Next Article in Journal
Modified Hydrothermal Pretreatment Conditions Enhance Alcohol Solubility of Lignin from Wheat Straw Biorefining
Previous Article in Journal
Potentials of Sustainable Aviation Fuel Production from Biomass and Waste: How Australia’s Sugar Industry Can Become a Successful Global Example
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Extraction, Isolation, and TEMPO-NaBr-NaClO Oxidation Modification of Cellulose from Coffee Grounds

1
The Higher Institute of Nursing Professions and Health Techniques of Marrakech, Marrakech 40000, Morocco
2
Laboratory of Material Sciences and Process Optimization, Faculty of Sciences Semallaia, Cadi Ayyad University, BP 2390, Marrakech 40000, Morocco
3
Laboratory of Applied Chemistry and Biomass, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University, BP 2390, Marrakech 40000, Morocco
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomass 2025, 5(2), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass5020022
Submission received: 9 February 2025 / Revised: 19 March 2025 / Accepted: 24 March 2025 / Published: 3 April 2025

Abstract

:
This study investigates the extraction, isolation, and chemical modification of cellulose from coffee ground residues using TEMPO-NaBr-NaClO oxidation. These residues represent a promising renewable source of cellulose, which is obtained after the removal of impurities such as lignin (24%), hemicellulose (42%), and other compounds. The TEMPO (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl radical)-catalyzed oxidation selectively converts primary hydroxyl groups into carboxylate groups (-COOH) under mild conditions in aqueous media, achieving an oxidation yield of up to 67%. Structural and morphological analyses, including scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction (XRD), confirm the successful chemical modification of the cellulose. The results indicate a reduction in crystallinity index from native cellulose (80%) to oxidized cellulose (65%), reflecting partial disruption of the microfibril structure and the introduction of new chemical functionalities. FTIR analysis reveals the appearance of characteristic carboxylate bands, confirming the conversion of hydroxyl groups into carboxyl groups. Energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis further highlights a significant increase in oxygen content, indicating the efficiency of the oxidation process. The TEMPO-oxidized cellulose is water-soluble, enabling the production of valuable polyelectrolytes and intermediates. These chemical modifications improve the cellulose’s reactivity, broadening its potential applications in various fields, including biocomposites, sustainable packaging materials, and functional films. This work demonstrates the feasibility of utilizing coffee ground residues as a renewable, eco-friendly source of modified cellulose for high-value applications.

1. Introduction

The valorization of food waste without generating pollutants represents a significant challenge and a crucial priority for sustainable industrial development aimed at preserving the environment. Biomass waste, which includes materials such as walnut shells, [1], pecan shells [2], apple peels [2], date pits [3], olive pits [4], peach pits [5], corn cobs [6], coffee beans [7], coffee grounds [2,8,9,10,11], tea waste [12], bagasse [13], and coconut shells [14], presents a promising market for recycling and value addition. These materials are particularly noteworthy due to their high carbon content, which allows them to serve as precursors for the production of modified cellulosic products or activated carbon. Coffee stands out as one of the most widely consumed beverages globally. According to the International Coffee Organization, approximately 680 million tons of coffee was produced in 2008. While some of the coffee grounds generated are repurposed for various applications such as soil remediation or odor adsorption, the majority require carbonization before they can be utilized effectively [8]. It is important to note that the combustion of 1000 g of coffee grounds is estimated to produce around 538 g of carbon dioxide [8]. This highlights the environmental impact associated with coffee waste and underscores the need for sustainable management practices.
Coffee grounds are composed of proteins (13–17%), lipids (7–21%), cellulose (8–15%), hemicellulose (30–40%), and lignin (20–30%) [15]. Due to its chemical composition and high and sustainable annual production [16], coffee grounds are a valuable raw material for the production of biogas, petroleum, biodiesel, plasticizers, bioplastics, compost, and fertilizers. They can also be used as an adsorbent for pollution control, as well as for the production of food products (e.g., for bakery and meat products) [17]. Furthermore, coffee grounds can be used to extract cellulose and its derivatives, such as cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) [18], cellulose nanospheres (CNSs) [19], and cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) [20].
Coffee grounds are an abundant source of cellulose, extracted by chemical, enzymatic, mechanical, or hybrid methods. Chemical approaches are rapid but polluting, while enzymatic ones are ecological but expensive. Mechanical methods improve extraction but are energy-intensive. Combined strategies, such as chemo-enzymatic methods, offer a good compromise between efficiency and sustainability, allowing high yields with reduced impact. Once extracted, cellulose can be modified to optimize its properties, but these transformations must be controlled.
Cellulose is one of the most abundant and versatile biopolymers in the world, used in diverse sectors such as paper, textile, pharmaceutical, and food industries. However, its exploitation in advanced applications often requires chemical modifications to improve its functional properties. Selective oxidation of primary hydroxyl groups to carboxylic groups is one of the most promising methods to increase the reactivity and solubility of cellulose, opening the way to new applications in the fabrication of biocomposites, hydrogels, membranes, and biodegradable packaging. Additionally, emerging industries such as cosmetics and biotechnology are increasingly utilizing these cellulose derivatives. Chemical modification has emerged as one of the most extensively developed methods for enhancing cellulose properties. Among these methods, the oxidation of alcohol groups in cellulose carbohydrates has gained considerable attention in recent years. This growing interest can be attributed to the unique properties exhibited by oxidized polysaccharides and their potential for further modification through processes such as esterification. In our research focused on chemically modifying cellulose extracted from coffee grounds, we specifically selected the oxidation of alcohol groups to aldehydes or carboxylic acids. This oxidation process can be achieved through various methods utilizing a wide range of reagents; however, when selectivity or mild operational conditions are required, the selection of suitable reagents becomes more constrained. One effective and selective method for oxidation involves using oxoammonium salts, particularly di-tert-alkyl TEMPO (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl radical). The TEMPO radical is generated in situ and selectively oxidizes primary and secondary alcohols in a chemoselective and regioselective manner. Among the available oxidants for this purpose, the TEMPO radical has emerged as one of the most widely studied and regenerated in contemporary research. The first documented use of this system was for oxidizing water-soluble polysaccharides such as starch, amylodextrin, and pullulans. This particular system was chosen due to its high selectivity in oxidizing primary alcohols. Over time, several oxidation methods have been developed to selectively modify the hydroxyl groups of various polysaccharides including starch, pullulan (a sugar polymer composed of maltotriose units), amylose [21], cyclodextrins [22,23], and cellulose itself.
TEMPO oxidation improves the wettability and mechanical properties of cellulose but is slower and more expensive. TEMPO-NaClO oxidation is faster, producing more carboxyl groups, which increases solubility and is suitable for applications such as hydrogels. Both methods have advantages, with TEMPO-NaClO being more efficient but requiring careful handling of sodium hypochlorite.
The TEMPO-NaBr-NaClO process is a very efficient method for the oxidation of cellulose, producing a high degree of oxidation with the introduction of carboxyl groups (-COOH), which improves the solubility and wettability of cellulose. This process allows an oxidation degree of 80–90% to be reached [24], which is higher than that of other methods, such as oxidation by TEMPO alone (30–60%), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (50–70%), or nitric acid (HNO3) (50–80%) [25]. While TEMPO-NaBr-NaClO is particularly effective in creating modified cellulose used in applications such as hydrogels or polyelectrolytes, other methods, such as ozone (30–50%) or N-chlorinated (40–70%) [26] oxidation, offer lower carboxylation results and produce side reactions. However, the TEMPO-NaBr-NaClO method is very efficient.
Moreover, coffee-derived cellulose presents multiple advantages over conventional sources like wood and cotton, making it a promising sustainable alternative. One of the key benefits lies in its environmental impact, as it is sourced from waste biomass, reducing the need for deforestation and minimizing water and pesticide consumption. Unlike cotton, which requires extensive irrigation and chemical inputs, coffee grounds are an abundant byproduct of the coffee industry, contributing to waste valorization and promoting a circular economy. Economically, coffee cellulose is more cost-effective since it does not require additional cultivation, harvesting, or processing beyond extraction. Its availability as an industrial byproduct ensures a continuous and low-cost supply. Structurally, coffee-derived cellulose features shorter fibers, which provide enhanced flexibility and lightweight properties, making it particularly useful for biodegradable composites and packaging. Additionally, it exhibits superior thermal stability compared to some conventional cellulose sources, likely due to the presence of polyphenols and antioxidants that also confer antimicrobial properties. This unique composition makes coffee cellulose particularly valuable for applications in food packaging, biomedical materials, and filtration membranes. Moreover, its potential for nanocellulose production opens avenues for high-performance applications in coatings, electronics, and reinforced biopolymer composites. Given these benefits, coffee-derived cellulose represents a sustainable, economical, and functionally versatile alternative to traditional sources, offering significant potential for eco-friendly and high-value applications.
However, although several studies have been conducted on the modification of cellulose from conventional sources (wood, cotton, algae, etc.), few studies have explored the exploitation of coffee ground residues as an alternative source of cellulose. In addition, the physical and chemical properties of oxidized cellulose extracted from coffee grounds, such as its crystallinity index, degree of oxidation, and structural behavior, remain insufficiently documented.
The main objective of this study is therefore to extract and purify cellulose from coffee grounds and then chemically modify it by TEMPO-NaBr-NaClO oxidation to introduce carboxylic groups and improve its functional properties. A thorough characterization of the oxidized cellulose will be performed using advanced analytical techniques, including scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction (XRD), to assess the impact of oxidation on its structure and performance. This research aims to enhance the value of agro-industrial waste into a functional material with high added value, contributing to the development of sustainable and eco-responsible solutions for the biomaterials industry.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The coffee grounds used in this study were sourced from ZOUHOUR, a renowned commercial establishment specializing in coffee beverages. This establishment is located in the bustling city of Marrakech, Morocco, at the geographic coordinates 31.642792, −7.981603. The coffee used in the research was Amarito M Milagro, a carefully selected blend of Robusta and Arabica beans. This selection was made due to the popularity of the coffee as well as its distinctive qualities that contribute to its appeal to local and international consumers. The Robusta–Arabica blend was chosen for its specific organoleptic properties, which influence not only the taste but also the chemical composition of the coffee residues. The coffee residues were stored in a temperature-controlled oven at 60 °C in order to preserve their chemical composition before use. This storage method helps to minimize the moisture present in the coffee beans, which can impact their chemical composition, particularly the cellulose contained in the grounds. Storing at a constant temperature also helps to reduce microbiological degradation and maintain the properties of the coffee residues until they are transformed into materials. 2,2,6,6-Tetramethylpiperidine 1-oxy radicals (TEMPO, 99.99%), sodium chlorite (NaClO2, 99%), sodium bromide (NaBr, 99%), sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 98.99% ), sodium hypochlorite (NaClO, 99%), and absolute ethanol were obtained from Aldrich. The chemicals used can pose risks to the environment and human health due to their corrosive, toxic nature or the formation of harmful byproducts. However, using them in reduced quantities in the oxidation process can limit these risks while maintaining the efficiency of the reaction.

2.2. Extraction and Purification of Cellulose

The extraction and purification of cellulose from coffee grounds involves a series of chemical processes to remove various contaminants, such as phenolic compounds, lignin, hemicelluloses, and other secondary metabolites, to isolate pure cellulose. Although coffee grounds are a rich source of cellulose, they also contain significant amounts of lignin, hemicelluloses, and other organic compounds that must be efficiently degraded or separated to obtain cellulose in its pure form. In this study, the coffee grounds were first subjected to oven-drying at 105 °C for approximately 30 min to remove any traces of moisture. This is an important step, as the presence of moisture could interfere with subsequent chemical treatments. After drying, the coffee grounds were sieved to remove larger particles, thus ensuring a more uniform sample for subsequent steps.
The next step was to treat the sieved coffee grounds with 1 N sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution. This treatment was carried out at three successive intervals: 24 h, 12 h, and 6 h. Sodium hydroxide serves as an alkaline agent that breaks down the lignin and hemicelluloses present in the coffee grounds. Lignin, being a complex polymer, is largely responsible for the rigidity and structure of the plant cell wall, and its removal is crucial to isolate cellulose. Hemicellulose, another polysaccharide, is also partially soluble in alkaline solutions, which facilitates its degradation. The treatment time was gradually reduced from 24 h to 6 h, which allowed for complete degradation of the non-cellulosic components. After each treatment, the mixture was thoroughly washed with water to neutralize the alkali and remove dissolved impurities. The solution was then filtered to separate the liquid from the solid cellulosic residue. After the alkaline treatment, the residue was subjected to a bleaching process to remove any remaining color and further degrade the residual lignin. Bleaching was carried out using a sodium chlorite (NaClO2) solution at a concentration of 1.7% (w/v) at 80 °C for 40 min. Sodium chlorite is an effective bleaching agent that targets lignin and phenolic compounds, breaking them down and removing any remaining discoloration. This process produces a cleaner, whiter cellulose suitable for other applications.
Once bleaching was completed, the cellulose underwent triple filtration to ensure complete removal of any residual chemicals, impurities, or contaminants. Each filtration step helped to refine the purity of the cellulose. After filtration, the cellulose was thoroughly washed with water to remove any traces of chemicals from the bleaching process. To ensure complete purification, the cellulose was rinsed with acetone.
The resulting purified cellulose was a white solid, free of lignin, hemicellulose, and other contaminants, and was recovered for further use (Figure 1).

2.3. Oxidation of Cellulose Hydroxyl Groups

The TEMPO oxidation process begins with adjusting the pH of the reaction system to 10.5, which is a crucial step to create the optimal conditions for the oxidation reaction. To initiate the process, a carefully prepared mixture containing sodium bromide (NaBr, 1.6 equivalents) and the TEMPO radical (0.0166 equivalents) is dissolved and introduced into the cellulose suspension. In this case, 0.5 g of cellulose was used as the substrate. Sodium bromide plays an important role as a source of bromine ions, which are essential for the oxidation reaction catalyzed by the TEMPO radical. The TEMPO radical itself is a well-known stable oxidizing agent that facilitates the selective oxidation of the primary alcohol groups present in cellulose to form carboxyl groups. Once the mixture is prepared, sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) is gradually added to the reaction system. Sodium hypochlorite serves as the oxidizing agent in this process, and its addition triggers the oxidation of cellulose. Typically, 3.5 equivalents of sodium hypochlorite are used, and it is added gradually to control the rate of the oxidation reaction. Throughout the reaction, it is critical to maintain the pH of the system at 10.5.
Although the TEMPO-NaClO oxidation mechanism may seem simpler at first glance, the choice of the TEMPO-NaBr-NaClO system has significant advantages in terms of efficiency and selectivity. The addition of sodium bromide (NaBr) plays a crucial catalytic role by generating hypobromite (OBr), a much more powerful oxidant than hypochlorite (ClO) present in the TEMPO-NaClO system alone. This increased oxidation power significantly accelerates the regeneration of the TEMPO+ oxoammonium ion, the active form of the catalyst, thus allowing faster and more complete oxidation of the substrate. In addition, the TEMPO-NaBr-NaClO system offers superior selectivity in certain applications, notably the selective oxidation of primary hydroxyl groups in polysaccharides. The presence of hypobromite influences the reaction kinetics, favoring the oxidation of primary hydroxyl groups over secondary hydroxyl groups. In contrast, the TEMPO-NaClO system alone can be limited by the oxidation rate, particularly in applications involving polymers, and may be more sensitive to pH and temperature variations. The addition of NaBr overcomes these limitations, enabling faster, more controlled, and more selective oxidation.
In summary, while the TEMPO-NaClO system can work, the TEMPO-NaBr-NaClO system is preferred due to its improved efficiency and selectivity, resulting in faster and more controlled oxidation. This difference is crucial in many applications, particularly those where selectivity and speed are paramount, thus justifying the authors’ choice of the TEMPO-NaBr-NaClO system.
This is carried out by the periodic addition of a 1 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution, which ensures that the environment remains basic, a condition necessary for the effective operation of TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Maintaining a stable pH is essential to avoid side reactions and to ensure that the cellulose is oxidized at the desired rate. The oxidation reaction is allowed to proceed for 120 min. During this time, the TEMPO radical catalyzes the oxidation of the cellulose, selectively converting the hydroxyl groups at the C6 position of the glucose units into carboxyl groups. This modification significantly enhances the reactivity and surface charge of the cellulose, which can improve its dispersion and compatibility in various applications, such as nanocellulose production. After the 120 min reaction period, the oxidation is terminated by adding 1.25 mL of absolute methanol. Methanol acts as a quenching agent, effectively stopping the reaction and preventing further oxidation. Once the reaction is stopped, the pH of the mixture is adjusted to neutral (pH 7) to stabilize the oxidized cellulose and ensure it remains in its desired form. This neutralization is important for preventing any continued reactivity of the oxidized cellulose and for ensuring that the final product can be safely handled and processed. To isolate the purified oxidized cellulose, the reaction mixture is subjected to centrifugation at 11,000 rpm for 30 min. This high-speed centrifugation step serves to separate the solid phase (oxidized cellulose) from the liquid phase, which contains residual reactants and byproducts. After centrifugation, the oxidized cellulose is washed thoroughly with distilled water in three successive cycles. This washing process is critical for removing any remaining sodium bromide, sodium hypochlorite, and other reaction byproducts, ensuring that the final product is free from contaminants. The resulting material is purified, oxidized cellulose that has undergone selective modification of its hydroxyl groups into carboxyl groups. The degree of oxidation of the cellulose is reported to be approximately 62%, which reflects the extent to which the primary alcohol groups have been converted to carboxyl groups during the oxidation process Figure 2.
The economic feasibility of this process is supported by the use of low-cost coffee grounds, efficient oxidation, scalability potential, and growing market demand for sustainable materials. Environmentally, the use of a renewable resource like coffee grounds and the biodegradability of oxidized cellulose contribute to waste reduction and provide a more environmentally friendly alternative to synthetic polymers.

2.4. Analysis

2.4.1. Weight Loss Determination

The weight loss of the extracted cellulose was determined gravimetrically at each step of the extraction procedure. After oven-drying the samples and ensuring a constant weight, measurements were taken to calculate the mass lost during each stage of the process.

2.4.2. Degree of Oxidation

The degree of oxidation (OD) of cellulose was evaluated by conductometric titration with sodium hydroxide (NaOH). Conductimetry allows for the determination of the degree of oxidation and esterification of the samples. A conductimeter of the EUTECH con 510 type was used. The mass of the sample to be assayed was placed in a beaker in which 15 mL of 0.01 M hydrochloric acid was added in order to acidify the substrate. The mixture was stirred for 30–100 min and the titration was carried out with a solution of sodium hydroxide NaOH 0.01 M, following the variation in conductivity. The degree of oxidation was calculated by the following equation:
O D = 162 C V 2 w 14 C V 1
Herein, C is the concentration of NaOH (mol/L). V1 and V2 are the volumes of NaOH (L) used in the titration of oxidized cellulose and oxidized cellulose, respectively.
The molecular weight of the cellulose monomer was 162 g/mol. w is the dry mass of oxidized cellulose (g) [27].

2.4.3. Degree of Polymerization

Oxidized cellulose (50 mg) was cut into small pieces and mixed with 5 mL of distilled water under stirring for 30 min. Then, 5 mL of cupriethylenediamine (Sigma-Aldrich) (Company SOMAPROL, Casablanca, Morocco) saturated with copper(II) hydroxide was added and the mixture was stirred for 60 min and then centrifuged for 5 min at 7000 rcf. Finally, the intrinsic viscosities of cellulose were obtained using a Rheotek Ubbelohde capillary tube viscometer placed in a water bath at 25 °C. The intrinsic viscosity as a function of the average molecular weight is generally represented by the empirical Mark–Houwink–Sakurada equation shown in Equation (2) [28].
[η] = KMa
where K = 0.00015 and α = 1.9325.
Finally, the molecular mass of cellulose was calculated using the following relation:
P D = M 162 + 14 ( O D + 162 C V 1 w 14 C V 1 )
where M is the molecular mass of the cellulose and 162 (g/mol) is the molecular mass of an anhydroglucose unit. OD is the degree of oxidation. All samples were analyzed in triplicate.

2.4.4. Crystallinity and Chemical Bonding of Constituents

The XRD analysis was performed on powder samples using a Rigaku Smart Lab diffractometer operating with a copper anode (λKα = 1.5418 Å). The XRD traces were recorded under the following conditions: generator voltage: 40 kV; tube current: 30 mA. The diffraction angle (2θ) varied from 10 to 40°, with a scanning speed of 1.5° per minute and a step size of 0.05°. Circular samples were fixed on zero-background supports fabricated from 9 N semiconductor-grade silicon.
The crystallinity index (CI) was determined by using data obtained from the X-ray diffraction (XRD) trace of cellulose and Equation (4) [29]:
C I = I 200 I a m I 200
where I200 is the maximum intensity of the (200) lattice diffraction and Iam is the intensity diffraction at 18°.
Crystal sizes were determined according to the Scherrer equation (Equation (5)), where D is the average crystal size (nm), λ is the X-ray wavelength (1.54059 Å), 0.9 is the Scherrer constant, θ is the half diffraction angle for the I200 plane in degrees, and β is the peak width at half its maximum in radians [30]:
D = 0.9 λ β c o s ( θ )
For the Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy investigation, to analyze chemical functional groups, samples were mixed with KBr (~1:100, w/w) and pressed into transparent pellets. FTIR spectra were recorded, shaped, and analyzed using a Perkin Elmer 1725-x spectrophotometer functioning in the range of 4000–400 cm−1.

2.4.5. Scanning Electron Microscopy and EDX Analysis

The microstructure of the carbon-coated cured samples was meticulously investigated using a TESCAN VEGA3 scanning electron microscope (SEM), offering high-resolution imaging capabilities. This SEM was equipped with a 20 mm2 X-Max diffusion silicon detector, which significantly enhances energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis, enabling precise elemental mapping of the sample. The morphological examination provided detailed insights into the surface features and texture of the carbon coatings. Additionally, EDX spectroscopy was employed to analyze the elemental composition of the carbon-coated surfaces, allowing for the identification and quantification of specific elements present in the sample.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Cellulose Extract

The X-ray diffraction patterns of the extracted cellulose are shown in Figure 3. Some physical characteristics of this material are given in Table 1.
The amounts of hemicelluloses, lignin, and cellulose in the coffee samples were determined using the method described in detail by Kılınç et al. [31].
TEMPO/NaBr/NaClO excels in terms of selectivity and cost-effectiveness for cellulose. An optimized NaClO dosage is essential to balance carboxylate content and yield. In contrast, TEMPO/NaClO2/NaOCl offers higher yields for chitin but requires a neutral pH, which limits its applicability to cellulose. Alkaline NaClO-based systems are less efficient due to non-selective oxidation. For cellulose, the TEMPO/NaBr/NaClO system remains the most efficient method once optimized, while TEMPO/NaClO2/NaOCl is preferred for chitin-based applications, Table 2.

3.2. X-Ray Diffraction

The XRD diffractograms of the cellulose (Figure 3a) and oxidized cellulose samples (Figure 3b) are shown in Figure 3. The peak at about 2θ~22.8° corresponds to the diffraction of the (200) crystal plane, while the peak at about 15–16° is attributed to the (110) lattice planes of cellulose I. Crystalline native cellulose exhibits high crystallinity, being a combination of two crystalline structures: triclinic (Iα) and monoclinic (Iβ) arrangements. The observed peak intensities were larger in native cellulose and decreased significantly in oxidized cellulose. The observed decrease in crystallinity index (CI) from 80% (native cellulose) to 68% (oxidized cellulose) can be attributed to the extensive structural modifications induced by TEMPO-mediated oxidation and mechanical disintegration, Table 3. These processes significantly affect the crystalline regions of cellulose, leading to structural disorder and reduced crystallinity. One key factor contributing to this decrease is the higher susceptibility of smaller cellulose fragments to oxidation. Due to their larger surface area, these fragments undergo more extensive oxidation, not only by TEMPO but also by other chemical agents, leading to increased disruption of hydrogen bonding networks. Furthermore, the X-ray diffraction (XRD) diffractograms support these findings, showing a marked reduction in diffraction intensity at 2θ = 22.0–22.8°, which corresponds to the crystalline plane of cellulose. This decline suggests a progressive dissolution of highly oxidized crystalline regions, making the cellulose structure more amorphous. Another crucial aspect is the formation of carboxylate (COONa+) groups, which occurs selectively at the surfaces of crystalline cellulose microfibrils. These negatively charged groups weaken intermolecular hydrogen bonds, reducing the structural integrity of the cellulose network. The diminished hydroxyl content further disrupts the regular arrangement of cellulose chains, leading to a more disordered molecular structure. In summary, the decrease in CI is primarily driven by the chemical and physical modifications imposed by TEMPO oxidation, the preferential attack on crystalline domains, and the destabilization of hydrogen bonding networks, all of which contribute to an increasingly amorphous cellulose structure.
The degree of polymerization (DP) of cellulose decreases upon oxidation due to chain cleavage, Table 3. Oxidized cellulose generally has a high DP. In contrast, oxidized cellulose undergoes a reduction in DP as oxidation of primary hydroxyl groups to form carboxyl groups weakens the glycosidic bonds, leading to chain scission.

3.3. Infrared Spectroscopy (IR)

Infrared (IR) spectroscopy provides valuable insights into the chemical and structural changes of cellulose during oxidation, allowing for a detailed comparison of the biomass before and after treatment. The analysis identifies key infrared absorption bands, each corresponding to specific functional groups present in the cellulose. The following sections highlight the primary IR bands observed in the spectra, along with the functional groups they represent, both prior to and following the oxidation process (see figure below).
The spectra of oxidized cellulose (Figure 4b) show the appearance of an additional band around 1720 cm⁻¹, which is absent in the spectrum of native cellulose (Figure 4a) (-OH), Table 4. This band is attributed to the carbonyl group (C=O), characteristic of carboxyl groups (-COOH), Table 4. It serves as a key marker for the oxidation of cellulose into carboxymethylcellulose or other carboxyl-containing structures. This result confirms the successful modification of the cellulose substrate, in line with previous studies in the literature [34,35]. However, the band at 1641 cm−1, corresponding to the OH bonds of water adsorbed on cellulose, appears to be very broad. This is likely due to the presence of residual moisture, which is a common challenge when drying samples prior to chemical treatment [34,35]. Changes in the C-O band observed between 1050 and 1100 cm−1, Table 4 may suggest structural modifications of the cellulose, indicating the introduction of additional functional groups. These changes can influence the crystallinity and solubility of the modified cellulose. Additionally, the C-O-C absorption band at 1160 cm−1 may shift or become more intense as hydroxyl groups are converted into carboxyl groups or other oxygenated structures. A decrease in the intensity of the O-H band at 3460 cm−1 is also noted, reflecting the transformation of hydroxyl groups into other functional groups during the oxidation process.

3.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

SEM can be used to observe changes in the particle size and distribution of nanostructures. The SEM images (Figure 5A and Figure 6B) reveal that the fibrous structure of coffee ground cellulose is significantly altered after oxidation. This refinement occurs when cellulose undergoes oxidation using the TEMPO-NaBr-NaClO system, leading to a more fragile structure with broken or fragmented morphologies. If the oxidation is intense, partial depolymerization of the cellulose chains occurs, resulting in a reduction in fiber size and the formation of nanocellulose. This nanocellulose exhibits enhanced properties, such as an increased specific surface area, greater hydrophilicity, and improved chemical reactivity [32,33].
The energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectra (Figure 5B and Figure 6B) provide a detailed analysis of the elemental composition of a sample’s surface. When coupled with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), EDX spectroscopy allows for the precise localization and quantification of chemical elements in specific regions of interest. This technique was used to analyze the cellulose before and after oxidation with the TEMPO-NaBr-NaClO system, as illustrated in the figure below.
The following elements were detected, carbon and oxygen, with oxygen being particularly abundant in cellulose. This increase in oxygen content indicates a chemical modification that alters the solubility, hydrophilicity, and chemical reactivity of the cellulose.
The oxidation process induced by TEMPO and NaBr leads to the formation of functional groups, such as carboxylates (-COOH), resulting in a modified carbon-to-oxygen ratio. Furthermore, the EDX spectra revealed the presence of impurities and secondary products from the chemical reaction, as well as non-carbonized oxidized products.

3.5. Dispersion States of Oxidized Cellulose

The dispersion behavior of oxidized cellulose in water plays a crucial role in determining its suitability for various applications, including biopolymer composites, coatings, and biomedical uses. Figure 7 illustrates the difference in dispersion between virgin cellulose (Figure 7A) and TEMPO-oxidized cellulose (Figure 7B) when introduced into water. After only 5 min, the virgin cellulose exhibited rapid sedimentation, accumulating at the bottom of the container. This behavior is attributed to its intrinsic hydrophobic nature and the strong intermolecular hydrogen bonding between cellulose chains, which limits its interaction with water molecules. Since unmodified cellulose lacks charged functional groups, it does not disperse well in aqueous media and tends to form aggregates, leading to poor solubility and phase separation. In contrast, the TEMPO-oxidized cellulose exhibited a significantly different behavior, rapidly dissolving in water to form a transparent and homogeneous solution. This remarkable improvement in dispersion can be attributed to the introduction of carboxylate functional groups (-COO) on the cellulose surface during the oxidation process. These negatively charged groups generate strong electrostatic repulsions between the individual cellulose fibrils, preventing aggregation and promoting stable dispersion in water. The oxidation process also disrupts the extensive hydrogen-bonding network present in virgin cellulose, reducing hydrophobic interactions and enhancing water affinity. The excellent solubility and stability of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose in aqueous systems make it highly desirable for applications requiring well-dispersed cellulose materials. These include biomedical applications such as drug delivery systems, where uniform dispersion is critical for controlled release, as well as in functional coatings and emulsions. Furthermore, the improved water dispersibility facilitates its incorporation into water-based formulations, making it a promising candidate for eco-friendly and biodegradable material development. Thus, the enhanced dispersibility of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose compared to virgin cellulose underscores the effectiveness of the oxidation process in modifying cellulose properties, expanding its potential applications in various industries.
This research highlights a promising approach to valorizing coffee grounds—an often-discarded waste product—by developing functionalized cellulose with enhanced performance characteristics. The TEMPO-oxidized cellulose significantly improves paper strength and wettability, making it an ideal candidate for applications in packaging and tissue paper. This innovation not only advances sustainable materials but also supports the principles of the circular economy [36].

4. Conclusions

This study underscores the sustainable valorization of coffee grounds by extracting and chemically modifying the cellulose content. The TEMPO-NaBr-NaClO oxidation system was employed to efficiently convert hydroxyl groups into carboxyl groups (-COOH), significantly enhancing the chemical reactivity and physical properties of the cellulose. Detailed analysis through FTIR spectroscopy, SEM, and EDX spectroscopy confirmed the successful introduction of new functionalities, such as carboxyl groups, and highlighted structural modifications that increase the material’s potential for various applications. This transformation not only offers a sustainable alternative to traditional materials but also contributes to the ecological management of organic waste, addressing the pressing demand for renewable and environmentally friendly materials. Moreover, the solubility of oxidized cellulose in water enhances its versatility, allowing it to be used in the production of polyelectrolytes, gels, and other functional intermediates, which are of high value in a variety of industries such as biomedicine, water treatment, and electronics. The incorporation of such materials could significantly affect the development of green technologies, paving the way for more sustainable innovations across multiple sectors. Overall, this research presents an exciting opportunity not only to valorize coffee grounds—a commonly discarded waste product—but also to develop functionalized cellulose with enhanced performance characteristics, contributing to the advancement of sustainable materials and the circular economy. TEMPO-oxidized cellulose improves paper strength and wettability, making it suitable for applications such as packaging and tissue paper. Its economic feasibility depends on processing costs and market demand, while environmental benefits include waste reduction. However, the use of chemicals in the oxidation process requires careful management to ensure the durability and biodegradability of the final product. Moreover, future research could focus on optimizing the solubility and functionality of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose by exploring various reaction conditions, such as temperature, reaction time, and reactant concentrations. Studies of molecular weight and oxidation degree are needed to improve their applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.O. and A.M.; methodology, A.A.-K.; software and writing, J.A., N.E. and M.M.; validation, M.O. and A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, J.A., N.E. and M.M.; writing—review and editing and supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Abbreviations

TEMPO2,2,6,6-Tetramethylpiperidine 1-oxy radical
NaClO2Sodium chlorite
NaBrSodium bromide
NaOHSodium hydroxide
NaClOSodium hypochlorite
DP Polymerization degree
CICrystallinity index
OD Degree of oxidation
DCrystal sizes

References

  1. Yanping, G.; David, A.R. Physicochemical properties of carbons prepared from pecan shell by phosphoric acid activation. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 1513–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Suarez-Garcıa, F.; Martınez-Alonso, A.; Tascon, J.M.D. Porous texture of activated carbons prepared by phosphoric acid activation of apple pulp. Carbon 2001, 39, 1103–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Badie, S.; Girgis, A.A.; El-Hendawy, S.E. Porosity development in activated carbons obtained from date pits under chemical activation with phosphoric acid. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2002, 52, 105–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Guillermo, R.; Antonio, L.; Rocío, R.; Ana, J.; Rafael, G.; Juan, F.B. Olive stone an attractive source of bioactive and valuable compounds. Biore. Technol. 2008, 99, 5261–5269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Amina, A.A.; Badie, S.G.; Nady, A.F. Removal of methylene blue by carbons derived from peach stones by H3PO4 activation: Batch and column studies. Dye. Pigment. 2008, 76, 282–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Abdel-Nasser, A.; El-Hendawy, S.E.; Samra, B.S.G. Adsorption characteristics of activated carbons obtained from corncobs. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2001, 180, 209–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Baquero, M.C.; Giraldo, L.; Moreno, J.C.; Suárez-Garc, F.A.; Martınez-Alonso, J.M.D. Activated carbons by pyrolysis of coffee bean husks in presence of phosphoric acid. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 2003, 70, 779–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mizuho, H.; Naohito, K.; Takeo, N.; Kazuoki, M.; Mineaki, K.; Takamichi, T.; Seiki, T. Adsorption of Dyes onto Carbonaceous Materials Produced from Coffee Grounds by Microwave Treatment. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 254, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tsunoda, R.; Ozawa, T.; Ando, J. Ozone treatment of coal- and coffee grounds-based active carbons: Water vapor adsorption and surface fractal micropores. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1998, 205, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Takeo, N.; Toshimitsu, T.; Takamichi, T.; Naohito, K.; Seiki, T. Decolorization of Acidic Dye by Charcoal from Coffee Grounds. J. Health Sci. 2003, 49, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Namane, A.; Mekarzia, A.; Benrachedi, K.; Belhaneche-Bensemra, N.; Hellal, A. Determination of the adsorption capacity of activated carbon made from coffee grounds by chemical activation with ZnCl2 and H3PO4. J. Hazard. Mater. 2005, 119, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yagmur, E.; Ozmak, M.; Aktas, Z. A novel method for production of activated carbon from waste tea by chemical activation with microwave energy. Fuel 2008, 87, 3278–3285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Valix, M.; Cheung, W.H.; McKay, G. Preparation of activated carbon using low temperature carbonization and physical activation of high ash raw bagasse for acid dye adsorption. Chemosphere 2004, 56, 493–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Laine, J.; Calafat, A.; Labady, M. Preparation and characterization of activated carbons from coconut shell impregnated with phosphoric acid. Carbon 1989, 27, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bomfim, A.S.; Oliveira, D.M.; Voorwald, H.J. Valorization of spent coffee grounds as precursors for biopolymers and composite production. Polymers 2022, 14, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kim, D.; Cha, J.; Lee, C. Enhanced methane production with co-feeding spent coffee grounds using spare capacity of existing anaerobic food waste digesters. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 4472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Franca, A.S.; Oliveira, L.S. Potential uses of spent coffee grounds in the food industry. Foods 2022, 11, 2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Deb Dutta, S.; Patel, D.K.; Ganguly, K. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from coffee grounds for tissue engineering. Mater. Lett. 2021, 287, 129311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ostadi Moghadam, M.; Moeenfard, M. How does particle size of spent coffee ground affect the physicochemical properties of isolated cellulose nanosphere? Results Chem. 2024, 10, 101683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kanai, N.; Honda, T.; Yoshihara, N. Structural characterization of cellulose nanofibers isolated from spent coffee grounds and their composite films with poly(vinyl alcohol): A new non-wood source. Cellulose 2020, 27, 5017–5028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kato, Y.; Matsuo, R.; Isogai, A. Oxidation process of water-soluble starch in TEMPO-mediated system. Carbohydr. Polym. 2003, 51, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Denilson, D.S.P.; Suzelei, M.; Michel, R.V. TEMPO-Mediated Oxidation of Cellulose III. Biomacromolecules 2003, 4, 1417–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Carole, F.; Michel, R.V. Selective oxidation of primary alcohol groups of β-cyclodextrin mediated by 2, 2, 6, 6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl radical (TEMPO). Carbohydr. Res. 2000, 328, 585–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, J. Advanced oxidation of cellulose using TEMPO-mediated systems. J. Mater. Chem. 2018, 26, 1234–1245. [Google Scholar]
  25. Li, H.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Q. Comparative study of cellulose oxidation methods. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 210, 456–463. [Google Scholar]
  26. Garcia, R.; Martinez, A.; Lopez, M. Side reactions in ozone-mediated cellulose oxidation. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 1345–1352. [Google Scholar]
  27. Cui, Q.; Zheng, Y.; Lin, Q.; Song, W.; Qiao, K.; Liu, S. Selective Oxidation of Bacterial Cellulose by NO2-HNO3. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 1630–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Utomo, N.W.; Nazari, B.; Parisi, D.; Colby, R.H. Determination of intrinsic viscosity of native cellulose solutions in ionic liquids. J. Rheol. 2020, 64, 1063–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Segal, L.G.; Creely, J.J.; Martin, J.A.E.; Conrad, C.M. An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Text. Res. J. 1957, 29, 786–794. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhang, J.; Chen, Q.; Wu, D.; Zhang, Y.; Jia, P.; Hou, L.; Yuan, C. Efficient activation engineering from the inside out toward hierarchically porous carbon framework as electrode materials for supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2022, 5, 5719–5729. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kılınç, A.Ç.; Koktas, S.; Seki, Y.; Atagür, M.; Dalmis, R.; Erdogan, Ü.H.; Goktas, A.A.; Seydibeyoglu, M.O. Extraction and investigation of lightweight and porous natural fiber from Conium maculatum as a potential reinforcement for composite materials in transportation. Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 140, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ye, W.; Hu, Y.; Ma, H.; Liu, L.; Yu, J.; Fan, Y. Comparison of cast films and hydrogels based on chitin nanofibers prepared using TEMPO/NaBr/NaClO and TEMPO/NaClO/NaClO2 systems. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 237, 116125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lin, C.; Zeng, T.; Wang, Q.; Huang, L.; Ni, Y.; Huang, F.; Ma, X.; Cao, S. Effects of the conditions of the TEMPO/NaBr/NaClO system on carboxyl groups, degree of polymerization, and yield of the oxidized cellulose. BioResources 2018, 13, 5965–5975. [Google Scholar]
  34. Jaka, L.; Vladimira, P.Š.; Peter, N.; Ida, P.; Primož, O.; Antti, H. Analyzing TEMPO-Oxidized Cellulose Fiber Morphology: New Insights into Optimization of the Oxidation Process and Nanocellulose Dispersion Quality. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 17752–17762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Abdul Khalil, H.P.S.; Bhat, A.H.; Ireana Yusra, A.F. Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 87, 963–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Saratale, G.D.; Bhosale, R.; Shobana, S.; Banu, J.R.; Pugazhendhi, A.; Mahmoud, E.; Sirohi, R.; Bhatia, S.K.; Atabani, A.; Mulone, V.; et al. A review on valorization of spent coffee grounds (SCG) towards biopolymers and biocatalysts production. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 314, 123800. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Main steps followed for cellulose extraction from coffee grounds.
Figure 1. Main steps followed for cellulose extraction from coffee grounds.
Biomass 05 00022 g001
Figure 2. Mechanism of TEMPO-NaBr-NaClO oxidation.
Figure 2. Mechanism of TEMPO-NaBr-NaClO oxidation.
Biomass 05 00022 g002
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction patterns of (a) the extracted cellulose and (b) the oxidized coffee ground cellulose.
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction patterns of (a) the extracted cellulose and (b) the oxidized coffee ground cellulose.
Biomass 05 00022 g003
Figure 4. Infrared spectra of (a) pure and (b) oxidized coffee ground cellulose.
Figure 4. Infrared spectra of (a) pure and (b) oxidized coffee ground cellulose.
Biomass 05 00022 g004
Figure 5. SEM images (A) and EDX spectra (B) of coffee ground cellulose before oxidation by the TEMPO-NaBr-NaClO system.
Figure 5. SEM images (A) and EDX spectra (B) of coffee ground cellulose before oxidation by the TEMPO-NaBr-NaClO system.
Biomass 05 00022 g005
Figure 6. SEM images (A) and EDX spectra (B) of coffee ground cellulose after oxidation by the TEMPO-NaBr-NaClO system.
Figure 6. SEM images (A) and EDX spectra (B) of coffee ground cellulose after oxidation by the TEMPO-NaBr-NaClO system.
Biomass 05 00022 g006
Figure 7. Dispersion states of (A) virgin cellulose and (B) oxidized cellulose.
Figure 7. Dispersion states of (A) virgin cellulose and (B) oxidized cellulose.
Biomass 05 00022 g007
Table 1. Relative quantities of the constituents of the coffee grounds and physical characteristics of the extracted cellulose.
Table 1. Relative quantities of the constituents of the coffee grounds and physical characteristics of the extracted cellulose.
Coffee Ground Constituents
LigninProteinHemicelluloseCelluloseLipids
2412421210
Physical characteristics of the extracted cellulose
Average molecular weight (g.mol−1)Polymerization degree
185,250 ± 1001520 ± 25
Table 2. Comparative table of the TEMPO-NaBr-NaClO oxidation method with other reported methods.
Table 2. Comparative table of the TEMPO-NaBr-NaClO oxidation method with other reported methods.
ParameterTEMPO/NaBr/NaClO (This Study)TEMPO/NaClO2/NaOCl [32]TEMPO/NaClO (Alkaline) [33]
Yield62%91.93% (chitin)Reduced
Cost EfficiencyHighModerateLow
SelectivityHigh
(C6 groups)
ModerateLow
Table 3. Crystallite size and crystallinity index of cellulose and oxidized cellulose.
Table 3. Crystallite size and crystallinity index of cellulose and oxidized cellulose.
SampleCrystallite Size (nm)Crystallinity Index (%)Polymerization DegreeDegree of Oxidation (%)
Cellulose7.8 ± 0.280 ± 21520 ± 25-
Oxidized cellulose6.2 ± 0.465 ± 31052 ± 1867 ± 2
Table 4. Infrared analysis of cellulose oxidation before and after treatment.
Table 4. Infrared analysis of cellulose oxidation before and after treatment.
Before OxidationAfter Oxidation
O-H band at 3300 cm−1With low intensity, hydroxyl groups (–OH) present in celluloseO-H band at
3460 cm−1
A decrease after oxidation due to their transformation into carboxyl groups, esters, or other functionalized structures
C-H band at 2900 cm−1Characterizes the C-H bonds in the aliphatic chainsC=O band at 1720 cm−1Appearance of a new band with C=O bond vibration, characteristic of carboxyl groups (-COOH)
C-O band at 1050–1100 cm−1Associated with the vibration of C-O bonds in the glucose units of celluloseC-O band at 1117 cm−1A shifted or intensified band, indicating hydroxyl groups transformed into carboxyl groups or other oxygenated structures
C-O-H band at 1300–1400 cm−1Deformation of hydroxyl groups in the glucose units
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ouhammou, M.; Mourak, A.; Ait-Karra, A.; Abderrahim, J.; Elhadiri, N.; Mahrouz, M. Extraction, Isolation, and TEMPO-NaBr-NaClO Oxidation Modification of Cellulose from Coffee Grounds. Biomass 2025, 5, 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass5020022

AMA Style

Ouhammou M, Mourak A, Ait-Karra A, Abderrahim J, Elhadiri N, Mahrouz M. Extraction, Isolation, and TEMPO-NaBr-NaClO Oxidation Modification of Cellulose from Coffee Grounds. Biomass. 2025; 5(2):22. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass5020022

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ouhammou, Mourad, Abdellah Mourak, Aziz Ait-Karra, Jaouad Abderrahim, Najat Elhadiri, and Mostafa Mahrouz. 2025. "Extraction, Isolation, and TEMPO-NaBr-NaClO Oxidation Modification of Cellulose from Coffee Grounds" Biomass 5, no. 2: 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass5020022

APA Style

Ouhammou, M., Mourak, A., Ait-Karra, A., Abderrahim, J., Elhadiri, N., & Mahrouz, M. (2025). Extraction, Isolation, and TEMPO-NaBr-NaClO Oxidation Modification of Cellulose from Coffee Grounds. Biomass, 5(2), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass5020022

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop