Next Article in Journal
Survival of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Resin Post-Restored vs. Cast Post-and-Core-Restored Teeth: A Retrospective Clinical Study
Previous Article in Journal
Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Mimicking Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws (MRONJ): A Case Series
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Technical Note

From Denture to the Final Implant-Supported Prosthesis Using a Full-Digital Protocol: A Dental Technique

by
Francisco Fernando Todescan
1,
Marcos Masayuki Hayashi
1,
Luiz Roberto Giugni
1,
Marco Antonio Bottino
2 and
João Paulo Mendes Tribst
3,*
1
Oral Implantology Course, Foundation for the Scientific and Technological Development of Dentistry (FUNDECTO), São Paulo University (USP), São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil
2
Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo 12245-000, Brazil
3
Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Department of Dental Materials, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 LA Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Oral 2021, 1(4), 332-339; https://doi.org/10.3390/oral1040033
Submission received: 8 November 2021 / Revised: 25 November 2021 / Accepted: 26 November 2021 / Published: 1 December 2021

Abstract

:
Proper maxillomandibular relationship registration can be clinically challenging during a digital workflow in full-arch rehabilitations. This dental technique requires the manufacturing and use of a hybrid surgical guide custom scanning device, indicated to be used during implant placement surgery, in addition to being used to simultaneously register the maxillomandibular relationship and transfer the implants’ 3D positioning, ensuring a fully digital workflow in full-arch implant-supported prosthesis rehabilitation. The sequence of steps presented here will allow dentists and dental technicians to conduct rehabilitations from denture to the final implant-supported prosthesis using a full-digital protocol, using a minimal quantity of intraoral devices and digital tools.

1. Introduction

Digital impressions with intraoral scanners in a digital workflow have been well-documented in the literature as a suitable alternative to conventional impressions [1]. In this sense, virtual impressions can be easily performed, reduce visits to the dental office, are comfortable to the patient, can record the oral tissues without pressure, allow the correction of errors, and reduce the influence of dental material properties such as expansion, shrinkage, and distortion [2,3].
Although intraoral scanners can be used to digitally capture edentulous arches, they are usually difficult to use for inexperienced clinicians [3,4,5]. Errors in capture can generate distortion in the digital model, which can compromise the accurate fabrication of the prosthesis due to the failure in precisely replicating the implants’ three-dimensional positioning and their relationship to the surrounding tissues [6,7].
Therefore, not only is correct implant placement essential to improve esthetic outcomes, prosthesis manufacturing with a passive fit is also necessary to guarantee the long-term success of dental implants with the stability of peri-implant tissues [8].
The versatile applicability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) associated with 3D imaging tools strongly modified implant rehabilitation and treatment planning. Using virtual planning of implants’ positions while considering the oral anatomic structures and future prosthetic needs improved dentists’ and dental technicians’ communication [5,9].
Furthermore, implant placement with computer-guided surgery can increase implant survival rates and reduce treatment costs in comparison to free-hand implant placement protocols [10].
Despite the increasing popularity of a digital workflow, the challenging maxillomandibular relationship registration is still one of the major difficulties when using the intraoral scan technique for prosthesis fabrication [2,4,6,11]. Previous reports have been proposed for complete-arch rehabilitations, describing the use of a muco-supported surgical guide with occlusal registration and scan bodies to fabricate a definitive fixed restoration, as well as digitally transferring from interim to definitive restoration [12,13].
In addition, there are reports showing that the failing dentition of partially edentulous individuals may be used as an initial reference for stackable restrictive surgical guides during full-arch immediate implant placement. The stackable guide option derived from a digital workflow can be used to increase the predictability during immediate implant placement, as well as the immediate loading of provisional implant-supported fixed dental prostheses [14].
Therefore, the present technique aims to demonstrates how to combine digital impressions with accurate maxillomandibular relationship transference using a modified surgical guide for implant-supported full-arch rehabilitations.

2. Materials and Methods

Technique Description

1.
Perform the patient’s documentation including clinical extra- and intraoral photos in occlusion and smiling (Figure 1).
2.
With the aid of an intraoral scanner device (Medit i500, Medit Corp., Seul, South Korea), perform a digital scan of the dentition (Figure 2). Before scanning, set up the order to export standard tessellation language (STL) files. Import the acquired digital data into CAD software (Dental System 2020; 3Shape Dental System; 3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark). With the aid of a modeling tool, perform a virtual extraction of the crowns and provide a new complete denture design with corrected esthetics and prosthetic outcomes following the workflow indicated by the software, and generate the new STL files.
3.
Process the STL file of the new denture by using a 3D printer (5100 3D Systems; Nextdent) and denture resin (Denture 3D+; Nextdent). Follow the post-processing and finishing technique according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Figure 3).
4.
Follow the surgical plan, perform the necessary tooth extraction and install the printed denture during the healing period.
5.
After healing, perform artificial landmarks using gutta-percha on the external surface of the buccal flange. Make a CBCT scan with and without the denture record in place (Figure 4). For this, the double tomography technique is used: first, the tomography is made with the patient wearing the denture with the gutta-percha marks in a seated position, then a second tomography is performed only for the prosthesis (outside the mouth).
6.
Identify at least 3 regions with positive and negative features that exhibit adequate contact intraorally. These areas need to be as far apart as possible (Figure 5).
7.
Import the DICOM file of the CBCT and the STL file of the digital scan of the dentures into the guided treatment planning software (DTX, KaVo Kerr, Brea, CA, USA) (Figure 6).
8.
Align the STL file with the DICOM file to obtain the relationship between the arches and denture. Then, plan the implants’ 3D position according to your patient, individualizing the surgical guide with buccal screws to stabilize the device during the surgical procedure.
9.
After the implants’ placement, use a scan body in each implant to scan the arches (Medit i500, Medit Corp., Seul, South Korea) and the implants according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Complete the scan and remove unnecessary areas (Figure 6).
10.
Perform a second scan with a scan body and surgical guide placed in position. For this step, it is necessary to remove the restrictive metallic cylinders from the surgical guide. The surgical guide must by fixed by endosseuous fixation screws (Figure 7).
11.
In the CAD software, align the antagonist arch scan with both STL file of the previous digital scan. This step will allow the recording of planned teeth position, 3D implants’ positioning, and oral tissue characteristics, considering the maxillomandibular relationship and vertical dimension of occlusion (Figure 7).
12.
Proceed with the prosthesis manufacturing based on the acquired information (Figure 8).

3. Discussion

The edentulous arch scan can be difficult, and viable techniques are not commonly described. Similar to previous reports [2,11,12], for the present dental technique, the manufacturing of a surgical guide requires an adequate, complete denture and knowledge of 3D modeling, CAD software, and 3D printer [2,11,12]. The use of a custom scanning device reduces the number of clinical steps, with adequate retention, stability, and support. However, in the present report the custom scanning device is a hybrid device applied in the surgical step for proper implant placement, as well as to improve the scanning process, the transferring of oral tissue characteristics, implants’ position, and the maxillomandibular relationship registration.
Although the chair time can be reduced by following the described technical protocol [2,13,14], it is necessary perform two scans instead of one [2]. Different from previous techniques, during the second scan, the surgical guide scanning device is indicated to be retained by endosseous screws that will guarantee a fixed retention, instead of just being muco-supported.
In general, surgical guides are easily adaptable to various clinical scenarios when they are properly supported. It has been shown that natural dentition and existing fixed dental prostheses provide support and stability to the guide during implant insertion [14]. The present study suggests the use of endosseus screws for that purpose.
The use of endosseus screws, working as anchoring pins, secured the surgical guide in the right position during the surgery and scanning process [15]. Generally, it is possible to observe three types of surgical guides (tooth-, mucosa-, and bone-supported). However, for full-arch rehabilitations only muco-supported and bone-supported can be considered, with the last one being suggested to reduce the risk of complications [16].
In addition to the mandatory knowledge, managing costs, as well as learning curve, it is necessary to use CAD software that allows the virtual alignment of similar 3D structures [11]. For that the software must present a friendly algorithm using the mathematical method to move the meshes into their “best fit” without overlapping between the STL files [2].
The traditional analogic workflow for implant-supported rehabilitations in an edentulous maxilla requires an existing denture to prosthetically drive the implant placement. Therefore, the presented approach does not use analogic processes as cast models or impression materials, but still need an existing denture for the similar aim of prosthetically driving the implant placement. The summarized workflow for each approach can be observed in the flowchart from Figure 9.
However, different from the analogic workflow, the present approach can be performed, associated with an easy transfer process and a reduced number of clinical steps. In addition, adequate restorative materials, implants’ system, and patient characteristics should be considered during the treatment plan [17]. Despite the reduced number of clinical steps, this digital workflow requires a fully collaborative and digitally equipped dental laboratory, increasing the lab costs and planning time.

4. Conclusions

This dental technique describes the fabrication and use of a hybrid surgical guide custom scanning device to be used during the surgical and prosthetic steps. During the rehabilitation of an edentulous maxilla with dental implants, it was possible to follow the implants’ positioning plan during surgery, record the maxillomandibular relationship, and transfer the implants’ position to manufacture the maxillary full-arch implant–supported prosthesis. This dental technique provides a digital workflow protocol using a reduced number of clinical steps, dental office visits, and number of devices that need be manufactured by the dental technician.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.F.T., M.M.H., L.R.G., and J.P.M.T.; methodology, F.F.T., M.M.H., and L.R.G.; investigation, M.A.B., and J.P.M.T.; resources, F.F.T., M.M.H., L.R.G., M.A.B., and J.P.M.T.; writing—original draft preparation, F.F.T., M.M.H., and L.R.G.; writing—review and editing, M.A.B., and J.P.M.T.; visualization, F.F.T., and J.P.M.T.; supervision, F.F.T., M.A.B., and J.P.M.T.; project administration, F.F.T., and J.P.M.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Michelinakis, G.; Apostolakis, D.; Kamposiora, P.; Papavasiliou, G.; Özcan, M. The direct digital workflow in fixed implant prosthodontics: A narrative review. BMC Oral Health 2021, 21, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pérez-Giugovaz, M.G.; Park, S.H.; Revilla-León, M. 3D virtual patient representation for guiding a maxillary overdenture fabrication: A dental technique. J. Prosthodont. 2021, 30, 636–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Arcas, L.P.B.; Tribst, J.P.M.; Baroudi, K.; Amaral, M.; da Silva-Concílio, L.R.; Vitti, R.P. Dimensional accuracy comparison of physical models generated by digital impression/3D-printing or analog impression/plaster methods. Int. J. Odontostomatol. 2021, 15, 562–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Griseto, N.T.; Gallucci, G.O. Digital maxillomandibular relationship registration for an edentulous maxilla: A dental technique. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2021, 125, 858–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Moura, G.F.; Siqueira, R.; Meirelles, L.; Maska, B.; Wang, H.-L.; Mendonça, G. Denture scanning technique for computer-guided implant-supported restoration treatment of edentulous patients. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2021, 125, 726–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mai, H.-N.; Lee, D.-H. A digital technique to replicate edentulous arches with functional borders and accurate maxillomandibular relationship for digital complete denture. J. Prosthodont. 2020, 29, 356–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Flügge, T.; van der Meer, W.J.; Gonzalez, B.G.; Vach, K.; Wismeijer, D.; Wang, P. The accuracy of different dental impression techniques for implant-supported dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2018, 29 (Suppl. 16), 374–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Figueras-Alvarez, O.; Cantó-Navés, O.; Real-Voltas, F.; Roig, M. Protocol for the clinical assessment of passive fit for multiple implant-supported prostheses: A dental technique. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Siqueira, R.A.C.; Cabral, B.L.; Siqueira, G.R.; Mendonça, G.; Wang, H.L. Using digital technique to obtain the ideal soft tissue contour in immediate implants with provisionalization. Implant Dent. 2019, 28, 411–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Bover-Ramos, F.; Viña-Almunia, J.; Cervera-Ballester, J.; Peñarrocha-Diago, M.; García-Mira, B. Accuracy of implant placement with computer-guided surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing cadaver, clinical, and in vitro studies. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant 2018, 33, 101–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Li, J.; Galli, M.; Chen, Z.; Venezia, P.; Mangano, F.; Lepidi, L. A novel digital technique for maintaining maxillomandibular relations in fixed prosthetic rehabilitations. J. Dent. 2021, 114, 103798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tribst, J.P.M.; de Oliveira Dal Piva, A.M.; da Silva-Concílio, L.R.; Ausiello, P.; Kalman, L. Influence of implant-abutment contact surfaces and prosthetic screw tightening on the stress concentration, fatigue life and microgap formation: A finite element analysis. Oral 2021, 1, 88–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Michelinakis, G.; Nikolidakis, D. Using the surgical guide for impression-free digital bite registration in the edentulous maxilla-a technical note. Int. J. Implant Dent. 2019, 5, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yang, J.-W.; Liu, Q.; Yue, Z.-G.; Hou, J.-X.; Afrashtehfar, K.I. Digital workflow for full-arch immediate implant placement using a stackable surgical guide fabricated using SLM technology. J. Prosthodont. 2021, 30, 645–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Dahiya, A.; Garbacea, A.; Kattadiyil, M.T.; AlHelal, A. Digital technology for performing a nasopalatine and greater palatine nerve block with a modified implant surgical guide: A technique article. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2018, 120, 338–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Turkyilmaz, I. Keys to achieving successful restoratively driven implant placement with CAD/CAM surgical guide: A technical note. J. Stomatol. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2019, 120, 462–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Datte, C.E.; Datte, F.B.; Borges, A.L.; Campos, J.F.; Lopes, G.D.; Tribst, J.P.; Nishioka, R.S. The influence of restorative material, bone height and implant system on the stress distribution of implant-supported posterior crowns. Int. J. Dev. Res. 2021, 11, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Complete documentation including face (A), smile, intra- (B) and extra-oral photographs, and intraoral scanning (C).
Figure 1. Complete documentation including face (A), smile, intra- (B) and extra-oral photographs, and intraoral scanning (C).
Oral 01 00033 g001
Figure 2. Data exported to CAD software, followed by the virtual extraction of all upper teeth (A). Virtual assembly of the artificial teeth in a new position (B). Correcting all the aesthetic and functional parameters using virtual articular (C,D).
Figure 2. Data exported to CAD software, followed by the virtual extraction of all upper teeth (A). Virtual assembly of the artificial teeth in a new position (B). Correcting all the aesthetic and functional parameters using virtual articular (C,D).
Oral 01 00033 g002
Figure 3. Three-dimensional-printed total denture designed in CAD (A), followed by extraction of upper teeth (B,C) and the installation as well as adjustment of the immediate denture for healing (D).
Figure 3. Three-dimensional-printed total denture designed in CAD (A), followed by extraction of upper teeth (B,C) and the installation as well as adjustment of the immediate denture for healing (D).
Oral 01 00033 g003
Figure 4. Artificial gutta-percha landmarks made on the complete denture, preparing for the image examination using tomography.
Figure 4. Artificial gutta-percha landmarks made on the complete denture, preparing for the image examination using tomography.
Oral 01 00033 g004
Figure 5. The 3D data were exported to the CAD software to plan the placement of the implants’ prosthetic-driven position and the design of the hybrid surgical guide (A). Care was taken in the design of the device in order to maintain 3 points of occlusal contact, one in the anterior area and two in the posterior region, one on each side of the arch (B). This step will allow digital recording of the vertical dimension of occlusion, as well as the relationship between the arches, without the need to go through the analog phase (C). On the left, there is the occlusal view of the surgical guide obtained after planning 5 implants’ placement in the ideal position from a biomechanical and aesthetic point of view, with reference to the complete denture. The image of the center shows how, in the design of the guide, 3 points of contact between the guide and the lower arch were maintained, in order to relate the upper and lower arches in a stable way, previously determined by the complete denture. Finally, the front view of the surgical guide in position, occluding with the lower arch in exactly the same digitally determined position.
Figure 5. The 3D data were exported to the CAD software to plan the placement of the implants’ prosthetic-driven position and the design of the hybrid surgical guide (A). Care was taken in the design of the device in order to maintain 3 points of occlusal contact, one in the anterior area and two in the posterior region, one on each side of the arch (B). This step will allow digital recording of the vertical dimension of occlusion, as well as the relationship between the arches, without the need to go through the analog phase (C). On the left, there is the occlusal view of the surgical guide obtained after planning 5 implants’ placement in the ideal position from a biomechanical and aesthetic point of view, with reference to the complete denture. The image of the center shows how, in the design of the guide, 3 points of contact between the guide and the lower arch were maintained, in order to relate the upper and lower arches in a stable way, previously determined by the complete denture. Finally, the front view of the surgical guide in position, occluding with the lower arch in exactly the same digitally determined position.
Oral 01 00033 g005
Figure 6. After the implants’ placement (A) the first intraoral scan is performed using scan bodies (B,C).
Figure 6. After the implants’ placement (A) the first intraoral scan is performed using scan bodies (B,C).
Oral 01 00033 g006
Figure 7. The second intraoral scan is performed with both the surgical guide and scan bodies in position. For that, the restrictive metallic cylinders should be removed from the guide, allowing it to fit in the previous surgical position (A). Then, it should be fixed with anchoring pins. After the second scanning, the clinical parameters can be transferred at the same time to the CAD software and aligned with the correct 3D position (B,C).
Figure 7. The second intraoral scan is performed with both the surgical guide and scan bodies in position. For that, the restrictive metallic cylinders should be removed from the guide, allowing it to fit in the previous surgical position (A). Then, it should be fixed with anchoring pins. After the second scanning, the clinical parameters can be transferred at the same time to the CAD software and aligned with the correct 3D position (B,C).
Oral 01 00033 g007
Figure 8. Following the informed data, the dental lab can proceed with the prosthesis manufacturing, respecting the esthetic and prosthetic outcomes. Final prosthesis installation (A), after occlusal adjustments (B), in occlusal view (C), and buccal view of the patient smile (D).
Figure 8. Following the informed data, the dental lab can proceed with the prosthesis manufacturing, respecting the esthetic and prosthetic outcomes. Final prosthesis installation (A), after occlusal adjustments (B), in occlusal view (C), and buccal view of the patient smile (D).
Oral 01 00033 g008
Figure 9. Flowchart for the conventional and digital workflows with the major clinical steps that should be considered for each approach.
Figure 9. Flowchart for the conventional and digital workflows with the major clinical steps that should be considered for each approach.
Oral 01 00033 g009
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Todescan, F.F.; Hayashi, M.M.; Giugni, L.R.; Bottino, M.A.; Tribst, J.P.M. From Denture to the Final Implant-Supported Prosthesis Using a Full-Digital Protocol: A Dental Technique. Oral 2021, 1, 332-339. https://doi.org/10.3390/oral1040033

AMA Style

Todescan FF, Hayashi MM, Giugni LR, Bottino MA, Tribst JPM. From Denture to the Final Implant-Supported Prosthesis Using a Full-Digital Protocol: A Dental Technique. Oral. 2021; 1(4):332-339. https://doi.org/10.3390/oral1040033

Chicago/Turabian Style

Todescan, Francisco Fernando, Marcos Masayuki Hayashi, Luiz Roberto Giugni, Marco Antonio Bottino, and João Paulo Mendes Tribst. 2021. "From Denture to the Final Implant-Supported Prosthesis Using a Full-Digital Protocol: A Dental Technique" Oral 1, no. 4: 332-339. https://doi.org/10.3390/oral1040033

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop