Previous Article in Journal
Sodium-Doped Carbon Dots as Fluorescent Sensor for Highly Selective Detection of TNP Explosives in the Environment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Time-Dependent Hydrothermal Synthesis of TiO2 in the Presence of Zn2+: Effects on Photoconductivity

by
Tilemachos Georgakopoulos
1,*,
Georgios Samourgkanidis
2,
Nadia Todorova
3,
Christos Trapalis
3 and
Katerina Pomoni
1
1
Department of Physics, University of Patras, 26500 Patras, Greece
2
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Cyprus, Nicosia 1678, Cyprus
3
Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, NCSR Demokritos, 15341 Agia Paraskevi, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomanufacturing 2025, 5(4), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/nanomanufacturing5040017
Submission received: 31 August 2025 / Revised: 19 October 2025 / Accepted: 28 October 2025 / Published: 3 November 2025

Abstract

Titanium dioxide nanoparticles were synthesized via hydrothermal treatment of tetrabutyl titanate in sulfuric acid, with controlled reaction times (10 h and 24 h) and zinc sulfate as a modifier. XRD confirmed exclusive formation of the anatase phase, with longer reaction times promoting crystallite growth. SEM and BET analyses showed that introducing Zn during synthesis suppressed agglomeration, decreased the particle size, and modified porosity while maintaining the mesoporous nature of all samples. UV–Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy showed a band gap near 3.2 eV, which was unaffected by Zn content or morphology. Photoconductivity studies showed a several-orders-of-magnitude increase in conductivity under vacuum conditions, especially in samples heat-treated for 24 h, due to the generation of oxygen vacancies and Ti 3 + states that prolong the carrier lifetime. In particular, the TS24Z8 sample exhibited a photoconductivity enhancement of five orders of magnitude relative to its dark conductivity and nearly 30 times higher than that of the commercial P25 benchmark. In contrast, in air, photoconductivity remained low because of strong surface recombination with adsorbed oxygen. These results emphasize the critical influence of hydrothermal duration and zinc incorporation on the defect structure and electronic response of TiO 2 , offering insights for improved photocatalytic and optoelectronic applications.

1. Introduction

Titanium dioxide ( TiO 2 ) is one of the most extensively studied semiconductor materials due to its excellent chemical stability, non-toxicity, and unique electronic and optical properties. These characteristics make it highly suitable for applications such as photocatalysis, solar energy conversion, and environmental remediation [1]. However, the practical performance of pristine TiO 2 is often limited by its wide band gap, which restricts absorption to the ultraviolet region, and by the rapid recombination of photogenerated electron–hole pairs [2]. As a result, strategies to enhance its visible-light activity and charge separation efficiency have become a major focus in materials science research [3].
Beyond its fundamental scientific significance, TiO 2 has established itself as one of the most versatile functional materials, with applications spanning both environmental and energy-related fields. In environmental remediation, TiO 2 -based photocatalysts are widely utilized for the degradation of organic contaminants in wastewater treatment [4,5,6], the removal of volatile pollutants in air purification [7,8,9,10], and as self-cleaning and anti-fogging coatings on glass [11,12,13], ceramics [14], and construction surfaces [15]. The strong oxidative capability of TiO 2 under irradiation has also enabled its use in antimicrobial and antibacterial coatings [16,17,18], with growing interest in the healthcare and food packaging industries [19]. In the field of energy conversion [20] and storage, TiO 2 has been incorporated as a photoanode material in dye-sensitized and perovskite solar cells [21,22,23], as an electrode material in lithium-ion and sodium-ion batteries [24,25,26], and as a photoelectrode in water-splitting systems for sustainable hydrogen production [27,28,29]. More recently, TiO 2 nanostructures have been explored for applications in gas sensors [30], supercapacitors [31], and even biomedical devices such as drug delivery systems [32]. These diverse applications demonstrate the wide technological impact of TiO 2 while at the same time highlighting the urgency of addressing its intrinsic drawbacks in order to optimize efficiency and extend its practical utility in real-world systems.
To obtain TiO 2 materials with desirable properties, several synthesis techniques have been developed and widely studied [33,34]. Conventional methods such as sol–gel processing, precipitation, and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) allow for the preparation of TiO 2 with controlled particle sizes and phase compositions, while approaches like hydrothermal and solvothermal synthesis provide additional advantages in adjusting the morphology, crystallinity, and surface area. More advanced strategies, including atomic layer deposition (ALD) and electrochemical methods, have been employed for fabricating TiO 2 thin films and nanostructures with precise dimensional control. Each of these routes offers distinct benefits and limitations, and the choice of synthesis method often determines the resulting photocatalytic and electronic performance of TiO 2 -based materials. Rajkumar and Arunachalam [35] synthesized Lanthanum-doped TiO 2 using the co-precipitation method and annealed it at 600 °C. Structural and morphological analyses confirm improved crystallinity and needle-like particle formation upon doping and annealing. Photoconductivity studies in air show that LaTiO 2 exhibits a photosensitivity of 2.40, compared to 0.28 for pure TiO 2 , corresponding to an 8.6-fold enhancement, which is attributed to reduced recombination centers and prolonged carrier lifetimes due to effective photodesorption of surface oxygen molecules. In this work of ours [36], TiO 2 /ZnO nanocomposite thin films were synthesized via the sol–gel method, and their photoconductivity was studied at 300 K. The composites exhibited significantly reduced photoconductivity compared to the pure oxides, with Ti 50 Zn 50 O showing σ p around 2.60 × 10 8   Ω 1 m 1 in vacuum and 3.8 × 10 10   Ω 1 m 1 in air, indicating enhanced electron–hole recombination. Fukuhara et al. [37] synthesized fine TiO 2 powders via chemical vapor deposition (CVD) using titanium tetraisopropoxide and studied their photocatalytic activity. TiO 2 produced at 200 °C was amorphous and inactive, while higher temperatures (up to 500 °C) yielded crystalline particles with improved activity despite the reduced surface area. Calcination at 550 °C further enhanced the performance of low-temperature powders by increasing crystallinity. Notably, although the 500 °C TiO 2 had a smaller surface area than commercial JRC-TIO-4, its activity per unit surface area was higher, demonstrating that controlled CVD synthesis can yield more efficient photocatalysts. In this work [38], we studied Zn-modified TiO 2 /ZnO nanocomposites prepared via a one-step hydrothermal/solvothermal method. Zn incorporation promoted anatase crystallization, reduced aggregation, and slightly modified the band gap. The 8% Zn sample (TZ8) showed the highest photoconductivity ( σ p = 5.80 × 10 4   Ω 1 m 1 ) in vacuum, 46% higher than TiO 2 and 65% higher than P25, corresponding to enhanced photocatalytic NOx degradation under UV light. Sasinska et al. [39] investigated the effect of hydrogen plasma treatment on TiO 2 thin films grown by atomic layer deposition to enhance photoanode performance. Plasma-treated TiO 2 showed improved visible-light absorption, likely due to surface reduction, with XPS confirming the formation of Ti 3 + states. Photocurrent densities increased eightfold (1 ma/cm2 at 0.8 V vs. NHE) compared to untreated TiO 2 (0.12 mA/cm2); this is attributed to localized mid-gap states that improve separation and transport of photoexcited charge carriers under UV illumination. Kamble et al. [40] prepared amorphous TiO 2 thin films on FTO glass via low-cost chemical bath deposition. FE-SEM revealed creamy, high-surface-area morphology, and UV–Vis/PL studies showed band gaps of 2.84–3.43 eV. Photoelectrochemical measurements indicated a 3.24% conversion efficiency with a 0.43 fill factor, demonstrating the films potential for solar cell applications.
In this work, TiO 2 nanoparticles were synthesized via hydrothermal treatment of tetrabutyl titanate in sulfuric acid, with zinc sulfate as a modifier and reaction times of 10 h and 24 h. XRD confirmed pure anatase formation, with longer durations promoting crystallite growth. SEM and BET analyses showed that Zn incorporation suppressed agglomeration, reduced the particle size, and modified porosity while maintaining mesoporous characteristics. UV–Vis spectroscopy indicated a stable band gap of approximately 3.2 eV, independent of Zn content. Photoconductivity measurements revealed a strong enhancement under vacuum conditions, particularly for the samples heat-treated for 24 h, due to oxygen vacancies and Ti 3 + states that prolong the carrier lifetime, while in air, recombination with adsorbed oxygen limited conductivity. This work demonstrates that the combined influence of Zn 3 + presence during hydrothermal synthesis and reaction duration plays a key role in controlling the defect structure and electronic properties of TiO 2 . The transient photoconductivity results clearly show that the extended reaction time in the presence of Zn promotes the formation of oxygen vacancies and Ti 3 + centers, which markedly enhance the photoconductive response compared to commercial TiO 2 (P25). This Zn/time synergy provides a simple and controllable route to improve TiO 2 performance through self-doping induced by oxygen vacancies, without introducing additional dopants. These findings offer useful insights for the rational design of defect-engineered TiO 2 materials for photocatalytic and photoelectronic applications.

2. Materials and Methods

During the preparation of titanium dioxide, the raw materials and reagents listed in Table 1 were used. Titanium alkoxide, specifically tetrabutyl titanate (TBT), served as the precursor. Deionized water was employed for hydrolysis, while Zn 2 + ions were introduced as modifiers. The acidic environment provided by sulfuric acid was employed to control the phase formation of TiO 2 . Figure 1 schematically illustrates the stages involved in the synthesis of the titanium dioxide powder.
For the synthesis step, 5.50 mL of H 2 SO 4 was added to 100 mL of deionized water to prepare a 1 M sulfuric acid solution. Then, 3.32 mL of TBT was added dropwise, keeping the solution transparent. In some syntheses, specified amounts of ZnSO 4 · 7 H 2 O were also incorporated. The solution was stirred for approximately 30 min and then transferred into Teflon-lined autoclaves that were filled to 80% of their volume. After sealing the autoclaves in steel containers, they were placed in an oven at 180 °C for either 10 or 24 h. Following the reaction, the autoclaves were removed from the oven and allowed to cool to room temperature. The mixture was collected, and the precipitate was separated from the supernatant by centrifugation. The precipitate was washed several times with deionized water until the sulfuric acid was completely removed and the pH reached neutrality. Finally, the washed sample was placed in a glass dish and dried in an oven at 60 °C overnight to remove residual moisture. Table 2 summarizes the compositions of the samples along with their respective reaction times. Here we would like to add that the Zn:Ti molar ratio was selected based on established practices, where low modifier concentrations (<10%) effectively tune both the electronic and structural properties of metal oxides [41,42]. The use of ZnSO 4 as a precursor is particularly advantageous, as sulfate ions ( SO 4 2 ) are known to favor anatase phase formation during TiO 2 crystallization [43].
The crystalline phases of the prepared samples were analyzed using the Siemens D500 (Karlsruhe, Germany) X-ray diffractometer, with diffraction patterns recorded within the 2 θ range of 20–70°, employing a step size of 0.03° and a counting time of 4 s per step. The surface morphology and nanostructural features were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using an FEI Inspect instrument (Eindhoven, The Netherlands), operating with a tungsten filament at 25 kV and utilizing a secondary electron detector for image acquisition. Measurements were taken manually for a statistically significant number of particles to ensure representative sampling. Textural properties, including porosity and the surface area, were determined through nitrogen adsorption–desorption analysis carried out at liquid-nitrogen temperature using a Quantachrome Autosorb-iQ system (Graz, Austria). The specific surface area was calculated by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method, while the pore size distribution was obtained using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) approach. Finally, the optical characteristics were assessed by UV–Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy with a Shimadzu UV-2100 (Kyoto, Japan) spectrophotometer equipped with an integrating sphere, employing BaSO 4 as the non-absorbing reference material.
Photoconductivity measurements were performed in both vacuum and air at room temperature (300 K). For electrical characterization, TiO 2 powders were compacted into pellets under a pressure of 30 bar, yielding samples with thicknesses of 0.5–0.9 mm and a diameter of 10 mm. Silver electrodes were then deposited by thermal evaporation through a mask to ensure uniform contact geometry, and copper wires were attached using silver paste. The linear current–voltage (I-V) characteristics confirmed the ohmic behavior of the contacts. Each pellet was mounted in an individual sample holder to prevent cross-contamination and maintain stable electrical connections. During testing, a bias voltage of 5 V was applied, as the I-V response remained ohmic across the 1–50 V range. Measurements were performed inside a vacuum cryostat, where photocurrent was monitored under both illumination and dark conditions using a Keithley 6517A electrometer (Cleveland, Ohio, USA), with data collected at 10 s intervals. Illumination was provided by a 100 W xenon lamp equipped with a heat filter (KG3) to minimize thermal effects. The light intensity at the sample surface was adjusted to 240 W/m2 and measured using an Ophir PD300-BB radiometer head (Andover, Massachusetts, USA). Each specimen was exposed to two light cycles of 1200 s that interspersed with two dark intervals of equal duration. Prior to testing, the pellets were annealed at 170 °C for 90 min to remove any residual photogenerated effects, then stored overnight in darkness to stabilize at ambient temperature.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Crystalline Structures

Figure 2 shows the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the sample series after 10 and 24 h of reaction times. All samples crystallized exclusively into the anatase phase, in agreement with the reference pattern [JCPDS No. 73-1764], indicating that the acidic environment, particularly the presence of sulfate ions, favors the selective formation of anatase [43]. No peaks corresponding to zinc were detected, likely due to its removal during washing. Using the Scherrer equation, the crystallite sizes were calculated from the three main anatase reflections, and the results are summarized in Table 3.
For the TS10 series, crystallite sizes range from 15.8 to 18.1 nm, suggesting that the gradual addition of Zn during the synthesis stage results in only a slight increase in size, while in the TS24 series, the progressive addition of ZS during the synthesis stage produces a significant increase, with values between 17.5 and 24.3 nm. These findings indicate that longer reaction times (i.e., extended hydrothermal treatment in the autoclave) promote further crystallite growth [44,45,46]. Moreover, the XRD pattern of the TS10Z4 sample exhibits anisotropic crystallite growth along different crystallographic directions: the broad (004) diffraction corresponds to a reduced crystallite size along the [001] axis, while the intensity of the (101) reflection is related to the [101] direction. This anisotropy is consistent with our observations, where the TS10Z4 sample shows broadening of (004) alongside a narrower (200) peak, suggesting preferential growth along the a-axis and enhanced exposure of 001 facets [47,48,49].

3.2. Morphology and Band Gap Analysis

The morphology of the samples was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Figure 3 presents SEM images for all samples, illustrating both particle size and surface morphology.
The TS10 sample exhibits an average particle size of approximately 160 nm and shows evidence of agglomeration. With the addition of Zn during the synthesis process (4%Zn and 8%Zn), the average particle size decreases to 90 nm and 77 nm, respectively, accompanied by a slight reduction in agglomerates. The TS24 sample displays a smaller average particle size of about 85 nm, which further decreases to 78 nm and 68 nm upon the addition of 4%Zn and 8%Zn, respectively. This indicates that Zn addition during synthesis reduces the particle size and agglomeration in both series. A comparison between the two series reveals that the TS10 samples generally exhibit larger particle sizes than those of the TS24 series. Moreover, the 24 h samples show fewer agglomerates, suggesting that prolonged hydrothermal treatment in the autoclave (i.e., increased reaction time) promotes more pronounced crystal growth [46].
In order to determine the reflection and absorption regions of the samples in the UV-Vis range, they were analyzed using UV-Vis spectroscopy. The data obtained from the spectra were then used, along with the Kubelka–Munk function [50], to calculate the band gap energy (Eg) of the samples, with the results summarized in Table 4. Figure 4a,c show the diffuse reflectance spectra of this series of titania samples, while Figure 4b,d present the plot of [F(R)·E]1/2 versus photon energy (eV), illustrating the method used to determine Eg. The calculated band gap values indicate that all samples absorb around 3.2 eV, consistent with the anatase band gap. Furthermore, the band gap appears to be independent of the crystallographic structure and morphology of the samples.

3.3. Specific Surface Area

Figure 5 presents the nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms and the pore size distribution histograms of the samples, while Table 5 summarizes the results obtained from the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area analysis, including pore diameter, pore volume, and porosity percentage.
The adsorption–desorption isotherms are of type IV [51], which is characteristic of mesoporous materials, with an H3 hysteresis loop. Within the TS10 series, the TS10Z4 sample exhibits the highest specific surface area, consistent with the XRD results, indicating exposure of the 001 facets; this agrees with the literature reporting that anatase crystals with exposed 001 facets possess the highest specific surface area [52,53,54]. In the TS24 series, the highest surface area is observed for the undoped TS24 sample, with only minor variations among the samples. Pore size distribution histograms show that the pore diameters of both the TS10 and TS24 series fall within the range of 7–25 nm, which is typical of mesoporous materials according to the IUPAC classification [52,53,54]. Finally, it is observed that the addition of ZS during synthesis changes the pore diameter across all samples, as it acts as an additional structural modifier.

3.4. Photoconductivity

3.4.1. Vacuum

Figure 6 shows photoconductivity ( σ p ) as a function of time at 300 K under vacuum for all samples, along with commercial titania P25, which is used as a reference material for comparison. During the first illumination cycle, the photoconductivity values of this series increase by 2–3 orders of magnitude relative to dark conductivity.
Specifically, at the initial stages of illumination, a rapid rise in photoconductivity is observed, followed by a slower increase over time, with the rate varying among the samples and exhibiting sublinear behavior [55]. In the TS10Z4 and TS10Z8 samples, the recombination rate is more pronounced, leading to lower photoconductivity values. After the first illumination, an initial sharp decrease occurs due to strong carrier recombination, followed by a linear decrease, indicating that the rates of thermal excitation and recombination change over time in the same manner. During the second illumination cycle, photoconductivity reaches higher values than in the first, suggesting that some traps remain filled at the end of the first dark period and contribute during subsequent illumination. Furthermore, the photoconductivity of the TS10 sample exceeds that of P25, while the values for the 4%Zn and 8%Zn samples are slightly lower than those of P25.
Following the transient photoconductivity plots for the TS24 sample series at 300 K under vacuum, as in the previous case, the photoconductivity values exhibit a sharp increase during the initial stages of illumination, followed by a slower rise as the carrier recombination rate becomes significant. In this series, photoconductivity increases by 4–5 orders of magnitude. Under acidic conditions, photoconductivity reaches higher values compared to basic conditions. This behavior is attributed to the formation of anatase in acidic media, whereas in basic media, both the rutile and anatase phases are present [38]. Regarding reaction time, it is observed that a longer duration (24 h compared to 10 h) leads to higher photoconductivity values, as longer treatment favors improved particle formation, which is also supported by the SEM images. Another crucial factor in enhancing photoconductivity, as noted in the introduction, is the presence of oxygen vacancies. These vacancies, or self-doping with Ti 3 + , can create intermediate energy states within the band gap. The mechanism of Ti 3 + self-doping is based on the trapping of photogenerated electrons, which subsequently reduce Ti 4 + ions to Ti 3 + [56], while the photogenerated holes oxidize O 2 anions to O or even molecular O 2 . The detailed steps of oxygen vacancy formation are presented in Figure 7, which illustrates the Ti 3 + states within the TiO 2 band gap.
It has also been reported that the hydrothermal method [57,58], the solvothermal method [59,60], and the metal reduction method [61,62] are among the most suitable techniques for generating oxygen vacancies or Ti 3 + self-doping. Wang et al. [57] demonstrated that by adjusting the hydrothermal conditions, the concentration of oxygen vacancies could be controlled. Metallic zinc (formed from Zn 2 + under hydrothermal conditions) acts as a reductant, directly reducing Ti 4 + to Ti 3 + and creating oxygen vacancies. Simultaneously Zn 2 incorporation into the TiO 2 structure weakens the surrounding Ti-O bonds, significantly lowering the formation energy of oxygen vacancies and facilitating their creation. Both pathways synergistically enhance oxygen vacancy formation during synthesis, while the soluble Zn 2 byproducts are subsequently removed during washing, leaving behind the stable self-doped TiO 2 [42]. The presence of oxygen vacancies or Ti 3 + states, either on the surface or within the bulk, can suppress electron–hole recombination. It is well established that the Fermi level (EF) lies very close to the conduction band when the concentration of oxygen vacancies is high. These vacancies represent defect states located near the conduction band (Figure 7), facilitating easier transfer of photogenerated carriers between bands. Since oxygen vacancies carry a positive charge, Ti 3 + centers are formed near the conduction band. Moreover, Ti 3 + ions act as hole traps, hindering carrier recombination and thereby extending the lifetime of the charge carriers.
The rise-and-decay behavior of the photoconductivity response is strongly influenced by defect states acting either as trapping sites or recombination centers. Hence, analysis of the photoconductivity transients provides insights into their nature and distribution [63]. The carrier lifetime can be extracted by fitting (Figure 6a inset) a double-exponential function to either the rising or decaying part of the photoconductivity curve, as illustrated in Figure 6. The decay process is described by Equation (1):
σ p = σ o + A r exp ( t τ r ) + A t exp ( t τ t )
where σ o represents the initial photoconductivity (at the instant when illumination is switched off), τ r and τ t are time constants corresponding to the lifetimes of photogenerated carriers, and A r and A t are pre-exponential factors. The constants τ r and τ t correspond to two different recombination pathways. In the first case, recombination through deep traps is characterized by a short τ r (fast process), while in the second case, carriers captured in shallow traps exhibit a longer τ t (slow process) [64,65]. The trap depth can be estimated using Equation (2):
E = k B T ( l n S l n ( l n ( σ o σ p ) t ) )
where k B is the Boltzmann constant and S is the “attempt-to-escape” frequency, which is typically on the order of 109 at room temperature [63,66].
Based on the above discussion, it becomes evident that zinc promotes the formation of oxygen vacancies, as confirmed by the higher photoconductivity values observed for the TS24Z8 sample in the TS24 series. In contrast, such behavior is not observed in the TS10 series, where the addition of Zn during synthesis does not lead to increased photoconductivity. This suggests that preparation conditions, such as longer reaction times, play a crucial role in the generation of oxygen vacancies. Table 6 summarizes the dark conductivity and photoconductivity during the first and second illumination cycles under vacuum, as well as the corresponding trap energies.

3.4.2. Air

Figure 8 presents the transient photoconductivity as a function of time for all samples in air at 300 K, and Table 7 summarizes the values of dark conductivity and photoconductivity at the end of the first illumination. It is evident that the photoconductivity values are very low compared to vacuum, which is attributed to strong carrier recombination during illumination.
When the sample is exposed to air, oxygen strongly influences its photoconductivity. Upon illumination, electron–hole pairs are generated, and adsorbed oxygen molecules on the material’s surface act as electron scavengers. By capturing the photogenerated electrons, these oxygen molecules reduce carrier lifetimes, keeping the photoconductivity low ( O 2 + e O 2 ). The photogenerated holes migrate to the surface, where they neutralize the adsorbed O 2 ions, triggering the photodesorption of oxygen from the metal oxide surface ( O 2 + h + O 2 ). Thus, the balance between photoadsorption and photodesorption governs the amount of oxygen adsorbed on the surface [67]. Reports indicate that photoadsorption dominates, leading to reduced photoconductivity in air [68]. Additionally, the mobility of holes in TiO 2 is much lower than that of electrons, making electrons the primary charge carriers [69].
Specifically, the TS10 and TS10Z8 samples exhibit maximum photoconductivity within the first seconds of illumination, followed by a decrease due to intense recombination persisting until the end of illumination. In contrast, the TS10Z4 sample shows a slower rate of decrease. After the first illumination, the TS10 and TS10Z8 samples display a sharp drop caused by fast recombination, followed by a significant thermal release that increases photoconductivity. For the TS10Z4 sample, the decrease in photoconductivity during the dark period is initially smaller and continues more gradually until the end of the dark interval. Concerning the TS24 series, A similar behavior is observed for all samples: an initial maximum at the beginning of illumination, followed by strong carrier recombination. Additionally, during the dark period, the TS24Z4 sample exhibits a slight increase in photoconductivity, which is attributed to thermal excitation. Finally, it should be noted that the extremely low values of photoconductivity in air, for both the TS10 and TS24 series, are due to strong electron trapping by oxygen molecules adsorbed on the TiO 2 surface. The low photoconductivity of TS10Z4 is likely due to enhanced oxygen adsorption, which is facilitated by its high specific surface area resulting from the presence of Zn 2 + ions during synthesis. Furthermore, the observed slower decay rate is consistent with these low photoconductivity values, as a lower initial carrier density leads to a slower recombination rate. The use of Zn as a reducing agent during synthesis introduced oxygen vacancies into the TiO 2 structure. While these vacancies enhance photoconductivity in vacuum by providing charge carriers, they become preferential adsorption sites for atmospheric oxygen. The resulting surface reaction ( O 2 + h + O 2 ) converts these beneficial defects into recombination centers, explaining the suppressed photoconductivity observed in air measurements [57,70].

3.5. Comparison Results

Table 8 provides a comparison of TiO 2 -based materials prepared using various synthesis methods, emphasizing their intended properties and the resulting variations in performance. The optoelectronic and catalytic performance of TiO 2 -based materials is highly dependent on the synthesis route, as even similar compositions can exhibit drastically different behaviors. For instance, TiO 2 /ZnO films prepared by the sol–gel method showed suppressed photoconductivity [36], whereas the same system synthesized hydrothermally exhibited a 65% improvement under vacuum conditions [38], underscoring the decisive role of synthesis conditions in charge transport. Similarly, CVD-synthesized TiO 2 powders achieved improved surface area and catalytic performance [37]. Thin films produced via ALD showed an eightfold increase in photocurrent density [39], and electrochemical methods further enhanced conversion efficiency [40]. Within this context, our hydrothermally synthesized TiO 2 powders demonstrated a remarkable 30-fold increase in photoconductivity under vacuum compared to commercial P25, highlighting not only the critical influence of the synthesis strategy but also the potential of defect engineering to tailor TiO 2 for advanced photocatalytic and optoelectronic applications.

4. Conclusions

This work demonstrates that the interplay between hydrothermal synthesis duration and zinc incorporation is critical for engineering the defect structure and electronic properties of TiO 2 . Structural and morphological analyses confirmed that extended hydrothermal treatment promotes crystallite growth, while Zn addition during synthesis suppresses agglomeration, reduces the particle size, and modifies porosity without compromising the mesoporous framework. Optical studies showed that the band gap remains stable near 3.2 eV, independent of reaction conditions.
Photoconductivity investigations revealed striking differences between vacuum and air environments. Under vacuum conditions, samples synthesized for 24 h displayed conductivity enhancements of up to five orders of magnitude relative to dark conditions. In particular, the TS24Z8 sample exhibited nearly 30-fold higher photoconductivity than commercial P25, a performance increase attributed to the synergistic effects of prolonged hydrothermal treatment and Zn-induced oxygen vacancies/ Ti 3 + states that prolong carrier lifetimes. The enhanced photoconductivity of the final material provides direct evidence for the presence of these oxygen vacancies, which act as a form of self-doping in the TiO 2 lattice. Conversely, in air, strong surface recombination with adsorbed oxygen suppressed photoconductivity across all samples.
These results highlight hydrothermal synthesis combined with controlled Zn incorporation as an effective strategy to tune charge carrier dynamics and defect chemistry in TiO 2 . The approach provides a pathway toward designing high-performance photocatalysts and optoelectronic devices, where precise defect engineering is essential for achieving superior activity and stability.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.G., G.S., N.T., and K.P.; methodology, T.G., G.S., and N.T.; software, T.G.; validation T.G. and G.S.; formal analysis, T.G. and G.S.; investigation, T.G.; resources, C.T. and K.P.; data curation, T.G. and G.S.; writing—original draft preparation, T.G. and G.S.; writing—review and editing, T.G., G.S., N.T., and K.P.; visualization, T.G. and G.S.; supervision, C.T. and K.P.; project administration, N.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon request from the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kang, X.; Liu, S.; Dai, Z.; He, Y.; Song, X.; Tan, Z. Titanium dioxide: From engineering to applications. Catalysts 2019, 9, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ijaz, M.; Zafar, M. Titanium dioxide nanostructures as efficient photocatalyst: Progress, challenges and perspective. Int. J. Energy Res. 2021, 45, 3569–3589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pelaez, M.; Nolan, N.T.; Pillai, S.C.; Seery, M.K.; Falaras, P.; Kontos, A.G.; Dunlop, P.S.; Hamilton, J.W.; Byrne, J.A.; O’shea, K.; et al. A review on the visible light active titanium dioxide photocatalysts for environmental applications. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2012, 125, 331–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Agócs, T.Z.; Puskás, I.; Varga, E.; Molnár, M.; Fenyvesi, É. Stabilization of nanosized titanium dioxide by cyclodextrin polymers and its photocatalytic effect on the degradation of wastewater pollutants. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2016, 12, 2873–2882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Areerachakul, N.; Sakulkhaemaruethai, S.; Johir, M.; Kandasamy, J.; Vigneswaran, S. Photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants from wastewater using aluminium doped titanium dioxide. J. Water Process Eng. 2019, 27, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, C.; Guo, D.; Shen, T.; Hou, X.; Zhu, M.; Liu, S.; Hu, Q. Titanium dioxide/magnetic metal-organic framework preparation for organic pollutants removal from water under visible light. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2020, 589, 124484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. O’Keeffe, C.; Gannon, P.; Gilson, P.; Kafizas, A.; Parkin, I.P.; Binions, R. Air purification by heterogeneous photocatalytic oxidation with multi-doped thin film titanium dioxide. Thin Solid Film. 2013, 537, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Leng, Z.; Yu, H. Novel method of coating titanium dioxide on to asphalt mixture based on the breath figure process for air-purifying purpose. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2016, 28, 04015188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Verma, S.; Kumar, N.; Kim, K.H.; Park, J. Photocatalytic efficacy of air purifiers equipped with self-cleaning titanium dioxide xerogel coatings against gaseous formaldehyde: A study using DRIFTS and DFT analysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 486, 150269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, Q.; Zhan, X.; Fan, C.; Yang, X.; Li, B.; Liu, H.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, K.; Tang, P. Rational design of versatile 1D Ti–O-based core–shell nanostructures for efficient pollutant removal and solar fuel production. J. Mater. Chem. A 2024, 12, 33290–33300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kasanen, J.; Suvanto, M.; Pakkanen, T.T. Self-cleaning, titanium dioxide based, multilayer coating fabricated on polymer and glass surfaces. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 111, 2597–2606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kayani, Z.N.; Saleem, Z.; Riaz, S.; Naseem, S.; Saleemi, F. Deposition of porous titanium oxide thin films as anti-fogging and anti-reflecting medium. Optik 2016, 127, 5124–5127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Syafiq, A.; Balakrishnan, V.; Rahim, N.A. Durable self-cleaning nano-titanium dioxide superhydrophilic coating with anti-fog property. Pigment Resin Technol. 2024, 53, 261–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chao, S.; Petrovsky, V.; Dogan, F. Effects of sintering temperature on the microstructure and dielectric properties of titanium dioxide ceramics. J. Mater. Sci. 2010, 45, 6685–6693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Taiwo, L.A.; Obianyo, I.I.; Amu, O.O.; Omoniyi, A.O.; Onwualu, A.P.; Soboyejo, A.B. Effects of titanium dioxide coatings on building composites for sustainable construction applications. Cogent Eng. 2022, 9, 2151168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Felice, B.; Seitz, V.; Bach, M.; Rapp, C.; Wintermantel, E. Antimicrobial polymers: Antibacterial efficacy of silicone rubber–titanium dioxide composites. J. Compos. Mater. 2017, 51, 2253–2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Abdulazeem, L.; Al-Amiedi, B.; Alrubaei, H.A.; AL-Mawlah, Y.H. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles as antibacterial agents against some pathogenic bacteria. Drug Invent. Today 2019, 12, 963–967. [Google Scholar]
  18. Yao, Y.; Lin, P.; Ye, D.; Miao, H.; Cao, L.; Zhang, P.; Xu, J.; Dai, L. Enhanced Long-Term Antibacterial and Osteogenic Properties of Silver-Loaded Titanium Dioxide Nanotube Arrays for Implant Applications. Int. J. Nanomed. 2025, 20, 3749–3764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, J.; Zhang, D.; Hou, C. Application of nano-titanium dioxide in food antibacterial packaging materials. Bioengineering 2024, 12, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Singh, J.; Sahu, K.; Singh, R.; Som, T.; Kotnala, R.; Mohapatra, S. Thermal annealing induced strong photoluminescence enhancement in Ag-TiO2 plasmonic nanocomposite thin films. J. Alloy. Compd. 2019, 786, 750–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shen, P.S.; Tseng, C.M.; Kuo, T.C.; Shih, C.K.; Li, M.H.; Chen, P. Microwave-assisted synthesis of titanium dioxide nanocrystalline for efficient dye-sensitized and perovskite solar cells. Sol. Energy 2015, 120, 345–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Balis, N.; Zaky, A.A.; Perganti, D.; Kaltzoglou, A.; Sygellou, L.; Katsaros, F.; Stergiopoulos, T.; Kontos, A.G.; Falaras, P. Dye sensitization of titania compact layer for efficient and stable perovskite solar cells. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2018, 1, 6161–6171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hsu, C.Y.; Al-Salman, H.; Hussein, H.H.; Juraev, N.; Mahmoud, Z.H.; Al-Shuwaili, S.J.; Ahmed, H.H.; Ami, A.A.; Ahmed, N.M.; Azat, S.; et al. Experimental and theoretical study of improved mesoporous titanium dioxide perovskite solar cell: The impact of modification with graphene oxide. Heliyon 2024, 10, e26633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yan, Z.; Liu, L.; Tan, J.; Zhou, Q.; Huang, Z.; Xia, D.; Shu, H.; Yang, X.; Wang, X. One-pot synthesis of bicrystalline titanium dioxide spheres with a core–shell structure as anode materials for lithium and sodium ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2014, 269, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lou, S.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, J.; Yin, G.; Du, C.; Sun, X. Ti-based oxide anode materials for advanced electrochemical energy storage: Lithium/sodium ion batteries and hybrid pseudocapacitors. Small 2019, 15, 1904740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, X.; Zhang, K.; Ao, H.; Gong, Y.; Yu, K.; Liang, C. Template-free synthesis of hollow titanium dioxide microspheres and amorphous titanium dioxide microspheres with superior lithium and sodium storage performance. J. Energy Storage 2025, 105, 114759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, R.; Weng, Y.; Zhou, X.; Wang, X.; Mi, Y.; Chong, R.; Han, H.; Li, C. Achieving overall water splitting using titanium dioxide-based photocatalysts of different phases. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 2377–2382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Miyoshi, A.; Nishioka, S.; Maeda, K. Water splitting on rutile TiO2-based photocatalysts. Chem.-Eur. J. 2018, 24, 18204–18219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kumar, V.; Prasad Singh, G.; Kumar, M.; Kumar, A.; Singh, P.; Ansu, A.K.; Sharma, A.; Alam, T.; Yadav, A.S.; Dobrota, D. Nanocomposite marvels: Unveiling breakthroughs in photocatalytic water splitting for enhanced hydrogen evolution. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 6147–6164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ramanavicius, S.; Jagminas, A.; Ramanavicius, A. Gas sensors based on titanium oxides. Coatings 2022, 12, 699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Singh, G.; Kumar, Y.; Husain, S. Fabrication of symmetric polyaniline/nano-titanium dioxide/activated carbon supercapacitor device in different electrolytic mediums: Role of high surface area of carbon and facile interactions with nano-titanium dioxide for high-performance supercapacitor. Energy Technol. 2023, 11, 2200931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zuo, F.; Zhu, Y.; Wu, T.; Li, C.; Liu, Y.; Wu, X.; Ma, J.; Zhang, K.; Ouyang, H.; Qiu, X.; et al. Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: Progress in synthesis and application in drug delivery. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Singh, R.; Kumar, M.; Saini, M.; Satpati, B.; Som, T. White light-driven photo response of TiO2 thin films: Influence of substrate texturing. Sol. Energy 2018, 174, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chandoliya, R.; Sharma, S.; Sharma, V.; Joshi, R.; Sivanesan, I. Titanium dioxide nanoparticle: A comprehensive review on synthesis, applications and toxicity. Plants 2024, 13, 2964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rajkumar, C.; Arulraj, A. One-step synthesis of needle-like lanthanum-doped TiO2 nanomaterials and their photoconductivity activity in air medium. Mater. Lett. 2025, 380, 137733. [Google Scholar]
  36. Georgakopoulos, T.; Todorova, N.; Pomoni, K.; Trapalis, C. On the transient photoconductivity behavior of sol–gel TiO2/ZnO composite thin films. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2015, 410, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fukuhara, Y.; Yamakawa, T.; Sakai, Y.; YAMASAKI, A.; SATOKAWA, S.; KOJIMA, T. Synthesis of TiO2 by CVD using Titanium Tetraisopropoxide and their Photocatalytic Activity. J. Ecotechnol. Res. 2010, 15, 85–89. [Google Scholar]
  38. Georgakopoulos, T.; Todorova, N.; Boukos, N.; Pomoni, K.; Trapalis, C. Evaluation of the photoconductive and photocatalytic properties of nanocrystalline TiO2/ZnO powder systems prepared by one-step hydro-solvothermal method. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2025, 322, 118637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sasinska, A.; Singh, T.; Wang, S.; Mathur, S.; Kraehnert, R. Enhanced photocatalytic performance in atomic layer deposition grown TiO2 thin films via hydrogen plasma treatment. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2015, 33, 01A152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kamble, A.A.; Ubale, P.A.; Jadhav, A.L.; Jadhav, S.L.; Kadam, A.V.; Kanamadi, C.M.; Bhuse, V.M. Studies on optical, structure, and photoconductivity of titanium dioxide thin films prepared by chemical bath deposition via aqueous route. In Macromolecular Symposia; Wiley Online Library: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2021; Volume 400, p. 2100020. [Google Scholar]
  41. Chen, X.; Mao, S.S. Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: Synthesis, properties, modifications, and applications. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2891–2959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zheng, Z.; Huang, B.; Meng, X.; Wang, J.; Wang, S.; Lou, Z.; Wang, Z.; Qin, X.; Zhang, X.; Dai, Y. Metallic zinc-assisted synthesis of Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 with tunable phase composition and visible-light photocatalytic activity. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 868–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhao, Z.; Sun, Z.; Zhao, H.; Zheng, M.; Du, P.; Zhao, J.; Fan, H. Phase control of hierarchically structured mesoporous anatase TiO2 microspheres covered with {001} facets. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 21965–21971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zlobin, V.; Nevedomskiy, V.; Almjasheva, O. Formation and growth of anatase TiO2 nanocrystals under hydrothermal conditions. Mater. Today Commun. 2023, 36, 106436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kojima, T.; Baba, T.; Inamoto, K.; Isowaki, R.; Yukita, C.; Ujiie, K.; Takeda, A.; Shiba, F.; Uekawa, N. Preparation of porous titania particles by partial dissolution and hot-water or hydrothermal treatment of hydrous titania. Adv. Appl. Ceram. 2023, 122, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, H.; Li, T.; Liu, H.; Huang, B.; Zhang, Q. Hierarchical flower-like nanostructures of anatase TiO2 nanosheets dominated by {001} facets. J. Alloy. Compd. 2016, 657, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  47. Ong, W.J.; Tan, L.L.; Chai, S.P.; Yong, S.T.; Mohamed, A.R. Highly reactive {001} facets of TiO2-based composites: Synthesis, formation mechanism and characterization. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 1946–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pantaleone, S.; Pellegrino, F.; Maurino, V.; Corno, M.; Ugliengo, P.; Mino, L. Disclosing the true atomic structure of {001} facets in shape-engineered TiO2 anatase nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. A 2024, 12, 4325–4332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhao, C.; Ren, L.; Shi, Y.; Wang, X.; Huang, W.; Xie, H. Advances and recent applications in high-energy {001} facets of anatase TiO2: A review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 115764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Murphy, A. Modified Kubelka–Munk model for calculation of the reflectance of coatings with optically-rough surfaces. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2006, 39, 3571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Brunauer, S.; Emmett, P. The use of van der waals adsorption isotherms in determining the surface area of iron synthetic ammonia catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1935, 57, 1754–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Emmett, P.H.; Brunauer, S. The use of low temperature van der Waals adsorption isotherms in determining the surface area of iron synthetic ammonia catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1937, 59, 1553–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sing, K.S. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Recommendations 1984). Pure Appl. Chem. 1985, 57, 603–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rouquerol, J.; Avnir, D.; Everett, D.; Fairbridge, C.; Haynes, M.; Pernicone, N.; Ramsay, J.; Sing, K.; Unger, K. Guidelines for the characterization of porous solids. In Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1994; Volume 87, pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  55. Jiang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, J.; Rong, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Pan, C. Characterization of oxygen vacancy associates within hydrogenated TiO2: A positron annihilation study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 22619–22624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Xiao-Quan, C.; Huan-Bin, L.; Guo-Bang, G. Preparation of nanometer crystalline TiO2 with high photo-catalytic activity by pyrolysis of titanyl organic compounds and photo-catalytic mechanism. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2005, 91, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, X.; Gao, S.; Huang, B.; Dai, Y. Preparation of Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 nanoparticles and their visible light photocatalytic activity. Chin. J. Catal. 2015, 36, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Qiu, B.; Zhou, Y.; Ma, Y.; Yang, X.; Sheng, W.; Xing, M.; Zhang, J. Facile synthesis of the Ti3+ self-doped TiO2-graphene nanosheet composites with enhanced photocatalysis. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Sirisuk, A.; Klansorn, E.; Praserthdam, P. Effects of reaction medium and crystallite size on Ti3+ surface defects in titanium dioxide nanoparticles prepared by solvothermal method. Catal. Commun. 2008, 9, 1810–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Xin, X.; Xu, T.; Yin, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, C. Management on the location and concentration of Ti3+ in anatase TiO2 for defects-induced visible-light photocatalysis. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 176, 354–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Satuf, M.L.; Brandi, R.J.; Cassano, A.E.; Alfano, O.M. Photocatalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol: A kinetic study. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2008, 82, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Si, L.; Huang, Z.; Lv, K.; Tang, D.; Yang, C. Facile preparation of Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 nanosheets with dominant {0 0 1} facets using zinc powder as reductant. J. Alloy. Compd. 2014, 601, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Georgakopoulos, T.; Apostolopoulou, A.; Todorova, N.; Pomoni, K.; Trapalis, C.; Stathatos, E. Evaluation of photoconductive and photoelectrochemical properties of mesoporous nanocrystalline TiO2 powders and films prepared in acidic and alkaline media. J. Alloy. Compd. 2017, 692, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mahesh, A.; Jawahar, I.; Biju, V. Photogenerated charge carrier processes in carbonate derived nanocrystalline ZnO: Photoluminescence, photocurrent response and photocatalytic activity. Appl. Phys. A 2024, 130, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ruda, H.E. Photoconductivity of Nanowire Systems. Photocond. Photocond. Mater. Fundam. Tech. Appl. 2022, 2, 493–522. [Google Scholar]
  66. Randall, J.T.; Wilkins, M.H.F. Phosphorescence and electron traps-I. The study of trap distributions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A. Math. Phys. Sci. 1945, 184, 365–389. [Google Scholar]
  67. Georgakopoulos, T.; Sofianou, M.; Pomoni, K.; Todorova, N.; Giannakopoulou, T.; Trapalis, C. The environment effect on the electrical conductivity and photoconductivity of anatase TiO2 nanoplates with silver nanoparticles photodeposited on {101} crystal facets. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2016, 56, 386–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhao, L.; Sun, S.; Zhang, S.; Liu, Z.; Huang, B.; Wang, N.; Zhang, J.; Li, X. UV-activated hollow ZnO@ TiO2 heterostructured nanaospheres for detecting formaldehyde at room temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2023, 394, 134306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Dittrich, T.; Sydorenko, J.; Spalatu, N.; Nickel, N.H.; Mere, A.; Krunks, M.; Oja Acik, I. Synthesis control of charge separation at anatase TiO2 thin films studied by transient surface photovoltage spectroscopy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 43163–43170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pan, X.; Yang, M.Q.; Fu, X.; Zhang, N.; Xu, Y.J. Defective TiO2 with oxygen vacancies: Synthesis, properties and photocatalytic applications. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 3601–3614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the titanium dioxide powder synthesis stages.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the titanium dioxide powder synthesis stages.
Nanomanufacturing 05 00017 g001
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the samples together with the corresponding JCPDS reference pattern. Sample series after (a) 10 h and (b) 24 h of reaction times.
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the samples together with the corresponding JCPDS reference pattern. Sample series after (a) 10 h and (b) 24 h of reaction times.
Nanomanufacturing 05 00017 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of the samples’ morphology: (a) TS10, (b) TS24, (c) TS10Z4, (d) TS24Z4, (e) TS10Z8, and (f) TS24Z8. Arrows indicate the magnified areas shown.
Figure 3. SEM images of the samples’ morphology: (a) TS10, (b) TS24, (c) TS10Z4, (d) TS24Z4, (e) TS10Z8, and (f) TS24Z8. Arrows indicate the magnified areas shown.
Nanomanufacturing 05 00017 g003
Figure 4. Diffuse reflectance spectra of the (a) TS10 and (c) TS24 sample series and determination of the band gap energies using the Kubelka–Munk function for the (b) TS10 and (d) TS24 sample series.
Figure 4. Diffuse reflectance spectra of the (a) TS10 and (c) TS24 sample series and determination of the band gap energies using the Kubelka–Munk function for the (b) TS10 and (d) TS24 sample series.
Nanomanufacturing 05 00017 g004
Figure 5. Representation of nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms for (a) TS10 and (e) TS24 and pore size distribution histograms of the (bd) TS10 and (fh) TS24 sample series.
Figure 5. Representation of nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms for (a) TS10 and (e) TS24 and pore size distribution histograms of the (bd) TS10 and (fh) TS24 sample series.
Nanomanufacturing 05 00017 g005aNanomanufacturing 05 00017 g005b
Figure 6. Transient photoconductivity measured at 300 K under vacuum for (a) P25 and TS10, (b) TS10Z4 and TS10Z8, (c) P25 and TS24, and (d) TS24Z4 and TS24Z8 samples. Light ON/OFF cycles represent the different illumination periods experienced by the samples. The inset illustrates the fitting process used to extract the carrier lifetime.
Figure 6. Transient photoconductivity measured at 300 K under vacuum for (a) P25 and TS10, (b) TS10Z4 and TS10Z8, (c) P25 and TS24, and (d) TS24Z4 and TS24Z8 samples. Light ON/OFF cycles represent the different illumination periods experienced by the samples. The inset illustrates the fitting process used to extract the carrier lifetime.
Nanomanufacturing 05 00017 g006
Figure 7. Representation of Ti 3 + states within the band gap of TiO 2 .
Figure 7. Representation of Ti 3 + states within the band gap of TiO 2 .
Nanomanufacturing 05 00017 g007
Figure 8. Transient photoconductivity measured at 300 K in air for (a) TS10, (b) TS10Z4 and TS10Z8, (c) TS24 and TS24Z4, and (d) TS24Z8 samples. The light ON/OFF cycles indicating the different illumination periods experienced by the samples.
Figure 8. Transient photoconductivity measured at 300 K in air for (a) TS10, (b) TS10Z4 and TS10Z8, (c) TS24 and TS24Z4, and (d) TS24Z8 samples. The light ON/OFF cycles indicating the different illumination periods experienced by the samples.
Nanomanufacturing 05 00017 g008
Table 1. The chemical substances, with their abbreviations, sources, and properties, are listed here.
Table 1. The chemical substances, with their abbreviations, sources, and properties, are listed here.
Reagent/MaterialAbbreviationSourcePurity
Titanium butoxide ( C 16 H 36 O 4 Ti)TBTMerck (Darmstadt, Germany)97%
Sulfuric acid ( H 2 SO 4 )SAFluka (Buchs, Switzerland)95%
Zinc sulfate heptahydrate ( ZnSO 4 · 7 H 2 O)ZSSigma-Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany)99%
Table 2. Compositions of the samples along with their respective reaction times.
Table 2. Compositions of the samples along with their respective reaction times.
SamplesZS (g)AbbreviationReaction Time (h)
TiO 2 10 h0TS1010
TiO 2 10 h 4% ZS0.120TS10Z410
TiO 2 10 h 8% ZS0.183TS10Z810
TiO 2 24 h0TS2424
TiO 2 24 h 4% ZS0.120TS24Z424
TiO 2 24 h 8% ZS0.183TS24Z824
Table 3. Crystallite size of the main anatase peaks for the sample series.
Table 3. Crystallite size of the main anatase peaks for the sample series.
Samplesd(101) nmd(004) nmd(200) nm
TS1015.8 ± 0.317.9 ± 0.415.0 ± 0.5
TS10Z416.1 ± 0.315.3 ± 0.516.1 ± 0.6
TS10Z816.6 ± 0.318.1 ± 0.416.5 ± 0.6
TS2417.5 ± 0.421.7 ± 0.517.8 ± 0.3
TS24Z419.7 ± 0.518.6 ± 0.419.3 ± 0.8
TS24Z822.2 ± 0.324.3 ± 0.722.6 ± 0.6
Table 4. Band gap energies of the samples.
Table 4. Band gap energies of the samples.
SamplesEg (eV)
TS103.13
TS10Z43.20
TS10Z83.19
TS243.20
TS24Z43.15
TS24Z83.21
Table 5. Summarized surface analysis results.
Table 5. Summarized surface analysis results.
SamplesS (m2/g)Vp (cm3/g)Dpor (nm)ϕ (%)
TS1045.330.0997.2827.26
TS10Z462.480.37619.6458.82
TS10Z854.850.17310.6539.64
TS2447.630.17313.4139.68
TS24Z446.200.36224.5457.92
TS24Z836.150.16116.1737.91
Table 6. Values of dark conductivity ( σ d ) before the first illumination and photoconductivity ( σ p ) at the end of the first and second illumination cycles, along with the trap energies and time constants under vacuum.
Table 6. Values of dark conductivity ( σ d ) before the first illumination and photoconductivity ( σ p ) at the end of the first and second illumination cycles, along with the trap energies and time constants under vacuum.
Samples σ d   Ω ( 1 m 1 ) σ p 1   Ω ( 1 m 1 ) σ p 2   Ω ( 1 m 1 ) E1 (eV)E2 (eV) τ r  (s) τ t  (s)
P251.53 ×  10 7 2.24 ×  10 4 3.52 ×  10 4 0.6710.671431646
TS101.46 ×  10 7 3.55 ×  10 4 5.96 ×  10 4 0.6820.614641043
TS10Z44.66 ×  10 7 4.66 ×  10 5 8.43 ×  10 5 0.6890.620831336
TS10Z86.22 ×  10 8 1.44 ×  10 4 2.20 ×  10 4 0.6880.602411285
TS241.44 ×  10 8 7.78 ×  10 4 1.20 ×  10 3 0.6900.604441377
TS24Z46.04 ×  10 7 3.14 ×  10 3 4.71 ×  10 3 0.6880.602411324
TS24Z89.98 ×  10 8 6.70 ×  10 3 9.00 ×  10 3 0.6920.613411012
Table 7. Values of dark conductivity ( σ d ) before the first illumination and photoconductivity ( σ p ) at the end of the first illumination.
Table 7. Values of dark conductivity ( σ d ) before the first illumination and photoconductivity ( σ p ) at the end of the first illumination.
Samples σ d   Ω ( 1 m 1 ) σ p 1   Ω ( 1 m 1 )
TS101.46 ×  10 6 2.65 ×  10 7
TS10Z42.78 ×  10 7 3.40 ×  10 8
TS10Z82.26 ×  10 7 2.55 ×  10 8
TS243.50 ×  10 8 4.46 ×  10 8
TS24Z43.49 ×  10 7 2.34 ×  10 8
TS24Z82.76 ×  10 7 4.89 ×  10 7
Table 8. Comparison of TiO 2 -based materials synthesized by different methods, highlighting their targeted properties and corresponding performance changes.
Table 8. Comparison of TiO 2 -based materials synthesized by different methods, highlighting their targeted properties and corresponding performance changes.
Ref.Synthesis MethodMaterialPropertyChange
[36]Sol-gel TiO 2 /ZnO filmPhotoconductivityPerformance reduced
[37]Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) TiO 2 powderSurface areaIncreased activity
[38]Hydrothermal/solvothermal TiO 2 /ZnO powderPhotoconductivity65% increase in vacuum
[39]Atomic layer deposition (ALD) TiO 2 filmPhotocurrent density×8 increase
[40]Electrochemical TiO 2 filmConversion efficiencyImproved
CWHydrothermal TiO 2 powderPhotoconductivity×30 increase in vacuum
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Georgakopoulos, T.; Samourgkanidis, G.; Todorova, N.; Trapalis, C.; Pomoni, K. Time-Dependent Hydrothermal Synthesis of TiO2 in the Presence of Zn2+: Effects on Photoconductivity. Nanomanufacturing 2025, 5, 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/nanomanufacturing5040017

AMA Style

Georgakopoulos T, Samourgkanidis G, Todorova N, Trapalis C, Pomoni K. Time-Dependent Hydrothermal Synthesis of TiO2 in the Presence of Zn2+: Effects on Photoconductivity. Nanomanufacturing. 2025; 5(4):17. https://doi.org/10.3390/nanomanufacturing5040017

Chicago/Turabian Style

Georgakopoulos, Tilemachos, Georgios Samourgkanidis, Nadia Todorova, Christos Trapalis, and Katerina Pomoni. 2025. "Time-Dependent Hydrothermal Synthesis of TiO2 in the Presence of Zn2+: Effects on Photoconductivity" Nanomanufacturing 5, no. 4: 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/nanomanufacturing5040017

APA Style

Georgakopoulos, T., Samourgkanidis, G., Todorova, N., Trapalis, C., & Pomoni, K. (2025). Time-Dependent Hydrothermal Synthesis of TiO2 in the Presence of Zn2+: Effects on Photoconductivity. Nanomanufacturing, 5(4), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/nanomanufacturing5040017

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop