Next Article in Journal
Production of Anthocyanin-Rich Red Rose Petal Extract by Enzymatic Maceration
Next Article in Special Issue
Production, Extraction and Partial Characterization of Natural Pigments from Chryseobacterium sp. kr6 Growing on Feather Meal Biomass
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancing the Extraction of Phenolic Antioxidants from Amazonian Assai (Euterpe oleracea Martius) Fruit Waste through Response Surface Methodology Optimization
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Edible Paper Sheets from Alternanthera philoxeroides and Hypophthalmichthys molitrix: Smart Biomass Valorization

Department of Fisheries and Marine Bioscience, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore 7408, Bangladesh
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biomass 2024, 4(2), 414-428; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass4020020
Submission received: 5 March 2024 / Revised: 3 April 2024 / Accepted: 6 May 2024 / Published: 9 May 2024

Abstract

:
Alternanthera philoxeroides and Hypophthalmichthys molitrix offer significant nutritional benefits. This study evaluates the proximate composition, amino acid profile, GC-MS analysis, FT-IR spectroscopy, SEM and EDX, and color values of edible paper sheets (EPSs) derived from Alternanthera philoxeroides incorporating different levels of Hypophthalmichthys molitrix flesh. The protein content in the EPSs varied based on fish flesh incorporation, peaking at 52.66% in Ap100/Hm300 (Non-boil). Protein and carbohydrate contents showed an inverse correlation across EPSs, with the highest carbohydrate content of 60.89% in sample Ap400/Hm0 (Boil). Lipid content was also found to correlate with H. molitrix flesh content in EPSs, ranging from 1.59% to 18.41%. Amino acid analysis identified 11 types, with methionine as the most prevalent, followed by leucine, phenylalanine, and lysine. GC-MS analysis revealed 51 bioactive compounds, including carbonic acid, hentriacontane, and various fatty acids. FT-IR analysis showed characteristic bonds, while color analysis displayed L* values ranging from 24.37 to 30.97. SEM analyses depicted the microstructure, surface view, and elemental composition of the EPSs, and EDX showed an abundance of Ca, N, K, O, C, Mg, Na, P, Cl, Mn, and Fe. Therefore, EPSs prepared from A. philoxeroides and H. molitrix could offer a promising approach for effectively utilizing aquatic biomass and providing both plant and animal nutrients to consumers.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Aquatic resources including plants and animals represent a bountiful gift to humanity, offering essential sustenance and nutrition vital for the growth and protection of the human body. Bangladesh, despite its small size, boasts abundant rivers, beels, haors, lakes, baors, and floodplains, constituting one of the world’s largest inland fisheries [1] and hosting diverse aquatic flora. These aquatic habitats serve as crucial sources of food and medicine for rural communities. Aquatic weeds, renowned for their renewable biomass, offer a rich array of nutrients such as protein, lipids, vitamins, minerals, polysaccharides, amino acids, polyphenols, and other bioactive compounds [2] while being low in fat, calories, and fiber content. In regions such as China, Japan, Korea, and Southeast Asia, various edible paper sheets (EPSs) are crafted from seaweeds, known commercially as nori in Japan and China, gim in Korea, and gamet in the Philippines. These are popular in Asian countries such as China, Japan, and Korea due to their nutritional richness and health benefits, often used plain or seasoned for soups and as wrappers for rice balls. An abundant reservoir of compounds that promote health, exhibiting functional properties such as antioxidative, antihypertensive, antihyperlipidemic, and anticancer effects, nori is considered an excellent contender as a food ingredient to enhance overall well-being [3].
A. philoxeroides, commonly known as alligator weed, is traditionally used to treat various ailments such as night blindness. The stems and leaves of the plant are decocted and consumed on an empty stomach, believed to alleviate vomiting when ingested with salt [4,5]. It has been historically employed to address a range of health issues including night blindness, hazy vision, post-natal complaints, malaria, diarrhea, dysentery, and puerperal fever. Given the absence of commercial seaweed harvesting and cultivation in Bangladesh, efforts have been made to produce edible paper sheets (EPSs) from freshwater aquatic weeds [6] that demonstrate nutritional and technological viability. Phenolics and flavonoids in plants are associated with free radical scavenging activities [7]. However, EPSs derived solely from aquatic plants lack animal protein and essential amino acids crucial for optimal health. Animal protein typically contains all essential amino acids in proportions closer to human requirements compared to most plant proteins [8]. Consequently, this study proposes the incorporation of fish flesh into the EPS formulation sourced from aquatic weed. To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have been found on enriching the protein content in EPSs prepared from aquatic weeds. Therefore, this research focuses on a novel approach of incorporating fish flesh with aquatic weeds for the formulation of EPSs. Fish protein contains essential amino acids in the right proportions that are easily digestible and bioavailable [9]; additionally, it is a very available and cheap source of animal protein. EPSs prepared from aquatic weeds, incorporating fish muscles, hold importance in cuisine for various dish preparations, such as rice rolls, dish toppings, and wrappings for non-traditional fillings. Additionally, they serve as health supplements and can be incorporated into various snacks as flavorants and nutritional supplements [10].
Hypophthalmichthys molitrix, commonly known as silver carp, is a widely recognized and affordable fish species in Bangladesh. It is extensively cultivated in freshwater aquaculture and often referred to as Chinese carp. Silver carp is esteemed for its richness in protein and fat content [11]. Its appealing white flesh and high nutritional value make it a preferred choice for the production of ready-to-eat and premium-quality fish products suitable for human consumption. Rich in essential polyunsaturated fatty acids, silver carp offers significant health benefits, boasting high levels of protein, essential fatty acids, and necessary amino acids, thus serving as a valuable source of nutrients for human consumption [12]. Despite its nutritional value, some individuals, particularly young consumers, may exhibit reluctance to consume silver carp due to taste preferences, concerns about bones, and texture. By adopting preservation, processing, and product development techniques for affordable fish varieties such as silver carp, a consistent year-round supply to consumers can be ensured, while also generating employment opportunities and enhancing income within the fisheries sector [13]. In this context, the production of edible aquatic weed paper sheets incorporating fish flesh emerges as an economical, straightforward, and safe method for fish flesh consumption and storage. Therefore, incorporation of H. molitrix flesh for the preparation of EPSs could provide balanced nutritional supplements to consumers. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess the feasibility of preparing EPSs of A. philoxeroides incorporating H. molitrix flesh, evaluating their physico-chemical and nutritional properties such as proximate composition, GC-MS, amino acids, SEM, EDX, FT-IR, and color analysis to reveal the potential of EPSs as a sustainable and nutritious food candidate.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Preparation of EPSs

A. philoxeroides was collected from Jashore district, while H. molitrix was purchased from Churamankathi bazar, Jashore, in Bangladesh. Two types of paper sheets were prepared: one boiled and the other non-boiled. Initially, the A. philoxeroides was thoroughly cleaned with water. The H. molitrix was descaled, cleaned, and filleted with a knife. The flesh was then washed with water and boiled for 20 min. After boiling, the fish flesh was cooled and small bones were manually separated. The A. philoxeroides was ground properly using an electric blender (model: WBL-13EC25N, Walton, Dhaka, Bangladesh) after adding water at a ratio of 2:1 (w/v) (A. philoxeroides:water). The H. molitrix paste was added to the A. philoxeroides in different proportions and treated with both boiling and non-boiling methods as per the experimental design outlined in Table 1. The mixture was blended again and settled in a cheesecloth-covered tray, then placed in a hot air oven (model: BOV-T270C, Biobase, Jinan, China) at 65 °C for 12 h. After drying, the thin EPS was carefully separated from the cloth. All dried paper sheets were ground separately using an electrical crusher, and the resulting powders were stored in different airtight plastic bags within a plastic container at room temperature for further analysis.

2.2. Determination of Proximate Composition

The proximate composition of moisture, protein, lipid, and ash content was analyzed following the methods of AOAC [14]. The carbohydrate content was calculated by subtracting the sum of the percentages of protein, moisture, ash, and lipid contents from 100%.

2.3. Determination of Amino Acid Composition

The amino acid content of the paper sheets was determined using an amino acid analyzer (LA 8080, Hitachi, Japan) equipped with a Hitachi high-performance cation-exchange column, with the column temperature maintained at 57 °C with some alternations as previously described [15]. Each sample, weighing one gram, was added to 25 mL of 6 M HCl in individual plastic tubes. These tubes were then placed in a sand bath and heated to 110 °C for 24 h. Following the HCl evaporation process, the solid samples were dried and mixed with 6 mL of distilled water. Subsequently, the mixture was filtered using a 0.45 µm syringe filter.

2.4. Determination of Major Bioactive Compounds by GC-MS Analysis

To prepare the samples, 5 g of each sample was placed in a beaker. Subsequently, 50 mL of ethanol was added to each sample, and they were covered with aluminum foil paper before being placed on a magnetic stirrer at 400 rpm for 6 h. Following this, the samples were filtered using double filter paper and then filtered again using a syringe filter before being stored in tubes. These tubes were kept at room temperature and covered with foil paper. The analysis was conducted using a Clarus 690 gas chromatograph equipped with an Elite-35 column (30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 µm film thickness; PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Initially, a 1-microliter sample was injected, and pure helium (99.99%) was utilized as a carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 1 mL/min for a 40-min run time. The material was evaluated using high-energy (70 eV) electron ionization mode. The inlet temperature remained constant at 280 °C for 4 min. The substances present in the samples were identified by referencing the database of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).

2.5. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR) Analysis

To prepare the samples, 1 g of each sample was measured and placed in a beaker. Potassium bromide (99%) was then added to each sample to create a mixture. Hydraulic pressure was applied to shape this mixture into pellets. These resulting sample pellets were positioned in the path of the IR source. A detector captured the analog signal and converted it into a spectrum. Subsequently, the signals were analyzed and peaks were identified using OMNIC software (version 9.2).

2.6. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and Energy-Dispersive X-ray (EDX) Analysis

The surface morphology and microstructure of the EPSs were examined using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) microanalyzer (Zeiss Sigma300, Berlin, Germany). Initially, carbon tape was attached to a metallic stub, onto which a small quantity of EPS samples was dispersed. Each stub was then subjected to gold sputtering for 2 min. Subsequently, each stub was affixed to a sample holder and inserted into the FE-SEM machine, initiating the pumping process. After completion of pumping, images of the samples were captured using the FE-SEM at a magnification of 100 and an electron accelerating voltage of 5.00 kV. For EDX analysis, measurements were performed at an electron accelerating voltage of 20.0 kV and a magnification of 3000.

2.7. Color Value Measurement of EPSs

For color analysis, 2 g of each sample was placed on separate slides. Each slide was positioned at the bottom of the color reader device (model: CS-826, Konica Minolta, Hangzhou, China). The power button of the device was then activated, and the camera was passed over the sample.

2.8. Statistical Analyses of Experimental Data

Microsoft Excel was utilized to generate the graph and table. All experiments were conducted three times, and the results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Data analysis was performed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) on IBM SPSS software version 29 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Significant differences between the means were determined using Duncan’s Multiple Range Tests, and p ≤ 0.05 was regarded as significant.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Proximate Composition of EPSs

3.1.1. Protein Content

The protein content in the edible paper sheets produced from A. philoxeroides incorporating H. molitrix fish flesh exhibited significant variation (p ≤ 0.05) based on the concentrations of fish flesh; however, there were no significant differences observed regarding the boiling process (Figure 1). The inclusion of H. molitrix flesh led to an increase in protein content in the produced EPSs. In the boiled samples, the highest protein content was recorded as 51.12% in Ap100/Hm300, followed by 40.12%, 29.43%, and 17.25% in samples Ap200/Hm200, Ap300/Hm100, and Ap400/Hm0, respectively. A similar increasing trend of protein content in the EPSs was observed with the non-boiling treatment due to the augmentation of H. molitrix flesh. In a previous study, the protein contents of edible paper sheets produced from A. philoxeroides, E. fluctuans, and I. aquatica were reported to be 17.12%, 16.23%, and 15.25%, respectively [6]. They also noted a reduction in protein content in EPSs compared to raw aquatic weeds due to processing. Aquatic weeds are considered to have low-protein-content biomass, with the highest reported protein content in A. philoxeroides, I. aquatica, and L. adscendens being 2.18%, 1.52%, and 2.0%, respectively, on a wet weight basis [16]. The study also documented that the protein content in aquatic weeds was found to be lower than that of terrestrial plants. They are expected to have a high moisture level, resulting in a reduction in protein content. Therefore, the incorporation of H. molitrix in EPSs resulted in an increase in protein content. H. molitrix is recognized for its high protein content, ranging from 64.5% to 68.7% on a dry weight basis [17]. The primary objective of the present study was to enhance the fish protein content in EPSs, making them suitable for consumption by individuals who are not interested in consuming fish directly.

3.1.2. Lipid Content

The changes in lipid content in EPSs produced with A. philoxeroides incorporating H. molitrix flesh are depicted in Figure 1. The lipid content in the EPSs was found to increase with higher H. molitrix flesh contents; however, there were no significant changes due to boiling treatment. The maximum lipid content was recorded as 10.59% in Ap100/Hm300 (Boil), followed by 9.72% in Ap100/Hm300 (Non-boil). The lowest lipid content was observed as 1.59% in Ap400/Hm0 (Boil). Suraiya et al. [6] prepared edible paper sheets using A. philoxeroides, E. fluctuans, and I. aquatica without incorporating fish flesh and reported lipid contents of 1.59%, 1.95%, and 2.11%, respectively. It is noteworthy that aquatic weeds typically have a low lipid content. A study examining four edible aquatic weeds found that E. fluctuans and A. philoxeroides leaves contained lipid contents ranging from 1.12% to 2.96%, while stems ranged from 1.11% to 2.02% [18]. The lipid content observed in the present study is consistent with previous reports. The lipids found in aquatic weeds play a significant role in promoting health as they offer essential fatty acids renowned for their beneficial impacts on cardiovascular health, brain function, inflammation regulation, and more [18,19]. Lipids derived from aquatic organisms are considered healthy due to their contents of long-chain and essential fatty acids [15].

3.1.3. Moisture Content

The moisture content in the EPSs prepared using A. philoxeroides incorporating H. molitrix flesh did not vary significantly depending on the concentration of fish flesh and boiling treatment. The moisture content was approximately 8.09–9.82% (Figure 1). In a previous study conducted by Suraiya et al. [6], the moisture content in edible paper sheets produced from aquatic weeds such as A. philoxeroides, E. fluctuans, and I. aquatica was 9.36%, 10.62%, and 8.61%, respectively. During processing, the EPSs were dried in a hot air oven at a certain temperature for a certain period, which reduced the moisture content. The moisture content in raw fish and aquatic weeds depends on environmental factors, nutritional parameters, seasonal variations, etc. [11]. Pulipati et al. [20] reported that the moisture content in A. philoxeroides was 10%. These findings closely correspond with the aggregated results from previous studies as well as the outcomes of the current investigation.

3.1.4. Ash Content

The ash content of the EPS samples exhibited significant variation depending on the incorporation levels of A. philoxeroides and H. molitrix. The ash content in the EPS samples ranged from 5.58% to 10.58%. The highest ash content, 10.58%, was observed in Ap400/Hm0 (Boil), which decreased significantly with decreasing concentrations of A. philoxeroides in the EPSs. The lowest ash content, 5.58%, was found in Ap100/Hm300 (Boil). However, there were no significant changes in ash content due to boiling treatment. The ash content in edible paper sheets produced from aquatic weeds such as A. philoxeroides, E. fluctuans, and I. aquatica was reported as 10.58%, 10.16%, and 9.30%, respectively [6]. The findings of the present study align with this previous report. The ash content in food is determined by inorganic minerals such as sodium, potassium, calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, and trace elements [21].

3.1.5. Carbohydrate Content

In this study, carbohydrate emerged as the most abundant compound in the EPSs, with its content varying from 21.38% to 60.89% depending on the proportion of A. philoxeroides and H. molitrix in the EPS. The highest carbohydrate content, 60.89%, was observed in Ap400/Hm0 (Boil), gradually decreasing with increasing H. molitrix flesh content. Conversely, in the EPS sample Ap100/Hm300 (Non-boil), the carbohydrate content was the lowest at 21.38%. There was no significant difference in carbohydrate content between boiled and non-boiled EPS samples. The carbohydrate content in edible paper sheets prepared from I. aquatica, A. philoxeroides, and E. fluctuans was reported as 64.63%, 60.89%, and 60.04%, respectively [6]. In a study examining wild edible plants, the carbohydrate content in dhekishak, helencha, kalmishak, patshak, and shapla stems was reported as 57.69%, 61.61%, 52.78%, 60.21%, and 76.34%, respectively [22]. Umar et al. [23] investigated the nutritional composition of water spinach leaves and recorded a carbohydrate content of 54.20%. Previous studies have revealed similarities in carbohydrate content to the results of the current study. Environmental factors, such as variances in soil composition, harvesting techniques, plant varieties, and temperature, have been identified as potential factors contributing to the nutritional variations observed among various aquatic weeds.

3.2. Amino Acid Composition of EPSs

The amino acid chromatogram and composition are depicted in Figure 2 and Table 2, respectively. A total of 11 different amino acids were detected in the EPSs produced from A. philoxeroides and H. molitrix. Methionine emerged as the predominant amino acid in the EPSs, with a content of 12,161.79 mg/100 g in the Ap100/Hm300 (Non-boil) EPS, followed by leucine, phenylalanine, and lysine. The amino acid contents in the prepared EPSs increased with the increment in H. molitrix flesh. A. philoxeroides exhibited a poor amino acid content, with no serine, cysteine, and threonine detected in EPSs produced solely with A. philoxeroides. There was no significant variation in amino acid content due to boiling treatment. Other amino acids found in the EPSs included valine, tyrosine, histidine, and aspartic acid. Both A. philoxeroides and H. molitrix contributed to the amino acid content in the EPSs. Fish is recognized as a high-protein and amino-acid-rich food with high digestibility properties. Additionally, some essential and rare amino acids are also available in fish, such as methionine and lysine. Dewanji et al. [24] found the amino acids lysine, histidine, arginine, aspartic acid, threonine, serine, glutamic acid, proline, glycine, alanine, valine, methionine, leucine, tyrosine, and phenylalanine in A. philoxeroides. Sabetian et al. [25] found that the amount of essential amino acids in rainbow trout was (35.74 ± 0.1)%. Among the amino acids, glutamic acid, aspartic acid, and lysine were predominant, with values of (11.1 ± 0.4)%, (9.53 ± 0.1)%, and (7.72 ± 0.1)%, respectively, in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).

3.3. Major Bioactive Compounds Available in EPS Detected by GC-MS Analysis

The major bioactive compounds, along with their molecular weight, molecular formula, and quantity, are presented in Table 3. A total of 51 bioactive compounds were identified in the EPSs produced from A. philoxeroides and H. molitrix. Key compounds included N-hexadecanoic acid, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-3-(phenylacetamido)quinolone, tetradecanoic acid, N-hexadecanoic acid, pentadecanoic acid, 14-bromo-, 6-octadecenoic acid, trans-2-methyl-4-n-butylthiane, s,s-dioxide, and 9-octadecenoic acid. Other common compounds included carbonic acid, 2-dimethylaminoethyl ethyl ester, hentriacontane, pentadecanoic acid, N-hexadecanoic acid, tetradecanoic acid, 10,13-dimethyl-, methyl ester, and 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-3-(phenylacetamido)quinolone. Most of the phenolic and flavonoid compounds in the EPSs originated from the aquatic weed sample, while the fatty acid compounds were sourced from fish oil. Increased antioxidant activity was associated with rises in the levels of phenolic and flavonoid contents, which in turn scavenge free radicals [26]. In a previous study, 33 compounds were identified in an edible aquatic weed paper sheet produced from A. philoxeroides [6]. Akbar et al. [27] conducted a gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis on A. philoxeroides and discovered the presence of acetic acid 2-(2-methoxycarbonylamino-5-nitrophenylthio)-, methyl ester, at the highest concentration (31.19%), followed by 1,4-benzenediol, 1,2,5-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)- (15.06%). Suraiya et al. [6] conducted a similar analysis on A. philoxeroides and found the presence of dodecanoic acid (8.71%) and phytol (14.02%).

3.4. FT-IR Analysis of EPSs

The FT-IR spectra of the EPSs produced from A. philoxeroides and H. molitrix are depicted in Figure 3. FT-IR spectra are utilized to determine the molecular composition and structure by measuring the absorption of infrared light by materials in solid, liquid, and gas states. Their most common application is in identifying unknown materials and confirming product composition, as well as determining the chemical bonds of compounds. The figure illustrates bonds ranging from 440 cm−1 to 3500 cm−1. Specifically, the Si-O-Si bond appears at around 440 cm−1, the C-H bond at 667 cm−1, the C-O bond at 1080 cm−1, the C = O bond at 1660 cm−1, the C-C bond at 2930 cm−1, and the O-H bond at 3500 cm−1. The absorption peak observed at 2985 cm−1 is attributed to the asymmetric stretching vibration of methylene groups within the CH2-OH present in cellulose components. Additionally, the band located approximately at 1160 cm−1 is attributed to the asymmetrical stretching vibration of C-O-C, associated with cellulose and hemicellulose [28]. The bands at 1633 and 1536 are responsible for amide-I and amide-II, respectively [29]. In this work, the evident bands higher in Ap100/Hm300 (Boil) are indicative of the high protein content among these EPSs. Sanden et al. [30] found that the connective tissue of Atlantic cod contains spectral regions ranging from 1800 to 800 cm−1. Careche et al. [31] observed that frozen hake (Merluccius merluccius) muscle exhibits C-H vibration (3100–2750 cm−1), C = O vibration (1800–1670 cm−1), and phospholipid vibration (1330–1127 cm−1).

3.5. SEM View and EDX Analysis of EPS

The SEM view of EPSs produced from A. philoxeroides and H. molitrix is presented in Figure 4. The SEM offers magnified images revealing the size, shape, and physical and chemical properties of EPS samples, as well as providing insights into their surface morphology and microstructure at a very high magnification. The figure illustrates that incorporation of a high amount of H. molitrix flesh gives the sample a rough and porous appearance (Figure 4D,H). However, boiling treatment appears to improve the surface. The EPS samples prepared with a higher proportion of A. philoxeroides exhibited a more regular and fibrous appearance (Figure 4A,B,E,F). Ural et al. [32] demonstrated that SEM analysis of clay particles can help explain unexplained physical or mechanical behavior. SEM imaging provides valuable insights into the microstructure and surface characteristics of aquatic weed paper sheets, aiding in understanding their properties and potential applications.
The EDX technique is employed for elemental analysis of samples, operating by directing a concentrated stream of electrons onto a sample to stimulate the emission of X-rays from its atoms. These emitted X-rays are then analyzed to determine the elemental composition of the sample. The EDX chromatograms of EPSs produced from A. philoxeroides and H. molitrix are presented in Figure 5. Slight variations were observed in the different compositions in the EPS samples, possibly due to variations in the proportions of A. philoxeroides and H. molitrix in the samples. All samples contained elements such as Ca, N, K, O, C, Mg, Na, P, Cl, Mn, and Fe in their structure. From Figure 5, it is evident that minerals such as P, K, and Na showed higher peak areas in Ap200/Hm200 (Boil) and Ap100/Hm300 (Boil). Therefore, EPSs containing a high fish muscle content with boiling showed higher amounts of essential minerals. Currently, there are no available reports detailing EDX composition analyses of aquatic weed paper sheets.

3.6. Color Values of EPSs

The color values (L*, a*, b*) of EPSs prepared from A. philoxeroides and H. molitrix are presented in Table 4. The L* value indicates the lightness of the product, while the a* and b* values denote the red to green and yellow to blue axes, respectively. The L* values ranged from 30.97 to 24.37, with the highest value (30.97) observed in Ap100/Hm300 (Boil) and the lowest value (24.37) in Ap400/Hm0 (Boil). L* increased with higher contents of H. molitrix flesh and decreased A. philoxeroides contents, as the light flesh of H. molitrix contributed to the overall lightness of the EPS. The a* value ranged from 5.20 to 16.70, with the highest value (16.70) observed in Ap400/Hm0 (Non-boil), which contained the highest concentration of A. philoxeroides. Since A. philoxeroides is green, its higher concentrations contributed to higher a* values. The b* value varied from 3.62 to 10.12 across the EPS samples, showing a decrease with the increasing concentration of H. molitrix flesh. Color is an important factor influencing food acceptance by consumers, and the lightness and green hue of the EPSs produced from aquatic weeds would likely be favorable to consumers.

4. Conclusions

A. philoxeroides is a nutritious aquatic weed, while H. molitrix contains abundant protein and nutrients. Combining both A. philoxeroides and H. molitrix to produce EPSs could yield a highly nutritious food item beneficial for various demographics. The EPSs produced in this study with the boiling treatment did not exhibit distinct variations. Therefore, decisions regarding boiling treatment could be based on organoleptic evaluation in forthcoming research. Additionally, this research focused only on physico-chemical and nutritional properties. Further research could be conducted based on biofunctional characterization through in vitro and in vivo studies in the future. These EPSs could serve as a valuable source of supplementary nutrition in the regular diets of consumers. Moreover, A. philoxeroides possesses medicinal qualities and can help address malnutrition issues in underdeveloped countries. H. molitrix, commonly known as silver carp, is rich in protein, lipids, amino acids, and other bioactive compounds, making it an excellent nutritional source for both children and adults. Despite EPSs not being widely recognized in many countries, they could introduce familiarity with paper-based food items. EPS preparation requires less time compared to cooking traditional meals, making it convenient for consumption. Utilizing edible paper sheets enables us to maximize nutritional benefits and promote healthier dietary habits.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S., M.A.S.M. and M.F.; methodology, S.S., M.A.S.M. and M.F.; software, M.A.S.M., M.F. and S.M.; validation, M.A.R. and M.H.; formal analysis, S.S., M.F. and M.A.S.M.; investigation, S.M., M.A.R. and M.H.; resources, S.S. and M.A.S.M.; data curation, S.M., M.F., M.A.R. and M.H.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A.S.M. and S.S.; writing—review and editing, M.A.R., M.H. and S.M.; visualization, M.H. and S.M.; supervision, M.H. and S.M.; project administration, S.S. and M.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All related data and methods are presented in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Research Cell, M. A. Wazed Miah Institute of Higher Studies and Research, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore 7408, Bangladesh, for supporting with the analysis of samples.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shamsuzzaman, M.M.; Islam, M.M.; Tania, N.J.; Al-Mamun, M.A.; Barman, P.P.; Xu, X. Fisheries resources of Bangladesh: Present status and future direction. Aquacult. Fish. 2017, 2, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Brouwer, P.; Nierop, K.G.; Huijgen, W.J.; Schluepmann, H. Aquatic weeds as novel protein sources: Alkaline extraction of tannin-rich Azolla. Biotechnol. Rep. 2019, 24, e00368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Supawong, S.; Park, J.W.; Park, J. Functional and chemical properties of gim (Porphyra yezoensis) as affected by the product form. J. Aquat. Food Prod. Technol. 2022, 31, 418–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sushil, K.; Kamlesh, V. Nutritive value of alligator weed [Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb.] and its possible utility as a fodder in India. Ind. J. Weed Sci. 2005, 37, 152. [Google Scholar]
  5. Pamila, U.A.; Karpagam, S. A comparative study on phytoconsti-tuents of three different species of Genus Alternanthera. Int. J. Innov. Res. Adv. Stud. 2018, 5, 52–54. [Google Scholar]
  6. Suraiya, S.; Bristy, S.A.; Ali, M.S.; Biswas, A.; Ali, M.R.; Haq, M. A green approach to valorizing abundant aquatic weeds for nutrient-rich edible paper sheets production in Bangladesh. Clean Technol. 2023, 5, 1269–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Makrygiannis, I.; Athanasiadis, V.; Bozinou, E.; Chatzimitakos, T.; Makris, D.P.; Lalas, S.I. An investigation into apricot pulp waste as a source of antioxidant polyphenols and carotenoid pigments. Biomass 2022, 2, 334–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yuan, M.; Pickering, R.T.; Bradlee, M.L.; Mustafa, J.; Singer, M.R.; Moore, L.L. Animal protein intake reduces risk of functional impairment and strength loss in older adults. Clin. Nutr. 2021, 40, 919–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Desai, A.S.; Brennan, M.A.; Guo, X.; Zeng, X.A.; Brennan, C.S. Fish protein and lipid interactions on the digestibility and bioavailability of starch and protein from durum wheat pasta. Molecules 2019, 24, 839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cho, T.J.; Rhee, M.S. Health functionality and quality control of laver (Porphyra, Pyropia): Current issues and future perspectives as an edible seaweed. Mar. Drugs 2019, 18, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kabir, M.I.; Ove, T.A.; Kamal, M.M.; Karim, S.; Hasan, S.M.; Haque, M.R.; Akhter, M. Production and evaluation of quality characteristics of edible fish powder from tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) and silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix). J. Food Qual. 2022, 2022, 2530533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Alavi Talab, H.; Ardjmand, M.; Motalebi, A.A.; Pourgholam, R. Optimization of morphology and geometry of encapsulated Hypophthalmichthys molitrix oil. Iran. J. Fish. Sci. 2010, 9, 199–208. [Google Scholar]
  13. Isra, L.; Suraiya, S.; Salma, U.; Haq, M. Nutritional evaluation and shelf-life study of mackerel tuna (Euthynnus affinis) fish pickle. Agr. Res. 2022, 11, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. AOAC International. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International; AOAC International: Rockville, MD, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  15. Islam, M.A.; Mohibbullah, M.; Suraiya, S.; Sarower-E-Mahfuj, M.; Ahmed, S.; Haq, M. Nutritional characterization of freshwater mud eel (Monopterus cuchia) muscle cooked by different thermal processes. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 8, 6247–6258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jha, P.; Sudarshan, M.; Santra, S.C.; Dewanji, A. Elemental content in under-utilized green leafy vegetables of urban waterbodies in Kolkata, India and their associated health risk. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2023, 118, 105212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ullah, S.; Hasan, Z.; Zuberi, A.; Younus, N.; Rauf, S. Comparative study on body composition of two Chinese carps, common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix). Glob. Vet. 2014, 13, 867–876. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hasan, M.M.; Nahar, S.; Arafat, S.T.; Debnath, S.; Parvez, M.S.; Rahman, S.M.; Ahsan, M.N. Proximate composition of edible aquatic vegetables: A preliminary assessment of four species from Bangladesh. Khulna Univ. Stud. 2016, 13, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dutta, P. Pharmacognostical evaluation and preliminary phytochemical analysis of Alternanthera philoxeroides. Int. J. Medi. Pharm. Res. 2015, 1, 7–13. [Google Scholar]
  20. Pulipati, S.; Devi, B.S.; Devi, G.R.; Bhanuja, M. Pharmacognostic studies of Alternanthera philoxeroides (mart.) griseb. J. Pharmacog. Phytochem. 2015, 4, 202–204. [Google Scholar]
  21. Harper, J.M. Ash content determination in foods: A review of current techniques and applications. Food Chem. 2016, 197, 1280–1287. [Google Scholar]
  22. Satter, M.M.A.; Khan, M.M.R.L.; Jabin, S.A.; Abedin, N.; Islam, M.F.; Shaha, B. Nutritional quality and safety aspects of wild vegetables consume in Bangladesh. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2016, 6, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Umar, K.J.; Hassan, L.G.; Dangoggo, S.M.; Ladan, M.J. Nutritional composition of water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica Forsk.) leaves. J. Appl. Sci. 2007, 7, 803–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dewanji, A. Amino acid composition of leaf proteins extracted from some aquatic weeds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 41, 1232–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sabetian, M.; Delshad, S.T.; Moini, S.; Islami, H.R.; Motalebi, A. Identification of fatty acid content, amino acid profile and proximate composition in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). J. Am. Sci. 2012, 8, 670–677. [Google Scholar]
  26. Aon-im, P.; Monthakantirat, O.; Daodee, S.; Chulikhit, Y.; Sriya, N.; Boonyarat, C.; Chumwangwapee, T.; Khamphukdee, C.; Kijjoa, A. Evaluation of the impact of Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb. Extract on memory impairment in D-galactose-induced brain aging in mice through its effects on antioxidant enzymes, neuroinflammation, and telomere shortening. Molecules 2024, 29, 503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Akbar, M.; Amin, A.; Khalil, T.; Iqbal, M.S.; Nazir, A.; Taswar, A. Antibacterial activity of Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb. against bacterial phytopathogens: Erwinia carotovora, Ralstonia solanacearum and Xanthomonas axonopodis. Allelopath. J. 2021, 53, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Song, W.; Ding, L.; Liu, M.; Cheng, J.; Zhou, J.; Li, Y.Y. Improving biohydrogen production through dark fermentation of steam-heated acid pretreated Alternanthera philoxeroides by mutant Enterobacter aerogenes ZJU1. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 716, 134695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sun, W.; Zhou, F.; Zhao, M.; Yang, B.; Cui, C. Physicochemical changes of myofibrillar proteins during processing of Cantonese sausage in relation to their aggregation behaviour and in vitro digestibility. Food Chem. 2011, 129, 472–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Sanden, K.W.; Kohler, A.; Afseth, N.K.; Böcker, U.; Rønning, S.B.; Liland, K.H.; Pedersen, M.E. The use of Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy to characterize connective tissue components in skeletal muscle of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.). J. Biophotonics 2019, 12, e201800436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Careche, M.; Carmona, P.; Sánchez-Alonso, I. Monitoring the time and temperature history of frozen hake (Merluccius merluccius L.) muscle by FTIR spectroscopy of the lipid fraction. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2015, 8, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ural, N. The significance of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis on the microstructure of improved clay: An overview. Open Geosci. 2021, 13, 197–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Proximate composition of different edible paper sheets produced from A. philoxeroides and H. molitrix. Values are the results of mean ± SD (n = 3). Different letters on each column bar for the same composition indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Proximate composition of different edible paper sheets produced from A. philoxeroides and H. molitrix. Values are the results of mean ± SD (n = 3). Different letters on each column bar for the same composition indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Biomass 04 00020 g001
Figure 2. Amino acid chromatogram of different edible paper sheets produced from A. philoxeroides and H. molitrix. (A) Ap300/Hm100 (Boil); (B) Ap300/Hm100 (Boil); (C) Ap200/Hm200 (Boil); (D) Ap100/Hm300 (Boil); (E) Ap400/Hm0 (Non-Boil); (F) Ap300/Hm100 (Non-Boil); (G) Ap200/Hm200 (Non-Boil); and (H) Ap100/Hm300 (Non-Boil).
Figure 2. Amino acid chromatogram of different edible paper sheets produced from A. philoxeroides and H. molitrix. (A) Ap300/Hm100 (Boil); (B) Ap300/Hm100 (Boil); (C) Ap200/Hm200 (Boil); (D) Ap100/Hm300 (Boil); (E) Ap400/Hm0 (Non-Boil); (F) Ap300/Hm100 (Non-Boil); (G) Ap200/Hm200 (Non-Boil); and (H) Ap100/Hm300 (Non-Boil).
Biomass 04 00020 g002
Figure 3. FT-IR analysis of different edible paper sheets produced from A. philoxeroides and H. molitrix. S1: Ap300/Hm100 (Boil); S2: Ap300/Hm100 (Boil); S3: Ap200/Hm200 (Boil); S4: Ap100/Hm300 (Boil); S5: Ap400/Hm0 (Non-Boil); S6: Ap300/Hm100 (Non-Boil); S7: Ap200/Hm200 (Non-Boil); and S8: Ap100/Hm300 (Non-Boil).
Figure 3. FT-IR analysis of different edible paper sheets produced from A. philoxeroides and H. molitrix. S1: Ap300/Hm100 (Boil); S2: Ap300/Hm100 (Boil); S3: Ap200/Hm200 (Boil); S4: Ap100/Hm300 (Boil); S5: Ap400/Hm0 (Non-Boil); S6: Ap300/Hm100 (Non-Boil); S7: Ap200/Hm200 (Non-Boil); and S8: Ap100/Hm300 (Non-Boil).
Biomass 04 00020 g003
Figure 4. Scanning electron microscope pictures of different edible paper sheets produced from A. philoxeroides and H. molitrix. (A) Ap300/Hm100 (Boil); (B) Ap300/Hm100 (Boil); (C) Ap200/Hm200 (Boil); (D) Ap100/Hm300 (Boil); (E) Ap400/Hm0 (Non-Boil); (F) Ap300/Hm100 (Non-Boil); (G) Ap200/Hm200 (Non-Boil); and (H) Ap100/Hm300 (Non-Boil).
Figure 4. Scanning electron microscope pictures of different edible paper sheets produced from A. philoxeroides and H. molitrix. (A) Ap300/Hm100 (Boil); (B) Ap300/Hm100 (Boil); (C) Ap200/Hm200 (Boil); (D) Ap100/Hm300 (Boil); (E) Ap400/Hm0 (Non-Boil); (F) Ap300/Hm100 (Non-Boil); (G) Ap200/Hm200 (Non-Boil); and (H) Ap100/Hm300 (Non-Boil).
Biomass 04 00020 g004
Figure 5. EDX chromatograms of different edible paper sheets produced from A. philoxeroides and H. molitrix. (A) Ap300/Hm100 (Boil); (B) Ap300/Hm100 (Boil); (C) Ap200/Hm200 (Boil); (D) Ap100/Hm300 (Boil); (E) Ap400/Hm0 (Non-Boil); (F) Ap300/Hm100 (Non-Boil); (G) Ap200/Hm200 (Non-Boil); and (H) Ap100/Hm300 (Non-Boil).
Figure 5. EDX chromatograms of different edible paper sheets produced from A. philoxeroides and H. molitrix. (A) Ap300/Hm100 (Boil); (B) Ap300/Hm100 (Boil); (C) Ap200/Hm200 (Boil); (D) Ap100/Hm300 (Boil); (E) Ap400/Hm0 (Non-Boil); (F) Ap300/Hm100 (Non-Boil); (G) Ap200/Hm200 (Non-Boil); and (H) Ap100/Hm300 (Non-Boil).
Biomass 04 00020 g005
Table 1. Experimental design used in the present study.
Table 1. Experimental design used in the present study.
Sample TagsA. philoxeroides
(g)
H. molitrix
(g)
Normal Salt
(g)
Water
(mL)
Technique
Ap400/Hm0 (Boil)40002200Boil
Ap300/Hm100 (Boil)3001002200Boil
Ap200/Hm200 (Boil)2002002200Boil
Ap100/Hm300 (Boil)1003002200Boil
Ap400/Hm0 (Non-boil)40002200Non-boil
Ap300/Hm100 (Non-boil)3001002200Non-boil
Ap200/Hm200 (Non-boil)2002002200Non-boil
Ap100/Hm300 (Non-boil)1003002200Non-boil
Table 2. Amino acid composition and contents (mg/100 g) of different edible paper sheets produced from A. philoxeroides and H. molitrix.
Table 2. Amino acid composition and contents (mg/100 g) of different edible paper sheets produced from A. philoxeroides and H. molitrix.
Amino AcidsAp400/Hm0 (Boil)Ap300/Hm100 (Boil)Ap200/Hm200 (Boil)Ap100/Hm300 (Boil)Ap400/Hm0
(Non-Boil)
Ap300/Hm100 (Non-Boil)Ap200/Hm200 (Non-Boil)Ap100/Hm300 (Non-Boil)
Sern.d.88.31 ± 2.24 c179.02 ± 5.85 b298.33 ± 4.65 an.d.97.11 ± 2.54 c191.87 ± 6.25 b286.68 ± 5.50 a
Cysn.d.126.80 ± 5.58 c728.14 ± 12.25 b1544.88 ± 18.25 an.d.113.65 ± 5.25 c750.52 ± 10.25 b1532.69 ± 20.25 a
Met804.77 ± 14.25 c465.24 ± 5.25 d6666.62 ± 75.25 b11,990.94 ± 780.25 a901.55 ± 18.54 c458.33 ± 5.57 d6680.19 ± 60.25 b12,161.79 ± 87.25 a
Leu2072.24 ± 45.52 d2705.27 ± 50.25 c4348.96 ± 98.22 b4938.94 ± 140.25 a2194.50 ± 85.22 d2648.83 ± 75.25 c4397.27 ± 83.25 b4905.93 ± 90.25 a
Phe3394.24 ± 45.67 c3067.87 ± 48.25 d4138.08 ± 73.25 b4677.47 ± 82.25 a3693.12 ± 76.35 c2904.41 ± 49.25 d3975.66 ± 80.25 b4762.60 ± 92.25 a
Lys4270.07 ± 140.25 d4768.48 ± 87.01 c5476.14 ± 58.47 b4640.63 ± 76.35 a4294.84 ± 82.25 d4676.02 ± 47.58 c5543.00 ± 90.25 b4604.12 ± 45.36 a
Thrn.d.203.60 ± 12.21 c314.19 ± 14.20 b376.79 ± 5.25 an.d.192.70 ± 4.58 c304.07 ± 8.52 b350.90 ± 9.35 a
Val408.17 ± 10.25 d3278.15 ± 98.25 c4054.30 ± 80.35 b4455.23 ± 48.25 a410.14 ± 10.24 d3114.36 ± 57.36 c4111.46 ± 83.25 b4204.43 ± 86.25 a
Tyr2399.43 ± 45.25 d2704.87 ± 75.28 c4274.41 ± 46.45 b4746.36 ± 46.25 a2555.32 ± 74.18 c2630.74 ± 80.29 c4278.56 ± 46.80 b4498.97 ± 47.58 a
His408.17 ± 12.25 d442.47 ± 10.27 c1105.99 ± 8.25 b1511.63 ± 17.25 a455.50 ± 18.34 d3819.45 ± 20.27 c1192.77 ± 42.25 b1680.86 ± 41.73 a
Asp242.92 ± 10.27 d5619.94 ± 44.25 c762.22 ± 8.25 b975.81 ± 6.34 a240.03 ± 4.35 d4447.39 ± 4.58 c763.72 ± 8.54 b1169.06 ± 8.25 a
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation of triplicates. Different superscript small letters on each row indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). n.d.: not detected.
Table 3. GC-MS analysis of different edible paper sheets produced from A. philoxeroides and H. molitrix.
Table 3. GC-MS analysis of different edible paper sheets produced from A. philoxeroides and H. molitrix.
Sl NoIdentifying CompoundMolecular
Weight
Molecular
Formula
Peak Area (%)
Ap400/Hm0 (Boil)Ap300/Hm100 (Boil)Ap200/Hm200 (Boil)Ap100/Hm300 (Boil)Ap400/Hm0 (Non-Boil)Ap300/Hm100 (Non-Boil)Ap200/Hm200 (Non-Boil)Ap100/Hm300 (Non-Boil)
1Carbonic acid, 2-dimethylaminoethyl ethyl ester161C7H15NO31.541.422.040.020.560.531.770.25
2Acetamide, 2-amino-n-ethyl-2-thioxo-132C4H8N2OS--0.03--0.09--
3Propane, 2-chloro-2-nitro-123C3H6ClNO2--0.15---0.49-
4Propamocarb188C9H20N2O2--0.45-0.280.210.49-
5Oxime-, methoxy-phenyl-_151C8H9NO2-0.531.242.99-0.201.332.14
6Oxime-, methoxy-phenyl-_151C8H9NO2-0.53-2.99-0.200.33-
7D-Methionine149C5H11NO2S3.221.250.21--3.252.401.19
8Phthalan120C8H8O--1.071.12-2.82--
9Dimethylisopropylsilyloxycyclobutane172C9H20OSi1.450.25---1.25--
10Tetrazolo[5,1-a]phthalazin-6-amine, n-methyl-200C9H8N6-2.25-----0.37-
11Diethyl 1-methyl-3-hydroxy-5-phenylpyrrole-2,4-dicarboxylate317C17H19NO5---3.450.310.370.592.21
12Hentriacontane436C31H64-0.51--0.130.20--
13Hexadecane226C16H34-0.460.50-0.180.260.31-
14Hentriacontane436C31H64-0.510.440.980.130.200.25-
15Hentriacontane436C31H64-0.510.440.980.130.200.25-
16S-butyl n-hexyl disulfide206C10H22S2-1.870.50-0.720.54--
17Phosphoric acid, bis(trimethylsilyl)monomethyl ester256C7H21O4PSi239.5435.0229.8820.4037.6431.3828.3319.25
18Triacontane422C30H62---0.710.32-0.36-
19Hexadecane226C16H34-0.460.50-0.180.260.31-
20Pipradrol267C18H21NO0.88------1.46
212,4-difluorobenzoic acid, 2-formyl-4,6-dichlorophenyl ester330C14H6Cl2F2O3--0.51.240.170.16-1.05
22Dodecanoic acid200C9H8N62.502.251.58--2.472.141.37-
23Tritetracontane604C43H88-----0.26--
24Triacontane422C30H62----0.32-0.36-
25Quinoline, 2-Ethyl-157C11H11N0.27------0.19
26Dl-Alanyl-Dl-Alanine482C17H28N2O5----- -0.16
27Oleic acid282C18H34O221.0120.4115.0010.4221.8312.2010.255.34
28N-decanoic acid172C10H20O2-0.98--5.101.340.31-
29Isoheptadecanol256C17H36O28.2424.2421.8811.8337.6439.3838.3324.02
30Methyl 11-Methyl-Dodecanoate228C14H28O24.463.252.141.243.542.471.432.54
31Undecanoic Acid,10-Methyl-,Methyl Ester214C13H26O20.05------8.05
32Tetradecanoic acid, 10,13-dimethyl-, methyl ester270C17H34O22.142.363.504.801.311.301.912.14
33N-hexadecanoic acid256C16H32O22.145.249.880.407.649.388.3310.25
34Phytol296C20H40O2.89------14.02
3513-octadecenoic acid, methyl ester296C19H36O2---0.502.15---
36Heptadecanoic acid, 16-methyl-, methyl ester298C19H38O2---0.030.08---
37Methyl 8,11,14-heptadecatrienoate278C18H30O20.561.431.331.14-1.001.431.51
38Ethyl 9,12,15-octadecatrienoate306C20H34O2----0.560.74--
3911,14,17-Eicosatrienoic Acid, Methyl Ester320C21H36O26.3312.5213.5415.275.2511.2413.2513.81
40N-propyl 11-octadecenoate324C21H40O20.253.795.256.960.128.2510.8112.47
41Pentadecanoic acid, 14-bromo-320C15H29BrO22.145.2511.2415.581.244.2510.7014.27
42N-propyl 11-octadecenoate324C21H40O2-3.7911.4715.24-2.255.817.5
433-cyclopentylpropionic acid, 2-dimethylaminoethyl ester213C12H23NO22.748.124.225.86-4.04--
44Cis-2-methyl-4-n-butylthiane, s,s-dioxide204C10H20O2S---1.65-1.95--
45Glycidyl palmitate312C19H36O3-1.331.422.841.942.132.853.25
46Glycidyl palmitate312C19H36O3-1.33-6.841.94-2.85-
472-amino-4-methyl-6-(2-thienyl)pyrimidine191C9H9N3S---5.47--0.73-
48Phenol, 2,5-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-206C10H22S2-1.870.50-0.720.54--
491,2,3,4-tetrahydro-3-(phenylacetamido)quinoline266C17H18N2O9.288.957.225.2510.568.326.284.25
501,2,3,4-tetrahydro-3-(phenylacetamido)quinoline266C17H18N2O-2.141.851.642.632.321.280.76
51Acetic acid, (dodecahydro-7-hydroxy-1,4b,8,8-tetramethyl-10-oxo-2(1h)405C24H39NO4-1.461.74-----
Table 4. The color values of different edible paper sheets produced from A. philoxeroides and H. molitrix.
Table 4. The color values of different edible paper sheets produced from A. philoxeroides and H. molitrix.
SerialSamplesLightness
(L*)
Red to Green (a*)Yellow to Blue (b*)
1.Ap400/Hm0 (Boil)24.37 ± 1.25 d15.40 ± 0.58 a9.24 ± 0.47 a
2.Ap300/Hm100 (Boil)25.83 ± 0.85 c9.25 ± 0.10 c4.77 ± 0.54 b
3.Ap200/Hm200 (Boil)28.28 ± 1.23 b7.14 ± 0.76 d3.62 ± 0.37 c
4.Ap100/Hm300 (Boil)30.97 ± 1.70 a5.20 ± 0.47 d3.63 ± 0.74 c
5.Ap400/Hm0 (Non-boil)25.95 ± 0.76 d16.70 ± 0.43 a10.12 ± 0.18 a
6.Ap300/Hm100 (Non-boil)26.43 ± 1.81 c13.25 ± 1.07 b4.52 ± 0.40 b
7.Ap200/Hm200 (Non-boil)27.38 ± 1.05 b9.60 ± 1.04 c3.70 ± 0.20 c
8.Ap100/Hm300 (Non-boil)29.47 ± 1.73 a5.24 ± 0.74 d3.47 ± 0.14 c
Different superscript small letters on each column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Suraiya, S.; Mohona, M.A.S.; Fatema, M.; Haq, M.; Rahman, M.A.; Mondal, S. Edible Paper Sheets from Alternanthera philoxeroides and Hypophthalmichthys molitrix: Smart Biomass Valorization. Biomass 2024, 4, 414-428. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass4020020

AMA Style

Suraiya S, Mohona MAS, Fatema M, Haq M, Rahman MA, Mondal S. Edible Paper Sheets from Alternanthera philoxeroides and Hypophthalmichthys molitrix: Smart Biomass Valorization. Biomass. 2024; 4(2):414-428. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass4020020

Chicago/Turabian Style

Suraiya, Sharmin, Mst. Ayesha Siddika Mohona, Mst Fatema, Monjurul Haq, Md. Anisur Rahman, and Subrata Mondal. 2024. "Edible Paper Sheets from Alternanthera philoxeroides and Hypophthalmichthys molitrix: Smart Biomass Valorization" Biomass 4, no. 2: 414-428. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass4020020

APA Style

Suraiya, S., Mohona, M. A. S., Fatema, M., Haq, M., Rahman, M. A., & Mondal, S. (2024). Edible Paper Sheets from Alternanthera philoxeroides and Hypophthalmichthys molitrix: Smart Biomass Valorization. Biomass, 4(2), 414-428. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass4020020

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop