Next Article in Journal
The Informal Structure of Senpai (Seniors), Kohai (Juniors), and Doki (Peers) in Japanese Organizations
Previous Article in Journal
Field Guide: Morphometric Visualization and Characterization of Selected Foodborne Pathogens Using Advanced Imaging Techniques
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Quantum-Inspired Statistical Frameworks: Enhancing Traditional Methods with Quantum Principles

1
Department of Psychology, Panteion University, 17671 Athens, Greece
2
Independent Researcher, 17671 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Encyclopedia 2025, 5(2), 48; https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5020048
Submission received: 30 December 2024 / Revised: 26 March 2025 / Accepted: 29 March 2025 / Published: 4 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Mathematics & Computer Science)

Abstract

:
This manuscript introduces a comprehensive framework for augmenting classical statistical methodologies through the targeted integration of core quantum mechanical principles—specifically superposition, entanglement, measurement, wavefunctions, and density matrices. By concentrating on these foundational concepts instead of the whole expanse of quantum theory, we propose “quantum-inspired” models that address persistent shortcomings in conventional statistical approaches. In particular, five pivotal distributions (normal, binomial, Poisson, Student’s t, and chi-square) are reformulated to incorporate interference terms, phase factors, and operator-based transformations, thereby facilitating the representation of multimodal data, phase-sensitive dependencies, and correlated event patterns—characteristics that are frequently underrepresented in purely real-valued, classical frameworks. Furthermore, ten quantum-inspired statistical principles are delineated to guide practitioners in systematically adapting quantum mechanics for traditional inferential tasks. These principles are illustrated through domain-specific applications in finance, cryptography (distinct from direct quantum cryptography applications), healthcare, and climate modeling, demonstrating how amplitude-based confidence measures, density matrices, and measurement analogies can enrich standard statistical models by capturing more nuanced correlation structures and enhancing predictive performance. By unifying quantum constructs with established statistical theory, this work underscores the potential for interdisciplinary collaboration and paves the way for advanced data analysis tools capable of addressing high-dimensional, complex, and dynamically evolving datasets. Complete R code ensures reproducibility and further exploration.

1. Introduction

1.1. Historical Context of Quantum Mechanics

Quantum mechanics emerged in the early 20th century as a revolutionary framework for comprehending phenomena at the microscopic scale [1]. Its genesis can be traced to Max Planck’s 1900 energy quantization proposition [2], which provided the foundation for subsequent scientific advancements. In 1905, Albert Einstein extended this paradigm by elucidating the photoelectric effect by introducing light quanta, or photons [3]. By the mid-1920s, prominent physicists such as Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg, and Erwin Schrödinger formulated the core principles of quantum theory, culminating in the dualistic description of atomic systems via matrix mechanics and wave mechanics [4,5,6]. Paul Dirac’s integration of quantum mechanics with special relativity further solidified the discipline, facilitating the development of advanced theories such as quantum electrodynamics and quantum field theory [7,8].
These foundational developments introduced critical concepts, including wave–particle duality, superposition, and entanglement, which fundamentally challenged classical notions of determinism and causality [9,10,11]. Quantum phenomena—such as non-commuting observables and discrete energy levels—underscored the limitations of classical physics in accurately describing the behavior of microscopic systems [12,13]. By the mid-20th century, quantum mechanics had matured into a comprehensive theoretical framework underpinning numerous advanced technologies. Notably, quantum computing leverages superposition and entanglement to perform computations that exceed the capabilities of classical machines [14,15].

1.2. Evolution of Statistical Theory

Concurrent with the evolution of quantum mechanics, statistical theory has undergone significant transformation. The foundational contributions of Blaise Pascal and Pierre de Fermat in the 17th century established the early principles of probability [16,17]. The 18th century witnessed Thomas Bayes introducing Bayes’ theorem, pivotal for inference and decision-making under uncertainty [18,19,20]. In the 19th century, statistics emerged as an independent discipline, with Adolphe Quetelet applying statistical methods to social phenomena and Karl Pearson developing essential statistical tools such as the correlation coefficient and chi-square (χ2) tests [21,22,23]. These advancements laid the groundwork for the rigorous analysis of data and the quantification of uncertainty.
The early 20th century saw substantial contributions from Ronald A. Fisher, Jerzy Neyman, and Egon Pearson, who established the foundations of modern inferential statistics [24]. They introduced methodologies including maximum likelihood estimation, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and hypothesis testing [25,26]. These classical statistical methods emphasized parameter estimation, error types, and the frequentist paradigm, shaping contemporary statistical analysis. These classical approaches remain indispensable across scientific research and various industries, providing a robust—albeit inherently classical—toolset for data modeling, inference, and prediction [27].

1.3. Intersection of Quantum Mechanics and Statistics

Quantum statistics initially emerged to describe the behavior of large ensembles of particles governed by quantum rules, exemplified by Bose–Einstein and Fermi–Dirac distributions [28]. These distributions account for the statistical properties of bosons and fermions, respectively, reflecting the quantum nature of particles. Over time, it became evident that quantum mechanical concepts—such as wavefunction formalism and operator methods—could inform broader statistical challenges beyond purely physical systems [29]. For instance, quantum computing utilizes superposition to encode data in qubits, enabling novel algorithms with superior performance in tasks such as factoring large numbers and unstructured search [30]. Additionally, quantum information theory extends Shannon’s classical framework by incorporating quantum correlations, such as entanglement, thereby redefining our understanding of communication and entropy [31]. Recent research has explored quantum-inspired statistical methods, investigating applications in data science, finance, and cryptography [32,33,34]. Unlike classical approaches, quantum-inspired strategies can capture richer correlations through entanglement-like structures and utilize complex amplitudes. However, fully realizing these benefits necessitates a rigorous reconciliation of quantum mechanics’ conceptual foundations with conventional statistical theory. This integration requires meticulous consideration of aspects such as operator formalism, measurement postulates, and positivity constraints, presenting an ongoing challenge for researchers [35]. This work does not claim that classical statistical models inherently possess quantum properties. Rather, we demonstrate that mathematical principles from quantum mechanics—such as wavefunction-based probability representations, operator-based transformations, and entanglement-inspired correlations—provide extensions to classical statistical methodologies that address limitations in real-valued probability models.

1.4. Practical Applications

The potential practical applications of quantum-inspired statistics are vast and transformative, promising significant advancements in multiple fields:
Data Science: Quantum-inspired statistical methods can significantly enhance machine learning models and data analysis techniques [36]. These methods excel at capturing complex, high-dimensional data patterns that traditional approaches might miss. For example, quantum-inspired clustering algorithms can improve image recognition systems, leading to more accurate and efficient classification of large datasets [37]. Additionally, these methods can enhance predictive analytics by modeling intricate relationships within data more effectively, thus providing more precise and reliable forecasts [38].
Finance: In the financial sector, quantum-inspired models offer substantial benefits for predicting stock prices, managing risks, and optimizing portfolios [39]. By analyzing vast amounts of financial data more precisely, these models can uncover subtle correlations between assets, which traditional methods might overlook. This improved analysis capability leads to more effective risk management strategies and optimized investment portfolios. For instance, quantum-inspired portfolio optimization techniques can achieve higher returns and lower risks than classical methods, providing a competitive edge in financial decision-making [40].
Cryptography: Quantum-inspired statistics can significantly enhance cryptographic protocols, making them more robust against attacks [41]. One notable application is quantum key distribution (QKD), which ensures secure communication channels by leveraging the principles of quantum mechanics [42,43]. QKD can provide security levels unattainable by traditional encryption methods, effectively protecting sensitive information from potential cyber threats. Integrating quantum principles into cryptographic systems enhances security, reliability, and efficiency, setting a new standard for secure communications.
Healthcare: In healthcare, quantum-inspired statistical methods can improve diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes [44,45]. These methods can analyze complex medical data, such as genetic information and medical imaging, with greater precision. For example, quantum-inspired algorithms can enhance the detection of patterns in MRI scans, leading to earlier and more accurate diagnoses of diseases [46]. Additionally, these methods can optimize treatment plans by predicting patient responses to various therapies, thus personalizing healthcare and improving efficacy.
Climate Science: Quantum-inspired statistics can also contribute to climate science by enhancing the accuracy of climate models and predictions. These methods can better capture complex interactions within climate systems, leading to more precise weather patterns and climate change impact forecasts [47,48]. Improved predictive capabilities can inform policy decisions and strategies for mitigating climate change effects, ultimately aiding global efforts to address environmental challenges.

1.5. Research Objectives

The primary objective of this research is to integrate quantum mechanics with traditional statistical theory to develop quantum-inspired statistical frameworks. This involves investigating the following questions:
  • How can quantum mechanical concepts such as superposition, entanglement, and wavefunction dynamics be systematically integrated into statistical methodologies and probability theory to overcome limitations inherent in classical statistical approaches?
  • How can classical statistical distributions—including normal, binomial, Poisson, t, and chi-square—be extended with quantum parameters and interference effects to capture a broader spectrum of real-world phenomena where standard statistical assumptions may not hold?
  • What fundamental principles of quantum statistics, such as the superposition of distributions, entanglement-induced correlations, quantum-based variance measures, and coherent sampling techniques, can be identified and formalized to guide the consistent application of quantum mechanics within statistical modeling frameworks?
  • What are the broader theoretical implications of integrating quantum mechanics with classical statistics for interdisciplinary collaboration and advancements in data analysis?
By addressing these research questions, this study aims to establish a robust foundation for quantum-inspired statistical analysis, effectively bridging the conceptual gaps between quantum theory and the expansive domain of data science. The subsequent sections explore the theoretical underpinnings, delineate specific quantum-inspired extensions of classical statistical distributions, and present fundamental principles of quantum statistics.
The Supplementary Material provides full R implementations of the statistical models developed in this work, ensuring reproducibility for researchers.

2. Quantum Mechanics Foundations for Statistical Modeling

This section delineates the specific quantum mechanics principles that form the cornerstone of our quantum-inspired statistical frameworks (Table 1). Rather than exhaustively covering all aspects of quantum theory, we concentrate on those concepts—superposition, entanglement, measurement, wavefunctions, and density matrices—that are directly translatable into statistical methodologies [10]. By focusing on these foundational elements, we establish a robust bridge between quantum mechanics and statistical analysis, enabling the development of advanced models capable of capturing complex, multimodal, and highly correlated data structures [35]. This targeted approach ensures that the principles discussed are both relevant and instrumental in overcoming the inherent limitations of classical statistical methods [4].

2.1. Superposition

Superposition is a fundamental principle in quantum mechanics, characterizing the ability of a quantum system to exist simultaneously in multiple distinct states. This principle asserts that until a measurement is made, a quantum system does not reside in a single definite state but rather in a combination of all possible states [49,50,51,52,53,54].
Formally, consider a quantum system that can exist in two possible states, denoted by ψ 1 and ψ 2 . According to the superposition principle, the system’s overall state ψ can be expressed as a linear combination of these basis states:
ψ = α ψ 1 + β ψ 2
Here, α and β are complex coefficients known as probability amplitudes. These amplitudes must satisfy the normalization condition:
α 2 + β 2 = 1
This condition ensures that the probability of all possible outcomes sums to one, maintaining the probabilistic interpretation of quantum mechanics [55].
Physically, superposition leads to observable phenomena such as interference patterns, where the probabilities of different outcomes can interfere constructively or destructively. Conceptually, superposition is the foundation for quantum-inspired models, enabling data representation through overlapping or mixed states, which can capture more complex structures than classical models. Superposition, in this context, refers to the ability of a probability distribution to represent overlapping states. This enables soft clustering approaches where data points belong to multiple groups simultaneously with varying probabilities, improving segmentation accuracy in image analysis.
Example: To illustrate superposition, consider image segmentation. Traditional hard clustering assigns each pixel exclusively to one segment. In contrast, quantum-inspired soft clustering allows pixels to belong partially to multiple segments, capturing overlapping features and enhancing segmentation accuracy [10,11].

2.2. Entanglement

Entanglement is a uniquely quantum mechanical phenomenon where the states of two or more particles become intrinsically linked, such that the state of each particle cannot be described independently of the others. In an entangled system, the joint state of the particles cannot be factored into a product of individual states [56].
For example, consider an entangled pair of particles described by the following state:
| Ψ = 1 2 ( | 1 2 | 1 2 )
In this expression:
  • 1 and 1   represent the spin-up and spin-down states of particle 1.
  • 2 and 2 represent the spin-up and spin-down states of particle 2.
  • The coefficients 1 2 ensure normalization of the state.
This entangled state implies that if the spin of particle one is measured and found to be up ( 1 ), the spin of particle two will instantaneously be down ( 2 ), and vice versa, regardless of the distance separating the particles. Such correlations surpass classical explanations and have no counterpart in classical statistics [57].
In quantum-inspired statistics, entanglement analogies manifest as dependencies between stronger and more intricate variables than those captured by classical covariance measures. This has led to the development of novel correlation measures that can account for these complex interdependencies.
Example: Classical correlation measures may miss complex dependencies between assets in portfolio optimization. Quantum-inspired entanglement measures uncover non-linear and intricate stock relationships, leading to more effective diversification strategies [40,56].

2.3. Measurement

Measurement in quantum mechanics plays a pivotal role by collapsing a quantum system’s superposed state into one of its possible eigenstates. The probability of the system collapsing into a particular eigenstate is determined by the squared magnitude of the corresponding amplitude in the superposition [50,58].
Consider a qubit, which is a basic quantum system that can exist in a superposition of the basis states 0 and 1 :
ψ = α 0 + β 1
Upon measurement, the qubit will collapse to:
  • 0 with probability α 2 ;
  • 1 with probability β 2 .
This probabilistic outcome underscores the distinction between the amplitude (complex) wavefunction and the observed measurement results in the probability (real) domain.
In quantum-inspired statistical frameworks, measurement-like operations can be analogously treated as transformations that re-weight or collapse statistical distributions. These operations follow specific rules that mimic quantum projection, allowing for incorporating quantum-like probabilistic behavior into classical statistical models. In quantum-inspired statistics, measurement corresponds to an operator-based transformation that updates probability distributions, similar to Bayesian updating. This process allows for probabilistic inference incorporating interference effects, enabling more accurate diagnostic assessments when symptoms exhibit overlapping probabilistic dependencies.
Example: In medical diagnostics, traditional hypothesis testing evaluates each potential diagnosis independently. Quantum-inspired measurement models account for interference between overlapping symptoms, allowing simultaneous consideration of multiple diagnoses for more accurate confidence assessments [55,58].

2.4. Wavefunctions

A wavefunction ψ(x) provides a complete description of a quantum system in continuous variables, such as the position of a particle [59]. The wavefunction’s amplitude ψ(x) contains all the information about the system and its squared magnitude ψ x 2 represents the probability density of finding the particle at position x.
For instance, consider a particle confined in a one-dimensional infinite potential well of length L. The stationary states (energy eigenstates) of the system are given by:
ψ n x = 2 L sin n π x L for 1 x L
where n is a positive integer representing the quantum number of the state. These wavefunctions capture the discrete energy levels of quantum confinement [60].
From a statistical perspective, wavefunctions can represent probability distributions that exhibit interference effects—phenomena where the probability distributions can display patterns resulting from the superposition of multiple states. These interference effects are not accounted for by classical statistical models, making wavefunctions a powerful tool for capturing more complex distributional behaviors.
Example: In signal processing, classical normal distributions model single-source signals. Quantum normal distributions incorporate complex amplitudes and interference, enabling multiple overlapping signal sources to be modeled for more detailed signal analysis [61].

2.5. Density Matrices for Describing Quantum States

The density matrix ρ is a mathematical construct that generalizes the concept of a wavefunction to include both pure and mixed states. While a pure state describes a system with complete information about its quantum state, a mixed state represents a statistical ensemble of possible states [61].
For a pure state ϕ , the density matrix is defined as:
ρ = ϕ ϕ
This outer product ensures that ρ fully encapsulates the state ϕ .
In contrast, a mixed state is represented by a weighted sum of pure states:
ρ = i p i ϕ i ϕ i
Here, ϕ i represents the possible pure states, and p i represents the probabilities associated with each state, satisfying i p i = 1 Key properties of density matrices include the following:
  • Hermiticity: ρ = ρ , ensuring that the density matrix is equal to its conjugate transpose.
  • Unit Trace: Tr ρ = 1 , maintaining the total probability.
  • Positivity: For any state ψ , ψ ρ ψ 0 , guaranteeing non-negative probabilities.
In quantum-inspired statistical analyses, density matrices offer a flexible way to encode uncertainties or mixtures of different states, providing a richer framework than classical probability vectors for representing complex statistical ensembles.
Example: During multivariate hypothesis testing, classical chi-square tests assume variable independence. Quantum chi-square distributions utilize density matrices to model interdependent variables, providing a more comprehensive assessment of model fit in complex datasets [23,61].

3. Quantum-Inspired Statistical Principles

Building upon the quantum mechanics foundations established in the previous chapter, this section introduces ten core quantum-inspired statistical principles designed to enhance and extend traditional statistical methodologies (Table 2). These principles leverage quantum concepts to model complex data structures, capture intricate dependencies, and incorporate novel probabilistic behaviors that classical statistics may inadequately address [62,63]. Each principle is meticulously formulated with accompanying mathematical expressions, illustrating how quantum mechanics can revolutionize data modeling and inference processes. By adopting these quantum-inspired principles, statisticians can develop more flexible, accurate, and sophisticated models that better reflect the complexities of real-world data.

3.1. Superposition and Interference in Distributions

Superposition is a cornerstone of quantum mechanics, permitting a system to exist simultaneously in multiple states until a measurement is performed [64]. In statistical contexts, superposition represents a dataset as a combination of multiple underlying distributions, incorporating interference terms absent in classical real-weighted mixtures.
Mathematical Formulation:
P x = i = 1 n α i ψ i x 2
where
  • ψ i x represents the basis wavefunctions, each normalized such that,
    | ψ i ( x ) | 2 d x = 1
  • α i represents complex coefficients satisfying the normalization condition:
    i = 1 n | α i | 2 = 1
The probability distribution P(x) emerges from the squared magnitude of the superposed wavefunctions, allowing for the inclusion of cross-terms α i α j * ψ i x ψ j * x when i   j . These cross-terms facilitate constructive or destructive interference effects, enabling the model to capture intricate data patterns that cannot be represented by classical mixtures, which lack such interference.
Implications for Statistical Modeling: Superposition enables the modeling of complex data structures [65], particularly in high-dimensional or highly correlated scenarios. Superposed distributions can represent overlapping clusters or subpopulations with enhanced fidelity by incorporating interference effects, offering a richer and more flexible framework than classical additive mixtures.
Example: In customer segmentation, traditional hard clustering assigns each customer exclusively to one segment. Quantum-inspired soft clustering allows customers to belong to multiple segments with varying probabilities, capturing nuanced purchasing behaviors and overlapping market segments [11,63].

3.2. Entanglement and Advanced Correlation Measures

Entanglement is a quintessential quantum phenomenon where subsystems exhibit correlations that transcend classical factorizations [66]. In statistical terms, entanglement-inspired techniques enable pairs or sets of variables to share phase relationships and dependencies impervious to standard covariance measures.
Mathematical Formulation:
A bipartite density matrix ρ A B is considered entangled if it cannot be expressed as a tensor product of individual density matrices:
ρ A B ρ A ρ B
Implications for Statistical Modeling: Entanglement correlation allows for modeling complex interdependencies and latent structures within datasets. Unlike classical covariance, which measures linear dependencies, entanglement-inspired correlations can capture non-linear and phase-sensitive relationships [67]. This capability is particularly valuable in finance, biology, and machine learning, where variables often interact in intricate and non-classical ways.
Example: In healthcare analytics, classical correlation might reveal a linear relationship between two biomarkers. Quantum-inspired entanglement measures can detect non-linear dependencies between multiple biomarkers and disease outcomes, enabling more accurate predictive models [10,56].

3.3. Amplitude-Based Confidence and Inference

In quantum mechanics, the state amplitude Ψ is a complex quantity whose squared magnitude Ψ 2 represents a probability [68]. It is essential to distinguish between amplitude and classical confidence measures as Ψ 2 = 1 signifies normalization of the wavefunction rather than absolute certainty [46].
Mathematical Formulation:
C A = Ψ A 2
where
Ψ A is the amplitude associated with hypothesis A.
Implications for Statistical Modeling: Confidence amplitude measures a particular state hypothesis’s relative strength or confidence within a quantum-inspired framework. By integrating amplitude-based confidence with classical probability measures, this principle enhances hypothesis testing and inference, allowing for the incorporation of interference effects and partial coherence among competing hypotheses [69].
Example: In fraud detection, traditional hypothesis testing evaluates each indicator independently. Quantum-inspired amplitude-based confidence assesses the likelihood of fraud by considering the interference between multiple indicators, enhancing detection accuracy by capturing the interplay of various risk factors [55,58].

3.4. Enhanced Variance and Uncertainty Principles

Quantum systems inherently possess uncertainties due to the non-commuting nature of certain observables, leading to variances that differ from classical expectations [70]. In quantum-inspired statistics, these principles are harnessed to capture data variability more comprehensively, especially in complex dependencies or wave-like fluctuations.
Mathematical Formulation:
σ q 2 = x P q x x μ q 2
where
  • P q x = Ψ x 2 represents the quantum probability distribution.
  • μ q = x P q x x is the quantum mean.
Implications for Statistical Modeling: Enhanced estimation variance accommodates subtle correlations and dependencies within the data that classical variance measures may overlook. By incorporating quantum-inspired uncertainty principles [71], statisticians can achieve more accurate and flexible measures of data spread, particularly in datasets exhibiting non-linear or wave-like interactions.
Example: Classical variance may underestimate temperature variability due to spatial correlations in environmental monitoring. Quantum-inspired variance measures incorporate these correlations, more accurately representing environmental variability and improving climate models [47,56].

3.5. Coherent Sampling and Quantum Resampling Techniques

Coherent sampling ensures that each draw from a distribution preserves coherence among quantum states, maintaining cross-terms and interference effects integral to quantum-inspired models [72]. Unlike classical sampling, where each trial is independent, coherent sampling maintains phase relationships across samples, capturing correlated uncertainties and complex dependencies.
Mathematical Formulation:
μ sample = i = 1 n a i μ i with i = 1 n a i 2 = 1
where
  • μ i are the means of sub-distributions.
  • a i are complex coefficients.
Implications for Statistical Modeling: Coherent sampling preserves essential coherence and dependency structures within synthetic datasets, enhancing the realism and fidelity of resampled data. This approach particularly benefits small-sample or highly correlated domains, where classical resampling techniques may disrupt crucial dependency structures [73].
Example: In network traffic analysis, traditional bootstrap methods resample packet arrivals independently, ignoring temporal dependencies. Quantum-inspired coherent sampling preserves the sequence and dependencies of packet arrivals, resulting in synthetic datasets that more accurately reflect real traffic patterns [61].

3.6. Quantum Bayesian Inference and Measurement Updates

Bayesian inference in classical statistics [74] involves updating prior beliefs P(A) with new evidence P(B∣A) to obtain posterior probabilities P(A∣B). Quantum-inspired Bayesian inference extends this framework by defining priors and likelihoods via complex amplitudes, allowing for interference among hypotheses or states [48].
Mathematical Formulation:
| Ψ posterior = P B | Ψ A
where
  • P B   i s   the projection operator corresponding to event B.
  • A represents the state associated with hypothesis A.
Implications for Statistical Modeling: Quantum-inspired Bayesian inference allows for more nuanced updates that account for overlapping or competing hypotheses through interference effects [75]. This enhances the flexibility and accuracy of Bayesian updates, particularly in dynamic or sequential decision-making processes where observations significantly reconfigure the state of knowledge.
Example: Traditional Bayesian updates treat each learning path independently in adaptive learning systems. Quantum Bayesian inference allows for interference among multiple learning paths, enabling dynamic adjustments to belief states based on the interplay of various learning objectives [18,20].

3.7. Variational Parameter Optimization in Quantum Models

Variational parameter updates in quantum mechanics involve tuning parameters in trial wavefunctions to minimize energy or maximize fidelity [76]. Analogously, quantum-inspired statistical models define an objective function Q(θ) and iteratively update parameters θ to optimize the model.
Mathematical Formulation:
θ new = θ old η Q θ old
where
  • η is the learning rate.
  • Q θ old is the gradient of the objective function concerning θ at the current parameter values.
Implications for Statistical Modeling: Variational parameter updates enable optimizing amplitude-phase relationships in wavefunction-based distributions or fine-tuning parameters governing entanglement-driven correlations. This iterative process facilitates the convergence of statistical models towards optimal representations of the observed data, akin to finding ground states in quantum systems [77].
Example: Classical gradient descent may struggle with complex optimization landscapes in training quantum neural networks. Quantum-inspired variational parameter optimization uses complex gradients to navigate parameter spaces more effectively, avoiding local minima and achieving faster convergence [75,76,77].

3.8. Quantum-Inspired Data Analysis

Adopting this concept in statistical data analysis involves applying matrix operators that preserve the trace and positivity of density matrices, analogous to unitary transformations in quantum mechanics. These transformations model changes in distribution shape or correlation structure over time.
Mathematical Formulation:
Given an initial density matrix ρ old , a transformation operator U is applied to obtain the new density matrix ρ new :
ρ new = U ρ old U
For example, if ρ old is a 2 × 2 matrix representing a system of two possible states, and U is a unitary matrix, the transformation can swap or rotate the basis states, resulting in a new density matrix ρ new that reflects the transformed state.
Implications for Statistical Modeling: Density matrix transformations enable dynamic modeling of data distributions and their correlation structures. By applying operator-based transformations that preserve fundamental probabilistic properties, statisticians can effectively model temporal changes and evolving dependencies within datasets, enhancing the adaptability and accuracy of statistical models [78,79].
Example: In real-time financial modeling, classical static parameter models fail to adapt to sudden market changes. Quantum-inspired density matrix transformations dynamically evolve data distributions, maintaining accurate predictions even during volatile market conditions [33,61].

3.9. Quantum Mutual Information and Overlap Measures

Quantum mutual information extends Shannon’s mutual information [80] to quantum-inspired frameworks, measuring the total correlations present in a system. This measure captures deeper correlations than classical mutual information, enabling the detection of complex dependencies within data.
Mathematical Formulation:
I A ; B = Tr ρ A B log ρ A B Tr ρ A B log ρ A Tr ρ B log ρ B
where
  • ρ A B is the joint density matrix of variables A and B.
  • ρ A and ρ B are the reduced density matrices for variables A and B, respectively.
    Wave Packets and Overlap:
  • Wave Packets:
    Ψ x , t = Ψ k e i k x ω t d k
    Wave packets unify position–momentum uncertainty, enabling dynamic distribution modeling in continuous variables.
  • State Overlap:
    ψ 1 ψ 2 2
This quantifies the similarity between two wavefunctions, providing insight into how closely related different data states are.
Implications for Statistical Modeling: Quantum mutual information offers a more nuanced understanding of data correlations by accounting for classical and quantum-like dependencies [81]. This allows for detecting intricate and dynamic relationships within datasets that traditional mutual information might overlook. Additionally, wave packets and overlap measures facilitate the modeling of evolving distributions and the assessment of similarity between different data states, enhancing statistical analyses’ overall depth and accuracy.
Example: In social network analysis, classical mutual information assesses shared information between user interactions but may miss deeper relational dynamics. Quantum mutual information captures both direct and indirect dependencies, revealing complex interaction patterns and hidden community structures [65].

3.10. Spin Correlation and Bell Inequality Adaptations

Spin correlation and Bell inequality adaptations are pivotal for assessing non-classical dependencies and entanglement-like correlations within data [82,83]. Quantum spin correlation measures and Bell-like inequalities are adapted to assess non-classical dependencies and entanglement-like correlations within data.
Mathematical Formulation:
Bell inequalities can be adapted to test for non-classical dependencies in statistical data. For example:
| E ( a , b ) E ( a , b ) | + | E ( a , b ) + E ( a , b ) | 2
where E ( a , b ) represents the expectation value of correlated variables a and b. For implementation details, see the Supplementary Material.
Implications for Statistical Modeling: Provides new methodologies for assessing non-classical dependencies and entanglement-like correlations within datasets, surpassing the capabilities of classical correlation measures [84]. This enables the identification of deeper interdependencies that may be overlooked by traditional statistical tools, enhancing the robustness and depth of data analysis.
Example: In behavioral economics, traditional correlation measures might overlook intricate dependencies between consumer behaviors. Adapted Bell inequalities in quantum-inspired models detect entanglement-like correlations, providing deeper insights into the interdependencies and interactions influencing consumer decision-making [10,56].

4. Quantum-Inspired Statistical Distributions

This section explores the adaptation of classical statistical distributions through the lens of quantum mechanics, presenting five quantum-inspired distributions: normal, Binomial, Poisson, Student’s t, and chi-square (Table 3). Each classical distribution [85,86,87] is meticulously modified to incorporate quantum parameters and interference effects, enabling the modeling of overdispersion, multimodality, and complex dependencies that traditional distributions may fail to capture. Through rigorous mathematical formulations, we demonstrate how these quantum-inspired distributions offer enhanced flexibility and descriptive power, making them suitable for a broader range of real-world phenomena. Practical applications across diverse fields such as finance, genetics, telecommunications, and robust regression underscore the versatility and efficacy of these advanced statistical tools.

4.1. Quantum Normal Distribution

The quantum normal distribution extends the classical normal distribution [88] by incorporating wavefunction-based amplitude parameters. Unlike the classical distribution, defined by real-valued parameters, the quantum normal distribution utilizes complex amplitudes to represent probability densities.
Mathematical Formulation:
ψ normal x , μ q = 0 , σ q = 1 = 1 2 π σ q 2 1 / 4 e x μ q 2 4 σ q 2
Here, μ q and σ q represent the quantum mean and standard deviation, respectively. The probability density is obtained by taking the squared modulus of the wavefunction:
P normal x = ψ normal x 2 = 1 2 π σ q 2 e x μ q 2 2 σ q 2
Mean and Variance: The quantum normal distribution maintains the same mean and variance as the classical counterpart, with μ q and σ q 2 defining the central tendency and dispersion.
Quantum Interpretation and Advantages: The introduction of complex amplitudes allows the quantum normal distribution to model interference effects, enabling the representation of multimodal distributions and capturing non-linear dependencies within data. This flexibility surpasses the classical normal distribution’s ability to model only unimodal, symmetric data.
Applications: Quantum normal distributions are particularly useful in scenarios where data exhibit overlapping clusters or require modeling of wave-like interference patterns, such as in signal processing and complex system analysis.
Example: In audio signal processing, classical normal distributions model single-source noise. Quantum normal distributions, with their complex amplitudes and interference effects, can model multiple overlapping sound sources, allowing for more accurate separation and analysis of individual instruments in a mixed audio signal [52,61].

4.2. Quantum Binomial Distribution

The quantum binomial distribution modifies the classical binomial distribution [89] by introducing complex phase terms into the probability amplitudes. This incorporation allows for interference effects between different trial outcomes, providing a more nuanced representation of binary events.
Mathematical Formulation:
α k = n k p q k 1 p q n k e i ϕ k
Here, n is the number of trials, p q is the quantum probability of success, and ϕ k represents the phase associated with the k-th outcome.
The probability of observing k successes is:
P quantum   binomial k = α k 2 = n k p q k 1 p q n k
Mean and Variance: The quantum binomial distribution retains the classical mean and variance:
μ q = n p q , σ q 2 = n p q 1 p q
Implications: While the probability mass function remains similar to the classical binomial distribution when phases are zero, introducing phase terms allows for modeling dependencies and correlations that classical binomial models cannot capture. This enhancement is particularly beneficial in modeling scenarios where trial outcomes influence each other beyond simple independence.
Applications: Quantum binomial distributions are applicable in fields such as genetics, where allele distributions may exhibit correlated inheritance patterns, and in finance, where binary outcomes like market movements can display interdependencies.
Example: Traditional binomial distributions assume independent allele transmissions in genetic inheritance modeling. Quantum binomial distributions introduce phase terms that model dependencies between alleles, accurately reflecting linked genes and capturing more realistic genetic variations within populations [52,61,89].

4.3. Quantum Poisson Distribution

The quantum Poisson distribution adapts the classical Poisson distribution [90] by incorporating quantum probability amplitudes, enabling the modeling of overdispersed data and capturing interference effects between event counts.
Mathematical Formulation:
α k = λ q k e λ q k ! e i ϕ k
where λ q is the quantum rate parameter and ϕ k represents phase terms.
The probability of observing k events is:
P quantum   Poisson k = α k 2 = λ q k e λ q k !
Mean and Variance: The quantum Poisson distribution maintains the classical mean and variance:
μ q = λ q , σ q 2 = λ q
Implications: Similar to the quantum binomial distribution, including phase terms allows for interference between different event counts, facilitating data modeling with overdispersion or correlated events—situations where classical Poisson models may be inadequate.
Applications: Quantum Poisson distributions are beneficial in fields like telecommunications, where event counts (e.g., packet arrivals) can display clustering beyond classical Poisson assumptions. In epidemiology, disease incidence rates may exhibit correlated spread patterns.
Example: In telecommunications traffic analysis, classical Poisson distributions assume independent packet arrivals, which may not hold during peak usage. Quantum Poisson distributions incorporate phase terms to model clustered and correlated packet arrivals, providing a more accurate representation of real-world network traffic patterns [52,61,90].

4.4. Quantum Student’s t-Distribution

The quantum Student’s t-distribution extends the classical Student’s t-distribution [91] by incorporating wavefunction-based amplitude parameters, enabling the capture of heavy tails and complex dependencies inherent in certain datasets.
Mathematical Formulation:
ψ t x = Γ ν + 1 2 ν π Γ ν 2 1 + x 2 ν ν + 1 4
where ν is the degrees of freedom and Γ is the gamma function.
The probability density function is obtained by:
P quantum   t x = ψ t x 2 = Γ ν + 1 2 ν π Γ ν 2 1 + x 2 ν ν + 1 2
Mean and Variance: For ν > 1, the mean is zero, and for ν > 2, the variance is σ q 2 = ν ν 2 .
Implications: The quantum Student’s t-distribution retains the flexibility of the classical version while allowing for quantum-inspired modifications that can capture data complexities such as heavy tails and non-linear dependencies. This enhances the distribution’s applicability in modeling real-world data that deviate from classical assumptions.
Applications: Quantum Student’s t-distributions are particularly useful in robust regression, finance (modeling asset returns with heavy tails), and any field requiring data modeling with extreme variability and dependencies.
Example: In financial risk assessment, traditional Student’s t-distributions model asset returns with heavy tails but assume independence. Quantum Student’s t-distributions incorporate wavefunction-based amplitudes to capture extreme variability and non-linear dependencies between asset returns, leading to more precise risk evaluations and portfolio optimizations [52,61,91].

4.5. Quantum Chi-Square Distribution

Quantum-Inspired Changes: The quantum chi-square distribution [92] adapts the classical chi-square distribution by utilizing density matrices and operator-based transformations, allowing for modeling complex dependencies and higher-order interactions within data.
Mathematical Formulation:
For a system with k degrees of freedom, the density matrix ρ is transformed via a unitary operator U as follows:
ρ new = U ρ old U
This transformation allows for the rotation or alteration of the distribution’s structure while preserving fundamental properties such as trace and positivity.
Mean and Variance: The quantum chi-square distribution maintains the classical mean and variance:
μ q = k , σ q 2 = 2 k
Implications: By introducing operator-based transformations, the quantum chi-square distribution can model more intricate dependency structures and interactions between variables, surpassing the limitations of the classical chi-square distribution. For implementation details, see the Supplementary Material.
Applications: Quantum chi-square distributions find applications in areas like hypothesis testing, where complex interactions between variables are present, and in multivariate analysis, where higher-order dependencies need to be captured effectively.
Example: In multivariate hypothesis testing, classical chi-square tests assume variable independence, which can be limiting in complex datasets. Quantum chi-square distributions use density matrices and operator-based transformations to model interdependent variables, providing a more robust and comprehensive assessment of goodness-of-fit for models with intricate variable interactions [23,61,92].

5. Discussion

5.1. Answers to Research Objectives

This study addresses the four primary research objectives by systematically integrating quantum mechanical concepts [8] into statistical methodologies, extending classical distributions with quantum-inspired modifications [74], establishing foundational principles for quantum-inspired statistical models, and demonstrating their practical applications across diverse domains [38,39,40].
Firstly, integrating quantum mechanical concepts such as superposition, entanglement, and wavefunction dynamics into statistical methodologies and probability theory has been meticulously achieved [59]. The research transcends traditional probability frameworks by redefining probability measures through wavefunctions and density matrices, enabling the modeling of complex, multimodal data structures that classical statistics cannot adequately represent [93,94,95]. The superposition principle allows for combining multiple underlying distributions with interference effects, while entanglement-inspired correlations capture dependencies that exceed classical covariance measures. These integrations facilitate data representation through overlapping or mixed states, thereby overcoming limitations inherent in classical approaches and providing a more nuanced and flexible framework for data analysis.
This study successfully extends classical statistical distributions [96]—including normal, binomial, Poisson, Student’s t, and chi-square distributions—by incorporating quantum parameters and interference effects. Each distribution has been adapted to include complex amplitudes and phase terms, introducing interference phenomena absent in classical models. For instance, the quantum normal distribution leverages wavefunction-based amplitudes to model multimodal distributions and interference patterns, while the quantum binomial and Poisson distributions incorporate phase terms to capture dependencies and correlated events that classical distributions cannot. These quantum-inspired extensions enhance the ability of statistical models to capture real-world phenomena characterized by complex correlations, overdispersion, and non-linear dependencies [97], thereby broadening their applicability and improving their descriptive power in various data-driven contexts.
Thirdly, formulating and formalizing fundamental principles underpinning quantum-inspired statistical models have been comprehensively established. Ten core principles, including superposition and interference in distributions, entanglement-induced correlations, amplitude-based confidence measures, enhanced variance and uncertainty principles, coherent sampling techniques, quantum Bayesian inference, variational parameter optimization, operator-based transformations, quantum mutual information, and spin correlation adaptations, provide a robust theoretical foundation. These principles guide the consistent application of quantum mechanics within statistical frameworks, ensuring mathematical rigor and interpretative clarity. By formalizing these principles, the study establishes a cohesive and structured approach to integrating quantum concepts into statistical modeling, facilitating the development of sophisticated models that can address intricate data structures and dependencies [98].
Lastly, enhanced data analysis across diverse fields through quantum-inspired statistical methods has been convincingly demonstrated. Machine learning, finance, cryptography, healthcare, and climate modeling applications illustrate the proposed frameworks’ practical utility and interdisciplinary relevance [99,100]. In machine learning, quantum-inspired models improve pattern recognition and clustering by capturing non-linear dependencies and overlapping clusters. In finance, modeling asset correlations using density matrices unveils hidden interdependencies, enhancing risk assessment and portfolio optimization. Cryptographic protocols benefit from amplitude-based security measures and robust random number generation techniques, while healthcare imaging leverages interference effects for improved diagnostic accuracy. Additionally, climate modeling incorporates amplitude-based couplings to manage correlated uncertainties and complex feedback loops. These applications underscore the transformative potential of quantum-inspired statistical methods in addressing complex, real-world data challenges, thereby advancing data analysis methodologies across multiple scientific and industrial domains.
This study has successfully met its research objectives by seamlessly integrating quantum mechanical concepts into statistical methodologies, extending classical distributions with quantum-inspired modifications, establishing fundamental principles for quantum-inspired models, and demonstrating their practical enhancements across various fields. These achievements collectively lay a solid foundation for the continued development and application of quantum-inspired statistics, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration and advancing the frontiers of data analysis.

5.2. Theoretical Implications

As delineated in this study, integrating quantum mechanical principles into classical statistical frameworks ushers a paradigm shift with profound theoretical implications. By redefining probability measures through the utilization of wavefunctions and density matrices, this research transcends traditional Kolmogorovian axioms [101], allowing for the incorporation of complex amplitudes that facilitate interference effects and phase-dependent probabilities. This novel approach enables modeling multimodal and overlapping data structures [102], often inadequately captured by classical real-valued probability distributions. Furthermore, adopting entanglement-inspired correlation measures extends beyond classical covariance, capturing non-linear and phase-sensitive dependencies that reveal deeper interdependencies within datasets. Operator-based transformations, analogous to unitary operations in quantum mechanics, provide a dynamic mechanism for evolving probability distributions, thereby enhancing the ability to model temporal changes and complex interactions within data. The introduction of quantum mutual information [103] offers a more comprehensive metric for assessing total correlations, encompassing both classical and quantum-like dependencies [104], thus enriching the understanding of data interrelationships.
Additionally, implementing variational parameter optimization inspired by quantum systems [105] introduces a flexible and iterative methodology for refining statistical models, promoting convergence towards optimal representations akin to finding ground states in quantum mechanics.
Collectively, these theoretical advancements bridge the conceptual divide between quantum mechanics and classical statistics and establish a robust foundation for developing sophisticated, quantum-inspired statistical models. This unified framework enhances the capacity to address complex, non-classical data phenomena, paving the way for innovative analytical methodologies that leverage the strengths of both quantum theory and traditional statistical approaches.

5.3. Practical Implications

The practical implications of these advancements are broad, although contingent on their implementation and validation in applied settings. In machine learning, quantum-inspired principles such as superposition and entanglement correlations could significantly improve pattern recognition and clustering by enhancing the detection of complex dependencies and overlapping clusters in high-dimensional datasets. Similarly, applying quantum mutual information in the financial sector may uncover hidden correlations among assets, improving risk assessment and portfolio optimization strategies. These methods could enable more accurate modeling of financial data variability and interdependencies, enhancing decision-making under uncertainty. In cryptography, amplitude-based security protocols and robust random number generation can strengthen encryption schemes and improve the resilience of communication channels against cyber threats. Using interference effects to identify subtle patterns in medical imaging and genomic data could lead to earlier and more precise diagnostic insights in healthcare. These methods may also enhance predictive modeling for personalized treatments, particularly by capturing complex, multimodal correlations. Quantum-inspired frameworks also hold promise for climate modeling, where their ability to manage correlated uncertainties and feedback loops could improve the accuracy of forecasts related to weather and climate change. While these practical applications demonstrate the transformative potential of quantum-inspired methods, their realization depends on broader adoption and empirical validation [106,107,108,109,110,111].

5.4. Future Directions

Validation of the proposed models across diverse and large-scale datasets is essential for evaluating robustness and scalability. Testing in genomics, social sciences, and engineering will help establish their utility in real-world applications [112,113]. The development of hybrid algorithms, integrating quantum-inspired methodologies with classical techniques, represents another important avenue [114]. This approach may enhance computational efficiency and model performance by leveraging the strengths of both paradigms. Expanding the theoretical framework to include multivariate and non-parametric distributions [115] will broaden the versatility of quantum-inspired models and enable the analysis of more complex statistical phenomena. Enhancing interpretability and transparency is another priority, particularly for applications in sensitive domains such as healthcare and finance, where actionable insights and stakeholder understanding are crucial. Advanced optimization techniques tailored to quantum-inspired statistical models, such as quantum annealing, could improve parameter tuning and model accuracy, making these frameworks more practical for real-time decision-making [116]. Further research into integrating these statistical methodologies with emerging quantum computing hardware could unlock new computational capabilities, advancing the potential of quantum-inspired models in processing speed and complexity [117]. Ethical and societal implications, including data privacy, security, and fairness, must also be addressed to ensure the responsible deployment of these methodologies [118]. Interdisciplinary collaboration among quantum physicists, statisticians, and domain experts will drive innovation and promote the practical adoption of quantum-inspired frameworks. By addressing these challenges and opportunities, the field of quantum-inspired statistics can potentially transform data analysis and decision-making across scientific and industrial domains.

6. Conclusions

This study integrates specific and foundational quantum mechanical principles [119,120,121] into classical statistical frameworks, pioneering quantum-inspired statistical methodologies. By extending traditional probability theory and adapting key statistical distributions such as normal, binomial, Poisson, Student’s t, and chi-square with quantum parameters and interference effects, this research enables the modeling of complex, multimodal, and non-linear data structures that classical methods cannot adequately capture.
Establishing ten fundamental quantum-inspired statistical principles provides a robust theoretical foundation, guiding the consistent application of quantum mechanics within statistical modeling. These principles enhance the ability to capture intricate dependencies and dynamic interactions within data, advancing statistical analyses’ descriptive and predictive capabilities.
Practical applications demonstrated in machine learning, finance, cryptography, healthcare, and climate modeling highlight the versatility and efficacy of quantum-inspired methods. These applications underscore significant improvements in pattern recognition, risk assessment, data security, diagnostic accuracy, and predictive modeling, showcasing the transformative potential of merging quantum principles with classical statistics.
The continued development and empirical validation of quantum-inspired statistical frameworks promise to enhance their utility and scalability further [122,123,124]. Addressing challenges related to model interpretability, optimization, and interdisciplinary collaboration will be essential for realizing the full potential of these innovative methodologies. Overall, this work lays a crucial groundwork for the evolution of statistical theory and practice, positioning quantum-inspired frameworks as pivotal tools in advancing data-driven analysis.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/encyclopedia5020048/s1, Supplementary Material: This supplementary material provides the R code implementations for the quantum-inspired statistical methods discussed in the manuscript by section.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.K. and M.P.; methodology, T.K. and M.P.; software, T.K. and M.P.; validation, T.K. and M.P.; formal analysis, T.K. and M.P.; investigation, T.K. and M.P.; resources, T.K. and M.P.; data curation, T.K. and M.P.; writing—original draft preparation, T.K. and M.P.; writing—review and editing, T.K. and M.P.; visualization, T.K. and M.P.; supervision, T.K. and M.P.; project administration, T.K. and M.P.; funding acquisition, T.K. and M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable. The manuscript does not involve empirical data collection or studies involving human participants.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Therefore, data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Feynman, R.P.; Hey, T. Quantum mechanical computers. In Feynman Lectures on Computation; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2023; pp. 169–192. [Google Scholar]
  2. Santamaria, R. Quantization of the Energy. In Molecular Dynamics; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 159–178. [Google Scholar]
  3. Giliberti, M.; Lovisetti, L. The Photoelectric Effect and the Electron Charge. In Old Quantum Theory and Early Quantum Mechanics: A Historical Perspective Commented for the Inquiring Reader; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 159–228. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mohrhoff, U.J. Niels Bohr, objectivity, and the irreversibility of measurements. Quantum Stud. Math. Found. 2020, 7, 373–382. [Google Scholar]
  5. Capellmann, H. Space-time in quantum theory. Found. Phys. 2021, 51, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mussardo, G.; Mussardo, G. Quantum. Erwin’s Version. In The ABC’s of Science; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 159–167. [Google Scholar]
  7. Drago, A. Dirac’s book The principles of quantum mechanics as an alternative way of organizing a theory. Found. Sci. 2023, 28, 551–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. McIntyre, D.H. Quantum Mechanics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chang, D.C. Review on the physical basis of wave–particle duality: Conceptual connection between quantum mechanics and the Maxwell theory. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 2021, 35, 2130004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Aubrun, G.; Lami, L.; Palazuelos, C.; Plávala, M. Entanglement and superposition are equivalent concepts in any physical theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022, 128, 160402. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chamgordani, M.A. The entanglement properties of superposition of fermionic coherent states. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 2022, 61, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Stickler, B.A.; Hornberger, K.; Kim, M.S. Quantum rotations of nanoparticles. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2021, 3, 589–597. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zinn-Justin, J. Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2021; Volume 171. [Google Scholar]
  14. Preskill, J. Quantum computing 40 years later. In Feynman Lectures on Computation; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2023; pp. 193–244. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gill, S.S.; Kumar, A.; Singh, H.; Singh, M.; Kaur, K.; Usman, M.; Buyya, R. Quantum computing: A taxonomy, systematic review and future directions. Softw. Pract. Exp. 2022, 52, 66–114. [Google Scholar]
  16. Binmore, K.; Binmore, K. Blaise Pascal Versus Pierre de Fermat. In Imaginary Philosophical Dialogues: Between Sages down the Ages; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 55–61. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ghahramani, S. Fundamentals of Probability; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  18. Downey, A.B. Think Bayes; O’Reilly Media, Inc.: Sebastopol, CA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  19. Berkson, J. Bayes’ theorem. Ann. Math. Stat. 1930, 1, 42–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Caprio, M.; Sale, Y.; Hüllermeier, E.; Lee, I. A novel Bayes’ theorem for upper probabilities. In International Workshop on Epistemic Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  21. Tafreshi, D. Adolphe Quetelet and the legacy of the “average man” in psychology. Hist. Psychol. 2022, 25, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Prasad, S. Correlation and Regression. In Elementary Statistical Methods; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2023; pp. 241–279. [Google Scholar]
  23. Turhan, N.S. Karl Pearson’s Chi-Square Tests. Educ. Res. Rev. 2020, 16, 575–580. [Google Scholar]
  24. Acree, M.C.; Acree, M.C. The Fisher and Neyman-Pearson Theories of Statistical Inference. In The Myth of Statistical Inference; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 187–235. [Google Scholar]
  25. Stoker, P.; Tian, G.; Kim, J.Y. Analysis of variance (ANOVA). In Basic Quantitative Research Methods for Urban Planners; Routledge: London, UK, 2020; pp. 197–219. [Google Scholar]
  26. Pan, J.X.; Fang, K.T.; Pan, J.X.; Fang, K.T. Maximum likelihood estimation. In Growth Curve Models and Statistical Diagnostics; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 77–158. [Google Scholar]
  27. Thulin, M. Modern Statistics with R: From Wrangling and Exploring Data to Inference and Predictive Modelling; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  28. López-Castillo, A. Exact Results for Bose–Einstein and Fermi–Dirac Statistics for Finite Generic Systems. J. Low Temp. Phys. 2024, 216, 698–721. [Google Scholar]
  29. Arsiwalla, X.D.; Chester, D.; Kauffman, L.H. On the operator origins of classical and quantum wave functions. Quantum Stud. Math. Found. 2024, 11, 193–215. [Google Scholar]
  30. Balamurugan, K.S.; Sivakami, A.; Mathankumar, M.; Ahmad, I. Quantum computing basics, applications and future perspectives. J. Mol. Struct. 2024, 1308, 137917. [Google Scholar]
  31. Aggarwal, M. An entropy framework for randomness and fuzziness. Expert Syst. Appl. 2024, 243, 122431. [Google Scholar]
  32. Priyadarshini, I. Swarm-intelligence-based quantum-inspired optimization techniques for enhancing algorithmic efficiency and empirical assessment. Quantum Mach. Intell. 2024, 6, 69. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lu, Y.; Yang, J. Quantum financing system: A survey on quantum algorithms, potential scenarios and open research issues. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2024, 41, 100663. [Google Scholar]
  34. Whig, P.; Mudunuru, K.R.; Remala, R. Quantum-Inspired Data-Driven Decision Making for Supply Chain Logistics. In Quantum Computing and Supply Chain Management: A New Era of Optimization; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2024; pp. 85–98. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kyriazos, T.; Poga, M. Quantum concepts in Psychology: Exploring the interplay of physics and the human psyche. Biosystems 2024, 235, 105070. [Google Scholar]
  36. Mandal, A.K.; Chakraborty, B. Quantum computing and quantum-inspired techniques for feature subset selection: A review. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 2024, 67, 2019–2061. [Google Scholar]
  37. Roy, S.K.; Rudra, B. Quantum-inspired hybrid algorithm for image classification and segmentation: Q-Means++ max-cut method. Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol. 2024, 34, e23015. [Google Scholar]
  38. Sharma, D.; Singh, P.; Kumar, A. Quantum-inspired attribute selection algorithms. Quantum Sci. Technol. 2024, 10, 015036. [Google Scholar]
  39. Faccia, A. Quantum Fintech. In Artificial Intelligence and Beyond for Finance; World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd: Singapore, 2024; pp. 235–263. [Google Scholar]
  40. Gunjan, A.; Bhattacharyya, S. Quantum-inspired meta-heuristic approaches for a constrained portfolio optimization problem. Evol. Intell. 2024, 17, 3061–3100. [Google Scholar]
  41. Butt, M.O.; Waheed, N.; Duong, T.Q.; Ejaz, W. Quantum-Inspired Resource Optimization for 6G Networks: A Survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2024, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tian, X.H.; Yang, R.; Liu, H.Y.; Fan, P.; Zhang, J.N.; Gu, C.; Gong, Y.-X.; Zhu, S.-N.; Xie, Z. Experimental Demonstration of Drone-Based Quantum Key Distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2024, 133, 200801. [Google Scholar]
  43. Aquina, N.; Rommel, S.; Monroy, I.T. Quantum secure communication using hybrid post-quantum cryptography and quantum key distribution. In Proceedings of the 2024 24th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON), Bari, Italy, 14–18 July 2024; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ibrahim, H.K.; Rokbani, N.; Wali, A.; Ouahada, K.; Chabchoub, H.; Alimi, A.M. A Medical Image Classification Model based on Quantum-Inspired Genetic Algorithm. Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res. 2024, 14, 16692–16700. [Google Scholar]
  45. Yan, F.; Huang, H.; Pedrycz, W.; Hirota, K. Review of medical image processing using quantum-enabled algorithms. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2024, 57, 300. [Google Scholar]
  46. Swathi, G.; Altalbe, A.; Kumar, R.P. QuCNet: Quantum-Inspired Convolutional Neural Networks for Optimized Thyroid Nodule Classification. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 27829–27842. [Google Scholar]
  47. Rahman, S.M.; Alkhalaf, O.H.; Alam, M.S.; Tiwari, S.P.; Shafiullah, M.; Al-Judaibi, S.M.; Al-Ismail, F.S. Climate Change Through Quantum Lens: Computing and Machine Learning. Earth Syst. Environ. 2024, 8, 705–722. [Google Scholar]
  48. Agarwal, P.; Sahoo, A.; Garg, D. An Improved Quantum Inspired Particle Swarm Optimization for Forest Cover Prediction. Ann. Data Sci. 2024, 11, 2217–2233. [Google Scholar]
  49. Scherrer, R.J. Quantum Mechanics: An Accessible Introduction; World Scientific: Singapore, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  50. Sakurai, J.J.; Napolitano, J. Modern Quantum Mechanics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  51. Landau, L.D.; Lifshitz, E.M. Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
  52. Moyal, J.E. Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory. In Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1949; Volume 45, pp. 99–124. [Google Scholar]
  53. Levi, A.F.J. Applied Quantum Mechanics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  54. Takhtadzhian, L.A. Quantum Mechanics for Mathematicians; American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, USA, 2008; Volume 95. [Google Scholar]
  55. de Ronde, C. Measuring Quantum Superpositions: (Or, “It Is Only the Theory Which Decides What Can Be Observed.”). In Non-Reflexive Logics, Non-Individuals, and the Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: Essays in Honour of the Philosophy of Décio Krause; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 261–296. [Google Scholar]
  56. Annila, A.; Wikström, M. Quantum entanglement and classical correlation have the same form. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 2024, 139, 560. [Google Scholar]
  57. Horodecki, R.; Horodecki, P.; Horodecki, M.; Horodecki, K. Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2009, 81, 865–942. [Google Scholar]
  58. Jordan, A.N.; Siddiqi, I.A. Quantum Measurement: Theory and Practice; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  59. Ney, A. The World in the Wave Function: A Metaphysics for Quantum Physics; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  60. Allori, V.; Bassi, A.; Dürr, D.; Zanghi, N. Do wave functions jump? In Fundamental Theories of Physics; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  61. Man’ko, M.A.; Man’ko, V.I. Probability Distributions as Alternatives of the Density Operator and Wave Function for Describing Quantum States. In The Quantum-Like Revolution: A Festschrift for Andrei Khrennikov; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 215–234. [Google Scholar]
  62. Pomarico, D.; Fanizzi, A.; Amoroso, N.; Bellotti, R.; Biafora, A.; Bove, S.; Didonna, V.; Forgia, D.L.; Pastena, M.I.; Tamborra, P.; et al. A proposal of quantum-inspired machine learning for medical purposes: An application case. Mathematics 2021, 9, 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Fan, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, P.; Lin, Q.; Li, Y.; Qian, Y. Quantum-inspired language models based on unitary transformation. Inf. Process. Manag. 2024, 61, 103741. [Google Scholar]
  64. Tasaki, H. Physics and Mathematics of Quantum Many-Body Systems; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; Volume 66. [Google Scholar]
  65. Ullah, A.; Wang, B.; Sheng, J.; Long, J.; Khan, N.; Sun, Z. Identification of nodes influence based on global structure model in complex networks. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 6173. [Google Scholar]
  66. Erhard, M.; Krenn, M.; Zeilinger, A. Advances in high-dimensional quantum entanglement. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2020, 2, 365–381. [Google Scholar]
  67. Zhang, J.; Li, Z.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Hu, S.; Xiao, J.; Li, Z. Quantum entanglement inspired correlation learning for classification. In Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 58–70. [Google Scholar]
  68. Di, S.; Xu, J.; Shu, G.; Feng, C.; Ding, X.; Shan, Z. Amplitude transformed quantum convolutional neural network. Appl. Intell. 2023, 53, 20863–20873. [Google Scholar]
  69. Chen, Y.; Wang, F.; Cai, Y. Partially coherent light beam shaping via complex spatial coherence structure engineering. Adv. Phys. X 2022, 7, 2009742. [Google Scholar]
  70. Backes, K.M.; Palken, D.A.; Kenany, S.A.; Brubaker, B.M.; Cahn, S.B.; Droster, A.; Hilton, G.C.; Ghosh, S.; Jackson, H.; Lamoreaux, S.K.; et al. A quantum enhanced search for dark matter axions. Nature 2021, 590, 238–242. [Google Scholar]
  71. Zhang, Q. Quantum Inspired Concepts in Decision Making; Missouri University of Science and Technology: Rolla, MO, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  72. Hangleiter, D.; Eisert, J. Computational advantage of quantum random Sampling. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2023, 95, 035001. [Google Scholar]
  73. Yuan, Y.; Wei, J.; Huang, H.; Jiao, W.; Wang, J.; Chen, H. Review of resampling techniques for the treatment of imbalanced industrial data classification in equipment condition monitoring. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2023, 126, 106911. [Google Scholar]
  74. Casella, G.; Berger, R. Statistical Inference; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  75. Nguyen, N.; Chen, K.C. Bayesian quantum neural networks. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 54110–54122. [Google Scholar]
  76. Cerezo, M.; Arrasmith, A.; Babbush, R.; Benjamin, S.C.; Endo, S.; Fujii, K.; McClean, J.R.; Mitarai, K.; Yuan, X.; Cincio, L.; et al. Variational quantum algorithms. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2021, 3, 625–644. [Google Scholar]
  77. Tilly, J.; Chen, H.; Cao, S.; Picozzi, D.; Setia, K.; Li, Y.; Grant, E.; Wossnig, L.; Rungger, I.; Booth, G.H.; et al. The variational quantum eigensolver: A review of methods and best practices. Phys. Rep. 2022, 986, 1–128. [Google Scholar]
  78. Jiang, C.; Pan, Y.; Yang, Y.; Dong, D. Interpolation of positive matrices by quantum-inspired optimal control. IET Control Theory Appl. 2024, 18, 877–886. [Google Scholar]
  79. García-Ripoll, J.J. Quantum-inspired algorithms for multivariate analysis: From interpolation to partial differential equations. Quantum 2021, 5, 431. [Google Scholar]
  80. Zhang, Z.; Henderson, T.; Karaman, S.; Sze, V. FSMI: Fast computation of Shannon mutual information for information-theoretic mapping. Int. J. Robot. Res. 2020, 39, 1155–1177. [Google Scholar]
  81. Kuwahara, T.; Kato, K.; Brandão, F.G. Clustering of conditional mutual information for quantum Gibbs states above a threshold temperature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 124, 220601. [Google Scholar]
  82. Harvey, S.M.; Wasielewski, M.R. Photogenerated spin-correlated radical pairs: From photosynthetic energy transduction to quantum information science. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 15508–15529. [Google Scholar]
  83. Ruzbehani, M. Simulation of the Bell inequality violation based on quantum steering concept. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 5647. [Google Scholar]
  84. Srivastava, A.K.; Müller-Rigat, G.; Lewenstein, M.; Rajchel-Mieldzioć, G. Introduction to quantum entanglement in many-body systems. In New Trends and Platforms for Quantum Technologies; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 225–285. [Google Scholar]
  85. Gupta, S.C.; Kapoor, V.K. Fundamentals of Mathematical Statistics; Sultan Chand & Sons: New Delhi, India, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  86. Peck, R.; Short, T.; Olsen, C. Introduction to Statistics and Data Analysis; Cengage Learning: Belmont, CA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  87. Forbes, C.; Evans, M.; Hastings, N.; Peacock, B. Statistical Distributions; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  88. Moore, M.L.; Pollock, J.R.; Smith, J.F.; Elahi, M.A.; Rosenow, C.S. Distributions. In Translational Orthopedics; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2024; pp. 123–127. [Google Scholar]
  89. García-García, J.I.; Fernández Coronado, N.A.; Arredondo, E.H.; Imilpán Rivera, I.A. The binomial distribution: Historical origin and evolution of its problem situations. Mathematics 2022, 10, 2680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Maurya, S.K.; Nadarajah, S. Poisson generated family of distributions: A review. Sankhya B 2021, 83, 484–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. John, D.I.; Stephen MA TH, E.W. Statistical properties and applications of transmuted skew student t distribution. Reliab. Theory Appl. 2024, 19, 144–156. [Google Scholar]
  92. Hutcheson, A.T.; Brown, K.G. Chi-Square. In Statistics for Psychology Research: A Short Guide Using Excel; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 161–177. [Google Scholar]
  93. Phukan, A.; Pal, S.; Ekbal, A. Hybrid Quantum-Classical Neural Network for Multimodal Multitask Sarcasm, Emotion, and Sentiment Analysis. IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst. 2024, 11, 5740–5750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Jia, K.; Meng, F.; Liang, J. Hierarchical graph contrastive learning framework based on quantum neural networks for sentiment analysis. Inf. Sci. 2025, 690, 121543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Xing, Z.; Lam, C.T.; Yuan, X.; Im, S.K.; Machado, P. MMQW: Multimodal Quantum Watermarking Scheme. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024, 19, 5181–5195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Weibull, W. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J. Appl. Mech. 1951, 18, 293–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Shapovalova, Y.; Baştürk, N.; Eichler, M. Multivariate Count Data Models for Time Series Forecasting. Entropy 2021, 23, 718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Altman, E.; Brown, K.R.; Carleo, G.; Carr, L.D.; Demler, E.; Chin, C.; DeMarco, B.; Economou, S.E.; Eriksson, M.A.; Fu, K.M.C.; et al. Quantum simulators: Architectures and opportunities. PRX Quantum 2021, 2, 017003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Cherbal, S.; Zier, A.; Hebal, S.; Louail, L.; Annane, B. Security in internet of things: A review on approaches based on blockchain, machine learning, cryptography, and quantum computing. J. Supercomput. 2024, 80, 3738–3816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. SaberiKamarposhti, M.; Ng, K.W.; Chua, F.F.; Abdullah, J.; Yadollahi, M.; Moradi, M.; Ahmadpour, S. Post-quantum healthcare: A roadmap for cybersecurity resilience in medical data. Heliyon 2024, 10, e31406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Svozil, K. Extending Kolmogorov’s axioms for a generalized probability theory on collections of contexts. Entropy 2022, 24, 1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Huang, Y.; Du, C.; Xue, Z.; Chen, X.; Zhao, H.; Huang, L. What makes multimodal learning better than single (provably). Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2021, 34, 10944–10956. [Google Scholar]
  103. Ling, Z.; Hao, Z.J. Intrusion detection using normalized mutual information feature selection and parallel quantum genetic algorithm. Int. J. Semant. Web Inf. Syst. 2022, 18, 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  104. Filk, T. The Quantum-like Behavior of Neural Networks. In From Electrons to Elephants and Elections: Exploring the Role of Content and Context; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 553–575. [Google Scholar]
  105. Wiersema, R.; Zhou, C.; de Sereville, Y.; Carrasquilla, J.F.; Kim, Y.B.; Yuen, H. Exploring entanglement and optimization within the hamiltonian variational ansatz. PRX Quantum 2020, 1, 020319. [Google Scholar]
  106. Hakemi, S.; Houshmand, M.; KheirKhah, E.; Hosseini, S.A. A review of recent advances in quantum-inspired metaheuristics. Evol. Intell. 2024, 17, 627–642. [Google Scholar]
  107. Núñez-Merino, M.; Maqueira-Marín, J.M.; Moyano-Fuentes, J.; Castaño-Moraga, C.A. Quantum-inspired computing technology in operations and logistics management. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2024, 54, 247–274. [Google Scholar]
  108. Slongo, F.; Hauke, P.; Faccioli, P.; Micheletti, C. Quantum-inspired encoding enhances stochastic Sampling of soft matter systems. Sci. Adv. 2023, 9, eadi0204. [Google Scholar]
  109. Abd El-Latif, A.A.; Abd-El-Atty, B.; Mehmood, I.; Muhammad, K.; Venegas-Andraca, S.E.; Peng, J. Quantum-inspired blockchain-based cybersecurity: Securing smart edge utilities in IoT-based smart cities. Inf. Process. Manag. 2021, 58, 102549. [Google Scholar]
  110. Almotiri, S.H.; Nadeem, M.; Al Ghamdi, M.A.; Khan, R.A. Analytic review of healthcare software by using quantum computing security techniques. Int. J. Fuzzy Log. Intell. Syst. 2023, 23, 336–352. [Google Scholar]
  111. Lv, X.; Rani, S.; Manimurugan, S.; Slowik, A.; Feng, Y. Quantum-inspired sensitive data measurement and secure transmission in 5G-enabled healthcare systems. Tsinghua Sci. Technol. 2024, 30, 456–478. [Google Scholar]
  112. Boev, A.S.; Rakitko, A.S.; Usmanov, S.R.; Kobzeva, A.N.; Popov, I.V.; Ilinsky, V.V.; Kiktenko, E.O.; Fedorov, A.K. Genome assembly using quantum and quantum-inspired annealing. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 13183. [Google Scholar]
  113. Muhuri, S.; Singh, S.S. Quantum-Social Network Analysis for Community Detection: A Comprehensive Review. IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst. 2024, 11, 6795–6806. [Google Scholar]
  114. Chakraborty, S.; Shaikh, S.H.; Chakrabarti, A.; Ghosh, R. A hybrid quantum feature selection algorithm using a quantum inspired graph theoretic approach. Appl. Intell. 2020, 50, 1775–1793. [Google Scholar]
  115. Xiang, H. A mixture non-parametric regression prediction model with its application in the fault prediction of rocket engine thrust. J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 2024, 30, 120–132. [Google Scholar]
  116. Du, Y.; Wang, H.; Hennig, R.; Hulandageri, A.; Kochenberger, G.; Glover, F. New advances for quantum-inspired optimization. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 2025, 32, 6–17. [Google Scholar]
  117. Hassija, V.; Chamola, V.; Saxena, V.; Chanana, V.; Parashari, P.; Mumtaz, S.; Guizani, M. Present landscape of quantum computing. IET Quantum Commun. 2020, 1, 42–48. [Google Scholar]
  118. Nguyen, A.; Ngo, H.N.; Hong, Y.; Dang, B.; Nguyen BP, T. Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2023, 28, 4221–4241. [Google Scholar]
  119. Shankar, R. Principles of Quantum Mechanics; Springer Science & Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  120. Cohen-Tannoudji, C.; Diu, B.; Laloë, F. Quantum Mechanics Volume 2; Hermann: Paris, France, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  121. Cohen-Tannoudji, C.; Diu, B.; Laloë, F. Quantum Mechanics, Volume 3: Fermions, Bosons, Photons, Correlations, and Entanglement; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  122. Kyriazos, T.; Poga, M. Quantum-Inspired Latent Variable Modeling in Multivariate Analysis. Stats 2025, 8, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Poga, M.; Kyriazos, T.A. Alice and Bob: Quantum Short Tales; Psychometric Research, Ed.; Amazon: Seattle, WA, USA, 2023; Available online: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CM5SXLH7 (accessed on 28 March 2025).
  124. Kyriazos, T.A.; Poga, M. Quantum Mechanics and Psychological Phenomena: A Metaphorical Exploration; Psychometric Research, Ed.; Amazon: Seattle, WA, USA, 2023; Available online: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CKNLL7P7 (accessed on 28 March 2025).
Table 1. Integration of quantum principles into statistical foundations.
Table 1. Integration of quantum principles into statistical foundations.
Quantum PrincipleTraditional Statistics ApproachQuantum-Inspired ApproachSignificance/Innovation
SuperpositionTraditional models assume data points belong to one state or category exclusively.Models represent data points as superpositions, allowing simultaneous membership in multiple states with varying probabilities.Enables modeling of overlapping data structures and captures complex, multimodal distributions.
EntanglementClassical statistics use covariance matrices to capture linear dependencies between variables.Utilizes entanglement-inspired correlations to capture non-linear and phase-sensitive dependencies.Reveals hidden interdependencies and enhances the robustness of models in capturing complex relationships.
MeasurementHypothesis testing relies on real-valued probabilities without considering interactions between multiple hypotheses.Implements amplitude-based confidence measures, allowing for interference between competing hypotheses.Provides more nuanced confidence measures and improves inference accuracy by accounting for overlapping hypotheses.
WavefunctionsProbability distributions are modeled using real-valued functions without interference effects.Uses wavefunctions with complex amplitudes to model probability distributions, incorporating interference patterns.Captures wave-like fluctuations and multimodal distributions, offering a richer representation of data variability.
Density MatricesStatistical models typically use probability vectors to represent state distributions.Employs density matrices to represent both pure and mixed states, allowing for modeling statistical ensembles with complex dependencies.Encodes uncertainties and mixtures of different states more flexibly than classical probability vectors, enhancing model richness.
Table 2. Each quantum-inspired principle is applied based on its mathematical compatibility with the statistical method. Superposition is used where probabilistic states overlap, while interference is applied where probability amplitudes interact to create non-linear dependencies. These distinctions ensure that quantum-inspired modifications are applied in a structured, principled manner.
Table 2. Each quantum-inspired principle is applied based on its mathematical compatibility with the statistical method. Superposition is used where probabilistic states overlap, while interference is applied where probability amplitudes interact to create non-linear dependencies. These distinctions ensure that quantum-inspired modifications are applied in a structured, principled manner.
Quantum-Inspired PrincipleTraditional ApproachQuantum-Inspired ApproachSignificance/Innovation
Superposition and InterferenceHard clustering assigns each data point to one cluster.Soft clustering allows data points to belong to multiple clusters with probabilities.Captures overlapping and blended data patterns, improving clustering accuracy.
Entanglement and Advanced CorrelationsPearson’s correlation captures only linear dependencies.Entanglement-inspired measures capture non-linear and complex dependencies.Enhances correlation modeling by identifying hidden, intricate relationships.
Amplitude-Based ConfidenceReal-valued confidence levels in hypothesis testing.Complex amplitude-based confidence allows for interference among hypotheses.Enables more nuanced and accurate inference by accounting for hypothesis interactions.
Enhanced Variance MeasuresClassical variance assumes i.i.d. data, possibly underestimating variability.Quantum variance accounts for correlations and non-linear dependencies.Provides more accurate uncertainty estimates in complex, correlated datasets.
Coherent SamplingIndependent bootstrap samples can disrupt data dependencies.Coherent sampling preserves phase relationships and dependencies during resampling.Maintains data structure integrity, leading to more realistic synthetic datasets.
Quantum Bayesian InferenceBayesian updates treat hypotheses independently.Quantum Bayesian updates incorporate interference among hypotheses.Allows for dynamic belief updates considering multiple interacting hypotheses.
Variational Parameter OptimizationReal-valued gradients in gradient descent algorithms.Complex gradients enable the optimization of amplitude-phase relationships.Improves convergence and navigates complex parameter spaces more effectively.
Density Matrix TransformationsStatic parameter models do not account for dynamic interactions.Unitary operations dynamically evolve data distributions while preserving probabilities.Enables adaptive modeling of changing data distributions in real-time applications.
Quantum Mutual InformationClassical mutual information measures shared information.Quantum mutual information captures both classical and quantum-like dependencies.Provides a comprehensive measure of total correlations, enhancing data analysis depth.
Spin Correlation AdaptationsPearson’s coefficient assesses only linear relationships.Adapted Bell inequalities detect non-classical, entanglement-like dependencies.Identifies deeper interdependencies, offering richer insights into data structures.
Table 3. Quantum-enhanced statistical distributions compared to classical models.
Table 3. Quantum-enhanced statistical distributions compared to classical models.
Quantum-Inspired DistributionTraditional DistributionQuantum-Inspired ModificationSignificance/Innovation
Quantum Normal DistributionModels unimodal, symmetric data with independence.Incorporates complex amplitudes, allowing for multimodal distributions and interference.Captures overlapping signal sources and complex distribution shapes.
Quantum Binomial DistributionModels number of successes in independent Bernoulli trials.Introduces phase terms, enabling interference between trial outcomes and modeling dependencies.Models correlated trial outcomes, capturing realistic genetic variations.
Quantum Poisson DistributionModels independent events in fixed intervals.Adds phase terms, allowing for interference and modeling of correlated or clustered events.Represents network traffic with clustered packet arrivals more accurately.
Quantum Student’s t-DistributionUsed for small sample sizes with unknown variance, exhibits heavy tails.Incorporates wavefunction-based amplitudes, capturing heavy tails and complex dependencies.Models asset returns with extreme variability and non-linear dependencies.
Quantum Chi-Square DistributionUsed for hypothesis testing assuming variable independence.Utilizes density matrices and operator-based transformations to model dependencies and interactions.Assesses goodness-of-fit in multivariate models with interdependent variables.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kyriazos, T.; Poga, M. Quantum-Inspired Statistical Frameworks: Enhancing Traditional Methods with Quantum Principles. Encyclopedia 2025, 5, 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5020048

AMA Style

Kyriazos T, Poga M. Quantum-Inspired Statistical Frameworks: Enhancing Traditional Methods with Quantum Principles. Encyclopedia. 2025; 5(2):48. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5020048

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kyriazos, Theodoros, and Mary Poga. 2025. "Quantum-Inspired Statistical Frameworks: Enhancing Traditional Methods with Quantum Principles" Encyclopedia 5, no. 2: 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5020048

APA Style

Kyriazos, T., & Poga, M. (2025). Quantum-Inspired Statistical Frameworks: Enhancing Traditional Methods with Quantum Principles. Encyclopedia, 5(2), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5020048

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop