Next Article in Journal
Systematic Assessment of Hebius beddomei (Günther, 1864) (Serpentes: Colubridae: Natricinae) with Description of a New Genus and a New Allied Species from the Western Ghats, India
Previous Article in Journal
Four New Caddisfly Species of Marilia Müller, 1880 (Trichoptera: Odontoceridae) from a Tailings Dam Disaster Area, Rio Doce basin, Brazil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Revision of the Chrysis leachii Group from Cyprus, with a Description of an Outstanding Species and a New Synonymy (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae) †

1
Laboratory of Zoology, Institute of Biosciences, University of Mons, Place du Parc, 20, 7000 Mons, Belgium
2
Ethnikis Antistaseos 21, C-3022 Lemesós, Cyprus
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3D513CEA-9EFD-4233-935D-A930C1E7A378; urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:29E9A918-5E8B-4B3F-8C75-A5CFB6079F67.
Taxonomy 2023, 3(3), 401-414; https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy3030023
Submission received: 2 July 2023 / Revised: 6 August 2023 / Accepted: 9 August 2023 / Published: 14 August 2023

Abstract

:
A new species in the Chrysis leachii group from Cyprus, Chrysis kalliroi Rosa & Makris, sp. Nov., is described. Distribution, illustrations, and a key to the Cypriot members of this species group are provided. Chrysis lanceolata Linsenmaier, 1959 is recorded from Cyprus for the first time. Chrysis pumilio Balthasar, 1953 stat. nov. is raised to species rank. Chrysis cypruscula Linsenmaier, 1959 (repl. Name for Chrysis leachii cypriana Linsenmaier, 1951 nec Enslin, 1950) is synonymised with Chrysis pumilio Balthasar, 1953.

1. Introduction

The cuckoo wasp fauna of Cyprus is undoubtedly one of the most interesting in the Mediterranean basin because it includes numerous endemic taxa (Linsenmaier 1959) and some of the most colourful species in the Mediterranean. Several authors [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8] listed and described new species from Cyprus, mostly basing the descriptions on specimens collected by the renowned entomologist George A. Mavromoustakis (1898–1968), a bee taxonomist native to the island. His material was studied by his contemporary colleagues: Trautmann [1], Invrea [2], Enslin [3,4], Balthasar [5], and Linsenmaier [6,7,8]. The second author’s dedicated efforts in recent years have resulted in the discovery of several species new to science and for Cyprus, which also led to the initiation of a comprehensive revision of the Cypriot fauna.
This paper serves a dual purpose. Firstly, it describes the newly discovered species Chrysis kalliroi. Secondly, it provides illustrations and a key for the identification of the Cypriot species of the leachii group.

2. Materials and Methods

The holotype of the newly described species has been deposited in the Linsenmaier collection at the Natur-Museum (Luzern, Switzerland, NMLU). Paratypes were deposited in the private collections of the authors (CMC and PRC). Other specimens studied in this paper are deposited in the Natur-Museum (Luzern, Switzerland, NMLU) and in the Natural History Museum, Prague (Prague, Czech Republic, NHMP), and in the private collections of G. Georgiou (Cyprus, GGC) and G. Pischilis (Cyprus, GPC).
The abbreviations used in these descriptions are as follows: F1, F2, F3, etc., = flagellomeres 1, 2, 3, etc., respectively; l/w = length/width ratio; MOD = median ocellus diameter (measured in frontal view); MS = malar space, the shortest distance between the base of the mandible and the lowest margin of the compound eye; OOL = oculo-ocellar line, the shortest distance between the posterior ocellus and compound eye; P = pedicel; PD = puncture diameter; POL = posterior ocellar line, the shortest distance between posterior ocelli; T1, T2, T3, etc. = terga 1, 2, 3, etc.
The specimens were photographed by C. Makris, using a Camera Canon EOS 5D Mark III (Canon Inc., Ōta, Tokyo, Japan) with a Canon MP-E 65 mm f/2.8 1–5× Macro Photo lens; the images were stacked using software. Zerene Stacker, T2020-05-22-1330 (Zerene Systems LLC, Richland, WA, USA) then enhanced them using Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). Other images were obtained by P. Rosa using a Camera Olympus (Olympus Corporation, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan) E-M1 Mark II with an Olympus Zuiko 60 mm (Olympus Corporation, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan) and a Mitutoyo 5× lens (Mitutoyo Corporation, Kanagawa, Japan); the images were stacked using Helicon software v. 8.2 (Helicon Soft Ltd., Oakland, CA, USA) and then enhanced using Adobe Photoshop v. 13.0 (Adobe Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Taxonomy

Chrysis Linnaeus, 1761: 414. Type species: Sphex ignita Linnaeus, 1758 [=Chrysis ignita (Linnaeus, 1758)], by subsequent designation of Latreille, 1810.
 
leachii species group
Chrysis (Chrysis) leachii group: Linsenmaier 1959: 92 (key to species group); 117–118 (diagnosis, keys), 190 (catalogue of the species); 1999: 161 (diagnosis),
Chrysis succincta-leachii subgroup: Kimsey & Bohart 1991: 364 (diagnosis, host, discussion).
 
Diagnosis of the leachii group. The leachii group includes very small to small species (2.5–5.0 mm) with apex of T3 edentate or with median tooth short to spiny or lanceolate; scapal basin broadly microridged in both sexes; malar space short and strongly convergent; transverse frontal carina faint; black spots on second sternum medium-sized (covering about half segment length) to large (covering two-thirds of segment length), subsquare to subrectangular, separated by narrow metallic line.
Discussion. The leachii group is closely related to the succincta group: females are distinguished by the microridged scapal basin (medially polished and laterally micropunctate in the succincta group), males can be separated by habitus, shape and coloration.
In contrast to some species groups, such as the ignita group or the comparata group, members of the leachii species group can be easily identified based on their colour pattern and the shape of genital capsule, as illustrated by Linsenmaier [7]. The following key for the identification of species in this group is partially based on these diagnostic features to allow for easy identification by final users with or without taxonomic experience in this family.
Haris [9] synonymised Chrysis leachii Shuckard, 1837 with C. hungarica Scopoli, 1772 against the opinion of experts and without following the recommendations of the International Code on Zoological Nomenclature [10]. For these reasons, subsequent authors continued to considered the name C. leachii to be valid, and C. hungarica a synonym of C. succincta Linnaeus, 1767 as proposed by Mocsáry [11], thus ignoring Haris’ [7] opinion (e.g., [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]). An article dealing with nomenclatorial cases will be submitted to the Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, and the case of Chrysis hungarica will be reported, asking for an action. Meanwhile, the use of the name Chrysis leachii is maintained herein.
Hosts. The hosts are Crabronidae in the genera Diodontus, Miscophus, and Tracheliodes [7,24,25,26]. Some of these records require confirmation.

3.2. New Species Description

Chrysis kalliroi Rosa & Makris, sp. nov.
LSID: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:29E9A918-5E8B-4B3F-8C75-A5CFB6079F67
Figure 1A,B, Figure 2A–E, Figure 8C,H and Figure 9C.
Type Material
Holotype: ♂, Troodos (Kannoures), 5.VII.2020, leg. C. Makris (NMLU). Paratypes: 1♂, Kourio, 06.VI.2006, leg. C. Makris (CMC); 1♀, Troodos (Kannoures), 5.VII.2020, leg. C. Makris (PRC).
Diagnosis: Chrysis kalliroi sp. n. is easily distinguished from other Cypriot species via its unique colouration (Figure 1 and Figure 2); sculpture with large punctures on mesonotum and T2, on the latter with small punctures on interstices; shape of the genital capsule (Figure 9C) with elongate gonostylus and inner margin of gonocoxa oblique and medially gently waved. Only one other species in the leachii group shares a similar colouration, C. alcudiae Reder & Arens, 2012, which is endemic to the island of Mallorca (Spain), in the western Mediterranean (Figure 3). However, C. alcudiae is entirely red to golden red, including the scapal basin, scape, pedicel, tegula, and legs. In addition, C. kalliroi sp. nov. has a different sculpture pattern, with large, deep, and spaced punctures on the mesosoma and metasoma (Figure 2B), whereas in both sexes of C. alcudiae, the punctation is characterised by dense and small punctures (Figure 3C). The male genital capsule of C. kalliroi sp. n. is differently shaped (Figure 9C), with an unmodified inner margin of the gonocoxae, similar to C. leachii, leaving the aedeagus visible in dorsal view, whereas the gonocoxae of C. alcudiae are fully developed and apically curved to protect the aedeagus (Figure 9C).
Figure 2. Chrysis kalliroi sp. nov., holotype, male. (A) Head and mesosoma, dorsal view; (B) metasoma, dorsal view; (C) metasoma, ventral view; (D) head, frontal view; (E) metasoma, postero-lateral view.
Figure 2. Chrysis kalliroi sp. nov., holotype, male. (A) Head and mesosoma, dorsal view; (B) metasoma, dorsal view; (C) metasoma, ventral view; (D) head, frontal view; (E) metasoma, postero-lateral view.
Taxonomy 03 00023 g002
Description. Male. Body length 4.0–4.2 mm (holotype 4.2 mm, Figure 1A).
Head. Brow between scapal basin and anterior ocellus with dense, polygonal to irregular and somewhere confluent punctures, medium to large (about 0.4–0.6 × MOD), without interspaces (Figure 2D); similar sculpture between scapal basin and eye, with row of small punctures aligned along eye; head posterior to ocelli with smaller punctures and narrow, polished interspaces, rugose around posterior ocelli; transverse frontal carina faint; scapal basin deep, with sharp transverse ridges, shallower on longitudinal midline and medially weak on lower scapal basin; genal carina straight, sharp, fully developed from mid-eye to mandibular insertion; subantennal space short, 0.6 × MOD; apex of clypeus with dark brown rim. OOL 1.5 × MOD; POL 2.0 × MOD; MS 1.1 × MOD; relative length of P:F1:F2:F3 = 1.0:1.4:0.9:0.9.
Mesosoma. Medial pronotal line shallow and elongate, reaching two-thirds of pronotal lenght (Figure 2A); pronotum as long as mesoscutellum, with deep punctures, irregularly sized antero-medially and with narrow, sharp interspaces; shallower punctation on mesoscutum; postero-medially with large, irregular punctures; somewhere on interspaces with weak transverse wrinkles; notauli formed by deep, black, sub-rectangular foveae, parapsidal signum distinct; mesoscutellum with irregular sized punctures, medially weak; mesoscutellar-metanotal suture deep, formed by longitudinally elongate punctures; metanotum antero-medially with enlarged, impunctate area, irregularly sculptured; posteriorly and laterally with small, round punctures and polished interspaces; posterior propodeal projections divergent, covered by deep and dense small punctures; mesopleuron with episternal sulcus formed by small foveae.
Metasoma. T1 with deep, large punctures, dorsally with small, shallow punctures on interspaces (Figure 2B), laterally with widely spaced with polished interspaces, without small punctures; largest punctures of T1 half as wide as basal mesonotal punctures; T2 dorsally with sculpture similar to T1, punctures smaller toward posterior margin; weak median longitudinal carina on T2-T3; T3 without pre-pit swelling; pits of pit row deep, irregular and partially confluent (Figure 2E); apical margin bordered by hyaline rim and with weak median indentation (Figure 2B); black spots on S2 subrectangular, as long as two-thirds of segment length, medially separated by narrow line (Figure 2C); genital capsule (Figure 9C) with elongate gonostylus, longer than in other species, and inner margin of gonocoxa oblique, gently waved medially.
Coloration. Body dorsally violet to purple, ventrally blue; scapal basin, scape, pedicel, tegula and legs blue. Vertex and mesoscutum with golden reflections, probably post-mortem. Wings hyaline with light brown nervures.
Female. Body length 4.5 mm. Similar to the male, with strong, triangular apical median tooth of T3.
Distribution: Cyprus. The species was collected on the highest peak of Troodos mountains, at Kannoures at the beginning of July, and close to the sea at Kourio at the beginning of June.
Figure 3. Chrysis alcudiae Reder & Arens, 2012, paratype, female (PRC). (A) Habitus, lateral view, (B) head, frontal view; (C) metasoma, dorsal view; (D) metasoma, ventral view.
Figure 3. Chrysis alcudiae Reder & Arens, 2012, paratype, female (PRC). (A) Habitus, lateral view, (B) head, frontal view; (C) metasoma, dorsal view; (D) metasoma, ventral view.
Taxonomy 03 00023 g003
Etymology. The name kalliroi (καλληρρόη) means “beautiful flow” in Greek, deriving from the words kallos (κάλλος, meaning beauty) and roi (ροή, meaning flow); therefore, kalliroi refers to the species’ beautiful body coloration, which changes from violet to purple. In Greek mythology, the nymph Kalliroi was one of the Oceanids, daughters of the titan Oceanus. From this mythological name derives the name Roi, name of the wife of the second author, to whom the species is dedicated.
Discussion. The outstanding colour of Chrysis kalliroi is rare in cuckoo wasps and thus far, is known only for a few species, including another member of the leachii group, Chrysis alcudiae Reder & Arens, 2012 (Figure 3), the female of Chrysis episcopalis rubrafeminae Linsenmaier, 1968 (viridissima group), and Chrysis hemipyrrha Mocsáry, 1889 (smaragdula group).

3.3. Other Cypriot Species of the leachii Group

Chrysis ignescoa Linsenmaier, 1959
Chrysis (Chrysis) ignescoa Linsenmaier, 1959: 118 (key), 120 (descr.), 190 (cat., leachii group), 204 (Fig. 334), 207 (Fig. 470), 208 (Figs. 472, 473). Holotype ♂; Cyprus, without locality [actually Limassol, VII.1932, leg Mavromoustakis] (NMLU).
Figure 4A,B, Figure 8A,F and Figure 9A
Material examined: The following specimens were collected by A. Mavromoustakis and deposited at NMLU: 1♂, Limassol, IX.1922, holotype; 1♀, Kathikas, 22.IX.1949, allotype; 1♂, Limassol, VII.1932; 1♀, id., V.1937; 2♂♂, id., IX.1951; 1♀, id., 4.IV.1958; 1♀, near Limassol 21.XI.1957; 1♂, Erimi, 21.VII.1950; 1♂, near Zakaki, 3.VI.1950; other specimens without type status from the same collection: 1♀, near Limassol, 19.X.1961; 1♂, Limassol, 18.IV.1959. All the following specimens were collected by the second author and deposited in his private collection: 3♂♂, Troodos, 30.VII.2005, leg. C. Makris; 1♂, 2♀♀, id., 15.VII.2007, leg. C. Makris; 1♂, 7♀♀, id., 29.VII.2007, leg. C. Makris; 2♀♀, id., 11.VIII.2007, leg. C. Makris; 1♂, id., 17.VI.2019, leg. C. Makris; 1♀, id., 25.VII.2020, leg. C. Makris; 1♀, Troodos (Kannoures), 6.VII.2008, leg. C. Makris; 1♀, id., 12.VII.2008, leg. C. Makris; 1♀, Troodos (Chionistra), 19.VII.2020, leg. C. Makris; 1♀, Kantou, 22.VIII.2006, leg. C. Makris; 1♀, Oreites, 27.VI.2008, leg. C. Makris; 1♂, Agia Varvara, 11.IV.2006, leg. C. Makris; 1♂, Ypsonas, 25.IV.2006, leg. C. Makris; 1♂, id., 26.IV.2006, leg. C. Makris; 1♂, Moni, 26.VIII.2022, leg. P. Rosa (PRC); 2♀♀, Agios Sozomenos, 9.IV.2007, leg. C. Makris; 1♀, id., 22.X.2022, leg. C. Makris.
Diagnosis: Chrysis ignescoa can be separated from other Cypriot species based on its colour pattern and the shape of the male genital capsule. It is the only species with a blue line on the posterior margin of the pronotum and T1, contrasting the red colour of these segments. The female is largely red on propodeum and posterior propodeal projections. The genital capsule has an oblique inner margin, similar to C. kalliroi sp. nov., but the gonostylus is short and stout (Figure 9A), whereas it is elongated and slender in C. kalliroi sp. nov. (Figure 9C).
Distribution: Cyprus endemic.
 
Chrysis ignigena Linsenmaier, 1959
Chrysis (Chrysis) ignigena Linsenmaier, 1959: 118 (key), 120 (descr., holotype ♂; Cyprus, without locality), 190 (cat., leachii group), 204 (Fig. 338), 207 (Fig. 469), 208 (Fig. 482) (NMLU).
Figure 5A,B, Figure 8B,G and Figure 9B
Material examined: 2♂♂, Yermasoyia River, IX.1951, leg. G. Mavromoustakis, holotype and paratype (NMLU); 1♀, Achna dam, 19.VI.2005, leg. C. Makris (CMC); 1♂, Akrotiri, 8.IX.2019, leg. C. Makris (CMC); 1♂, Potamia, 2.VII.2019, leg. C. Makris (CMC); 1♂, Polemidia, 3.VII.2020, leg. C. Makris (CMC); 1♂, id., 23.VIII.2020, leg. C. Makris (CMC); 1♀, Agios Sozomenos, 29. X. 2022, leg. C. Makris (CMC); 1♀, id., 5.IX.2022, leg. P. Rosa (PRC).
Diagnosis: Chrysis ignigena can be separated from other Cypriot species via its colour pattern and the shape of the male genital capsule. It is the only species with pronotum and T1 entirely red, without distinct blue posterior margin; the vertex is almost entirely red in both sexes. The female has extended red colour on posterior propodeal projections and propodeum. The genital capsule has a unique shape, with inner margins of gonocoxae parallel and apically pointed (Figure 9B).
Distribution: Cyprus endemic.
 
Chrysis lanceolata Linsenmaier, 1959
Chrysis (Chrysis) lanceolata Linsenmaier, 1959: 118 (key), 121 (descr., holotype ♀; Russia, without locality [type examined, locality: Rostov Prov.: Taganrog, 24.VIII.1925, leg. C. Ahnger]), 190 (cat., leachii group), 204 (Fig. 338), 207 (Fig. 471) (NMLU).
Figure 6A,B, Figure 8D,I and Figure 9D
Material examined: 1♀, Geri, 28.X.2005, leg. C.Makris, (CMC); 1♂, Troodos (Kannoures), 5.VII.2020, leg. C. Makris (CMC); 1♂, 1♀, Agios Sozomenos, 8.X.2022, leg. C. Makris (CMC); 2♂♂, id., 9.X.1922, leg. C. Makris (CMC); 1♀, id., 22.X.2022, leg. C. Makris (CMC); 1♂, Moni, 14.VIII.2021, leg. G. Pischilis (GPC).
Diagnosis: Chrysis lanceolata is the only Cypriot species with sexually dimorphic colouration. The male is recognisable by the green colour on its head, mesosoma, and T1, with some golden reflections (Figure 6). The female has the typical colour pattern of Chrysis leachii, with a blue head, pronotum posteriorly, metanotum, propodeum and T1-T2 posteriorly. The male can be recognised from similarly coloured species in the East Mediterranean by the shape of the genital capsule (Figure 9D), with parallel inner margins of the gonocoxae, which are gently curved apically. The female can be recognised from similarly coloured species in the East Mediterranean by the strong and lanceolate median tooth on T3.
Distribution: First record for Cyprus. The species is known from France (Corsica), Greece (mainland, Crete), Crimea, Croatia, Hungary, Italy (mainland and Sardinia), Romania, Russia (South and Ural), Slovakia [27], and possibly Spain [28].
 
Chrysis pumilio Balthasar, 1953 stat. nov.
Chrysis succincta f. pumilio Balthasar, 1953: 288 (descr., holotype ♀; Israel: Yarkon Petach Tikvah), 290 (key) (NHMP).
Chrysis (Chrysogona) leachii var. cypriana Linsenmaier, 1951: 50 (descr., syntypes ♂, ♀; Cyprus, without locality), nom. praeocc., nec Enslin 1950 (NMLU). Syn. nov.
Chrysis (Chrysis) cypruscula Linsenmaier, 1959a: 120 (replacement name for Chrysis leachii var. cypriana Linsenmaier 1951, nec Enslin, 1950). Syn. nov.
Chrysis cypruscula: Rosa & Soon 2012. Reinstated.
Material examined: 2♀♀, Geri, 21.X.2005, leg. C. Makris (CMC); 1♂, Fasouri, 28.X.2005, leg. G. Georgiou (GGC); 1♀, id., 9.XI.2005, leg. C. Makris (CMC); 1♀, id., 18.X.2006, leg. G. Georgiou (GGC); 1♂, Timi, 1.IV.2006, leg. C. Makris (CMC); 1♂, Ladys Mile, 4.VI.2006, leg. C. Makris (CMC); 2♀♀, id., 18.VIII.2019, leg. C. Makris (CMC); 1♂, Agia Varvara, 22.V.2008, leg. C. Makris (CMC); 1♀, Potamia, 24.X.2020, leg. C. Makris (CMC); 1♀, Anarita, 5.VI.2021, leg. C. Makris (CMC); 1♀, Agios Sozomenos, 8.X.2022, leg. C. Makris (CMC); 1♀, id., 22.X.2022, leg. C. Makris (CMC); 1♀, id., 29.X.2022, leg. C. Makris (CMC); 2♀ ♀, id., 6.XI.2022, leg. C. Makris (CMC). All the following specimens were collected by A. Mavromoustakis, identified by W. Linsenmaier and are deposited at NMLU: 1♂, near Zazaki, 3.VI.1950, syntype of Chrysis leachii var. cypriana [labelled as type]; 1♀, Moni, 3.X.1941, syntype of Chrysis leachii var. cypriana [labelled as allotype]; 3♂♂ near Zakaki, 1.VI.1950; 2♂♂ Erimi, 21.VII.1950; 1♂, Cherkes, 27.VII.1941, Coll. Dr. Enslin; 1♀, Limassol, 1.X.1952; 2♀♀, near Limassol, 5.IX.1957; 1♂, id., 19.X.1961; 2♂♂, 2♀♀, Yermasoyia Hills, IX.1951; 1♀, id., 24.IX.1951; 2♂♂, id., 25.IX.1951.
Diagnosis: Chrysis pumilio is the most easily identifiable species in East Mediterranean countries via its unique colour pattern: head blue, pronotum and mesonotum entirely red, metanotum and propodeum blue, T1 largely blue medially and red laterally, T2 red, T3 red with apical margin green to blue (Figure 7). Genital capsule with parallel inner margins of gonocoxae and apical apically straight (Figure 9E).
Figure 7. Chrysis pumilio Balthasar, 1953, habitus in dorsal view. (A) Male; (B) female.
Figure 7. Chrysis pumilio Balthasar, 1953, habitus in dorsal view. (A) Male; (B) female.
Taxonomy 03 00023 g007
Distribution: Cyprus. Greece (Rhodes), Palestine, and Turkey (Balthasar 1953; Linsenmaier 1968).
Remarks: Linsenmaier [7] replaced the name Chrysis leachii var. cypriana Linsenmaier, 1951 nec Enslin, 1950 with Chrysis cypruscula Linsenmaier, 1959. Chrysis leachii var. cypriana and C. cypruscula were synonymised by Kimsey and Bohart [29] with Chrysis succincta Linnaeus, 1761, whereas C. succincta f. pumilio Balthasar, 1953 was not mentioned in the catalogue, like many other forms described by Balthasar [30]. Linsenmaier (1959) recognised that Chrysis leachii var. cypriana and Chrysis succincta f. pumilio Balthasar, 1953 are conspecific; nevertheless, he considered the latter to be an invalid name. According to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature [10], taxa described as form (f.) before 1961 are considered subspecific and not infrasubspecific unless the author expressly gave them an infrasubspecific rank (Article 45.6.4). Therefore, the taxa described as forms by Balthasar [30] must be considered available, as in the case of pumilio Balthasar, 1953 which has priority over the name cypruscula Linsenmaier, 1959. The types of Chrysis pumilio and Chrysis leachii var. cypriana Linsenmaier were examined to confirm the synonymy.

3.4. Species to Be Excluded from the Cypriot Fauna

Chrysis leachii Shuckard, 1837
Chrysis (Monochrysis) leachii: Invrea 1935: 103 (cat., Cyprus: Limassol, June, August, September).
Chrysis leachi [!]: Enslin 1950: 663 (cat., Fassouri, 30.IX.1941; Moni, 3.X.1941).
 
Remarks: Invrea [2] and Enslin [4] listed Chrysis leachii from Cyprus. Nevertheless, all the species listed in the present article were described after these two references; the examination of these old specimens is needed to correctly identify them.

3.5. Key to the Species of the leachii Group from Cyprus

  • 1. Body dorsally fully violet to purple (Figure 8C,H), ventrally blue; scapal basin, scape, pedicel, tegula and legs blue; male genital capsule as in Figure 9C, with oblique inner margin of gonocoxa and gonostylus slender and elongate ……… C. kalliroi sp. nov.
     
  • - Body with different colour pattern (Figure 8A,B, 8D–G, 8I,J), with green to blue head, metanotum and propodeum, red mesoscutum and large part of metasoma dorsally; genital capsule differently shaped, with fully developed inner margin of gonocoxa (Figure 9B,D–F), covering the aedeagus, or with gonostylus broad and short (Figure 9A,D) ………………………………………………………………… 2
    Figure 8. Cypriot species of the leachii group, habitus in dorsal view. Males (AE) and females (FJ).
    Figure 8. Cypriot species of the leachii group, habitus in dorsal view. Males (AE) and females (FJ).
    Taxonomy 03 00023 g008
    Figure 9. Genital capsules of Cypriot species, dorsal view. (A) Chrysis ignescoa, (B) C. ignigena, (C) C. kalliroi sp. nov., holotype, (D) C. lanceolata, (E) C. pumilio, and (F) C. alcudiae paratype from Mallorca. Scale bar: 0.5 mm.
    Figure 9. Genital capsules of Cypriot species, dorsal view. (A) Chrysis ignescoa, (B) C. ignigena, (C) C. kalliroi sp. nov., holotype, (D) C. lanceolata, (E) C. pumilio, and (F) C. alcudiae paratype from Mallorca. Scale bar: 0.5 mm.
    Taxonomy 03 00023 g009
  • 2. Body with head, mesosoma and T1 green, with golden reflections; T2 and T3 red with green posterior margin; genital capsule as in Figure 9D, with very short gonostylus and round, slightly declivitous inner margin of gonocoxa …………………………………………………………………………………… C. lanceolata
     
  • - Body with different colour pattern, red on pronotum, mesonotum and large part of T1 and shape of genital capsule with inner margin of gonocoxae distinctly obliquous (Figure 9A,C), convex (Figure 9B), or straight apically (Figure 9E,F) …………………………………………………………………………………………… 3
     
  • 3. Head entirely blue, T1 with large blue band on posterior margin ………………… 4
     
  • - Head blue with red or golden-green reflections on vertex, T1 largely or entirely red …………………………………………………………………………………………… 6
     
  • 4. Pronotum entirely red; T1 medially blue, laterally red; T2 entirely red; male genital capsule as in Figure 9E, with straight apical margin of gonocoxa ……… C. pumilio
     
  • - Pronotum anteriorly red, posteriorly blue; T1 anteriorly and posteriorly blue, medially red; T2 red, with narrow blue posterior line; genital capsule with oblique apical margin of gonocoxa ………………………………………………………………………………………… 5
     
  • 5. Pronotum with narrow anterior golden stripe; apical margin of T3 with lanceolate median tooth; male with head, mesosoma and T1 green, with golden reflections; T2 and T3 red with green posterior margin; male with head, mesosoma and T1 green, with golden reflections (see couplet 2); genital capsule as in Figure 9D, with slightly divergent inner margin of gonocoxa and with oblique apical margin; short and stout gonostylus …………………………………………………………………… C. lanceolata
     
  • - Pronotum with anterior golden stripe covering more than half the pronotal length; apical margin of T3 slightly projecting medially; male usually darker dorsally on metasoma and coloured similarly as the female; genital capsule with highly divergent inner and apical margining of gonocoxa, leaving the capsule wide open medially …… C. leachii
     
  • 6. Pronotum posteriorly with a narrow blue stripe; T1 without posterior blue stripe; genital capsule as in Figure 9A …………………………………………… C. ignigena
     
  • - Pronotum entirely red; T1 posteriorly bordered by narrow blue stripe; genital capsule as in Figure 9B ……………………………………………… C. ignescoa

4. Discussion

With five species, the leachii species group is currently the most speciose group of Chrysis Linnaeus, 1761 in Cyprus. It was established by Linsenmaier [7], based on West Palaearctic species, and Kimsey and Bohart [29] considered leachii a subgroup of the C. succincta group. The leachii group is still poorly known, and in recent years, the number of known species has almost doubled [31,32,33,34,35,36]. Moreover, its distributional range has been recently revised with the discovery of species in the Afrotropical realm [21]. For this reason, a wider revision of this species group is needed, including molecular analyses.
Three of the five species known for the Cypriot fauna are endemic: C. ignigena, C. ignescoa and C. kalliroi sp. nov. (the collecting site is shown in Figure 10; the distribution map of species of the leachii group is shown in Figure 11). The reason for this high rate of endemism should be further investigated, beginning research on their hosts. Of the other two species, C. pumilio is known from other eastern Mediterranean localities, such as Rhodes, Turkey [8], and Palestine [30], whereas C. lanceolata was originally described from southern Russia and is apparently spreading its distributional range from Eastern into Western Europe [37].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.R.; methodology, P.R. and C.M., writing—original draft preparation, P.R.; review and editing, P.R. and C.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was partially funded by the University of Mons, Zoology Laboratory and FNRS, application IDs 40013892 and 40019179.

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting recorded results in this study may be obtained through direct contact with the first author (P.R.).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Marco Bernasconi (Natur-Museum, Luzern, Switzerland) and Jan Macek (Natural History Museum of Prague, Czech Republic), who allowed for the examination of types from the Linsenmaier and Balthasar collections. We thank Denis Michez (UMons, Belgium), supervisor of the first author for his PhD, and Menelaos Stavrinides (Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol) for the logistical and procedural support to this research. We thank Thomas J. Wood (Umons, Belgium) for proofreading the manuscript. The research was partially supported by the FNRS (2022/V 3/5/224-40013892-JG/MF-2293) and the Institute de Biosciences of Mons (Belgium). We thank the Department of Environment of the Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment for the collecting permit ref: 04.05.002.005.006,02.15.001.003 and the Department of Forests of the Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment for the permit ref: 2.15.005.3.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Trautmann, W. Beitrag zur kenntnis der Goldwespen Cyperns. Konowia 1929, 8, 154–158. [Google Scholar]
  2. Invrea, F. Crisidi raccolti nell’isola di Cipro dal Sig. Mauromoustakis (Hymen. Chrysididae). Boll. Soc. Entomol. Ital. 1935, 67, 102–106. [Google Scholar]
  3. Enslin, E. Neue Beiträge zur Goldwespenfauna von Cypern. Entomol. Z. 1939, 53, 105–110. [Google Scholar]
  4. Enslin, E. On the Chrysididae (Hymenoptera) of Cyprus. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 1950, 3, 656–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Balthasar, V. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Sphegiden und Chrysididen der Insel Cypern. Opuscola Hymenopterologica XII. Acta Entomol. Mus. Natn. Pragae 1954, 28, 39–56. [Google Scholar]
  6. Linsenmaier, W. Die europäischen Chrysididen (Hymenoptera). Versuch einer natürlichen Ordnung mit Diagnosen. Mitt. Schweiz. Entomol. Ges. 1951, 24, 1–110. [Google Scholar]
  7. Linsenmaier, W. Revision der Familie Chrysididae (Hymenoptera) mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der europäischen Spezies. Mitt. Schweiz. Entomol. Ges. 1959, 32, 1–232. [Google Scholar]
  8. Linsenmaier, W. Revision der Familie Chrysididae (Hymenoptera). Zweiter Nachtrag. Mitt. Schweiz. Entomol. Ges. 1968, 41, 1–144. [Google Scholar]
  9. Haris, A. Hymenoptera Research in the Carpathian Basin (Hymenoptera: Aculeata). Nat. Som. 2016, 29, 5–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN). International Code on Zoological Nomenclature, 4th ed.; ITZN: London, UK, 1999; xxx +; 306p. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mocsáry, A. Monographia Chrysididarum Orbis Terrarum Universi; Academia Hungarica Scientarum: Budapest, Hungary, 1889; 643p. [Google Scholar]
  12. Oshibah, A.D.A.; Salem, M.M.; Hossni, H.T.; Galhoum, A.M. Key for identification of the species included in the genus Chrysis Linnaeus (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae) of Egypt with a new record. Egypt. Acad. J. Biol. Sci. 2017, 10, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Józan, Z. Fundamental data of the chrysid (cuckoo) wasp fauna of the South-Transdanubia, Hungary (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Nat. Somogy. 2018, 31, 89–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Frommer, U.; Tischendorf, S. Kommentierte Rote Liste der Goldwespen Hessens. 1. Fassung; Hessisches Landesamt für Naturschutz, Umwelt und Geologie: Wiesbaden, Germany, 2021; 248p. [Google Scholar]
  15. Özbek, H.; Strumia, F. Research on the subfamily Chrysidinae (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae) Fauna of Turkey with distributional evaluation. Acta Entomol. Serbica 2019, 23, 75–104. [Google Scholar]
  16. Pauli, T.; Castillo-Cajas, R.F.; Rosa, P.; Kukowka, S.; Berg, A.; van den Berghe, E.; Fornoff, F.; Hopfenmüller, S.; Niehuis, M.; Peters, R.S.; et al. Phylogenetic analysis of cuckoo wasps (Chrysididae) reveals the partially artificial nature of the current classification at the genus level in this family of Hymenoptera. Syst. Entomol. 2019, 44, 322–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ruchin, A.; Antropov, A. Wasp fauna (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae, Chrysididae, Dryinidae, Tiphiidae, Mutillidae, Scoliidae, Pompilidae, Vespidae, Sphecidae, Crabronidae & Trigonalyidae) of Mordovia State Nature Reserve and its surroundings in Russia. J. Threat. Taxa 2019, 11, 13195–13250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Majzlan, O.; Tyrner, P. Chrysididae family (Hymenoptera) of Horšianska dolina valley (Ipeľská pahorkatina highland), south-west Slovakia. Ochr. Prírody 2018, 32, 10–15. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wiesbauer, H.; Rosa, P.; Zettel, H. Die Goldwespen der Mitteleuropa. Biologie, Lebensräume, Artenporträts; Verlag Eugen Ulmer: Stuttgart, Germany, 2020; 248p. [Google Scholar]
  20. Falahatpisheh, A.; Fallahzadeh, M.; Dousti, A.F.; Strumia, F.; Saghaei, N. A survey of the genus Chrysis (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae) in Fars province, with six new records for Iranian fauna. J. Entomol. Res. 2021, 12, 29–37. [Google Scholar]
  21. Rosa, P. First records of the Chrysis leachii group from sub-Saharan Africa, with description of a new species (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Far East. Entomol. 2021, 437, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vinokurov, N.B. Species abundance and ecological characteristics of cuckoo wasps of the tribe (Chrysidini) in plant communities of the water protection zone of the Kuma and Podkumok rivers (the North Caucasus). AIP Conf. Proc. 2021, 2388, 040019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vinokurov, N.B. Dynamics of the abundance of cuckoo wasps (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae) in the conditions of the altitudinal-belt heterogeneity of the North Caucasus. BIO Web Conf. Mt. Ecosyst. Their Compon. 2021, 35, 00023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Grandi, G. Studi di un entomologo sugli Imenotteri superiori. Boll. Ist. Entomol. Univ. Bologna 1961, 25, 1–659. [Google Scholar]
  25. Heinrich, J. Beitrag zur HymenopterenFauna des westlichen Unterfranken.1. Teil, Chrysididae. Nach. Naturwissenschaftl. Mus. Aschaffenbg. 1964, 71, 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  26. Gerth, M.; Franke, F.; Stolle, E.; Bleidorn, C. Ein neuer Nachweis der Goldwespe Chrysis leachii Shuckard, 1837 (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae) in Thüringen mit Anmerkungen zu potentiellen Wirten. Ampulex 2010, 2, 61–64. [Google Scholar]
  27. Rosa, P.; Soon, V. Hymenoptera: Chrysididae. Fauna Europaea Version 2.5. 2012. Available online: http://www.faunaeur.org (accessed on 31 December 2022).
  28. Gonzales, J.A.; Gayubo, S.F.; Strumia, F. Biodiversità dei crisididi di un ambiente orticolo del territorio “Las Arribes del Duero” (Provincia di Salamanca, Spagna Occidentale) (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Frustula Entomol. 1998, 21, 26–41. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kimsey, L.S.; Bohart, R.M. The Chrysidid Wasps of the World; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1991; 652p. [Google Scholar]
  30. Balthasar, V. Monographie des Chrysidides de Palestine et des pays limitrophes. Acta Entomol. Mus. Natn. Pragae 1953 [1951], 27 (Suppl. S2), 1–317. [Google Scholar]
  31. Linsenmaier, W. Neue Chrysididen von den Kanarischen Inseln (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Chrysididae). Veröff. Übersee-Mus. Brem. Naturwissensch. 1993, 12, 721–732. [Google Scholar]
  32. Linsenmaier, W. The Chrysididae (Insecta: Hymenoptera) of the Arabian Peninsula. Fauna Saudi Arab. 1994, 14, 145–206. [Google Scholar]
  33. Linsenmaier, W. Die Goldwespen Nordafrikas (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Entomofauna 1999, Supplement 10, 1–210. [Google Scholar]
  34. Reder, G.; Arens, W. Chrysis alcudiae sp. n. a new gold wasp of the Chrysis leachii-group from Mallorca. Mitt. Interntl Entomol. Ver. EV Frankf. 2012, 37, 163–172. [Google Scholar]
  35. Arens, W. Zwei neue Goldwespen-Arten von griechischen Ägäis-Inseln (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae). Linzer Biolog. Beitr. 2016, 48, 989–997. [Google Scholar]
  36. Rosa, P.; Proshchalykin, M.Y.; Lelej, A.S.; Loktionov, V.M. Contribution to the Siberian Chrysididae (Hymenoptera). Part 1. Far East. Entomol. 2017, 341, 1–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rosa, P. I Crisidi della Valle d’Aosta. Monografie del Museo regionale di Scienze naturali. 2006, 6, 368 pp + 48 pls. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Chrysis kalliroi sp. nov., habitus, dorsal view. (A) Male holotype; (B) female paratype.
Figure 1. Chrysis kalliroi sp. nov., habitus, dorsal view. (A) Male holotype; (B) female paratype.
Taxonomy 03 00023 g001
Figure 4. Chrysis ignescoa Linsenmaier, 1959, habitus in dorsal view. (A) Male; (B) female.
Figure 4. Chrysis ignescoa Linsenmaier, 1959, habitus in dorsal view. (A) Male; (B) female.
Taxonomy 03 00023 g004
Figure 5. Chrysis ignigena Linsenmaier, 1959, habitus in dorsal view. (A) Male; (B) female.
Figure 5. Chrysis ignigena Linsenmaier, 1959, habitus in dorsal view. (A) Male; (B) female.
Taxonomy 03 00023 g005
Figure 6. Chrysis lanceolata Linsenmaier, 1959, habitus in dorsal view. (A) Male, (B) female.
Figure 6. Chrysis lanceolata Linsenmaier, 1959, habitus in dorsal view. (A) Male, (B) female.
Taxonomy 03 00023 g006
Figure 10. Type locality of Chrysis kalliroi sp. nov. in the Troodos Mountains (Ph.: P. Rosa).
Figure 10. Type locality of Chrysis kalliroi sp. nov. in the Troodos Mountains (Ph.: P. Rosa).
Taxonomy 03 00023 g010
Figure 11. Distribution of species of the leachii group in Cyprus.
Figure 11. Distribution of species of the leachii group in Cyprus.
Taxonomy 03 00023 g011
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rosa, P.; Makris, C. A Revision of the Chrysis leachii Group from Cyprus, with a Description of an Outstanding Species and a New Synonymy (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Taxonomy 2023, 3, 401-414. https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy3030023

AMA Style

Rosa P, Makris C. A Revision of the Chrysis leachii Group from Cyprus, with a Description of an Outstanding Species and a New Synonymy (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Taxonomy. 2023; 3(3):401-414. https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy3030023

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rosa, Paolo, and Christodoulos Makris. 2023. "A Revision of the Chrysis leachii Group from Cyprus, with a Description of an Outstanding Species and a New Synonymy (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae)" Taxonomy 3, no. 3: 401-414. https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy3030023

APA Style

Rosa, P., & Makris, C. (2023). A Revision of the Chrysis leachii Group from Cyprus, with a Description of an Outstanding Species and a New Synonymy (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Taxonomy, 3(3), 401-414. https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy3030023

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop