Abstract
The human oral cavity contains a variety of habitats, all of which are colonized by microorganisms. Oral bacteria form multi-genera communities, exhibiting adhesive properties, both to oral tissue surfaces and to each other. In certain conditions, these properties represent the first step towards the development of oral diseases. The oral microbiome undergoes changes in its composition, which can alter the balance between health and disease and is dynamically interconnected with the host. Probiotics with a targeted effect on the oral cavity can successfully compete with pathobionts and increase the presence of beneficial bacteria, thus contributing positively mainly to the prevention of oral diseases. The application of probiotics to maintain balance of oral microbiota has been a subject of intensive research. Oral health products containing lactic acid bacteria represent a modern approach to prevent or reduce the level of infections in the oral cavity. The application of these products is an alternative and promising way to prevent diseases through competitive interactions of beneficial microorganisms with pathobionts.
1. Introduction
In recent decades, there has been a significant increase in scientific activity focused on the study of probiotic microorganisms. A number of scientific studies have established that many probiotic strains from the lactic acid bacteria (LAB) group possess beneficial effects in the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases in the oral cavity. In the course of increasing research, the beneficial properties of probiotic strains to interact with the oral microbiota and maintain a healthy microbial balance have been established [1].
LAB include a wide variety of representatives that have become part of human life throughout their long probiotic history. They are included in our daily diets in the form of naturally containing products, food products fermented with starter cultures, and various food supplements with probiotic application. LAB also naturally colonizes the human body, contributing in various ways to its health [2].
The human oral microbiome plays an important role in the microbial community and health. Since the oral cavity is the starting point of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT), the development of oral diseases can also contribute to the occurrence of systemic diseases. Therefore, much scientific research is directed towards studying the processes of inhibiting pathobionts and maintaining health in the oral cavity [3].
The level of oral hygiene is of utmost importance and has a significant impact on the composition and condition of the oral microbiome. Maintaining good oral health affects the ability of a person to adapt to physiological changes throughout their life and to maintain their dentition and oral cavity through independent self-care. In recent years, scientific research has expanded its focus on biological strategies to restore microbial balance in the oral cavity. Probiotics with a targeted effect on the oral cavity can exert beneficial effects through multiple mechanisms and successfully compete with potentially pathobiontic commensal microorganisms to increase the presence of beneficial bacteria. With these effects they can positively contribute to the prevention of oral diseases, including caries, gingivitis, periodontitis, and halitosis, as well as their therapy when they occur [4].
An increased focus of research on strains and delivery methods is taking place. Various strains, specifically Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei Shirota, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, Limosilactobacillus reuteri, Streptococcus salivarius K12 and M18, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12, etc., are well known for their specific probiotic traits. The delivery systems for oral probiotics are diverse and include tablets, lozenges, chewing gum, yoghurt, fermented milk, ice cream, etc. The efficacy of oral probiotic products depends not only on the incorporated strain but also on the delivery vehicle, strain viability, dosage, and duration of administration [5].
Therefore, the study of LAB as natural antagonists of various oral pathobionts, as well as their beneficial functional properties, continues to be of significant interest to modern science. Also, studies of their probiotic potential are essential for their inclusion in various food supplements in order to develop effective functional products. This review focuses on descriptive representation of oral microbiota, analyzation of the impact of LAB on reducing the counts of potential pathobiontic commensals, effectiveness of probiotics in preventing different oral diseases and maintaining oral equilibrium, exploration of oral probiotic mechanisms of action, review on in vitro evaluations and clinical trials of commonly used probiotic strains in oral health products, application of probiotic strains in different product vehicles, and highlighting possible future research directions on next-generation probiotics and innovative delivery systems.
2. Microbiota in the Oral Cavity
The human oral microbiota is formed from all microorganisms that are found on or in the oral cavity and its adjacent extensions to the esophagus. It is not uniform and varies according to anatomical and physiological conditions [6,7]. The development of microorganisms depends on factors such as temperature, acidity, redox potential, availability of nutrients, water content, structural morphology of the oral cavity, saliva flow and the presence of antimicrobial compounds. Each of these factors selectively affect the oral ecosystem and help maintain the balance of microbial populations [8].
The oral cavity is one of the most studied microbiomes to date, with a total of 836 taxa with at least one reference genome and a total genome count of over 8170 (Table 1). According to data described in the Expanded Human Oral Microbiome Database (eHOMD), it is composed of 818 microbial species from 253 genera in 16 bacterial and archaeal phyla. Of all the species in this database, 49% are officially named, 21% are unnamed but cultivated, and 29% are known only as uncultivated phylotypes (https://www.homd.org/, accessed on 11 February 2026).
Table 1.
Summary of the eHOMD data at phylum level.
The main bacterial representatives present in a healthy oral cavity are: Gram-positive cocci of the Streptococcus, Peptostreptococcus, Abiotrophia, and Stomatococcus genera, rod-shaped representatives of the Lactobacillaceae family and the Actinomyces, Bifidobacterium, Corynebacterium, Cutibacterium, Eubacterium, Pseudoramibacter, and Rothia genera; Gram-negative cocci of the Neisseria, Veillonella, and Moraxella genera and rod-shaped representatives of the Fusobacterium, Prevotella, Campylobacter, Capnocytophaga, Leptotrichia, Treponema, Desulfobacter, Desulfovibrio, Eikenella, Haemophilus, Wolinella, Selemonas, and Simonsiella genera [9,10]. The main species that colonize the oral environment are representatives predominantly belonging to the Candida genus, as well as the Cryptococcus, Aspergillus, Fusarium, Cladosporium, Saccharomycetales, and Aureobasidium genera [11].
The gingival pocket is one of the places where microorganisms from the external environment develop primarily. The site is rich in nutrients, has a low redox potential and is colonized mainly by obligate anaerobic rod-shaped bacteria. It is assumed that microorganisms in the gingival pocket are interconnected with the composition of supragingival plaque due to the frequent occurrence of rod-shaped representatives of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Porphyromonas endodontalis, Prevotella denticola, Prevotella loescheii, Prevotella melaninogenica, and Prevotella intermedia [8]. The most common bacterial representatives in the gingival pocket are Streptococcus sanguinis, Streptococcus mitis, Streptococcus intermedius, Streptococcus mobillorum, Streptococcus constellatus, Lacticaseibacillus casei, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Micrococcus spp., Mycoplasma spp., Trichomonas tenax, Entamoeba gingivalis, Veillonella parvula, Peptostreptococcus micros, Eubacterium lentum, Cutibacterium acnes, Actinomyces viscosus, Actinomyces odontolyticus, Actinomyces naeslundii, Catonella spp., Johnsonella spp., Rothia dentocariosa, Prevotella oralis, P. denticola, Capnocytophaga gingivalis, Capnocytophaga ochracea, Bacteroides melaninogenicus, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Campylobacter sputorum, Selenomonas sputigena, Treponema spp., Eikenella corrodens, Wolinella spp., Leptotrichia spp., and Granulicatella spp. [8,12].
Dental biofilm forms on the surface of the teeth and is composed of microorganisms that produce a complex matrix composed of their extracellular products and salivary components. Bacteria isolated from the plaque are mainly Gram-positive facultative anaerobic representatives of the Streptococcus and Actinomyces genera. Bacteria of the Veillonella, Haemophilus, and Bacterioides genera are usually isolated from the deeper biofilm layers. Anaerobic microorganisms, including Lactobacillaceae, Cutibacterium spp., Prevotella buccalis, P. oralis, Actinomyces israelii, A. naeslundii, A. viscosus, A. odontolyticus, Fusobacterium spp., Leptotrichia spp., R. dentocariosa, Peptostreptococcus, Nocardia spp., and Veillonella spp., and aerobic representatives, including Streptococcus mutans, S. sanguinis, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Neisseria spp., and Mycoplasma spp., can be isolated from the surface of the teeth [8].
The tongue can serve as a reservoir for microorganisms involved in the pathogenesis of periodontal diseases. S. salivarius can be frequently isolated but also other aerobic representatives, including S. mitis, S. sanguinis, Staphylococcus spp., Corynebacterium spp., Candida, Enterobacteriaceae, Neisseriaceae, and Micrococcus spp., and anaerobic ones, including C. sputorum, B. melaninogenicus, P. oralis, Cutibacterium, Actinomyces, Peptococcus, Peptostreptococcus, and Veillonella [8,13].
Saliva has the potential to remineralize hard dental tissues and exert a suppressive effect on the development of caries due to the presence of unsaturated ions of phosphates, fluorine and calcium. The presence of glycoprotein mucin plays the role of lubricating oral surfaces and forms a protective barrier against the external environment. Mucin is one of the factors through which the aggregation of bacteria on the tissues in the oral cavity occurs. Representatives, including S. mitis, S. sanguinis, Streptococcus gordonii, S. mutans, S. salivarius, Streptococcus milleri, Streptococcus mitior, A. actinomycetemcomitans, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Lactobacillaceae, Actinomyces spp., and Veillonella spp., can be found in saliva [14].
3. Microbial Balance and Diseases in the Oral Cavity
The oral microbiome can alter the balance between health and disease, and the specific activities of microbial communities are expressed in their participation in physiological, metabolic and immunological functions [15,16]. The oral cavity contains a complex mixture of fluids, mainly saliva and gingival fluid, which play an important role in maintaining a healthy oral environment [17,18,19]. At a neutral pH, a balance is maintained between the minerals of tooth enamel and saliva. When bacteria produce organic acids the acidity in the oral cavity increases, reaching values under pH 5.5, and tooth demineralization begins. Salivary components can neutralize the acidity to a certain extent and reduce the rate of demineralization, thus delaying or preventing the formation of caries. This buffering capacity is achieved through the presence of bicarbonate, phosphate and protein buffers [20]. Maintaining 37 °C in the oral cavity and salivary pH between 6.5 and 7.5 provide a stable habitat for bacterial growth [21]. Bacteria, together with saliva, have a direct impact on the formation and growth of dental biofilm. Salivary components are the main source of nutrients for microorganisms and are necessary for the development of a balanced microbiome. Many components, including secretory immunoglobulin A, lysozyme, lactoferrin, lactoperoxidase, statherin and histatins, directly and indirectly regulate the oral microbiome, maintaining it in a balanced state [22]. Enzymes that help regulate the microbiome balance are immobilized in the acquired enamel pellicle, forming an active structure [23,24]. The individually structured pellicle activates and supports the adhesive ability of bacteria to non-detachable hard surfaces through various interactions. Saliva not only helps maintain an environment that allows the biofilm to thrive but also modulates its layers through enzymes, glycoproteins and minerals, which, in turn, control the formation of the biofilm and its activity [22,25].
Upon initial contact with the oral cavity, bacteria interact with saliva, which promotes their absorption on the dental surface and, through their multiplication, the biofilm matrix starts to form. The first bacteria to attach to dental tissues are species of the Streptococcus genus, as they are part of the commensal microflora and characterize the biofilm formed by them, associated with healthy teeth and gums. These microorganisms exert their beneficial effects by significantly hindering the colonization of potentially pathobiontic species [17,26]. However, disruption of the oral ecosystem leads to dysbiosis, with carbohydrate-fermenting Gram-positive species becoming predominant, leading to demineralization of dental tissues, which, in turn, leads to oral pathological processes [6,27].
Oral dysbiosis is an imbalance in the oral microbial community. It is associated with an increase in pathogenic bacteria and a decrease in beneficial bacteria alike and can contribute to the development of oral and systemic diseases [28]. Dysbiosis can occur rapidly if salivary flow is disrupted, as saliva supplies components of the innate and adaptive immune response that are vital for maintaining homeostasis in the oral cavity. Some bacterial species possess intrinsic resistance to host defense peptides, while others can modulate their susceptibility to environmental stimuli. There is also significant interstrain variation in their susceptibility to defense peptides within the same species [29,30].
It is generally accepted that bacteria historically considered as potential oral pathobionts can be found in low numbers in healthy sites, with oral diseases occurring as a consequence of a detrimental alteration in the natural balance of the oral microbiota rather than as a result of exogenous infection. During a dysbiotic state, these disease-associated bacteria can grow to higher proportions than under healthy conditions, where they are normally commensal residents of the dental biofilm [31].
Oral Pathobionts and Prevalent Oral Diseases
Maintaining good oral health affects the ability of an individual to adapt to physiological changes throughout their life and maintain their dentition and oral cavity through independent self-care. Although largely preventable, oral diseases are widespread throughout life and have significant negative effects on people and are a global public health problem [32,33,34,35].
Oral pathobionts are commensal microorganisms that can induce diseases only under specific genetic or environmental changes in the oral cavity. The differences between them and opportunistic pathogens are that the latter lead to acute infections and are mostly acquired from external sources. Commensals can alter into pathobionts when influenced by endogenous or exogenous factors that can cause oral dysbiosis and ultimately leading to pathological conditions. The pathobiont-state transition can be influenced by different factors, including microbial dysbiosis, antibiotic resistance, impaired immune system, and genetic mutations [36].
Dental caries is the local destruction of hard dental tissues by acidic by-products of bacterial fermentation of free sugar compounds. It is manifested through two stages. The first is initiation, where bacterial acids dissolve minerals from the tooth enamel, causing white spots. This stage is reversible through the normal process of remineralization and with good oral hygiene. The second is progression, which is a continued breakdown of enamel and then dentin, forming a physical tooth cavity. This stage is irreversible and requires mechanical intervention to prevent further destruction and devitalization of teeth [37]. Under normal physiological conditions, the processes of demineralization and remineralization in the supragingival biofilm are in a balanced state and are unlikely to have a detrimental effect on the teeth. The process of caries formation is dynamic, with periods of de- and remineralization being disrupted by tooth-related fluctuations in the pH values of the dental biofilm. The lower the acidity, the higher the tendency to degrade the components of the hard tissues. The bacteria in the biofilm metabolize the sugars and increase the acidity through their products. Over time, the pH values return to neutral due to the good buffering capacity of saliva and the additional dissolved mineral content from the tooth surfaces [38,39,40]. Scientific data shows that oral diseases are not caused by a single microorganism but are polymicrobial in nature. Microorganisms associated with the formation of dental caries are S. mutans, representatives of the Cutibacterium, Neisseria, and Selenomonas genera, as well as Candida albicans [41,42].
Periodontal diseases are chronic inflammatory conditions affecting the soft tissues surrounding and supporting the teeth. Periodontal disease initially manifests as gingivitis, a reversible inflammation of the periodontal soft tissues, which results in bleeding and swelling of the gums. If left untreated, a greater number of anaerobic organisms begin to colonize the deeper periodontal pockets, including P. gingivalis and A. actinomycetemcomitans, which progresses gingivitis to periodontitis and triggers the host inflammatory responses [43,44,45]. A wide range of microorganisms from the Bacteroidetes, Spirochaetes, and Synergistetes phyla, from the Clostridia, Erysipelotrichia, and Negativicutes class, from the Fusobacterium and Prevotella genera, as well as species including P. gingivalis, Treponema denticola, Tannerella forsythia, Filifactor alocis, A. actinomycetemcomitans, and Parvimonas micra, as well as archaea, including Methanobrevibacter oralis, Methanosarcina mazeii, and Methanobacterium curvum/congolense are responsible for the occurrence of periodontal diseases [46,47,48,49].
Oral candidiasis is one of the most common fungal infections caused by Candida species. They are present in the oral cavity as a commensal microorganism under balanced oral conditions but, when an imbalance in the microbiota occurs, different species, most often C. albicans, start to predominate and cause infections [50]. As a polymorphic fungus, it adheres to epithelial cells and transitions from yeast to a hyphal form in order to enhance tissue penetration. Further accumulation leads to formation of white-colored dense biofilms that can withstand antifungal metabolites and immune defenses, leading to further soft tissue damage [51]. Oral candidiasis can vary in its entity, including pseudomembranous candidiasis (thrush), hyperplastic or atrophic (denture) candidiasis, linear gingival erythema, median rhomboid glossitis, and angular cheilitis [52]. In addition to C. albicans being the most ubiquitous in oral yeast infections, species including Candida glabrata, Candida tropicalis, Candida pseudotropicalis, Candida parapsilosis, Candida krusei, and Candida stellatoidea are also present in the oral cavity and can be a part of the disease etiology [52,53].
Halitosis or oral malodor is a disease characterized by an unpleasant odor emanating from the oral cavity. Its main cause is the presence of volatile sulfur compounds, including hydrogen sulfide, dimethyl sulfide, and methyl mercaptan, as a result of the prevalence of anaerobic oral Gram-negative bacteria. Extra-oral causes of halitosis include gastrointestinal diseases, respiratory tract infections, as well as systemic disorders. The intra-oral causes are mainly associated with microbial degradation of sulfur- and non-sulfur-containing amino acids derived from proteins in the course of other oral diseases or poor oral hygiene [54,55]. Several bacterial representatives are known to produce volatile sulfur compounds in the oral cavity, including T. denticola, P. intermedia, P. loescheii, P. gingivalis, P. endodontalis, Bacteroides loescheii, Centipeda periodontii, E. corrodens, F. nucleatum, Bacteroides forsythus, T. forsythyia, Selenomonas and Eubacterium [54].
4. Role of Oral Probiotic Microorganisms and Criteria for Their Selection
In the dynamic ecosystem of the oral cavity, the microbiome is heterogeneous and diverse, and therefore more opportunities arise to cause imbalances leading to the manifestation of oral diseases. Conventional treatment of these diseases includes mechanical removal of bacterial plaque and antimicrobial therapy with antibiotic drugs. Due to the limited efficacy of antibiotic substances, arising from the emergence of antibiotic resistance in microorganisms, it is necessary to explore other alternative treatment options and, in this context, probiotic microorganisms can play a significant role.
A significant number of strains of the Lactobacillaceae family, Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Saccharomyces, and Bacillus genera have a long history of safe application and have been subject to extensive monitoring and evaluation, so it can be concluded that there are no serious safety concerns for their application in foods and dietary supplements. Their mechanism of action is expressed through non-specific, species-specific and strain-specific mechanisms [56,57].
In recent years, the application of probiotics to maintain ecological balance and the effectiveness of normalizing the oral microbiota has been the subject of intensive research [58,59,60,61,62]. Regulation of the composition of microbiota provides an opportunity to influence the development and implementation of mucosal and systemic immunity. Probiotic microorganisms reduce the damaging effects caused by pathobionts by naturally colonizing the oral cavity. Changing the active composition of an infected tissue area from an environment rich in inflammatory cytokines to a more benign one through colonization of beneficial microorganisms contributes to systemic health in general. The most commonly used species in oral probiotic products are bacterial representatives, including Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, L. casei, L. acidophilus, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Ligilactobacillus salivarius, Lactobacillus helveticus, Streptococcus thermophilus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Enterococcus faecium, as well as the yeast representative Saccharomyces boulardii. With the advancement of research and application of oral probiotics, there has been a shift from their use solely as an adjunct to dental treatments to a more established routine therapeutic strategy [5].
Probiotic treatments are widely used in diseases of the intestinal tissues but are not used in oral diseases due to the still limited scientific evidence of their beneficial effects. Probiotics with a targeted effect on the oral cavity may cause chemical and physical alterations to the oral microbiota [63]. Research suggests that probiotics possess expressed adhesive properties to oral tissues, higher than pathobionts, and can successfully compete for adhesion surfaces and increase the presence of beneficial bacteria, thus contributing positively mainly to the prevention of oral diseases [63,64,65,66]. For oral probiotics to be effective, they must be able to maintain the environmental conditions in the oral cavity. Through aggregation, co-aggregation and formation of new biofilms, probiotics adhere to and colonize oral tissues in order to compete for adhesion sites, nutrients, and growth factors, thus inhibiting the transformation of commensals to pathobionts [67].
An important matter to be mentioned is the correlation of some lactobacilli in the further development of caries [68,69]. Their metabolic pathways lead to the production of acidic compounds which may increase the risk of caries [70]. While being identified at lesion sites, the initiation of the disease starts with the accumulation of pathobionts, including S. mutans, which, in low pH conditions, increases the demineralization time and starts the destruction of the enamel. After this, the dentin structure is presented to and favored by a more widespread variety of microorganisms. But, according to many studies, it can be claimed that the consumption of probiotics does not cause the initiation of caries [63]. It can be suggested that oral species of the Lactobacillaceae family display a niche specificity. Based on the 16S gene sequence [71] and the 73 core genes [72], phylogenetic relationships between dominant oral species belong to different clades or phylogroups. This indicates that caries-associated lactobacilli do not arise from a recent common ancestor but their adaptation to an existing lesion niche is independent in different lineages [73].
The selection of probiotic strains requires a systematic approach using an incremental strategy. In many cases, evaluated strains are narrowed down through sequential series of tests. Finishing this procedure yields a selection of strains which present the highest number of functional properties. The selected strains are then proceeded through product incorporation and clinical trials [74]. Important criteria for effectiveness include capacity to survive oral conditions (salivary flow, pH fluctuations, and lysozyme), adhesion ability to epithelial cells (binding to mucin) and further colonization, production of metabolites with antimicrobial activity (organic acids, bacteriocins, and H2O2), physical competition with oral pathobionts, and safety assessment (taxonomic identification; absence of virulence factors, toxicity, and transferable antibiotic resistance genes) [75,76]. In addition, host-associated functional properties should also be considered, including anti-cancer and immunostimulatory activities [74]. The beneficial effects of oral probiotic LAB strains are reported to involve antimicrobial, anti-mutagenic, anti-cariogenic, immunomodulating, and antioxidant activities. These probiotic features are reported as species- and even strain-dependent [76]. Emphasis in strain-related traits should be considered, as different strains within the same species can have entirely different effects. Some can exhibit beneficial properties, while others possess insignificant or no effects at all [59]. It must be noted that, when presented in the environment of the oral cavity, probiotic strains should not actively ferment sugars. This is important in order to avoid lowering pH and enamel demineralization, inhibiting the organization of the extracellular matrix in the dental biofilm, limiting the cytotoxic productivity of pathobiontic bacteria, and favorably changing biochemical parameters affecting the biofilm (buffer capacity and salivary components) [77,78].
5. Specific Mechanisms of Probiotic Activity of Lactic Acid Bacteria in the Oral Cavity
LAB are a dominant bacterial group that is widely distributed in nature, being present in dairy, plant and meat fermented foods, in the microbiome of the GIT and urogenital tract (UGT) of humans and animals, but are also naturally present in water, soil and plants [79]. This group of microorganisms is well known for its ability to produce lactic acid as the main end product of their anaerobic metabolism, as well as for the synthesis of a wide range of metabolic products, including exopolysaccharides (EPSs), polyols, organic acids, aromatic compounds, bacteriocins, enzymes, and vitamins, which contribute to the nutritional, aromatic and technological properties of various fermented food products, as well as maintaining the health of the human organism [80,81,82]. As a result of these properties, LAB are widely used as probiotics, starter cultures, and for biosynthesis of various biological compounds due to their adaptive metabolism [83,84,85]. Other important applications include their use as bioprotective agents, contributing to the inhibition of various pathobiontic microorganisms [86], as well as recombinant vectors for transfer of proteins and DNA vaccines as preventive and therapeutic drugs [87].
The spectrum of species belonging to the Lactobacillaceae family is a subject of intensive research interest and widespread application due to the established properties to maintain the health of the human organism [88]. Their selection as probiotic microorganisms is due to the expression of many vital properties, including the ability to adhere to mucosal tissues, high tolerance to acids, the ability to withstand low pH values, to exhibit resistance to antibiotics, antimicrobial and antagonistic activity, production of EPSs, etc. [89,90,91].
LAB-containing probiotic products represent a modern approach to prevent or reduce the level of infectious diseases caused by pathobiontic microorganisms in the oral cavity [92]. Scientific studies have established positive effects of probiotic microorganisms through interaction with host tissues, synthesis of metabolic products and competitiveness [93].
5.1. Production of Antimicrobial Metabolic Compounds
As a result of the fermentative type of metabolism in LAB, a variety of organic acids are synthesized, which is an important metabolic feature of probiotics. They mainly produce lactic acid but also acetic, citric, propionic, 3-hydroxypropionic, succinic, formic, 3-phenyllactic, gamma-aminobutyric, and 2-hydroxyisocaproic acids [94,95]. The synthesized organic acids can affect the functions of the bacterial cell wall, cytoplasmic membrane and specific metabolism, which can lead to cell devitalization of potentially pathobiontic microorganisms (Figure 1) [96]. Although possessing antimicrobial effects, the produced acids have an ambiguous nature. They lower pH in the oral cavity, which leads to acidogenicity in the oral environment, thus contributing to increased potential of initiating caries [97]. Huang et al. investigated the antimicrobial activity of acetic, propionic and formic acids, establishing inhibition to varying degrees of some of the common oral pathobionts, including S. mutans, S. gordonii, S. sanguinis, P. gingivalis, F. nucleatum, A. actinomycetemcomitans, and C. albicans [98]. Studies show that, even though acetic acid production is the lowest compared to other organic acids, it has a higher proportion of non-dissociating acid, therefore possessing a higher antimicrobial effect than lactic acid at certain pH levels [94].
Figure 1.
Production of different metabolites from LAB and their main effects on oral pathobionts (created in https://BioRender.com (accessed on 15 December 2025) and Adobe InDesign 21.0.2).
The synthesis of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is a well-known property of several bacterial species associated with the human oral microbiota [99]. These representatives do not possess production mechanisms for H2O2-scavenging enzymes, including catalase and NADH peroxidase, and cannot biotransform it by themselves. Synthesis and accumulation of H2O2 is due to exposure to molecular oxygen of anaerobic LAB by oxidizing lactic acid, NADH, and pyruvate [100]. H2O2 is characterized by antibacterial activity, and, depending on various factors, it can exhibit a bacteriostatic or bactericidal effect (Figure 1) [101]. In direct co-cultivations of LAB, including Lactobacillus gasseri, W. cibaria, L. salivarius, and L. fermentum, with several periodontal pathobionts, including S. mutans, S. sanguinis, Streptococcus sobrinus, F. nucleatum, P. intermedia, P. gingivalis, and Porphyromonas catoniae, definite inhibitory activity on the number of viable cells was indicated [102,103].
Bacteriocins are metabolic products composed of short-chain peptides, polypeptides, proteins and protein complexes with antibacterial activity, which are synthesized by bacteria [104]. The main action of bacteriocins is to inhibit the development and reproduction of a variety of bacteria, through mechanisms of suppressing cell wall synthesis, increasing cell membrane permeability, suppressing nucleic acid and protein synthesis (Figure 1) [105]. Bacteriocins produced by Gram-positive bacteria are divided into several classes [106]. In a study by Messaoudi et al., the antimicrobial activity of bacteriocin produced by oral isolate of L. salivarius BGHO1 against S. mutans, S. pneumoniae, S. aureus, and E. faecalis was established [107]. Gautam and Sharma established the bacteriocin-synthesizing potential of Levilactobacillus spicheri G2, with the production of bacteriocin, exhibiting high activity against S. mutans, S. aureus, and Bacillus cereus [108]. In a study by da Silva et al., the authors established the antimicrobial activity of bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances (BLIS) produced by L. plantarum ST16 Pa, Lactococcus lactis CECT-4434, B. animalis subsp. lactis BL 04, and Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis 27 against S. mutans, E. coli, S. aureus, Listeria innocua, and Carnobacterium maltaromaticum [109].
Exopolysaccharides (EPSs) are macromolecules which are secondary metabolic products of oral LAB and are associated with their probiotic functions. EPSs are synthesized as extracellular products and play a role as postbiotic components, providing health benefits to humans through modulation of the immune system, antimicrobial, antitumor, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties and modulation of the microbiome [110]. Some of the main bioactive EPSs from LAB include dextran, levan, inulin, and reuteran [111]. The production of EPSs by bacterial cells supports their normal growth in the presence of stress factors, such as changes in pH, dehydration, osmotic stress, antibiotics, bacteriophages, and lysozymes [112]. One of the main properties is their role as adhesins, promoting the adhesion of LAB to epithelial cells during colonization, and they are particularly important in the formation and accumulation of biofilms. These properties improve the survival and persistent presence of LAB in the human body [113]. Also, promoting their adhesion to mucosal tissue and the formation of biofilms may complement their antimicrobial and antibiofilm properties (Figure 1) [114]. Both antagonistic and antibiofilm activity have been established by a newly isolated oral LAB group against S. mutans and C. albicans [115]. The antimicrobial properties of EPSs produced by Bifidobacterium bifidum WBIN03 and L. plantarum R315 strains have been studied by Li et al. and Mahdhi et al. The authors reported that, at different concentrations, EPSs exhibit inhibitory effects against C. albicans, E. coli, B. cereus, S. aureus, and P. aeruginosa [116,117]. Allonsius et al. studied EPSs from L. rhamnosus GG and reported that, in a purified state, they were able to inhibit the formation of hyphae and adhesion of Candida through coaggregation, competition for binding sites, and immunomodulation of epithelial cells [118]. The antibiofilm activity of dextran produced by Weissella confusa was investigated by Rosca et al. The authors reported activity against the formation and pre-formed biofilms of C. albicans SC5314 [119].
LAB can produce substances with antioxidant properties that are safe and can have a variety of beneficial effects on the human oral cavity [92,120]. Antioxidants can avoid, reduce or interrupt oxidative damage and are widely used in pharmaceutical and food industries [121]. As a main function, antioxidants are able to neutralize free radicals and are closely related to health effects and can potentially prevent the development of many diseases [122,123]. It has been studied that LAB produce antioxidative substances that can neutralize reactive oxygen species (ROS), upregulate host antioxidant enzymes, downregulate enzymes related to ROS synthesis, and regulate the signaling pathway for antioxidant production in the host (Figure 1) [124]. Various oral LAB strains, including L. plantarum, Latilactobacillus sakei, L. gasseri, S. salivarius, and E. faecium, have been reported to demonstrate hydroxyl radical scavenging activities [123].
As different metabolites are produced from LAB, they are released in the oral environment and connect with saliva. Saliva by itself contains a wide variety of organic and inorganic components and plays crucial roles in oral health. Secreted metabolites can not only possess effects against pathobionts but could change the properties of saliva. Metabolites can affect salivary flow, buffering capacity, and pH fluctuations. This can lead to either balancing the oral environment and contributing to a healthy oral cavity or disrupt the equilibrium and cause dysbiosis and disease initiation [125,126].
5.2. Formation and Activity of Oral Biofilms
Oral biofilms are comprised of complex microbial communities that adhere to the hard and soft tissues in the oral cavity and are constantly influenced by mastication, periodical nutrient intake, and host immune responses, thus creating a dynamic microenvironment [127,128]. Microorganisms in these biofilms are embedded in a highly organized matrix, comprised of water, EPSs, proteins, lipids, inorganic ions, and extracellular DNA with different functions. EPSs stabilize the biofilm and facilitate microbial adhesion and aggregation; extracellular proteins promote structural integrity, enzymatic activity, and processing of nutrients; lipids enhance biofilm hydrophobicity and physical barrier functions; inorganic ions contribute to cross-link matrix components and regulate the demineralization–remineralization process; extracellular DNA from lysed cells maintain structural cohesion, enhance antimicrobial resistance, and trigger host immune responses (Figure 2) [129].
Figure 2.
Composition of oral biofilms and interactions within their structure (created in https://BioRender.com (accessed on 17 December 2025) and Adobe InDesign 21.0.2).
Microorganisms in the oral cavity form complexly structured biofilms, comprised of multiple layers of different species occupying distinct ecological niches. This multispecies biofilm architecture enables interspecies interactions and competition [130]. Within this structure, microorganisms arrange into spatial organizations to form multilayered communities. This structuring creates microenvironments with different nutrient gradients, oxygen levels, and metabolic activities. Reduction in local oxygen tension by the early colonizers, including Streptococcus spp., creates anaerobic niches for obligate anaerobes. Although probiotic LAB are mostly anaerobic, this decrease in oxygen levels makes a suitable environment for potential pathobiontic species implicated in periodontal diseases and can contribute to maturation and pathobiont-abundant oral biofilms [129]. The architectural complexity of biofilms provides physical stability and increases resistance to antibiotics and immune defenses, as well as influencing bacterial gene expression and metabolism. This promotes interspecies interactions and, in most cases, transforms commensal communities into pathobiontic with increased pathogenicity, evasion of immune responses, and pro-inflammatory activity [129]. Similar biofilm structures present a critical target for management of biofilm-associated oral diseases [131].
Initially, oral biofilms start to form from pioneer microorganisms that adhere to the salivary pellicle. This structure is comprised of proteins and carbohydrates that selectively bind oral microorganisms and is mediated by adhesion factors in the form of adhesins and biofilm-associated proteins [127]. Adhesion can be influenced by factors, including temperature, pH, nutrient content, and mechanical breakdown from the salivary flow [132]. Following the initial adhesion, structural and compositional changes occur. The early colonizers proliferate but new microbial species are also incorporated, increasing complexity and heterogeneity of the biofilm. Bacteria produce extracellular polymeric substances to form a matrix, which provide structural stability and promote interspecies interactions, including nutrient sharing and metabolic cross-feeding, thereby increasing microbial diversity [114,133]. As biofilms mature and become more diverse, their architecture and protective matrix increase the resistance to antimicrobial agents. A mature oral biofilm is structurally resilient, with metabolically active microbial communities that can endure environmental stress and support diverse microbial populations [134]. The stability is maintained through synergistic interactions between the matrix, microbial metabolism, and intercellular signaling pathways, as well as providing a physical barrier with antimicrobial functions [114,135].
The formation of bacterial biofilms is controlled by the quorum sensing (QS) system. With an increase in cell density, it allows bacteria to secrete chemical signal molecules that are used for intra/interspecific communication to coordinate group behavior through gene regulation [136]. Specific signals can activate physiological and biochemical reactions, including formation of biofilms, accumulation of extracellular matrix, production of secondary metabolites, and the QS system itself [137]. Bacteria in the oral cavity utilize QS to respond to environments continuously, to coordinate the expression of genes and coordinate colony behavior based on the density of their current population [136]. This interspecific communication is achieved through the LuxS/AI-2 signaling system, which is a universal QS system of autoinducer-2 (AI-2). In LAB small peptides are more prevalent as signaling molecules of the auto-inducing peptide (AIP) signaling system [138]. AIPs are cyclic thiodepsipeptide QS molecules synthesized by Gram-positive bacteria, which can regulate secondary metabolite production, including bacteriocins, and impact the composition of the microbiome [139].
Oral biofilms have a dual function regarding oral health. Under certain conditions, pathobionts can become dominant and biofilms can transition into a dysbiotic state, promoting oral infections and contributing to systemic diseases [140]. But oral biofilms are not intrinsically pathobiontic in nature and function as dynamic ecological communities essential for maintaining oral homeostasis and microbial balance. In a healthy host state, oral biofilms are dominated by commensal bacteria that act as a barrier against external pathogens and stimuli. This stable oral ecosystem can modulate host immune responses, promote immune tolerance, and prevent excessive inflammation. In this oral eubiotic state, balanced microbial interactions maintain tissue integrity and can prevent the occurrence of microbial dysbiosis [141,142]. Probiotic species from the Lactobacillaceae family can contribute to oral health by producing antimicrobial compounds, downregulating virulence genes, and preventing the adhesion of oral pathobionts, including S. mutans [142,143,144].
Commonly mediated by a biofilm is dental caries. The ability to inhibit the formation and growth of pathobiontic biofilms in the oral cavity is a crucial property of probiotic microorganisms. Some species, including L. fermentum, L. rhamnosus, L. plantarum, L. casei, L. acidophilus, L. brevis, L. delbrueckii, L. salivarius, Lactiplantibacillus pentosus, Latilactobacillus curvatus, S. salivarius, Streptococcus oralis, Bifidobacterium lactis, Bifidobacterium longum, and W. confusa, have been reported to exert antibiofilm activity against oral pathobionts [115,145]. Probiotic microorganisms, including S. salivarius K12, L. casei ATCC 393, L. reuteri ATCC 23272, L. plantarum ATCC 14917, and L. salivarius ATCC 11741, can modulate microbial composition and behavior by downregulating S. mutans glucosyltransferase genes (gtfB, gtfC, and gtfD), which suppresses cariogenic EPS synthesis and biofilm formation and stability [146,147,148]. LAB biofilms have also been shown to possess antifungal activity. An investigation involving L. plantarum, Lactobacillus crispatus, Limosilactobacillus vaginalis, and L. gasseri biofilms tested against C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. glabrata, Candida lusitaniae, C. parapsilosis, and C. krusei clinical isolates. The results indicated that biofilm cell-free supernatants exerted higher fungistatic activity against all Candida representatives compared to planktonic cell-free supernatants [149]. Probiotics are also capable of inhibiting the yeast–hyphae transition of C. albicans, which is a crucial step in its pathogenesis. A combination of L. helveticus CBS N116411, L. plantarum SD5870, and S. salivarius DSM 14685 can significantly downregulate the expression of transition genes, including EFG1, SAP5, ALS3 and HWP1 [150].
The adhesion capability of LAB is the first step for determining their probiotic properties. The attachment to hard and soft oral tissues is determined by the physicochemical characteristics of the bacterial surface. Initial adhesion and biofilm formation are controlled by different genes, and adhesion is an important prerequisite for biofilm formation [151]. An important characteristic of probiotic microorganisms is the ability to outcompete potential oral pathobionts for adhesion sites and colonization [152]. A successful colonization of S. salivarius M18 showed anticaries activity as indicated by a reduction in plaque scores and S. mutans levels [153]. L. brevis KCCM 202399 showed antimicrobial and antibiofilm effects against S. mutans KCTC 5458 by reducing its self-aggregation, cell surface hydrophobicity, and EPS production [154].
Aggregation is very important regarding the formation of biofilms and is related to cell adherence properties. This trait directly involves the ability of LAB to survive and persist in the oral cavity. Co-aggregation is an advantageous property of LAB as it allows them to form a physical barrier that impedes surface attachment and colonization of potential pathobionts [155] and has been observed between microbial species in the oral microbiome’s composition. LAB, which can co-aggregate with oral pathobionts, may exert important host defense mechanisms against the development of infections [156]. LAB are reported to exhibit specific co-aggregative properties with oral pathobionts, including S. mutans and C. albicans in vitro [115,157,158].
6. In Vitro and Clinical Trials Evidence and Application of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Delivery Systems
6.1. In Vitro and Clinical Research Viewpoint
The prophylactic and therapeutic potential of probiotic microorganisms has been widely studied and has led to promising results in serious oral diseases, including dental caries and periodontitis [159,160,161]. Despite numerous studies and developments, questions remain about which probiotic species or strains are most effective against the different oral diseases, as well as for each population or individual [162]. In addition, questions remain about what carriers and at what dose a probiotic microorganism can be administered, as well as the frequency of its administration.
A number of authors have conducted studies with various probiotic strains of oral origin, establishing in vitro and clinical outcomes towards the prevention and therapy of various oral diseases, inhibition of oral pathobionts, as well as clinical indicators. Table 2 serves as exemplary material on research with specific strains and different outcomes from the conducted studies.
Table 2.
Effects of studied probiotics on the development of different pathobionts and on different conditions of the oral cavity.
6.2. Delivery Systems Viewpoint
Research of probiotic strains incorporated into oral health products provides a modern approach to address oral infections before they occur. Replacement therapy in the form of probiotic products is an alternative and promising way to prevent diseases through competitive interactions of beneficial microorganisms with pathobionts [182]. In recent years, various probiotic strains have been added to a variety of carriers, including pastilles, hard and soft candies, lollipops, chewing gums, lozenges, ice cream and various dairy products, as well as oral hygiene products. The information below will provide exemplary material on different delivery system formulations, applied probiotic strains, and outcomes from the conducted studies.
Lozenges and candies are products that are easily prepared and can deliver multiple substances during their slow dissolution in the oral cavity [183]. During the time they are present in the oral cavity, they can contribute to a local beneficial effect in the prevention or therapeutic manipulation of oral diseases. Therefore, lozenges are a suitable potential carrier of probiotic strains for oral administration [184]. Studied L. reuteri strains ATCC 55730, DSM 17938, and ATCC PTA 5289 in lozenge formulations have been reported to significantly reduce gingival pocket depth on probing, gingival inflammation and bleeding, of saliva-associated S. mutans and C. albicans, and of P. gingivalis, P. intermedia, A. actinomycetemcomitans, F. nucleatum, and T. forsythia in patients with chronic periodontitis [185,186,187,188]. Lozenges containing L. brevis CD2 strain have been reported to reduce the development of severe forms of oral mucositis, dental biofilm accumulation, gingival inflammation, and gingival pocket depth on probing in aggressive periodontitis [189,190]. Prolonged use of candy with L. paracasei DSMZ16671 has been reported to reduce the levels of saliva-associated S. mutans [191]. Lozenges containing S. salivarius M18 have been reported to possess inhibitory activity against S. mutans, S. mitis, S. sobrinus and Rothia mucilagenosa, as well as plaque index reduction [153]. Long-term application of lozenge formulations containing L. rhamnosus GG and B. lactis BB-12 has been reported to reduce gingival and plaque indices [192].
Tablets are a commonly used delivery vehicle for probiotics and have been used in numerous scientific studies [157]. They contain components that have undergone freeze-drying and machine tableting or molding processes. Long-term intake of freeze-dried tablets containing inactivated L. paracasei 111 and 141 strains has been reported to decrease the depth of the gingival pocket on probing, inhibition of the development of periodontal diseases, as well as improvement of the condition of oral halitosis [157]. Authors have reported significant reductions in S. mutans, F. nucleatum, P. gingivalis, P. intermedia, and A. actinomycetemcomitans levels with long-term use of probiotic tablets containing L. reuteri ATCC 55730, ATCC PTA 5289, and DSM-17938 [193,194]. Other authors have reported a significant improvement in plaque index, decrease in the concentration of volatile sulfur compounds, and reduced gingival pocket depth on probing in patients with an increased risk for periodontal diseases and halitosis after prolonged intake of tablets with added L. salivarius WB21 [195,196].
Chewing gum is a widely used product for oral hygiene. Many products containing adjuvants such as xylitol, sorbitol, and chlorhexidine have been used in studies as antibiofilm agents and to increase pH and salivary flow [197]. The addition of probiotic microorganisms to the composition of various chewing gum bases to reduce the presence of oral pathobionts provides new ways to prevent infections of the oral cavity [198]. A significant reduction in saliva-associated S. mutans with prolonged use of probiotic chewing gum and mastic gum with added L. reuteri ATCC 55730 and ATCC PTA 5289 has been reported [198,199]. Long-term use of probiotic gum and toothpaste with added L. reuteri SGL 01, L. salivarius SGL 03, and L. plantarum SGL 07 strains has been reported to reduce F. nucleatum and P. intermedia concentrations [200].
Dairy products are some of the most widely consumed products worldwide [201]. Numerous types of dairy products are supplemented with additional probiotic strains and are easily available and suitable for all ages [182]. Ice cream is a food product with significant nutritional value, well digestible by the human body, and a suitable carrier for delivering probiotic microorganisms [202,203]. B. lactis BB-12 and L. acidophilus LA-5 has been reported to successfully colonize upon long-term intake of probiotic ice-cream-based product, as well as significantly inhibit saliva-associated S. mutans [203,204,205,206]. Prolonged intake of probiotic milk with added L. rhamnosus GG has been reported to reduce the risk of caries development [207]. Long-term consumption of cheese formulations with added L. rhamnosus GG, LC 705 and Propionibacterium freudenreichii subsp. shermanii JS has been reported to reduce the presence of S. mutans and Candida in the oral cavity [208,209]. Long-term consumption of milk with added L. rhamnosus strains has been reported to reduce the risk of caries development, as well as the levels of saliva-associated S. mutans [210,211]. Long-term consumption of milk and milk powder with L. paracasei SD1 has been reported to decrease S. mutans levels and increase the presence of the probiotic strain in the oral cavity [212,213]. Consumption of B. lactis BB-12 incorporated into cottage cheese has been reported to decrease S. mutans presence and increase salivary pH values [182].
Other model products, including sachets, oil drops, freeze-dried capsules, etc., are also being formulated and investigated as suitable vessels for probiotics. Controlled continuous drinking of water through straws with immobilized L. reuteri ATCC 55730 has been reported to significantly reduce S. mutans levels [193]. Freeze-dried L. rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium sp., and Bacillus coagulans in powdered form has been reported to reduce the levels of saliva-associated S. mutans during administration [214]. Long-term oral intake of probiotic drops containing refined oils and freeze-dried L. reuteri ATCC 55730 has been reported to reduce the incidence of caries and improve the gingival index [215]. After long-term use of capsules containing freeze-dried L. acidophillus HS101, L. rhamnosus HS111, and B. bifidum has been reported to significantly inhibit the presence of Candida sp. in patients without clinical symptoms [216]. Long-term application of drops with refined oils, a prebiotic and added L. reuteri ATCC 55730, L. rhamnosus ATCC 15820, and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis ATCC 15697 strains has reported a decrease in saliva-associated S. mutans [217]. Mouth rinsing with water-dissolving capsules containing L. salivarius and L. reuteri has been reported to improve plaque and gingival indices [218]. Long-term use of sachets containing L. rhamnosus SP1 has been reported to improve periodontal health in patients with chronic periodontitis [219]. Long-term application of freeze-dried inactivated cells of L. salivarius CECT 5713 dissolved in water and used as a mouthwash has been reported to reduce the concentration of S. mutans in saliva [220].
6.3. Critical Analysis
Oral probiotic formulations show promising results in inhibiting oral pathobionts, balancing the oral microbiome, and improving oral health conditions. However, evaluations from studies reveal several limitations, inconsistencies, and non-regulatory oversight.
Many studies apply a variety of probiotic strains, different dosages in the product formulations, as well as numerous delivery vehicles. Probiotic efficacy is highly strain-specific, but trials often use different strains or combinations, hindering the comparison of results across studies. Furthermore, there is an absence of standardized dosages, expressed in colony-forming units (CFU) counts and, in some cases, these are not reported. This methodological inconsistency complicates the meta-analyzation and comparison of effectiveness across results. Data from trials indicate that applied probiotics have transient colonization in the oral cavity. Their inability to permanently colonize in the oral environment requires continuous intake for the specific effects to persist. Most studies evaluate achieved results over a short time which is insufficient to determine sustained health benefits and potential side effects remain understudied. Many randomized controlled trials are also unreliable, involving too few participants to make solid conclusions regarding efficacy. This makes it difficult to distinguish the probiotic effect from the placebo [5,59,221,222,223,224].
In order to improve these limitations, trials should be standardized considering dosages, defined delivery methods, and long-term studies. Studies are needed to determine how long benefits last after discontinuation and the safety of long-term consumption. Relying on clinical markers, including gingival index, plaque index, etc., provides insufficient data on how the oral environment changes after probiotic application. Molecular methods, including 16S rRNA sequencing, RAPD, and metagenomic analyses should be implemented to measure how probiotics transform the oral microbiome. Quality control of products to improve regulations or standards should also be considered. Analysis on CFU counts should be accurately provided, in order to ensure viability at the time of consumption [5,59,221,222,223,224].
7. Challenges and Future Perspectives in Oral Probiotics Development
The evaluation of probiotic candidates, formulation of suitable carrier matrix, and sustainability present many difficulties. Assessment of new isolates often narrows down suitable candidates for specific application in the oral cavity as many effects are strain-specific [225]. On the other hand, development of new formulations as a delivery system encounters challenges and key points should be taken into account, including selection and integration of the composition components, initial stability of the matrix base during preparation, long-term stability of the product with and without the addition of probiotic strains, viability of the strains after incorporation, cross-contamination with undesirable microorganisms, and assuring minimum permissible resident microbiota of non-heat-treatable ingredients.
Another aspect is maintaining the probiotic strains viable in the final product. This mainly refers to strains that are susceptible to technological processing and long-term storage. Some strains may decrease in viable cell counts in a short period of time, leading to the inability of colonizing in the oral cavity. Colonization and persistence in the oral cavity are another important matter. Many LAB often possess lower affinity to hard dental surfaces and/or are transient, often affected by salivary flow [226]. Also, for some strains (e.g., L. acidophilus and L. casei) the production of excess lactic acid is probable, lowering oral pH and increasing the risk of caries initiation [96]. Other limitations also apply, as constant intake of certain probiotic product could lead to undesirable and unpredictable changes in the oral microbial populations, although research on the long-term ecological impacts in the oral cavity is scarce [225].
Future concern regarding the application of exogenous probiotics is their foreign nature to the immune system of the host that, in rare cases, could increase the chance of oral disease development. A promising approach is the incorporation of autoprobiotics into oral products. It involves isolation of microorganisms from the oral cavity of the host and developing personalized products to restore balance of the oral microbiota. This approach is considered as a modern direction with better efficacy in periodontal disease treatment, including reducing gum inflammation and pathobiont counts in periodontal pockets, but needs more research [227,228].
The majority of research on conventional probiotic microorganisms continues to develop and expand across scientific and industrial fields. The knowledge on established benefits of their direct physical interactions and metabolic activity can shift research to look at non-conventional and next-generation microorganisms as promising probiotic candidates. Several bacterial species have already been identified as potential probiotic candidates, including Akkermansia muciniphila, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, Christensenella minuta, and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, as well as yeast species from the genera Debaryomyces, Hanseniaspora, and Pichia. These microorganisms are currently undergoing research and development and have demonstrated the capacity to exert beneficial effects regarding different systemic disorders [229,230]. Research on these bacterial and yeast representatives for probiotic characteristics aimed at the oral cavity and against oral pathobionts could be a promising scientific contribution.
Besides the traditional product formulations, non-conventional probiotic delivery systems are gaining attention in order to surmount limitations [231]. Innovative methods for delivery systems preparation are already being studied and incorporate different EPSs, including gum arabic and starch-based biopolymers, which are easily soluble in the GIT and could also be promising for oral health products [232]. Technological processes, including spray-drying and freeze-drying rely on the addition of protectants to ensure cell viability. The implementation of natural products, like fruits in the form of juices and pulps with the addition of prebiotic components, could increase the development of better and more stable delivery systems [230,233].
8. Conclusions
Microbiological and biotechnological research on microbial interactions in the oral microbiome and evidence on developed oral probiotic products show promising results. The composition of oral microbiota shows the importance of maintaining an ecological balance, to prevent transition of oral commensal microorganisms to pathobionts. Probiotic LAB are well studied and beneficial effects have been established in the prevention and treatment of oral diseases. Outcomes from in vitro and clinical studies with different delivery vehicles suggest oversight on strain-specific traits, rather than the application of certain species of probiotics. Although short-term benefits have been widely observed, the persistence of these effects is still understudied, suggesting longer periods of application and standardization among studies. Overall, probiotic product development is consistent and further optimization of the addition of probiotic microorganisms, vehicle formulations, and trials will effectively guide their successive application.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, N.A. and D.N.; investigation, N.A.; writing—original draft preparation, N.A. and D.B.; writing—review and editing, D.N. and Y.E.; supervision, D.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The support of the Centre of Competence “Sustainable Utilization of Bio-resources and Waste of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants for Innovative Bioactive Products” (BIORESOURCES BG), project BG16RFPR002-1.014-0001, funded by the Program “Research, Innovation and Digitization for Smart Transformation” 2021–2027, co-funded by the EU, is greatly acknowledged.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
| LAB | Lactic acid bacteria |
| GIT | Gastrointestinal tract |
| eHOMD | Expanded human oral microbiome database |
| CFU | Colony-forming units |
| UGT | Urogenital tract |
| EPSs | Exopolysaccharides |
| ROS | Reactive oxygen species |
| AI-2 | Autoinducer-2 |
| AIP | Auto-inducing peptide |
| QS | Quorum sensing |
References
- Das, T.K.; Pradhan, S.; Chakrabarti, S.; Mondal, K.C.; Ghosh, K. Current status of probiotic and related health benefits. App. Food Res. 2022, 2, 100185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Filippis, F.; Pasolli, E.; Ercolini, D. The food-gut axis: Lactic acid bacteria and their link to food, the gut microbiome and human health. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2020, 44, 454–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajasekaran, J.J.; Krishnamurthy, H.K.; Bosco, J.; Jayaraman, V.; Krishna, K.; Wang, T.; Bei, K. Oral Microbiome: A Review of Its Impact on Oral and Systemic Health. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sedghi, L.; DiMassa, V.; Harrington, A.; Lynch, S.V.; Kapila, Y.L. The oral microbiome: Role of key organisms and complex networks in oral health and disease. Periodontology 2000 2021, 87, 107–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Inchingolo, A.D.; Inchingolo, A.M.; Palumbo, I.; Guglielmo, M.; Riccaldo, L.; Morolla, R.; Inchingolo, F.; Palermo, A.; Dipalma, G. The role of probiotics in preventing dental caries: A systematic review of clinical evidence. Front. Oral Health 2025, 6, 1720036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Z.; Zuo, T.; Frey, N.; Rangres, A.Y. A systematic framework for understanding the microbiome in human health and disease: From basic principles to clinical translation. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 2024, 9, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moutsopoulos, N.M.; Konkel, J.E. Tissue-Specific Immunity at the Oral Mucosal Barrier. Trends Immunol. 2018, 39, 276–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stašková, A.; Nemcová, R.; Lauko, S.; Jenča, A. Oral Microbiota from the Stomatology Perspective; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020; pp. 279–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, H.; Ni, C.; Du, Z.; Yan, F. Human oral microbiota and its modulation for oral health. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 99, 883–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barboza-Solís, C.; Acuña-Amador, L.A. The Oral Microbiota: A Literature Review for Updating Professionals in Dentistry. Part I. Odovtos Int. J. Dent. Sci. 2020, 22, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, N.; Bhatia, S.; Sodhi, A.S.; Batra, N. Oral microbiome and health. AIMS Microbiol. 2018, 4, 42–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fernandes, G.V.O.; Mosley, G.A.; Ross, W.; Dagher, A.; dos Santos Martins, B.G.; Fernandes, J.C.H. Revisiting Socransky’s Complexes: A Review Suggesting Updated New Bacterial Clusters (GF-MoR Complexes) for Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 2214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abdulkareem, A.A.; Al-Taweel, F.B.; Al-Sharqi, A.J.B.; Gul, S.S.; Sha, A.; Chapple, I.L.C. Current concepts in the pathogenesis of periodontitis: From symbiosis to dysbiosis. J. Oral Microbiol. 2023, 15, 2197779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, C.; Minty, M.; Vinel, A.; Canceill, T.; Loubières, P.; Burcelin, R.; Kaddech, M.; Blasco-Baque, V.; Laurencin-Dalicieux, S. Oral Microbiota: A Major Player in the Diagnosis of Systemic Diseases. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popowski, W.; Domanowska, D.; Koseski, D.; Ostrowski, R.; Zalewska, M.; Małecka-Giełdowska, M.; Łasica, A.; Popowska, M. Analysis of the oral microbiome composition of healthy individuals and the in vitro antibacterial activity of platelet-rich fibrin from these individuals against oral pathogenic bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1691046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sampaio-Maia, B.; Caldas, I.M.; Pereira, M.L.; Pérez-Mongiovi, D.; Araujo, R. The Oral Microbiome in Health and Its Implication in Oral and Systemic Diseases. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 97, 171–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.-H.; Chung, S.W.; Auh, Q.-S.; Hong, S.-J.; Lee, Y.-A.; Jung, J.; Lee, G.-J.; Park, H.J.; Shin, S.-I.; Hong, J.-Y. Progress in Oral Microbiome Related to Oral and Systemic Diseases: An Update. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pedersen, A.M.L.; Belstrøm, D. The role of natural salivary defences in maintaining a healthy oral microbiota. J. Dent. 2019, 80, S3–S12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kane, S.F. The effects of oral health on systemic health. Gen. Dent. 2017, 65, 30–34. [Google Scholar]
- Farooq, I.; Bugshan, A. The role of salivary contents and modern technologies in the remineralization of dental enamel: A narrative review. F1000Research 2020, 9, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, Y.; Totsika, M.; Morrison, M.; Punyadeera, C. Oral Microbiome: A New Biomarker Reservoir for Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancers. Theranostics 2017, 7, 4313–4321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vila, T.; Rizk, A.M.; Sultan, A.S.; Jabra-Rizk, M.A. The power of saliva: Antimicrobial and beyond. PLoS Pathog. 2019, 15, e1008058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferrari, C.R.; Hannig, M.; Buzalaf, M.A.R. Acquired pellicle engineering: A fascinating approach to prevent demineralization. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2025, 33, e20240359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flemming, J.; Hannig, C.; Hannig, M. Caries Management—The Role of Surface Interactions in De- and Remineralization-Processes. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 7044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Radaic, A.; Kapila, Y.L. The oralome and its dysbiosis: New insights into oral microbiome-host interactions. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 1335–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butera, A.; Scribante, A. Editorial for Oral Microbes and Human Health. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larsen, T.; Fiehn, N.E. Dental biofilm infections—An update. J. Pathol. Microbiol. Immunol. 2017, 125, 376–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maier, T. Oral Microbiome in Health and Disease: Maintaining a Healthy, Balanced Ecosystem and Reversing Dysbiosis. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nagakubo, D.; Kaibori, Y. Oral Microbiota: The Influences and Interactions of Saliva, IgA, and Dietary Factors in Health and Disease. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 2307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rebelo, M.B.; Oliveira, C.S.; Tavaria, F.K. Novel Strategies for Preventing Dysbiosis in the Oral Cavity. Front. Biosci. Elite 2023, 15, fbe1504023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sedghi, L.M.; Bacino, M.; Kapila, Y.L. Periodontal Disease: The Good, The Bad, and The Unknown. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 766944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peres, M.A.; Macpherson, L.M.D.; Weyant, R.J.; Daly, B.; Venturelli, R.; Mathur, M.R.; Listl, S.; Celeste, R.K.; Guarnizo-Herreño, C.C.; Kearns, C.; et al. Oral diseases: A global public health challenge. Lancet 2019, 394, 249–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barranca-Enríquez, A.; Romo-González, T. Your health is in your mouth: A comprehensive view to promote general wellness. Front. Oral Health 2022, 3, 971223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Patel, J.; Wallace, J.; Doshi, M.; Gadanya, M.; Ben Yahya, I.; Roseman, J.; Srisilapanan, P. Oral health for healthy ageing. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021, 2, e521–e527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kassebaum, N.J.; Smith, A.G.C.; Bernabé, E.; Fleming, T.D.; Reynolds, A.E.; Vos, T.; Murray, C.J.L.; Marcenes, W. GBD 2015 Oral Health Collaborators. Global, Regional, and National Prevalence, Incidence, and Disability-Adjusted Life Years for Oral Conditions for 195 Countries, 1990–2015: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors. J. Dent. Res. 2017, 96, 380–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bharathi, S.; Rajan, Y.A.P.A.S.; Prakash, S.; Immanuel, G.; Ramasubburayan, R. Pathobionts in the microbiome: Drivers of disease and targets for treatment. Microb. Pathog. 2026, 211, 108268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spatafora, G.; Li, Y.; He, X.; Cowan, A.; Tanner, A.C.R. The Evolving Microbiome of Dental Caries. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baumann, T.; Bereiter, R.; Lussi, A.; Carvalho, T.S. The effect of different salivary calcium concentrations on the erosion protection conferred by the salivary pellicle. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 12999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Warreth, A.; Abuhijleh, E.; Almaghribi, M.A.; Mahwal, G.; Ashawish, A. Tooth surface loss: A review of literature. Saudi Dent. J. 2020, 32, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pitts, N.B.; Zero, D.T.; Marsh, P.D.; Ekstrand, K.; Weintraub, J.A.; Ramos-Gomez, F.; Tagami, J.; Twetman, S.; Tsakos, G.; Ismail, A. Dental caries. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2017, 3, 17030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Li, J.; Li, X.; Ying, Y.; Yuan, J.; Chen, K.; Deng, S.; Wang, Q. Association of polymicrobial interactions with dental caries development and prevention. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1162380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Daliri, E.B.-M.; Chelliah, R.; Oh, D.-H. Isolation and Identification of Potentially Pathogenic Microorganisms Associated with Dental Caries in Human Teeth Biofilms. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ursu, R.G.; Iancu, L.S.; Porumb-Andrese, E.; Damian, C.; Cobzaru, R.G.; Nichitean, G.; Ripa, C.; Sandu, D.; Luchian, I. Host mRNA Analysis of Periodontal Disease Patients Positive for Porphyromonas gingivalis, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Tannerella forsythia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tonetti, M.S.; Jepsen, S.; Jin, L.; Otomo-Corgel, J. Impact of the global burden of periodontal diseases on health, nutrition and wellbeing of mankind: A call for global action. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2017, 44, 456–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kinane, D.F.; Stathopoulou, P.G.; Papapanou, P.N. Periodontal diseases. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2017, 3, 17038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, X.; Liu, S.; Deng, H.; Song, Y.; Zhang, L.; Song, Z. Advances in the oral microbiota and rapid detection of oral infectious diseases. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1121737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belibasakis, G.N.; Belstrøm, D.; Eick, S.; Gursoy, U.K.; Johansson, A.; Könönen, E. Periodontal microbiology and microbial etiology of periodontal diseases: Historical concepts and contemporary perspectives. Periodontology 2000 2023, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Spirito, F.; Di Palo, M.P.; De Benedetto, G.; Piedepalumbo, F.; Galdi, M.; Cannatà, D.; Cafà, N.; Contaldo, M. Periodontal Microbial Profiles Across Periodontal Conditions in Pediatric Subjects: A Narrative Review. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yekani, M.; Dastgir, M.; Fattahi, S.; Shahi, S.; Dizaj, S.M.; Memar, M.Y. Microbiological and molecular aspects of periodontitis pathogenesis: An infection-induced inflammatory condition. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2025, 15, 1533658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Asan, M.F.; Babu, G.S.; Bhat, S. Effect of probiotics on oral Candida—A review. Gulhane Med. J. 2022, 64, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, X.; Zheng, Q.; Nguyen, T.T.M.; Yang, S.-J.; Park, S.-J.; Yi, G.-S.; Yi, T.-H. Lactic Acid Bacteria from Kiwi: Antifungal and Biofilm-Inhibitory Activities Against Candida albicans. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arya, N.R.; Rafiq, N.B. Candidiasis. In StatPearls [Internet]; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2025. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560624/ (accessed on 10 December 2025).
- Zeise, K.D.; Woods, R.J.; Huffnagle, G.B. Interplay between Candida albicans and Lactic Acid Bacteria in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Impact on Colonization Resistance, Microbial Carriage, Opportunistic Infection, and Host Immunity. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2021, 34, e0032320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Izidoro, C.; Botelho, J.; Machado, V.; Reis, A.M.; Proença, L.; Alves, R.C.; Mendes, J.J. Revisiting Standard and Novel Therapeutic Approaches in Halitosis: A Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 11303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, H.S.; Yum, H.; Cho, Y.D.; Kim, S. Improvement of halitosis by probiotic bacterium Weissella cibaria CMU: A randomized controlled trial. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1108762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shah, A.B.; Baiseitova, A.; Zahoor, M.; Ahmad, I.; Ikram, M.; Bakhsh, A.; Shah, M.A.; Ali, I.; Idress, M.; Ullah, R.; et al. Probiotic significance of Lactobacillus strains: A comprehensive review on health impacts, research gaps, and future prospects. Gut Microbes 2024, 16, 2431643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarita, B.; Samadhan, D.; Hassan, M.Z.; Kovaleva, E.G. A comprehensive review of probiotics and human health-current prospective and applications. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 15, 1487641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matsubara, V.H.; Bandara, H.M.; Ishikawa, K.H.; Mayer, M.P.; Samaranayake, L.P. The role of probiotic bacteria in managing periodontal disease: A systematic review. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2016, 14, 643–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Beattie, R.E. Probiotics for oral health: A critical evaluation of bacterial strains. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1430810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frencken, J.E.; Sharma, P.; Stenhouse, L.; Green, D.; Laverty, D.; Dietrich, T. Global epidemiology of dental caries and severe periodontitis–a comprehensive review. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2017, 44, S94–S105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Longo, M.; de Souza Ramos, T.C.; Nunes, C.M.M.; Santamaria, M.P.; Jardini, M.A.N. Probiotic therapy as a novel approach in the prevention and treatment of gingivitis. A review. Braz. Dent. Sci. 2018, 21, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaura, E.; Twetman, S. Critical Appraisal of Oral Pre- and Probiotics for Caries Prevention and Care. Caries Res. 2019, 53, 514–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rad, A.H.; Pourjafar, H.; Mirzakhani, E. A comprehensive review of the application of probiotics and postbiotics in oral health. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1120995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zymovets, V.; Rakhimova, O.; Schmidt, A.; Bronnec, V.; Limanska, N.; Brundin, M.; Kelk, P.; Landström, M.; Vestman, N.R. Inhibition of infection-associated oral bacteria adhesion by probiotics: In vitro and in vivo models. IScience 2025, 28, 112412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sabatini, S.; Lauritano, D.; Candotto, V.; Silvestre, F.J.; Nardi, G.M. Oral probiotics in the management of gingivitis in diabetic patients: A double blinded randomized controlled study. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 2017, 31, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Keller, M.K.; Brandsborg, E.; Holmstrøm, K.; Twetman, S. Effect of tablets containing probiotic candidate strains on gingival inflammation and composition of the salivary microbiome: A randomised controlled trial. Benef. Microbes 2018, 9, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Grusovin, M.G.; Bossini, S.; Calza, S.; Cappa, V.; Garzetti, G.; Scotti, E.; Gherlone, E.F.; Mensi, M. Clinical efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri-containing lozenges in the supportive therapy of generalized periodontitis stage III and IV, grade C: 1-year results of a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled pilot study. Clin. Oral Investig. 2020, 24, 2015–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, D.; Shu, X.; Yao, L.; Zhou, G.; Ji, M.; Liao, G.; Zhu, Y.; Zou, L. Unveiling the dual nature of Lactobacillus: From cariogenic threat to probiotic protector—A critical review with bibliometric analysis. Front. Oral Health 2025, 6, 1535233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sidhu, G.K.; Mantha, S.; Murthi, S.; Sura, H.; Kadaru, P.; Jangra, J.K. Evaluation of Lactobacillus and Streptococcus mutans by addition of probiotics in the form of curd in the diet. J. Int. Oral Health JIOH 2015, 7, 85–89. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, X.; Schulte, R.M.; Burne, R.A.; Nascimento, M.M. Characterization of the arginolytic microflora provides insights into pH homeostasis in human oral biofilms. Caries Res. 2015, 49, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salvetti, E.; Torriani, S.; Felis, G.E. The Genus Lactobacillus: A Taxonomic Update. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2012, 4, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Z.; Harris, H.M.; McCann, A.; Guo, C.; Argimón, S.; Zhang, W.; Yang, X.; Jeffery, I.B.; Cooney, J.C.; Kagawa, T.F.; et al. Expanding the biotechnology potential of lactobacilli through comparative genomics of 213 strains and associated genera. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caufield, P.W.; Schön, C.N.; Saraithong, P.; Li, Y.; Argimón, S. Oral Lactobacilli and Dental Caries: A Model for Niche Adaptation in Humans. J. Dent. Res. 2015, 94, 110S–118S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Melo Pereira, G.V.; de Oliveira Coelho, B.; Magalhães Júnior, A.I.; Thomaz-Soccol, V.; Soccol, C.R. How to select a probiotic? A review and update of methods and criteria. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018, 36, 2060–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atanasov, N.; Evstatieva, Y.; Nikolova, D. Probiotic Potential of Lactic Acid Bacterial Strains Isolated from Human Oral Microbiome. Microbiol. Res. 2023, 14, 262–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tumbarski, Y.; Peykova-Shapkova, I.; Ivanova, M.; Cholakov, R.; Dutkiewicz, A.; Grzymajło, K. Characterization and Selection of Lactobacillus Strains with Potential Probiotic Applications. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 2902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yousuf, A.; Sidiq, M.; Ganta, S.; Nagaraj, A.; Vishnani, P.; Jan, I. Effect of Freeze Dried Powdered Probiotics on Gingival Status and Plaque Inhibition: A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Study. Contemp. Clin. Dent. 2017, 8, 116–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saïz, P.; Taveira, N.; Alves, R. Probiotics in Oral Health and Disease: A Systematic Review. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 8070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Pang, H.; Zhang, H.; Cai, Y. Biodiversity of Lactic Acid Bacteria. In Lactic Acid Bacteria: Fundamentals and Practice; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014; Volume 2014, pp. 103–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anumudu, C.K.; Miri, T.; Onyeaka, H. Multifunctional Applications of Lactic Acid Bacteria: Enhancing Safety, Quality, and Nutritional Value in Foods and Fermented Beverages. Foods 2024, 13, 3714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wedajo, B. Lactic acid bacteria: Benefits, selection criteria and probiotic potential in fermented food. J. Probiotics Health 2015, 3, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bintsis, T. Lactic acid bacteria: Their applications in foods. J. Bacteriol. Mycol. 2018, 6, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hatti-Kaul, R.; Chen, L.; Dishisha, T.; Enshasy, H.E. Lactic acid bacteria: From starter cultures to producers of chemicals. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2018, 365, fny213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hakim, B.N.A.; Xuan, N.J.; Oslan, S.N.H. A Comprehensive Review of Bioactive Compounds from Lactic Acid Bacteria: Potential Functions as Functional Food in Dietetics and the Food Industry. Foods 2023, 12, 2850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruiz-Rodríguez, L.; Bleckwedel, J.; Eugenia Ortiz, M.; Pescuma, M.; Mozzi, F. Lactic Acid Bacteria. In Industrial Biotechnology; Wittmann, C., Liao, J.C., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertuci, M.L.; Souza, C.V.B.; Alves, C.A., Jr.; Todorov, S.D.; Penna, A.L.B.; da Silva Barretto, A.C. Bioprotective and Technological Roles of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Reduced-Sodium Fermented Sausages. Foods 2025, 14, 3758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, J.; Fu, J.; Liu, H.; Kang, C.; Wang, Z.; Jin, Y.; Wu, S.; Li, T.; Yang, R.; Jin, M.; et al. Application of Recombinant Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) Live Vector Oral Vaccine in the Prevention of F4+ Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Vaccines 2024, 12, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walter, J.; O’Toole, P.W. Microbe Profile: The Lactobacillaceae. Microbiology 2023, 169, 001414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tulumoglu, S.; Yuksekdag, Z.N.; Beyatli, Y.; Simsek, O.; Cinar, B.; Yaşar, E. Probiotic properties of lactobacilli species isolated from children’s feces. Anaerobe 2013, 24, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruiz, L.; Margolles, A.; Sánchez, B. Bile resistance mechanisms in Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mokoena, M.P.; Mutanda, T.; Olaniran, A.O. Perspectives on the probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria from African traditional fermented foods and beverages. Food Nutr. Res. 2016, 60, 29630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Cao, Q.; Wang, W.; Wang, B.; Yang, Y.; Xian, C.J.; Li, T.; Zhai, Y. The Impact of Lactobacillus reuteri on Oral and Systemic Health: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Research. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chugh, P.; Dutt, R.; Sharma, A.; Bhagat, N.; Dhar, M.S. A critical appraisal of the effects of probiotics on oral health. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 70, 103985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bangar, S.P.; Suri, S.; Trif, M.; Ozogul, F. Organic acids production from lactic acid bacteria: A preservation approach. Food Biosci. 2022, 46, 101615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salvatore, M.M.; Maione, A.; Buonanno, A.; Guida, M.; Andolfi, A.; Salvatore, F.; Galdiero, E. Biological activities, biosynthetic capacity and metabolic interactions of lactic acid bacteria and yeast strains from traditional home-made kefir. Food Chem. 2025, 470, 142657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saha, S.; Chopra, A.; Kamath, S.U.; Kashyap, N.N. Can acid produced from probiotic bacteria alter the surface roughness, microhardness, and elemental composition of enamel? An in vitro study. Odontology 2023, 111, 929–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campus, G.; Cagetti, M.G.; Lehrkinder, A.; Alshabeeb, A.; Caimoni, N.; Lingström, P. The Probiotic Effects of Lactobacillus brevis CD2 on Caries Related Variables of Dental Plaque Biofilm. Int. Dent. J. 2025, 75, 1662–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, C.B.; Alimova, Y.; Myers, T.M.; Ebersole, J.L. Short- and medium-chain fatty acids exhibit antimicrobial activity for oral microorganisms. Arch. Oral Biol. 2011, 56, 650–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahn, Y.J.; Kim, Y.-S.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, H.; Kang, N.-K. Balancing the oral microbiome based on the hydrogen peroxide-producing bacteria. Int. J. Clin. Prev. Dent. 2021, 17, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miko, E.; Barakonyi, A. The Role of Hydrogen-Peroxide (H2O2) Produced by Vaginal Microbiota in Female Reproductive Health. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hertzberger, R.; Arents, J.; Dekker, H.L.; Pridmore, R.D.; Gysler, C.; Kleerebezem, M.; de Mattos, M.J. H2O2 production in species of the Lactobacillus acidophilus group: A central role for a novel NADH-dependent flavin reductase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 2229–2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.J.; Tsai, H.T.; Chen, W.J.; Hsieh, C.Y.; Wang, P.C.; Chen, C.S.; Wang, L.; Yang, C.C. In vitro antagonistic growth effects of Lactobacillus fermentum and Lactobacillus salivarius and their fermentative broth on periodontal pathogens. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2012, 43, 1376–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mann, S.; Park, M.S.; Johnston, T.V.; Ji, G.E.; Hwang, K.T.; Ku, S. Oral probiotic activities and biosafety of Lactobacillus gasseri HHuMIN D. Microb. Cell Factories 2021, 20, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tagg, J.R.; Harold, L.K.; Jain, R.; Hale, J.D.F. Beneficial modulation of human health in the oral cavity and beyond using bacteriocin-like inhibitory substance-producing streptococcal probiotics. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1161155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumariya, R.; Garsa, A.K.; Rajput, Y.S.; Sood, S.K.; Akhtar, N.; Patel, S. Bacteriocins: Classification, synthesis, mechanism of action and resistance development in food spoilage causing bacteria. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 128, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solis-Balandra, M.A.; Sanchez-Salas, J.L. Classification and Multi-Functional Use of Bacteriocins in Health, Biotechnology, and Food Industry. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Messaoudi, S.; Manai, M.; Kergourlay, G.; Prévost, H.; Connil, N.; Chobert, J.M.; Dousset, X. Lactobacillus salivarius: Bacteriocin and probiotic activity. Food Microbiol. 2013, 36, 296–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gautam, N.; Sharma, N. A study on characterization of new bacteriocin produced from a novel strain of Lactobacillus spicheri G2 isolated from Gundruk—A fermented vegetable product of North East India: A novel bacteriocin production from Lactobacillus spicheri G2. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 5808–5816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- da Silva, A.R.S.; de Souza de Azevedo, P.O.; Converti, A.; de Souza Oliveira, R.P. Cultivation of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Potential of Partially Purified Bacteriocin-like Inhibitory Substances against Cariogenic and Food Pathogens. Fermentation 2022, 8, 400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdalla, A.K.; Ayyash, M.M.; Olaimat, A.N.; Osaili, T.M.; Al-Nabulsi, A.A.; Shah, N.P.; Holley, R. Exopolysaccharides as Antimicrobial Agents: Mechanism and Spectrum of Activity. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 664395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aguirre-Garcia, Y.L.; Cerda-Alvarez, N.C.; Santiago-Santiago, R.M.; Chantre-López, A.R.; Rangel-Ortega, S.D.C.; Rodríguez-Herrera, R. The Metabolites Produced by Lactic Acid Bacteria and Their Role in the Microbiota–Gut–Brain Axis. Fermentation 2025, 11, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castro-Bravo, N.; Wells, J.M.; Margolles, A.; Ruas-Madiedo, P. Interactions of surface exopolysaccharides from Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus within the intestinal environment. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tu, Y.; Ren, H.; He, Y.; Ying, J.; Chen, Y. Interaction between microorganisms and dental material surfaces: General concepts and research progress. J. Oral Microbiol. 2023, 15, 2196897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cugini, C.; Shanmugam, M.; Landge, N.; Ramasubbu, N. The Role of Exopolysaccharides in Oral Biofilms. J. Dent. Res. 2019, 98, 739–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atanasov, N.; Evstatieva, Y.; Nikolova, D. Antagonistic Interactions of Lactic Acid Bacteria from Human Oral Microbiome against Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, S.; Huang, R.; Shah, N.P.; Tao, X.; Xiong, Y.; Wei, H. Antioxidant and antibacterial activities of exopolysaccharides from Bifidobacterium bifidum WBIN03 and Lactobacillus plantarum R315. J. Dairy Sci. 2014, 97, 7334–7343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mahdhi, A.; Leban, N.; Chakroun, I.; Chaouch, M.A.; Hafsa, J.; Fdhila, K.; Mahdouani, K.; Majdoub, H. Extracellular polysaccharide derived from potential probiotic strain with antioxidant and antibacterial activities as a prebiotic agent to control pathogenic bacterial biofilm formation. Microb. Pathog. 2017, 109, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allonsius, C.N.; van den Broek, M.F.L.; De Boeck, I.; Kiekens, S.; Oerlemans, E.F.M.; Kiekens, F.; Foubert, K.; Vandenheuvel, D.; Cos, P.; Delputte, P.; et al. Interplay between Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Candida and the involvement of exopolysaccharides. Microb. Biotechnol. 2017, 10, 1753–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosca, I.; Petrovici, A.R.; Peptanariu, D.; Nicolescu, A.; Dodi, G.; Avadanei, M.; Ivanov, I.C.; Bostanaru, A.C.; Mares, M.; Ciolacu, D. Biosynthesis of dextran by Weissella confusa and its In vitro functional characteristics. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 107, 1765–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Torshabi, M.; Bardouni, M.M.; Hashemi, A. Evaluation of Antioxidant and Antibacterial Effects of Lyophilized Cell-Free Probiotic Supernatants of Three Lactobacillus spp. and Their Cytocompatibility Against Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2023, 22, e136438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Jia, X.; Liu, D.; Huang, X.; Wang, C.; Zhu, Y.; Yue, C.; Deng, S.; Lyu, Y. Lactic acid bacteria with a strong antioxidant function isolated from “Jiangshui,” pickles, and feces. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1163662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khurdal, A.S.; Mani, S.; Toshniwal, N.G.; Manerikar, R.; Mishra, S. Antioxidants: Oral health and diseases. J. Global Oral Health 2024, 7, 115–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rwubuzizi, R.; Kim, H.; Holzapfel, W.H.; Todorov, S.D. Beneficial, safety, and antioxidant properties of lactic acid bacteria: A next step in their evaluation as potential probiotics. Heliyon 2023, 9, e15610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, T.; Wang, J. Oxidative stress tolerance and antioxidant capacity of lactic acid bacteria as probiotic: A systematic review. Gut Microbes 2020, 12, 1801944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jo, R.; Nishimoto, Y.; Umezawa, K.; Yama, K.; Aita, Y.; Ichiba, Y.; Murakami, S.; Kakizawa, Y.; Kumagai, T.; Yamada, T.; et al. Comparison of oral microbiome profiles in stimulated and unstimulated saliva, tongue, and mouth-rinsed water. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 16124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lima-Holanda, A.T.; de Sousa, E.T.; Nobre-Dos-Santos, M.; Steiner-Oliveira, C. The role of mechanical control of biofilm in the salivary pH after sucrose exposure in children with early childhood caries. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 7496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mirghani, R.; Saba, T.; Khaliq, H.; Mitchell, J.; Do, L.; Chambi, L.; Diaz, K.; Kennedy, T.; Alkassab, K.; Huynh, T.; et al. Biofilms: Formation, drug resistance and alternatives to conventional approaches. AIMS Microbiol. 2022, 8, 239–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolenbrander, P.E.; Palmer, R.J., Jr.; Periasamy, S.; Jakubovics, N.S. Oral multispecies biofilm development and the key role of cell-cell distance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 471–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, C.; Wang, Z.; Li, Z.; Shi, X.; Xiao, M.; Xu, Y. Formation, architecture, and persistence of oral biofilms: Recent scientific discoveries and new strategies for their regulation. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1602962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reichhardt, C.; Parsek, M.R. Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy for Analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Architecture and Matrix Localization. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bell, R.D.; Cann, E.A.; Mishra, B.; Valencia, M.; Zhang, Q.; Huang, M.; Yang, X.; Carli, A.; Bostrom, M.; Ivashkiv, L.B. Staphyloccocus aureus biofilm, in absence of planktonic bacteria, produces factors that activate counterbalancing inflammatory and immune-suppressive genes in human monocytes. J. Orthop. Res. 2024, 42, 2582–2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alvarez, S.; Leiva-Sabadini, C.; Schuh, C.M.A.P.; Aguayo, S. Bacterial adhesion to collagens: Implications for biofilm formation and disease progression in the oral cavity. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2022, 48, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serrage, H.J.; Jepson, M.A.; Rostami, N.; Jakubovics, N.S.; Nobbs, A.H. Understanding the Matrix: The Role of Extracellular DNA in Oral Biofilms. Front. Oral Health 2021, 2, 640129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maier, B. How physical interactions shape bacterial biofilms. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2021, 50, 401–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Panlilio, H.; Rice, C.V. The role of extracellular DNA in the formation, architecture, stability, and treatment of bacterial biofilms. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2021, 118, 2129–2141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagi, M.; Chapple, I.L.C.; Sharma, P.; Kuehne, S.A.; Hirschfeld, J. Quorum Sensing in Oral Biofilms: Influence on Host Cells. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mion, S.; Carriot, N.; Lopez, J.; Plener, L.; Ortalo-Magne, A.; Chabriere, E.; Culioli, G.; Daude, D. Disrupting quorum sensing alters social interactions in Chromobacterium violaceum. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2021, 7, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Che, J.; Shi, J.; Fang, C.; Zeng, X.; Wu, Z.; Du, Q.; Tu, M.; Pan, D. Elimination of Pathogen Biofilms via Postbiotics from Lactic Acid Bacteria: A Promising Method in Food and Biomedicine. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, N.; Cai, P.; Lin, X.; Song, Z.M.; He, J.; Li, Z.; Li, Z.; Zhang, D.; Song, Y.; Li, Y.X. Autoinducing peptides regulate antibiotic production to potentially shape root microbiome. Sci. Adv. 2025, 11, eadw5076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurtzman, G.M.; Horowitz, R.A.; Johnson, R.; Prestiano, R.A.; Klein, B.I. The systemic oral health connection: Biofilms. Medicine 2022, 101, e30517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Santacroce, L.; Passarelli, P.C.; Azzolino, D.; Bottalico, L.; Charitos, I.A.; Cazzolla, A.P.; Colella, M.; Topi, S.; Godoy, F.G.; D’Addona, A. Oral microbiota in human health and disease: A perspective. Exp. Biol. Med. 2023, 248, 1288–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zanetta, P.; De Giorgis, V.; Barberis, E.; Manfredi, M.; Amoruso, A.; Pane, M.; Azzimonti, B. Lactobacillus probiotic cell-free supernatants and vitamin D influence interleukin-6 production and mitigate oral periodontopathogens-induced cytotoxicity in FaDu cells. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1578267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giordani, B.; Parolin, C.; Vitali, B. Lactobacilli as Anti-biofilm Strategy in Oral Infectious Diseases: A Mini-Review. Front. Med. Technol. 2021, 3, 769172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kang, C.E.; Park, Y.J.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, N.K.; Paik, H.D. Probiotic Weissella cibaria displays antibacterial and anti-biofilm effect against cavity-causing Streptococcus mutans. Microb. Pathog. 2023, 180, 106151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barzegari, A.; Kheyrolahzadeh, K.; Khatibi, S.M.H.; Sharifi, S.; Memar, M.Y.; Vahed, S.Z. The Battle of Probiotics and Their Derivatives Against Biofilms. Infect. Drug Resist. 2020, 13, 659–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wasfi, R.; El-Rahman, O.A.A.; Zafer, M.M.; Ashour, H.M. Probiotic Lactobacillus sp. inhibit growth, biofilm formation and gene expression of caries-inducing Streptococcus mutans. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2018, 22, 1972–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, D.; Im, J.; Park, D.H.; Jeong, S.; Park, M.; Yoon, S.; Park, J.; Han, S.H. Lactobacillus plantarum Lipoteichoic Acids Possess Strain-Specific Regulatory Effects on the Biofilm Formation of Dental Pathogenic Bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 758161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.J.; Yoo, H.J. Inhibitory effects of Streptococcus salivarius K12 on formation of cariogenic biofilm. J. Dent. Sci. 2023, 18, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Parolin, C.; Croatti, V.; Laghi, L.; Giordani, B.; Tondi, M.R.; De Gregorio, P.R.; Foschi, C.; Vitali, B. Lactobacillus Biofilms Influence Anti-Candida Activity. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 750368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- James, K.M.; MacDonald, K.W.; Chanyi, R.M.; Cadieux, P.A.; Burton, J.P. Inhibition of Candida albicans biofilm formation and modulation of gene expression by probiotic cells and supernatant. J. Med. Microbiol. 2016, 65, 328–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alp, D.; Kuleaşan, H. Adhesion mechanisms of lactic acid bacteria: Conventional and novel approaches for testing. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 35, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, T.H.; Lin, C.H.; Pan, T.M. The implication of probiotics in the prevention of dental caries. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 577–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burton, J.P.; Drummond, B.K.; Chilcott, C.N.; Tagg, J.R.; Thomson, W.M.; Hale, J.D.F.; Wescombe, P.A. Influence of the probiotic Streptococcus salivarius strain M18 on indices of dental health in children: A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J. Med. Microbiol. 2013, 62, 875–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.H.; Jang, H.J.; Lee, N.; Paik, H. Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Effect of Cell-Free Supernatant of Lactobacillus brevis KCCM 202399 Isolated from Korean Fermented Food against Streptococcus mutans KCTC 5458. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 32, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Luo, S.C.; Wei, S.M.; Luo, X.T.; Yang, Q.Q.; Wong, K.H.; Cheung, P.C.K.; Zhang, B.B. How probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics prevent dental caries: An oral microbiota perspective. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2024, 10, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rickard, A.H.; Gilbert, P.; High, N.J.; Kolenbrander, P.E.; Handley, P.S. Bacterial coaggregation: An integral process in the development of multi-species biofilms. Trends Microbiol. 2003, 11, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, W.-K.; Lu, Y.-C.; Hsieh, C.-R.; Wei, C.-K.; Tsai, Y.-H.; Chang, F.-R.; Chan, Y. Developing Lactic Acid Bacteria as an Oral Healthy Food. Life 2021, 11, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malfa, P.; Brambilla, L.; Giardina, S.; Masciarelli, M.; Squarzanti, D.F.; Carlomagno, F.; Meloni, M. Evaluation of Antimicrobial, Antiadhesive and Co-Aggregation Activity of a Multi-Strain Probiotic Composition against Different Urogenital Pathogens. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tukaram, K.S.; Sopanrao, S.R.; Kacharu, L.O. Unveiling The Therapeutic Potential of Probiotics: A Review. J Future Foods 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seminario-Amez, M.; López-López, J.; Estrugo-Devesa, A.; Ayuso-Montero, R.; Jané-Salas, E. Probiotics and oral health: A systematic review. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal 2017, 22, e282–e288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pujia, A.M.; Costacurta, M.; Fortunato, L.; Merra, G.; Cascapera, S.; Calvani, M.; Gratteri, S. The probiotics in dentistry: A narrative review. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2017, 21, 1405–1412. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Veiga, P.; Suez, J.; Derrien, M.; Elinav, E. Moving from probiotics to precision probiotics. Nat. Microbiol. 2020, 5, 878–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Petti, S.; Tarsitani, G.; D’Arca, A.S. Antibacterial activity of yoghurt against viridans streptococci in vitro. Arch. Oral Biol. 2008, 53, 985–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mendi, A.; Köse, S.; Uçkan, D.; Akca, G.; Yilmaz, D.; Aral, L.; Gültekin, S.E.; Eroğlu, T.; Kiliç, E.; Uçkan, S. Lactobacillus rhamnosus could inhibit Porphyromonas gingivalis derived CXCL8 attenuation. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2016, 24, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khalaf, H.; Nakka, S.S.; Sandén, C.; Svärd, A.; Hultenby, K.; Scherbak, N.; Aili, D.; Bengtsson, T. Antibacterial effects of Lactobacillus and bacteriocin PLNC8 αβ on the periodontal pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis. BMC Microbiol. 2016, 16, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Strahinic, I.; Busarcevic, M.; Pavlica, D.; Milasin, J.; Golic, N.; Topisirovic, L. Molecular and biochemical characterizations of human oral lactobacilli as putative probiotic candidates. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 2007, 22, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zanetta, P.; Squarzanti, D.F.; di Coste, A.; Rolla, R.; Valletti, P.A.; Garzaro, M.; Dell’Era, V.; Amoruso, A.; Pane, M.; Azzimonti, B. In Vitro Selection of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium Probiotic Strains for the Management of Oral Pathobiont Infections Associated to Systemic Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 16163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Squarzanti, D.F.; Dell’Atti, F.; Scalia, A.C.; Najmi, Z.; Cochis, A.; Malfa, P. Exploring the In Vitro Antibacterial Potential of Specific Probiotic Strains against Oral Pathogens. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Holm, W.; Carvalho, R.; Delanghe, L.; Eilers, T.; Zayed, N.; Mermans, F.; Bernaerts, K.; Boon, N.; Claes, I.; Lebeer, S.; et al. Antimicrobial potential of known and novel probiotics on in vitro periodontitis biofilms. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2023, 9, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vazquez-Munoz, R.; Thompson, A.; Russell, J.T.; Sobue, T.; Zhou, Y.; Dongari-Bagtzoglou, A. Insights from the Lactobacillus johnsonii Genome Suggest the Production of Metabolites with Antibiofilm Activity Against the Pathobiont Candida albicans. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 853762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Etebarian, A.; Sheshpari, T.; Kabir, K.; Sadeghi, H.; Moradi, A.; Hafedi, A. Oral Lactobacillus species and their probiotic capabilities in patients with periodontitis and periodontally healthy individuals. Clin. Exp. Dent. Res. 2023, 9, 746–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sakata, S.; Sakamaki, Y.; Yuki, M.; Sugaya, T.; Hirota, T. Screening of heat-killed lactic acid bacteria based on inhibitory activity against oral bacteria and effects of oral administration of heat-killed Ligilactobacillus salivarius CP3365 on periodontal health in healthy participants: A double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J. Oral Microbiol. 2023, 15, 2250649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Twetman, S.; Derawi, B.; Keller, M.; Ekstrand, K.; Yucel-Lindberg, T.; Stecksen-Blicks, C. Short-term effect of chewing gums containing probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri on the levels of inflammatory mediators in gingival crevicular fluid. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2009, 67, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nishihara, T.; Suzuki, N.; Yoneda, M.; Hirofuji, T. Effects of Lactobacillus salivarius-containing tablets on caries risk factors: A randomized open-label clinical trial. BMC Oral Health 2014, 14, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wattanarat, O.; Makeudom, A.; Sastraruji, T.; Piwat, S.; Tianviwat, S.; Teanpaisan, R.; Krisanaprakornkit, S. Enhancement of salivary human neutrophil peptide 1–3 levels by probiotic supplementation. BMC Oral Health 2015, 15, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srivastava, S.; Saha, S.; Kumari, M.; Mohd, S. Effect of Probiotic Curd on Salivary pH and Streptococcus mutans: A Double Blind Parallel Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2016, 10, ZC13–ZC16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laleman, I.; Pauwels, M.; Quirynen, M.; Teughels, W. A dual-strain Lactobacilli reuteri probiotic improves the treatment of residual pockets: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2020, 47, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Invernici, M.M.; Furlaneto, F.A.C.; Salvador, S.L.; Ouwehand, A.C.; Salminen, S.; Mantziari, A.; Vinderola, G.; Ervolino, E.; Santana, S.I.; Silva, P.H.F.; et al. Bifidobacterium animalis subsp lactis HN019 presents antimicrobial potential against periodontopathogens and modulates the immunological response of oral mucosa in periodontitis patients. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0238425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, M.S.; Lee, D.S.; Lee, S.A.; Kim, M.S.; Nam, S.H. Effects of probiotic bacterium Weissella cibaria CMU on periodontal health and microbiota: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. BMC Oral Health 2020, 20, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarmento, É.G.; Cesar, D.E.; Martins, M.L.; de Oliveira Góis, E.G.; Martins, E.M.F.; da Rocha Campos, A.N.; Del’Duca, A.; de Oliveira Martins, A.D. Effect of probiotic bacteria in composition of children’s saliva. Food Res. Int. 2019, 116, 1282–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, D.S.; Kim, M.; Nam, S.H.; Kang, M.S.; Lee, S.A. Effects of Oral Probiotics on Subjective Halitosis, Oral Health, and Psychosocial Health of College Students: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhalla, M.; Ingle, N.A.; Kaur, N.; Yadav, P. Mutans streptococci estimation in saliva before and after consumption of probiotic curd among school children. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2015, 5, 31–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Edwards, W.P. The Science of Sugar Confectionery, 2nd ed.; The Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2018; ISBN 978-1-78801-133-4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Witzler, J.J.P.; Pinto, R.A.; de Valdez, G.F.; Cavallini, D.C.U. Development of a Potential Probiotic Lozenge containing Enterococcus faecium CRL 183. LWT 2017, 77, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Çaglar, E.; Kuscu, O.O.; Cildir, S.K.; Kuvvetli, S.S.; Sandalli, N. A probiotic lozenge administered medical device and its effect on salivary mutans streptococci and lactobacilli. Int. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2008, 18, 35–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kraft-Bodi, E.; Jørgensen, M.R.; Keller, M.K.; Kragelund, C.; Twetman, S. Effect of Probiotic Bacteria on Oral Candida in Frail Elderly. J. Dent. Res. 2015, 94, 181S–186S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vivekananda, M.R.; Vandana, K.L.; Bhat, K.G. Effect of the probiotic Lactobacilli reuteri (Prodentis) in the management of periodontal disease: A preliminary randomized clinical trial. J. Oral Microbiol. 2010, 2, 5344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teughels, W.; Durukan, A.; Ozcelik, O.; Pauwels, M.; Quirynen, M.; Haytac, M.C. Clinical and microbiological effects of Lactobacillus reuteri probiotics in the treatment of chronic periodontitis: A randomized placebo-controlled study. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2013, 40, 1025–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, A.; Rath, G.K.; Chaudhary, S.P.; Thakar, A.; Mohanti, B.K.; Bahadur, S. Lactobacillus brevis CD2 lozenges reduce radiation- and chemotherapy-induced mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Eur. J. Cancer 2012, 48, 875–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, M.P.; Gujjari, S.K.; Chandrasekhar, V.S. Evaluation of the effect of probiotic (inersan®) alone, combination of probiotic with doxycycline and doxycycline alone on aggressive periodontitis—A clinical and microbiological study. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2013, 7, 595–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holz, C.; Alexander, C.; Balcke, C.; Moré, M.; Auinger, A.; Bauer, M.; Junker, L.; Grünwald, J.; Lang, C.; Pompejus, M. Lactobacillus paracasei DSMZ16671 Reduces Mutans Streptococci: A Short-Term Pilot Study. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2013, 5, 259–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toiviainen, A.; Jalasvuori, H.; Lahti, E.; Gursoy, U.; Salminen, S.; Fontana, M.; Flannagan, S.; Eckert, G.; Kokaras, A.; Paster, B.; et al. Impact of orally administered lozenges with Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 on the number of salivary mutans streptococci, amount of plaque, gingival inflammation and the oral microbiome in healthy adults. Clin. Oral Investig. 2015, 19, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Çaglar, E.; Cildir, S.K.; Ergeneli, S.; Sandalli, N.; Twetman, S. Salivary mutans streptococci and lactobacilli levels after ingestion of the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC 55730 by straws or tablets. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2006, 64, 314–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Iniesta, M.; Herrera, D.; Montero, E.; Zurbriggen, M.; Matos, A.R.; Marín, M.J.; Sánchez-Beltrán, M.C.; Llama-Palacio, A.; Sanz, M. Probiotic effects of orally administered Lactobacillus reuteri-containing tablets on the subgingival and salivary microbiota in patients with gingivitis. A randomized clinical trial. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2012, 39, 736–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shimauchi, H.; Mayanagi, G.; Nakaya, S.; Minamibuchi, M.; Ito, Y.; Yamaki, K.; Hirata, H. Improvement of periodontal condition by probiotics with Lactobacillus salivarius WB21: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2008, 35, 897–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Suzuki, N.; Yoneda, M.; Tanabe, K.; Fujimoto, A.; Iha, K.; Seno, K.; Yamada, K.; Iwamoto, T.; Masuo, Y.; Hirofuji, T. Lactobacillus salivarius WB21-containing tablets for the treatment of oral malodor: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 2014, 117, 462–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dodds, M.; Hsieh, S.; Johnson, D.A. The effect of increased mastication by daily gum chewing on salivary flow and dental plaque acidogenicity. J. Dent. Res. 1991, 70, 1474–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biria, M.; Eslami, G.; Taghipour, E.; Akbarzadeh Baghban, A. Effects of Three Mastic Gums on the Number of Mutans Streptococci, Lactobacilli and PH of the Saliva. J. Dent. 2014, 11, 672–679. [Google Scholar]
- Çaglar, E.; Kavaloglu, S.C.; Kuscu, O.O.; Sandalli, N.; Holgerson, P.L.; Twetman, S. Effect of chewing gums containing xylitol or probiotic bacteria on salivary mutans streptococci and lactobacilli. Clin. Oral Investig. 2007, 11, 425–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butera, A.; Gallo, S.; Maiorani, C.; Molino, D.; Chiesa, A.; Preda, C.; Esposito, F.; Scribante, A. Probiotic Alternative to Chlorhexidine in Periodontal Therapy: Evaluation of Clinical and Microbiological Parameters. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nikolova, D.; Hoxha, R.; Atanasov, N.; Trifonova, E.; Dobreva, L.; Nemska, V.; Evstatieva, Y.; Danova, S. From Traditional Bulgarian Dairy Products to Functional Foods. In Current Issues and Advances in the Dairy Industry; Ibrahim, S., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Başyiğit, G.; Kuleaşan, H.; Karahan, A.G. Viability of human-derived probiotic lactobacilli in ice cream produced with sucrose and aspartame. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 33, 796–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, R.P.; Damle, S.G.; Chawla, A. Salivary mutans streptococci and lactobacilli modulations in young children on consumption of probiotic ice-cream containing Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 and Lactobacillus acidophilus La5. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2011, 69, 389–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chinnappa, A.; Konde, H.; Konde, S.; Raj, S.; Beena, J.P. Probiotics for future caries control: A short-term clinical study. Indian J. Dent. Res. 2013, 24, 547–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nagarajappa, R.; Daryani, H.; Sharda, A.J.; Asawa, K.; Batra, M.; Sanadhya, S.; Ramesh, G. Effect of Chocobar Ice Cream Containing Bifidobacterium on Salivary Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacilli: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Oral Health Prev. Dent. 2015, 13, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ashwin, D.; Ke, V.; Taranath, M.; Ramagoni, N.K.; Nara, A.; Sarpangala, M. Effect of Probiotic Containing Ice-cream on Salivary Mutans Streptococci (SMS) Levels in Children of 6–12 Years of Age: A Randomized Controlled Double Blind Study with Six-months Follow Up. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2015, 9, ZC06–ZC09. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Näse, L.; Hatakka, K.; Savilahti, E.; Saxelin, M.; Pönkä, A.; Poussa, T.; Korpela, R.; Meurman, J.H. Effect of long-term consumption of a probiotic bacterium, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, in milk on dental caries and caries risk in children. Caries Res. 2001, 35, 412–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ahola, A.J.; Yli-Knuuttila, H.; Suomalainen, T.; Poussa, T.; Ahlström, A.; Meurman, J.H.; Korpela, R. Short-term consumption of probiotic-containing cheese and its effect on dental caries risk factors. Arch. Oral Biol. 2002, 47, 799–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hatakka, K.; Ahola, A.J.; Yli-Knuuttila, H.; Richardson, M.; Poussa, T.; Meurman, J.H.; Korpela, R. Probiotics reduce the prevalence of oral candida in the elderly—A randomized controlled trial. J. Dent. Res. 2007, 86, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Juneja, A.; Kakade, A. Evaluating the effect of probiotic containing milk on salivary mutans streptococci levels. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 2012, 37, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodríguez, G.; Ruiz, B.; Faleiros, S.; Vistoso, A.; Marró, M.L.; Sánchez, J.; Urzúa, I.; Cabello, R. Probiotic Compared with Standard Milk for High-caries Children: A Cluster Randomized Trial. J. Dent. Res. 2016, 95, 402–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teanpaisan, R.; Piwat, S. Lactobacillus paracasei SD1, a novel probiotic, reduces mutans streptococci in human volunteers: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Clin. Oral Investig. 2014, 18, 857–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ritthagol, W.; Saetang, C.; Teanpaisan, R. Effect of Probiotics Containing Lactobacillus paracasei SD1 on Salivary Mutans Streptococci and Lactobacilli in Orthodontic Cleft Patients: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 2014, 51, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jindal, G.; Pandey, R.K.; Agarwal, J.; Singh, M. A comparative evaluation of probiotics on salivary mutans streptococci counts in Indian children. Eur. Arch. Paediatr. Dent. 2011, 12, 211–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stensson, M.; Koch, G.; Coric, S.; Abrahamsson, T.R.; Jenmalm, M.C.; Birkhed, D.; Wendt, L.K. Oral administration of Lactobacillus reuteri during the first year of life reduces caries prevalence in the primary dentition at 9 years of age. Caries Res. 2014, 48, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ishikawa, K.H.; Mayer, M.P.; Miyazima, T.Y.; Matsubara, V.H.; Silva, E.G.; Paula, C.R.; Campos, T.T.; Nakamae, A.E. A multispecies probiotic reduces oral Candida colonization in denture wearers. J. Prosthodont. 2015, 24, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tehrani, M.H.; Akhlaghi, N.; Talebian, L.; Emami, J.; Keyhani, S.E. Effects of probiotic drop containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium infantis, and Lactobacillus reuteri on salivary Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus levels. Contemp. Clin. Dent. 2016, 7, 469–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Penala, S.; Kalakonda, B.; Pathakota, K.R.; Jayakumar, A.; Koppolu, P.; Lakshmi, B.V.; Pandey, R.; Mishra, A. Efficacy of local use of probiotics as an adjunct to scaling and root planing in chronic periodontitis and halitosis: A randomized controlled trial. J. Res. Pharm. Pract. 2016, 5, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morales, A.; Carvajal, P.; Silva, N.; Hernandez, M.; Godoy, C.; Rodriguez, G.; Cabello, R.; Garcia-Sesnich, J.; Hoare, A.; Diaz, P.I.; et al. Clinical Effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus in Non-Surgical Treatment of Chronic Periodontitis: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial with 1-Year Follow-Up. J. Periodontol. 2016, 87, 944–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sañudo, A.I.; Luque, R.; Díaz-Ropero, M.P.; Fonollá, J.; Bañuelos, Ó. In vitro and in vivo anti-microbial activity evaluation of inactivated cells of Lactobacillus salivarius CECT 5713 against Streptococcus mutans. Arch. Oral Biol. 2017, 84, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Holm, W.; Lauwens, K.; De Wever, P.; Schuermans, A.; Zayed, N.; Pamuk, F.; Saghi, M.; Fardim, P.; Bernaerts, K.; Boon, N.; et al. Probiotics for oral health: Do they deliver what they promise? Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1219692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inchingolo, F.; Inchingolo, A.M.; Malcangi, G.; De Leonardis, N.; Sardano, R.; Pezzolla, C.; de Ruvo, E.; Di Venere, D.; Palermo, A.; Inchingolo, A.D.; et al. The Benefits of Probiotics on Oral Health: Systematic Review of the Literature. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lundtorp-Olsen, C.; Markvart, M.; Twetman, S.; Belstrøm, D. Effect of Probiotic Supplements on the Oral Microbiota—A Narrative Review. Pathogens 2024, 13, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Passadakis, G.; Neophytou, C.; Davidopoulou, S.; Papadimitriou, K. Effectiveness of Probiotics in Managing Oral Halitosis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2025, 15, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nizami, M.Z.I.; Chu, S.; Chu, S.; Chu, C.H. Probiotics for caries prevention: A narrative review. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. 2025, 23, 22808000251376427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wen, Z.T.; Huang, X.; Ellepola, K.; Liao, S.; Li, Y. Lactobacilli and human dental caries: More than mechanical retention. Microbiology 2022, 168, 001196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Suvorov, A.; Karaseva, A.; Kotyleva, M.; Kondratenko, Y.; Lavrenova, N.; Korobeynikov, A.; Kozyrev, P.; Kramskaya, T.; Leontieva, G.; Kudryavtsev, I.; et al. Autoprobiotics as an Approach for Restoration of Personalised Microbiota. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koroleva, I.; Mikhaylova, E.; Zhukovskaia, E.; Kraeva, L.; Suvorov, A. Clinical and microbiological evaluation of the efficacy of autoprobiotics in the combination treatment of chronic generalized periodontitis. Rev. Latinoam. Hipertens. 2021, 16, 15–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lalowski, P.; Zielińska, D. The Most Promising Next-Generation Probiotic Candidates—Impact on Human Health and Potential Application in Food Technology. Fermentation 2024, 10, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramírez, A.; Bermúdez-Luque, A.; Román-Camacho, J.J.; Martín-García, F.J.; Moreno-García, J.; Güngörmüşler, M.; Ruiz-Castilla, F.J. Exploring the future of probiotics with innovations in delivery systems and market insights. Food Biosci. 2025, 71, 107029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, G.; Chen, Y.; Xia, Y.; Song, X.; Ai, L. Characteristics of Probiotic Preparations and Their Applications. Foods 2022, 11, 2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Z.-D.; Zhang, W.; Liang, T.-X. Advancements in Oral Delivery Systems for Probiotics Based on Polysaccharides. Polymers 2025, 17, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gregório, M.; Araújo, M.; Albuquerque, A.; Rodrigues, T.; Santos, N.C.; Fonseca, M.T.; da Costa, M.E.; Tomé, A.; Gomes, J.; Gouveia, D.; et al. Probiotication of Plum Pulp and Conditions Effects Freeze-Drying in Cell Viability, Functional Properties and Antioxidant Activity. Foods 2024, 13, 3551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.

