The Metaverse in Industry 5.0: A Human-Centric Approach towards Personalized Value Creation
Definition
:1. Introduction
1.1. World Wide Web (WWW): From Web 1.0 to Web 3.0
1.2. Web 4.0 and the Metaverse
1.3. Web 4.0 and the Metaverse Need
- The online environment has to be consistently connected, enabling constant interaction. Users can connect with one another;
- The emerging web functions as a unified Web OS, where information seamlessly transfers between various points within the system;
- Background processes involve self-learning AI systems that strive to comprehend users, mimicking human communication patterns;
- It engages users through interpersonal communication methods, much like human interactions;
- It embodies an intelligent, interconnected, and open web structure;
- The speed and dependability of Web 4.0 exceed previous standards;
- It necessitates ubiquity, identity, and connectivity as fundamental prerequisites.
1.4. Human-Centric Metaverse Challenges
1.5. Contribution of the Paper
1.6. Manuscript Structure
2. Pertinent Literature
Cyber-Physical Systems for Personalized Value Creation in the Industrial Metaverse
- 3C (Connection, Conversion, Cyber) architecture: The integration of computation, communication, and control in 3C CPS architecture enables the realization of smart industries by incorporating human, physical, and cyber components [23];
- 5C (Connection, Conversion, Cyber, Cognition, and Configuration) architecture: The architectural framework of the 5C Cyber-Physical System (CPS) encompasses five distinct levels: smart connection, conversion, cyber, cognition, and configuration. This structure seamlessly integrates several components, including sensors, actuators, cognitive modules, and advanced automation mechanisms. Its primary objective lies in facilitating and enhancing intelligent decision-making processes within the intricate production environment [3];
- Key protocols: Implementations such as Profibus/Profinet, Open Platform Communications—Unified Architecture (OPC-UA), Fieldbus, and Ethernet Powerlink play crucial roles within the 5C CPS architectures [24];
- Self-adaptiveness: Self-adaptive CPS architectures exhibit the ability to operate in dynamic and uncertain environments, employing adaptation logic to adjust to adverse circumstances and uncertainties [25];
- Fog computing: Fog gateways in industrial CPS leverage fog computing to process samples efficiently and enable rapid evaluation, integrating predictive models with intelligent machinery [26];
- Reference Architecture Models: Reference Architectural Model Industrie 4.0 (RAMI 4.0) and International Industrial Relations Association (IIRA) serve as reference architecture models for Industry 4.0 and the industrial internet, respectively, facilitating standardization, information sharing, and interoperability among technologies in smart industries [27].
- Enabling Platforms: These form the bedrock of the Metaverse ecosystem, serving as the fundamental architecture that enables the intricate interplay between the virtual and real world. Within this layer, crucial information and communication technology (ICT) components are harnessed to provide the necessary backbone for seamless connectivity and data exchange.
- Content Platforms: At the heart of the Metaverse, content platforms facilitate the creation, distribution, and consumption of diverse digital content. This layer incorporates advanced technologies like immersive media production tools, enabling the realization of rich and engaging virtual experiences.
- Human-Centered Platforms: Focused on user interaction and experience, this layer emphasizes the harmonious integration of humans and technology within the Metaverse. It encompasses innovative user interface (UI) paradigms, responsive interactions, and sensory feedback mechanisms, all of which aim to provide a user-centric and immersive digital environment.
- Utility Platforms: This layer underpins the practical functionality of the Metaverse by integrating Internet of Things (IoT) devices and associated protocols. It empowers real-time data acquisition and communication, enabling dynamic interaction between the physical and virtual realms.
- Platforms for Applications: Situated on top of the preceding layers, this layer provides the canvas upon which several application scenarios are developed and executed, such as healthcare, education, entertainment, and manufacturing.
- Communication Protocols Layer: In the context of the proposed industrial Metaverse framework, robust and efficient communication protocols play an indispensable role in ensuring seamless and secure data exchange across the interconnected fabric of virtual and physical environments. These protocols act as the digital highways that enable real-time interactions between Internet of Things (IoT) devices, smart sensors, immersive interfaces, and backend systems. By adhering to standardized communication protocols, such as MQTT (Message-Queuing Telemetry Transport) and CoAP (Constrained Application Protocol), the industrial Metaverse can facilitate rapid and reliable information flow, enabling predictive maintenance, real-time monitoring, and collaborative production. These protocols also contribute to optimizing bandwidth usage, enhancing latency management, and bolstering cybersecurity measures, thereby laying a robust foundation for the industrial Metaverse’s transformative potential in shaping the factories of the future.
3. A framework for Personalized Value Creation in the Metaverse
4. Applications of the Human-Centric Metaverse (HCM) in Industry 5.0
4.1. Education Metaverse
4.2. Healthcare Metaverse
4.3. The Metaverse in Tourism and Archaeology
4.4. Blockchain Integration in Industrial Metaverse
4.5. Industrial Metaverse
5. Discussion and Outlook: Challenges for the Industrial Human-Centric Metaverse and Web 4.0
5.1. Wisdom Manufacturing, the Industrial Metaverse, and the Social-Driven Web
5.2. Industrial Metaverse Sustainability
5.3. Industrial Human-Centric Metaverse Challenges
- Will this transformation prioritize efficiency and incentives at the expense of authenticity, diversity, and safety?
- Ensuring alignment with our values, identities, and self-worth becomes paramount, aiming to amplify and enhance human endeavors.
6. Concluding Remarks
Supplementary Materials
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Mystakidis, S. Metaverse. Encyclopedia 2022, 2, 486–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aloqaily, M.; Bouachir, O.; Karray, F.; Ridhawi, I.A.; Saddik, A.E. Integrating Digital Twin and Advanced Intelligent Technologies to Realize the Metaverse. IEEE Consum. Electron. Mag. 2022, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mourtzis, D.; Panopoulos, N.; Angelopoulos, J. Production management guided by industrial internet of things and adaptive scheduling in smart factories. In Design and Operation of Production Networks for Mass Personalization in the Era of Cloud Technology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 117–152. [Google Scholar]
- Qin, H.X.; Wang, Y.; Hui, P. Identity, Crimes, and Law Enforcement in the Metaverse. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2210.06134. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, F.Y.; Qin, R.; Wang, X.; Hu, B. MetaSocieties in Metaverse: MetaEconomics and MetaManagement for MetaEnterprises and MetaCities. IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst. 2022, 9, 2–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mourtzis, D.; Panopoulos, N.; Angelopoulos, J.; Wang, B.; Wang, L. Human centric platforms for personalized value creation in metaverse. J. Manuf. Syst. 2022, 65, 653–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berners-Lee, T.; Hendler, J.; Lassila, O. The semantic web. Sci. Am. 2001, 284, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aghaei, S.; Nematbakhsh, M.A.; Farsani, H.K. Evolution of the world wide web: From WEB 1.0 to WEB 4.0. Int. J. Web Semant. Technol. 2012, 3, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polona, C.A.R.; André, M.T.; Maria, N. Metaverse: Opportunities, Risks and Policy Implications. 2022. Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2022)733557 (accessed on 25 July 2023).
- Mourtzis, D.; Angelopoulos, J.; Panopoulos, N. The Future of the Human–Machine Interface (HMI) in Society 5.0. Future Internet 2023, 15, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertuzzi, L. LEAK: EU Commission to Set Out Its Vision on the Metaverse, Web 4.0, EURACTIV. 2023. Available online: https://www.euractiv.com/section/platforms/news/leak-eu-commission-to-set-out-its-vision-on-the-metaverse-web-4-0/ (accessed on 20 July 2023).
- Metaverse Market by Component, Vertical and Region—Global Forecast to 2027. Market Research Report 2022. Available online: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/metaverse-market-166893905.html?gclid=CjwKCAjwoqGnBhAcEiwAwK-OkaLifxbj9JphDw88AoKfBZTkmaFs3l9_XSmstcbHnoKJ3gZCcHqCBRoClKsQAvD_BwE (accessed on 18 July 2023).
- Almeida, F. Concept and dimensions of web 4.0. Int. J. Comput. Technol. 2017, 16, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Z.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X.; Sun, Y.; Xu, H. A Review of Gaps between Web 4.0 and Web 3.0 Intelligent Network Infrastructure. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2308.02996. [Google Scholar]
- Ibrahim, A.K. Evolution of the Web: From Web 1.0 to 4.0. Qubahan Acad. J. 2023, 1, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khanzode, C.A.; Sarode, R.D. Evolution of the world wide web: From web 1.0 to 6.0. Int. J. Digit. Libr. Serv. 2016, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Nath, K.; Dhar, S.; Basishtha, S. Web 1.0 to Web 3.0-Evolution of the Web and its various challenges. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Reliability Optimization and Information Technology (ICROIT), Faridabad, India, 6–8 February 2014; pp. 86–89. [Google Scholar]
- George, A.S.H.; Maschio, F.; Shaji, G.; Baskar, T.; Digvijay, P. Metaverse: The next stage of human culture and the internet. Int. J. Adv. Res. Trends Eng. Technol. 2021, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Towards the Next Technological Transition: Commission Presents EU Strategy to Lead on Web 4.0 and Virtual Worlds. 2023. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_3718 (accessed on 25 July 2023).
- EU Competitiveness beyond 2030: Looking Ahead at the Occasion of the 30th Anniversary of the Single Market. 2023. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_1668 (accessed on 25 July 2023).
- Europe’s Digital Decade. 2023. Available online: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/europes-digital-decade#tab_2 (accessed on 18 July 2023).
- Souad, R.; Zacharewicz, G.; Chapurlat, V. Digital twin for services (DT4S): Conceptual strategy. In Proceedings of the 10th IFAC Conference on Manufacturing Modelling, Management and Control (MIM), Nantes, France, 22–24 June 2022; pp. 3256–3261. [Google Scholar]
- Kayan, H.; Nunes, M.; Rana, O.; Burnap, P.; Perera, C. Cybersecurity of industrial cyber-physical systems: A review. ACM Comput. Surv. 2022, 54, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akundi, A.; Euresti, D.; Luna, S.; Ankobiah, W.; Lopes, A.; Edinbarough, I. State of Industry 5.0—Analysis and identification of current research trends. Appl. Syst. Innov. 2022, 5, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petrovska, A.; Kugele, S.; Hutzelmann, T.; Beffart, T.; Bergemann, S.; Pretschner, A. Defining adaptivity and logical architecture for engineering (smart) self-adaptive cyber–physical systems. Inf. Softw. Technol. 2022, 147, 106866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Zhao, J. Mobile edge computing, metaverse, 6G wireless communications, artificial intelligence, and blockchain: Survey and their convergence. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 8th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), Fujisawa Kanagawa, Japan, 31 October 2022; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, L.; Mra, J. Metaverse reference architecture. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet of Things, Delft, The Netherlands, 8–10 November 2022; pp. 102–120. [Google Scholar]
- Valaskova, K.; Vochozka, M.; Lăzăroiu, G. Immersive 3D Technologies, Spatial Computing and Visual Perception Algorithms, and Event Modeling and Forecasting Tools on Blockchain-based Metaverse Platforms. Anal. Metaphys. 2022, 21, 74–90. [Google Scholar]
- Mourtzis, D. Digital twin inception in the Era of industrial metaverse. Front. Manuf. Technol. 2022, 3, 1155735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rehm, S.V.; Goel, L.; Crespi, M. The metaverse as mediator between technology, trends, and the digital transformation of society and business. J. Virtual Worlds Res. 2015, 8, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Chardonnet, J.-R.; Merienne, F.; Ovtcharova, J. Using Fuzzy Logic to Involve Individual Differences for Predicting Cybersickness during VR Navigation. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), Lisboa, Portugal, 27 March–1 April 2021; pp. 373–381. [Google Scholar]
- Mourtzis, D.; Angelopoulos, J.; Panopoulos, N. Blockchain Integration in the Era of Industrial Metaverse. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, W.; Du, H.; Liew, Z.; Lim, W.Y.B.; Xiong, Z.; Niyato, D.; Chi, X.; Shen, X.S.; Miao, C. Semantic Communications for Future Internet: Fundamentals, Applications, and Challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2022, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fettke, P.; Houy, C.; Loos, P. On the relevance of design knowledge for design-oriented business and information systems engineering. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2010, 2, 347–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, Y.; Zeng, X.Y.; Bruniaux, P.; Liu, K.X. Interactive virtual try-on based three-dimensional garment block design for disabled people of scoliosis type. Text. Res. J. 2017, 87, 1261–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zepeto. Another Me in Another Universe. © NAVER Z Corp. All Rights Reserved. Available online: https://web.zepeto.me (accessed on 20 July 2023).
- Mourtzis, D.; Panopoulos, N.; Angelopoulos, J. A hybrid teaching factory model towards personalized education 4.0. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kye, B.; Han, N.; Kim, E.; Park, Y.; Jo, S. Educational applications of metaverse: Possibilities and limitations. J. Educ. Eval. Health Prof. 2021, 18, 1149230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomason, J. MetaHealth-How will the Metaverse change health care? J. Metaverse 2021, 1, 13–16. [Google Scholar]
- Mourtzis, D.; Angelopoulos, J.; Panopoulos, N.; Kardamakis, D. A smart IoT platform for oncology patient diagnosis based on ai: Towards the human digital twin. Procedia CIRP 2021, 104, 1686–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, D.; Zhou, J.; Chen, R.; Song, Y.; Song, Z.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Q.; Wang, K.; Zhou, C.; Sun, J.; et al. Expert consensus on the metaverse in medicine. Clin. Ehealth 2022, 5, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Explore Scoolzz’s Metaverse—An Extended Reality Platform for 3D-Learning, Simulations, XR & Mixed Reality Training Using Headset and Motion Tracking Technology. Available online: https://scoolzz.io/education_trainings (accessed on 20 July 2023).
- Dwivedi, K.Y.; Hughes, L.; Baabdullah, M.A.; Ribeiro-Navarrete, S.; Giannakis, M.; Al-Debei, M.M.; Dennehy, D.; Metri, B.; Buhalis, D.; Cheung, C.M.K.; et al. Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for re-search, practice and policy. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2022, 66, 102542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buhalis, D.; Karatay, D. Mixed reality (MR) for Generation Z in cultural heritage tourism towards metaverse. In Proceedings of the ENTER22 e-Tourism Conference, Tianjin, China, 11–14 January 2022; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 16–27. [Google Scholar]
- Helliar, C.V.; Crawford, L.; Rocca, L.; Teodori, C.; Veneziani, M. Permissionless and permissioned blockchain diffusion. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 54, 102136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guidi, B.; Michienzi, A. From NFT 1.0 to NFT 2.0: A Review of the Evolution of Non-Fungible Tokens. Future Internet 2023, 15, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regner, F.; Urbach, N.; Schweizer, A. NFTs in practice–non-fungible tokens as core component of a blockchain-based event ticketing application. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2019), Munich, Germany, 15–18 December 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Alpala, L.O.; Quiroga-Parra, D.J.; Torres, J.C.; Peluffo-Ordóñez, D.H. Smart Factory Using Virtual Reality and Online Multi-User: Towards a Metaverse for Experimental Frameworks. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 6258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dolgui, A.; Ivanov, D. Metaverse supply chain and operations management. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, X.F.; Lian, Z.T.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Jin, H. Wisdom manufacturing: New humans-computers-things collaborative manufacturing model. Comput. Integr. Manuf. Syst. 2014, 20, 1490–1498. [Google Scholar]
- Jing, X.; Yao, X. Big Data Driven Cloud-Fog Manufacturing Architecture. Comput. Integr. Manuf. Syst. 2019, 25, 2119–2139. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, N.; Yao, X.; Wang, K. Current status and prospect of future Internet oriented wisdom manufacturing. Sci. Sin. Technol. 2022, 52, 55–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, X.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, C.; Liu, M. Proactive manufacturing—A big-data driven emerging manufacturing paradigm. Comput. Integr. Manuf. Syst. 2017, 23, 172–185. [Google Scholar]
- Yao, X.; Huang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Mai, H.; Yang, E.; Yu, H. Autonomous smart manufacturing: Social-cyber-physical interaction, reference architecture and operation mechanism. Comput. Integr. Manuf. Syst. 2022, 28, 325–338. [Google Scholar]
- Yao, X.; Ma, N.; Zhang, J.; Wang, K.; Yang, E.; Faccio, M. Enhancing wisdom manufacturing as industrial metaverse for industry and society 5.0. J. Intell. Manuf. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Giovanni, P. Sustainability of the Metaverse: A Transition to Industry 5.0. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lovell, J. Big Data: A Big Energy Challenge. Australian Energy Council: Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Available online: https://www.energycouncil.com.au/analysis/big-data-a-big-energy-challenge/ (accessed on 20 July 2023).
- Jones, N. How to stop data centres from gobbling up the world’s electricity. Nature 2018, 561, 163–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Y.; Su, Z.; Zhang, N.; Xing, R.; Liu, D.; Luan, T.H.; Shen, X. A survey on metaverse: Fundamentals, security, and privacy. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaddoura, S.; Husseiny, F.A. The rising trend of Metaverse in education: Challenges, opportunities, and ethical considerations. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 2023, 9, e1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parker, C.; Yoo, S.; Lee, Y.; Fredericks, J.; Dey, A.; Cho, Y.; Billinghurst, M. Towards an Inclusive and Accessible Metaverse. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Hamburg, Germany, 23–28 April 2023; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Zhong, J.; Zheng, Y. Empowering future education: Learning in the Edu-Metaverse. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET), Hong Kong, China, 19–22 July 2022; pp. 292–295. [Google Scholar]
- Islam, S.; Tan, T.M. Trust in Digital Asset Transactions in a Web 3 Based Metaverse. Marketing 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Schwirn, M. Putting Metaverse Concerns into Perspective. Computer Weekly. 2022. Available online: https://www.computerweekly.com/feature/Putting-metaverse-concerns-into-perspective (accessed on 20 July 2023).
- Dave, S. Digital India Act to Police Social Media and OTT Platforms, Economic Times. 2022. Available online: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/technology/digital-india-act-to-police-social-media-and-ott-platforms/articleshow/93601085.cms?from=mdr (accessed on 20 July 2023).
- Kulasooriya, D.; Khoo, M.; Tan, M. Being Human in a Digital World: Questions to Guide the Internet’s Evolution. Deloitte Insights. 2023. Available online: https://www2.deloitte.com/uk/en/insights/regions/asia-pacific/human-centric-approach-in-metaverse.html/#endnote-11 (accessed on 20 July 2023).
Web Version | Description | Technical Aspects | Application Examples | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Web 1.0 | Static, read-only web content | Basic HyperText Markup Language (HTML) and Cascade Styling Sheet (CSS) for layout; | Early websites, online encyclopedias | [15] |
Web 2.0 | Interactive, user-generated content | Asynchronous JavaScript and XM (AJAX) for real-time interactivity | Social media platforms, Wikipedia, YouTube | [16] |
Web 3.0 | Semantic web, machine-understandable data | Resource Description Framework (RDF), ontologies, metadata for semantic understanding | Linked data projects, semantic search engines | [17] |
Web 4.0 | AI-driven, immersive and personalized experiences | Artificial intelligence (AI), Internet of Things (IoT) integration, virtual reality, blockchain potential | AI virtual assistants, mixed reality applications | [13] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Mourtzis, D. The Metaverse in Industry 5.0: A Human-Centric Approach towards Personalized Value Creation. Encyclopedia 2023, 3, 1105-1120. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3030080
Mourtzis D. The Metaverse in Industry 5.0: A Human-Centric Approach towards Personalized Value Creation. Encyclopedia. 2023; 3(3):1105-1120. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3030080
Chicago/Turabian StyleMourtzis, Dimitris. 2023. "The Metaverse in Industry 5.0: A Human-Centric Approach towards Personalized Value Creation" Encyclopedia 3, no. 3: 1105-1120. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3030080
APA StyleMourtzis, D. (2023). The Metaverse in Industry 5.0: A Human-Centric Approach towards Personalized Value Creation. Encyclopedia, 3(3), 1105-1120. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3030080