Next Article in Journal
Ageing Organizations: Reviewing the Literature and Making a Few Recommendations for Human Resource Management
Previous Article in Journal
Belbin’s Team Role Balance and Team Effectiveness in Community Mental Health Teams in an Area of Northwest Ireland: Implications for Leadership
Previous Article in Special Issue
Perceived Workplace Support for Employee Participation in Workplace Wellness Programs: A Brief Report
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effectiveness of Digital and Analog Stress Management Interventions within Occupational Health Management in the Public Sector

1
Institute of Psychology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
2
Department of Health and Social Work, IU International University, 99084 Erfurt, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Merits 2023, 3(4), 615-639; https://doi.org/10.3390/merits3040037
Submission received: 3 August 2023 / Revised: 25 September 2023 / Accepted: 28 September 2023 / Published: 2 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue HRM Leading the Way to Workplace Happiness)

Abstract

Stress increases among the working population in Germany. Workplace stress management interventions are therefore becoming increasingly important, especially in the public sector, which has a higher structural risk for work-related stress than other organizations. Currently, face-to-face formats dominate, but promising digital offerings are being developed. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a stress management intervention as a face-to-face and self-guided digital format, referring to the Job Demands-Resources Model. The preregistered study applied a randomized control group design in which N = 65 public service employees were assigned to face-to-face training, an online course, or waitlist control group. Participants completed online questionnaires before the intervention, shortly after the intervention, and six weeks later. Although trends for reductions in emotional exhaustion and perceived stress were evident among the intervention groups, mixed analyses of variance showed no interaction effects between the time and group on the outcomes. The main effects showed a significant decrease in stress levels regardless of the group and significant differences between intervention groups, with the online course reporting the lowest stress level. The results indicate that digital and analog stress management interventions can have desired effects within occupational health management. However, many unpredictable events (e.g., illness, vacation during the intervention) seem to influence the effectiveness in the workplace setting, and so further research is needed.
Keywords: stress management; work engagement; online course; face-to-face training; public sector; workplace prevention; Job Demands-Resources Model stress management; work engagement; online course; face-to-face training; public sector; workplace prevention; Job Demands-Resources Model

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fasthoff, R.M.; Nolte, L.; Kortsch, T. Effectiveness of Digital and Analog Stress Management Interventions within Occupational Health Management in the Public Sector. Merits 2023, 3, 615-639. https://doi.org/10.3390/merits3040037

AMA Style

Fasthoff RM, Nolte L, Kortsch T. Effectiveness of Digital and Analog Stress Management Interventions within Occupational Health Management in the Public Sector. Merits. 2023; 3(4):615-639. https://doi.org/10.3390/merits3040037

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fasthoff, Runa Maj, Lea Nolte, and Timo Kortsch. 2023. "Effectiveness of Digital and Analog Stress Management Interventions within Occupational Health Management in the Public Sector" Merits 3, no. 4: 615-639. https://doi.org/10.3390/merits3040037

APA Style

Fasthoff, R. M., Nolte, L., & Kortsch, T. (2023). Effectiveness of Digital and Analog Stress Management Interventions within Occupational Health Management in the Public Sector. Merits, 3(4), 615-639. https://doi.org/10.3390/merits3040037

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop