Next Article in Journal
Cognitive Assessment and Training in Extended Reality: Multimodal Systems, Clinical Utility, and Current Challenges
Previous Article in Journal
New Frontiers of Electronic Theses and Dissertations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Sustainable Water Management Practices in Agriculture: The Case of East Africa

by
Meseret Dawit Teweldebrihan
1,2,* and
Megersa Olumana Dinka
1
1
Department of Civil Engineering Sciences, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, APK Campus, Auckland Park, P.O. Box 524, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa
2
School of Water Resource and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Technology, Haramaya University, Dire Dawa P.O. Box 138, Ethiopia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Encyclopedia 2025, 5(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5010007
Submission received: 26 November 2024 / Revised: 6 January 2025 / Accepted: 8 January 2025 / Published: 10 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Social Sciences)

Abstract

:
This study dives into the essential issue of sustainable water management techniques in East Africa. Recognizing water as a key component of sustainable agricultural development, the study highlights the importance of a complete approach that takes into account technological, socio-economic, and environmental issues. A detailed, comprehensive review of 109 scientific research articles published between 1993 and 2024 was conducted to acquire a thorough grasp of current sustainable water resource management techniques in East Africa. This in-depth investigation sought to uncover major regional trends, challenges, and opportunities in water resource management. Furthermore, the evaluation aimed to identify specific knowledge gaps impeding the region’s implementation of sustainable water management techniques. As East Africa faces rising problems from climatic variability and change, which have a direct impact on water availability and agricultural output, the need for comprehensive policies becomes clear. The review reveals significant gaps in previous research, including a lack of focus on the socio-economic consequences of water management methods, gender dynamics, long-term assessments, indigenous knowledge integration, and climate change adaptation. By highlighting these areas, the study emphasizes the necessity of future research in addressing these gaps and developing more effective and sustainable water management solutions for East Africa.

1. Introduction

Sustainable water management in agriculture is a pressing global concern as water scarcity, environmental degradation, and food security challenges escalate. The need for effective water management practices is particularly pronounced in East Africa, a region grappling with a complex interplay of climate variability, population growth, and economic constraints [1,2]. Globally, scholars emphasize adopting sustainable water management practices to ensure long-term agricultural productivity and resilience [2,3,4]. This framework encompasses strategies, including efficient irrigation technologies, rainwater harvesting, and integrated water resource management [5,6,7].
On the other hand, the global water shortage is posing a serious danger to agricultural sustainability, especially as the world’s population grows and the demand for water resources increases [3,6]. These practices include a variety of measures, such as effective irrigation, rainwater collection, and integrated water resource management [6,7]. Thus, employing these solutions can address water scarcity concerns while also ensuring agriculture’s long-term viability. Sustainable water management in agriculture has arisen as a major global concern, particularly in East Africa, where water shortages, climate change, and population increase all offer substantial challenges to agricultural production and food security [8,9,10]. Effective water management strategies are urgently required to ensure agricultural systems’ long-term viability and community well-being. In East Africa, consisting of countries like Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Ethiopia, and Rwanda, the challenges in managing water resources for agriculture are distinct compared to global challenges due to agro-climate conditions and norms [8,9]. The region faces susceptibility to climate change-induced droughts and erratic rainfall patterns, aggravating water scarcity and impacting crop yields and livelihoods [9,11,12,13]. The East African region is especially exposed to the negative consequences of climate change, such as repeated droughts and irregular rainfall patterns [12,13]. These climate variations have a direct impact on water availability, posing considerable problems to agriculture and livelihoods [10,13,14]. The region’s poor irrigation system, which irrigates less than 2% of farmed land sustainably, exacerbates water scarcity [12,14]. Countries such as Ethiopia (1.8%), Kenya (1.7%), Tanzania (1.1%), and Uganda (0.09%), for example, confront similar restrictions despite their differences in population size. Furthermore, climate change is predicted to have a considerable impact on Ethiopia, which has a large population. Kenya and Somalia are also at risk [15,16].
The interplay of rapid population expansion, urbanization, and conflicting water needs from other industries puts further strain on already limited water resources [17,18]. The region’s susceptibility to climate change-related issues, such as rising temperatures and changed precipitation patterns, exacerbates these difficulties [16,17,18]. As a result, efficient water management methods are critical for mitigating the effects of climate change while also ensuring long-term water security for the region’s rising population.
Sustainable water management strategies are critical for resolving East Africa’s serious issues of water scarcity, environmental degradation, and rising agricultural demand [12,19,20]. Water resources can be conserved, agricultural production improved, and ecosystems protected by using a range of solutions, including effective irrigation techniques, rainwater gathering, and integrated water resource management [17,19,20]. Studies show that East African countries like Ethiopia, Kenya, and Uganda need to prioritize sustainable water resource management alongside enhanced water security. Efficient water use is a cornerstone of sustainability, and precision irrigation, rainwater collecting, and good soil moisture management are critical for increasing water use efficiency in agriculture [21,22,23]. These measures not only increase crop output, they also help to conserve water resources and ensure responsible resource management. Consequently, novel and eco-friendly irrigation techniques, such as drip and spray irrigation, are becoming increasingly essential in terms of water conservation and environmental impact [22,24,25,26]. These technologies provide better precision in encouraging a more sustainable irrigation method that is consistent with the ideals of resource conservation and environmental care. This change to more efficient irrigation technologies is critical for balancing agricultural needs and environmental conservation.
In terms of technological approach, Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) promotes a comprehensive strategy that recognizes the interconnection of water sources, land use, and ecosystem health [27,28]. IWRM frameworks promote coordinated decision-making by acknowledging the interdependence of various water usage [29,30]. This integrated strategy guarantees that water resources are allocated in a balanced and sustainable manner, taking into account the needs of different sectors as well as the environment. In the face of escalating climate change consequences, implementing climate-resilient methods is critical for long-term water management [30,31,32,33]. This includes applying adaptive strategies to adjust for shifting precipitation patterns, temperature fluctuations, and changing climatic circumstances. Climate-resilient water management strategies help agricultural systems stay sustainable by preparing them for future environmental uncertainty.
Also, inclusive and participatory techniques involving local people are also required for successful sustainable water management [34,35,36]. Engaging stakeholders in decision-making processes, recognizing indigenous knowledge, and supporting community-led initiatives all improve the social acceptability and effectiveness of water management solutions. Local communities play an important role in establishing and maintaining sustainable water management practices. A holistic approach to sustainable water management must take into account both water quality and quantity [37,38,39]. Monitoring and protecting water quality includes assessing the potential effects of agricultural activities on water bodies, reducing pollution risks, and ensuring that water resources are safe for both ecosystems and human consumption. Maintaining the availability and quality of water supplies is critical for long-term viability. As a result, good governance and policy integration are essential for adopting sustainable water management methods [38,39,40]. Effective water resource management can be achieved by establishing robust governance frameworks and implementing well-coordinated policies, ensuring that initiatives are properly executed, monitored, and enforced, thus creating an environment conducive to the flourishing of sustainable water management practices, particularly concerning water. The review study found that there is a geographic concentration on regions experiencing significant water issues, such as water scarcity, sustainable water management practices, and related issues, with approximately 65% of recent articles addressing global water concerns, with a focus on Africa and a comparative analysis of developing and developed countries [6,10,21,24,26,32]. Furthermore, developing tendencies in Asia and the Americas are discussed in the literature [8,22]. Thus, studies highlight the critical importance of water resources in the global discourse on sustainability.
The primary theme of this research is water resource management, which includes both integrated and sustainable approaches [13,21,32]. This emphasis is understandable, given the critical role water plays in sustaining many ecosystems. Water is critical to wetland and marine settings, as well as agricultural ecosystems that provide food. The growing global population and estimated growth in food demand by 2050 require a large increase in global output [13,22]. This increase could be achieved in a variety of ways, including increasing the cultivated area, intensifying production on existing land, and building integrated management systems that maximize resource usage [3,9,14]. However, different production scenarios have differing effects on water supplies. In scenarios with lower production efficiency, satisfying 2050 food demand will most certainly necessitate both an increase in water resource usage and a significant extension of cultivated area worldwide [10,17,22]. This demonstrates the interdependence of food security and water availability. Furthermore, forecasts show that increases in irrigation water usage to fulfill rising food demand will be much greater in developing countries than in industrialized countries. This mismatch reflects many developing economies’ reliance on agriculture, as well as their restricted access to efficient irrigation methods and water management infrastructure.
For millennia, East Africa’s different populations have relied on the region’s intricate network of water resources for food and survival [13,16,19,41]. These communities have a thorough awareness of their local waterways, including rivers, lakes, wetlands, and groundwater systems. This intimate knowledge has resulted in the creation of sophisticated water management methods that are suited to their unique needs and environmental situations. These initiatives did not rely exclusively on actual hydrological and technological knowledge, such as irrigation techniques or well construction. Crucially, traditional water management in East Africa was intricately linked to cultural, spiritual, and political factors [17,41]. Water sources were frequently revered, appearing in rites and celebrations that strengthened community relationships and reverence for the natural environment. Access to and control over water resources influenced social hierarchies and power relations within and across tribes [7,8,41]. These diverse areas of knowledge collaborated to create comprehensive and regionally adapted water management systems that protected livelihoods and promoted social peace. However, since the late twentieth century, East Africa’s attitude to water management has shifted dramatically [39,41]. Water is becoming a more significant component of national economic and social development projects [32,39]. Governments and organizations have made considerable expenditures on large-scale water projects with the purpose of increasing water access and boosting economic growth [6,7]. Despite decades of work and enormous financial investment, the desired outcomes have yet to be achieved [13,20]. The review identifies a significant gap in East Africa’s sustainable water management practices, which is due to a lack of integrated water resource management implementation, insufficient stakeholder and government cooperation and commitment, and an imbalance between smallholder farmers’ indigenous knowledge and contemporary approaches [16,17]. Hence, coordinated efforts at local, national, and regional levels, coupled with formulating adaptive policies that consider socio-economic and environmental dynamics, are essential for fostering a supportive and enabling environment for sustainable water management. Therefore, the review study aimed to address the essential need for sustainable water management methods in East Africa to ensure long-term agricultural output and resilience in the face of water scarcity, climate change, population growth, and economic constraints.

2. Materials and Methods

A detailed search was conducted utilizing a variety of keywords. These keywords included variations of “water management” (e.g., “water management”, “management of water”), “water use” (e.g., “water use”, “water-use”, “use of water”), and sustainability-related terms (e.g., “water management sustainability”, “sustainable water management”) Terms relating to agricultural water use (e.g., “Agricultural water”, “irrigation”) and geographical location (e.g., “East Africa”, “Africa”) were also included. The search also included Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) and related terms (e.g., “IWRM”, “Sustainable water use”, “Water allocation”). This method ensured a broad but focused retrieval of relevant literature. The use of these various keywords enabled the identification of a wide range of studies linked to the topic. The search used a combination of keywords relating to water management, sustainability, agriculture, and the geographical location of interest to capture the range of research on sustainable water resource management strategies in East Africa. This kind of keyword search is widely used in bibliometric studies, which frequently use a variety of indicators to examine and categorize the retrieved material. A comprehensive review of 109 scientific research articles published between 1993 and 2024 was performed from the selected 350 articles.
Water quality implications are frequently overlooked in present approaches to water management in East African agriculture, which is a fundamental flaw. While water quantity, or water availability, receives a lot of attention, the potential effects of agricultural activities on water quality are typically underestimated [42,43]. This narrow focus ignores the negative consequences of agricultural activities, such as nutrient runoff from fertilizers, soil degradation that causes sedimentation, and pesticide and other pollution poisoning of water sources. Effective water management techniques must be assessed holistically, taking into account their impact on both water quantity and quality [44,45]. A comprehensive approach is required to ensure that measures not only address water supply but also reduce any negative effects on human health and aquatic ecosystems.
These limitations indicate the consequences of agricultural practices on downstream water users as well as watershed health in general. Recognizing these constraints emphasizes the need for a more integrated and comprehensive approach to research on sustainable water management in East African agriculture. Therefore, tackling both water quantity and quality issues can help to establish equitable, effective, long-term solutions that benefit farmers, local people, and the environment.

2.1. Study Area

The rapidly growing population in East Africa has led to a surge in water demand, placing immense pressure on the region’s already strained water resources [46,47]. Eastern Africa’s population is currently rising at a rate of more than 2.5% per year, which ranks among the highest in the world [48,49]. This high population growth is a major factor driving up demand for water resources in the region. While countries such as Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, and those in the East Africa region are focused on meeting immediate needs, long-term challenges like climate change, inadequate water storage, and vulnerability to extreme weather events remain largely unaddressed [50]. Agriculture serves as the backbone of many East African economies, with irrigated agriculture and energy production identified as key drivers for enhancing food and nutritional security [51,52,53]. However, the region’s water scarcity poses significant challenges to the development of these sectors. As countries strive to expand their agricultural and energy capabilities, the insufficient water supply threatens to undermine these efforts and exacerbate existing water scarcity issues.

2.2. Methodology

The study used a two-pronged methodology to identify key water management concerns in East Africa. The first component involved a comprehensive literature review, which consisted of three stages. First, relevant research publications were identified in academic databases such as JSTOR, Google Scholar, Research Gate, Web of Science, AQUASTAT, and African Journals Online (AJOL). Second, these publications from academic databases were thoroughly reviewed against pre-determined exclusion criteria to confirm their relevance to the study’s objectives [54,55]. Finally, the chosen publications were thoroughly examined to extract crucial information and insights.
The methodology’s second component focuses on secondary data analysis. This method entailed extracting important indicators from these sources and assessing the trends in water management techniques over time. By combining these two techniques, the study attempted to provide a thorough understanding of East Africa’s complicated water management concerns.

2.2.1. Literature Selection Process

To ensure the relevance and quality of the included studies, a thorough screening process was used. Articles were initially evaluated based on their relevance to the study’s special emphasis on water management methods and concerns in East Africa. This entailed determining the geographical extent of the study area in order to confirm its relevance to the region of interest. Furthermore, the conceptual scope of each article was assessed to see if it provided insights into sustainable water management techniques and their components in the East African setting. Studies that went beyond the scope of water management practices were eliminated from further evaluation.
A second layer of screening was used to improve the selection of articles. This step focused on the extent to which the research took into account diverse water management techniques. The goal was to find articles that investigated the interconnection of various water management components, such as water supply, sanitation, and irrigation. Studies that focused only on a particular water management component were judged insufficient for the purposes of this study.

2.2.2. Data Extraction and Curation

Database construction was a two-step approach that entailed extracting biometric data from Scopus and manually characterizing research using the Nexus framework. The first phase, biometric data extraction, used Scopus’ automatic metadata characterization tool. This allowed for the export of a saved list of studies into a CSV file, capturing important metadata such as author names, publication year, journal title, and abstract. The second phase, study characterization, required manual curation based on a specified data registration template. Each study received a unique ID based on its Scopus metadata. Relevant data were then properly documented in designated columns of the template. This includes information about water management strategies, specific indicators, and research methodologies.

2.2.3. A Bibliometric and Post-Bibliometric Analysis of Water Management Research

A bibliometric analytic strategy was used in this comprehensive review to thoroughly evaluate the corpus of research on water management techniques [56,57]. Metadata taken from one of the top academic research platforms, the Scopus database, were analyzed. During this first stage, a comprehensive review of the publication environment was conducted, covering important elements like the publication history, temporal trends, and the most popular author-selected keywords. These data gave important insights into how this field of study has developed and what the main areas of scientific inquiry are. A more thorough post-bibliometric investigation was conducted in order to build on this fundamental understanding. During this step, the methodological approaches used in each study on water management practices were painstakingly extracted by hand. In order to provide a structured repository for additional research and synthesis, the retrieved data were methodically arranged. A thorough analysis of the various methodological frameworks employed by researchers in this field was made possible by the granular level of data collecting (Figure 1).
This comprehensive review sought to offer a thorough and nuanced grasp of the current state of knowledge on water management methods by integrating these two analytical methodologies. A macro-level viewpoint was provided by the bibliometric study, which identified broad trends and patterns in the field of research. However, by delving into the specifics of individual research, the post-bibliometric analysis allowed for a critical evaluation of the field’s methodological diversity, strengths, and shortcomings. These two complementary methods worked well together to give a strong basis for the results’ later synthesis and interpretation.

3. Results and Discussion

A review of the number of publications published between 1993 and 2024 using relevant keywords demonstrates a considerable increase in research on sustainable water management. Specifically, the volume of articles on water management, use, and related subjects, both internationally and in the East African context, has increased dramatically, rising from a mere 10 publications in 1993 to an astonishing figure of more than 200 after 2018. Figure 2 graphically illustrates the exponential increase in scholarly output within this thematic domain.
Furthermore, Figure 3 was generated to allow for a comparative examination of publishing patterns or published articles between general publications on water, water use, irrigation, water consumption, water management, and related use, as well as publications focusing on sustainable water management and integrated water resource management.

3.1. Identifying Gaps in Research on Sustainable Water Management in East African Agriculture

The field of sustainable water management in East African agriculture shows a significant increase in the number of publications. While extensive research exists on the technical aspects of water management, there is a notable lack of studies focusing on the broader implications for farmers’ livelihoods, income, and well-being [58,59,60]. This oversight hinders a comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted nature of sustainable water management and its potential repercussions on local communities. To promote the widespread adoption of sustainable water management strategies, it is crucial to investigate how these interventions affect farmers’ lives. This includes assessing their economic viability and social equity implications, ensuring that they contribute positively to agricultural productivity and the welfare of local communities. By addressing this research gap, we can gain valuable insights into the real-world impact of sustainable water management practices and develop more effective strategies to support both agricultural sustainability and rural development in East Africa.
Understanding the socio-economic dynamics is pivotal for evaluating the success and acceptance of sustainable water management strategies within East African agricultural settings. Farmers, as key stakeholders, are directly affected by these interventions, and an in-depth analysis of how such practices influence their economic viability and social well-being is imperative [61,62,63]. A study by [62,64,65] underscores the significance of considering the broader socio-economic context, emphasizing the need for a holistic evaluation that extends beyond technical efficiency to encompass the socio-economic landscape. In addition, the economic viability of sustainable water management practices is closely tied to their adoption and long-term success. A thorough investigation into the financial implications would shed light on the cost-effectiveness of these strategies, aiding policymakers and practitioners in designing interventions that are not only environmentally sustainable but also financially viable for farmers [21,65]. Moreover, it would contribute to the identification of potential barriers or challenges that may hinder the widespread adoption of sustainable water management practices across diverse socio-economic contexts within East Africa.
Social equity considerations further amplify the need for research in this domain. An in-depth exploration of the social distribution of benefits and burdens associated with sustainable water management practices is essential to ensure that these interventions contribute positively to the welfare of local communities [63,65,66]. Inclusive practices considering different social groups’ diverse needs and capacities, including marginalized populations, are critical for fostering equitable outcomes. Moreover, a nuanced understanding of the socio-economic impacts can unveil potential trade-offs and synergies between agricultural productivity and community welfare. For instance, a sustainable water management practice that enhances crop yields might positively impact farmers’ income but may also have unintended consequences on other aspects of community well-being. Only through a comprehensive analysis of the socio-economic dimensions can researchers and policymakers develop strategies that optimize agricultural productivity and local communities’ overall welfare.

3.1.1. Insufficient Attention to Gender Dynamics

A large gap exists in the sustainable water management literature for East African agriculture, particularly in Ethiopia, where gender considerations in water resource management are essentially absent, echoing a similar trend throughout other African countries. While women’s roles in crucial water-related activities, such as irrigation and water fetching, are acknowledged, their specific needs, challenges, and contributions remain marginalized in scholarly discussions [67,68,69]. This lack of attention to gender dynamics poses significant implications for the region’s effectiveness and equity of sustainable water management practices. Women’s roles in water-related tasks are often integral to agricultural processes, as highlighted by [68,69]. However, the gendered dimensions of these roles, including their impact on women’s time, health, and overall well-being, are frequently overshadowed in the existing discourse. Ignoring these dynamics can perpetuate gender inequalities and hinder the potential success of sustainable water management interventions.
Understanding how sustainable water management practices impact men and women differently is essential for developing inclusive and effective strategies. Women may face unique challenges related to access to water resources, time constraints, and the burden of multiple responsibilities. Conversely, they may also possess valuable insights into local water dynamics and contribute innovative solutions that remain untapped due to the prevailing oversight [67,70]. Acknowledging and addressing these gender-specific distinctions is a matter of social justice and a fundamental aspect of ensuring the sustainability and acceptance of water management practices.
Thus, to rectify this gap, future research endeavors should intentionally incorporate a gender lens in studying sustainable water management in East African agriculture. This involves exploring how water management practices intersect with existing gender roles, norms, and power structures. Such research should go beyond tokenistic inclusion and actively seek women’s perspectives in the community, ensuring their voices are heard and their experiences inform policy and practice. Strategies to provide equitable access to water resources must be identified and implemented. This could involve the development of targeted interventions that consider the specific needs of women, recognizing the diversity of their roles in agriculture and water management. Moreover, promoting women’s participation in decision-making processes related to water governance can contribute to more inclusive and effective policies [67,68,69,70].

3.1.2. Lack of Long-Term Impact Assessment

While numerous studies contribute valuable insights into the short-term impacts of sustainable water management practices, a notable gap exists in assessing their long-term effects on agricultural landscapes and ecosystems. Most existing literature tends to focus on immediate outcomes, such as changes in crop yields or water use efficiency, providing a limited understanding of the enduring consequences of these interventions. Comprehensive longitudinal studies are imperative to unravel sustainable water management practices’ sustained benefits and potential drawbacks over extended periods [21,59,61,71]. The authors of [21,72] underscored the importance of longitudinal studies, which advocate for a more holistic evaluation of sustainable water management practices that extend beyond short-term gains. Such studies allow researchers to trace the evolution of impacts, addressing questions related to the persistence of positive outcomes and the emergence of potential negative consequences over time. Refs. [24,73] further emphasize the need for extended timeframes in research, noting that ecological processes and adaptations to sustainable practices may unfold gradually and become apparent only in the long run.
By assessing the durability of interventions, researchers can provide nuanced recommendations beyond immediate effectiveness. Longitudinal studies enable a more robust understanding of the adaptive capacity of agricultural ecosystems to sustainable water management practices. This, in turn, aids policymakers and practitioners in formulating resilient strategies that can withstand dynamic environmental and socio-economic changes [61]. Furthermore, a comprehensive long-term assessment allows for the identification of potential trade-offs and unintended consequences. For instance, a sustainable water management practice that initially enhances crop yields may lead to shifts in land use or alterations in nutrient cycling that have adverse effects in the long run [24,71]. Understanding these complexities is vital for devising sustainable interventions that optimize agricultural productivity and environmental health. In light of these considerations, future research in sustainable water management should prioritize longitudinal studies that span multiple growing seasons and account for variations in climate and other contextual factors. Integrating such temporal dimensions into research designs will provide a more accurate depiction of the dynamic relationships between water management practices, agricultural productivity, and ecosystem health. This, in turn, will contribute to developing robust policies and practices that stand the test of time, ensuring sustainable outcomes in East African agriculture.

3.1.3. Limited Integration of Indigenous Knowledge

Integrating indigenous knowledge systems into sustainable water management practices remains a critical but frequently overlooked aspect in the current research landscape. Indigenous communities across East Africa possess unique and valuable insights into local ecosystems, water dynamics, and sustainable agricultural practices [74,75,76]. Despite this, there is a pervasive gap in acknowledging and incorporating this wealth of traditional wisdom into modern water management strategies, hindering the development of more holistic and culturally sensitive approaches to sustainability [77,78,79]. Refs. [67,78] highlight the potential benefits of integrating indigenous knowledge, emphasizing that local communities often deeply understand their environments, including seasonal patterns, soil characteristics, and water availability. Indigenous knowledge can provide valuable insights into sustainable water management practices, offering context-specific solutions rooted in the community’s socio-cultural fabric [65,76]. However, the current lack of integration often results in a disconnect between formal water management strategies and the lived experiences of indigenous communities.
Exploring ways to bridge this gap is essential for fostering more inclusive and effective sustainable water management practices. Future studies should actively engage with indigenous communities, recognizing their role as land stewards and repositories of valuable ecological knowledge [79,80]. This engagement should go beyond tokenistic inclusion, involving collaborative and participatory research approaches that empower local communities to contribute actively to the design and implementation of sustainable water management strategies [78,79]. Moreover, building partnerships between indigenous communities and external stakeholders, including researchers, policymakers, and non-governmental organizations, is crucial. Such partnerships can facilitate the co-creation of knowledge, ensuring that traditional wisdom is acknowledged and integrated into broader water management frameworks [76,80]. This collaborative approach respects the autonomy of indigenous communities and recognizes their agency in shaping sustainable water practices.
Culturally sensitive water management practices enhance the effectiveness of interventions and contribute to communities’ resilience and adaptive capacity in the face of environmental changes [77,80]. Recognizing the interconnectedness of indigenous knowledge with ecological sustainability can lead to more sustainable and contextually appropriate water management strategies that align with the values and aspirations of local communities [76,79].

3.1.4. Inadequate Consideration of Climate Change Adaptation

The vulnerability of East Africa to climate change poses a pressing challenge for agricultural sustainability, making it imperative to understand how sustainable water management practices contribute to climate change adaptation in the region. However, a significant gap exists in the literature used in this review, where the emphasis on mitigating the impacts of climate change overshadows the potential of these practices to build resilience within farming communities [21,31,81]. While many studies focus on short-term strategies to mitigate the immediate impacts of climate change, there is insufficient attention to the long-term adaptation measures that can enhance the resilience of agricultural systems in the face of evolving climatic conditions. Sustainable water management practices have the potential to address current challenges and contribute significantly to building adaptive capacity within farming communities.
Understanding the synergies between sustainable water management and climate change adaptation is crucial for developing actionable insights to inform policies and practices. Refs. [21,82] advocate for a more integrated approach, considering the intricate connections between water management, agriculture, and climate resilience. Such an approach involves optimizing water use efficiency and incorporating adaptive strategies that anticipate and respond to changing climate patterns. This integrated perspective is essential for developing comprehensive and context-specific solutions that account for the complex interactions between water availability, agricultural productivity, and climate variability. Moreover, research should explore the socio-economic dimensions of climate change adaptation through sustainable water management. Refs. [31,81] argue that understanding adaptation’s social and economic aspects is as crucial as technical solutions. Examining how these practices influence farmers’ adaptive capacity, income stability, and overall well-being is essential for designing strategies that are not only environmentally sustainable but also socially and economically inclusive [82,83].
Future studies should, therefore, delve into the specific mechanisms through which sustainable water management practices contribute to climate change adaptation in East African agriculture. This includes evaluating the role of water-efficient irrigation technologies, rainwater harvesting, and integrated water resource management in enhancing the resilience of farming systems [31,80,84]. Additionally, research should explore the potential trade-offs and co-benefits between climate change adaptation and other sustainability goals, ensuring that interventions contribute positively to multiple dimensions of agricultural and environmental well-being [21,81,85].

3.1.5. Incomplete Assessment of Water Quality Implications

This review study, which draws on existing literature and published articles from 1993 to 2024, reveals a significant trend, indicating that the majority of research on sustainable water management in agriculture focuses on water quantity issues, such as irrigation efficiency and water scarcity. This sole focus, while necessary, leaves a significant gap in our understanding of the water quality implications of sustainable agriculture practices. While maximizing water usage is critical, it is also critical to evaluate the risk of contamination caused by agricultural inputs such as fertilizers and pesticides. A full assessment of sustainable water management requires a holistic approach that takes into account both water quantity and quality, assuring the long-term health and sustainability of water resources [36,37,86]. Studies have shown that agricultural activities can contribute to water quality degradation, with the runoff of agrochemicals and nutrients into water bodies adversely affecting human health and aquatic ecosystems [37,87,88]. Neglecting the assessment of water quality implications can result in unforeseen environmental and health consequences. Therefore, a more holistic approach is needed to ensure that sustainable water management practices address quantity concerns and uphold the integrity of local water sources.
On the other hand, industrialization and mining in East Africa have had a substantial impact on long-term water resource management, particularly in agriculture [87,88]. These activities frequently result in increased water use, pollution of water bodies, and degradation of water sources [10,43]. This can lead to water scarcity, poor agricultural output, and conflict over water supplies. Mining operations can also contaminate groundwater and surface water with heavy metals and other contaminants, lowering water quality and harming both human health and agricultural practices [89,90]. To offset these negative effects, it is critical to develop sustainable water management strategies such as water conservation, irrigation efficiency, and pollution control technology. This will contribute to the availability of clean water for agriculture and other critical requirements in the region.
Refs. [35,91] highlight the need for an integrated assessment that considers the intricate connections between agricultural practices and water quality. This involves evaluating the impact of sustainable water management practices on nutrient runoff, soil erosion, and the introduction of contaminants into water bodies. Ref. [36] further stresses the importance of monitoring and modeling approaches to understand the dynamic interactions between agricultural activities and water quality over time. Future research endeavors should incorporate advanced analytical techniques to assess water quality, including identifying emerging contaminants and evaluating potential cumulative impacts on aquatic ecosystems [61,87,92]. Table 1 indicates studies conducted to address the gaps in sustainable water management in East Africa. Additionally, studies should consider the socio-economic implications of compromised water quality, as it directly affects communities dependent on these water sources for drinking and agriculture [36,93,94]. This socio-ecological perspective is essential for formulating effective and socially equitable water management strategies (Table 1).
Furthermore, the assessment of water quality implications should extend beyond traditional agricultural pollutants to encompass broader environmental considerations, such as the impact of climate change on water quality parameters [92,95]. Changes in precipitation patterns, temperature, and land use can influence the transport and fate of contaminants in water bodies, adding another layer of complexity to the relationship between agricultural practices and water quality.
Table 1. Case studies addressing gaps in sustainable water management research in East Africa.
Table 1. Case studies addressing gaps in sustainable water management research in East Africa.
Case StudyDescriptionKey PracticesReference
1. Socio-economic impact assessment in UgandaA comprehensive study evaluating the socio-economic impacts of sustainable water management practices. Assessing effects on farmers’ livelihoods, income, and overall well-being-Socio-economic impact assessment
-Community engagement and participatory approaches
[25,96,97,98]
2. Gender-inclusive water management in KenyaIn-depth exploration of gender dynamics in water management, highlighting women’s roles in water-related activities. Identifying strategies for equitable access to water resources.-Gender-sensitive water management
-Community participation and empowerment
[25,70]
3. Long-term impact assessment in EthiopiaLongitudinal study assessing sustainable water management practices’ sustained benefits and drawbacks over extended periods, providing nuanced recommendations for policymakers.-Long-term impact assessment
-Adaptive management strategies
[21,31]
4. Integration of indigenous knowledge in TanzaniaExploration of ways to integrate indigenous knowledge systems into sustainable water management practices. Enhancing the relevance and effectiveness of interventions.-Integration of indigenous knowledge
-Collaborative approaches with local communities
[25,78]
5. Climate-resilient water management in RwandaInvestigating the synergies between sustainable water management and climate change adaptation. Providing actionable insights for policymakers addressing climate-related shocks.-Climate-resilient water management
-Adaptive strategies for climate change
[31,81]
6. Policy implementation challenges in Kenya and UgandaIn-depth exploration of challenges associated with policy implementation at the ground level. Identifying barriers and strategies for effective policy translation into actionable practices.-Policy implementation challenges
-Stakeholder engagement and context-specific strategies
[34,40]

3.2. Economic Implications

Adopting technologies and strategies geared towards sustainable water use can yield economic benefits by enhancing efficiency and mitigating risks associated with water scarcity. Research by [99,100] emphasizes that sustainable water management practices, such as precision irrigation and efficient water delivery systems, contribute to cost savings for farmers. The long-term gains often outweigh the upfront investment in these technologies through improved water use efficiency and increased crop yields. This cost-effectiveness benefits individual farmers and strengthens the economic resilience of entire communities reliant on agriculture.
Furthermore, the economic benefits extend beyond direct cost savings. Sustainable water management practices contribute to agricultural systems’ overall health and productivity, promoting long-term sustainability. Studies by [21] highlight the potential for sustainable intensification of agriculture, where judicious water use leads to higher yields per unit of water input. This supports food security and contributes to the economic viability of farming communities.

3.3. Social and Environmental Impact: Exploring Sustainable Water Management’s Social and Environmental Implications

Sustainable water management practices carry economic benefits and play a pivotal role in shaping social dynamics and environmental well-being. Adopting these practices contributes to community welfare and environmental conservation, fostering a holistic approach to agriculture (Figure 4). In the social context, sustainable water management practices often involve community participation and engagement. Studies by [40] emphasize the importance of inclusive water governance, where local communities are actively involved in decision-making processes. This empowers communities and ensures that water management strategies align with their needs and priorities.
Figure 4 shows a thematic map of the review landscape, classifying articles into clusters based on shared author-nominated keywords [101,102]. The size of each cluster shows its relative importance within the field, whereas the x-axis represents the centrality of a subject, assessing its interconnection with other themes over the entire network. On the other hand, the y-axis indicates topic density, representing internal coherence and the growth of keyword links inside that cluster, whilst the x-axis represents theme centrality, indicating their larger effect and linkages to diverse research areas. Similarly, the y-axis shows increasing theme density, indicating a higher level of internal cohesiveness and development within specific research topics. This visualization technique is a useful tool for studying the changing dynamics and developing patterns in the topic of study.
Moreover, sustainable water management practices contribute to environmental conservation by mitigating the negative impacts of water use on ecosystems. Ref. [37] highlights practices that can reduce the risk of water contamination and preserve the integrity of local water sources. Protecting water quality, alongside efficient water use, ensures the availability of clean water for both agricultural and domestic purposes, positively influencing community health. In summary, sustainable water management practices’ social and environmental impact extends far beyond the immediate agricultural context. These practices promote a more sustainable and harmonious relationship between agriculture and its broader socio-environmental context by fostering community engagement and contributing to environmental conservation.

3.4. Opportunities for Improvement

3.4.1. Enhanced Socio-Economic Integration

Future interventions should focus on integrating socio-economic considerations into sustainable water management strategies. Refs. [61,103] suggest the need for comprehensive studies that assess these practices’ economic viability and social equity implications, ensuring they positively impact both agricultural productivity and local communities. Ref. [61] highlights the necessity for comprehensive economic studies that delve into the multifaceted impacts of sustainable water management practices. These assessments should go beyond the traditional focus on agricultural productivity, extending to evaluate the broader economic viability of interventions. Examining the economic implications of these practices ensures that they align with the financial realities of farmers and contribute positively to the overall economic landscape.
Sustainable water management strategies should be designed to promote social equity within local communities. Research by [70,104] underscores the importance of understanding how these practices may impact different demographic groups, particularly concerning gender dynamics. Implementing gender-sensitive approaches ensures that the benefits and burdens of sustainable water management are distributed equitably, contributing to the community’s overall well-being. In addition to economic assessments, incorporating participatory approaches in research and implementation is crucial. Engaging with local communities ensures that unique social contexts and needs are considered. This approach aligns with the findings of [78], who emphasize the importance of community involvement in decision-making processes. Participatory approaches enhance the social acceptance and effectiveness of sustainable water management practices.

3.4.2. Gender-Inclusive Approaches

The studies address and overlook gender dynamics; thus, research efforts should be directed toward understanding how sustainable water management practices impact men and women differently. Ref. [70] emphasizes the importance of gender-sensitive approaches in water management, requiring a deeper exploration of gender dimensions and strategies to ensure equitable access to water resources. Refs. [67,70] advocate for a comprehensive understanding of how sustainable water management practices affect men and women differently. Such an understanding requires an exploration of the diverse roles and responsibilities that men and women play in water-related activities. Recognizing these differences is crucial for tailoring interventions, considering both genders’ unique needs and challenges.
Women often play pivotal roles in water-related activities, such as irrigation and water fetching. However, their specific needs and challenges are frequently ignored in the design and implementation of water management strategies. Refs. [69,70] emphasize the importance of recognizing and addressing these disparities, highlighting the need for interventions that alleviate the burden on women and ensure their equitable participation in decision-making processes related to water use. Achieving gender equity in water management involves understanding existing disparities and implementing strategies to rectify them. Future research should explore and propose actionable solutions to bridge the gender gap in access to water resources. Strategies might include the development of gender-sensitive policies, capacity-building programs, and initiatives that empower women in water-related decision-making.

3.4.3. Long-Term Impact Assessment

A critical gap exists in understanding the long-term effects of sustainable water management practices. Longitudinal studies, as advocated by [21], are essential for assessing the durability of interventions and providing nuanced recommendations for policymakers and practitioners. This can ensure that solutions work initially and remain resilient over time. Ref. [21] advocates for longitudinal studies to delve into sustainable water management practices’ sustained benefits and potential drawbacks. Such studies would provide insights into how interventions evolve over time, allowing for identifying factors that contribute to their long-term success or challenges that may emerge after initial implementation.
Evaluating the durability of interventions is essential to ensure their resilience over time. As highlighted by [37], sustainable water management practices should be effective initially and resilient in the face of changing environmental conditions and societal dynamics. Longitudinal assessments enable researchers to track the adaptive capacity of these practices and recommend adjustments to enhance their long-term efficacy. Longitudinal studies contribute to the development of holistic recommendations for policymakers and practitioners. By understanding the long-term effects of sustainable water management, researchers can offer nuanced guidance beyond immediate outcomes. This is in line with the findings of [72], who emphasize the need for comprehensive assessments to inform policy decisions and ensure the sustained success of water management strategies.

3.4.4. Integration of Indigenous Knowledge

Bridging the gap between traditional wisdom and modern water management strategies is crucial for a holistic approach. Ref. [78] highlights the importance of incorporating indigenous knowledge systems, suggesting that future studies should explore ways to integrate these valuable insights to enhance the relevance and effectiveness of interventions. Indigenous communities possess valuable insights into local ecosystems and water dynamics. The study by [78] emphasizes that these insights, accumulated over generations, offer a unique understanding of the intricacies of the environment. Integrating such knowledge into sustainable water management practices can enhance the contextual relevance of interventions, ensuring they align with the specific needs and conditions of the region.
The importance of cultural sensitivity in water management is highlighted by [27], who argues that indigenous knowledge reflects the cultural context of a community. Recognizing and respecting this cultural context is crucial for the success of water management interventions. Future studies should explore ways to seamlessly integrate traditional wisdom with contemporary strategies, fostering a more holistic and culturally sensitive approach to sustainability. The incorporation of indigenous knowledge is not only about extracting insights but also about empowering local communities. Research by [37] suggests that involving communities in decision-making processes based on their traditional knowledge enhances their sense of ownership and responsibility. This participatory approach contributes to the sustainable implementation of water management practices, aligning them with the cultural values and practices of the community.

3.4.5. Climate Change Adaptation

Given East Africa’s susceptibility to climate change, research should delve into the synergies between sustainable water management and climate change adaptation. Studies by [81] emphasize the need to explore how these practices contribute to building resilience within farming communities, providing actionable insights for policymakers to address climate-related shocks. The susceptibility of East Africa to climate change necessitates a comprehensive exploration of sustainable water management practices and their role in climate change adaptation. Refs. [67,81] stress the importance of understanding how these practices build resilience within farming communities. Integrating sustainable water management strategies with climate adaptation efforts can enhance the capacity of communities to withstand and recover from climate-related shocks, ensuring the continued productivity of agricultural systems.
The works of [21,67] underscore the significance of sustainable water management in enhancing adaptive capacity. By efficiently managing water resources, communities can mitigate the impacts of changing climate patterns. As recommended by [37,66], longitudinal studies are essential for assessing the effectiveness of sustainable practices in providing long-term adaptive solutions. This approach allows for a dynamic understanding of how these strategies evolve in response to changing climate conditions. Examining the synergies between sustainable water management and climate adaptation aligns with the broader concept of climate-resilient farming. Refs. [31,65] highlight the need for strategies that address immediate climate challenges and build adaptive capacity over the long term. When integrated into climate-resilient farming practices, sustainable water management offers a multifaceted approach to addressing the complex challenges posed by climate change in East Africa. Insights derived from these studies have direct policy implications. Policies informed by research on the synergies between sustainable water management and climate adaptation, as suggested by [67,81], can guide policymakers in developing strategies that strengthen the resilience of farming communities. This involves aligning national and regional policies with sustainable water management practices to ensure a coherent and effective response to climate-related shocks.

4. Conclusions

The study identifies major gaps in research on sustainable water management in East African agriculture. These gaps limit the creation and implementation of effective and equitable policies. One important shortcoming is the lack of emphasis on the socio-economic implications of water management measures. While research frequently focuses on technical elements, it often ignores the larger social and economic ramifications, notably for farmers’ livelihoods and well-being. A greater knowledge of these effects is critical for increasing the adoption of sustainable methods. Another shortcoming is insufficient attention to gender relations. Women’s contributions to water management are typically neglected despite their major involvement in water-related activities. Research should look into how practices influence men and women differently, addressing gender-specific challenges and opportunities.
Additionally, the absence of long-term effect assessments is a big concern. Most studies focus on short-term outcomes, disregarding the long-term viability and potential unintended consequences of interventions. Longitudinal studies are required to investigate practice sustainability, long-term ecosystem impact, and potential trade-offs. On the other hand, the insufficient incorporation of indigenous knowledge represents a severe deficit. Indigenous tribes have a unique understanding of local ecosystems and water dynamics, which is sometimes overlooked in modern methodologies. Research should look into ways to apply this knowledge to long-term water management plans to improve their effectiveness and cultural sensitivity.
Subsequently, poor discussion of climate change adaptation and insufficient study of policy implementation issues are critical gaps that must be addressed. The focus of the research should be on how water management methods can help agricultural systems adapt to climate change and increase resilience. Furthermore, a better understanding of the challenges of policy implementation at the local level is required for creating effective interventions. Addressing these disparities is critical to creating equitable, effective, and long-term solutions that benefit farmers, communities, and the environment.
In conclusion, the review of sustainable water management practices in East Africa has shed light on critical dimensions that demand immediate attention for the holistic development of effective strategies. As advocated by [61], the integrated approach emphasizes the need for policies that intertwine technical considerations with socio-economic dimensions. Understanding the long-term impact, as suggested by [21,37], is crucial for ensuring the durability and resilience of interventions over time. Gender inclusivity, a theme underscored by [70,105], calls for strategies that recognize and address women’s specific needs and challenges in water-related activities. Furthermore, as highlighted by [78,84,106], incorporating indigenous knowledge systems emerges as an essential aspect of a holistic and culturally sensitive approach to sustainability.
The synergies between sustainable water management and climate change adaptation, emphasized by [21,81,107], underscore the need to develop climate-resilient farming practices. As East Africa faces increasing climate variability and change, integrating water management with adaptive strategies becomes paramount for building resilience within farming communities [108]. As we move forward, policymakers, researchers, and practitioners must heed the recommendations derived from this review. Policies should integrate socio-economic considerations, gender-inclusive strategies, and indigenous knowledge to ensure sustainable water management practices’ effectiveness and social equity. Future research directions should explore innovative technologies, cross-regional comparative studies, ecosystem-based approaches, and the dynamics of policy implementation.

5. Recommendations

In addressing the multifaceted challenges of sustainable water management in East Africa, a comprehensive set of recommendations emerges from the existing literature. Policymakers are urged to adopt an integrative approach incorporating socio-economic considerations, ensuring water management practices’ economic viability and social equity implications. Active community engagement, as advocated by [78], is crucial, necessitating participatory approaches to enhance policy effectiveness. Recognizing and rectifying gender imbalances in water management is paramount, focusing on gender-sensitive strategies to ensure equitable access and alleviate the disproportionate burden on women, as highlighted by [70]. Longitudinal studies, inspired by [21,37], should be prioritized to assess the durability of interventions and inform the development of enduring strategies for sustained agricultural productivity. Hence, studies need to intentionally incorporate a gender lens when studying sustainable water management in East African agriculture, investigating how water management practices intersect with existing gender roles, norms, and power structures. This can go beyond symbolic inclusion and actively seek women’s perspectives in the community, ensuring their voices are heard, and their experiences inform policy and practice.
Additionally, integrating indigenous knowledge, as proposed by [37,78], will enrich the relevance and effectiveness of water management practices by incorporating valuable insights from local communities. Furthermore, the analysis of the review from the gathered articles shows that the research needs to address climate change adaptation by evaluating the role of water-efficient technologies and integrated management in enhancing farming system resilience. Policymakers need to prioritize climate-resilient farming practices, building on the work of [33,81], to align sustainable water management with climate adaptation efforts, thereby enhancing the overall resilience of farming communities. In moving forward, a coherent strategy must embrace these recommendations, fostering an integrated and adaptive approach to sustainable water management in East Africa.

6. The Way Forward

There are exciting avenues for future research and development in sustainable water management. Future research can explore emerging technologies, such as precision irrigation and smart water management systems, to optimize water use efficiency and reduce wastage. As suggested by [109], conducting comparative analyses across different regions can provide a broader understanding of sustainable water management practices, allowing for identifying region-specific patterns and successes. Future research can delve into ecosystem-based approaches, incorporating insights from [37] to ensure holistic and integrated management of water resources. In line with [40], future research should focus on understanding the complexities of policy implementation. Exploring the challenges of translating policies into actionable practices will contribute to more effective interventions.

7. Limitation

The review study’s key shortcoming or limitation is its lack of emphasis on the socio-economic ramifications of water management strategies, such as their impact on farmers’ livelihoods and well-being. Furthermore, the study fails to effectively address gender relations, neglecting women’s crucial engagement in water-related activities and investigating the variations in practice between men and women. As a result, the trend and long-term effect assessments are limited since the review concentrates on short-term outcomes while overlooking the long-term viability and potential unintended consequences of projects. Furthermore, the review acknowledges limitations in incorporating indigenous knowledge and potential ideas from local communities into their ecosystems and water dynamics. Finally, the review assessment finds a gap in the topic of climate change adaptation, as well as insufficient research on policy implementation issues, both of which are crucial for developing effective and context-specific solutions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.D.T.; methodology, M.O.D. and M.D.T.; validation, M.D.T. and M.O.D.; formal analysis, M.D.T.; writing—original draft preparation, M.D.T. and M.O.D.; writing—review and editing, M.D.T.; visualization, M.O.D.; supervision M.O.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors express their gratitude for the SG-NAPI award, generously supported by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) through UNESCO-TWAS, under financial agreement number FR3240330995. The authors also extend their thanks to the University of Johannesburg for providing access to a wealth of literature review papers.

Data Availability Statement

The data used are presented in the study and further information will be made available upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Masese, M.A.; Mukhebi, A.; Gor, C. Analysis of Agricultural Extension Service Agents Information Sources and Sorghum Production in Bondo Sub County, Kenya. 2018. Available online: https://afribary.com/works/analysis-of-agricultural-extension-service-agents-information-sources-and-sorghum-production-in-bondo-sub-county-kenya (accessed on 4 March 2018).
  2. Russo, M.A.; Santarelli, D.M.; O’Rourke, D. The physiological effects of slow breathing in the healthy human. Breathe 2017, 13, 298–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Russo, T.; Alfredo, K.; Fisher, J. Sustainable water management in urban, agricultural, and natural systems. Water 2014, 6, 3934–3956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pahl-Wostl, C. Adaptive and sustainable water management: From improved conceptual foundations to transformative change. In Global Water Resources; Routledge: London, UK, 2021; pp. 175–193. [Google Scholar]
  5. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). National gender profile of agriculture and rural livelihoods–Country Gender Assessment Series; Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO): Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2019; pp. 1–84. Available online: https://openknowledge.fao.org/items/fcea84cc-958b-4bc3-b01d-5dab475f6e6a (accessed on 25 November 2024).
  6. Hasan, N.; Pushpalatha, R.; Manivasagam, V.; Arlikatti, S.; Cibin, R. Global sustainable water management: A systematic qualitative review. Water Resour. Manag. 2023, 37, 5255–5272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Amede, T.; Konde, A.A.; Muhinda, J.J.; Bigirwa, G. Sustainable farming in practice: Building resilient and profitable smallholder agricultural systems in sub-Saharan Africa. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kotir, J.H. Climate change and variability in Sub-Saharan Africa: A review of current and future trends and impacts on agriculture and food security. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2011, 13, 587–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Qadir, M.; Boers, T.M.; Schubert, S.; Ghafoor, A.; Murtaza, G. Agricultural water management in water-starved countries: Challenges and opportunities. Agric. Water Manag. 2003, 62, 165–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jain, S.; Srivastava, A.; Khadke, L.; Chatterjee, U.; Elbeltagi, A. Global-scale water security and desertification management amidst climate change. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 58720–58744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Conway, D.; Schipper, E.L.F. Adaptation to climate change in Africa: Challenges and opportunities identified from Ethiopia. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2011, 21, 227–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Conway, D.; Van Garderen, E.A.; Deryng, D.; Dorling, S.; Krueger, T.; Landman, W.; Lankford, B.; Lebek, K.; Osborn, T.; Ringler, C. Climate and southern Africa’s water–energy–food nexus. Nat. Clim. Change 2015, 5, 837–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nakawuka, P.; Langan, S.; Schmitter, P.; Barron, J. A review of trends, constraints and opportunities of smallholder irrigation in East Africa. Glob. Food Secur. 2018, 17, 196–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Okumu, B.; Kehbila, A.G.; Osano, P. A review of water-forest-energy-food security nexus data and assessment of studies in East Africa. Curr. Res. Environ. Sustain. 2021, 3, 100045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Solecki, W.; Roberts, D.; Seto, K.C. Strategies to improve the impact of the IPCC Special Report on Climate Change and Cities. Nat. Clim. Change 2024, 14, 685–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Thalheimer, L. Compounding Risks and Increased Vulnerabilities: Climate Change, Conflict, and Mobility in East Africa. In Environmental Migration in the Face of Emerging Risks: Historical Case Studies, New Paradigms and Future Directions; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023; pp. 137–153. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bedasa, Y.; Deksisa, K. Food insecurity in East Africa: An integrated strategy to address climate change impact and violence conflict. J. Agric. Food Res. 2024, 15, 100978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Njenga, M.K.; Dawa, J.; Nanyingi, M.; Gachohi, J.; Ngere, I.; Letko, M.; Otieno, C.; Gunn, B.M.; Osoro, E. Why is there low morbidity and mortality of COVID-19 in Africa? Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2020, 103, 564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Palmer, P.I.; Wainwright, C.M.; Dong, B.; Maidment, R.I.; Wheeler, K.G.; Gedney, N.; Hickman, J.E.; Madani, N.; Folwell, S.S.; Abdo, G. Drivers and impacts of Eastern African rainfall variability. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2023, 4, 254–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Teweldebrihan, M.; Dinka, M. The effect of irrigation practice and water consumption using aqua-crop. Glob. J. Environ. Sci. Manag. 2024, 40, 2099–2114. [Google Scholar]
  21. Rockström, J.; Williams, J.; Daily, G.; Noble, A.; Matthews, N.; Gordon, L.; Wetterstrand, H.; DeClerck, F.; Shah, M.; Steduto, P. Sustainable intensification of agriculture for human prosperity and global sustainability. Ambio 2017, 46, 4–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Velasco-Muñoz, J.F.; Aznar-Sánchez, J.A.; Belmonte-Ureña, L.J.; Román-Sánchez, I.M. Sustainable water use in agriculture: A review of worldwide research. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gong, X.; Zhang, H.; Ren, C.; Sun, D.; Yang, J. Optimization allocation of irrigation water resources based on crop water requirement under considering effective precipitation and uncertainty. Agric. Water Manag. 2020, 239, 106264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Falk, T.; Spangenberg, J.H.; Siegmund-Schultze, M.; Kobbe, S.; Feike, T.; Kuebler, D.; Settele, J.; Vorlaufer, T. Identifying governance challenges in ecosystem services management–Conceptual considerations and comparison of global forest cases. Ecosyst. Serv. 2018, 32, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Luo, Y.; Sophocleous, M. Two-way coupling of unsaturated-saturated flow by integrating the SWAT and MODFLOW models with application in an irrigation district in arid region of West China. J. Arid Land 2011, 3, 164–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhao, S.; Schmidt, S.; Gao, H.; Li, T.; Chen, X.; Hou, Y.; Chadwick, D.; Tian, J.; Dou, Z.; Zhang, W. A precision compost strategy aligning composts and application methods with target crops and growth environments can increase global food production. Nat. Food 2022, 3, 741–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Biswas, A.K. Integrated water resources management: A reassessment: A water forum contribution. Water Int. 2004, 29, 248–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kidanemaraim, J. Participatory integrated water resources management (IWRM) planning: Lessons from Berki Catchment, Ethiopia. In Water, Sanitation and Hygiene: Sustainable Development and Multisectoral Approaches, Proceedings of the 34th WEDC International Conference, United Nations Conference Centre, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 18–22 May 2009; Loughborough University: Loughborough, UK, 2009; pp. 326–333. [Google Scholar]
  29. FAO. AQUASTAT Database. 2015. Available online: http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/main/index.stm (accessed on 21 June 2015).
  30. Wada, Y.; Bierkens, M.F.; Roo, A.d.; Dirmeyer, P.A.; Famiglietti, J.S.; Hanasaki, N.; Konar, M.; Liu, J.; Müller Schmied, H.; Oki, T. Human–water interface in hydrological modelling: Current status and future directions. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2017, 21, 4169–4193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Thornton, P.K.; Whitbread, A.; Baedeker, T.; Cairns, J.; Claessens, L.; Baethgen, W.; Bunn, C.; Friedmann, M.; Giller, K.E.; Herrero, M. A framework for priority-setting in climate smart agriculture research. Agric. Syst. 2018, 167, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wada, Y.; Flörke, M.; Hanasaki, N.; Eisner, S.; Fischer, G.; Tramberend, S.; Satoh, Y.; Van Vliet, M.; Yillia, P.; Ringler, C. Modeling global water use for the 21st century: The Water Futures and Solutions (WFaS) initiative and its approaches. Geosci. Model Dev. 2016, 9, 175–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Madajewicz, M.; Pfaff, A.; van Geen, A.; Graziano, J.; Hussein, I.; Momotaj, H.; Sylvi, R.; Ahsan, H. Can information alone both improve awareness and change behavior? Arsenic contamination of groundwater in Bangladesh. J. Dev. Econ. 2007, 84, 731–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mollinga, P.P. Boundary work and the complexity of natural resources management. Crop Sci. 2010, 50, S-1–S-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pande, S.; Roobavannan, M.; Kandasamy, J.; Sivapalan, M.; Hombing, D.; Lyu, H.; Rietveld, L. A Socio-Hydrological Perspective on the Economics of Water Resources Development and Management. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  36. Adams, S.; Acheampong, A.O. Reducing carbon emissions: The role of renewable energy and democracy. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 240, 118245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Van Meter, K.; Van Cappellen, P.; Basu, N. Legacy nitrogen may prevent achievement of water quality goals in the Gulf of Mexico. Science 2018, 360, 427–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Masscheleyn, P.H.; Patric, W.H., Jr. Biogeochemical processes affecting selenium cycling in wetlands. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. Int. J. 1993, 12, 2235–2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Providoli, I.; Zeleke, G.; Kiteme, B.; Heinimann, A.; von Dach, S.W. From Fragmented to Integrated Knowledge for Sustainable Water and Land Management and Governance in Highland–Lowland Contexts. Mt. Res. Dev. 2017, 37, 377–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lankford, A.; Adkins, K.G.; Madfis, E. Are the deadliest mass shootings preventable? An assessment of leakage, information reported to law enforcement, and firearms acquisition prior to attacks in the United States. J. Contemp. Crim. Justice 2019, 35, 315–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bender, M.V. Water Management in East Africa; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Iyiola, A.O.; Kolawole, A.S.; Ajayi, F.O.; Ogidi, O.I.; Ogwu, M.C. Sustainable water use and management for agricultural transformation in Africa. In Water Resources Management for Rural Development; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024; pp. 287–300. [Google Scholar]
  43. Andres, L.; Bryson, J.R.; Bakare, H.; Pope, F. Institutional logics and regional policy failure: Air pollution as a wicked problem in East African cities. Environ. Plan. C Politics Space 2023, 41, 313–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jayasinghe, G.; Perera, T.; Perera, H.; Karunarathne, H.; Manawadu, L.; Weerasinghe, V.; Sewwandi, B.; Haroon, M.; Malalgoda, C.; Amaratunga, D. A systematic literature review on Integrating disaster risk reduction (DRR) in sustainable tourism (SusT): Conceptual framework for enhancing resilience and minimizing environmental impacts. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2024, 111, 104742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gemechu, E.; Arsano, Y. Towards Transboundary Water Management Policy Regime in the Eastern Nile Basin for Sustainable Water Use and Conservation. East Afr. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 2023, 8, 17–32. [Google Scholar]
  46. Tinazzi, I. Water Scarcity, Migrations and Climate Change: An Assessement of Their Nexus; Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia: Venezia, Italy, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  47. Valjarevic, A. Population Dynamics and Water Stress: Analyzing Impacts on Africa’s River Systems Through GIS and Spatial Analysis. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385572749_Population_Dynamics_and_Water_Stress_Analyzing_Impacts_on_Africa%27s_River_Systems_Through_GIS_and_Spatial_Analysis (accessed on 12 January 2024).
  48. Tuyishimire, A.; Liu, Y.; Yin, J.; Kou, L.; Lin, S.; Lin, J.; Kubwimana, J.J.; Moharrami, K.; Simbi, C.H. Drivers of the increasing water footprint in Africa: The food consumption perspective. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 809, 152196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Nikiel, C.A.; Eltahir, E.A. Past and future trends of Egypt’s water consumption and its sources. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. du Plessis, A. Water resources from a global perspective. In South Africa’s Water Predicament: Freshwater’s Unceasing Decline; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023; pp. 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  51. Urugo, M.M.; Yohannis, E.; Teka, T.A.; Gemede, H.F.; Tola, Y.B.; Forsido, S.F.; Tessema, A.; Suraj, M.; Abdu, J. Addressing post-harvest losses through agro-processing for sustainable development in Ethiopia. J. Agric. Food Res. 2024, 18, 101316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mbene, K.; Alakeh, N.M.; Asongwe, G.A.; Fomenky, N.N.; Nkenganang, M.C.A.; Tening, A.S. Assessment of the Soil Resources of Sub-Saharan Africa in Relation to Food Security: Perspectives Past, Present, and Future. In Soil Constraints and Productivity; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2023; pp. 553–580. [Google Scholar]
  53. Tom, T.; Nirmala, M.; Kumar, N.S.; Reshmi, U. Unveiling the Agricultural Growth Catalyst: A Review on the Importance of Public Expenditure in the Agriculture. In Anticipating Future Business Trends: Navigating Artificial Intelligence Innovations; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2024; Volume 2, p. 243. [Google Scholar]
  54. Ridwan, Q.; Wani, Z.A.; Anjum, N.; Bhat, J.A.; Hanief, M.; Pant, S. Human-wildlife conflict: A bibliometric analysis during 1991–2023. Reg. Sustain. 2023, 4, 309–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Šlibar, B.; Oreški, D.; Begičević Ređep, N. Importance of the open data assessment: An insight into the (meta) data quality dimensions. Sage Open 2021, 11, 21582440211023178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Choi, W.; Yoon, H.-M.; Hyun, M.-H.; Lee, H.-J.; Seol, J.-W.; Lee, K.D.; Yoon, Y.J.; Kong, H. Building an annotated corpus for automatic metadata extraction from multilingual journal article references. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0280637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nasir, T.; Raina, D.I.; Wani, Z.A.; Ridwan, Q.; Hanief, M.; Pant, S.; Rawat, Y.S. A bibliometric analysis of wildlife tourism research from 1991–2022. Front. Sustain. Tour. 2024, 3, 1393525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nicol, A.; Langan, S.; Victor, M.; Gonsalves, J. Water-Smart Agriculture in East Africa; IWMI: Colombo, Sri Lanka, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  59. Mekonen, A.; Awualchew, S. Assessment of the performance of selected irrigation schemes in Ethiopia. Z. Für Bewässerungswirtschaft 2009, 44, 121–142. [Google Scholar]
  60. Ani, K.J.; Jungudo, M.M.; Ojakorotu, V. Aqua-conflicts and hydro-politics in Africa: Unfolding the role of African Union water management interventions. J. Afr. Union Stud. 2018, 7, 5–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mekonnen, M.M.; Gerbens-Leenes, W. The water footprint of global food production. Water 2020, 12, 2696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Dawit, M. A socio-hydrological approach for assessing the Eco-system sustainability of water resource development; Abbay/Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. In Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, Vienna, Austria, 4–13 April 2018; p. 5173. [Google Scholar]
  63. Zewdie, M.C.; Van Passel, S.; Moretti, M.; Annys, S.; Tenessa, D.B.; Ayele, Z.A.; Tsegaye, E.A.; Cools, J.; Minale, A.S.; Nyssen, J. Pathways how irrigation water affects crop revenue of smallholder farmers in northwest Ethiopia: A mixed approach. Agric. Water Manag. 2020, 233, 106101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Dawit, M.; Dinka, M.O.; Leta, O.T.; Muluneh, F.B. Impact of Climate Change on Land Suitability for the Optimization of the Irrigation System in the Anger River Basin, Ethiopia. Climate 2020, 8, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Teweldebrihan, M.D.; Pande, S.; McClain, M. The dynamics of farmer migration and resettlement in the Dhidhessa River Basin, Ethiopia. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2020, 65, 1985–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Dawit, M.; Dinka, M.O.; Leta, O.T. Implications of Adopting Drip Irrigation System on Crop Yield and Gender-Sensitive Issues: The Case of Haramaya District, Ethiopia. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2020, 6, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Dawit, M.; Dinka, M. Farmer’s Perception of Climate Change with Gender-Sensitive for Optimized Irrigation in a Compound Surface-Groundwater System. J. Water Land Dev. 2022, 52, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ambaw, G.; Tadesse, M.; Mungai, C.; Kuma, S.; Radeny, M.; Tamene, L.; Solomon, D. Gender Assessment for Women’s Economic Empowerment in Doyogena Climate-Smart Landscape in Southern Ethiopia. 2019. Available online: https://gender.cgiar.org/publications/gender-assessment-womens-economic-empowerment-doyogena-climate-smart-landscape (accessed on 1 December 2019).
  69. Ogato, G.S.; Boon, E.K.; Subramani, J. Improving access to productive resources and agricultural services through gender empowerment: A case study of three rural communities in Ambo District, Ethiopia. J. Hum. Ecol. 2009, 27, 85–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Doss, C.R. Women and agricultural productivity: Reframing the Issues. Dev. Policy Rev. 2018, 36, 35–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Rockström, J.; Falkenmark, M. Agriculture: Increase water harvesting in Africa. Nature 2015, 519, 283–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Javaid, M.; Haleem, A.; Khan, I.H.; Suman, R. Understanding the potential applications of Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture Sector. Adv. Agrochem 2023, 2, 15–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Falkenmark, M.; Rockström, J.; Karlberg, L. Present and future water requirements for feeding humanity. Food Secur. 2009, 1, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. McDermot, E.; Agdas, D.; Rodríguez Díaz, C.R.; Rose, T.; Forcael, E. Improving performance of infrastructure projects in developing countries: An Ecuadorian case study. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 2022, 22, 2469–2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Molnár, Z.; Berkes, F. Role of traditional ecological knowledge in linking cultural and natural capital in cultural landscapes. In Reconnecting Natural and Cultural Capital: Contributions from Science and Policy; Paracchini, M.L., Zingari, P.C., Blasi, C., Eds.; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2018; pp. 183–193. Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/6a0efd09-0d4d-11e8-966a-01aa75ed71a1 (accessed on 4 July 2018).
  76. Berkes, F. Sacred Ecology; Routledge: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  77. Reid, R.S.; Nkedianye, D.; Said, M.Y.; Kaelo, D.; Neselle, M.; Makui, O.; Onetu, L.; Kiruswa, S.; Kamuaro, N.O.; Kristjanson, P. Evolution of models to support community and policy action with science: Balancing pastoral livelihoods and wildlife conservation in savannas of East Africa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 4579–4584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Reid, A.J.; Carlson, A.K.; Creed, I.F.; Eliason, E.J.; Gell, P.A.; Johnson, P.T.; Kidd, K.A.; MacCormack, T.J.; Olden, J.D.; Ormerod, S.J. Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity. Biol. Rev. 2019, 94, 849–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Turner, N.A.; Sharma-Kuinkel, B.K.; Maskarinec, S.A.; Eichenberger, E.M.; Shah, P.P.; Carugati, M.; Holland, T.L.; Fowler Jr, V.G. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: An overview of basic and clinical research. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 203–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Díaz, S.; Demissew, S.; Carabias, J.; Joly, C.; Lonsdale, M.; Ash, N.; Larigauderie, A.; Adhikari, J.R.; Arico, S.; Báldi, A. The IPBES Conceptual Framework—Connecting nature and people. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2015, 14, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Makate, C. Local institutions and indigenous knowledge in adoption and scaling of climate-smart agricultural innovations among sub-Saharan smallholder farmers. Int. J. Clim. Change Strateg. Manag. 2020, 12, 270–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ariom, T.O.; Dimon, E.; Nambeye, E.; Diouf, N.S.; Adelusi, O.O.; Boudalia, S. Climate-smart agriculture in African countries: A Review of strategies and impacts on smallholder farmers. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Machiwal, D.; Jha, M.K. Hydrologic Time Series Analysis: Theory and Practice; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  84. Bernards, N. The World Bank, Agricultural Credit, and the Rise of Neoliberalism in Global Development. New Political Econ. 2022, 27, 116–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Hagedorn, M.; Karahan, F.; Manovskii, I.; Mitman, K. Unemployment Benefits and Unemployment in the Great Recession: The Role of Macro Effects; National Bureau of Economic Research: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  86. Wu, L.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, G.; Xu, Y.J.; Tan, Z. Integrating the JRC Monthly Water History Dataset and Geostatistical Analysis Approach to Quantify Surface Hydrological Connectivity Dynamics in an Ungauged Multi-Lake System. Water 2021, 13, 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wu, Q.; Lane, C.R.; Li, X.; Zhao, K.; Zhou, Y.; Clinton, N.; DeVries, B.; Golden, H.E.; Lang, M.W. Integrating LiDAR data and multi-temporal aerial imagery to map wetland inundation dynamics using Google Earth Engine. Remote Sens. Environ. 2019, 228, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Calhoun, A.J.; Mushet, D.M.; Bell, K.P.; Boix, D.; Fitzsimons, J.A.; Isselin-Nondedeu, F. Temporary wetlands: Challenges and solutions to conserving a ‘disappearing’ ecosystem. Biol. Conserv. 2017, 211, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Padhiary, M.; Kumar, R. Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Agriculture, Industrial Operations, and Mining on Agro-Ecosystems. In Smart Internet of Things for Environment and Healthcare; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2024; pp. 107–126. [Google Scholar]
  90. Mvile, B.N.; Bishoge, O.K. Mining and sustainable development goals in Africa. Resour. Policy 2024, 90, 104710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Van Emmerik, T.; Li, Z.; Sivapalan, M.; Pande, S.; Kandasamy, J.; Savenije, H.; Chanan, A.; Vigneswaran, S. Socio-hydrologic modeling to understand and mediate the competition for water between agriculture development and environmental health: Murrumbidgee River basin, Australia. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2014, 18, 4239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Ma, T.; Sun, S.; Fu, G.; Hall, J.W.; Ni, Y.; He, L.; Yi, J.; Zhao, N.; Du, Y.; Pei, T. Pollution exacerbates China’s water scarcity and its regional inequality. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Awulachew, S.B. Irrigation potential in Ethiopia: Constraints and opportunities for enhancing the system. Gates Open Res. 2019, 3, 22. [Google Scholar]
  94. Aldababseh, A.; Temimi, M.; Maghelal, P.; Branch, O.; Wulfmeyer, V. Multi-criteria evaluation of irrigated agriculture suitability to achieve food security in an arid environment. Sustainability 2018, 10, 803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Adgolign, T.B.; Rao, G.S.; Abbulu, Y. Evaluation of Existing Environmental Protection Policies and Practices vis-à-vis Sustainable Water Resources Development in Didessa Sub-basin, West Ethiopia. Nat. Environ. Pollut. Technol. 2016, 15, 385. [Google Scholar]
  96. Guido, Z.; Finan, T.; Rhiney, K.; Madajewicz, M.; Rountree, V.; Johnson, E.; McCook, G. The stresses and dynamics of smallholder coffee systems in Jamaica’s Blue Mountains: A case for the potential role of climate services. Clim. Change 2018, 147, 253–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Mekonnen, A. Economic costs of climate change and climate finance with a focus on Africa. J. Afr. Econ. 2014, 23, ii50–ii82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ahmed, Z.S.-Y.; Nigatu, L.; Mekonnen, E. Tree Species Diversity in Smallholder Coffee Farms of Bedeno District, Eastern Hararghe Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. Eur. J. Biophys. 2021, 9, 72–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Foster, T.; Mieno, T.; Brozović, N. Satellite-based monitoring of irrigation water use: Assessing measurement errors and their implications for agricultural water management policy. Water Resour. Res. 2020, 56, e2020WR028378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Hunt, R.J.; Hayashi, M.; Batelaan, O. Ecohydrology and Its Relation to Integrated Groundwater Management. In Integrated Groundwater Management; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 297–312. [Google Scholar]
  101. Aria, M.; Cuccurullo, C. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J. Informetr. 2017, 11, 959–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Forliano, C.; De Bernardi, P.; Yahiaoui, D. Entrepreneurial universities: A bibliometric analysis within the business and management domains. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 165, 120522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Mekonnen, Z.; Sintayehu, G.; Hibu, A.; Andualem, Y. Performance Evaluation of Small-Scale Irrigation Scheme: A Case Study of Golina Small-Scale Irrigation Scheme, North Wollo, Ethiopia. Water Conserv. Sci. Eng. 2022, 7, 491–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Keane, J.; Page, S.; Kennan, J. Climate Change and Developing Country Agriculture; International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  105. Bannor, F. Agriculture, Climate Change and Technical Efficiency: The Case of Sub-Saharan Africa. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  106. Noszczyk, T.; Cegielska, K.; Rogatka, K.; Starczewski, T. Exploring green areas in Polish cities in context of anthropogenic land use changes. Anthr. Rev. 2022, 10, 20530196221112137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. World Bank. Total Estimated Population of Major Towns; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  108. Kiogora, J.; Kagabo, D.M.; Byandaga, L.; Mvuyibwami, P.; Singh, M.; Nchanji, E.; Ngige, C.M.; Gatsinzi, P.; Ntwari, N. Enhancing Climate Change Resilience in East Africa Project (ECREA): Newsletter; CGIAR: Montpellier, France, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  109. White, S.; Robinson, J.; Cordell, D.; Jha, M.; Milne, G. Urban Water Demand Forecasting and Demand Management: Research Needs Review and Recommendations; Water Services Association of Australia Inc.: Docklands, Victoria, 2003. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Methodology for the analysis.
Figure 1. Methodology for the analysis.
Encyclopedia 05 00007 g001
Figure 2. The trend of the number of articles published on water-related areas.
Figure 2. The trend of the number of articles published on water-related areas.
Encyclopedia 05 00007 g002
Figure 3. A comparison of the number of articles published on IWRM, water, and related topics.
Figure 3. A comparison of the number of articles published on IWRM, water, and related topics.
Encyclopedia 05 00007 g003
Figure 4. The landscape of the thematic review.
Figure 4. The landscape of the thematic review.
Encyclopedia 05 00007 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Teweldebrihan, M.D.; Dinka, M.O. Sustainable Water Management Practices in Agriculture: The Case of East Africa. Encyclopedia 2025, 5, 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5010007

AMA Style

Teweldebrihan MD, Dinka MO. Sustainable Water Management Practices in Agriculture: The Case of East Africa. Encyclopedia. 2025; 5(1):7. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5010007

Chicago/Turabian Style

Teweldebrihan, Meseret Dawit, and Megersa Olumana Dinka. 2025. "Sustainable Water Management Practices in Agriculture: The Case of East Africa" Encyclopedia 5, no. 1: 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5010007

APA Style

Teweldebrihan, M. D., & Dinka, M. O. (2025). Sustainable Water Management Practices in Agriculture: The Case of East Africa. Encyclopedia, 5(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5010007

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop