Tissue Culture for Conservation of Coastal Plant Species in the Baltic Sea Region: A Review of Protocols, Opportunities, and Challenges
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Analysis of Tissue Culture Studies with Coastal Plant Species
3.1. Alismataceae
3.2. Cyperaceae
3.3. Iridaceae
3.4. Juncaceae
3.5. Juncaginaceae
3.6. Poaceae
3.7. Amaranthaceae
3.8. Apiaceae
3.9. Asteraceae
3.10. Boraginaceae
3.11. Brassicaceae
3.12. Caryophyllaceae
3.13. Crassulaceae
3.14. Euphorbiaceae
3.15. Fabaceae
3.16. Gentianaceae
3.17. Lamiaceae
3.18. Malvaceae
3.19. Orobanchaceae
3.20. Papaveraceae
3.21. Plantaginaceae
3.22. Plumbaginaceae
3.23. Polygonaceae
3.24. Primulaceae
3.25. Ranunculaceae
4. Successes and Challenges Identified
4.1. Tissue Cultures and Propagation In Vitro
4.2. Long-Term Storage of Tissue Cultures by Slow Growth
4.3. Long-Term Storage of Tissue Cultures by Cryopreservation
4.4. Functional Studies and Other Applications
4.5. Aspects of Genetic Diversity
4.6. Importance of Technological Advances
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| 2,4D | 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid |
| BA | 6-Benzylaminopurine/6-benzyladenine |
| GA3 | Gibberellic acid |
| IAA | Indole-3-acetic acid |
| IBA | Indole-3-butyric acid |
| IPA | Indole-3-propionic acid |
| KN | Kinetin |
| LN | Liquid nitrogen |
| mINO | myo-Inositol |
| MS | Murashige & Skoog |
| NAA | Naphthaleene-3-acetic acid |
| PGRs | Plant growth regulators |
| TDZ | Thidiazuron |
| TIBS | Temporary immersion bioreactor system |
References
- CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity). Decision Adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity on 1 November 2024. UN Environment Programme, CBD/CP/DEC/16/20. Available online: https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-16/cop-16-dec-20-en.pdf (accessed on 10 October 2025).
- Pence, V.C. Evaluating costs for the in vitro propagation and preservation of endangered plants. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2011, 47, 176–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, S.M.; Nakhooda, M. Clonal and micropropagation. In Encyclopedia of Applied Plant Sciences; Breeding Genetic and Biotechnology; Thomas, B., Murphy, D.J., Murray, B.G., Eds.; Elsevier Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; Volume 2, pp. 428–432. [Google Scholar]
- Pence, V.C. In vitro methods and the challenge of exceptional species for Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 2013, 99, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skarpaas, O.; Stabbetrop, O.E. Diaspore ecology of Mertensia maritima: Effects of physical treatments and their relative timing on dispersal and germination. OIKOS 2001, 95, 374–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lah, N.H.C.; El Enshasy, H.A.; Mediani, A.; Azizan, K.A.; Aizat, W.M.; Tan, J.K.; Afzan, A.; Noor, N.M.; Rohani, E.R. An insight into the behaviour of recalcitrant seeds by understanding their molecular changes upon desiccation and low temperature. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banaszczyk, L.; Starke, M.; Szelbracikowski, D.; Kapusta, M. Kultury in vitro w ochronie gatunków cennych dla bioróżnorodności. Alcumena 2023, 2, 73–83. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, D.; Su, P.; Gao, Y.; Chen, X.; Kan, W.; Hou, J.; Wu, L. Efficient plant regeneration through direct shoot organogenesis and two-step rooting in Eucommia ulmoides Oliver. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1444878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatia, S. Application of plant biotechnology. In Modern Applications of Plant Biotechnology in Pharmaceutical Sciences; Bhatia, S., Dahiya, R., Sharma, K., Bera, T., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 157–207. [Google Scholar]
- Taha, R.A.; Allam, M.A.; Hassan, S.A.M.; Bakr, B.M.M.; Hassan, M.M. Thidiazuron-induced direct organogenesis from immature inflorescence of three date palm cultivars. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2021, 19, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fehér, A. Somatic embryogenesis—Stress-induced remodeling of plant cell fate. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1849, 385–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- García-Hernández, E.; Loera-Quezada, M.M.; Morán-Velázquez, D.C.; López, M.G.; Chable-Vega, M.A.; Santillán-Fernández, A.; Zavaleta-Mancera, H.A.; Tang, J.Z.; Azadi, P.; Ibarra-Laclette, E.; et al. Indirect organogenesis for high frequency shoot regeneration of two cultivars of Sansevieria trifasciata Prain differing in fiber production. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 8507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mosoh, D.A.; Khandel, A.K.; Verma, S.K.; Vendrame, W.A. Optimizing callus induction and indirect organogenesis in non-dormant corm explants of Gloriosa superba (L.) via media priming. Front. Hortic. 2024, 3, 1378098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majumder, S.; Igamberdiev, A.U.; Debnath, S.C. Somaclonal variation and clonal fidelity in commercial micropropagation: Challenges and perspectives. Agronomy 2025, 15, 1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, Y.; Yang, Y.; Pan, G.; Shen, Y. New insights into tissue culture plant-regeneration mechanisms. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 926752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, Y.; Zhan, Y.; Fu, Q.; Li, S.; Sun, X.; Wang, Y.; Yu, M.; Qin, D.; Huo, J.; Zhu, C. Plant regeneration via somatic embryogenesis and indirect organogenesis in blue honeysuckle (Lonicera caerulea L.). Horticulturae 2023, 9, 996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Sousa, P.C.A.; e Souza, S.S.S.; Nogueira, G.F.; de Araújo Silva-Cardoso, I.M.; Scherwinski-Pereira, J.E. Indirect somatic embryogenesis of Piper hispidinervum L. and evaluation of the regenerated plants by flow cytometry. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2022, 20, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ahmed, M.W.A.-M. An efficient protocol for indirect somatic embryogenesis and shoot organogenesis from leaf segments of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cv. Quntar. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2015, 10, 1031–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pulianmackal, A.J.; Kareem, A.V.K.; Durgaprasad, K.; Trivedi, Z.B.; Prasad, K. Competence and regulatory interactions during regeneration in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belaizi, M.; Paul, H.; Sangwan, R.S.; Sangwan-Norreel, B.S. Direct organogenesis from internodal segments of in vitro grown shoots of apple cv. Golden delicious. Plant Cell Rep. 1991, 9, 471–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mežaka, I.; Kļaviņa, D.; Kaļāne, L.; Kronberga, A. Large-scale in vitro propagation and ex vitro adaptation of the endangered medicinal plant Eryngium maritimum L. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakurte, I.; Berga, M.; Mežaka, I. Phytochemical diversity comparison in leaves and roots of wild and micropropagated Latvian sea holly (Eryngium maritimum L.). Molecules 2023, 28, 3924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arya, S.S.; Rookes, J.E.; Cahill, D.M.; Lenka, S.K. Next-generation metabolic engineering approaches towards development of plant cell suspension cultures as specialized metabolite producing biofactories. Biotechnol. Adv. 2020, 45, 107635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wijerathna-Yapa, A.; Hiti-Bandaralage, J. Tissue culture—A sustainable approach to explore plant stresses. Life 2023, 13, 780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Purmale, L.; Osvalde, A.; Karlsons, A.; Ievinsh, G. Comparison of two subspecies of a halophytic multi-use plant Mertensia maritima in vitro and ex vitro: Propagation, salinity tolerance and mineral nutrition. Environ. Exp. Biol. 2024, 22, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wochok, Z.S. The role of tissue culture in preserving threatened and endangered plant species. Biol. Conserv. 1981, 20, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fay, M.F. Conservation of rare and endangered plants using in vitro methods. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 1992, 28, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fay, M.F. In what situations is in vitro culture appropriate to plant conservations? Biodivers. Conserv. 1994, 3, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, K.A. In vitro conservation including rare and endangered plants, heritage plants and important agricultural plants. In The Importance of Tissue Culture and Biotechnology in Plant Sciences; Taji, A., Williams, R., Eds.; University of New England Publications Unit: Amidale, Australia, 2002; pp. 79–90. [Google Scholar]
- Sarasan, V.; Cripps, R.; Ramsay, M.M.; Atherton, C.; McMichen, M.; Prendergast, G.; Rowntree, J.K. Conservation in vitro of threatened plants—Progress in the past decade. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2006, 42, 206–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Engelmann, F. Use of biotechnologies for the conservation of plant biodiversity. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2011, 47, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pence, V.C. The possibilities and challenges of in vitro methods for plant conservation. Kew Bull. 2010, 65, 539–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pathak, M.R.; Abido, M.S. The role of biotechnology in the conservation of biodiversity. J. Exp. Biol. Agric. Sci. 2014, 2, 352–363. [Google Scholar]
- Shahzad, A.; Parveen, S.; Sharma, S.; Shaheen, A.; Saeed, T.; Yadav, V.; Akhtar, R.; Ahmad, Z.; Upadhay, A. Plant tissue culture: Applications in plant improvement and conservation. In Plant Biotechnology: Principles and Applications; Abdin, M.Z., Kiran, U., Kamaluddin, A.A., Eds.; Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore, 2017; pp. 37–72. [Google Scholar]
- Oseni, O.M.; Pande, V.; Nailwal, T.K. A review on plant tissue culture, a technique for propagation and conservation of endangered plant species. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2018, 7, 3778–3786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thakur, J.; Abbas, N.S.; Bhardwaj, S.; Kaula, B.C. Biotechnological tools in the propagation and conservation of threatened species: An overview. Indian J. Biotechnol. 2021, 20, 217–235. [Google Scholar]
- Ruikar, S.S.; Pathade, A.G.; Ghatage, A.A. The role of plant tissue culture in ex situ conservation of biodiversity. Nat. Camp. 2024, 28, 206–211. [Google Scholar]
- Cruz-Cruz, C.A.; González-Arnao, M.T.; Engelmann, F. Biotechnology and conservation of plant biodiversity. Resources 2013, 2, 73–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coelho, N.; Gonçalves, S.; Romano, A. Endemic plant species conservation: Biotechnological approaches. Plants 2020, 9, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chauhan, R.; Singh, V.; Quraishi, A. In vitro conservation through slow-growth storage. In Synthetic Seeds; Faisal., M., Alatar, A.A., Eds.; Springer Nature Switzerland AG: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 397–416. [Google Scholar]
- Kulak, V.; Longboat, S.; Brunet, N.D.; Shukla, M.; Saxena, P. In vitro technology in plant conservation: Relevance to biocultural diversity. Plants 2022, 11, 503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González-Benito, M.E.; Martin, C. In vitro preservation of Spanish biodiversity. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2011, 47, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radomir, A.-M.; Stan, R.; Florea, A.; Ciobotea, C.-M.; Bănuță, F.M.; Negru, M.; Neblea, M.A.; Sumedrea, D.I. Overview of the success of in vitro culture for ex situ conservation and sustainable utilization of endemic and subendemic native plants of Romania. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sankararamasubramanian, H.M.; Selvam, V.; Parida, A. Biotechnological tools for the conservation and enhancement of coastal ecosystem. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. B Biol. Sci. 2012, 82, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tyler, T.; Herbertsson, L.; Olofsson, J.; Olsson, P.A. Ecological indicator and traits values for Swedish vascular plants. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 120, 106923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bona, C.; Moryel Pellanda, R.; Bergmann Carlucci, M.; Giese de Paula Machado, R.; Ciccarelli, D. Functional traits reveal coastal vegetation assembly patterns in a short edaphic gradient in southern Brazil. Flora 2020, 271, 151661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciccarelli, D.; Bona, C. Exploring the functional strategies adopted by coastal plants along an ecological gradient using morpho-functional traits. Estuaries Coasts 2022, 45, 114–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ievinsh, G. Biological basis of biological diversity: Physiological adaptations of plants to heterogeneous habitats along a sea coast. Acta Univ. Latv. 2006, 710, 53–79. [Google Scholar]
- Custódio, L.; Charles, G.; Magné, C.; Barba-Espín, G.; Piqueras, A.; Hernández, J.A.; Hamed, K.B.; Castañeda-Loaiza, V.; Fernandes, E.; Rodrigues, M.J. Application of in vitro plant tissue culture techniques to halophyte species: A review. Plants 2023, 12, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- van der Maarel, E.; van der Maarel-Versluys, M. Distribution and conservation status of littoral vascular plant species along the European coasts. J. Coast. Conserv. 1996, 2, 73–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, C.-F.; Qin, P.; Xie, M. Vegetating coastal areas of east China: Species selection, seedling cloning and transplantation. Ecol. Eng. 2003, 20, 275–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kļaviņa, D.; Gailīte, A.; Ievinsh, G. Initial responses of explants from rare and endangered coastal plant species during initiation of tissue culture. Acta Univ. Latv. 2006, 710, 81–91. [Google Scholar]
- Panayotova, L.G.; Ivanova, T.A.; Bogdanova, Y.Y.; Gussev, C.V.; Stanilova, M.I.; Bosseva, Y.Z.; Stoeva, T.D. In vitro cultivation of plant species from sandy dunes along the Bulgarian Black Sea coast. Phytol. Balcan. 2008, 14, 119–123. [Google Scholar]
- Romano, G.; Ricci, G.F.; Leronni, V.; Venerito, P.; Gentile, F. Soil bioengineering techniques for Mediterranean coastal dune restoration using autochthonous vegetation species. J. Coast. Conserv. 2022, 26, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ievinsh, G. Creating a conceptual framework for analysis of vascular plant diversity in a coastal landscape: Functional aspects and ecosystem services for plants at the Baltic Sea. Environ. Exp. Biol. 2024, 22, 201–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chytrý, M.; Tichý, L.; Hennekens, S.M.; Knollová, I.; Janssen, J.A.M.; Rodwell, J.S.; Peterka, T.; Marcenò, C.; Landucci, F.; Danihelka, J.; et al. EUNIS Habitat Classification: Expert system, characteristic species combinations and distribution maps of European habitats. Appl. Veg. Sci. 2020, 23, 648–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, M.; Lin, Z.; Luo, C.; Chi, Z.; Mo, Z.; He, F.; Jiang, W.; Chen, L.; He, X.; Wei, S. High efficiency of propagation for Sagittaria sagittifolia using a temporary immersion bioreactor system. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. A 2016, 6, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Kane, M.E.; Philman, N.L.; Emshousen, C. Wetland plant propagation: Comparative growth and reproduction of micropropagated Sagittaria latifolia ecotypes. In Combined Proceedings of the International Plant Propagators’ Society; International Plant Propagators’ Society: Bellefonte, PA, USA, 2002; Volume 52, pp. 43–459. [Google Scholar]
- Kļaviņa, D.; Kļaviņa, D. Ex situ conservation of endangered plant species of Latvia by slow growth storage. Environ. Exp. Biol. 2018, 16, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogers, S.M.D. Tissue culture and wetland establishment of the freshwater monocots Carex, Juncus, Scirpus, and Typha. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2003, 39, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banaszczyk, L.; Kapusta, M.; Rojek, J.; Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno, M. Effective germination strategies for the coastal dune pioneer Carex arenaria L. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2025, 160, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Czakó, M.; Feng, X.; He, Y.; Liang, D.; Márton, L. Genetic modification of wetland grasses for phytoremediation. Z. Für Naturforsch. 2005, 60, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, M.; Jiang, W.; Wei, S.; Lin, Z.; Cai, B.; Yang, L.; Luo, C.; He, X.; Tan, J.; Chen, L. High efficiency propagation of Chinese water chestnut [Eleocharis dulcis (Burm.f.) Trin ex Hensch] using a temporary immersion bioreactor system. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2015, 121, 761–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Seliskar, D.M.; Gallagher, J.L. Growth of tissue culture-regenerated salt marsh monocots in a simulated marsh field plot: Implication for wetland creation and restoration. Ecol. Eng. 2007, 29, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rossetto, M.; Dixon, K.W.; Meney, K.A.; Bunn, E. In vitro propagation of Chinese Puzzle (Caustis dioica Cyperaceae)—A commercial sedge species from Western Australia. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1992, 30, 65–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panaia, M.; Bunn, E.; McComb, J. Primary and repetitive secondary somatic embryogenesis of Lepidosperma drummondii (Cyperaceae) and Baloskion tetraphyllum (Restionaceae) for land restoration and horticulture. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2011, 47, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rewers, M.; Kisiala, A.; Drouin, J.; Sliwinska, E.; Cholewa, E. In vitro-regenerated wetland sedge Eriophorum vaginatum L. is genetically stable. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2012, 34, 2197–2206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kodym, A.; Clarke, I.; Aponte, C.; Turner, S.; Bunn, E.; Delpratt, J. Large-scale micropropagation of the Australian key species Gahnia radula (Cyperaceae) and its return to revegetation sites. Aust. J. Bot. 2014, 62, 417–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, S.; Menon, A.; Turner, S.; Kodym, A.; Bunn, E. Development of an in vitro protocol for a difficult-to-propagate endemic Australian dryland sedge species Mesomelaena pseudostygia (Cyperaceae). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2014, 50, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ascough, G.D.; Erwin, J.E.; van Staden, J. Micropropagation of Iridaceae—A review. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2009, 97, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jevremović, S.; Jeknić, Z.; Subotić, A. Micropropagation of Iris sp. In Protocols for Micropropagation of Selected Economically-Important Horticultural Plants; Lombardi, M., Ed.; Springer Science & Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 291–303. [Google Scholar]
- Tikhomirova, L.I. Scientific framework for selecting explants of Iris L. genus for direct shoot regeneration. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 421, 052014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dolganova, Z.V.; Tikhomirova, L.I. Reproduction methods of Iris spuria varieties in the forest steppe of the Altai Territory. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 941, 012034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Safari, N.; Tehranifar, A.; Kharrazi, M.; Shoor, M. Micropropagation of endangered Iris ferdowsii Joharchi & Memariani through callus induction. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2023, 154, 595–604. [Google Scholar]
- Meucci, A.; Ghelardi, C.; Maggini, R.; Malorgio, F.; Chietera, G.; Mensuali, A. Micropropagation via somatic embryogenesis of Iris pallida Lam. ecotypes. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2024, 158, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Du, Y.; Rahman, M.M.; Tang, B.; Fan, L.-J.; Kilaru, A. Establishment of an efficient in vitro propagation system for Iris sanguinea. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 17100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Petolescu, C.; Lapadatescu, S.; Velicevici, G.; Danci, M.; Lazar, A.; Cretescu, L.; Bala, M. Genetic stability of micropropagated Iris germanica L. varieties assessed by RAPD markers. Roman. Biotechnol. Lett. 2014, 19, 9778–9784. [Google Scholar]
- Ievinsh, G. Halophytic clonal plant species: Important functional aspects for existence in heterogeneous saline habitats. Plants 2023, 12, 1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vyas, K.D.; Ranawat, B.; Singh, A. Development of high frequency cost-effective micropropagation protocol for Juncus rigidus using liquid culture medium and extraction of cellulose from their in vitro shoots—An important rush. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 35, 102099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Seliskar, D.M.; Gallagher, J.L. Tissue culture and plant regeneration of the salt marsh monocots Juncus roemerianus and Juncus gerardi. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2005, 41, 274–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaněk, T.; Mot’ková, K.; Podlipná, R. Accumulation of cadmium by halophytic and non-halophytic Juncus species. Theor. Exp. Plant Physiol. 2016, 28, 415–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niino, T.; Tanaka, D.; Tantely, R.R.; Fukui, K.; Shirata, K. Cryopreservation of basal stem buds of in vitro-grown mat rush (Juncus spp.) by vitrification. CryoLetters 2007, 28, 197–206. [Google Scholar]
- Giri, C.C.; Praveena, M. In vitro regeneration, somatic hybridization and genetic transformation studies: An appraisal for biotechnological interventions in grasses. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2015, 120, 843–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balestri, E.; Luccarini, G.; Cinelli, F. Isolation of leaf protoplasts from Pancratium maritimum L. and two other dune plants: Possible applications. J. Coast. Res. 2001, 17, 188–194. [Google Scholar]
- Twardovska, M.; Konvalyuk, I.; Lystvan, K.; Andreev, I.; Parnikoza, I.; Kunakh, V. Phenolic and flavonoid contents in Deschampsia antarctica plants growing in nature and cultured in vitro. Pol. Polar Res. 2021, 42, 97–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zamora, P.; Rasmussen, S.; Pardo, A.; Prieto, H.; Zúñiga, G.E. Antioxidant responses of in vitro shoots of Deschampsia antarctica to polyethylene glycol treatment. Antarct. Sci. 2010, 22, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cuba, M.; Gutiérrez-Moraga, A.; Butendieck, B.; Gidekel, M. Micropropagation of Deschampsia antarctica—A frost resistant Antarctic plant. Antarct. Sci. 2005, 17, 69–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osorio, J.; Calderón, C.; Gutiérrez-Moraga, A.; Gidekel, M. The effects of growth regulators and a scanning electron microscope study of somatic embryogenesis in Antartic hair grass (Deschampsia antarctica Desv.). Polar Biol. 2014, 37, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sequeida, Á.; Tapia, E.; Ortega, M.; Zamora, P.; Castro, Á.; Montes, C.; Zúñiga, G.E.; Prieto, H. Production of phenolic metabolites by Deschampsia antarctica shoots using UV-B treatments during cultivation in a photobioreactor. Electr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 15, 7. [Google Scholar]
- Jin, C.-W.; Sun, Y.-L.; Hong, S.-K. Recent advances in plant tissue culture of the halophyte Leymus chinensis T. (Poaceaea). Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2011, 6, 4412–4423. [Google Scholar]
- Regalado González, J.J.; Berdion, V.; Tossi, V.E.; Iannone, L.J.; Pitta-Alvarez, S.I.; Novas, M.V. Influence of Epichloë coenophiala, a seed-borne endophyte, on the micropropagation of tall fescue. Mycol. Prog. 2020, 19, 1301–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regalado, J.J.; Vignale, M.V.; Novas, M.V.; Pitta-Alvarez, S.I.; Iannone, L.J. Epichloë occultans enhances micropropagation efficiency in Lolium multiflorum. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2017, 130, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Binh, D.Q.; Heszky, L.E.; Gyulai, G.; Kiss, E.; Csillag, A. Plant regeneration from callus of Puccinellia distans (L.) Parl. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1989, 18, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.L.; Fang, Q.; Guo, W.L.; Fei, R.; Yu, X.M.; Zhang, J.L. Assessment of genetic instabilities induced by tissue culture in alkaligrass. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2016, 63, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mei, B.; No, E.G.; McWilliams, E.L.; Gould, J.H.; Newton, R.J. In vitro regeneration of fourwing saltbush [Atriplex canescens (Pursh) Nutt.]. J. Range Manag. 1997, 50, 413–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reyes-Vera, I.; Potenza, C.; Barrow, J. Hyperhydricity reversal and clonal propagation of four-wing saltbush (Atriplex canescens, Chenopodiaceae) cultivated in vitro. Aust. J. Bot. 2008, 56, 358–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uchida, A.; Nagamiya, K.; Takabe, T. Transformation of Atriplex gmelini plants from callus lines using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2003, 75, 51–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Halfaoui, Y.; Kadiri, A.; Ighilhariz, Z. Atriplex halimus (Amarantacees) callogenesis induction from different explant type. J. Fundam. Appl. Sci. 2018, 10, 20–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Aldahhak, O.; Zaid, S.; Abdul-Kader, A.M. Development of in vitro propagation system for Atriplex halimus L. Int. J. Hortic. Sci. 2014, 20, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vinod, K.; Sabah, A.; Anisha, S.; Hamed, A.-A.; Fadila, A.-S.; Sindhu, N. High-frequency multiple shoot induction from nodal segments and assessment of genetic homogeneity of micropropagated Atriplex halimus L. Res. J. Biotechnol. 2019, 14, 7–15. [Google Scholar]
- Muñoz-Alcayaga, C.; Soto, J.; Román-Figueroa, C.; Paneque, M. Ex situ conservation of Atriplex taltalensis I.M. Johnst. via in vitro culturing of its axillary shoots. Diversity 2023, 15, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neddjimi, B.; Daoud, Y.; Touati, M. Growth, water relations, proline and ion content of in vitro cultured Atriplex halimus subsp. schweinfurthii as affected by CaCl2. Commun. Biometry Crop Sci. 2006, 1, 79–89. [Google Scholar]
- Saunders, J.W.; Doley, W.P. One step shoot regeneration from callus of whole plant leaf explants of sugarbeet lines and somaclonal variant for in vitro behavior. J. Plant Physiol. 1986, 124, 473–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, Z.; Smith, H.G.; Thomas, T.H. In vitro culture of petioles and intact leaves of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Plant Growth Regul. 1993, 12, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacq, B.; Tétu, T.; Sangwan, R.S.; De Laat, A.; Sangwan-Norreel, B.S. Plant regeneration from sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) hypocotyls cultured in vitro and flow cytometric nuclear DNA analysis of regenerants. Plant Cell Rep. 1992, 11, 329–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kulshrestha, S.; Coutts, R.H.A. Direct somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from mature sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) zygotic cotyledons. Plant Growth Regul. 1997, 22, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ergül, A.; Khabbazi, S.D.; Oğuz, M.Ç.; Özmen, C.Y.; Gürel, S.; Gürel, E. In vitro multiplication of wild relatives in genus Beta conserves the invaluable threatened germplasms. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2018, 134, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gürel, S.; Topal, E.; Gürel, E. The effect of pretreating seedlings with TDZ on direct shoot regeneration from petiole explants of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Asia Pac. J. Mol. Biol. Biotechnol. 2003, 11, 57–62. [Google Scholar]
- Gürel, E.; Wren, M.J. In vitro development from leaf explants of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Rhizogenesis and the effect of sequential exposure to auxin and cytokinin. Ann. Bot. 1995, 75, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Smith, M.K.; Mccomb, J.A. Effect of NaCl on the growth of whole plants and their corresponding callus cultures. Austr. J. Plant Physiol. 1981, 8, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- von Hedenström, H.; Breckle, S.-W. Obligate halophytes? A test with tissue culture methods. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 1974, 74, 183–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hüsemann, W.; Plohr, A.; Barz, W. Photosynthetic characteristics of photomixotrophic and photoautotrophic cell suspension cultures of Chenopodium rubrum. Protoplasma 1979, 100, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peters, W.; Ritter, J.; Tiller, H.; Valdes, O.; Renner, U.; Fountain, M.; Beck, E. Growth, ageing and death of a photoautotrophic plant cell culture. Planta 2000, 210, 478–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knösche, R.; Günter, G. A cell division cycle in suspension cultures from Chenopodium album with unspecific arrest at G1 and G2 phase under stationary growth conditions. Biol. Zenytralblatt 1988, 107, 653–661. [Google Scholar]
- Burnouf-Radosevich, M.; Paupardin, C. Vegetative propagation of Chenopodium quinoa by shoot tip culture. Am. J. Bot. 1985, 72, 278–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regalado, J.J.; Tossi, V.E.; Burrieza, H.P.; Encina, C.L.; Pitta-Alvarez, S.I. Micropropagation protocol for coastal quinoa. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2020, 142, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zanella, L.; Vianello, F. Functional food from endangered ecosystems: Atriplex portulacoides as a case study. Foods 2020, 9, 1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cárdenas-Pérez, S.; Piernik, A.; Chanona-Pérez, J.J.; Grigore, M.N.; Perea-Flores, M.J. An overview of the emerging trends of the Salicornia L. genus as a sustainable crop. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2021, 191, 104606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aghaleh, M.; Niknam, V.; Ebrahimzadeh, H.; Razavi, K. Antioxidative enzymes in two in vitro cultured Salicornia species in response to increasing salinity. Biol. Plant. 2014, 58, 391–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, X.-L.; Han, H.-P.; Shi, W.-L.; Li, Y.-X. NaCl and TDZ are two key factors for the improvement of in vitro regeneration rate of Salicornia europaea L. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2006, 48, 1185–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, A.; Jani, K.; Kumari, P.; Agarwal, P.K. Effect of MgCl2 and double concentration of Murashige and Skoog medium on in vitro plantlet and root cultures generation in halophytic grasswort Salicornia brachiata. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2015, 120, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joshi, M.; Mishra, A.; Jha, B. NaCl plays a key role for in vitro micropropagation of Salicornia brachiata, an extreme halophyte. Ind. Crops Prod. 2012, 35, 313–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rathore, M.S.; Paliwal, N.; Anand, K.G.V.; Agarwal, P.K. Somatic embryogenesis and in vitro plantlet regeneration in Salicornia brachiata Roxb. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2015, 120, 355–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, V.; Ramawat, K.G. Salt stress enhanced antioxidant response in callus of three halophytes (Salsola baryosma, Trianthema triquetra, Zygophyllum simplex) of Thar Desert. Biologia 2014, 69, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amini, F.; Ghanbarzadeh, Z.; Askary, M. Biochemical and physiological response of Salsola arbuscula callus to salt stress. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. A Sci. 2017, 41, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stefaniak, B.; Woźny, A.; Li, V. Plant micropropagation and callus induction of some annual Salsola species. Biol. Plant. 2003, 46, 305–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Behr, J.H.; Bouchereau, A.; Berardocco, S.; Seal, C.E.; Flowers, T.J.; Zörb, C. Metabolic and physiological adjustment of Suaeda maritima to combined salinity and hypoxia. Ann. Bot. 2017, 119, 965–976. [Google Scholar]
- Mohamed, E.; Matsuda, R.; El-Khatib, A.A.; Takechi, K.; Takano, H.; Takio, S. Differential tolerance to high salt with regard to cell growth and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in calluses of the halophyte Suaeda maritima from Japan and Egypt. Plant Omics J. 2016, 9, 81–89. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, A.; Chikara, J.; Pandya, J.B. Plant regeneration from callus cultures in Suaeda nudiflora (Wild.) Moq. Indian J. Biotechnol. 2004, 3, 454–456. [Google Scholar]
- Mohammadi, M.A.; Xu, M.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wai, M.H.; Rizwan, H.M.; An, C.; Aslam, M.; Zhang, C.; Wang, G.; et al. A highly efficient organogenesis system based on 6-benzylaminopurine and indole-6-butyric acid in Suaeda glauca—A medicinal halophyte under varying photoperiods. Ind. Crops Prod. 2024, 216, 118672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, S.; Ruan, Y.; Wang, B. Tissue culture and plant regeneration from immature inflorescence explants of Suaeda salsa. Chin. Bull. Bot. 2006, 23, 52–55. [Google Scholar]
- Cerrillo-Rojas, G.V.; Tiscareño-Andrade, M.; Ochoa-Alfaro, A.E.; Balch, E.P.-M.; Soria-Guerra, R.E.; Morales-Domínguez, J.F. In vitro propagation, isolation and expression studies of Suaeda edulis genes involved in the osmoprotectant biosynthesis. Phyton Int. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 89, 715–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalbekova, K.; Ziyavitdinov, J. Biotechnological assessment of Suaeda arcuate under in vitro conditions. Adv. Biosci. Biotechnol. 2023, 14, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frese, L.; Bönisch, M.; Nachtigall, M.; Schirmak, U. Patterns of genetic diversity and implications for in situ conservation of wild celery (Apium graveolens L. ssp. graveolens). Agriculture 2018, 8, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nadel, B.L.; Altman, A.; Ziv, M. Regulation of somatic embryogenesis in celery cell suspensions. 1. Promoting effects of mannitol on somatic embryo development. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1989, 18, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vítová, L.; Stodlková, E.; Bartoníčková, A.; Lipavská, H. Mannitol utilisation by celery (Apium graveolens) plants grown under different conditions in vitro. Plant Sci. 2002, 163, 907–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCormick, N.; Ford, R.; Rodoni, B. Production and Assessment of Virus Resistant Carrot and Celery Cultivars for the Fresh Market; Horticulture Australia: Sydney, Australia, 2006; 93p, ISBN 0734112661. [Google Scholar]
- Meier, P.; Hotti, H.; Rischer, H. Elicitation of furanocoumarins in poison hemlock (Conium maculatum L.) cell culture. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2015, 123, 443–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kikowska, M.; Chanaj-Kaczmarek, J.; Derda, M.; Budzianowska, A.; Thiem, B.; Ekiert, H.; Szopa, A. The evaluation of phenolic acids and flavonoids content and antiprotozoal activity of Eryngium species biomass produced by biotechnological methods. Molecules 2022, 27, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kikowska, M.; Thiem, B.; Sliwinska, E.; Rewers, M.; Kowalczyk, M.; Stochmal, A.; Oleszek, W. The effect of nutritional factors and plant growth regulators on micropropagation and production of phenolic acids and saponins from plantlets and adventitious root cultures of Eryngium maritimum L. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2014, 33, 809–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koh, G.C.; Ahn, C.S. Production and developmental pattern of embryogenic callus in Oenanthe javanica (Bl.) DC. Korean J. Plant Tissue Cult. 1995, 22, 283–289. [Google Scholar]
- Koh, G.C.; Ahn, C.S. Production of somatic embryos in Oenanthe javanica (BL.) DC. Korean J. Plant Tissue Cult. 1997, 24, 107–112. [Google Scholar]
- Bora, K.S.; Sharma, A. The genus Artemisia: A comprehensive review. Pharm. Biol. 2010, 49, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nabi, N.; Saffeullah, P.; Singh, S. Micropropagation using direct and indirect organogenesis in Artemisia maritima L.: Scanning electron microscopy of somatic embryos and genome size analysis by flow cytometry. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2022, 58, 1012–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Georgieva, Z.E.; Atanasov, N.T.; Hristova, P.D.; Konstantinova, Z.M.; Todorova, C.G. Efficient protocol for mass propagation of Artemisia annua L. GSC Biol. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018, 5, 59–68. [Google Scholar]
- Blando, F.; Rizzello, F.; Durante, M.; De Paoilis, A.; Caretto, S.; Mita, G. In vitro adventitious regeneration of Artemisia annua L. influencing artemisinin metabolism. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sujatha, G.; Kumari, B.D.R. Effect of phytohormones on micropropagation of Artemisia vulgaris L. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2007, 29, 189–195. [Google Scholar]
- Govindaraj, S.; Kumari, B.D.R.; Cioni, P.L.; Flamini, G. Mass propagation and essential oil analysis of Artemisia vulgaris. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2008, 105, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sujatha, G.; Kumari, B.D.R. Micropropagation, encapsulation and growth of Artemisia vulgaris node explants for germplasm preservation. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2008, 74, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sánchez-García, R.; Green, A.J.; Tomasson, L.; Hortas, F.; Ortiz, M.A. Invasive buttonweed Cotula coronopifolia (Asteraceae) is halotolerant and has high potential for dispersal by endozoochory. Plants 2024, 13, 2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sacco, E.; Mascarello, C.; Pamato, M.; Di Silvestro, D.; Ruffoni, B. In vitro propagation of Cotula bipinnata Thunb. and Chironia linoides L., South African ornamental species suitable for cultivation in Mediterranean area. Acta Hortic. 2017, 1155, 625–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laime, B.; Tjarve, D.; Znotiņa, V.; Laukalēja, Z. Distribution and ecology of neophyte Lactuca tatarica population on the east Baltic Sea coast in Latvia. Proc. Latv. Acad. Sci. Sect. B 2022, 76, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iwamoto, Y.; Kagi, T. Mass-propagation of virus-free plants of Japanese butterbur (Petasites japonicus Fr. Schmidt) by tissue culture. J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1995, 64, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wildi, E.; Schaffner, W.; Büter, K.B. In vitro propagation of Petasites hybridus (Asteraceae) from leaf and petiole explants and from inflorescence buds. Plant Cell Rep. 1998, 18, 336–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Radulović, N.S.; Mladenović, M.Z.; Vukićević, D.R.; Stojanović, N.M.; Randjelović, P.J.; Stojanović-Radić, Z.Z.; Boylan, F. Pulicaria dysenterica (L.) Bernh.— rightfully earned name? Identification and biological activity of new 3-methoxycuminyl esters from P. dysenterica essential oil. Plants 2022, 11, 3340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ushahra, J.; Malik, C.P. In vitro cloning of Pulicaria crispa: An important medicinal plant. LS Int. J. Life Sci. 2012, 1, 171–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franco, I.; Mouga, T.M.; Afonso, C.N. In-vitro setting and multiplication of Pulicaria microcephala, an endemic species from Berlengas Island. Front. Mar. Sci. 2016, 3, 00076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ievinsh, G.; Lejniece, K.K. Comparison of sand burial-dependent growth responses of two Tragopogon species from different habitats. Botanica 2021, 27, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheydaei, P.; Duarte, A.P. The genus Tripleurospermum Sch. Bip. (Asteraceae): A comprehensive review of its ethnobotanical utilizations, pharmacology, phytochemistry, and toxicity. Life 2023, 13, 1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rychlová, M.; Čellárová, E.; Hončariv, R. The study of morphological and histological changes in tissue cultures of Matricaria inodora L. Biol. Plant. 1984, 26, 197–201. [Google Scholar]
- Kay, Q.O.N. Tripleurospermum inodorum (L.) Schultz Bip. J. Ecol. 1994, 82, 681–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cuce, M.; Inceer, H. Micropropagation and reintroduction of the endemic Tripleurospermum ziganaense (Asteraceae) to its natural habitat. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2024, 60, 646–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cuce, M.; Inceer, H.; Imamoglu, K.V.; Ergin, T.; Ucler, A.O. Towards ex situ conservation of globally rare Turkish endemic Tripleurospermum fissurale (Asteraceae). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2022, 58, 1002–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uno, Y.; Nakao, S.; Yamai, Y.; Koyama, R.; Kanechi, M.; Inagaki, N. Callus formation, plant regeneration, and transient expression in the halophyte sea aster (Aster tripolium L.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2009, 98, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Purmale, L.; Ievinsh, G. Comparison of salt tolerance of Tripolium pannonicum in tissue culture using agar-solidified and liquid medium with a temporary immersion system. Environ. Exp. Biol. 2024, 22, 49–50. [Google Scholar]
- Uno, Y.; Kanechi, M.; Inagaki, N.; Taki, N.; Maekawa, S. Growth and protein profile responses in the halophyte sea aster (Aster tripolium L.) suspension-cultured cells to salinity. J. Plant Res. 1996, 109, 409–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Copetta, A.; Bazzicalupo, M.; Cassetti, A.; Marchioni, I.; Mascarello, C.; Cornara, L.; Pistelli, L.; Ruffoni, B. Plant production and leaf anatomy of Mertensia maritima (L.) Gray: Comparison of in vitro culture methods to improve acclimatization. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, H.Y.; Kim, D.H.; Saini, R.K.; Gopal, J.; Keum, Y.-S.; Sivanesan, I. Micropropagation and quantification of bioactive compounds in Mertensia maritima (L.) Gray. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fedoreyev, S.A.; Inyushkina, Y.V.; Bulgakov, V.P.; Veselova, M.V.; Tchernoded, G.K.; Gerasimenko, A.V.; Zhuravlev, Y.N. Production of allantoin, rabdosiin and rosmarinic acid in callus cultures of the seacoastal plant Mertensia maritima (Boraginaceae). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2012, 110, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samsone, I.; Druva-Lūsīte, I.; Andersone, U.; Nečajeva, J.; Karlsons, A.; Ievinsh, G. Plasticity of a dune plant Alyssum gmelinii in response to sand burial in natural conditions. Acta Univ. Latv. 2009, 753, 125–136. [Google Scholar]
- Wiszniewska, A.; Hanus-Fajerska, E.; Muszyńska, E.; Smoleń, S. Comparative assessment of response to cadmium in heavy metal-tolerant shrubs cultured in vitro. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2017, 228, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Górecka, M.; Koszelnik-Leszek, A.; Rusaczonek, A.; Marek, N.; Matz, O.; Muszyńska, E. In vitro propagation of Alyssum species with different metal accumulation strategies. Plants 2024, 13, 3122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muszyńska, E.; Labudda, M.; Różańska, E.; Hanus-Fajerska, E.; Znojek, E. Heavy metal tolerance in contrasting ecotypes of Alyssum montanum. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 161, 305–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mir, R.; Mircea, D.M.; Ruiz-González, M.X.; Brocal-Rubio, P.; Boscaiu, M.; Vicente, O. Cakile maritima: A halophyte model to study salt tolerance mechanisms and potential useful crop for sustainable saline agriculture in the context of climate change. Plants 2024, 13, 2880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ben Hamed, I.; Biligui, B.; Arbelet-Bonnin, D.; Abdelly, C.; Ben Hamed, K.; Bouteau, F. Establishment of a cell suspension culture of the halophyte Cakile maritima. Adv. Hortic. Sci. 2014, 28, 43–48. [Google Scholar]
- Ben Hamed-Laouti, I.; Arbelet-Bonnin, D.; De Bont, L.; Biligui, B.; Gakière, B.; Abdelly, C.; Ben Hamed, K.; Bouteau, F. Comparison of NaCl-induced programmed cell death in the obligate halophyte Cakile maritima and the glycophyte Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Sci. 2016, 247, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arbelet-Bonnin, D.; Ben Hamed-Laouti, I.; Laurenti, P.; Abdelly, C.; Ben Hamed, K.; Bouteau, F. Cellular mechanisms to survive salt in the halophyte Cakile maritima. Plant Sci. 2018, 272, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pushkarova, N.; Yemets, A. Biotechnological approaches for improvement of Crambe species as valuable oilseed plants for industrial purposes. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 7168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drew, R.L.K.; Fellows, J.R. Generation of seakale (Crambe maritima L.) plantlets by tissue culture. Ann. Bot. 1986, 58, 179–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peron, J.Y.; Regnier, E. In vitro propagation of Crambe maritima. Can. J. Bot. 1987, 65, 72–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Speranza, J.; Miceli, N.; Taviano, M.F.; Ragusa, S.; Kwiecień, I.; Szopa, A.; Ekiert, H. Isatis tinctoria L. (woad): A review of its botany, ethnobotanical uses, phytochemistry, biological activities, and biotechnological studies. Plants 2020, 9, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, L.; Kai, G.; Xu, T.; Pi, Y.; Zhang, H.; Sun, X.; Tang, K. Efficient regeneration of tetraploid Isatis indigotica plants via adventitious organogenesis from hypocotyl explants. Biol. Plant. 2004, 48, 121–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saglam, S.; Cifici, C.Y. Effects of agar and isubgol on adventitious shoot regeneration of woad (Isatis tictoria). Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2010, 12, 281–285. [Google Scholar]
- Miceli, N.; Kwiecień, I.; Nicosia, N.; Speranza, J.; Ragusa, S.; Cavò, E.; Davì, F.; Taviano, M.F.; Ekiert, H. Improvement in the biosynthesis of antioxidant-active metabolites in in vitro cultures of Isatis tinctoria (Brassicaceae) by biotechnological methods/elicitation and precursor feeding. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gai, Q.-Y.; Jiao, J.; Luo, M.; Wang, W.; Ma, W.; Zu, Y.-G.; Fu, Y.-J. Establishment of high-productive Isatis tinctoria L. hairy root cultures: A promising approach for efficient production of bioactive alkaloids. Biochem. Eng. J. 2015, 95, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DeNittis, A.M.; Larson, J.M.; Kopp, O.R. Micropropagation of Lepidium ostleri (Brassicaceae), a native endemic plant species. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2023, 59, 684–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pande, D.; Malik, S.; Bora, M.; Srivastava, P.S. A rapid protocol for in vitro micropropagation of Lepidium sativum Linn. and enhancement in the yield of lepidine. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2002, 38, 451–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osuna, L.; Tapia-Pérez, M.E.; Figueroa, O.; Jiménez-Ferrer, E.; Garduño-Ramírez, M.L.; González-Garza, M.T.; Carranza-Rosales, P.; Cruz-Vega, D.E. Micropropagation of Lepidium virginicum (Brassicaceae), a plant with antiprotozoal activity. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2006, 42, 596–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cristea, V.; Besenyei, E.; Jarda, L.; Farkas, A.; Marcu, D.; Clapa, D.; Halmagyi, A.; Butiuc-Keul, A. In situ genetic variability and micropropagation of Cerastium banaticum (Rochel) Heuff. (Caryophyllaceae)—A rare and endemic species from Romania. Acta Biol. Cracov. Bot. 2019, 61, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holobiuc, I.; Pǎunescu, A.; Blȋndu, R. Ex situ conservation using in vitro methods in some Caryophyllaceae plant species from the Red List of vascular plants in Romania. Rom. J. Biol. 2004–2005, 49–50, 3–16. [Google Scholar]
- Kulpa, D.; Wrobel, M.; Bednarek, M. Type of explant affects in vitro development and multiplication success of the rare halophyte plant Honckenya peploides L. Ehrh. Plants 2020, 9, 1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davy, A.J.; Baker, A.J.M.; Willis, A.J. Biological flora of Britain and Ireland: Silene uniflora. J. Ecol. 2024, 112, 2135–2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muszyńska, E.; Labudda, M.; Kamińska, I.; Górecka, M.; Bederska-Błaszczyk, M. Evaluation of heavy metal-induced responses in Silene vulgaris ecotypes. Protoplasma 2019, 256, 1279–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cafuir, L.; Antonovics, J.; Hood, M.E. Tissue culture and quantification of individual-level resistance to anther-smut disease in Silene vulgaris. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2007, 168, 415–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muszyńska, E.; Labudda, M.; Kral, A. Ecotype-specific pathways of reactive oxygen species deactivation in facultative metallophyte Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke treated with heavy metals. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Muszyńska, E.; Labudda, M.; Różańska, E.; Hanus-Fajerska, E.; Koszelnik-Leszek, A. Structural, physiological and genetic diversification of Silene vulgaris ecotypes from heavy metal-contaminated areas and their synchronous in vitro cultivation. Planta 2019, 249, 1761–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miszczak, S.; Sychta, K.; Dresler, S.; Kurdziel, A.; Hanaka, A.; Słomka, A. Innate, high tolerance to zinc and lead in violets confirmed at the suspended cell level. Cells 2022, 11, 2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghareb, H.E.-S.; Ibrahim, S.D.; Hegazi, G.A.E.-M. In vitro propagation and DNA barcode analysis of the endangered Silene schimperiana in Saint Katherine protectorate. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2020, 18, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sterk, A.A. Biosystematic studies on Spergularia media and S. marina in the Netherlands. III. The variability of S. media and S. marina in relation to the environment. Acta Bot. Neerl. 1969, 18, 561–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Pungin, A.; Lartseva, L.; Loskutnikova, V.; Shakhov, V.; Popova, E.; Skrypnik, L.; Krol, O. Effect of salinity stress on phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity in halophytes Spergularia marina (L.) Griseb. and Glaux maritima L. cultured in vitro. Plants 2023, 12, 1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walkey, D.G.A.; Cooper, J. Heat inactivation of cucumber mosaic virus in cultured tissues of Stellaria media. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1976, 84, 425–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wojciechowicz, M.K. Comparison of regenerative potential of petals, stamens and pistils of five Sedum species in vitro. Biodivers. Res. Conserv. 2007, 5, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burbulis, N.; Blinstrubienė, A.; Jonytienė, V. Organogenesis induction in leaf explants of Sedum L. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2013, 11, 2110–2112. [Google Scholar]
- Kitamura, Y.; Kubo, K.; Rahman, L.; Ikenaga, T. Reproduction of Sedum drymarioides, an endangered rare species, by micropropagation. Plant Biotechnol. 2002, 19, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, S.-J.; Zhang, Z.-C.; Gao, X.; Tohsun, G.; Qiu, B.-S. Plant regeneration of the mining ecotype of Sedum alfredii and cadmium hyperaccumulation in regenerated plants. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2009, 99, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wärner, C.; Welk, E.; Durka, W.; Wittig, B.; Diekmann, M. Biological flora of Central Europe: Euphorbia palustris L. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2011, 13, 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perera, D.; Trader, B.W. Poinsettia ‘PrestigeTM Red’ (Euphorbia pulcherrima) in vitro propagation. HortScience 2010, 45, 1126–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Danial, G.H.; Ibrahim, D.A. Efficient protocol of micropropagation, and organogenesis of Euphorbia pulcherrima Willd. plants via stem and leaf segments. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Res. Sci. 2016, 3, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dewir, Y.H.; Chakrabarty, E.J.; Hahn, E.J.; Paek, K.Y. Reversion of inflorescence development in Euphorbia millii and its application to large-scale micropropagation in an air-lift bioreactor. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2005, 80, 581–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, B.; Dai, W.; Chao, W.S. An efficient method for in vitro regeneration of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2008, 44, 548–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kondamundi, R.; Murthy, K.S.R.; Pullaiah, T. Euphorbiaceae—A critical review on plant tissue culture. Tropic. Subtropic. Agroecosyst. 2009, 10, 313–335. [Google Scholar]
- Sujkowska-Rybkowska, M.; Muszyńska, E.; Labudda, M. Structural adaptation and physiological mechanisms in the leaves of Anthyllis vulneraria L. from metallicolous and non-metallicolous populations. Plants 2020, 9, 662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gavidia, I.; Zaragozá, C.; Segura, J.; Pérez-Bermúdez, P. Plant regeneration from juvenile and adult Anthyllis cytisoides, a multipurpose leguminous shrub. J. Plant Physiol. 1997, 150, 714–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martini, A.N.; Papafotiou, M. In vitro seed and clonal propagation of the Mediterranean bee friendly plant Anthyllis hermanniae L. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salmia, M.A. Cytology of two Lathyrus tissues grown in vitro. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 1974, 11, 279–284. [Google Scholar]
- Debnath, S.C.; McKenzie, D.B.; McRae, K.B. Callus induction and shoot regeneration from stem, rachis and leaf explants in beach pea (Lathyrus japonicus Willd). J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 2001, 10, 57–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malik, K.A.; Ali-Khan, S.T.; Saxena, P.K. High-frequency organogenesis from direct seed culture in Lathyrus. Ann. Bot. 1993, 72, 629–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barik, D.P.; Mohapatra, U.; Chand, P.K. High frequency in vitro regeneration of Lathyrus sativus L. Biol. Plant. 2005, 49, 637–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pupilli, F.; Damiani, F.; Nenz, E.; Arcioni, S. In vitro propagation of Medicago and Lotus species by node culture. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 1992, 28, 167–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orshinsky, B.R.; Tomes, D.T. Effect of long-term culture and low temperature incubation on plant regeneration from a callus line of birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.). J. Plant Physiol. 1985, 119, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akashi, R.; Kawano, T.; Hashiguchi, M.; Kutsuna, Y.; Hoffmann-Tsay, S.-S.; Hoffmann, F. Super roots in Lotus corniculatus: A unique tissue culture and regeneration system in a legume species. Plant Soil 2003, 255, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Webb, K.J.; Woodcock, S.; Chamberlain, D.A. Plant regeneration from protoplasts of Trifolium repens and Lotus corniculatus. Plant Breed. 1987, 98, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Hinnawy, E.; Pierrot, H. Effect of some growth regulating substances and carbohydrates on chlorophyll production in Melilotus alba (Desr.) callus tissue cultures. Z. Für Pflanzenphysiol. 1974, 74, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taira, T.; Haskins, F.A.; Gorz, H.J. Callus and suspension cultures of Melilotus alba tissues and cells. Crop Sci. 1977, 17, 407–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gampe, N.; Szakács, Z.; Darcsi, A.; Boldizsár, I.; Szőke, E.; Kuzovkina, I.; Kursinszki, L.; Béni, S. Qualitative and quantitative phytochemical analysis of Ononis hairy root cultures. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 11, 622585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tumova, L.; Tuma, J.; Dolezal, M. Pyrazinecarboxamides as potential elicitors of flavonolignan and flavonoid production in Silybum marianum and Ononis arvensis cultures in vitro. Molecules 2011, 16, 9142–9152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Miguel, M.G.; Barroso, J.G. Cell suspension cultures of Ononis natrix L. subspecies ramosissima: Establishment and culture conditions. Biotechnol. Lett. 1992, 14, 223–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, M.K.; Mccomb, J.A. Use of callus cultures to detect NaCl tolerance in cultivars of three species of pasture legumes. Austr. J. Plant Physiol. 1981, 8, 437–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rybczynski, J.J. Plant regeneration from highly embryogenic callus, cell suspension and protoplast cultures of Trifolium fragiferum. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1997, 51, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhojwani, S.S. A tissue culture method for propagation and low temperature storage of Trifolium repens genotypes. Physiol. Plant. 1981, 52, 187–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krstić, D.; Janković, T.; Šavikin-Fodulović, K.; Menković, N.; Grubišić, D. Secoiridoids and xanthones in the shoots and roots of Centaurium pulchellum cultured in vitro. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2003, 39, 203–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Todorović, S.; Grubišić, D.; Giba, Z.; Mišić, D.; Konjević, R. Sucrose effects on in vitro fruiting and seed production of Centaurium pulchellum. Biol. Plant. 2006, 50, 771–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piątczak, E.; Wysokińska, H. In vitro regeneration of Centaurium erythraea Rafn from shoot tips and other seedling explants. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 2003, 72, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Filipović, B.K.; Simonović, A.D.; Trifunović, M.M.; Dmitrović, S.S.; Savić, J.M.; Jevremović, S.B.; Subotić, A.R. Plant regeneration in leaf culture of Centaurium erythraea Rafn. Part 1: The role of antioxidant enzymes. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2015, 121, 703–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trifunović-Momčilov, M.; Motyka, V.; Dragićević, I.Č.; Petrić, M.; Jevremović, S.; Malbeck, J.; Holík, J.; Dobrev, P.I.; Subotić, A. Endogenous phytohormones in spontaneously regenerated Centaurium erythraea Rafn. plants grown in vitro. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2016, 35, 543–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subotić, A.; Jevremović, S.; Grubišić, D. Influence of cytokinins on in vitro morphogenesis in root cultures of Centaurium erythraea—Valuable medicinal plant. Sci. Hortic. 2009, 120, 386–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simonović, A.D.; Trifunović-Momčilov, M.A.; Filipović, B.K.; Marković, M.P.; Bogdanović, M.D.; Subotić, A.R. Somatic embryogenesis in Centaurium erythraea Rafn—Current status and perspectives: A review. Plants 2021, 10, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nishikawa, K.; Shimomura, K.; Kayano, T.; Ishimaru, K. Shoot regeneration in root cultures of Centaurium scilloides. Plant Biotechnol. 1997, 14, 117–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González-Benito, M.E.; Pérez, C.; Viviani, A.B. Cryopreservation of nodal explants of an endangered plant species (Centaurium rigualii Esteve) using the encapsulation–dehydration method. Biodivers. Conserv. 1997, 6, 583–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mišić, D.; Šiler, B.; Skorić, M.; Djurickovic, M.S.; Nestorovi-Živković, J.; Jovanović, V.; Giba, Z. Secoiridoid glycosides production by Centaurium maritimum (L.) Fritch hairy root cultures in temporary immersion bioreactor. Process Biochem. 2013, 48, 1587–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cole, I.B.; Saxena, P.K.; Murch, S.J. Medicinal biotechnology in the genus Scutellaria. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2007, 43, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.; Zheng, S.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Shah, S.B.A.; Wang, Y.; Gao, R.; Xu, Z. Advances in pharmacology, biosynthesis, and metabolic engineering of Scutellaria-specialized metabolites. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2024, 44, 302–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joshee, N.; Tascan, A.; Medina-Bolivar, F.; Parajuli, P.; Rimando, A.M.; Shannon, D.A.; Adelberg, J.W. Scutellaria: Biotechnology, phytochemistry and its potential as a commercial medicinal crop. In Biotechnology for Medicinal Plants: Micropropagation and Improvement; Chandra, S., Lata, H., Varma, A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 69–99. [Google Scholar]
- Dyduch-Siemińska, M.; Gawroński, J. The influence of cytokinin on the multiplication efficiency and genetic stability of Scutellaria baicalensis regenerants in in vitro culture conditions. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 4791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zakaria, I.A.; Sherman, S.H.; Vaidya, B.N.; Joshee, N. In vitro propagation and synseed mediated short-term conservation of Scutellaria alpina L. and Scutellaria altissima L. Plant Cell Cult. Micropropag. 2020, 16, e163. [Google Scholar]
- Naz, R.; Anis, M.; Aref, I.M. Management of cytokinin–auxin interactions for in vitro shoot proliferation of Althaea officinalis L.: A valuable medicinal plant. Rend. Fis. Acc. Lincei 2015, 26, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mujib, A.; Pipal, T.; Ali, M.; Tonk, D.; Zafar, N.; Gulzar, B. In vitro propagation of Althaea officinalis: The role of plant growth regulators in morphogenesis. BioTechnologia 2017, 98, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naz, R.; Anis, M.; Alatar, A.A. Embling production in Althaea officinalis L., through somatic embryogenesis and their appraisal via histological and scanning electron microscopical studies. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2017, 182, 1182–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naz, R.; Anis, M.; Alatar, A.A.; Ahmad, A.; Naaz, A. Nutrient alginate encapsulation of nodal segments of Althaea officinalis L., for short-term conservation and germplasm exchange. Plant Biosyst. 2018, 152, 1256–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ievinsh, G. Disentangling the belowground web of biotic interactions in temperate coastal grasslands: From fundamental knowledge to novel applications. Land 2023, 12, 1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salama, A.; Shukla, M.R.; Popova, E.; Fisk, N.S.; Jones, M.P.; Saxena, P.K. In vitro propagation and reintroduction of golden paintbrush (Castilleja levisecta), a critically imperilled plant species. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2018, 98, 762–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piątczak, E.; Talar, A.; Kuźma, L.; Wysokińska, H. Iridoid and phenylethanoid glycoside production in multiple shoots and regenerated Rehmannia elata N.E. Brown ex Prain plants following micropropagation. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2015, 37, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamed, M.E.; Arafa, A.M.; Soliman, S.S.; Eldahmy, S.I. Plant germination and production of callus from the yellow hornpoppy (Glaucium flavum): The first stage of micropropagation. Pharmazie 2014, 69, 715–720. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Doycheva, I.; Yankova-Tsvetkova, E.; Stanilova, M. Somatic embryogenesis induction in Glaucium flavum Crantz. (Papaveraceae). C. R. Acad. Bulg. Sci. 2017, 70, 525–530. [Google Scholar]
- Necajeva, J.; Ievinsh, G. Seed germination of six coastal plant species of the Baltic region: Effect of salinity and dormancy-breaking treatments. Seed Sci. Res. 2008, 18, 173–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banaszczyk, L.; Starke, M.D.; Szelbracikowski, D.; Ścibior, J.; Kapusta, M. In vitro germination and organogenesis of endangered neo-endemic Baltic dunes species Linaria loeselii Scweigg. Plants 2024, 13, 2461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freipica, I.; Ievinsh, G. Relative NaCl tolerance of rare and endangered coastal plant species in conditions of tissue culture. Environ. Exp. Biol. 2010, 8, 35–42. [Google Scholar]
- Makowczyńska, J.; Andrzejewska-Golec, E. Micropropagation of Plantago maritima L.—A vanishing species in Poland. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 2009, 78, 13–18. [Google Scholar]
- Lefèbvre, C. Population variation and taxonomy in Armeria maritima with special reference to heavy-metal-tolerant populations. New Phytol. 1974, 73, 209–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, J.; Cai, R.; Liu, T.Y.; He, H.; Wu, A. Propagation in vitro and karyotype analysis of Armeria maritima. Guangxi Zhiwu 2004, 24, 33–36. [Google Scholar]
- Aly, M.A.M.; Rathinasabapathi, B.; Bhalsod, S. Somatic embryogenesis in members of the Plumbaginaceae ornamental statice Limonium and sea thrift Armeria maritima. HortScience 2002, 37, 1122–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gourguillon, L.; Rustenholz, C.; Lobstein, A.; Gondet, L. Callus induction and establishment of cell suspension cultures of the halophyte Armeria maritima (Mill.) Willd. Sci. Hortic. 2018, 233, 407–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Purmale, L.; Jēkabsone, A.; Andersone-Ozola, U.; Karlsons, A.; Osvalde, A.; Ievinsh, G. Comparison of in vitro and in planta heavy metal tolerance and accumulation potential of different Armeria maritima accessions from a dry coastal meadow. Plants 2022, 11, 2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Purmale, L.; Jēkabsone, A.; Andersone-Ozola, U.; Ievinsh, G. Salinity tolerance, ion accumulation potential and osmotic adjustment in vitro and in planta of different Armeria maritima accessions from a dry coastal meadow. Plants 2022, 11, 2570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kaninski, A.I.; Ivanova, I.; Bistrichanov, S.; Zapryanova, N.; Atanassova, B.; Iakimova, E.T. Ex situ conservation of endangered Limonium species in the Bulgarian flora. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res. 2012, 20, 115–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amo-Marco, J.B.; Ibañez, M.R. Micropropagation of Limonium cavanillesii Erben, a threatened statice, from inflorescence stems. Plant Growth Regul. 1998, 24, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casazza, G.; Savona, M.; Carli, S.; Minuto, L.; Profumo, P. Micropropagation of Limonium cordatum (L.) Mill. for conservation purposes. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2002, 77, 541–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seelye, J.F.; Maddocks, D.J.; Burge, G.K.; Morgan, E.R. Shoot regeneration from leaf discs of Limonium perigrinum using thidiazuron. N. Z. J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 1994, 22, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dam, A.; Paul, S.; Bandyopadhyay, T.K. Direct somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from leaf explants of Limonium sinensis (Girard) Kuntze. Sci. Hortic. 2010, 126, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khadka, S.; Rana, N.; Rajbahak, S. In-vitro mass propagation of Limonium sinuatum L. Mill. (Statice). J. Plant Ecol. 2019, 17, 147–151. [Google Scholar]
- Matsumoto, T. Cryopreservation of Limonium shoot tips and shoot primordia. In Floriculture, Ornamental and Plant Biotechnology; Teixeira da Silva, J.A., Ed.; Global Science Books: London, UK, 2008; Volume V, pp. 234–239. [Google Scholar]
- Barraco, G.; Sylvestre, I.; Iapichino, G.; Engelmann, F. Cryopreservation of Limonium serotinum apical meristems from in vitro plantlets using droplet-vitrification. Sci. Hortic. 2011, 130, 309–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Custodio, L.; Garcia-Caparros, P.; Pereira, C.G.; Castelo-Branco, P. Halophyte plants as potential sources of anticancer agents: A comprehensive review. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haneef, S.; Varghese, S.K.; Job, J. An efficient protocol for the rapid micropropagation of Polygonum glabrum Willd. Plant Cell Biotechnol. Mol. Biol. 2019, 20, 473–477. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, L.-C.; Nalawade, S.M.; Mulabagal, V.; Yeh, M.-S.; Tsay, H.-S. Micropropagation of Polygonum multiflorum Thunb and quantitative analysis of the anthraquinones emodin and physcion formed in in vitro propagated shoots and plants. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2003, 26, 1467–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Lima, S.S.; de Lima Moreira, D.; Affonso, V.R.; Henriques, A.B.; Sato, A.; Esquibel, M.A.; Leitão, G.G.; Lage, C.L.S. Micropropagation of Polygonum acre Kunth var. aquatile (Mart.) Meisn, and seasonal variation of tannins in acclimatized plants. J. Med. Plants Res. 2010, 4, 573–578. [Google Scholar]
- Pham, T.H.T.; Nguyen, T.A.; Ashaolu, T.J.; Le, T.-D.; Le, T.T.M.; Ha, M.K.T.T.; Ha, T.M.N.; Vu, T.H.; Le, T.H.; Ho, T.-T. Rapid in vitro propagation and bioactive compounds evaluation in Polygonum multiflorum Thunb. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2024, 159, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marc, J.M.; Hagendoorn, M.J.M.; Geelan, T.A.M.; Beek, T.A.V.; Jamar, D.C.L.; Tetteroo, F.A.A.; van der Plas, L.H.W. Occurrence of polygodial in plant organs and tissue culture of Polygonum hydropiper. Physiol. Plant. 1994, 92, 595–600. [Google Scholar]
- Hasan, M.F.; Sikdar, B. In vitro propagation of Polygonum hydropiper L. from shoot tips. Plant Tissue Cult. Biotechnol. 2010, 20, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vasas, A.; Orbán-Gyapai, O.; Hohmann, J. The genus Rumex: Review of traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacology. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 175, 198–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhattacharyya, P.; Kumaria, S.; Bose, B.; Paul, P.; Tandon, P. Evaluation of genetic stability and analysis of phytomedicinal potential in micropropagated plants of Rumex nepalensis—A medicinally important source of pharmaceutical biomolecules. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2017, 6, 80–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Shafey, N.M.; Sayed, M.; Ahmed, E.S.; Hammouda, O.; Khodary, S.E.-D.A. Effect of growth regulators on micropropagation, callus induction and callus flavonoid content of Rumex pictus Forssk. Egypt. J. Bot. 2019, 59, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alfarraj, N.S.; Al-Qurainy, F.; Nadeem, M.; Tarroum, M.; Alansi, S.; Salih, A.M.; Alenezi, N.; Shaikhaldein, H.O.; Alanazi, A.R.; Al-Humaid, L.A. An efficient and improved micropropagation method of Rumex nervosus: A valuable medicinal plant from Saudi Arabia. Pak. J. Bot. 2022, 54, 1909–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Singh, T.; Agrawal, V. Optimization of micropropagation protocol and elicitation of luteolin and rutin biomolecules using phenylalanine and chitosan in root callus of Rumex hastatus D. Don. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2023, 152, 183–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ślesak, H.; Dziedzic, K.; Kwolek, D.; Cygan, M.; Mizia, P.; Olejniczak, P.; Joachimiak, A.J. Female versus male: Rumex thyrsiflorus Fingerh. under in vitro conditions. Does sex influence in vitro morphogenesis? Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2017, 129, 521–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ślesak, H.; Góralski, G.; Kwolek, D.; Dziedzic, K.; Grabowska-Joachimiak, A. Male adventitious roots of Rumex thyrsiflorus Fingerh. as a source of genetically stable micropropagated plantlets. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2015, 123, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gozdur, K.; Ślesak, I.; Ślesak, H. Photosynthetic and antioxidant activity in the sex-related heat stress response of the dioecious species Rumex thyrsiflorus Fingerh. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2023, 152, 151–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gozdur, K.; Szopa, A.; Ślesak, H. Effect of salt stress on growth and phenolic compounds production in callus suspension culture of the dioecious species thyrse sorrel (Rumex thyrsiflorus Fingerh.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2024, 158, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bae, S.-J.; Kang, B.-C.; Jeong, M.; Kim, S.; Kim, C.K.; Han, J.-S. In vitro multiplication through single-node culture of sea-milkwort (Glaux maritima L.). Korean J. Hortic. Sci. Technol. 2016, 34, 461–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, J.-S. Plant regeneration via callus culture of sea-milkwort (Glaux maritima L.). J. Plant Biotechnol. 2017, 44, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Benson, E.E.; Danaher, J.E.; Pimbley, I.M.; Anderson, C.T.; Wake, J.E.; Daley, S.; Adams, L.K. In vitro micropropagation of Primula scotica: A rare Scottish plant. Biodivers. Conserv. 2000, 9, 711–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharaf, A.R.N.; Hamidoghli, Y.; Zakizadeh, H. In vitro seed germination and micropropagation of primrose (Primula heterochroma Stapf.) an endemic endangered Iranian species via shoot tip explants. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2011, 52, 298–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sitek, E.; Nowak, B.; Fecowicz, M.; Gajewski, Z.; Dańda, P.; Kapała, K.; Kozik-Dąbek, B. Application of horticultural and tissue culture methods for ex situ conservation of endangered Primula farinosa L. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 2020, 89, 8913. [Google Scholar]
- Tütüncü, M. In vitro culture of Primula: A review. Int. J. Agric. Nat. Sci. 2020, 13, 118–125. [Google Scholar]
- Beruto, M.; Debergh, P. Micropropagation of Ranunculus asiaticus: A review and perspectives. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2004, 77, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beruto, M.; Rinino, S.; Bisignano, A.; Fibiani, M. Study of slow growth conditions of Ranunculus in vitro shoots. Acta Hortic. 2011, 908, 391–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bicknell, R.A.; Braun, R.H.; Evans, A.C.; Morgan, E.R. Tissue culture of Ranunculus lyallii Hook. f. N. Z. J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 1996, 24, 303–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, K.-D.; Wang, W.; Yu, D.-S.; Li, X.-L.; Chen, J.-M.; Feng, B.-J.; Zhao, Y.-W.; Cheng, M.-J.; Liu, X.-X.; Li, C.-W. NAA at a high concentration promotes efficient plant regeneration via direct somatic embryogenesis and SE-mediated transformation system in Ranunculus sceleratus. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 18321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Srinivasan, P.; Raja, H.D.; Tamilvanan, R. Effect of coconut water and cytokinins on rapid micropropagation of Ranunculus wallichianus Wight & Arnn—A rare and endemic medicinal plant of the Western Ghats, India. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2021, 57, 365–371. [Google Scholar]
- Kocot, D.; Nowak, B.; Sitek, E. Long-term organogenic callus cultivation of Ranunculus illyricus L.: A blueprint for sustainable ex situ conservation of the species in urban greenery. BMC Plant Biol. 2024, 24, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, S.M. Tissue culture-derived variation in crop improvement. Euphytica 2001, 118, 153–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anju, T.R.; Theresa, M.; Mohanlal, J. Conservation approaches of plant genetic resources. In Sustainable Utilization and Conservation of Plant Genetic Resources; Al-Khayri, J.M., Jain, S.M., Penna, S., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2024; pp. 643–681. [Google Scholar]
- Rai, M.K. Plant tissue culture targeting germplasm conservation. In Advances in Plant Tissue Culture: Current Developments and Future Trends; Rai, A.C., Kumar, A., Modi, A., Singh, M., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2022; pp. 205–221. [Google Scholar]
- Kanayama, Y. Physiological roles of polyols in horticultural crops. J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2009, 78, 158–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patel, T.K.; Williamson, J.D. Mannitol in plants, fungi, and plant-fungal interactions. Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 486–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kaczmarczyk, A.; Funnekotter, B.; Menon, A.; Phang, P.Y.; Al-Hanbali, A.; Bunn, E.; Mancera, R. Current issues in plant cryopreservation. In Current Frontiers in Cryobiology; Katkov, I.I., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2012; pp. 417–436. [Google Scholar]
- Pence, V.C. Tissue cryopreservation for plant conservation: Potential and challenges. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2014, 175, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.-H.; Popova, E. Improvement and innovation of cryopreservation and in vitro methods in plant resource protection. Biology 2024, 13, 741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Doran, P.M. Application of plant tissue cultures in phytoremediation research: Incentives and limitations. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 103, 60–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandler, S.F.; Thorpe, T.A. Variation from plant tissue cultures: Biotechnological application to improving salinity tolerance. Biotechnol. Adv. 1986, 4, 117–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arzani, A. Improving salinity tolerance in crop plants: A biotechnological view. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2008, 44, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jurado-Mañogil, C.; Díaz-Vivancos, P.; Hernández, J.A.; Piqueras, A.; Barba-Espin, G. Efficient in vitro platform for multiplication, acclimatization, and deliver of high-NaCl-tolerant clones of the halophyte Arthrocaulon macrostachyum. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2024, 43, 1631–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tester, M.; Davenport, R. Na+ tolerance and Na+ transport in higher plants. Ann. Bot. 2003, 91, 503–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acosta-Motos, J.R.; Ortuño, M.F.; Bernal-Vicente, A.; Diaz-Vivancos, P.; Sanchez-Blanco, M.J.; Hernandez, J.A. Plant responses to salt stress: Adaptive mechanisms. Agronomy 2017, 7, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radi, H.; Koufan, M.; Belkoura, I.; Koussa, T.; Mazri, M.A. In vitro mycorrhization for plant propagation and enhanced resilience to environmental stress: A review. Plants 2025, 14, 2097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nawrot-Chorabik, K. The use of interactions in dual cultures in vitro to evaluate the pathogenicity of fungi and susceptibility of host plant genotypes. In Environmental Biotechnology—New Approaches and Prospective Applications; Petra, M., Ed.; IntechOpen Science Publisher: London, UK, 2013; pp. 287–301. [Google Scholar]
- Cai, T.; Babiker, A.G.; Ejeta, G.; Butler, L.G. Morphological response of witchweed (Striga asiatica) to in vitro culture. J. Exp. Bot. 1993, 44, 1377–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tomilov, A.; Tomilova, N.; Yoder, J.I. In vitro haustorium development in roots and root cultures of the hemiparasitic plant Triphysaria versicolor. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2004, 77, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stanković, M.; Stojanović-Radić, Z.; Jakovljević, D.; Zlatić, N.; Luković, M.; Dajić-Stevanović, Z. Coastal halophytes: Potent source of bioactive molecules from saline environment. Plants 2023, 12, 1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nigam, M.; Atanassova, M.; Mishra, A.P.; Pezzani, R.; Devkota, H.P.; Plygun, S.; Salehi, B.; Setzer, W.N.; Sharifi-Rad, J. Bioactive compounds and health benefits of Artemisia species. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2019, 14, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Khayri, J.M.; Sudheer, W.N.; Lakshmaiah, V.V.; Mukherjee, E.; Nizam, A.; Thiruvengadam, M.; Nagella, P.; Alessa, F.M.; Al-Mssallem, M.Q.; Rezk, A.; et al. Biotechnological approaches for production of artemisinin, an anti-malarial drug from Artemisia annua L. Molecules 2022, 27, 3040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaman, S.; Barkatulllah; Zahoor, M.; Shah, S.W.A.; Ullah, Z.; Ullah, R.; Alotaibi, A. Pharmacognostic evaluation of Artemisia maritima L. a highly medicinal species of genus Artemisia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 29, 103419. [Google Scholar]
- Ksouri, R.; Ksouri, W.M.; Jallali, I.; Debez, A.; Magné, C.; Hiroko, I.; Abdelly, C. Medicinal halophytes: Potent source of health promoting biomolecules with medical, nutraceutical and food applications. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2012, 32, 289–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petropoulos, S.A.; Karkanis, A.; Martins, N.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Halophytic herbs of the Mediterranean basin: An alternative approach to health. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 114, 155–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Custódio, L.; Slusarczyk, S.; Matkowski, A.; Castañeda-Loaiza, V.; Fernandes, E.; Pereira, C.; Rodrigues, M.J. A first approach for the micropropagation of the medicinal halophyte Polygonum maritimum L. and phenolic profile of acclimatized plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 960306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bairu, M.W.; Aremu, A.O.; Van Staden, J. Somaclonal variation in plants: Causes and detection methods. Plant Growth Regul. 2011, 63, 147–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aronen, T.; Sota, V.; Cvjetković, B.; Christie, B.; Rupps, A.; Fischerova, L.; Rathore, D.S.; Werbrouck, S.P.O. From lab to forest: Overcoming barriers to in vitro propagation of forest trees. J. For. Res. 2025, 36, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosvall, O.; Bradshaw, R.H.W.; Egertsdotter, U.; Ingvarsson, P.K.; Mullin, T.J.; Wu, H. Using Norway spruce clones in Swedish forestry: Implications of clones for management. Scand. J. For. Res. 2019, 34, 390–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varis, S.; Klimaszewska, K.; Aronen, T. Somatic Embryogenesis and plant regeneration from primordial shoot explants of Picea abies (L.) H. Karst. somatic trees. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruffoni, B.; Savona, M. The temporary immersion system (T.I.S.) for the improvement of micropropagation of ornamental plants. Acta Hortic. 2003, 683, 445–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Carlo, A.; Tarraf, W.; Lambardi, M.; Benelli, C. Temporary immersion system for production of biomass and bioactive compounds from medicinal plants. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bello-Bello, J.J.; Cruz-Cruz, C.A.; Pérez-Guerra, J.C. A new temporary immersion system for commercial micropropagation of banana (Musa AAA cv. Grand Naine). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2019, 55, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez-Estrada, E.; Islas-Luna, B.; Pérez-Sato, J.A.; Bello-Bello, J.J. Temporary immersion improves in vitro multiplication and acclimatization of Anthurium andreanum Lind. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 249, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polivanova, O.B.; Bedarev, V.A. Hyperhydricity in plant tissue culture. Plants 2022, 11, 3313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mirzabe, A.H.; Hajiahmad, A.; Fadavi, A.; Rafiee, S. Temporary immersion systems (TISs): A comprehensive review. J. Biotechnol. 2022, 357, 56–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]





| Method | Presence of Callus | Characteristics | Advantages | Limitations/ Challenges | Mutation/Variation Risk | Purpose | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct organogenesis | No | Fast regeneration, but fewer shoots | Faster regeneration, maintains high genetic fidelity | Lower multiplication rate compared to callus methods, restricted to specific responsive tissues/genotypes | Low | When genetic stability is important | [8,9,10] |
| Indirect organogenesis | Yes | Higher number of regenerants (from callus) | High multiplication potential, suitable for mass production | High risk of somaclonal variation, longer culture period, requires careful subculturing to maintain regeneration potential | Moderate to high | For regeneration of difficult species or transformation | [11,12,13,14] |
| Direct somatic embryogenesis | No | Moderate number of embryos, fast regeneration | High genetic stability, allow a comparison to zygotic embryos, potential for synthetic seed production, rapid regeneration | Often difficult to induce, highly genotype-dependent, risk of physiological abnormalities | Relatively low | When direct embryogenesis is possible for clonal propagation | [15,16] |
| Indirect somatic embryogenesis | Yes | High number of embryos from embryogenic callus | Excellent for large-scale mass propagation, high proliferation rates | Higher risk of somaclonal variation, loss of embryogenic competence over prolonged culture | Higher mutation risk | Preferred strategy for mass propagation and embryogenesis research | [17,18] |
| Species/Synonym | SE Sea Shores * | SE Shore Meadows * | EUNIS Habitat Diagnostic (D) and Constant (C) Species ** | Tissue Culture Studies |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MONOCOTS | ||||
| Alismataceae | ||||
| Alisma wahlenbergii (Holmb.) Juz. | 5 | 0 | − | |
| Cyperaceae | ||||
| Blysmus compressus (L.) Panz. ex Link | 0 | 6 | − | |
| Blysmus rufus (Huds.) Link/Blysmopsis rufa (Huds.) Oteng-Yeb. | 0 | 10 | D: MA232 | − |
| Bolboschoenus maritimus (L.) Palla /Scirpus maritimus L. | 0 | 7 | C: MA232 | − |
| Carex bigelowii Torr. ex Schwein. /Carex concolor R.Br. | 0 | 5 | − | |
| Carex distans L. | 0 | 7 | − | |
| Carex extensa Gooden. | 0 | 7 | − | |
| Carex glareosa Schkuhr ex Wahlenb. | 7 | 3 | − | |
| halophila F.Nyl. | 5 | 5 | D: MA232 | − |
| Carex mackenziei V.I.Krecz. | 0 | 10 | D, C: MA232 | − |
| Carex maritima Gunnerus | 4 | 4 | − | |
| Carex paleacea Screb. ex Wahlenb. | 10 | 0 | D: MA232 | − |
| Carex punctata Gaudin | 10 | 0 | − | |
| Carex vacillans Drejer | 0 | 10 | − | |
| Eleocharis parvula (Roem. & Schult.) Link ex Bluff, Nees & Schauer | 0 | 10 | − | |
| Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani (C.C.Gmel.) Palla/Scirpus validus Vahl/Schoenoplectus validus (Vahl) Á.Löve & D.Löve | 0 | 7 | + | |
| Iridaceae | ||||
| Iris orientalis Mill. | 0 | 10 | − | |
| Iris spuria L. | 0 | 10 | + | |
| Juncaceae | ||||
| Juncus balticus Willd. | 7 | 0 | + | |
| Juncus gerardii Loisel. | 0 | 7 | D, C: MA232 | + |
| Juncus maritimus Lam. | 0 | 10 | − | |
| Juncus ranarius Songeon & E.P.Perrier | 0 | 6 | − | |
| Juncaginaceae | ||||
| Triglochin maritima L. | 3 | 7 | D, C: MA232 | + |
| Poaceae | ||||
| Alopecurus arundinaceus Poir. | 2 | 7 | + | |
| Calamagrostis arenaria (L.) Roth /Ammophila arenaria (L.) Link | 8 | 0 | C: N11; D, C: N13; D, C: N15; D, C: N18; C: N1A | − |
| Deschampsia cespitosa (L.) P.Beauv. subsp. cespitosa /Deschampsia bottnica (Wahlenb.) Trin. | 10 | 0 | − | |
| Dupontia fulva (Trin.) Röser & Tkach /Arctophila fulva (Trin.) Andersson | 0 | 5 | − | |
| Elymus pungens subsp. campestris (Godr. & Gren.) Melderis/Elytrigia campestris (Godr. & Gren.) M.A.Carreras ex Kerguélen | 7 | 0 | − | |
| Hordeum secalinum Schreb. | 0 | 10 | − | |
| Leymus arenarius (L.) Hochst. | 7 | 0 | D, C: N11; D, C: N13; C: N21 | − |
| Lolium arundinaceum (Schreb.) Darbysh./Schedonorus arundinaceus (Schreb.) Dumort. | 2 | 3 | + | |
| Parapholis strigosa (Dumort.) C.E.Hubb. | 0 | 10 | − | |
| Puccinellia distans (Jacq.) Parl /Puccinellia capillaris (Lilj.) Jansen | 5 | 5 | + | |
| Puccinellia maritima (Huds.) Parl. | 0 | 10 | − | |
| Thinopyrum junceum (L.) Á.Löve /Elytrigia juncea (L.) Nevski | 10 | 0 | D, C: N11; D, C: N13; C: N21 | − |
| DICOTS | ||||
| Amaranthaceae | ||||
| Atriplex glabriuscula Edmondston | 10 | 0 | D: N11; D, N21 | − |
| Atriplex laciniata L. | 10 | 0 | D, C: N11; D: N21 | − |
| Atriplex littoralis L. | 6 | 3 | D, C: N11; D: N21 | − |
| Atriplex longipes Drejer | 0 | 10 | − | |
| Atriplex prostrata Boucher ex DC. | 4 | 2 | D, C: N11; D, C: N21 | − |
| Atriplex prostrata subsp. calotheca (Rafn) M.A.Gust./Atriplex calotheca (Rafn) Fr. | 5 | 5 | − | |
| Atriplex rosea L. | 10 | 0 | − | |
| Beta vulgaris L. | 7 | 3 | D, C: N21; C: N31 | + |
| Chenopodium glaucum L./Oxybasis glauca (L.) S. Fuentes, Uotila & Borsch. | 3 | 4 | − | |
| Chenopodium rubrum L./Oxybasis rubra (L.) S. Fuentes, Uotila & Borsch. | 3 | 4 | − | |
| Halimione pedunculata L. | 0 | 10 | − | |
| Halimione portulacoides L. | 0 | 10 | − | |
| Salicornia europaea L. | 0 | 10 | + | |
| Salicornia procumbens Sm. | 0 | 10 | − | |
| Salsola kali L. | 9 | 0 | D, C: N11 | − |
| Suaeda maritima (L.) Dumort. | 0 | 10 | + | |
| Apiaceae | ||||
| Apium graveolens L. | 0 | 10 | + | |
| Bupleurum tenuissimum L. | 0 | 6 | − | |
| Conium maculatum L. | 3 | 3 | − | |
| Eryngium maritimum L. | 10 | 0 | D: N34; C: N13 | + |
| Ligusticum scoticum L. | 10 | 0 | − | |
| Oenanthe lachenalii C.C.Gmel. | 10 | 0 | − | |
| Asteraceae | ||||
| Artemisia maritima L. | 0 | 10 | + | |
| Artemisia stelleriana Besser | 10 | 0 | − | |
| Cotula coronopifolia L. | 0 | 10 | − | |
| Lactuca tatarica C.A.Mey | 7 | 0 | − | |
| Petasites spurius Rchb.f. | 7 | 0 | − | |
| Pulicaria dysenterica (L.) Bernh. | 0 | 10 | − | |
| Tragopogon heterospermus Schweigg. | – | – | + | |
| Tripleurospermum inodorum (L.) Sch.Bip. | 3 | 3 | + | |
| Tripleurospermum maritimum (L.) W.D.J.Koch | 3 | 3 | C: N11; D, C: N21 | − |
| Tripolium pannonicum (Jacq.) Dobrocz./Aster tripolium L./Tripolium vulgare Nees | 0 | 10 | C: MA232; C: N21 | + |
| Boraginaceae | ||||
| Mertensia maritima (L.) Gray | 10 | 0 | + | |
| Brassicaceae | ||||
| Alyssum montanum subsp. gmelinii (Jord.) Hegi & Em.Schmid/Alyssum gmelinii Jord. & Fourr. | – | – | + | |
| Cakile maritima L. | 10 | 0 | D, C: N11; C: N13; C: N21 | + |
| Cochlearia danica L. | 4 | 6 | D, C: N31; D, C: N34 | − |
| Cochlearia officinalis L. | 0 | 10 | − | |
| Crambe maritima L. | 10 | 0 | C: N21 | + |
| Isatis tinctoria L. | 6 | 0 | + | |
| Lepidium latifolium L. | 9 | 0 | − | |
| Caryophyllaceae | ||||
| Cerastium diffusum Pers. | 10 | 0 | D, C: N34 | − |
| Honckenya peploides (L.) Ehrh. | 10 | 0 | D, C: N11; D, C: N13: D, C: N21 | + |
| Sagina maritima Don | 6 | 4 | D, C: N21 | − |
| Silene borysthenica (Gruner) Walters | – | – | + | |
| Silene uniflora Roth/Silene maritima With. | 5 | 0 | D, C: N31; D, C: N34 | − |
| Silene viscosa Pers. | 5 | 0 | − | |
| Spergularia marina (L.) Besser /Spergularia salina J.Presl & C.Presl | 0 | 10 | + | |
| Spergularia media (L.) C.Presl | 0 | 10 | − | |
| Stellaria fennica (Murb.) Perfil. | 0 | 10 | − | |
| Crassulaceae | ||||
| Sedum anglicum Huds. | 5 | 0 | D, C: N34 | − |
| Euphorbiaceae | ||||
| Euphorbia palustris L. | 1 | 4 | + | |
| Fabaceae | ||||
| Anthyllis vulneraria subsp. maritima (Schweigg. ex K.G.Hagen) Corb. /Anthyllis maritima Schweigg. ex K.G.Hagen | – | – | − | |
| Lathyrus japonicus Willd./Lathyrus maritimus (L.) Fr. | 10 | 0 | D, C: N21 | + |
| Lotus maritimus L. | 0 | 6 | − | |
| Lotus tenuis Waldst. & Kit. ex Willd. | 0 | 7 | + | |
| Melilotus dentatus (Waldst. & Kit.) Desf. | 4 | 4 | − | |
| Ononis spinosa L. | 0 | 6 | − | |
| Trifolium fragiferum L. | 0 | 7 | + | |
| Gentianaceae | ||||
| Centaurium littorale (Turner) Gilmour | 0 | 6 | − | |
| Centaurium pulchellum (Sw.) Druce | 0 | 8 | + | |
| Lamiaceae | ||||
| Scutellaria hastifolia L. | 0 | 6 | + | |
| Malvaceae | ||||
| Althaea officinalis L. | 0 | 6 | + | |
| Orobanchaceae | ||||
| Euphrasia bottnica Kihlm. | 6 | 0 | − | |
| Odontites litoralis (Fr.) Fr. | 0 | 10 | − | |
| Papaveraceae | ||||
| Glaucium flavum Crantz | 7 | 0 | + | |
| Plantaginaceae | ||||
| Hippuris lanceolata Retz. | 0 | 10 | − | |
| Hippuris tetraphylla L.f. | 0 | 10 | − | |
| Linaria loeselii Schweigg. | – | – | + | |
| Plantago coronopus L. | 5 | 5 | D, C: N31; D, C: N34 | − |
| Plantago maritima L. | 3 | 4 | D, C: MA232; C: N31; C: N34 | + |
| Plumbaginaceae | ||||
| Armeria maritima (Mill.) Willd. | 4 | 3 | D, C: N31; D, C: N34 | + |
| Limonium humile Mill. | 0 | 10 | − | |
| Limonium vulgare Mill. | 0 | 10 | + | |
| Polygonaceae | ||||
| Polygonum oxyspermum C.A.Mey. & Bunge | 10 | 0 | − | |
| Rumex maritimus L. | 0 | 8 | − | |
| Rumex pseudonatronatus (Borbás) Murb. | 7 | 0 | − | |
| Primulaceae | ||||
| Lysimachia maritima (L.) Glasso, Banfi & Soldano/Glaux maritima L. | 3 | 7 | + | |
| Primula nutans Georgi | 10 | 0 | − | |
| Samolus valerandi L. | 0 | 8 | − | |
| Ranunculaceae | ||||
| Halerpestes cymbalaria Greene | 0 | 10 | − | |
| Ranunculus peltatus Schrank | 8 | 0 | − | |
| Family | No. of Species Evaluated | Stress Tolerator (%) | Common Explant Types | Key Growth Regulators | Long-Term Storage Success | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alismataceae | 2 | Direct organogenesis | Stolon apical explants, shoot tips | TA, BA, NAA | Not reported | Table S1 |
| Cyperaceae | 8 | Direct organogenesis, indirect organogenesis (callus) | Seeds, apical explants, immature inflorescence | BA, NAA, TDZ, 2,4D | Slow growth (up to 4 years, 5 °C) | Table S2 |
| Iridaceae | 5 | Indirect organogenesis (callus), somatic embryogenesis | Seeds, leaf base, flower buds | 2,4D, BA, NAA, KN | Not reported | Table S3 |
| Juncaceae | 5 | Indirect organogenesis (callus), direct organogenesis | Seeds, young inflorescence, shoot meristem | BA, NAA, 2,4D, TDZ, picloram | Slow growth (4 years), cryopreservation (LN) | Table S4 |
| Juncaginaceae | 1 | Initiation only | Seeds | – | Not reported | Table S5 |
| Poaceae | 6 | Indirect organogenesis (callus) | Seeds, mature apical shoots | 2,4D, BA, KN, Dicamba | Not reported | Table S6 |
| Amaranthaceae | 19 | Direct organogenesis, indirect organogenesis (callus) | Seeds. Stem/leaf explants, hypocotyls | BA, NAA, 2,4D, TDZ, KN | Not reported | Table S7 |
| Apiaceae | 3 | Somatic embryogenesis, direct organogenesis | Seeds, leaf, petiole | 2,4D, KIN, BA, NAA | Slow growth (2 years, 5 °C) | Table S8 |
| Asteraceae | 11 | Direct organogenesis, indirect organogenesis | Seeds, leaf, stem, flower explants | BA, NAA, 2,4D, TDZ, KN | Slow growth (up to 5 years, 5 °C) | Table S9 |
| Boraginaceae | 1 | Direct organogenesis | Leaf, nodal stem explants | BA, NAA, TDZ, IBA | Not reported | Table S10 |
| Brassicaceae | 7 | Direct organogenesis, indirect organogenesis | Seeds, leaf, hypocotyl, petiole | BA, NAA, 2,4D, TDZ, KN | Slow growth (3 years, 5 °C) | Table S11 |
| Caryophyllaceae | 7 | Direct organogenesis | Seeds, nodal segments, leaf | BA, NAA, KN, TDZ, 2,4D | Slow growth (3 years, 5 °C) | Table S12 |
| Crassulaceae | 7 | Direct organogenesis, indirect organogenesis | Leaf, apical meristem, petal | BA, NAA, 2,4D, TDZ | Not reported | Table S13 |
| Euphorbiaceae | 4 | Direct organogenesis, callus | Stem, seeds, floral explants | BA, NAA, IBA | Not reported | Table S14 |
| Fabaceae | 12 | Direct organogenesis, indirect organogenesis | Seeds, stem nodes, cotyledons | BA, MAA, 2,4D, TDZ | Slow growth (up to 5 years, 5 °C) | Table S15 |
| Gentianaceae | 4 | Direct organogenesis; somatic embryogenesis | Seeds, roots, flower buds | BA, IAA, NAA | Not reported | Table S16 |
| Lamiaceae | 4 | Direct organogenesis, callus, synseeds | Mature stem nodes, seeds | BA, NAA, KN | Slow growth (2 years); synseeds (8 weeks) | Table S17 |
| Malvaceae | 1 | Indirect organogenesis (callus); somatic embryogenesis | Stem nodes, seeds | BA, NAA, 2,4D, IBA | Not reported | Table S18 |
| Papaveraceae | 1 | Indirect organogenesis (callus); somatic embryogenesis | Seeds, stem explants | 2,4D, TDZ, BA | Not reported | Table S19 |
| Plantaginaceae | 2 | Direct organogenesis; indirect organogenesis | Seeds, stem explants | BAA, NAA, GA3, KN, IAA | Slow growth (up to 5 years, 5 °C) | Table S20 |
| Plumbaginaceae | 6 | Indirect organogenesis (callus), direct organogenesis | Seeds, immature inflorescence stems | BA, NAA, 2,4D, KN, TDZ | Slow growth (3 years); cryopreservation (shoot tips) | Table S21 |
| Polygonaceae | 10 | Direct organogenesis, callus | Nodal stems, leaf, seeds | BA, NAA, 2,4D, TDZ, KN | Not reported | Table S22 |
| Primulaceae | 4 | Direct organogenesis, callus | Seeds, shoot apical explants | BA, NAA, TDZ, 2,4D | Slow growth (3 years, 5 °C) | Table S23 |
| Ranunculaceae | 5 | Direct organogenesis; somatic embryogenesis | Seeds, nodal stems, rhizomes | BA, NAA, KN, TDZ, 2,4D | Slow growth (3 months) | Table S24 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Banaszczyk, L.; Purmale-Trasūne, L.; Ievinsh, G. Tissue Culture for Conservation of Coastal Plant Species in the Baltic Sea Region: A Review of Protocols, Opportunities, and Challenges. Conservation 2025, 5, 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation5040080
Banaszczyk L, Purmale-Trasūne L, Ievinsh G. Tissue Culture for Conservation of Coastal Plant Species in the Baltic Sea Region: A Review of Protocols, Opportunities, and Challenges. Conservation. 2025; 5(4):80. https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation5040080
Chicago/Turabian StyleBanaszczyk, Lidia, Līva Purmale-Trasūne, and Gederts Ievinsh. 2025. "Tissue Culture for Conservation of Coastal Plant Species in the Baltic Sea Region: A Review of Protocols, Opportunities, and Challenges" Conservation 5, no. 4: 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation5040080
APA StyleBanaszczyk, L., Purmale-Trasūne, L., & Ievinsh, G. (2025). Tissue Culture for Conservation of Coastal Plant Species in the Baltic Sea Region: A Review of Protocols, Opportunities, and Challenges. Conservation, 5(4), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation5040080

