Next Article in Journal
Evaluating the Contribution of Sporosarcina to Carbonate Precipitation in Anaerobic Soils: A Microbial Community and Quantitative Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of the Treatment of Beer Lees for Their Use in Sustainable Biomass Production of Lactic Acid Bacteria
Previous Article in Special Issue
Incorporation of Cyanobacteria and Microalgae in Yogurt: Formulation Challenges and Nutritional, Rheological, Sensory, and Functional Implications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Review of the Microbial Dynamics of Natural and Traditional Fermentations of Table Olive

1
CIMO, LA SusTEC, Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
2
MORE-Laboratório Colaborativo Montanhas de Investigação-Associação, 5300-358 Bragança, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Microbiol. 2025, 5(2), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/applmicrobiol5020052
Submission received: 14 March 2025 / Accepted: 25 March 2025 / Published: 30 May 2025

Abstract

:
The traditional fermentation of table olives is a complex and dynamic, process, carried out by a consortium of microorganisms that interact with each other and contribute to the uniqueness and attractiveness of the final product. Fermentation is conducted by yeasts and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) that coexist in olive fruits. The succession of one microbial population to the detriment of others depends on internal and external factors that affect the process, e.g., the maturation degree of fruits, cultivar, endophytic, or epiphytic state of microorganisms, pH, water activity, temperature, and salt concentration. Thus, studying microbiota evolution and their identification in natural table olive fermentations is paramount. This review aims to provide an overview of the knowledge on the natural fermentation of table olives, namely regarding microbial dynamics, as to report the main species involved in the fermentation process, highlight the influence of the olive oil ecosystem on the origin of the microbiota and consequently on the obtaining of the final product. The results report a total of 97 yeast species and 45 LAB species described in olives and brine over the last few decades.

1. Introduction

Table olive has great economic importance worldwide. More than a fermented product table olive is currently considered an important food source, being described as the food of the future [1,2] and rich in nutrients and has a high content of bioactive compounds that provide important health benefits [3]. According to data provided by the International Olive Oil Council (IOC), production in the 2020/21 crop year points to 2,661,000 t of table olives, down 10.1% on the previous year. Among IOC member countries, Spain produced 20.5% of the world’s table olives, with a volume 19.3% higher than the previous year. Egypt produced 18.8% of the total, which is 23.1% less than it produced in the 2019/20 crop year [4]. Estimates for the 2021/22 crop year point to a 7% increase with production reaching 2,846,500 t. Consumption is set to rise by 1.2% compared to the 2020/21 crop year.
In nature, olive fruit is acquired from the olive tree Olea europaea L. Still, it is considered unsuitable for consumption, due to the bitter component (oleuropein), low sugar content (2.6–6%), and high oil content (12–30%), depending on the time of the year and the variety [5]. Some characteristics prevent the olive be consumed directly from the tree, requiring a sequence of processes to make them an edible product much appreciated. The processing methods used are essentially based on how the bitter taste is eliminated and their preservation (ICO, 2004). The choice of method often depends on particular preferences, local traditions, and desired flavor profiles. Among different preparation processes, the most relevant worldwide are Sevillian or Spanish, Californian, and Greek styles, also known as natural or traditional fermentation [6]. In the present work, we will focus on the Greek-style, a traditional process that has been performed over several generations. Conducted only by autochthonous microorganisms present in olives, the removal of phenolic compounds is slow and incomplete, without very significant physicochemical changes in the olives [7]. As a result, naturally fermented table olives are the ones that have higher nutritional value, a balanced profile of polyunsaturated and monounsaturated fatty acids, and a high content of health-promoting phenolic compounds [8].

2. Greek-Style of Table Olives

Greek-style tables olives is a traditional method, which is fundamentally based on fermentation in water/brine, that results from the empirical knowledge, tradition, and intergenerational transfer of knowledge, which is responsible for the desired characteristics of the final product.
This production originated in the Mediterranean region and is one of the oldest biotechnological applications in food processing [9]. The main aim is to remove the bitterness from the olive flesh, hydrolyze the phenolic compounds, mainly the oleuropein, and acquire specific flavors, textures, and aromas distinct from products fermented in other regions [10]. In natural olives, the fruits are picked by manual harvesting systems, such as manual shakers or shaking combs, regardless of their maturation state when reach their normal size and with a reasonably firm texture [11].
The olives must be carefully transported immediately after being picked, followed by selection by size (sorting) and ripening index, eliminating the defective ones, those attacked by pests and diseases, as well as remaining leaves and twigs from the field. Then, the olives are washed under running water to remove surface dust, agrochemical residues, and undesirable microorganisms from the surrounding environment (for example, spoilage yeasts, associated with fruit deterioration during fermentation) [12].
In certain regions, the olives can be sweetened (periodic washing of the olives), followed by salting (gradual addition of salt up to 10%, without changing water [13]. However, the most usual is to place the olives directly in a brine solution, which can range from 6% to 10% NaCl or slightly lower (6%) in cooler production areas [14]. No acidity regulators or preservatives are normally added. This process naturally causes the brine to reach a pH of less than 4.5, ideal for preserving the olives in good microbiological conditions, flavor, and consistency.
The fermentation process occurs without full prediction, very slowly over several months in wooden vats or plastic containers (production on a small scale) or in cylindrical/spherical polyester and fiberglass fermentative tanks (production on a big scale) at around 25 °C, and in anaerobic conditions [11]. During this period, the brine removes polyphenols from the olives, including oleuropein and others, which are solubilized, promoting a partial reduction in the bitterness of the olives. Additionally, oleuropein hydrolyzation is catalyzed by microbial and endogenous enzymes, for example, the β-glucosidase and esterase enzymes [15]. The brine stimulates the microbial action (mainly halophilic microorganisms) and the fermentation starts, which is mainly promoted by yeasts and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) naturally associated with the raw material as well as the microflora that may be attached to the internal surface of the containers.
This mixed fermentation (yeasts/bacteria) shows probiotic characteristics, essentially due to the production of LAB, which reduces the pH, acting as a natural protection against the development of undesirable pathogenic species [16,17]. However, Gram-negative bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae can also arise and interact with the microorganisms [18]. The presence of this family in fresh fruits is very common, causing food deterioration. In natural table olives, generally disappear in the first phase of the process due to their sensitivity to brine and phenolic compounds [19].
According to [20], the black olives obtained by Greek-style reach equilibrium in 8–12 months and comprise three distinct phases:
First phase: growth of Gram-negative bacteria, reaching maximum growth on the second day after adding the brine to the olives. After this, the population gradually decreases between 12 and 15 days.
Second phase: starts at the moment when the pH drops to 6.0. It is characterized by the fast growth of lactobacilli and yeasts and a decrease in Gram-negative bacteria. Since the fermentation process begins, fast LAB growth starts, occurring between 7 and 10 days, and slowly decreases until it disappears, which can occur between 60–300 days of fermentation.
Third phase: this phase extends until the exhaustion of the fermentative substrates. During the entire period of this phase, the yeast population is also present and their growth contributes to improving the sensory characteristics of the final product.
However, the Greek-style does not always behave this way. Several phases have been described in olive fermentations from different cultivars and with different maturation indexes. In Conservolea and Kalamata table olives, different phases were described during 180 days of fermentation [21], while the spontaneous fermentation of the Negrinha de Freixo cultivar carried out in 149 days was characterized by two distinct phases [22], and the fermentation of Nyons olives in 480 days, in four phases [23]. As described above, it seems that the fermentation period is conditioned by several factors, including the cultivar (cv.), maturation degree, the NaCl content, and the temperature.
The process is only completed when the fermentable compounds (mainly sugars) are diffused through the olive epidermis to the outside and are completely exhausted while NaCl diffuses into the fruits [24]. The equilibration rate for reducing sugars in olives increased as brine concentration decreased, reaching equilibrium in most cases between 8 and 12 months [25].
Microorganisms use these compounds (glucose, fructose, mannitol, and sucrose) as a carbon source and convert them into organic acids, namely lactic acid, acetic acid, and malic acid [26]. However, the end of fermentation is decided by producers when they consider the olives ready for consumption [25]. Edible olives still retain a slightly bitter taste, essentially due to the presence of residual polyphenols [18].
At the end of fermentation, the olives must have a pH value of less than 4.3 and a free acidity of more than 0.3% expressed as lactic acid [4,27]. Then, the olives are packed in a new acidified brine, which can be flavored with herbs and spices for later marketing.
As mentioned initially, the Greek-style of table olives has been performed over several generations by introducing certain practices, making it possible to control and enhance fermentation performance. Currently, it is possible to apply acidifying substances, such as lactic, acetic, and citric acids [22,28] or glucose and sucrose supplements [29] at the beginning of fermentation to adjust the pH and to avoid communities of spoilage microorganisms and organoleptic problems. Additionally, the injection of air into the fermenters allows for anaerobic fermentations [30], the temperature, and salt concentrations [31] as well as, the application of yeasts and LAB as starter cultures of indigenous strains from olives [32]. All these practices have improved the Greek-style and reduced the processing time. Nevertheless, this process is still mainly carried out by small producers because, due to spending time to eliminate the bitterness of the olives, more effort, and energy, the table olive industry does not produce large quantities of natural olives.

3. Different Variables Affect the Indigenous Microbiota of the Olive Fruits

In nature, the aerial part of the olive tree is colonized by a great diversity of microorganisms including yeasts and bacteria, that can be found inside the pulp (endophytes) [33] or on the surface of the olive skin (epiphytes) [34]. These communities lead the fermentation processes of table olives and play a crucial role in the final product. Extrinsic and intrinsic variables of the oleic ecosystem can affect the microbial structure core that inhabits fruits. Several studies report the importance of abiotic (climatic variables) and biotic (plant organs, cultivar) factors in the microbial assembly of the Mediterranean ecosystem. Between factors evaluated at the phyllosphere of olive tree level, the season, wind speed, rainfall, temperature, and plant organ, are considered the major drivers for fungal communities [35]. The geographical influence on the microbial core in fermented green olives was recently studied by [36] in the province of Seville. Likewise, studies carried out with Konservólia and Halkidiki [37] Picholine [38], and Gemlik [39] table olive cultivars reported a possible relationship between yeast microorganisms and their designation of origin. These findings suggest that different environments include different communities, which will participate, drive different fermentations, and produce unique and distinctive products.
Through other research, the potential effects of the cultivar on the fungal diversity of olive fruits Madural and Verdeal Transmontana were verified by [40] Studies conducted by [41] showed the contribution of reproductive organs and host cultivars (cvs.) on endophytic fungal communities. Recently, ref. [34] described that olive fruit fungal epiphytic communities are affected by different maturation stages, ref. [42] explored the tissue and cultivar effect in epiphytic and endophytic bacteria on olive tree phyllosphere and presented a variation in communities. The variation of bacterial community structure was attributed mainly to olive plant internal and external plant tissues. The microbial consortia that colonize the raw material (olives) are closely related to the condition of the olive tree ecosystem and its interactions with intrinsic and extrinsic variables. Additionally, the harvesting period [43] is also a critical factor of extreme importance that influences the quality of the fruits and consequently the effectiveness of the fermentation process. Olives harvested at the ideal time translate into products with high nutritional power, rich in phenolic compounds and other antioxidants [44]. Thus, the identification or mapping of the microbiota diversity that occurs during the fermentation process is extremely important, as it allows a clearer understanding of the role of each microorganism and justifies the changes that occurred throughout the fermentation process.

4. Microbiota Associated with Greek-Style Table Olive

In the last decade, works on identifying and describing the microbiota through the Greek-style revealed that the process is generally dominated by complex yeast consortia and LAB. The presence of filamentous fungi has also been occasionally detected among the microbiota of table olives at the start of the fermentation, however, the role of these microorganisms is of slight relevance [23].
These microorganisms coexist simultaneously, and the success of fermentation is obtained from the relationships established between them. Yeasts emerge as the dominant microorganisms throughout the process, degrade phenolic compounds, and produce vitamins that favor the development and growth of LAB [45]. They play an extremely important role in the fermentation of table olives, especially in the Greek-style. However, depending on the species involved, in addition to causing positive effects, they can also cause negative effects [46]. Production of volatile compounds and metabolites such as ethanol, glycerol, organic acids, carotenoids, glutathione, and tocopherol improve the flavor, aroma, and conservation characteristics of the fermented product. On the other hand, excessive growth of some yeast species can produce undesirable alterations like spoilage of olives, off-flavors, off-odors defects, gas pocket formation and clouding of the brines [47,48]. According to Ref. [49], this effect is related to the olive variety and the production phase. A species can be beneficial during fermentation and harmful in packaged samples.
Concerning LAB, they are Gram-positive bacteria with complex nutritional needs that grow only in nutrient-rich media, however, they have a high resistance capacity to stress conditions, being able to grow in environments with temperature variations and different salt concentrations [49]. These species play an important role in the natural table olive fermentation process, due to their ability to produce lactic acid and antimicrobial compounds (bacteriocins) [50]. These compounds promote rapid brine acidification and inhibit the development of pathogenic microorganisms, reinforcing the safety and shelf life of the final product. These microorganisms are also responsible for the degradation of oleuropein [45].
In this review, the main microorganisms (Yeast/LAB) that have been isolated from the natural processing of whole table olives in the last fifteen years (from 2008 to 2023) are presented. The dominant yeasts belong to the genera Candida, Cryptococcus, Debaryomyces, Pichia, Rhodotorula, Saccharomyces, Zygosaccharomyces [21,25,47,51,52,53,54,55,56] and, in a small number Aureobasidium, Citeromyces, Dekkera, Metschnikowia, Schwanniomyces, Sporobolomyces and Zygotorulaspora [23,57,58,59,60]. Other genera appear exceptionally (new species) for example Barnettozyma, Bullera, Brettanomyces, Cystofilobasidium, Galactomyces, Guehomyces, Kloeckera, Kluyveromyces, Lodderomyces, Meyerozyma, Nakazawaea, Ogataeae, Priceomyces, Rhodosporidium, Torulaspora, Trichosporum, Wickerhamomyces, Zygoascus and Zygowilliopsis [22,37,47,54,59,61]
For the genera mentioned above, the species most often isolated from olives fruits/cultivars and the respective countries are described in Table 1.
The isolation of the microbiota allowed the identification of a total of 97 species, of which 31 belong to the genus Candida, 11 to the genus Pichia, 7 to the genus Cryptococcus, 5 to the genus Saccharomyces and, to a lesser extent, 4 to the genus Rhodotorula and Zygosaccharomyces and 3 to the genus Debaryomyces.
The level of Candida genus, the most frequent species were C. aaseri, C. boidinii, followed by C. diddensiae and C. membranaefaciens during olive fermentation in different countries. These species are among the most referred to in the literature, due to their abundant presence in naturally fermented table olives, and also in the pulp of naturally turning color olives from the traditional market [65]. Highlight for the species C. boidinii and C. diddensiae found intensely in Italian varieties, namely in Bosana; Cellina di Nardò; Istrana near; Peranzana; Nocellara del Belice; Nocellara messinese; Leccino and Leucocarpa [21,54,55,56,68].
These species were also the most abundant in Arbequina olives [25,67] in brines of Aloreña and Negrinha de Freixo olives [22] as well as Kalamata and Nyons black olives [23].
Candida aaseri was identified in different brines of the Arbequina, Gemlik, Nocellara messinese, and Konservolia table olives [25,55,59,64]. As regards, C. membranaefaciens is a common yeast in different fermentations, isolated from brined olives Negrinha de Freixo, Galega and Cordovil (Portugal), Aloreña and Arbequina (Spain), and Turkish Gemlik olives [19,22,25,39,66,67].
These species are able to synthesize a series of bioactive compounds that function as antioxidants. An example of this activity is the production of carotenoids, tocopherols, and citric acid [72]. They also have lipolytic capacity causing an increase in the amount of free fatty acids in the brine [70]. Moreover, they have pectinolytic activity changing the composition and quality of fermented olives. As seen in Table 1, other species were also found in a smaller percentage, such as C. atlantica, C. blattariae, C. cf apicola, C. citrea; C. ethanolica, C. famata, C. glabrata, C. globose C. gropengiesseri, C. intermedia, C. ishiwadae, C. krusei, C. molendinolei, C. naeodendra, C. norvegica, C. oleophila, and C. olivae, among other. These findings show the great diversity or heterogeneity of species found in natural olive fermentation. It was observed that different species were identified in different cultivars.
The presence of C. norvegica, C. oleophila, C. sake, C. utilis, and C. valida was only detected in brined olives of Portuguese Galega, Cordovil, and Negrinha de Freixo cvs. at the end of fermentation [22,66]. In research conducted by [66], C. oleophila specie showed oleuropeinolytic capacity (β-glucosidase enzymatic production), as well as mycogenic action against specific microorganisms.
Candida olivae was characterized for the first time as a novel yeast species from ‘Greek-style’ black olive by [59]. Candida molendinolei was recognized as a new species isolated from olive oil and its derivatives, characterized by high tolerance to salt (NaCl) and its ability to assimilate DL-lactate [73].
The genus Cryptococcus comprises a diverse group of organisms considered yeast-like fungi, which are found in soil, trees, and bird excrement. Species of this genus are recognized for producing a range of enzymes, such as proteases, urease, phos-hpolipase, and nuclease [74]. Although Cryptococcus sp. is considered nonfermentative yeast, several species have been identified in fermentative processes associated with table olives. The species Cry. albidus, Cry. laurentii and Cry. saitoi are the most prominent in Turkey’s Akhisar and Iznik regions (Gelmik cv.) and Tunisia (black olives). Ref. [39] focused on exploring the effect of regional differences on the yeast microbiota of naturally fermented Turkish Gemlik olives and found a greater diversity in the Akhisar than Iznik region. On the other hand, studies carried out in the Olea europaea Leucocarpa cv. by [68] showed great diversity in yeasts, being Cry. albidus and other microorganisms were more related to the cultivar than to the environment.
Recently, also [23] were identified Cry. carnescens and Cry. magnus for the first time in French PDO Nyons black table olives. However, as far as we know, the impact of these microorganisms on table olive fermentation is unknown.
Regarding the genus Debaryomyces, D. hansenii was the dominant specie at the beginning of spontaneous fermentation in black table olives produced following the Greek style [59] halotolerant yeast produces enzymes that degrade the olive cell wall, showing “killer” activity against spoilage yeasts [12,75]. In Portugal and Spain, many studies showed the high frequency of this specie during the processing of green and turning color olives table olives [19,22,58] and table olives in Tunisia, Italy and, Greece [21,62]. Within the genus, Pichia, P. anomala, synonymy Wickerhamomyces anomalus; P. galeiformis (also seen as P. manchuria), P. kluyveri and P. membranifaciens are the most described species in the Mediterranean region throughout different faces of fermentation. Inclusive, some authors considered W. anomalus and P. membranifaciens as dominant yeasts of the core microbiota in the Greek-style of olives green, turn color and black [22,23,67] in addition, they also appear in the storage process [70].The presence of the P. membranifaciens strain was detected in the early stages of the storage period of Hojiblanca olives while P. galeiformis was present throughout the process. These species have been evaluated as probiotics [76] and starter cultures [77,78] owing important proprieties for the food industry. The fact that these species adhere to the surface of the fruit and form biofilms makes olives a product with high probiotic power, leading to a new functional food.
Studies carried out to evaluate the probiotic effects and technological characteristics of indigenous yeasts isolated from different table olives, Galega and Cordovil [66], Negrinha de Freixo [76], and cv. Kalamata natural black olive [28] demonstrated that vitamin production, mycogenic and antimicrobial activity, as well as oleuropeinolytic activity are some of the characteristics that make P. membranifaciens a promising candidate as multifunctional starter cultures [66].
Greek-style offers a rich source for new manufacturing yeasts with biotechnological potentialities due to resulting metabolic products [79]. Nevertheless, in the Greek-style, several changes can occur due to the uncontrolled proliferation of these microorganisms, which results in atypical fermentations. Some microbial changes during olive processing are detectable by sensory analysis. Pichia manshurica and P. anomala are among other microorganisms, responsible for producing gas-pockets (fish-eye and alambrado) in fruit surface, resulting in the rupture of the cuticle, softening olives, and biofilm in the course of fermentation and after packing [12].
From the Rhodotorula genus four species; R. diobovatum, R. glutinis, R. graminis, and R. mucilaginosa were also found. R. glutinis and R. graminis were identified in Negrinha de Freixo and Arbequina, while R. diobovatum and R. mucilaginosa species appear in Konservolia table olives. The presence of R. glutinis and R. graminis species was identified during the first stages of fermentation and after that, they disappeared [22,25]. Their occasional detention has been associated with raw material surfaces, not being directly involved in the fermentation process, However, more research is needed to assess these occurrences. Although these species favor nutrient diffusion, their presence is undesirable. Thus, requires special attention in the olive preparation process, since these are associated with polygalacturonases production that causes olive softening [12] This activity was exhibited by R. minuta pink yeast in green olives fermentation [75].
As reported in the literature, within the Saccharomyces genus, S. cerevisiae is the most commonly identified and known as one of the yeasts associated with olive fermentation [70]. It has been detected in different olives varieties fermentations, especially Bosana, Gemlik, Negrinha de Freixo, Nocellara, Nyons, Kalamata; and Konservolia originating from specific regions in the Mediterranean basin.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain prevails throughout the olive process being identified in several phases, including in the last days of fermentation [22] and also in olive packed [80]. This species may play an important role in the conservation of table olives, protecting the final product from the oxidation of unsaturated fatty acids [75]. However, ref. [81] refer to undesirable effects for olives, when present in amounts greater than 7 log CFU/mL, due to the increased production of carbon dioxide, which can penetrate the olives, damaging them. This change was reported by [82], in the fermentation of black olives. Despite this, strain exhibits a set of crucial features that make a potential candidate as a starter culture to use in processing table olives [83]. They tolerate low pH and oxygen availability. High salt and ethanol concentrations influence LAB growth, promote greater acidification in the medium, help degrade phenolic compounds (oleuropein), and favor table olives’ sensory attributes [84].
In addition, S. cerevisiae is the only yeast species recognized as safe, then, for this reason, is considered by many authors the one natural fermenter [85]. Concerning to Zygosaccharomyces genus, Z. bailii, Z. mrakii, and Z. bisporus are the species described in brines during the fermentation of olives at the green and black stage of maturation. These species were isolated occasionally; Z. mrakii was identified in brines from Aloreña [19,57], Iznik-Gemlik and Leccino fermentations [21], whereas Z. bailii and Z. bisporus were mentioned in Greek-style black olives [62] and Cypriot green olives [52]. Species of the Zygosaccharomyces genus are found naturally in products that have high levels of sugar, low pH, and water activity and are considered spoilage species. Of the three species identified in olive fermentation, Z. bailii is the most related to the spoilage of foods and drinks [86]. Species of the Zygosaccharomyces genus are found naturally in products that have high levels of sugar, low pH, and water activity and are considered spoilage species [86]. It has a high resistance capacity in adverse environments, which becomes a considerable problem in terms of the production and conservation of foods. However, as far as we know, there are no reports associated with the Greek-style of table olives.
Relatively the genera that appear in smaller numbers (Aureobasidium, Citeromyces, Dekkera, Metschnikowia, Schwanniomyces Sporobolomyces, and Zygotorulaspora) we have to consider fermentative and non-fermentative species.
Emphasis to Aureobasidium pullulans non fermentative specie is a ubiquitous black yeast-like fungus associated with the olive endosphere [87]. Previously isolated from hypersaline waters, defined in the literature as a microorganism of halophilic and halotolerant nature [88]. Due to the biochemical characteristics it exhibits, this specie is considered by many authors a potential candidate for use in biotechnological applications [89] This species was identified as highly dominant in the early stages of green [57] and black [23] traditionally fermented table olives. Other less widespread species, but equally important were found; C. matriensis, C. nyonsensis, D. bruxellensis, M. pulcherrima, S. etchellsii, S. roseus, and Z. mrakii.
Similar to yeasts, over the past 15 years several LAB isolates have been identified. According to studies by [90] and with the recent classification and description of the Lactobacillaceae family, 23 new genera of Lactobacilli have been identified to date. However, in terms of Greek-style table olives, only 7 genera have been described to date: Enterococcus, Lactobacilli, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc, Pediococcus, Streptococcus, and Weissella. Enterococcus, Lactococcus, Pediococcus, and Streptococcus are homolactic genera, that produce only lactic acid, acidifying the product, while Leuconostoc and Weissella are heterolactic genera, which additionally produce other metabolites such as acetic acid, ethanol and carbon dioxide. The Lactobacilli genus may present both homolactic/heterolactic [91].
Table 2 summarizes the main genera and species that appear in Greek-styles of whole olives in different cultivars from different countries. Among the genera identified during the fermentation, Lactobacilli appears as the largest number of species (31), followed by Leuconostoc (6), Enterococcus and Pediococcus (5), and finally Lactococcus, Streptococcus, and Weissella (1). As it is possible to verify, Lactobacilli is the main isolated genus from the most diverse olive tree cultivars, in green or black olives and the predominant species are Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Lactiplantibacillus pentosus, followed by Lactiplantibacillus paraplantarum (Table 2). Italy is the country with the greatest biodiversity of olive cultivars and the presence of L. plantarum and L. pentosus, has been intensely reported during traditional fermentation Sicilian style [92,93,94,95,96]
Although with lesser frequency these microorganisms were also described in olive fermentations of Arbequina, Aloreña, Manzanilla, Gordal (Spain); Conservolea, Kalamata, Halkidiki, Bella di Cerignola (Greece); in Chemlal, Hamra and Sigoise (Algeria) Cobrançosa and Galega (Portugal), and occasionally in Cypriot, Picual, and Kalamata (Cyprus) cvs. (Table 2).
On the other hand, the strain L. paraplantarum is often associated with Kalamata and Conservolea, Galega, and Italian Tonda di Cagliari. According to some authors, the occurrence of these species is genetically related, being referred to as a group [94,95].
Recent studies carried out by [37], on fermented Greek table olives belonging to the Konservolia and Halkidiki varieties, point to the existence of biogeographic patterns of microbial populations. However, ref. [52] when evaluating the bacterial profile of varieties from different regions of Cyprus, found a high similarity between the population, both for the varieties and for the regions studied. In this study, Lactobacilli is also one of the most abundant genera. Its origin seems to be more directly associated with the raw material (olives), being considered by several authors as the main responsible for the fermentation of fruits and vegetables [114].
At the level of the food industry, they have been widely explored for their numerous multifunctional characteristics, including enzymatic activity [115]. In olives, L. plantarum and L. pentosus have an enzymatic activity that helps degrade oleuropein and other phenolic compounds reducing fruit bitterness [116]. On the other hand, they are responsible for the production of lactic acid which causes a drop in the pH of the brine, preventing the growth of deteriorating microorganisms and pathogens [50]. Studies performed by [25] in spontaneous fermentations of the Arbequina cultivar indicated the presence of this group of microorganisms varies during fermentation, L. pentosus remains throughout the fermentation process while L. pentosus appears in the initial phase and L. paraplantarum in the final phase. Ref. [17] mention L. paraplantarum with good adaptation to the sweetening stage of the spontaneous fermentation of the Cobrançosa olives. In addition, several types of research have shown a succession of the bacterial community in olives and brine during fermentations [17,23]. The benefits of these microorganisms as starter cultures in controlling traditional fermentation and producing high-quality table olives are immense. The reduction of pathogens and spoilage microorganisms, reduced debittering time, better flavor and aroma, preservation of food, and increased nutritional value. So, its application is highly recommended [12,13,117]. In this sense, they promote fermented products’ preservation and shelf life.
Several studies have shown that L. plantarum and L. pentosus can improve the nutritional quality of olives by increasing the content of bioactive compounds, such as phenolic compounds, vitamins, and minerals additionally have been recognized as shown to have probiotic properties, which can benefit human health [101]. While these species emerge as generalists and persistent, others show specificity by cultivar, geographic origin, and, maturation rate. And even some that appear occasionally and to a lesser extent. Examples of other species of Lactobacilli genus, which appear in lesser abundance are L. brevis, L. casei, L. coryniformis, L. curvatus, S. paracollinoides, and L. vaccinostercus. To highlight the presence of L. casei exclusively in Italian cvs. a fact that was described very early by [105], as a dominant species in Greek-style s of Sicilian green olives. The literature reports other species described sparsely in several countries, such as eg. S. collinoides, L. delbrueckii, L. farciminis, L. fermentum, L. helveticus, L. japonicus, L. kefiri, L. mali, L. paracasei, L. rhamnosus, and P. vaccinostercus among others (Table 2).
The bacterial dynamics were well evidenced in fermentations of green olives cv. Bella di Cerignola throughout the fermentation process, resulting from the presence of several stirpes of L. brevis, L. casei, L. coryniformis, L. mali, L. paracasei, L. pentosus, L. plantarum, L. rhamnosus, P. vaccinostercus throughout the fermentation process [97]. Within the Leuconostoc genus, the species L. cremoris, L. carnosum, L. mesenteroides, and L. mesenteroides ssp. mesenteroides; L. paramesenteroides; L. pseudomesenteroides have been described. In Greece and Spain, L. mesenteroides and L. pseudomesenteroides were the most recovered from fermented olive and brine samples.
Enterococcus genus also appears closely associated with black and green olives of Italian cultivars. So far, the species E. casseliflavus (in Bella di Cerignola cv.), E. durans (in Cellina di Nardò, Itrana bianca, and Bella di Cerignola cv.) E. faecalis (in green olives) E. faecium (in Tonda di Cagliari) and E. italicus (in Bella di Cerignola). Among these species, only E. faecium appeared simultaneously in fermentations of Cyprus and Turkey olives [98,118].
Pediococcus genus is also present in smaller numbers in olive table fermentation and it showed four species; P. acidilactici, P. ethanolidurans, P. parvulus, P. pentosaceus, and P. parvulus, P. pentosaceus are the species most relevant to the fermentation of cobrançosa olives [17] and Nocellara del Belice [99] in sweetening and bringing stages.
Finally, Lactococcus, Streptococcus, and Weissella are the genus less identified in natural olive table fermentation. L. lactis, S. thermophilus, and W. paramesenteroides were isolated from five olive cvs.; Aloreña; Cypriot, Kalamata, Picual, and Bella di Cerignola. The high variability of identified species indicates how complex and uncertain is fermentation the process. On the other hand, these species make olives a product of high-potential probiotic and antifungal properties [111]. Fermented olives harbor the microbial flora largely adhered to the surface, which when consumed regularly confer several health benefits.

5. Conclusions

The Greek-style promotes table olives of high microbiological and nutritional quality, currently being described as a functional product. For this reason, researchers have focused their studies on the isolation, identification, and characterization of the microbial community. In this review, we focused on the description of research work carried out in the last years related to the identification and characterization of microorganisms in the fermentation process. Here, we report the main microorganisms identified in natural olives fermentations from different cultivars, distributed in Mediterranean countries. The high abundance and diversity of species found reflect the complexity of the process. Each microorganism is unique and may present a general behavior, appearing in fermentations of olives from different cultivars. This finding may be related to the cultivar, physical-chemical characteristics, and their brine behavior. In addition, olives from different cultivars showed different properties, from skin thickness to phenol content, which affect the evolution of fermentation. Likewise, this trend was verified in several previous studies which correlated the cultivar genotype and the quality of the fermented products. Among the yeast genera mentioned in the bibliography; Candida, Cryptococcus, Debaryomyces, Pichia, Rhodotorula, Saccharomyces, and Zygosaccharomyces, appear the most reported. It was found that the dominant microorganisms are undoubtedly yeasts, having identified 97 species so far. The bacteria appear in smaller numbers represented by a total of 45 species, highlighting the genera Lactobacilli, Leuconostoc Enterococcus, and Pediococcus. Yeasts are present throughout the process while LAB may in some cases appear in the initial phase and disappear at the end of fermentation. Several authors consider that some strains have a high potential biotechnological and can be used alone or combined as multifunctional starters to improve the fermentation process. So, the Greek-style brings together a universe of factors that are interconnected with a core of indigenous microorganisms that carry out the process of obtaining table olives.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.M., N.R. and E.R.; writing—original draft preparation, F.M., N.R. and E.R.;—review and editing, F.M and E.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT, Portugal) for financial from the national funds FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC) to CIMO (UIDB/00690/2020, UIDP/00690/2020) and SusTEC (LA/P/0007/2021), and by the project “OleaChain: Competencies for sustainability and innovation in the traditional olive grove value chain in the North Interior of Portugal” (NORTE-06-3559-FSE-000188).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bonatsou, S.; Tassou, C.; Panagou, E.; Nychas, G.-J. Table Olive Fermentation Using Starter Cultures with Multifunctional Potential. Microorganisms 2017, 5, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Perpetuini, G.; Prete, R.; Garcia-Gonzalez, N.; Khairul Alam, M.; Corsetti, A. Table Olives More than a Fermented Food. Foods 2020, 9, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Malheiro, R.; Mendes, P.; Fernandes, F.; Rodrigues, N.; Bento, A.; Pereira, J.A. Bioactivity and phenolic composition from natural fermented table olives. Food Funct. 2014, 5, 3132–3142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. IOC. Trade Standard Applying to Table Olives (Resolution No. RES-2/91-IV/04). 2004. Available online: http://www.internationaloliveoil.org/estaticos/view/222-standards (accessed on 5 January 2024).
  5. ICO. Olive World. Table Olives. 2022. Available online: https://www.internationaloliveoil.org/olive-world/table-olives/ (accessed on 25 January 2024).
  6. Campus, M.; Değirmencioğlu, N.; Comunian, R. Technologies and Trends to Improve Table Olive Quality and Safety. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Brenes, M.; Kailis, S.G. Naturally processed table olives, their preservation and uses. In Olives and Olive Oil in Health and Disease Prevention; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 15–25. [Google Scholar]
  8. Rocha, J.; Borges, N.; Pinho, O. Table olives and health: A review. J. Nutr. Sci. 2020, 9, e57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Romeo, F.V. Microbiological Aspects of Table Olives. Em Olive Germplasm—The Olive Cultivation, Table Olive and Olive Oil Industry in Italy; InTech: Rang-du-Fliers, France, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  10. Campaniello, D.; Bevilacqua, A.; D’Amato, D.; Corbo, M.R.; Altieri, C.; Sinigaglia, M. Microbial Characterization of Table Olives Processed According to Spanish and Natural Styles. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2005, 43, 289–294. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sánchez, A.-H.; Ruiz-Barba, J.L.; López-López, A.; Montaño, A. Table olives: Types and trade preparations. In Olives and Olive Oil in Health and Disease Prevention; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 5–14. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lanza, B. Abnormal fermentations in table-olive processing: Microbial origin and sensory evaluation. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Coimbra-Gomes, J.; Reis PJ, M.; Tavares, T.G.; Silva, A.A.; Mendes, E.; Casal, S.; Malcata, F.X.; Macedo, A.C. Cobrançosa Table Olive Fermentation as per the Portuguese Traditional Method, Using Potentially Probiotic Lactiplantibacillus pentosus i106 upon Alternative Inoculation Strategies. Fermentation 2022, 9, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gómez Sanchez, A.H.; Garcia Garcia, P.; Navarro Rejano, L. Elaboration of table olives. Grasas Aceites 2006, 57, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Othman, N.B.; Roblain, D.; Chammen, N.; Thonart, P.; Hamdi, M. Antioxidant phenolic compounds loss during the fermentation of Chétoui olives. Food Chem. 2009, 116, 662–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Peres, C.M.; Alves, M.; Hernandez-Mendoza, A.; Moreira, L.; Silva, S.; Bronze, M.R.; Vilas-Boas, L.; Peres, C.; Malcata, F.X. Novel isolates of lactobacilli from fermented Portuguese olive as potential probiotics. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 59, 234–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Reis, P.J.M.; Tavares, T.G.; Rocha, J.M.; Malcata, F.X.; Macedo, A.C. Cobrançosa Table Olives: Characterization of Processing Method and Lactic Acid Bacteria Profile throughout Spontaneous Fermentation. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 9738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Panagou, E.Z.; Hondrodimou, O.; Mallouchos, A.; Nychas, G.-J.E. A study on the implications of NaCl reduction in the fermentation profile of Conservolea natural black olives. Food Microbiol. 2011, 28, 1301–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bautista-Gallego, J.; Rodríguez-Gómez, F.; Barrio, E.; Querol, A.; Garrido-Fernández, A.; Arroyo-López, F.N. Exploring the yeast biodiversity of green table olive industrial fermentations for technological applications. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 147, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Garrido Fernandez, A.; Fernandez-Dıez, M.J.; Adams, R.M. Table olives: Production and Processing; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bleve, G.; Tufariello, M.; Durante, M.; Perbellini, E.; Ramires, F.A.; Grieco, F.; Cappello, M.S.; De Domenico, S.; Mita, G.; Tasioula-Margari, M.; et al. Physico-chemical and microbiological characterization of spontaneous fermentation of Cellina di Nardà and Leccino table olives. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pereira, E.L.; Ramalhosa, E.; Borges, A.; Pereira, J.A.; Baptista, P. YEAST dynamics during the natural fermentation process of table olives (Negrinha de Freixo cv.). Food Microbiol. 2015, 46, 582–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Penland, M.; Deutsch, S.-M.; Falentin, H.; Pawtowski, A.; Poirier, E.; Visenti, G.; Le Meur, C.; Maillard, M.-B.; Thierry, A.; Mounier, J.; et al. Deciphering Microbial Community Dynamics and Biochemical Changes During Nyons Black Olive Natural Fermentations. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 586614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cardoso, S.M.; Mafra, I.; Reis, A.; Nunes, C.; Saraiva, J.A.; Coimbra, M.A. Naturally fermented black olives: Effect on cell wall polysaccharides and on enzyme activities of Taggiasca and Conservolea varieties. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 43, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hurtado, A.; Reguant, C.; Esteve-Zarzoso, B.; Bordons, A.; Rozès, N. Microbial population dynamics during the processing of Arbequina table olives. Food Res. Int. 2008, 41, 738–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hutkins. Microbiology and Technology of Fermented Foods. Fermented Vegetables; Blackwell Publishing: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  27. ICS67.040;67.230; Norma Portuguesa (NP) 3034 (2012). Azeitonas de Mesa. Definição, Classificação, Características, Acondicionamento e Rotulagem. Instituto Português da Qualidade: Caparica, Portugal, 2012.
  28. Bonatsou, S.; Paramithiotis, S.; Panagou, E.Z. Evolution of Yeast Consortia during the Fermentation of Kalamata Natural Black Olives upon Two Initial Acidification Treatments. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chorianopoulos, N.G.; Boziaris, I.S.; Stamatiou, A.; Nychas, G.-J.E. Microbial association and acidity development of unheated and pasteurized green-table olives fermented using glucose or sucrose supplements at various levels. Food Microbiol. 2005, 22, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ramírez, E.; García, P.; Brenes, M.; Romero, C. Evaluation of chemical components of debittered olives undergone preservation and polyphenol oxidation. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 51, 1674–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ramírez, E.; Medina, E.; García, P.; Brenes, M.; Romero, C. Optimization of the natural debittering of table olives. LWT 2017, 77, 308–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Paba, A.; Chessa, L.; Daga, E.; Campus, M.; Bulla, M.; Angioni, A.; Sedda, P.; Comunian, R. Do Best-Selected Strains Perform Table Olive Fermentation Better than Undefined Biodiverse Starters? A Comparative Study. Foods 2020, 9, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Costa, D.; Fernandes, T.; Martins, F.; Pereira, J.A.; Tavares, R.M.; Santos, P.M.; Baptista, P.; Lino-Neto, T. Illuminating Olea europaea L. endophyte fungal community. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 245, 126693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Castro, J.; Costa, D.; Tavares, R.M.; Baptista, P.; Lino-Neto, T. Olive Fungal Epiphytic Communities Are Affected by Their Maturation Stage. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gomes, T.; Pereira, J.A.; Benhadi, J.; Lino-Neto, T.; Baptista, P. Endophytic and Epiphytic Phyllosphere Fungal Communities Are Shaped by Different Environmental Factors in a Mediterranean Ecosystem. Microb. Ecol. 2018, 76, 668–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lucena-Padrós, H.; Ruiz-Barba, J.L. Microbial biogeography of Spanish-style green olive fermentations in the province of Seville, Spain. Food Microbiol. 2019, 82, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Argyri, K.; Doulgeraki, A.I.; Manthou, E.; Grounta, A.; Argyri, A.A.; Nychas, G.-J.E.; Tassou, C.C. Microbial Diversity of Fermented Greek Table Olives of Halkidiki and Konservolia Varieties from Different Regions as Revealed by Metagenomic Analysis. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Boudallaa, A.; El Antari, B.; Ababou, K.; Boukachabin, J. Characterization of yeast diversity colonizing various olive habitats associated to Moroccan Picholine olive variety (orchards and crushing units). J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2018, 9, 497–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mujdeci, G.; Arévalo-Villena, M.; Ozbas, Z.Y.; Briones Pérez, A. Yeast Identification During Fermentation of Turkish Gemlik Olives: Yeasts from Turkish Gemlik olives. J. Food Sci. 2018, 83, 1321–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Preto, G.; Martins, F.; Pereira, J.A.; Baptista, P. Fungal community in olive fruits of cultivars with different susceptibilities to anthracnose and selection of isolates to be used as biocontrol agents. Biol. Control 2017, 110, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Martins, F.; Cameirão, C.; Mina, D.; Benhadi-Marín, J.; Pereira, J.A.; Baptista, P. Endophytic fungal community succession in reproductive organs of two olive tree cultivars with contrasting anthracnose susceptibilities. Fungal Ecol. 2021, 49, 101003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mina, D.; Pereira, J.A.; Lino-Neto, T.; Baptista, P. Epiphytic and Endophytic Bacteria on Olive Tree Phyllosphere: Exploring Tissue and Cultivar Effect. Microb. Ecol. 2020, 80, 145–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sousa, A.; Malheiro, R.; Casal, S.; Bento, A.; Pereira, J.A. Optimal harvesting period for cvs. Madural and Verdeal Transmontana, based on antioxidant potential and phenolic composition of olives. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 62, 1120–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mele, M.A.; Islam, M.Z.; Kang, H.M.; Giuffrè, A.M. Pre-and post-harvest factors and their impact on oil composition and quality of olive fruit. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2018, 30, 592–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Arroyo-López, F.N.; Romero-Gil, V.; Bautista-Gallego, J.; Rodríguez-Gómez, F.; Jiménez-Díaz, R.; García-García, P.; Querol, A.; Garrido-Fernández, A. Potential benefits of the application of yeast starters in table olive processing. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Arroyo-López, F.N.; Querol, A.; Bautista-Gallego, J.; Garrido-Fernández, A. Role of yeasts in table olive production. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 128, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bleve, G.; Tufariello, M.; Durante, M.; Grieco, F.; Ramires, F.A.; Mita, G.; Tasioula-Margari, M.; Logrieco, A.F. Physico-chemical characterization of natural fermentation process of Conservolea and Kalamàta table olives and developement of a protocol for the pre-selection of fermentation starters. Food Microbiol. 2015, 46, 368–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tofalo, R.; Schirone, M.; Perpetuini, G.; Angelozzi, G.; Suzzi, G.; Corsetti, A. Microbiological and chemical profiles of naturally fermented table olives and brines from different Italian cultivars. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2012, 102, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Speranza, B.; Sinigaglia, M.; Corbo, M.R.; D’Errico, N.; Bevilacqua, A. A Preliminary Approach to Define the Microbiological Profile of Naturally Fermented Peranzana Alta Daunia Table Olives. Foods 2022, 11, 2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Portilha-Cunha, M.F.; Macedo, A.C.; Malcata, F.X. A Review on Adventitious Lactic Acid Bacteria from Table Olives. Foods 2020, 9, 948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Aponte, M.; Ventorino, V.; Blaiotta, G.; Volpe, G.; Farina, V.; Avellone, G.; Lanza, C.M.; Moschetti, G. Study of green Sicilian table olive fermentations through microbiological, chemical and sensory analyses. Food Microbiol. 2010, 27, 162–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kamilari, E.; Anagnostopoulos, D.A.; Tsaltas, D. Fermented table olives from Cyprus: Microbiota profile of three varieties from different regions through metabarcoding sequencing. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1101515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Muccilli, S.; Caggia, C.; Randazzo, C.L.; Restuccia, C. Yeast dynamics during the fermentation of brined green olives treated in the field with kaolin and Bordeaux mixture to control the olive fruit fly. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 148, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Porru, C.; Rodríguez-Gómez, F.; Benítez-Cabello, A.; Jiménez-Díaz, R.; Zara, G.; Budroni, M.; Mannazzu, I.; Arroyo-López, F.N. Genotyping, identification and multifunctional features of yeasts associated to Bosana naturally black table olive fermentations. Food Microbiol. 2018, 69, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sidari, R.; Martorana, A.; De Bruno, A. Effect of brine composition on yeast biota associated with naturally fermented Nocellara messinese table olives. LWT 2019, 109, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tofalo, R.; Perpetuini, G.; Schirone, M.; Suzzi, G.; Corsetti, A. Yeast biota associated to naturally fermented table olives from different Italian cultivars. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2013, 161, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Abriouel, H.; Benomar, N.; Lucas, R.; Gálvez, A. Culture-independent study of the diversity of microbial populations in brines during fermentation of naturally-fermented Aloreña green table olives. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 144, 487–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Arroyo-López, F.N.; Medina, E.; Ruiz-Bellido M, Á.; Romero-Gil, V.; Montes-Borrego, M.; Landa, B.B. Enhancement of the Knowledge on Fungal Communities in Directly Brined Aloreña de Málaga Green Olive Fermentations by Metabarcoding Analysis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Nisiotou, A.A.; Panagou, E.Z.; Nychas, G.-J.E. Candida olivae sp. Nov., a novel yeast species from ‘Greek-style’ black olive fermentation. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 1219–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ruiz-Moyano, S.; Esperilla, A.; Hernández, A.; Benito, M.J.; Casquete, R.; Martín-Vertedor, D.; Pérez-Nevado, F. Application of ISSR-PCR as a rapid method for clustering and typing of yeasts isolated from table olives. LWT 2019, 109, 250–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kazou, M.; Tzamourani, A.; Panagou, E.Z.; Tsakalidou, E. Unraveling the Microbiota of Natural Black cv. Kalamata Fermented Olives through 16S and ITS Metataxonomic Analysis. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Fendri, I.; Chamkha, M.; Bouaziz, M.; Labat, M.; Sayadi, S.; Abdelkafi, S. Olive fermentation brine: Biotechnological potentialities and valorization. Environ. Technol. 2013, 34, 181–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Mougiou, N.; Tsoureki, A.; Didos, S.; Bouzouka, I.; Michailidou, S.; Argiriou, A. Microbial and Biochemical Profile of Different Types of Greek Table Olives. Foods 2023, 12, 1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Leventdurur, S.; Sert-Aydın, S.; Boyaci-Gunduz, C.P.; Agirman, B.; Ben Ghorbal, A.; Francesca, N.; Martorana, A.; Erten, H. Yeast biota of naturally fermented black olives in different brines made from cv. Gemlik grown in various districts of the Cukurova region of Turkey. Yeast 2016, 33, 289–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Pereira, A.P.; Pereira, J.A.; Bento, A.; Estevinho, M.L. Microbiological characterization of table olives commercialized in Portugal in respect to safety aspects. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 2895–2902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Silva, T.; Reto, M.; Sol, M.; Peito, A.; Peres, C.M.; Peres, C.; Malcata, F.X. Characterization of yeasts from Portuguese brined olives, with a focus on their potentially probiotic behavior. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44, 1349–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hurtado, A.; Reguant, C.; Bordons, A.; Rozès, N. Influence of fruit ripeness and salt concentration on the microbial processing of Arbequina table olives. Food Microbiol. 2009, 26, 827–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lanza, B.; Di Marco, S.; Simone, N.; Di Marco, C.; Gabriele, F. Table Olives Fermented in Iodized Sea Salt Brines: Nutraceutical/Sensory Properties and Microbial Biodiversity. Foods 2020, 9, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Simões, L.; Fernandes, N.; De Souza, A.; Dos Santos, L.; Magnani, M.; Abrunhosa, L.; Teixeira, J.; Schwan, R.F.; Dias, D.R. Probiotic and Antifungal Attributes of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolates from Naturally Fermented Brazilian Table Olives. Fermentation 2022, 8, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rodríguez-Gómez, F.; Arroyo-López, F.N.; López-López, A.; Bautista-Gallego, J.; Garrido-Fernández, A. Lipolytic activity of the yeast species associated with the fermentation/storage phase of ripe olive processing. Food Microbiol. 2010, 27, 604–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Benítez-Cabello, A.; Romero-Gil, V.; Rodríguez-Gómez, F.; Garrido-Fernández, A.; Jiménez-Díaz, R.; Arroyo-López, F.N. Evaluation and identification of poly-microbial biofilms on natural green Gordal table olives. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2015, 108, 597–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Abbas, C.A. Production of Antioxidants, Aromas, Colours, Flavours, and Vitamins by Yeasts. In Yeasts in Food and Beverages; Querol, A., Fleet, G., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 285–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Čadež, N.; Raspor, P.; Turchetti, B.; Cardinali, G.; Ciafardini, G.; Veneziani, G.; Péter, G. Candida adriatica sp. Nov. And Candida molendinolei sp. Nov., two yeast species isolated from olive oil and its by-products. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2021, 62, 2296–2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Gupta, S.; Paul, K.; Kaur, S. Diverse species in the genus Cryptococcus: Pathogens and their non-pathogenic ancestors. IUBMB Life 2020, 72, 2303–2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hernández, A.; Martín, A.; Aranda, E.; Pérez-Nevado, F.; Córdoba, M.G. Identification and characterization of yeast isolated from the elaboration of seasoned green table olives. Food Microbiol. 2007, 24, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Oliveira, T.; Ramalhosa, E.; Nunes, L.; Pereira, J.A.; Colla, E.; Pereira, E.L. Probiotic potential of indigenous yeasts isolated during the fermentation of table olives from Northeast of Portugal. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2017, 44, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ciafardini, G.; Zullo, B.A. Use of selected yeast starter cultures in industrial-scale processing of brined Taggiasca black table olives. Food Microbiol. 2019, 84, 103250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Mujdeci, G.N.; Ozbas, Z.Y. Technological and enzymatic characterization of the yeasts isolated from natural fermentation media of Gemlik olives. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 131, 801–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Psani, M.; Kotzekidou, P. Technological characteristics of yeast strains and their potential as starter adjuncts in Greek-style black olive fermentation. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 22, 1329–1336123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Anagnostopoulos, D.A.; Tsaltas, D. Current Status, Recent Advances, and Main Challenges on Table Olive Fermentation: The Present Meets the Future. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 797295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Michailidou, S.; Petrovits, G.E.; Kyritsi, M.; Argiriou, A. Amplicon metabarcoding data of prokaryotes and eukaryotes present in ‘Kalamata’ table olives packaged under modified atmosphere. Data Brief 2021, 38, 107314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Fernández Díez, M.J.; Castro Ramos, R.; Garrido Fernández, A.; González Cancho, F.; González Pellisó, F.; Nosti Vega, M.; Heredia Moreno, A.; Mínguez Mosquera, M.I.; Rejano Navarro, L.; Durán, Q.; et al. Biotecnología de la Aceituna de Mesa; Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Gráficas Urpe: Madrid, Spain, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  83. Durán, Q.; González, F.; Garrido, A. Aceitunas negras al natural en salmuera. Ensayos de produccíon de alambrado. Inoculacíon de diversos microorganismos aislados de salmueras de fermentatición. Grasas Aceites 1979, 30, 361–367. [Google Scholar]
  84. Steensels, J.; Verstrepen, K.J. Taming Wild Yeast: Potential of Conventional and Nonconventional Yeasts in Industrial Fermentations. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 68, 61–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Goddard, M.R. Quantifying the Complexities of Saccharomyces cerevisiae’s Ecosystem Engineering via Fermentation. Ecology 2008, 89, 2077–2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Péter, G. Biodiversity of Zygosaccharomyces species in food systems. Acta Aliment. 2022, 51, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. James, S.A.; Stratford, M. Spoilage yeasts with emphasis on the genus Zygosaccharomyces. In Yeasts in Food; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 171–191. [Google Scholar]
  88. Nigro, F.; Antelmi, I.; Labarile, R.; Sion, V.; Pentimone, I. Biological control of olive anthracnose. Acta Hortic. 2018, 1199, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kogej, T.; Ramos, J.; Plemenitaš, A.; Gunde-Cimerman, N. The Halophilic Fungus Hortaea werneckii and the Halotolerant Fungus Aureobasidium pullulans Maintain Low Intracellular Cation Concentrations in Hypersaline Environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 6600–6605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Prasongsuk, S.; Lotrakul, P.; Ali, I.; Bankeeree, W.; Punnapayak, H. The current status of Aureobasidium pullulans in biotechnology. Folia Microbiol. 2018, 63, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Zheng, J.; Wittouck, S.; Salvetti, E.; Franz, C.M.; Harris, H.M.; Mattarelli, P.; O’toole, P.W.; Pot, B.; Vandamme, P.; Walter, J.; et al. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: Description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 2782–2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Abedi, E.; Hashemi, S.M.B. Lactic acid production—Producing microorganisms and substrates sources-state of art. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Martorana, A.; Di Miceli, C.; Alfonzo, A.; Settanni, L.; Gaglio, R.; Caruso, T.; Moschetti, G.; Francesca, N. Effects of irrigation treatments on the quality of table olives produced with the Greek-style process. Ann. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Pino, A.; Vaccalluzzo, A.; Solieri, L.; Romeo, F.V.; Todaro, A.; Caggia, C.; Arroyo-López, F.N.; Bautista-Gallego, J.; Randazzo, C.L. Effect of Sequential Inoculum of Beta-Glucosidase Positive and Probiotic Strains on Brine Fermentation to Obtain Low Salt Sicilian Table Olives. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Pino, A.; De Angelis, M.; Todaro, A.; Van Hoorde, K.; Randazzo, C.L.; Caggia, C. Fermentation of Nocellara Etnea Table Olives by Functional Starter Cultures at Different Low Salt Concentrations. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Randazzo, C.L.; Todaro, A.; Pino, A.; Pitino, I.; Corona, O.; Mazzaglia, A.; Caggia, C. Giarraffa and Grossa di Spagna naturally fermented table olives: Effect of starter and probiotic cultures on chemical, microbiological and sensory traits. Food Res. Int. 2014, 62, 1154–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. De Bellis, P.; Valerio, F.; Sisto, A.; Lonigro, S.L.; Lavermicocca, P. Probiotic table olives: Microbial populations adhering on olive surface in fermentation sets inoculated with the probiotic strain Lactobacilli paracasei IMPC2.1 in an industrial plant. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 140, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Anagnostopoulos, D.; Bozoudi, D.; Tsaltas, D. Enterococci Isolated from Cypriot Green Table Olives as a New Source of Technological and Probiotic Properties. Fermentation 2018, 4, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Yalçınkaya, S.; Kılıç, G.B. Isolation, identification and determination of technological properties of the halophilic lactic acid bacteria isolated from table olives. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 2027–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Comunian, R.; Ferrocino, I.; Paba, A.; Daga, E.; Campus, M.; Di Salvo, R.; Cauli, E.; Piras, F.; Zurru, R.; Cocolin, L. Evolution of microbiota during spontaneous and inoculated Tonda di Cagliari table olives fermentation and impact on sensory characteristics. LWT 2017, 84, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Anagnostopoulos, D.A.; Kamilari, E.; Tsaltas, D. Evolution of Bacterial Communities, Physicochemical Changes and Sensorial Attributes of Natural Whole and Cracked Picual Table Olives During Spontaneous and Inoculated Fermentation. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Idoui, T.; Boudjerda, J.; Leghouchi, E.; Karam, N.-E. Naturally fermented Jijelian black olives: Microbiological characteristics and isolation of lactic acid bacteria. Grasas Aceites 2009, 60, 516–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kumral, A.; Basoglu, F.; Sahin, I. Effect of the use of different lactic straters on the microbiological and physicochemical characteristics of naturally black table olives of Gemilk cultivar. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2009, 33, 651–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Tofalo, R.; Perpetuini, G.; Schirone, M.; Ciarrocchi, A.; Fasoli, G.; Suzzi, G.; Corsetti, A. Lactobacilli pentosus dominates spontaneous fermentation of Italian table olives. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 57, 710–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Randazzo, C.L.; Ribbera, A.; Pitino, I.; Romeo, F.V.; Caggia, C. Diversity of bacterial population of table olives assessed by PCR-DGGE analysis. Food Microbiol. 2012, 32, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Doulgeraki, A.I.; Pramateftaki, P.; Argyri, A.A.; Nychas, G.-J.E.; Tassou, C.C.; Panagou, E.Z. Molecular characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from industrially fermented Greek table olives. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 50, 353e356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Randazzo, C.L.; Russo, N.; Pino, A.; Mazzaglia, A.; Ferrante, M.; Conti, G.O.; Caggia, C. Effects of selected bacterial cultures on safety and sensory traits of Nocellara Etnea olives produced at large factory scale. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 115, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Albayrak, Ç.B.; Kamber, A. Microflora of Naturally Fermented Table Olives and Characterization of Their Lactic Acid Bacteria. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Derg. 2020, 17, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Benítez-Cabello, A.; Calero-Delgado, B.; Rodríguez-Gómez, F.; Garrido-Fernández, A.; Jiménez-Díaz, R.; Arroyo-López, F.N. Biodiversity and Multifunctional Features of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated From Table Olive Biofilms. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Tufariello, M.; Durante, M.; Ramires, F.A.; Grieco, F.; Tommasi, L.; Perbellini, E.; Falco, V.; Tasioula-Margari, M.; Logrieco, A.F.; Mita, G.; et al. New process for production of fermented black table olives using selected autochthonous microbial resources. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Martorana, A.; Alfonzo, A.; Settanni, L.; Corona, O.; La Croce, F.; Caruso, T.; Moschetti, G.; Francesca, N. An innovative method to produce green table olives based on “pied de cuve” technology. Food Microbiol. 2015, 50, 126–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Papadelli, M.; Zoumpopoulou, G.; Georgalaki, M.; Anastasiou, R.; Manolopoulou, M.; Lytra, I.; Papadimitriou, K.; Tsakalidou, E. Evaluation of Two Lactic Acid Bacteria Starter Cultures for the Fermentation of Natural Black Table Olives (Olea europaea L cv Kalamon). Pol. J. Microbiol. 2015, 64, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Franzetti, L.; Scarpellini, M.; Vecchio, A.; Planeta, D. Microbiological and safety evaluation of green table olives marketed in Italy. Ann. Microbiol. 2011, 61, 843–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Torriani, S.; Felis, G.E.; Dellaglio, F. Differentiation of Lactobacilli plantarum, L. pentosus, and L. paraplantarum by recA Gene Sequence Analysis and Multiplex PCR Assay with recA Gene-Derived Primers. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 3450–3454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Peres, C.M.; Peres, C.; Hernández-Mendoza, A.; Malcata, F.X. Review on fermented plant materials as carriers and sources of potentially probiotic lactic acid bacteria—With an emphasis on table olives. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 26, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Venegas-Ortega, M.G.; Flores-Gallegos, A.C.; Aguilar, C.N.; Rodríguez-Herrera, R.; Martínez-Hernández, J.L.; Nevárez-Moorillón, G.V. Multi-Functional Potential of Presumptive Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Chihuahua Cheese. Foods 2020, 9, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Corsetti, A.; Perpetuini, G.; Schirone, M.; Tofalo, R.; Suzzi, G. Application of starter cultures to table olive fermentation: An overview on the experimental studies. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Montoro, B.P.; Benomar, N.; Lavilla Lerma, L.; Castillo Gutiérrez, S.; Gálvez, A.; Abriouel, H. Fermented Aloreña Table Olives as a Source of Potential Probiotic Lactobacilli pentosus Strains. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. List of yeast identified in the natural fermentation of whole table olives in different cultivars and countries.
Table 1. List of yeast identified in the natural fermentation of whole table olives in different cultivars and countries.
Yeast SpeciesOlives Fruits/CultivarCountry of OriginReferences
Aureobasidum pullulansAloreñaSpain[57,58]
NyonsFrance[23]
Kalamata/Konservolia/Gemlik/
Cypriot
Greece[28,37,39,52,59]
Aureobasidium spp.KalamataGreece[61]
Barnettozyma californicaKalamataGreece[28]
Bullera variabilisBlack olives Tunisia[62]
Brettanomyces custersianusKonservoliaGreece[37,63]
Candida aaseri/butyriArbequina Spain[25]
GemlikTurkey[64]
Nocellara messineseItaly[55]
KonservoliaGreece[59]
Candida atlanticaNyonsFrance[23]
GemlikTurkey[64]
Candida blattariaeKonservoliaGreece[59]
Candida boidiniiNyonsFrance[23]
Nocellara messineseItaly[55]
Galega/Cordovil/Negrinha de FreixoPortugal [22,65,66]
ArbequinaSpain[25,67]
Konservolia/KalamataGreece[28,59]
GemlikTurkey[64]
Bosana/Cellina di Nardò/Istrana nera/Peranzana/Nocellara del Belice/Nocellara Messinese/Leccino/LeucocarpaItaly[21,54,55,56,68]
Candida cf apicolaAloreña Spain[57]
Candida citreaGalega/CordovilPortugal [66]
Candida diddensiaeAloreña/ArbequinaSpain[19,25,58]
Bosana/Nocellara del Bellice
/Nocellara messinese/
Cypriot/Kalamata/Picual
Italy[52,54,55]
Candida ethanolicaAmfissisGreece[69]
Candida famataLeucocarpaItaly[68]
GemlikTurkey[39]
Candida glabrataGalega Portugal [65]
Candida glaebosaArbequina Spain[67]
Candida gropengiesseriArbequina Spain[67]
Candida intermediaLeucocarpaItaly[68]
Candida ishiwadaeCellina di NardòItaly[56]
Candida kruseiCarolea/LeucocarpaItaly[68]
GalegaPortugal[65]
Candida membranaefaciensArbequina/AloreñaSpain[19,25,67]
GemlikTurkey[39]
Negrinha de Freixo/Galega/CordovilPortugal[22,66]
Candida molendinoleiKalamataGreece[28]
Candida naeodendraKalamataGreece[28]
Candida norvegicaNegrinha de Freixo/Galega/CordovilPortugal[22,66]
Candida oleophilaGalega/CordovilPortugal [66]
Candida olivaeKonservoliaGreece[59]
Candida parapsilosisArbequina Spain[25]
Brandofino/Nocellara del Belice/PassanularaItaly[51]
Candida pelliculosaGemlikTurkey[39]
Candida sakeGalega/CordovilPortugal [66]
Candida silvaeGalega/CordovilPortugal [66]
KonservoliaGreece[59]
Candida sorbosaArbequina olivesSpain[67]
Candida tartarivoransCellina di NardòItaly[21]
Candida tropicalisNegrinha de Freixo Portugal[22]
Nocellara messineseItaly[55]
Candida utilisGalegaPortugal[65]
Candida validaGalega/CordovilPortugal [66]
Candida sp.KalamataGreece[61]
NyonsFrance[23]
LeccinoItaly[21]
Citeromyces matriensisGalega/CordovilPortugal [66]
Citeromyces nyonsensisAzeitera Spain[60]
NyonsFrance[23]
Cryptococcus albidusBlack olivesTunisia[62]
GemlikTurkey[39]
LeucocarpaItaly[68]
Cryptococcus carnescensNyons France [23]
Cryptococcus flavusArbequinaSpain[67]
Cryptococcus laurentiiGemlikTurkey[39]
Black olivesTunisia[62]
Cryptococcus maceransAloreñaSpain[57]
Cryptococcus magnusNyonsFrance[23]
Cryptococcus saitoiGemlikTurkey[39]
Cystofilobasidium capitatumKonservoliaGreece[59]
Debaryomyces carsoniiCellina di NardòItaly[21]
Debaryomyces etchellsiiLeccino Italy[21]
Debaryomyces hanseniiAloreñaSpain[19,58]
KonservoliaGreece[59]
Black olivesTunisia[62]
Cellina di Nardò/KalamataItaly[21,47,52]
Negrinha de FreixoPortugal[22]
Dekkera bruxellensisBlack olivesTunisia[62]
Galactomyces reessiiNegrinha de Freixo Portugal[22]
Guehomyces pullulansKalamataGreece[47]
Kloeckera apiculataGalega/CordovilPortugal [66]
GemlikTurkish[39]
Kloeckera spp.GalegaPortugal[65]
Kluyveromyces lactisArbequinaSpain[25]
Lodderomyces elongisporusAloreña Spain[58]
Metschnikowia pulcherrimaKonservoliaGreece[59]
Galega/CordovilPortugal [66]
Meyerozyma sp.Gemlik Turkey[64]
Meyerozyma guilliermondiiCypriot/KalamataItaly[52]
Nakazawaea molendini-oleiBosana Italy[54]
Ogataeae spp.KalamataGreece[61]
Pichia anomala/Wickerhamomyces anomalusGemlikTurkey[39,64]
ArbequinaSpain[25,67]
Bella di Cerignola/Cellina di Nardò/Bosana/Brandofino/Passanulara/Nocellara dell’Etna/Nocellara messineseItaly[21,47,51,52,53,54,55,56]
Negrinha de Freixo Portugal[22]
NyonsFrance[23]
KonservoliaGreece[37,59,69]
Pichia carsoniiArbequinaSpain[67]
Pichia farinosaBlack olives Greece[62]
Pichia fermentansGalega/CordovilPortugal [66]
Pichia galeiformis/Pichia manshuricaPeranzana/Nocellara del Belice, Cellina di NardòItaly[56]
Manzanilla/Hojiblanca/Gordal/AloreñaSpain[57,70,71]
Konservolia/KalamataGreece[28,37,59]
Negrinha de Freixo Portugal[22]
Pichia kluyveriArbequina Spain[25,67]
KonservoliaGreece[59]
Brandofino/Castriciana/Manzanilla/Nocellara del Belice/PassanularaItaly[51]
Pichia kudriavzeviiNocellara messineseItaly[55]
GemlikTurkey[64]
Pichia membranifaciensKalamataGreece[47]
NyonsFrance [23]
GordalSpain[71]
KonservoliaGreece[37,69]
Galega/CordovilPortugal [66]
Cellina di Nardò/LeccinoItaly[21]
Pichia mexicanaNocellara messineseItaly[55]
Pichia rhodanensisArbequinaSpain[25]
Pichia sp.AloreñaSpain[57]
KalamataGreece[61]
Cellina di Nardò/LeccinoItaly[21]
Priceomyces carsoniiNyonsFrance[23]
Rhodosporidium capitatumGalega/CordovilPortugal [66]
Rhodotorula diobovatumKonservolia Greece[59]
Rhodotolura glutinisArbequina olivesSpain[25]
Negrinha de Freixo Portugal[22]
Rhodotolura graminisNegrinha de Freixo Portugal[22]
Rhodotorula mucilaginosaKonservolia Greece[59]
Saccharomyces cerevisiaeNocellara dell’Etna/Bosana/Cellina di Nardò/Leccino/Istrana nera, bianca/Peranzana/Nocellara del Belice/Bella di Cerignola/Nocellara messinese/KalamataItaly[52,53,54,55,56]
Aloreña/ManzanillaSpain[19,57,58]
Negrinha de Freixo/Galega/CordovilPortugal[22,66]
Kalamata/KonservoliaGreece[21,28,47,59,63]
GemlikTurkey[39]
NyonsFrance[23]
Saccharomyces dairensisArbequina olivesSpain[67]
Saccharomyces kluyveriGemlikTurkey[39]
Saccharomyces paradoxusNyonsFrance[23]
Saccharomyces sp. Gemlik Turkey[64]
KalamataGreece[61]
Peranzana Alta DauniaItaly[49]
Schwanniomyces etchellsiiGemlik Turkey[64]
NyonsFrance [23]
KonservoliaGreece[37]
Sporobolomyces roseusBlack olives Greece[62]
Galega/CordovilPortugal [66]
Torulaspora delbrueckiiGalega/CordovilPortugal [66]
Black olives Greece[62]
Trichosporum pullulansGalega/CordovilPortugal [66]
Wickerhamomyces sydowiorumKonservoliaGreece[37]
Wickerhamomyces spp.KalamataGreece[61]
Zygoascus hellenicusGemlik Turkey[64]
Nocellara messineseItaly[55]
Zygoascus meyeraeNocellara messineseItaly[55]
Zygosaccharomyces bailiiBlack olives Greece[62]
Zygosaccharomyces mrakiiGemlikTurkey[39]
AloreñaSpain[19,57]
LeccinoItaly[21]
Zygosaccharomyces bisporusCypriotItaly[52]
Zygosaccharomyces sp.GemlikTurkey[39]
Zygotorulaspora mrakiiNyonsFrance[23]
AloreñaSpain[54,58]
Zygowilliopsis californicaKonservolia Greece[59]
Table 2. List of lactic acid bacteria identified in the natural fermentation of whole table olives in different cultivars and countries.
Table 2. List of lactic acid bacteria identified in the natural fermentation of whole table olives in different cultivars and countries.
Identified SpeciesOlives Fruits/CultivarCountry of OriginReferences
Enterococcus casseliflavus species groupBella di CerignolaItaly[97]
Enterococcus duransCellina di Nardò/Itrana bianca/
Bella di Cerignola
Italy[48]
Enterococcus faecalisGreen olivesItaly[5]
Enterococcus faeciumCypriotCyprus[98]
Green and black olivesTukey[99]
Tonda di Cagliari Italy[100]
Enterococcus italicusBella di CerignolaItaly[97]
Ligilactobacillus acidipiscisBlack and green olivesTurkey[99]
Companilactobacillus alimentariusBlack olivesTurkey[99]
Lacticaseibacillus brantaePicualCyprus[101]
Levilactobacillus brevisBlack olives/Chemlal/Hamra/SigoiseAlgeria[102]
Green olives/Bella di CerignolaItaly[97]
GemlikTurkey[103]
Cypriot/Kalamata/PicualCyprus[52]
Lacticaseibacillus caseiGreen olives/Bella di Cerignola/Cellina di Nardò/Itrana nera/Nocellara del Belice/Itrana bianca/Nocellara Etnea/Grossa di SpagnaItaly[94,97,104,105]
Lacticaseibacillus casei ssp. tolerensBlack olives/Chemlal/Hamra/SigoiseAlgeria[102]
Secundilactobacillus collinoidesGreen olives/Tonda di CagliariItaly[100]
Loigolactobacillus coryniformisGreen olives/Bella di Cerignola/Geracese/Nocellara del BeliceItaly[93,97,105]
AloreñaSpain[57]
Latilactobacillus curvatusBlack olives/Chemlal/Hamra/SigoiseAlgeria[102]
Cypriot/Kalamata/PicualCyprus[52]
Lactobacillus delbrueckiiCypriot/Kalamata/PicualCyprus[52]
Companilactobacillus farciminisGreen olivesTurkey [99]
Limosilactobacillus fermentumBlack olives/Peranzana/Bella di CerignolaItaly[104]
Lactobacillus helveticusBlack olives/Cellina di NardòItaly[104]
Lactobacillus japonicusPicualCyprus[101]
Lentilactobacillus kefiriCypriot/Kalamata/PicualCyprus[52]
Liquorilactobacillus maliNatural green olives Bella di CerignolaItaly[97]
Lacticaseibacillus manihotivoransPicualCyprus[101]
Levilactobacillus namurensisBlack olivesTurkey[99]
Lacticaseibacillus paracaseiGreen olives/Bella di CerignolaItaly[97]
Secundilactobacillus paracollinoidesGreen olives/GeraceseItaly[105]
Green olives/AloreñaSpain[57]
Lentilactobacillus parafarraginisPicualCyprus[101]
Lentilactobacillus parakefiriPicualCyprus[101]
Companilactobacillus paralimentariusCypriot/Kalamata/PicualCyprus[52]
Lactiplantibacillus paraplantarumBlack olives/Conservolea/KalamataGreece[106]
Green olives/Tonda di CagliariItaly [5,100]
Black olives/Galega/CobrançosaPortugal[16,17]
Green olives/ArbequinaSpain[25]
Lactiplantibacillus pentosusBlack olives/Conservolea/Kalamata/AmfissisGreece[18,63,106]
Green and black olives/Bella di Cerignola/Cellina di Nardò/
Itrana nera/Peranzana/Nocellara del Belice/Itrana bianca/Bella di Cerignola/Tonda di Cagliari/Giarraffa/
Grossa di Spagna/Nocellara Etnea
Italy[5,93,94,95,96,97,100,104,107]
CobrançosaPortugal[17]
Green and black olive Turkey[108]
Arbequina/Aloreña
Gordal/Manzanilla
Spain[25,57,67,71,109]
Lactiplantibacillus plantarumChemlal/Hamra/SigoiseAlgeria[102]
Conservolea/Kalamata/Halkidiki/Bella di Cerignola Greece[11,37,47,97,110]
Cellina di Nardò/Leccino/Green olives/Itrana nera/Peranzana/Itrana bianca/Nocellara del Belice/Bella di Cerignola/Nocellara Etnea/Geracese/Tonda di Cagliari/Giarraffa/Grossa di SpagnaItaly [5,21,93,94,95,96,97,100,104,105,107,110,111]
Cobrançosa/GalegaPortugal[16,17]
Arbequina/Aloreña/Manzanilla/GordalSpain[19,25,67]
Cypriot/Picual/KalamataCyprus[52,101]
Black and green olivesTurkey[99]
Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosusNocellara Etnea/Bella di CerignolaItaly[97,107]
Paucilactobacillus suebicusAloreñaSpain[57]
Lactobacilli sp. AloreñaSpain[57]
Paucilactobacillus vaccinostercusBella di CerignolaItaly[97]
AloreñaSpain[57]
Lactobacilli veridesensChemlal/Hamra/SigoiseAlgeria[102]
Lactococcus lactisAloreñaSpain[57]
Cypriot/Kalamata/PicualCyprus[52]
Leuconostoc cremorisGemlikTurkey[103]
Leuconostoc carnosumCypriot/Kalamata/PicualCyprus[52]
Leuconostoc mesenteroidesChemlal/Hamra/SigoiseAlgeria[102]
Conservolea/Kalamata/AmfissisGreece[47,63,106,110]
Bella di Cerignola/Green olives/Grossa di Spagna Italy[5,96,97]
Leuconostoc mesenteroides ssp. mesenteroides KalamataGreece[112]
Leuconostoc paramesenteroidesGemlikTurkey[103]
Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroidesConservolea/Kalamata/AmfissisGreece[63,106]
AloreñaSpain[57]
Pediococcus acidilacticiGreen olivesItaly[113]
Pediococcus ethanoliduransConservoleaGreece[106]
Pediococcus parvulusGreen olives/Geracese/Tonda di CagliariItaly[5,100,105]
AloreñaSpain [57]
CobrançosaPortugal[17]
Pediococcus pentosaceusNocellara del BeliceItaly[93,111]
Pediococcus sp.AloreñaSpain[57]
Streptococcus thermophilusGeraceseItaly[105]
Cypriot/Kalamata/PicualCyprus[52]
Weissella paramesenteroidesBella di CerignolaItaly[97]
Cypriot/Kalamata/PicualCyprus[52]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martins, F.; Rodrigues, N.; Ramalhosa, E. A Review of the Microbial Dynamics of Natural and Traditional Fermentations of Table Olive. Appl. Microbiol. 2025, 5, 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/applmicrobiol5020052

AMA Style

Martins F, Rodrigues N, Ramalhosa E. A Review of the Microbial Dynamics of Natural and Traditional Fermentations of Table Olive. Applied Microbiology. 2025; 5(2):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/applmicrobiol5020052

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martins, Fátima, Nuno Rodrigues, and Elsa Ramalhosa. 2025. "A Review of the Microbial Dynamics of Natural and Traditional Fermentations of Table Olive" Applied Microbiology 5, no. 2: 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/applmicrobiol5020052

APA Style

Martins, F., Rodrigues, N., & Ramalhosa, E. (2025). A Review of the Microbial Dynamics of Natural and Traditional Fermentations of Table Olive. Applied Microbiology, 5(2), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/applmicrobiol5020052

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop