Previous Article in Journal
The Curious Case of Woodcreepers: Cytogenomic Evidence Based on the Position of NORs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Forgotten for Decades: Revalidation and Redescription of Raiamas harmandi (Sauvage, 1880) (Cypriniformes: Danionidae) from the Mekong River Basin

1
State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China
2
Southeast Asia Biodiversity Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yezin, Nay Pyi Taw 05282, Myanmar
3
Yunnan International Joint Laboratory of Southeast Asia Biodiversity Conservation, Mengla 666303, China
4
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
5
Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China
6
Forest Department, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Conservation, Nay Pyi Taw 15011, Myanmar
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Taxonomy 2025, 5(3), 42; https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy5030042
Submission received: 22 July 2025 / Revised: 17 August 2025 / Accepted: 18 August 2025 / Published: 20 August 2025

Abstract

The genus Raiamas currently comprises 18 valid species, only 2 of which occur in Asia; the remaining 16 are endemic to Africa. Raiamas harmandi was originally described by Sauvage in 1880 as Bola harmandi, which is distributed in the Great Lakes, Cambodia, the Mekong River Basin. It was considered a synonym of R. guttatus by later researchers. In this study, we examined 49 Raiamas individuals from the Mekong, Irrawaddy, and Salween river basins, recording both meristic counts and morphometric measurements. Based on the morphological evidence, we revised the taxonomy of Raiamas in the Mekong River Basin, confirming R. harmandi as a valid species and providing a comprehensive redescription. Raiamas harmandi can be distinguished from R. guttatus mainly by having more predorsal scales (25–28 vs. 21–23) and a different color pattern on the lateral body. Utilizing a total of 44 aligned COI and Cyt b sequences—including eight newly sequenced individuals of Raiamas from three river basins—we reconstructed its phylogenetic relationships. The analysis strongly supported four R. harmandi individuals from the Mekong River Basin forming a distinct clade, which was the sister to the clade comprising five R. guttatus individuals from the Irrawaddy and Salween river basins. Genetic distances between R. harmandi and R. guttatus ranged from 14.0 to 14.9% for COI and 16.1 to 17.0% for Cyt b. Distributionally, R. harmandi occurs throughout the Mekong River Basin, as evidenced by combined voucher specimens and molecular sequence data.

1. Introduction

The family Danionidae, with 367 species in 39 genera, is currently recognized as comprising 4 subfamilies: Danioninae, Chedrinae, Esominae, and Rasborinae [1,2,3]. Danioninae, Esominae, and Rasborinae exhibit distributions restricted to South, Southeast, and East Asia (with Rasbora steineri constituting the only species occurring in Southeast China), whereas Chedrinae occurs across both Asia and Africa. The genus Raiamas Jordan, 1919, one of the most elongate-bodied genera within Chedrinae and the entire Danionidae, inhabits freshwater rivers throughout Africa, South Asia, and Southeast Asia, characterized most notably by an exceptionally elongate gape [4,5].
With 18 currently valid species [1], Raiamas represents a relatively low species diversity genus within Danionidae. Sixteen species are endemic to Africa, where no new taxa have been described since the addition of two species in 2018 [5]. In contrast, Asia hosts only two species and has seen no new species of Raiamas for over a century. In earlier taxonomic studies, numerous African species were assigned to the genus Raiamas owing to their morphological similarity, particularly the elongate maxilla reaching to or beyond the eye center and the lateral body usually marked with numerous spots or black bars—features that distinguish Raiamas from other members of the family Danionidae [5]. However, recent evidence indicates that the two Asian species, R. bola (Hamilton, 1822) and R. guttatus (Day, 1870), differ from their African congeners in the presence of barbels, the relative length of the upper jaw, the color pattern of the caudal fin, and the number of branched anal-fin rays [6,7,8,9], as well as in their phylogenetic relationships [10]. Taken together, these findings suggest that the African taxa may represent a distinct genus.
Raiamas bola was originally described as Cyprinus bola by Hamilton (1822) based on specimens from the Brahmaputra River, India [6]. Subsequently, several new Indian taxa were described, including C. goha, Opsarius gracilis, O. megastomus, Leuciscus salmoides, Brailius corbetti, and B. jalkapoorei [6,11,12,13,14]. These taxa later were synonymized with R. bola through taxonomic revision [15,16,17]. Raiamas bola is now considered widely distributed along the Himalayan foothills of South Asia, encompassing Pakistan, Nepal, Bhutan, India, and Bangladesh.
Raiamas guttatus was first described as Opsarius guttatus by Day (1870) based on collections from the Irrawaddy River, Myanmar [7]. It was later recorded in the Salween River Basin. Sauvage described Bola harmandi in 1880 from the Great Lake (Tonlé Sap Lake, the Mekong River Basin) of Cambodia [18], while Yang and Hwang described Luciosoma fasciata in 1964 from the Lancangjiang River (the upper Mekong River Basin) in Yunnan Province, China [19]. Subsequent revisions synonymized both Mekong River Basin taxa under R. guttatus [15,20]. Recent records from Sumatra and the Malay Peninsula have expanded its known range [21,22], resulting in the current interpretation that nearly all Southeast Asian Raiamas populations represent R. guttatus. However, neither morphological nor phylogenetic studies have sufficiently considered implications of this broad trans-basin distribution. Investigations have typically relied on material from single river system, potentially obscuring hidden diversity within this widely distributed species.
The aim of this study is to employ comparative morphology and phylogenetic reconstruction on R. guttatus samples from the Irrawaddy, Salween, and Mekong River basins. The study seeks to assess species-level divergence among these populations, with the goal of determining whether the Mekong populations constitute a distinct and valid species. Based on the findings, we aim to revalidate Raiamas harmandi (originally described as Bola harmandi) and provide a full redescription herein.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Morphological Analysis

A total of 49 specimens of Raiamas were morphologically examined in this study (Figure 1). Among them, 45 specimens were the previous voucher specimens of the Muséum National d′Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France (MNHN); the Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China (KIZ); and the Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China (IHB). In addition, two specimens of R. harmandi and two specimens of R. guttatus were recently collected in Yunnan Province for this study. Tissues of pectoral fins from the collected specimens were cut and fixed with 95% ethanol for subsequent DNA extraction. After that, the collected specimens were fixed in 10% formalin solution and transferred to 75% alcohol solution for long-term preservation in the Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China (Table 1).
We mainly follow Stiassny et al. [29] and Manda et al. [5] in studying the morphology of Raiamas. In particular, 25 measurements and 12 meristic counts were processed on the left side of each specimen, except in cases where damage necessitated the use of the right side. Measurements were taken point to point with a digital caliper to 0.1 mm and given as percentage of standard length (SL), except for subunits of the head, which were given as percentage of head length (HL). Counts of dorsal-fin rays, anal-fin rays, abdominal vertebrae (excluding the four vertebrae of the Weberian complex), and caudal vertebrae were made on radiographs with the KUBTEC XPERT 80-L X-ray System. The last two branched rays, articulating on a single pterygiophore in the dorsal and anal fins, were counted as one. Caudal vertebrae were counted from the first vertebra with a hemal spine articulating with the first anal-fin pterygiophore to the first preural centrum. The first preural centrum was counted as one. The count of lateral-line scales excluded the scales on the caudal fin. Transverse scale counts included scales above the lateral line (lateral line to dorsal-fin origin) and scales below the lateral line (lateral line to pelvic-fin origin), and the scale immediately in front of the dorsal fin was counted as ½. The predorsal scale count included all the scales on the dorsal midline in front of the dorsal-fin origin [20].

2.2. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification, and Sequencing

In the present study, eight tissue samples of Raiamas from three river basins in three countries were selected for DNA extraction (Figure 1; Table 1). Total genomic DNA was extracted from ethanol-fixed fin tissues using the FastPure Cell/Tissue DNA Isolation Mini Kit-BOX (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Two mitochondrial gene markers, cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) and cytochrome b (Cyt b), were amplified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) by the following primers: FishFl: 5′-TCAACCAACCACAAAGACATTGGCAC-3′ and FishR1: 5′-TAGACTTCTGGGTGGCCAAAGAATCA-3′ (for COI); LA-danio: 5′-GACTYGAARAACCACYGTTG-3′ and HA-danio: 5′-CTCCGATCTTCGGATTACAAG-3′ (for Cyt b) [30,31]. PCRs were performed in 30 μL total volume: 2 μL of DNA template, 2 μL of each primer, 15 μL of Taq PCR Mix (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), and 9 μL of ddH2O. The PCR conditions were as follows. For COI: 95 °C for 5 min; 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min; then, 72 °C for 10 min. For Cyt b: 95 °C for 2 min; 35 cycles of 95 °C for 1 min, 56 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min; then, 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were directly sequenced by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The sequencing results were assembled and corrected using SeqMan Pro 11.1.0 [32].

2.3. Phylogenetic Analysis and Genetic Distance

For phylogenetic analysis, we selected 42 individuals of 30 species from the subfamily Chedrinae as ingroups, of which the sequences of 8 individuals were from this study and the remaining sequences were downloaded from NCBI (Table 1). Sequences from two individuals of Danio rerio were chosen as outgroups (Table 1). Implemented in the PhyloSuite 1.2.3 [33,34], sequences of COI and Cyt b genes were separately aligned with MAFFT 7.505 [35,36], trimmed with the automated alignment trimming tool trimAl 1.2 [37], and then concatenated. The best partitioning schemes and substitution models were estimated using PartitionFinder 2.1.1 [38], and the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) was applied. The maximum-likelihood (ML) tree was inferred with IQ-TREE 2.2.0 [39] under the GTR+I+G model. Support values were estimated through 5000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates [40]. The Bayesian inference (BI) tree was constructed with MrBayes 3.2.7 [41]. Four independent runs were performed with 50 million generations of Monte Carlo Markov chain (MCMC), sampling every 1000 generations. The first 25% of MCMCs were discarded as burn-in. Convergence of four runs was checked in Tracer 1.7.1 [42]. All effective sample size (ESS) values were above 200. Trees were visualized and optimized in iTOL 7.2 webserver [43]. The pairwise genetic distances for aligned sequences of COI and Cyt b among each species were calculated using MEGA X 10.2.2 under the pairwise Kimura two-parameter (K2P) model with 1000 bootstrap replicas [44,45].

3. Results

3.1. Molecular Phylogeny and Genetic Distance

Phylogenetic reconstruction incorporated 44 aligned sequences (2 outgroup, 42 from subfamily Chedrinae) (Figure 2; Table 1), including five Raiamas guttatus and three R. harmandi specimens sequenced in this study, supplemented by one GenBank-deposited Raiamas individual from Laos′s Mekong River Basin. In general, the ML and BI trees shared a similar topology (Figure 2). The results of the phylogenetic study showed that all the Raiamas materials from Asia clustered as a monophyletic group, and four individuals of R. harmandi in the Mekong River Basin (including the individual from Laos) form an independent lineage on the phylogenetic tree, with sister groups of R. guttatus in the Irrawaddy and Salween river basins. This result was highly supported by both BI and ML analyses (maximum-likelihood bootstrap values, BP = 97; Bayesian posterior probabilities, PP = 1). The clade consisting of R. harmandi and R. guttatus first clustered with R. bola and subsequently clustered with an African group comprising several Raiamas species and allied genera (Figure 2). However, these relationships received only low support values throughout the topology.
The interspecific genetic distances for COI and Cyt b sequences based on the K2P model between R. harmandi and its closest congener R. guttatus are 14.0–14.9% and 16.1–17.0%, respectively (Table 2). The intraspecific genetic distances in R. harmandi are 0–0.5% for COI and 0–0.9% for Cyt b (Table 2), which are much lower than the interspecific genetic distances.

3.2. Taxonomy and Morphology

Raiamas harmandi stat. rev. (Sauvage, 1880) (Figure 3, Figure 4a and Figure 5 and Figure 6a,c; Table 3).
Bola harmandi Sauvage, 1880: 231 [18] (original description, type locality: Great Lakes, Cambodia).
Barilius guttatus: Smith, 1945: 152 [46] (Chieng Sen, Mekong River baisn, Thailand); Li, 1976: 117 [47] (Jinghong, Mengla, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan Province, China).
Luciosoma fasciata Yang & Hwang, 1964: 53 [19] (Yunjinghong, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan Province, China).
Bola guttatus: Kottelat, 1984: 797 [48] (short review of the holotype of Bola harmandi).
Raiamas guttatus: Kuang, in Chu & Chen, 1989: 23 [49] (Mengla, Lancang, Jinghong, Mekong River Basin, Yunnan Province, China); Rainboth, 1996: 70 [50] (Cambodia); Menon, 1999: 24 [16] (list); Kottelat, 2001: 76 [20] (list); Kottelat, 2013: 150 [15] (list).
Holotype. MNHN-IC-A-2399 (Figure 3), 160.0 mm SL, Great Lakes (Tonlé Sap Lake), Cambodia.
Additional materials examined. KIZ 1973000965, 193.8 mm SL, Menglang Town, Pu′er, Yunnan, China, 1973; KIZ 1986000898–904, 1988001728, 184.1–233.9 mm SL, Mengla County, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China, April 1983; KIZ 1986002060, 191.1 mm SL, Mengla County, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China, 1986; KIZ 1996001371, 1996001373–1375, 1996001377, 88.6–137.6 mm SL, Mengla County, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China, 10 June 1996; KIZ 2008000171–172, 144.6–239.9 mm SL, Nanla River, Daluo Town, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China, 26 January 2008; KIZ 2012001350–1351, 181.2–190.3 mm SL, Menglun Town, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China, 25 April 2012; KIZ 2012001405, 237.4 mm SL, Mengla County, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China, 26 April 2012; KIZ 2025000150–151, 176.5–240.2 mm SL, 21.8881° N, 101.2740° E, Luosuojiang River, Menglun Town, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China, 29 March 2025 (Figure 4a); IHB 584078, 584147, 584201, 584213, 584216, 584228, 94.6–153.5 mm SL, Yunjinghong, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China, 1958.
Comparative materials. Raiamas guttatus: Irrawaddy River Basin: KIZ 1978000884–885, 191.7–208.5 mm SL, Nabang Town, Dehong, Yunnan, China, 1978; KIZ 2025000152, 159.2 mm SL, 24.7288° N, 97.5653° E, Mengnai River, Nabang Town, Dehong, Yunnan, China, 28 October 2024 (Figure 4b). Salween River Basin: KIZ 2002001879, 165.1 mm SL, Baishitou River, Yongde County, Lincang, Yunnan, China, June 2002; KIZ 2002002170–2171, 178.8–197.1 mm SL, Nanting River, Yongde County, Lincang, Yunnan, China, 18 June 2002; KIZ 2010002509–2510, 152.2–162.1 mm SL, Damengtong River, Changning County, Baoshan, Yunnan, China, 26 April 2010; KIZ 2015000651–653, 126.2–210.6 mm SL, Nanpeng Village, Gengma County, Lincang, Yunnan, China, 6 February 2015; KIZ 2015005462, 2015005468–69, 2015005481, 2015005483, 2015005490, 2015005493, 2015005496, 121.7–185.7 mm SL, Nanting River, Gengma County, Lincang, Yunnan, China, 4 June 2015; KIZ 2025000153, 128.9 mm SL, 24.5653° N, 99.0436° E, Nujiang River, Longling County, Baoshan, 11 May 2024 (Figure 4c).
Diagnosis. Raiamas harmandi can be distinguished from all other Asian Raiamas species by the following combination of characteristics: a distinctive color pattern of numerous small spots irregularly scattered on the lateral body; predorsal scales 25–28; lateral-line scales 45–50; total number of vertebrae 41–44; caudal vertebrae 20–22. It can be further distinguished from the most similar species, R. guttatus, by a proportionally longer upper jaw (57.9–68.6% HL vs. 56.3–61.9% HL).
Description. Meristic counts and morphometric measurements are listed in Table 3. Body elongate, compressed. Dorsal profile straight, slightly convex at dorsal-fin origin; ventral profile straight anteriorly, ascending at anal-fin base, straight posterior to anal fin. Caudal-peduncle length greater than its depth. Scales cycloid; scales on lateral body larger than dorsal/ventral scales; axillary scales present and developed at pectoral-fin and pelvic-fin bases (Figure 5a,b).
Lateral line complete, decurved ventrally, then straight to caudal-fin base; lateral-line scales 45–50; predorsal scales 25–28, irregularly arranged; circumpeduncular scales 18–20; scale rows between dorsal-fin origin and lateral line 8½–9½; scale rows between pelvic-fin origin and lateral line 3–4.
Head pointed, head length greater than body depth. Snout pointed. Mouth terminal, gape large; lower jaw slightly longer than upper jaw, posterior tip extending beyond posterior margin of orbit; anterior tip of lower jaw with prominent knob-like process fitting into upper-jaw notch (Figure 5c). Lips with weakly developed cuticular margins. Maxillary barbels minute, one pair (Figure 5d). Eyes small, dorsolaterally situated, closer to snout tip than to opercular margin. Interorbital width less than snout length, about twice eye diameter. Internarial region slightly concave.
Dorsal fin iii, 7 (29 specimens), insertion posterior to pelvic-fin origin, last ray tip extending posterior to anal-fin base; pectoral fin i, 13 (7); i, 14 (18); or i, 15 (4); subtriangular, tip extending beyond midpoint of pectoral–pelvic distance. Pelvic fin i, 8 (29), with truncate posterior margin, not reaching anal-fin origin; anus adjacent to anal-fin origin; anal fin iii, 10 (16) or iii, 11 (13), origin slightly posterior to dorsal-fin base, distance to pelvic-fin origin less than to caudal-fin base; caudal fin forked, upper and lower lobes subequal.
Coloration in life. Body generally grayish-green, back light brown. One row of large bluish-black spots on lateral body dorsally; 30–50 small, elliptical, bluish-black spots scattered irregularly below in adults. Several black spots between the upper jaw and eye. Orange on the bases and margins of pectoral, pelvic, and anal fins. Dorsal fin grayish-black with an orange base. Orange margins on both upper and lower lobes of the caudal fin. A black band extending posteriorly from the caudal peduncle through the middle of the fin to the tip of the lower lobe (Figure 6a,c).
Coloration in preservative. Fixed in formalin and briefly transferred in alcohol, the lateral and ventral body bright white, back grayish-black. Spots on the lateral body faded and light black. Pelvic and anal fins light white. Pectoral-fin margins light black. Dorsal fin grayish-black. Black band of caudal fin deep. With long-term preservation in alcohol, body dark brownish, back darker. Spots on sides; bars on dorsal and caudal fin. All fins light brownish (Figure 3 and Figure 4a).
Distribution. Raiamas harmandi is widely distributed in the Mekong River Basin, with records from China (the lower Lancang River), Laos, Vietnam, Thailand, and Cambodia (Figure 1). Species of the genus Raiamas have also been recorded in the Chao Phraya River Basin, Peninsular Malaysia, and South Sumatra, and it remains to be confirmed whether they are R. harmandi.
Habitat. Raiamas harmandi inhabits medium to large rivers, usually with strong and fast currents, and it feeds on small fish and aquatic insects [19,49,50]. Juveniles grow in small rivers or mountain streams.
Etymology. The name of this species, harmandi, is in honor of the French Navy surgeon, naturalist, and explorer François-Jules Harmand (1845–1921), who collected the holotype.

4. Discussion

Raiamas guttatus was first described by Day in 1870 as Opsarius guttatus from the Prome to Mandalay reach of Myanmar′s Irrawaddy River [7]. The original description documented essential meristic characters, including dorsal-, pectoral-, pelvic-, and anal-fin ray counts, circumpeduncular scales, and lateral-line scales, alongside some measurements and a brief description of color patterns. A decade later, Sauvage described Bola harmandi based on a unique specimen from Cambodia′s Great Lake (Tonlé Sap Lake, the Mekong River Basin), providing only a brief morphological diagnosis limited to dorsal- and anal-fin ray counts and lateral-line scales, without any measurement data [18]. Subsequent taxonomic revisions synonymized B. harmandi with R. guttatus [15,16,17]. Yang and Hwang described Luciosoma fasciata from seven specimens collected in Xishuangbanna, China (the Mekong River Basin), which was later similarly synonymized as R. guttatus; notably, their description included predorsal scale counts, a feature absent in the prior literature [19]. This study examined 49 specimens of R. guttatus spanning the Irrawaddy, Salween, and Mekong river basins, incorporating the holotype of B. harmandi and 6 syntypes of L. fasciata. Analysis of 25 measurements and 12 meristic characters revealed the Mekong populations possess significantly higher predorsal scale counts (25–28 vs. 21–23 in the other two basins) (Table 3), supporting recognition of R. harmandi as distinct. Consequently, we revalidate R. harmandi with a comprehensive redescription. Critical reassessment confirms L. fasciata (predorsal scales 25–27 for six syntypes) represents a junior synonym of R. harmandi (Table 3). The omission of predorsal scale data in the original descriptions of both species underscores how missing key diagnostic characters can lead to taxonomic errors in morphologically similar congeners.
Examination of live and freshly preserved specimens further revealed interspecific divergence in color patterns. Subadult R. harmandi exhibits slender spots, contrasting with the more rounded spots of R. guttatus. In adults, R. harmandi develops numerous small, irregularly scattered spots, while R. guttatus displays larger spots that merged anteriorly into near-striped formations extending posteriorly (Figure 6c,d). These distinctions align with Day’s description of “two rows of blue spots” [7: 621] versus Yang and Hwang′s description of “irregular black spots anteriorly” in L. fasciata [19: 54]. While this study also observed subtle differences in the distribution of black bands on the caudal fin between live R. harmandi and R. guttatus (Figure 6), this character was excluded from diagnostic features due to limited live material and its poor preservation stability in specimens.
Earlier molecular studies by Tang et al. [10] using RAG1, Rh, Cyt b, and COI genes showed incipient divergence among three R. guttatus specimens but lacked geographic precision to resolve species boundaries. Most prior phylogenetic investigations about Raiamas suffered from inadequate sampling of trans-basin populations, typically representing widespread species with single individuals [8,26,27]. Our study analyzed sequences from nine Raiamas specimens across four countries (including GenBank data from one Laos individual) with explicit drainage representation: four from the Irrawaddy River Basin, one from the Salween River Basin, and four from the Mekong River Basin (Figure 2; Table 1). Results demonstrated the Mekong individuals forming a distinct clade, while the Irrawaddy and Salween specimens clustered in a sister clade (Figure 2). Coupled with the substantial genetic distance between these lineages, our molecular evidence robustly supports morphology-based conclusions: the Mekong populations represent a species distinct from R. guttatus, warranting reinstatement of R. harmandi as valid.
Consistent with previous studies, Raiamas emerges as non-monophyletic [8,9,10,26]. In the present phylogeny, Asian Raiamas species form a monophyletic clade whose sister group comprises an assemblage of multiple Chedrinae lineages, including African Raiamas congeners and endemic African genera: Opsaridium, Leptocypris, Neobola, Rastrineobola, Engraulicypris, and Chelaethiops (Figure 2). This topology demonstrates pronounced evolutionary divergence between Asian and African Raiamas lineages, a pattern previously noted in morphology-based analyses [8]. Current taxonomic frameworks remain complex and unstable due to morphological convergence among Raiamas and allied genera. Future studies integrating molecular systematics, refined morphological comparisons, and osteological examinations will be essential to clarify the classification of this group.
With the revalidation of R. harmandi, the genus Raiamas now comprises 19 valid species, of which 3 are distributed in Asia. Current evidence demonstrates that R. harmandi is widely distributed throughout the Mekong River Basin, with northernmost records extending to Pu′er City (Yunnan Province, China) and southern limits reaching Cambodia, spanning the upper, middle, and lower reaches of the drainage (Figure 1). Although Raiamas have been reported from the Chao Phraya River Basin, Peninsular Malaysia, and Sumatra [20,21,22], the absence of direct specimen examination precludes confirmation of their identity as R. harmandi. This species now represents the easternmost distribution in the Eurasian continent for Raiamas, reflecting a prevailing biogeographic pattern among most Danionidae species. Currently, Opsarius pulchellus and Danio roseus extend eastward to the Red River Basin in the Eurasian continent [51], and only Rasbora steineri extends further eastward to the Pearl River Basin, whereas other danionids are confined eastward to the Mekong River Basin. The reinstatement of R. harmandi highlights potential diversity within trans-basin species and establishes fundamental taxonomic data for investigating danionid diversification and dispersal mechanisms.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.-X.L. and X.-Y.C.; data curation, C.-X.L.; formal analysis, C.-X.L. and Y.-Y.X.; investigation, C.-X.L., Y.-Y.X., Y.-Y.Z. and X.-Y.C.; methodology, C.-X.L. and X.-Y.C.; resources, C.-X.L., Y.-Y.X., Y.-Y.Z. and T.N.O.; software, C.-X.L.; visualization, C.-X.L.; writing—original draft, C.-X.L.; writing—review and editing, C.-X.L., Y.-Y.Z. and X.-Y.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (2024YFF1306700); the Yunnan Province Science and Technology Department (202403AC100028); the Southeast Asia Biodiversity Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Y4ZK111B01); and the Position of Bioclassonomist of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS-TAX-24-054).

Data Availability Statement

The sequence data are available in GenBank under accession numbers PV960707–PV960714 and PV976863–PV976870.

Acknowledgments

We express our sincere appreciation and respect to Philippe Béarez and Jonathan Pfliger (MNHN) for generously sharing morphological data of the Raiamas harmandi holotype. We are grateful to Rui Min and Wei Dao (KIZ) for help in specimen examination and X-ray imaging. We sincerely thank Huy Duc Hoang for providing Raiamas tissue samples from Vietnam. Finally, we gratefully acknowledge all field collectors as well as the anonymous reviewers for their valuable contributions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Fricke, R.; Eschmeyer, W.N.; Van der Laan, R. Eschmeyer’s Catalog of Fishes: Genera, Species, References. Available online: http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp (accessed on 16 August 2025).
  2. Stout, C.C.; Tan, M.; Lemmon, A.R.; Lemmon, E.M.; Armbruster, J.W. Resolving Cypriniformes relationships using an anchored enrichment approach. BMC Evol. Biol. 2016, 16, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tan, M.; Armbruster, J.W. Phylogenetic classification of extant genera of fishes of the order Cypriniformes (Teleostei: Ostariophysi). Zootaxa 2018, 4476, 6–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jordan, D.S. New genera of fishes. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 1919, 70, 341–344. [Google Scholar]
  5. Manda, B.K.; Snoeks, J.; Manda, A.C.; Vreven, E. Hidden species diversity in Raiamas salmolucius (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) from the Congo Basin: Two new species based on morphometric evidence. Ichthyol. Explor. Freshw. 2018, 28, 345–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hamilton, F. An Account of the Fishes Found in the River Ganges and Its Branches; Archibald Constable: Edinburgh, UK, 1822; pp. 1–405. [Google Scholar]
  7. Day, F. On the freshwater fishes of Burma—Part I. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1870, 37, 614–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liao, T.Y.; Arroyave, J.; Stiassny, M.L.J. Diagnosis of Asian Raiamas (Teleostei: Cyprinidae: Chedrina) with comments on Chedrin relationships and previously proposed diagnostic characters for Opsaridium and Raiamas. Ichthyol. Res. 2012, 59, 328–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liao, T.Y.; Ünlü, E.; Kullander, S.O. Western boundary of the Subfamily Danioninae in Asia (Teleostei, Cyprinidae): Derived from the systematic position of Barilius mesopotamicus based on molecular and morphological data. Zootaxa 2011, 2880, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tang, K.L.; Agnew, M.K.; Hirt, M.V.; Sado, T.; Schneider, L.M.; Freyhof, J.; Sulaiman, Z.; Swartz, E.; Vidthayanon, C.; Miya, M.; et al. Systematics of the subfamily Danioninae (Teleostei: Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2010, 57, 189–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. McClelland, J. Indian Cyprinidae. Asiat. Res. 1839, 19, 217–417. [Google Scholar]
  12. Blyth, E. Report of Curator, Zoological Department, for May, 1858. J. Asiat. Soc. Bengal 1858, 27, 267–290. [Google Scholar]
  13. Shrestha, J. Fishes of Nepal; Curriculum Development Centre, Tribhuvan Univ.: Kathmandu, Nepal, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  14. Tilak, R.; Husain, A. Description of a new species of the Genus Barilius Hamilton (Cyprinidae: Cypriniformes) from Corbett National Park, Uttar Pradesh. Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berl. 1980, 56, 41–44. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kottelat, M. The fishes of the inland waters of Southeast Asia: A catalogue and core bibliography of the fishes known to occur in freshwaters, mangroves and estuaries. Raffles Bull. Zool. 2013, (Suppl. S27), 1–663. [Google Scholar]
  16. Menon, A.G.K. Check List-Fresh Water Fishes of India; Zoological Survey of India: Calcutta, India, 1999; ISBN 978-81-85874-15-9. [Google Scholar]
  17. Talwar, P.K.; Jhingran, A.G. Inland Fishes of India and Adjacent Countries; Oxford & IBH Publishing, Co.: New Delhi, India; Bombay, India; Calcutta, India, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sauvage, H.E. Notice sur quelques poissons de l’île Campbell et de l’Indo-Chine. Bull. Soc. Philom. Paris 1880, 7, 228–233. [Google Scholar]
  19. Yang, Y.; Hwang, H. Leuciscinae. In The Cyprinid Fishes of China; Shanghai Science & Technology Press: Shanghai, China, 1964; Volume 1, pp. 7–61. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kottelat, M. Fishes of Laos; WHT Publications: Colombo, Sri Lanka, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  21. Aqmal-Naser, M.; Ali, N.; Azmi, N.; Fahmi-Ahmad, M.; Rizal, S.; Ahmad, A. Freshwater fishes (Actinopterygii) of Kenyir Reservoir, Peninsular Malaysia: Updated checklist, taxonomic concerns and alien species. BDJ 2023, 11, e100337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Setiawan, A.; Iqbal, M.; Pormansyah, P.; Setiawan, D.; Yustian, I. The burmese trout Raiamas guttatus (Day, 1870) (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) in South Sumatra revealed its southernmost record of its distributional range. Ecol. Mont. 2020, 27, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pasco-Viel, E.; Veran, M.; Viriot, L. Bleeker was right: Revision of the genus Cyclocheilichthys (Bleeker 1859) and resurrection of the genus Anematichthys (Bleeker 1859), based on morphological and molecular data of Southeast Asian Cyprininae (Teleostei, Cypriniformes). Zootaxa 2012, 3586, 41–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Saitoh, K.; Sado, T.; Doosey, M.H.; Bart, H.L.; Inoue, J.G.; Nishida, M.; Mayden, R.L.; Miya, M. Evidence from mitochondrial genomics supports the lower Mesozoic of South Asia as the time and place of basal divergence of cypriniform fishes (Actinopterygii: Ostariophysi): Cypriniform mitogenomics and biogeography. Zool. J. Linn. Soc.-lond. 2011, 161, 633–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rüber, L.; Kottelat, M.; Tan, H.; Ng, P.K.L.; Britz, R. Evolution of miniaturization and the phylogenetic position of Paedocypris, comprising the world’s smallest vertebrate. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yu, P.; Zhou, L.; Yang, X.-L.; Li, L.-L.; Jin, H.; Li, Z.; Wang, Z.-W.; Li, X.-Y.; Zhang, X.-J.; Wang, Y.; et al. Comparative mitogenomic analyses unveil conserved and variable mitogenomic features and phylogeny of Chedrinae fish. Zool. Res. 2022, 43, 30–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, X.J.; Song, L.; Cao, Y.W.; Wang, Q. Phylogenetic relationship and characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome sequence of Opsarius caudiocellatus (Cypriniformes: Danionidae: Chedrinae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2022, 7, 2051–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Flynn, T.; Signal, B.; Johnson, S.L.; Gemmell, N.J. Mitochondrial genome diversity among six laboratory zebrafish (Danio rerio) strains. Mitochondrial DNA Part A 2016, 27, 4364–4371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Stiassny, M.L.J.; Schelly, R.C.; Schliewen, U.K. A new species of Raiamas (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) from the lower Congo River, with a phylogenetic assessment of the generic limits of the predatory cyprinid genera Opsaridium, Raiamas, and Leptocypris. Copeia 2006, 3, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mayden, R.L.; Tang, K.L.; Conway, K.W.; Freyhof, J.; Chamberlain, S.; Haskins, M.; Schneider, L.; Sudkamp, M.; Wood, R.M.; Agnew, M.; et al. Phylogenetic relationships of Danio within the order Cypriniformes: A framework for comparative and evolutionary studies of a model species. J. Exp. Zool. Part B 2007, 308B, 642–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ward, R.D.; Zemlak, T.S.; Innes, B.H.; Last, P.R.; Hebert, P.D.N. DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 2005, 360, 1847–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Burland, T.G. DNASTAR’s Lasergene sequence analysis software. In Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2000; Volume 132, pp. 71–91. ISBN 978-1-59259-192-3. [Google Scholar]
  33. Xiang, C.; Gao, F.; Jakovlić, I.; Lei, H.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zou, H.; Wang, G.; Zhang, D. Using PhyloSuite for molecular phylogeny and tree-based analyses. iMeta 2023, 2, e87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, D.; Gao, F.; Jakovlić, I.; Zou, H.; Zhang, J.; Li, W.X.; Wang, G.T. PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2020, 20, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Katoh, K.; Misawa, K.; Kuma, K.; Miyata, T. MAFFT: A novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 3059–3066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Capella-Gutiérrez, S.; Silla-Martínez, J.M.; Gabaldón, T. trimAl: A tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1972–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lanfear, R.; Frandsen, P.B.; Wright, A.M.; Senfeld, T.; Calcott, B. PartitionFinder 2: New methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 34, 772–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Minh, B.Q.; Schmidt, H.A.; Chernomor, O.; Schrempf, D.; Woodhams, M.D.; Von Haeseler, A.; Lanfear, R. IQ-TREE 2: New models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2020, 37, 1530–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Minh, B.Q.; Nguyen, M.A.T.; Von Haeseler, A. Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 1188–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Ronquist, F.; Teslenko, M.; Van Der Mark, P.; Ayres, D.L.; Darling, A.; Höhna, S.; Larget, B.; Liu, L.; Suchard, M.A.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rambaut, A.; Drummond, A.J.; Xie, D.; Baele, G.; Suchard, M.A. Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Syst. Biol. 2018, 67, 901–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: Recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024, 52, W78–W82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kimura, M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 1980, 16, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Smith, H.M. The fresh-water fishes of Siam, or Thailand. Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus. 1945, 188, 1–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, S. New records of Chinese fishes from the Lancang River, Yunnan Province. Acta Zool. Sin. 1976, 22, 117–118. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kottelat, M. A review of the species of Indochinese fresh-water fishes described by H.-E. Sauvage. Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. Sect. A 1984, 6, 791–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kuang, F. Danioninae. In Fishes of Yunnan Province I; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1989; pp. 11–35. [Google Scholar]
  50. Rainboth, W.J. Fishes of the Cambodian Mekong; Food & Agriculture Org.: Rome, Italy, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  51. Zeng, Y.; Liu, C.; Pu, X.; Lyu, J.; Chen, X. A new record of Danio from the Red River and Salween River basins in Yunnan Province and a taxonomic revision of D. albolineatus in China. Chin. J. Zool. 2025, in press. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The collection sites of the samples examined and sequenced in this study. The map was made using AcrMap 10.8 and the basemap was from Resource and Environmental Science Data Platform, https://www.resdc.cn/ (accessed on17 August 2025).
Figure 1. The collection sites of the samples examined and sequenced in this study. The map was made using AcrMap 10.8 and the basemap was from Resource and Environmental Science Data Platform, https://www.resdc.cn/ (accessed on17 August 2025).
Taxonomy 05 00042 g001
Figure 2. The maximum-likelihood tree of 42 Chedrinae individuals reconstructed from the concatenated COI and Cyt b dataset, with two Danio rerio as outgroup taxa. The maximum-likelihood bootstrap values (BP) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) for each node are indicated; asterisks indicate BP = 100 and PP = 1.00; and “-” indicates that the ML tree and BI tree have different topologies at this node. The species name is followed by the voucher number or accession number in the label.
Figure 2. The maximum-likelihood tree of 42 Chedrinae individuals reconstructed from the concatenated COI and Cyt b dataset, with two Danio rerio as outgroup taxa. The maximum-likelihood bootstrap values (BP) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) for each node are indicated; asterisks indicate BP = 100 and PP = 1.00; and “-” indicates that the ML tree and BI tree have different topologies at this node. The species name is followed by the voucher number or accession number in the label.
Taxonomy 05 00042 g002
Figure 3. Raiamas harmandi, Sauvage (1880). Holotype, MNHN-IC-A-2399, 160.0 mm SL: (a) lateral view, (b) dorsal view. Photos were taken by Grosjean S. and Silvain M. from MNHN-Ichthyology.
Figure 3. Raiamas harmandi, Sauvage (1880). Holotype, MNHN-IC-A-2399, 160.0 mm SL: (a) lateral view, (b) dorsal view. Photos were taken by Grosjean S. and Silvain M. from MNHN-Ichthyology.
Taxonomy 05 00042 g003
Figure 4. Freshly preserved specimens: (a) Raiamas harmandi, KIZ 2025000150, 176.5 mm SL, Mekong River Basin; (b) R. guttatus, KIZ 2025000152, 159.2 mm SL, Irrawaddy River Basin; (c) R. guttatus, KIZ 2025000153, 128.9 mm SL, Salween River Basin.
Figure 4. Freshly preserved specimens: (a) Raiamas harmandi, KIZ 2025000150, 176.5 mm SL, Mekong River Basin; (b) R. guttatus, KIZ 2025000152, 159.2 mm SL, Irrawaddy River Basin; (c) R. guttatus, KIZ 2025000153, 128.9 mm SL, Salween River Basin.
Taxonomy 05 00042 g004
Figure 5. Morphological features of Raiamas harmandi: (a) axillary scale at pectoral-fin base; (b) axillary scale at pelvic-fin base; (c) knob-like process on the anterior tip of lower jaw; (d) extremely small maxillary barbel. The black arrow indicates the specific location of the features.
Figure 5. Morphological features of Raiamas harmandi: (a) axillary scale at pectoral-fin base; (b) axillary scale at pelvic-fin base; (c) knob-like process on the anterior tip of lower jaw; (d) extremely small maxillary barbel. The black arrow indicates the specific location of the features.
Taxonomy 05 00042 g005
Figure 6. Live individuals of (a) subadult Raiamas harmandi, 85.0 mm SL, (b) subadult R. guttatus, 95.0 mm SL, (c) adult R. harmandi, 176.5 mm SL, and (d) adult R. guttatus, 159.2 mm SL.
Figure 6. Live individuals of (a) subadult Raiamas harmandi, 85.0 mm SL, (b) subadult R. guttatus, 95.0 mm SL, (c) adult R. harmandi, 176.5 mm SL, and (d) adult R. guttatus, 159.2 mm SL.
Taxonomy 05 00042 g006
Table 1. Information on COI and Cyt b sequences used in phylogenetic analysis. 1 denotes Asian endemic species; 2 denotes African endemic species. * indicates individuals analyzed for both morphology and DNA sequences.
Table 1. Information on COI and Cyt b sequences used in phylogenetic analysis. 1 denotes Asian endemic species; 2 denotes African endemic species. * indicates individuals analyzed for both morphology and DNA sequences.
SpeciesVoucher No.COICyt bSource
Ingroup
Barilius cf. barila 1CTOL02812HM224138HM224257[10]
Barilius vagra 1CTOL03301HM224140HM224259[10]
Chelaethiops bibie 2CTOL02657HM224141HM224260[10]
Chelaethiops bibie 2CTOL03164HM224142HM224261[10]
Chelaethiops elongatus 2AMNH-I-247817JX196996JX197006[8]
Engraulicypris Sardella 2AMNH-I-248841JX196997JX197007[8]
Engraulicypris brevianalis 2CTOL03497HM224176HM224295[10]
Leptocypris modestus 2AMNH-I-240469JX196998JX197008[8]
Leptocypris niloticus 2CTOL02619HM224174HM224293[10]
Leptocypris niloticus 2CTOL03165HM224175HM224294[10]
Opsaridium boweni 2AMNH-I-243665JX197000JX197009[8]
Opsaridium ubangiense 2CTOL03214HM224193HM224312[10]
Raiamas batesii 2AMNH-I-249530JX197002JX197010[8]
Raiamas bola 1CTOL03200HM224212HM224329[10]
Raiamas buchholzi 2CTOL03213HM224213HM224330[10]
Raiamas buchholzi 2no6265AP012118AP012118Direct Submission
Raiamas christyi 2AMNH-I-250553JX197003JX197011[8]
Raiamas guttatus 1*KIZ2025000152PV960713PV976866This study
Raiamas guttatus 1*KIZ2025000153PV960714PV976867This study
Raiamas guttatus 1CXY20190499PV960710PV976868This study
Raiamas guttatus 1PZ20180114PV960711PV976869This study
Raiamas guttatus 1QT20180008PV960712PV976870This study
Raiamas harmandi 1QT20200210PV960707PV976864This study
Raiamas harmandi 1*KIZ2025000151PV960709PV976863This study
Raiamas harmandi 1XP0901418PV960708PV976865This study
Raiamas harmandi 1MNHN-2012-0078JQ346159JQ346143[23]
Raiamas salmolucius 2AMNH-I-251147JX197004JX197012[8]
Raiamas senegalensis 2CTOL02658HM224215HM224332[10]
Raiamas senegalensis 2CTOL03171HM224216HM224333[10]
Raiamas senegalensis 2N/AAP010780AP010780[24]
Raiamas steindachneri 2CK473AP012113AP012113Direct Submission
Rastrineobola argentea 2AMNH-I-256386JX197005JX197013[8]
Luciosoma bleekeri 1CBM-ZF-11202AP011399AP011399[10]
Luciosoma setigerum 1CBM-ZF-11273AP011423AP011423[10]
Salmostoma bacaila 1CBM-ZF-11516AP011223AP011223[10]
Cabdio morar 1CBM-ZF-11391AP011335AP011335[10]
Malayochela maassi 1LR1640FJ753486EF151098[25]
Nematabramis
steindachneri 1
LR1654FJ753496EF151106[25]
Neobola bottegoi 2CTOL02623HM224178HM224296[10]
Opsarius pulchellus 1N/AMW625808MW625808[26]
Opsarius caudiocellatus 1N/AOM617729OM617729[27]
Securicula gora 1CTOL03489HM224250HM224381[10]
Outgroup
Danio rerioN/AKT624625KT624625[28]
Danio rerioN/AKT624626KT624626[28]
Table 2. Genetic distances of the COI and Cyt b genes among three Asian Raiamas species.
Table 2. Genetic distances of the COI and Cyt b genes among three Asian Raiamas species.
COICyt b
SpeciesIntraspecific123Intraspecific123
1 Raiamas harmandi0–0.0050–0.009
2 Raiamas guttatus0–0.0030.140–0.1490–0.0090.161–0.170
3 Raiamas bola0.163–0.1650.162–0.1640.200–0.2110.214–0.216
Table 3. Body proportions and counts data of Raiamas harmandi (n = 29, except vertebral counts where n = 23) and R. guttatus (n = 20).
Table 3. Body proportions and counts data of Raiamas harmandi (n = 29, except vertebral counts where n = 23) and R. guttatus (n = 20).
CharactersRaiamas harmandiR. guttatus
HolotypeMean ± SDRangeMean ± SDRange
Standard length (SL, mm)160.0167.4 ± 45.288.6–240.2158.8 ± 28.0121.7–210.6
In Percent of SL (%)
Body depth21.120.9 ± 2.416.9–26.222.4 ± 2.117.4–26.6
Pectoral-fin length19.418.0 ± 1.016.3–20.019.0 ± 0.917.2–20.6
Prepectoral length28.427.3 ± 0.925.6–29.428.1 ± 1.225.8–30.4
Pelvic-fin length14.113.0 ± 0.811.9–14.312.6 ± 0.611.6–14.4
Prepelvic length49.850.4 ± 1.645.6–53.651.4 ± 1.349.6–54.6
Dorsal-fin length16.017.6 ± 0.816.0–19.016.6 ± 0.715.3–17.6
Dorsal-fin base length10.810.9 ± 0.79.8–12.210.6 ± 0.69.6–11.6
Predorsal length57.956.8 ± 1.651.3–59.457.7 ± 1.354.3–60.1
Anal-fin length 114.814.6 ± 0.913.0–16.514.5 ± 0.612.8–15.3
Anal-fin length 24.65.7 ± 0.64.3–6.75.2 ± 0.54.1–6.2
Anal-fin base length13.413.4 ± 0.612.1–14.515.1 ± 1.113.2–17.2
Preanal length70.070.4 ± 2.264.6–74.571.9 ± 1.769.2–76.2
Caudal peduncle length17.917.2 ± 1.015.5–19.416.7 ± 1.113.9–18.7
Caudal peduncle depth9.68.7 ± 0.57.9–9.89.2 ± 0.48.2–9.8
Head length (HL)27.827.0 ± 0.925.4–29.227.5 ± 1.125.8–29.7
In Percent of HL (%)
Head depth61.561.5 ± 2.057.1–66.660.6 ± 2.456.6–65.0
Head width41.941.9 ± 2.338.8–48.744.1 ± 3.138.3–50.0
Snout length26.828.7 ± 1.924.7–33.428.7 ± 1.525.7–31.7
Interorbital width26.825.9 ± 1.323.6–28.226.7 ± 1.123.2–28.2
Upper-jaw length67.164.2 ± 2.557.9–68.659.2 ± 1.356.3–61.9
Eye diameter18.217.4 ± 2.213.9–22.117.0 ± 1.714.1–20.4
Distance between nostril
and snout tip
18.919.9 ± 1.716.7–24.620.0 ± 1.318.0–23.3
Horizontal eye to
operculum distance
29.732.5 ± 2.328.2–37.133.5 ± 2.328.4–38.1
Opercular length24.820.8 ± 1.518.2–24.822.0 ± 1.419.4–24.3
CountsHolotypeMedianRangeMedianRange
Total number of vertebrae424341–4443.542–44
Abdominal vertebrae222221–232221–23
Caudal vertebrae202120–222121–22
Dorsal-fin raysiii, 7iii, 7iii, 7iii, 7iii, 7
Anal-fin raysiii, 10iii, 10iii, 10–iii, 11iii, 11iii, 10–iii, 12
Pectoral-fin raysi, 15i, 14i, 13–i, 15i, 13.5i, 13–i, 14
Pelvic-fin raysi, 8i, 8i, 8i, 8i, 8
Lateral line scales454745–504846–50
Lateral line–dorsal-fin
origin scales
8½–9½8½–9½
Lateral line–pelvic-fin
origin scales
333–433–4
Predorsal scales252625–282221–23
Circumpeduncular scales191818–201818–19
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, C.-X.; Xu, Y.-Y.; Zeng, Y.-Y.; Naing Oo, T.; Chen, X.-Y. Forgotten for Decades: Revalidation and Redescription of Raiamas harmandi (Sauvage, 1880) (Cypriniformes: Danionidae) from the Mekong River Basin. Taxonomy 2025, 5, 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy5030042

AMA Style

Liu C-X, Xu Y-Y, Zeng Y-Y, Naing Oo T, Chen X-Y. Forgotten for Decades: Revalidation and Redescription of Raiamas harmandi (Sauvage, 1880) (Cypriniformes: Danionidae) from the Mekong River Basin. Taxonomy. 2025; 5(3):42. https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy5030042

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Cai-Xin, Yi-Yang Xu, Yu-Yang Zeng, Thaung Naing Oo, and Xiao-Yong Chen. 2025. "Forgotten for Decades: Revalidation and Redescription of Raiamas harmandi (Sauvage, 1880) (Cypriniformes: Danionidae) from the Mekong River Basin" Taxonomy 5, no. 3: 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy5030042

APA Style

Liu, C.-X., Xu, Y.-Y., Zeng, Y.-Y., Naing Oo, T., & Chen, X.-Y. (2025). Forgotten for Decades: Revalidation and Redescription of Raiamas harmandi (Sauvage, 1880) (Cypriniformes: Danionidae) from the Mekong River Basin. Taxonomy, 5(3), 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy5030042

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop