Next Article in Journal
Analysis and Optimization of Laser Beam Welding Parameters for Aluminium Composite (Al-Zn-Cu Alloy) by Grey Relational Optimization
Previous Article in Journal
Pullulan/Collagen Scaffolds Promote Chronic Wound Healing via Mesenchymal Stem Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Unveiling the Intricacies of Microbial Pigments as Sustainable Alternatives to Synthetic Colorants: Recent Trends and Advancements

1
University Institute of Biotechnology, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali 140413, India
2
Department of Chemical Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micro 2024, 4(4), 621-640; https://doi.org/10.3390/micro4040038
Submission received: 17 September 2024 / Revised: 10 October 2024 / Accepted: 23 October 2024 / Published: 29 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Microscale Biology and Medicines)

Abstract

:
Bio-pigments are the colored primary and secondary metabolites released by microbes under stress conditions and are crucial for adaptation. Bio-pigments are being widely accepted for industrial utilization due to their natural form, organic source, and biodegradability. Also, the ease of cultivation, scalability and cost-effectiveness in terms of pigment extraction is bringing bio-pigments into the limelight. Chemical dyes are carcinogenic and pose a serious threat to human lives, which is another issue that environmentalists must address. However, bacterial pigments are safe to employ; therefore, the food, pharmaceutical, textile, and cosmetics sectors may all benefit from their applications. The therapeutic nature of bacterial pigments is revealed because of their antimicrobial, anticancer, cytotoxic, and remarkable antioxidant properties. Bio-pigments also have multifaceted properties and thus can be an attractive source for the next generation to live a sustainable life. The present review discusses the importance of bacterial pigments over synthetic dyes and their therapeutic and industrial potential. Extensive literature has been reviewed on the biomedical application of bacterial pigments, and further opportunities and future challenges have been discussed.

1. Introduction

The course of adaptation is vital for survival and evolution of microbes. Environmental stressors and cellular damage triggers adaptive mechanisms and the synthesis of pigments that are vivid secondary metabolites created by certain microorganisms in response to diverse environmental factors (Figure 1). These microorganisms possess multifunctional biotic properties and exhibit a range of activities [1]. For example, several bio-pigments have antioxidant properties and are compatible with optimizing functional foods or nutraceuticals [2,3].
Before the 19th century, natural bio-pigments from plants (Curcuma, Indigo) and animals were widely used in food, cosmetics and textiles due to their safety. The synthesis of mauve by W. Perkins in 1850 boosted the bio-pigment industry, impacting India’s traditional Indigo sector. By 1900, around 80 synthetic pigments were used in food despite limited knowledge of their toxicity and purity, leading to some reported toxic effects. According to a study, the majority of synthetic pigments cannot be used in food or cosmetics due to their lethal side effects [4]. The synthetic additives present two issues: first, several synthetic pigments have recently been removed due to concerns about their toxicity or allergenicity; second, even when synthetic additives have been proven safe at sufficient levels, they still appear as “artificial colorants” on the eatable’s packings; therefore, this makes it unclear to consumers. Natural color additives have begun to replace some artificial colorants due to rising concerns over their safety. For instance, artificial colorants, including tartrazin and azorubin, induce allergies [5]. The emerging need for natural pigments, both from natural and synthetic sources, can be seen in the food business. Developing new sources of natural pigments and improving the extraction methods establish new ways to easily launch the products into the market [6]. As the demand for the food industry grows, so does the availability of traditionally made pigments, necessitating the development of new alternatives, such as colorant synthesis through fermentation, as it is said to be the most prominent method for pigment production at a cheaper scale. Riboflavin and β-carotene are the two pigments that are currently generated commercially by fermentation [7].
The very first bio-pigment was derived from milk in 1879 and was named lactoflavin. Later, another variant of yellow dye was extracted from the same source, named riboflavin [8]. This breakthrough shed light on bio-pigment isolation from natural resources. Microbial pigments have been extensively researched and are commonly employed for adding color to clothing, textiles, cosmetics, and even food. These pigments, which are derived from microorganisms, undergo a thorough examination and are frequently utilized in various industries to enhance the visual appeal of their products. They play a vital role in providing vibrant hues and shades to fabrics, makeup and consumables, making them visually appealing to consumers. The utilization of microbial pigments not only adds aesthetic value but also opens up new possibilities for sustainable and eco-friendly coloring options in different applications. Studies have revealed that pigments isolated from microorganisms also have substantial pharmaceutical properties. Several microorganisms have been reported to secrete bio-pigments that comprise functional properties. For instance, the pigment isolated from Haematococcus pluvialis used as a food additive and pigment from Paracoccus denitrificans exhibit antiplasmic and anticancer properties [9]. In comparison with other plant-based or chemical-based pigments, microbial pigments are more stable, water-soluble, and rapidly produced. However, they have certain limitations when it comes to exposure to light, heat or an acidic pH [10].
The widespread use of synthetic dyes and the waste from this sector pose a substantial hazard to the atmosphere [9]. A survey indicated that in the textile industry, on an average investment of $2.3 billion every year, 1.3 million metric tons of dye are produced and only 15% is used; the rest leads to environmental pollution [11]. The ever-increasing expansion of the textile industry poses concerns regarding environmental preservation and seeks a substitute for synthetic dyes.

2. Microbial Pigments: Production and Market

Natural pigments are usually five to ten times as expensive as their synthetic equivalents. In 1987, the market for natural pigments was expected to be worth $35 million, but by 2000, it had grown to $250 million [12]. Natural pigments are expected to have a market value of between $350 and $600 million, with an expected increase in market value from $1.5 billion by the end of 2020 to $2.5 billion by 2025. The two biggest markets for food pigments are in Europe and the US. By the year 2031, the organic pigments market is anticipated to reach a value of $8.4 billion. From 2022 through 2031, this expansion is anticipated to occur at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.2%. The market is highly fragmented, with major companies such as Clariant, DIC Corporation, BASF SE, Ferro Corporation, and Lanxess holding significant market shares. The market is influenced by various factors, including the increasing demand for high-performance pigments, growing awareness about the environmental impact of pigments, and the need for bio-based paints and coatings. The market for organic pigments is divided into different geographical regions, namely North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and LAMEA. Each region represents a distinct market segment in terms of organic pigments. The Asia-Pacific region is projected to be the dominant market, holding the largest market share among these regions. This is due to the region’s rapid industrialization and growing population. North America and Europe are important markets for organic pigments as well. These regions are propelled by the existence of major industry players and the need for top-notch pigments across various sectors.
The most common pigment to be used in food and pharma industries is carotenoids. According to worldwide market surveys, the market potential for carotenoids in foods, medications, beverages, cosmetics, animal feed and dietary supplements was estimated to be 26.1, 9.2, 6.5, 34.8, and 23.5%, respectively, between the years 2018 and 2024. At this point, the process of synthesizing carotenoids is primarily reliant on chemical methods, accounting for around 80–90% of the overall synthesis [13]. Researchers tend to shift to microbial carotenoid synthesis due to their affordability and sustainability [14]. There are only certain bacterial-derived pigments in the market that have received FDA approval, such as riboflavin extracted from Eremothecium gossypii, lycopene and alpha-carotene extracted from Bacillus trispora, astaxanthin extracted from Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous and prodigiosin from Monascus sp. [15].

3. Habitats of Pigmented Microorganisms

Pigment-producing bacteria are found in both marine and terrestrial environments. These bacteria are varied and may be present deep in the water in tropical and arctic climates. According to research, pigment-producing microorganisms are more substantial and can withstand extreme environmental conditions. Pigment-producing bacteria fall into two categories: real marine species and adaptable bacteria (terrestrial species and evolved into marine species). It is believed that adaptable bacteria synthesize unique bioactive chemicals that help them adapt to aquatic environments [16]. Marine bacteria are more diverse in pigments due to their nutritional availability and geographical locations [17,18,19,20,21,22]. Bacterial sp. such as Micropeneta laotica (dimorphic), Penicillium purpurogenum (xerophilic), Thermus sp. (thermophilic), Salinibacter (extreme halophilic), Kocuria polaris (psychrophilic), Acidobacterium (acidophilic), Halorubrum sp. (polyextremophile), Diaphanoeca grandis (radioresistance) and Cellulophaga lytica (color mimic) show polyextremophilic characteristics, which help them to survive under stress conditions [23,24,25,26,27]. Sponge, mussels, sea cucumbers, sea grass, sediments and microbial and algal mats in cold region lakes, corals, lagoons, oil-contaminated soil and sea ice have all been stated to be devoid of bacterial colors up to this point [16]. However, a few studies have specifically stated that sponges and sea grass can be a significant source of microorganisms with pigments [28,29]. Few studies have been extensively done on extreme climatic conditions due to high UV radiation and low temperatures. It has been reported that high frequencies of pigmented microbes can be isolated from glacial areas, algal mats, sediments, snow and sea weeds. Pigments serve multiple functions, including photoprotection and UV absorption, which help microbes to survive in harsh conditions. High pigmentation rates were also noted in 79% of bacterial isolates from ice cores and 57% from Antarctic ice cores, with a similar trend in samples from Antarctic lakes and supraglacial systems. This microbial pigmentation diversity holds considerable biotechnological potential, offering novel compounds with applications in various fields [1]. Furthermore, there is another study on extremophile pigmented microbes isolated from central Europe. They require more extreme conditions to grow and develop. Microbes are basically isolated from caves and karst; besides their low nutrient value, they also have severe depletion in oxygen and extreme redox potential [1,2]. It is yet unknown what influences how these bacteria move about in various environments and geographical regions. As a result, new untapped sources need to be looked into to discover these natural pigment-producing bacteria.

4. Analytics of Bio-Pigments

To meet expanding desires for microbial pigments on the global market, genetic engineering and fermentation techniques are mostly used to mass-produce low-cost, exceptionally durable pigments (Figure 2). A variety of instrumental-based logistic approaches may be employed to purify and analyze these pigments for physical and chemical properties. There are several methods available to achieve the desired outcome. These methods include Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy, thin-layer chromatography, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance, high-performance liquid chromatography, and gel filtration chromatography [6].
Microbial pigments are becoming more popular in the market as a result of their distinctive attributes as anticancer agents, mutagenesis inhibitors, antioxidants, and bio-indicators. These properties make them a promising source in textiles, cosmetics, food, and pharmaceutical industries [30,31]. Various strains of microorganisms, including Bacillus sp., Sarcina sp., Serratia sp., Rhodotorula sp., Penicillium sp., Monascus sp., Streptomyces sp. and Cryptococcus sp., are capable of synthesizing all kinds of pigments [32]. Other than bacteria, fungi and yeast are also reported to produce pigments, like Aspergillus nidulans, Fusarium verticillioides and Rhodotorula sp. An anti-tumor pigment known as dolastatin has been isolated from marine invertebrates like mollusks and sea hares [33]. Epibiotic bacteria present in various vertebrates and invertebrates like seagrass, corals, mollusks, sponges, bryozoans, nudibranchs, ascidians and tunicates are responsible for pigment production [34]. Epibiotic bacterial species such as Pseudoalteromonas, Serratia marcescens and Pseudoalteromonas tunicate produce a yellow pigment known as tambjamine [35,36,37]. According to a theory, the bryozoan uses tambjamine as a chemical defense mechanism to prevent the spotted kelpfish Gibbonsia elegans from eating on it [38,39]. These microbial pigments can use different kinds of substrates, as shown in Table 1, to enhance their production, also making them cost-effective.

5. Genetically Modified Organisms in the Pigment Industry

5.1. Metabolic Engineering

Genetic engineering allows for the modification of bacteria to generate specific pigments. This method has led to a significant improvement in fermentation efficiency and an additional cost reduction. To synthesize these pigments, various strategies have been proposed to develop GMOs (genetically modified organisms). These strategies include over-expressing the key enzymes and the insertion or deletion of specific genes involved in the biosynthesis of pigments. These genetic modifications not only improve microbial strains but also help to overcome the toxicity arising from synthetic dyes [63]. For instance, a GM strain of Corynebacterium glutamicum has been developed by manipulating the transcriptional repressor gene crtR to enhance the production of a specific carotenoid called decaprenoxanthin [64]. Another GM strain, Rhodobacter sphaeroides, has been developed by using gene manipulation methods to enhance lycopene production [65]. Furthermore, scientists have successfully manipulated E. coli at the genetic level to produce various pigments, including β-carotene and zeaxanthin. One notable achievement in this field is the synthesis of a modified strain of Escherichia coli through the alteration of a gene involved in ATP synthesis, pentose phosphate, and the TCA (citric acid cycle). This modified strain of Escherichia coli has been specifically designed to synthesize β-carotene [66]. Hence, the application of GM microorganisms can be widely employed for the large-scale manufacturing of pigments that possess various medicinal and industrial uses.

5.2. Gene Cloning

Gene cloning in pigmented microorganisms is also a part of genetically modified organisms involving isolation and insertion of specific pigment-producing genes into the genome of host microorganisms to enhance or introduce pigment production. This process has significant implications for industrial biotechnology, environmental monitoring and medical applications. The first step in gene cloning involves identifying and isolating the gene responsible for pigmented production. This is typically achieved through techniques such as polymerase chain reaction or restriction enzyme digestion. The isolated gene is then inserted into a plasmid vector, which will carry the gene into the host microorganism [67,68,69]. Plasmids are circular DNA molecules that can be replicated independently within a bacterial cell. Vectors often contain selectable markers, such as antibiotic resistance genes, to facilitate the identification of successfully transformed cells. The recombinant plasmid is introduced into host microorganisms through a process known as transformation. Methods such as electroporation or chemical transformation are commonly used to induce the uptake of plasmid DNA by the host cells. Following transformation, the host cells are cultured on selective media containing antibiotics. Only those cells that have successfully taken up the plasmid will survive. These cells are then screened for pigment production using spectrophotometric or chromatographic methods. The cloned gene is expressed under controlled conditions to maximize pigment production. This may involve optimizing growth conditions such as pH, temperature, and nutrient availability, as well as using inducible promoters to control the timing and level of gene expression [69,70]. This involves Serratia marcescens producing prodigiosin pigment having antimicrobial and anticancer properties.
The biosynthetic pathway involves several genes, including pigC, pigD and pigE. These genes can be cloned into a suitable host to enhance pigment production [70,71,72,73,74]. The gene involved in biosynthesis can be isolated using PCR with specific primers and then cloned into expression vectors such as pET21a, which is suitable for high-level expression in E. coli. The recombinant plasmid is introduced into E. coli via electroporation. Transformed cells are selected on LB plates containing ampicillin. Positive clones are screened for prodigiosin production by measuring the absorbance at 535 nm. The expression conditions, including temperature, IPTG concentration (for induction) and media composition, are optimized to enhance violacein yield [70,72,73,74,75]. Experiments are conducted to determine the optimal conditions for maximum pigment production. Another scientist also studied melanin pigment isolated from Pseudomonas putida. This gene is cloned into an expression vector, such as pET21b, which is suitable for use in E. coli. Moreover, red carotenoid pigment termed lycopene is isolated from Pantoea ananatis. These genes are then cloned into an expression vector, such as pTrc99A, suitable for use in E. coli [70,74,75,76,77].
CRISPR-Cas9 (Clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats) has sparked a trend, with numerous laboratories utilizing this technology to explore novel approaches in biotechnology, particularly genome engineering. Therefore, the CRISPR-Cas9 system can effectively be utilized in bacteria, yeast, and fungi for metabolic engineering. This approach enables these organisms to function as cellular factories, resulting in the cost-effective production of natural food colors [78]. Nielsen et al. [79] have devised a system for Aspergillus nidulans that incorporates the CRISPR-Cas9 system to find potential applications in various fungal systems without requiring significant modifications. The researchers demonstrated its effectiveness in a wide range of filamentous fungi, highlighting its versatility and adaptability. The CRISPR-Cas9 system has also been implemented in Talaromyces atroroseus, which is used as a natural red food color in food industries. Furthermore, it has also been employed in recent studies involving Penicillium chrysogenum to improve filamentous properties [80].

6. Significance of Pigmented Bacteria

Pigmented microorganisms are significant due to their diverse applications in various fields, including pharmaceuticals, medicine and industry. These microorganisms produce pigments with unique properties, such as antimicrobial, antioxidant and anticancer activities, making them valuable for drug development and therapeutic purposes. In agriculture, microbial pigments can act as natural pesticides and growth promoters, contributing to sustainable farming practices. Additionally, these pigments are used in the food and textile industries as natural colorants, offering a safer alternative to synthetic dyes. The study and utilization of pigmented microorganisms are expanding, driven by their potential in biotechnological innovations and environmental sustainability. The following review discusses the applications of various pigmented microorganisms in detail.

6.1. Cosmetic Industries

Traditionally, herbal pastes, oils and mineral ingredients were used to protect the skin against infections and harsh conditions. People have used cosmetics for self-expression, to make temporary tattoos and to color their faces. In some cultures, cosmetics were even used for spiritual purposes; for example, in ancient Egypt, kohl was applied around the eyes to ward off evil spirits. With time, using advanced techniques, people began experimenting with new ingredients and products to create more effective beauty products [81]. The cosmetic industry consumes a global market nowadays, with 2000 manufacturers in the USA itself [82]. Globally, skin-whitening agents are the most desirable cosmetic products, as lighter skin tone is the prominent beauty factor among various Asian cultures. Investment in skin-whitening agents is increasing annually, especially in the markets of China, Japan and India [83]. Skin color is defined by various intrinsic and extrinsic factors like type of skin, genetic background, exposure to sun and pollution, melanin, pigment, etc. [84,85,86]. Though pigmentation is important for protecting skin against harmful UV injuries, excess pigment results in aesthetic problems, such as ephelides pigmentation, melasma and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation [83,84,85,86,87].
Traditional drugs like hydroquinone, corticosteroids and amino mercuric chloride brighten skin by either preventing melanocyte maturation or interfering with the process termed melanogenesis. The majority, if not all, of the stated drugs are, however, intimately linked to side effects such as prickling, contact dermatitis, irritation, high toxicity and sensitivity [88,89,90,91]. Cosmetic R&D industries effortfully develop innovative whitening agents that limit tyrosinase activity (TYR) to reduce the adverse effect on melanocytes and minimize hyperpigmentation. At present, natural skin-whitening agents are thus gaining interest in the cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries [92]. Recent research has demonstrated that melanin pigment, which was isolated from Streptomyces bellus MSA1, can be used in the production of bio-lip cream when coupled with beeswax, coconut oil, and lanolin [93]. Melanin has a high UV absorption tendency and, therefore, is a crucial ingredient in sunscreens, plastic films, varnishes, and cosmetics [94]. Few studies have reported on the sunscreen action and antioxidant properties of bacterial strains, which can be a valuable tool for the cosmetics industry [95,96]. Melanin is an important skin pigment, as it creates an epidermal–melanin barrier that reduces UV transmission to underlying skin cells, and UV-induced DNA photoproducts are a major cause of skin darkening. Moreover, bacterial pigments are stable and, hence, can be used as coloring agents in other cosmetic products, such as eye shadows, nail paints, hair colors, etc. [97,98].

6.2. Food and Pharmaceutical Industries

Pigments having potential health and nutritional benefits are highly valued and in demand and are mostly preferred by food industries. Therefore, finding new sources for natural and safe food colorants is required, rather than using synthetic colorants like tartrazine, reactive blue, vat green, and sunset yellow [99]. Microbial-extracted pigment carotenoids show an expanding business because they enhance food organoleptic properties without affecting food quality, eliminate many diseases, and have anti-aging properties [100]. Despite several benefits, microbial pigments have several drawbacks, such as less shelf-life and colors fading over time, sensitivity towards light, heat, pH and temperature, etc. To overcome this situation, scientists have discovered the use of nano-formulation, encapsulation, and non-emulsion techniques to enhance the stability of the pigment [101,102]. Encapsulated violet pigment shows more effective coloration in yogurts and jellies [103]. A wide range of microbial pigments are being utilized in various food and beverage industries. These pigments consist of beta-carotene and lycopene obtained from Blakeslea trispora; astaxanthin derived from different bacteria, algae, and Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous; pink-red pigment obtained from Penicillium oxalicum; pigments from Monascus sp.; and riboflavin obtained from Aphis gossypii, Dipterocarpus globosus, Candida guilliermondii and Eremothecium ashbyii [31,101,104]. Research has also emphasized the commercial potential of anthraquinone and azaphilone-producing strains, such as Penicillium sp. and Talaromyces sp., for food coloration [105,106,107]. Also, carotenoid pigments are highly used as food additives for animals or aquatic species [108,109]. Fungal species also produce colors, but extensive tests are required to check the virulence and toxicity [106,110,111].
Additionally, the expanding interest in adding microbe feed additions to livestock diets is a result of the rising cost of feed made from plants and animals. Over the past ten years, experts in the fields of nutrition and microbiology have extensively explored and revealed the various advantages associated with the utilization of microorganisms as feed additives, viz. (i) microbial cells contain a higher amount of protein in their biomass compared to grains, and the amino acid content is of high quality compared to eggs; (ii) certain beneficial microbes can produce vitamins, including vitamin B12, which cannot be performed by eukaryotic organisms; (iii) microbial production is not dependent on seasons and can be carried out in various climates without the need for specific planting zones; and (iv) microorganisms can be cultivated using waste materials, offering a potential solution to cost-related issues [112]. Photosynthetic bacteria (PSB) are acknowledged as a highly advantageous source of microbial feed due to their abundant content of protein, lipids, essential amino acids, fatty acids, ubiquinone-10 (CoQ10), vitamins and carotenoids [113,114,115,116]. Figure 3 depicts the ecological functions and other applications of important microbial pigments. The bacterium Enterococcus faecalis PA2, which undergoes photosynthesis, has been recently identified as a potential carotenoid producer. It exhibits a comparatively high level of biomass production [117]. In terms of photosynthesis, PSBs can produce various kinds of carotenoids, such as monocyclic, bicyclic and acyclic groups. Certain carotenoids have been exclusively found in PSB and can be added to animal feed, specifically aqua feeds, to enhance coloration and boost the immune response [25,118].

6.3. Therapeutic Significance

Microbial pigments come in a variation of colors and are recognized as defense systems against UV irradiation, enhancing the pigment’s stability and allowing microorganisms to better adapt to their environment compared to non-pigmented microorganisms [21,118,119]. Some bioactive pigmented bacteria show symbiotic or epibiotic relationships with their hosts and protect their hosts from other pathogenic microbes and predatory species [120]. Extremophilic bacteria, including Thermus filiformis, Halococcus morrhuae and Halobacterium salinarum, create C50-carotenoids, which are crucial for the integrity of cell membranes [121]. It has been proven that bacterial phenazines control the cellular gene terminologies that help the bacteria survive and synthesize biofilms [122]. Carotenoids can decrease the presence of oxygen radicals that are generated by reactive nitrogen and oxygen species, as well as other nonbiological radicals within the cells [123]. A recent study has shown that the violet pigment produced by Chromobacterium violaceum can safeguard the lipid membranes of rat liver microsomes, soya bean and egg phosphatidylcholine liposomes from peroxidation caused by reactive hydroxyl radicals [124].
Violacein pigments are also known to be effective against other bacteria as well. Pigments produced by Janthinobacterium lividum and Chromobacterium violaceum are seen to restrict the growth of a variety of Gram-positive bacteria, such as Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis. Furthermore, it has been concluded that pigment produced by these two species also has antifungal properties against Candida albicans, suggesting that violacein may be useful in the treatment of fungal infections. The ability to produce violacein pigments is an evolutionary advantage for these bacteria, as it provides them with a means of self-defense against predators and other hostile microorganisms [125]. Anti-phagocytosis properties are thought to be one of the positive functions of bacterial pigments. Similar to indigoidine, some Roseobacter strains create blue quinine compounds that eliminate other possibly rival bacteria [126]. Pyoverdine pigment generated by Pseudomonas fluorescens aids iron transport in plant cells as well [127]. Prodigiosin pigment-producing Vibrio strains are a thousand times more stable than non-pigment-producing Vibrio sp. when exposed to UV radiation [128].
Black pigmentation is said to have developed as a result of living things adjusting to harsh environmental circumstances. Melanin pigments, also termed cellular protectors, not only neutralize toxins like antibiotics and other drugs but also act as a survival factor for tolerating stressful conditions like starvation, high temperature, and hyperosmotic stress in Vibro cholerae [129,130]. Research has shown that pigment-producing marine bacteria are more resistant to drugs and heavy metals [131]. For mammals, insects, and microbes, the functional significance of this kind of pigment has been thoroughly examined [132,133]. The function of pigment in plants is not fully uncovered, but the research suggests that the dark color may also benefit them in certain ways. Melanin-based color is crucial for camouflage in plants, just like it is in mammals. The hull color in the majority of wild grains is black. The ripe, black-hulled seeds that drop to the ground are thought to be undetectable to birds over the backdrop of soil [134]. In theory, seeds with a black grain color have the potential to germinate earlier compared to yellow seeds. This is because black-grained seeds can absorb a greater amount of solar energy from light surfaces, converting it into heat. If we distinguish between black and white barley races, it is revealed that the black variety tends to reach maturity earlier than the white variety [135]. Melanins give seed shells more tensile strength, shielding them from harm. Additionally, due to its toxicity, melanin confers resistance to insects and vermin [136]. Black seed coverings on sunflower seeds protect them against mole larvae harm better than white-colored seeds [137]. Because melanins are a potent source of antioxidants, they can provide seeds with more vigor and protect them from environmental stresses [138,139]. Fungal melanins also protect against oxidative stress and reactive oxygen species, as well as against antimicrobial agents. In addition, they are known to be involved in the signaling and regulation of gene expression in fungi. In addition, melanins are believed to have a role in the formation of biofilms by offering a protective barrier and assisting in the cohesion of cells [140]. Table 2 enlists various microbial pigments, source organisms and their therapeutic effects.
Moreover, bio-pigments protect their host against predators. The endophytic fungi’s anthraquinones protect its host plants from pests and other microbes [162]. Tambjamine shows natural defense mechanisms against predators in a variety of microorganisms [37]. Interestingly, the fungus called Candida purpurea uses a variety of colors, including orange, red, yellow, and black, to warn off predators [163]. Pigments produced by microbes play a significant role in various antibacterial activities [164], virulence [142], antioxidant activity [124], ultraviolet absorption [143] and membrane stability [144].

6.3.1. Antibacterial Properties

Around 700,000 people die globally each year, and if essential steps are not taken, this number is likely to reach 10 million by 2050. The World Health Organization (WHO) has found 12 microorganisms that pose the greatest threat to humans due to their antibiotic resistance [145]. Melanins, flavins, carotenoids, monascins, quinones and violacein are a few examples of antibacterial pigments [146]. The soil bacterium Massilia sp. generates a violet pigment with deoxy violacein and violacein that has potential antibacterial activity against Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus and E. coli [147]. A different study found that the bioactive pigment of Streptomyces hygroscopicus has been active against Klebsiella sp. and E. coli cultures, as well as VRSA (vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus), MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) and ESBL (extended-spectrum beta-lactamase) [148]. Red pigment derived from Neisseria meningitidis was found to inhibit Gram-negative bacteria like E. coli and Pseudomonas sp. [149]. E. coli and Salmonella typhi were both susceptible to the antibacterial effects of Bacillus megaterium SU15’s orange pigment [149]. Furthermore, there is a pigment with a green hue that is generated by a specific strain of Bacillus cereus, known as cerein. This particular pigment has bactericidal properties against other strains of Bacillus cereus [150]. Certain research provides clear evidence that a melanin pigment extracted from Streptomyces djakartensis displayed potent anti-bacterial effects against E. coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa, even at minimal concentrations [151].

6.3.2. Antifungal Properties

Fungal pigments are secondary metabolites that are synthesized by mycelium in specific circumstances, such as nutrient scarcity or adverse environmental conditions. These pigments serve as a response to stress conditions and are not essential for the primary functioning of organisms [152]. Over the past 20 years, numerous lethal fungal and fungal-like illnesses have been documented in both plants and animals, endangering the safety of our food sources [153]. Amphotericin B, which is traditionally used as an antifungal treatment, is expensive and hazardous. Natural resources (plants and microbes) are assessed for their antifungal abilities to solve these issues. Serratia marcescens and Neisseria sp. are several pigmented bacteria with antifungal capabilities [154]. Prodigiosin is a tripyrole pigment that was initially identified in Serratia marcescens and is an efficient biocontrol agent for cyclamen’s grey mold [155]. When prodigiosin and chitinolytic enzymes were used together, a synergistic inhibitory effect was seen [46]. The red color pigment that was extracted and purified from the soil bacterium Neisseria sp. had potent activity against a variety of fungal species, including Candida sp., Aspergillus sp. and Trichoderma sp. [156]. Additionally, Janthinobacterium lividum violacein’s phytopathogenic fungi that cause white root rot are susceptible to its fungicidal effects [157]. In addition, during the investigation of the antifungal properties of Janthinobacterium lividum against aspergillus unguis in both pure culture and in the presence of Pseudomonas chlororaphis, it was discovered that the Janthinobacterium lividum culture exhibited the highest effectiveness. It inhibited the growth of mold mycelium by 46.3% and the Pseudomonas strain by only 21%. However, in the presence of Janthinobacterium lividum, the degree of suppression increased to 32%. This suggests that there are competing interactions between the bacteria, resulting in changes to overall antagonistic activity [158].

6.3.3. Anticancer Properties

Various factors contribute to the development of malignancy in somatic cells, including carcinogenic pollutants, unhealthy dietary patterns, oncogenic bacteria and viruses, and other unidentified causes. These factors collectively contribute to the initiation and progression of abnormal cell growth in the body [159]. Oncology chemotherapy has a major drawback, i.e., toxicity and resistance. It has been reported by various scientists that bacterial pigments could be the solution to these problems. These limits are overcome by influencing autophagy pathway apoptosis in cancer cell lines. Out of all bacterial pigments, violacein induces apoptosis in HL60 cells. It is a type of cancer cell line that is used as an example to study myeloid leukemia disease but does not present in normal lymphocytes [160]. Streptomyces glaucescens NEAE-H produced black extracellular melanin that was harmful to a skin cancer cell line [94]. Human hepatoma and glioblastoma cells were strongly suppressed by the blue-green pigment pyocyanin [162,163]. With an IC50 gene, the yellow pigment from S. griseoaurantiacus was one of the types of carotenoids that significantly caused cytotoxicity against cervical cancer-causing cells [164]. Flexirubin, a type of carotenoid extracted from Chryseobacterium artocarpi, induced programmed cell death in MCF7 breast cancer cells and exhibited enhanced effects when used in conjunction with silver nanoparticles [165].
In human cervical and laryngeal cancer cells, prodigiosin (PG) demonstrated potent anticancer and apoptotic effects [166]. Doxorubicin (Dox) and PG together have a synergistic impact on oral squamous cell cancer [167]. The working of PG and its processing is yet to be defined. Scientists have noticed that the red-colored pigment can suppress Wnt/-catenin signaling and lower the levels of cyclin D1 [168]. It has been suggested that PG offers therapeutic potential for treating advanced breast malignancies.

6.3.4. Antiparasitic Properties

Parasitic infections are among the most lethal and rapidly spreading infections transmitted by vectors. Examples of these diseases include malaria, encephalitis, leishmaniasis, and helminthiasis. They invade the host’s body and hinder its growth by depriving it of vital nutrients. Roughly one billion individuals, which accounts for approximately one-sixth of the global population, have experienced at least one type of parasitic infection in their lifetime [169]. These statistics are cause for concern, but the ramifications are not limited to this. Parasitic infections affect not only humans but also animals and plants, resulting in economic losses. Developing treatments that harm parasites without harming the host is always a difficult task due to the complex nature of the disease and the advanced virulence of the parasites. A study conducted on bacteria capable of surviving in cold temperatures in Antarctica discovered that certain strains of Pseudomonas sp. produce pigments with bioactive properties that can combat parasites [170]. Studies like these demonstrate the true effectiveness of microbial pigments and uncover the untapped potential of psychrophiles. Microbial pigments, such as violacein and deoxy violacein, are widely recognized in the pharmaceutical industry for their antimicrobial properties. However, in recent years, their ability to combat parasites, particularly Plasmodium falciparum and Trypanosoma cruzi, has gained attention. Efforts are ongoing to scale up the production of violacein to harness its potential as a drug against malaria and trypanosomiasis [171]. Furthermore, the use of bacterial pigments has demonstrated potential in mitigating plant nematode infestations. As an example, the pigment derived from Serratia marcescens has been found to effectively stop the juvenile stages of Radopholus similis and Meloidogyne javanica when administered in a low dosage [172]. The findings from this research showcase the potential of bacterial pigments in fighting against harmful parasites, presenting new avenues for exploration.

6.3.5. Immunosuppressing Properties

A marine bacterium called Pseudoalteromonas sp. has been discovered to contain a non-toxic bioactive pigment known as cycloprodogiosin hydrochloride. This pigment has shown the capacity to selectively prohibit the production of T-cells. Other members of the prodigiosin family are believed to have an impact on murine splenocytes. These findings offer novel opportunities to harness the power of bioactive pigments in developing immunosuppressive treatment drugs [173]. Another strain, MS-02-063, which is genetically related to the γ-proteobacterium Hahella sp., has been found to produce a red pigment known as RP-063. This pigment has also demonstrated immunosuppressive activity, although it differs from other well-known compounds in its mechanism of action. RP-063 inhibits the proliferation of lymphocytes to reduce the release of superoxide from these cells [160]. In addition to cycloprodigiosin hydrochloride and RP-063, there is another prodigiosin called 2,2′-[3-methoxy-1′amyl-5′-methyl-4-(1”-pyrryl) dipyrryl-methene (MAMPDM). MAMPDM is well known to inhibit the proliferation of both B-cells and T-cells [174]. It has been shown to induce apoptosis in Con A-stimulated cells, further demonstrating its selective inhibition of T-cells. Overall, these findings highlight the potential of bioactive pigments, such as cycloprodogiosin hydrochloride, RP-063 and MAMPDM, as promising candidates for the development of immunosuppressive drugs. Further studies in this area could lead to the discovery of new therapeutic options for conditions that involve excessive immune responses [175].

7. Bio-Colorants as Bio-Indicators

The term bio-indicator is defined as an indication of certain biochemical activities. Pigments generated from bacteria show greater application for antibacterial activity, antioxidant activity and various textile industries. Pigments showing fluorescent colors indicate the working of a certain chemical reaction. Phycoerythrin is a pigment used in calculating the rate of peroxy radical scavenging in human plasma; darker pigments signify its reaction with radicals, otherwise, it is fluorescent [176]. Some pigments are used in the detection of heavy metals present in soil or water. Some of the major examples include Vogesella indigofera producing a blue color when associated with normal environmental conditions, but when exposed to heavy metals, no such coloration can be seen [177]. Also, cyanobacteria act as good bio-indicators that detect heavy metals present in water by reducing the carotenoid content in cyanobacteria. Some pigmented bacteria are also used in monitoring temperature changes; Pantoea agglomerans is one of the pigmented microbes that gives a deep blue color when affected by higher temperatures [178].

8. Limitations of Pigmented Microbes

Though microbial pigments are essential and have numerous applications, we cannot deny the pathogenicity of microbial pigments, too. This can be seen in aquaculture farms and humans [179]. Children and adults have both been documented to contract infections from Chromobacterium violaceum, which produces violaceum [180]. Another violacein-producing bacterium, Janthinobacterium lividum, caused massive mortality in the Korean hatchery of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss [181]. In addition to humans, Serratia marcescens produces prodigiosin that also affects insects, other invertebrates and animals [182]. It has been found that certain Serratia marcescens and Chromobacterium violaceum strains are devious human infections [183,184]. There is no proof that the violacein and prodigiosin pigments play a part in the virulence functions of the microbe [185].
Moreover, pigments, including bacterial melanins [186] and pyoverdines [187], also have antibacterial activity against pathogens. Mycotoxins, such as citrinin and 4,15-diacetoxyscirpenol, are produced by the red pigment-producing fungus Fusarium and Monascus [188]. If we could simply identify the causes of this pathogenicity, we would be able to overcome the symptoms and prevent more infections.

9. Conclusions

Pigment-producing microbes are more likely to give multifaceted applications in all kinds of industries, like textiles, food, medicine, etc. The exploration of pigment-producing bacteria, fungi and cyanobacteria isolated from different environments, like aerobic, terrestrial and marine, is essential. It is important to recognize the convergent and divergent evolutionary patterns of these microbes. Moreover, the prime focus should be on introducing alternative substrates, like wastes from agro-industries, fisheries and poultry farms, as nutritional media to enhance microbial growth and pigment efficacy. This practice would provide a cheap and economical source for cultivation and a great approach to waste management. The potential of bacterial pigments is immense, and the future seems to be even brighter.
The potential of bacterial pigments for additional uses, such as biodegradable dyes, natural food colorants or even as a source of bioactive substances, has also become more apparent in this field. Understanding the interactions between various substances and their effects on the human body should be a major area of research. Additionally, clinical lab facilities must evaluate the effectiveness and safety of these chemicals to determine any related adverse effects. These investigations will aid our understanding of the therapeutic value of bio-pigments. It is crucial to go further into comprehending how these pigments’ chemical markings affect their biological functions. Investigating the complex relationship between structure and function can help us better understand the many roles they play.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.; methodology, A. and S.K.; writing, A., S.K. and L.G.; supervision, V.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Vila, E.; Hornero-Méndez, D.; Azziz, G.; Lareo, C.; Saravia, V. Carotenoids from heterotrophic bacteria isolated from fildes peninsula, king george island, antarctica. Biotechnol. Rep. 2019, 21, e00306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yadav, P.; Shukla, A.K.; Kumari, A.; Dhewa, T.; Kumar, A. Nutritional evaluation of probiotics enriched rabadi beverage (PERB) and molecular mapping of digestive enzyme with dietary fibre for exploring the therapeutic potential. Food Humanit. 2023, 2, 100221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rather, L.J.; Mir, S.S.; Ganie, S.A.; Li, Q. Research progress, challenges, and perspectives in microbial pigment production for industrial applications—A review. Dye. Pigment. 2023, 210, 110989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. US Foods. Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. Agency Response Lett. GRAS Not. No GRN 2002, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fabre, C.; Santerre, A.; Loret, M.; Baberian, R.; Pareilleux, A.; Goma, G. Production and food applications of the red pigments of Monascus ruber. J. Food Sci. 1993, 58, 1099–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Goswami, L.; Kushwaha, A.; Napathorn, S.C.; Kim, B.S. Valorization of organic wastes using bioreactors for polyhydroxyalkanoate production: Recent advancement, sustainable approaches, challenges, and future perspectives. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 247, 125743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Singh, A.; Kushwaha, A.; Goswami, S.; Tripathi, A.; Bhasney, S.M.; Goswami, L.; Hussain, C.M. Roadmap from microalgae to biorefinery: A circular bioeconomy approach. In Emerging Trends to Approaching Zero Waste; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 339–360. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kushwaha, A.; Yadav, A.N.; Singh, B.; Dwivedi, V.; Kumar, S.; Goswami, L.; Hussain, C.M. Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of algae-derived biodiesel: Current challenges and future prospects. In Waste-to-Energy Approaches Towards Zero Waste; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 343–372. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wehrs, M.; Tanjore, D.; Eng, T.; Lievense, J.; Pray, T.R.; Mukhopadhyay, A. Engineering robust production microbes for large-scale cultivation. Trends Microbiol. 2019, 27, 524–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Goswami, L.; Kayalvizhi, R.; Dikshit, P.K.; Sherpa, K.C.; Roy, S.; Kushwaha, A.; Rajak, R.C. A critical review on prospects of bio-refinery products from second and third generation biomasses. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 448, 137677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Uddin, F. Environmental hazard in textile dyeing wastewater from local textile industry. Cellulose 2021, 28, 10715–10739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Downham, A.; Collins, P. Colouring our foods in the last and next millennium. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2000, 35, 5–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Saini, R.K.; Keum, Y.-S. Microbial platforms to produce commercially vital carotenoids at industrial scale: An updated review of critical issues. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 46, 657–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ram, S.; Mitra, M.; Shah, F.; Tirkey, S.R.; Mishra, S. Bacteria as an alternate biofactory for carotenoid production: A review of its applications, opportunities and challenges. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 67, 103867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Venil, C.K.; Zakaria, Z.A.; Ahmad, W.A. Bacterial pigments and their applications. Process Biochem. 2013, 48, 1065–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ramesh, C.; Mohanraju, R.; Murthy, K.; Karthick, P. Molecular characterization of marine pigmented bacteria showing antibacterial activity. Indian J. Mar. Sci. 2017, 46, 2081–2087. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhang, X.; Yao, T.; Tian, L.; Xu, S.; An, L. Phylogenetic and physiological diversity of bacteria isolated from Puruogangri ice core. Microb. Ecol. 2008, 55, 476–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Khanafari, A.; Khavarinejad, D.; Mashinchian, A. Solar salt lake as natural environmental source for extraction halophilic pigments. Iran. J. Microbiol. 2010, 2, 103. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hermansson, M.; Jones, G.; Kjelleberg, S. Frequency of antibiotic and heavy metal resistance, pigmentation, and plasmids in bacteria of the marine air-water interface. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1987, 53, 2338–2342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Miteva, V.; Sheridan, P.; Brenchley, J. Phylogenetic and physiological diversity of microorganisms isolated from a deep Greenland glacier ice core. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 202–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Agogué, H.; Joux, F.; Obernosterer, I.; Lebaron, P. Resistance of marine bacterioneuston to solar radiation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 5282–5289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yurkov, V.V.; Krieger, S.; Stackebrandt, E.; Beatty, J.T. Citromicrobium bathyomarinum, a novel aerobic bacterium isolated from deep-sea hydrothermal vent plume waters that contains photosynthetic pigment-protein complexes. J. Bacteriol. 1999, 181, 4517–4525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Méndez-Zavala, A.; Contreras-Esquivel, J.; Lara-Victoriano, F.; Rodríguez-Herrera, R.; Aguilar, C. Fungal production of the red pigment using a xerophilic strain Penicillium purpurogenum GH-2. Rev. Mex. Ing. QuÍMica 2007, 6, 267–273. [Google Scholar]
  24. Likens, G.E. Plankton of Inland Waters; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  25. Takaichi, S. Carotenoids in algae: Distributions, biosyntheses and functions. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 1101–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Roy, S.; Llewellyn, C.A.; Egeland, E.S.; Johnsen, G. Phytoplankton Pigments: Characterization, Chemotaxonomy and Applications in Oceanography; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  27. Graham, R.D.; Rosser, J.M. Carotenoids in staple foods: Their potential to improve human nutrition. Food Nutr. Bull. 2000, 21, 404–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Thawornwiriyanun, P.; Tanasupawat, S.; Dechsakulwatana, C.; Techkarnjanaruk, S.; Suntornsuk, W. Identification of newly zeaxanthin-producing bacteria isolated from sponges in the Gulf of Thailand and their zeaxanthin production. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 167, 2357–2368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Nugraheni, S.A.; Khoeri, M.M.; Kusmita, L.; Widyastuti, Y.; Radjasa, O.K. Characterization of carotenoid pigments from bacterial symbionts of seagrass Thalassia hemprichii. J. Coast. Dev. 2010, 14, 51–60. [Google Scholar]
  30. Azman, A.-S.; Mawang, C.-I.; Abubakar, S. Bacterial pigments: The bioactivities and as an alternative for therapeutic applications. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2018, 13, 1934578X1801301240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Venil, C.K.; Dufossé, L.; Renuka Devi, P. Bacterial pigments: Sustainable compounds with market potential for pharma and food industry. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2020, 4, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bennett, J.; Bentley, R. Seeing Red: The Story of Prodigiosin; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  33. Soliev, A.B.; Enomoto, K. Antitumor Pigments from Marine Bacteria. In Marine Biomaterials: Characterization, Isolation and Applications; Kim, S., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2013; pp. 149–171. [Google Scholar]
  34. Okazaki, T.; Kitahara, T.; Okami, Y. Studies on marine microorganisms. IV a new antibiotic SS-228 Y produced by chainia isolated from shallow sea mud. J. Antibiot. 1975, 28, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Franks, A.; Haywood, P.; Holmström, C.; Egan, S.; Kjelleberg, S.; Kumar, N. Isolation and structure elucidation of a novel yellow pigment from the marine bacterium Pseudoalteromonas tunicata. Molecules 2005, 10, 1286–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pinkerton, D.M.; Banwell, M.G.; Garson, M.J.; Kumar, N.; de Moraes, M.O.; Cavalcanti, B.C. Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Activities of Synthetically Derived Tambjamines C and E–J, BE-18591, and a Related Alkaloid from the Marine Bacterium Pseudoalteromonas tunicata. Chem. Biodivers. 2010, 7, 1311–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Blackman, A.J.; Li, C. New tambjamine alkaloids from the marine bryozoan Bugula dentata. Aust. J. Chem. 1994, 47, 1625–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Carté, B.; Faulkner, D.J. Defensive metabolites from three nembrothid nudibranchs. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 2314–2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Carté, B.; Faulkner, D.J. Role of secondary metabolites in feeding associations between a predatory nudibranch, two grazing nudibranchs, and a bryozoan. J. Chem. Ecol. 1986, 12, 795–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tarangini, K.; Mishra, S. Production, characterization and analysis of melanin from isolated marine Pseudomonas sp. using vegetable waste. Res. J. Eng. Sci. 2013, 2278, 9472. [Google Scholar]
  41. Bezirhan Arikan, E.; Canli, O.; Caro, Y.; Dufossé, L.; Dizge, N. Production of bio-based pigments from food processing industry by-products (apple, pomegranate, black carrot, red beet pulps) using Aspergillus carbonarius. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Naik, C.; Srisevita, J.; Shushma, K.; Noorin, F.; Shilpa, A.; Muttanna, C. Peanut oil cake: A novel substrate for enhanced cell growth and prodigiosin production from Serratia marcescens CF-53. J. Res. Biol. 2012, 2, 549–557. [Google Scholar]
  43. Aruldass, C.A.; Venil, C.K.; Zakaria, Z.A.; Ahmad, W.A. Brown sugar as a low-cost medium for the production of prodigiosin by locally isolated Serratia marcescens UTM1. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2014, 95, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Luti, K.J.; Yonis, R.W.; Mahmoud, S.T. An application of solid state fermentation and elicitation with some microbial cells for the enhancement of prodigiosin production by Serratia marcescens. Al-Nahrain J. Sci. 2018, 21, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sumathi, C.; MohanaPriya, D.; Swarnalatha, S.; Dinesh, M.; Sekaran, G. Production of prodigiosin using tannery fleshing and evaluating its pharmacological effects. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 290327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Giri, A.V.; Anandkumar, N.; Muthukumaran, G.; Pennathur, G. A novel medium for the enhanced cell growth and production of prodigiosin from Serratia marcescens isolated from soil. BMC Microbiol. 2004, 4, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. El-Bondkly, A.M.; El-Gendy, M.M.; Bassyouni, R.H. Overproduction and biological activity of prodigiosin-like pigments from recombinant fusant of endophytic marine Streptomyces species. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 2012, 102, 719–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Aruldass, C.A.; Venil, C.K.; Ahmad, W.A. Violet pigment production from liquid pineapple waste by Chromobacterium violaceum UTM5 and evaluation of its bioactivity. Rsc Adv. 2015, 5, 51524–51536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ahmad, W.A.; Yusof, N.Z.; Nordin, N.; Zakaria, Z.A.; Rezali, M.F. Production and characterization of violacein by locally isolated Chromobacterium violaceum grown in agricultural wastes. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 167, 1220–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cassarini, M.; Crônier, D.; Besaury, L.; Rémond, C. Protein-rich agro-industrial co-products are key substrates for growth of Chromobacterium vaccinii and its violacein bioproduction. Waste Biomass Valorization 2022, 13, 4459–4468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Joshi, V.K.; Attri, D.; Rana, N.S. (Eds.) Optimization of apple pomace based medium and fermentation conditions for pigment production by Sarcina sp. Indian J. Nat. Prod. Resour. 2011, 2, 421–427. [Google Scholar]
  52. Valduga, E.; Ribeiro, A.H.R.; Cence, K.; Colet, R.; Tiggemann, L.; Zeni, J. Carotenoids production from a newly isolated Sporidiobolus pararoseus strain using agroindustrial substrates. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2014, 3, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Taskin, M.; Sisman, T.; Erdal, S.; Kurbanoglu, E.B. Use of waste chicken feathers as peptone for production of carotenoids in submerged culture of Rhodotorula glutinis MT-5. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2011, 233, 657–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Nasrabadi, M.R.N.; Razavi, S.H. Optimization of β-carotene production by a mutant of the lactose-positive yeast Rhodotorula acheniorum from whey ultrafiltrate. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2011, 20, 445–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bonadio, M.d.P.; Freita, L.A.d.; Mutton, M.J.R. Carotenoid production in sugarcane juice and synthetic media supplemented with nutrients by Rhodotorula rubra l02. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2018, 49, 872–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Moreira, M.D.; Melo, M.M.; Coimbra, J.M.; Dos Reis, K.C.; Schwan, R.F.; Silva, C.F. Solid coffee waste as alternative to produce carotenoids with antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. Waste Manag. 2018, 82, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kang, C.D.; An, J.Y.; Park, T.H.; Sim, S.J. Astaxanthin biosynthesis from simultaneous N and P uptake by the green alga Haematococcus pluvialis in primary-treated wastewater. Biochem. Eng. J. 2006, 31, 234–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ramírez, J.; Obledo, N.; Arellano, M.; Herrera, E. Astaxanthin production by Phaffia rhodozyma in a fedbatch culture using a low cost medium feeding. e-Gnosis 2006, 4, 5. [Google Scholar]
  59. Haard, N. Astaxanthin formation by the yeast Phaffia rhodozyma on molasses. Biotechnol. Lett. 1988, 10, 609–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Meyer, P.; Du Preez, J. Astaxanthin production by a Phaffia rhodozyma mutant on grape juice. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1994, 10, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lee, K.H.; Park, Y.H.; Han, J.K.; Park, J.H.; Lee, K.H.; Choi, H. Microorganism for Producing Riboflavin and Method for Producing Riboflavin Using the Same. U.S. Patent 7,166,456, 23 January 2007. [Google Scholar]
  62. El-Fouly, M.; Sharaf, A.; Shahin, A.; El-Bialy, H.A.; Omara, A. Biosynthesis of pyocyanin pigment by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2015, 8, 36–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Usmani, Z.; Sharma, M.; Sudheer, S.; Gupta, V.K.; Bhat, R. Engineered microbes for pigment production using waste biomass. Curr. Genom. 2020, 21, 80–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Henke, N.A.; Wiebe, D.; Pérez-García, F.; Peters-Wendisch, P.; Wendisch, V.F. Coproduction of cell-bound and secreted value-added compounds: Simultaneous production of carotenoids and amino acids by Corynebacterium glutamicum. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 247, 744–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Su, A.; Chi, S.; Li, Y.; Tan, S.; Qiang, S.; Chen, Z. Metabolic redesign of Rhodobacter sphaeroides for lycopene production. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 5879–5885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Zhao, J.; Li, Q.; Sun, T.; Zhu, X.; Xu, H.; Tang, J. Engineering central metabolic modules of Escherichia coli for improving β-carotene production. Metab. Eng. 2013, 17, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kushwaha, A.; Goswami, L.; Singhvi, M.; Kim, B.S. Biodegradation of poly (ethylene terephthalate): Mechanistic insights, advances, and future innovative strategies. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 457, 141230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Singh, S.; Goswami, L.; Hussain, C.M. (Eds.) Waste-to-Energy Approaches towards Zero Waste: Interdisciplinary Methods of Controlling Waste; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  69. Bharagava, R.N.; Goswami, L.; Kushwaha, A.; Hussain, C.M. (Eds.) Bio-Based Materials and Waste for Energy Generation and Resource Management: Volume 5 of Advanced Zero Waste Tools: Present and Emerging Waste Management Practices; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  70. Yang, D.; Park, S.Y.; Lee, S.Y. Production of rainbow colorants by metabolically engineered Escherichia coli. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2100743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Getino, L.; Chamizo-Ampudia, A.; Martín, J.L.; Luengo, J.M.; Barreiro, C.; Olivera, E.R. Specific Gene Expression in Pseudomonas putida U Shows New Alternatives for Cadaverine and Putrescine Catabolism. Genes 2023, 14, 1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Fang, M.Y.; Zhang, C.; Yang, S.; Cui, J.Y.; Jiang, P.X.; Lou, K.; Xing, X.H. High crude violacein production from glucose by Escherichia coli engineered with interactive control of tryptophan pathway and violacein biosynthetic pathway. Microb. Cell Factories 2015, 14, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Cheng, K.C.; Hsiao, H.C.; Hou, Y.C.; Hsieh, C.W.; Hsu, H.Y.; Chen, H.Y.; Lin, S.P. Improvement in violacein production by utilizing formic acid to induce quorum sensing in Chromobacterium violaceum. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ramesh, C.; Vinithkumar, N.V.; Kirubagaran, R.; Venil, C.K.; Dufossé, L. Applications of prodigiosin extracted from marine red pigmented bacteria Zooshikella sp. and actinomycete Streptomyces sp. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Mühlmann, M.; Forsten, E.; Noack, S.; Büchs, J. Optimizing recombinant protein expression via automated induction profiling in microtiter plates at different temperatures. Microb. Cell Factories 2017, 16, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Watstein, D.M.; McNerney, M.P.; Styczynski, M.P. Precise metabolic engineering of carotenoid biosynthesis in Escherichia coli towards a low-cost biosensor. Metab. Eng. 2015, 31, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Choi, O.; Kang, B.; Lee, Y.; Lee, Y.; Kim, J. Pantoea ananatis carotenoid production confers toxoflavin tolerance and is regulated by Hfq-controlled quorum sensing. MicrobiologyOpen 2021, 10, e1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Doudna, J.A.; Charpentier, E. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science 2014, 346, 1258096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Nielsen, J.C.; Nielsen, J. Development of fungal cell factories for the production of secondary metabolites: Linking genomics and metabolism. Synth. Syst. Biotechnol. 2017, 2, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Pohl, C.; Kiel, J.A.; Driessen, A.J.; Bovenberg, R.A.; Nygard, Y. CRISPR/Cas9 based genome editing of Penicillium chrysogenum. ACS Synth. Biol. 2016, 5, 754–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Pagels, F.; Almeida, C.; Vasconcelos, V.; Guedes, A.C. Cosmetic Potential of Pigments Extracts from the Marine Cyanobacterium Cyanobium sp. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Derikvand, P.; Llewellyn, C.A.; Purton, S. Cyanobacterial metabolites as a source of sunscreens and moisturizers: A comparison with current synthetic compounds. Eur. J. Phycol. 2017, 52, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Pillaiyar, T.; Manickam, M.; Namasivayam, V. Skin whitening agents: Medicinal chemistry perspective of tyrosinase inhibitors. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2017, 32, 403–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Videira, I.F.d.S.; Moura, D.F.L.; Magina, S. Mechanisms regulating melanogenesis. An. Bras. Dermatol. 2013, 88, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. D’Mello, S.A.; Finlay, G.J.; Baguley, B.C.; Askarian-Amiri, M.E. Signaling pathways in melanogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Gillbro, J.; Olsson, M. The melanogenesis and mechanisms of skin-lightening agents–existing and new approaches. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2011, 33, 210–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Costin, G.-E.; Hearing, V.J. Human skin pigmentation: Melanocytes modulate skin color in response to stress. FASEB J. 2007, 21, 976–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Takizawa, T.; Imai, T.; Onose, J.-I.; Ueda, M.; Tamura, T.; Mitsumori, K. Enhancement of hepatocarcinogenesis by kojic acid in rat two-stage models after initiation with N-bis (2-hydroxypropyl) nitrosamine or N-diethylnitrosamine. Toxicol. Sci. 2004, 81, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. García-Gavín, J.; González-Vilas, D.; Fernández-Redondo, V.; Toribio, J. Pigmented contact dermatitis due to kojic acid. A paradoxical side effect of a skin lightener. Contact Dermat. 2010, 62, 63–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Chung, K.W.; Jeong, H.O.; Jang, E.J.; Choi, Y.J.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, S.R. Characterization of a small molecule inhibitor of melanogenesis that inhibits tyrosinase activity and scavenges nitric oxide (NO). Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Gen. Subj. 2013, 1830, 4752–4761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Hong, Y.-H.; Jung, E.Y.; Noh, D.O.; Suh, H.J. Physiological effects of formulation containing tannase-converted green tea extract on skin care: Physical stability, collagenase, elastase, and tyrosinase activities. Integr. Med. Res. 2014, 3, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Lajis, A.F.B.; Ariff, A.B. Discovery of new depigmenting compounds and their efficacy to treat hyperpigmentation: Evidence from in vitro study. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2019, 18, 703–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Srinivasan, M.; Keziah, S.M.; Hemalatha, M.; Devi, C.S. (Eds.) Pigment from Streptomyces bellus MSA1 isolated from marine sediments. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  94. El-Naggar, N.E.-A.; El-Ewasy, S.M. Bioproduction, characterization, anticancer and antioxidant activities of extracellular melanin pigment produced by newly isolated microbial cell factories Streptomyces glaucescens NEAE-H. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Choksi, J.; Vora, J.; Shrivastava, N. Bioactive pigments from isolated bacteria and its antibacterial, antioxidant and sun protective application useful for cosmetic products. Indian J. Microbiol. 2020, 60, 379–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Kiki, M.J. Biopigments of microbial origin and their application in the cosmetic industry. Cosmetics 2023, 10, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Mourelle, M.L.; Gómez, C.P.; Legido, J.L. The potential use of marine microalgae and cyanobacteria in cosmetics and thalassotherapy. Cosmetics 2017, 4, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Chandra, R.; Parra, R.; MNIqbal, H. Phycobiliproteins: A novel green tool from marine origin blue-green algae and red algae. Protein Pept. Lett. 2017, 24, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Rana, B.; Bhattacharyya, M.; Patni, B.; Arya, M.; Joshi, G.K. The realm of microbial pigments in the food color market. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 5, 603892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Mussagy, C.U.; Khan, S.; Kot, A.M. Current developments on the application of microbial carotenoids as an alternative to synthetic pigments. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 62, 6932–6946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Sen, T.; Barrow, C.J.; Deshmukh, S.K. Microbial pigments in the food industry—Challenges and the way forward. Front. Nutr. 2019, 6, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Jurić, S.; Jurić, M.; Król-Kilińska, Ż.; Vlahoviček-Kahlina, K.; Vinceković, M.; Dragović-Uzelac, V. Sources, stability, encapsulation and application of natural pigments in foods. Food Rev. Int. 2022, 38, 1735–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Venil, C.K.; Zakaria, Z.A.; Ahmad, W.A. Optimization of culture conditions for flexirubin production by Chryseobacterium artocarpi CECT 8497 using response surface methodology. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2015, 62, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Meruvu, H.; Dos Santos, J.C. Colors of life: A review on fungal pigments. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2021, 41, 1153–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. He, J.; Jia, M.; Li, W.; Deng, J.; Ren, J.; Luo, F. Toward improvements for enhancement the productivity and color value of Monascus pigments: A critical review with recent updates. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 7139–7153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Poorniammal, R.; Prabhu, S.; Dufossé, L.; Kannan, J. Safety evaluation of fungal pigments for food applications. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Aruldass, C.A.; Dufossé, L.; Ahmad, W.A. Current perspective of yellowish-orange pigments from microorganisms—A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 180, 168–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Meléndez-Martínez, A.J.; Mandić, A.I.; Bantis, F.; Böhm, V.; Borge, G.I.A.; Brnčić, M. A comprehensive review on carotenoids in foods and feeds: Status quo, applications, patents, and research needs. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 1999–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Pereira da Costa, D.; Campos Miranda-Filho, K. The use of carotenoid pigments as food additives for aquatic organisms and their functional roles. Rev. Aquac. 2020, 12, 1567–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Dufossé, L. Microbial pigments from bacteria, yeasts, fungi, and microalgae for the food and feed industries. In Natural and Artificial Flavoring Agents and Food Dyes; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 113–132. [Google Scholar]
  111. Chatragadda, R.; Dufossé, L. Ecological and biotechnological aspects of pigmented microbes: A way forward in development of food and pharmaceutical grade pigments. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Nasseri, A.; Rasoul-Amini, S.; Morowvat, M.; Ghasemi, Y. Single cell protein: Production and process. Am. J. Food Technol. 2011, 6, 103–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Carlozzi, P.; Buccioni, A.; Minieri, S.; Pushparaj, B.; Piccardi, R.; Ena, A. Production of bio-fuels (hydrogen and lipids) through a photofermentation process. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 3115–3120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Kim, J.K.; Lee, B.-K. Mass production of Rhodopseudomonas palustris as diet for aquaculture. Aquac. Eng. 2000, 23, 281–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Tian, Y.; Machado, P.A.; Fu, H.; Hahm, T.-S.; Wei, C.-I.; Lo, Y.M. Photosynthetic bioconversion of coenzyme Q10 using agrowaste generated from tobacco biorefinery for nonsmoking applications: A review. J. Food Drug Anal. 2012, 20, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Wang, G.-S.; Grammel, H.; Abou-Aisha, K.; Sägesser, R.; Ghosh, R. High-level production of the industrial product lycopene by the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodospirillum rubrum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 7205–7215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Saejung, C.; Ampornpat, W. Production and nutritional performance of carotenoid-producing photosynthetic bacterium Rhodopseudomonas faecalis PA2 grown in domestic wastewater intended for animal feed production. Waste Biomass Valorization 2019, 10, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Dieser, M.; Greenwood, M.; Foreman, C.M. Carotenoid pigmentation in Antarctic heterotrophic bacteria as a strategy to withstand environmental stresses. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 2010, 42, 396–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Stafsnes, M.H.; Dybwad, M.; Brunsvik, A.; Bruheim, P. Large scale MALDI-TOF MS based taxa identification to identify novel pigment producers in a marine bacterial culture collection. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 2013, 103, 603–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Egan, S.; James, S.; Holmström, C.; Kjelleberg, S. Correlation between pigmentation and antifouling compounds produced by Pseudoalteromonas tunicata. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 4, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Mandelli, F.; Miranda, V.S.; Rodrigues, E.; Mercadante, A.Z. Identification of carotenoids with high antioxidant capacity produced by extremophile microorganisms. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 28, 1781–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Pierson, L.S.; Pierson, E.A. Metabolism and function of phenazines in bacteria: Impacts on the behavior of bacteria in the environment and biotechnological processes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 86, 1659–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Chew, B.P.; Park, J.S. Carotenoid action on the immune response. J. Nutr. 2004, 134, 257S–261S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Konzen, M.; De Marco, D.; Cordova, C.A.; Vieira, T.O.; Antonio, R.V.; Creczynski-Pasa, T.B. Antioxidant properties of violacein: Possible relation on its biological function. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 8307–8313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Matz, C.; Deines, P.; Boenigk, J.; Arndt, H.; Eberl, L.; Kjelleberg, S. Impact of violacein-producing bacteria on survival and feeding of bacterivorous nanoflagellates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 1593–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Soliev, A.B.; Hosokawa, K.; Enomoto, K. Bioactive pigments from marine bacteria: Applications and physiological roles. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. ECAM 2011, 2011, 670349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Visca, P.; Imperi, F.; Lamont, I.L. Pyoverdine siderophores: From biogenesis to biosignificance. Trends Microbiol. 2007, 15, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Borić, M.; Danevčič, T.; Stopar, D. Prodigiosin from Vibrio sp. DSM 14379, a new UV-protective pigment. Microb. Ecol. 2011, 62, 528–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Płonka, P.; Grabacka, M. Melanin synthesis in microorganisms: Biotechnological and medical aspects. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2006, 53, 429–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Coyne, V.; Al-Harthi, L. Induction of melanin biosynthesis in Vibrio cholerae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1992, 58, 2861–2865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Nair, S.; Chandramohan, D.; Bharathi, P.L. Differential sensitivity of pigmented and non-pigmented marine bacteria to metals and antibiotics. Water Res. 1992, 26, 431–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Solano, F. Melanins: Skin pigments and much more—Types, structural models, biological functions, and formation routes. New J. Sci. 2014, 2014, 498276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Cordero, R.J.; Casadevall, A. Functions of fungal melanin beyond virulence. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2017, 31, 99–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Zhu, B.-F.; Si, L.; Wang, Z.; Jingjie Zhu, Y.Z.; Shangguan, Y.; Lu, D. Genetic control of a transition from black to straw-white seed hull in rice domestication. Plant Physiol. 2011, 155, 1301–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Ceccarelli, S.; Grando, S.; Van Leur, J. Genetic diversity in barley landraces from Syria and Jordan. Euphytica 1987, 36, 389–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Jana, B.; Mukherjee, S. Notes on the distribution of phytomelanin layer in higher plants—A short communication. J. Pharm. Biol. 2014, 4, 131–132. [Google Scholar]
  137. Pandey, A.; Dhakal, M. Phytomelanin in compositae. Curr. Sci. 2001, 80, 933–940. [Google Scholar]
  138. Panzella, L.; Eidenberger, T.; Napolitano, A.; d’Ischia, M. Black sesame pigment: DPPH assay-guided purification, antioxidant/antinitrosating properties, and identification of a degradative structural marker. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 8895–8901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Łopusiewicz, Ł. Antioxidant, antibacterial properties and the light barrier assessment of raw and purified melanins isolated from (watermelon) seeds. Herba Pol. 2018, 64, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. López, G.D.; Álvarez-Rivera, G.; Carazzone, C.; Ibáñez, E.; Leidy, C.; Cifuentes, A. Bacterial Carotenoids: Extraction, Characterization, and Applications. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2023, 53, 1239–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Montaner, B.; Pérez-Tomás, R. Prodigiosin-induced apoptosis in human colon cancer cells. Life Sci. 2001, 68, 2025–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Liu, G.Y.; Nizet, V. Color me bad: Microbial pigments as virulence factors. Trends Microbiol. 2009, 17, 406–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Stafsnes, M.H.; Josefsen, K.D.; Kildahl-Andersen, G.; Valla, S.; Ellingsen, T.E.; Bruheim, P. Isolation and characterization of marine pigmented bacteria from Norwegian coastal waters and screening for carotenoids with UVA-blue light absorbing properties. J. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Oren, A. A short history of the symposia on halophilic microorganisms: From Rehovot 1978 to Beijing 2010. In Halophiles and Hypersaline Environments: Current Research and Future Trends; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 373–382. [Google Scholar]
  145. Kapil, S.; Sharma, V. d-Amino acids in antimicrobial peptides: A potential approach to treat and combat antimicrobial resistance. Can. J. Microbiol. 2021, 67, 119–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Heer, K.; Sharma, S. Microbial pigments as a natural color: A review. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2017, 8, 1913–1922. [Google Scholar]
  147. Agematu, H.; Suzuki, K.; Tsuya, H. Massilia sp. BS-1, a novel violacein-producing bacterium isolated from soil. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2011, 75, 2008–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Selvameenal, L.; Radhakrishnan, M.; Balagurunathan, R. Antibiotic pigment from desert soil actinomycetes; biological activity, purification and chemical screening. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2009, 71, 499. [Google Scholar]
  149. Samrot, A.V.; Rio, A.J.; Kumar, S.S.; Samanvitha, S.K. Bioprospecting studies of pigmenting Pseudomonas aeruginosa SU-1, Microvirga aerilata SU14 and Bacillus megaterium SU15 isolated from garden soil. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2017, 11, 330–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Agarwal, H.; Bajpai, S.; Mishra, A.; Kohli, I.; Varma, A.; Fouillaud, M. Bacterial Pigments and Their Multifaceted Roles in Contemporary Biotechnology and Pharmacological Applications. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. El-Zawawy, N.A.; Kenawy, E.-R.; Ahmed, S.; El-Sapagh, S. Bioproduction and optimization of newly characterized melanin pigment from Streptomyces djakartensis NSS-3 with its anticancer, antimicrobial, and radioprotective properties. Microb. Cell Factories 2024, 23, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Elkhateeb, W.; Daba, G. Fungal Pigments: Their Diversity, Chemistry, Food and Non-Food Applications. Appl. Microbiol. 2023, 3, 735–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Dixon, D.M.; McNeil, M.M.; Cohen, M.L.; Gellin, B.G.; La Montagne, J.R. Fungal infections: A growing threat. Public Health Rep. 1996, 111, 226. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  154. Andrighetti-Fröhner, C.; Antonio, R.; Creczynski-Pasa, T.; Barardi, C.; Simões, C. Cytotoxicity and potential antiviral evaluation of violacein produced by Chromobacterium violaceum. MemÓRias Do Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2003, 98, 843–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Moss, M. Bacterial pigments. Microbiologist 2002, 3, 10–12. [Google Scholar]
  156. Wagh, P.; Mane, R. Identification and characterization of extracellular red pigment producing Neisseria spp. isolated from soil sample. Int. J. Innov. Knowl. Concept. 2017, 5, 23–25. [Google Scholar]
  157. Shirata, A.; Tsukamoto, T.; Yasui, H.; Kato, H.; Hayasaka, S.; Kojima, A. Production of bluish-purple pigments by Janthinobacterium lividum isolated from the raw silk and dyeing with them. J. Sericultural Sci. Jpn. 1997, 66, 377–385. [Google Scholar]
  158. Lyakhovchenko, N.; Efimova, V.; Seleznev, A.; Ogneva, Z.; Solyanikova, I. (Eds.) Antifungal Activity of Gram-Negative Pigment-Forming Bacteria Against Aspergillus Unguis. In BIO Web of Conferences; EDP Sciences: Paris, France, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  159. Pan, M.-H.; Ho, C.-T. Chemopreventive effects of natural dietary compounds on cancer development. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 2558–2574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Kawauchi, K.; Shibutani, K.; Yagisawa, H.; Kamata, H.; Nakatsuji, S.; Anzai, H. A Possible Immunosuppressant, Cycloprodigiosin Hydrochloride, Obtained from Pseudoalteromonas denitrificans. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997, 237, 543–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Schneemann, I.; Wiese, J.; Kunz, A.L.; Imhoff, J.F. Genetic approach for the fast discovery of phenazine producing bacteria. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 772–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Zhao, J.; Wu, Y.; Alfred, A.; Wei, P.; Yang, S. Anticancer effects of pyocyanin on HepG2 human hepatoma cells. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 58, 541–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Vipin, C.; Ashwini, P.; Kavya, A.; Rekha, P. Overproduction of pyocyanin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by supplementation of pathway precursor shikimic acid and evaluation of its activity. Res. J. Pharm. Technol. 2017, 10, 533–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Prashanthi, K.; Suryan, S.; Varalakshmi, K.N. In vitro anticancer property of yellow pigment from Streptomyces griseoaurantiacus JUACT 01. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2015, 58, 869–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Venil, C.K.; Khasim, A.R.; Aruldass, C.A.; Ahmad, W.A. Microencapsulation of flexirubin-type pigment by spray drying: Characterization and antioxidant activity. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2016, 113, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Maheswarappa, G.; Kavitha, D.; Vijayarani, K.; Kumanan, K. Prodigiosin as anticancer drug Produced from bacteria of termite gut. Indian J. Basic Appl. Med. Res. 2013, 1, 257–266. [Google Scholar]
  167. Lin, S.-R.; Weng, C.-F. PG-priming enhances doxorubicin influx to trigger necrotic and autophagic cell death in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Wang, G.; Li, X.; Wang, Z. APD3: The antimicrobial peptide database as a tool for research and education. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, D1087–D1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Mitra, A.K.; Mawson, A.R. Neglected tropical diseases: Epidemiology and global burden. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2017, 2, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Silva, T.R.; Duarte, A.W.; Passarini, M.R.; Ruiz, A.L.T.; Franco, C.H.; Moraes, C.B. Bacteria from Antarctic environments: Diversity and detection of antimicrobial, antiproliferative, and antiparasitic activities. Polar Biol. 2018, 41, 1505–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Bilsland, E.; Tavella, T.A.; Krogh, R.; Stokes, J.E.; Roberts, A.; Ajioka, J. Antiplasmodial and trypanocidal activity of violacein and deoxyviolacein produced from synthetic operons. BMC Biotechnol. 2018, 18, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Rahul, S.; Chandrashekhar, P.; Hemant, B.; Chandrakant, N.; Laxmikant, S.; Satish, P. Nematicidal activity of microbial pigment from Serratia marcescens. Nat. Prod. Res. 2014, 28, 1399–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Gutierrez-Dalmau, A.; Campistol, J.M. Immunosuppressive therapy and malignancy in organ transplant recipients: A systematic review. Drugs 2007, 67, 1167–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Nakashima, T.; Kurachi, M.; Kato, Y.; Yamaguchi, K.; Oda, T. Characterization of bacterium isolated from the sediment at coastal area of Omura Bay in Japan and several biological activities of pigment produced by this isolate. Microbiol. Immunol. 2005, 49, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Pandey, R.; Chander, R.; Sainis, K. A novel prodigiosin-like immunosuppressant from an alkalophilic Micrococcus sp. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2003, 3, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. DeLange, R.J.; Glazer, A.N. Phycoerythrin fluorescence-based assay for peroxy radicals: A screen for biologically relevant protective agents. Anal. Biochem. 1989, 177, 300–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Gu, J.-D.; Cheung, K. Phenotypic Expression of Vogesella Indigofera upon Exposure to Hexavalent Chromium, Cr6+; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  178. Wong, L.; Teo, S. (Eds.) Naturally occurring carotenoids in cyanobacteria as a bioindicator for heavy metals detection. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Applied Science and Environmental Engineering–ASEE, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2–3 August 2014. [Google Scholar]
  179. Turcotte, F.; Mouget, J.-L.; Genard, B.; Lemarchand, K.; Deschênes, J.-S.; Tremblay, R. Prophylactic effect of Haslea ostrearia culture supernatant containing the pigment marennine to stabilize bivalve hatchery production. Aquat. Living Resour. 2016, 29, 401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Jitmuang, A. Human Chromobacterium violaceum infection in Southeast Asia: Case reports and literature review. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 2008, 39, 452. [Google Scholar]
  181. Oh, W.T.; Giri, S.S.; Yun, S.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, S.G.; Kim, S.W. Janthinobacterium lividum as an emerging pathogenic bacterium affecting rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fisheries in Korea. Pathogens 2019, 8, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Petersen, L.M.; Tisa, L.S. Friend or foe? A review of the mechanisms that drive Serratia towards diverse lifestyles. Can. J. Microbiol. 2013, 59, 627–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Mahlen, S.D. Serratia infections: From military experiments to current practice. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 24, 755–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Sharmin, S.; Kamal, S.M. Review on Chromobacterium violaceum, a rare but fatal bacteria needs special clinical attention. Anwer Khan Mod. Med. Coll. J. 2019, 10, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Zhou, W.; Li, J.; Chen, J.; Liu, X.; Xiang, T.; Zhang, L. The red pigment prodigiosin is not an essential virulence factor in entomopathogenic Serratia marcescens. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2016, 136, 92–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Nosanchuk, J.D.; Casadevall, A. The contribution of melanin to microbial pathogenesis. Cell. Microbiol. 2003, 5, 203–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Kang, D.; Revtovich, A.V.; Chen, Q.; Shah, K.N.; Cannon, C.L.; Kirienko, N.V. Pyoverdine-dependent virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Wang, Y.-Z.; Ju, X.-L.; Zhou, Y.-G. The variability of citrinin production in Monascus type cultures. Food Microbiol. 2005, 22, 145–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Building blocks of microbial cell factories in the synthesis of natural pigments. Genetic modification or isolation of natural pigments from pigmented microbes via gene mining, pathway optimization, and metabolic regulation is in the limelight of microbial science.
Figure 1. Building blocks of microbial cell factories in the synthesis of natural pigments. Genetic modification or isolation of natural pigments from pigmented microbes via gene mining, pathway optimization, and metabolic regulation is in the limelight of microbial science.
Micro 04 00038 g001
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of tools and techniques for extraction of pigments from intracellular and extracellular microbes and their workflow.
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of tools and techniques for extraction of pigments from intracellular and extracellular microbes and their workflow.
Micro 04 00038 g002
Figure 3. Ecological functions and other applications of important microbial pigments.
Figure 3. Ecological functions and other applications of important microbial pigments.
Micro 04 00038 g003
Table 1. Different microbes and types of pigments and substrates used for their enhanced production.
Table 1. Different microbes and types of pigments and substrates used for their enhanced production.
PigmentOrganism InvolvedSubstrate Used for ProductionProduction Rate (mg/L)Reference
MelaninPseudomonas sp.Vegetable waste2.79[40]
Aspergillus carbonariusApple, black carrot, pomegranate, red beet pulps61.84[41]
ProdigiosinSerratia marcescensPeanut oil cake40,000[42]
Brown sugar8[43]
Wheat bran and sunflower oil240[44]
Tannery fleshing33,000[45]
Sesame seed17[46]
Streptomyces sp.Dairy processing wastewater47,000 [47]
ViolaceinChromobacterium vilaceumLiquid pineapple waste16.25[48]
Sugarcane waste820[49]
Rapeseed cake12.93[50]
CarotenoidsSarcina sp.Apple pomace12.87[51]
Sporidiobolus pararoseusCorn steep liquor40 mg/L[52]
Rhodotorula glutinisChicken feathers92[53]
Rhodotorula achenoriumWhey filtrate262[54]
Rhodotorula rubraSugarcane juice30.39 mg/g[55]
Rhodotorula mucilaginosaCoffee pulp16.36[56]
AstaxanthinHaematococcus pluvialisPiggery wastewater83.9[57]
Phaffia rhodozyma
Juice of date23.8[58]
molasses15.3[59]
Grape juice9.8 µg/mL[60]
RiboflavinBacillus subtilisCorn steep liquor26.8[61]
PyocyaninPseudomonas aeruginosaGrape seed4 µg/mL[62]
Cotton seed meal4 µg/mL[62]
Table 2. Various microbial pigments and their therapeutic applications.
Table 2. Various microbial pigments and their therapeutic applications.
Pigment Produced Microbial SourceTherapeutic ApplicationReference
ProdigiosinSerratia marcescensHuman colon cancer cells[141]
ViolaceinC. violaceumColorectal cancer[142]
MonascinMonascus purpureusTeratogenic effects on chicken embryos[143]
CarotenoidsHaematococcus pluvialisFood additives [144]
BromoalterochromidePseudoalteromonas maricalorisCytotoxic effect on sea urchins[145]
TambjamineAtapozoa sp.Ichthyodeterrent activities[146]
AnthraquinonesPhoma multirostrataHerbicidal activities[147]
AstaxanthinPhaffia rhodozymaAnti-aging properties[148]
AstaxanthinPhaffia rhodozymaAntiproliferative activity[149]
MonascusRed mold dioscoreaAnti-diabetic activity[150]
CarotenoidStreptomyces mediolaniAntioxidant activity[151]
AstaxanthinHaematococcus pluvialisAnti-atherosclerotic activity[152]
AnthraquinonesPhoma foveataInhibition of HIV[147]
ProdigiosinS. marcescensAntitrypanosomal activity[153]
ViolaceinChromobacterium violaceumAnti-malarial activity[154]
FlexirubinFlavobacteriumTreatment of skin disease[155]
ProdigiosinS. marcescensAntileishmanial activity[156]
ViolaceinJanthinobacterium lividumAntiprotozoal activity[125]
ViolaceinPlasmodium falciparumAntiparasitic activity[154]
ProdigiosinHahella chejuensisAnti-algicidal activity[157]
ProdigiosinS. marcescensAntifouling activity[158]
FlexirubinFlavobacterium sp.Anti-tuberculosis activity[159]
PhycobilioproteinsCyanobacterial sp.Anti-alzhelmeric activity[159]
Cycloprodigiosin hydrochloridePseudoalteromonas denitrificansImmunosuppressive activity[160]
PhenazineStreptomyces sp.Antiviral activities[161]
AnthraquinoneTrichoderma harzianumAntifungal activity[161]
PhycocyaninSpirulinaPhycofluoures for DNA probes[159]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Anshi; Kapil, S.; Goswami, L.; Sharma, V. Unveiling the Intricacies of Microbial Pigments as Sustainable Alternatives to Synthetic Colorants: Recent Trends and Advancements. Micro 2024, 4, 621-640. https://doi.org/10.3390/micro4040038

AMA Style

Anshi, Kapil S, Goswami L, Sharma V. Unveiling the Intricacies of Microbial Pigments as Sustainable Alternatives to Synthetic Colorants: Recent Trends and Advancements. Micro. 2024; 4(4):621-640. https://doi.org/10.3390/micro4040038

Chicago/Turabian Style

Anshi, Shikha Kapil, Lalit Goswami, and Vipasha Sharma. 2024. "Unveiling the Intricacies of Microbial Pigments as Sustainable Alternatives to Synthetic Colorants: Recent Trends and Advancements" Micro 4, no. 4: 621-640. https://doi.org/10.3390/micro4040038

APA Style

Anshi, Kapil, S., Goswami, L., & Sharma, V. (2024). Unveiling the Intricacies of Microbial Pigments as Sustainable Alternatives to Synthetic Colorants: Recent Trends and Advancements. Micro, 4(4), 621-640. https://doi.org/10.3390/micro4040038

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop