Next Article in Journal
Fairness, Greenwashing, and Religious Centrality: Explaining Muslim Tourists’ Conservation Payment Intentions in a UNESCO Geopark
Previous Article in Journal
Scrolling the Menu, Posting the Meal: Digital Menu Effects on Foodstagramming Continuance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Constraints of Rural Tourism’s Contribution to Local Economic Development and Intervention Mechanisms—Evidence from Shandong Province, China

1
Department of Tourism and Heritage, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain 15551, United Arab Emirates
2
School of Economics and Management, Shandong Jiaotong University, Jinan 250357, China
3
School of Social Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005, Australia
4
College of Geography and Tourism, Handan University, 530 North College Road, Hanshan District, Handan 056005, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Tour. Hosp. 2025, 6(5), 223; https://doi.org/10.3390/tourhosp6050223
Submission received: 20 September 2025 / Revised: 8 October 2025 / Accepted: 20 October 2025 / Published: 24 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges and Development Opportunities for Tourism in Rural Areas)

Abstract

For visitors who live in the modern, hectic, and bustling city life, rural destinations provide an alternative to escape in a serene environment. Rural tourism also promotes community development, rural restructuring, and capital redistribution. Prior studies paid little attention to the role that rural tourism plays in local economic development. Particularly, what hinders rural tourism’s contribution to sustainable local economic development is inadequately examined. To address this gap in the literature, the current study explores the contribution of rural tourism to local economic development, using Shandong Province as a context. Research participants perceive that rural tourism makes positive contributions to sustainable local economic development by increasing household income, facilitating capital redistribution, and promoting rural entrepreneurship. However, its contribution has been constrained by financial, structural, marketing, and technological factors. Research implications are discussed, and avenues for future research are suggested.

1. Introduction

Due to its positive impact on the economy, society, culture, and environment, the tourism sector is regarded as a facilitator of sustainable development (M. M. Su et al., 2019; J. Sun et al., 2025; X. Wang et al., 2025). Tourism contributes toward achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as it is directly connected to goals 8 (decent work and economic growth), 12 (responsible consumption and production), 14 (life below water), and 15 (life on land) of the SDGs, with the potential to contribute to several others. Goal 8 emphasizes the promotion of sustained, inclusive, and sustainable economic growth, along with the provision of decent work opportunities for all, while Goal 12 underscores the importance of ensuring sustainable consumption and production patterns. Furthermore, Goal 14 focuses on the conservation and sustainable use of oceans, seas, and marine resources to support sustainable development, whereas Goal 15 highlights the necessity of protecting, restoring, and promoting the sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, forests, and biodiversity. These goals collectively relate to tourism by promoting responsible and sustainable practices that foster inclusive economic growth, create decent employment, and conserve both natural and cultural resources essential to the sustainable development of destinations. As one of the rapidly growing tourism segments, rural tourism has been advocated in both developed and developing countries (J. Gao & Wu, 2017; Iorio & Corsale, 2010; Rosalina et al., 2023; T. Xu et al., 2024) as a tool to balance urban and rural economic development and promotes local communities’ quality of life (Deng et al., 2020; C. X. Wang, 2020; Y. Wang et al., 2024). In China, tourism has been considered one of the key economic pillars in the long-term national socio-economic development of the country (J. Gao & Wu, 2017; H. Li et al., 2016).
In previous decades, several Chinese villages in the countryside have developed rural tourism (J. Gao & Wu, 2017; C. Liu et al., 2020; T. Liu & Chen, 2024). The development of rural tourism, in turn, promotes the integration of various businesses and facilitates industrial transformation as well as capital investment (Diao & Liu, 2019; M. M. Su et al., 2019). Therefore, given the substantial role of rural tourism, the Chinese central government has made a series of steps to promote its development (J. Gao & Wu, 2017; C. Liu et al., 2020; M. M. Su et al., 2019). Especially from 2017 onwards, rural tourism has received more attention in China since the Chinese state council espoused industry convergence as a key driver of rural tourism development and diversification (Lyu et al., 2021; Shen et al., 2019; J. Sun et al., 2025). Industry convergence implies a circumstance where the primary, secondary, and tertiary industries merge to provide support and boost tourism development (Shen et al., 2019). The growing attention of the Chinese government toward rural tourism has improved the global visibility of Chinese villages. For example, in 2024 alone, seven villages were awarded the title of “Best Tourism Village” by the United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), bringing the total number of Chinese villages recognized under this international award to fifteen—the highest in the world (Xinhua, 2024).
The notion of rural tourism is gaining attention in China, and the demand for rural tourism consumption has also been increasing (J. Gao & Wu, 2017; H. Li et al., 2016). People living in bustling urban centers have begun to realize the importance of rurality and look for a slower pace of life to escape to (Chi et al., 2020). In the contemporary world, the demand for rural tourism has also been prompted by numerous social media actors and influencers. Additionally, since the COVID-19 pandemic, people’s interest in domestic travel in China has been growing as a substitute for international tourism. However, despite the growing attention from the government and local communities on the importance of rural tourism, there is a dearth of research on the perspective of local economic sustainability, particularly the growth constraints and intervention mechanisms to further boost the contribution of rural tourism. More academic studies were called to identify best practices and constraints so that rural tourism can be used as a catalyst for sustainable local economic development (Shen et al., 2019). Furthermore, J. Gao and Wu (2017) and Deng et al. (2020) suggested further studies to unravel the inextricable linkages between the tourism sector and other sectors of the rural economy and thereby develop integrated rural tourism that contributes to sustainable long-term rural development. Subsequently, the objective of the current study is to explore the role of rural tourism in local economic development using Shandong Province as a research context.
In line with our primary research objective, this study aims to:
(1)
Examine the current state of rural tourism development in Shandong Province.
(2)
Investigate factors that facilitate sustainable rural tourism development in the province and.
(3)
Identify constraints hindering rural tourism development and forward possible suggestions for pertinent actors to expedite the sustainable development of rural tourism.

2. Theoretical Background

Rural tourism represents a form of tourism that is intricately connected to the economic, social, cultural, historical and natural dimensions of rural areas. Primarily relying on rural amenities, rural tourism is considered a niche tourism market that has a strong linkage with agriculture (Fleischer & Tchetchik, 2005; X. Wang et al., 2025). The complementarity between rural tourism and agriculture is widely discussed (Brune et al., 2023; Darău et al., 2010; Iorio & Corsale, 2010; Randelli et al., 2014; Turtureanu et al., 2025). Lane (1994) noted that interest in countryside recreation grew in the 19th century as a reaction to the stress and squalor of expanding industrial cities. However, rural tourism started to draw academic attention during the 1980s and 1990s. As discussed by Lane (1994), rural tourism has the following five essential features; (1) practiced in rural areas, (2) reflects rural function (the activities and products offered reflect traditional way of life such as farm tours, local crafts, and recreation in nature), (3) small scale (typically involves small businesses such as family run guesthouses and food and beverage businesses), (4) traditional culture (highlights and preserves local costumes and heritages), and (5) local ownership (enterprises are often owned and managed by local residents). By accentuating community participation, local ownership and responsible resource management, rural tourism today is increasingly recognized as a mechanism to enhance the socio-economic resilience and cultural vitality of rural communities (Maziliauske, 2024; X. Wang et al., 2025).
Rural tourism offers tourists the opportunity to experience an authentic rural lifestyle and allows direct host-guest interactions. Despite the lack of a uniform definition of rural tourism, the location where the activity takes place, the types of tourism activities, and the typologies of tourism products and services are common denominators of rural tourism. Nowadays, rural areas are no longer related purely to agricultural spaces but are becoming centers for the stimulation of new socio-economic activities and investment opportunities including tourism (Saxena et al., 2007). In many rural areas around the world, the economic implication of tourism goes beyond generating income through renting rooms and selling handicrafts (Aazami & Shanazi, 2020; Randelli & Martellozzo, 2019). It also invigorates rural infrastructure and facilities, creates short and long-term job opportunities, diversifies economies, draws in more investment opportunities, and stimulates local entrepreneurship (Shen et al., 2019).
Briedenhann and Wickens (2004a) and Shen et al. (2019) indicated that the development of rural tourism in underdeveloped areas stimulates the rise in other tourism businesses and the establishment of cooperation and partnership among different enterprises. Agri-tourism has also been growing exponentially in various countries, along with rural tourism, such as in Italy and Japan (Ohe & Ciani, 2012; Privitera, 2010). Rural tourism has been closely linked to food clusters (Lee et al., 2015) and alternative food networks (Sidali et al., 2015). Food clusters are places that offer visitors an array of culinary tourism experiences, such as food tours, farm visits, and complementary arts and cultural-related events (Lee et al., 2015) while alternative food networks refer community-supported agriculture, farmers’ markets, fair trade, specialized forms of organic agriculture, direct farm retail, and the slow food movements (Edwards, 2016). Some scholars also discuss rural tourism as a tool to build and consolidate national identity and defy neocolonialism. It also helps to diversify and promote the rural economy, expand employment opportunities, and support rural areas’ overall prosperity (Islam & Carlsen, 2012; Tang & Xu, 2023; C. X. Wang, 2020; Wilson et al., 2001). According to Geng et al. (2025), when its development is guided by sound policies and strategies, rural tourism balances economic development, environmental management, and cultural preservation in rural areas. Therefore, rural tourism enables communities in the countryside to reap several benefits of tourism while protecting their way of life, identity, and ecosystem. Iorio and Corsale (2010) also highlighted that in Romania, rural tourism diversifies communities’ economic base and improves their livelihood both economically and in other aspects of their lives. Unlike other types of tourism, rural tourism can be less expensive to develop, and it is less dependent on outside firms (Islam & Carlsen, 2012; Maziliauske, 2024). However, it is critical to ensure that rural tourism development initiatives take local leadership, widespread community support, and sustained collaboration between rural tourism enterprises and other stakeholders for successful rural tourism development.
In the previous decades, China’s rural tourism sector attracted growing attention (Chi & Han, 2021). The country has rich rural tourism resources and diverse natural landscapes that offer rural tourists a range of unique experiences, most of which can be contrasted with the images of Chinese cities (J. Liu et al., 2017; Y. Zhao et al., 2020). China’s rural development effort is impacted by its overall national development plans and policy implications (M. Li et al., 2020; Sofield & Li, 2011). The current development imbalance between urban and rural areas has been the root cause of social inequalities (Y. H. Liu, 2018). Consequently, rural revitalization is regarded as one of the major national strategic decisions through urban and rural integration, rural economic progress, and poverty alleviation (Han et al., 2025; Kou & Xue, 2024; C. Zhao et al., 2024). The rural revitalization strategy aims to shift the focus of national development from urban to rural areas (Lyu et al., 2021; Yin et al., 2022) and narrow the development gap between urban and rural areas (Hua & Wondirad, 2020). To this end, developing rural tourism has been identified as a viable option (Randelli et al., 2014). The development of rural tourism effectively guides and promotes the flow and redistribution of capital from urban areas to rural areas (Tang & Xu, 2023). It also supports areas that have been experiencing industrial transition such as from relying heavily on logging to developing sustainable tourism (Ma & Yang, 2022). Currently, rural tourism has become a key economic pillar and a tool to support communities in rural China (Chi & Han, 2021; J. Gao & Wu, 2017; Han et al., 2025) (Figure 1).
Tourism has been growing rapidly in Shandong province (CEIC, 2020c; B. Li et al., 2024). It is a special corridor for rural tourism development, because of its diversified geographical and socio-economic features as well as rich cultural and heritage resources. In 2018 and 2019, 503 and 540 million tourists (including both domestic and international) visited Shandong province, respectively (ProgrammerSought, 2020). Because of the favorable measures taken to increase investment in rural tourism and improve rural tourism facilities, rural tourism was projected to hit the 41 billion USD milestone in revenue in 2020 (Y. H. Liu, 2018). However, achieving this target might be impacted by the unprecedented outbreak of the COVID-19 global pandemic. In recent years, some of the villages in Shandong province have strived to combine rural natural tourist attractions such as mountains, rivers, lakes, and wetlands with rural cultural tourism resources such as local cuisine, folk culture, ancient villages, and farmhouses that expedite rural tourism development (Fan, 2022; Y. Zhao et al., 2020).
However, if its development is not well planned and controlled, through time, rural tourism could transform rural agricultural land into high-traffic commercial land that might alter the original characteristics of the countryside and harm the environment (L. Xue et al., 2017). Furthermore, rural tourism might change the livelihoods, lifestyles, and social fabrics of rural communities, influencing their perceptions of being rural residents (Bezemer & Headey, 2008; Cassel & Pettersson, 2015). Therefore, a deeper understanding of the challenges and constraints, as well as the development models of rural tourism development, becomes imperative.

3. Research Methodology

This study employs a qualitative research approach due to the exploratory nature of its objectives. There is a dearth of research that examines the roles rural tourism plays in local economic progress and influencing factors of the developmental process. To fulfill this research aim, we selected Shandong, China, as a research context. Shandong is one of the 23 provinces in the People’s Republic of China. The province covers a total area of 153,000 square km and with a total population of 100.472 million, it is the second most populated province in China after Guangdong (Statista, 2020). The province is situated on the lower banks of the Yellow River, and it faces the Bohai Sea to the north and the Yellow Sea to the east. The province has been pivotal in the development of Chinese culture and politics, and its rich heritage is evident through numerous archeological sites and cultural landmarks, reflecting its long-standing significance in China’s dynastic history (Jiang et al., 2022). Moreover, as a popular tourist destination, Shandong Province has a wide variety of rural tourist attractions (Y. Zhao et al., 2020). This study mainly considers the leisure tourism segment where visitors travel to rural destinations for holiday purposes and use local facilities and services in addition to sightseeing and participating in various local events such as festivals and traditional markets.
We collected data from various key tourism stakeholders in the province through in-depth interviews and researchers’ observations over two periods—between April 2022 and June 2022, and March 2024 and April 2024. Overall, a total of 41 participants were selected, comprising 12 members of the local community, 8 local guides, 4 tourism professionals, 4 government employees, 5 homestay owners, 4 restaurant owners, and 4 village shop owners (Table 1). We recruited participants purposively based on their proximity to the rural tourism sector in the province as well as their prior experience. In detail, the selection criteria were (1) individuals who have connections with the rural tourism sector, (2) work in the tourism sector, (3) engage in government tourism organizations, and (4) have four or more years of experience in the sector. To boost clarity and improve communication, we conducted all the in-depth interviews using Mandarin, the national language, and then we translated them into English. Theoretical saturation was considered to terminate further data collection as any additional interview ceases to bring new insights. Furthermore, the main purpose of a qualitative study is to advance a deeper understanding of the topic of interest by analyzing in-depth information instead of drawing generalizations from a large sample (Crouch & McKenzie, 2006). Subsequently, data saturation was reached after conducting 41 interviews. Researchers’ observations were also used as an additional data source and a method to triangulate interview data. It supports in-depth interviews by providing information about the local communities’ enthusiasm for the growth of rural tourism, the potential, and the constraints of existing rural tourism. Participants were informed of the research objectives, and their consent was sought. Participants’ privacy is protected as we conceal their identities. Prior to analysis, data were organized, cleaned, trimmed, and prepared for subsequent coding. Then we conducted our analysis using open coding, axial coding, and selective coding, as can be seen in Figure 2. Data were analyzed thematically, where similar themes were categorized to form the upper-level themes to eventually form theoretical insights (Wondirad et al., 2021).
To ensure the credibility of research findings, the researchers have implemented techniques such as confirmability audits (validating findings and interpretations with trail of field notes, interview transcripts, and coding manuals), member checks (sharing preliminary findings to with participants to confirm the accuracy and resonance of interpretations with their lived experiences), and peer debriefing (conducting regular discussions with researchers in the field to obtain expert feedback) in addition to spending adequate time during data collection. We also strived to maintain scientific rigor by immersing ourselves in the data and maintaining contact with research participants for further clarifications when a need arises (Easterby-Smith et al., 2015).

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Current State of Rural Tourism and Factors That Expedite Sustainable Rural Tourism

Currently, rural tourism plays a vital role in employment creation and drives the development of the rural economy in the province. As can be seen in Figure 3, while visitor numbers increased by 91 percent in just ten years (between 2007 and 2017), there was nearly a 77 percent increase in employment between 2005 and 2017. As depicted in Figure 3, rural tourism has demonstrated sustained growth since 2006. Notably, total arrivals rose from 2,537,600 in 2008 to 4,854,700 in 2016, representing an increase of approximately 48%, highlighting the sector’s significant expansion over this period. Rural areas possess resources such as scenery, culture, and activities that draw tourists and urban residents (Lyu et al., 2021). The vast majority of China’s UNESCO World Heritage sites are found in rural areas (Du & Shi, 2019). World Heritage sites are the centers of gravity for both domestic and international tourists to rural communities. China’s rich tourism resources and the current stage of economic and social development also provide a favorable climate for the development of rural tourism. Thus, China is undergoing a rural tourist boom, and even amid the COVID-19 outbreak, more than four billion trips were made throughout China in 2021, generating 500 billion USD in revenue (Westcott & Wang, 2021).
As a government tourism employee indicated during the interview, after carefully assessing its potential, the Shandong Provincial Party Committee has ratified rural tourism development plans to boost the sustainable development of the sector in the province. Moreover, according to our desk-top-based research, with the aim to financially strengthen rural tourism enterprises and thereby boost their development prospects, Shandong Provincial authorities have issued a series of financial and tax-favored policies (Y. Z. Liu, 2020). In terms of the infrastructure necessary for rural tourism development, the construction of roads connecting every village of the province is already completed. It significantly increased the capability of regional and less developed rural areas to receive visitation. In 2018 alone, the province allocated a total of 12.6 million USD in special funds for rural tourism development to support 72 counties, focusing on poverty alleviation, rural tourism cluster area development, and new tourist attractions development (PG1, May 2021). It was also highlighted that recently, the poverty alleviation project for rural tourism in Shandong Province approved three categories of financial support ranging from 14,585 USD to 14,585,000 USD, to sustain the development of rural tourism (PG1, May 2021). Such critical measures are taken by the government to stimulate rural tourism as one of the key economic pillars in the province. J. Gao and Wu (2017) and Lyu et al. (2021) noted that rural tourism preserves rural villages and sustains indigenous communities. The provincial government supports the sector in line with the policy directions from the central government (Shen et al., 2019). According to the Shandong Province Department of Culture and Tourism (2020), the province targeted to host 540 million arrivals with a total tourism receipt of nearly 4 billion USD in 2020, despite the actual achievement might be affected by the unprecedented outbreak of the COVID-19 global pandemic. In this respect, a homestay owner in Weihai reports that:
Many tourists came to our village before the epidemic, and most of them were from cities. Since I have been in this industry for the past seven years, I can say that tourism has been gradually expanding, and we have been able to generate revenue by renting out rooms. However, the COVID-19 outbreak had an impact on the visitor flow, which now starts to catch up.
(HO5, March 2024)

4.2. Constraints of Rural Tourism Development

As an emerging tourist destination in a rapidly developing country, Shandong Province faces financial, structural, marketing, and technological limitations that hinder the sustainable development of its rural tourism (Table 2). Among the setbacks, poor access to finance and low-interest fee loans were mentioned by the private sector participants. Moreover, the lack of sustained and customized training that helps to build the capacities of rural enterprises is identified as a constraint of successful rural tourism development. A local resident from Linyi highlights these challenges by stating:
We have been benefiting from the development of rural tourism, and we want to expand the development and obtain more benefits. However, such an expansion demands better infrastructure and facilities, which require capital investment. Although we receive some supporting funds and loans from the government and some villagers raise funds, there is still a considerably large funding gap to build quality asphalt roads, and clean and tidy scenic spots, museums, and libraries.
(LC1, June 2022)
In addition, factors such as lack of adequate follow-up from the government, ineffective crisis management, unhealthy competition among rural tourism enterprises, and poor facility development reduce the contributions of rural tourism to the local economic development and attractiveness of rural areas. Another factor that hinders the sustainable development of rural tourism in the province is the practice of an unsustainable development model that pays little to no attention to the local ecology and poverty alleviation as a research participant (tourism professional) from Jinan mentions:
Rural tourism does not only generate income and create job opportunities, but it also has unfavorable effects on the ecosystem by causing pollution such as an increase in rubbish, sewage, CO2 emissions, and environmental deterioration. Additionally, in some villages, only a small portion of the community ended up benefiting while the majority were overlooked. Due to the nature of the sector, these issues are urgent and require a shift in the development paradigm that prioritises quality over quantity, takes the natural ecosystem into account, and ensures justice and equity in community engagement.
(TP3, April 2024)
Moreover, the current rural tourism in the province is not yet properly integrated with other local economic activities such as trade and agriculture. This undermines the overall impacts of rural tourism in improving local tourism resources, enhancing destination competitiveness, boosting intersectoral linkages, and alleviating rural poverty from a long-term perspective (C. X. Wang, 2020). Integrated rural tourism is strongly linked to the economic, social, cultural, natural, and human structures of destinations to create value chains (J. Gao & Wu, 2017). To tackle such challenges, a government official highlights the necessity of revisiting the rural tourism development model to drive the sector in a sustainable manner as expressed below:
To develop sustainable and resilient rural tourism in Jinan village, the town authority has raised nearly one million USD. The fund is crucial for the development of rural tourism in the village in various ways, such as renovating roads and greening and reforesting recreational areas, which improve the attractiveness of the village. According to the requirements of provinces and cities, the government came to understand that the development of rural tourism should be envisioned as a long-term project that takes environmental and socio-cultural issues into account along with economic aspects. We will also provide funds, technology, management, and other support promptly to support the development status of rural tourism.
(PG1, June 2022)
Regarding the importance of a paradigm shift in rural tourism development, a local government representative also accentuates the determination of the government in promoting sustainable rural tourism to address rural poverty and foster environmental sustainability, as the following excerpt demonstrates:
Shandong Province has been increasingly allocating budgets to develop rural tourism that targets poverty alleviation, rural tourism cluster area development, and resilient tourism development endeavors. To achieve longer-term development, the provincial government will continue to support the development of rural tourism, improve rural tourism resources, link rural tourism with other rural industrial structures, including the agricultural industry chain, and develop communities’ capacity so that they take part in the rural tourism development.
(LGov2, April 2022)
Moreover, a limited diversification of tourism products and the inadequate integration of information technology in marketing, transactions, and networking have been identified as major constraints to rural tourism development in the province. The role of responsible marketing and promotion of the countryside for tourism purposes has been discussed in the literature, and setbacks such as inadequate financial and human resources, including lack of knowledge among local operators, impede rural tourism marketing efforts (H. Liu et al., 2024; Reina-Usuga et al., 2024; Sharpley, 2002). This is supplemented by a local government representative in Jinan as follows:
Presently, rural tourism products and projects in Shandong are mainly sightseeing and festivals, whereas other cultural features and environmental resources receive less attention.
(LG2, June 2022)
However, Shandong could capitalize on its diverse resources, including its suburbs, countryside, villages, scenic landscapes, ancient towns, local cultural lifestyles, and ecological resources, to augment its rural tourism. Research participants unanimously underline the significance of diversifying rural tourism products by integrating leisure, experience, vacation, and activity-based tourism such as sightseeing, hiking, walking, and camping to realize the development of competitive and resilient rural tourism (B. Li et al., 2024; Shi, 2018; T. Xu et al., 2024). In this regard, a local community representative describes that:
I noticed that tourists come to our village and visit the countryside, including agricultural areas. They buy agricultural products because the prices are quite cheap, and the products are fresh and authentic. However, due to a lack of diversified rural tourism products, tourists’ length of stay is quite short. I hope visitors’ stays could be extended if we work toward diversifying rural tourism offers and improving the attractiveness of our surroundings.
(LC7, June 2022)
The researchers have also observed this during field visits, where the sector would bring more benefits if the current potential of the province had been transformed into rural tourism products. The following is what a shop owner highlights regarding the significance of product diversification in the province.
Providing tourists with more tourism products and services brings more benefits to the destination and visitors. On the one hand, it develops value chains, boosts local trade, and increases earnings. On the other hand, it enables tourists to have alternatives in rural areas, which improves their overall experience.
(SO1, March 2024)
Regarding the application of information technology, our findings reveal inadequate usage in the sampled villages, confirming the existing literature (A. Wang, 2020). This is due to the lack of wider wireless internet coverage, which limits mobile and electronic payments in addition to inhibiting digital marketing (R. Xu et al., 2024). Considering the emergence of 5G and the application of augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR), the role of information and communication technology is enormous in revolutionizing the marketing landscape, improving service quality, and enhancing operational efficiency. Proper integration and usage of information technology are extremely important in transforming rural tourism development (Lane & Kastenholz, 2015; A. Wang, 2020). As Y. Zhao et al. (2020) also noted, the development of rural tourism in Shandong should take advantage of the internet and information technology to build a smart rural tourism ecosystem. The following quote from a homestay owner, which echoes the opinions of other rural tourism business owners, also demonstrates the growing importance of information technology and the internet in rural tourism development. The participant shares that:
The Internet becomes a crucial infrastructure and the lifeblood of rural tourism. By the way, as soon as tourists come to our bed and breakfast establishment, the first thing they ask for is the WiFi password. If there is no Internet, they do not like to stay. Many tourists hope that we can be as convenient as businesses in cities in terms of digital utilisation such as online booking and electronic payment options. Therefore, as we move forward, there are several areas for improvement, particularly in terms of information technology applications.
(HO4, April 2022)
Therefore, post-pandemic tourism needs to integrate IT into its operation to create convenience for tourists and promote the development of sustainable rural tourism.

4.3. Intervention Mechanisms to Further Develop Sustainable Rural Tourism

In line with the impediments to rural tourism development mentioned in Section 4.2, our research findings suggest the following countermeasures as part of intervention mechanisms. Given that sustained political commitment and attention are vital toward sustainable tourism development in general (Deng et al., 2020), governments at all levels in the province should create an enabling environment and introduce more encouraging policies and measures for the development of sustainable and resilient rural tourism. Regarding finance, the government shall allocate an adequate budget for rural tourism infrastructure development and facilitate access to minimal-interest loans for community members so that they can be included in the rural tourism business (Deng et al., 2020; L. H. Xue, 2020). Along with providing financial support and boosting the entrepreneurial and business capacities of rural communities, consistent training and capacity-building schemes are also paramount. While supporting the development of rural tourism, the government should also develop a set of effective early warning, monitoring, and management plans to ensure the resilience of rural tourism and to successfully respond to problems triggered by unforeseeable crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Since infrastructure and facility development are the lifeblood of tourism development, all pertinent rural tourism stakeholders are also expected to exert a concerted effort in this respect (Deng et al., 2020; C. Liu et al., 2020; G. H. Zhang & Zhang, 2020). To this end, a villager in Linyi underlined the necessity of infrastructure for rural tourism development, and revealed the insufficient capacity of the local community in sustaining rural tourism infrastructure themselves, as the following statement underscores:
Since we do not have all the necessary skill sets, techniques, and finance to build modern public toilets and recycling factories, support from governmental and non-governmental organisations is paramount to ensure hygiene and environmental cleanliness.
(LC8, May 2022)
As far as diversifying rural tourism products is concerned, all rural tourism actors are required to be innovative and creative in developing new offers. Packaging different rural tourism products and providing them to tourists at a reasonable price are also essential to improve visitors’ length of stay, enhance visitors’ experience, and increase the trickle-down effects of tourism (Lyu et al., 2021; Tian & Wang, 2020). The following quote reveals what a tourism professional highlights in this regard:
Considering that our industry is transitioning to a new era following the pandemic, developing tourism products that cater to a wide range of consumers is crucial. Post-pandemic tourism should aim for quality experience design and management in a rural setting, and most importantly, it needs to benefit communities and restore the natural ecosystem.
(TP4, April 2024)
With regard to expanding internet coverage and boosting its applications, both the private sector and government institutions shall work collaboratively and provide network coverage to villages so that they enjoy the fruits of digital technology (X. Sun et al., 2020). In this modern era, information technology penetrates almost all walks of life to varying degrees and rural tourism is no different. Since the lack of environmental cleanliness is also another chronic problem identified, carefully addressing this issue is also imperative, especially in the post-COVID-19 era where hygiene is enormously critical (Y. Z. Liu, 2020).
Finally, this study argues that to better integrate rural tourism with other local economic activities and ensure a bottom-up rural tourism development model where local communities play a dominant role in both owning and managing rural tourism enterprises, a paradigm shift is needed in the development model (Deng et al., 2020; Park et al., 2024; M. M. Su et al., 2019). Such a shift, in turn, helps to improve environmental attractiveness, boost destination competitiveness, reduce poverty, and thereby contribute to the sustainable economic development of tourist destinations (Abukhalifeh & Wondirad, 2019; Higgins-Desbiolles & Bigby, 2022). Application of the community-led paradigm, however, requires indigenized knowledge and consistent support from different stakeholders. Table 2 presents a summary of leading themes extracted from qualitative data.
Table 2 summarizes data extracted from interviews across three thematic clusters: (1) benefits, (2) constraints, and (3) interventions. This offers a nuanced understanding of how rural tourism contributes to regional transformation and the conditions necessary for its sustainability. The data reveal that rural tourism has become a crucial driver of socio-economic change in Shandong Province. The most frequently cited benefits: employment creation (65), poverty reduction (54), and infrastructure development (47) indicate that tourism has played a crucial role in improving livelihoods and boosting rural revitalization. These findings are in line with previous studies asserting that rural tourism contributes significantly to job creation and poverty alleviation through income diversification and stimulating local enterprise development (Y. Li, 2020; L. Su et al., 2023; X. Wang et al., 2025). Other frequently mentioned results such as ecological rehabilitation (39) and entrepreneurship cultivation (29) demonstrate a shift towards more community oriented and environmentally conscious tourism practices, reflecting the importance of integrating sustainability principles in rural development (Han et al., 2025; C. Liu, 2021; Roman et al., 2024; Tang & Xu, 2023; T. Xu et al., 2024). However, modest frequencies related to destination development (23) and government attention (18) suggest that tourism benefits are not evenly distributed across the province.
Moreover, as can be seen in Table 2 despite these benefits, the study identifies multiple formidable challenges hindering rural tourism development in the province where limited financial access (56), lack of capacity development training (45), and poor IT utilization (41) are the most critical constraints. These limitations reflect earlier findings from similar studies that highlight insufficient institutional support and resource constraints as major setbacks to tourism growth (Briedenhann & Wickens, 2004b; Rosalina et al., 2023; Yang et al., 2021). Additional obstacles, such as infrastructural limitations (27) and unplanned facility development (18), reveal a mismatch between tourism growth and spatial planning, while unhealthy competition (23) and unsustainable business practices (14) suggest a lack of consistent regulatory practices.
To strengthen the development of sustainable rural tourism in the province, a range of intervention strategies such as promotion of information technology (61) and facilitation of financial access (58) are suggested, highlighting the critical role of digitalization and inclusive financing in enhancing tourism competitiveness. Similar findings have been reported by J. Gao et al. (2022), who noted that technology adoption and digital marketing enhance accessibility, visibility, and management efficiency in rural destinations. Moreover, the call to introduce an integrated and resilient rural tourism development model (51) and to expand community capacity development (44) stresses the need for a shift in development model that balances economic, environmental, and socio-cultural objectives, aligning with the Sustainable Rural Tourism Development (SRTD) framework (Sharpley, 2020). Similarly, the emphasis on product diversification through innovation (42), community engagement (31), and stakeholder cooperation (29) underscores the growing recognition that sustainability depends on multi-level collaboration and genuine local empowerment (Park et al., 2024; Y. Zhang & Hall, 2022; Wondirad et al., 2020). The major themes identified in Table 2 reveal a strong correspondence with the research objectives established earlier in the study.

5. Conclusions

The existing literature underscores rural tourism as a catalyst for transformation in rural areas, as it stimulates local economic revitalization while fostering the preservation and promotion of social and cultural identities in rural areas. Combining protection and usage as its fundamental principles, rural tourism is also considered a viable option for poverty alleviation and rural development. In recent years, the development of rural tourism has gained attention from the Chinese government due to the introduction of the concept of industry convergence and comprehensive transition.
The current study explores the current state, facilitating factors, and constraints of rural tourism development in Shandong Province, China. Research findings suggest that rural tourism might help achieve the triple objectives of economic development, socio-cultural revitalization, and ecological protection in rural destinations if a proper development model is adopted. Participants perceived that rural tourism increases communities’ household income, complements rural agriculture, replaces environmentally extractive economic activities, and thereby rehabilitates the natural ecology. Qualitative findings also suggest that rural tourism promotes the employment of rural communities and improves the skills and capabilities of farmers, yet faces several constraints such as financial, infrastructure, entrepreneurial, and technological, as well as systemic challenges including poor integration and a weak value chain. Given that tourism is a sector connected to many other industries, tackling the challenges identified in this study requires a collaborative response from pertinent actors. Since the post-pandemic tourism consumption trend is changing toward activity and quality-based consumption and experiences (Assaf et al., 2022; Jin et al., 2022; Lyu et al., 2021), allocating sufficient resources and putting effort into it are critical investments to advance rural tourism. Addressing these challenges does not only improve rural tourism development but also enhances communities’ quality of life and tourists’ consumption experience. The Shandong Province government has been supporting rural tourism by providing incentives to enterprises that cater to it and developing rural infrastructure in accordance with policy directives from the central government.
Despite its multifaceted benefits, it is important to be aware that the development of rural tourism may also bring undesirable consequences such as occupying scarce rural land, especially for the construction of parking lots, entertainment facilities, and other tourism business venues, among others, which eventually lead to the shortage of rural land. Moreover, the influx of many tourists also produces waste, sewage, and CO2 emissions that affect the quality of the rural ecosystem.
In conclusion, our findings suggest that sustainable rural tourism in Shandong Province requires a multi-dimensional and collaborative approach that combines sustained government commitment, private sector innovation, and active community engagement. Effectively implementing such a model can simultaneously enhance economic diversification, foster social inclusion, and protect rural landscapes and heritage.
Based on our research findings, we provide the following recommendations.
(1)
To achieve sustainable rural tourism development in Shandong Province, we suggest the creation of integrated governance frameworks that coordinate efforts among local governments, private investors, and community organizations. This can be achieved through the creation of public–private–community partnerships (PPCPs) that mutually plan, finance, and monitor tourism projects.
(2)
Rural tourism’s transformative potential highly depends on developing human capital and sustainable infrastructure. Therefore, investing in entrepreneurial, managerial, and digital skills of rural residents is extremely important to increase their participation meaningfully in tourism enterprises.
(3)
The government should introduce incentives to drive the adoption of eco-friendly technologies and promote green infrastructure development, including waste management, renewable energy, and sustainable transport systems, to alleviate environmental degradation.
(4)
It is also crucial to properly connect rural tourism with agriculture, trade, cultural heritage, and environmental conservation efforts to create diversified livelihood opportunities. Developing tourism clusters that interconnect agro-tourism, cultural heritage circuits, and eco-villages might strengthen local value chains.

6. Implications, Limitations, and Directions for Future Research

Theoretically, the findings of this research advance our understanding regarding the multidimensional roles of rural tourism in fostering economic development. In pursuit of sustainable economic development efforts, there are various structural and practical handicaps that require a collaborative response from key rural tourism actors. We argue that environmental rehabilitation as well as concerted tourism stakeholders’ collaboration are important for successful rural tourism development. Practically, based on the analysis of the literature and our results, this study identifies relevant intervention mechanisms that need to be implemented by pertinent rural tourism actors such as local communities, local and provincial government organs, and private rural tourism business operators.
While the findings of the current study provide valuable empirical insights into the dynamics of rural tourism in Shandong Province, several limitations must be acknowledged. First, since this research attempts to examine the roles of rural tourism mainly for economic development from a destination development perspective, it does not involve tourists as research participants. However, had we also been able to include visitors as study participants, the study findings could perhaps be more robust and comprehensive. Second, the research primarily relied on qualitative data, which, although allows for depth and contextual understanding, may limit the generalizability of findings across the entire province or to other regions of China. Quantitative validation through larger-scale surveys with a longitudinal approach could help draw robust and comprehensive conclusions.
Finally, we were constrained due to a lack of fresh data regarding the flow of rural tourists in various villages in the province which in turn limits the study in triangulating its findings. In this respect, future research shall integrate the views of rural tourists and portray a holistic picture by consulting up-to-date secondary data.
Nevertheless, despite the aforesaid limitations, this research offers substantial insights into sustainable and competitive rural tourism development in China and subsequently offers valuable lessons to other places that experience a comparable rural tourism development path or face similar kinds of rural tourism development constraints.

Author Contributions

Study conception and design: A.N.W. Acquisition of data: A.N.W., Y.C. and J.W. Analysis and interpretation of data: A.N.W., Y.C. and J.W. Drafting of manuscript: A.N.W., Y.C. and J.W. Critical revision: A.N.W. and Y.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of STHM Research Ethics Committee (protocol code STHM-SRE-2022-0032 and 2 April 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their sincere gratitude to the research participants for generously dedicating their valuable time and providing critical insights, which significantly contributed to the achievement of the study’s objectives.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Aazami, M., & Shanazi, K. (2020). Tourism wetlands and rural sustainable livelihood: The case from Iran. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 30, 100284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Abukhalifeh, A. N., & Wondirad, A. (2019). Contributions of community-based tourism to the socio-economic well-being of local communities: The case of Pulau Redang Island, Malaysia. International Journal of Tourism Sciences, 19(2), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Assaf, A. G., Kock, F., & Tsionas, M. (2022). Tourism during and after COVID-19: An expert-informed agenda for future research. Journal of Travel Research, 61(2), 454–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bezemer, D., & Headey, D. (2008). Agriculture, development, and urban bias. World Development, 36(8), 1342–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Briedenhann, J., & Wickens, E. (2004a). Rural tourism—Meeting the challenges of the new South Africa. International Journal of Tourism Research, 6(3), 189–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Briedenhann, J., & Wickens, E. (2004b). Tourism routes as a tool for the economic development of rural areas—Vibrant hope or impossible dream? Tourism Management, 25(1), 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Brune, S., Knollenberg, W., & Vilá, O. (2023). Agritourism resilience during the COVID-19 crisis. Annals of Tourism Research, 99, 103538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cassel, S. H., & Pettersson, K. (2015). Performing gender and rurality in Swedish farm tourism. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 15(1–2), 138–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. CEIC. (2020a). China CN: Domestic tourism revenue: Rural. Available online: https://www.ceicdata.com/en/china/domestic-tourism-revenue (accessed on 23 April 2020).
  10. CEIC. (2020b). China CN: Domestic tourist: Rural. Available online: https://www.ceicdata.com/en/china/domestic-tourist (accessed on 23 April 2020).
  11. CEIC. (2020c). China tourism: Shandong. Available online: https://www.ceicdata.com/en/china/tourism-shandong (accessed on 17 May 2020).
  12. Chi, X., & Han, H. (2021). Emerging rural tourism in China’s current tourism industry and tourist behaviors: The case of Anji County. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 38(1), 58–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chi, X., Lee, S. K., Ahn, Y.-J., & Kiatkawsin, K. (2020). Tourist-perceived quality and loyalty intentions towards rural tourism in China. Sustainability, 12, 3614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Crouch, M., & McKenzie, H. (2006). The logic of small samples in interview based qualitative research. Social Science Information, 45(4), 483–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Darău, A. P., Corneliu, M., Brad, M. L., & Avram, E. (2010). The concept of rural tourism and agritourism. Studia Universitatis “Vasile Goldis” Arad, 5(1), 39–42. [Google Scholar]
  16. Deng, A., Lu, J., & Zhao, Z. (2020). Rural destination revitalization in China: Applying evolutionary economic geography in tourism governance. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 26, 215–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Diao, H. B., & Liu, Y. H. (2019). Research on the promotion of rural tourism in Shandong Province from the perspective of global tourism. Journal of Shandong Vocational and Technical College of Commerce, 019(002), 5–9. [Google Scholar]
  18. Du, X., & Shi, D. (2019). Rural heritage: Value, conservation and Revitalisation—From the perspective of the hu-man-land relationship. Built Heritage, 3(2), 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Jackson, P. R. (2015). Management and business research (5th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  20. Edwards, F. (2016). Alternative food networks. In M. K. David (Ed.), Encyclopedia of food and agricultural ethics (pp. 1–7). Springer. [Google Scholar]
  21. Fan, L. (2022). Tourism resources and their characteristics in Shandong Province. Resources Data Journal, 1, 31–37. [Google Scholar]
  22. Fleischer, A., & Tchetchik, A. (2005). Does rural tourism benefit from agriculture? Tourism Management, 26(4), 493–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gao, J., Huang, Z., & Zhang, L. (2022). Digital transformation and rural tourism innovation in China. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 30(4), 623–640. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gao, J., & Wu, B. (2017). Revitalizing traditional villages through rural tourism: A case study of Yuanjia Village, Shaanxi Province, China. Tourism Management, 63, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Geng, Y., Zhao, S., Zhang, X., Li, J., Yan, Y., & Gao, J. (2025). Bibliometric analysis of sustainable rural tourism. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Han, C., Zhang, H., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Balancing growth and preservation: Strategic pathways for sustainable rural tourism in China’s environmental landscape. Sustainability, 17(1), 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Higgins-Desbiolles, F., & Bigby, B. C. (2022). A local turn in tourism studies. Annals of Tourism Research, 92(C), 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hua, H., & Wondirad, A. (2020). Tourism network in urban agglomerated destinations: Implications for sustainable tourism destination development through a critical literature review. Sustainability, 13(1), 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Iorio, M., & Corsale, A. (2010). Rural tourism and livelihood strategies in Romania. Journal of Rural Studies, 26(2), 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Islam, F., & Carlsen, J. (2012). Tourism in rural Bangladesh: Unlocking opportunities for poverty alleviation? Tourism Recreation Research, 37(1), 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jiang, A., Cai, J., Chen, F., Zhang, B., Wang, Z., Xie, Q., & Yu, S. (2022). Sustainability assessment of cultural heritage in Shandong Province. Sustainability, 14(21), 13961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jin, X., Bao, J., & Tang, C. (2022). Profiling and evaluating Chinese consumers regarding post-COVID-19 travel. Current Issues in Tourism, 25(5), 745–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kou, Y., & Xue, X. (2024). The influence of rural tourism landscape perception on tourists’ revisit intentions—A case study in Nangou village, China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lane, B. (1994). What is rural tourism? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2(1–2), 7–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lane, B., & Kastenholz, E. (2015). Rural tourism: The evolution of practice and research approaches–towards a new generation concept? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(8–9), 1133–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lee, A. H., Wall, G., & Kovacs, J. F. (2015). Creative food clusters and rural development through place branding: Culinary tourism initiatives in Stratford and Muskoka, Ontario, Canada. Journal of Rural Studies, 39, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, B., Lu, Y., Li, Y., Zuo, H., & Ding, Z. (2024). Research on the spatiotemporal distribution characteristics and accessibility of traditional villages based on geographic information systems—A case study of Shandong province, China. Land, 13(7), 1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, H., Chen, J. L., Li, G., & Goh, C. (2016). Tourism and regional income inequality: Evidence from China. Annals of Tourism Research, 58, 81–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, M., Liu, T., & Qiu, S. (2020). Governance of sustainable tourism development in China. Journal of China Tourism Research, 16(2), 261–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, Y. (2020). Rural tourism and sustainable development in China: Progress and challenges. Tourism Geographies, 22(2), 244–266. [Google Scholar]
  41. Liu, C. (2021). Ecological governance and community participation in Chinese rural tourism. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 26(11), 1123–1138. [Google Scholar]
  42. Liu, C., Dou, X., Li, J., & Cai, L. A. (2020). Analyzing government role in rural tourism development: An empirical investigation from China. Journal of Rural Studies, 79, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, H., Tan, Z., & Xia, Z. (2024). The coupling coordination relationship and driving factors of the digital economy and high-quality development of rural tourism: Insights from Chinese experience data. Land, 13(11), 1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, J., Nijkamp, P., & Lin, D. (2017). Urban-rural imbalance and tourism-led growth in China. Annals of Tourism Research, 64, 24–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, T., & Chen, B. (2024). Rural tourism in China: ‘Root-seeking’ and construction of national identity. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 60, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liu, Y. H. (2018). Research on the path of improving the quality and efficiency of Shandong rural tourism under the rural revitalization strategy. Journal of Yantai Vocational College, 4, 7–12. [Google Scholar]
  47. Liu, Y. Z. (2020). Research on the transformation and upgrading of rural tourism in Shandong under the COVID-19 epidemic. Gansu Agricultural, 04, 19–22. [Google Scholar]
  48. Lyu, J., Huang, H., & Mao, Z. (2021). Middle-aged and older adults’ preferences for long-stay tourism in rural China. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 19, 100552. [Google Scholar]
  49. Ma, Y., & Yang, L. (2022). Sustainable tourism in emerging regional destinations in China: Stakeholder participation in Genhe. In A. S. Balasingam, & Y. Ma (Eds.), Asian tourism sustainability (pp. 101–117). Springer Nature. [Google Scholar]
  50. Maziliauske, E. (2024). Innovation for sustainability through co-creation by small and medium-sized tourism enterprises (SMEs): Socio-cultural sustainability benefits to rural destinations. Tourism Management Perspectives, 50, 101201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ohe, Y., & Ciani, A. (2012). Accessing demand characteristics of agritourism in Italy. Tourism and Hospitality Management, 18(2), 281–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Park, J., Zou, S., & Soulard, J. (2024). Transforming rural communities through tourism development: An examination of empowerment and disempowerment processes. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 32(4), 835–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Privitera, D. (2010). Importance of organic agriculture in tourism rural. Available online: https://dea.lib.unideb.hu/server/api/core/bitstreams/21139333-8d5c-4b77-8323-64111d717cfd/content (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  54. ProgrammerSought. (2020). Shandong explores the integration of cultural tourism and promotes the revitalization of Qilu countryside. Available online: https://www.programmersought.com/article/3102556942/ (accessed on 5 March 2022).
  55. Randelli, F., & Martellozzo, F. (2019). Is rural tourism-induced built-up growth a threat for the sustainability of ru-ral areas? The case study of Tuscany. Land Use Policy, 86, 387–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Randelli, F., Romei, P., & Tortora, M. (2014). An evolutionary approach to the study of rural tourism: The case of Tuscany. Land Use Policy, 38, 276–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Reina-Usuga, L., Camino, F., Gomez-Casero, G., & Alba, C. A. J. (2024). Rural tourism initiatives and their relationship to collaborative governance and perceived value: A review of recent research and trends. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 34, 100926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Roman, M., Kudinova, I., Samsonova, V., & Kawęcki, N. (2024). Innovative development of rural green tourism in Ukraine. Tourism and Hospitality, 5(3), 537–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rosalina, P. D., Dupre, K., Wang, Y., Putra, I. N. D., & Jin, X. (2023). Rural tourism resource management strategies: A case study of two tourism villages in Bali. Tourism Management Perspectives, 49, 101194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Saxena, G., Clark, G., Oliver, T., & Ilbery, B. (2007). Conceptualizing integrated rural tourism. Tourism Geographies, 9(4), 347–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sharpley, R. (2002). Rural tourism and the challenge of tourism diversification: The case of Cyprus. Tourism Management, 23(3), 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sharpley, R. (2020). Tourism, sustainable development and the theoretical divide: 20 years on. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(11), 1932–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Shen, W., Liu-Lastres, B., Pennington-Gray, L., Hu, X., & Liu, J. (2019). Industry convergence in rural tourism development: A China-featured term or a new initiative? Current Issues in Tourism, 22(20), 2453–2457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Shi, B. (2018). Motivation and path of rural tourism transformation and upgrading from the perspective of regional tourism: A case study of Shaanxi Province. Enterprise Economic, 7, 77–82. [Google Scholar]
  65. Sidali, K. L., Kastenholz, E., & Bianchi, R. (2015). Food tourism, niche markets and products in rural tourism: Combining the intimacy model and the experience economy as a rural development strategy. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(8–9), 1179–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sofield, T., & Li, S. (2011). Tourism governance and sustainable national development in China: A macro-level synthesis. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(4–5), 501–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Statista. (2020). Population in China in 2018, by region. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/279013/population-in-china-by-region/ (accessed on 13 March 2022).
  68. Su, L., Chen, J., & Huang, Y. (2023). Rural tourism, poverty alleviation, and community well-being in China. Tourism Management Perspectives, 45, 101045. [Google Scholar]
  69. Su, M. M., Wall, G., Wang, Y., & Jin, M. (2019). Livelihood sustainability in a rural tourism destination-Hetu Town, Anhui Province, China. Tourism Management, 71, 272–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sun, J., Zhou, M., & Wang, S. (2025). Localized practices of rural tourism makers from a resilience perspective: A comparative study in China. Journal of Rural Studies, 119, 103722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sun, X., Yan, W., Zhou, H., Wang, Z., Zhang, X., Huang, S., & Li, L. (2020). Internet use and need for digital health technology among the elderly: A cross-sectional survey in China. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tang, M., & Xu, H. (2023). Cultural integration and rural tourism development: A scoping literature review. Tourism and Hospitality, 4(1), 75–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Tian, Y., & Wang, D. G. (2020). Upgrading and Transformation Path choice of rural tourism destinations in Shandong Province in the post-epidemic era. Humanities World, 165, 14–19. [Google Scholar]
  74. Turtureanu, A. G., Crețu, C. M., Pripoaie, R., Marinescu, E. Ș., Sîrbu, C. G., & Talaghir, L. G. (2025). Sustainable Development Through Agritourism and Rural Tourism: Research Trends and Future Perspectives in the Pandemic and Post-Pandemic Period. Sustainability, 17(9), 3998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wang, A. (2020). Research on the development of smart rural tourism in Shandong province in the era of internet. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1575(1), 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wang, C. X. (2020). Exploration on the development predicament and path of tourism poverty alleviation Villages in Shandong Province. China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House, 12(027), 59–60. [Google Scholar]
  77. Wang, X., Huang, Y., & Huang, K. (2025). How does social entrepreneurship achieve sustainable development goals in rural tourism destinations? The role of legitimacy and social capital. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 33(7), 1262–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Zhang, W., Chao, I. C., & Li, H. (2024). The impact of rural tourism on rural culture evidence from China. Agriculture, 14(12), 2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Westcott, B., & Wang, S. (2021). China is experiencing a rural tourism boom amid the COVID-19 pandemic. CNN. Available online: https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/china-rural-tourism-pandemic-cmb-intl-hnk (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  80. Wilson, S., Fesenmaier, D. R., Fesenmaier, J., & Van Es, J. C. (2001). Factors for success in rural tourism development. Journal of Travel Research, 40(2), 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wondirad, A., Kebete, Y., & Li, Y. (2021). Culinary tourism as a driver of regional economic development and socio-cultural revitalization: Evidence from Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 19, 100482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wondirad, A., Tolkach, D., & King, B. (2020). Stakeholder collaboration as a major factor for sustainable ecotourism development in developing countries. Tourism Management, 78, 104024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Xinhua. (2024). Seven Chinese villages recognized as best tourism villages by UN Tourism. Available online: http://english.news.cn/20241115/c2a3d287822d47c6bb8a147570aad8eb/c.html (accessed on 13 September 2025).
  84. Xu, R., Kim, Y. G., & Liang, C. (2024). The effect of digitization on economic sustainable growth in Shandong province of China. Sustainability, 16(16), 6798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Xu, T., Weng, G., & Guo, W. (2024). Coupling and coordination relationship of tourism inclusive green growth system: Evidence from Shandong Province. Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, 22(3), 334–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Xue, L., Kerstetter, D., & Hunt, C. (2017). Tourism development and changing rural identity in China. Annals of Tourism Research, 66, 170–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Xue, L. H. (2020). Research on rural tourism development in Shandong Province under the background of rural revitalization Strategy. South China Agriculture, 14(12), 108–112. [Google Scholar]
  88. Yang, J., Wang, S., & Zhang, F. (2021). Constraints to rural tourism development: Evidence from China’s provincial regions. Tourism Economics, 27(6), 1351–1368. [Google Scholar]
  89. Yin, Y., Zou, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, R., & Zhang, H. (2022). Temporarily returning to an ideal life: Research on Chinese rural tourists’ home experience. Tourism Management Perspectives, 41, 100915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zhang, G. H., & Zhang, H. (2020). Analysis on the driving force and spatial pattern of rural tourism development in Shandong Province. Journal of Shandong Technology and Business University, 34(3), 23–30. [Google Scholar]
  91. Zhang, Y., & Hall, C. M. (2022). Collaborative governance and sustainable rural tourism development in China. Sustainability, 14(3), 1423. [Google Scholar]
  92. Zhao, C., Shang, Z., & Pan, Y. (2024). Beauty and tourists’ sustainable behaviour in rural tourism: A self-transcendent emotions perspective. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 32(7), 1413–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhao, Y., Han, Y., & Wang, Y. (2020). How to establish the wisdom of rural tourism based on “Internet+”: Taking coastal areas in Shandong province for example. Journal of Coastal Research, 103(SI), 1047–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Rural tourist arrivals and rural tourism receipts (USD) in China (2008–2019) (CEIC, 2020a, 2020b).
Figure 1. Rural tourist arrivals and rural tourism receipts (USD) in China (2008–2019) (CEIC, 2020a, 2020b).
Tourismhosp 06 00223 g001
Figure 2. Qualitative data analysis flow.
Figure 2. Qualitative data analysis flow.
Tourismhosp 06 00223 g002
Figure 3. Total number of tourism employees (2005–2017) and the total number of tourist arrivals (2007–2018) in Shandong Province (CEIC, 2020c).
Figure 3. Total number of tourism employees (2005–2017) and the total number of tourist arrivals (2007–2018) in Shandong Province (CEIC, 2020c).
Tourismhosp 06 00223 g003
Table 1. Demographic profiles of research participants.
Table 1. Demographic profiles of research participants.
Participant No.Participant CategorySexAgeParticipants’ ResidenceTotal Years of Experience in Tourism
1Local community_LC1F20–30Linyi 5
2Local community_LC2M41–50Linyi 7
3Local community_LC3MAbove 50Linyi 15
4Local community_LC4M31–40Jinan 8
5Local community_LC5F41–50Jinan 6
6Local community_LC6M31–40Jinan 10
7Local community_LC7M20–30Zibo 7
8Local community_LC8FAbove 50Linyi 9
9Local community_LC9M31–40Weihai4
10Local community_LC10MAbove 50Zibo16
11Local community_LC11F41–50Linyi 9
12Local community_LC12F20–30Jinan6
13Local guide_LG1F41–50Jinan 7
14Local guide_LG2F41–50Jinan 9
15Local guide_LG3M41–50Linyi 6
16Local guide _LG4MAbove 50Zibo 12
17Local guide_LG5FAbove 50Zibo 11
18Local guide_LG6M31–40Weihai5
19Local guide_LG7M41–50Linyi8
20Local guide_LG8F31–40Weihai4
21Tourism Professional_TP1MAbove 50Zibo 21
22Tourism Professional_TP2M31–40Zibo 12
23Tourism Professional_TP3F41–50Jinan9
24Tourism Professional_TP4F41–50Weihai12
25Local government_LGov1M41–50Linyi 15
26Local government_LGov2M31–40Weihai 8
27Local government_LGov3F41–50Zibo11
28Provincial government_PG1M41–50Jinan 10
29Homestay owner _HO1F31–40Jinan 6
30Homestay owner _HO2M41–50Weihai 10
31Homestay owner _HO3MAbove 50Zibo11
32Homestay owner _HO4F41–50Linyi8
33Homestay owner _HO5M31–40Weihai 7
34Restaurant owner_RO1M41–50Jinan10
35Restaurant owner_RO2FAbove 50Zibo15
36Restaurant owner_RO3MAbove 50Weihai11
37Restaurant owner_RO4F41–50Linyi9
38Shop owner_SO1F41–50Zibo6
39Shop owner_SO2M31–40Weihai4
40Shop owner_SO3M41–50Jinan7
41Shop owner_SO4MAbove 50Linyi8
Table 2. Summary of leading themes extracted from qualitative data.
Table 2. Summary of leading themes extracted from qualitative data.
NoLeading ThemesFrequency
Benefits of rural tourism
1Creates employment opportunities65
2Reduces poverty54
3Develops rural infrastructure47
4Rehabilitates local ecology 39
5Creates value chains35
6Cultivates rural entrepreneurship 29
7Increases the demand for rural products and services25
8Improves rural quality of life25
9Develops rural destination23
10Stimulates local economy 20
11Increases government attention to rural areas18
Constraints of rural tourism development
1Access to finance56
2Lack of capacity development training45
3Poor information technology (IT) utilization (in marketing and transactions)41
4Inadequate follow-up and technical support38
5Ineffective crisis management strategies32
6Infrastructural constraints27
7Unhealthy competition among rural tourism businesses 23
8Unplanned facility development 18
9Poor hygiene 16
10Unsustainable business practices 14
11Lack of diversification (products and services)12
12Poor integration of rural tourism 10
Interventions for the development of resilient and competitive rural tourism
1Promote the use of information technology61
2Facilitate financial access58
3Introduce a new rural tourism development model (competitive, resilient, integrated, and sustainable) 51
5Community capacity development 44
6Innovation and new product development (authentic and affordable)42
7Allocate sufficient budget 37
8Expand infrastructural development34
10Improve environmental cleanliness and attractiveness34
11Maintain hygiene consistently32
12Engage local communities (participation and empowerment) 31
13Increase stakeholders’ cooperation 29
14Scale-up government support 27
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wondirad, A.N.; Cui, Y.; Ma, Y.; Wang, J. Constraints of Rural Tourism’s Contribution to Local Economic Development and Intervention Mechanisms—Evidence from Shandong Province, China. Tour. Hosp. 2025, 6, 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/tourhosp6050223

AMA Style

Wondirad AN, Cui Y, Ma Y, Wang J. Constraints of Rural Tourism’s Contribution to Local Economic Development and Intervention Mechanisms—Evidence from Shandong Province, China. Tourism and Hospitality. 2025; 6(5):223. https://doi.org/10.3390/tourhosp6050223

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wondirad, Amare Nega, Yuanqi Cui, Yue Ma, and Jingya Wang. 2025. "Constraints of Rural Tourism’s Contribution to Local Economic Development and Intervention Mechanisms—Evidence from Shandong Province, China" Tourism and Hospitality 6, no. 5: 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/tourhosp6050223

APA Style

Wondirad, A. N., Cui, Y., Ma, Y., & Wang, J. (2025). Constraints of Rural Tourism’s Contribution to Local Economic Development and Intervention Mechanisms—Evidence from Shandong Province, China. Tourism and Hospitality, 6(5), 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/tourhosp6050223

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop