Next Article in Journal
Heterogeneity in Long-Term Care for Older Adults in Europe: Between Individual and Systemic Effects
Previous Article in Journal
Understanding the Impact of Care Literacy on Preventive Care: Evidence from Family Carers in Japan
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JAL
Volume 2
Issue 2
10.3390/jal2020013
jal-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Perspective

Perspectives on Wider Integration of the Health-Assistive Smart Home

by
Gordana Dermody
1,*,
Jenna Mikus
2,
Davina Porock
3,
Dov Sugarman
4,
Naeem K. Janjua
5,
Christopher How
6 and
Roschelle Fritz
7
1
School of Nursing Paramedicine and Midwifery, University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs, QLD 4556, Australia
2
School of Architecture & Built Environment, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
3
Centre for Research in Aged Care, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
4
AgeMyWay, Shlomo Hamelech 35/6, Tel Aviv 6608610, Israel
5
School of Science, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
6
Bethanie on Pier, Perth, WA 6000, Australia
7
College of Nursing, Washington State University, Vancouver, WA 98686-9600, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Ageing Longev. 2022, 2(2), 140-152; https://doi.org/10.3390/jal2020013
Submission received: 18 March 2022 / Revised: 25 May 2022 / Accepted: 9 June 2022 / Published: 16 June 2022
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Most older adults desire to be as independent as possible and remain living in their ancestral home as they age. Aging-in-place maximizes the independence of older adults, enhancing their wellbeing and quality of life while decreasing the financial burden of residential care costs. However, due to chronic disease, multimorbidity, and age-related changes, appropriate conditions are required to make aging-in-place possible. Remote monitoring with smart home technologies could provide the infrastructure that enables older adults to remain living independently in their own homes safely. The health-assistive smart home shows great promise, but there are challenges to integrating smart homes on a larger scale. The purpose of this discussion paper is to propose a Design Thinking (DT) process to improve the possibility of integrating a smart home for health monitoring more widely and making it more accessible to all older adults wishing to continue living independently in their ancestral homes. From a nursing perspective, we discuss the necessary stakeholder groups and describe how these stakeholders should engage to accelerate the integration of health smart homes into real-world settings.

1. Introduction

Health systems around the world are faced with challenges including an explosion in the number of older adults. The global population of persons aged 60 and older is expected to nearly double from 12% to 22% between 2015 and 2050 [1]. Older adults typically desire to remain living in their ancestral homes for as long as possible [2,3]. However, complex interacting challenges such as chronic disease, multimorbidity, and age-related changes necessitate a certain level of oversight of the health and wellness of the older adult who is aging-in-place [4,5]. Many older adults will require specialized care [6] to manage chronic conditions, and many older adults typically have one or more chronic conditions requiring ongoing medical management [4,5,7]. The Health Smart Home (HSH) could serve as the infrastructure that enables the convergence of independent living with health, wellness, and medical care. The HSH could be central to the development of new, innovative models of aged care with a focus on dignity, independence, autonomy, and the avoidance of institutionalization of older adults which could enable cost-effective quality health outcomes [8,9,10,11].

1.1. Health-Smart Home

Smart homes for health monitoring are made possible by the Internet of Things (IoT) which connects a variety of electronic devices to enable the collection of large amounts of sensor-collected data which is then stored and processed using machine learning algorithms without human intervention [12]. Smart home sensors are described in various ways in the extant literature. They usually involve continuous, unobtrusive, in-home sensor-based health monitoring of social, behavioral, physical, and biological (e.g., vital signs) monitoring that is represented in activities of daily living (ADLs) which have been described as everyday activities such as sleeping, eating, toileting, and cooking [13]. Bennett, Roka, and Chen (2017) [14] define smart health care in the home as:
“A home or dwelling with a set of networked sensors and devices that extend the functionality of the home…in the pursuit of improving the health and wellbeing of its occupants and assisting in the delivery of healthcare services” (p. 2). We will use the term HSH to refer to sensor technology that is embedded or deployed in the home environment (e.g., attached to ceilings, walls, furniture, appliances) to detect motion in persons living in private dwellings in the community or retirement villages with an emphasis on remotely monitoring the health and wellness of the occupant to detect changes to facilitate early intervention.
A primary goal for the HSH is forecasting and predicting potential changes in health because with this knowledge the clinical team can implement early interventions prior to a health crisis [15,16]. For example, studies have shown that smart home sensors can recognize clinically significant changes in ADLs, showing potential for the HSH to support pain management and monitor function, falls, and sleep [17,18,19,20]. Some smart home products that offer services to customers that provide alerts to family caregivers or medical service providers if changes in the baseline are detected are already available on the market [21]. Despite some smart home companies catering to the needs of the older adult end-user, the HSH is not currently designated as a medical device, and the full potential of artificial intelligence for precision health using this technology is yet to be realized and widely adopted by older adults and caregivers [21].

1.2. Accelerating the Integration of the Health Smart Home

The World Health Organizations Global Strategy on Digital Health 2020–2025 guiding principles state that successful digital health initiatives require an integrated strategy [22].
The HSH should be viewed as part of the digital health ecosystem that can address the wider health needs of aging older adults.
Accordingly, there needs to be both coordination and collaboration among different stakeholders. Although interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary collaboration are not new concepts in smart home research, nor in aging research, the fruits of this collaboration remain elusive. For example, the integration of the HSH as a standard intervention for older adults living at home with chronic disease and age-related changes is currently not evident. This could be because older adults may not be sufficiently informed of the possibilities of the HSH, but the gross lack of adoption reveals that there are larger issues [23]. Given the HSH’s potential to support positive health outcomes and extended independence for older adults and its potential to support the healthcare system by providing data about patients’ health during complex and unprecedented challenges like COVID-19, more widespread adoption would be expected. In addition, there is little evidence that new models of home care such as those provided by HSH systems are being introduced to frontline health professionals to prepare them for clinical practice settings where home monitoring technologies are used.
In response to this perplexing situation, we reached out to multiple stakeholders including nurses with home care expertise to elicit their thoughts on how our disciplines can work together to advance the use of HSH data and the wider adoption of the technology. With this paper, we aim to stimulate a discussion leading to meaningful advancement of the HSH’s use for extending older adults’ independence. We propose a Design Thinking (DT) process for specific stakeholder groups that we (as nurses) believe should be engaged to accelerate the integration of the HSH into real-world settings.

2. Design Thinking

There are many types of DT processes, models, and frameworks that can be used to develop products and solutions [24]. We prefer the DT framework used by the Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford which includes five design phases: empathize, define the problem, ideate, prototype, and test. According to Auernhammer and Roth (2021), DT is made possible because it is based on psychological theories which integrate creative and human values. DT has been described as a strategic big-idea process that results in a product that addresses or solves a problem [25]. DT includes gaining a deep understanding of the perspectives of end-users’ requirements and needs. DT processes have not been used to the full extent possible in the development of smart homes [26]. Thus, we will propose a process.
Whilst user-centered design is important [27], it is futile if the HSH is not accessible to the population it was designed for or if it cannot be integrated into everyday clinical aged care. User-centered design models are the most widely accepted and may have, at least in part, led to the current low uptake environment. These designs have not holistically considered accessibility (financial, acquisition), wants versus needs, privacy concerns, and end-user support and maintenance [23,28,29]. These design models may not take into consideration that the end-user is likely not to be the primary barrier to wider integration [30].
It is noteworthy to mention that whilst there is potential for wider integration, to our knowledge the HSH is currently not in the tool kit of healthcare professionals or medical service providers (e.g., home-care, primary care clinics) for routine recommendations for older adults who have a chronic disease, multimorbidity, and decreased function—and live alone—nor has it become part of new models of home care post-hospitalization or used as a routine intervention in retirement apartments to ensure the health, wellness, and safety of its occupants. From a gerontologic nursing perspective, both wider accessibility and integration of the HSH into everyday clinical aged care are required for the HSH to be widely adopted. We hypothesize a lack of wide integration is likely due to certain stakeholder groups not being included in the design process from the beginning. We believe the stakeholders highlighted here should be involved in the design. However, practically speaking, it is impossible to get all stakeholders together (across disciplines, industries, and patient populations) at the same design table for every meeting at every phase.
In Figure 1, we exhibit a stakeholder-based DT process aimed at facilitating wider integration of the HSH so older adults can be supported in their quest for independent living in their ancestral home for as long as possible. As Auernhammer and Roth (2021) indicate, moving from product design to product integration requires fluency in thinking and flexible approaches. Product development requires the capabilities and dynamic innovative synergy of a variety of stakeholders and a robust design culture with the capabilities of removing hindrances or barriers from the team [24].

3. Stakeholder Groups

It is well-known that a variety of disciplines and stakeholder groups must collaborate to provide quality care to older adults [31]. However, to facilitate the integration of HSHs in everyday clinical practice, wider groups of stakeholders must be included in the DT processes (Figure 1). From a nursing perspective, we believe that certain stakeholder groups are key to each design phase (Table 1). Stakeholders need to begin by empathizing with older adults living in poverty, suffering from chronic disease, multimorbidity, and natural age-related changes who wish to remain living in their ancestral home. This phase could be achieved using world-café methods to generate dialogue which should be thematically analyzed.
Next, the stakeholders need to begin defining the problem and analyzing the associated root causes. This could be achieved through blended activities such as brainstorming, diagrammatic illustrations, and drawing on the expertise and knowledge of stakeholders. After ideas are generated using humanistic and creative processes, a multi-faceted set of solutions and accompanying mechanisms can be developed and approaches to testing can be determined. To facilitate the DT process, the relationship between all primary stakeholder groups needs to be transparent and collaborative (Figure 2). Members of the DT team should be aware that some stakeholder groups may be in closer proximity to the older adult and family caregiver at the microsystem level, whereas other stakeholders such as health care policymakers, whilst important, may be situated at the macrosystem level. The stakeholder group’s role in the DT process should be commensurate with where in the system the stakeholder groups are situated, and their input and contribution may vary in intensity depending on the phase they are most critically needed for in the DT process.

3.1. Older Adult, Family Caregivers & Frontline Healthcare Professionals

As the older adult population increases and alternative aging-in-place solutions emerge, it is important that HSHs are designed for the unique needs of the older adult end-user [32]. The older generation may not be universally comfortable with technology leading to varied perceptions about living with sensor-based monitoring [23]. Older adults and their family caregivers need to be more informed about how the HSH could support older adults to remain living independently, and HSHs should be designed to consider user preferences, add value, and not impinge on the quality of life or privacy [33]. Frontline health care professionals such as nurses, recognized as a trusted profession [34], are optimally positioned to provide education about the HSH to the older adults and family caregivers and to advocate for the implementation of the HSH [35]. Community-based nurses are familiar with a person’s medical history, psychosocial context, desires, and needs and can use this holistic view to make recommendations for the HSH to doctors on behalf of the older adult. Subsequently, front-line health care professionals like nurses as well as older adults and family caregivers must become valued members at each phase of the DT process, with opportunities to participate in every DT phase [36].
The readiness of HSH adoption among older adults is questionable, and more studies are needed. Previous studies have reported that older adults have limited knowledge of how the HSH works and how it can be used to support them to age-in-place [23,29]. However, others suggest that whilst older adults also have concerns about maintaining privacy, they are willing to trade perceived loss of privacy for independence if they can remain living in their own home with the HSH [23,37,38,39]. The utilization of HSH technology to support family caregivers’ roles in providing care for older adults is also important and could reduce the family caregiver burden [40].
However, more research involving both family caregivers and older adults is needed, because they may have different perceptions about the factors that may influence their readiness to adopt HSH [41]. In addition, family caregivers may be influential in supporting the adoption of the HSH. Accordingly, the lived experience and the desires and needs of both older adults and family caregivers and how HSH could support them is critical knowledge needed by the DT process to overcome the barriers impeding the adoption of HSHs and guide knowledge development and create pragmatic solutions to make the technology more acceptable, and adaptable.

3.2. Multidisciplinary Research and Academic or Educator Roles

Some healthcare professionals work in academic institutions to educate the next generation of healthcare professionals and conduct research, and some are educators in a variety of healthcare settings [42]. Whether the educator role is an academic role or a role in a health care setting, these professionals are optimally positioned to educate students, clients, and family caregivers about how the HSH works, the benefits, and how it can be accessed. This stakeholder group is positioned to develop a curriculum for the allied health professions and develop age-appropriate educational material for older adults and family caregivers which could support the integration of the HSH. The engagement of these stakeholder groups in defining the problem and idea generation is critical because the university environment is a natural and optimal place to explore novel solutions to real-world problems.

3.3. Social Workers

Because the home environment sets the stage for the older person’s health and well-being, social workers could be instrumental in assessing the complex social needs of this population by ensuring social justice and social program access [43].
Therefore, social workers are critical at the idea phase as they can share insights about the pathways that can make the HSH accessible to older adults living in poverty. However, to our knowledge, no HSH development teams include social workers. These insights may be missed if this stakeholder group is not included. Social worker stakeholders should also collaborate with governmental and non-governmental agencies to develop policies or services which can support the creation of health care policies and the integration of the HSH.

3.4. Health Care Organizations

Health care organizations that provide home services and operate primary care clinics routinely care for older adults. Health care professionals that work for these providers follow the model of care required by the health care organization [44,45]. If the HSH is not integrated into the toolkit of health care professionals to be used in everyday practice, it is unlikely that a health care professional would recommend the HSH to their patients/clients. If the HSH is to be financially paid for by private or public insurance, medical doctors, nurse practitioners, and other allied health care professionals with prescribing ability may need to “prescribe” the HSH as a medical device. In addition, mechanisms to make the smart home data accessible to health care professionals to support care coordination would have to be created.
Whilst health care professionals could use the smart home data to identify changes in ADLs that may warrant early interventions, integration into the existing electronic medical record system and a dashboard to visualize that data with the healthcare professional in mind is still needed. Currently, health care professionals do not receive education on the use of smart home sensor data to augment clinical decision-making.
Accordingly, health care professionals need training and practical tools, work processes, and policies for the HSH to be integrated into in-home care services, primary care clinics, and similar settings that provide home services and telehealth to older adults. Many care costs are managed within healthcare organizations which makes these organizations a key partner in defining the problem. Cost-effective solutions will be more widely adopted and the systems (people within it) that manage those costs understand where solutions should be applied.

3.5. Aged Care Industry

The aged care industry provides a range of services and support to older adults wherever they live, including home care, aged care villages, long-term, and respite care. In 2018, more than 1.2 million people received aged care services in Australia alone, with most (77%) receiving support in their home or other community-based settings. Over 70% of older Australians live at home and will require clinical and supportive services at some point [11]. Insights on the global aged care market confirm that home-based care dominates the markets across not only Australia but also North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa [46].
Importantly, many aged care organizations are early adopters of novel technologies as they can see the potential uses for their consumers. Despite its potential, the aged care sector has struggled to integrate innovative technologies into the aged-care system [47]. Whilst the aged care industry is a key stakeholder in the adoption of HSH technology across the aging spectrum, digital immaturity may inhibit some aged care providers from engaging with HSH technology. For example, one report found that cost, concerns about data privacy and security, and questions about the reliability and validity of the HSH technology are barriers to adoption among some aged care providers [48,49].
Partnering with these organizations to define the problem will be key to developing technology solutions that will be widely adopted. Likewise, these organizations are an optimal environment within which to test prototype solutions.

3.6. Computer Science & Electrical Engineering Teams

Researchers such as electrical engineers, computer scientists, start-ups, and big organizations (e.g., Google) are leading development and research in the smart home sensor technology space [15,50]. Although computer scientists use sophisticated computer-based modeling techniques and statistical analysis to understand sensor data of older adults in the home, they need health care professionals to provide real-world context about the meaning of the data. Without this context, it is difficult to produce reliable HSH monitoring and interventions [16]. Data visualization dashboards that make sense for health care professionals and can integrate with existing electronic health record systems are needed for the HSH to be integrated into healthcare settings. The consistent engagement of electrical engineers and computer scientists with health care professional stakeholders will be useful for further innovation and machine learning [16,17]. Collaboration with start-up companies and collaboration with existing companies is needed to manufacture and market the most effective and user-friendly HSH system with the least cost possible. This stakeholder group is critical to every DT phase but should focus on more robust engagement in the empathizing phase. Nursing collaborators and other frontline caregivers are optimally positioned to facilitate first-hand empathizing experiences for the engineering group.

3.7. Companies and Start-Ups

This stakeholder group is critical at all phases. Companies usually include business strategists that can establish the business case for the HSH, implement the design plan effectively, and highlight its successes [21].
While the cost-benefit seems obvious to the health discipline stakeholders, making a positive business case to health policymakers and health care organizations can be challenging [51]. Collaborating with health care economists could prove useful in establishing a positive business case which can be evaluated during the testing phase. In addition to supporting the need for the HSH, business strategists establish timelines and address logistical considerations such as project schedules, team dynamics, and change management to optimize each HSH rollout to the health care market.
However, academic and commercial HSH development without front-line health care professionals will likely result in limited clinical application and therefore insufficient efficacy, redirecting efforts into a dead-end regarding how much can be achieved to support aging-in-place and quality of health care, safety, life for the older adult, and will culminate in slowing widespread adoption and real-world integration [35,52]. A primary goal for the HSH is forecasting and predicting potential changes in health because with this knowledge the clinical team can implement early interventions prior to a health crisis [15,16]. For example, studies have shown that smart home sensors can recognize changes in ADLs, showing potential for the HSH to support pain management and monitor function, falls, and sleep [17,18,19,20]. The consistent integration of the stakeholders including technical and clinical teams has a symbiotic effect to develop HSHs with the ability to predict potential changes in health and mitigate or eliminate health problems which has implications for health care utilization and subsequently can be used to make a positive business case for scaling up.

3.8. Healthcare Policy Makers and Special Interest Groups

Health care policies at the government level are needed to support the development of mechanisms that will facilitate new models of digitally enhanced care [45].
Government policies are needed for the integration of the HSH into everyday clinical practice and to ensure that all older adults—regardless of financial means—have access to the HSH if they desire to use it to support aging-in-place. Policies and procedures governing the use, operationalization, and expectation of the HSHs must be articulated to provide end-users with realistic expectations of the HSHs’ capabilities. This is important to protect older adults and their families and to support informed decision-making. Because the health care policymakers function at the macrosystem level, they should leave their helicopter view and engage in the empathize phase which will be a driver to take policy recommendations forward during the defining the problem, idea, prototype, and testing phases.
There are a variety of special interest groups that could be helpful to disseminate information about the HSH to older adults and family caregivers during the testing phase. Special interest groups such as the Alzheimer’s Association or Dementia Australia could also use their influence to advocate for specific HSH requirements for certain sub-populations, for example, older adults with dementia. Special interest groups are important stakeholders in the testing phase because they can use successful outcomes obtained in the testing phase and influence the development and implementation of health policies [53] which could enable and solidify mechanisms for access and coverage of the HSH.

3.9. Master System Integrator

The smart building or technical design stakeholders have a critical role in the implementation of technology within the built environment, assessing current systems and stakeholder needs to develop a realistic gap analysis-driven approach to getting from the current state to a desired HSH future state. The technology specialist determines how software and hardware components should be architected to satisfy the requirements captured from stakeholder groups [54].
A Master System Integrator (MSI) should be incorporated into the DT process to develop the prototype and in the testing phases because this role is knowledgeable about balancing the depth and breadth of knowledge required to design and manage smart building systems in a short- and long-term basis. The multiskilled MSI is described as the “glue” and could be working closely with all stakeholder groups to support the integration of the HSH into real-world settings such as private homes, and retirement villages by connecting the multidisciplinary team members with trade teams for effective design, implementation, and evaluation [55].

4. Implications for Design Thinking for Real-World Integration of the HSH

A DT process that includes critical stakeholders could be effective in finding solutions and providing equitable access to the HSH. However, there are advantages and limitations to using this approach. The advantage of the consistent engagement of stakeholder groups in a DT process is that this interaction includes the relevant stakeholder groups which will ensure that each stakeholder group is able to give feedback and contribute equally through the humanistic and creative practices. Importantly, older adults, family caregivers, and front-line healthcare professionals will be able to provide valuable insights on wide integration and the issues surrounding accessibility. In addition, using a DT approach with the aim of HSH integration could also overcome global health system challenges such as workforce supply issues, pandemics, and ensure cost-effective, individualized care without overburdening the family caregiver. Finding solutions to make the HSH widely accessible is a complex undertaking as it is embedded in social and healthcare policy situated at the macrosystem level. Healthcare and social policies are needed to enable the development of mechanisms that support HSH integration into everyday care approaches.
Yet, the enactment of healthcare policy to drive HSH development and to provide wide access should not be viewed as a panacea for the wider adoption of the HSH. For example, whilst a policy-driven approach in China has indeed led to rapid development and scaling up of HSH to meet the older populations’ needs, the demand for HSH by older adults has remained very low [29]. Primary concerns include older adults’ lack of knowledge about the HSH, limited understanding of how this technology can support them, and concerns about cost and user-friendliness. Accordingly, potential barriers impeding HSH adoption should be examined, and addressed in tandem with the DT process to overcome these barriers [23,29,56]. Whilst most DT processes are time-limited, the complexity of making the HSH widely accessible will likely require a greater time commitment which may result in inconsistent stakeholder input, which could fragment the process. Another limitation of using the DT process is that it may be challenging to find organizational commitment that is also matched with a design culture and capabilities that can pragmatically support the process and remove barriers that may hinder the DT process and the actions that stakeholders may need to take.
Finally, further discussion is needed regarding how the integration of the HSH will be tested, and the type of health outcomes that could be measured to determine the effectiveness of the HSH in terms of achieving positive health outcomes on a population’s health level. More research is needed to understand the readiness for adoption of the HSH in older adults and their family caregivers, and pragmatic clinical trials are needed to determine the value of the HSH.

5. Conclusions

The development of the HSH does not end with a final product but continues with the integration of the HSH into the lives of everyday older adults who desire to remain living in their ancestral home as they age. Whilst the HSH can make this desire a reality, equitable access for all older adults—regardless of financial means—and scalability can only be achieved if critical stakeholder groups use a process like DT when developing the necessary mechanisms that make access for all older adults possible.

Author Contributions

This paper was conceptualized by G.D. and R.F.; the methodology for writing the paper was informed by G.D., R.F. and J.M.; the visualizations were developed by G.D., with feedback from J.M. and R.F. The writing of the original draft G.D., J.M., N.K.J., D.S., D.P., C.H. and R.F.; reviewing and editing the draft G.D., J.M. and R.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded in part by the National Institutes of Health’s Institute for Nursing Research grant number R01NR016732.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Healthy Ageing and the Sustainable Development Goals. Available online: http://www.who.int/ageing/sdgs/en/ (accessed on 10 March 2021).
  2. American Advisors Group. Importance of Home Survey. 2021. Available online: https://www.aag.com/homesurvey/p/1 (accessed on 3 May 2022).
  3. James, A.; Rowley, S.; Stone, W.; Parkinsson, S.; Spinney, A.; Ryenolds, M. Older Australians and the Housing Aspirations Gap: Housing Aspirations and Constraints for Lower Income Australians. Australian and Housing Research Institute. Available online: https://www.ahuri.edu.au/sites/default/files/migration/documents/AHURI-Final-Report-317-Older-Australians-and-the-housing-aspirations-gap.pdf (accessed on 3 May 2022).
  4. McGilton, K.S.; Vellani, S.; Yeung, L.; Chishtie, J.; Commisso, E.; Ploeg, J.; Andrew, M.K.; Ayala, A.P.; Gray, M.; Morgan, D.; et al. Identifying and understanding the health and social care needs of older adults with multiple chronic conditions and their caregivers: A scoping review. BMC Geriatr. 2018, 18, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rohrmann, S. Epidemiology of Frailty in Older People. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2020, 1216, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kim, E.-J.; Jung, S.-W.; Kim, Y.-E.; Go, D.-S.; Yoon, S.-J. Assessing the Impact of Aging on Burden of Disease. Iran. J. Public Health 2018, 47, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. The Desire to Age in Place among Older Australians. pp. 1–20. Available online: https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/69a6b0b9-6f86-411c-b15d-943144296250/15141.pdf (accessed on 4 May 2022).
  8. National Institute on Aging. Aging Well in the 21st Century: Strategic Directions for Research on Aging. Goal C: Develop Effective Interventions to Maintain Health, Well-Being, and Function and Prevent or Reduce the Burden of Age-Related Diseases, Disorders, and Disabilities. Available online: https://www.nia.nih.gov/about/aging-strategic-directions-research (accessed on 3 April 2020).
  9. National Aged Care Alliance. Ensuring Equity of Access & Outcomes in the Future Aged Care System. Available online: https://naca.asn.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Equity-of-Access-and-Outcomes-Statement-of-Principles_Landscape-1.pdf (accessed on 4 March 2019).
  10. European Comission. Making Ageing Better: Service Design Can Innovate Senior Care. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/projects/finland/making-ageing-better-service-design-can-innovate-senior-care (accessed on 3 January 2021).
  11. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Population Projections, 2012 (Bases) to 2101. Available online: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/Lookup/3222.0main+features32012%20(base)%20to%202101 (accessed on 3 January 2019).
  12. Carnemolla, P. Ageing in place and the internet of things—How smart home technologies, the built environment and caregiving intersect. Vis. Eng. 2018, 6, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Sponselee, A.; Schouten, B.; Bouwhuis, D.; Willems, C. Smart Home Technology for the Elderly: Perceptions of Multidisciplinary Stakeholders. In Constructing Ambient Intelligence; Mühlhäuser, M., Ferscha, A., Aitenbichler, E., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2007; Volume 11, pp. 314–326. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bennett, J.; Rokas, O.; Chen, L. Healthcare in the Smart Home: A Study of Past, Present and Future. Sustainability 2017, 9, 840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Cook, D.J.; Crandall, A.S.; Thomas, B.L.; Krishnan, N.C. CASAS: A Smart Home in a Box. Computer 2013, 46, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Fritz, R.L.; Dermody, G. A nurse-driven method for developing artificial intelligence in “smart” homes for aging-in-place. Nurs. Outlook 2019, 67, 140–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fritz, R.L.; Wilson, M.; Dermody, G.; Schmitter-Edgecombe, M.; Cook, D.J. Automated Smart Home Assessment to Support Pain Management: Multiple Methods Analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020, 22, e23943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bae, I.-H. An ontology-based approach to ADL recognition in smart homes. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2014, 33, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Williams, J.A.; Cook, D.J. Forecasting behavior in smart homes based on sleep and wake patterns. Technol. Health Care 2017, 25, 89–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Nawaz, A.; Helbostad, J.L.; Skjæret, N.; Vereijken, B.; Bourke, A.; Dahl, Y.; Mellone, S. Designing Smart Home Technology for Fall Prevention in Older People. In HCI International 2014—Posters’ Extended Abstracts; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 485–490. [Google Scholar]
  21. InteliCare Worry Less, Care More. Available online: https://intelicare.com.au/ (accessed on 2 May 2022).
  22. World Health Organization. Global Strategy on Digital Health 2020–2025. 2021, pp. 1–60. Available online: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/documents/gs4dhdaa2a9f352b0445bafbc79ca799dce4d.pdf (accessed on 2 April 2021).
  23. Dermody, G.; Fritz, R.; Glass, C.; Dunham, M.; Whitehead, L. Factors influencing community-dwelling older adults’ readiness to adopt smart home technology: A qualitative exploratory study. J. Adv. Nurs. 2021, 77, 4847–4861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Auernhammer, J.; Roth, B. The origin and evolution of Stanford University’s design thinking: From product design to design thinking in innovation management. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2021, 38, 623–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nedeltcheva, G.N.; Shoikova, E. Coupling Design Thinking, User Experience Design and Agile: Towards Cooperation Framework. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Big Data and Internet of Thing, London, UK, 20–22 December 2017; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 225–229. [Google Scholar]
  26. Martins, F.; Almeida, M.; Calili, R.; Oliveira, A. Design Thinking Applied to Smart Home Projects: A User-Centric and Sustainable Perspective. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kim, M.J.; Cho, M.E.; Jun, H.J. Developing Design Solutions for Smart Homes Through User-Centered Scenarios. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Pal, D.; Funilkul, S.; Charoenkitkarn, N.; Kanthamanon, P. Internet-of-Things and Smart Homes for Elderly Healthcare: An End User Perspective. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 10483–10496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, Q.; Li, M.; Wu, Y. Smart home for elderly care: Development and challenges in China. BMC Geriatr. 2020, 20, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sumner, J.; Chong, L.S.; Bundele, A.; Lim, Y.W. Co-Designing Technology for Aging in Place: A Systematic Review. Gerontol. 2020, 61, e395–e409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ellis, G.; Sevdalis, N. Understanding and improving multidisciplinary team working in geriatric medicine. Age Ageing 2019, 48, 498–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fisk, A.D.; Rogers, W.A.; Charness, N.; Czaja, S.J.; Sharit, J. Designing for Older Adults-Principles and Creative Human Factor Approaches, 2nd ed.; CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  33. Reeder, B.; Meyer, E.; Lazar, A.; Chaudhuri, S.; Thompson, H.J.; Demiris, G. Framing the evidence for health smart homes and home-based consumer health technologies as a public health intervention for independent aging: A systematic review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2013, 82, 565–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Yale School of Nursing Gallup: Nurses Are Most Trusted Profession for 20th Straight Year. Available online: https://nursing.yale.edu/news/gallup-nurses-are-most-trusted-profession-20th-straight-year (accessed on 4 May 2022).
  35. Rantz, M.J.; Skubic, M.; Popescu, M.; Galambos, C.; Koopman, R.J.; Alexander, G.L.; Phillips, L.J.; Musterman, K.; Back, J.; Miller, S.J. A New Paradigm of Technology-Enabled ‘Vital Signs’ for Early Detection of Health Change for Older Adults. Gerontology 2015, 61, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Dermody, G.; Fritz, R. A conceptual framework for clinicians working with artificial intelligence and health-assistive Smart Homes. Nurs. Inq. 2018, 26, e12267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Peek, S.T.M.; Wouters, E.J.M.; van Hoof, J.; Luijkx, K.G.; Boeije, H.R.; Vrijhoef, H.J.M. Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2014, 83, 235–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Demiris, G.; Rantz, M.J.; A Aud, M.; Marek, K.D.; Tyrer, H.W.; Skubic, M.; A Hussam, A. Older adults’ attitudes towards and perceptions of ‘smart home’ technologies: A pilot study. Med. Inform. Internet Med. 2004, 29, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Arthanat, S.; Wilcox, J.; Macuch, M. Profiles and Predictors of Smart Home Technology Adoption by Older Adults. OTJR Occup. Particip. Health 2018, 39, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. A Lindeman, D.; Kim, K.K.; Gladstone, C.; Apesoa-Varano, E.C. Technology and Caregiving: Emerging Interventions and Directions for Research. Gerontologist 2020, 60, S41–S49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Berridge, C.; Wetle, T.F. Why Older Adults and Their Children Disagree about In-Home Surveillance Technology, Sensors, and Tracking. Gerontologist 2020, 60, 926–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Risling, T. Educating the nurses of 2025: Technology trends of the next decade. Nurse Educ. Pract. 2017, 22, 89–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Gibson, A.; Bardach, S.H.; Pope, N.D. COVID-19 and the Digital Divide: Will Social Workers Help Bridge the Gap? J. Gerontol. Soc. Work 2020, 63, 671–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ginter, P.M.; Duncan, W.J.; Swayne, L.E. The Strategic Management of Health Care Organizations; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  45. Benjamin, K.; Potts, H.W.J.D.H. Digital transformation in government: Lessons for digital health? Digital Health 2018, 4, 2055207618759168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Research Report World. Global Aged Care Services Market Report. Available online: https://www.researchreportsworld.com/-global-aged-care-services-market-17229184 (accessed on 3 January 2021).
  47. Manchester, H. Co-designing technologies for care: Spaces of co-habitation. In Socio-Gerontechnology; Routledge: London, UK, 2021; pp. 213–227. [Google Scholar]
  48. Barnett, K.; Livingstone, A.; Margelis, G.; Tomlins, G.; Gould, G.; Capamagian, L.; Alexander, G.; Mason, C.; Young, R. Innovation Driving Care Systems Capability: Final Report; Aged Care Industry IT Company: Murarrie, QLD, Australia, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  49. Topol, E. Preparing the Healthcare Workforce to Deliver the Digital Future. pp. 1–53. Available online: https://topol.hee.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/HEE-Topol-Review-2019.pdf (accessed on 6 April 2021).
  50. Rantz, M.J.; Porter, R.T.; Cheshier, D.; Otto, D.; Servey, C.H., 3rd; Johnson, R.A.; Aud, M.; Skubic, M.; Tyrer, H.; He, Z.; et al. TigerPlace, a State-Academic-Private Project to Revolutionize Traditional Long-Term Care. J. Hous. Elder. 2008, 22, 66–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Franck, E.; Nauta, J.; de Haan, R. Business Case for Smart Homes. In Handbook of Smart Homes, Health Care and Well-Being; van Hoof, J., Demiris, G., Wouters, E.J.M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 413–426. [Google Scholar]
  52. Ghods, A.; Caffrey, K.; Lin, B.; Fraga, K.; Fritz, R.; Schmitter-Edgecombe, M.; Hundhausen, C.; Cook, D.J. Iterative Design of Visual Analytics for a Clinician-in-the-Loop Smart Home. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 2018, 23, 1742–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Campos, P.A.; Reich, M.R. Political Analysis for Health Policy Implementation. Health Syst. Reform 2019, 5, 224–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Vanus, J.; Koziorek, J.; Hercík, R. Design of a smart building control with view to the senior citizens’ needs. IFAC Proc. Vol. 2013, 46, 422–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Barker, O. Realizing the Promise of the Internet of Things in Smart Buildings. Computer 2020, 53, 76–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Demiris, G.; Hensel, B.K.; Skubic, M.; Rantz, M. Senior residents’ perceived need of and preferences for “smart home” sensor technologies. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 2008, 24, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jal 02 00013 g001 550
Figure 1. Design thinking process for integration of the HSH in the care of older adults.
Figure 1. Design thinking process for integration of the HSH in the care of older adults.
Jal 02 00013 g001
Jal 02 00013 g002 550
Figure 2. Relationships between primary stakeholder groups for design thinking.
Figure 2. Relationships between primary stakeholder groups for design thinking.
Jal 02 00013 g002
Table
Table 1. Requirements and contribution for integration of health smart homes.
Table 1. Requirements and contribution for integration of health smart homes.
Stakeholder GroupRequirements for HSH IntegrationContribution to HSH Integration
Microsystem
Older adult & family caregivers
(critical at each phase)		Knowledge of the HSH, benefits, and potential challenges
How the HSH can meet the goals/needs of an older adult and family caregivers
Funding mechanism that addresses initial HSH cost and ongoing service/maintenance fees
Offering different levels of HSH that can change with the worsening of chronic conditions		Can be early adopters to test the user-friendliness of the HSH and to determine the aspects still needed to meet their needs
Frontline healthcare professionals
(critical at idea generation, developing the prototype, testing the mechanism phases)		Education for older adults and their family caregivers
Clinical workforce readiness to use HSH in care delivery		Trusted professions, prescribing/gatekeeping role
Monitoring of health outcomes
Contribute to workforce readiness
Social workers
(critical at idea generation phase)		Opportunities to collaborate with governmental and non-governmental agencies, policies, or services
Connect with HSH stakeholders to share knowledge that may impact the integration of the HSH		Determine the social complexities that impact aging-in-place of the older adult; connect older adult governmental and non-governmental agencies, policies, or services
Multidisciplinary research teams
(critical at each phase)		Funding and supportive academic and clinical environments to conduct research
Studies that show clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the HSH
Studies that show that the HSH is meeting the needs/expectations of older adults and family caregivers and clinicians		Findings from pragmatic clinical trials on the clinical effectiveness of the HSH
The impact of HSH on older adults and family caregivers’ needs/desires; and clinician end-user experiences/perceptions regarding the HSH and clinical decision-making
Cost-benefit analysis
Academic or educator roles
(critical at defining the problem, idea generation phases)		Increased digital literacy in health professional’s education standards
Increased educational materials developed for the public about HSH and how it can support older adults and family caregivers		Development of curriculum for allied health professions; educational material for older adults and family caregivers, and education on the HSH
Mesosystem
Health care organizations
(critical at defining the problem, idea, and testing phases)		New models of care delivery using HSH
Enable prescriptions for HSH
Robust technology infrastructure and supports		Development of new models of care
Clinical policies and procedures
Aged-care organizations
(critical at defining the problem, idea generation, and testing phases)		Clinical workforce readiness to use HSH in care delivery
Data visualizations that make sense for clinicians, and integration into existing electronic health record systems
need a mechanism by which equitable access to the HSH is available to all older adults including low/lower income		Early adopters of HSH in retirement villages/apartments.
Provides a platform to provide education to the public, older adults, and family caregivers
Collaborate with the multidisciplinary research team
HSH Companies: Computer science & electrical engineering teams, entrepreneurs, start-ups, companies
(critical at all phases)		Clinical significance of monitored health behavior to refine machine learning
Data visualizations that make sense for clinicians, and integration into existing electronic health record systems
Privacy/data security
Business development and strategies for scaling up		Development of algorithms & artificial intelligent agent
Clinician dashboard
Sensor development and further innovation (e.g., gait analysis in the home, accommodating for pets)
Formation of start-up companies to advance the practical manufacturing of HSH with minimal cost and clinical effectiveness and user-friendliness for older adults, families, and the clinical workforce
Master system integrator (MSI)
(critical at developing the prototype, and testing phases)		Collaboration with technicians and building expertsBalances the depth and breadth of knowledge required to design and manage smart building systems on a short and long-term basis
Connects the multidisciplinary team members with trade contractors and coordinates trade teams for effective design, implementation, and evaluation
Macrosystem
Health care policymakers
(critical at empathizing, defining a problem, testing phases)		Policies and standards for the HSH if covered by aged care packages public health funding
Integration of HSH into aged care packages/ public funding
Policies and standards developed for privacy and data management of HSH data		Development of health care policy with corresponding mechanisms for prescribers and payment, ensuring that all older adults have access to the HSH
Special interest groups/advocates
(critical at Testing phase)		Knowledge and understanding of how the HSH can benefitAdvocacy, dissemination of education
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dermody, G.; Mikus, J.; Porock, D.; Sugarman, D.; Janjua, N.K.; How, C.; Fritz, R. Perspectives on Wider Integration of the Health-Assistive Smart Home. J. Ageing Longev. 2022, 2, 140-152. https://doi.org/10.3390/jal2020013

AMA Style

Dermody G, Mikus J, Porock D, Sugarman D, Janjua NK, How C, Fritz R. Perspectives on Wider Integration of the Health-Assistive Smart Home. Journal of Ageing and Longevity. 2022; 2(2):140-152. https://doi.org/10.3390/jal2020013

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dermody, Gordana, Jenna Mikus, Davina Porock, Dov Sugarman, Naeem K. Janjua, Christopher How, and Roschelle Fritz. 2022. "Perspectives on Wider Integration of the Health-Assistive Smart Home" Journal of Ageing and Longevity 2, no. 2: 140-152. https://doi.org/10.3390/jal2020013

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop