Previous Issue
Volume 5, September
 
 

Trauma Care, Volume 5, Issue 4 (December 2025) – 3 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
9 pages, 543 KB  
Article
Rib Fractures: A Review of Presenting Factors, Associated Injuries and Outcomes at a Level 1 Trauma Facility
by Estelle Laney, Shumani Makhadi, Ekene Emmanuel Nweke, Nnenna Elebo and Maeyane Stephens Moeng
Trauma Care 2025, 5(4), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/traumacare5040025 - 30 Oct 2025
Viewed by 172
Abstract
Background: Fractured ribs remain a significant cause of morbidity and are associated with severe injuries requiring several healthcare resources and may be associated with prolonged hospital stays that may require an ICU facility. In our facility, we have a high burden of patients [...] Read more.
Background: Fractured ribs remain a significant cause of morbidity and are associated with severe injuries requiring several healthcare resources and may be associated with prolonged hospital stays that may require an ICU facility. In our facility, we have a high burden of patients sustaining rib fractures, and we aim to compare management options, outcomes, and factors associated with mortality from a single center. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on patients who presented with rib fractures at a Level 1 Trauma facility in Johannesburg, undergoing medical or surgical management. The study included data from 1 July 2011 until 31 December 2020. All patients were identified using the Medibank database. STATA Version 18 software was used for all data analysis. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Injuries were subdivided according to the Abbreviated Injury Severity score as follows, Mild = AIS Grade I–II, Moderate = AIS Grade III, Severe AIS Grade IV–V. Results: There was a total of 940 patients. The median age was 45 (IQR: 34–55) years, with 22% female patients in a cohort of 940. The mechanism of injury was blunt in 96%. Most patients (93%) fractured 3/> ribs. Only 4.6% sustained a flail chest. The median SBP was 126 mmHg (IQR:109–144), and the pulse rate was 91 (IQR: 79–108) beats per minute. The mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) and New Injury Severity Score (NISS) were 17 (IQR: 10–29) and 22 (IQR: 14–34), respectively. The most common associated injuries were chest trauma in 42%, combined abdominal and pelvic trauma in 35%, and severe extremity trauma in 37%. The mortality rate was 17% (159/940). Most patients required medical and supportive management, with only 8% undergoing rib plating (76/940). The mean length of stay was 14 days (IQR: 6–25). Statistically significant factors associated with mortality were rib fractures 3≥, flail chest, higher ISS, severe head, neck, chest, abdomen and pelvis injuries (p-value 0.001) and severe extremity injury (p-value 0.006). Conclusions: Rib fractures remain a common pathology in the trauma population, and these patients can have significant associated injuries. With an appropriate multidisciplinary approach, our study found an 83% survival rate, and only 8% of patients requiring surgical intervention. Poor outcomes in patients are directly linked to the number of ribs involved, the injury severity score, associated injuries, and advanced age. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 8765 KB  
Review
Current Insights into Post-Traumatic Lymphedema
by Coeway Boulder Thng and Jeremy Mingfa Sun
Trauma Care 2025, 5(4), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/traumacare5040024 - 18 Oct 2025
Viewed by 258
Abstract
Post-traumatic lymphedema (PTL) is a chronic and often under-recognized sequela of soft tissue trauma, leading to persistent swelling, functional impairment, and increased risk of infection. While lymphedema is traditionally associated with oncologic interventions, growing evidence highlights the significant burden of PTL in trauma [...] Read more.
Post-traumatic lymphedema (PTL) is a chronic and often under-recognized sequela of soft tissue trauma, leading to persistent swelling, functional impairment, and increased risk of infection. While lymphedema is traditionally associated with oncologic interventions, growing evidence highlights the significant burden of PTL in trauma patients. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the current understanding of PTL, including epidemiology, risk factors, pathophysiology, diagnostic modalities, and treatment strategies. PTL often occurs after high-impact musculoskeletal injuries (such as open fractures with significant soft tissue loss) or burns (especially if deep or circumferential). This risk is increased if injury occurs at critical areas of increased lymphatic density (such as anteromedial leg, medial knee, medial thigh, medial elbow, or medial arm). Advances in imaging techniques, including indocyanine green lymphography and magnetic resonance lymphangiography, have improved early detection and classification of PTL. Management approaches range from conservative therapies, such as complete decongestive therapy (CDT), to surgical interventions, including lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA), vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT), and vascularized lymph vessel transfer (VLVT)/lymph-interpositional-flap transfer (LIFT). We report on our experience with two patients. At our center, we diagnose and stage PTL with ICG lymphography and trial CDT for 6 months. If there is no significant improvement, we recommend LVA. If there is insufficient improvement after 12 months, we recommend LIFT/repeat LVA/VLNT. We also treat open fractures with significant soft tissue defects with LIFT, as prophylaxis against PTL. PTL remains an underdiagnosed condition, necessitating increased awareness and intervention to prevent long-term disability. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 359 KB  
Article
The Epidemiology of Radial Head Fractures: A Registry-Based Cohort Study
by Narinder Kumar, Joanna F. Dipnall, Belinda Gabbe, Richard S. Page and Ilana N. Ackerman
Trauma Care 2025, 5(4), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/traumacare5040023 - 6 Oct 2025
Viewed by 335
Abstract
Objective: There is scarce reporting of radial head fracture epidemiology and patient characteristics beyond age and sex. This study aimed to describe demographic, socioeconomic, and injury pattern characteristics for people sustaining a radial head fracture admitted to trauma centers over a 15-year period. [...] Read more.
Objective: There is scarce reporting of radial head fracture epidemiology and patient characteristics beyond age and sex. This study aimed to describe demographic, socioeconomic, and injury pattern characteristics for people sustaining a radial head fracture admitted to trauma centers over a 15-year period. Methods: Analysis of Victorian Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes Registry data was conducted to describe the demographic and case characteristics of patients with radial head fractures admitted to collaborating hospitals. Cohort and case characteristics were compared by center type (Level 1 vs. other trauma centers). Results: A total of 991 cases with a unilateral radial head fracture were recorded over 15 years, with 827 admitted to Level 1 trauma centers and 164 admitted to other centers. The mean age at time of injury was 48.7 years (SD 19.7), with male predominance (n = 621, 62.7%). Most patients resided in major cities (n = 824, 85.2%), were treated under the universal healthcare system (n = 546, 56.1%), and had no Charlson Comorbidity Index conditions (n = 738, 74.5%). A higher proportion of patients managed at Level 1 centers were male (65.7% vs. 47.6%), younger (mean 47.7 vs. 53.7 years), living in major cities (86.6% vs. 78.5%), and working prior to injury (71.3% vs. 57.1%). Over 85% of the cohort sustained concomitant injuries, with Level 1 centers receiving a higher proportion of multiple injury cases (87.8% vs. 73.2%). Elbow dislocations constituted the largest proportion of concomitant injuries (n = 257, 25.9%). Conclusions: This study has provided new insights into the demographic characteristics, comorbidity status, and associated injuries of radial head fracture populations admitted to Level 1 and other trauma centers, using long-established registry data. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop