Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in Social Media Analysis: Enhancing Public Communication Through Data Science
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Role of AI in Social Media Analysis
2.2. Applications in Public Communication
2.3. Ethical Risks and Governance
2.4. Technical Challenges
2.5. Tools and Techniques Used in AI-Driven Social Media Analytics
2.6. Best Practices for Ethical and Effective Implementation
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Research Design
3.2. Data Processing Procedures
3.3. Sample Design
3.4. Data Strategy Justification
AI Tools Selection and Overview
3.5. Tool Selection and Comparative Evaluation
- Google NLP and IBM Watson NLU were chosen for their advanced capabilities in semantic analysis and sentiment detection, with strong support for Modern Standard Arabic (MSA). These tools ensure context-sensitive and culturally aware language processing, which is essential for the region-focused nature of the study.
- Hootsuite Insights and Talkwalker Analytics were selected for their real-time trend detection, cross-platform performance tracking, and multimedia content analysis, which support comprehensive evaluations of public engagement and message dissemination.
- Sprout Social was included for its strengths in historical engagement tracking, scheduling analytics, and audience interaction metrics, adding strategic insights into long-term communication impact.
3.6. Research Model
- NLP tools: Google Cloud Natural Language, IBM Watson NLU.
- Trend analysis tools: Hootsuite Insights and Talkwalker Analytics.
- Tools for timing optimization: Sprout Social.
- Public engagement.
- Communication planning.
- Communication effectiveness.
- H1: Text Analysis Tools- Public Engagement
- H2: Strategic Communication Planning → Trend Analysis Tools
- H3: Timing Optimization Tools → Communication Effectiveness
4. Results
4.1. AI Tool Observations and Interpretations Summary
4.2. Inductive Analysis Through AI Tool Outcomes and Reference Works
4.2.1. Model-Based Conclusion and Link to SMART PLS Structural Analysis
4.2.2. Interpretive Commentary
- Generally, the text analysis tools (Google NLP and IBM Watson NLU) have a large effect on public engagement by confirming that the sentiment and semantic analysis play a prominent role in formulating digital interaction.
- Trend analysis tools including Hootsuite Insights and Talkwalker Analytics can also facilitate strategy by homing in on real-time audience behavior and media performance data.
- Communications ops tools (Sprout Social) foster connection by finding the perfect timing to distribute your content.
5. Discussion
5.1. Text Analysis Tools (Google NLP and IBM Watson NLU)
5.2. Trend Analysis Tools (Hootsuite Insights and Talkwalker Analytics)
5.3. Sprout Social: Timing Optimization Tool
5.4. Cross-Theoretical Integration
5.4.1. Cultural Contextualization and AI-Driven Communication
5.4.2. Ethical and Technical Considerations by AI Tool
5.4.3. Integration with Prior Literature
5.4.4. Technical Limitations in Arabic-Language Contexts
5.4.5. Human Oversight and Hybrid Communication Models
5.4.6. Ethical Governance Model
- Transparency: Organizations need to articulate how AI systems extract data and produce recommendations in order to cultivate user trust.
- Fairness and Bias Mitigation: Regular audits of training data are required to minimize bias, especially in semantic classification.
- Privacy: Anonymization of user data in real-time and compliance with the privacy directives like GDPR are key requirements to preserve user privacy.
- Human Review: Communication professionals must review all AI-generated outputs to ensure they are culturally appropriate and contextually accurate.
- Institutional Accountability: Ethics boards or compliance officers must be created to ensure the responsible deployment of AI tools and tracking its impact.
5.4.7. Principal Contributions
- A Multi-Tool Analytic Framework: In this study, a systematic evaluation of five AI tools, namely Google (GCPN), IBM (IBMW), Hootsuite (HOO), Talkwalker (TAW), and Sprout (SPR), was performed based on their functionality (text analysis, trend detection, multimedia engagement, and content scheduling). This conceptual framework allows for a more holistic view of AI’s potential in strategy communication.
- A Validation of An Empirical Use of SMART PLS Modeling: This utilizes data derived from real-world social media. This study tests the impact of the usage of AI tools on key communication outcomes, including public engagement, strategic planning, and message effectiveness using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). This model validates all critical causal links and then provides quantitative guidance to enhance communication effectiveness.
- Ethical Governance Framework: This shows a five-principle ethical model that ensures transparency, fairness, privacy, human oversight, and institutional accountability. Based on real tool usage and the ethical dilemmas encountered when analyzing content, this model lays the foundation for adopting ethical AI.
- This research fills a gap in the AI communication domain based upon Arabic-language social media-based data. This paper investigates the capabilities and limitations of current AI technologies in processing Modern Standard Arabic and culturally embedded dialogs, contributing to the design of more inclusive and context-aware AI systems.
- Bridging Theory and Practice: The research model successfully interlinks performance analysis, ethical reflection, and communication design objectives in one model. This convergence across disciplinary interventions renders the research pertinent not only to scholars and digital strategists, but also to public institutions and policymakers concerned with the application of AI to public communication and beyond.
5.4.8. Theoretical Contribution
- Dual Framework Integration:
- 2.
- Mapping of AI Tool Typology to Communication Theory:
- 3.
- Grounding Ethical Principles in Real Content:
5.4.9. Future Directions and Emerging Trends
6. Conclusions
7. Recommendations
- Developing clear internal guidelines that define the ethical boundaries of AI use in social media analysis is essential for institutions. Such guidelines must be in accordance with international standards, including, but not limited to, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and must be customized according to the cultural and legal realities of the respective region.
- If communication professionals are trained with even the most basic AI concepts and are familiar with the tools, they are then much better prepared to interpret AI-generated insights accurately and apply them in effective ways. This is particularly interesting in cases where decision-making is based on real-time data.
- However, organizations cannot rely solely on automated systems. AI-generated statement outputs should be supplemented by human judgment to maintain the contextual relevance, emotional sensitivity, and clarity of the statement.
- In their endeavors to engage with the public using AI tools, however, institutions need to be transparent with stakeholders on how the tools are being applied, which data are being analyzed, and how conclusions are being reached. This transparency builds trust and accountability in the public.
- As communications increasingly need to reflect rich media formats and multiple languages, organizations should look for AI platforms that can analyze text, images, and video through a culturally sensitive lens. For instance, tools designed for Arabic dialects or regional use cases can be even more precise and relevant to the message.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Abdallah, R., Abokhoza, R., & Aissani, R. (2024). The use of multimedia in newspapers: A study on the websites of Emirati newspapers. Studies in Media and Communication, 12(2), 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdallah, R. A.-Q., Hatamleh, I. H. M., Abu Eid, Y. S. N., & Mahroum, M. (2024). Communication in the digital age: The impact of communication skills and cultural restraint on the use of social media platforms in the case of Jordan. Journalism and Media, 5, 1244–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, S. F., Han, H., Alam, M. M., Rehmat, M. K., Irshad, M., Arraño-Muñoz, M., & Ariza-Montes, A. (2023). Impact of artificial intelligence on human loss in decision making, laziness and safety in education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alawneh, Y. J., Al-Momani, T., Salman, F. N., Al-Ahmad, S. D., Kaddumi, T. A., & Al-Dlalah, M. (2023, May 12–13). A detailed study analysis of artificial intelligence implementation in social media applications. 3rd International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE) (pp. 1191–1194), Greater Noida, India. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alharbi, N., Alkalifah, B., Alqarawi, G., & Rassam, M. A. (2024). Countering social media cybercrime using deep learning: Instagram fake accounts detection. Future Internet, 16(10), 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alhindi, T., ElKhatib, M., & Shahbazian, E. (2023). Evaluating multilingual sentiment analysis in dialect-rich environments: The case of Arabic social media. Language Resources and Evaluation, 57, 423–442. [Google Scholar]
- Anshu, M., & Sharma, M. (2024). AI in social media marketing: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science Engineering and Information Technology, 10(5), 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babacan, H., Arık, E., Bilişli, Y., Akgün, H., & Özkara, Y. (2025). Artificial intelligence and journalism education in higher education: Digital transformation in undergraduate and graduate curricula in Türkiye. Journalism and Media, 6(2), 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deiner, M. S., Dredze, M., & Phillips, M. M. (2023). Large language models can enable inductive thematic analysis of a social media corpus in a single prompt: Human validation study. JMIR Infodemiology, 3(1), e48685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Deuze, M. (2003). The web and its journalisms: Considering the consequences of different types of newsmedia online. New Media & Society, 5(2), 203–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eickelman, D. F., & Anderson, J. W. (Eds.). (2003). New media in the Muslim world: The emerging public sphere (2nd ed.). Indiana University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Every Learner Everywhere. (2024). 12 creative faculty who put digital learning tools into action and improved equity. Available online: https://www.everylearnereverywhere.org/blog/12-creative-faculty-who-put-digital-learning-tools-into-action-and-improved-equity/ (accessed on 14 March 2025).
- Gerlich, M., Elsayed, W., & Sokolovskiy, K. (2023). Artificial intelligence as a toolset for analysis of public opinion and social interaction in marketing: Identification of micro and nano influencers. Frontiers in Communication, 8, 1075654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayes, J. L., Britt, B. C., Evans, W., Rush, S. W., Towery, N. A., & Adamson, A. C. (2021). Can social media listening platforms’ artificial intelligence be trusted? Examining the accuracy of crimson hexagon’s (now brandwatch consumer research’s) AI-driven analyses. Journal of Advertising, 50(1), 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazmi, S. B. A. (2025). The role of AI in social media marketing and consumer behavior shifts. Bahria University Islamabad Campus. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389880535_The_Role_of_AI_in_Social_Media_Marketing_and_Consumer_Behavior_Shifts (accessed on 25 March 2025).
- Krajčovič, P. (2024, May 30–31). The impact of artificial intelligence on social media: Examining its influence on marketing communications. Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on social media (ECSM 2024) (pp. 102–111), Brighton, UK. [Google Scholar]
- Maghsoudi, M., Mohammadi, A., & Habibipour, S. (2024). Navigating and addressing public concerns in AI: Insights from social media analytics and Delphi. IEEE Access, 12, 126043–126062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maldonado-Canca, L.-A., Casado-Molina, A.-M., Cabrera-Sánchez, J.-P., & Bermúdez-González, G. (2024). Beyond the post: An SLR of enterprise artificial intelligence in social media. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 14(1), 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitchell, L. (2024). The future of journalism education: Adapting to the digital age. Brooklyn Bureau. Available online: https://www.bkbureau.org/the-future-of-journalism-education-adapting-to-the-digital-age/ (accessed on 25 March 2025).
- Novotny, M., Gretzel, U., & Zanker, M. (2022). Understanding the adoption of data-driven decision-making practices among Canadian DMOs. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 24, 100722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavlik, J. V. (2004). A sea-change in journalism: Convergence, journalists, their audiences and sources. Convergence, 10(4), 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richardson, M., Carter, F., Levordashka, A., Voinescu, A., Gilchrist, I. D., & Stanton Fraser, D. (2025). Methods used to study audience experience of screen-based media: A scoping review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Safori, A. O., Ahmed, A. K., Manajreh, M. M., Abdallah, R. A. Q., & Aissani, R. (2025). Digital transformation and its impact on the journalistic industry in Jordan. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 52(5), 7613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saheb, T., Sidaoui, M., & Schmarzo, B. (2024). Convergence of artificial intelligence with social media: A bibliometric & qualitative analysis. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 9, 100146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taha, S., Aissani, R., & Abdallah, R. (2024a, September 24–27). AI applications for news. 2024 International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Communication, Networking and Services (ICCNS) (pp. 220–227), Dubrovnik, Croatia. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taha, S., Alqawasmi, A., Almahdawi, A., Abusini, B. S., & Bouzenoun, A. (2024b). Investigating YouTube as a learning tool in higher education: Perceptions of pre-service teachers. World of Media, 2024(3), 60–84. [Google Scholar]
- Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wenger, D., & Hossain, M. S. (2024). Has journalism education kept up with digital transformation? Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 79(2), 138–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Tool | Key Function | Justification |
---|---|---|
Google NLP | Sentiment and syntax analysis | Supports MSA; strong API for entity recognition |
IBM Watson NLU | Semantic mapping | Tracks conceptual frames; interprets value-laden language |
Hootsuite Insights | Trend tracking | Real-time data; ideal for audience behavior mapping |
Talkwalker Analytics | Multimedia interaction analysis | Cross-platform media analysis; tracks CTR and attention span |
Sprout Social | Timing optimization | Scheduling precision; historical engagement modeling |
AI Tool | Field of Analysis | Key Observations (Data-Driven) | Interpretation | Related Hypothesis/Question |
---|---|---|---|---|
Google Cloud Natural Language | Sentiment detection, entity recognition, topic classification | 78% of posts were positive in sentiment, and positive posts had 45% more engagement on average than neutral/negative posts. | Emotionally meaningful content motivates greater audience participation, consistent with the results of Saheb et al. (2024). | H1, Q1 |
IBM Watson NLU | Semantic context and conceptual mapping | Posts stressing terms like “trust” and “security” were shared 40–45% more. | By reframing the conversation in relation to its value, you establish credibility and message integrity that pushes insights like observed with Deiner et al. (2023). | H1, H2, Q2 |
Hootsuite Insights | Tracking trends in real-time, analytics that time | Engagement during this window peaked about 24 h after publication and drove a 50–60% increase in interaction. | Posting at the right time makes sense, considering the responsiveness of most audiences and predictive release strategies like the form in which they indicate to manage timing (Maldonado-Canca et al., 2024). | H1, Q2 |
Talkwalker Analytics | Leverage cross-platform insights with multimedia engagement | They achieved up to 39% longer attention spans and 15–18% higher CTR with posts combining video with external links. | These findings align with Krajčovič (2024) and Anshu and Sharma (2024), who assert that rich media formats lead to increased audience retention and actions taken. | H1, H2, Q1, Q3 |
Sprout Social | Content scheduling and engagement timing data | Publishing midweek, between the hours of 5–8 PM saw up to 55% higher interaction rates. | Automated scheduling tools enhance reach optimized with specific patterns of audience activity, as evidenced by Kazmi (2025) and also by Alharbi et al. (2024). | H1, H3, Q1, Q3 |
Independent Variable | Dependent Variable | Path Coefficient (β) | p-Value | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|
Text Analysis Tools (Google NLP + IBM Watson NLU) | Public Engagement | 0.62 | 0.001 | Highly Significant |
Trend Analysis Tools (Hootsuite + Talkwalker) | Strategic Communication Planning | 0.74 | 0.000 | Highly Significant |
Timing Optimization Tools (Sprout Social) | Communication Effectiveness | 0.59 | 0.004 | Statistically Significant |
AI Tool | Key Technical Challenge | Key Ethical Concern | Recommended Solutions (from Literature) |
---|---|---|---|
Google NLP | Difficulty detecting sarcasm and cultural slang (Deiner et al., 2023) | Potential misclassification of sentiment | Enhance models with context-aware, multilingual training datasets |
IBM Watson NLU | Semantic ambiguity and conceptual overlap | Risk of bias in entity representation and meaning interpretation | Conduct regular bias audits and use inclusive datasets (Alawneh et al., 2023). |
Hootsuite Insights | High data volume in real-time processing | Privacy concerns related to monitoring public interactions | GDPR-compliant user tracking practices (or at least that is what they say) using anonymized data |
Talkwalker Analytics | Complexity in analyzing cross-platform multimedia in a unified model | Consent requirements for visual data use | Make sure to implement clear protocols and user-aware consent frameworks (Maldonado-Canca et al., 2024) |
Sprout Social | Overdependence on algorithmic timing recommendations | Risk of marginalizing human judgment | Integrate AI outputs with expert oversight for context-aware communication strategies (Alharbi et al., 2024) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Taha, S.; Abdallah, R.A.-Q. Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in Social Media Analysis: Enhancing Public Communication Through Data Science. Journal. Media 2025, 6, 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6030102
Taha S, Abdallah RA-Q. Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in Social Media Analysis: Enhancing Public Communication Through Data Science. Journalism and Media. 2025; 6(3):102. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6030102
Chicago/Turabian StyleTaha, Sawsan, and Rania Abdel-Qader Abdallah. 2025. "Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in Social Media Analysis: Enhancing Public Communication Through Data Science" Journalism and Media 6, no. 3: 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6030102
APA StyleTaha, S., & Abdallah, R. A.-Q. (2025). Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in Social Media Analysis: Enhancing Public Communication Through Data Science. Journalism and Media, 6(3), 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6030102