Previous Issue
Volume 5, December
 
 

Ruminants, Volume 6, Issue 1 (March 2026) – 2 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 378 KB  
Article
The Impact of Oregano Essential Oil and the Finishing System on Performance, Carcass Characteristics and Meat Quality in Heifers
by Mirelle Magalhães Souza, Julián Andrés Castillo Vargas, Andressa Moraes Carvalho, Ana Carolina Müller Conti, Daniel Henrique Souza Tavares, Bárbara Pércya Lopes Coelho, Eduardo Pereira Santos, José Neuman Miranda Neiva and Fabrícia Rocha Chaves Miotto
Ruminants 2026, 6(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants6010002 (registering DOI) - 26 Dec 2025
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of oregano essential oil (OEO) as a replacement for monensin (MON) on performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality in heifers finished either in confinement or on pasture. Thirty-six Nellore heifers (252.44 kg ± [...] Read more.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of oregano essential oil (OEO) as a replacement for monensin (MON) on performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality in heifers finished either in confinement or on pasture. Thirty-six Nellore heifers (252.44 kg ± 21.80 kg) were distributed in a completely randomised design in a 2 × 2 factorial scheme, with two types of additives and two finishing systems. In both systems, a concentrate at 1.5% of body weight (BW) on a dry matter (DM) basis containing MON (282.2 mg/animal/day) or OEO (300 mg/animal/day) was offered daily. The final BW (FBW) and average daily gain (ADG) were higher in confinement-finished animals than in those finished on pasture (p < 0.01). There was no effect from the finishing system (p ≥ 0.376) or additive (p ≥ 0.057) for hot-carcass weight, hot-carcass yield, subcutaneous fat thickness, or the Longissimus lumborum area. The pH and shear force of the meat did not differ between treatments (p ≥ 0.076). Finishing in confinement resulted in brighter meat than finishing on pasture (p ≤ 0.006). The use of OEO increased the redness of the meat (p ≤ 0.042). Consumer perception (n = 63) of the sensory attributes of aroma, colour, tenderness, flavour and juiciness was not affected by the treatments (p > 0.05). Heifers finished in confinement or on pasture, with the same proportion of concentrate in the diet and the addition of MON or OEO, presented similar characteristics for both the carcass and the meat. Full article
18 pages, 605 KB  
Article
Digestion in and Performance of Intensively Reared Beef Cattle Fed Diets with a Majority of Maize or Barley, Either Ground or Dry-Rolled
by Abdelmuhsen Al Alami, Antonio Gimeno, Sofía Schauf, Carlos Castrillo and Antonio de Vega
Ruminants 2026, 6(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants6010001 - 22 Dec 2025
Viewed by 103
Abstract
Barley is more extensively and more rapidly fermentable than maize, thus it is supposed to increase digestive disorders in ruminants. However, the effect of cereal type on animal performance and digestion may vary with processing degree. In the present experiment, the effect of [...] Read more.
Barley is more extensively and more rapidly fermentable than maize, thus it is supposed to increase digestive disorders in ruminants. However, the effect of cereal type on animal performance and digestion may vary with processing degree. In the present experiment, the effect of dry-rolling or grinding barley and maize, as the main cereals in a concentrate containing a high proportion of starch with different rates of fermentation, on intensively reared beef cattle performance, diet digestibility, and feed intake amount and pattern, was studied. Thirty-six 3-month-old male calves were allocated to one of four diets consisting of barley straw (BS) and a concentrate with 60% cereals (barley and maize in proportions 75:25 or 25:75) presented dry-rolled or ground through a 3.5 mm sieve. The experimental period was divided into two phases of 10 weeks each: from start to 277 ± 3.6 kg live weight (LW; Growing), and from 289 ± 3.8 kg LW to slaughter (399 ± 4.6 kg; Finishing). For the Growing phase, there were no differences (p > 0.10) between the majority cereal in the concentrates, nor between their processing methods, in the daily intake of concentrate and BS, and in the animals’ final LW. With respect to Finishing, the interaction between cereal type and processing was significant (p < 0.05) for concentrate daily intake. As a result, animals consuming ground barley ate less concentrate than those fed rolled barley, whereas there were no differences between processing methods for animals fed maize-based diets. Animals consuming ground-barley concentrates consumed significantly more straw than those fed on dry-rolled-barley concentrates (p < 0.05 for Growing and p < 0.01 for Finishing) during the first four hours after feeding. No such differences appeared in animals consuming maize-based concentrates. Starch digestibility was higher in animals fed ground cereals vs. dry-rolled cereals during the Growing phase (p = 0.048), whereas NDF digestibility was also higher (p = 0.008) in animals fed ground cereals during the Finishing phase. The faeces from animals fed on rolled-maize concentrates showed a higher concentration of purine bases than the faeces of animals fed on rolled-barley concentrates (p = 0.016), although there were no differences for the ground cereals. Overall, the results reported indicated that replacing maize with barley in diets for feedlot beef cattle did not affect average daily gain, intake of straw or concentrate, or feed conversion ratios (total or considering just the concentrate); hence the inclusion of either cereal in greater proportions should be based on their market price and on the final cost of the compound feed (which may include different ingredients). The processing method of the cereals (grinding or dry-rolling) also had no influence on the above-mentioned variables, so the selection of the method should be based on their relative cost, exclusively in terms of feed efficiency. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop