Comparative Evaluation of Inspection Techniques for Decay Detection in Urban Trees †
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Test Devices
2.2.1. Microsecond Timer
2.2.2. Resistograph Resi PD400
3. Data Processing and Analysis
4. Results and Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Brashaw, B.K.; Bucur, V.; Divos, F.; Goncalves, R.; Lu, J.; Meder, R.; Pellerin, R.F.; Potter, S.; Ross, R.J.; Wang, X.; et al. Nondestructive testing and evaluation of wood: A worldwide research update. For. Prod. J. 2009, 59, 7–14. [Google Scholar]
- Smiley, E.T.; Fraedrich, B.R.; Fengler, P.H. Hazard Tree Inspection, Evaluation, and Management. In Handbook of Urban and Community Forestry in the Northeast; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2000; pp. 243–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Wiedenbeck, J.; Ross, R.J.; Forsman, J.W.; Erickson, J.R.; Pilon, C.; Brashaw, B.K. Nondestructive Evaluation of Incipient Decay in Hardwood logs; US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory: Madison, WI, USA, 2005; Volume 162, p. 11. Available online: http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplgtr/fpl_gtr162.pdf (accessed on 16 September 2020).
- Socco, L.V.; Sambuelli, L.; Martinis, R.; Comino, E.; Nicolotti, G. Feasibility of ultrasonic tomography for nondestructive testing of decay on living trees. Res. Nondestruct. Eval. 2004, 15, 31–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sambuelli, L.; Socco, L.V.; Godio, A.; Nicolotti, G.; Martinis, R. Ultrasonic, electric and radar measurements for living trees assessment. Boll. Geofis. Teor. Appl. (Bull. Theor. Appl. Geophys.) 2003, 44, 253–279. [Google Scholar]
- Bucur, V. Nondestructive Characterization and Imaging of Wood; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Tomikawa, Y.; Iwase, Y.; Arita, K.; Yamada, H. Nondestructive inspection of a wooden pole using ultrasonic computed tomography. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 1986, 33, 354–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Proto, A.R.; Zimbalatti, G.; Bernardi, B. Nuovi strumenti al servizio delle utilizzazioni forestali [New tools for forest utilization]. In Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Silviculture, Italian Academy of Forest Sciences, Florence, Italy, 26–29 November 2014; Volume 1, pp. 463–468. (In Italian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Proto, A.R.; Cataldo, M.F.; Costa, C.; Papandrea, S.F.; Zimbalatti, G. A tomographic approach to assessing the possibility of ring shake presence in standing chestnut trees. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2020, 78, 1137–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vössing, K.J.; Niederleithinger, E. Nondestructive assessment and imaging methods for internal inspection of timber. A review. Holzforschung 2018, 72, 467–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, H.; Li, G.; Fu, S.; Wang, X. Tomographic Image Reconstruction Using an Interpolation Method for Tree Decay Detection. BioResources 2014, 9, 3248–3263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Allison, R.B. Decay detection in red oak trees using a combination of visual inspection, acoustic testing, and resistance microdrilling. Arboric. Urban For. 2008, 34, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Divos, F.; Szalai, L. Tree evaluation by acoustic tomography. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Wood, Berkeley, CA, USA, 19–21 August 2002; pp. 251–256. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.; Allison, R.B.; Wang, L.; Ross, R.J. Acoustic Tomography for Decay Detection in Red Oak Trees; Research Paper FPL-RP-642; USDA, Forest Service, Forest Products Lab: Madison, WI, USA, 2007; Volume 7. [Google Scholar]
- Proto, A.R.; Macrí, G.; Bernardini, V.; Russo, D.; Zimbalatti, G. Acoustic evaluation of wood quality with a non-destructive method in standing trees: A first survey in Italy. IForest 2017, 10, 700–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Divos, F.; Meszaros, K. Root decay detection by stress wave technique. In Proceedings of the First European Symposium on Nondestructive Testing, Sopron, Hungary, 21–23 September 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Halabe, U.B.; Bidigalu, G.M.; GangaRao, H.V.S.; Ross, P. Nondestructive evaluation of green wood using stress wave and transverse vibration techniques. Mater. Eval. 1997, 55, 1013–1018. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.P.; Divos, F.; Pilon, C.; Brashaw, B.K.; Ross, R.J.; Pellerin, R.F. Assessment of Decay in Standing Timber Using Stress Wave Timing Nondestructive Evaluation Tools—A Guide for Use and Interpretation; US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory: Madison, WI, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Ross, R.J. Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation of Wood; US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory: Madison, WI, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Mattheck, C.; Bethge, K.; Albrecht, W. How to read the results of resistograph m. Arboric. J. 1997, 21, 331–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reinprecht, L.; Šupina, P. Comparative evaluation of inspection techniques for impregnated wood utility poles: Ultrasonic, drill-resistive, and CT-scanning assessments. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2015, 73, 741–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa, A.F.; Teles, R.F.; Goncalves, J.C. Stress wave and visual analysis of treated and non-treated fence posts after 15 years in field test. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the International Research Group on Wood Protection, Biarritz, France, 9–13 May 2010; p. 11. [Google Scholar]
No. | Min. Value | Max. Value | Mean Value | Standard Deviation | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
DZR (%) | 23 | 0.000 | 75.000 | 35.594 | 25.495 |
VUW (m/s) | 23 | 0.830 | 1.830 | 1.355 | 0.328 |
Pearson Coefficient | p-Value | Standard Error | |
---|---|---|---|
DZR (%)—VUW (m/s) | −0.956 | 0.000 | 0.0731 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Papandrea, S.F.; Proto, A.R.; Cataldo, M.F.; Zimbalatti, G. Comparative Evaluation of Inspection Techniques for Decay Detection in Urban Trees. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2021, 3, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2020-07969
Papandrea SF, Proto AR, Cataldo MF, Zimbalatti G. Comparative Evaluation of Inspection Techniques for Decay Detection in Urban Trees. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2021; 3(1):14. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2020-07969
Chicago/Turabian StylePapandrea, Salvatore F., Andrea R. Proto, Maria F. Cataldo, and Giuseppe Zimbalatti. 2021. "Comparative Evaluation of Inspection Techniques for Decay Detection in Urban Trees" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 3, no. 1: 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2020-07969
APA StylePapandrea, S. F., Proto, A. R., Cataldo, M. F., & Zimbalatti, G. (2021). Comparative Evaluation of Inspection Techniques for Decay Detection in Urban Trees. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 3(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2020-07969