Next Article in Journal
A Review of Dimension Stone Extraction Methods
Previous Article in Journal
A Stope Mining Design with Consideration of Hanging Wall When Transitioning from Open Pit Mining to Underground Mining for Sepon Gold Mine Deposit, Laos
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Scientific Research Support for the Construction and Operation of Inwashed Tailing Dumps at Operating Sites

Mining 2023, 3(3), 483-515; https://doi.org/10.3390/mining3030028
by Alan Lolaev 1,2,*, Aleksandr Badoev 1,3,*, Aleksan Oganesyan 1,4, Emil Oganesyan 3,4, Stanislav Dzeboev 1,3 and Ilya Tvauri 1,3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Mining 2023, 3(3), 483-515; https://doi.org/10.3390/mining3030028
Submission received: 3 July 2023 / Revised: 24 July 2023 / Accepted: 2 August 2023 / Published: 8 August 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Good article. Only a few grammatical and technical errors were found.

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thanks for your review of our article. All recommendations were taken into account and all errors were corrected. The attached PDF contains all comments and responses.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The reviewer welcomes the opportunity to review this work. Overall the work presents some level of interest but its presentation needs to be greatly improved so that the work becomes appealing to the reader. Several figures are not publication quality and will need to be replaced. There are unfinished phrases and various information about testing methods is unclear. All these comments were made directly in the attached pdf.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

The paper needs to be revised. There are sentences that are too long, there is information that should be compiled in tables for easier reading, and there are unfinished sentences and missing references.

Author Response

Thank you for your careful review of our article. All recommendations were taken into account and all errors were corrected. The attached PDF contains all comments and responses.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The reviewer is grateful that corrections have been made. The paper may proceed for publication.

Back to TopTop