Next Article in Journal
Comparative Morphological Analysis of Two Species of Turtle Leeches Coexisting in North America (Hirudinea: Glossiphoniidae): Embryological Evidence for Character Displacement
Previous Article in Journal
A New Species of Large Duck (Aves: Anatidae) from the Miocene of New Zealand
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cytogeography of the East Asian Tulips (Amana, Liliaceae)

1
Laboratory of Systematic & Evolutionary Botany and Biodiversity, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
2
Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research at Kunming, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China
3
College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
4
Shanghai Science and Technology Museum, Shanghai 200127, China
5
Department of Environment and Forest Resources, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Taxonomy 2022, 2(1), 145-159; https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy2010012
Submission received: 21 January 2022 / Revised: 2 March 2022 / Accepted: 8 March 2022 / Published: 10 March 2022

Abstract

:
Amana Honda (Liliaceae), known as ‘east Asian tulips’, is a spring ephemeral genus endemic to Sino-Japanese Floristic Subregion, mainly distributed in eastern and central China, Japan and the Korean peninsula. Chromosome numbers are reported here for the first time from 89 populations of Amana (representing all seven accepted species, two new species about to be published, and two suspected new species). Three ploidy levels are found in this genus. These are diploid (2n = 2x = 24) and tetraploid (2n = 4x = 48) in the widespread A. edulis, while all the narrow endemics are diploid, except for one population of A. tianmuensis, which is triploid (2n = 3x = 36). The northernmost and southernmost populations of A. edulis are diploid and tetraploid, respectively, while diploids and tetraploids coexist in between, with gradual transition to diploids as the latitude increases. This may indicate polyploids have an advantage in tolerance of environmental stress and are more adaptable to high-temperature environment in subtropical regions than diploids. The species and cytotype distributions in Amana are complex, and these results provide hypotheses about the origins of the genus and the polyploid cytotypes.

1. Introduction

Liliaceae belong to Liliales of the monocotyledons (APG IV, 2016 [1]) and consist of 15 genera with more than 600 species (Lu et al., 2021 [2]). The family is organized into six tribes, and Amana Honda, Erythronium L., Gagea Salisb. and Tulipa L. are included in tribe Tulipeae (Peruzzi, 2016 [3]).
Among these, Amana, commonly known as ‘east Asian tulips’, is a genus endemic to Sino-Japanese Floristic Subregion, mainly distributed in eastern and central China, Japan and the Korean peninsula (Honda et al., 1935 [4]; Tan et al., 2005 [5]; Li et al., 2017 [6]). All the species are spring ephemerals, which occur in temperate deciduous or subtropical mixed forests. Spring ephemerals refer to the perennial plants that appear quickly in the early spring and die after a short period of growth and reproduction (Struik, 1965 [7]). It is a common survival strategy in understory herbs in temperate deciduous forests. Before woody plants form a canopy, spring ephemerals effectively use strong sunlight that reaches the forest understory to complete their life cycle. Then, in the summer, when the canopy begins to close, the aboveground parts of spring ephemerals die, and the underground parts enter a dormant period (Mckenna and Houle, 2000 [8]). Therefore, spring ephemerals are closely linked with temperate deciduous forests and are usually found in temperate regions. However, the genus Amana spreads to subtropical regions (such as Zhejiang, southern Anhui and northern Jiangxi, China), unlike classic spring ephemerals, such as tulips, trout lilies, crocuses, daffodils, and hyacinths. The mechanism of such a spring ephemeral genus adapting to the subtropical climate is intriguing.
Currently, seven species are recognized in the genus Amana, namely A. anhuiensis (X.S. Shen) D.Y. Tan and D.Y. Hong, A. baohuaensis B.X. Han, Long Wang and G.Y. Lu, A. edulis (Miq.) Honda, A. erythronioides (Baker) D.Y. Tan and D.Y. Hong, A. kuocangshanica D.Y. Tan and D.Y. Hong, A. latifolia (Makino) Honda, and A. wanzhensis L.Q. Huang, B.X. Han and K. Zhang (Ohwi and Kitagawa, 1992 [9]; Chen and Mordak, 2000 [10]; Shen, 2001 [11]; Tan et al., 2007 [12]; Han et al., 2014 [13]; Wang et al., 2019 [14]). Within the genus, A. edulis is the most common and widespread species, covering the entire distribution range of the genus, while the other six species are narrow endemics. Although the range of the narrow endemics overlaps with that of A. edulis, their habitats often differ in altitude. Therefore, admixed populations of two or more species in the same place are not common (Li et al., 2017 [6]). With extensive fieldwork since 2014, we found that there may be four more cryptic species in the genus. Amana sp.1 occurs in the northeastern part of Zhejiang Province; Amana sp.2 is mainly distributed along the Dabie Mountains in Henan and Hubei provinces; A. nanyueensis (Wang et al., 2022 [15]) is only found in Mt. Heng in Hunan Province; and A. tianmuensis (Wang et al., 2022 [15]) appears from northern Zhejiang to southern Anhui provinces.
Geographical isolation results in restricted gene flow between populations and promotes genetic differentiation (Yuan, 2013 [16]). Habitat heterogeneity also changes genetic composition, which is reflected in the chromosome morphology and numbers. Therefore, ploidy is an important basis for studying the inheritance and evolution of species. Previous studies have shown that the basic chromosome number of Amana is x = 12 (Peruzzi, 2009 [17]), and there are two ploidy levels in A. edulis: diploid (2n = 2x = 24 in the northernmost populations, such as Liaoning and Henan provinces, China) and tetraploid (2n = 4x = 48 in the southernmost population, such as Zhejiang Province, China) (Zhu et al., 2002 [18]; Deng, 2016 [19]). This gives us a hint that polyploidization might be the reason for its adaptation to subtropical climate. However, there are very few karyotypic studies on the other A. edulis populations or the other Amana species (only A. latifolia was reported to be diploid), and thus, a comprehensive analysis is needed.
In this study, we included 94 populations (89 from present study and 5 from previous studies) representing all 11 species (including 2 suspected new species) and performed an investigation of the cytogeography. We aim to find out the geographical distribution pattern of cytotypes in Amana, which is helpful for clarifying the phylogenetic relationships within this genus and providing support for subsequent taxonomic revisions. Moreover, it will deepen our understanding on the evolutionary history and polyploidization event of spring ephemerals.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Field Observations and Sampling

Extensive field surveys and sample collections were conducted in Anhui, Jiangsu, Jiangxi, Henan, Hubei, Hunan, Shandong, Shanxi, and Zhejiang provinces in China since 2014. We also collected a population of A. edulis from the Korean peninsula, which is the only species that grows there. The vertical dropper (about 5 mm) that germinates for asexual reproduction in spring was used as the material for subsequent observation of chromosomes (Figure A1). A total of 89 populations were collected to analyze the geographical distribution pattern of ploidy levels (Table 1). Voucher specimens were deposited at the Herbarium of Zhejiang University (HZU).

2.2. Chromosome Observation and Geographical Distribution Analysis

Droppers collected in the field were washed and pretreated with 0.1% Colchicine for 4.5 h, then fixed in Carnoy’s solution (1 glacial acetic acid: 3 ethanol, v/v) for 12–24 h. Finally, they were transferred to absolute ethanol and stored in the refrigerator at −20 °C for later use. Before observation, front tip (about 2 mm) was taken and hydrolyzed in 1 mol/L HCl for 10–15 min, then washed with distilled water, dyed with Carbol fuchsin and squashed for observation. Cells in metaphase of mitosis were found using a 10-fold objective lens, and chromosome numbers were counted using a 100-fold objective lens. Photographs were taken using the SOPTOP DMCX40 microscope (SOPTOP, China). The latitude, longitude and chromosome number of each collection were used to create geographical distribution maps of cytotypes through ArcMap 10.2 (Minami et al., 2000 [20]). The Elevation data (30 s) was downloaded from WorldClim v2.1 (https://worldclim.org/ (accessed on 21 February 2022)). Phylogenomic analyses revealed three clades within the genus Amana. Clade I included 3 spp. (A. edulis, A. tianmuensis, and A. nanyueensis); Clade II consisted of 4 spp. (A. erythronioides, A. kuocangshanica, A. latifolia, and Amana sp.1); and Clade III was also composed of 4 spp. (A. baohuaensis, A. wanzhensis, A. anhuiensis, and Amana sp.2) (our unpublished data). To show cytogeography of closely related species more clearly, we created different maps according to three different clades, except for the widespread A. edulis, for which we created a separate map.

3. Results

3.1. Chromosome Number and Ploidy Levels

According to chromosomal observation, there are two ploidy levels in A. edulis: diploid (2n = 2x = 24) and tetraploid (2n = 4x = 48) (Table 1, Figure 1). All the populations of the other ten species are diploid (2n = 2x = 24), except for one population (Population 59, A. tianmuensis), which is both diploid and triploid (2n = 3x = 36) (Table 1, Figure 1).

3.2. Geographical Distribution Pattern of Cytotypes

The distribution of cytotypes for 50 A. edulis populations was shown in Figure 2. This species is widespread in eastern and central China, the Korean peninsula and Japan. In China, the northernmost (such as Liaoning, Shandong and northern Henan provinces) and southernmost populations of A. edulis (such as Zhejiang and southeastern Hubei provinces) are diploid and tetraploid, respectively, while diploid and tetraploid coexist in between, with gradual transition to diploid as the latitude increases. The only population we sampled from the Korean peninsula (Daejeon, South Korea) is tetraploid.
Within Clade I, Amana nanyueensis is only found at several peaks of Mt. Heng in Hunan Province, China. It mostly grows in moist deciduous broadleaf forests on the mountain slope, at elevations of 950–1150 m. Two populations of A. nanyueensis that we sampled are both diploid (Table 1, Figure 3). Additionally, Amana tianmuensis is essentially distributed in southeastern Anhui and western Zhejiang Province, China (Figure 3). It grows in evergreen-deciduous broadleaved mixed forests or moist-deciduous broadleaf forests on the mountain slope, at elevations of 600–1500 m. Most populations (7/8) of A. tianmuensis are all diploid, but a population from Qingliangfeng Botanical Garden, Lin’an District, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, is both diploid and triploid (Table 1, Figure 3).
The species of Clade II (A. erythronioides, A. kuocangshanica, A. latifolia and Amana sp.1) are all found in Zhejiang Province but rarely coexist (Figure 4). We detected four populations of A. erythronioides (at elevations of 120–860 m, northeastern Zhejiang), three of A. kuocangshanica (at elevations of 400–1380 m, eastern Zhejiang), four of A. latifolia (at elevations of 80–700 m, southeastern Zhejiang) and five of Amana sp.1 (at elevations of 400–1000 m, central to northeastern Zhejiang). All the populations that we examined are diploid.
The species of Clade III (A. wanzhensis, A. baohuaensis, A. anhuiensis and Amana sp.2) show a much wider and parapatric distribution (Figure 5). We detected six populations of A. wanzhensis (at elevations of 300–1130 m, central Zhejiang to southeastern Anhui), six of A. baohuaensis (at elevations of 70–350 m, southwestern Jiangsu to eastern Anhui), three of A. anhuiensis (at elevations of 700–1200 m, southwestern Anhui and northwestern Jiangxi) and three of Amana sp.2 (at elevations of 160–530 m, along Mt. Dabie bordering Henan and Hubei). All the populations that we examined are diploid.

4. Discussion

Increasing relative DNA content by polyploidization has proven to be an important mechanism of speciation in angiosperms and is a key driver of diversity (De Bodt et al., 2005 [23]; Soltis et al., 2009 [24]; Tank et al., 2015 [25]; Soltis and Soltis, 2016 [26]; Landis et al., 2018 [27]). Recent research shows that the ancestral haploid chromosome number for angiosperms is n = 7, with the inferred ancestral diploid status and with the low ancestral genome size, which highlights the importance of WGD events later in the evolution of angiosperms (Carta et al., 2020 [28]). Relationships between genome size and environmental variables suggest that DNA content might be adaptive and of evolutionary importance in plants, and extreme environmental pressures may have facilitated repeated whole-genome duplication events (Vidal-Russell et al., 2021 [29]). Related research shows that the genome size increase in Liliaceae is constrained by climate seasonality, which has a negative correlation with altitude and precipitation (Carta and Peruzzi, 2016 [30]). Polyploidy can potentially contribute to the acquisition of new morphological, genetic and/or physiological features, which may enhance the competitive ability, fitness or ecological tolerance of polyploids compared to the diploid parents. These events, which have occurred at temporal scales from ancient to contemporary times, are thought to have a fundamental role in plant adaptation and range expansion (Levin 1983 [31]; Udall and Wendel 2006 [32]). This hypothesis has been supported by several investigations confirming that polyploidy has obvious advantages in adaptation and tolerance to environmental stress (McArthur and Sanderson 1999 [33]; Brochmann et al., 2004 [34]; Hijmans et al. 2007 [35]). Areas with higher latitudes and altitudes are usually not good for the growth of plants due to the cold and dry climate, therefore, the percentage of polyploids generally increases when it goes from lower latitudes/altitudes to higher ones (Actinidia chinensis, Li et al., 2010 [36]; Claytonia perfoliata, Patrick, 2012 [37]; Eugenia, Silveira et al., 2016 [38]; Asparagus, Mousavizadeh et al., 2021 [39]; Peruzzi et al., 2012 [40]).
However, in the genus Amana, it is quite the opposite. The populations in the lower latitudes or altitudes are more likely to be tetraploid. Similar latitudinal distribution pattern has been reported in several other taxa (Solidago canadensis L., Li, 2011 [41]; Chamerion angustifolium L., Thompson et al., 2014 [42]; Andropogon gerardii, Mcallister et al., 2015 [43]; Callisia section Cuthbertia, Molgo et al., 2017 [44]). The correlation between ploidy level distribution and temperature indicates that polyploidy may be more adaptable to heterogeneous high-temperature environment than diploidy in low-latitude areas. In terms of altitude, some studies have also shown similar result (Pilosella officinarum, Mráz et al., 2008 [45]; Turnera sidoides subsp. pinnatifida, Elías et al., 2011 [46]). Diploids occur at higher elevations (Husband and Sabara, 2003 [47]; Schönswetter et al., 2007 [48]) and lower minimum temperatures (Pockman and Sperry, 1997 [49]) than polyploids, which suggests that ecological sorting based on cold tolerance can occur between cytotypes. Previous studies have shown that spring ephemerals inhabiting cool-temperate forests grow better under cool conditions, when under warm temperature, both vegetative and reproductive activities were negatively affected, resulting in less vegetative growth and lower seed-set (Sunmonu and Kudo, 2015 [50]). These previous findings together with our results imply that the ancestor of the genus Amana might be a diploid that originated in a temperate region and later migrated south to the subtropical region (perhaps during the Pleistocene glacial epoch). It then either moved up to higher altitudes to track suitable habitat or became a tetraploid and thus more adapted to warmer temperature in low latitudes/altitudes afterward. Although there are both diploids and triploids in an A. tianmuensis population, the latter could be a hybrid between historically sympatric tetraploid and diploid. Morphological and molecular analyses are needed to unravel the complex relationships among cytotypes of Amana, which will allow us to reveal the parentage and evolutionary history of all cytotypes within the genus.
The Sino-Japanese flora in east Asia has the most abundant temperate flora in the world (Liu, 1988 [51]; Ying, 2001 [52]). The Japanese archipelago was once part of Eurasia (Iijima and Tada, 1990 [53]). However, it began to separate from Eurasia during the Miocene period (about 20–16 million years ago) and gradually formed the prototype of a modern Japanese island (Maruyama et al., 1997 [54]; Otofuji et al., 1985 [55], 1996 [56]). Therefore, it is generally believed that Japanese plants originated from Eurasia (Iijima and Tada, 1990 [53]). Some recent studies have shown that the Japanese archipelago was connected to the east Asian continent during the period of 3.5 to 1.7 Ma (Kitamura et al., 2001 [57]; Kitamura and Kimoto, 2006 [58]), and after 1.7 Ma, the connection between the two was mainly achieved through unstable land bridges during the ice age (Tsuchiya et al., 2000 [59]; Shinohara et al., 2004 [60]; Kawamura, 2007 [61]). Therefore, the separation of the Pleistocene land bridge and glacial refuges may have led to species formation and lineage differentiation between China and Japan. In our case, Amana populations dwelled at higher altitudes, such as sky islands, which might have further promoted species differentiation and formation in the genus. Two populations from Japan (one from Koishikawa Botanical Garden and the other from Akitsu) were reported to be tetraploid (Sato, 1943 [21]; Noguchi and Kowano, 1974 [22]). The Japanese populations of A. edulis may be most closely related with populations from southeastern China or the Korean peninsula, which explains why the Japanese populations are also tetraploid.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.L.; methodology, P.L.; investigation, J.W., M.W., Z.Z., M.C., J.L. and P.L.; experiment, J.W., Z.Z., M.C. and J.L.; writing—original draft preparation, J.W.; writing—review and editing, M.W., J.L. and P.L.; supervision, P.L.; resources, P.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31970225), and the National Science and Technology Basic Project of China (Grant No. 2015FY110200).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank Yuantong Hou, Yonghua Zhang, Ruisen Lu, Yao Chen, Xuan Lu, Xinglv Xie, Huixia Cai, Jiaxian Dong, Zhenyu Jin, Difei Wu, Zhecheng Qi, Luxian Liu, Peizi He, Junke Li, Zongcai Liu, Xiaokai Fan and Shenglu Zhang for helping with plant materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Figure A1. A whole plant of Amana edulis. The red arrow points to the vertical dropper.
Figure A1. A whole plant of Amana edulis. The red arrow points to the vertical dropper.
Taxonomy 02 00012 g0a1

References

  1. APG IV. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2016, 181, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lu, R.S.; Yang, T.; Chen, Y.; Wang, S.Y.; Cai, M.Q.; Cameron, K.M.; Li, P.; Fu, C.X. Comparative plastome genomics and phylogenetic analyses of Liliaceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2021, 196, 279–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Peruzzi, L. A new infrafamilial taxonomic setting for Liliaceae, with a key to genera and tribes. Plant Biosyst.—Int. J. Deal. All Asp. Plant Biol. 2016, 150, 1341–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Honda, M. Amana a new genus of Liliaceae. Bull. Biogeograpical Soc. Jpn. 1935, 6, 19–21. [Google Scholar]
  5. Tan, D.Y.; Zhang, Z.; Li, X.R.; Hong, D.Y. Restoration of the genus Amana Honda (Liliaceae) based on a cladistic analysis of morphological characters. Acta Phytotaxon. Sin. 2005, 43, 262–270. [Google Scholar]
  6. Li, P.; Lu, R.S.; Xu, W.Q.; Ohi-Toma, T.; Cai, M.Q.; Qiu, Y.X.; Cameron, K.M.; Fu, C.X. Comparative Genomics and Phylogenomics of East Asian Tulips (Amana, Liliaceae). Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Struik, G.J. Growth patterns of some native annual and perennial herbs in southern Wisconsin. Ecology 1965, 46, 401–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mckenna, M.F.; Houle, G. Why are annual plants rarely spring ephemerals? New Phytol. 2000, 148, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ohwi, J.; Kitagawa, M. New Flora of Japan; Shibundo Co. Ltd.: Tokyo, Japan, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, X.Q.; Mordak, H.V. Tulipa Linnaeus. In Flora of China; Wu, Z.-Y., Raven, P.H., Eds.; Science Press: Beijing, China; Missouri Botanical Garden Press: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2000; Volume 24, pp. 123–126. [Google Scholar]
  11. Shen, X.S. A new species of Tulipa (Liliaceae) from China. Acta Bot. Yunnanica 2001, 23, 39–40. [Google Scholar]
  12. Tan, D.Y.; Li, X.R.; Hong, D.Y. Amana kuocangshanica (Liliaceae) a new species from south–east China. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2007, 154, 435–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Han, B.X.; Zhang, K.; Huang, L.Q. Amana wanzhensis (Liliaceae) a new species from Anhui China. Phytotaxa 2014, 177, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Wang, L.; Xing, Q.; Lu, G.Y.; Lu, X.; Zhao, Q.; Song, X.W.; Han, B.X. Amana baohuaensis (Liliaceae) a new species from East China. Phytotaxa 2019, 427, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, M.Z.; Fan, X.K.; Zhang, Y.H.; Wu, J.; Mao, L.M.; Zhang, S.L.; Cai, M.Q.; Li, M.H.; Zhu, Z.S.C.; Zhao, M.S.; et al. Phylogenomics and integrative taxonomy reveal two new species of Amana (Liliaceae). Plant Divers. 2022; in press. [Google Scholar]
  16. Yuan, W.B. Genetic Diversity Research of Aconitum carmichaeli Debx; Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences: Beijing, China, 2013; pp. 22–24. [Google Scholar]
  17. Peruzzi, L.; Leitch, I.J.; Caparelli, K.F. Chromosome diversity and evolution in Liliaceae. Ann. Bot. 2009, 103, 459–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhu, X.N.; Jin, X.F.; Gao, Z. Karyotype analysis on three species of Liliaceae. J. Zhejiang For. Sci. Technol. 2002, 22, 22–25. [Google Scholar]
  19. Deng, A.H.; Li, K.; Chen, Y.; Liu, C.Y.; Guo, Q.S.; Zhu, Z.B.; Miao, Y.Y. Karyotype analysis of different populations of Tulipa edulis. Chin. Herb. Med. 2016, 39, 493–498. [Google Scholar]
  20. Minami, M.; Sakala, M.; Wrightsell, J. Using ArcMap; ESRI: Redlands, CA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sato, D. Karyotype alteration and phylogeny in Liliaceae and allied families. Jpn. J. Bot. 1943, 12, 57–161. [Google Scholar]
  22. Noguchi, J.; Kowano, S. Brief notes on the chromosomes of Japanese plants (3). Jpn. J. Bot. 1974, 49, 75–86. [Google Scholar]
  23. De Bodt, S.; Maere, S.; Van de Peer, Y. Genome duplication and the origin of angiosperms. Trends Eco. Evol 2005, 20, 591–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Soltis, D.E.; Albert, V.A.; Leebens-Mack, J.; Bell, C.D.; Paterson, A.H.; Zheng, C.F.; Sankoff, D.; de Pamphilis, C.W.; Wall, P.K.; Soltis, P.S. Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification. Am. J. Bot. 2009, 96, 336–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Tank, D.C.; Eastman, J.M.; Pennell, M.W.; Soltis, P.S.; Soltis, D.E.; Hinchliff, C.E.; Brown, J.W.; Sessa, E.B.; Harmon, L.J. Nested radiations and the pulse of angiosperm diversification: Increased diversification rates often follow whole genome duplications. New Phytol. 2015, 207, 454–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Soltis, P.S.; Soltis, D.E. Ancient WGD events as drivers of key innovations in angiosperms. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2016, 30, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Landis, J.B.; Soltis, D.E.; Li, Z.; Marx, H.E.; Barker, M.S.; Tank, D.C.; Soltis, P.S. Impact of whole-genome duplication events on diversification rates in angiosperms. Am. J. Bot. 2018, 105, 348–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Carta, A.; Bedini, G.; Peruzzi, L. A deep dive into the ancestral chromosome number and genome size of flowering plants. New Phytol. 2020, 228, 1097–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vidal-Russell, R.; Tadey, M.; Urfusová, R.; Urfus, T.; Souto, C.P. Evolutionary importance of the relationship between cytogeography and climate: New insights on creosote bushes from North and South America. Plant Divers. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Carta, A.; Peruzzi, L. Testing the large genome constraint hypothesis: Plant traits, habitat and climate seasonality in Liliaceae. New Phytol. 2016, 2, 709–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Levin, D.A. Polyploidy and novelty in flowering plants. Am. Nat. 1983, 122, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Udall, J.A.; Wendel, J.F. Polyploidy and crop improvement. Crop. Sci. 2006, 46, S3–S14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. McArthur, E.D.; Sanderson, S.C. Cytogeography and chromosome evolution of subgenus Tridentatae of Artemisia (Asteraceae). Am. J. Bot. 1999, 86, 1754–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Brochmann, C.; Brysting, A.K.; Alsos, I.G.; Borgen, L.; Grundt, H.H.; Scheen, A.C.; Elven, R. Polyploidy in arctic plants. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2004, 82, 521–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Hijmans, R.J.; Gavrilenko, T.; Stephenson, S.; Bamberg, J.; Salas, A.; Spooner, D.M. Geographical and environmental range expansion through polyploidy in wild potatoes (Solanum section Petota). Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2007, 16, 485–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, D.; Liu, Y.F.; Zhong, C.H.; Huang, H.W. Morphological and cytotype variation of wild kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis complex) along an altitudinal and longitudinal gradient in central-west China. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2010, 164, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Patrick, J.M. Cytogeography and genome size variation in the Claytonia perfoliata (Portulacaceae) polyploid complex. Ann. Bot. 2012, 110, 1195–1203. [Google Scholar]
  38. Silveira, R.M.; Machado, R.M.; Forni-Martins, E.R.; Verola, C.F.; Costa, I.R. Environmental variations drive polyploid evolution in neotropical Eugenia species (Myrtaceae). Genet. Mol. Res. 2016, 15, gmr15048842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mousavizadeh, S.J.; Gil, J.; Moreno, R.; Mashayekhi, K. Asparagus ploidy distribution related to climates adaptation in Iran. Environ Dev. Sustain. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Peruzzi, L.; Góralski, G.; Joachimiak, A.J.; Bedini, G. Does actually mean chromosome number increase with latitude in vascular plants? An answer from the comparison of Italian, Slovak and Polish floras. Comp. Cytogenet. 2012, 6, 371–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Li, J. Ecological Significance of Polyploidy in the Invasion of Solidago Canadensis in China. Ph.D. Thesis, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  42. Thompson, K.A.; Husband, B.C.; Maherali, H. Climatic niche differences between diploid and tetraploid cytotypes of Chamerion angustifolium (Onagraceae). Am. J. Bot. 2014, 101, 1868–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. McAllister, C.; Blaine, R.; Kron, P.; Bennett, B.; Garrett, H.; Kidson, J.; Matzenbacher, B.; Glotzbach, A.; Miller, A.J. Environmental correlates of cytotype distribution in Andropogon gerardii (Poaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2015, 102, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Molgo, I.E.; Soltis, D.E.; Soltis, P.S. Cytogeography of Callisia section Cuthbertia (Commelinaceae). Comp. Cytogenet. 2017, 11, 553–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Mráz, P.; Šingliarová, B.; Urfus, T.; Krahulec, F. Cytogeography of Pilosella officinarum (Compositae): Altitudinal and longitudinal differences in ploidy level distribution in the Czech Republic and Slovakia and the general pattern in Europe. Ann. Bot. 2008, 101, 59–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Elías, G.; Sartor, M.; Solís-Neffa, V.G. Patterns of cytotype variation of Turnera sidoides subsp. pinnatifida (Turneraceae) in mountain ranges of central Argentina. J. Plant Res. 2011, 124, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Husband, B.C.; Sabara, H.A. Reproductive isolation between autotetraploids and their diploid progenitors in fi reweed, Chamerion angustifolium (Onagraceae). New Phytol. 2003, 161, 703–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Schönswetter, P.; Lachmayer, M.; Lettner, C.; Prehsler, D.; Rechnitzer, S.; Reich, D.S.; Sonnleitner, M.; Wagner, I.; Hülber, K.; Schneeweiss, G.M.; et al. Sympatric diploid and hexaploid cytotypes of Senecio carniolicus (Asteraceae) in the Eastern Alps are separated along an altitudinal gradient. J. Plant Res. 2007, 120, 721–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Pockman, W.T.; Sperry, J.S. Freezing-induced xylem cavitation and the northern limit of Larrea tridentata. Oecologia 1997, 109, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sunmonu, N.; Kudo, G. Warm temperature conditions restrict the sexual reproduction and vegetative growth of the spring ephemeral Gagea lutea (Liliaceae). Plant Ecol. 2015, 216, 1419–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Liu, K.B. Quaternary history of the temperate forests of China. Quat. Sci. Rev. 1988, 7, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ying, T.S. Species diversity and distribution pattern of seed plants in China. Biodivers. Sci. 2001, 9, 393–398, (In Chinese with an English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  53. Iijima, A.; Tada, R. Evolution of tertiary sedimentary basins of Japan in reference to opening of the Japan Sea. J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. II 1990, 22, 121–171. [Google Scholar]
  54. Maruyama, S.; Isozaki, Y.; Kimura, G.; Terabayashi, M. Paleogeographic maps of the Japanese Islands: Plate tectonics synthesis from 750 Ma to the present. Isl. Arc 1997, 6, 121–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Otofuji, Y.I.; Matsuda, T.; Nohda, S. Opening mode of the Japan Sea inferred from the paleomagnetism of the Japan Arc. Nature 1985, 317, 603–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Otofuji, Y.I. Large tectonic movement of the Japan Arc in late Cenozoic times inferred from paleomagnetism: Review and synthesis. Isl. Arc 1996, 5, 229–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kitamura, A.; Takano, O.; Takada, H.; Omote, H. Late Pliocene-early Pleistocene paleoceanographic evolution of the Sea of Japan. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2001, 172, 81–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Kitamura, A.; Kimoto, K. History of the inflow of the warm Tsushima Current into the Sea of Japan between 3.5 and 0.8 Ma. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2006, 236, 355–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Tsuchiya, K.; Suzuki, H.; Shinohara, A.; Harada, M.; Wakana, S.; Sakaizumi, M.; Han, S.H.; Lin, L.K.; Kryukov, A.P. Molecular phylogeny of East Asian moles inferred from the sequence variation of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Genes Genet. Syst. 2000, 75, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Shinohara, A.; Suzuki, H.; Tsuchiya, K.; Zhang, Y.P.; Luo, J.; Jiang, X.L.; Wang, Y.X.; Campbell, K.L. Evolution and biogeography of talpid moles from continental East Asia and the Japanese islands inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences. Zool. Sci. 2004, 21, 1177–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Kawamura, K.; Parrenin, F.; Lisiecki, L.; Uemura, R.; Vimeux, F.; Severinghaus, J.P.; Hutterli, M.A.; Nakazawa, T.; Aoki, S.; Jouzel, J.; et al. Northern Hemisphere forcing of climatic cycles in Antarctica over the past 360,000 years. Nature 2007, 448, 912–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chromosome numbers of Amana. (A) A. edulis (2n = 2x = 24, WMZ1408); (B) A. edulis (2n = 2x = 24, WMZ1486); (C) A. edulis (2n = 4x = 48, WMZ1494); (D) A. edulis (2n = 4x = 48, Daejeon, South Korea); (E) A. tianmuensis (2n = 2x = 24, WMZ1504); (F) A. tianmuensis (2n = 3x = 36, WMZ1502); (G) A. nanyueensis (2n = 2x = 24, WMZ1464); (H) A. anhuiensis (2n = 2x = 24, WMZ1480); (I) A. baohuaensis (2n = 2x = 24, WMZ1407); (J) A. wanzhensis (2n = 2x = 24, WMZ1460); (K) A. erythronioides (2n = 2x = 24, WMZ1435); (L) A. kuocangshanica (2n = 2x = 24, WMZ1443); (M) A. latifolia (2n = 2x = 24, WMZ1445); (N) Amana sp.1 (2n = 2x = 24, WMZ1458); (O) Amana sp.2 (2n = 2x = 24, WMZ1489).
Figure 1. Chromosome numbers of Amana. (A) A. edulis (2n = 2x = 24, WMZ1408); (B) A. edulis (2n = 2x = 24, WMZ1486); (C) A. edulis (2n = 4x = 48, WMZ1494); (D) A. edulis (2n = 4x = 48, Daejeon, South Korea); (E) A. tianmuensis (2n = 2x = 24, WMZ1504); (F) A. tianmuensis (2n = 3x = 36, WMZ1502); (G) A. nanyueensis (2n = 2x = 24, WMZ1464); (H) A. anhuiensis (2n = 2x = 24, WMZ1480); (I) A. baohuaensis (2n = 2x = 24, WMZ1407); (J) A. wanzhensis (2n = 2x = 24, WMZ1460); (K) A. erythronioides (2n = 2x = 24, WMZ1435); (L) A. kuocangshanica (2n = 2x = 24, WMZ1443); (M) A. latifolia (2n = 2x = 24, WMZ1445); (N) Amana sp.1 (2n = 2x = 24, WMZ1458); (O) Amana sp.2 (2n = 2x = 24, WMZ1489).
Taxonomy 02 00012 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of ploidy levels of Amana edulis in China, Japan and the Korean peninsula based on present data. The red color represents tetraploid (2n = 4x = 48), and the black color represents diploid (2n = 2x = 24). The five populations centered with a white dot are based on previous studies (Deng, 2016 [19]; Sato, 1943 [21]; Noguchi and Kowano, 1974 [22]).
Figure 2. Distribution of ploidy levels of Amana edulis in China, Japan and the Korean peninsula based on present data. The red color represents tetraploid (2n = 4x = 48), and the black color represents diploid (2n = 2x = 24). The five populations centered with a white dot are based on previous studies (Deng, 2016 [19]; Sato, 1943 [21]; Noguchi and Kowano, 1974 [22]).
Taxonomy 02 00012 g002
Figure 3. Distribution of ploidy levels of Amana nanyueensis and A. tianmuensis in Anhui province and Zhejiang province. The green color represents triploid (2n = 3x = 36) and the black color represents diploid (2n = 2x = 24).
Figure 3. Distribution of ploidy levels of Amana nanyueensis and A. tianmuensis in Anhui province and Zhejiang province. The green color represents triploid (2n = 3x = 36) and the black color represents diploid (2n = 2x = 24).
Taxonomy 02 00012 g003
Figure 4. Distribution of ploidy levels of Amana erythronioides, A. kuocangshanica, A. latifolia and Amana sp.1 in Zhejiang Province. All four species are diploid (2n = 2x = 24).
Figure 4. Distribution of ploidy levels of Amana erythronioides, A. kuocangshanica, A. latifolia and Amana sp.1 in Zhejiang Province. All four species are diploid (2n = 2x = 24).
Taxonomy 02 00012 g004
Figure 5. Distribution of ploidy levels of Amana anhuiensis, A. baohuaensis, A. wanzhensis and Amana sp.2 in Hubei, Henan, Jiangxi, Anhui, Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces. All four species are diploid (2n = 2x = 24).
Figure 5. Distribution of ploidy levels of Amana anhuiensis, A. baohuaensis, A. wanzhensis and Amana sp.2 in Hubei, Henan, Jiangxi, Anhui, Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces. All four species are diploid (2n = 2x = 24).
Taxonomy 02 00012 g005
Table 1. The populations information and ploidy levels found in Amana. A, B, C refer to different collections from the same population.
Table 1. The populations information and ploidy levels found in Amana. A, B, C refer to different collections from the same population.
Pop.SpeciesVoucher NumberChromosome NumbersLatitudeLongitudeElevationLocality
1Amana edulis/2440.1161124.3584/China, Liaoning Province, Dandong City, Zhenxin District (Deng, 2016)
2A. edulis/2439.0989121.7955/China, Liaoning Province, Dalian City, Mt. Dahei (Deng, 2016)
3A. edulisLP1612302437.4546121.583345China, Shandong Province, Yantai City, Yangma Island
4A. edulisLP1611952436.6298117.0413283China, Shandong Province, Jinan City, Mt. Fohui
5A. edulisLP1611942436.2551117.0746749China, Shandong Province, Taian City, Mt. Tai
6A. edulis/4836.2200127.2400/South Korea, Daejeon
7A. edulis/4835.9167140.4333/Japan, Tokyo, Koishikawa Botanical Garden (Sato, 1943)
8A. edulis/4835.7783139.496856Japan, Tokyo, Akitsu. HigashiMurayama (Noguchi and Kowano, 1974)
9A. edulisLP1611802435.6164116.990273China, Shandong Province, Qufu County, Cemetery of Confucius
10AA. edulisLP1611742435.6017117.1556335China, Shandong Province, Sishui County, Mt. Ge
10BA. edulisLP1611752435.6013117.1583240China, Shandong Province, Sishui County, Mt. Ge
11AA. edulisLP1611762435.5972117.1950226China, Shandong Province, Sishui County, Mt. Matou
11BA. edulisLP1611772435.5969117.1975302China, Shandong Province, Sishui County, Mt. Matou
11CA. edulisLP1611782435.5946117.2050330China, Shandong Province, Sishui County, Mt. Matou
11DA. edulisLP1611792435.5930117.2016349China, Shandong Province, Sishui County, Mt. Matou
12A. edulis/2435.3000113.9000/China, Henan Province, Xinxiang City (Deng, 2016)
13A. edulisLP1611232435.1313117.4130198China, Shandong Province, Zaozhuang City, Yunfengshan Village
14A. edulisLP1730252434.9805111.4382910China, Shanxi Province, Xia County, Wulongmiao
15A. edulisLP1730724834.7155119.4267183China, Jiangsu Province, Lianyungang City, Mt. Yuntai
16AA. edulisLP2079072434.2433117.1736104China, Jiangsu Province, Xuzhou City, Mt. Yunlong
16BA. edulisLP1730712434.2433117.1737104China, Jiangsu Province, Xuzhou City, Mt. Yunlong
17A. edulisLP1730732433.5989119.05687China, Jiangsu Province, Huai’an City, Mt. Bochi
18A. edulisLP1730574833.1717113.0545295China, Henan Province, Wugang County, Dengtaijia
19AA. edulisLP1730552433.0600112.0579354China, Henan Province, Nanyang City, Mt. Du
19BA. edulisLP2079162433.0600112.0579354China, Henan Province, Nanyang City, Mt. Du
20A. edulisLP1961984832.4635118.930815China, Jiangsu Province, Nanjing City, Mt. Guizi
21A. edulisWMZ14904832.3954113.2989249China, Henan Province, Tongbai County, Tayuan Temple
22A. edulisWMZ14934832.3067113.4549161China, Henan Province, Tongbai County, Huangjialaozhuang
23A. edulisWMZ14224832.2956118.286487China, Anhui Province, Chuzhou City, Mt. Langya
24A. edulisWMZ14164832.1251119.0896129China, Jiangsu Province, Jurong County, Mt. Baohua
25A. edulisWMZ14184832.1008118.5875102China, Jiangsu Province, Nanjing City, Mt. Lao
26A. edulisWMZ14204832.0625118.552387China, Jiangsu Province, Nanjing City, Shiziling
27A. edulisWMZ14082431.8154119.3090269China, Jiangsu Province, Jurong County, Mt. Mao
28A. edulisWMZ14882431.7980114.0873394China, Hubei Province, Guangshui County, Heilongtan
29A. edulisWMZ14822431.7153115.5012379China, Henan Province, Shangnan County, Liluocheng Village
30A. edulisWMZ14242431.6710118.084641China, Anhui Province, Hanshan County, Mt. Baochan
31A. edulisWMZ14862431.5727114.6192660China, Hubei Province, Hong’an County, Mt. Tiantai
32A. edulisWMZ14854831.5719114.6154590China, Hubei Province, Hong’an County, Mt. Tiantai
33A. edulisWMZ14262431.4650117.7859132China, Anhui Province, Wuwei County, Loujialong
34AA. edulisLP2079054831.2615119.753082China, Jiangsu Province, Yixing County, Haoshan Village
34BA. edulisWMZ14044831.2614119.752888China, Jiangsu Province, Yixing County, Haoshan Village
35A. edulisLP1729082431.0643119.2697322China, Jiangsu Province, Liyang County, Mt. Wawu
36A. edulisWMZ14772430.4191117.203590China, Anhui Province, Chizhou City, Yaogang
37A. edulisLJK544830.3866118.2291473China, Anhui Province, Huangshan County, Qiaoshan Village
38A. edulisWMZ14714830.3846118.2460614China, Anhui Province, Huangshan City, Qiaoshan Village
39A. edulisWMZ14944830.1979115.1092158China, Hubei Province, Huangshi City, Feiyun Cave
40A. edulisWMZ14964829.9485114.749185China, Hubei Province, Daye County, Caomen Village
41AA. edulisLP1500694829.7446121.0833892China, Zhejiang Province, Yuyao County, Mt. Siming
41BA. edulisWMZ14324829.7426121.0842880China, Zhejiang Province, Yuyao County, Mt. Siming
41CA. edulisWMZ14304829.7398121.0869861China, Zhejiang Province, Yuyao County, Mt. Siming
42AA. edulisWMZ14344829.6488121.5570571China, Zhejiang Province, Ningbo City, Mt. Jin’e
42BA. edulisLP1849534829.6458121.5575564China, Zhejiang Province, Ningbo City, Mt. Jin’e
42CA. edulisWMZ14364829.6386121.5596458China, Zhejiang Province, Ningbo City, Mt. Jin’e
43AA. edulisWMZ14564829.5147120.2411564China, Zhejiang Province, Zhuji County, Fenglinxia Village
43BA. edulisLP1849304829.5138120.2438447China, Zhejiang Province, Zhuji County, Fenglinxia Village
44A. edulisWMZ14594829.4565120.2906234China, Zhejiang Province, Zhuji County, Banqiu Village
45A. edulisLP1849394829.3811121.6190263China, Zhejiang Province, Ninghai County, Mt. Cha
46AA. edulisLP1849364829.3773121.5875628China, Zhejiang Province, Ninghai County, Mt. Cha
46BA. edulisWMZ14404829.3772121.5875671China, Zhejiang Province, Ninghai County, Mt. Cha
47A. edulisWMZ14384829.3428121.7588268China, Zhejiang Province, Xiangshan County, Dalingyan
48A. edulisWMZ14532429.2085119.6260558China, Zhejiang Province, Jinhua City, Shuanglong Scenic Area
49A. edulisLP1848604829.0454120.2871331China, Zhejiang Province, Zhuji County, Banqiu Village
50A. edulisLP1611624828.8559121.1082561China, Zhejiang Province, Linhai County, Mt. Chenghuang
51AA. nanyueensisWMZ14632427.2881112.69321067China, Hunan Province, Hengyang City, Mt. Heng
51BA. nanyueensisLP1962192427.2881112.69321055China, Hunan Province, Hengyang City, Mt. Heng
52A. nanyueensisWMZ14642427.2767112.67461063China, Hunan Province, Hengyang City, Mt. Heng
53A. tianmuensisWMZ14732430.4728117.8345736China, Anhui Province, Qingyang County, Mt. Jiuhua
54AA. tianmuensisWMZ14702430.3884118.2182629China, Anhui Province, Huangshan City, Yuxiang
54BA. tianmuensisLJK512430.3878118.2169692China, Anhui Province, Huangshan City, Yuxiang
54CA. tianmuensisLP1730122430.3878118.2169692China, Anhui Province, Huangshan City, Yuxiang
55AA. tianmuensisWMZ15042430.3497119.42621437China, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou County, Mt. Tianmu
55BA. tianmuensisLJK422430.3425119.43321104China, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou County, Mt. Tianmu
55CA. tianmuensisWMZ14652430.3423119.43331108China, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou County, Mt. Tianmu
56AA. tianmuensisLJK452430.3085119.12151120China, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, Zhexitianchi
56BA. tianmuensisWMZ15052430.3082119.12141118China, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, Zhexitianchi
57A. tianmuensisWMZ14722430.2008118.1846629China, Anhui Province, Huangshan City, Yuanlinchang
58A. tianmuensisWMZ15062430.1426118.17041620China, Anhui Province, Huangshan City, Mt. Huang
59AA. tianmuensisLJK482430.1097118.9013902China, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, Qingliangfeng Botanical Garden
59BA. tianmuensisWMZ15023630.1097118.9014872China, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, Qingliangfeng Botanical Garden
60AA. tianmuensisLJK192429.2085119.6263577China, Zhejiang Province, Jinhua City, Shuanglong Scenic Area
60BA. tianmuensisLP2079132429.2085119.6263577China, Zhejiang Province, Jinhua City, Shuanglong Scenic Area
60CA. tianmuensisLP1730092429.2085119.6263577China, Zhejiang Province, Jinhua City, Shuanglong Scenic Area
61A. erythronioidesWMZ14292429.7398121.0869845China, Zhejiang Province, Yuyao County, Mt. Siming
62AA. erythronioidesLP1849442429.7339121.3429169China, Zhejiang Province, Ningbo City, Tianhu Scenic Area
62BA. erythronioidesLJK242429.7286121.3461148China, Zhejiang Province, Ningbo City, Tianhu Scenic Area
62CA. erythronioidesWMZ14332429.7283121.3456118China, Zhejiang Province, Ningbo City, Tianhu Scenic Area
63A. erythronioidesWMZ14352429.6489121.5570573China, Zhejiang Province, Ningbo City, Mt. Jin’e
64AA. erythronioidesLP1849342429.3735121.5855492China, Zhejiang Province, Ninghai County, Mt. Cha
64BA. erythronioidesWMZ14392429.3735121.5854509China, Zhejiang Province, Ninghai County, Mt. Cha
65A. kuocangshanicaWMZ14412429.3752121.5909460China, Zhejiang Province, Ninghai County, Mt. Cha
66A. kuocangshanicaWMZ14432428.8150120.9432868China, Zhejiang Province, Linhai County, Mt. Kuocang
67A. kuocangshanicaWMZ14482428.5512120.7998865China, Zhejiang Province, Yongjia County, Mt. Sihai
68AA. latifoliaWMZ14452427.9379120.5080401China, Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou City, Jinbao Village
68BA. latifoliaLP1730102427.9423120.5061400China, Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou City, Jinbao Village
69A. latifoliaWMZ14442427.9079120.6970324China, Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou City, Mt. Daluo
70A. latifoliaLP1729952427.8950120.7445694China, Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou City, Mt. Daluo
71A. latifoliaWMZ14462427.8273120.3295336China, Zhejiang Province, Rui’an County, Huayan National Forest Park
72AAmana sp.1LJK102429.5070120.4370438China, Zhejiang Province, Zhuji County, Mt. Dongbai
72BAmana sp.1WMZ14612429.5068120.4370430China, Zhejiang Province, Zhuji County, Mt. Dongbai
73AAmana sp.1LP1849592429.4501120.2861432China, Zhejiang Province, Zhuji County, Banqiu Village
73BAmana sp.1WMZ14582429.4500120.2860413China, Zhejiang Province, Zhuji County, Banqiu Village
74AAmana sp.1LP1500732429.3517121.0251588China, Zhejiang Province, Xinchang County, Malikeng Village
74BAmana sp.1WMZ14512429.3514121.0259629China, Zhejiang Province, Xinchang County, Malikeng Village
74CAmana sp.1LP1611712429.3513121.0255636China, Zhejiang Province, Xinchang County, Malikeng Village
75AAmana sp.1WMZ14502429.2525121.0977990China, Zhejiang Province, Tiantai County, Huading National Forest Park
75BAmana sp.1LP1611692429.2523121.0959962China, Zhejiang Province, Tiantai County, Huading National Forest Park
76Amana sp.1WMZ14492428.9799120.5393747China, Zhejiang Province, Pan’an County, Mt. Dapan
77A. wanzhensisWMZ14272431.0871119.3349307China, Anhui Province, Guangde County, Xiaojiawan
78AA. wanzhensisLJK442430.3487119.2296713China, Anhui Province, Ningguo County, Longmentou Village
78BA. wanzhensisWMZ14662430.3480119.2298720China, Anhui Province, Ningguo County, Longmentou Village
79A. wanzhensisLJK462430.3065119.31631120China, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, Zhexitianchi
80A. wanzhensisWMZ14692430.3064119.11961126China, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, Zhexitianchi
81A. wanzhensisWMZ14552429.5148120.2410572China, Zhejiang Province, Zhuji County, Fenglinxia Village
82A. wanzhensisWMZ14602429.4565120.2906244China, Zhejiang Province, Zhuji County, Banqiu Village
83A. baohuaensisWMZ14132432.1385119.2762259China, Jiangsu Province, Zhenjiang City, Mt. Chaofeng
84A. baohuaensisWMZ14152432.1251119.0896216China, Jiangsu Province, Jurong County, Mt. Baohua
85A. baohuaensisWMZ14192432.0559118.5476346China, Jiangsu Province, Nanjing City, Shiziling
86AA. baohuaensisWMZ14072431.8160119.3090333China, Jiangsu Province, Jurong County, Mt. Mao
86BA. baohuaensisLP1729062431.8156119.3090235China, Jiangsu Province, Jurong County, Mt. Mao
87A. baohuaensisWMZ14092431.7883119.2961107China, Jiangsu Province, Jurong County, Mt. Mao
88A. baohuaensisWMZ14232431.6714118.088874China, Anhui Province, Hanshan County, Mt. Baochan
89AA. anhuiensisLJK622430.7412116.45311183China, Anhui Province, Qianshan County, Mt. Tianzhu
89BA. anhuiensisCMQ20150752430.7410116.45261207China, Anhui Province, Qianshan County, Mt. Tianzhu
90A. anhuiensisWMZ14802430.7235116.4537708China, Anhui Province, Qianshan County, Mt. Tianzhu
91AA. anhuiensisWMZ14992429.0968115.5768711China, Jiangxi Province, Yongxiu County, Mt. Yunju
91BA. anhuiensisLP1730142429.0963115.5767703China, Jiangxi Province, Yongxiu County, Mt. Yunju
92Amana sp.2WMZ14892432.3954113.2989248China, Henan Province, Tongbai County, Tayuan Temple
93Amana sp.2WMZ14872431.7973114.0872529China, Hubei Province, Guangshui County, Heilongtan
94Amana sp.2WMZ14832431.7212115.5038496China, Henan Province, Shangnan County, Liluocheng Village
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, J.; Wang, M.; Zhu, Z.; Cai, M.; Lee, J.; Li, P. Cytogeography of the East Asian Tulips (Amana, Liliaceae). Taxonomy 2022, 2, 145-159. https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy2010012

AMA Style

Wu J, Wang M, Zhu Z, Cai M, Lee J, Li P. Cytogeography of the East Asian Tulips (Amana, Liliaceae). Taxonomy. 2022; 2(1):145-159. https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy2010012

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Jing, Meizhen Wang, Zhangshichang Zhu, Minqi Cai, Joongku Lee, and Pan Li. 2022. "Cytogeography of the East Asian Tulips (Amana, Liliaceae)" Taxonomy 2, no. 1: 145-159. https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy2010012

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop