.G.; Amoroso, R.O.; Saravia, J.; Orensanz, J.M. Rapid expansion and potential range of the invasive kelp Undaria pinnatifida in the southwestern Atlantic. Aquat. Invasions. 2014, 9, 467–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Epstein, G.; Smale, D.A. Undaria pinnatifida: A case study to highlight challenges in marine invasion ecology and management. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 7, 8624–8642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Japan Fisheries Cooperative. Annual Report of Wakame in the Sanriku Region. 2021. Available online: https://www.zengyoren.or.jp/ (accessed on 15 September 2021).
  11. Iwate Prefecture. 2018. Available online: http://www3.pref.iwate.jp/webdb/view/outside/s118Tokei/ (accessed on 15 September 2021).
  12. Ishikawa, Y. Analysis of quantitative traits in cultured wakame for breeding. Fish Genet. Breed. Sci. 1991, 16, 19–24. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  13. Hara, M.; Akiyama, K. Heterosis in growth of Undaria pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar. Bull. Tohoku Reg. Fish. Res. Lab. 1985, 47, 47–50. [Google Scholar]
  14. Pang, S.J.; Hu, X.Y.; Wu, C.Y.; Hirosawa, A.; Ohno, M. Intraspecific crossing of Undaria pinnatifida (Harv.) Sur.—A possible timesaving way of strain selection. Chin. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 1997, 15, 227–235. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dan, A.; Kato, S. Differences of morphology and growth between the two culture varieties originating from Undaria pinnatifida f. distans and U. pinnatifida f. typica in Naruto Strait. Bull. Tokushima Pref. Fish Res. Ins. 2008, 6, 79–83. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  16. Kato, S.; Sumitomo, T.; Dan, A. Cultivar improvement of Undaria pinnatifida by crossing gametophytes originated from one zoospore. Algal Resour. 2010, 3, 205–210. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  17. Shan, T.F.; Pang, S.J.; Li, J.; Gao, S.Q. Breeding of an elite cultivar Haibao No.1 of Undaria pinnatifida (Phaeophyceae) through gametophyte clone crossing and consecutive selection. J. Appl. Phycol. 2016, 28, 2419–2426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Niwa, K.; Harada, K. Experiment on forcing cultivation of Undaria pinnatifida sporophytes in the Seto Inland Sea by using free-living gametophytes cultured in laboratory. Jpn. J. Phycol. 2016, 64, 10–18. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  19. Gao, X.; Endo, H.; Taniguchi, K.; Agatsuma, Y. Genetic differentiation of high-temperature tolerance in the kelp Undaria pinnatifida sporophytes from geographically separated populations along the Pacific coast of Japan. J. Appl. Phycol. 2013, 25, 567–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sato, Y.; Hirano, T.; Niwa, K.; Suzuki, T.; Fukunishi, N.; Abe, T.; Kawano, S. Phenotypic differentiation in the morphology and nutrient uptake kinetics among Undaria pinnatifida cultivated at six sites in Japan. J. Appl. Phycol. 2016, 28, 3447–3458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sato, Y.; Yamaguchi, M.; Hirano, T.; Fukunishi, N.; Abe, T.; Kawano, S. Effect of water velocity on Undaria pinnatifida and Saccharina japonica growth in a novel tank system designed for macroalgae cultivation. J. Appl. Phycol. 2017, 29, 1683–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sato, Y.; Hirano, T.; Ichida, H.; Murakami, M.; Fukunishi, N.; Abe, T.; Kawano, S. Morphological and physiological differences among cultivation lines of Undaria pinnatifida in a common garden experiment using a tank culture system. J. Appl. Phycol. 2017, 29, 2287–2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tatewaki, M. Formation of a crustose sporophyte with unilocular sporangia in Scytosiphon lomentaria. Phycologia 1966, 6, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dan, A.; Ohno, M.; Matsuoka, M. Changes of the research and development on the resources of Undaria and Laminaria in the culture ground of Tokushima coasts. Bull. Tokushima Pref. Fish Res. Ins. 2015, 10, 25–48. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  25. White, A.J.; Critchley, C. Rapid light curves: A new fluorescence method to assess the state of the photosynthetic apparatus. Photosyn. Res. 1999, 59, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Genty, B.; Briantais, J.M.; Baker, N.R. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1989, 990, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sakanishi, Y.; Iizumi, H. Photosynthesis–temperature relationship of Laminaria longissima Miyabe (Laminariales, Phaeophyta). Jpn. J. Phycol. 1988, 46, 105–110. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  28. Hurd, C.L.; Dring, M.J. Phosphate uptake by intertidal fucoid algae in relation to zonation and season. Mar. Biol. 1990, 107, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, J.Y.; Agatsuma, Y.; Nagai, T.; Sato, Y.; Taniguchi, K. Differences in resource storage pattern between Laminaria longissima and Laminaria diabolica (Laminariaceae; Phaeophyta) reflecting their morphological characteristics. J. Appl. Phycol. 2009, 21, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Maag, M.; Malinovsky, M.; Nielsen, S.M. Kinetics and temperature dependence of potential denitrification in riparian soils. J. Env. Qual. 1997, 26, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xu, D.; Gao, Z.; Zhang, X.; Qi, Z.; Meng, C.; Zhuang, Z.; Ye, N. Evaluation of the potential role of the macroalga Laminaria japonica for alleviating coastal eutrophication. Biores. Tech. 2011, 102, 9912–9918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nanba, N.; Fujiwara, T.; Kuwano, K.; Ishikawa, Y.; Ogawa, H.; Kado, R. Effect of water flow velocity on growth and morphology of cultured Undaria pinnatifida sporophytes (Laminariales, Phaeophyceae) in Okirai Bay on the Sanriku coast, northeast Japan. J. Appl. Phycol. 2011, 23, 1023–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hasegawa, K.; Suzuki, S. Work analysis of harvesting and salt–preserved Wakame seaweed (Undaria pinnatifida) processing. Tech. Rept. Nat. Res. Inst. Fish Eng. 2005, 27, 61–80. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  34. Raven, J.A.; Geider, R.J. Temperature and algal growth. New Phytol. 1988, 110, 441–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lobban, C.S.; Harrison, P.J. Seaweed Ecology and Physiology; Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge: Cambridge, UK, 1994; 366p. [Google Scholar]
  36. Pedersen, A. The effects of temperature and nutrient concentrations on nitrate and phosphate uptake in different species of Porphyra from Long Island Sound (USA). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2004, 312, 235–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sato, J. Wakame Nyumon; The Japan Food Journal: Tokyo, Japan, 2015; 164p. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  38. Gao, X.; Endo, H.; Yamana, M.; Taniguchi, K.; Agatsuma, Y. Compensation of the brown alga Undaria pinnatifida (Laminariales; Phaeophyta) after thallus excision under cultivation in Matsushima Bay, northern Japan. J. Appl. Phycol. 2013, 25, 1171–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kawamura, R. Rapidly developing extratropical cyclones and their associated strong and gusty winds in northern winter. Wind Eng. 2017, 42, 5–14. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Photographs and a schematic diagram of the cultivation tests. (a) Gametophytes from regional strains of Undaria pinnatifida; (b) sporelings attached to fibers wound around a stainless steel frame; (c) the acclimatization of the sporelings to marine conditions at the marine cultivation farm; (d) setting the sporelings on the mother cultivation rope; (e) collected thalli from 1m of the mother rope to measure the yield and morphological characteristics; and (f) diagram of the 150-m-long mother rope and the setting of MAT and HRT, which were cultivated from each end of the mother rope. I–V indicate the dates on which the sporelings were set and the cultivation began. These were as follows: set I, 14 September; set II, 9 October; set III, 19 October; set IV, 6 November; and set V, 12 December.
Figure 1. Photographs and a schematic diagram of the cultivation tests. (a) Gametophytes from regional strains of Undaria pinnatifida; (b) sporelings attached to fibers wound around a stainless steel frame; (c) the acclimatization of the sporelings to marine conditions at the marine cultivation farm; (d) setting the sporelings on the mother cultivation rope; (e) collected thalli from 1m of the mother rope to measure the yield and morphological characteristics; and (f) diagram of the 150-m-long mother rope and the setting of MAT and HRT, which were cultivated from each end of the mother rope. I–V indicate the dates on which the sporelings were set and the cultivation began. These were as follows: set I, 14 September; set II, 9 October; set III, 19 October; set IV, 6 November; and set V, 12 December.
Phycology 01 00010 g001
Figure 2. Changes in the environmental conditions and nutrient concentrations at Hirota Bay. (a) Seawater temperature, (b) nitrate (NO3–N) and ammonium (NH4–N) concentrations, and (c) phosphate (PO4–P) concentration. I–V indicate the dates on which the sporelings were set and cultivation began (see Materials and Methods).
Figure 2. Changes in the environmental conditions and nutrient concentrations at Hirota Bay. (a) Seawater temperature, (b) nitrate (NO3–N) and ammonium (NH4–N) concentrations, and (c) phosphate (PO4–P) concentration. I–V indicate the dates on which the sporelings were set and cultivation began (see Materials and Methods).
Phycology 01 00010 g002
Figure 3. Changes in the total length (a), the thallus weight (b), and the sporophyll weight (c) of Undaria pinnatifida of MAT and HRT at five different dates on which the sporelings were set and cultivation began (set I–V, see Section 2, shows as I–V). The values represent the mean ± standard deviations (n = 20 individuals). The asterisks indicate significant differences between MAT and HRT at p < 0.05 according to a t-test.
Figure 3. Changes in the total length (a), the thallus weight (b), and the sporophyll weight (c) of Undaria pinnatifida of MAT and HRT at five different dates on which the sporelings were set and cultivation began (set I–V, see Section 2, shows as I–V). The values represent the mean ± standard deviations (n = 20 individuals). The asterisks indicate significant differences between MAT and HRT at p < 0.05 according to a t-test.
Phycology 01 00010 g003
Figure 4. Photographs of typical thalli of Undaria pinnatifida. MAT (a) and HRT (b), harvested in March 2015. These thalli began to be cultivated in set III, on 19 October 2014. The scale bars are 50 cm.
Figure 4. Photographs of typical thalli of Undaria pinnatifida. MAT (a) and HRT (b), harvested in March 2015. These thalli began to be cultivated in set III, on 19 October 2014. The scale bars are 50 cm.
Phycology 01 00010 g004
Figure 5. Maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm,) (a), nitrate (NO3–N) uptake rate (b), ammonium (NH4–N) uptake rate (c), and phosphate (PO4–P) uptake rate (d) in Undaria pinnatifida at different seawater temperatures. The values are means ± standard deviations ((a): n = 30 individuals, (bd): n = 5 individuals). The asterisks indicate significant differences between MAT and HRT at p < 0.05, according to a t-test.
Figure 5. Maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm,) (a), nitrate (NO3–N) uptake rate (b), ammonium (NH4–N) uptake rate (c), and phosphate (PO4–P) uptake rate (d) in Undaria pinnatifida at different seawater temperatures. The values are means ± standard deviations ((a): n = 30 individuals, (bd): n = 5 individuals). The asterisks indicate significant differences between MAT and HRT at p < 0.05, according to a t-test.
Phycology 01 00010 g005
Table 1. Changes in the total wet weight of individuals per 1m of mother rope (kg m−1) of MAT and HRT. Cultivation started from 19 October 2014 (set III).
Table 1. Changes in the total wet weight of individuals per 1m of mother rope (kg m−1) of MAT and HRT. Cultivation started from 19 October 2014 (set III).
Harvest Date
30 December15 January13 February4 March4 April28 April
MAT 0.72.114.011.024.635.6
HRT 0.10.94.88.621.825.3
Table 2. Q10 values for the nitrate, ammonium, and phosphate uptake rates of the MAT and HRT sporophytes. The sporophytes began to be cultured in set III (19 October 2014), and were collected on 15 January in 2015. The pre-culture was carried out in the CFCS for one month. The nutrient uptake rates were measured at 5 °C intervals from seawater temperatures of 5 °C to 25 °C.
Table 2. Q10 values for the nitrate, ammonium, and phosphate uptake rates of the MAT and HRT sporophytes. The sporophytes began to be cultured in set III (19 October 2014), and were collected on 15 January in 2015. The pre-culture was carried out in the CFCS for one month. The nutrient uptake rates were measured at 5 °C intervals from seawater temperatures of 5 °C to 25 °C.
Variables of TemperatureNO3–NNH4–NPO4–P
MATHRTMATHRTMATHRT
5–10 °C3.31.21.41.03.14.7
10–15 °C1.71.01.31.06.32.2
15–20 °C1.51.01.21.15.33.1
20–25 °C0.20.60.90.91.01.1
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sato, Y.; Hirano, T.; Ichida, H.; Fukunishi, N.; Abe, T.; Kawano, S. Extending the Cultivation Period of Undaria pinnatifida by Using Regional Strains with Phenotypic Differentiation along the Sanriku Coast in Northern Japan. Phycology 2021, 1, 129-142. https://doi.org/10.3390/phycology1020010

AMA Style

Sato Y, Hirano T, Ichida H, Fukunishi N, Abe T, Kawano S. Extending the Cultivation Period of Undaria pinnatifida by Using Regional Strains with Phenotypic Differentiation along the Sanriku Coast in Northern Japan. Phycology. 2021; 1(2):129-142. https://doi.org/10.3390/phycology1020010

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sato, Yoichi, Tomonari Hirano, Hiroyuki Ichida, Nobuhisa Fukunishi, Tomoko Abe, and Shigeyuki Kawano. 2021. "Extending the Cultivation Period of Undaria pinnatifida by Using Regional Strains with Phenotypic Differentiation along the Sanriku Coast in Northern Japan" Phycology 1, no. 2: 129-142. https://doi.org/10.3390/phycology1020010

APA Style

Sato, Y., Hirano, T., Ichida, H., Fukunishi, N., Abe, T., & Kawano, S. (2021). Extending the Cultivation Period of Undaria pinnatifida by Using Regional Strains with Phenotypic Differentiation along the Sanriku Coast in Northern Japan. Phycology, 1(2), 129-142. https://doi.org/10.3390/phycology1020010

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop