Next Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Arc-Flash Protective Textiles: Materials, Mechanisms, and Performance
Previous Article in Journal
Optimizing Ozone-Based Pre-Treatment as a Sustainable Alternative to Conventional Bleaching: A Foundation to Achieve Uniform and High-Depth Colour in Textiles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Novel Eco-Friendly Chitosan-Loaded CuO-SiO2 Coating on Cotton Fabric for Durable, Multifunctional, and Mechanical Properties

1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET), Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
2
Department of Wet Process Engineering, Bangladesh University of Textiles (BUTEX), Dhaka 1208, Bangladesh
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Textiles 2026, 6(3), 87; https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles6030087
Submission received: 12 March 2026 / Revised: 15 April 2026 / Accepted: 13 July 2026 / Published: 21 July 2026

Abstract

Developing durable multifunctional clothing with enhanced mechanical and comfort properties utilizing eco-friendly, cost-effective hybrid nano finishes is highly challenging. The reason behind the nondurable functionality is the lack of bonding ability of nanoparticles (NPs) with cotton fabric, and this additional coating has a great impact on the mechanical, thermo-physiological, and sensorial comfort properties of cotton fabric. Focusing on these issues, this paper attempts to develop biogenic chitosan-loaded CuO-SiO2 hybrid nano finishes with three distinct formulations, namely Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L), Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L), and Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L) hybrid nanofluids, to incorporate on cotton fabric by pad-dry-cure method. These hybrid nanofluids from biogenic Chi-CuO and rice husk SiO2 NPs have been newly introduced for textile application. The NPs CuO and SiO2 are synthesized from lemon peel zest extract and rice husk, respectively. Characterization of CuO NPs by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM), Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDX), and X-ray diffractometers (XRD) evidences that spherical-shaped, amorphous, and 60–80 nm sized NPs are synthesized. The hydrodynamic performance of hybrid nanofluids measured by Zeta Sizer shows that the chitosan-loaded CuO-SiO2(5g/L) hybrid nanofluid is the most stable among the three, and the value is +29.4 mV. The presence of CuO NPs, SiO2 NPs, and chitosan on cotton fabric was confirmed by FTIR, FESEM, and EDX spectra of the hybrid nanofluid-deposited fabric. The cotton fabric coated with chitosan-loaded CuO-SiO2 hybrid nanofluids exhibits better durable antimicrobial efficacy, UV-protective properties, and thermo-physiological comfort properties than that of the uncoated fabric. More specifically, CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-coated fabric demonstrates approximately 99.99% bacterial efficacy against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria even after 15 washing cycles, and excellent UV-protective properties. In addition, CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-coated fabric displays around 75% enhancement of overall moisture management properties and 1.22% and 0.53% enhancement of tensile strength in warp and weft directions with excellent elongation compared to the pristine one. Moreover, assessment of the mechanical sensorial comfort properties of this fabric depicts that it is smoother, and has better thermal conductivity than that of the control one. In addition, CuO-SiO2(5g/L) hybrid nanofluid-treated cotton fabric exhibited cell viability above 95%, which confirms its non-cytotoxicity. The outcomes of this study suggest that chitosan-loaded CuO-SiO2(5g/L) hybrid nanofluid-treated cotton fabric can be considered as optimum and employed as biomedical textiles with better mechanical and comfort properties.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Cotton fiber is the most favored material for apparel manufacturing because of its versatile amenities, such as comfort, flexibility, biodegradability, nontoxicity, and hydrophilicity [1,2,3]. The porous and hydrophilic nature of cotton fiber yields to the growth of microorganisms that create unpleasant odor, allergic reactions, and hygiene problems [4,5], which also lead to a reduction of the mechanical strength of the fabric [6]. Therefore, demand for antibacterial finishing is a vital issue among consumers, especially in biomedical applications like masks, surgical gowns, bandages, hospital bed sheets, curtains, drapes, and mattress covers, etc. [7,8]. Extensive research regarding the antibacterial properties of metal nanoparticle-treated fabric is currently being conducted. Among metal NPs, bio-based silver (Ag), gold (Au), and copper/copper oxide (Cu/CuO) are extremely renowned antibacterial agents because of their rapid, cheap, eco-friendly, and sustainable approaches [9,10,11]. The latter attained significant attention because of the low cost of precursors and their distinctive properties like UV-protective properties and electrical conductivity, along with antibacterial properties [1]. Moges et al. (2024) evidenced the UV-protective properties of green-synthesized CuO NP-treated fabric, which is another important requirement among consumers at this time [12]. Green synthesis of copper oxide NPs involves various sources like plants (leaves, roots, flowers, and fruits) and microbes (bacteria, algae, and fungi) [13]. Among them, agro-waste lemon peel, a byproduct of the citrus industry, earned significant attention because of its abundance of bioactive compounds [14]. Very little research regarding bio-based synthesis of CuO NPs utilizing lemon peel extract has been reported. The majority of studies exploited copper (II) nitrate trihydrate, copper (II) chloride dihydrate, copper (II) chloride, and copper sulphate pentahydrate as precursors to be reduced and stabilized by lemon peel extract [14,15,16,17,18]. None of the researchers, however, apply these synthesized CuO NPs to cotton fabric to assess their effect on it due to lack of a binding agent that improves wash durability. Focusing on wash durability, some of the researchers formulated chitosan-loaded copper oxide NPs on cotton fabric and assessed their effect on it. Gouda and Hebeish (2010) prepared chitosan-loaded CuO NPs from chitosan and copper sulphate as precursors in a chemical synthesis method and attained 99% and 96% reductions against S. aureus and E. coli bacteria with better wash durability [19]. Later, Dhineshbabu and Rajendram (2015) chemically synthesized a CuO/chitosan composite solution to coat cotton fabric by the pad-dry method and obtained excellent antibacterial properties with a slight reduction in wash durability [20]. More recently, Saleh et al. (2021) devised Cu/CS nano composites from CS and CuSO4·5H2Oprecursors and applied them on cotton by gamma radiation and found better antibacterial activity against gram-positive bacteria [21]. Xiao et al. (2022) assembled cotton–CS–Cu-treated fabric by soaking cotton in chitosan solution and achieved excellent bacterial reduction against both bacteria with excellent wash durability [22]. In all cases, the chemical synthesis method was adopted, and CuSO4 was used as a precursor, which has the possibility of making the fabric cytotoxic for human cells [23]. Also, the aforementioned research only focuses on durable antibacterial properties in expensive chemical synthesis methods, avoiding UV-protective ability, mechanical, and comfort properties, which are also of great concern among consumers today. Besides, cytotoxicity analysis is an important aspect for the treated fabric when it is utilized for biomedical clothing purposes [21].
Based on the above discussion, it can be pointed out that there is a scope for producing biogenic synthesis of hybrid nanofluids. Subsequently, the present study provides an innovative method for bio-synthesizing CuO NPs and SiO2 NPs utilizing agro-waste such as lemon peel zest and rice husk, respectively, in a simple, rapid, low-cost, and eco-friendly way. From these, three distinct formulations of hybrid nanofluids, namely Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L), Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L), and Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L), are green-synthesized and applied on cotton fabric by the pad-dry method. Then, investigations were conducted among untreated and treated specimens in terms of durable antibacterial properties, UV protection ability, mechanical properties, thermo-physiological and sensorial wear comfort properties to meet the recent growing demand of consumers.
The first novelty of this study is to prepare CuO NPs in a green route employing agro-waste, lemon peel zest, in a non-expensive and eco-friendly approach, where the utilization of copper acetate also assists in avoiding toxicity on cotton fabric. Another novelty is the preparation of Chi-CuO-SiO2 hybrid nanofluids from bio-based Chi-CuO and rice husk SiO2 NPs, which have not yet been synthesized. The core objectives of this study are to incorporate these novel synthesized hybrids on cotton fabric for the purpose of acquiring durable, multifunctional, mechanically strong, thermo-physiological, and sensorial comfort properties for cotton fabric for biomedical and protective clothing.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Silver Composite Mills Ltd., Gazipur, Bangladesh, supplied 100% pretreated cotton woven fabric with 164 g/m2 and 142 ends per inch and 74 picks per inch of 30 Ne count. Lemon and rice husk were purchased from the local market of Dhaka, Bangladesh. Acetic acid, sodium hydroxide, and chitosan were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany, and copper acetate monohydrate was collected from Giant Chem Solutions, Miami, FL, USA.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Bio-Synthesis of CuO NPs

Figure 1 displays the experimental route to biogenic synthesis of CuO NPs. Firstly, the extraction of lemon peel zest was carried out with an M:L ratio of 1:10 utilizing distilled water heated at 80 °C for 1 h. Then, it was filtered with Whatman filter paper No. 1 to obtain a pale, bright yellow-colored extraction. In a 5 mM copper acetate solution, the filtered extract was added dropwise slowly with an M:L ratio of 5:95 with continuous magnetic stirring at room temperature for 2 h. Subsequently, a deep green-colored colloidal solution was obtained from a light blue-colored copper acetate solution. The colloidal solution was centrifuged and washed with distilled water three times, followed by ethanol three times. The final wash was also performed using distilled water, and the sample was dried in an oven dryer at 80 °C until completely dry. After mortaring, powder of CuO NPs was achieved and stored for further testing.

2.2.2. Bio-Synthesis of SiO2 NPs

SiO2 NPs were synthesized from rice husk according to our previous article [24]. In short, acid-pretreated rice husk was carbonized and then calcined at 700 °C for 3 h by heating at a rate of 5 °C/min in a muffle furnace. In a 2.5 M NaOH solution of 80 mL, rice husk ash was added and refluxed at 80 °C for 1 h to achieve a clear solution of sodium silicate, which was filtered with Whatman Grade No. 41. This clear solution was titrated with 2 M acetic acid solution to precipitate nano silica. Further washing, filtering, drying, and mortaring of this precipitate would produce powder of nano silica.

2.2.3. Assembling of Chitosan-Loaded CuO-SiO2 Hybrid Nanofluids

In a prepared CuO nano solution, 0.2% chitosan solution was added dropwise and stirred for 1.5 h. In this solution, different concentrations of SiO2 NPs (5 g/L, 10 g/L, and 20 g/L) were added with stirring for 2 h to prepare three distinct formulations of chitosan-loaded CuO-SiO2 hybrid nanofluids. Then, the samples were immersed in these prepared hybrid nanofluids at room temperature and kept for 10 min, followed by passing through a laboratory padding mangle with a two-dip and two-nip process to achieve 75% pick up. The nanofluid-deposited specimens were air dried and cured at 130 °C for 2 min.

2.3. Characterization

Characteristic peaks of bio-reduced CuO NPs were investigated by a UV–visible spectrophotometer (UV-1800, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) in the range of 400–700 nm. Chemical bonding of CuO NPs and the structure of NPs with the fabric surface were characterized by Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy (FTIR-8400, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) coupled with a variable-angle attenuated total reflection accessory (ATR) at a range of 4000–400 cm−1, respectively. Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) by a ZEISS Sigma 300 VP (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) with Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX), was conducted to explore the surface morphology, particle size, and elemental composition of CuO NPs, respectively. It also examines the surface morphology and distribution of NPs, and the chemical composition of the pristine and hybrid nanofluid-coated fabric specimens. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was carried out using X-ray diffractometers (Malvern Panalytical Empyrean, Almelo, Netherlands). The zeta potential stability of chitosan-loaded CuO-SiO2 hybrid nanofluids was assessed using a Malvern Zeta Sizer (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, England).
The standard test method ASTM E 2149-01 (2001) [25] was conducted to assess the antibacterial activity of fabric specimens against gram-positive (S. aureus) and gram-negative (E. coli) bacteria under dynamic contact time. Firstly, the bacterial strain was grown in tryptic soy broth (TSA) and then diluted to achieve 1.5–3 × 103 colony-forming units (CFUs) per mL−1 bacteria. Later, a small piece of sterile cotton specimen was placed inside the flask, which had 50 mL of buffer solution with 1.5–3 × 103 CFU mL−1 bacteria. These flasks were incubated at 37 °C and shaken continuously for 1 h, followed by 24 h of contact time. After incubation, these solutions were diluted and plated on a petri dish with TSA. All the petri dishes were again incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Finally, the CFUs of control and coated specimens were calculated to determine the bacterial reduction percentage (%), which is expressed by the following:
Reduction   ( % )   =   F o F t F o × 100
where Fo and Ft are the number of bacterial colonies viable from control and coated specimens, respectively, after 1 and 24 h of contact time [26,27]. Standard test method AATCC 61-2013 was carried out to investigate the wash durability of antibacterial specimens after five and 15 washes [28].
The UPF factor was determined by an in vitro method. In this method, transmittance% of control and treated specimens were recorded utilizing UV-1800 (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) in the range of 290–400 nm. Each specimen was scanned three times, and the mean values were calculated. By putting these values in the following Equation (2), the ultraviolet protection factor was calculated. The UV protection factor (UPF) is calculated by using the following equation:
  U P F = λ = 290 400 E λ × S λ × Δ λ λ = 290 400 E λ × S λ × T λ × Δ λ
where Eλ, Sλ, Tλ, ∆λ, and λ indicate relative erythermal spectral effectiveness, solar spectral irradiance in W·m−2nm−1, spectral transmittance of the sample, wavelength in nm, and wavelength in nm, respectively. By assessing the value of UPF rating, the samples were classified according to Australian/New Zealand standard AS/NZS 4399-2017 [29,30].
The strip test method based on a constant rate of extension was employed to measure tensile strength and elongation at break in both warp and weft directions using the Titan Universal Strength tester from James Heal, England, according to the ISO 13934-1:2013 standard test method [31]. The tear strength of specimens was assessed by the Elma tear of James Heal, England, by adopting the standard ISO13937-1 test method [32].
The thermo-physiological comfort properties of specimens were assessed by a Moisture Management Tester (MMT) from SDL Atlas, South Carolina, USA, by the AATCC-195 standard test method [33]. A specimen (8 cm × 8 cm) was employed to place instrumentally one drop of 9 g/L standard saline solution for 20 s. Then, several indicators such as the wetting time, absorption rate, spreading speed, and one-way transport capability were monitored for a duration of 120 s. At the same time, overall moisture management capability (OMMC) was also determined by using the following formula:
OMMC = 0.25 BAR + 0.5 OWTC + 0.25 SSb
where BAR points out the moisture absorption rate on the bottom side, OWTC points out the one-way transport capability, and SSb points out the moisture spreading speed at the bottom side. These indicators were measured and graded as per a five-grade system of the AATCC test method 195 [34]. The pristine and hybrid nanofluid-deposited specimens were conditioned in a conditioning chamber under standard atmosphere (at 20 ± 5 °C and 65 ± 2% relative humidity for 12 h) before every test.
Skin sensorial comfort properties were evaluated by a Fabric Touch Tester (FTT) from SDL Atlas, South Carolina, USA. This device simultaneously measured 13 fabric indices, such as bending, heat, surface roughness, and compression, during testing. From these values, primary sensory indices of smoothness, softness, and warmness were calculated utilizing FTT QC Evaluation Software Version 2.0.
Before testing, each specimen was cut L-shaped (30 cm × 30 cm) to the shape of a template. Six measurements were tested for each specimen, with three inner surfaces and three outer surfaces. Before starting the test, the temperature difference between the upper and lower plate was created instrumentally by 10 °C to fabricate a temperature difference between the skin and the textiles. Firstly, the sample was placed on the lower plate, followed by continuous movement of the upper heated plate until it reached the lowest position, and then returned to the initial position. During this movement, 13 fabric indices, namely, bending, compression, thermal, and surface properties (friction and roughness), were measured [35]. These 13 indices are listed in Table 1.
Cytotoxicity of the treated specimen that contains 5 g/L silica NPs was evaluated by assessment of the viability of the Vero cell line by an in vitro assay method. In this method, a kidney epithelial cell line extracted from an African green monkey was maintained in DMEM (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s medium) containing 1% penicillin–streptomycin (1:1), 0.2% gentamycin, and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Cells (1.5 × 104 per 100 µL) were seeded onto a 48-well plate and incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2. The next day, a 25 µL sample (autoclaved) was added to each well. Cell viability was assessed under an inverted light microscope after 48 h of incubation by using the following formula:
Cell   Survival   ( % )   =   V i a b l e   c e l l s   i n   t r e a t e d   w e l l V i a b l e   c e l l s   i n   c o n t r o l   w e l l × 100
Vero cell viability above 95% indicates non-cytotoxicity [36].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of CuO NPs

The UV–Visible spectra in Figure 2a show a strong surface plasmon resonance at a wavelength of 335 nm, which suggests the formation of CuO NPs. This outcome strongly agrees with the previous work regarding green synthesis of CuO NPs, where a characteristic peak in the range of 250–395 nm was obtained [37,38,39,40]. The FTIR spectra of CuO NPs are presented in Figure 2b, where peaks in the range of wave number 3200–3700 cm−1 are ensured for O-H stretching of phenolic compounds. Absorption peaks at wave numbers 1632 cm−1 and 1538 cm−1 are associated with the stretching vibration of the carbonyl group (C=O) stretching band [20]. The spectrum around 1120 cm−1 and 2349 cm−1 is attributed to C-O and -C-O-C- stretching, respectively, due to alcohol and esters [17]. It can be noted that the presence of these peaks is due to the existence of biomolecules from green synthesis. In general, the characteristic peaks in the range of 400–650 cm−1 represent the Cu-O stretching. Accordingly, peaks at 579 cm−1 and 546 cm−1 confirm the stretching vibration of the Cu-O bond in CuO NPs. This observation agrees with Keabadile et al. (2020) [41]. Moreover, the FESEM image of CuO NPs in Figure 2c, illustrates a spherical shape with variable sizes and slight aggregations. The majority of the particles lie in a size range between 60 and 80 nm. This observation is aligned with the previous literature [42]. EDX analysis shown in Figure 2d exhibits the elemental composition of bio-synthesized CuO NPs. This spectrum specifies the characteristic peaks of bio-synthesized Cu, along with peaks of C and O. The dominance of (copper) Cu and oxygen (O) confirms the synthesis of CuO NPs with a purity of around 70%.

3.2. XRD of SiO2 and CuO NPs

In our previous study, characterization of silica NPs was carried out in detail [24], except XRD of silica NPs, which is illustrated in this study. The X-ray diffraction pattern of SiO2 nano powder derived from rice husk is shown in Figure 3a. This pattern affirms a broadening peak in the range of 2θ = 18° to 35° [43] with characteristic peak intensities at 2θ = 22.29°, confirming the amorphous silica NPs [44,45]. These findings are evidenced by comparing and matching the obtained data with the ICSD card no. 01-081-0069. This XRD pattern of rice husk SiO2 NPs matches very well with Wang et al. (2011), Azat et al. (2019) and Yuan et al. (2024) [43,44,46].
The XRD pattern of bio-synthesized CuO NPs is presented in Figure 3b. The broad spectrum with the absence of a sharp peak is a hallmark of amorphous CuO NPs. A strong peak at 2θ values, 38.16, shows Miller indices of 111, which confirms the formation of CuO NPs according to the International Centre for Diffraction Data [47]. These findings are validated by comparing and matching the obtained data with the ICSD card no. 00-044-0706. The obtained pattern resembles the pattern obtained by Anchani et al. (2024) and Millavithanachchi et al. (2025) [48,49].

3.3. Characterization of Chitosan-Loaded CuO-SiO2 Hybrid Nanofluids

The stability of hybrid nanofluids is pivotal, as it significantly affects the further characteristics of the treated fabric. Zeta potential refers to the electrostatic repulsion and electrical potential of NPs in the fluids. A zeta potential value at around ±25 mV and higher is regarded as stable [50]. The graphical depiction of the zeta potential distribution of Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L), Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L), and Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L) hybrid nanofluids is illustrated in Figure 4a–c. Among the prepared bio-based hybrid nanofluids, the highest zeta potential distribution of Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L) is +29.4 mV, as depicted in Figure 4a, indicating good colloidal stability. This outcome aligns with that of Mehta et al. (2021) [51]. They acquired a zeta potential stability of green-synthesized chitosan-loaded CuO NPs of +23.6 mV. In congruence with this literature, it can be conclusively observed that the addition of SiO2 NPs in Chi-CuO increases the stability of the hybrid nanofluid in this context. Besides, the increment of SiO2 concentration from 5 to 20 g/L leads to a lowering of the dispersion stability of fluids. In addition, good colloidal stability is attributed to the chitosan polymer that repels the nuclei of NPs in the solution to prevent aggregation. Positive surface is due to the positive charge of the chitosan amino group at a lower pH level and also from CuO NPs [52]. Although SiO2 NPs exhibited a negative surface charge [53], the combination of these three finally provides a higher positive surface charge.

3.4. Characterization of Hybrid Nanofluid-Treated Fabric

3.4.1. FTIR Analysis

Figure 5 exposes the FTIR-ATR spectrum of various Chi-CuO-SiO2-deposited specimens. For pristine fabric, the characteristic peaks of 3327 cm−1 and 2890 cm−1 are assigned to O-H and -C-H stretching, respectively. For all specimens, bending near 1640 cm−1 corresponds to water molecules (H-O-H). The asymmetric stretching vibration glucose ring of cellulose is observed at 1052 cm−1. Bands at 1025 cm−1 and 1160 cm−1 are attributed to the bending vibrations of C-O and C-O-C, respectively [20]. These are manifested by observing the graph; the mentioned peaks are very similar, with a slight shift of the peak and a reduction of peak intensities for all specimens.
The signal from the cotton fabric eclipses the aspect of peaks of the SiO2 NP band at (1081–995) cm−1 for (Si-OH) and the band at 791 cm−1 for (Si-O-Si) groups [54]. A shift of peak from 2890 cm−1 to 2850 cm−1 also confirms the presence of -NH deformation, which is assigned for chitosan. The shift of peak from 3327 cm−1 to 3332 cm−1, 3334 cm−1, 3334 cm−1 for three treated specimens is associated with the overlapping of the -OH group and -NH group with a broader peak when the cotton is crosslinked with chitosan [22,55]. A minimum shift of other peaks compared with the control one is attributed to the existence of the new element, chitosan, SiO2 NPs, and CuO NPs, on the fabric.

3.4.2. FESEM Analysis

The FESEM analysis is demonstrated in Figure 6, where Figure 6a,b stands for untreated fabric, Figure 6c,d for Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated fabric, Figure 6e,f for Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L)-treated fabric and Figure 6g,h for Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-treated fabric. Figure 6a illustrates a smooth surface that stipulates no deposition of NPs on it. On the other hand, FESEM micrographs of Chi-CuO-SiO2-treated fabric from Figure 6c,e,g clearly evidences the deposition of NPs. Among them, uniform and well-dispersed NPs are observed for Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated fabric. Non-uniform dispersion of NPs appears on Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L)-treated fabric, which is clearly visible from Figure 6e, and agglomeration of NPs is obtained for Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-treated fabric due to deposition of a high amount of silica NPs.
Elemental analysis of specimens provides rapid quantitative data on chemical composition. Figure 6b depicts that the untreated fabric contains only carbon (C) and oxygen (O). In contrast, the treated specimens carry silicon (Si), copper (Cu), and nitrogen (N) along with carbon (C) and oxygen. Another vital issue is that upon treatment, the amount of oxygen increases drastically for all treated specimens compared with the pristine one, which also authenticates the presence of SiO2 NPs, CuO NPs, and chitosan on the treated fabric. Further, the existence of nitrogen (N) confirms the presence of chitosan on all the treated fabrics. A higher amount of SiO2 NP deposition is observed for the fabric treated with 5 g/L SiO2 NPs compared with the fabric treated with 10 g/L silica NPs may be related to the zeta potential stability of these fluids. It becomes double for Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-treated fabric, which leads to agglomeration of NPs on the fabric.
Treatment with 5 g/L SiO2 NPs compared with the fabric treated with 10 g/L silica NPs may be related to the zeta potential stability of these fluids. It becomes double for Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-treated fabric, which leads to agglomeration of NPs on the fabric.

3.4.3. Elemental Mapping

EDX mapping of untreated and Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated fabric is conducted to accurately explain the presence of NP distribution on the fabric. Figure 7a exhibits the image of pristine fabric with a size of 50 µm, and the elemental mapping of it is shown in Figure 7b,c, whereas Figure 7d shows the image of Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated fabric, and the individual elemental distributions of it are shown in Figure 7e–i. These figures show that only C and O are present on the pristine one. In comparison with this, the distribution of Cu, Si, and N, along with C and O, in the treated fabric confirms the presence of SiO2 NPs and CuO NPs on it, while the presence of N authenticates the existence of chitosan on it.

3.5. Assessment of Functional Properties

3.5.1. Evaluation of Antibacterial Properties

The antibacterial efficacy of non-functionalized and functionalized cotton woven textiles with chitosan-loaded CuO-SiO2 hybrid nanofluids is displayed in Figure 8 against gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and gram-negative Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteria. The bacterial reduction percentage is observed before washing, after five and 15 washing cycles. In this figure, the chitosan-loaded CuO-SiO2(5g/L), CuO-SiO2(10g/L), and CuO-SiO2(20g/L) hybrid nanofluid-treated fabric is denoted by CCS-1, CCS-2, and CCS-3, respectively. Figure 9a–h and Figure 10a–h illustrate the disk image of agar plate for bacterial viability of untreated, Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-, Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L)-, and Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-treated fabrics before washing after 1 h and 24 h contact time, respectively. Investigations of these graphs and figures demonstrate that the reduction percentage against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria after 1 h and 24 h contact time is found as 99.99% against both bacteria for all functionalized specimens before washing.
Sharma et al. (2022) reported that chemically synthesized CuO NPs demonstrated very good antimicrobial activity up to 97% [56]. Comparing with these outcomes, the outstanding achievement of this context is due to the existence of bio-synthesized CuO NPs, along with chitosan, and SiO2 NPs in hybrid nanofluids. The mechanism of the antibacterial activity of CuO NPs causes the destruction of the cell wall of bacteria, producing reactive oxygen species, and degrading DNA, and thus inhibiting the DNA replication in the microorganism [27,57]. Chitosan is an effective organic antibacterial agent that has a positive effect on antibacterial activity [58]. Chitosan-loaded CuO NPs enhance antibacterial efficacy remarkably, which has also been reported by Saleh et al. (2021) [21].
However, it is observed graphically from Figure 8 that all the specimens retained their antibacterial activity as unwashed specimens after five washing cycles against both bacteria after 1 h and 24 h of contact time. After 15 washing cycles, the three treated specimens retained excellent bacterial efficacy against S. aureus bacteria for 1 and 24 h of contact time. On the contrary, the three treated fabrics ascribed 86.44%, 89.49% and 92.88% bacterial efficacy at 1 h contact time, whereas they retained 97.97%, 97.97%, and 99.99% bacterial efficacy after 24 h contact time in the case of E. coli bacteria. This excellent wash durability after washing is due to the formation of crosslinking of chitosan between NPs and cotton fabric.

3.5.2. Evaluation of Ultraviolet Protection Factor

The UV transmittance curve and obtained approximate quantitative outcomes of untreated and treated specimens are presented in Table 2 and Figure 11, respectively. It is illustrated that the pristine specimen transmits around 70% UVR, which is inadequate for UV protection. Conversely, chitosan-loaded CuO-SiO2(5g/L), CuO-SiO2(10g/L), and CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-deposited specimens block around 96.42%, 96.07% and 97.53% UVR, respectively, with UPF values of 30, 30, and 40. These are categorized as very good, very good, and excellent according to the AS/NZ standard [59]. It is evidenced that the incorporation of hybrid nanofluid on cotton fabric significantly enhanced the UV protection efficacy of the specimen. The highest UV protection provision efficacy is achieved for the chitosan-loaded CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-treated specimen. It can be pointed out that, from 5 g/L to 20 g/L silica concentration, the UV protection properties have enhanced remarkably. This finding is in line with Attia et al. (2017), who proved that with increased concentrations of rice husk silica NPs, the UV-protective efficacy of fabric is significantly enhanced [60]. Boruah et al. (2024) found that green-synthesized CuO NPs reduced with Syzygium cumini leaf extract acquired very good UV-protective properties with a UPF factor of 36.18 [61]. In relation to these findings, the outstanding outcomes for Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-treated fabric are inferred to be superior. Thus, it is notable that these hybrid nanofluids have enormous potential as UV-protective agents.

3.6. Assessment of Mechanical Properties

Table 3 illustrates the impact of mechanical properties on Chi-CuO-SiO2 hybrid nanofluids deposited on cotton fabric. Figure 12 represents the effect of tensile strength on extension% of (a) untreated, (b) Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated, (c) Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L)-treated, and (d) Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-treated fabric. It is perceived, as shown in Table 3 and Figure 12, that the tensile strength of Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated fabric has improved 1.22% and 0.53%, respectively, both in warp and weft directions, compared with that of the control one. On the other hand, the tensile strength of Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L)- and Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-treated fabrics has decreased by around 3.32% and 3.64% for warp, and 7.8% and 9.86% for weft directions, respectively, in contrast to the control one. This is due to the utilization of 1% acetic acid and increased silica NP concentration jointly reducing the pH below the required level during the preparation of hybrid nanofluids, which affects the fiber structure. This phenomenon has been explained by the FTIR spectrum from Figure 5, where the achieved peak of the glucose ring is at wave number 1052 cm−1 and 1053 cm−1 stretching for the untreated and Chi CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated fabric. On the contrary, the diminution of peak position from 1052 cm−1 to 1037 cm−1 and also the reduction of peak intensity for both Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L)- and Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-treated fabric indicate the damage to the fiber structure that ultimately affects the strength of the fabric. Xiao et al. (2022) fabricated chitosan and Cu(II) ions on cotton fabric along with succinic acid and attained a depletion of around 18.41% tensile strength [22]. This acquired outcome is very relevant to the present context.
The average GSM of untreated, Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-, Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L)-, and Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L) hybrid nanofluid-treated fabric is 164, 177, 174, and 172, respectively, whereas the average ends per inch (EPI) and picks per inch (PPI) of those specimens are 142 and 74, 143 and 76, 141 and 75, and 140 and 74, respectively. In particular, the EPI and PPI of Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated fabric have been enhanced and reduced for the other two compared with the untreated one. This is another reason for the enhancement of the tensile strength of Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated fabric compared with the others.
Additionally, elongation percentage follows an increasing trend for both warp and weft directions in all modified specimens, in congruence with the control ones. Elongation at break reaches the highest 22.20% in warp direction for the Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated specimen and 16.37% for the Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L)-treated specimen for weft direction. More specifically, elongation at break has risen approximately 83.62%, 53.5% and 66.8% in the warp direction, and 1.6%, 6.4%, and 3.9% in the weft direction, compared with the pristine one. The highest 9.56% deterioration of tear strength is attained in the warp direction for the Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated specimen, and 27.6% in the weft direction for the Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-treated specimen. The reduction in tear strength is higher for the weft than the warp direction. The reason behind the decline in tear strength is that the crosslinking of fiber and yarn hinders the slippage and thus lessens tear strength [62].

3.7. Assessment of Comfort Properties

3.7.1. Assessment of Moisture Management Properties

To transfer the liquid or sweat vapor from the body to the atmosphere via clothing is referred to as the moisture management properties of textiles. This helps to improve the thermo-physiological comfort properties of fabric by keeping the thermal balance of the body [7].
The impact of Chi-CuO-SiO2 hybrid nanofluids on the moisture management properties of cotton fabric is tabulated in Table 4. The grading system of the MMT test for all parameters is graphically displayed in Figure 13a–d. The results for the untreated fabric indicate that the wetting time required for both the top and bottom surfaces is lower for the pristine one than for the others, and it is graded as excellent. The presence of a coating of hybrid nanofluids leads to an increase in the wetting time of both surfaces of all the coated fabrics. Among the treated specimens, Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L) hybrid nanofluid-coated fabric exhibits the lowest wetting time and is graded as very good and excellent for top and bottom surfaces, respectively. In the case of the absorption rate, it is found that these values are raised significantly for all treated fabrics in comparison to the pristine ones. In particular, the bottom surface of Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L) hybrid nanofluid-coated fabric depicts the highest moisture absorption rate, indicating that the highest amount of moisture is absorbed by it due to the hydrophilic characteristics of silica NPs [63]. The larger difference in absorption rates between the two fabric layers of this fabric points out the slower movement of moisture from the bottom to the top surface [33]. The grading of absorption rates from the graphics illustrates that the rating from the bottom to top surface of untreated fabric is fair to poor, whereas for Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L) hybrid nanofluid-coated fabric is good to poor. Moreover, the highest wetted radius is exploited for Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L) hybrid nanofluid-coated fabric and graded as excellent for both surfaces. The larger wetted radius eases faster drying periods, which take the moisture vapor away from the skin quickly. The highest dispersion stability of NPs and the hydrophilic nature of Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L) hybrid nanofluid-coated fabric facilitates achieving a higher absorption rate and wetted radius than other treated specimens. The moisture spreading speed for untreated and Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L) hybrid nanofluid-coated fabric is graded as excellent, which is better than the other two.
Outcomes of one-way transportability (OWT) from the table and graph demonstrate that better OWT is achieved for all treated specimens than for untreated ones. All treated specimens are graded as excellent, while the untreated specimen is graded as good. The highest value of one-way transportability is attained at 414.043 for Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L) hybrid nanofluid-coated fabric. Following this, the highest value of overall moisture management properties (OMMC) is gained at 0.8537, for Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L) hybrid nanofluid-coated fabric, which is 75% better than the untreated one and graded as excellent, whereas CuO-SiO2(10g/L)- and CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-treated specimens are graded as very good, and the untreated one is good.
Khandual et al. (2020) incorporated only silica NPs on cotton fabric and acquired OMMC at 0.7782 and graded it as very good [63]. Comparing with this context, a remarkable improvement in OMMC is achieved for chitosan-loaded Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L) hybrid nanofluid-coated fabric. Consequently, it is clearly evidenced that the presence of CuO NPs and chitosan, along with silica NPs, has a great positive impact on the moisture management properties of cotton fabric.

3.7.2. Assessment of Sensorial Mechanical Comfort Indices

Thirteen FTT predicted mechanical comfort indices determined by the FTT software are tabulated in Table 5. The primary indices (smoothness, softness, and warmness) obtained from these 13 indices are diagrammatically represented in Figure 14 with standard deviation.
Characteristics of the fabric surface, such as surface friction and roughness, are utilized to determine fabric smoothness. The surface friction coefficient quantifies the frictional force relative to the normal force. Fabric with a lower frictional coefficient is perceived as smoother [64]. Data from Table 5 points out that the lowest surface friction coefficient is obtained for the untreated specimen in comparison with other hybrid nanofluid-treated specimens. These attributes indicate the smooth surface of untreated fabric than others.
But the smoothness of fabric is also greatly influenced by surface roughness. The maximum height of a fiber wave measured from the flat surface of the fabric is termed surface roughness amplitude. Fabric with higher roughness amplitude points out pronounced irregularities on the fabric surface. The distance between successive crests on a surface of a fabric is referred to as the surface roughness wavelength. Fabric with a shorter surface roughness wavelength is perceived as smooth [64]. Here, the outcomes from Table 5 suggest that the highest surface amplitude and surface wavelength are observed for untreated fabric, and the lowest values are achieved for Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L) nanofluid-treated fabric. Following the above discussion, finally, the highest value of smoothness from Figure 14 is obtained, 0.62 for both untreated and Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L) hybrid nanofluid-treated fabric, which also confirms the even distribution of NPs on this treated fabric. In situ application of Ag NPs on cotton fabric diminished the smoothness of the fabric achieved by Saha et al. (2025) [65], whereas this context shows the Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L) nanofluid-treated fabric is as smooth as the control one because good dispersion stability properly facilitates the dispersion of the NPs on the fabric surface.
Bending average rigidity (BAR), bending work (BW), and compression modules are very relevant in determining fabric softness. Fabric with a higher value of bending average rigidity and bending work is considered stiff [66]. The lowest values of bending average rigidity and bending work are acquired for Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L) hybrid nanofluid-treated fabric, and the softness value is 0.56. This value is higher than untreated fabric, for which it is 0.11. With an increase in silica concentration from 10 g/L to 20 g/L, BAR and BW increased gradually, and the softness value reduced from 0.23 to 0.15. So, it is observed that with increased silica concentration in this hybrid nanofluid, the fabric softness is reduced; however, all the hybrid nanofluid-treated specimens are still softer than the untreated fabric.
From the compression module, it is found that the value of thickness remains the same (0.42) for untreated and Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L) nanofluid-treated fabric, and is reduced to 0.39 and 0.38 for Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L)- and Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L) hybrid nanofluid-treated fabric. The highest value, 2003.56 of compression work, is gained for the control fabric, whereas lower values are achieved for all treated specimens, which confirms the stiffness of the control fabric compared with others. Compression recovery rate (CRR) is referred to as the percentage of thickness changes after compression.
Fabric that has a higher CRR is considered soft. Here, the highest CRR value, 0.64, is observed for Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated fabric, and the lowest CRR value, 0.40, is achieved for the pristine one. So, following the value of bending average rigidity, the compression module also confirms that Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated fabric is softer than the pristine one.
Thermal conductivity during compression and recovery shows a significant enhancement for the treated specimens compared to the untreated counterpart due to the presence of highly conductive CuO NPs on the fabric. Among the treated specimens, the highest conductivity with Qmax value is achieved for Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L) hybrid nanofluid-treated fabric. Following this, the lowest warmness value 0.47 is obtained for this sample. So, it can be said that the application of Chi-CuO-SiO2 hybrid nanofluid has a significant positive effect on the thermal conductivity of the fabric. With increased silica concentration, the thermal conductivity of treated fabric has reduced as the presence of silica NPs makes the fabric thermally resistive. Saha et al. (2025) observed that the incorporation of Ag NPs on cotton fabric resulted in an increased Qmax value compared to that of the untreated one. The acquired outcomes of this research are in agreement with this observation [65].
From the above discussions, it can be concluded that chitosan-loaded Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L) hybrid nanofluid-treated fabric provides better mechanical sensorial comfort properties than the untreated one in terms of smoothness, softness, and thermal conductivity.

3.8. Assessment of Cytotoxicity

The microscopic observations of survival Vero cells and the outcomes of data interpretation for the percentage of survival cells are exhibited in Figure 15 and Table 6, respectively. A microscopic image of Vero cells after exposure to negative solvent (control) illustrates 100% survival of cells, whereas Vero cells after exposure to positive solvent and positive solvent with Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated fabric show some destruction of cells compared with control ones. Arrow marks on the Vero cells after exposure to positive solvent with Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L) indicate the fiber on the Vero cell culture. More specifically, data interpretation from Table 5 illustrates that 100%, 96.35%, and 95.8% survival of cells is achieved for Vero cells subjected to control (-solvent), positive solvent, and positive solvent with Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated fabric. As cell viability above 95% is regarded as non-cytotoxic, chitosan-loaded CuO-SiO2(5g/L) hybrid nanofluid-treated fabric can be considered as non-cytotoxic under the conditions of this in vitro assay. Green synthesis of CuO and SiO2, and non-toxic chitosan, facilitates achieving these remarkable outcomes. Rezaie et al. (2018) examined the cytotoxicity of environmentally friendly lower concentrations of CuO NPs on cotton fabric and found 75.36% cell viability [67]. Compared with that study, excellent results are obtained in this context.

4. Conclusions

This research aimed to bio-synthesize hybrid nanofluids in a cost-effective and eco-friendly approach to develop durable, functionalized textiles with better serviceability as well as thermo-physiological and sensorial comfort properties. Three distinct varieties of bio-synthesized hybrid nanofluids, namely chitosan-loaded CuO-SiO2(5g/L), CuO-SiO2(10g/L), and CuO-SiO2(20g/L), are applied on cotton woven fabric for optimizing so that this can be employed for biomedical applications. Among the hybrids, the Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L) hybrid nanofluid demonstrates the highest zeta potential stability, which leads to uniform deposition of NPs. It is found that the Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-deposited fabric achieves the highest 99.99% antibacterial efficacy against S. aureus and E. coli bacteria, even after only 1 h contact time before wash. Surprisingly, the highest antibacterial efficacy, 99.99%, is retained even after 15 washing cycles against S. aureus bacteria after 1 h contact time with 5 g/L silica concentration in hybrid nanofluids, and this value is regarded as optimal, whereas for E. coli, similar outcomes are attained for Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-deposited fabric. These outstanding outcomes affirm the significant durability of hybrid nanoparticles on cotton fabric even at low silica concentration. Besides the intrinsic antibacterial properties, the UV-blocking performance of Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-, Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L)-, and Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-functionalized fabric displays UPF factors of 30, 30, and 40, which can be categorized as very good, very good, and excellent, respectively. It can be highlighted that the UV-protective performance reaches to its highest with increased silica concentration. Assessment of mechanical properties shows the augmentation of tensile strength and elongation of Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-functionalized fabric in comparison with the pristine one. Moreover, the quantitative data of thermo-physiological and sensorial comfort properties authenticate a notable enhancement in comfort properties for all treated fabrics. A remarkable enhancement of OMMC value, 0.8537, which is around 75% better than the untreated one, ensures excellent thermo-physiological comfort properties of the hybrid nanofluid-treated fabric that contains 5 g/L silica NPs. Also, the Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-deposited specimen provides better sensorial comfort properties in terms of smoothness, softness, and warmness than that of the others. Cell viability for Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated fabric is 95.8% with no observable cytotoxic effects, which confirms the non-cytotoxicity of this treated fabric.
Considering the aforementioned discussions, a conclusive statement can be made that Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L) hybrid nanofluid-treated fabric can be effectively utilized as durable, multifunctional, mechanically strong, and comfortable clothing for biomedical approaches. Further extensive study can be conducted on more fascinating properties, such as the flame-retardant and self-cleaning properties of the fabricated surface of cotton woven fabric.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A. and M.T.A.; methodology, M.T.A.; software, M.T.A.; validation, M.A. and M.T.A.; formal analysis, M.T.A.; investigation, M.A. and M.T.A.; resources, M.A. and M.T.A.; data curation, M.T.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.T.A.; writing—review and editing, M.A. and M.T.A.; visualization, M.A. and M.T.A.; supervision, M.A.; project administration, M.A.; funding acquisition, M.A. and M.T.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is supported by a Postgraduate Fellowship from the Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET), Dhaka, Bangladesh, grant number AC/PG Fellowship/2023/R-4652.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the experimental support from the Chemistry Laboratory and the Biomedical Engineering Laboratory of Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET), Dhaka, Bangladesh, and the Accredited Laboratory, Wet Process Laboratory, BUTex, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
FESEMField Emission Scanning Electron Microscope
EDSEnergy Dispersive Spectroscopy
XRDX-Ray Dispersive Spectroscopy
FTIRFourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
UPFUltraviolet Protection Factor
T%Transmittance%
UVUltraviolet Ray
AATCCThe American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists
MMTMoisture Management Tester
FTTFabric Touch Tester

References

  1. Fang, Y.L.; Chen, L.; Liu, J.; Wu, L. Multi-functionalization of cotton fabrics with excellent flame retardant, antibacterial and superhydrophobic properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 254, 127889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  2. Deogaonkar-Baride, S.; Tandel, T.; Chandel, A. A Green Method of Developing Copper Nanoparticle-Based Antiviral Textiles. Fiber Polym. 2025, 26, 5465–5474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Abou Elmaaty, T.M.; Elsisi, H.; Elsayad, G.; Elhadad, H.; Plutino, M.R. Recent advances in functionalization of cotton fabrics with nanotechnology. Polymers 2022, 14, 4273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  4. Preethi, S.; Abarna, K.; Nithyasri, M.; Kishore, P.; Deepika, K.; Ranjithkumar, R.; Bhuvaneshwari, V.; Bharathi, D. Synthesis and characterization of chitosan/zinc oxide nanocomposite for antibacterial activity onto cotton fabrics and dye degradation applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 2779–2787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  5. Tharchanaa, S.B.; Anupriyanka, T.; Shanmugavelayutham, G. Ecofriendly surface modification of cotton fabric to enhance the adhesion of CuO nanoparticles for antibacterial activity. Mater. Technol. 2022, 37, 3222–3230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Tan, L.Y.; Sin, L.T.; Bee, S.T.; Tee, T.T.; Ratnam, C.T.; Woo, K.K.; Rahmat, A.R. Functionalization and mechanical properties of cotton fabric with ZnO nanoparticles for antibacterial textile application. Solid State Phenom. 2019, 290, 292–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Shahid, M.; Ali, A.; Khaleeq, H.; Tahir, M.F.; Militky, J.; Wiener, J. Development of antimicrobial multifunctional textiles to avoid from hospital-acquired infections. Fiber Polym. 2021, 22, 3055–3067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Haripriya, P.; Revathy, M.P.; Kumar, M.S.; Navaneeth, P.; Suneesh, P.V.; Satheesh Babu, T.G.; Darbha, V.R.K. Biosurfactant-capped CuO nanoparticles coated cotton/polypropylene fabrics toward antimicrobial textile applications. Nanotechnology 2024, 35, 165601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Filho, S.A.; Almeida, C.M.; Romanos, M.T.V.; Backx, B.P.; Bonelli, R.R. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles for functional cotton fabrics: Antimicrobial efficacy against multidrug-resistant bacteria and cytotoxicity evaluation. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2025, 53, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Niznik, Ł.; Noga, M.; Kobylarz, D.; Kapka-Skrzypczak, L.; Jurowski, K. Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs)—Toxicity, safety and green synthesis: A critical review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 4057. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Ávila-Orta, C.A.; Cruz-Delgado, V.J.; García-Hernández, Z.; Soriano-Corral, F.; Cadenas-Pliego, G.; Padilla-Vaca, F.; Anaya-Velázquez, F.; Franco, B.; Mendoza-Macías, C.L.; Alvarez-Canales, J.A.; et al. Development and Evaluation of Antimicrobial Hospital Apparel Incorporating Copper Nanoparticles: Upscaling, Durability, and Hospital Assessment. Textiles 2026, 6, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Moges, G.; Haile, A.; Firew, M.; Pawlos, M.; Muche, S. Synergetic antibacterial and UV-protective finishing of cotton fabric functionalized with copper oxide nanoparticles and phenolic compounds of Azolla Nilotica algae extracts. J. Ind. Text. 2024, 54, 15280837241299460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Gebreslassie, Y.T.; Gebremeskel, F.G. Green and cost-effective biofabrication of copper oxide nanoparticles: Exploring antimicrobial and anticancer applications. Biotechnol. Rep. 2024, 41, e00828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Yadav, S.; Sharma, G.; Malik, S.; Khyalia, P.A.; Gupta, A. Lemon Peel-Extracted Recyclable Copper Oxide Nanoparticles for Methylene Blue Dye Adsorption: Optimization, Isotherms, Kinetics, Thermodynamics, and Reusability Study. ChemistrySelect 2024, 9, e202404178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Xian, T.L. Green Synthesis and Characterization of Copper (ii) Oxide Nanoparticles Derived from Lemon (Citrus limon) Peel Extract for the Photocatalytic Degradation of Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME). Bachelor’s Thesis, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Perak, Malaysia, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sangeetha, A.; Abarna, B.J. Lemon peel assisted synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles for photocatalytic degradation. Mater. Today Proc. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Kir, I.; Mohammed, H.A.; Laouini, S.E.; Souhaila, M.; Hasan, G.G.; Abdullah, J.A.A.; Mokni, S.; Naseef, A.; Alsalme, A.; Barhoum, A. Plant extract-mediated synthesis of CuO nanoparticles from lemon peel extract and their modification with polyethylene glycol for enhancing photocatalytic and antioxidant activities. J. Polym. Environ. 2024, 32, 718–734. [Google Scholar]
  18. Krishan, B.; Kumar, A.; Azmi, W.; Dhiman, S. Biological activities of citrus fruit-derived copper oxide nanoparticles: Towards sustainable antimicrobial and antioxidant solutions. Folia Microbiol. 2025, 71, 349–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Gouda, M.; Hebeish, A. Preparation and evaluation of CuO/chitosan nanocomposite for antibacterial finishing cotton fabric. J. Ind. Text. 2010, 39, 203–214. [Google Scholar]
  20. Dhineshbabu, N.R.; Rajendran, V. Antibacterial activity of hybrid chitosan–cupric oxide nanoparticles on cotton fabric. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2016, 10, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  21. Saleh, S.N.; Khaffaga, M.M.; Ali, N.M.; Hassan, M.S.; El-Naggar, A.W.M.; Rabie, A.G.M. Antibacterial functionalization of cotton and cotton/polyester fabrics applying hybrid coating of copper/chitosan nanocomposites loaded polymer blends via gamma irradiation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 183, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  22. Xiao, Y.; Shen, G.; Zheng, W.; Fu, J.; Fu, F.; Hu, X.; Jin, Z.; Liu, X. Remarkable durability of the antibacterial function achieved via a coordination effect of Cu (II) ion and chitosan grafted on cotton fibers. Cellulose 2022, 29, 1003–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Salim, T.M.S.; Bekhit, M.M.M.; Serag, A.M. Cytogenotoxic Effects of Different Concentrations of Copper Sulfate Using the Allium sativum Assay. Egypt. Acad. J. Biol. 2025, 17, 99–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  24. Aktek, M.T.; Ali, M. Biosynthesized Ag–SiO2 hybrid nano fluid with cross-linker for augmentation of multifunctional and mechanical properties of cotton fabric. Cellulose 2025, 32, 4615–4633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  25. ASTM E 2149-01; Standard Test Method for Determining the Antimicrobial Activity of Antimicrobial Agents Under Dynamic Contact Conditions. American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PN, USA, 2001.
  26. Markovića, D.; Deeksb, C.; Nunneyb, T.; Radovanovića, Ž.; Radoičićc, M.Z.; Šaponjićc, Z.M.; Radetićd, M. Antibacterial activity of Cu-based nanoparticles synthesized on the cotton fabrics modified with polycarboxylic acids. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 200, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Janakiraman, V.; Reethiga Sampathkumar, B.; Prakash, N.U. Phytosynthesis of copper nanoparticles using curcuma aromatica and its application in medical fabrics for antibacterial activity. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 2024, 33, 705–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  28. Ding, Q.; Liu, J.L.; Liu, Y.Y.; He, W.Z.; Zhang, L.; Xu, Y.J. Durable antibacterial cotton fabrics with good performance enabled by quaternary ammonium salts. Cellulose 2024, 31, 6551–6564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Tania, I.S.; Ali, M. Coating of ZnO nanoparticle on cotton fabric to create a functional textile with enhanced mechanical properties. Polymers 2021, 13, 2701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  30. Saha, B.; Saha, A.; Das, P.; Kakati, A.; Banerjee, A.; Chattopadhyay, P. A comprehensive review of ultraviolet radiation and functionally modified textile fabric with special emphasis on UV protection. Heliyon 2024, 10, e40027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  31. ISO 13934-1:2013; Textiles—Tensile Properties of Fabrics—Part 1: Determination of Maximum Force and Elongation at Maximum Force Using the Strip Method. The International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.
  32. ISO 13937-1; Textiles—Tear Properties of Fabrics—Part 1: Determination of Tear Force Using Ballistic Pendulum Method (Elmendorf). The International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000.
  33. Saha, R.; Hannan, M.A.; Islam, U.; Bhuiyan, A.H. Improvement of Moisture Transmission Properties of Acrylic–Cotton Blended Fabric Using Calcium Chloride-Based Desiccants: A Novel Approach. Fiber Polym. 2024, 25, 4291–4306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  34. Karthik, T.; Senthilkumar, P.; Murugan, R. Analysis of comfort and moisture management properties of polyester/milkweed blended plated knitted fabrics for active wear applications. J. Ind. Text. 2018, 47, 897–920. [Google Scholar]
  35. Musa, A.B.H.; Malengier, B.; Vasile, S.; Langenhove, L.V. Determination of comfort indices of fabrics using fabric touch tester (FTT). In AIP Conference Proceedings; AIP Publishing LLC: New York, NY, USA, 2021; Volume 2368, p. 020005. [Google Scholar]
  36. Sangour, M.H.; Ali, I.M.; Atwan, Z.W.; Ali, A.A.A.L.A. Effect of Ag nanoparticles on viability of MCF-7 and Vero cell lines and gene expression of apoptotic genes. Egypt. J. Med. Hum. Genet. 2021, 22, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  37. Khan, J.; Siddiq, M.; Akram, B.; Ashraf, M.A. In-situ synthesis of CuO nanoparticles in P (NIPAM-co-AAA) microgel, structural characterization, catalytic and biological applications. Arab. J. Chem. 2018, 11, 897–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  38. Gebremedhn, K.; Kahsay, M.H.; Aklilu, M. Green synthesis of CuO nanoparticles using leaf extract of Catha edulis and its antibacterial activity. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2019, 7, 327–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  39. Mitra, S.; Dua, T.K.; Easmin, S.; Sarkar, S.; Roy, A.P.; Sahu, R.; Nandi, G.; Haydar, S.; Roy, S.; Paul, P. Green synthesis of copper nanoparticles by using pineapple peel waste: In vitro characterizations and antibacterial potential. Bioprocess. Biosyst. Eng. 2024, 47, 1151–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  40. Toala, R.S.; Gutierrez-Miceli, F.; Gonzalez-Mendoza, D.; Tzintzun-Camacho, O.; Basilio-Cortes, A.; Valdez-Salas, B.; Beltran-Partida, E.; Grimaldo-Juarez, O. Biosynthesis of copper nanoparticles from Acacia cornigera and Annona purpurea and their insecticidal effect against Tribolium castaneum. Reactions 2024, 5, 274–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. Keabadile, O.P.; Aremu, A.O.; Elugoke, S.E.; Fayemi, O.E. Green and traditional synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles—Comparative study. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  42. El-Sherbiny, G.M.; Shehata, M.; Kalaba, M.H. Biogenic copper and copper oxide nanoparticles to combat multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Green synthesis, mechanisms, resistance, and future perspectives. Biotechnol. Rep. 2025, 46, e00896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  43. Yuan, S.; Hou, Y.; Liu, S.; Ma, Y. A comparative study on rice husk, as agricultural waste, in the production of silica nanoparticles via different methods. Materials 2024, 17, 1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  44. Azat, S.; Korobeinyka, A.V.; Moustakas, K.; Inglezakisa, V.J. Sustainable production of pure silica from rice husk waste in Kazakhstan. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 217, 352–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  45. Setyawan, N.; Hoerudin Wulanawati, A. Simple extraction of silica nanoparticles from rice husk using technical grade solvent: Effect of volume and concentration. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 309, 012032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  46. Wang, W.; Martin, J.C.; Ma, C.; Han, A.; Zhang, L.S.N. Harvesting silica nanoparticles from rice husks. J. Nanopart. Res. 2011, 13, 6981–6990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  47. Peddi, P.; Ptsrk, P.R.; Rani, N.U.; Tulasi, S.L. Green synthesis, characterization, antioxidant, antibacterial, and photocatalytic activity of Suaeda maritima (L.) Dumort aqueous extract-mediated copper oxide nanoparticles. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2021, 19, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  48. Anchani, A.H.; Abishini, A.H.; Ashokkumar, T. A novel method for biosynthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles using banana blossom and E-waste: Characterization and application in malachite green dye removal through response surface methodology optimization. Discov. Biotechnol. 2024, 1, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  49. Millavithanachchi, S.S.; Gunasena, M.D.K.M.; Galpaya, G.D.C.P.; Priyadarshana, H.V.V.; Indupama, S.V.A.A.; Induranga, D.K.A.; Kariyawasam, W.A.C.N.; Kaluthanthri, D.V.S.; Koswattage, K.R. Green Synthesis, Optimization, and Characterization of CuO Nanoparticles Using Tithonia diversifolia Leaf Extract. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  50. El-Kattan, N.; Ibrahim, M.A.; Emam, A.N.; Metwally, K.; Yousse, F.S.; Nassar, N.A.; Mansour, A.S. Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of chitosan-and curcumin-capped copper oxide nanostructures against multi-drug-resistant microorganisms. Nanoscale Adv. 2025, 7, 2988–3007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  51. Mehta, M.R.; Mahajan, H.P.; Hivrale, A.U. Green synthesis of chitosan capped-copper nano biocomposites: Synthesis, characterization, and biological activity against plant pathogens. BioNanoScience 2021, 11, 417–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  52. Fadhill, A.A.; Ahmed, M.E. Characterization of chitosan-based copper nanoparticles: Synthesis approach, antimicrobial activity, and cytotoxicity assay investigation. Microb. Biosyst. 2025, 10, 187–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  53. Kumari, A.; Singh, R.K.; Aman, A.K.; Kr, N.; Singh, A.K. Low-cost green synthesis of silica engineering nanomaterials from rice husk (Agriculture waste) and its physical and luminescent properties measurements. Curr. Nat. Sci. Eng. 2024, 1, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  54. Borah, M.P.; Kalita, B.B.; Jose, S.; Baruah, S. Fabrication of hydrophobic surface on Eri silk/wool fabric using nano silica extracted from rice husk. Silicon 2023, 15, 7039–7046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  55. Pires, A.B.; Vitali, L.; Tavares, A.; Germano, C.A.; Amorim, S.M.; Moreira, R.F.P.M.; Peralta, R.A.; Neves, A. Chitosan functionalized with heptadentate dinucleating ligand applied to removal of nickel, copper and zinc. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 256, 117589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  56. Sharma, V.; Basak, S.; Ali, S.W. Synthesis of copper nanoparticles on cellulosic fabrics and evaluation of their multifunctional performances. Cellulose 2022, 29, 7973–7988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  57. Marković, D.; Ašanin, J.; Nunney, T.; Radovanović, Ž.; Radoičić, M.; Mitrić, M.; Mišić, D.; Radetić, M. Broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity of cotton fabric modified with oxalic acid and CuO/Cu2O nanoparticles. Fiber Polym. 2019, 20, 2317–2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  58. Makhlouf, G.; Abdelkhalik, A.; Ameen, H. Preparation of highly efficient chitosan-based flame retardant coatings with good antibacterial properties for cotton fabrics. Prog. Org. Coat. 2022, 163, 106627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  59. Australian/New Zealand Standard 4339-1997: Information Technology–Telecommunications and Information Exchange Between Systems–Private Integrated Services Network–Inter-Exchange Signalling Protocol–Call Transfer Supplementary Service. Available online: https://www.standards.govt.nz/shop/asnzs-43391997/ (accessed on 22 May 2025).
  60. Attia, N.F.; Moussa, M.; Sheta, A.M.; Taha, R.; Gamal, H. Synthesis of effective multifunctional textile based on silica nanoparticles. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017, 106, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Boruah, G.; Phukan, A.R.; Kalita, B.; Gangwar, A.K.S.; Jose, S. Antimicrobial and UV protection finishing of cotton fabric with copper nanoparticles synthesized using S. cumini leaf extract. Clean. Technol. Environ. Policy 2025, 27, 2043–2053. [Google Scholar]
  62. Aslam, S.; Hussain, T.; Ashraf, M.; Tabassum, M.; Rehman, A.; Iqbal, K.; Javid, A. Multifunctional finishing of cotton fabric. Autex Res. J. 2019, 19, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  63. Khandual, A.; Rout, N.; Verma, S.K.; Patel, P.; Pattanaik, P.; Luximon, Y.; Kumar, A.; Nayak, R.K.; Suar, M. Controlled nano-particle dyeing of cotton can ensure low cytotoxicity risk with multi-functional property enhancement. Mater. Today Chem. 2020, 17, 100345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  64. Vasile, S.; Malengier, B.; De Raeve, A.; Musa, A.B.H. FTT comfort indices of ring-spun and air-jet knitted fabrics with post-treatments. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 254, 182016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  65. Saha, S.K.; Alam, M.R.; Repon, M.R.; Siddique, A.B.; Ali, A.; Chowdhury, T.A. Development of antimicrobial textile using in-situ AgNPs and evaluation of comfort performance for biomedical applications. SPE Polym. 2025, 6, e70001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  66. Tang, K.P.; Kan, C.W.; Fan, J.T.; Tso, S.L. Effect of softener and wetting agent on improving the flammability, comfort, and mechanical properties of flame-retardant finished cotton fabric. Cellulose 2017, 24, 2619–2634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  67. Rezaie, A.B.; Montazer, M.; Rad, M.M. Environmentally friendly low cost approach for nano copper oxide functionalization of cotton designed for antibacterial and photocatalytic applications. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 204, 425–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Figure 1. Experimental route to biogenic synthesis of CuO NPs.
Figure 1. Experimental route to biogenic synthesis of CuO NPs.
Textiles 06 00087 g001
Figure 2. UV—visible spectra of bio-synthesized CuO NPs reduced by lemon peel zest extract (a), FTIR spectrum (b) FESEM image with 30,000× magnification (c) and EDX spectrum (d) of green-synthesized CuO NPs.
Figure 2. UV—visible spectra of bio-synthesized CuO NPs reduced by lemon peel zest extract (a), FTIR spectrum (b) FESEM image with 30,000× magnification (c) and EDX spectrum (d) of green-synthesized CuO NPs.
Textiles 06 00087 g002
Figure 3. XRD of rice husk SiO2 NPs (a) and lemon peel zest extract-reduced CuO NPs (b).
Figure 3. XRD of rice husk SiO2 NPs (a) and lemon peel zest extract-reduced CuO NPs (b).
Textiles 06 00087 g003
Figure 4. Zeta potential distribution of green-synthesized (a) Chi-CuO-SiO2 (5g/L), (b) Chi-CuO-SiO2 (10g/L), and (c) Chi-CuO-SiO2 (20g/L) hybrid nanofluids.
Figure 4. Zeta potential distribution of green-synthesized (a) Chi-CuO-SiO2 (5g/L), (b) Chi-CuO-SiO2 (10g/L), and (c) Chi-CuO-SiO2 (20g/L) hybrid nanofluids.
Textiles 06 00087 g004
Figure 5. FTIR-ATR spectrum of various Chi-CuO-SiO2-deposited specimens.
Figure 5. FTIR-ATR spectrum of various Chi-CuO-SiO2-deposited specimens.
Textiles 06 00087 g005
Figure 6. FESEM image and EDX spectrum of untreated fabric (a,b), Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated fabric (c,d), Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L)-treated fabric (e,f) and Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-treated fabric (g,h) with 5000× magnifications, respectively.
Figure 6. FESEM image and EDX spectrum of untreated fabric (a,b), Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated fabric (c,d), Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L)-treated fabric (e,f) and Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-treated fabric (g,h) with 5000× magnifications, respectively.
Textiles 06 00087 g006
Figure 7. EDX mapping of (a) untreated, and (d) Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated fabric. Different color indicates the distribution of C and O on untreated fabric (b,c), and C, O, Si, Cu, and N on Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated fabric (ei).
Figure 7. EDX mapping of (a) untreated, and (d) Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated fabric. Different color indicates the distribution of C and O on untreated fabric (b,c), and C, O, Si, Cu, and N on Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated fabric (ei).
Textiles 06 00087 g007
Figure 8. Graphical representation of bacterial reduction% (S. aureus and E. coli) of unwashed and different Chi-CuO-SiO2-treated fabric with 1 h and 24 h contact time before and after five and 15 washing cycles.
Figure 8. Graphical representation of bacterial reduction% (S. aureus and E. coli) of unwashed and different Chi-CuO-SiO2-treated fabric with 1 h and 24 h contact time before and after five and 15 washing cycles.
Textiles 06 00087 g008
Figure 9. Digital disk photographs of viable bacteria after 1 h contact time before wash: (a) untreated, (b) Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-coated, (c) Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L), (d) Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-coated fabric for S. aureus, and (e) untreated, (f) Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-coated, (g) Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L), (h) Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-treated fabric for E. coli.
Figure 9. Digital disk photographs of viable bacteria after 1 h contact time before wash: (a) untreated, (b) Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-coated, (c) Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L), (d) Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-coated fabric for S. aureus, and (e) untreated, (f) Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-coated, (g) Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L), (h) Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-treated fabric for E. coli.
Textiles 06 00087 g009
Figure 10. Digital disk photographs of viable bacteria after 24 h contact time before wash: (a) untreated, (b) Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-coated, (c) Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L), (d) Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-coated fabric for S. aureus, and (e) untreated, (f) Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-coated, (g) Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L), (h) Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-treated fabric for E. coli.
Figure 10. Digital disk photographs of viable bacteria after 24 h contact time before wash: (a) untreated, (b) Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-coated, (c) Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L), (d) Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-coated fabric for S. aureus, and (e) untreated, (f) Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-coated, (g) Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L), (h) Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-treated fabric for E. coli.
Textiles 06 00087 g010
Figure 11. Transmission% of untreated and treated chitosan-loaded CuO-SiO2 hybrid nanofluid-treated fabric.
Figure 11. Transmission% of untreated and treated chitosan-loaded CuO-SiO2 hybrid nanofluid-treated fabric.
Textiles 06 00087 g011
Figure 12. Effect of tensile strength on extension% of (a) untreated, (b) Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated, (c) Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L)-treated and, (d) Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-treated fabric.
Figure 12. Effect of tensile strength on extension% of (a) untreated, (b) Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated, (c) Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L)-treated and, (d) Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-treated fabric.
Textiles 06 00087 g012
Figure 13. Finger print of moisture management properties of (a) untreated fabric, (b) Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated, (c) Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L)-treated, and (d) Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-treated fabric.
Figure 13. Finger print of moisture management properties of (a) untreated fabric, (b) Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated, (c) Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L)-treated, and (d) Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-treated fabric.
Textiles 06 00087 g013
Figure 14. Graphical depiction of FTT predicted primary of untreated and various chitosan-loaded CuO-SiO2 hybrid nanofluid-treated specimens.
Figure 14. Graphical depiction of FTT predicted primary of untreated and various chitosan-loaded CuO-SiO2 hybrid nanofluid-treated specimens.
Textiles 06 00087 g014
Figure 15. Microscopic image of Vero cells after unveiling to negative solvent (control) (a), Vero cells after exposure to positive solvent (b), Vero cells after exposure to positive solvent with Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated fabric (c) after 48 h of incubation time.
Figure 15. Microscopic image of Vero cells after unveiling to negative solvent (control) (a), Vero cells after exposure to positive solvent (b), Vero cells after exposure to positive solvent with Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated fabric (c) after 48 h of incubation time.
Textiles 06 00087 g015
Table 1. Thirteen FTT fabric indices with units and interpretation [35].
Table 1. Thirteen FTT fabric indices with units and interpretation [35].
Fabric IndicesIndexDescriptionUnit Given in FTT SoftwareInterpretations
BendingBARBending Average Rigiditygf mm rad−1Force needed to bend per radian
BWBending Workgf mm radWork needed to bend
Surface frictionSFCSurface Friction Coefficient-Friction coefficient on the surface with a ribbed plate
Surface roughnessSRASurface Roughness AmplitudeµmRoughness irregular wave amplitude
SRWSurface Roughness WavelengthmmRoughness irregular wave wavelength
CompressionCWCompression Workgf mmWork is needed to compress the specimen
CRRCompression Recovery Rate-Percentage of thickness changes after compression
CARCompression Average Rigiditygf mm−3Forces needed to compress per mm
RARRecovery Average Rigiditygf mm−3Forces reflected when recovery per mm
TThicknessmmThickness of the materials
Thermal conductivityTCCThermal Conductivity under Compression10−3 W m−1 °C−1Energy per degree per m per second transmitted under specimen compression
TCRThermal Conductivity under Recovery10−3 W m−1 °C−1Energy per degree per m per second transmitted under specimen recovery
QmaxThermal Maximum FluxW mm−2Maximum energy is transmitted during compression
Table 2. T% with ultraviolet protection factor of untreated and various Chi-CuO-SiO2-treated specimens.
Table 2. T% with ultraviolet protection factor of untreated and various Chi-CuO-SiO2-treated specimens.
SampleUV-A
(320–400) nm
UV-B
(290–320) nm
UV-R
(290–400) nm
UPF with Respect to the Average T %UPFUV Protection Category
Untreated84.1564.6169.435.96 ± 1.2-Insufficient
Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated4.63 ± 0.12.5 ± 0.183.58 ± 0.1131.29 ± 0.0530Very Good
Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L)-treated4.83 ± 0.633.16 ± 0.33.93 ± 0.2529.27 ± 0.9830Very Good
Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-treated2.74 ± 0.62.1 ± 0.522.47 ± 0.5241.5 ± 0.4340Excellent
Table 3. Mechanical properties of untreated and various Chi-CuO-SiO2 hybrid nanofluid-treated fabric.
Table 3. Mechanical properties of untreated and various Chi-CuO-SiO2 hybrid nanofluid-treated fabric.
SampleTensile Strength (N)Elongation %Tear Strength (N)
WarpWeftWarpWeftWarpWeft
Untreated857.45 ± 19.7520.91 ± 23.612.09 ± 0.1115.38 ± 0.39.62 ± 0.429.67 ± 0.3
Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-treated867.89 ± 18.48523.69 ± 37.5722.20 ± 0.3715.62 ± 0.228.7 ± 0.117.2 ± 0.32
Chi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L)-treated828.97 ± 62.91479.90 ± 49.9118.57 ± 1.06716.37 ± 0.618.8 ± 0.237.3 ± 0.15
Chi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-treated826.22 ± 12.63469.54 ± 21.8920.17 ± 0.1715.98 ± 0.578.9 ± 0.197 ± 0.14
Table 4. MMT test results of control and various chitosan-loaded CuO-SiO2 hybrid nanofluid-treated fabric.
Table 4. MMT test results of control and various chitosan-loaded CuO-SiO2 hybrid nanofluid-treated fabric.
Parameters UncoatedChi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-CoatedChi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L)-CoatedChi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-Coated
Wetting time (s)Top0.7493.1836.2726.365
Bottom1.9662.343.2765.71
Absorption rate (%/s)Top9.72439.77115.19612.82
Bottom16.546347.338425.0832.08
Max wetted radius(mm)Top25302020
Bottom25302520
Spreading speed (mm/s)Top8.16978.07813.672.46
Bottom5.69936.03654.362.30
One-way transport capability (%) 147.6503414.043405.46395.84
Overall moisture management 0.48780.85370.79190.6701
Table 5. Outcomes of FTT indices of untreated and chitosan-loaded CuO-SiO2 hybrid nanofluid-treated fabric.
Table 5. Outcomes of FTT indices of untreated and chitosan-loaded CuO-SiO2 hybrid nanofluid-treated fabric.
ParametersIndicesUnit Given in FTT SoftwareUntreatedChi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-TreatedChi-CuO-SiO2(10g/L)-TreatedChi-CuO-SiO2(20g/L)-Treated
BendingBARagf mm rad−1752.6271.6268.58128.48
BARegf mm rad−11013.778.48671.791582.52
BWagf mm rad2590.46374.03331.90355.68
BWegf mm rad3174.07463.72062.473811.89
CompressionTMm0.420.420.390.38
CWgf mm2003.56668.13825.161036.37
CRR-0.400.640.580.53
CARgf mm−3149.30328.85419.45434.20
RARgf mm−3825.371139.611333.701548.76
FluxTCC10−3 W m−1 °C−143.1748.1547.8740.24
TCR10−3 W m−1 °C−143.7449.8849.6644.76
QmaxW mm−21203.571348.731269.941252.65
FrictionSFCa-0.280.310.320.33
SFCe-0.280.310.310.31
RoughnessSRAaµm16.913.889.458.69
SRAeµm15.418.535.987.16
SRWaMm1.130.530.520.68
SRWeMm1.180.370.470.63
Table 6. Viable cell percentage with data interpretation for various specimens.
Table 6. Viable cell percentage with data interpretation for various specimens.
TreatmentWellCells SeededViable Cells CountedCell Survival (%)Average Cell Survival (%)
Solvent (−)11.5 × 1041.5 × 104100100
Solvent (−)21.5 × 1041.5 × 104100
Solvent (+)11.5 × 1041.44 × 1049696.35
Solvent (+)21.5 × 1041.45 × 10496.7
Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-Treated (1)11.5 × 1041.43 × 10495.395.8
Chi-CuO-SiO2(5g/L)-Treated (2)21.5 × 1041.445 × 10496.3
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aktek, M.T.; Ali, M. Novel Eco-Friendly Chitosan-Loaded CuO-SiO2 Coating on Cotton Fabric for Durable, Multifunctional, and Mechanical Properties. Textiles 2026, 6, 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles6030087

AMA Style

Aktek MT, Ali M. Novel Eco-Friendly Chitosan-Loaded CuO-SiO2 Coating on Cotton Fabric for Durable, Multifunctional, and Mechanical Properties. Textiles. 2026; 6(3):87. https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles6030087

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aktek, Mst. Tania, and Mohammad Ali. 2026. "Novel Eco-Friendly Chitosan-Loaded CuO-SiO2 Coating on Cotton Fabric for Durable, Multifunctional, and Mechanical Properties" Textiles 6, no. 3: 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles6030087

APA Style

Aktek, M. T., & Ali, M. (2026). Novel Eco-Friendly Chitosan-Loaded CuO-SiO2 Coating on Cotton Fabric for Durable, Multifunctional, and Mechanical Properties. Textiles, 6(3), 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles6030087

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop