Next Article in Journal
Distribution of Salts in Milk and Cheese: Critical Methodological Aspects
Previous Article in Journal
Loyalty in Islam: A Critical Survey
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Entry

The 1H HR-NMR Methods for the Evaluation of the Stability, Quality, Authenticity, and Shelf Life of Foods

by
Gianfranco Picone
Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL), University of Bologna, Piazza Goidanich 60, 47521 Cesena, FC, Italy
Encyclopedia 2024, 4(4), 1617-1628; https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4040106
Submission received: 29 August 2024 / Revised: 21 October 2024 / Accepted: 28 October 2024 / Published: 29 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Chemistry)

Definition

:
1H High-Resolution Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (1H HR-NMR) spectroscopy is a powerful analytical methodology used in various fields, including food science. In the food science field, NMR combined with the principles of metabolomics can provide detailed information about a food’s molecular composition, structure, dynamics, and interactions within food matrices, making it invaluable for assessing changes during storage, processing, and shelf life. This entry aims to list the main applications of one-dimensional 1H HR-NMR methods in the field of food science, such as their use in the assessment of the stability, quality, authenticity, and shelf life of food samples. Several kinds of foods are taken into consideration to give a huge overview of the potentiality of the methods.

1. Introduction

1H High-Resolution Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (1H HR-NMR) spectroscopy is a versatile analytical methodology that exploits the magnetic properties of certain atomic nuclei. It has widespread applications in different scientific areas, such as chemistry [1], biochemistry [2,3], medicine [4,5,6], and materials science [7]. In recent decades, this methodology has also been largely used in the fields of health, environment, and food science, with a high amount of research papers produced [8,9,10]. In these fields, the nuclear methodology is often combined with the principles of metabolomics [11], where the metabolic profile of a biological system (e.g., cells, tissues, or biofluids) is studied. The so-called NMR-based metabolomics approach helps in identifying and quantifying small molecules, providing insights into metabolic pathways and changes in response to various external conditions [12]. NMR-based metabolomics has several unique advantages over other metabolomics techniques such as gas chromatography (GC) and mass spectrometry (MS), which is why it is increasingly being adopted in various fields. First of all, it is a more uniform detection system and can be used directly for the identification and quantification of metabolites, even in vivo [11]. Its non-destructive nature, relatively short times, and ability to measure samples such as urine directly are the most promising features of NMR. Another major advantage of NMR is the ease of quantifying all compounds, since a single internal standard can quantify all degraded metabolites without requiring calibration curves for each compound. Finally, the NMR specimen needs no physical or chemical treatment before analysis, only the adjustment of solution conditions such as temperature, pH, and salt concentration [11]. In the latter case, general sample preparation (biological or food) involves three basic steps: (1) The first step involves rapid sample collection and freezing to quench metabolism and preserve metabolites. Samples are typically stored at −80 °C to avoid degradation. (2) The second step involves extracting methods. The choice of extraction method depends on the function and the polarity of the metabolites to be extracted. If both polar and lipophilic metabolites are to be extracted, methanol and chloroform extraction can be used to separate metabolite classes. (3) Optimization of the solution for NMR spectroscopy is the third step. This typically involves buffering the pH of the sample to minimize chemical shift variation of the NMR resonance (e.g., 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH = 7.00), adding deuterium oxide (D2O) to provide frequency locking to the spectrometer, and adding an internal chemical shift (and intensity) standard such as sodium 3-(trimethylsilyl)propionate 2,2,3,3-d4 (TSP) [11]. In food science, the NMR-based metabolomics approach is also known as Foodomics [13]. It can be employed for several applications which include, above all, analyzing the composition and measuring the physicochemical properties and functionality of food matrices [9]. Laghi et al. [13] clearly explain the reason why, in several areas of the food industry and food science, a Foodomics approach can be adopted, and the main reason is that the metabolome can be considered the last step of the omics pathway, which includes the genome, transcriptome, and proteome. Thus, it is the best representation of a food’s phenotype, providing a significant view of all the metabolites that may have an effect on or interact with the organism [13]. There is another important aspect that can and must be taken into consideration when dealing with NMR spectroscopy in the Foodomics field: it can be employed for the evaluation of the stability, quality, authenticity, and shelf life of food samples. This is highly important based on the increased demand from consumers for high-quality foods, quality that should be guaranteed during the period between purchase and consumption [14]. In the narrative review by Ciampa et al. [8], the authors perfectly explain the advantages of using 1H-NMR metabolomics in food quality determination compared to other traditional methods, and why the food industry should pay attention to this emerging approach. First, the NMR method can assess and guarantee the quality of foodstuff through its capability to offer qualitative, as well as quantitative, knowledge about food samples, with high reproducibility. At the same time, compared with the other methods, it is more green, as it operates following the green chemistry guidelines for sample preparation [8]. NMR provides direct, non-destructive information on sample composition and concentration with confidence. Due to (1) the low cost per sample, (2) minimal sample preparation, (3) the simultaneous identification and quantification of compounds, (4) the combination of targeted and non-targeted analysis to ensure the presence of intended ingredients and the absence of impurities or adulterants, and (5) the advanced statistical models available to assess authenticity of origin, species purity, adulteration, production process control, sample similarity, etc., NMR is becoming a strategic tool for industries to assess and ensure food safety and quality to avoid fraud, contamination, adulteration, etc. Thus, this entry aims to give a summary and an overview of the applications of one-dimensional (1D) 1H HR-NMR in the field of food quality analysis, also including food stability, authenticity, and shelf life, exploring, above all, two of the most used approaches in the food science field.

2. The 1H HR-NMR Methods

NMR can provide detailed information about the molecular structures, compositions, and dynamics of the compounds present in a sample [15,16]. For example, some general methods used in NMR’s application, including during the assessment of the stability, quality, authenticity, and shelf life of food samples, are listed here: (1) Chemical Shift Analysis (CSA) [17]. Each type of nucleus in a molecule (N, C, H, and P) gives rise to a characteristic set of Chemical Shifts (CSs) in the NMR spectrum. In Organic Chemistry, a CS refers to the position of an NMR signal in relation to a standard reference signal, such as the TSP. It is measured in parts per million (ppm) and indicates the electronic environment surrounding a specific atom. CSs are highly reproducible, sensitive parameters with far-reaching utility in characterizing the structure and dynamics of a diverse range of biomolecules [18]. By comparing the chemical shift values observed in the NMR spectrum of a food sample to reference data or databases, it is possible to identify the types of compounds present. The chemical shift values are influenced by the electronic environment of the nuclei and can be indicative of the molecular structure. In NMR spectra, CSs are also sensitive to changes in molecular environments, providing information about the type and location of atoms within a molecule. Monitoring changes in chemical shifts over time can reveal alterations in the composition of food sample extracts and identify potential degradation products [19]. By acquiring NMR spectra of food samples at different time points, any shifts in the chemical shift values that indicate changes in the molecular composition or structure can be monitored. At the same time, it is necessary to keep in mind that factors such as pH, the presence of paramagnetic cations, and ionic strength often cause variations in CSs, which can be problematic for data analysis [9].
CSA helps to assess the quality of food samples by confirming the absence or presence of certain expected compounds. Unexpected peaks or shifts may indicate contamination or the presence of unwanted compounds. In summary, the use of chemical shift analysis in NMR for food analysis serves as a powerful tool for the qualitative assessment of food samples. (2) Peak Intensity and Area Analysis. In an NMR spectrum, especially in 1D experiments, each peak’s size is representative of the number of nuclei that compete in the characterization of that peak. The evaluation of the peak’s size is possible through an integration method that measures the area under the peak. It is also possible to obtain relative information about the number of nuclei without adopting an integration method: A single signal associated, for example, with three hydrogen atoms would be about three times larger than a single signal associated with a single hydrogen atom. This intensity is proportional to the area under the peak [20], and exists when the considered chemical groups of the same molecule have the same concentration.
The area under an NMR peak is calculated by integrating the signal over a specific range of frequencies. This area represents the total number of nuclei contributing to that particular signal [21]. The integration process involves summing up the individual intensities (signal heights) at each point within the peak. In general, the area under an NMR peak is a more reliable measure of the quantity of a particular species in the sample compared to peak height, as it accounts for the entire signal. However, for qualitative analysis, peak heights are often used as they are easier to measure directly from the spectrum. Changes in peak intensity or integrated peak areas indicate variations in the concentrations of specific compounds [22]. It is important to note that while peak intensity and area correlate with the abundance of nuclei in the sample, they do not directly provide quantitative information about the concentration of the corresponding compound unless the sample concentration is known and properly calibrated [23,24]. For quantitative analysis, additional techniques are typically employed. For accurate quantification, an internal standard of known concentration and purity is usually added to the sample [23,24]. The ratio of the integrated signal of the analyte to the internal standard is used to calculate the concentration of the analyte. The internal standard should ideally have a non-overlapping signal with the analyte, be chemically inert, and have similar relaxation properties to the analyte. External calibration curves are often used to relate the signal intensity of the analyte to its concentration. This involves running a series of standards with known concentrations through the sample and plotting the integrated signal against the concentration.

3. Chemical Shift Analysis (CSA) for Food Analysis

CSA can indeed be applied to evaluate the stability of food samples, encompassing their quality, authenticity, and shelf life. It can be useful for the following aspects: (1) the identification of components, providing a fingerprint of the sample; (2) monitoring changes in molecular profile composition; and (3) structural elucidation in combination with other NMR experiments such as bidimensional (2D) NMR spectroscopy. In summary, chemical shift analysis in NMR spectroscopy can be a valuable tool for monitoring food samples by providing insights into changes in the compositions, structures, and concentrations of key components [25]. When we deal with all these aspects concerning foods, NMR by itself is not enough, and it becomes necessary to couple it with metabolomics, which is mainly used for the discrimination of sample groups or to highlight significant clusters of unknown samples by using statistical models [26]. The latter may be either targeted (supervised), untargeted (unsupervised), or both, according to the specific application [27]. The supervised method focuses on molecular compound identification by comparing the 1D 1H NMR spectrum of a metabolite mixture with a 1D 1H NMR spectrum contained in a specific database such as Chenomx (https://www.chenomx.com/ (accessed on 29 August 2024)). Generally, further validation can be performed through the acquisition of the 2D NMR spectra [28]. The unsupervised metabolomics method is based on the appropriate identification of a defined set of metabolites in samples (biological or food samples) [28] to build up a molecular dataset composed of the assigned metabolites. The molecular dataset is then analyzed by using specific statistical data analysis tools or packages (see, for example, R Project for Statistical Computing) to verify how well-targeted metabolites contribute to separating the control group from the rest of the experiment (the phenotype of interest group) [28]. Untargeted studies aim to compare, measure, and identify as many signals as possible in a set of spectra, and generally, the metabolite ID’s identification of these signals is performed using databases [28]. This approach is very interesting, above all, in the identification of unknown biomarkers in research studies [28]. Unfortunately, a lot of signals detected in untargeted studies cannot be identified since their spectra are not present in databases, although these are constantly expanded by new metabolites. Correlating changes in chemical shifts with stability parameters enables researchers to assess the quality, stability, authenticity, and shelf life of food products. For example, Ciampa and Picone [29] developed a model able to predict the kinetics of the evolution of different compounds related to fish freshness using fish stored at different temperatures by exploiting chemical shift analysis in 1H HR-NMR-based metabolomics approach experiments.
The quality and the freshness of fish are highly perishable and, thus, fish food samples are characterized by a short shelf life. The storage temperature of the fish and the time between the catching and the storage in the fish market are fundamental parameters that can both define and influence the degree of freshness, and as a consequence, the nutritional quality too. Through both chemical and physical indices it is possible to estimate the freshness and the quality of food, as described by Ciampa and Picone [29]. In this research work, the authors highlighted how different temperatures during storage and shelf life (+4 °C and 0 °C) affected the metabolic profile of two species of fish samples: red mullet (Mullus barbatus) and bogue (Boops boops). In particular, 1H HR-NMR was used to study how the metabolic profile changed during fish spoilage. The kinetic model was estimated using HR-NMR spectroscopy data and it was useful to predict how different compounds related to fish freshness, such as trimethylamine (TMA-N), change over time. TMA is known to be a volatile compound responsible for the characteristic “fishy” odor and is often associated with seafood. It is produced by the degradation of trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), which is naturally present in fish and other marine organisms. TMAO is converted to TMA by enzymes produced by bacteria present in the fish, or by endogenous enzymes released upon tissue damage or spoilage [30]. Temperature, pH, storage conditions, and the presence of bacteria are factors that influence the rate of TMA formation in fish. The formation of TMA is often considered an indicator of fish freshness. Fresh fish typically have low levels of TMA, while higher levels indicate the onset of spoilage. Therefore, TMA levels are frequently used as a quality control measure in the seafood industry. Consumption of fish with elevated levels of TMA may lead to an unpleasant odor and taste (Figure 1). Moreover, its presence in spoiled fish can be an indication of potentially harmful bacterial growth, which could pose health risks if consumed. Thus, to ensure food safety and quality, it is essential to handle and store fish properly, maintaining appropriate temperatures and minimizing the time between catch and consumption. Additionally, cooking fish thoroughly can help mitigate the risk of consuming harmful bacteria and reduce the formation of TMA. The determination and quantification of TMA, according to the AOAC Internation, is performed by using a colorimetric reference method. Together with TMA, the exploitation of Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP) catabolites is also an indicator of freshness; in this context, we talk about the K-index, which is usually determined by HPLC [24]. In another paper by Ciampa et al. [31], a monodimensional NMR methodology was adopted for aqueous fish extracts as an alternative method to assess both freshness indexes: TMA and K-index. According to EuroChem guidelines, requirements such as linearity, accuracy, specificity, precision, detection limits, and range of linearity and quantification have been checked to validate the proposed method. The obtained results indicate that the methodology proposed by Ciampa et al. [31] satisfies all the validation requirements as much as the most commonly used methods. In addition, the NMR-based method is faster and more repeatable, and at the same time, it allows us to avoid the use of toluene, formaldehyde, and picric acid, which are dangerous solvents and reagents.
When we deal with the term “quality”, we also include another important aspect, which is food authenticity. The latter is important if we take into consideration the DOP (Designation of Protected Origin) and IGP (Typical Geographic Indications) of foods. The main applications of NMR metabolomics in food authenticity are listed in Table 1.
For all food, a significant concern is ensuring its authenticity [26,27,60,61,62,63]. In their recent work, Lolli and Caligiani [26] summarized the main applications of NMR in the field of food authentication for different foodstuffs, highlighting in this way the high versatility of the methodology.

4. Peak Intensity and Area Analysis for Food Quantity Analysis

As stated in the Introduction, changes in peak intensity or integrated peak areas can indicate variations in the concentrations of specific compounds. At the same time, tracking the intensity or area of specific NMR peaks associated with key components in food extracts helps to assess further changes in these components over time. Generally, this approach is called quantitative NMR (qNMR) and it is a specific application of NMR spectroscopy that focuses on the precise and accurate quantification of the chemical compounds within a sample. Unlike qualitative NMR, which is primarily used for structural elucidation, qNMR is optimized to measure the concentrations of specific molecules, often with high precision and accuracy.
The NMR signal area is directly proportional to concentration, and this “response” is the same for all molecules. The qNMR method requires only that (a) the sample be completely dissolved in a fully deuterated solvent; (b) it contains NMR-active nuclides; and (c) a certain amount of care and attention be given to the acquisition and processing of the data. The concentration of a chemical species in an NMR experiment can be determined by one of two methods: (1) absolute integral and (2) internal standard. In the first case, a reference standard solution of known concentration is required to determine an NMR “response factor” for a nuclide under a given set of experimental conditions. In the second case, a spectrum signal is generated. Its “concentration” is determined with respect to a real standard of known concentration [64,65]. These advantages make qNMR suitable for use in food chemistry for the quality control of a wide variety of complex matrices. For example, Burton et al. [54] developed a specific methodology based on qHNMR for the authentication of pure coffee (100% arabica or robusta) and used it to predict the percentage of robusta in blends of 292 coffee samples.
Due to its peculiarity, qNMR has also become prominent as a favored fatty acid characterization methodology, since it makes it possible to obtain and predict the composition and the ratio of fatty acids in oil samples. Furthermore, through this methodology it is even possible to monitor the occurrence of hydrolysis, oxidation, or deterioration processes, as far as to classify edible oils [66]. An interesting application of qNMR in the study of lipids concerns the adulteration of oil, such as essential oils (EOs). EOs have always been part of the herbal tradition and are used not only to create perfumes and enrich cosmetics, but also for therapeutic purposes. For this reason, they are widely used and due to their large profit, they are frequently adulterated [62]. Truzzi et al. [65] applied qNMR to quantify vegetable oils that are used to adulterate and dilute EOs through the quantification of both 1H and 13C glycerol backbone signals, which are present in each vegetable oil containing triglycerides [65].
Lipids are crucial components of foods and cells and are subject to oxidation in many ways, which can adversely affect food quality and human health. Therefore, it is important to find ways to control and reduce the oxidation of lipids in order to improve their stability [67]. The process of lipid oxidation occurs in three stages: initiation with the formation of free radicals, propagation when the free radicals’ chain reactions start, and termination with the formation of non-radical products (Figure 2A). A study conducted by Merkx et al. [68] used 1H NMR spectroscopy to evaluate lipid oxidation products in emulsion foods, such as mayonnaise, which is particularly prone to oxidation. An efficient and reproducible procedure was developed to obtain samples in which the 1H NMR signals of oxidation products could be clearly observed (Figure 2B,C). NMR signals of hydroperoxides were specifically identified for fatty acids and isomers. The use of selective 1H NMR pulses allowed the accurate and rapid measurement of hydroperoxides and aldehydes, with a sensitivity range from 0.03 mmol/kg [68]. Storage temperature was found to have a significant effect on lipid oxidation mechanisms through exploratory multivariate modeling of quantitative 1H NMR profiles.
Dietary fatty acid intake has received considerable attention regarding its nutritional aspects. For proper nutrition and a healthy lifestyle, the major public health institutes recommend a balanced daily intake of saturated fatty acids (SFA), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA). Unfortunately, the nature of the effect of fatty acids on human health has been questioned by current lipid intake guidelines in Western industrialized countries [69]. The Western diet [70,71,72] includes high consumption of SFAs. This has been associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD). However, the lack of a clear association between SFA intake and CVD has been reported in recent work by Siciliano et al. [69]. In the lipid fractions of foods, portions of SFAs, MUFAs, and PUFAs are present either as a fraction of free fatty acids or as structural components of acylglycerol fractions. In addition, some important aspects of foods are regulated by the composition and structural nature of fatty acid chains [69]. For instance, in meat and its related products, the total fatty acid content of the edible parts of the musculature, called marbling fat, has a strong influence on the physical and chemical properties of the food, e.g., consistency, mouthfeel, firmness, and juiciness [69]. Regarding meat, qNMR spectroscopy for the determination and quantification of the fatty acid chain profiles of lipids in pork products during maturation has been proposed by Siciliano et al. [69]. Two typical Mediterranean PDO salamis produced in Calabria, a region in the south of Italy, were selected as case studies. The fatty acid chain profiles of the total lipid extracts were obtained by quantitative NMR analysis. Transesterification of the total lipid extracts provided fatty acids as their methyl esters (FAME). This allowed quantification of the fatty acid acyl chains in the acylglycerol and free fatty acid (FFA) fractions. Oleyl chains predominated and high amounts of polyunsaturated fatty acid chains were observed in all cases. It was also possible to estimate the main nutritional parameters of fermented dry meat products using the proposed spectroscopic method [69].
Another interesting application of qNMR concerns the quantification of polyols in sugar-free foodstuffs by Scettri and Schievano [73]. The control of polyol levels in sugar-free foods is important for nutrition information and quality control. As reported by Lenhart and Chey [74], high levels of polyols (especially mannitol) can cause intolerance symptoms, so monitoring is important for consumer health. Furthermore, for the food industry, polyol monitoring is important for sugar substitution research [73]. Therefore, the aim of Scettri and Schievano [73] was to develop and validate an NMR method for identifying and quantifying six polyols (sorbitol, mannitol, xylitol, erythritol, maltitol, and isomalt) often present in different combinations in sugar-free products. The qNMR method was found to be easy to apply directly to water-suspended solutions without further treatment. The findings show that the method provides a fast and reliable tool to monitor single sweetening agents with good sensitivity and precision [73].
To conclude the overview of the different applications of qNMR, highlighting, above all, the importance of the peak intensity and area analysis in assessing the stability, quality, and shelf life of food samples, a work by Shumilina et al. [75] can be cited. This work is about the monitoring of qualitative and quantitative changes in fish by-products, with special attention paid to salmon (Salmon salar) fish samples due to their commercial importance. This research evaluated the freshness of salmon by-products using a multiparametric approach. Changes in trimethylamine and biogenic amine concentrations were compared with the K-index, and safe temperatures and storage times of salmon by-products were proposed. The K-index, which indicates the presence of enzymatic autolytic mechanisms already active immediately after capture, can be used as a parameter for assessing freshness [31,76]. The process is dependent on the catabolic activities that degrade adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP) into its catabolites: adenosine 5′-diphosphate (ADP), adenosine 5′-monophosphate (AMP), and inosine 5′-monophosphate (IMP) into inosine (HxR) and hypoxanthine (Hx). The investigation revealed the presence of significant bioactive metabolites, including phosphocreatine, taurine, and anserine, in extracts of salmon heads, backbones, and viscera. It was established that salmon by-products can be stored for up to seven days at 4 °C without notable alterations in the concentrations of major metabolites or the formation of deleterious compounds. The storage period is reduced to three days at 10 °C due to the accelerated formation of undesirable degradation compounds, such as biogenic amines. The trituration of heads was demonstrated to shorten their storage time (in terms of TMA formation) by 2–3 days. The K-index freshness indicator has been correlated with the formation of these unwanted metabolites [72].

5. Future Perspectives

NMR is a robust tool for assessing the stability, quality, authenticity, and shelf life of foods, offering detailed insights into the metabolic composition of food products. By providing a unique metabolic fingerprint, it helps in verifying geographical origin, detecting adulteration, identifying varieties, and authenticating processing methods. Despite its high cost and complexity, the comprehensive and non-destructive nature of NMR makes it a valuable methodology that can aid the fight against food fraud and ensure the authenticity of high-value food products. At the same time, this is possible as the methodology exhibits the ability to evaluate the stability and quality of food samples through chemical shift, peak intensity, and area analysis. Both qualitative and quantitative analysis can evaluate different aspects, most of which are related to the nutritional aspects of foods. These aspects are important as they meet the consumers’ need to have safe and healthy foods on their tables every day. Hence, the analysis of nutrients at the molecular level is a further challenge concerning human health for NMR and NMR-based metabolomics. So-called Nutrimetabolomics [77] is a field of study focusing on the analysis of small molecules in biological samples such as blood, urine, and tissue, to understand the relationship between diet, metabolism, and health [78]. It is a combination of different disciplines such as nutrition, metabolomics, and systems biology, and it aims to identify and quantify the metabolic response of an individual to dietary interventions [79]. In this context, NMR spectroscopy has been widely used and it is becoming a powerful key analytical tool in human nutritional studies [4,78,80,81,82,83,84].

Funding

This work was partially supported by the Italian Ministry of University and Research MUR (RFO grant) awarded to G. Picone, and by the MUR-NRRP funding (MABEL project number SOE_0000116, awarded to G. Picone).

Acknowledgments

I thank the Department of Agri-Food Science and Technology (DISTAL) of the University of Bologna for the use of their instruments and laboratories.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Richards, S.A.; Hollerton, J.C. Essential Practical NMR for Organic Chemistry; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alderson, T.R.; Kay, L.E. NMR spectroscopy captures the essential role of dynamics in regulating biomolecular function. Cell 2021, 184, 577–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Krivdin, L.B. Computational 1H NMR: Part 3. Biochemical studies. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2020, 58, 15–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Trimigno, A.; Łoniewska, B.; Skonieczna-Żydecka, K.; Kaczmarczyk, M.; Łoniewski, I.; Picone, G. The application of High-Resolution Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (HR NMR) in metabolomic analyses of meconium and stool in newborns. A preliminary pilot study of MABEL project: Metabolomics approach for the assessment of Baby-Mother Enteric Microbiota Legacy. PharmaNutrition 2024, 27, 100378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Simonetti, G.; Mengucci, C.; Padella, A.; Fonzi, E.; Picone, G.; Delpino, C.; Nanni, J.; De Tommaso, R.; Franchini, E.; Papayannidis, C. Integrated genomic-metabolic classification of acute myeloid leukemia defines a subgroup with NPM1 and cohesin/DNA damage mutations. Leukemia 2021, 35, 2813–2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Silva, R.A.; Pereira, T.C.; Souza, A.R.; Ribeiro, P.R. 1H NMR-based metabolite profiling for biomarker identification. Clin. Chim. Acta 2020, 502, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tampieri, A.; Szabó, M.; Medina, F.; Gulyás, H. A brief introduction to the basics of NMR spectroscopy and selected examples of its applications to materials characterization. Phys. Sci. Rev. 2021, 6, 20190086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ciampa, A.; Danesi, F.; Picone, G. NMR-Based Metabolomics for a More Holistic and Sustainable Research in Food Quality Assessment: A Narrative Review. Appl. Sci. 2022, 13, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hatzakis, E. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy in food science: A comprehensive review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2019, 18, 189–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fraga-Corral, M.; Carpena, M.; Garcia-Oliveira, P.; Pereira, A.; Prieto, M.; Simal-Gandara, J. Analytical metabolomics and applications in health, environmental and food science. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2022, 52, 712–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Picone, G. NMR, Metabonomics and Molecular Profiles: Applications to the Quality Assessment of Foodstuffs; University of Bologna: Bologna, Italy, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  12. Klassen, A.; Faccio, A.T.; Canuto, G.A.B.; da Cruz, P.L.R.; Ribeiro, H.C.; Tavares, M.F.M.; Sussulini, A. Metabolomics: Definitions and significance in systems biology. Metabolomics Fundam. Clin. Appl. 2017, 3–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Laghi, L.; Picone, G.; Capozzi, F. Nuclear magnetic resonance for foodomics beyond food analysis. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2014, 59, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Brown, M. Processing and food and beverage shelf life. In The Stability and Shelf-Life of Food; Kilcast, D., Subramaniam, P., Eds.; Wood Head Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2011; pp. 184–236. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lindon, J.C.; Nicholson, J.K.; Holmes, E.; Everett, J.R. Metabonomics: Metabolic processes studied by NMR spectroscopy of biofluids. Concepts Magn. Reson. Educ. J. 2000, 12, 289–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ross, A.; Schlotterbeck, G.; Dieterle, F.; Senn, H. NMR spectroscopy techniques for application to metabonomics. In The Handbook of Metabonomics and Metabolomics; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007; Volume 4, p. 55. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wishart, D.S.; Sykes, B.D. [12] Chemical shifts as a tool for structure determination. Methods Enzymol. 1994, 239, 363–392. [Google Scholar]
  18. Nerli, S.; McShan, A.C.; Sgourakis, N.G. Chemical shift-based methods in NMR structure determination. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2018, 106–107, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. de Oliveira, C.R.; Carneiro, R.L.; Ferreira, A.G. Tracking the degradation of fresh orange juice and discrimination of orange varieties: An example of NMR in coordination with chemometrics analyses. Food Chem. 2014, 164, 446–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lambert, J.B.; Mazzola, E.P.; Ridge, C.D. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: An Introduction to Principles, Applications, and Experimental Methods; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  21. Raja, P.M.V.; Barron, A.R. NMR Spectroscopy. 2022. Available online: https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Analytical_Chemistry/Physical_Methods_in_Chemistry_and_Nano_Science_(Barron)/04%3A_Chemical_Speciation/4.07%3A_NMR_Spectroscopy (accessed on 29 August 2024).
  22. Farmer, S.; Kennepohl, D.; Soderberg, T. Integration of 1H NMR Absorptions—Proton Counting. Org. Chem. 2024. [Google Scholar]
  23. Malet-Martino, M.; Holzgrabe, U. NMR techniques in biomedical and pharmaceutical analysis. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2011, 55, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Simmler, C.; Napolitano, J.G.; McAlpine, J.B.; Chen, S.-N.; Pauli, G.F. Universal quantitative NMR analysis of complex natural samples. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014, 25, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cao, R.; Liu, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhai, X.; Cao, T.; Wang, A.; Qiu, J. Applications of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to the evaluation of complex food constituents. Food Chem. 2021, 342, 128258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lolli, V.; Caligiani, A. How nuclear magnetic resonance contributes to food authentication: Current trends and perspectives. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2024, 58, 101200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sobolev, A.P.; Thomas, F.; Donarski, J.; Ingallina, C.; Circi, S.; Cesare Marincola, F.; Capitani, D.; Mannina, L. Use of NMR applications to tackle future food fraud issues. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 91, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bingol, K. Recent Advances in Targeted and Untargeted Metabolomics by NMR and MS/NMR Methods. High-Throughput 2018, 7, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ciampa, A.; Picone, G. Application of HR-NMR for the Metabolic Kinetic Assessment of Red Mullet (Mullus barbatus) and Bogue (Boops boops) Samples during Different Temperature Storage. Metabolites 2023, 13, 482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Velasquez, M.T.; Ramezani, A.; Manal, A.; Raj, D.S. Trimethylamine N-Oxide: The Good, the Bad and the Unknown. Toxins 2016, 8, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ciampa, A.; Laghi, L.; Picone, G. Validation of a 1 H-NMR Spectroscopy Quantitative Method to Quantify Trimethylamine Content and K-Index Value in Different Species of Fish. J. Food Qual. 2022, 2022, 3612095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Spiteri, C.; Lia, F.; Farrugia, C. Determination of the geographical origin of Maltese honey using 1H NMR fingerprinting. Foods 2020, 9, 1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Calò, F.; Girelli, C.R.; Wang, S.C.; Fanizzi, F.P. Geographical origin assessment of extra virgin olive oil via NMR and MS combined with chemometrics as analytical approaches. Foods 2022, 11, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, J.; Chen, H.; Fan, C.; Gao, S.; Zhang, Z.; Bo, L. Classification of the botanical and geographical origins of Chinese honey based on 1H NMR profile with chemometrics. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, 109714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pacholczyk-Sienicka, B.; Ciepielowski, G.; Albrecht, Ł. The application of NMR spectroscopy and chemometrics in authentication of spices. In Analysis of Food Spices; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2023; pp. 251–284. [Google Scholar]
  36. Lau, H.; Laserna, A.K.C.; Li, S.F.Y. 1H NMR-based metabolomics for the discrimination of celery (Apium graveolens L. var. dulce) from different geographical origins. Food Chem. 2020, 332, 127424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mascellani, A.; Hoca, G.; Babisz, M.; Krska, P.; Kloucek, P.; Havlik, J. 1H NMR chemometric models for classification of Czech wine type and variety. Food Chem. 2021, 339, 127852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cagliani, L.; Maestri, G.; Consonni, R. Detection and evaluation of saccharide adulteration in Italian honey by NMR spectroscopy. Food Control 2022, 133, 108574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cerceau, C.I.; Barbosa, L.C.; Alvarenga, E.S.; Maltha, C.R.; Ismail, F.M. 1H-NMR and GC for detection of adulteration in commercial essential oils of Cymbopogon ssp. Phytochem. Anal. 2020, 31, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Horn, B.; Esslinger, S.; Fauhl-Hassek, C.; Riedl, J. 1H NMR spectroscopy, one-class classification and outlier diagnosis: A powerful combination for adulteration detection in paprika powder. Food Control 2021, 128, 108205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Alharbi, H.; Kahfi, J.; Dutta, A.; Jaremko, M.; Emwas, A.-H. The detection of adulteration of olive oil with various vegetable oils–A case study using high-resolution 700 MHz NMR spectroscopy coupled with multivariate data analysis. Food Control 2024, 166, 110679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Akhtar, M.T.; Samar, M.; Shami, A.A.; Mumtaz, M.W.; Mukhtar, H.; Tahir, A.; Shahzad-ul-Hussan, S.; Chaudhary, S.U.; Kaka, U. 1H-NMR-based metabolomics: An integrated approach for the detection of the adulteration in chicken, chevon, beef and donkey meat. Molecules 2021, 26, 4643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ogrinc, N.; Košir, I.; Spangenberg, J.; Kidrič, J. The application of NMR and MS methods for detection of adulteration of wine, fruit juices, and olive oil. A review. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2003, 376, 424–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lucarini, M.; Di Cocco, M.E.; Raguso, V.; Milanetti, F.; Durazzo, A.; Lombardi-Boccia, G.; Santini, A.; Delfini, M.; Sciubba, F. NMR-based metabolomic comparison of Brassica oleracea (var. italica): Organic and conventional farming. Foods 2020, 9, 945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hohmann, M.; Christoph, N.; Wachter, H.; Holzgrabe, U. 1H NMR profiling as an approach to differentiate conventionally and organically grown tomatoes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 8530–8540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Villa-Ruano, N.; Rosas-Bautista, A.; Rico-Arzate, E.; Cruz-Narvaez, Y.; Zepeda-Vallejo, L.G.; Lalaleo, L.; Hidalgo-Martínez, D.; Becerra-Martínez, E. Study of nutritional quality of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) juice using 1H NMR-based metabolomic approach: A comparison between conventionally and organically grown fruits. LWT 2020, 134, 110222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Picone, G.; Trimigno, A.; Tessarin, P.; Donnini, S.; Rombolà, A.D.; Capozzi, F. 1H NMR foodomics reveals that the biodynamic and the organic cultivation managements produce different grape berries (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sangiovese). Food Chem. 2016, 213, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Picone, G.; Mezzetti, B.; Babini, E.; Capocasa, F.; Placucci, G.; Capozzi, F. Unsupervised principal component analysis of NMR metabolic profiles for the assessment of substantial equivalence of transgenic grapes (Vitis vinifera). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 9271–9279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mihailova, A.; Kelly, S.D.; Chevallier, O.P.; Elliott, C.T.; Maestroni, B.M.; Cannavan, A. High-resolution mass spectrometry-based metabolomics for the discrimination between organic and conventional crops: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 110, 142–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Maestrello, V.; Solovyev, P.; Bontempo, L.; Mannina, L.; Camin, F. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in extra virgin olive oil authentication. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2022, 21, 4056–4075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Alves, R.P.; Antoniosi Filho, N.R.; Lião, L.M.; Flores, I.S. Evaluation of the Metabolic Profile of Arabica Coffee via NMR in Relation to the Time and Temperature of the Roasting Procedure. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2021, 32, 123–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Utpott, M.; Rodrigues, E.; de Oliveira Rios, A.; Mercali, G.D.; Flôres, S.H. Metabolomics: An analytical technique for food processing evaluation. Food Chem. 2022, 366, 130685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zhou, C.-Y.; Bai, Y.; Wang, C.; Li, C.-B.; Xu, X.-L.; Pan, D.-D.; Cao, J.-X.; Zhou, G.-H. 1H NMR-based metabolomics and sensory evaluation characterize taste substances of Jinhua ham with traditional and modern processing procedures. Food Control 2021, 126, 107873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Burton, I.W.; Martinez Farina, C.F.; Ragupathy, S.; Arunachalam, T.; Newmaster, S.; Berrué, F. Quantitative NMR Methodology for the Authentication of Roasted Coffee and Prediction of Blends. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 14643–14651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Cui, C.; Xu, Y.; Jin, G.; Zong, J.; Peng, C.; Cai, H.; Hou, R. Machine learning applications for identify the geographical origin, variety and processing of black tea using 1H NMR chemical fingerprinting. Food Control 2023, 148, 109686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tristán, A.I.; Abreu, A.C.; Aguilera-Sáez, L.M.; Peña, A.; Conesa-Bueno, A.; Fernández, I. Evaluation of ORAC, IR and NMR metabolomics for predicting ripening stage and variety in melon (Cucumis melo L.). Food Chem. 2022, 372, 131263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Di Matteo, G.; Spano, M.; Esposito, C.; Santarcangelo, C.; Baldi, A.; Daglia, M.; Mannina, L.; Ingallina, C.; Sobolev, A.P. Nmr characterization of ten apple cultivars from the piedmont region. Foods 2021, 10, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Xing, M.; Wang, S.; Lin, J.; Xia, F.; Feng, J.; Shen, G. Composition profiling and authenticity assessment of camellia oil using high field and low field 1H NMR. Molecules 2021, 26, 4738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Bambina, P.; Spinella, A.; Lo Papa, G.; Chillura Martino, D.F.; Lo Meo, P.; Cinquanta, L.; Conte, P. 1H-NMR Spectroscopy Coupled with Chemometrics to Classify Wines According to Different Grape Varieties and Different Terroirs. Agriculture 2024, 14, 749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Selamat, J.; Rozani, N.A.A.; Murugesu, S. Application of the Metabolomics Approach in Food Authentication. Molecules 2021, 26, 7565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Consonni, R.; Cagliani, L.R. The potentiality of NMR-based metabolomics in food science and food authentication assessment. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2019, 57, 558–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Cubero-Leon, E.; Peñalver, R.; Maquet, A. Review on metabolomics for food authentication. Food Res. Int. 2014, 60, 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sobolev, A.P.; Circi, S.; Mannina, L. 6—Advances in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy for Food Authenticity Testing. In Advances in Food Authenticity Testing; Downey, G., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2016; pp. 147–170. [Google Scholar]
  64. Pauli, G.F.; Godecke, T.; Jaki, B.U.; Lankin, D.C. Quantitative 1H NMR. Development and potential of an analytical method: An update. J. Nat. Prod. 2012, 75, 834–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Truzzi, E.; Marchetti, L.; Benvenuti, S.; Righi, V.; Rossi, M.C.; Gallo, V.; Bertelli, D. A Novel qNMR Application for the Quantification of Vegetable Oils Used as Adulterants in Essential Oils. Molecules 2021, 26, 5439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Triyasmono, L.; Holzgrabe, U. Combination quantitative 1H NMR and chemometric approaches for the assessment of quality control in commercially available products of red fruit (Pandanus conoidues, Lam.) oil. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. Open 2023, 1, 100010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wang, D.; Xiao, H.; Lyu, X.; Chen, H.; Wei, F. Lipid oxidation in food science and nutritional health: A comprehensive review. Oil Crop Sci. 2023, 8, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Merkx, D.W.H.; Hong, G.T.S.; Ermacora, A.; van Duynhoven, J.P.M. Rapid Quantitative Profiling of Lipid Oxidation Products in a Food Emulsion by 1H NMR. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 4863–4870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Siciliano, C.; Belsito, E.; De Marco, R.; Di Gioia, M.L.; Leggio, A.; Liguori, A. Quantitative determination of fatty acid chain composition in pork meat products by high resolution 1H NMR spectroscopy. Food Chem. 2013, 136, 546–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rakhra, V.; Galappaththy, S.L.; Bulchandani, S.; Cabandugama, P.K. Obesity and the western diet: How we got here. Mo. Med. 2020, 117, 536. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  71. Clemente-Suárez, V.J.; Beltrán-Velasco, A.I.; Redondo-Flórez, L.; Martín-Rodríguez, A.; Tornero-Aguilera, J.F. Global impacts of western diet and its effects on metabolism and health: A narrative review. Nutrients 2023, 15, 2749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Newsome, R.; Yang, Y.; Jobin, C. Western diet influences on microbiome and carcinogenesis. In Seminars in Immunology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2023; p. 101756. [Google Scholar]
  73. Scettri, A.; Schievano, E. Quantification of polyols in sugar-free foodstuffs by qNMR. Food Chem. 2022, 390, 133125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Lenhart, A.; Chey, W.D. A systematic review of the effects of polyols on gastrointestinal health and irritable bowel syndrome. Adv. Nutr. 2017, 8, 587–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Shumilina, E.; Slizyte, R.; Mozuraityte, R.; Dykyy, A.; Stein, T.A.; Dikiy, A. Quality changes of salmon by-products during storage: Assessment and quantification by NMR. Food Chem. 2016, 211, 803–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ciampa, A.; Picone, G.; Laghi, L.; Nikzad, H.; Capozzi, F. Changes in the amino acid composition of Bogue (Boops boops) fish during storage at different temperatures by 1H-NMR spectroscopy. Nutrients 2012, 4, 542–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. LeMieux, M.J.; Aljawadi, A.; Moustaid-Moussa, N. Nutrimetabolomics. Adv. Nutr. 2014, 5, 792–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Srivastava, U.; Kanchan, S.; Kesheri, M.; Singh, S. Nutrimetabolomics: Metabolomics in Nutrition Research. In Metabolomics: Recent Advances and Future Applications; Soni, V., Hartman, T.E., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 241–268. [Google Scholar]
  79. Ulaszewska, M.M.; Weinert, C.H.; Trimigno, A.; Portmann, R.; Andres Lacueva, C.; Badertscher, R.; Brennan, L.; Brunius, C.; Bub, A.; Capozzi, F.; et al. Nutrimetabolomics: An Integrative Action for Metabolomic Analyses in Human Nutritional Studies. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2019, 63, 1800384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Münger, L.H.; Trimigno, A.; Picone, G.; Freiburghaus, C.; Pimentel, G.g.; Burton, K.J.; Pralong, F.o.P.; Vionnet, N.; Capozzi, F.; Badertscher, R. Identification of urinary food intake biomarkers for milk, cheese, and soy-based drink by untargeted GC-MS and NMR in healthy humans. J. Proteome Res. 2017, 16, 3321–3335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Trimigno, A.; Picone, G.; Capozzi, F. A 1H NMR-Based Metabolomics Approach on Dietary Biomarker Research in Human Urine. Magn. Reson. Food Sci. Defin. Food Magn. Reson. 2015, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Chowdhury, C.R.; Kavitake, D.; Jaiswal, K.K.; Jaiswal, K.S.; Reddy, G.B.; Agarwal, V.; Shetty, P.H. NMR-based metabolomics as a significant tool for human nutritional research and health applications. Food Biosci. 2023, 53, 102538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hernandez-Baixauli, J.; Quesada-Vázquez, S.; Mariné-Casadó, R.; Gil Cardoso, K.; Caimari, A.; Del Bas, J.M.; Escoté, X.; Baselga-Escudero, L. Detection of early disease risk factors associated with metabolic syndrome: A new era with the NMR metabolomics assessment. Nutrients 2020, 12, 806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Karlsson, T.; Winkvist, A.; Rådjursöga, M.; Ellegård, L.; Pedersen, A.; Lindqvist, H.M. Identification of single and combined serum metabolites associated with food intake. Metabolites 2022, 12, 908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. A 1H NMR fish sample spectrum acquired at a frequency of 400.13 MHz. It is possible to identify signals as singlets belonging to TMAO and N-TMA at 3.27 and 2.91 ppm, respectively [31]. Trimethylamine oxide (TMAO) is an important modulator of osmotic and hydrostatic pressure in fish, maintaining salt and water balance. During decomposition, bacteria and enzymes convert TMAO into trimethylamine (with TMA being responsible for the typical fishy smell).
Figure 1. A 1H NMR fish sample spectrum acquired at a frequency of 400.13 MHz. It is possible to identify signals as singlets belonging to TMAO and N-TMA at 3.27 and 2.91 ppm, respectively [31]. Trimethylamine oxide (TMAO) is an important modulator of osmotic and hydrostatic pressure in fish, maintaining salt and water balance. During decomposition, bacteria and enzymes convert TMAO into trimethylamine (with TMA being responsible for the typical fishy smell).
Encyclopedia 04 00106 g001
Figure 2. (A) The oxidation reaction of fats is a three-step reaction (initiation, propagation, and termination) that leads to the formation in the food matrix of unpalatable products that compromise the quality of food (commonly known as rancidity, including a “Rancid smell”). This reaction is caused by the oxidation of RH molecules by reactive oxygen species (ROS), both radical and not (initiation). This oxidation leads to the formation of free radicals from RH and then triggers a kind of chain oxidation of the remaining RH (propagation) that has not yet been oxidized (this is an auto-catalytic reaction). (B,C) 1H NMR spectra of oxidized oil representing the hydroperoxide region (11.24–10.57 ppm) and the aldehyde region (9.81–9.44 ppm), respectively [68].
Figure 2. (A) The oxidation reaction of fats is a three-step reaction (initiation, propagation, and termination) that leads to the formation in the food matrix of unpalatable products that compromise the quality of food (commonly known as rancidity, including a “Rancid smell”). This reaction is caused by the oxidation of RH molecules by reactive oxygen species (ROS), both radical and not (initiation). This oxidation leads to the formation of free radicals from RH and then triggers a kind of chain oxidation of the remaining RH (propagation) that has not yet been oxidized (this is an auto-catalytic reaction). (B,C) 1H NMR spectra of oxidized oil representing the hydroperoxide region (11.24–10.57 ppm) and the aldehyde region (9.81–9.44 ppm), respectively [68].
Encyclopedia 04 00106 g002
Table 1. Applications of NMR metabolomics in food authenticity.
Table 1. Applications of NMR metabolomics in food authenticity.
ApplicationExampleReferences
Geographical Origin and TraceabilityThe metabolic profile of a food product is often influenced by its geographical origin. NMR metabolomics can be used to verify the claimed origin of products like wine, olive oil, coffee, honey, and tea.Wines from different regions have distinct metabolite profiles due to variations in soil, climate, and grape variety. NMR can detect these differences, confirming whether a wine is truly from a specified region.[32,33,34,35,36,37]
Detection of AdulterationNMR metabolomics is highly effective in detecting adulteration, where a product is diluted or mixed with lower-quality ingredients.MR can identify the addition of cheaper oils in high-quality olive oil by detecting unusual metabolites that should not be present in pure samples.[38,39,40,41,42,43]
Identification of Organic vs. Conventional FarmingThe metabolic profiles of products grown through organic farming can differ from those grown using conventional farming methods. NMR metabolomics can help authenticate claims of organic production.Organic vegetables might have different levels of certain metabolites compared to conventionally grown ones due to the absence of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides.[44,45,46,47,48,49]
Authentication of Processing MethodsThe way a product is processed can significantly alter its metabolic profile. NMR metabolomics can be used to authenticate products based on specific processing methods.In coffee, the metabolite profile differs significantly between washed and dry-processed beans. NMR can be used to confirm whether a batch of coffee has been processed as claimed.[25,50,51,52,53,54]
Varietal IdentificationDifferent varieties of the same product, such as apples, grapes, or tomatoes, have unique metabolic signatures. NMR can be used to verify whether the claimed variety matches the actual variety of the product.In tea, different varieties of Camellia sinensis (the plant used to produce tea) can be distinguished by their specific metabolite profiles, which NMR can accurately identify.[55,56,57,58,59]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Picone, G. The 1H HR-NMR Methods for the Evaluation of the Stability, Quality, Authenticity, and Shelf Life of Foods. Encyclopedia 2024, 4, 1617-1628. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4040106

AMA Style

Picone G. The 1H HR-NMR Methods for the Evaluation of the Stability, Quality, Authenticity, and Shelf Life of Foods. Encyclopedia. 2024; 4(4):1617-1628. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4040106

Chicago/Turabian Style

Picone, Gianfranco. 2024. "The 1H HR-NMR Methods for the Evaluation of the Stability, Quality, Authenticity, and Shelf Life of Foods" Encyclopedia 4, no. 4: 1617-1628. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4040106

APA Style

Picone, G. (2024). The 1H HR-NMR Methods for the Evaluation of the Stability, Quality, Authenticity, and Shelf Life of Foods. Encyclopedia, 4(4), 1617-1628. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4040106

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop